EP1844603A1 - Method for securing the communication links and the associated charges in a redundant communication network - Google Patents
Method for securing the communication links and the associated charges in a redundant communication networkInfo
- Publication number
- EP1844603A1 EP1844603A1 EP05822337A EP05822337A EP1844603A1 EP 1844603 A1 EP1844603 A1 EP 1844603A1 EP 05822337 A EP05822337 A EP 05822337A EP 05822337 A EP05822337 A EP 05822337A EP 1844603 A1 EP1844603 A1 EP 1844603A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- hardware units
- sip
- terminals
- hardware
- failure
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 52
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 37
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 230000003863 physical function Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000014510 cooky Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003449 preventive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L65/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
- H04L65/1066—Session management
- H04L65/1101—Session protocols
- H04L65/1104—Session initiation protocol [SIP]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L12/00—Data switching networks
- H04L12/02—Details
- H04L12/14—Charging, metering or billing arrangements for data wireline or wireless communications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L65/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
- H04L65/1066—Session management
- H04L65/1101—Session protocols
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/40—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass for recovering from a failure of a protocol instance or entity, e.g. service redundancy protocols, protocol state redundancy or protocol service redirection
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M15/00—Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M15/00—Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
- H04M15/56—Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP for VoIP communications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M15/00—Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
- H04M15/63—Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP based on the content carried by the session initiation protocol [SIP] messages
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M15/00—Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
- H04M15/82—Criteria or parameters used for performing billing operations
- H04M15/8292—Charging for signaling or unsuccessful connection
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
- H04M3/08—Indicating faults in circuits or apparatus
- H04M3/12—Marking faulty circuits "busy"; Enabling equipment to disengage itself from faulty circuits ; Using redundant circuits; Response of a circuit, apparatus or system to an error
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
- H04M3/22—Arrangements for supervision, monitoring or testing
- H04M3/2254—Arrangements for supervision, monitoring or testing in networks
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
- H04M3/22—Arrangements for supervision, monitoring or testing
- H04M3/24—Arrangements for supervision, monitoring or testing with provision for checking the normal operation
- H04M3/248—Arrangements for supervision, monitoring or testing with provision for checking the normal operation for metering arrangements or prepayment telephone systems
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M7/00—Arrangements for interconnection between switching centres
- H04M7/006—Networks other than PSTN/ISDN providing telephone service, e.g. Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), including next generation networks with a packet-switched transport layer
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M2215/00—Metering arrangements; Time controlling arrangements; Time indicating arrangements
- H04M2215/20—Technology dependant metering
- H04M2215/202—VoIP; Packet switched telephony
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for securing the kommunikationseducationen and the associated Verryungen in a redundant communication network, communicate with the terminals via mediators, preferably an IP bearer, by means of messages, with a monitoring function, the correct function of the terminals and / or the hardware units are monitored and in case of failure of one or more hardware units, the still functioning hardware units take over the physical functions of the failed hardware units.
- MGC-MGC communication MGC
- IP Internet Protocol
- the RFC 2976 (INFO Method) was adopted, which allows to transport ISUP messages that could not be mapped to the messages defined by the RFC 2543 or RFC 3261.
- NGN Next Generation Network
- the SDP Session Description Protocol in this case includes the exact description of the properties of the currently used RTP bearer, for example the iP address, the RTP port, the used CODEC s, also called payload types, the state of the echo canceler, the state of the bearer, the SDP version counter and more.
- a stable call is a call which, by lifting the telephone receiver, reaches the state: "subscriber has answered” and no other feature is activated, such as call hold or other call data has been lost and SIP session timer re-INVITE can no longer be answered, since in particular the session description protocol in the session initiation protocol is used to control functions such as call hold, bearer redirection, CODEC switchover of the bearer this means the unnecessary provision of storage and computational capacity for a stable calendar that does not really need this storage and computational capacity.
- Modern z. B. Software based architectures provide exactly this separation between application and signaling transport, such. B. in the communication systems hiQ6200 and hiQ9200 of the applicant.
- SMP simple symmetry processor
- SIP applications have interfaces to a central SIP transport function or location.
- transport functional parts are provided by third party manufacturers (OEM) or a software development unit of the applicant and incorporated into the products.
- the SIP transport layer keeps a record of whether a response to a sent message exists between a hardware unit of the network (transport part) and a terminal has been received and sends the message again after expiration of a timer-controlled period according to RFC3261, chapter 17.1.2.2, if this answer is pending.
- the SIP application is also informed if the answer is completely absent, so that the SIP application is left to proceed, such. B. a trigger or another attempt to another target, etc.
- Standby page in case of failure of the whole unit and thus also failure of the software and the associated data of the transaction of the transport part
- a single network manufacturer can have no influence on the structure of the transport part in order, for example, to be able to seamlessly integrate the transport part into the own software-based structure and architecture, because manufacturers of the transport function offer as much software as possible for all potential network manufacturers. This makes it impossible for the network manufacturer to restore states of the transport part on a redundant hardware unit. Nevertheless, the network manufacturer must guarantee the telecommunications service provider the efficient use of its network, such as: B. in the sense of no hanging of resources.
- the replacement solution of the failed hardware unit by the functioning hardware unit remains at a charging level for the telecommunications service provider or for the user of a terminal in conjunction with at least one of the two hardware units very questionable. If, in the case of an unstable call, a transaction is open in the event of a default, it is possible, for example, to B. if a billing message is lost, unwanted overbilling will occur.
- a still existing transaction eg. B. is triggered by a failure unit or simply to be taken into account, overcharges for this transaction are avoided.
- the inventor proposes the known method for securing the communication connections and the associated charging in a redundantly structured communication network, in which terminals are distributed via intermediaries, preferably an IP bearer, and via hardware units
- the correct function of the terminals and / or the mediator (2) and / or the hardware units is monitored and in case of failure of one or more hardware units, the still functioning hardware units take over the physical functions of the failed hardware units, to improve that immediately after taking over the physical functions, the functional hardware units transmit a message to the participating terminals and additionally specify that the monitoring function is performed by the still functioning hardware units.
- a license plate is transmitted from one or more of the failed hardware units to one or more of the functional hardware units, so that over-charging for this transaction is avoided.
- the redundantly constructed communication network can be a SIP communication network and the transmitted messages are SIP messages.
- the terminals which receive a message from the functional hardware units return an answer to them.
- the involved SIP terminal may send a 200 OK in response to the UPDATE.
- SIP Session Timer Session Initiation Protocol
- the SIP Session Timer monitoring function can determine whether the terminals or hardware components involved send or receive an INVITE or UPDATE message using the UPDATE message without SDP. This determines the role of the SIP endpoint. This is particularly advantageous since the other party no longer has to send a re-INVITE with the Session Description Protocol, which then in turn, in turn, with the no longer necessarily existing Session Description Protocol with all its aspects in the response to the re-INVITE would have to be answered. The effort to connect the new hardware unit with the previous terminal, after taking over the functions of the failed hardware unit is therefore kept smaller than previously in the new process.
- the billing is performed by a SIP proxy, preferably a proxy server.
- the message UPDATE can be sent to both communicating terminals after the physical functions have been taken over by the functional hardware units so that the call is not triggered. Where the page waiting to receive the periodic re-INVITE / UPDATE will trigger the call when the message is received.
- billing may be further performed or stopped depending on the response of the terminals if no response comes from the terminals. If, for example, a reply to a message of a functional hardware unit to the participating terminal with a negative response, it can be concluded that this page is still functional and the call and the charge can continue to run.
- Figure 1 Schematic structure of a SIP Gaynikationsnet- zes
- Figure 2 schematic diagram showing the failure of a hardware unit and the subsequent steps explained in the new method.
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic structure of a SIP communication network 1.
- SIP communication network 1 communication terminals 7.1-7.X, preferably simple telephone sets, are connected to one another via an intermediary, here an IP bearer 2.
- the communication terminals 7.1-7. X are connected to Public Switched Telephone Networks 6.
- computers 12 can also communicate with one another via this SIP communication network 1 and the transfer of SIP messages 13 taking place therein.
- the invention also covers networks in which SIP terminals are connected directly to a SIP proxy in a pure SIP domain, without a public telecommunications network PSTN 6.
- the network operator would also like to ensure the failure of one or more hardware units of the SIP communication network 1, so that on the one hand the billing for the existing communication connections can be billed correctly and continue.
- the users of the SIP Communication network 1 despite failure the usual services without waiting time are available.
- a new simple method is presented, which enables the securing of the communication connections and the associated billing in a SIP communication network.
- FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram in which a failure 14.1 of a hardware unit, in this case the first hardware unit 14, is shown, which, for example, is shown in FIG. Outwardly as a unit within units 8 or 9, for example, communicating via the SIP protocol (eg, the MGCP could run between units 8 and 3).
- the failure 14.1 of the first hardware unit 14 is represented by the X symbol.
- FIG. 2 schematically shows how the second hardware unit 15 performs the tasks of the failed first hardware unit 14 and which steps are initiated for this purpose in the new method.
- the hardware units 14 and 15 in a communication network have a redundant connection 16 with one another, so that a takeover of the function of the failed hardware unit 14 by the still functional hardware unit 15 is made possible.
- Session Initiation Protocol SIP
- SIP Session Initiation Protocol
- the second hardware unit 15 will assume the function of the first hardware unit 14 in accordance with the redundant structure of the communication network. So far, the first hardware unit 14 was connected to a SIP terminal 11, such as a telephone and / or a computer. The connection of the first hardware unit 14 to the SIP terminal 11 is not shown in FIG. After failure 14.1 of the first hardware unit 14, the second hardware unit 15 is connected to the SIP terminal 11 and communicate with it.
- the second hardware unit 15 in the new method sends a message 17 to the SIP terminal 11, here a SIP UPDATE.
- the SIP UPDATE is a SIP message or a possible method, which is defined in RFC3311 and is not excluded in the SIP Session Timer draft, which can indicate a change of the SIP call without omitting the Session Description Protocol of the communication. onsnetztechnikes to use.
- the message 17 may include the additional stipulation that the SIP session timer monitoring function is performed immediately from here, ie from the second hardware unit 15.
- the SIP session timer monitoring function can specify which of the two parties involved, ie the second hardware unit 15 or the SIP terminal 11 should send the messages INVITE or UPDATE to determine the readiness and presence of the other party.
- the message INVITE is a SIP message which can establish a connection or, on the other hand, makes it possible for an existing stable connection to change the connection data as re-INVITE. It can also be used for the SIP Session Timer procedure.
- the determination that the second hardware unit 15 will be the new communication partner of the SIP terminal 11 can thus be determined independently of the previous history on the first hardware unit 14 by the second hardware unit 15. This is particularly advantageous, as it means that the other party can no longer send a re-INVITE with the Session Description Protocol, which then in turn, with the not necessarily existing Session Description Protocol with all its aspects in the response 18, here a 200 OK to re-INVITE, would have to be answered.
- both the second hardware unit 15 and the SIP terminal 11 know that the call or the connection is in order and the charging and the call need not be terminated.
- failure 14.1 of the first hard- Waresko 14, which provides only the SIP signaling the associated communication network is still very functional, and the communication participants can still speak or communicate with each other, and the failure 14.1 of the first hardware unit 15 has no effect.
- the second hardware unit 2 will judge this reaction as an acknowledgment, after which the other party is still functional, and the call and billing can continue.
- the transmission of the UPDATE is to be carried out to both sides of the connection.
- ISDN Integrated Services Digital Network service integrating digital telecommunication network
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102005003195 | 2005-01-24 | ||
DE102005007419A DE102005007419A1 (en) | 2005-01-24 | 2005-02-18 | Communication links and charges securing method for session initiation protocol communication network, involves transmitting characteristics of one of failed hardware units to one of functional hardware units during on-going transaction |
PCT/EP2005/013978 WO2006079411A1 (en) | 2005-01-24 | 2005-12-23 | Method for securing the communication links and the associated charges in a redundant communication network |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1844603A1 true EP1844603A1 (en) | 2007-10-17 |
Family
ID=36061600
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05822337A Withdrawn EP1844603A1 (en) | 2005-01-24 | 2005-12-23 | Method for securing the communication links and the associated charges in a redundant communication network |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20080130487A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1844603A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102005007419A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006079411A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101536464B (en) * | 2006-11-10 | 2012-09-05 | 艾利森电话股份有限公司 | Method and apparatus for controlling communications |
US8570853B2 (en) * | 2007-07-20 | 2013-10-29 | Ipc Systems, Inc. | Systems, methods, apparatus and computer program products for networking trading turret systems using SIP |
US20090036128A1 (en) * | 2007-08-03 | 2009-02-05 | Newstep Networks Inc. | Method and system for dynamic call anchoring |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5473599A (en) * | 1994-04-22 | 1995-12-05 | Cisco Systems, Incorporated | Standby router protocol |
US6751191B1 (en) * | 1999-06-29 | 2004-06-15 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Load sharing and redundancy scheme |
US20040255039A1 (en) * | 2001-05-10 | 2004-12-16 | Bernard Honeisen | Method, system and network element device for controlling sessions between terminals |
JP2005229273A (en) * | 2004-02-12 | 2005-08-25 | Fujitsu Ltd | Server backup system |
-
2005
- 2005-02-18 DE DE102005007419A patent/DE102005007419A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-12-23 US US11/792,607 patent/US20080130487A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2005-12-23 WO PCT/EP2005/013978 patent/WO2006079411A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2005-12-23 EP EP05822337A patent/EP1844603A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2006079411A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2006079411A1 (en) | 2006-08-03 |
DE102005007419A1 (en) | 2006-08-03 |
US20080130487A1 (en) | 2008-06-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE60014234T2 (en) | System and method for enabling fault tolerant systems | |
DE60023586T2 (en) | System and method for restarting signaling units in H.323-based real-time communication networks | |
DE60124087T2 (en) | PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING CALLS IN AN IP-BASED NETWORK | |
DE60014492T2 (en) | System and method for direct user signaling in H.323 communication networks | |
EP2018765B1 (en) | Control of service quality and/or charging of telecommunication services | |
DE60031817T2 (en) | A method of communication session setup between a packet-based network terminal and a terminal connected to a remote access server | |
DE102006014921A1 (en) | Lawful interception method for call forwarding in a packet-oriented telecommunications network | |
EP1994714B1 (en) | Method for allocating at least one user data link to at least one multiplex connection | |
EP1759514A1 (en) | Connection setup for the exchange of data of an ip-based service | |
DE102008062982A1 (en) | Billing center for publishing / subscribing the status data originating from distributed telecommunication systems | |
WO2006079411A1 (en) | Method for securing the communication links and the associated charges in a redundant communication network | |
EP1854268A1 (en) | Signaling the outage of a network unit over a communications network | |
DE10335149A1 (en) | Method for reversing a Bearer Redirect for SIP / SIP-T subscribers | |
DE60117452T2 (en) | Call monitoring in a communication system | |
WO2007113073A1 (en) | Method for restoring an ipsec cryptographically secured connection between a p-cscf and a user unit | |
EP1841161A1 (en) | Method for secured transmission of payload data | |
EP1817869A1 (en) | Process for securing communication connections and associated billing in a redundant communication network | |
WO2004102921A1 (en) | Method for the establishment of a communication link, and communication system | |
EP1294166A1 (en) | Signaling method for the payload transmission over circuit and packet switched networks | |
EP2027670B1 (en) | Method for securing ip connections for network operator combinatory connections | |
DE102005057244B4 (en) | Method for communication between terminals in SIP networks | |
EP1514433B1 (en) | Method for controlling a connection in a packet-oriented communication network and arrangements for carrying out said method | |
DE102005031410B4 (en) | Method for establishing a multimedia connection for cascaded call forwarding | |
WO2020216454A1 (en) | Method for providing connection set-up data, and arrangement having a plurality of communication servers and a mediator | |
EP2649751A1 (en) | Method for monitoring a communication system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20070824 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
RAP3 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS S.P.A. |
|
RAP3 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS GMBH & CO. KG |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20080118 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN |
|
18W | Application withdrawn |
Effective date: 20080605 |