EP1785525B1 - Messungen eines Verfahrens Papier/Karton - Google Patents

Messungen eines Verfahrens Papier/Karton Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1785525B1
EP1785525B1 EP20050110706 EP05110706A EP1785525B1 EP 1785525 B1 EP1785525 B1 EP 1785525B1 EP 20050110706 EP20050110706 EP 20050110706 EP 05110706 A EP05110706 A EP 05110706A EP 1785525 B1 EP1785525 B1 EP 1785525B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sub
suspension
distribution
solid elements
measurement
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP20050110706
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1785525A1 (de
Inventor
Juan Carlos Cecchini
Petri Jetsu
Antti Poikolainen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Valmet Automation Oy
Original Assignee
Metso Automation Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Metso Automation Oy filed Critical Metso Automation Oy
Priority to EP20050110706 priority Critical patent/EP1785525B1/de
Publication of EP1785525A1 publication Critical patent/EP1785525A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1785525B1 publication Critical patent/EP1785525B1/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21G—CALENDERS; ACCESSORIES FOR PAPER-MAKING MACHINES
    • D21G9/00—Other accessories for paper-making machines
    • D21G9/0009—Paper-making control systems
    • D21G9/0018—Paper-making control systems controlling the stock preparation

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a process of paper/board production.
  • samples of furnish can be taken from various places of the process for measurements to be made on-line, in-line, based on sampling or in a laboratory (off-line).
  • the measurement results show certain properties of the furnish and if the furnish does not meet the desired target properties, the process can be adjusted.
  • An object of the invention is to provide improved methods and improved apparatuses for measurement of a paper/board process.
  • a method of predicting formation in a process of paper/board production comprising performing at least one sub-process in the process of paper/board production, each sub-process adjusting at least one property of the suspension.
  • the method further comprises performing a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before at least one sub-process which includes at least one of the following: refining, a blending chest, polymer addition, adding micro particles; performing a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the at least one sub-process; and predicting formation to be formed in a former as a function of the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process.
  • a method of predicting floc strength in a process of paper/board production comprising performing at least one sub-process in the process of paper/board production, each sub-process adjusting at least one property of a suspension with solid elements in water.
  • the method further comprising performing a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before at least one sub-process which includes at least one of the following: refining, a blending chest, polymer addition, adding micro particles; performing a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the at least one sub-process; and predicting floc strength to be formed as a function of the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process.
  • a method of predicting porosity in a process of paper/board production comprising performing at least one sub-process in the process of paper/board production, each sub-process adjusting at least one property of a suspension with solid elements in water.
  • the method further comprising performing a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before at least one sub-process which includes at least one of the following: refining, a blending chest, polymer addition, adding micro particles; performing a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the at least one sub-process; and predicting porosity to be formed as a function of the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process
  • a method of controlling a process of paper/board production comprising performing at least one sub-process of the process of paper/board production on suspension with solid elements in water, each sub-process adjusting at least one property of the suspension.
  • the method further comprising performing a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before at least one sub-process which includes at least one of the following: refining, a blending chest, polymer addition, adding micro particles; performing a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the at least one sub-process; and controlling the at least one sub-process as a function of a difference between the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process.
  • an apparatus for predicting formation of suspension with solid elements in water in a process of paper/board production comprising at least one sub-process adjusting at least one property of the suspension.
  • the apparatus comprises a measuring unit configured to perform a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before at least one sub-process which includes at least one of the following: refining, a blending chest, polymer addition, adding micro particles, to perform a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the at least one sub-process, and to predict formation to be formed in a former as a function of the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process.
  • an apparatus for predicting floc strength of suspension with solid elements in water in a process of paper/board production comprising at least one sub-process adjusting at least one property of the suspension.
  • the apparatus comprises a measuring unit configured to perform a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before at least one sub-process which includes at least one of the following: refining, a blending chest, polymer addition, adding micro particles, to perform a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the at least one sub-process, and to predict floc strength to be formed as a function of the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process.
  • an apparatus for predicting porosity of the end product in a process of paper/board production comprising at least one sub-process adjusting at least one property of the suspension.
  • the apparatus comprises a measuring unit configured to perform a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before at least one sub-process which includes at least one of the following: refining, a blending chest, polymer addition, adding micro particles, to perform a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the at least one sub-process, and to predict porosity to be formed in the end product as a function of the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process.
  • a controller for a process of paper/board production where suspension with solid elements in water is processed in at least one sub-process adjusting at least one property of the suspension.
  • a controller configured to receive measurement results from a measuring unit configured to perform a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before at least one sub-process which includes at least one of the following: refining, a blending chest, polymer addition, adding micro particles, and to perform a measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the at least one sub-process, and the controller is configured to control at least one sub-process as a function of a difference between the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process.
  • the invention provides several advantages.
  • the distribution of solid elements of the suspension can be measured effectively in a plurality of sections of the process of paper/board production and the measurement results can be, if so desired, used to predict or control the quality of the web and the end product.
  • Each type of pulp fed to the paper making process can be refined in separate refiners 100 to 104.
  • the refiners can be cylindrical refiners or conical/double discs.
  • the output may be fed further into the paper making process through valves 106 to 110.
  • the valves may be adjusted adaptively such that a desired amount of each type of pulp can be metered to the process.
  • the amount of pulp metered may be controlled, for example, by a basis weight control or a grade change program.
  • a blending chest 112 and a machine chest 114 kraft and broke may be added to the pulp. Broke and kraft can be determined as papers that are re-pulped in this manner.
  • PCC Precipitated Calcium Carbonate
  • GCC Ground Calcium Carbonate
  • the blending chest 112 and the machine chest 114 can also be replaced by a separate mixing reactor (not shown in Figure 1 ).
  • pulp and furnish can be considered to be suspension with solid elements in water.
  • the solid elements may be fibers such as wood fibers, fiber fines, particles or fillers. Dissolved colloids promote the conformation of flocs which are enhanced with dosage of chemical additives.
  • Sand, air and other coarse materials can be removed from the furnish using cleaning devices 118, such as a sentrifugal cleaner, a deculator and a machine screen, and the furnish can pumped by a pump 120 to the headbox 122.
  • cleaning devices 118 such as a sentrifugal cleaner, a deculator and a machine screen
  • TA such as kaolin, calcium carbonate, talc, chalk, titanium dioxide, diatomite
  • a retention aid RA such as inorganic, inartificial organic or synthetic water-soluble polymers to name a few of TA and RA, can be added and mixed to the furnish in a desired manner. Metering each of these can be controlled by adaptively adjustable valves 124 to 126 or by adaptive adjustable dosing pumps.
  • micro/nano particles The purpose of the micro/nano particles is to improve, for example, the formation, surface properties, opacity, brightness, lightness and printing quality as well as to reduce the manufacturing costs.
  • Retention aids RA for their part, may improve, for instance, the retention of the fines and fillers as well as speed up dewatering in a desired manner.
  • the furnish may be fed through the slice opening 128 of the headbox to a former 130, which may be a fourdrinier in slow paper machines, a hybrid former in medium speed paper machines and a gap former in fast paper machines.
  • a former 130 water drains out of the web, and ash, fines and fibres are led to the short circulation.
  • the furnish is fed as a fibre web onto a wire, and the web can be preliminarily formed by fast water removal and pressed in a press 132.
  • the fibre web can also be primarily dried in dryers 134 and 136.
  • the paper machine which in this application refers to both paper and board machines, may also comprise a reel and size presses or a calender, for instance, but these parts are not shown in Figure 1 .
  • the general operation of a paper machine is known per se to a person skilled in the art.
  • measurements can be made in at least two different places in the process of paper/board production. Between these at least two places, the suspension with solid elements in water is processed by a sub-process of the process of paper/board production.
  • the measurement points are marked with letter "M or M F " in Figure 1 .
  • Figure 2 illustrates the measurements made before the head box 122. Let us assume that two components of retention aids are added somewhere after the deculator and before the headbox 116. In general, the order and the number of the added substances may be arbitrary.
  • Each addition can be considered a sub-process in the process of paper/board production.
  • the number of sub-processes may be one or vary from 1 to N, where N is a positive integer larger than one.
  • the furnish is measured before the addition of retention aids and/or micro particles.
  • the measurement 200 may measure a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process(es).
  • a first sub-process 202 relating to an addition of a first component of the retention aid is performed.
  • the first component may be a polymer or micro particles.
  • a pump 204 may be used to proceed and mix the furnish.
  • the first component may be added before or after the pump 204.
  • a measurement 206 measures a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the first sub-process.
  • Screening by a screen 208 may improve the mixing of the first component of the retention aid system as well reduce the size of the flocs by shear forces rate at this stage.
  • a second sub-process 210 relating to an addition of a second component of the retention aid is performed (if dual component or micro particle retention aid system is in use).
  • the second component may be a polymer or micro particles. If a polymer is added first, micro particles may be added second.
  • a measurement 212 measures a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the second sub-process.
  • the measurements 200, 206 and 212 may be on-line measurements where a sample from the furnish in a pipe 218 is taken using a sampler 250 and fed to a measuring unit 220, which may output a signal to a control unit 222.
  • the measuring unit 220 may have several operational principles.
  • the measuring unit may form an image of the sample of the furnish such that the solid elements included in the suspension can be recognized in the image.
  • a numerical value which may be called a parameter, for each processable property of the solid elements can be formed by an image processing program run in the measuring unit.
  • a parameter describing a distribution of the sizes of the solid elements a parameter describing entanglement of fibers, such as the number of crossing points, may be formed.
  • the sample may be diluted in a possible sampler 250 before forming the image such that the consistency of the sample is proper for the image.
  • the image can be formed by taking a picture, for example, using a CCD-camera (Charge Coupled Device) or the like.
  • CCD-camera Charge Coupled Device
  • the measuring unit 220 may have a fractionating hose 250 to separate solid elements of different sizes into fractions with a good performance.
  • the fractionating hose 250 can be used to separate different fractions such as shives, flocs, fibers, fines and fillers.
  • the measuring unit 220 may be an optical apparatus which utilizes absorption, attenuation, scattering and/or depolarisation of optical radiation interacting with small particles.
  • a numerical value for each processable property of the solid elements can be formed by an image processing program run in the measuring unit 220.
  • a typical parameter in this kind of measurement is a parameter describing the size distribution of the solid elements.
  • the measuring unit 220 may also measure consistency of small samples such that a possible agglomeration of solid material in the suspension, such as a floc, may be recognized from the average consistency of the sample.
  • This kind of measurement can give an estimate of distribution of the solid elements in the suspension.
  • a shift in the particle distribution indicates that particles may change their sizes by growing or shrinking in the sub-process (depending on the type of retention aid component added, polymer or micro particles respectively).
  • the measurement can be an optical measurement. If the consistency measurement is complemented with a CCD camera, an image analysis is required to characterize the flocs conformation.
  • the measuring unit 220 may predict formation and/or porosity to be formed in a former 130 as a function of the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process.
  • the distributions before and after a sub-process can be parameters in a prediction model, which may be a mathematical expression describing dependency between distributions and the formation and/or porosity.
  • the prediction model may also take into account the number of crossing points in a floc.
  • cationic polymer enhance retention of fines as well as promote further entanglement of fibers resulting in flocculation.
  • the flocs are assumed to become stronger when water is removed and tighter when a suitable polymer or a combination of polymer and micro/nano-particle is added. If shear forces (i.e. mechanical refining) are applied, flocs tend to become smaller or smoother.
  • a base of a model describing the behaviour of flocs with respect to certain sub-processes can be as follows. When a suitable polymer is added to suspension, flocs increase in size.
  • flocs decrease in size.
  • flocs decrease in size but also increase in number.
  • flocs decrease strongly in size (more than without shear forces) but increase in number.
  • the floc structure may relate, for example, to fiber crossings. These measurements also enable to predict or to estimate the quality of the end product (paper or board). The measurements further enable control of formation, floc strength and/or porosity and the quality of the end product.
  • the measured floc sizes and structures can be linked to formation patterns, such as cloudy, granny, smooth, etc., and their numerical values. For example, beta formation decreases when formation improves.
  • the mathematical expression of the prediction model can be related to a formation factor FF which describes the quality of formation and is also related to the quality of the end product (paper or board).
  • the information on distributions before and after each sub-process can be utilized to control at least one sub-process in the process of paper/board production.
  • the sub-process that is controlled can be the same as the measured one or a different one.
  • Figure 3 illustrates an embodiment relating to the blending chest 112.
  • kraft and broke are added to the pulp in the blending chest 112.
  • the main pulp could be considered to form from one fresh pulp feed or M fresh pulps feeds to the machine chest, where M is a positive integer larger than 2.
  • the measuring unit 220 may perform on-line measurements 300 to 306 of pulp, kraft and broke before and after they enter the sub-processes (addition of kraft can be considered one sub-process and addition of broke can be considered another sub-process) in the blending chest 112.
  • the measurements relate to a distribution of solid elements in the suspension in a similar manner to that described in Figure 2 .
  • a quality of the suspension may be estimated as a function of the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before and after the sub-process(es). At least one sub-process can be taken into account but also many or all sub-processes can be utilized.
  • the estimation of quality can be based on a mathematical model which includes the superposition of mass fractions and the rates of fibre fines included in each component or sub-process.
  • a mass fraction and fibre fines amount can be defined as a reference and the blending can be controlled according to the reference and the measurements.
  • Abs m is a fines fraction distribution is a measured current i and Depo m is a long/coarse fraction distribution is a measured current i.
  • the measurement can take place after the blending chest 112.
  • the information on distributions before and after each sub-process can be utilized to control at least one sub-process in the process of paper/board production.
  • the sub-process that is controlled by the controller 222 receiving a signal relating to measurements from the measurement unit 220 can be the same as the measured one or a different one.
  • FIG 3 there is also shown a sub-process of adding and mixing polymer to a sample of the furnish.
  • the effect of this sub-process can be determined from measurements 306 and 308 made before and after the sub-process.
  • the flocculation tendency of the sample can be determined before or after mixing the furnish with filler(s) in the machine chest 114.
  • the machine chest 114 operation can be controlled by these measurements, which also indicates the possible range of retention aid dosage.
  • the control may be performed such that a retention polymer can be added according to the retention needs and the ratio between retention polymer and micro particles can be formed according to the formation needs.
  • formation can be predicted, the additions of the components to the furnish can be determined using the predicting model. If predicted formation and measured formation in the ready made paper do not meet, the model can be modified (model may be adaptive) or a feedback is used to correct the model prediction methods in a similar manner to a known MP (Model Predictive) control technology.
  • MP Model Predictive
  • Figure 4 illustrates measurements M F made in the former 130.
  • a heavy drainage and particle losses take place in the former 130.
  • filler distribution changes and a considerable filler loss takes place at different vacuum units and loadable blade area.
  • the measuring unit measures the drainage from at least two places in a multifoil shoe (or a vacuum chamber) 400, a loadable blade unit 402, a wire 404 and between a forming roll 406 and a breast roll 408.
  • the rolls and their configuration/arrangement are not limited to those shown in Figure 4 .
  • the former 130 may not necessarily include a forming/sucking roll (BelBaie configuration BBV or a belshoe or an equivalent).
  • the measurements made in at least two places may give information on distribution and changes in distribution of solid elements in the suspension on the wire 404. This information can be utilized in a similar manner as in the examples explained relating to the previous figures.
  • formation can be predicted, the quality of suspension and/or the end product can be estimated or at least one of the sub-processes can be controlled for achieving a proper papermaking suspension to evaluate fibre fines and filler particle losses. This may be utilized in a proper z-profile control of a paper web.
  • Figure 5 illustrates a possible kind of shift in the size distribution of large solid elements (mainly fibers) in suspension treated with a refiner.
  • the signal strength is in y-axis and size is in x-axis, both in arbitrary scale.
  • the depolarisation curve 500 measured before the treatment indicates a distribution that refers to larger solid elements in average than the depolarisation curve 502 relating to a distribution measured after the treatment. Note that the size of solid elements tend to decrease when the sub-process is an addition of a single polymer.
  • Figure 6 illustrates a possible kind of shift in the size distribution of small solid elements (mainly fines and other micro particles) in suspension treated with a refiner.
  • the signal strength is in y-axis and size is in x-axis, both in arbitrary scale.
  • the scattering curve 600 measured before the treatment indicates a distribution that refers to larger solid elements in average than the scattering curve 602 relating to a distribution measured after the treatment. Note also here that the size of solid elements tend to decrease when the sub-process is an addition of a single polymer.
  • Figure 7 illustrates a method of estimating a quality of suspension.
  • step 700 an on-line measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before a sub-process is performed.
  • step 702 an on-line measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process is performed.
  • step 704 a quality of the suspension is estimated as a function of the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process.
  • Figure 8 illustrates a method of predicting formation.
  • step 800 an on-line measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before a sub-process is performed.
  • step 802 an on-line measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process is performed.
  • step 804 formation to be formed in a former is predicted as a function of the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process.
  • Figure 9 illustrates a method of predicting floc strength in a process of paper/board production.
  • step 900 an on-line measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before a sub-process is performed.
  • step 902 an on-line measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process is performed.
  • step 904 floc strength to be formed is predicted as a function of the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process.
  • Figure 10 illustrates a method of controlling a process of paper/board production.
  • step 1000 an on-line measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before a sub-process is performed.
  • step 1002 an on-line measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process is performed.
  • step 1004 at least one sub-process is controlled as a function of a difference between the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process.
  • Figure 11 illustrates a method of predicting porosity in a process of paper/board production.
  • step 1100 an on-line measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension before a sub-process is performed.
  • step 1102 an on-line measurement of a distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process is performed.
  • step 1104 porosity to be formed in the end product is predicted as a function of the distribution of solid elements in the suspension before the sub-process and the distribution of solid elements in the suspension after the sub-process.
  • the prediction model, the estimation and the control operations illustrated in Figures 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 and 11 may be realized as a computer program.
  • the computer program may be stored on a computer program distribution medium readable by a computer or a processor.
  • the computer program medium may be, for example but not limited to, an electric, magnetic, optical, infrared or semiconductor system, device or transmission medium.
  • the medium may be a computer readable medium, a program storage medium, a record medium, a computer readable memory, a random access memory, an erasable programmable read-only memory, a computer readable software distribution package, a computer readable signal, a computer readable telecommunications signal, and a computer readable compressed software package.

Landscapes

  • Paper (AREA)

Claims (22)

  1. Ein Verfahren zum Voraussagen der Bahnbildung in einem Prozess zur Herstellung von Papier/Karton, wobei das Verfahren Folgendes aufweist
    mindestens einen Sub-Prozess in dem Prozess zur Herstellung von Papier/Karton durchführen, wobei jeder Sub-Prozess mindestens eine Eigenschaft der Suspension einstellt, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass
    eine Messung (200, 206, 212, 300 bis 308, 420 bis 430) der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor mindestens einem Sub-Prozess durchgeführt wird (800), welcher mindestens einen der folgenden einschließt: Raffinieren, eine Mischkammer, Zusatz von Polymer, Zusatz von Mikropartikeln;
    eine Messung (200, 206, 212, 300 bis 308, 420 bis 430) der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension nach dem mindestens einen Sub-Prozess durchgeführt wird (802); und
    die in einem Former zu bildende Bahnbildung als eine Funktion der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor dem Sub-Prozess und der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension nach dem Sub-Prozess vorausgesagt wird (804).
  2. Ein Verfahren zum Voraussagen der Flockenstärke in einem Prozess zur Herstellung von Papier/Karton, wobei das Verfahren Folgendes aufweist
    mindestens einen Sub-Prozess in dem Prozess zur Herstellung von Papier/Karton durchführen, wobei jeder Sub-Prozess mindestens eine Eigenschaft der Suspension mit festen Elementen in Wasser einstellt, dadurch ge- kennzeichnet, dass
    eine Messung der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor mindestens einem Sub-Prozess durchgeführt wird (900), welcher mindestens einen der folgenden einschließt: Raffinieren, eine Mischkammer, Zusatz von Polymer, Zusatz von Mikropartikeln;
    eine Messung der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension nach dem mindestens einen Sub-Prozess durchgeführt wird (902); und
    die zu bildende Flockenstärke als Funktion der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor dem Sub-Prozess und der Verteilung von soliden Elementen in der Suspension nach dem Sub-Prozess vorausgesagt wird (904).
  3. Ein Verfahren zum Voraussagen der Porosität in einem Prozess zur Herstellung von Papier/Karton, wobei das Verfahren Folgendes aufweist
    mindestens einen Sub-Prozess in dem Prozess zur Herstellung von Papier/Karton durchführen, wobei jeder Sub-Prozess mindestens eine Eigenschaft der Suspension mit festen Elementen in Wasser einstellt, dadurch ge - kennzeichnet, dass
    eine Messung der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor mindestens einem Sub-Prozess durchgeführt wird (1100), welcher mindestens einen der folgenden einschließt: Raffinieren, eine Mischkammer, Zusatz von Polymer, Zusatz von Mikropartikeln;
    eine Messung der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension nach dem mindestens einen Sub-Prozess durchgeführt wird (1102); und
    die zu bildende Porosität als Funktion der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor dem Sub-Prozess und der Verteilung von soliden Elementen in der Suspension nach dem Sub-Prozess vorausgesagt wird (1104).
  4. Ein Verfahren zur Steuerung eines Prozesses zur Herstellung von Papier/Karton, wobei das Verfahren Folgendes aufweist
    mindestens einen Sub-Prozess des Prozesses zur Herstellung von Papier/Karton an der Suspension mit festen Elementen in Wasser durchführen, wobei jeder Sub-Prozess mindestens eine Eigenschaft der Suspension mit festen Elementen in Wasser einstellt, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass
    eine Messung (200, 206, 212, 300 bis 308, 420 bis 430) der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor mindestens einem Sub-Prozess durchgeführt wird (1000), welcher mindestens einen der folgenden einschließt: Raffinieren, eine Mischkammer, Zusatz von Polymer, Zusatz von Mikropartikeln;
    eine Messung (200, 206, 212, 300 bis 308, 420 bis 430) einer Verteilung der festen Elemente in der Suspension nach dem mindestens einen Sub-Prozess durchgeführt wird (1002); und
    der mindestens eine Sub-Prozess als Funktion einer Differenz zwischen der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor dem Sub-Prozess und der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension nach dem Sub-Prozess gesteuert wird (1004).
  5. Das Verfahren gemäß dem Patentanspruch 4, dadurch g e - kennzeichnet, dass eine Kontrolle eines Sub-Prozesses durchgeführt wird, welcher derselbe ist wie der Sub-Prozess, der vorher und nachher gemessen wurde.
  6. Das Verfahren gemäß dem Patentanspruch 4, dadurch ge - kennzeichnet, dass ein Sub-Prozess in einer Mischkammer (112) durchgeführt wird und der, Rohmaterial in der Mischkammer (112) mischende Sub-Prozess gesteuert wird.
  7. Das Verfahren gemäß dem Patentanspruch 4, dadurch ge - kennzeichnet, dass eine Kontrolle eines Sub-Prozesses durchgeführt wird, welcher unterschiedlich von dem Sub-Prozess ist, der vorher und nachher gemessen wurde.
  8. Das Verfahren gemäß dem Patentanspruch 7, dadurch ge - kennzeichnet, dass ein Sub-Prozess durchgeführt wird, bei dem ein Polymer in die Fasersuspension zugesetzt wird, und ein Sub-Prozess gesteuert wird, bei dem die Mikropartikeln in der Fasersuspension gemessen werden.
  9. Das Verfahren gemäß dem Patentanspruch 1, 2, 3 oder 4, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass feste Elemente in einem fraktionierenden Schlauch (250) für die Messung (200, 206, 212, 300 bis 308, 420 bis 430) einer Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension separiert werden.
  10. Das Verfahren gemäß dem Patentanspruch 1, 2, 3 oder 4, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass eine Probe von der Suspension vor und nach einem Sub-Prozess genommen wird und die Proben zu einer gewünschten Konsistenz für die Messung verdünnt werden.
  11. Das Verfahren gemäß dem Patentanspruch 1, 2, 3 oder 4, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Messungen (200, 206, 212, 300 bis 308, 420 bis 430) der Verteilung der Größe mindestens einer der folgenden Kategorien durchgeführt werden: Flocken, Fasern, Feinstoff.
  12. Eine Vorrichtung zum Voraussagen von Bahnbildung einer Suspension mit festen Elementen in Wasser in einem Prozess zur Herstellung von Papier/Karton, wobei der Prozess mindestens einen Sub-Prozess des Einstellens mindestens einer Eigenschaft der Suspension aufweist, dadurch ge - kennzeichnet, dass die Vorrichtung Folgendes aufweist
    eine Messeinheit (220), die angeordnet ist, eine Messung einer Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor mindestens einem Sub-Prozess durchzuführen, welcher mindestens einen der folgenden einschließt: Raffinieren, eine Mischkammer, Zusatz von Polymer, Zusatz von Mikropartikeln, um eine Messung einer Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension nach dem mindestens einen Sub-Prozess durchzuführen, und die zu bildende Formation in einem Former als Funktion der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor dem Sub-Prozess und der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension nach dem Sub-Prozess vorauszusagen.
  13. Eine Vorrichtung zum Voraussagen der Flockenstärke einer Suspension mit festen Elementen in Wasser in einem Prozess zur Herstellung von Papier/Karton, wobei der Prozess mindestens einen Sub-Prozess der Einstellung mindestens einer Eigenschaft der Suspension aufweist, dadurch ge - kennzeichnet, dass die Vorrichtung Folgendes aufweist
    eine Messeinheit (220), die angeordnet ist, eine Messung einer Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor mindestens einem Sub-Prozess durchzuführen, welcher mindestens einen der folgenden einschließt: Raffinieren, eine Mischkammer, Zusatz von Polymer, Zusatz von Mikropartikeln, um eine Messung einer Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension nach dem mindestens einen Sub-Prozess durchzuführen, und die zu bildende Flockenstärke als Funktion der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor dem Sub-Prozess und der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension nach dem Sub-Prozess vorauszusagen.
  14. Eine Vorrichtung zum Voraussagen der Porosität des Endprodukts in einem Prozess zur Herstellung von Papier/Karton, wobei der Prozess mindestens einen Sub-Prozess der Einstellung mindestens einer Eigenschaft der Suspension aufweist, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Vorrichtung Folgendes aufweist
    eine Messeinheit (220), die angeordnet ist, eine Messung einer Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor mindestens einem Sub-Prozess durchzuführen, welcher mindestens einen der folgenden einschließt: Raffinieren, eine Mischkammer, Zusatz von Polymer, Zusatz von Mikropartikeln, um eine Messung einer Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension nach dem mindestens einen Sub-Prozess durchzuführen, und die zu bildende Porosität in dem Endprodukt als Funktion der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor dem Sub-Prozess und der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension nach dem Sub-Prozess vorauszusagen.
  15. Eine Steuereinheit für einen Prozess zur Herstellung von Papier/Karton, wobei eine Suspension mit festen Elementen in Wasser in mindestens einem Sub-Prozess der Einstellung mindestens einer Eigenschaft der Suspension verarbeitet wird, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass
    eine Steuereinheit (222) angeordnet ist, Messergebenisse von einer Messeinheit (220) zu empfangen, die angeordnet ist, eine Messung (200, 206, 212, 300 bis 308, 420 bis 430) einer Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor mindestens einem Sub-Prozess durchzuführen, welcher mindestens einen der folgenden einschließt: Raffinieren, eine Mischkammer, Zusatz von Polymer, Zusatz von Mikropartikeln, und um eine Messung (200, 206, 212, 300 bis 308, 420 bis 430) einer Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension nach dem mindestens einen Sub-Prozess durchzuführen, und
    die Steuereinheit (222) angeordnet ist, mindestens einen Sub-Prozess als Funktion einer Differenz zwischen der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension vor dem Sub-Prozess und der Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension nach dem Sub-Prozess zu steuern.
  16. Die Vorrichtung gemäß dem Patentanspruch 15, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Steuereinheit (222) angeordnet ist, eine Kontrolle eines Sub-Prozesses durchzuführen, welcher derselbe Sub-Prozess ist, der vorher und nachher gemessen wurde.
  17. Die Vorrichtung gemäß dem Patentanspruch 15, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Steuereinheit (222) angeordnet ist, einen Sub-Prozess in einer Mischkammer (112) durchzuführen und den, Rohmaterial in der Mischkammer (112) mischenden Sub-Prozess zu steuern.
  18. Die Vorrichtung gemäß dem Patentanspruch 15, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Steuereinheit (222) angeordnet ist, eine Kontrolle eines Sub-Prozesses durchzuführen, welcher unterschiedlich von dem Sub-Prozess ist, der vorher und nachher gemessen wurde.
  19. Die Vorrichtung gemäß dem Patentanspruch 18, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der Sub-Prozess das Zusetzen eines Polymers in die Fasersuspension ist, und der zu steuernde Sub-Prozess ein Subprozess des Messens von Mikropartikeln in der Fasersuspension ist.
  20. Die Vorrichtung gemäß dem Patentanspruch 12, 13, 14 oder 15, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Messeinheit (220) einen fraktionierenden Schlauch (250) zum Separieren von festen Elementen für die Messung (200, 206, 212, 300 bis 308, 420 bis 430) einer Verteilung von festen Elementen in der Suspension aufweist.
  21. Die Vorrichtung gemäß dem Patentanspruch 12, 13, 14 oder 15, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Vorrichtung eine Probeentnahme-Einheit (250) zum Entnehmen einer Probe aus der Suspension vor und nach einem Sub-Prozess aufweist, und die Probeentnahme-Einheit (250) angeordnet ist, die Proben zu einer gewünschten Konsistenz für die Messung zu verdünnen.
  22. Die Vorrichtung gemäß dem Patentanspruch 12, 13, 14 oder 15, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Messeinheit (220) angeordnet ist, Messungen (200, 206, 212, 300 bis 308, 420 bis 430) über die Verteilung der Größe mindestens einer der folgenden Kategorien durchzuführen: Flocken, Fasern, Feinstoff.
EP20050110706 2005-11-14 2005-11-14 Messungen eines Verfahrens Papier/Karton Active EP1785525B1 (de)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20050110706 EP1785525B1 (de) 2005-11-14 2005-11-14 Messungen eines Verfahrens Papier/Karton

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20050110706 EP1785525B1 (de) 2005-11-14 2005-11-14 Messungen eines Verfahrens Papier/Karton

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1785525A1 EP1785525A1 (de) 2007-05-16
EP1785525B1 true EP1785525B1 (de) 2013-03-06

Family

ID=35478700

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20050110706 Active EP1785525B1 (de) 2005-11-14 2005-11-14 Messungen eines Verfahrens Papier/Karton

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1785525B1 (de)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102011083709A1 (de) 2011-09-29 2013-04-04 Voith Patent Gmbh Betriebsverfahren für eine Stoffaufbereitung
FI127895B (en) * 2016-12-05 2019-05-15 Valmet Automation Oy Device and method for measuring suspension and control of a suspension process

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4243319A (en) * 1977-01-24 1981-01-06 Nekoosa Papers, Inc. Optical property measurement system and method
FI71018C (fi) 1983-07-06 1986-10-27 Valmet Oy Foerfarande baserande sig pao ekolodning med ultraljud foer at foelja med banbildningen och/eller massasuspensionsstroe mmn pao en viradel och/eller i en inloppslaoda i en pappers makin och anordning foer tillaempning av foerfarandet samt vanendning av foerfarandet och/eller anordningen
US5825653A (en) * 1997-03-14 1998-10-20 Valmet Corporation Method for overall regulation of a former of a paper machine or equivalent
FI974327A (fi) * 1997-11-25 1999-05-26 Valmet Automation Inc Menetelmä ja laitteisto paperin ominaisuuksien säätämiseksi
FI116075B (fi) * 1998-02-23 2005-09-15 Metso Paper Inc Paperikoneen säätöjärjestelmä
FI20012175A (fi) 2001-11-09 2003-05-10 Metso Paper Automation Oy Menetelmä ja laitteisto viiraosan toiminnan säätämiseksi
FI111173B (fi) * 2002-05-03 2003-06-13 Metso Paper Inc Menetelmä paperirainan laadun hallitsemiseksi

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1785525A1 (de) 2007-05-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6086716A (en) Wet end control for papermaking machine
EP2417497B1 (de) Modellierung einer eigenschaft von papier, pappe oder karton
EP2595716B1 (de) Verfahren und system zur überwachung der eigenschaften eines wässrigen stroms
US7566382B2 (en) Method and arrangement for controlling short circulation in a paper machine or the like
US20210095422A1 (en) Method and apparatus for controlling a fiber fractionation system
EP1785525B1 (de) Messungen eines Verfahrens Papier/Karton
US6562196B1 (en) Method for optimizing the degree of flocculation
EP1073910B1 (de) Messung und regelung des zeta-potentials von papierstoff
Beghello Some factors that influence fiber flocculation
CN110914496A (zh) 纸浆质量监测
Svedberg et al. The effect of various retention aids on retention and formation
Ho et al. Department of Chemical Engineering
Saren et al. New innovations for the study of fibre furnish characteristics
Jokinen et al. Effect of furnish quality on pressure screen performance
Montgomery The role of suction boxes on forming section retention and filler migration
Motiee Effect of chemical additives on Z-direction filler distribution in paper
Matula et al. Efficient Management of Fines in the Stock Flow prior to Headbox in Paper, Board, and Tissue Production
Cecchini et al. Alternative methods to evaluate flocculation of particles in papermaking suspensions
Svedberg et al. A pilot web former designed to study retention-formation relationships
Brown On-line Control of Paper Web Formation Using Stochastic Distribution Theory
JP2004308067A (ja) インレット原料の調整方法
Rantala et al. Management of wet end chemistry-online measurements and mill results

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070620

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20070719

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R079

Ref document number: 602005038408

Country of ref document: DE

Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: D21G0009000000

Ipc: D21H0023040000

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: D21H 17/20 20060101ALI20120529BHEP

Ipc: D21G 9/00 20060101ALI20120529BHEP

Ipc: D21H 23/04 20060101AFI20120529BHEP

Ipc: D21H 23/20 20060101ALI20120529BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: METSO AUTOMATION OY

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 599711

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130315

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602005038408

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130502

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130617

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130606

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20130306

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130607

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130706

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130708

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20131209

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602005038408

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20131209

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131130

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131130

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20130306

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131114

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20051114

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20171121

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20171123

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Payment date: 20181024

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20181123

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 599711

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20181114

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20181114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181114

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FI

Ref legal event code: MAE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191130

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20231120

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231121

Year of fee payment: 19