EP1515289B1 - User interface for a control station - Google Patents

User interface for a control station Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1515289B1
EP1515289B1 EP20030020878 EP03020878A EP1515289B1 EP 1515289 B1 EP1515289 B1 EP 1515289B1 EP 20030020878 EP20030020878 EP 20030020878 EP 03020878 A EP03020878 A EP 03020878A EP 1515289 B1 EP1515289 B1 EP 1515289B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
area
alarm
event
user interface
characterized
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
EP20030020878
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1515289A1 (en
Inventor
Klaus-Peter Dr. Schneider
Axel Platz
Renato Colcerasa
Gianluca Mazzimini
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens AG filed Critical Siemens AG
Priority to EP20030020878 priority Critical patent/EP1515289B1/en
Publication of EP1515289A1 publication Critical patent/EP1515289A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1515289B1 publication Critical patent/EP1515289B1/en
Application status is Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B25/00Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
    • G08B25/14Central alarm receiver or annunciator arrangements

Description

  • The present invention refers to a user interface for a control station of a security system, in particular a danger management system.
  • The US 6529137 B1 describes a method and apparatus for processing and displaying "alarm" information. Specifically, four separate windows are simultaneously presented to an operator during an alarm condition, where the four windows present an alarm event, alarm instructions, a map of the location of the alarm event and alarm responses, respectively.
  • The US 5297252 describes a color graphics terminal for monitoring a system in which a graphics monitor is connected to a computer, the graphics and at least two separate graphics windows which are capable of representing simultaneously two geographically, hierarchically related graphic displays of the system, with an arrangement for controlling the computer to automatically display on the graphics monitor the related graphic displays in response to certain inputs received by the computer.
  • Known danger management systems present in their user interface schema en element that represents the alarm situation in the system in summary form. The most common realization of this element is a group of "lamps" of different colors, one per alarm category. Many interfaces display also a counter which informs of the number of alarms present in the respective category. It is also known to present a list of pending alarms in order to allow the operator to select the alarm to be treated. Such lists however do not allow efficiently checking the degree of completion of the alarm treatment.
  • MS-Windows based operating systems allow the quasi-parallel completion of several tasks in different windows. But as the arrangement of the windows and their operation are completely in the user's hands, it cannot be excluded that windows may overlap and hide each other on the screen. This is also the case in several danger management systems where event lists are available but may be hidden by windows related to other activities and/or by a large window opened by the operator for treatment of an event.
  • The invention is now intended to provide a user interface which enables efficient and secure alarm treatment, in particular correct interpretation of the displayed information and execution of the adequate responses. In particular, the invention should provide an approach to multiple alarm handling and should make certain that security relevant information displayed on the screen cannot be hidden by other windows.
  • This object is achieved by a user interface of the type mentioned at the beginning, having the features of claim 1 and claim 10.
  • A first preferred embodiment of the user interface according to the invention is characterized in that the displayscreen is dynamically segmented such that a permanent overview over events is preserved even when a detailed view of a single event is active.
  • The user interface according to the invention has the advantage that the summary of the events in the system and the event list are always brought to the operator's attention and cannot be hidden by other windows.
  • A second preferred embodiment of the user interface is characterized in that the first area has the form of a column or row and is provided at a first edge of the display screen, in that the second area has the form of a column or row and is provided perpendicular to the first area at a second edge of the display screen, and in that the third area covers the remaining surface of the display screen. Preferably, the first area is provided at the upper edge and the second area is provided at the left edge of the display screen.
  • A third preferred embodiment of the use interface is characterized in that by the clicking of an event tag the third area is covered by a semi-transparent screen.
  • A fourth preferred embodiment of the user interface is characterized in that by clicking of an event tag the respective event tag is expanded to an event object in the form of a row which provides a larger screen extension and allows to display a detailed description of the respective alarm in detailed form.
  • Further advantageous and preferred embodiments and developments of the invention are specified in claims 7 to 9.
  • The invention is described in greater detail below using an exemplary embodiment and the drawings; in the drawings:
  • Fig. 1
    shows a flow chart of the work sequence of an operator of the control station of a danger management system; and
    Fig. 2
    shows a diagrammatic view of the display of a user interface according to the invention.
  • The control station of a security system, for example a fire detection, a gas detection or an intrusion detection system and also of a danger management system which is placed over the said systems offers a user interface supporting the user, commonly an operator, in managing the system. The description of the user interface in connection with the control station of a danger management system, which control station is hereinafter referred to as danger management station, should not mean any limitation of the user interface to danger management stations. It is herewith expressly pointed out that the user interface shown in Figure 2 can be used for the control station of any suitable security system.
  • The most important function of a danger management station is the alarm management, whereby alarms represent conditions the operator must be alerted of and should react on. Alarms are the result of abnormal events which are typically detected automatically by event detectors of the fire and security subsystems connected to the danger management station, and range from various kinds of anomalies and faults to severe alarms related to life-safety threats or attacks to property. In the following description both terms alarm and event are used. Other typical functions of a danger management station are the supervision and control of connected subsystems, visual supervision via CCTV systems, visitor's management and others.
  • The flow chart of Fig. 1 shows the work sequence of an operator of a danger management system. The operator of a danger management station is engaged in alarm management for a fraction of his time only. Alarms happen asynchronously with the other activities of the operator, but, depending on their type, may have priority over all those activities. Efficient and secure alarm treatment is essential for the prevention of severe consequences. It requires the correct interpretation of the information available and the execution of adequate actions, as for example acknowledging and quitting alarms or calling the police or the fire brigade.
  • The cycle of an alarm is as follows:
    • The alarm is generated and as long as not selected for treatment by an operator, it is set in "unprocessed" status, requiring action by the operator.
    • When selected by the operator, the alarm is in "in-process" status and requires no action by any other operator that the one who has selected it.
    • The operator can completely terminate all operations required and can then close the alarm or he can interrupt treatment of an alarm in some cases.
  • Normally the operator is engaged in the loop of activities 1 to 3. During execution of any other activity (step 1), he/she shall continuously monitor the system and assess the alarm situation in order to decide whether he/she has to react or not. When the operator becomes aware that one or more alarms require an action (step 2), he decides whether the new alarm(s) have priority on her/his current activity (step 3). When the decision is NO, the operator returns to her/his stand by status (step 1).
  • When the decision is YES, the operator has to select which of the pending alarms is the most important one and needs an urgent action (step 4). After this selection, the operator enters in the alarm treatment phase (step 5) in which he performs a number of specific actions. During the alarm treatment phase however he shall continuously monitor the overall situation of the system. When he becomes aware of a new alarm (step 6), he/she has to decide whether this new alarm has priority over the alarm he/she (step 7) is currently treating. When the decision is NO, the operator returns to the treatment of the previous alarm (step 8). When the decision is YES, the operator performs treatment of the most important new alarm (step 9).
  • The operator has three possible ways to terminate the treatment of an alarm:
    • All necessary actions have been executed and the alarm is closed (step 10). The operator returns to step 1.
    • The operator cannot further proceed in the alarm treatment due to external conditions. In this case the operator has to suspend treatment of the respective alarm (step 11) and waits for the necessary external actions (that is e.g. the case when a subsystem has detected a fault, after calling for the intervention of a maintenance team the operator can do nothing but wait for the maintenance team to repair the fault).
    • An alarm with higher priority requires treatment. The operator suspends treatment of the current alarm and selects the new one (step 9).
  • The description of Fig. 1 should have made evident that the user interface of the danger management station should provide means to guarantee that the operator can get awareness of an incoming alarm, independently of other actions he might be performing, and that he/she will not loose her/his awareness of other possibly more severe alarms when he/she is treating an alarm. It is also necessary to provide efficient means to evaluate the importance of the actions required, so that the decisions in steps 3 and 7 can be made in a secure and reliable way.
  • Fig. 2 shows a diagrammatic view of the display 12 of the user interface of a danger management station. The display 12 is divided into three marked off areas, a first area 13, the so-called global scheme, a second area 14, the so-called event bar, and a third area 15, the so-called work area. The global schema 13 which is arranged at the top of the display and has the form of a horizontal strip contains a number of display fields 16 of the "lamp" type representing the summary of all alarms that are present in the system. The alarms are grouped by various criteria among which the most common is the severity of the alarm. There are different severity degrees each of them associated to a different color. Every display field 16 shows also the number of the respective alarms. For instance the display field 16 on the left end of the global schema is provided for severe alarms, the next display field 16 is provided for alarms, the next is provided for exclusions. Other display fields are provided for faults, anomalies, etc. The global scheme 13 is permanent and cannot be covered by other areas or windows.
  • The event bar 14 which is arranged on the left side of the display 12 and has the form of a column comprises a number of display fields in the form of event tags 17. The event tags 17 display the most important information about the alarms in a symbolic form; they are formed by a square comprising an icon that represents the cause of the alarm and they have a simple visual code that immediately furnish the operator with information about the urgency of the actions to be taken. Each event tag 17 represents one type of alarm (e.g. fire, intrusion, gas, etc.) and displays all important features which are necessary to make the initial decisions in steps 3 and 7 of Fig. 1. The event bar 14 is coordinate with the global scheme 13 and provides the operator with an additional level of information. Alarms are not also distinguished according to types but also according to categories in order to have a first indication of their severity. Typical categories are "severe alarm", "fault" and "exclusion".
  • Each alarm category has assigned a specific color which is constant in the system. The square of an alarm tag 17 in full color and blinking indicates that an alarm of the type indicated by the icon and of the category indicated by the color is present and is in an un-processed state. The square in pale color and lightening steady indicates that the respective alarm is currently under treatment by another operator, so that no further action of the operator concerned is required. The square in grey indicates that the alarm has been already seen and is suspended. Each square comprises in one of its corners a triangle 18 to indicate the category of a suspended alarm. The triangle in full color indicates the category and a blinking triangle indicates that the alarm requires action, otherwise the triangle is in a steady state. In summary, a blinking object (square or triangle) indicates that an action is necessary, an object in a steady state indicates that no action is necessary. A larger blinking object (square) indicates a more urgent necessary action than a smaller blinking object (triangle). The event bar 14 is a permanent column and cannot be covered by other areas or windows. If the length of the alarm list on the event bar 14 exceeds the display 12, scrolling can be invoked.
  • When the operator selects an alarm by clicking the respective event tag 17, any contents of the work area 15 is covered with a semi-transparent screen and the selected event tag 17 moves a short distance to the right and expands to an event object 19 in the form of a row. The event object provides a larger screen extension and allows to display a detailed description of the alarm in an explicit (verbal) form. The expanded event object 19 contains in verbal form all the information needed by the operator to make his complete selection choice: the cause of the event and its source, date and time of its occurrence, some operating instructions in short form, the action the operator has to perform and the commands to perform the most urgent actions (e.g. silencing the alarm sirens).
  • The covering of the contents of the work area 15 with a semi-transparent screen in the moment when an event tag 17 is clicked has the advantage that the operator has the comfort of persistence of his/her previous screen while his/her attention is attracted at the same time to the highlighted expanded event object. The expanded event object confirms the operator of the selection he has made while keeping and highlighting the relationship of this event with the others present in the event bar 14.
  • When the operator needs to assess the complete alarm condition of the danger management system globally and more extensively, he can expand the event bar 14 to a full featured alarm list by selecting a command 20 located top left near to the event tags. 17. The selection of command 20 will produce expansion of all event tags 17 from left to right up to the coverage of the full work area 15 and will provide the display of all expanded event objects. In this configuration the operator has a complete overview of the alarm condition in the danger management system and is in the best position to make the selection decision.
  • When the operator wants to go back to his previous activities, he has to select command 20 which selection will force the expanded alarm list to roll back from right to left, discovering the work area 15 which will display its previous contents. In order to select the event treatment for the selected event, it is sufficient to double click the chosen event tag 17. This double click corresponds to the transition from step 4 to step 5 in Figure 2.
  • The described means and measures maintain the operator's awareness and allow easy event selection even when the operator is engaged in the loop between steps 5 and 7 in Figure 2.

Claims (10)

  1. User interface for a control station of a security system, in particular a danger management system, the interface comprising a display screen (12) for the indication of an events in the system and means for the treatment of the indicated events by an operator, whereas the display screen (12) is segmented into three areas, a first area (13) which represents the summary of the events in the system, a second area (14) representing an event list comprising information about the displayed events in a symbolic form, and a third area (15) which can be used for any application useful for the operation of the control station, whereby the first and the second area (13, 14) cannot be covered by other windows, whereas the second area (14) comprises a number of display fields which are hereinafter called event tags (17) and comprise an icon that represents the cause of the alarm and furnish the operator with information about the urgency of the action to be taken, whereas each event tag (17) represents one alarm, whereas both in the first and the second area (13, 14) each alarm category has assigned a specific color which is constant in the system, whereas the first area (13) provides information about the categories of the alarms to have a first indication of their severity, characterized in that each event tag (17) is formed by a square comprising the said icon and a triangle (18) in a corner of the square to indicate the category of a suspended alarm.
  2. User interface according to claim 1, characterized in that the display screen (12) is dynamically segmented such that a permanent overview over events is preserved even when a detailed view of a single event is active.
  3. User interface according to claim 2, characterized in that the first area (13) has the form of a column or row and is provided at a first edge of the display screen (12), in that the second area (14) has the form of a column or row and is provided perpendicular to the first area (13) at a second edge of the display screen (12), and in that the third area covers the remaining surface of the display screen (12).
  4. User interface according to claim 3, characterized in that the first area (13) is provided at the upper edge and in that the second area (14) is provided at the left edge of the display screen (12).
  5. User interface according to claim 1 characterized in that by the clicking of an event tag the third area (15) is covered by a semi-transparent screen.
  6. User interface according to claim 5, characterized in that by clicking of an event tag (17) the respective event tag (17) is expanded to an event object (19) in the form of a row which provides a larger screen extension and allows to display a detailed description of the respective alarm in detailed form.
  7. User interface according to claim 6, characterized in that the second area (14) can be expanded to a full featured alarm list with all event tags (17) being expanded from left to right up to the coverage of the full third area (15).
  8. User interface according to claim 1, characterized in that a triangle (18) in full color indicates the category of the alarm and a blinking triangle (18) indicates that the alarm requires action.
  9. User interface according to claim 8, characterized in that a blinking square or triangle (18) indicates that an action and a steady square or triangle (18) indicates that no action is necessary, and in that a blinking square indicates a more urgent necessary action than a blinking triangle (18).
  10. Method for indication of events on a user interface, which comprises a display screen (12), for a control station of a security system, in particular a danger management system, and for treatment of the indicated events by an operator, whereas the display screen (12) will be segmented into three areas, a first area (13) which represents the summary of the events in the system, a second area (14) representing an event list comprising information about the displayed events in a symbolic form and a third area (15) which can be used for any application useful for the operation of the control station, that the first and the second area (13, 14) cannot be covered by other windows, whereas the second area (14) comprises a number of display fields which are hereinafter called event tags (17) and comprise an icon that represents the cause of the alarm and furnish the operator with information about the urgency of the action to be taken, whereas each event tag (17) represents one alarm, whereas both in the first and the second area (13, 14) each alarm category has assigned a specific color which is constant in the system, whereas the first area (13) provides information about the categories of the alarms to have a first indication of their severity, characterized in that each event tag (17) is formed by a square comprising the said icon and a triangle (18) In a corner of the square to indicate the category of a suspended alarm.
EP20030020878 2003-09-15 2003-09-15 User interface for a control station Expired - Fee Related EP1515289B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20030020878 EP1515289B1 (en) 2003-09-15 2003-09-15 User interface for a control station

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20030020878 EP1515289B1 (en) 2003-09-15 2003-09-15 User interface for a control station
DE2003619531 DE60319531T2 (en) 2003-09-15 2003-09-15 User interface for a control station
AT03020878T AT388461T (en) 2003-09-15 2003-09-15 User interface for a control station
CN 200410078563 CN100430866C (en) 2003-09-15 2004-09-15 User interface for a control station
HK05110100A HK1078152A1 (en) 2003-09-15 2005-11-11 User interface for a control station

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1515289A1 EP1515289A1 (en) 2005-03-16
EP1515289B1 true EP1515289B1 (en) 2008-03-05

Family

ID=34130212

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20030020878 Expired - Fee Related EP1515289B1 (en) 2003-09-15 2003-09-15 User interface for a control station

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1515289B1 (en)
CN (1) CN100430866C (en)
AT (1) AT388461T (en)
DE (1) DE60319531T2 (en)
HK (1) HK1078152A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2574999A2 (en) 2011-09-30 2013-04-03 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Management system using function abstraction for output generation
WO2013048427A1 (en) 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Management system with versatile display
US9560482B1 (en) 2015-12-09 2017-01-31 Honeywell International Inc. User or automated selection of enhanced geo-fencing

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2012084041A1 (en) * 2010-12-22 2012-06-28 Abb Research Ltd Method and system for monitoring an industrial system involving an eye tracking system
US8730054B2 (en) * 2011-05-31 2014-05-20 General Electric Company Systems and methods to customize alert presentation
US9170702B2 (en) * 2011-09-30 2015-10-27 Siemens Schweiz Ag Management system user interface in a building automation system
CN104239727B (en) * 2014-09-22 2018-01-23 深圳沈鼓测控技术有限公司 The method of displaying the operating state of the rotating machinery condition monitoring trends in Unit
US9900174B2 (en) 2015-03-06 2018-02-20 Honeywell International Inc. Multi-user geofencing for building automation
US9967391B2 (en) 2015-03-25 2018-05-08 Honeywell International Inc. Geo-fencing in a building automation system
US9609478B2 (en) 2015-04-27 2017-03-28 Honeywell International Inc. Geo-fencing with diagnostic feature
US10057110B2 (en) 2015-11-06 2018-08-21 Honeywell International Inc. Site management system with dynamic site threat level based on geo-location data
US9628951B1 (en) 2015-11-11 2017-04-18 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems for performing geofencing with reduced power consumption
US9860697B2 (en) 2015-12-09 2018-01-02 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems for automatic adjustment of a geofence size
US10302322B2 (en) 2016-07-22 2019-05-28 Ademco Inc. Triage of initial schedule setup for an HVAC controller
US10306403B2 (en) 2016-08-03 2019-05-28 Honeywell International Inc. Location based dynamic geo-fencing system for security
WO2018144783A1 (en) * 2017-02-02 2018-08-09 Carrier Corporation System and method for facilitating user interactions with life safety systems
US10317102B2 (en) 2017-04-18 2019-06-11 Ademco Inc. Geofencing for thermostatic control
EP3503060A1 (en) * 2017-12-22 2019-06-26 PKE Holding AG Method for controlling an alarm display unit

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5297252A (en) * 1991-05-07 1994-03-22 Don Becker Color graphics terminal for monitoring an alarm system
DE69428816D1 (en) * 1993-03-25 2001-11-29 Nohmi Bosai Ltd Receiving station fire alarm system
JP3445920B2 (en) 1997-05-20 2003-09-16 シャープ株式会社 Medium storing a display screen processing unit and a display screen processing apparatus control program
US6529137B1 (en) * 1999-08-31 2003-03-04 Compass Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for displaying alarm information

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2574999A2 (en) 2011-09-30 2013-04-03 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Management system using function abstraction for output generation
WO2013048427A1 (en) 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Management system with versatile display
US9560482B1 (en) 2015-12-09 2017-01-31 Honeywell International Inc. User or automated selection of enhanced geo-fencing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE60319531T2 (en) 2009-04-02
CN1617077A (en) 2005-05-18
DE60319531D1 (en) 2008-04-17
EP1515289A1 (en) 2005-03-16
AT388461T (en) 2008-03-15
HK1078152A1 (en) 2009-07-03
CN100430866C (en) 2008-11-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5295062A (en) Facility management apparatus having touch responsive display screens
EP0747805B1 (en) Window management
JP2691129B2 (en) Data access method and system in an electronic book
US5247438A (en) Personal time management system and method
US5859639A (en) Mechanism to control visible presence of desktop objects in a graphical user interface
JP4055911B2 (en) Computer system for automatically generating an instance of the task specified by the user
AU622371B2 (en) Method and system for scheduling, monitoring and dynamically managing resources
US5315711A (en) Method and apparatus for remotely and centrally controlling a plurality of host processors
US8321790B2 (en) System management user interface providing user access to status information for process control system equipment including a search function
US7137074B1 (en) System and method for displaying alarm status
US20050102631A1 (en) System and method for displaying status of background worker threads
McFarlane et al. The scope and importance of human interruption in human-computer interaction design
US6100857A (en) Interactive control system having plural displays, and a method thereof
US20100073159A1 (en) Arrangement for the Propagation of Alarm Information in a Building Automation System that Includes One or More Applications that Access Building System Data via a Monitoring and Control System
US4749985A (en) Functional relationship-based alarm processing
US8134457B2 (en) Method and system for spatio-temporal event detection using composite definitions for camera systems
AU720822B2 (en) Analog spectrum display for environmental control
US20070239351A1 (en) System management user interface providing user access to status information for process control system equipment including displayed propagated status in a navigation pane
US7752508B2 (en) Method and system for concurrent error identification in resource scheduling
US5689416A (en) Computer system monitoring apparatus
EP2359232B1 (en) Alarm trend summary display system and method
US20070245169A1 (en) Location Based Diagnostics Method And Apparatus
US6731311B2 (en) Patient monitor with continuous status display
Woods The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management
US6262720B1 (en) Electronic checklist system with checklist inhibiting

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated contracting states:

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent to

Extension state: AL LT LV MK

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20050808

RAP1 Transfer of rights of an ep published application

Owner name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG

AKX Payment of designation fees

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

RIN1 Inventor (correction)

Inventor name: PLATZ, AXEL

Inventor name: COLCERASA, RENATO

Inventor name: SCHNEIDER, KLAUS-PETER, DR.

Inventor name: MAZZIMINI, GIANLUCA

RAP1 Transfer of rights of an ep published application

Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

AK Designated contracting states:

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60319531

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20080417

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080305

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080616

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080305

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080305

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080805

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080305

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080305

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080305

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080305

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20081208

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PCAR

Free format text: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG;INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FREILAGERSTRASSE 40;8047 ZUERICH (CH)

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080305

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080930

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080915

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080915

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080906

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080606

PGFP Postgrant: annual fees paid to national office

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20121210

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Postgrant: annual fees paid to national office

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20130911

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20130924

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Postgrant: annual fees paid to national office

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20131120

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130930

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 60319531

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20140915

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20150529

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150401

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140915

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state announced via postgrant inform. from nat. office to epo

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140930