EP1352375A1 - Method and device for estimating movement parameters of targets - Google Patents
Method and device for estimating movement parameters of targetsInfo
- Publication number
- EP1352375A1 EP1352375A1 EP01991684A EP01991684A EP1352375A1 EP 1352375 A1 EP1352375 A1 EP 1352375A1 EP 01991684 A EP01991684 A EP 01991684A EP 01991684 A EP01991684 A EP 01991684A EP 1352375 A1 EP1352375 A1 EP 1352375A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- target object
- relative
- target
- acceleration
- speed
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
- G08G1/16—Anti-collision systems
- G08G1/161—Decentralised systems, e.g. inter-vehicle communication
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for specifying parameter values which relate to the relative kinematic behavior of an object, in particular a first vehicle, and a target object, in particular a second vehicle, it being possible to use the parameter values to make a statement as to whether the object and the target object is likely to collide.
- the process comprises the following steps:
- the invention further relates to a device for outputting parameter values which determine the relative kinematic see behavior of an object, in particular a first vehicle, and a target object, in particular a second vehicle, wherein a statement can be made based on the parameter values as to whether the object and the target object are likely to collide.
- the device has: a sensor system which is arranged on the object, the sensor system being provided to transmit and receive signals in order to obtain measured values ri, r , ⁇ for the target object distance r and / or for the relative radial speed v r des Detect target object, and means for evaluating the measured values r 1, v r , i detected by the sensor system and for outputting the parameter values.
- sensors are used, for example optical sensors, capacitive sensors, ultrasonic sensors or radar sensors, with which the distance r between the vehicles and / or the relative radial speed v r of the second vehicle are measured within a range to be monitored. It is known from these measurements to determine the radial component of the relative radial acceleration a r of the second vehicle by differentiation of the radial speed.
- the radial speed by evaluating the Doppler frequency or by differentiating the distance.
- the normal components of the distance, the speed and the acceleration, which are perpendicular to the front area of the motor vehicle are calculated from the measured values of several spatially distributed sensors by triangulation.
- several spatially distributed transmitting or receiving units or sensors are required, which causes a high level of hardware expenditure.
- Another problem encountered in the prior art is that even if several sensors are used, only one sensor may receive a signal that can be used for an evaluation. Since the triangulation cannot be carried out in this case, an upcoming collision, for example, cannot be detected.
- step c) of the method according to the invention can be carried out on the basis of the signals received by only one receiver, that is to say that no triangulation is carried out, the hardware expenditure can be reduced and even if only one sensor receives a signal that can be used for a corresponding evaluation , reliable predictions can be made.
- the means carry out the evaluation on the basis of the signals received by only one of the receivers assigned to the sensor system.
- the parameter values preferably relate to one or more of the following parameters: the relative acceleration a of the target object, the relative radial acceleration a r of the target object, the relative speed v of the target object, the relative radial speed v r of the target object , the offset ⁇ y between the object and the target object, the angle ⁇ between the vectors of the relative speed v of the target object and the relative radial speed v r of the target object or between the vectors of the relative acceleration a of the target object and the relative radial acceleration a r of the target object.
- the parameter values for some of these parameters are preferably estimated on the basis of the present measured values, and the parameter values for further parameters are determined on the basis of the estimated parameter values.
- a vector p is preferably provided which contains at least some of the parameters sought, this vector p having the shape
- hv 0 , ⁇ 0 may have. It is provided that a is the relative acceleration of the target object, vo is the relative initial speed of the target object in the first measurement in the first measurement and ⁇ 0 is the angle between the vectors of the relative speed v of the target object and the relative radial speed v r of the target object or the angle between the vectors of the relative acceleration a of the target object and the relative radial acceleration a r of the target object in the first measurement.
- the times ti can, but need not, be equidistant. For example, measured values could also be recorded at equidistant target distances.
- target object distances r ⁇ are measured at different times ti, and that the target object distance r is related to:
- r 0 is the target distance in the first measurement
- o is the relative initial speed of the target in the first measurement in the first measurement
- a is the relative acceleration of the target
- t is time
- ⁇ 0 is the angle between the Vectors of the relative speed v of the target object and the relative radial speed v r des Target object or the angle between the vectors of the relative acceleration a of the target object and the relative radial acceleration a r of the target object in the first measurement.
- the parameter values for the parameters contained in the vector p can be estimated using a standard, as will be explained in more detail later.
- the estimation can also be carried out using the values ti, ri 2 after squaring the given equation.
- the parameters r 0 , v 0 , a, t and ⁇ 0 correspond to the parameters of the first embodiment.
- a third embodiment of the invention provides that target object distances ri and relative radial velocities v r , i are measured at different times ti, and that the relative radial velocity v r of the target object is related via:
- a standard Q (p) is preferably defined as follows in connection with the first embodiment:
- a standard Q (p) is preferably defined as follows in connection with the second embodiment:
- a standard Q (p) is preferably defined as follows in connection with the third embodiment:
- the parameter values for the parameters contained in the vector p are preferably estimated on the basis of the measured values.
- the parameter values for the . Parameters contained in the vector p can be estimated by means of the times ti and the measured values ri for the target object distances and / or the measured values v r .i for the relative radial speed of the target object using an optimization method by determining the minimum of the standard Q (p) ,
- the relative acceleration a of the target object is constant and / or that the acceleration vector a is parallel to the speed vector v. Accordingly, a linear course of the relative speed v of the target object is then assumed.
- the relative acceleration a 0 m / s 2 if the relative speed v is greater than a predetermined limit value and that the relative acceleration a ⁇ 0 m / s2 if the relative speed v is less than is the predetermined limit.
- the offset ⁇ y between the object and the target object can be determined via the relationship
- the instantaneous kel ⁇ (t) between the vectors of the relative speed v of the target object and the relative radial speed v r of the target object or between the vectors of the relative acceleration a of the target object and the relative radial acceleration a r of the target object via the relationship
- the amount of the relative instantaneous radial speed of the target object can also be determined from the estimated parameter values of the parameters contained in the vector p via the relationship
- the point in time ti of a possible collision can be determined from the estimated parameter values of the parameters contained in the vector p via the relationship
- i is the point in time with the smallest target distance at point P.
- the error measure e (p) is intended to provide an error estimate for the estimated parameter values and / or for the parameter values derived from the estimated parameter values.
- the error measure e (p) enables, for example, the definition of threshold values that can be adapted to the respective application. If these threshold values are exceeded or fallen below, for example, the parameter values for individual parameters can then be classified as invalid.
- Figure 1 is a geometric representation of the object and the target object.
- FIG. 1 an object in the form of a first vehicle is provided overall with the reference number 10.
- a sensor system 11 is arranged on the first vehicle 10.
- the normal to the front area of the first motor vehicle 10 is designated by 13.
- a target object in the form of a second vehicle is provided overall with reference number 12.
- FIG. 1 shows the case of a drive past, that is, there is no collision.
- the distance between the first vehicle 10 and the second vehicle 12 is identified by a vector r
- the component normal to the front region of the first vehicle 10 is identified by x.
- An angle ⁇ is included between the vectors r and x.
- the offset between the first vehicle 10 and the second vehicle 12 is ⁇ y, the initial distance between the point P and the second vehicle 12 being identified by the vector z.
- the offset ⁇ y On the basis of the offset ⁇ y, either a drive past or an impending collision can be detected.
- the offset ⁇ y is assumed in the horizontal plane (azimuth). It is advisable to measure with a small opening angle in the vertical direction (elevation). For example, if you want to determine the height of the target object, i.e. the offset in the vertical direction, a small opening angle in the azimuth is suitable.
- the measurement of the offset is also in a plane inclined to the horizontal or vertical plane with a correspondingly flat antenna. possible diagram. If you measure the offset in two orthogonal planes (e.g. elevation and azimuth), the target coordinates in the monitored space are clearly determined with the target object distance r.
- FIG. 2 The initial position of the first vehicle 10 and the second vehicle 12 corresponds to that of FIG. 1.
- the vector arrows show the kinematic behavior of the second vehicle 12.
- both the first vehicle 10 and the second generally move Vehicle 12 or the target object is not formed by a second vehicle but by a fixed target object. Therefore, as in the preceding, we speak of relative quantities.
- the vectors v r and a r indicate the relative radial speed and the relative radial acceleration of the second vehicle 12.
- the vectors v and a indicate the relative speed and the relative acceleration of the second vehicle 12, an angle ⁇ being included between the vectors v r and v or a r and a.
- the tangential components of the relative radial speed v r or the relative radial acceleration a r of the second vehicle, which are perpendicular to the radial components, are indicated by v t or a t , the point P being defined by the vectors v t and a t or v and a becomes.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10100413 | 2001-01-08 | ||
DE10100413A DE10100413A1 (en) | 2001-01-08 | 2001-01-08 | Method and device for estimating movement parameters of targets |
PCT/DE2001/004912 WO2002054369A1 (en) | 2001-01-08 | 2001-12-22 | Method and device for estimating movement parameters of targets |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1352375A1 true EP1352375A1 (en) | 2003-10-15 |
EP1352375B1 EP1352375B1 (en) | 2005-08-24 |
Family
ID=7669893
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP01991684A Expired - Lifetime EP1352375B1 (en) | 2001-01-08 | 2001-12-22 | Method and device for estimating movement parameters of targets |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6785631B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1352375B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4044844B2 (en) |
DE (2) | DE10100413A1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2248411T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002054369A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102007047716A1 (en) * | 2007-10-05 | 2009-04-09 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Sensor device for capacitive distance determination |
DE102007058242A1 (en) * | 2007-12-04 | 2009-06-10 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method for measuring transverse movements in a driver assistance system |
CA2910296A1 (en) * | 2014-12-12 | 2016-06-12 | Atlantic Inertial Systems Limited (HSC) | Collision detection system |
DE102017204495A1 (en) * | 2017-03-17 | 2018-09-20 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method and device for determining transverse relative velocity components of radar targets |
DE102017204496A1 (en) * | 2017-03-17 | 2018-09-20 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method and radar device for determining radial relative acceleration of at least one target |
US20190187267A1 (en) * | 2017-12-20 | 2019-06-20 | Nxp B.V. | True velocity vector estimation |
DE102018211240A1 (en) * | 2018-07-07 | 2020-01-09 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method for classifying an object's relevance |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5983161A (en) * | 1993-08-11 | 1999-11-09 | Lemelson; Jerome H. | GPS vehicle collision avoidance warning and control system and method |
JP3186401B2 (en) * | 1994-02-10 | 2001-07-11 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Vehicle distance data processing device |
JPH08124100A (en) | 1994-10-28 | 1996-05-17 | Nikon Corp | Monitoring device for distance between vehicles |
US6014601A (en) * | 1997-01-07 | 2000-01-11 | J. Martin Gustafson | Driver alert system |
DE19749086C1 (en) * | 1997-11-06 | 1999-08-12 | Daimler Chrysler Ag | Device for determining data indicating the course of the lane |
JP3381778B2 (en) * | 1998-08-05 | 2003-03-04 | 三菱自動車工業株式会社 | Vehicle running control method |
DE19910590A1 (en) * | 1999-03-10 | 2000-09-14 | Volkswagen Ag | Distance control method and device for a vehicle |
-
2001
- 2001-01-08 DE DE10100413A patent/DE10100413A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2001-12-22 ES ES01991684T patent/ES2248411T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-12-22 DE DE50107229T patent/DE50107229D1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2001-12-22 US US10/221,082 patent/US6785631B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2001-12-22 WO PCT/DE2001/004912 patent/WO2002054369A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2001-12-22 JP JP2002555392A patent/JP4044844B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2001-12-22 EP EP01991684A patent/EP1352375B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO02054369A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE50107229D1 (en) | 2005-09-29 |
JP4044844B2 (en) | 2008-02-06 |
ES2248411T3 (en) | 2006-03-16 |
JP2004517420A (en) | 2004-06-10 |
EP1352375B1 (en) | 2005-08-24 |
DE10100413A1 (en) | 2002-07-11 |
US6785631B2 (en) | 2004-08-31 |
US20030163280A1 (en) | 2003-08-28 |
WO2002054369A1 (en) | 2002-07-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3175256B1 (en) | Method for classifying an object in an area surrounding a motor vehicle, driver assistance system and motor vehicle | |
DE102009053283B4 (en) | Method and device for recognizing a parking space | |
DE102015006931B4 (en) | Parking zone detection device and control method thereof | |
EP2401630B1 (en) | Method for detecting icing at an angle-resolving radar sensor in a driver assistance system for motor vehicles | |
DE102013104443A1 (en) | Traffic monitoring system for speed measurement and assignment of moving vehicles in a multi-target recording module | |
WO2008128814A1 (en) | Driver assistance system and method for determining the plausibility of objects | |
DE102004032118B4 (en) | Object recognition method for vehicles | |
DE102018104243B3 (en) | Method and system for detecting parking spaces suitable for a vehicle | |
EP3740784B1 (en) | Method and device for detecting critical transverse movements | |
DE102018200688B4 (en) | Method and device for operating an acoustic sensor | |
DE102015200939A1 (en) | Method and system for detecting objects in the vicinity of a vehicle | |
DE102016225590A1 (en) | Radar device and sensor fusion system using these | |
EP1913565B1 (en) | Sensor device | |
DE102014209723A1 (en) | Determination of an indicator of blindness of a radar sensor | |
EP1352375A1 (en) | Method and device for estimating movement parameters of targets | |
DE102018221448A1 (en) | Procedure for determining visibility | |
DE102007037178B4 (en) | Method and system for evaluating at least one environment sensor of a vehicle for recognizing at least one object | |
EP3299844A1 (en) | Operating method for an ultrasonic sensor system, control device, ultrasonic sensor system and vehicle | |
DE10160299A1 (en) | Method and system for detecting at least one object | |
DE102017202964A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for providing ultrasound signal information | |
WO2017108237A1 (en) | Method for adapting an echo threshold value curve for an ultrasonic sensor in a motor vehicle | |
DE102020215424A1 (en) | Method for determining an airspeed estimate and an angle estimate of targets | |
DE102007008853A1 (en) | Illusion field detecting method for e.g. global positioning system receiver, involves providing reference periodic information, and comparing reference periodic information with periodic information contained in navigation signals | |
DE10238896B4 (en) | Method for evaluating radar data | |
EP3658953A1 (en) | Device and method for detecting the height of an object |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20030808 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20040305 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT SE |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT SE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 50107229 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20050929 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20051212 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2248411 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20060526 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20071220 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20071220 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20071220 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20071220 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20080226 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20071214 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed | ||
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20081222 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20090831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090701 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081222 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20081223 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081231 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081223 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081223 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081222 |