EP1349906A1 - Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts - Google Patents

Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts

Info

Publication number
EP1349906A1
EP1349906A1 EP01994230A EP01994230A EP1349906A1 EP 1349906 A1 EP1349906 A1 EP 1349906A1 EP 01994230 A EP01994230 A EP 01994230A EP 01994230 A EP01994230 A EP 01994230A EP 1349906 A1 EP1349906 A1 EP 1349906A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
catalyst
slurry
group viii
supported
metals
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP01994230A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Zhiguo Hou
Roby Bearden, Jr.
Kenneth L. Riley
Craig Y. Sabottke
David T. Ferrughelli
Martin L. Gorbaty
William N. Olmstead
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ExxonMobil Technology and Engineering Co
Original Assignee
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co filed Critical ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Co
Publication of EP1349906A1 publication Critical patent/EP1349906A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G47/00Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions
    • C10G47/02Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G47/10Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions characterised by the catalyst used with catalysts deposited on a carrier
    • C10G47/12Inorganic carriers

Definitions

  • An embodiment of the instant invention is directed to an integrated slurry hydroprocessing process.
  • SHP Slurry hydroprocessing
  • U.S. 3,622,495 and U.S. 3,622,498 describe a slurry process for effecting the hydroconversion of a hydrocarbonaceous charge stock cont- ⁇ iing sulfiirous compounds.
  • the process utilizes finely divided catalyst selected from the metals of Group V-B, VI-B or VIII of the periodic table.
  • Preferred metallic components are vanadium, chromium, iron, cobalt, nickel, niobium, molybdenum, tantalum, and/or tungsten.
  • the Group VIII noble metals are not generally considered for use.
  • the catalyst may be combined with a refractory inorganic oxide carrier, but the process is said to be facilitated when the sulfide of the metal is unsupported.
  • U.S. 4,525,267 is directed to a process for hydrocracking hydrocarbons for residuum conversion. At least part of the catalyst utilized in the hydrocracking is extracted from the reaction zone and subjected to a hydrotreatment regeneration followed by recycle back to the hydrocracking step. The process is said to reduce coke production to a considerable degree. While conventional slurry hydroprocessing has met with varying degrees of commercial success, there still remains a need in the art for processes and slurry catalysts that result in improved yields and selectivity.
  • slurry hydroprocessing a hydrocarbon feedstock, at slurry hydroprocessing conditions, in the presence of a hydrogen cont-tining treat gas and in the presence of a supported metallic catalyst comprising a supported sulfide of at least one Group VIII non-noble metal and at least one metal selected from the group consisting of non-noble Group VIII metals, Group VIB metals and mixtures thereof wherein said support is an inorganic refractory oxide carbon or mixtures thereof and wherein said catalyst has an average diameter of about 0.5 to about 100 microns to obtain a first product stream comprising said catalyst and a hydroprocessed feedstream;
  • SHP slurry hydroprocessing
  • FIG. 1 depicts one possible flow scheme for the instant invention.
  • Feed and slurry catalyst enter the hydroprocessing reactor along with hydrogen.
  • the reactor effluent is then passed to a separator zone that may comprises a cross-flow filtration chamber, as shown here, or other separation means, where the effluent is separated into a catalyst-free stream and a catalyst- containing stream.
  • the catalyst containing stream after withdrawal of a purge stream to control solids concentration in the reactor liquid, is recycled to the hydroprocessing reactor along with fresh feed.
  • the catalyst free stream is then separated into gaseous and liquid products.
  • the gaseous products include hydrogen which can then be recycled to the slurry hydroprocessing reactor.
  • Figure 2 depicts another possible flow scheme where volatiles are removed before the separation of the first product into a catalyst-free and catalyst-containing stream.
  • Figure 3 depicts another possible embodiment where the volatiles are removed from the first product stream during separation into a catalyst free and catalyst containing stream.
  • the effluent from the slurry hydroprocessing reactor can be passed through a cooler (not shown) and introduced into a gas- liquid separator or disengaging means where the hydrogen gas, along with ammonia and hydrogen sulfide by-products from the hydroprocessing reactions, may be separated from the liquid effluent and recycled back for reuse in the hydrogen stream.
  • the recycled gas is usually passed through a scrubber (not shown) to remove hydrogen sulfide and ammonia.
  • An aspect of the instant invention provides an integrated slurry hydroprocessing process which provides a more effective and efficient process by improving separation of product from the slurry.
  • the process may also include separating said catalyst-free product stream into gaseous and liquid hydrocarbon components prior to said step (c).
  • feedstocks which will typically contain both nitrogen and sulfur, include whole and reduced petroleum crudes, atmospheric and vacuum residua, asphaltenes, deasphalted oils, cycle oils, FCC tower bottoms, gas oils, including atmospheric and vacuum gas oils and coker gas oils, light to heavy distillates including raw virgin distillates, hydrocrackates, hydrotreated oils, dewaxed oils, slack waxes, Fischer-Tropsch waxes, raffinates, naphthas, and mixtures thereof.
  • the heavy feeds which may be treated in accordance with the teachings herein are heavy feeds, defined as feeds having an API gravity of ⁇ 10-15° with a viscosity of > 60 centistokes at 60 C, including heavy crude oils and vacuum resids.
  • the light feeds which can be processed herein include feeds such as kerosene, home heating oil, straight run atmospheric gas oils, straight run vacuum gas oils etc. and mixtures thereof. Typically, such feeds will have a o boiling point in the range of about 60 to about 1050 F (about 16 to about 566 ° C).
  • a feedstream and slurry hydroprocessing (SHP) catalyst along with hydrogen are fed to a reactor, which includes an external pump-around line and crossflow filter chamber.
  • the crossflow filter chamber which operates at reactor pressure and temperature, consists of a vapor zone and liquid zone. Hydrogen and gaseous products are removed from the vapor zone to a downstream separator. Upgraded catalyst-free liquid is withdrawn through the crossflow filter, and the resultant catalyst-containing liquid is recycled to the reactor, after removal of a suitable purge stream to control solids level in the reactor.
  • the recycle stream can be fed directly to the reactor or premixed with the fresh feed stream. Additionally, fresh catalyst may be used in combination with the recycled catalyst.
  • Catalysts which may be utilized in the invention are supported catalysts.
  • the supports may comprise inorganic refractory oxides such as silica, alumina and mixtures thereof, carbon and mixtures of carbon and inorganic refractory oxides.
  • the catalyst will preferably comprise sulfides of molybdenum, nickel, tungsten, cobalt, or mixtures thereof.
  • the catalyst will have an average diameter ranging from about 0.5 to about 100 microns and can be prepared directly from pre-sized inorganic oxide materials or obtained by reducing the size of commercially available hydrotreating catalysts.
  • the catalysts will be prepared ex-situ by crushing commercially available catalysts and catalyst supports to obtain the desired catalyst diameter. It is believed that the selection and control of the particle size distribution of the catalyst enhances solid-liquid separation and significantly improves the hydrodesulfurization process.
  • the ex-situ preparation provides flexibility to control the particle hardness and attrition resistance, intrinsic catalyst activity and other catalyst properties important to the process performance and physical separation.
  • An example of a useable catalyst is a supported sulfided material prepared from a precursor represented by the formula: (X)b(Y) c where X is a Group VIII non-noble metal and Y is a Group VIII non noble metal or a Vlb metal.
  • the molar ratio described as the ratio of b:c is 0.1/1 to 3/1, preferably 0.25/1 to 2/1, more preferably 0.35/1 to 1/1, and most preferably 0.4/1 to 0.7/1.
  • Another useable sulfided catalyst comprises at least three metals wherein at least one of said metals is a Group VIII non-noble metal and at least one of said metals is a Group VIB metals where the ratio of Group VIB metal to Group VIII non-noble metal is from about 10:1 to about 1:10, supported on an inorganic oxide.
  • the Group VIII non-noble metal is selected from Ni and Co.
  • the Group VIII metal is Ni
  • the molar ratio of b to (c+d) is 0.25/1 to 2.0/1 and the molar ratio of c to d is 1/10 to 10/1.
  • Desired catalysts that are used to process heavy feeds have median pore diameters between 10.0 and 35.0 nm. For distillate boiling range feeds, preferred median pore diameters are between 12.0 and 20.0 nm; and most preferred median pore diameters are between 14.0 and 18.0 nm. For heavy feeds, preferred median pore diameters are > 30 nm. These median pore diameters are typically determined by Hg porosimetry.
  • Process conditions in the hydroprocessing reactor will depend on such things as the particular feed being treated. Such conditions are readily adjustable by the skilled artisan within the ranges herein taught.
  • General process o o conditions for SHP include temperatures of about 500 to about 900 F (about 260 to about 482 ° C), preferably about 650 to about 850 ° F (about 385 to about 454 ° C) and most preferably about 725 to about 850 ° F (about 343 to about 454 ° C) and pressures from about 300 to about 2500 psig (about 2170 to about 17,339 kPa), preferably about 500 to about 2500 psig (3,549 to about 17,339 kPa) and most preferably about 800 to about 1000 psig (about 5,617 kPa to about 6996 kPa).
  • the hydrogen treat gas rate is suitably about 200 to 2000 SCF/B (standard cubic feet per barrel) (36 to 360 m 3 /m 3 ), preferably about 500 to 1500 SCF/B (90 to 270 m 3 /m 3 ).
  • the residence time is suitably from about 0.5 to 4 hours and preferably about 1 to 2 hours.
  • Catalyst concentration on feed will range from about 1 wt% to 30 wt%, preferably about 5 to about 20 wt%.
  • the hydroprocessing of the present invention can be practiced in one or more reaction zones and can be practiced in either countercurrent flow or cocurrent flow mode.
  • countercurrent flow mode we mean a process mode wherein the feedstream flows countercurrent to the flow of hydrogen-containing treat gas.
  • the slurry hydroprocessing process of the present invention can be practiced by introducing a given feedstock into a slurry hydroprocessing reactor. Before being passed to the hydroprocessing reactor, the feed may be mixed with a hydrogen containing gas stream and heated to a reaction temperature in a furnace or preheater. Alternatively, the hydrogen gas can be introduced directly into the hydroprocessing reactor.
  • the reactor contains the slurried catalyst as previously described. Recycle of the reactor effluent via a pump is optional to provide mixing within the reactor zone.
  • the catalyst/solids separation from the product oil is accomplished by a cross-flow filtering step integrated with a pump around loop in the slurry reactor.
  • a cross-flow filtering step integrated with a pump around loop in the slurry reactor.
  • turbulent cross-flow filtration zone there is minimal build-up of filter cake, which minimizes problems associated with filter binding.
  • Other established separation steps such as gravity settling, centrifugation and other commonly known techniques may also be employed in combination with cross-flow filtration to enhance the process performance.
  • the most efficient process will employ a catalyst particle size and functionality that has been selected for the reactor conversion objectives and the cross-flow filtering system.
  • catalyst particle diameters on the order of 0.5 to 25 microns in size will be utilized.
  • the performance of the cross- flow filtering step may be enhanced by the use of filter media aids. These filter media aids can be specially sized particles in the size range of about 5 to 200 microns that are used to pre-coat the filter media surface to enhance filter performance. Filter design can either be a back-flushed or continuously purged configuration.
  • the cross-flow filtration step can be either close coupled to the reactor in an external pump around loop or integrated into the reactor design as a section of the reactor in combination with a pump around zone (not shown in the figures).
  • the separation step is typically carried out under conditions which maximize separation to produce a recyclable active catalyst product having a maximum concentration which can be pumped or conveyed to the feed. This is typically in the range of from about 5 weight percent ("wt. %") to about 75 wt. %, preferably in the range of from about 10 wt. % to about 50 wt. %, and even more preferably in the range of from about 15 wt. % to about 35 wt. %. Except for cross-flow filtration, the separation step may comprise the use of centrifuges, cyclones, filters or even settling and draw-off.
  • a supported slurry catalyst was prepared by reducing the size of commercially available NiMo catalyst (Catalyst A).
  • a typical hydroprocessing experiment involved charging an autoclave with 100 g of resid (ALVR, Brent VR), and appropriate amount of catalyst chosen on the basis of wt% metal on feed.
  • the mixture was stirred at 1500 RPM at 775°F (413 ° C) under 1000 psig (6996 kPa) of hydrogen pressure for 2 hours. Hydrogen was flowed through during the test to maintain an effective hydrogen partial pressure of about 900 psig (6307 kPa).
  • the autoclave was then cooled to 300°F (149 ° C) and vented, and the liquid containing the catalyst was discharged.
  • the product was separated by filtration through a two- layer of filter composed of one sheet of #2 and one sheet of #3 Whatman filter papers. The solid was washed with toluene and dried under vacuum over night.
  • the product oil was analyzed for metals, sulfur and Microcarbon Residue (MCR).

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Abstract

A slurry hydroprocessing process (SHP) where a hydrocarbon feedstock is treated at slurry hydrotreating conditions, in the presence of a hydrogen containing treat gas and in the presence of a supported metallic catalyst which is a supported sulfide of a metal selected from the group of non-noble Group VIII metals, Group VIB metals and mixtures thereof where the support is an inorganic oxide and where the catalyst has an average diameter of about 0.5 to about 100 microns to obtain a first product stream comprising the catalyst and a hydroprocessed feedstream; separating the first product into a catalyst-free product stream and a catalyst-containing stream and recycling at least a portion of the catalyst-containing stream back to the hydroprocessing step.

Description

SLURRY HYDROPROCESSING FOR HEAVY OIL UPGRADING USING SUPPORTED SLURRY CATALYSTS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
An embodiment of the instant invention is directed to an integrated slurry hydroprocessing process.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Slurry hydroprocessing (SHP) is a technology capable of providing a low cost means for upgrading heavy crudes. Numerous patents exist that teach the use of hydroprocessing to obtain upgraded products from heavy crudes.
U.S. 3,622,495 and U.S. 3,622,498 describe a slurry process for effecting the hydroconversion of a hydrocarbonaceous charge stock cont-ώiing sulfiirous compounds. The process utilizes finely divided catalyst selected from the metals of Group V-B, VI-B or VIII of the periodic table. Preferred metallic components are vanadium, chromium, iron, cobalt, nickel, niobium, molybdenum, tantalum, and/or tungsten. The Group VIII noble metals are not generally considered for use. The catalyst may be combined with a refractory inorganic oxide carrier, but the process is said to be facilitated when the sulfide of the metal is unsupported.
U.S. 4,525,267 is directed to a process for hydrocracking hydrocarbons for residuum conversion. At least part of the catalyst utilized in the hydrocracking is extracted from the reaction zone and subjected to a hydrotreatment regeneration followed by recycle back to the hydrocracking step. The process is said to reduce coke production to a considerable degree. While conventional slurry hydroprocessing has met with varying degrees of commercial success, there still remains a need in the art for processes and slurry catalysts that result in improved yields and selectivity.
As the supply of low sulfur, low nitrogen crudes decrease, refineries are processing crudes with greater sulfur and nitrogen contents at the same time that environmental regulations are mandating lower levels of these heteroatoms in products. Consequently, a need exists for increasingly efficient desulfurization and denitrogenation catalysts.
What is needed in the art is an improved process and catalysts which upgrade heavy feeds economically and effectively.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An embodiment of the instant invention is directed to a process comprising the steps of:
(a) slurry hydroprocessing (SHP) a hydrocarbon feedstock, at slurry hydroprocessing conditions, in the presence of a hydrogen cont-tining treat gas and in the presence of a supported metallic catalyst comprising a supported sulfide of at least one Group VIII non-noble metal and at least one metal selected from the group consisting of non-noble Group VIII metals, Group VIB metals and mixtures thereof wherein said support is an inorganic refractory oxide carbon or mixtures thereof and wherein said catalyst has an average diameter of about 0.5 to about 100 microns to obtain a first product stream comprising said catalyst and a hydroprocessed feedstream;
(b) separating said first product into a catalyst-free product stream and a catalyst-containing stream
(c) recycling at least a portion of the catalyst-containing stream to said hydroprocessing step (a).
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
Figure 1 depicts one possible flow scheme for the instant invention. Feed and slurry catalyst enter the hydroprocessing reactor along with hydrogen. The reactor effluent is then passed to a separator zone that may comprises a cross-flow filtration chamber, as shown here, or other separation means, where the effluent is separated into a catalyst-free stream and a catalyst- containing stream. The catalyst containing stream, after withdrawal of a purge stream to control solids concentration in the reactor liquid, is recycled to the hydroprocessing reactor along with fresh feed. The catalyst free stream is then separated into gaseous and liquid products. The gaseous products include hydrogen which can then be recycled to the slurry hydroprocessing reactor.
Figure 2 depicts another possible flow scheme where volatiles are removed before the separation of the first product into a catalyst-free and catalyst-containing stream. Figure 3 depicts another possible embodiment where the volatiles are removed from the first product stream during separation into a catalyst free and catalyst containing stream. The effluent from the slurry hydroprocessing reactor can be passed through a cooler (not shown) and introduced into a gas- liquid separator or disengaging means where the hydrogen gas, along with ammonia and hydrogen sulfide by-products from the hydroprocessing reactions, may be separated from the liquid effluent and recycled back for reuse in the hydrogen stream. The recycled gas is usually passed through a scrubber (not shown) to remove hydrogen sulfide and ammonia. This is usually recommended because of the inhibiting effect of such gases on the kinetics of hydrotreating and also to reduce corrosion in the recycle circuit. Fresh make-up hydrogen can be introduced into the recycle circuit. The gas-free liquid from the gas-liquid separator then enters a solids separator, or a filter, vacuum flash, centrifuge or the like, in order to divide the hydrotreating reactor effluent into a catalyst- containing stream and a product stream
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
An aspect of the instant invention provides an integrated slurry hydroprocessing process which provides a more effective and efficient process by improving separation of product from the slurry.
The process may also include separating said catalyst-free product stream into gaseous and liquid hydrocarbon components prior to said step (c).
A wide range of petroleum and chemical hydrocarbon feedstocks can be hydroprocessed in accordance with the present invention. Suitable feedstocks, which will typically contain both nitrogen and sulfur, include whole and reduced petroleum crudes, atmospheric and vacuum residua, asphaltenes, deasphalted oils, cycle oils, FCC tower bottoms, gas oils, including atmospheric and vacuum gas oils and coker gas oils, light to heavy distillates including raw virgin distillates, hydrocrackates, hydrotreated oils, dewaxed oils, slack waxes, Fischer-Tropsch waxes, raffinates, naphthas, and mixtures thereof.
The heavy feeds which may be treated in accordance with the teachings herein are heavy feeds, defined as feeds having an API gravity of < 10-15° with a viscosity of > 60 centistokes at 60 C, including heavy crude oils and vacuum resids.
The light feeds which can be processed herein include feeds such as kerosene, home heating oil, straight run atmospheric gas oils, straight run vacuum gas oils etc. and mixtures thereof. Typically, such feeds will have a o boiling point in the range of about 60 to about 1050 F (about 16 to about 566 °C).
In an embodiment of the instant invention (illustrated in Figure 2, a feedstream and slurry hydroprocessing (SHP) catalyst, along with hydrogen are fed to a reactor, which includes an external pump-around line and crossflow filter chamber. The crossflow filter chamber, which operates at reactor pressure and temperature, consists of a vapor zone and liquid zone. Hydrogen and gaseous products are removed from the vapor zone to a downstream separator. Upgraded catalyst-free liquid is withdrawn through the crossflow filter, and the resultant catalyst-containing liquid is recycled to the reactor, after removal of a suitable purge stream to control solids level in the reactor. The recycle stream can be fed directly to the reactor or premixed with the fresh feed stream. Additionally, fresh catalyst may be used in combination with the recycled catalyst.
Catalysts which may be utilized in the invention are supported catalysts. The supports may comprise inorganic refractory oxides such as silica, alumina and mixtures thereof, carbon and mixtures of carbon and inorganic refractory oxides. The catalyst will preferably comprise sulfides of molybdenum, nickel, tungsten, cobalt, or mixtures thereof. The catalyst will have an average diameter ranging from about 0.5 to about 100 microns and can be prepared directly from pre-sized inorganic oxide materials or obtained by reducing the size of commercially available hydrotreating catalysts.
Preferably, the catalysts will be prepared ex-situ by crushing commercially available catalysts and catalyst supports to obtain the desired catalyst diameter. It is believed that the selection and control of the particle size distribution of the catalyst enhances solid-liquid separation and significantly improves the hydrodesulfurization process. The ex-situ preparation provides flexibility to control the particle hardness and attrition resistance, intrinsic catalyst activity and other catalyst properties important to the process performance and physical separation.
An example of a useable catalyst is a supported sulfided material prepared from a precursor represented by the formula: (X)b(Y)c where X is a Group VIII non-noble metal and Y is a Group VIII non noble metal or a Vlb metal. The molar ratio described as the ratio of b:c is 0.1/1 to 3/1, preferably 0.25/1 to 2/1, more preferably 0.35/1 to 1/1, and most preferably 0.4/1 to 0.7/1. Another useable sulfided catalyst comprises at least three metals wherein at least one of said metals is a Group VIII non-noble metal and at least one of said metals is a Group VIB metals where the ratio of Group VIB metal to Group VIII non-noble metal is from about 10:1 to about 1:10, supported on an inorganic oxide.
In yet another preferred embodiment the supported sulfided metallic catalyst has a precursor represented by the formula: (X)b(Mo)c(W)dOz; wherein X is a non-noble Group VIII metal, and the molar ratio of b to (c+d) is 0.1/1 to 3/1; the molar ratio of c to d is > 0.01/1; and z = [2b + 6(c+d)]2.
In another preferred embodiment of the present invention the Group VIII non-noble metal is selected from Ni and Co.
In still another preferred embodiment of the present invention the Group VIII metal is Ni, and the X-ray diffraction pattern of the catalyst is essentially amorphous with crystalline peaks at d = 2.53 Angstroms and d = 1.70 Angstroms.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention the molar ratio of b to (c+d) is 0.25/1 to 2.0/1 and the molar ratio of c to d is 1/10 to 10/1.
Desired catalysts that are used to process heavy feeds have median pore diameters between 10.0 and 35.0 nm. For distillate boiling range feeds, preferred median pore diameters are between 12.0 and 20.0 nm; and most preferred median pore diameters are between 14.0 and 18.0 nm. For heavy feeds, preferred median pore diameters are > 30 nm. These median pore diameters are typically determined by Hg porosimetry.
The process conditions in the hydroprocessing reactor will depend on such things as the particular feed being treated. Such conditions are readily adjustable by the skilled artisan within the ranges herein taught. General process o o conditions for SHP include temperatures of about 500 to about 900 F (about 260 to about 482 °C), preferably about 650 to about 850°F (about 385 to about 454°C) and most preferably about 725 to about 850 °F (about 343 to about 454 °C) and pressures from about 300 to about 2500 psig (about 2170 to about 17,339 kPa), preferably about 500 to about 2500 psig (3,549 to about 17,339 kPa) and most preferably about 800 to about 1000 psig (about 5,617 kPa to about 6996 kPa). The hydrogen treat gas rate is suitably about 200 to 2000 SCF/B (standard cubic feet per barrel) (36 to 360 m3/m3), preferably about 500 to 1500 SCF/B (90 to 270 m3/m3). The residence time is suitably from about 0.5 to 4 hours and preferably about 1 to 2 hours. For heavy feeds, it is preferable to attain about 1025 + °F to 1025 - °F (552 + °C to 552 - °C) conversion of at least about 30%, preferably about 40%, and most preferably from about 50 to 60%. Catalyst concentration on feed will range from about 1 wt% to 30 wt%, preferably about 5 to about 20 wt%.
It is to be understood that the hydroprocessing of the present invention can be practiced in one or more reaction zones and can be practiced in either countercurrent flow or cocurrent flow mode. By countercurrent flow mode we mean a process mode wherein the feedstream flows countercurrent to the flow of hydrogen-containing treat gas. The slurry hydroprocessing process of the present invention can be practiced by introducing a given feedstock into a slurry hydroprocessing reactor. Before being passed to the hydroprocessing reactor, the feed may be mixed with a hydrogen containing gas stream and heated to a reaction temperature in a furnace or preheater. Alternatively, the hydrogen gas can be introduced directly into the hydroprocessing reactor. The reactor contains the slurried catalyst as previously described. Recycle of the reactor effluent via a pump is optional to provide mixing within the reactor zone.
In the preferred embodiment, the catalyst/solids separation from the product oil is accomplished by a cross-flow filtering step integrated with a pump around loop in the slurry reactor. In the turbulent cross-flow filtration zone there is minimal build-up of filter cake, which minimizes problems associated with filter binding. Other established separation steps such as gravity settling, centrifugation and other commonly known techniques may also be employed in combination with cross-flow filtration to enhance the process performance.
The most efficient process will employ a catalyst particle size and functionality that has been selected for the reactor conversion objectives and the cross-flow filtering system. The skilled artisan can readily select such parameters. In the most preferred embodiment, catalyst particle diameters on the order of 0.5 to 25 microns in size will be utilized. The performance of the cross- flow filtering step may be enhanced by the use of filter media aids. These filter media aids can be specially sized particles in the size range of about 5 to 200 microns that are used to pre-coat the filter media surface to enhance filter performance. Filter design can either be a back-flushed or continuously purged configuration.
The cross-flow filtration step can be either close coupled to the reactor in an external pump around loop or integrated into the reactor design as a section of the reactor in combination with a pump around zone (not shown in the figures).
In most slurry hydroprocessing operations it is desirable to separate substantially all of the catalyst from the liquid hydrocarbon product. Thus, the separation step is typically carried out under conditions which maximize separation to produce a recyclable active catalyst product having a maximum concentration which can be pumped or conveyed to the feed. This is typically in the range of from about 5 weight percent ("wt. %") to about 75 wt. %, preferably in the range of from about 10 wt. % to about 50 wt. %, and even more preferably in the range of from about 15 wt. % to about 35 wt. %. Except for cross-flow filtration, the separation step may comprise the use of centrifuges, cyclones, filters or even settling and draw-off.
The following examples are meant to be illustrative and not limiting.
Example 1
A supported slurry catalyst was prepared by reducing the size of commercially available NiMo catalyst (Catalyst A). A sample of Catalyst A was wet-ball milled overnight and dried at 100 -110°C for 3-4 hours. After calcining at 400°C for 3 hours, a fine powdered catalyst sample was obtained with measured average particle size at 3.6 microns. Prior to hydrotreating tests, it was pre-treated with hydrogen and hydrogen sulfide under 1000 psig (6996 kPa) of total pressure (H22S = 90/10, v/v) at 725°F (385 °C) for 60 minutes both to sulfide and to activate the catalyst. Table 1 provides additional physical properties of this catalyst.
Table 1. Physical Properties of Pre-treated Slurry Catalyst A
Physical Properties of Slurrv Catalvst A
Mo, wt% 5.9
Ni, wt% 1.73
Surface Area, m2/g 121
Pore Volume, cc/g 0.41
Median Particle Size, μm 3.6
Example 2
A typical hydroprocessing experiment involved charging an autoclave with 100 g of resid (ALVR, Brent VR), and appropriate amount of catalyst chosen on the basis of wt% metal on feed. The mixture was stirred at 1500 RPM at 775°F (413 °C) under 1000 psig (6996 kPa) of hydrogen pressure for 2 hours. Hydrogen was flowed through during the test to maintain an effective hydrogen partial pressure of about 900 psig (6307 kPa). The autoclave was then cooled to 300°F (149 ° C) and vented, and the liquid containing the catalyst was discharged. The product was separated by filtration through a two- layer of filter composed of one sheet of #2 and one sheet of #3 Whatman filter papers. The solid was washed with toluene and dried under vacuum over night. The product oil was analyzed for metals, sulfur and Microcarbon Residue (MCR).
Table 2. Mild Slurry hydroprocessing tests of supported slurry Catalyst A. Conditions 775°F (413 °C), 1000 psig H2 (6996 kPa), 2 hours. The catalyst was charged at 12 wt% on feed equivalent to 0.5 wt% Mo on feed.
Table 3. Limited Catalyst Recycle Tests of the Supported Slurry Catalyst A on ALVR. Conditions: 775°F (413 ° C), 1000 psig (6996 kPa) H2, 2 hours, the catalyst was charged at 12 wt% on feed for the first cycle, equivalent to 0.6 wt% Mo on feed.
ALVR Slurry Hvdroprocessin
Total Liquid Product Feed Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3
Quality
Ni, PPM 27.1 14.5 20.5 21.6
V, PPM 95.7 18.6 23.9 25.3
S, wt% 4.18 1.44 1.64 1.70
CCR, wt% 24.3 13.5 14.5 14.8 In summary, it has been demonstrated that the supported slurry catalysts could be utilized to improve the quality of feeds. In the case of the slurry Catalyst A (Table 2), better upgrading results were achieved for both Brent VR and ALRV, and HDS was particularly higher due to Ni components of the catalyst The recycle test, though not under optimum conditions, indicated that the supported slurry catalyst could provide reasonable recycle activity maintenance (Table 3). In addition, since the supported slurry catalysts are made ex-situ, their particle size can be better controlled and the size distribution can be made particularly narrow, thus providing for better solid-liquid separation relative to soft, small particle catalysts.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A process comprising the steps of:
(a) slurry hydroprocessing (SHP) a hydrocarbon feedstock, at slurry hydroprocessing conditions, in the presence of a hydrogen containing treat gas and in the presence of a supported metallic catalyst comprising a supported sulfide of at least one Group VIII non-noble metal and at least one metal selected from the group consisting of non-noble Group VIII metals, Group VIB metals and mixtures thereof wherein said support is an inorganic refractory oxide, carbon and mixtures thereof, and wherein said catalyst has an average diameter of about 0.5 to about 100 microns to obtain a first product stream comprising said catalyst and a hydroprocessed feedstream;
(b) separating said first product into a catalyst-free product stream and a catalyst-containing stream;
(c) recycling at least a portion of the catalyst-containing stream to said hydroprocessing step (a).
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said hydrocarbon feedstock is selected from the group consisting of heavy feeds, distillates, asphaltenes, deasphalted oils, cycle oils, FCC tower bottoms, gas oils, hydrocrackates, dewaxed oil, slack waxes, Fischer Tropsch waxes, raffinates, naphthas, hydrotreated oils and mixtures thereof.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst is selected from a supported sulfided metallic catalyst wherein said metal is selected from molybdenum, nickel, tungsten, cobalt and mixtures thereof.
4. The process of claim 1 wherein said inorganic refractory oxide catalyst support is selected from alumina, silica and mixtures thereof.
5. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst is a supported sulfided material prepared from a precursor represented by the formula (X)b(Y)c where X is a Group VIII non-noble metal and Y is a Group VIII non-noble metal or a Vlb metal and the molar ratio of b to c is 0.1/1 to 3/1.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst comprises at least three metals and wherein at least one of said metals is a group VIII non- noble metal and at one of said metals is a group VIB metals where the ratio of group VIB metal to group VIII non-noble metal is from about 10: 1 to about 1: 10.
7. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst is prepared from a precursor is represented by the formula (X)b( o)c(W)dOz; wherein X is a non-noble Group VIII metal, and the molar ratio of b to (c+d) is 0.5/1 to 3/1; the molar ratio of c:d is > 0.01/1; and z = [2b + 6(c+d)]2.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein said Group VIII non-noble metal is nickel.
9. The process of claim 8 wherein said catalyst has an essentially amorphous x-ray diffraction pattern with crystalline peaks at d=2.53 Angstroms and d=1.70 Angstroms.
10. The process in claim 1 wherein said separation of said first product into a catalyst free and catalyst containing stream is accomplished using a cross- flow filtering step.
11. The process of claim 10 wherein said catalyst has a particle size of about 0.5 to 25 microns.
12. The process of claim 10 wherein filter media aids comprising particles in the size range of about 5 to about 200 microns are utilized.
13. The process of claim 10 wherein said cross-flow filtering step is integral to said slurry hydroprocessing step.
14. The process of claim 1 wherein said process further comprised separating volatiles from said first product stream prior to said separation step (b).
15. The process of claim 1 further comprising removing gaseous overheads during said separation step (b).
16. The process of claim 15 wherein when said overheads comprise a hydrogen containing gas, further comprising recycling said hydrogen containing gas to said step (a).
17. The process of claim 1 further comprising separating said catalyst-free product stream into gaseous and liquid hydrocarbon components prior to said step (c).
18. The process of claim 1 wherein said supported metallic catalyst has a median pore diameter of between 10.0 and 35.0 nm.
EP01994230A 2000-12-15 2001-11-30 Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts Withdrawn EP1349906A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US746540 2000-12-15
US09/746,540 US20020112987A1 (en) 2000-12-15 2000-12-15 Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts
PCT/US2001/048202 WO2002059235A1 (en) 2000-12-15 2001-11-30 Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1349906A1 true EP1349906A1 (en) 2003-10-08

Family

ID=25001281

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01994230A Withdrawn EP1349906A1 (en) 2000-12-15 2001-11-30 Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US20020112987A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1349906A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2004518012A (en)
CN (1) CN1481430A (en)
CA (1) CA2428489A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2002059235A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (52)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7096953B2 (en) 2000-04-24 2006-08-29 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal processing of a coal formation using a movable heating element
EA200201127A1 (en) 2000-04-24 2003-06-26 Шелл Интернэшнл Рисерч Маатсхаппий Б.В. EXTRACTION OF HYDROCARBONS AT THE PLACE OF RESPONSE FROM CAROGEN CONTAINING FORMATION
WO2002086029A2 (en) 2001-04-24 2002-10-31 Shell Oil Company In situ recovery from a relatively low permeability formation containing heavy hydrocarbons
US6877555B2 (en) 2001-04-24 2005-04-12 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal processing of an oil shale formation while inhibiting coking
CN100545415C (en) 2001-04-24 2009-09-30 国际壳牌研究有限公司 Method for treating a hydrocarbon containing formation in situ
US6981548B2 (en) 2001-04-24 2006-01-03 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal recovery from a relatively permeable formation
US7090013B2 (en) 2001-10-24 2006-08-15 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal processing of a hydrocarbon containing formation to produce heated fluids
US7077199B2 (en) 2001-10-24 2006-07-18 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal processing of an oil reservoir formation
US7104319B2 (en) 2001-10-24 2006-09-12 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal processing of a heavy oil diatomite formation
CN100540843C (en) 2001-10-24 2009-09-16 国际壳牌研究有限公司 In situ heat treatment of hydrocarbon containing formations using natural distributed combustors
US7165615B2 (en) 2001-10-24 2007-01-23 Shell Oil Company In situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation using conductor-in-conduit heat sources with an electrically conductive material in the overburden
US20050244764A1 (en) * 2002-07-19 2005-11-03 Frank Haase Process for combustion of a liquid hydrocarbon
US20050255416A1 (en) * 2002-07-19 2005-11-17 Frank Haase Use of a blue flame burner
AU2003250146A1 (en) * 2002-07-19 2004-02-09 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Use of a yellow flame burner
US7121341B2 (en) 2002-10-24 2006-10-17 Shell Oil Company Conductor-in-conduit temperature limited heaters
CA2524689C (en) * 2003-04-24 2012-05-22 Shell Canada Limited Thermal processes for subsurface formations
US7591941B2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2009-09-22 Shell Oil Company Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US20100098602A1 (en) * 2003-12-19 2010-04-22 Opinder Kishan Bhan Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7763160B2 (en) 2003-12-19 2010-07-27 Shell Oil Company Systems and methods of producing a crude product
US7745369B2 (en) 2003-12-19 2010-06-29 Shell Oil Company Method and catalyst for producing a crude product with minimal hydrogen uptake
NL1027750C2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2006-07-13 Shell Int Research Systems, methods and catalysts for producing a crude product.
CA2563583C (en) 2004-04-23 2013-06-18 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Temperature limited heaters used to heat subsurface formations
US7918992B2 (en) 2005-04-11 2011-04-05 Shell Oil Company Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
BRPI0609416A2 (en) 2005-04-11 2011-10-11 Shell Int Research method to produce a gross product
JP2008536002A (en) * 2005-04-11 2008-09-04 シエル・インターナシヨネイル・リサーチ・マーチヤツピイ・ベー・ウイ System, method and catalyst for producing crude product
US8070840B2 (en) 2005-04-22 2011-12-06 Shell Oil Company Treatment of gas from an in situ conversion process
EA014258B1 (en) 2005-04-22 2010-10-29 Шелл Интернэшнл Рисерч Маатсхаппий Б.В. Temperature limited heater utilizing non-ferromagnetic conductor
KR101434259B1 (en) 2005-10-24 2014-08-27 쉘 인터내셔날 리써취 마트샤피지 비.브이. Cogeneration systems and processes for treating hydrocarbon containing formations
EP2010754A4 (en) 2006-04-21 2016-02-24 Shell Int Research ADJUSTING ALLOY COMPOSITIONS TO OBTAIN SELECTED PROPERTIES IN LIMITED-TEMPERATURE HEATING SYSTEMS
US20080083655A1 (en) 2006-10-06 2008-04-10 Bhan Opinder K Methods of producing a crude product
CA2665865C (en) 2006-10-20 2015-06-16 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Heating hydrocarbon containing formations in a spiral startup staged sequence
CN101680287B (en) 2007-04-20 2013-12-18 国际壳牌研究有限公司 Heating systems for heating subsurface formations and method for heating subsurface formations
JP5379804B2 (en) 2007-10-19 2013-12-25 シエル・インターナシヨネイル・リサーチ・マーチヤツピイ・ベー・ウイ Irregular spacing of heat sources for treatment of hydrocarbon-containing layers
EP2262978A1 (en) 2008-04-18 2010-12-22 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Using mines and tunnels for treating subsurface hydrocarbon containing formations
ITMI20081061A1 (en) * 2008-06-11 2009-12-12 Eni Spa CATALYTIC SYSTEM AND PROCEDURE FOR THE HYDRO-CONVERSION OF HEAVY OIL PRODUCTS
US8313705B2 (en) * 2008-06-23 2012-11-20 Uop Llc System and process for reacting a petroleum fraction
AU2009303608B2 (en) 2008-10-13 2013-11-14 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Using self-regulating nuclear reactors in treating a subsurface formation
US20100122934A1 (en) * 2008-11-15 2010-05-20 Haizmann Robert S Integrated Solvent Deasphalting and Slurry Hydrocracking Process
US9284494B2 (en) * 2008-11-15 2016-03-15 Uop Llc Solids management in slurry hydroprocessing
US8448707B2 (en) 2009-04-10 2013-05-28 Shell Oil Company Non-conducting heater casings
US8631866B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2014-01-21 Shell Oil Company Leak detection in circulated fluid systems for heating subsurface formations
US8820406B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2014-09-02 Shell Oil Company Electrodes for electrical current flow heating of subsurface formations with conductive material in wellbore
US9127523B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2015-09-08 Shell Oil Company Barrier methods for use in subsurface hydrocarbon formations
US8701769B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2014-04-22 Shell Oil Company Methods for treating hydrocarbon formations based on geology
US8691080B2 (en) * 2010-06-10 2014-04-08 Uop Llc Slurry hydrocracking apparatus or process
US9016370B2 (en) 2011-04-08 2015-04-28 Shell Oil Company Partial solution mining of hydrocarbon containing layers prior to in situ heat treatment
ITMI20111626A1 (en) * 2011-09-08 2013-03-09 Eni Spa CATALYTIC SYSTEM AND PROCEDURE FOR THE TOTAL HYDRO-CONVERSION OF HEAVY OILS
KR101532187B1 (en) 2011-11-21 2015-06-26 사우디 아라비안 오일 컴퍼니 Slurry bed hydroprocessing and system
CN106029840A (en) * 2013-11-25 2016-10-12 沙特阿拉伯石油公司 Method for enhancing heavy oil upgrading by adding a hydrotreating step to the upgrading process
CN105727981B (en) * 2014-12-11 2019-11-05 国家能源投资集团有限责任公司 A kind of Fischer Tropsch waxes hydrocracking catalyst, and preparation method thereof, and its application
WO2017058976A1 (en) 2015-09-30 2017-04-06 Uop Llc Process for using molybdenum and particulate carbon catalyst for slurry hydrocracking
CN111944554A (en) * 2020-08-12 2020-11-17 中国科学院青岛生物能源与过程研究所 A homogeneous hydrogenation method for producing biodiesel using a liquid catalyst

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4882036A (en) * 1987-09-16 1989-11-21 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Combination coking and hydroconversion process
US5164354A (en) * 1990-12-24 1992-11-17 Exxon Research And Engineering Co. Supported hydrogenation and hydrotreating catalysts
US5198100A (en) * 1990-12-24 1993-03-30 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Hydrotreating using novel hydrotreating catalyst
US5756420A (en) * 1996-11-05 1998-05-26 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Supported hydroconversion catalyst and process of preparation thereof
US6171471B1 (en) * 1999-04-30 2001-01-09 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Heavy oil upgrading process (LAW813)

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO02059235A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2002059235A1 (en) 2002-08-01
CA2428489A1 (en) 2002-08-01
CN1481430A (en) 2004-03-10
JP2004518012A (en) 2004-06-17
US20020112987A1 (en) 2002-08-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20020112987A1 (en) Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts
US10414991B2 (en) Processing of heavy hydrocarbon feeds
US6511937B1 (en) Combination slurry hydroconversion plus solvent deasphalting process for heavy oil upgrading wherein slurry catalyst is derived from solvent deasphalted rock
KR100930991B1 (en) Recycling method of active slurry catalyst composition for heavy oil improvement
US5300212A (en) Hydroconversion process with slurry hydrotreating
US6136179A (en) Low pressure process for the hydroconversion of heavy hydrocarbons
CA1238289A (en) Heavy oil hydroprocessing
US5779992A (en) Process for hydrotreating heavy oil and hydrotreating apparatus
US7279090B2 (en) Integrated SDA and ebullated-bed process
US6127299A (en) Process for preparing a hydroprocessing catalyst from waste hydroprocessing catalyst
JP2002534586A (en) Slurry hydrotreatment using bulk multimetallic catalysts
WO1992000807A1 (en) A high activity slurry catalyst process
JPS5950276B2 (en) Method for hydrotreating mineral oils
AU2002246652A1 (en) Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts
CA2244821C (en) Low pressure process for the hydroconversion of heavy hydrocarbons
WO2025221845A1 (en) Heavy oil conversion with heavy oil hydrotreating recycle
MXPA98006542A (en) Low pressure process for the hidroconversion of hydrocarbons pesa

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20030623

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20040601