WO2002059235A1 - Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts - Google Patents

Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2002059235A1
WO2002059235A1 PCT/US2001/048202 US0148202W WO02059235A1 WO 2002059235 A1 WO2002059235 A1 WO 2002059235A1 US 0148202 W US0148202 W US 0148202W WO 02059235 A1 WO02059235 A1 WO 02059235A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
catalyst
slurry
group viii
supported
metals
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2001/048202
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Zhiguo Hou
Roby Bearden, Jr.
Kenneth L. Riley
Craig Y. Sabottke
David T. Ferrughelli
Martin L. Gorbaty
William N. Olmstead
Original Assignee
Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company filed Critical Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company
Priority to EP01994230A priority Critical patent/EP1349906A1/en
Priority to CA002428489A priority patent/CA2428489A1/en
Priority to JP2002559524A priority patent/JP2004518012A/en
Publication of WO2002059235A1 publication Critical patent/WO2002059235A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G47/00Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions
    • C10G47/02Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G47/10Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions characterised by the catalyst used with catalysts deposited on a carrier
    • C10G47/12Inorganic carriers

Definitions

  • An embodiment of the instant invention is directed to an integrated slurry hydroprocessing process.
  • SHP Slurry hydroprocessing
  • U.S. 3,622,495 and U.S. 3,622,498 describe a slurry process for effecting the hydroconversion of a hydrocarbonaceous charge stock cont- ⁇ iing sulfiirous compounds.
  • the process utilizes finely divided catalyst selected from the metals of Group V-B, VI-B or VIII of the periodic table.
  • Preferred metallic components are vanadium, chromium, iron, cobalt, nickel, niobium, molybdenum, tantalum, and/or tungsten.
  • the Group VIII noble metals are not generally considered for use.
  • the catalyst may be combined with a refractory inorganic oxide carrier, but the process is said to be facilitated when the sulfide of the metal is unsupported.
  • U.S. 4,525,267 is directed to a process for hydrocracking hydrocarbons for residuum conversion. At least part of the catalyst utilized in the hydrocracking is extracted from the reaction zone and subjected to a hydrotreatment regeneration followed by recycle back to the hydrocracking step. The process is said to reduce coke production to a considerable degree. While conventional slurry hydroprocessing has met with varying degrees of commercial success, there still remains a need in the art for processes and slurry catalysts that result in improved yields and selectivity.
  • slurry hydroprocessing a hydrocarbon feedstock, at slurry hydroprocessing conditions, in the presence of a hydrogen cont-tining treat gas and in the presence of a supported metallic catalyst comprising a supported sulfide of at least one Group VIII non-noble metal and at least one metal selected from the group consisting of non-noble Group VIII metals, Group VIB metals and mixtures thereof wherein said support is an inorganic refractory oxide carbon or mixtures thereof and wherein said catalyst has an average diameter of about 0.5 to about 100 microns to obtain a first product stream comprising said catalyst and a hydroprocessed feedstream;
  • SHP slurry hydroprocessing
  • FIG. 1 depicts one possible flow scheme for the instant invention.
  • Feed and slurry catalyst enter the hydroprocessing reactor along with hydrogen.
  • the reactor effluent is then passed to a separator zone that may comprises a cross-flow filtration chamber, as shown here, or other separation means, where the effluent is separated into a catalyst-free stream and a catalyst- containing stream.
  • the catalyst containing stream after withdrawal of a purge stream to control solids concentration in the reactor liquid, is recycled to the hydroprocessing reactor along with fresh feed.
  • the catalyst free stream is then separated into gaseous and liquid products.
  • the gaseous products include hydrogen which can then be recycled to the slurry hydroprocessing reactor.
  • Figure 2 depicts another possible flow scheme where volatiles are removed before the separation of the first product into a catalyst-free and catalyst-containing stream.
  • Figure 3 depicts another possible embodiment where the volatiles are removed from the first product stream during separation into a catalyst free and catalyst containing stream.
  • the effluent from the slurry hydroprocessing reactor can be passed through a cooler (not shown) and introduced into a gas- liquid separator or disengaging means where the hydrogen gas, along with ammonia and hydrogen sulfide by-products from the hydroprocessing reactions, may be separated from the liquid effluent and recycled back for reuse in the hydrogen stream.
  • the recycled gas is usually passed through a scrubber (not shown) to remove hydrogen sulfide and ammonia.
  • Fresh make-up hydrogen can be introduced into the recycle circuit.
  • the gas-free liquid from the gas-liquid separator then enters a solids separator, or a filter, vacuum flash, centrifuge or the like, in order to divide the hydrotreating reactor effluent into a catalyst- containing stream and a product stream
  • An aspect of the instant invention provides an integrated slurry hydroprocessing process which provides a more effective and efficient process by improving separation of product from the slurry.
  • the process may also include separating said catalyst-free product stream into gaseous and liquid hydrocarbon components prior to said step (c).
  • feedstocks which will typically contain both nitrogen and sulfur, include whole and reduced petroleum crudes, atmospheric and vacuum residua, asphaltenes, deasphalted oils, cycle oils, FCC tower bottoms, gas oils, including atmospheric and vacuum gas oils and coker gas oils, light to heavy distillates including raw virgin distillates, hydrocrackates, hydrotreated oils, dewaxed oils, slack waxes, Fischer-Tropsch waxes, raffinates, naphthas, and mixtures thereof.
  • the heavy feeds which may be treated in accordance with the teachings herein are heavy feeds, defined as feeds having an API gravity of ⁇ 10-15° with a viscosity of > 60 centistokes at 60 C, including heavy crude oils and vacuum resids.
  • the light feeds which can be processed herein include feeds such as kerosene, home heating oil, straight run atmospheric gas oils, straight run vacuum gas oils etc. and mixtures thereof. Typically, such feeds will have a o boiling point in the range of about 60 to about 1050 F (about 16 to about 566 ° C).
  • a feedstream and slurry hydroprocessing (SHP) catalyst along with hydrogen are fed to a reactor, which includes an external pump-around line and crossflow filter chamber.
  • the crossflow filter chamber which operates at reactor pressure and temperature, consists of a vapor zone and liquid zone. Hydrogen and gaseous products are removed from the vapor zone to a downstream separator. Upgraded catalyst-free liquid is withdrawn through the crossflow filter, and the resultant catalyst-containing liquid is recycled to the reactor, after removal of a suitable purge stream to control solids level in the reactor.
  • the recycle stream can be fed directly to the reactor or premixed with the fresh feed stream. Additionally, fresh catalyst may be used in combination with the recycled catalyst.
  • Catalysts which may be utilized in the invention are supported catalysts.
  • the supports may comprise inorganic refractory oxides such as silica, alumina and mixtures thereof, carbon and mixtures of carbon and inorganic refractory oxides.
  • the catalyst will preferably comprise sulfides of molybdenum, nickel, tungsten, cobalt, or mixtures thereof.
  • the catalyst will have an average diameter ranging from about 0.5 to about 100 microns and can be prepared directly from pre-sized inorganic oxide materials or obtained by reducing the size of commercially available hydrotreating catalysts.
  • the catalysts will be prepared ex-situ by crushing commercially available catalysts and catalyst supports to obtain the desired catalyst diameter. It is believed that the selection and control of the particle size distribution of the catalyst enhances solid-liquid separation and significantly improves the hydrodesulfurization process.
  • the ex-situ preparation provides flexibility to control the particle hardness and attrition resistance, intrinsic catalyst activity and other catalyst properties important to the process performance and physical separation.
  • An example of a useable catalyst is a supported sulfided material prepared from a precursor represented by the formula: (X)b(Y) c where X is a Group VIII non-noble metal and Y is a Group VIII non noble metal or a Vlb metal.
  • the molar ratio described as the ratio of b:c is 0.1/1 to 3/1, preferably 0.25/1 to 2/1, more preferably 0.35/1 to 1/1, and most preferably 0.4/1 to 0.7/1.
  • Another useable sulfided catalyst comprises at least three metals wherein at least one of said metals is a Group VIII non-noble metal and at least one of said metals is a Group VIB metals where the ratio of Group VIB metal to Group VIII non-noble metal is from about 10:1 to about 1:10, supported on an inorganic oxide.
  • the Group VIII non-noble metal is selected from Ni and Co.
  • the Group VIII metal is Ni
  • the molar ratio of b to (c+d) is 0.25/1 to 2.0/1 and the molar ratio of c to d is 1/10 to 10/1.
  • Desired catalysts that are used to process heavy feeds have median pore diameters between 10.0 and 35.0 nm. For distillate boiling range feeds, preferred median pore diameters are between 12.0 and 20.0 nm; and most preferred median pore diameters are between 14.0 and 18.0 nm. For heavy feeds, preferred median pore diameters are > 30 nm. These median pore diameters are typically determined by Hg porosimetry.
  • Process conditions in the hydroprocessing reactor will depend on such things as the particular feed being treated. Such conditions are readily adjustable by the skilled artisan within the ranges herein taught.
  • General process o o conditions for SHP include temperatures of about 500 to about 900 F (about 260 to about 482 ° C), preferably about 650 to about 850 ° F (about 385 to about 454 ° C) and most preferably about 725 to about 850 ° F (about 343 to about 454 ° C) and pressures from about 300 to about 2500 psig (about 2170 to about 17,339 kPa), preferably about 500 to about 2500 psig (3,549 to about 17,339 kPa) and most preferably about 800 to about 1000 psig (about 5,617 kPa to about 6996 kPa).
  • the hydrogen treat gas rate is suitably about 200 to 2000 SCF/B (standard cubic feet per barrel) (36 to 360 m 3 /m 3 ), preferably about 500 to 1500 SCF/B (90 to 270 m 3 /m 3 ).
  • the residence time is suitably from about 0.5 to 4 hours and preferably about 1 to 2 hours.
  • Catalyst concentration on feed will range from about 1 wt% to 30 wt%, preferably about 5 to about 20 wt%.
  • the hydroprocessing of the present invention can be practiced in one or more reaction zones and can be practiced in either countercurrent flow or cocurrent flow mode.
  • countercurrent flow mode we mean a process mode wherein the feedstream flows countercurrent to the flow of hydrogen-containing treat gas.
  • the slurry hydroprocessing process of the present invention can be practiced by introducing a given feedstock into a slurry hydroprocessing reactor. Before being passed to the hydroprocessing reactor, the feed may be mixed with a hydrogen containing gas stream and heated to a reaction temperature in a furnace or preheater. Alternatively, the hydrogen gas can be introduced directly into the hydroprocessing reactor.
  • the reactor contains the slurried catalyst as previously described. Recycle of the reactor effluent via a pump is optional to provide mixing within the reactor zone.
  • the catalyst/solids separation from the product oil is accomplished by a cross-flow filtering step integrated with a pump around loop in the slurry reactor.
  • a cross-flow filtering step integrated with a pump around loop in the slurry reactor.
  • turbulent cross-flow filtration zone there is minimal build-up of filter cake, which minimizes problems associated with filter binding.
  • Other established separation steps such as gravity settling, centrifugation and other commonly known techniques may also be employed in combination with cross-flow filtration to enhance the process performance.
  • the most efficient process will employ a catalyst particle size and functionality that has been selected for the reactor conversion objectives and the cross-flow filtering system.
  • catalyst particle diameters on the order of 0.5 to 25 microns in size will be utilized.
  • the performance of the cross- flow filtering step may be enhanced by the use of filter media aids. These filter media aids can be specially sized particles in the size range of about 5 to 200 microns that are used to pre-coat the filter media surface to enhance filter performance. Filter design can either be a back-flushed or continuously purged configuration.
  • the cross-flow filtration step can be either close coupled to the reactor in an external pump around loop or integrated into the reactor design as a section of the reactor in combination with a pump around zone (not shown in the figures).
  • the separation step is typically carried out under conditions which maximize separation to produce a recyclable active catalyst product having a maximum concentration which can be pumped or conveyed to the feed. This is typically in the range of from about 5 weight percent ("wt. %") to about 75 wt. %, preferably in the range of from about 10 wt. % to about 50 wt. %, and even more preferably in the range of from about 15 wt. % to about 35 wt. %. Except for cross-flow filtration, the separation step may comprise the use of centrifuges, cyclones, filters or even settling and draw-off.
  • a supported slurry catalyst was prepared by reducing the size of commercially available NiMo catalyst (Catalyst A).
  • a typical hydroprocessing experiment involved charging an autoclave with 100 g of resid (ALVR, Brent VR), and appropriate amount of catalyst chosen on the basis of wt% metal on feed.
  • the mixture was stirred at 1500 RPM at 775°F (413 ° C) under 1000 psig (6996 kPa) of hydrogen pressure for 2 hours. Hydrogen was flowed through during the test to maintain an effective hydrogen partial pressure of about 900 psig (6307 kPa).
  • the autoclave was then cooled to 300°F (149 ° C) and vented, and the liquid containing the catalyst was discharged.
  • the product was separated by filtration through a two- layer of filter composed of one sheet of #2 and one sheet of #3 Whatman filter papers. The solid was washed with toluene and dried under vacuum over night.
  • the product oil was analyzed for metals, sulfur and Microcarbon Residue (MCR).

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Abstract

A slurry hydroprocessing process (SHP) where a hydrocarbon feedstock is treated at slurry hydrotreating conditions, in the presence of a hydrogen containing treat gas and in the presence of a supported metallic catalyst which is a supported sulfide of a metal selected from the group of non-noble Group VIII metals, Group VIB metals and mixtures thereof where the support is an inorganic oxide and where the catalyst has an average diameter of about 0.5 to about 100 microns to obtain a first product stream comprising the catalyst and a hydroprocessed feedstream; separating the first product into a catalyst-free product stream and a catalyst-containing stream and recycling at least a portion of the catalyst-containing stream back to the hydroprocessing step.

Description

SLURRY HYDROPROCESSING FOR HEAVY OIL UPGRADING USING SUPPORTED SLURRY CATALYSTS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
An embodiment of the instant invention is directed to an integrated slurry hydroprocessing process.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Slurry hydroprocessing (SHP) is a technology capable of providing a low cost means for upgrading heavy crudes. Numerous patents exist that teach the use of hydroprocessing to obtain upgraded products from heavy crudes.
U.S. 3,622,495 and U.S. 3,622,498 describe a slurry process for effecting the hydroconversion of a hydrocarbonaceous charge stock cont-ώiing sulfiirous compounds. The process utilizes finely divided catalyst selected from the metals of Group V-B, VI-B or VIII of the periodic table. Preferred metallic components are vanadium, chromium, iron, cobalt, nickel, niobium, molybdenum, tantalum, and/or tungsten. The Group VIII noble metals are not generally considered for use. The catalyst may be combined with a refractory inorganic oxide carrier, but the process is said to be facilitated when the sulfide of the metal is unsupported.
U.S. 4,525,267 is directed to a process for hydrocracking hydrocarbons for residuum conversion. At least part of the catalyst utilized in the hydrocracking is extracted from the reaction zone and subjected to a hydrotreatment regeneration followed by recycle back to the hydrocracking step. The process is said to reduce coke production to a considerable degree. While conventional slurry hydroprocessing has met with varying degrees of commercial success, there still remains a need in the art for processes and slurry catalysts that result in improved yields and selectivity.
As the supply of low sulfur, low nitrogen crudes decrease, refineries are processing crudes with greater sulfur and nitrogen contents at the same time that environmental regulations are mandating lower levels of these heteroatoms in products. Consequently, a need exists for increasingly efficient desulfurization and denitrogenation catalysts.
What is needed in the art is an improved process and catalysts which upgrade heavy feeds economically and effectively.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An embodiment of the instant invention is directed to a process comprising the steps of:
(a) slurry hydroprocessing (SHP) a hydrocarbon feedstock, at slurry hydroprocessing conditions, in the presence of a hydrogen cont-tining treat gas and in the presence of a supported metallic catalyst comprising a supported sulfide of at least one Group VIII non-noble metal and at least one metal selected from the group consisting of non-noble Group VIII metals, Group VIB metals and mixtures thereof wherein said support is an inorganic refractory oxide carbon or mixtures thereof and wherein said catalyst has an average diameter of about 0.5 to about 100 microns to obtain a first product stream comprising said catalyst and a hydroprocessed feedstream;
(b) separating said first product into a catalyst-free product stream and a catalyst-containing stream
(c) recycling at least a portion of the catalyst-containing stream to said hydroprocessing step (a).
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
Figure 1 depicts one possible flow scheme for the instant invention. Feed and slurry catalyst enter the hydroprocessing reactor along with hydrogen. The reactor effluent is then passed to a separator zone that may comprises a cross-flow filtration chamber, as shown here, or other separation means, where the effluent is separated into a catalyst-free stream and a catalyst- containing stream. The catalyst containing stream, after withdrawal of a purge stream to control solids concentration in the reactor liquid, is recycled to the hydroprocessing reactor along with fresh feed. The catalyst free stream is then separated into gaseous and liquid products. The gaseous products include hydrogen which can then be recycled to the slurry hydroprocessing reactor.
Figure 2 depicts another possible flow scheme where volatiles are removed before the separation of the first product into a catalyst-free and catalyst-containing stream. Figure 3 depicts another possible embodiment where the volatiles are removed from the first product stream during separation into a catalyst free and catalyst containing stream. The effluent from the slurry hydroprocessing reactor can be passed through a cooler (not shown) and introduced into a gas- liquid separator or disengaging means where the hydrogen gas, along with ammonia and hydrogen sulfide by-products from the hydroprocessing reactions, may be separated from the liquid effluent and recycled back for reuse in the hydrogen stream. The recycled gas is usually passed through a scrubber (not shown) to remove hydrogen sulfide and ammonia. This is usually recommended because of the inhibiting effect of such gases on the kinetics of hydrotreating and also to reduce corrosion in the recycle circuit. Fresh make-up hydrogen can be introduced into the recycle circuit. The gas-free liquid from the gas-liquid separator then enters a solids separator, or a filter, vacuum flash, centrifuge or the like, in order to divide the hydrotreating reactor effluent into a catalyst- containing stream and a product stream
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
An aspect of the instant invention provides an integrated slurry hydroprocessing process which provides a more effective and efficient process by improving separation of product from the slurry.
The process may also include separating said catalyst-free product stream into gaseous and liquid hydrocarbon components prior to said step (c).
A wide range of petroleum and chemical hydrocarbon feedstocks can be hydroprocessed in accordance with the present invention. Suitable feedstocks, which will typically contain both nitrogen and sulfur, include whole and reduced petroleum crudes, atmospheric and vacuum residua, asphaltenes, deasphalted oils, cycle oils, FCC tower bottoms, gas oils, including atmospheric and vacuum gas oils and coker gas oils, light to heavy distillates including raw virgin distillates, hydrocrackates, hydrotreated oils, dewaxed oils, slack waxes, Fischer-Tropsch waxes, raffinates, naphthas, and mixtures thereof.
The heavy feeds which may be treated in accordance with the teachings herein are heavy feeds, defined as feeds having an API gravity of < 10-15° with a viscosity of > 60 centistokes at 60 C, including heavy crude oils and vacuum resids.
The light feeds which can be processed herein include feeds such as kerosene, home heating oil, straight run atmospheric gas oils, straight run vacuum gas oils etc. and mixtures thereof. Typically, such feeds will have a o boiling point in the range of about 60 to about 1050 F (about 16 to about 566 °C).
In an embodiment of the instant invention (illustrated in Figure 2, a feedstream and slurry hydroprocessing (SHP) catalyst, along with hydrogen are fed to a reactor, which includes an external pump-around line and crossflow filter chamber. The crossflow filter chamber, which operates at reactor pressure and temperature, consists of a vapor zone and liquid zone. Hydrogen and gaseous products are removed from the vapor zone to a downstream separator. Upgraded catalyst-free liquid is withdrawn through the crossflow filter, and the resultant catalyst-containing liquid is recycled to the reactor, after removal of a suitable purge stream to control solids level in the reactor. The recycle stream can be fed directly to the reactor or premixed with the fresh feed stream. Additionally, fresh catalyst may be used in combination with the recycled catalyst.
Catalysts which may be utilized in the invention are supported catalysts. The supports may comprise inorganic refractory oxides such as silica, alumina and mixtures thereof, carbon and mixtures of carbon and inorganic refractory oxides. The catalyst will preferably comprise sulfides of molybdenum, nickel, tungsten, cobalt, or mixtures thereof. The catalyst will have an average diameter ranging from about 0.5 to about 100 microns and can be prepared directly from pre-sized inorganic oxide materials or obtained by reducing the size of commercially available hydrotreating catalysts.
Preferably, the catalysts will be prepared ex-situ by crushing commercially available catalysts and catalyst supports to obtain the desired catalyst diameter. It is believed that the selection and control of the particle size distribution of the catalyst enhances solid-liquid separation and significantly improves the hydrodesulfurization process. The ex-situ preparation provides flexibility to control the particle hardness and attrition resistance, intrinsic catalyst activity and other catalyst properties important to the process performance and physical separation.
An example of a useable catalyst is a supported sulfided material prepared from a precursor represented by the formula: (X)b(Y)c where X is a Group VIII non-noble metal and Y is a Group VIII non noble metal or a Vlb metal. The molar ratio described as the ratio of b:c is 0.1/1 to 3/1, preferably 0.25/1 to 2/1, more preferably 0.35/1 to 1/1, and most preferably 0.4/1 to 0.7/1. Another useable sulfided catalyst comprises at least three metals wherein at least one of said metals is a Group VIII non-noble metal and at least one of said metals is a Group VIB metals where the ratio of Group VIB metal to Group VIII non-noble metal is from about 10:1 to about 1:10, supported on an inorganic oxide.
In yet another preferred embodiment the supported sulfided metallic catalyst has a precursor represented by the formula: (X)b(Mo)c(W)dOz; wherein X is a non-noble Group VIII metal, and the molar ratio of b to (c+d) is 0.1/1 to 3/1; the molar ratio of c to d is > 0.01/1; and z = [2b + 6(c+d)]2.
In another preferred embodiment of the present invention the Group VIII non-noble metal is selected from Ni and Co.
In still another preferred embodiment of the present invention the Group VIII metal is Ni, and the X-ray diffraction pattern of the catalyst is essentially amorphous with crystalline peaks at d = 2.53 Angstroms and d = 1.70 Angstroms.
In yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention the molar ratio of b to (c+d) is 0.25/1 to 2.0/1 and the molar ratio of c to d is 1/10 to 10/1.
Desired catalysts that are used to process heavy feeds have median pore diameters between 10.0 and 35.0 nm. For distillate boiling range feeds, preferred median pore diameters are between 12.0 and 20.0 nm; and most preferred median pore diameters are between 14.0 and 18.0 nm. For heavy feeds, preferred median pore diameters are > 30 nm. These median pore diameters are typically determined by Hg porosimetry.
The process conditions in the hydroprocessing reactor will depend on such things as the particular feed being treated. Such conditions are readily adjustable by the skilled artisan within the ranges herein taught. General process o o conditions for SHP include temperatures of about 500 to about 900 F (about 260 to about 482 °C), preferably about 650 to about 850°F (about 385 to about 454°C) and most preferably about 725 to about 850 °F (about 343 to about 454 °C) and pressures from about 300 to about 2500 psig (about 2170 to about 17,339 kPa), preferably about 500 to about 2500 psig (3,549 to about 17,339 kPa) and most preferably about 800 to about 1000 psig (about 5,617 kPa to about 6996 kPa). The hydrogen treat gas rate is suitably about 200 to 2000 SCF/B (standard cubic feet per barrel) (36 to 360 m3/m3), preferably about 500 to 1500 SCF/B (90 to 270 m3/m3). The residence time is suitably from about 0.5 to 4 hours and preferably about 1 to 2 hours. For heavy feeds, it is preferable to attain about 1025 + °F to 1025 - °F (552 + °C to 552 - °C) conversion of at least about 30%, preferably about 40%, and most preferably from about 50 to 60%. Catalyst concentration on feed will range from about 1 wt% to 30 wt%, preferably about 5 to about 20 wt%.
It is to be understood that the hydroprocessing of the present invention can be practiced in one or more reaction zones and can be practiced in either countercurrent flow or cocurrent flow mode. By countercurrent flow mode we mean a process mode wherein the feedstream flows countercurrent to the flow of hydrogen-containing treat gas. The slurry hydroprocessing process of the present invention can be practiced by introducing a given feedstock into a slurry hydroprocessing reactor. Before being passed to the hydroprocessing reactor, the feed may be mixed with a hydrogen containing gas stream and heated to a reaction temperature in a furnace or preheater. Alternatively, the hydrogen gas can be introduced directly into the hydroprocessing reactor. The reactor contains the slurried catalyst as previously described. Recycle of the reactor effluent via a pump is optional to provide mixing within the reactor zone.
In the preferred embodiment, the catalyst/solids separation from the product oil is accomplished by a cross-flow filtering step integrated with a pump around loop in the slurry reactor. In the turbulent cross-flow filtration zone there is minimal build-up of filter cake, which minimizes problems associated with filter binding. Other established separation steps such as gravity settling, centrifugation and other commonly known techniques may also be employed in combination with cross-flow filtration to enhance the process performance.
The most efficient process will employ a catalyst particle size and functionality that has been selected for the reactor conversion objectives and the cross-flow filtering system. The skilled artisan can readily select such parameters. In the most preferred embodiment, catalyst particle diameters on the order of 0.5 to 25 microns in size will be utilized. The performance of the cross- flow filtering step may be enhanced by the use of filter media aids. These filter media aids can be specially sized particles in the size range of about 5 to 200 microns that are used to pre-coat the filter media surface to enhance filter performance. Filter design can either be a back-flushed or continuously purged configuration.
The cross-flow filtration step can be either close coupled to the reactor in an external pump around loop or integrated into the reactor design as a section of the reactor in combination with a pump around zone (not shown in the figures).
In most slurry hydroprocessing operations it is desirable to separate substantially all of the catalyst from the liquid hydrocarbon product. Thus, the separation step is typically carried out under conditions which maximize separation to produce a recyclable active catalyst product having a maximum concentration which can be pumped or conveyed to the feed. This is typically in the range of from about 5 weight percent ("wt. %") to about 75 wt. %, preferably in the range of from about 10 wt. % to about 50 wt. %, and even more preferably in the range of from about 15 wt. % to about 35 wt. %. Except for cross-flow filtration, the separation step may comprise the use of centrifuges, cyclones, filters or even settling and draw-off.
The following examples are meant to be illustrative and not limiting.
Example 1
A supported slurry catalyst was prepared by reducing the size of commercially available NiMo catalyst (Catalyst A). A sample of Catalyst A was wet-ball milled overnight and dried at 100 -110°C for 3-4 hours. After calcining at 400°C for 3 hours, a fine powdered catalyst sample was obtained with measured average particle size at 3.6 microns. Prior to hydrotreating tests, it was pre-treated with hydrogen and hydrogen sulfide under 1000 psig (6996 kPa) of total pressure (H22S = 90/10, v/v) at 725°F (385 °C) for 60 minutes both to sulfide and to activate the catalyst. Table 1 provides additional physical properties of this catalyst.
Table 1. Physical Properties of Pre-treated Slurry Catalyst A
Physical Properties of Slurrv Catalvst A
Mo, wt% 5.9
Ni, wt% 1.73
Surface Area, m2/g 121
Pore Volume, cc/g 0.41
Median Particle Size, μm 3.6
Example 2
A typical hydroprocessing experiment involved charging an autoclave with 100 g of resid (ALVR, Brent VR), and appropriate amount of catalyst chosen on the basis of wt% metal on feed. The mixture was stirred at 1500 RPM at 775°F (413 °C) under 1000 psig (6996 kPa) of hydrogen pressure for 2 hours. Hydrogen was flowed through during the test to maintain an effective hydrogen partial pressure of about 900 psig (6307 kPa). The autoclave was then cooled to 300°F (149 ° C) and vented, and the liquid containing the catalyst was discharged. The product was separated by filtration through a two- layer of filter composed of one sheet of #2 and one sheet of #3 Whatman filter papers. The solid was washed with toluene and dried under vacuum over night. The product oil was analyzed for metals, sulfur and Microcarbon Residue (MCR).
Table 2. Mild Slurry hydroprocessing tests of supported slurry Catalyst A. Conditions 775°F (413 °C), 1000 psig H2 (6996 kPa), 2 hours. The catalyst was charged at 12 wt% on feed equivalent to 0.5 wt% Mo on feed.
Figure imgf000014_0001
Table 3. Limited Catalyst Recycle Tests of the Supported Slurry Catalyst A on ALVR. Conditions: 775°F (413 ° C), 1000 psig (6996 kPa) H2, 2 hours, the catalyst was charged at 12 wt% on feed for the first cycle, equivalent to 0.6 wt% Mo on feed.
ALVR Slurry Hvdroprocessin
Total Liquid Product Feed Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3
Quality
Ni, PPM 27.1 14.5 20.5 21.6
V, PPM 95.7 18.6 23.9 25.3
S, wt% 4.18 1.44 1.64 1.70
CCR, wt% 24.3 13.5 14.5 14.8 In summary, it has been demonstrated that the supported slurry catalysts could be utilized to improve the quality of feeds. In the case of the slurry Catalyst A (Table 2), better upgrading results were achieved for both Brent VR and ALRV, and HDS was particularly higher due to Ni components of the catalyst The recycle test, though not under optimum conditions, indicated that the supported slurry catalyst could provide reasonable recycle activity maintenance (Table 3). In addition, since the supported slurry catalysts are made ex-situ, their particle size can be better controlled and the size distribution can be made particularly narrow, thus providing for better solid-liquid separation relative to soft, small particle catalysts.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A process comprising the steps of:
(a) slurry hydroprocessing (SHP) a hydrocarbon feedstock, at slurry hydroprocessing conditions, in the presence of a hydrogen containing treat gas and in the presence of a supported metallic catalyst comprising a supported sulfide of at least one Group VIII non-noble metal and at least one metal selected from the group consisting of non-noble Group VIII metals, Group VIB metals and mixtures thereof wherein said support is an inorganic refractory oxide, carbon and mixtures thereof, and wherein said catalyst has an average diameter of about 0.5 to about 100 microns to obtain a first product stream comprising said catalyst and a hydroprocessed feedstream;
(b) separating said first product into a catalyst-free product stream and a catalyst-containing stream;
(c) recycling at least a portion of the catalyst-containing stream to said hydroprocessing step (a).
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said hydrocarbon feedstock is selected from the group consisting of heavy feeds, distillates, asphaltenes, deasphalted oils, cycle oils, FCC tower bottoms, gas oils, hydrocrackates, dewaxed oil, slack waxes, Fischer Tropsch waxes, raffinates, naphthas, hydrotreated oils and mixtures thereof.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst is selected from a supported sulfided metallic catalyst wherein said metal is selected from molybdenum, nickel, tungsten, cobalt and mixtures thereof.
4. The process of claim 1 wherein said inorganic refractory oxide catalyst support is selected from alumina, silica and mixtures thereof.
5. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst is a supported sulfided material prepared from a precursor represented by the formula (X)b(Y)c where X is a Group VIII non-noble metal and Y is a Group VIII non-noble metal or a Vlb metal and the molar ratio of b to c is 0.1/1 to 3/1.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst comprises at least three metals and wherein at least one of said metals is a group VIII non- noble metal and at one of said metals is a group VIB metals where the ratio of group VIB metal to group VIII non-noble metal is from about 10: 1 to about 1: 10.
7. The process of claim 1 wherein said catalyst is prepared from a precursor is represented by the formula (X)b( o)c(W)dOz; wherein X is a non-noble Group VIII metal, and the molar ratio of b to (c+d) is 0.5/1 to 3/1; the molar ratio of c:d is > 0.01/1; and z = [2b + 6(c+d)]2.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein said Group VIII non-noble metal is nickel.
9. The process of claim 8 wherein said catalyst has an essentially amorphous x-ray diffraction pattern with crystalline peaks at d=2.53 Angstroms and d=1.70 Angstroms.
10. The process in claim 1 wherein said separation of said first product into a catalyst free and catalyst containing stream is accomplished using a cross- flow filtering step.
11. The process of claim 10 wherein said catalyst has a particle size of about 0.5 to 25 microns.
12. The process of claim 10 wherein filter media aids comprising particles in the size range of about 5 to about 200 microns are utilized.
13. The process of claim 10 wherein said cross-flow filtering step is integral to said slurry hydroprocessing step.
14. The process of claim 1 wherein said process further comprised separating volatiles from said first product stream prior to said separation step (b).
15. The process of claim 1 further comprising removing gaseous overheads during said separation step (b).
16. The process of claim 15 wherein when said overheads comprise a hydrogen containing gas, further comprising recycling said hydrogen containing gas to said step (a).
17. The process of claim 1 further comprising separating said catalyst-free product stream into gaseous and liquid hydrocarbon components prior to said step (c).
18. The process of claim 1 wherein said supported metallic catalyst has a median pore diameter of between 10.0 and 35.0 nm.
PCT/US2001/048202 2000-12-15 2001-11-30 Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts WO2002059235A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP01994230A EP1349906A1 (en) 2000-12-15 2001-11-30 Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts
CA002428489A CA2428489A1 (en) 2000-12-15 2001-11-30 Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts
JP2002559524A JP2004518012A (en) 2000-12-15 2001-11-30 Slurry-hydrotreatment using supported slurry catalyst to upgrade heavy oil

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/746,540 US20020112987A1 (en) 2000-12-15 2000-12-15 Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts
US09/746,540 2000-12-15

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2002059235A1 true WO2002059235A1 (en) 2002-08-01

Family

ID=25001281

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2001/048202 WO2002059235A1 (en) 2000-12-15 2001-11-30 Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US20020112987A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1349906A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2004518012A (en)
CN (1) CN1481430A (en)
CA (1) CA2428489A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2002059235A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1702044A2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2006-09-20 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US8956528B2 (en) 2011-11-21 2015-02-17 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Slurry bed hydroprocessing and system using feedstock containing dissolved hydrogen
RU2615766C2 (en) * 2011-09-08 2017-04-11 Эни С.П.А. Catalyst system and method for complete hydrotreatment of heavy oils

Families Citing this family (41)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6742593B2 (en) * 2000-04-24 2004-06-01 Shell Oil Company In situ thermal processing of a hydrocarbon containing formation using heat transfer from a heat transfer fluid to heat the formation
US7004247B2 (en) 2001-04-24 2006-02-28 Shell Oil Company Conductor-in-conduit heat sources for in situ thermal processing of an oil shale formation
NZ532091A (en) 2001-10-24 2005-12-23 Shell Int Research In situ recovery from a hydrocarbon containing formation using barriers
CA2493884A1 (en) * 2002-07-19 2004-01-29 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Use of a blue flame burner
EP1534996A1 (en) * 2002-07-19 2005-06-01 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. Process for combustion of a liquid hydrocarbon
JP2005533235A (en) * 2002-07-19 2005-11-04 シエル・インターナシヨネイル・リサーチ・マーチヤツピイ・ベー・ウイ Use of yellow flame burner
WO2004038175A1 (en) * 2002-10-24 2004-05-06 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Inhibiting wellbore deformation during in situ thermal processing of a hydrocarbon containing formation
US7121342B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2006-10-17 Shell Oil Company Thermal processes for subsurface formations
US20100098602A1 (en) * 2003-12-19 2010-04-22 Opinder Kishan Bhan Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7402547B2 (en) 2003-12-19 2008-07-22 Shell Oil Company Systems and methods of producing a crude product
US7648625B2 (en) 2003-12-19 2010-01-19 Shell Oil Company Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
US7745369B2 (en) 2003-12-19 2010-06-29 Shell Oil Company Method and catalyst for producing a crude product with minimal hydrogen uptake
CA2579496A1 (en) 2004-04-23 2005-11-03 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Subsurface electrical heaters using nitride insulation
JP2008536002A (en) * 2005-04-11 2008-09-04 シエル・インターナシヨネイル・リサーチ・マーチヤツピイ・ベー・ウイ System, method and catalyst for producing crude product
EP1874896A1 (en) * 2005-04-11 2008-01-09 Shell International Research Maatschappij B.V. Method and catalyst for producing a crude product having a reduced nitroge content
US7918992B2 (en) 2005-04-11 2011-04-05 Shell Oil Company Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
AU2006239988B2 (en) 2005-04-22 2010-07-01 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Reduction of heat loads applied to frozen barriers and freeze wells in subsurface formations
EA011905B1 (en) 2005-04-22 2009-06-30 Шелл Интернэшнл Рисерч Маатсхаппий Б.В. In situ conversion process utilizing a closed loop heating system
AU2006306471B2 (en) 2005-10-24 2010-11-25 Shell Internationale Research Maatschapij B.V. Cogeneration systems and processes for treating hydrocarbon containing formations
AU2007240367B2 (en) 2006-04-21 2011-04-07 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. High strength alloys
US20080087575A1 (en) 2006-10-06 2008-04-17 Bhan Opinder K Systems and methods for producing a crude product and compositions thereof
JP5330999B2 (en) 2006-10-20 2013-10-30 シエル・インターナシヨネイル・リサーチ・マーチヤツピイ・ベー・ウイ Hydrocarbon migration in multiple parts of a tar sand formation by fluids.
WO2008131171A1 (en) 2007-04-20 2008-10-30 Shell Oil Company Parallel heater system for subsurface formations
CA2700732A1 (en) 2007-10-19 2009-04-23 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Cryogenic treatment of gas
US8151907B2 (en) 2008-04-18 2012-04-10 Shell Oil Company Dual motor systems and non-rotating sensors for use in developing wellbores in subsurface formations
ITMI20081061A1 (en) * 2008-06-11 2009-12-12 Eni Spa CATALYTIC SYSTEM AND PROCEDURE FOR THE HYDRO-CONVERSION OF HEAVY OIL PRODUCTS
US8313705B2 (en) * 2008-06-23 2012-11-20 Uop Llc System and process for reacting a petroleum fraction
WO2010045097A1 (en) 2008-10-13 2010-04-22 Shell Oil Company Circulated heated transfer fluid heating of subsurface hydrocarbon formations
US20100122934A1 (en) * 2008-11-15 2010-05-20 Haizmann Robert S Integrated Solvent Deasphalting and Slurry Hydrocracking Process
US9284494B2 (en) * 2008-11-15 2016-03-15 Uop Llc Solids management in slurry hydroprocessing
US20100258291A1 (en) 2009-04-10 2010-10-14 Everett De St Remey Edward Heated liners for treating subsurface hydrocarbon containing formations
US8739874B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2014-06-03 Shell Oil Company Methods for heating with slots in hydrocarbon formations
US8631866B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2014-01-21 Shell Oil Company Leak detection in circulated fluid systems for heating subsurface formations
US9127523B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2015-09-08 Shell Oil Company Barrier methods for use in subsurface hydrocarbon formations
US8875788B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2014-11-04 Shell Oil Company Low temperature inductive heating of subsurface formations
US8691080B2 (en) * 2010-06-10 2014-04-08 Uop Llc Slurry hydrocracking apparatus or process
US9016370B2 (en) 2011-04-08 2015-04-28 Shell Oil Company Partial solution mining of hydrocarbon containing layers prior to in situ heat treatment
CN106029840A (en) * 2013-11-25 2016-10-12 沙特阿拉伯石油公司 Method for enhanced upgrading of heavy oil by adding a hydrotreating step to an upgrading process
CN105727981B (en) * 2014-12-11 2019-11-05 国家能源投资集团有限责任公司 A kind of Fischer Tropsch waxes hydrocracking catalyst, and preparation method thereof, and its application
WO2017058976A1 (en) * 2015-09-30 2017-04-06 Uop Llc Process for using molybdenum and particulate carbon catalyst for slurry hydrocracking
CN111944554A (en) * 2020-08-12 2020-11-17 中国科学院青岛生物能源与过程研究所 Homogeneous hydrogenation method for producing biodiesel by using liquid catalyst

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4882036A (en) * 1987-09-16 1989-11-21 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Combination coking and hydroconversion process
US5164354A (en) * 1990-12-24 1992-11-17 Exxon Research And Engineering Co. Supported hydrogenation and hydrotreating catalysts
US5198100A (en) * 1990-12-24 1993-03-30 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Hydrotreating using novel hydrotreating catalyst
US5756420A (en) * 1996-11-05 1998-05-26 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Supported hydroconversion catalyst and process of preparation thereof
US6171471B1 (en) * 1999-04-30 2001-01-09 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Heavy oil upgrading process (LAW813)

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4882036A (en) * 1987-09-16 1989-11-21 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Combination coking and hydroconversion process
US5164354A (en) * 1990-12-24 1992-11-17 Exxon Research And Engineering Co. Supported hydrogenation and hydrotreating catalysts
US5198100A (en) * 1990-12-24 1993-03-30 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Hydrotreating using novel hydrotreating catalyst
US5756420A (en) * 1996-11-05 1998-05-26 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Supported hydroconversion catalyst and process of preparation thereof
US6171471B1 (en) * 1999-04-30 2001-01-09 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Heavy oil upgrading process (LAW813)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1702044A2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2006-09-20 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
RU2615766C2 (en) * 2011-09-08 2017-04-11 Эни С.П.А. Catalyst system and method for complete hydrotreatment of heavy oils
US8956528B2 (en) 2011-11-21 2015-02-17 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Slurry bed hydroprocessing and system using feedstock containing dissolved hydrogen

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2004518012A (en) 2004-06-17
CN1481430A (en) 2004-03-10
US20020112987A1 (en) 2002-08-22
EP1349906A1 (en) 2003-10-08
CA2428489A1 (en) 2002-08-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20020112987A1 (en) Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts
US10414991B2 (en) Processing of heavy hydrocarbon feeds
US6511937B1 (en) Combination slurry hydroconversion plus solvent deasphalting process for heavy oil upgrading wherein slurry catalyst is derived from solvent deasphalted rock
KR100930991B1 (en) Recycling method of active slurry catalyst composition for heavy oil improvement
US5300212A (en) Hydroconversion process with slurry hydrotreating
US6136179A (en) Low pressure process for the hydroconversion of heavy hydrocarbons
CA1238289A (en) Heavy oil hydroprocessing
RU2352615C2 (en) Method for processing of heavy charge, such as heavy base oil and stillage bottoms
US7279090B2 (en) Integrated SDA and ebullated-bed process
US5779992A (en) Process for hydrotreating heavy oil and hydrotreating apparatus
US6127299A (en) Process for preparing a hydroprocessing catalyst from waste hydroprocessing catalyst
JP2002534586A (en) Slurry hydrotreatment using bulk multimetallic catalysts
US5362382A (en) Resid hydrocracking using dispersed metal catalysts
US4560465A (en) Presulfided red mud as a first-stage catalyst in a two-stage, close-coupled thermal catalytic hydroconversion process
WO1992000807A1 (en) A high activity slurry catalyst process
JPS5950276B2 (en) Method for hydrotreating mineral oils
AU2002246652A1 (en) Slurry hydroprocessing for heavy oil upgrading using supported slurry catalysts
CA2244821C (en) Low pressure process for the hydroconversion of heavy hydrocarbons
CN114058404A (en) Process for hydrogenating a conversion residue with several hydroconversion stages, incorporating a deasphalting step
MXPA98006542A (en) Low pressure process for the hidroconversion of hydrocarbons pesa

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2428489

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2002246652

Country of ref document: AU

Ref document number: 2002559524

Country of ref document: JP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 018205461

Country of ref document: CN

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2001994230

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2001994230

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 2001994230

Country of ref document: EP