EP1317371A1 - Method and apparatus for torque control of a machine - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for torque control of a machine

Info

Publication number
EP1317371A1
EP1317371A1 EP00959983A EP00959983A EP1317371A1 EP 1317371 A1 EP1317371 A1 EP 1317371A1 EP 00959983 A EP00959983 A EP 00959983A EP 00959983 A EP00959983 A EP 00959983A EP 1317371 A1 EP1317371 A1 EP 1317371A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
stator phase
phase voltage
angle
machine
operating mode
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP00959983A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1317371A4 (en
Inventor
Malakondaiah Naidu
Rassem R. Henry
Thomas W. Nehl
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
Steering Solutions IP Holding Corp
Original Assignee
Delphi Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Delphi Technologies Inc filed Critical Delphi Technologies Inc
Publication of EP1317371A1 publication Critical patent/EP1317371A1/en
Publication of EP1317371A4 publication Critical patent/EP1317371A4/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02PCONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
    • H02P6/00Arrangements for controlling synchronous motors or other dynamo-electric motors using electronic commutation dependent on the rotor position; Electronic commutators therefor
    • H02P6/08Arrangements for controlling the speed or torque of a single motor
    • H02P6/085Arrangements for controlling the speed or torque of a single motor in a bridge configuration
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02PCONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
    • H02P6/00Arrangements for controlling synchronous motors or other dynamo-electric motors using electronic commutation dependent on the rotor position; Electronic commutators therefor
    • H02P6/14Electronic commutators
    • H02P6/15Controlling commutation time

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to torque control of a machine, and in particular to torque control of permanent magnet (PM) synchronous machines used in electric power steering systems.
  • PM permanent magnet
  • PM synchronous motors are attractive as servo drives because of their high power densities.
  • the stator phases of such motors may be electrically excited to produce a controlled torque on the rotor, the torque being proportional to the field intensity of the rotor magnets and the amplitude of the stator phase excitation, thus permitting control of the rotor motion.
  • feedback signals representing rotor position and rotor velocity are used.
  • These feedback sensors are often generated using current sensors connected to phase windings of a PM synchronous motor to achieve effective torque control.
  • An exemplary system using current sensors for rotor position control is described in U.S. Patent 5,569,994.
  • An exemplary embodiment of the invention is a method for torque control of a PM synchronous machine.
  • the method includes obtaining a torque command signal and a machine speed and determining an operating mode in response to the torque command signal and the machine speed.
  • the operating mode includes a first operating mode and a second operating mode.
  • a stator phase voltage magnitude is computed and an angle between the stator phase voltage and a stator phase back emf is determined in response to the stator phase voltage magnitude.
  • the stator phase voltage is set to a predetermined magnitude and the angle between the stator phase voltage and the stator phase back emf is determined in response to the predetermined magnitude.
  • Figure 1 illustrates torque control below the base speed in the voltage mode
  • Figure 2 illustrates torque control above the base speed in the voltage mode
  • Figure 3 is a flow diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the torque control system
  • Figure 4 illustrates torque vs. speed of a PM motor in voltage mode control
  • Figure 5 illustrates phase current vs. speed of a PM motor in voltage mode control
  • An exemplary embodiment of the invention is a method for controlling the torque of a PM machine in a first mode below the base speed and in a second mode above the base speed without the use of current sensors.
  • the machine is a motor.
  • the machine phase voltages and their angles with respect to their back emfs are determined based on measured speed and known machine parameters. These voltages are fed to the machine by means of a PWM inverter at an optimum computed angle with respect to their back emfs to obtain required torque.
  • This controller mimics the performance of a conventional current controller without low frequency torque ripple otherwise caused by current sensors due to the dc off-set.
  • the exemplary embodiment of the invention is applicable in two running modes of a PM synchronous machine.
  • the first mode (referred to as a constant torque mode) is below a base speed where the back emf is less than the battery voltage. Based on known machine parameters and the speed, computed voltages are impressed across the machine terminals at an optimum angle such that the stator phase currents are co-phasal with their respective back emfs to produce maximum torque per ampere. This mode is shown in Figure 1 and described in further detail herein.
  • the second mode is above the base speed (referred to as extended mode) where the back emfs exceed the battery voltage. For a given torque command, the required computed voltages are impressed at the machine terminals at an optimum computed angle with respect to their back emfs.
  • the phase current leads the back emf thereby reducing the air gap flux and producing the required torque.
  • This mode is shown in Figure 2 and described in further detail herein.
  • the speed ranges defining the first mode and the second mode depends upon the inductance of the machine.
  • V the stator phase terminal voltage
  • phase voltages are impressed across the machine terminals at an angle ⁇ 0 such that the phase currents I are in phase with the respective back emf E for maximum torque per ampere, as shown in Figure
  • the electromagnetic torque produced by the machine is given as
  • the terminal phase voltage is given as
  • V 2 (E+IR) 2 +(IX) 2 (2)
  • V 2 ⁇ (Ke ⁇ O m +Ki T crad ) 2 +K 2 (T cmd ⁇ m ) 2 ⁇ (3)
  • T cmd is the torque required of the motor by the system, i.e., power steering system.
  • V can be obtained from a V 2 vs V lookup table to minimize the computational time.
  • V a V sin ( ⁇ 0 + 0) (8)
  • V b V sin ( ⁇ 0 + 0+240) (9)
  • V C V sin ( ⁇ 0 + 0+120) (10)
  • T cmd can be obtained as a function of load angle, ⁇ i using (11) and (12) as
  • Tcmd ⁇ 3Ke/(R 2 +X 2 ) ⁇ ⁇ (V m cos ⁇ 1 -K e ⁇ m )R+(X V m sin ⁇ i) ⁇ (13)
  • V m is the maximum available phase voltage of the PWM inverter.
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary block diagram of a control system for a permanent magnet synchronous machine in both the first and second modes.
  • a three phase pulse width modulation (PWM) inverter 104 converts battery voltage from battery 102 to phase voltages and provides the phase voltages to the PM motor 105.
  • An encoder 106 is coupled to the shaft of the PM motor 105 to measure the rotation angle ⁇ of the PM motor 105.
  • a controller shown as 101 receives the rotation angle ⁇ and other inputs and generates phase voltages N a , N b and N c as described herein.
  • the controller 101 may be implemented using a microprocessor along with conventional associated components (e.g., memory, communications device, etc.). Components such as look up tables may be used in controller 101 as described herein.
  • the steps performed by the controller 101 are shown in flowchart form within controller 101.
  • the rotation angle ⁇ is used to provide a calculation of the mechanical angular frequency ⁇ in radians/second at speed computation step 110.
  • the stator phase voltage magnitude N is determined using the torque command signal T cmd requesting a torque from the PM motor and ⁇ as inputs to calculate N 2 . As shown at step 118, N 2 is equal to
  • N 2 ⁇ (K e ⁇ m +K, T cmd ) 2 +K 2 (T cmd ⁇ m ) 2 ⁇ (3)
  • N K 2 -[(P L a )/ (3K e )] 2 (5) N may determined from N 2 by a look up table accessed at 118.
  • the voltage N determined at 118 is compared to a maximum inverter voltage N m that can be generated by inverter 104.
  • the maximum inverter voltage N m is determined as where is a constant and V bat is the battery voltage provided by battery 102.
  • step 126 it is determined whether V is less than V m . If not, the PM motor 105 is to operate in the first mode and flow proceeds to step 112 where the controller determines the three phase voltages based on N and angle ⁇ 0 . A value designated l/V derived at step 118 and ⁇ are used at 130 to determine ⁇ 0 as follows:
  • a further look up table may be used to compute ⁇ 0 based on IN and ⁇ at step 130.
  • the values of ⁇ , ⁇ 0 and V are used at step 112 to determine phase voltages V a , V b , and V c .
  • the phase voltages V a , V , and V c are coupled to the PWM inverter 104 for application to the PM motor 105. If the Tcm d signal input to step 118 generates a value V greater than V m , this indicates the second mode of operation and decision element 126 directs flow to step 134 where V is set equal to V m .
  • a lookup table may be used to determine the value of ⁇ i from sin ⁇ i.
  • step 138 the angle ⁇ i may be adjusted based on an iterative loop described herein. On the initial determination of ⁇ i . , step 138 may be omitted.
  • step 140 cos ⁇ i and sin ⁇ i values are derived (e.g., by look up tables) and provides to step 148 where a computed torque value Z is determined based on the voltage V m and the angle ⁇ i. Z represents a computed torque value at the angle i.
  • a demanded torque value Y is calculated at step 150. The computed torque value Z and the demanded torque value Y are compared at step 152.
  • step 114 phase voltages V a .
  • V b , and V c are determined based on ⁇ i and Vm.
  • the phase voltages V a , V , and V c are coupled to the PWM inverter 104 for application to the PM motor 105.
  • step 154 it is determined if the measured current I d is greater than or equal to a current limit Idmax-
  • the measured current Id may be provided from a current sensor located outside of the phase windings.
  • step 154 results in a yes, the system cannot increase the current and the existing angle ⁇ i is used at step 114 for computation of the phase voltages. If Id is less than I dmax. flow proceeds to step 138 where the angle ⁇ i may be incremented or decremented as necessary. If the current demanded torque value Y n is greater than or equal to the prior demanded torque value Y n -i, then the value of ⁇ i is incremented by + ⁇ . Alternatively, if Y n is less than Y n - l5 ⁇ i is decremented by - ⁇ and flow proceeds to step 140 where the iterative process continues until either the demanded torque value Y is met or exceeded or the maximum current I d max is reached.
  • a 12V, PM motor was simulated using this method over the entire speed range taking the current limit of the machine into account.
  • Figure 4 shows the torque-speed characteristics at rated conditions while the Figure 5 shows the current drawn at different speeds with and without phase angle advance of ⁇ i described above. Using this method higher torques can be obtained in the extended speed range as compared with the conventional operation. It is possible to optimally design the machine to obtain the required torque-speed characteristics over the entire speed range.
  • the exemplary embodiment of the invention described herein provides a cost effective torque control method without current sensors over the extended speed range.
  • the control method and controller may be implemented in conjunction with an electric power steering system to control torque generation in the power steering system.
  • the exemplary embodiment of the invention described herein provides numerous advantages. Torque per ampere in the constant torque region below the base speed is maximized by placing the back emf and current signals in phase as shown in Figure 1. Torque control capability in the extended speed range above the base speed is provided for optimum performance. Low frequency torque due to the use of current sensors is eliminated. This elimination is desirable when the controller is used in connection with a steering column mounted electric power steering system.
  • the controller can be easily implemented in a low cost microcontroller since the mathematical operations involved include only additions and multiplications along with look up tables.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Control Of Motors That Do Not Use Commutators (AREA)

Abstract

An exemplary embodiment of the invention is a method for torque control of a PM synchronous machine (105). The method includes obtaining a torque command signal (Tcmd) and a machine speed (φm) and determining an operating mode (112, 114) in response to the torque command signal (Tcmd) and the machine speed (φ). The operating mode (112, 114) includes a first operating mode (112) and a second operating mode (114). In the first operating mode (112), a stator phase voltage magnitude (V) is computed and an angle (δ°) between the stator phase voltage (V) and a stator phase check emf (E) is determined in response to the stator phase voltage magnitude (V). In the second operating mode (114), the stator phase voltage (V) is set to a predetermined magnitude (Vm) and the angle (δ°) between the stator phase voltage (V) and the stator phase back emf (E) is determined in response to the predetermined magnitude.

Description

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TORQUE CONTROL OF A MACHINE
TECHNICAL FIELD
The invention relates generally to torque control of a machine, and in particular to torque control of permanent magnet (PM) synchronous machines used in electric power steering systems.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
PM synchronous motors are attractive as servo drives because of their high power densities. The stator phases of such motors may be electrically excited to produce a controlled torque on the rotor, the torque being proportional to the field intensity of the rotor magnets and the amplitude of the stator phase excitation, thus permitting control of the rotor motion. When such motors are employed for high performance servo drive applications, which require precise control of rotor motion, feedback signals representing rotor position and rotor velocity are used. These feedback sensors are often generated using current sensors connected to phase windings of a PM synchronous motor to achieve effective torque control. An exemplary system using current sensors for rotor position control is described in U.S. Patent 5,569,994. The use of current sensors, however, adds expense to the overall system and tends to cause low frequency torque ripple. Accordingly, there is a need in the art for a method and system for providing torque control without the use of current sensors coupled to the phase windings. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An exemplary embodiment of the invention is a method for torque control of a PM synchronous machine. The method includes obtaining a torque command signal and a machine speed and determining an operating mode in response to the torque command signal and the machine speed. The operating mode includes a first operating mode and a second operating mode. In the first operating mode, a stator phase voltage magnitude is computed and an angle between the stator phase voltage and a stator phase back emf is determined in response to the stator phase voltage magnitude. In the second operating mode, the stator phase voltage is set to a predetermined magnitude and the angle between the stator phase voltage and the stator phase back emf is determined in response to the predetermined magnitude.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The invention will be further described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Figure 1 illustrates torque control below the base speed in the voltage mode;
Figure 2 illustrates torque control above the base speed in the voltage mode;
Figure 3 is a flow diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the torque control system;
Figure 4 illustrates torque vs. speed of a PM motor in voltage mode control; and Figure 5 illustrates phase current vs. speed of a PM motor in voltage mode control. DESCRIPTION OF AN EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION
An exemplary embodiment of the invention is a method for controlling the torque of a PM machine in a first mode below the base speed and in a second mode above the base speed without the use of current sensors. h an exemplary embodiment, the machine is a motor. In this method, the machine phase voltages and their angles with respect to their back emfs are determined based on measured speed and known machine parameters. These voltages are fed to the machine by means of a PWM inverter at an optimum computed angle with respect to their back emfs to obtain required torque. This controller mimics the performance of a conventional current controller without low frequency torque ripple otherwise caused by current sensors due to the dc off-set.
The exemplary embodiment of the invention is applicable in two running modes of a PM synchronous machine. The first mode (referred to as a constant torque mode) is below a base speed where the back emf is less than the battery voltage. Based on known machine parameters and the speed, computed voltages are impressed across the machine terminals at an optimum angle such that the stator phase currents are co-phasal with their respective back emfs to produce maximum torque per ampere. This mode is shown in Figure 1 and described in further detail herein. The second mode is above the base speed (referred to as extended mode) where the back emfs exceed the battery voltage. For a given torque command, the required computed voltages are impressed at the machine terminals at an optimum computed angle with respect to their back emfs. In the second mode, the phase current leads the back emf thereby reducing the air gap flux and producing the required torque. This mode is shown in Figure 2 and described in further detail herein. The speed ranges defining the first mode and the second mode depends upon the inductance of the machine.
Control in the first mode will now be described with reference to Figure 1. The variables shown in Figures 1 and 2 are as follows: E = the stator phase back emf
V = the stator phase terminal voltage
I = the stator phase current
R = the stator resistance
X = ωeLa, the stator phase reactance ωe = the electrical angular frequency, in rad/s
La = the stator phase inductance δ = the load angle between the phase back emf and the terminal voltage α = the angle between phase back emf and current.
In order to optimize the drive performance in the constant torque mode below the base speed, the phase voltages are impressed across the machine terminals at an angle δ0 such that the phase currents I are in phase with the respective back emf E for maximum torque per ampere, as shown in Figure
1.
The electromagnetic torque produced by the machine is given as
Te=3 KeI (1)
where,
Ke=E/ωm = back emf constant.
The terminal phase voltage is given as
V2=(E+IR)2+(IX)2 (2)
For a given torque command TCmd. (neglecting friction losses) substituting (1) in to (2), the terminal voltage is expressed in terms of machine parameters and the measured speed as
V2= {(KeϋOm+Ki Tcrad)2 +K2 (Tcmdωm) 2} (3)
Where, Kι= R/(3Ke) (4)
K2= {(PLa)/ (3Ke)} 2 (5)
P = number of poles ωm= Pωe = mechanical angular frequency, rad/s
Tcmd is the torque required of the motor by the system, i.e., power steering system. V can be obtained from a V2 vs V lookup table to minimize the computational time. The angle δ0 is computed in terms of known parameters as sin δ0= (Tcmd ωmK3/V) (6)
Where,
K3=(P La/6 Ke) (7) The required phase voltages for a given torque command are given as
Va= V sin (δ0+ 0) (8)
Vb =V sin (δ0+ 0+240) (9)
VC = V sin (δ0+ 0+120) (10) These voltages are impressed across the machine by a driver such as a PWM inverter as described below with reference to Figure 3.
Operation in the second mode, above the base speed as shown in Figure 2, will now be described. To operate above the base speed, for a given torque command the maximum available phase voltages are impressed across the machine terminals at an angle δi computed from the known parameters. Under this condition the phase current leads the back emf and its demagnetizing component reduces the air gap flux such that the machine produces the required torque.
From Figure 2, the angle between stator phase current I and the back emf E is calculated as cos α = {R(V cos δι-E)+Nxsin δλ)}/{l(R 2z+, X V2)} (11)
The electromagnetic torque under this condition is given as Te= 3Ke Icosα (12)
Tcmd can be obtained as a function of load angle, δi using (11) and (12) as
Tcmd = {3Ke/(R2+X2)} {(Vm cos δ1-Keωm)R+(X Vm sin δi)} (13) Where, Vm is the maximum available phase voltage of the PWM inverter.
Since the torque command Tcrad is the function of sin δi and cos δi, the angle δi is computed by an iteration method until the condition defined in equation (13) is satisfied. The maximum available voltages are impressed across the machine terminals by mean of PWM inverter at an angle δi with respect to the back emfs to obtain the required torque. Frictional losses may be taken into account by defining Tcmd = Te+ Tπction-
Figure 3 is an exemplary block diagram of a control system for a permanent magnet synchronous machine in both the first and second modes. A three phase pulse width modulation (PWM) inverter 104 converts battery voltage from battery 102 to phase voltages and provides the phase voltages to the PM motor 105. An encoder 106 is coupled to the shaft of the PM motor 105 to measure the rotation angle θ of the PM motor 105. A controller shown as 101 receives the rotation angle θ and other inputs and generates phase voltages Na, Nb and Nc as described herein. The controller 101 may be implemented using a microprocessor along with conventional associated components (e.g., memory, communications device, etc.). Components such as look up tables may be used in controller 101 as described herein. The steps performed by the controller 101 are shown in flowchart form within controller 101.
The rotation angle θ is used to provide a calculation of the mechanical angular frequency ω in radians/second at speed computation step 110. The stator phase voltage magnitude N is determined using the torque command signal Tcmd requesting a torque from the PM motor and ω as inputs to calculate N2. As shown at step 118, N2 is equal to
N2= {(Keωm+K, Tcmd)2 +K2 (Tcmdωm) 2 } (3)
Where,
K,= R/(3Ke) (4)
K2-[(P La)/ (3Ke)] 2 (5) N may determined from N2 by a look up table accessed at 118.
To determine whether the motor is to operate in the first mode or second mode, the voltage N determined at 118 is compared to a maximum inverter voltage Nm that can be generated by inverter 104. The maximum inverter voltage Nm is determined as where is a constant and Vbat is the battery voltage provided by battery 102.
At step 126, it is determined whether V is less than Vm. If not, the PM motor 105 is to operate in the first mode and flow proceeds to step 112 where the controller determines the three phase voltages based on N and angle δ0. A value designated l/V derived at step 118 and ω are used at 130 to determine δ0 as follows:
Sin δ0 = (Pla/6 Ke)= (Tcmd K3 comN), where K3 = (Pla/6 I . A look up table may be used to determine l/V from V at step
118. A further look up table may be used to compute δ0 based on IN and ω at step 130. The values of θ, δ0 and V are used at step 112 to determine phase voltages Va, Vb, and Vc. The phase voltages Va, V , and Vc are coupled to the PWM inverter 104 for application to the PM motor 105. If the Tcmd signal input to step 118 generates a value V greater than Vm, this indicates the second mode of operation and decision element 126 directs flow to step 134 where V is set equal to Vm. Step 136 uses Vm , Tcmd and ωmto calculate sin δi . sin δ ι = (Tcmd K3 ωm Nm)
A lookup table may be used to determine the value of δi from sin δi.
Flow proceeds to step 138 where the angle δi may be adjusted based on an iterative loop described herein. On the initial determination of δi. , step 138 may be omitted. At step 140, cos δi and sin δi values are derived (e.g., by look up tables) and provides to step 148 where a computed torque value Z is determined based on the voltage Vm and the angle δi. Z represents a computed torque value at the angle i. A demanded torque value Y is calculated at step 150. The computed torque value Z and the demanded torque value Y are compared at step 152. If the computed torque value Z equals or exceeds the demanded torque value Y, then the angle δi is suitable to achieve the desired torque and flow proceeds to step 114 where phase voltages Va. Vb, and Vc are determined based on δi and Vm. The phase voltages Va, V , and Vc are coupled to the PWM inverter 104 for application to the PM motor 105. If the computed torque value Z does not equal or exceed the demanded torque value Y at step 152, flow proceeds to step 154 where it is determined if the measured current Id is greater than or equal to a current limit Idmax- The measured current Id may be provided from a current sensor located outside of the phase windings. If step 154 results in a yes, the system cannot increase the current and the existing angle δi is used at step 114 for computation of the phase voltages. If Id is less than Idmax. flow proceeds to step 138 where the angle δi may be incremented or decremented as necessary. If the current demanded torque value Yn is greater than or equal to the prior demanded torque value Yn-i, then the value of δi is incremented by +Δδ. Alternatively, if Yn is less than Yn-l5 δi is decremented by -Δδ and flow proceeds to step 140 where the iterative process continues until either the demanded torque value Y is met or exceeded or the maximum current Idmax is reached.
A 12V, PM motor was simulated using this method over the entire speed range taking the current limit of the machine into account. Figure 4 shows the torque-speed characteristics at rated conditions while the Figure 5 shows the current drawn at different speeds with and without phase angle advance of δi described above. Using this method higher torques can be obtained in the extended speed range as compared with the conventional operation. It is possible to optimally design the machine to obtain the required torque-speed characteristics over the entire speed range.
The exemplary embodiment of the invention described herein provides a cost effective torque control method without current sensors over the extended speed range. The control method and controller may be implemented in conjunction with an electric power steering system to control torque generation in the power steering system. The exemplary embodiment of the invention described herein provides numerous advantages. Torque per ampere in the constant torque region below the base speed is maximized by placing the back emf and current signals in phase as shown in Figure 1. Torque control capability in the extended speed range above the base speed is provided for optimum performance. Low frequency torque due to the use of current sensors is eliminated. This elimination is desirable when the controller is used in connection with a steering column mounted electric power steering system. The controller can be easily implemented in a low cost microcontroller since the mathematical operations involved include only additions and multiplications along with look up tables. While preferred embodiments have been shown and described, various modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustration only, and such illustrations and embodiments as have been disclosed herein are not to be construed as limiting to the claims

Claims

CLAIMSWhat is claimed is:
1. A method for torque control of a machine comprising: obtaining a torque command signal; obtaining a machine speed; determining an operating mode in response to the torque command signal and the machine speed, said operating mode including a first operating mode and a second operating mode; in the first operating mode, computing a stator phase voltage magnitude and determining an angle between the stator phase voltage and a stator phase back emf in response to the stator phase voltage magnitude; in the second operating mode, setting the stator phase voltage to a predetermined magnitude and determining the angle between the stator phase voltage and the stator phase back emf in response to the predetermined magnitude.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein: the stator phase voltage magnitude is computed in response to the torque command signal and the machine speed, and the angle between the stator phase voltage and the stator phase back emf is determined in response to the torque command signal, the machine speed and the stator phase voltage magnitude.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein: the predetermined magnitude is based on a battery voltage; and, the angle between the stator phase voltage and the stator phase back emf is determined in response to the torque command signal, the machine speed and the predetermined magnitude.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein in the second mode, the angle δ between the stator phase voltage and the stator phase back emf is determined by iteratively varying the angle δ until a computed torque value equals or exceeds a demanded torque value.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the demanded torque value is {Tcmd (R2 + X2 )/3Ke)} + 3Ke R ω and the computed torque value is Vm cos δ + Vm sin δ,
where
Tcmd is the torque command signal,
R = the stator resistance X = ωeLa, the stator phase reactance
La= the stator phase inductance
E = the stator phase back emf ωe = the electrical angular frequency, in rad/s
Ke = E/ ωm, and Vm is a function of the battery voltage.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein said machine is part of a vehicular electric power steering system.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said machine is a permanent magnet motor.
8. A system for control of torque of a machine, the system comprising: a driver coupled to the machine; an encoder coupled to a shaft of the machine, the encoder generating a rotation angle signal; a controller coupled to an input of the driver and coupled to an output of the encoder, wherein the controller: obtains a torque command signal; determines a machine speed in response to the rotation angle signal; determines an operating mode in response to the torque command signal and the machine speed, said operating mode including a first operating mode and a second operating mode; in the first operating mode, computing a stator phase voltage magnitude and determining an angle between the stator phase voltage and a stator phase back emf in response to the stator phase voltage magnitude; in the second operating mode, setting the stator phase voltage to a predetermined magnitude and determining the angle between the stator phase voltage and the stator phase back emf in response to the predetermined magnitude.
9. The system of claim 8 wherein: the stator phase voltage magnitude is computed in response to the torque command signal and the machine speed, and the angle between the stator phase voltage and the stator phase back emf is determined in response to the torque command signal, the machine speed and the stator phase voltage magnitude.
10. The system of claim 8 wherein: the predetermined magnitude is based on a battery voltage; and, the angle between the stator phase voltage and the stator phase back emf is determined in response to the torque command signal, the machine speed and the predetermined magnitude.
11. The system of claim 10, wherein in the second mode, the angle δ between the stator phase voltage and the stator phase back emf is determined by iteratively varying the angle δ until a computed torque value equals or exceeds a demanded torque value.
12. The system of claim 11 wherein the demanded torque value is {Tcmd (R2 + X2 )/3Ke)} + 3Ke R ω and the computed torque value is Vm cos δ + Vm sin δ, where
Tcmd is the torque command signal, R = the stator resistance X = ωeLa, the stator phase reactance La = the stator phase inductance
E = the stator phase back emf ωe = the electrical angular frequency, in rad/s Ke = E/ ωm, and Vmis a function of the battery voltage.
13. The system of claim 8, wherein said machine is part of a vehicular electric power steering system.
14. The system of claim 13 wherein said machine is a motor.
15. The system of claim 8 wherein said driver is a PWM inverter.
16. The system of claim 8 wherein said machine is a permanent magnet motor.
EP00959983A 2000-09-07 2000-09-07 Method and apparatus for torque control of a machine Withdrawn EP1317371A4 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2000/024535 WO2002020332A1 (en) 2000-09-07 2000-09-07 Method and apparatus for torque control of a machine

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1317371A1 true EP1317371A1 (en) 2003-06-11
EP1317371A4 EP1317371A4 (en) 2009-05-06

Family

ID=21741752

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00959983A Withdrawn EP1317371A4 (en) 2000-09-07 2000-09-07 Method and apparatus for torque control of a machine

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1317371A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2004508793A (en)
WO (1) WO2002020332A1 (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1994007301A1 (en) * 1992-09-24 1994-03-31 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process and device for regulating a converter-powered, permanently excited synchronous motor
EP0748038A2 (en) * 1995-06-05 1996-12-11 Kollmorgen Corporation System and method for controlling brushless permanent magnet motors
WO1999029031A2 (en) * 1997-12-03 1999-06-10 Kone Corporation Method for controlling a permanent magnet synchronous motor
WO2000007289A1 (en) * 1998-07-31 2000-02-10 S/L Montevideo Technology, Inc. Brushless dc motor controller with speed control from zero to above base speed

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0556870B1 (en) * 1988-07-11 1995-12-13 Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. Power steering apparatus
EP0398238B1 (en) * 1989-05-17 1994-03-09 Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. Motor-driven power steering apparatus
JP3572471B2 (en) * 1996-02-21 2004-10-06 光洋精工株式会社 Electric power steering device
JP2852640B2 (en) * 1996-04-12 1999-02-03 光洋精工株式会社 Electric power steering device
JP3681259B2 (en) * 1997-07-23 2005-08-10 光洋精工株式会社 Electric power steering device

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1994007301A1 (en) * 1992-09-24 1994-03-31 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Process and device for regulating a converter-powered, permanently excited synchronous motor
EP0748038A2 (en) * 1995-06-05 1996-12-11 Kollmorgen Corporation System and method for controlling brushless permanent magnet motors
WO1999029031A2 (en) * 1997-12-03 1999-06-10 Kone Corporation Method for controlling a permanent magnet synchronous motor
WO2000007289A1 (en) * 1998-07-31 2000-02-10 S/L Montevideo Technology, Inc. Brushless dc motor controller with speed control from zero to above base speed

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO0220332A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1317371A4 (en) 2009-05-06
JP2004508793A (en) 2004-03-18
WO2002020332A1 (en) 2002-03-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Husain et al. Unified control for switched reluctance motors for wide speed operation
EP1083649B1 (en) Motor system capable of obtaining high efficiency and method for controlling a motor
JP3467961B2 (en) Control device for rotating electric machine
US6498449B1 (en) Low ripple torque control of a permanent magnet motor without using current sensors
JP3686596B2 (en) Control system for permanent magnet motor
US6566829B1 (en) Method and apparatus for torque control of a machine
US8766571B2 (en) Method and apparatus for controlling an electrical machine
JPH08182398A (en) Driving device for permanent magnet-type synchronous motor
JPS6024676B2 (en) Device that controls a permanent magnet synchronous motor
JP2003199389A (en) Motor controller and controlling method
Fu et al. A sensorless direct torque control technique for permanent magnet synchronous motors
JP3531428B2 (en) Motor control device and control method
US6025691A (en) Synchronous motor control system and method of controlling synchronous motor
JP3473178B2 (en) Control device for rotating electric machine
JP3278556B2 (en) AC motor control device
Kubota et al. Speed sensorless field oriented control of induction motor with rotor resistance adaptation
JPH08275599A (en) Control method for permanent magnet synchronous motor
JPH08331885A (en) Controller and control method of synchronous motor
EP0503879A2 (en) Synchronous motor with permanent magnets and motor system
JPH10243679A (en) Synchronous motor controller
JP4380271B2 (en) Control device for synchronous motor
Brunner et al. Sensorless control of a Planetary Motor
EP1317371A1 (en) Method and apparatus for torque control of a machine
JP3680618B2 (en) Control device for permanent magnet type synchronous motor
JP3503893B2 (en) Control system and drive device for stepping motor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20030407

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20090406

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H02P 6/08 20060101ALI20090331BHEP

Ipc: B62D 5/04 20060101AFI20020320BHEP

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20120627

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: STEERING SOLUTIONS IP HOLDING CORPORATION

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H02P 6/14 20060101AFI20130603BHEP

Ipc: H02P 6/08 20060101ALI20130603BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20130712

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20131125