EP1226271A2 - Dna sequencing method - Google Patents

Dna sequencing method

Info

Publication number
EP1226271A2
EP1226271A2 EP00964544A EP00964544A EP1226271A2 EP 1226271 A2 EP1226271 A2 EP 1226271A2 EP 00964544 A EP00964544 A EP 00964544A EP 00964544 A EP00964544 A EP 00964544A EP 1226271 A2 EP1226271 A2 EP 1226271A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
enzyme
polynucleotide
label
solid support
polymerase
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP00964544A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1226271B1 (en
Inventor
Daniel Henry Medical Biosystems Ltd. DENSHAM
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Medical Biosystems Ltd
Original Assignee
Medical Biosystems Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Medical Biosystems Ltd filed Critical Medical Biosystems Ltd
Publication of EP1226271A2 publication Critical patent/EP1226271A2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1226271B1 publication Critical patent/EP1226271B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6869Methods for sequencing

Definitions

  • This invention relates to polynucleotide sequence determinations . Background of the invention
  • the ability to determine the sequence of a polynucleotide is of great scientific importance.
  • the Human Genome Project is an ambitious international effort to map and sequence the three billion bases of DNA encoded in the human genome.
  • the resulting sequence database will be a tool of unparalleled power for biomedical research.
  • the major obstacle to the successful completion of this project concerns the technology used in the sequencing process.
  • the principle method in general use for large-scale DNA sequencing is the chain termination method. This method was first developed by Sanger and Coulson (Sanger et al . , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci .
  • dideoxy derivatives of the four nucleoside triphosphates which are incorporated into a nascent polynucleotide chain in a polymerase reaction.
  • the dideoxy derivatives terminate the polymerase reaction and the products are then separated by gel electrophoresis and analysed to reveal the position at which the particular dideoxy derivative was incorporated into the chain.
  • the spectroscopic techniques described are surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy, which measures changes in an analyte within an evanescent wave field, and fluorescence measuring techniques.
  • SPR surface plasmon resonance
  • fluorescence measuring techniques have the disadvantage of increasing background interference from the fluorophores incorporated on the growing nascent polynucleotide chain. As the chain grows, the background "noise" increases and the time required to detect each nucleotide incorporation needs to be increased. This severely restricts the use of the method for sequencing large polynucleotides .
  • Single fragment polynucleotide sequencing approaches are outlined in WO-A-9924797 and WO-A-9833939 , both of which employ fluorescent detection of single labelled nucleotide molecules.
  • These single nucleotides are cleaved from the template polynucleotide, held in a flow by an optical trap (Jett, et al . , J. Biomol . Struc . Dyn, 1989; 7:301-309), by the action of an exonuclease molecule. These cleaved nucleotides then flow downstream within a quartz flow cell, are subjected to laser excitation and then detected by a sensitive detection system.
  • the present invention is based on the realisation that the sequence of a target polynucleotide can be determined by measuring conformational changes in an enzyme that binds to and processes along the target polynucleotide. The extent of the conformational change that takes place is different depending on which individual nucleotide on the target is in contact with the enzyme.
  • a method for determining the sequence of a polynucleotide comprises the steps of:
  • the enzyme is a polymerase enzyme which interacts with the target in the process of extending a complementary strand.
  • the enzyme is typically immobilised on a solid support to localise the reaction within a defined area.
  • the enzyme comprises a first bound detectable label, the characteristics of which alter as the enzyme undergoes a conformational change.
  • the enzyme may also comprise a second bound detectable label capable of interacting with the first label, wherein the degree of interaction is dependent on a conformational change in the enzyme.
  • the first label is an energy acceptor and the second label is an energy donor, and detecting the conformational change is carried out by measuring energy transfer between the two labels.
  • fluorescence resonance energy transfer is used to detect a conformational change in an enzyme that interacts with and processes along a target polymerase, thereby determining the sequence of the polynucleotide.
  • Fluorescence resonance energy transfer may be carried out between FRET donor and acceptor labels, each bound to the enzyme.
  • one of the labels may be bound to the enzyme and the other label bound to the polynucleotide.
  • a detectably-labelled enzyme capable of interacting with and precessing along a target polynucleotide, to determine the sequence of the polynucleotide, wherein the label alters its detectable characteristics as the enzyme processes along the polynucleotide.
  • a solid support comprises at least one immobilised enzyme capable of interacting with and precessing along a target polynucleotide, the enzyme being labelled with one or more detectable labels.
  • a system for determining the sequence of a polynucleotide comprises a solid support as defined above, and an apparatus for detecting the label.
  • the present invention offers several advantages over conventional sequencing technology. Once a polymerase enzyme begins its round of polynucleotide elongation, it tends to polymerase several thousand nucleotides before falling off from the strand. Additionally, certain specific polymerase systems are able to anchor or tether themselves to the template polynucleotide via a 'sliding clamp 1 (e.g. Polymerase III) which encircles the template molecule or via a molecular hook (e.g. T7 : thireodoxin complex) which partially encircles the template.
  • a 'sliding clamp 1 e.g. Polymerase III
  • a molecular hook e.g. T7 : thireodoxin complex
  • the invention may also enable tens of kilobases (kb) or more to be sequenced in one go, at a rate of hundreds of base pairs per second. This is a result of sequencing on a single fragment of DNA.
  • An advantage of sequencing a single fragment of DNA is that sequencing rates are determined by the enzyme system utilised and not upon indirect, summated reactions, and are therefore correspondingly higher. Just as important as the high rate is the ability to sequence large fragments of DNA. This will significantly reduce the amount of subcloning and the number of overlapping sequences required to assemble megabase segments of sequencing information.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a trace taken after fluorescence resonance energy transfer, with each of the peaks representing the detection of a specific nucleotide.
  • the present method for sequencing a polynucleotide involves the analysis of conformational changes between an enzyme and a target polynucleotide.
  • polynucleotide as used herein is to be interpreted broadly, and includes DNA and RNA, including modified DNA and RNA, as well as other hybridising nucleic acid-like molecules, e.g. peptide nucleic acid (PNA) .
  • PNA peptide nucleic acid
  • the enzyme may be a polymerase enzyme, and a conformational change is brought about when the polymerase incorporates a nucleotide into a nascent strand complementary to the target polynucleotide. It has been found that the conformational change will be different for each of the different nucleotides, A, T, G or C and therefore measuring the change will identify which nucleotide is incorporated.
  • the enzyme may be any that is involved in an interaction with a polynucleotide, e.g. a helicase enzyme , primase and holoenzyme .
  • a polynucleotide e.g. a helicase enzyme , primase and holoenzyme .
  • the enzyme processes along the polynucleotide, its conformation will change depending on which nucleotide on the target it is brought into contact with.
  • One way of detecting a conformational change in the enzyme is to measure resonance energy transfer between a suitable energy donor label and a suitable energy acceptor label .
  • the donor and acceptor are each bound to the enzyme and the conformational change in the enzyme brought about by its interaction with the target polynucleotide alters the relative positioning of the labels.
  • one label may be positioned on the enzyme and the other on a nucleotide of the target or on a nucleotide incorporated onto a strand complementary to the target .
  • FRET fluorescence resonance energy transfer
  • the present invention may also be carried out using measurement techniques that require only a single label. Any system that is capable of measuring changes in the local environment of the enzyme at the single molecule level, is an accepted embodiment of the invention.
  • Various properties of single fluorescent probes attached to a polynucleotide processive enzyme and/or its substrate (s) can be exploited in the context of the invention to provide data on variables within or in close proximity to the enzyme system/molecular environment that are specific to a nucleotide incorporation event.
  • Such variables include, but are not limited to, molecular interactions, enzymatic activity, reaction kinetics, conformational dynamics, molecular freedom of motion, and alterations in activity and in chemical and electrostatic environment .
  • the absorption and emission transition dipoles of single fluorophores can be determined by using polarized excitation light or by analysing the emission polarisation, or both.
  • the temporal variation in dipole orientation of a rigidly attached or rotationally diffusing tethered label can report on the angular motion of a macromolecule system or one of its subunits (Warshaw, et al . , Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci . USA, 1998; 95:8034) and therefore may be applied in the present invention.
  • the label is a fluorescence label, such as those disclosed in Xue, et al . , Nature, 1995; 373:681.
  • fluorescing enzymes such as green fluorescent protein (Lu, et al . , Science, 1998; 282:1877) can be employed.
  • the preferred embodiment of the invention involves the use of small fluorescence molecules that are covalently and site-specifically attached to the polynucleotide processive enzyme, e.g. tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) .
  • TMR tetramethylrhodamine
  • fluorescent labels are used in the invention, their detection may be affected by photobleaching caused by repeated exposure to excitation wavelengths.
  • One possible way to avoid this problem is to carry out many sequential reactions, but detecting fluorescence signals on only a few at a time. Using this iterative process, the correct sequence of signals can be determined and the polynucleotide sequence determined. For example, by immobilising a plurality of enzymes on a solid support and contacting them with the target polynucleotide, the sequencing reactions should start at approximately the same time. Excitation and detection of fluorescence can be localised to a proportion of the total reactions, for a time until photobleaching becomes evident. At this time, excitation and detection can be transferred to a different proportion of the reactions to continue the sequencing.
  • the labels may be attached to the enzymes by covalent or other linkages.
  • a number of strategies may be used to attach the labels to the enzyme. Strategies include the use of site-directed mutagenesis and unnatural amino acid mutagenesis (Anthony-Cahi1 , et al . , Trends Biochem. Sci., 1989; 14:400) to introduce cysteine and ketone handles for specific and orthogonal dye labelling proteins (Cornish, et al . , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1994; 91:2910).
  • GFP green fluorescent protein
  • polymerase e.g. polymerase
  • GFP green fluorescent protein
  • This technique has been demonstrated to be applicable to the measurement of conformational changes (Miyawaki, et al . , Nature, 1997; 388:882) and local pH changes (Llopis, et al . , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998; 95:6803). Supports suitable for use in immobilising the enzymes, will be apparent to the skilled person.
  • Enzyme immobilisation may be carried out by covalent or other means.
  • covalent linker molecules may be used to attach to a suitably prepared enzyme . Attachment methods are known to the skilled person.
  • Resonance energy transfer may be measured by the techniques of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or fluorescent surface plasmon resonance .
  • spectroscopy by total internal reflectance fluorescence (TIRF) , attenuated total reflection (ATR) , frustrated total reflection (FTR) , Brewster angle reflectometry, scattered total internal reflection (STIR) , fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy and spectroscopy (FLIMS) , fluorescence polarisation anisotrophy (FPA) , fluorescence spectroscopy, or evanescent wave ellipsometry.
  • TIRF total internal reflectance fluorescence
  • ATR attenuated total reflection
  • FTR frustrated total reflection
  • TSR frustrated total reflection
  • HTR scattered total internal reflection
  • FLIMS fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy and spectroscopy
  • FPA fluorescence polarisation anisotrophy
  • fluorescence spectroscopy or evanescent wave ellipsometry.
  • This Example used a confocal fluorescence setup, as shown in Fig. 1.
  • the setup consists of a scan table (1) able to scan at high resolution in X, Y and Z dimensions, a class coverslip (2) which is part of a microfluidic flow cell system with an inlet (8) for introducing the primer-template polynucleotide complex (4) and nucleotides over the immobilised (9) polymerase molecule (3) within a buffer, and an outlet (7) for waste.
  • Incident light from a laser light source (6) for donor excitation is delivered via an oil-immersion objective (5) .
  • TMR Tetramethylrhodamine
  • Cy5 acceptor
  • T7 DNA Polymerase from New England Biolabs (supplied at 10 000 U/ml) was used. 50 ⁇ l of T7 was bu fer-exchanged in a Vivaspin 500 (Vivaspin) against 4 x 500 ⁇ l of 200mM Sodium Acetate buffer at pH 4 in order to remove the DTT from the storage buffer that the T7 DNA Polymerase is supplied in. Then, 50 ⁇ l of the buffer-exchanged T7 DNA polymerase was added to lOO ⁇ l of Sodium Acetate buffer at pH 4 and 50 ⁇ l saturated 2-2-DiPyridyl-DiSulphide in aqueous solution. This reaction was then left for 110 minutes and the absorption at 343nm noted. Finally, the sample was then buffer-exchanged into 200mM Tris at pH 8 as before (4 times 500 ⁇ l) . Dye attachment was verified by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Cy5 succinimidyl ester
  • Glass coverslips were derivatized with N-[(3- trimethoxysilyDpropyl] ethylenediamine triacetic acid. The coverslip was then glued into a flow-cell arrangement that allowed buffer to be flowed continuously over the derivatized glass surface. The labelled polymerase was then added to the buffer and allowed to flow over the coverslip so that protein was immobilised on the glass surface .
  • Proteins were then immobilised on the glass-water interface with low density so that only one molecule was under the laser excitation volume at any one time.
  • Laser light (514 nm Ar ion laser, 15 ⁇ W, circularly polarized) was focused onto a 0.4 ⁇ m spot using an oil immersion objective in an epi- illumination setup of a scanning-stage confocal microscope.
  • the fluorescence emission was collected by the same objective and divided into two by a dichroic beam splitter (long pass at 630 nm) and detected by two Avalanche Photo Diode (APD) counting units, simultaneously.
  • APD Avalanche Photo Diode
  • a 585 nm band pass filter was placed in front of the donor detector; a 650 nm long pass filter was placed in front of the acceptor detector. Since the spectral ranges during fluorescence detection are sufficiently removed from the cutoff wavelength of the dichroic beam splitter, the polarization dependence of the detection efficiency of both donor and acceptor signal is negligible. It has been shown that the polarization mixing due to the high near field aperture (NA) objective can be overlooked (Ha et al , Supra) .
  • NA near field aperture
  • oligonucleotides Two oligonucleotides were synthesised using standard phosphoramidite chemistry.
  • the oligonucleotide defined as SEQ ID NO.l was used as the target polynucleotide, and the oligonucleotide defined as SEQ ID No.2 was used as the primer.
  • the two oligonucleotides were reacted under hybridizing conditions to form the target-primer complex.
  • the reaction was then initiated by injecting the primed DNA into the flow cell with all four nucleotides

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Investigating, Analyzing Materials By Fluorescence Or Luminescence (AREA)
  • Saccharide Compounds (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By The Use Of Chemical Reactions (AREA)
  • Immobilizing And Processing Of Enzymes And Microorganisms (AREA)

Abstract

A method for determining the sequence of a polynucleotide, the method relying on the detection of a conformational change in an enzyme that interacts with and processes along the polynucleotide. The detection of a conformational change may be carried out by measuring changes in a fluorophore bound to the enzyme.

Description

DNA SEQUENCING METHOD
Field of the Invention
This invention relates to polynucleotide sequence determinations . Background of the invention
The ability to determine the sequence of a polynucleotide is of great scientific importance. For example, the Human Genome Project is an ambitious international effort to map and sequence the three billion bases of DNA encoded in the human genome. When complete, the resulting sequence database will be a tool of unparalleled power for biomedical research. The major obstacle to the successful completion of this project concerns the technology used in the sequencing process. The principle method in general use for large-scale DNA sequencing is the chain termination method. This method was first developed by Sanger and Coulson (Sanger et al . , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci . USA, 1977; 74: 5463-5467), and relies on the use of dideoxy derivatives of the four nucleoside triphosphates which are incorporated into a nascent polynucleotide chain in a polymerase reaction. Upon incorporation, the dideoxy derivatives terminate the polymerase reaction and the products are then separated by gel electrophoresis and analysed to reveal the position at which the particular dideoxy derivative was incorporated into the chain.
Although this method is widely used and produces reliable results, it is recognised that it is slow, labour- intensive and expensive. An alternative sequencing method is proposed in EP-A- 0471732, which uses spectroscopic means to detect the incorporation of a nucleotide into a nascent polynucleotide strand complementary to a target. The method relies on an immobilised complex of template and primer, which is exposed to a flow containing only one of the different nucleotides. Spectroscopic techniques are then used to measure a time-dependent signal arising from the polymerase catalysed growth of the template copy. The spectroscopic techniques described are surface plasmon resonance (SPR) spectroscopy, which measures changes in an analyte within an evanescent wave field, and fluorescence measuring techniques. However, limitations of this method are recognised; the most serious for the SPR technique being that, as the size of the copy strand grows, the absolute size of the signal also grows due to the movement of the strand out of the evanescent wave field, making it harder to detect increments. The fluorescence measuring techniques have the disadvantage of increasing background interference from the fluorophores incorporated on the growing nascent polynucleotide chain. As the chain grows, the background "noise" increases and the time required to detect each nucleotide incorporation needs to be increased. This severely restricts the use of the method for sequencing large polynucleotides .
Single fragment polynucleotide sequencing approaches are outlined in WO-A-9924797 and WO-A-9833939 , both of which employ fluorescent detection of single labelled nucleotide molecules. These single nucleotides are cleaved from the template polynucleotide, held in a flow by an optical trap (Jett, et al . , J. Biomol . Struc . Dyn, 1989; 7:301-309), by the action of an exonuclease molecule. These cleaved nucleotides then flow downstream within a quartz flow cell, are subjected to laser excitation and then detected by a sensitive detection system. However, limitations of this method are recognised; the most serious for the exonuclease technique being the fact that the labelled nucleotides severely affect the processivity of the exonuclease enzyme. Other limitations of this method include 'sticking' of the nucleotide (s) to the biotin bead used to immobilise the polynucleotide fragment, thus resulting in the nucleotide flow becoming out of phase; inefficiency and length limitation of the initial enzymatic labelling process; and the excitation 'cross-over' between the four different dye molecules resulting in a greatly increased error rate.
There is therefore a need for an improved method, preferably at the single fragment level, for determining the sequence of polynucleotides, which significantly increases the rate and fragment size of the polynucleotide sequenced and which is preferably carried out by an automated process, reducing the complexity and cost associated with existing methods. Summary of the Invention
The present invention is based on the realisation that the sequence of a target polynucleotide can be determined by measuring conformational changes in an enzyme that binds to and processes along the target polynucleotide. The extent of the conformational change that takes place is different depending on which individual nucleotide on the target is in contact with the enzyme.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a method for determining the sequence of a polynucleotide comprises the steps of:
(i) reacting a target polynucleotide with an enzyme that is capable of interacting with and precessing along the polynucleotide, under conditions sufficient to induce the enzyme activity; and (ii) detecting conformational changes in the enzyme as the enzyme processes along the polynucleotide.
In a preferred embodiment, the enzyme is a polymerase enzyme which interacts with the target in the process of extending a complementary strand. The enzyme is typically immobilised on a solid support to localise the reaction within a defined area.
According to a second embodiment of the invention, the enzyme comprises a first bound detectable label, the characteristics of which alter as the enzyme undergoes a conformational change. The enzyme may also comprise a second bound detectable label capable of interacting with the first label, wherein the degree of interaction is dependent on a conformational change in the enzyme. Typically, the first label is an energy acceptor and the second label is an energy donor, and detecting the conformational change is carried out by measuring energy transfer between the two labels.
According to a further embodiment of the invention, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is used to detect a conformational change in an enzyme that interacts with and processes along a target polymerase, thereby determining the sequence of the polynucleotide. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer may be carried out between FRET donor and acceptor labels, each bound to the enzyme. Alternatively, one of the labels may be bound to the enzyme and the other label bound to the polynucleotide. According to a further embodiment, there is the use of a detectably-labelled enzyme, capable of interacting with and precessing along a target polynucleotide, to determine the sequence of the polynucleotide, wherein the label alters its detectable characteristics as the enzyme processes along the polynucleotide.
According to a further aspect, a solid support comprises at least one immobilised enzyme capable of interacting with and precessing along a target polynucleotide, the enzyme being labelled with one or more detectable labels.
According to a further aspect, a system for determining the sequence of a polynucleotide comprises a solid support as defined above, and an apparatus for detecting the label. The present invention offers several advantages over conventional sequencing technology. Once a polymerase enzyme begins its round of polynucleotide elongation, it tends to polymerase several thousand nucleotides before falling off from the strand. Additionally, certain specific polymerase systems are able to anchor or tether themselves to the template polynucleotide via a 'sliding clamp1 (e.g. Polymerase III) which encircles the template molecule or via a molecular hook (e.g. T7 : thireodoxin complex) which partially encircles the template.
The invention may also enable tens of kilobases (kb) or more to be sequenced in one go, at a rate of hundreds of base pairs per second. This is a result of sequencing on a single fragment of DNA. An advantage of sequencing a single fragment of DNA is that sequencing rates are determined by the enzyme system utilised and not upon indirect, summated reactions, and are therefore correspondingly higher. Just as important as the high rate is the ability to sequence large fragments of DNA. This will significantly reduce the amount of subcloning and the number of overlapping sequences required to assemble megabase segments of sequencing information. An additional advantage of the single fragment approach is the elimination of problems associated with the disposal of hazardous wastes, such as acrylamide, which plague current sequencing efforts. Description of the Drawings Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of a confocal microscope setup for use in the invention;
Figure 2 illustrates a trace taken after fluorescence resonance energy transfer, with each of the peaks representing the detection of a specific nucleotide. Description of the Invention
The present method for sequencing a polynucleotide involves the analysis of conformational changes between an enzyme and a target polynucleotide.
The term "polynucleotide" as used herein is to be interpreted broadly, and includes DNA and RNA, including modified DNA and RNA, as well as other hybridising nucleic acid-like molecules, e.g. peptide nucleic acid (PNA) .
The enzyme may be a polymerase enzyme, and a conformational change is brought about when the polymerase incorporates a nucleotide into a nascent strand complementary to the target polynucleotide. It has been found that the conformational change will be different for each of the different nucleotides, A, T, G or C and therefore measuring the change will identify which nucleotide is incorporated.
Alternatively, the enzyme may be any that is involved in an interaction with a polynucleotide, e.g. a helicase enzyme , primase and holoenzyme . As the enzyme processes along the polynucleotide, its conformation will change depending on which nucleotide on the target it is brought into contact with. One way of detecting a conformational change in the enzyme is to measure resonance energy transfer between a suitable energy donor label and a suitable energy acceptor label . In one example the donor and acceptor are each bound to the enzyme and the conformational change in the enzyme brought about by its interaction with the target polynucleotide alters the relative positioning of the labels. The differences in positioning are reflected in the resulting energy transfer and are characteristic of the particular nucleotide in contact with the enzyme. Alternatively, one label may be positioned on the enzyme and the other on a nucleotide of the target or on a nucleotide incorporated onto a strand complementary to the target .
The use of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a preferred embodiment of the invention. This technique is capable of measuring distances on the 2- to 8nm scale and relies on the distance-dependent energy transfer between a donor fluorophore and an acceptor fluorophore. The technique not only has superior static co-localization capabilities but can also provide information on dynamic changes in the distance or orientation between the two fluorophores for intramolecular and intermolecular FRET. Since the first measurement of energy transfer between a single donor and a single acceptor (single pair FRET) (Ha, et al . , Proc . Natl . Acad. Sci. USA, 1996; 96:893), it has been used to study ligand- receptor co-localisation (Schutz, et al . , Biophys . J. , 1998; 74:2223), to probe equilibrium protein structural fluctuations and enzyme-substrate interactions during catalysis (Ha, et al . , 1999 Supra), and to identify conformational states and sub-populations of individual diffusing molecules in solutions. All of these variables are envisioned as applicable within the context of the invention.
The present invention may also be carried out using measurement techniques that require only a single label. Any system that is capable of measuring changes in the local environment of the enzyme at the single molecule level, is an accepted embodiment of the invention. Various properties of single fluorescent probes attached to a polynucleotide processive enzyme and/or its substrate (s) can be exploited in the context of the invention to provide data on variables within or in close proximity to the enzyme system/molecular environment that are specific to a nucleotide incorporation event. Such variables include, but are not limited to, molecular interactions, enzymatic activity, reaction kinetics, conformational dynamics, molecular freedom of motion, and alterations in activity and in chemical and electrostatic environment .
For example, the absorption and emission transition dipoles of single fluorophores can be determined by using polarized excitation light or by analysing the emission polarisation, or both. The temporal variation in dipole orientation of a rigidly attached or rotationally diffusing tethered label can report on the angular motion of a macromolecule system or one of its subunits (Warshaw, et al . , Proc. Natl . Acad. Sci . USA, 1998; 95:8034) and therefore may be applied in the present invention.
The labels that may be used in the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Preferably, the label is a fluorescence label, such as those disclosed in Xue, et al . , Nature, 1995; 373:681. Alternatively, fluorescing enzymes such as green fluorescent protein (Lu, et al . , Science, 1998; 282:1877) can be employed. The preferred embodiment of the invention, however, involves the use of small fluorescence molecules that are covalently and site-specifically attached to the polynucleotide processive enzyme, e.g. tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) .
If fluorescent labels are used in the invention, their detection may be affected by photobleaching caused by repeated exposure to excitation wavelengths. One possible way to avoid this problem is to carry out many sequential reactions, but detecting fluorescence signals on only a few at a time. Using this iterative process, the correct sequence of signals can be determined and the polynucleotide sequence determined. For example, by immobilising a plurality of enzymes on a solid support and contacting them with the target polynucleotide, the sequencing reactions should start at approximately the same time. Excitation and detection of fluorescence can be localised to a proportion of the total reactions, for a time until photobleaching becomes evident. At this time, excitation and detection can be transferred to a different proportion of the reactions to continue the sequencing. As all the reactions are relatively in phase, the correct sequence should be obtained with minimal sequence reassembly. The labels may be attached to the enzymes by covalent or other linkages. A number of strategies may be used to attach the labels to the enzyme. Strategies include the use of site-directed mutagenesis and unnatural amino acid mutagenesis (Anthony-Cahi1 , et al . , Trends Biochem. Sci., 1989; 14:400) to introduce cysteine and ketone handles for specific and orthogonal dye labelling proteins (Cornish, et al . , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1994; 91:2910).
Another foreseen embodiment used to tag the polynucleotide processive enzyme is the fusion of green fluorescent protein (GFP) to the processive enzyme (e.g. polymerase) via molecular cloning techniques known in the art (Pierce, D.W. et al . , Nature, 1997; 388:338). This technique has been demonstrated to be applicable to the measurement of conformational changes (Miyawaki, et al . , Nature, 1997; 388:882) and local pH changes (Llopis, et al . , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1998; 95:6803). Supports suitable for use in immobilising the enzymes, will be apparent to the skilled person. Silicon, glass and ceramics materials may be used. The support will usually be a planar surface. Enzyme immobilisation may be carried out by covalent or other means. For example, covalent linker molecules may be used to attach to a suitably prepared enzyme . Attachment methods are known to the skilled person.
There may be one or more enzymes immobilised to the solid support. In a preferred embodiment, there are a plurality of enzymes attached. This allows monitoring of many separate reactions, and may be useful to overcome photobleaching problems as outlined above.
A variety of techniques may be used to measure a conformational change in the enzyme. Resonance energy transfer may be measured by the techniques of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) or fluorescent surface plasmon resonance .
However, other techniques which measure changes in radiation via interaction with a 'label' or energy transducer may be considered, for example spectroscopy by total internal reflectance fluorescence (TIRF) , attenuated total reflection (ATR) , frustrated total reflection (FTR) , Brewster angle reflectometry, scattered total internal reflection (STIR) , fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy and spectroscopy (FLIMS) , fluorescence polarisation anisotrophy (FPA) , fluorescence spectroscopy, or evanescent wave ellipsometry.
The invention will now be illustrated further by the following Example, with reference to the accompanying drawings. Example
This Example used a confocal fluorescence setup, as shown in Fig. 1.
With reference to Fig. 1, the setup consists of a scan table (1) able to scan at high resolution in X, Y and Z dimensions, a class coverslip (2) which is part of a microfluidic flow cell system with an inlet (8) for introducing the primer-template polynucleotide complex (4) and nucleotides over the immobilised (9) polymerase molecule (3) within a buffer, and an outlet (7) for waste. Incident light from a laser light source (6) for donor excitation is delivered via an oil-immersion objective (5) . Protein Conjugation
In this experiment, Tetramethylrhodamine (TMR, donor) and Cy5 (acceptor) where used as the FRET pair. This was due to their well separated emission wavelengths (>100nm) and large Foster radius.
T7 DNA Polymerase from New England Biolabs (supplied at 10 000 U/ml) was used. 50μl of T7 was bu fer-exchanged in a Vivaspin 500 (Vivaspin) against 4 x 500μl of 200mM Sodium Acetate buffer at pH 4 in order to remove the DTT from the storage buffer that the T7 DNA Polymerase is supplied in. Then, 50μl of the buffer-exchanged T7 DNA polymerase was added to lOOμl of Sodium Acetate buffer at pH 4 and 50 μl saturated 2-2-DiPyridyl-DiSulphide in aqueous solution. This reaction was then left for 110 minutes and the absorption at 343nm noted. Finally, the sample was then buffer-exchanged into 200mM Tris at pH 8 as before (4 times 500μl) . Dye attachment was verified by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Cy5 succinimidyl ester
(Molecular Probes) was conjugated to the TMR-T7 DNA
Polymerase under the same labelling conditions and purified and characterized as described above. Polymerase Immobilization
Glass coverslips were derivatized with N-[(3- trimethoxysilyDpropyl] ethylenediamine triacetic acid. The coverslip was then glued into a flow-cell arrangement that allowed buffer to be flowed continuously over the derivatized glass surface. The labelled polymerase was then added to the buffer and allowed to flow over the coverslip so that protein was immobilised on the glass surface .
Proteins were then immobilised on the glass-water interface with low density so that only one molecule was under the laser excitation volume at any one time. Laser light (514 nm Ar ion laser, 15 μW, circularly polarized) was focused onto a 0.4 μm spot using an oil immersion objective in an epi- illumination setup of a scanning-stage confocal microscope. The fluorescence emission was collected by the same objective and divided into two by a dichroic beam splitter (long pass at 630 nm) and detected by two Avalanche Photo Diode (APD) counting units, simultaneously.
A 585 nm band pass filter was placed in front of the donor detector; a 650 nm long pass filter was placed in front of the acceptor detector. Since the spectral ranges during fluorescence detection are sufficiently removed from the cutoff wavelength of the dichroic beam splitter, the polarization dependence of the detection efficiency of both donor and acceptor signal is negligible. It has been shown that the polarization mixing due to the high near field aperture (NA) objective can be overlooked (Ha et al , Supra) .
In order to acquire donor and acceptor emission times, a search condition on the acceptor signal was employed as outlined in (Ha, et al . , Appl . Phys . Lett., 1997; 70:782). This procedure aids in the screening of doubly labelled proteins: with no direct excitation of the acceptor, only proteins experiencing FRET could show acceptor signal . Once a protein was screened, located and positioned under the laser spot, donor and acceptor time traces (5 ms integration time) were acquired. The acquisition time lasted until all the fluorescent labels on the target protein where photobleached. Reaction Initiation
Two oligonucleotides were synthesised using standard phosphoramidite chemistry. The oligonucleotide defined as SEQ ID NO.l was used as the target polynucleotide, and the oligonucleotide defined as SEQ ID No.2 was used as the primer. The two oligonucleotides were reacted under hybridizing conditions to form the target-primer complex.
CAAGGAGAGGACGCTGTCTGTCGAAGGTAAGGAACGGACGAGAGAAGGGAGAG
SEQ ID NO.l
CTCTCCCTTCTCTCGTC SEQ ID NO .2
The reaction was then initiated by injecting the primed DNA into the flow cell with all four nucleotides
(dGTP, dCTP, dATP and dTTP) present at a concentration of
0.4mM. The flow cell was maintained at 25 degrees Celsius by a modified peltier device. An oxygen-scavenging system was also employed [50 μg/ml glucose oxidase, 10 μg/ml catalase, 18% (wt/wt) glucose, 1% (wt/vol) β-mercaptoethanol] to prolong fluorescent lifetimes (Funatsu, et al . , Nature, 1995; 374:555-559) . FRET data anaylsis
Initial studies have determined the origins of blinking, photobleaching and triplet state spikes (Ha, et al . , Chem. Phy. , 1999; 247:107-118), all of which can interfere with the underlying changes in FRET efficiency, due to distance changes between fluorophores as a result of conformational changes. After subtracting the background signal from donor and acceptor time traces as disclosed in Ha, et al . , 1999 (Supra) , a median filter, with five points average, was applied to remove triplet spikes. Next, data points that showed simultaneous dark counts on both detectors due to donor blinking events were disregarded from the time traces. The amount of donor signal recovery upon acceptor photobleaching is related to the quantum yields of the molecules and their overall detection efficiencies.
Energy transfer efficiency time trace was then obtained. The FRET efficiency time trace during polymerization of target strand SEQ ID NO.l shown in figure 2. Reading Fig. 2, the sequence corresponds to the complement of that of SEQ ID No. 1 (reading right to left, minus that part which hybridises to the primer sequence) .

Claims

I . A method for determining the sequence of a polynucleotide, comprising the steps of: i . reacting a target polynucleotide with an enzyme that is capable of interacting with and precessing along the polynucleotide, under conditions sufficient to induce enzyme activity; and ii. detecting conformational changes in the enzyme as the enzyme processes along the polynucleotide. 2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the enzyme is a polymerase enzyme .
3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the enzyme is a helicase enzyme or a primase enzyme.
4. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the enzyme is immobilised on a solid support.
5. A method according to claim 4, comprising a plurality of enzymes immobilised on the solid support.
6. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein the enzyme comprises a first bound detectable label, the characteristics of which alter as the enzyme undergoes a conformational change.
7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the enzyme comprises a second bound detectable label capable of interacting with the first label, wherein the degree of interaction is dependent on a conformational change in the enzyme .
8. A method according to claim 6, wherein a second detectable label is bound to a nucleotide brought into contact with the enzyme. 9. A method according to claim 7 or claim 8, wherein the first label is an energy acceptor and the second label is an energy donor, or vice versa, and wherein step (ii) is carried out by measuring energy transfer between the two labels. 10. A method according to any preceding claim, wherein step (ii) is carried out using confocal microscopy.
II. A method according to claim 10, wherein step (ii) is carried out by fluorescence imaging.
12. A method according to claim 6, wherein step (ii) is carried out by measuring a polarisation effect consequent on the altered characteristics of the first label. 13. A method according to claim 12, wherein step (ii) is carried out by fluorescence polarisation anisotrophy.
14. Use of fluorescence resonance energy transfer to detect a conformational change in an enzyme that interacts with and processes along a target polymerase, to thereby determine the sequence of the polynucleotide.
15. Use according to claim 14, wherein the enzyme is a polymerase enzyme.
16. Use according to claim 14 or claim 15, wherein the enzyme is immobilised on a solid support. 17. Use of a detectably-labelled enzyme, capable of interacting with and precessing along a target polynucleotide, to determine the sequence of the polynucleotide, wherein the label alters its detectable characteristics as the enzyme processes along the polynucleotide.
18. A solid support comprising at least one immobilised enzyme capable of interacting with and precessing along a target polynucleotide, the enzyme being labelled with one or more detectable labels. 19. A solid support according to claim 18, wherein the enzyme is a polymerase .
20. A solid support according to claim 18 or claim 19, wherein the label is a fluorophore.
21. A system for determining a sequence of a polynucleotide, comprising a solid support according to any of claims 18 to 21, and an apparatus for detecting the label .
EP00964544A 1999-10-06 2000-10-06 Dna sequencing method Expired - Lifetime EP1226271B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB9923644.0A GB9923644D0 (en) 1999-10-06 1999-10-06 DNA sequencing
GB9923644 1999-10-06
PCT/GB2000/003860 WO2001025480A2 (en) 1999-10-06 2000-10-06 Dna sequencing method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1226271A2 true EP1226271A2 (en) 2002-07-31
EP1226271B1 EP1226271B1 (en) 2008-03-05

Family

ID=10862234

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00964544A Expired - Lifetime EP1226271B1 (en) 1999-10-06 2000-10-06 Dna sequencing method

Country Status (21)

Country Link
US (4) US20050214849A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1226271B1 (en)
JP (2) JP5030249B2 (en)
KR (1) KR100809171B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1159457C (en)
AT (1) ATE388242T1 (en)
AU (1) AU769102B2 (en)
BR (1) BR0014468A (en)
CA (1) CA2386115C (en)
DE (1) DE60038244T2 (en)
DK (1) DK1226271T3 (en)
EA (1) EA006702B1 (en)
ES (1) ES2302497T3 (en)
GB (1) GB9923644D0 (en)
HK (1) HK1045857A1 (en)
IL (2) IL148678A0 (en)
IS (1) IS6333A (en)
MX (1) MXPA02003534A (en)
NZ (1) NZ517775A (en)
PT (1) PT1226271E (en)
WO (1) WO2001025480A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ATE225858T1 (en) * 1997-07-28 2002-10-15 Medical Biosystems Ltd SEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEIC ACIDS
US6780591B2 (en) 1998-05-01 2004-08-24 Arizona Board Of Regents Method of determining the nucleotide sequence of oligonucleotides and DNA molecules
US7875440B2 (en) 1998-05-01 2011-01-25 Arizona Board Of Regents Method of determining the nucleotide sequence of oligonucleotides and DNA molecules
GB9907812D0 (en) * 1999-04-06 1999-06-02 Medical Biosystems Ltd Sequencing
EP1681356B1 (en) 1999-05-19 2011-10-19 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Method for sequencing nucleic acid molecules
US7056661B2 (en) 1999-05-19 2006-06-06 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Method for sequencing nucleic acid molecules
GB9923644D0 (en) * 1999-10-06 1999-12-08 Medical Biosystems Ltd DNA sequencing
EP1975251A3 (en) 2000-07-07 2009-03-25 Visigen Biotechnologies, Inc. Real-time sequence determination
EP1354064A2 (en) 2000-12-01 2003-10-22 Visigen Biotechnologies, Inc. Enzymatic nucleic acid synthesis: compositions and methods for altering monomer incorporation fidelity
GB0112238D0 (en) * 2001-05-18 2001-07-11 Medical Biosystems Ltd Sequencing method
US6956114B2 (en) 2001-10-30 2005-10-18 '454 Corporation Sulfurylase-luciferase fusion proteins and thermostable sulfurylase
US6902921B2 (en) 2001-10-30 2005-06-07 454 Corporation Sulfurylase-luciferase fusion proteins and thermostable sulfurylase
SE0201655D0 (en) * 2002-05-31 2002-05-31 Amersham Biosciences Ab A method of electrophoresis
JP2007529999A (en) * 2003-07-15 2007-11-01 デンシャム,ダニエル,ヘンリー Measurement of polynucleotide amplification reaction
GB0317343D0 (en) * 2003-07-24 2003-08-27 Medical Biosystems Ltd Polynucleotide sequencing
US7169560B2 (en) 2003-11-12 2007-01-30 Helicos Biosciences Corporation Short cycle methods for sequencing polynucleotides
US7981604B2 (en) 2004-02-19 2011-07-19 California Institute Of Technology Methods and kits for analyzing polynucleotide sequences
US7170050B2 (en) 2004-09-17 2007-01-30 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Apparatus and methods for optical analysis of molecules
US7666593B2 (en) 2005-08-26 2010-02-23 Helicos Biosciences Corporation Single molecule sequencing of captured nucleic acids
EP3373174A1 (en) * 2006-03-31 2018-09-12 Illumina, Inc. Systems and devices for sequence by synthesis analysis
GB0721340D0 (en) * 2007-10-30 2007-12-12 Isis Innovation Polymerase-based single-molecule DNA sequencing
CA2991818C (en) 2008-03-28 2022-10-11 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Compositions and methods for nucleic acid sequencing
US9182406B2 (en) * 2008-08-04 2015-11-10 Biodesy, Inc. Nonlinear optical detection of molecules comprising an unnatural amino acid possessing a hyperpolarizability
WO2010068884A2 (en) * 2008-12-11 2010-06-17 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and systems for direct sequencing of single dna molecules
US8911972B2 (en) 2009-12-16 2014-12-16 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Sequencing methods using enzyme conformation
WO2011159942A1 (en) 2010-06-18 2011-12-22 Illumina, Inc. Conformational probes and methods for sequencing nucleic acids
WO2012129347A1 (en) 2011-03-21 2012-09-27 Biodesy, Llc Classification of kinase inhibitors using nonlinear optical techniques
DE102013202721A1 (en) * 2013-02-20 2014-08-21 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft A sequencing device for sequencing at least one nucleic acid single strand and methods for sequencing at least one nucleic acid single strand
GB201306444D0 (en) * 2013-04-09 2013-05-22 Base4 Innovation Ltd Single nucleotide detection method
US10605766B2 (en) 2014-07-15 2020-03-31 Illumina, Inc. Biochemically activated electronic device
EP3237906B8 (en) 2014-12-23 2020-10-28 Bluelight Therapeutics, Inc. Attachment of proteins to interfaces for use in nonlinear optical detection
US10077470B2 (en) 2015-07-21 2018-09-18 Omniome, Inc. Nucleic acid sequencing methods and systems
AU2017258619B2 (en) 2016-04-29 2020-05-14 Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. Sequencing method employing ternary complex destabilization to identify cognate nucleotides
JP6828140B2 (en) 2016-08-15 2021-02-10 オムニオム インコーポレイテッドOmniome, Inc. Methods and systems for sequencing nucleic acids
WO2018034780A1 (en) 2016-08-15 2018-02-22 Omniome, Inc. Sequencing method for rapid identification and processing of cognate nucleotide pairs
WO2018125759A1 (en) 2016-12-30 2018-07-05 Omniome, Inc. Method and system employing distinguishable polymerases for detecting ternary complexes and identifying cognate nucleotides
CA3050695C (en) 2017-01-20 2024-02-20 Omniome, Inc. Process for cognate nucleotide detection in a nucleic acid sequencing workflow
US10161003B2 (en) 2017-04-25 2018-12-25 Omniome, Inc. Methods and apparatus that increase sequencing-by-binding efficiency
US9951385B1 (en) 2017-04-25 2018-04-24 Omniome, Inc. Methods and apparatus that increase sequencing-by-binding efficiency
WO2019055867A1 (en) * 2017-09-15 2019-03-21 Illumina, Inc. Sequence-detection system
CA3079411C (en) 2017-10-19 2023-12-05 Omniome, Inc. Simultaneous background reduction and complex stabilization in binding assay workflows
US11499962B2 (en) 2017-11-17 2022-11-15 Ultima Genomics, Inc. Methods and systems for analyte detection and analysis
US10267790B1 (en) 2017-11-17 2019-04-23 Ultima Genomics, Inc. Systems for biological sample processing and analysis
US10512911B1 (en) * 2018-12-07 2019-12-24 Ultima Genomics, Inc. Implementing barriers for controlled environments during sample processing and detection

Family Cites Families (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE462454B (en) 1988-11-10 1990-06-25 Pharmacia Ab METHOD FOR USE IN BIOSENSORS
GB8910880D0 (en) * 1989-05-11 1989-06-28 Amersham Int Plc Sequencing method
CA2044616A1 (en) 1989-10-26 1991-04-27 Roger Y. Tsien Dna sequencing
US5583026A (en) * 1994-08-31 1996-12-10 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Process for reconstituting the polymerase III* and other subassemblies of E. coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme from peptide subunits
GB9208733D0 (en) 1992-04-22 1992-06-10 Medical Res Council Dna sequencing method
US5360714A (en) * 1992-08-28 1994-11-01 Fox Chase Cancer Center Hepadnavirus polymerase gene product having RNA-dependent DNA priming and reverse transcriptase activities and methods of measuring the activities thereof
CA2158642A1 (en) 1993-03-19 1994-09-29 Hubert Koster Dna sequencing by mass spectrometry via exonuclease degradation
WO1995006138A1 (en) * 1993-08-25 1995-03-02 The Regents Of The University Of California Microscopic method for detecting micromotions
US5747247A (en) * 1994-07-25 1998-05-05 The Regents Of The University Of California Spectroscopic helicase assay
US5801042A (en) * 1994-08-18 1998-09-01 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Unique associated Kaposi's sarcoma virus sequences and uses thereof
US5753439A (en) * 1995-05-19 1998-05-19 Trustees Of Boston University Nucleic acid detection methods
DE69825601T2 (en) * 1997-02-12 2005-04-28 Chan, Eugene Y, Brookline METHOD FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POLYMERS
JP2001514511A (en) * 1997-03-05 2001-09-11 スクリプトゲン ファーマシューティカルズ インク Screening using fluorescence anisotropy to identify compounds with affinity for nucleic acids
US6159687A (en) * 1997-03-18 2000-12-12 Novo Nordisk A/S Methods for generating recombined polynucleotides
ATE225858T1 (en) 1997-07-28 2002-10-15 Medical Biosystems Ltd SEQUENCE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEIC ACIDS
US7875440B2 (en) * 1998-05-01 2011-01-25 Arizona Board Of Regents Method of determining the nucleotide sequence of oligonucleotides and DNA molecules
US6210896B1 (en) * 1998-08-13 2001-04-03 Us Genomics Molecular motors
US6263286B1 (en) * 1998-08-13 2001-07-17 U.S. Genomics, Inc. Methods of analyzing polymers using a spatial network of fluorophores and fluorescence resonance energy transfer
AU5560699A (en) 1998-08-13 2000-03-06 U.S. Genomics, Inc. Optically characterizing polymers
ES2310514T3 (en) * 1999-03-10 2009-01-16 Asm Scientific, Inc. A METHOD FOR DIRECT SEQUENCING OF NUCLEIC ACID.
GB9907812D0 (en) * 1999-04-06 1999-06-02 Medical Biosystems Ltd Sequencing
US7056661B2 (en) * 1999-05-19 2006-06-06 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. Method for sequencing nucleic acid molecules
US6335420B1 (en) 1999-11-22 2002-01-01 Ibc Advanced Technologies, Inc. Polyamide ligand-containing polymeric resins and methods of using the same for removing, separating and/or concentrating desired metal ions from solutions
US6908736B1 (en) * 1999-10-06 2005-06-21 Medical Biosystems, Ltd. DNA sequencing method
GB9923644D0 (en) 1999-10-06 1999-12-08 Medical Biosystems Ltd DNA sequencing
GB0112238D0 (en) 2001-05-18 2001-07-11 Medical Biosystems Ltd Sequencing method
GB0317343D0 (en) * 2003-07-24 2003-08-27 Medical Biosystems Ltd Polynucleotide sequencing
GB0413082D0 (en) 2004-06-11 2004-07-14 Medical Biosystems Ltd Method
US8262900B2 (en) * 2006-12-14 2012-09-11 Life Technologies Corporation Methods and apparatus for measuring analytes using large scale FET arrays
US20100301398A1 (en) * 2009-05-29 2010-12-02 Ion Torrent Systems Incorporated Methods and apparatus for measuring analytes
US20100137143A1 (en) * 2008-10-22 2010-06-03 Ion Torrent Systems Incorporated Methods and apparatus for measuring analytes
US8673627B2 (en) * 2009-05-29 2014-03-18 Life Technologies Corporation Apparatus and methods for performing electrochemical reactions
US8574835B2 (en) * 2009-05-29 2013-11-05 Life Technologies Corporation Scaffolded nucleic acid polymer particles and methods of making and using

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0125480A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR100809171B1 (en) 2008-02-29
EP1226271B1 (en) 2008-03-05
NZ517775A (en) 2004-01-30
WO2001025480A2 (en) 2001-04-12
JP2012196201A (en) 2012-10-18
CA2386115C (en) 2010-06-15
DE60038244D1 (en) 2008-04-17
GB9923644D0 (en) 1999-12-08
ATE388242T1 (en) 2008-03-15
HK1045857A1 (en) 2002-12-13
JP5030249B2 (en) 2012-09-19
KR20020059444A (en) 2002-07-12
US20120214164A1 (en) 2012-08-23
US20050214849A1 (en) 2005-09-29
US20110177520A1 (en) 2011-07-21
DK1226271T3 (en) 2008-07-07
ES2302497T3 (en) 2008-07-16
CN1159457C (en) 2004-07-28
CA2386115A1 (en) 2001-04-12
AU769102B2 (en) 2004-01-15
US7939264B1 (en) 2011-05-10
IS6333A (en) 2002-04-05
DE60038244T2 (en) 2009-04-23
CN1391615A (en) 2003-01-15
AU7546700A (en) 2001-05-10
IL148678A (en) 2008-12-29
BR0014468A (en) 2002-08-20
PT1226271E (en) 2008-05-23
WO2001025480A3 (en) 2002-05-16
MXPA02003534A (en) 2004-09-10
JP2003511043A (en) 2003-03-25
EA200200428A1 (en) 2002-10-31
EA006702B1 (en) 2006-02-24
IL148678A0 (en) 2002-09-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7939264B1 (en) DNA sequencing method
US6908736B1 (en) DNA sequencing method
EP2267164B1 (en) Nucleic acid sequence analysis
US9382584B2 (en) Methods and systems for direct sequencing of single DNA molecules
US6524829B1 (en) Method for DNA- or RNA-sequencing
US20090011514A1 (en) Dna Crosslinking for Primer Extension Assays
MXPA00000715A (en) Nucleic acid sequence analysis
AU4382801A (en) Nucleic acid sequence analysis

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020417

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20030923

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60038244

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20080417

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20080512

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: E. BLUM & CO. AG PATENT- UND MARKENANWAELTE VSP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20080401309

Country of ref document: GR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2302497

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HK

Ref legal event code: GR

Ref document number: 1045857

Country of ref document: HK

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20081217

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: MC

Payment date: 20081211

Year of fee payment: 9

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20081208

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20081205

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20081215

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081006

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: MM4A

Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES

Effective date: 20100406

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20100226

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20100301

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091031

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20100301

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20100301

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100406

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20100916 AND 20100922

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100504

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20100303

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CA

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: PC2A

Owner name: GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED

Effective date: 20110412

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091006

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101031

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101006

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101006

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101031

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20121008

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20131025

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20131028

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20140501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 16

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141006

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 17

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20191029

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20191023

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20191025

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20191104

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20191028

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 60038244

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20201005

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20210126

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20201005

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20201007