EP1218609B1 - Smart card with card in vehicle warning - Google Patents

Smart card with card in vehicle warning Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1218609B1
EP1218609B1 EP00967232A EP00967232A EP1218609B1 EP 1218609 B1 EP1218609 B1 EP 1218609B1 EP 00967232 A EP00967232 A EP 00967232A EP 00967232 A EP00967232 A EP 00967232A EP 1218609 B1 EP1218609 B1 EP 1218609B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
vehicle
card
request
ignition
operator
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP00967232A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1218609A1 (en
Inventor
David T. Proefke
Thomas E. Utter
Robert C. Baillargeon
Thomas W. Pfeffer
Jeffrey R. Coil
Andrew C. Brenz
Kenneth P. Orlando
Tejas B. Desai
Christian O. Johnson
Ronald J. Plichta
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Huf North America
Motors Liquidation Co
Continental Automotive Systems Inc
Original Assignee
Huf North America
Motors Liquidation Co
Siemens VDO Automotive Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Huf North America, Motors Liquidation Co, Siemens VDO Automotive Corp filed Critical Huf North America
Publication of EP1218609A1 publication Critical patent/EP1218609A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1218609B1 publication Critical patent/EP1218609B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C9/00Individual registration on entry or exit
    • G07C9/00174Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys
    • G07C9/00309Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated with bidirectional data transmission between data carrier and locks
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C9/00Individual registration on entry or exit
    • G07C9/00174Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys
    • G07C2009/00753Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated by active electrical keys
    • G07C2009/00769Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated by active electrical keys with data transmission performed by wireless means
    • G07C2009/00793Electronically operated locks; Circuits therefor; Nonmechanical keys therefor, e.g. passive or active electrical keys or other data carriers without mechanical keys operated by active electrical keys with data transmission performed by wireless means by Hertzian waves
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C2209/00Indexing scheme relating to groups G07C9/00 - G07C9/38
    • G07C2209/60Indexing scheme relating to groups G07C9/00174 - G07C9/00944
    • G07C2209/63Comprising locating means for detecting the position of the data carrier, i.e. within the vehicle or within a certain distance from the vehicle

Definitions

  • This application relates to improvements in so called smart card systems for detecting the presence of a card in a vehicle undergoing a change in status.
  • remote controls which actuate door locks, ignition start, and other functions, remotely through an RKE device upon actuation of a switch.
  • These devices known as keyfobs utilize a non-hard wire connection, such as an RF or LF connection.
  • Vehicles incorporating the ability to communicate with such RKEs also typically have the ability to work with a mechanical key. These systems thus also require the use of some device which is actuated to request that a particular command be effected.
  • the type of devices are known generically as "smart cards" and include a card carried by a user that authorizes the user to operate a particular vehicle.
  • the card carries a coded signal which is checked by the vehicle computer to ensure that a proper operator for the vehicle is requesting the particular actuation.
  • the card may have an LF transmitter/receiver, such as are commonly utilized in ignition lock systems.
  • the operator When in a vehicle, the operator merely requests that the vehicle be started. No key is used.
  • a sensor within the vehicle searches for an appropriate key in the vehicle. If the operator is carrying an appropriate key, then the sensor communicates with the vehicle control to actuate a signal to start the vehicle.
  • the card may have the ability to receive a challenge coded signal from the vehicle, and modify that signal in a certain fashion. The modified signal is then transmitted back to the vehicle. The vehicle can determine whether the card is appropriate based upon the modification to the signal.
  • the card and the vehicle are programmed together, in a fashion which is well within the skill of a worker in this art.
  • the passenger may well be the passenger who is holding the appropriate card. That is, if a driver and passenger both enter a vehicle, the driver may not be holding the proper card, but rather the passenger is holding the card. The driver may have forgotten to bring the card. The vehicle would still start, however, since the passenger's card would be identified. If during the course of a trip the passenger leaves while the vehicle is still running ( i . e ., passenger dropped off at airport, etc.) the operator would be able to continue to operate the vehicle. However, if the operator stops after the passenger has left, and turns off the ignition, the operator would not be able to restart the vehicle.
  • Another example of a problem with passive cards occurs if the passive card is left at a location in the vehicle, such as on the dash, in a console, etc. The driver may then leave the vehicle, and the vehicle doors could be locked. Since the driver is not carrying the card, the driver would not be able to enter the car.
  • EP-A-0924370 describes a device for locking and unlocking a door of a motor vehicle which stores a drive authorisation code and warns if the device is removed from the vehicle.
  • US-A-5293160 relates to a keyless vehicle lock system which provides a warning if a card is left in the vehicle or absent.
  • the present invention is directed to providing warnings to an operator should situations such as outlined above occur with a smart card system.
  • a method of operating a vehicle comprises the steps of
  • a vehicle control system comprises a sensor for sensing presence of an appropriate card within a cab of a vehicle; a card provided with a code to be sensed by said sensor; at least one vehicle system to be operated upon a request from an operator, said sensor communicating with a control authorizing operation of said at least one system; characterised in that said system is a vehicle ignition; and in that the said control is operable upon receiving a request for a change in status of said at least one system to check for the presence of an authorized card within the cab of a vehicle receiving said system, said control providing a warning to an operator should a request for a change in status of the vehicle system not be advisable given that a request for stopping the ignition is received and no appropriate card is identified in the vehicle.
  • a smart card system is provided with warnings to an operator when a card status in a vehicle may not be desirable given a requested action for the vehicle.
  • a sensor prior to turning off the ignition on a vehicle a sensor will check the interior of the vehicle to ensure that there is a proper card still within the vehicle.
  • the driver later asking for the ignition to be stopped would be provided with a warning that there is no valid card in the vehicle. If the driver has stopped at a spot on the way home, the driver would then have the opportunity to continue to drive the vehicle without turning off the ignition. A proper card could then be retrieved. In this way, the chance of a "walk home" situation for the driver would be avoided.
  • a light and audio signal could be provided to the operator at the request of a ignition off if no proper card is sensed in the vehicle.
  • the senor will check the interior of the vehicle to identify the presence of a card. If a card is sensed within the vehicle a warning signal is sent, such as an audio warning. This warning signal will allow the operator the opportunity to retrieve the card prior to the door locks being actuated.
  • FIG 1A shows a vehicle 20 incorporating a smart card system.
  • a sensor and control 22 is placed within the cab of the vehicle.
  • a driver 24 and a passenger 26 are shown within the cab.
  • the smart card 28 is held by the passenger 26.
  • the driver 24 does not recognize that he did not bring his card with him.
  • the control 22 will allow the vehicle to be started.
  • the vehicle would have a start button 30 and a stop button 32.
  • door lock controls 34 and 36 are also activated passively upon sensing of an appropriate card.
  • the switches 30, 32, 34 and 36 are all simple actuation switches. No key is necessary to authorize the operation of these switches. This is one of the main benefits of effecting the smart key system. The several key lock mechanisms are no longer necessary.
  • the passenger 26 has now exited the vehicle.
  • the driver 24 has not stopped the vehicle, such as a situation where the passenger is being dropped off. If the driver then drives to another location, and attempts to stop the vehicle by actuating the stop button 32, the sensor 22 will first check to ensure the presence of a valid card within the vehicle. That is, prior to actuating the appropriate steps to stop the vehicle, the sensor 22 will first search the cab of the vehicle for a proper card. If no proper card is identified, then a signal 33 is sent to the operator. This signal can be both visual and audio. The operator will then have to re-actuate the stop ignition button 32 for the vehicle to be stopped.
  • This system would thus provide the operator with the ability to not stop the vehicle in the event that the operator has forgotten his smart card.
  • the present invention thus avoids the operator encountering a "walk home" situation.
  • Figure 2 is a flowchart of the Figure 1 scenario. If an off request is received, the control will search the vehicle cab to identify the presence of a proper card. If a proper card is identified, then the ignition is stopped. If no proper card is identified, then a signal is sent. If a second request to stop is received, then the ignition is stopped.
  • Figure 3 shows another scenario in which the control provides the operator with the ability of avoiding a potentially lock out undesirable situation.
  • the operator 24 has left the vehicle but left the card 40 within the vehicle.
  • the sensor 22 will scan the interior of the cab for an appropriate card. If an appropriate card 40 is sensed, then a signal is sent, such as by the visual warning 33, but also the audio warning 42 to identify the presence of the card 40 within the vehicle to the operator 24.
  • the operator 24 will then be able to reopen the door 34, and retrieve the card 40.
  • the door 34 will be locked with the operator 24 outside the vehicle and the card 40 inside the vehicle. In such a situation the operator would be unable to reopen the door.
  • this system ensures that an operator will have the opportunity to retrieve a card prior to the door being locked.
  • the control will initially search the cab for an appropriate card. If an appropriate card is found within the cab, then a warning will be actuated. If the operator then opens the door, the warning will be stopped.
  • the system first checks to see whether the driver's door has been opened and closed within a predetermined period of time. This would provide an indication that the operator has left the vehicle. Once this has occurred, the control searches for the presence of a key within the vehicle. If no key is sensed, then the system returns to its steady state operation and the doors are locked. However, if a key is sensed, then a short period warning is sent. If the door is opened during this short warning period, then the system will again search for the presence of a key. If the key is no longer sensed, then the doors are locked. However, if a key is still sensed, then the warning will be sent again. The system can either continue to send the warning until either a second actuation of the door lock is manually received, or until a period of time has ended.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This application relates to improvements in so called smart card systems for detecting the presence of a card in a vehicle undergoing a change in status.
Historically, vehicles have been controlled by mechanical keys which are utilized to unlock doors and start the ignition of the vehicle. These devices typically require an operator to place the key into the key lock, turn the key lock, and control such as door unlock or ignition start are then actuated.
More recently, remote controls have been developed which actuate door locks, ignition start, and other functions, remotely through an RKE device upon actuation of a switch. These devices, known as keyfobs utilize a non-hard wire connection, such as an RF or LF connection. Vehicles incorporating the ability to communicate with such RKEs also typically have the ability to work with a mechanical key. These systems thus also require the use of some device which is actuated to request that a particular command be effected.
More recently, it has been proposed to have passive controls. The type of devices are known generically as "smart cards" and include a card carried by a user that authorizes the user to operate a particular vehicle. The card carries a coded signal which is checked by the vehicle computer to ensure that a proper operator for the vehicle is requesting the particular actuation. As an example, the card may have an LF transmitter/receiver, such as are commonly utilized in ignition lock systems. When in a vehicle, the operator merely requests that the vehicle be started. No key is used. Upon receiving the request to start the vehicle, a sensor within the vehicle searches for an appropriate key in the vehicle. If the operator is carrying an appropriate key, then the sensor communicates with the vehicle control to actuate a signal to start the vehicle. As one example, the card may have the ability to receive a challenge coded signal from the vehicle, and modify that signal in a certain fashion. The modified signal is then transmitted back to the vehicle. The vehicle can determine whether the card is appropriate based upon the modification to the signal. The card and the vehicle are programmed together, in a fashion which is well within the skill of a worker in this art.
While the basic concept of a smart card has promise, a number of practical realities and challenges still remain. One particular challenge relates to the fact that a user may very well forget that he is or is not carrying a card at any particular point in time. Since the card does not require any active manipulation to generate signals, the user may forget whether he is carrying the card.
As one example, if there are two people in a vehicle, and the passenger leaves the vehicle it may well be the passenger who is holding the appropriate card. That is, if a driver and passenger both enter a vehicle, the driver may not be holding the proper card, but rather the passenger is holding the card. The driver may have forgotten to bring the card. The vehicle would still start, however, since the passenger's card would be identified. If during the course of a trip the passenger leaves while the vehicle is still running (i.e., passenger dropped off at airport, etc.) the operator would be able to continue to operate the vehicle. However, if the operator stops after the passenger has left, and turns off the ignition, the operator would not be able to restart the vehicle.
Another example of a problem with passive cards occurs if the passive card is left at a location in the vehicle, such as on the dash, in a console, etc. The driver may then leave the vehicle, and the vehicle doors could be locked. Since the driver is not carrying the card, the driver would not be able to enter the car.
EP-A-0924370 describes a device for locking and unlocking a door of a motor vehicle which stores a drive authorisation code and warns if the device is removed from the vehicle.
US-A-5293160 relates to a keyless vehicle lock system which provides a warning if a card is left in the vehicle or absent.
The present invention is directed to providing warnings to an operator should situations such as outlined above occur with a smart card system.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention a method of operating a vehicle comprises the steps of
  • 1) providing a card carrying a passive code for authorizing operation of the vehicle, and providing a sensor on the vehicle;
  • 2) searching for presence of a proper card within a cab of a vehicle, and authorizing operation of the vehicle when the presence of a proper card is sensed; characterised in that the method further comprises;
  • 3) receiving a signal relative to a change in status of the vehicle, said status request change being a request to stop ignition of the vehicle;
  • 4) checking for the presence of a proper authorized card in the vehicle upon the receipt of signal at step 3; and,
  • 5) providing a warning to an operator should a status change requested in step 3 not be advisable given that no proper authorised card was sensed in the vehicle at step 4.
  • In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention a vehicle control system comprises a sensor for sensing presence of an appropriate card within a cab of a vehicle; a card provided with a code to be sensed by said sensor; at least one vehicle system to be operated upon a request from an operator, said sensor communicating with a control authorizing operation of said at least one system; characterised in that said system is a vehicle ignition; and in that the said control is operable upon receiving a request for a change in status of said at least one system to check for the presence of an authorized card within the cab of a vehicle receiving said system, said control providing a warning to an operator should a request for a change in status of the vehicle system not be advisable given that a request for stopping the ignition is received and no appropriate card is identified in the vehicle.
    In a disclosed embodiment of this invention, a smart card system is provided with warnings to an operator when a card status in a vehicle may not be desirable given a requested action for the vehicle. In one embodiment, prior to turning off the ignition on a vehicle a sensor will check the interior of the vehicle to ensure that there is a proper card still within the vehicle. Thus, and as is outlined in the first example above, should the passenger have left the vehicle, and should the passenger be the one holding the appropriate card, the driver later asking for the ignition to be stopped would be provided with a warning that there is no valid card in the vehicle. If the driver has stopped at a spot on the way home, the driver would then have the opportunity to continue to drive the vehicle without turning off the ignition. A proper card could then be retrieved. In this way, the chance of a "walk home" situation for the driver would be avoided. In one example, a light and audio signal could be provided to the operator at the request of a ignition off if no proper card is sensed in the vehicle.
    Similarly, if the operator leaves the vehicle, and a control senses that the door has been shut and a door lock has been requested, the sensor will check the interior of the vehicle to identify the presence of a card. If a card is sensed within the vehicle a warning signal is sent, such as an audio warning. This warning signal will allow the operator the opportunity to retrieve the card prior to the door locks being actuated.
    These and other features of the present invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Figure 1A is a schematic view showing a first situation addressed by the present invention.
  • Figure 1B shows a subsequent step in the first situation.
  • Figure 2 is a flowchart of the first situation.
  • Figure 3 shows a second situation.
  • Figure 4 is a flowchart of the second situation.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
    Figure 1A shows a vehicle 20 incorporating a smart card system. As is known, a sensor and control 22 is placed within the cab of the vehicle. A driver 24 and a passenger 26 are shown within the cab. In the scenario of Figures 1A and 1B, the smart card 28 is held by the passenger 26. The driver 24 does not recognize that he did not bring his card with him. Since the passenger is holding a card, the control 22 will allow the vehicle to be started. As known, the vehicle would have a start button 30 and a stop button 32. Moreover, door lock controls 34 and 36 are also activated passively upon sensing of an appropriate card. The switches 30, 32, 34 and 36 are all simple actuation switches. No key is necessary to authorize the operation of these switches. This is one of the main benefits of effecting the smart key system. The several key lock mechanisms are no longer necessary.
    As shown in Figure 1B, the passenger 26 has now exited the vehicle. The driver 24 has not stopped the vehicle, such as a situation where the passenger is being dropped off. If the driver then drives to another location, and attempts to stop the vehicle by actuating the stop button 32, the sensor 22 will first check to ensure the presence of a valid card within the vehicle. That is, prior to actuating the appropriate steps to stop the vehicle, the sensor 22 will first search the cab of the vehicle for a proper card. If no proper card is identified, then a signal 33 is sent to the operator. This signal can be both visual and audio. The operator will then have to re-actuate the stop ignition button 32 for the vehicle to be stopped.
    This system would thus provide the operator with the ability to not stop the vehicle in the event that the operator has forgotten his smart card. The present invention thus avoids the operator encountering a "walk home" situation.
    Figure 2 is a flowchart of the Figure 1 scenario. If an off request is received, the control will search the vehicle cab to identify the presence of a proper card. If a proper card is identified, then the ignition is stopped. If no proper card is identified, then a signal is sent. If a second request to stop is received, then the ignition is stopped.
    Figure 3 shows another scenario in which the control provides the operator with the ability of avoiding a potentially lock out undesirable situation. The operator 24 has left the vehicle but left the card 40 within the vehicle. Now, before the door 34 locks, as would typically be the case routinely once the door had been shut, the sensor 22 will scan the interior of the cab for an appropriate card. If an appropriate card 40 is sensed, then a signal is sent, such as by the visual warning 33, but also the audio warning 42 to identify the presence of the card 40 within the vehicle to the operator 24. The operator 24 will then be able to reopen the door 34, and retrieve the card 40. In the absence of such a signal, it is possible that the door 34 will be locked with the operator 24 outside the vehicle and the card 40 inside the vehicle. In such a situation the operator would be unable to reopen the door. By providing the warning signals, this system ensures that an operator will have the opportunity to retrieve a card prior to the door being locked.
    As shown in Figure 4, should a car door be closed, the control will initially search the cab for an appropriate card. If an appropriate card is found within the cab, then a warning will be actuated. If the operator then opens the door, the warning will be stopped.
    More particularly, if a request is received to lock the vehicle doors, the system first checks to see whether the driver's door has been opened and closed within a predetermined period of time. This would provide an indication that the operator has left the vehicle. Once this has occurred, the control searches for the presence of a key within the vehicle. If no key is sensed, then the system returns to its steady state operation and the doors are locked. However, if a key is sensed, then a short period warning is sent. If the door is opened during this short warning period, then the system will again search for the presence of a key. If the key is no longer sensed, then the doors are locked. However, if a key is still sensed, then the warning will be sent again. The system can either continue to send the warning until either a second actuation of the door lock is manually received, or until a period of time has ended.
    These aspects of the control have been disclosed in one preferred embodiment. A worker in this art would recognize that many other embodiments and forms of providing these benefits would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.

    Claims (7)

    1. A method of operating a vehicle, the method comprising the steps of:
      1) providing a card (28) carrying a passive code for authorizing operation of the vehicle, and providing a sensor (22) on the vehicle;
      2) searching for presence of a proper card within a cab of a vehicle, and authorizing operation of the vehicle when the presence of a proper card is sensed; characterised in that the method further comprises;
      3) receiving a signal relative to a change in status of the vehicle, said status request change being a request to stop ignition of the vehicle;
      4) checking for the presence of a proper authorized card in the vehicle upon the receipt of signal at step 3; and,
      5) providing a warning to an operator should a status change requested in step 3 not be advisable given that no proper authorised card was sensed in the vehicle at step 4.
    2. A method as set forth in claim 1, wherein a signal is sent to the operator in the event that a request to stop the ignition is received and no card is identified in the cab and the ignition is not stopped unless a second request for stopping ignition is received.
    3. A method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the status request also includes the locking of a door, and the warning of step 5 occurs when the presence of an appropriate card is sensed within the cab.
    4. A vehicle control system comprising a sensor (22) for sensing presence of an appropriate card within a cab of a vehicle; a card (28) provided with a code to be sensed by said sensor; at least one vehicle system to be operated upon a request from an operator, said sensor being arranged for communicating with a control authorizing operation of said at least one vehicle system; characterised in that said vehicle system is a vehicle ignition; and in that the said control is operable upon receiving a request for a change in status of said at least one vehicle system to check for the presence of an authorized card within the cab of a vehicle receiving said vehicle system, said control being arranged for providing a warning to an operator should a request for a change in status of the vehicle system not be advisable given that a request for stopping the ignition is received and no appropriate card is identified in the vehicle.
    5. A vehicle control system as set forth in claim 4, wherein the vehicle ignition is not stopped until a second actuation of the request for vehicle ignition stop is received after the warning signal.
    6. A vehicle control system as set forth in at least claim 4, wherein the system also includes the vehicle door locks.
    7. A vehicle control system as set forth in claim 6, wherein if a request for door locks is received, then the vehicle control system is adapted to sense for the presence of a card within the vehicle, and if a card is sensed within the vehicle, then a warning signal is sent.
    EP00967232A 1999-10-04 2000-10-02 Smart card with card in vehicle warning Expired - Lifetime EP1218609B1 (en)

    Applications Claiming Priority (3)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    US15759399P 1999-10-04 1999-10-04
    US157593P 1999-10-04
    PCT/US2000/027103 WO2001025573A1 (en) 1999-10-04 2000-10-02 Smart card with card in vehicle warning

    Publications (2)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP1218609A1 EP1218609A1 (en) 2002-07-03
    EP1218609B1 true EP1218609B1 (en) 2005-01-19

    Family

    ID=22564416

    Family Applications (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP00967232A Expired - Lifetime EP1218609B1 (en) 1999-10-04 2000-10-02 Smart card with card in vehicle warning

    Country Status (4)

    Country Link
    EP (1) EP1218609B1 (en)
    JP (2) JP3859513B2 (en)
    DE (1) DE60017578T2 (en)
    WO (1) WO2001025573A1 (en)

    Families Citing this family (3)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    DE10248419A1 (en) * 2002-10-17 2004-04-29 Hella Kg Hueck & Co. Method for checking the presence of an ID transmitter in the interior of a motor vehicle
    DE102006042976A1 (en) * 2006-09-13 2008-04-03 Siemens Ag Access arrangement for a vehicle
    DE102006042943B3 (en) * 2006-09-13 2008-05-15 Siemens Ag Access arrangement for a vehicle

    Family Cites Families (4)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US5293160A (en) * 1989-11-02 1994-03-08 Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. Keyless vehicle lock system with distance measuring
    DE19735658C1 (en) * 1997-08-16 1998-07-30 Bosch Gmbh Robert Vehicle locking system using transponders inside
    DE19755770A1 (en) * 1997-12-16 1999-07-01 Bosch Gmbh Robert Device for locking and unlocking a door of a motor vehicle
    DE19839355C1 (en) * 1998-08-28 2000-04-13 Daimler Chrysler Ag Vehicle security system with keyless go functionality

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    EP1218609A1 (en) 2002-07-03
    DE60017578T2 (en) 2005-07-07
    WO2001025573A1 (en) 2001-04-12
    DE60017578D1 (en) 2005-02-24
    JP3859513B2 (en) 2006-12-20
    JP2006299798A (en) 2006-11-02
    JP2003511589A (en) 2003-03-25

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    JP2906042B2 (en) Key for start-up and inter-vehicle communication device with functions to prevent escape and remote control
    US8543257B2 (en) Vehicle remote operation system and on-board device
    CN103010154B (en) Remote starting system for vehicle and control method for the same
    US8054158B2 (en) On-vehicle equipment control system
    US8648693B2 (en) Key slot device for in-vehicle auxiliary key
    JP3079204B2 (en) Ignition key and vehicle-to-vehicle communication device to prevent incorrect operation
    US7394350B2 (en) Power-saving on-vehicle controller
    JP4881095B2 (en) Key system
    US6386447B1 (en) Smart card with card in vehicle warning
    US7612650B2 (en) Remote control system and method
    US6549115B1 (en) Vehicle security system with active and passage remote actuation
    CN102019905A (en) Control of a vehicle having a passive entry-passive start function
    CN112365632A (en) NFC activation of vehicle into privacy mode
    KR100817659B1 (en) Vehicle engine control system and method
    US20050264399A1 (en) Remote control system and method
    US6850154B2 (en) Method and device for protecting motor vehicles against theft
    EP1218609B1 (en) Smart card with card in vehicle warning
    AU5389700A (en) Method for locking a motor vehicle in a keyless manner
    EP1339026B1 (en) Electronic key apparatus for vehicle and arrest cancellation method for rotation arresting device
    JP2001018754A (en) Electronic key device for vehicle
    JP2001323698A (en) Electronic key device for vehicle
    JP4599534B2 (en) Vehicle access system and control method thereof
    GB2296937A (en) Motor vehicle security system
    JP2009051336A (en) Vehicle antitheft system
    JPH0219332Y2 (en)

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 20020312

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

    RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

    Owner name: GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION

    Owner name: SIEMENS VDO AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION

    Owner name: HUF NORTH AMERICA

    RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

    Inventor name: PFEFFER, THOMAS, W.

    Inventor name: ORLANDO, KENNETH, P.

    Inventor name: UTTER, THOMAS, E.

    Inventor name: PROEFKE, DAVID, T.

    Inventor name: BAILLARGEON, ROBERT, C.

    Inventor name: COIL, JEFFREY, R.

    Inventor name: BRENZ, ANDREW, C.

    Inventor name: DESAI, TEJAS, B.

    RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB LI

    GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

    RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

    Designated state(s): DE FR GB

    GRAS Grant fee paid

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

    GRAA (expected) grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: B1

    Designated state(s): DE FR GB

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    REF Corresponds to:

    Ref document number: 60017578

    Country of ref document: DE

    Date of ref document: 20050224

    Kind code of ref document: P

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20051002

    PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

    ET Fr: translation filed
    26N No opposition filed

    Effective date: 20051020

    GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

    Effective date: 20051002

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Payment date: 20121031

    Year of fee payment: 13

    Ref country code: FR

    Payment date: 20121031

    Year of fee payment: 13

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: ST

    Effective date: 20140630

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: DE

    Ref legal event code: R119

    Ref document number: 60017578

    Country of ref document: DE

    Effective date: 20140501

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20140501

    Ref country code: FR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20131031