EP1190272A2 - Dual stage deformable mirror - Google Patents

Dual stage deformable mirror

Info

Publication number
EP1190272A2
EP1190272A2 EP01900884A EP01900884A EP1190272A2 EP 1190272 A2 EP1190272 A2 EP 1190272A2 EP 01900884 A EP01900884 A EP 01900884A EP 01900884 A EP01900884 A EP 01900884A EP 1190272 A2 EP1190272 A2 EP 1190272A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
actuators
linear actuators
optical surface
wavefront
deformable
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP01900884A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Gon-Yen Shen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Goodrich Corp
Original Assignee
Goodrich Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Goodrich Corp filed Critical Goodrich Corp
Publication of EP1190272A2 publication Critical patent/EP1190272A2/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G02—OPTICS
    • G02B—OPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B26/00—Optical devices or arrangements for the control of light using movable or deformable optical elements
    • G02B26/06—Optical devices or arrangements for the control of light using movable or deformable optical elements for controlling the phase of light

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to optical systems and methods and, more particularly, to the field of deformable mirrors used in adaptive optical systems for compensating a wavefront for errors induced by atmospheric and other disturbances.
  • a beam control system In a number of optical systems, including those used for high energy laser applications, a beam control system is required to correct a wavefront for wavefront errors generated internally by the system, as well as for external disturbances.
  • the wavefront errors can be large in magnitude and can exhibit a varying spatial and temporal frequency content.
  • the large magnitude/low frequency errors can be attributed to a boundary layer near the conformal window, while the small magnitude/high frequency (spatial and temporal) error can be attributed to atmospheric turbulence.
  • the large magnitude/lower frequency wavefront error can originate in a field-dependent WFOV beam expander, while the smaller magnitude/higher frequency wavefront error may originate in the laser and beam control system.
  • WFOV wide field of view
  • a conventional technique to compensate for these wavefront errors employs two deformable mirrors 1 and 2.
  • Mirror 1 is used to compensate for the large magnitude/low frequency error (low bandwidth (BW)), while mirror 2 is used to compensate for the smaller magnitude/higher frequency error (high BW).
  • Deformable mirror 1 includes a base plate or backup structure 3 that supports a plurality of first actuators 5, which in turn support a facesheet 4 having a reflective surface 4A.
  • Deformable mirror 2 is similarly constructed to include a backup structure 6 that supports a plurality of second actuators 8, which in turn support a facesheet 7 having a reflective surface 7A.
  • the first actuators 5 will provide a larger range of linear motion (wider dynamic range), but with longer response time (lower BW), than the second actuators 8.
  • a beam 9 to be wavefront corrected must therefore be directed so as to impinge on both surfaces 4A and 7A, with the large magnitude/lower frequency wavefront error being corrected by the low BW mirror 1 , while the smaller magnitude/higher frequency wavefront error is corrected by the high BW mirror 2.
  • a multistage deformable mirror structure is constructed and operated so as to simultaneously compensate an incident wavefront for both large and small magnitude and low and high temporal and spatial frequency wavefront errors with a dual stage device.
  • a mirror facesheet is provided that is supported by and deformed with a set of high bandwidth actuators that are closely spaced together.
  • the set of high bandwidth, closely spaced actuators are supported by an intermediate deformable structure which, in turn, is supported by and deformed with a set of larger dynamic range actuators.
  • the set of larger dynamic range actuators operate with a lower bandwidth, and are spaced at wider intervals than the set of high bandwidth actuators.
  • the deformed shape is transmitted through the closely spaced, high bandwidth actuators and deforms the mirror facesheet so as to correct for the large magnitude/lower frequency wavefront errors.
  • the set of high bandwidth, closely spaced actuators are selectively operated to compensate an incident wavefront for the smaller magnitude/higher frequency wavefront errors.
  • the single mirror facesheet is thus simultaneously deformed and given a shape suitable for compensating the incident wavefront for the large and small magnitude and low and high temporal and spatial frequency wavefront errors.
  • a multistage deformable mirror structure in accordance with the teachings of this invention, includes a backup structure having a support surface; a mirror facesheet having an optical surface; and, interposed between the support surface and the optical surface, at least one intermediate deformable structure that is coupled at a first surface to the support surface through a first set of linear actuators for being deformed by the set first set of actuators.
  • the at least one intermediate deformable structure is also coupled at an opposing second surface to the optical surface through a second set of linear actuators for deforming the optical surface.
  • the optical surface assumes a shape that is a combination of the deformation imparted to the at least one intermediate deformable structure by the first set of linear actuators, and the deformation imparted to it by the second set of linear actuators.
  • the first set of linear actuators have a wider dynamic range than the second set of linear actuators, and the optical surface is deformed so as to simultaneously compensate an incident wavefront for both large and small magnitude and low and high temporal and spatial frequency wavefront errors.
  • the first set of linear actuators operate with a lower bandwidth, and are spaced at wider intervals, than the second set of linear actuators.
  • This method includes steps of: (a) directing the wavefront to an optical surface of a facesheet of a deformable mirror structure; and (b) simultaneously deforming the optical surface with a first set of actuators, applied through an intermediate deformable structure, and with a second set of actuators that are mounted on the intermediate deformable structure.
  • the step of simultaneously deforming includes a step of varying the linear extension of individual ones of the second set of actuators at a higher rate than the linear extension of the first set of actuators is varied. In this manner the second set of actuators are operated to deform the optical surface for correcting for the small magnitude/high frequency error, while the first set of actuators are operated to simultaneously deform the optical surface for correcting for the larger magnitude/lower frequency error.
  • Fig. 1 is a cross-sectional view (not to scale) of a prior art two mirror system used for compensating an incident wavefront for both large magnitude/low frequency wavefront errors and smaller magnitude/higher frequency wavefront errors;
  • Fig. 2 is a cross-sectional view (not to scale) of a dual stage deformable mirror system in accordance with the teachings of this invention.
  • Figs. 3A and 3B are each a top view showing a portion of the facesheet of the dual stage mirror of Fig. 2, with the remaining portion being cut-away for revealing two exemplary patterns of the underlying high frequency actuators.
  • Fig. 2 for illustrating a dual stage deformable mirror structure 10 that is constructed and operated so as to simultaneously compensate an incident wavefront of a beam 11 for both large and small magnitude and low and high temporal and spatial frequency wavefront errors.
  • the beam 11 may be a high energy laser beam, or any beam that has a wavefront susceptible to wavefront errors that are desired to be corrected.
  • the dual stage deformable mirror structure 10 includes a single backup structure 12 made of any suitable rigid material.
  • a set of large dynamic range linear actuators 16 which could be, by example, lead screw, linear stepper motor, Lead/Magnesium/Niobate (PMN) actuators, or PZT actuators.
  • An exemplary range of motion for the actuators 16 is +10 micrometers to +50 micrometers, and they may exhibit a bandwidth in the range of about 5 Hz to about 20 Hz.
  • the set of large dynamic range actuators 16 in turn support an intermediate structure 14, Intermediate structure 14 can be comprised of, by example, metal, glass or some ultra low expansion (ULE) material.
  • UEE ultra low expansion
  • the thickness of the intermediate structure may be in the range of about 2.5 millimeters to about 20 millimeters, while the selected thickness is generally a function of the number of actuators 16 (i.e., as fewer actuators are used the structure 14 is made thinner, and vice versa.)
  • a mirror facesheet 18 is supported by and deformed with a set of high bandwidth actuators 20 that are more closely spaced together than the actuators 16.
  • the set of high bandwidth, closely spaced actuators 20 are supported by the intermediate deformable structure 14 which, as was just explained, is supported by and deformed with the set of large dynamic range actuators 16.
  • the set of large dynamic range actuators 16 operate with a lower bandwidth, and are spaced at wider intervals, than the set of high bandwidth actuators 20.
  • the deformed shape is transmitted through the closely spaced, high bandwidth actuators 20 and deform the mirror facesheet 18 so as to correct the incident wavefront of beam 11 for the large magnitude/lower frequency wavefront errors.
  • the set of high bandwidth, closely spaced actuators are selectively operated to compensate the incident wavefront of beam 11 for the smaller magnitude/higher frequency wavefront errors.
  • the single mirror facesheet 18 is thus simultaneously deformed and given a shape suitable for compensating the incident wavefront for the large and small magnitude and low and high temporal and spatial frequency wavefront errors.
  • the mirror facesheet is comprised of ULE, or ZERODURTM, or silicon, or glass, or any suitable material.
  • a suitable thickness is in the range of about 0.7 millimeters to about 2 millimeters.
  • the actuators 20, in the preferred embodiment of the invention are PMN actuators that exhibit an exemplary range of linear motion of +2 micrometers, and they may exhibit a bandwidth in the range of about 500 Hz to about 1000 Hz. Other types of actuators could be used as well.
  • the facesheet 18 has a reflective surface 18A.
  • the reflective surface could contain a film of aluminum, or silver, or gold, or any suitable material. It is also within the scope of this invention to prove the surface 18A of the facesheet 18 as a multi-layer stack (similar to an interference filter), thereby providing some degree of wavelength selectivity. In general, the surface 18A may be referred to herein as an optical surface.
  • a controller 22 is responsive to an indication of wavefront errors (which may be generated in a conventional fashion, such as by monitoring the wavefront of the beam) to generate low bandwidth control (LBC) signals 22A for controlling individual ones of the actuators 16, as well as high bandwidth control (HBC) signals 22B for controlling individual ones of the actuators 20.
  • LBC low bandwidth control
  • HBC high bandwidth control
  • the controller 22 determines the required mirror shape, then drives the actuators 16 to deform the facesheet 18 to compensate for the large magnitude disturbances, and then drives the actuators 20 to further deform the facesheet 18 to compensate for the smaller magnitude disturbances.
  • the controller 22 then monitors and tracks the disturbances, and adaptively changes the actuator drive signals accordingly, with the actuators 20 being driven and updated at a significantly higher rate than the low bandwidth actuators 16.
  • Fig. 3A illustrates an exemplary circular shape for the facesheet 18, and also shows a first, hexagonal layout pattern for the array of actuators 20. In practice, multiple concentric hexagonal patterns of actuators 20 may be employed.
  • Fig. 3B shows an alternative, generally square grid layout pattern for the actuators 20.
  • the diameter of the facesheet 18 is in the range of about 10 centimeters to about 30 centimeters
  • the distance (d) between actuators 20 can be in the range of about 0.7 centimeters to about 1.5 centimeters.
  • the lower bandwidth actuators 16 may be laid out in the same pattern as the higher bandwidth actuators 20, but the distance between the actuators 16 is typically made about three to about five times the distance between the actuators 20.
  • the actuators 16 could be spaced 3 centimeters apart to 5 centimeters apart. The number of and spacing between the actuators 16 is taken into account when determining the thickness of the intermediate structure 14.
  • a preferred technique to join the actuators 16 and 20 to their supporting and supported surfaces is with an adhesive (epoxy) bond, although other suitable fastening techniques could be used.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Light Control Or Optical Switches (AREA)
  • Optical Elements Other Than Lenses (AREA)

Abstract

Multistage stage deformable mirror structure (10) includes backup structure (12); single mirror facesheet (18) having an optical surface (18A); and, interposed between the support surface and the optical surface, an intermediate deformable structure (14) that is coupled at a first surface to the support surface through a first set of linear actuators (16). The intermediate deformable structure is coupled at a second opposing surface to the optical surface through a second set of linear actuators (20). The optical surface assumes a shape that is a combination of the deformation imparted to the intermediate deformable structure by the first set of linear actuators, and the deformation imparted to it by the second set of linear actuators. The first set of linear actuators have a wider dynamic range, the optical surface is deformed so as to simultaneously compensate an incident wavefront for large/small magnitude and low/high temporal/spatial frequency wavefront errors.

Description

DUAL STAGE DEFORMABLE MIRROR
FIELD OF THE INVENTION:
This invention relates generally to optical systems and methods and, more particularly, to the field of deformable mirrors used in adaptive optical systems for compensating a wavefront for errors induced by atmospheric and other disturbances.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION: In a number of optical systems, including those used for high energy laser applications, a beam control system is required to correct a wavefront for wavefront errors generated internally by the system, as well as for external disturbances. The wavefront errors can be large in magnitude and can exhibit a varying spatial and temporal frequency content.
As an example, in airborne laser applications the large magnitude/low frequency errors can be attributed to a boundary layer near the conformal window, while the small magnitude/high frequency (spatial and temporal) error can be attributed to atmospheric turbulence.
As another example, in a wide field of view (WFOV) application the large magnitude/lower frequency wavefront error can originate in a field- dependent WFOV beam expander, while the smaller magnitude/higher frequency wavefront error may originate in the laser and beam control system.
Referring to Fig. 1 , a conventional technique to compensate for these wavefront errors employs two deformable mirrors 1 and 2. Mirror 1 is used to compensate for the large magnitude/low frequency error (low bandwidth (BW)), while mirror 2 is used to compensate for the smaller magnitude/higher frequency error (high BW). Deformable mirror 1 includes a base plate or backup structure 3 that supports a plurality of first actuators 5, which in turn support a facesheet 4 having a reflective surface 4A. Deformable mirror 2 is similarly constructed to include a backup structure 6 that supports a plurality of second actuators 8, which in turn support a facesheet 7 having a reflective surface 7A.
In general, the first actuators 5 will provide a larger range of linear motion (wider dynamic range), but with longer response time (lower BW), than the second actuators 8. A beam 9 to be wavefront corrected must therefore be directed so as to impinge on both surfaces 4A and 7A, with the large magnitude/lower frequency wavefront error being corrected by the low BW mirror 1 , while the smaller magnitude/higher frequency wavefront error is corrected by the high BW mirror 2.
It can be seen that this approach to wavefront correction increases the complexity, mass, volume and cost of the system by requiring two mirror structures, with additional transfer optics (not shown) for directing the beam between the two mirror structures.
OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES OF THE INVENTION:
It is a first object and advantage of this invention to provide an improved deformable mirror system that overcomes the foregoing and other problems.
It is a further object and advantage of this invention to provide a dual stage deformable mirror structure that requires only one backup structure, and only one reflective surface, for simultaneously compensating a wavefront of interest for both the large magnitude/lower frequency wavefront errors and the smaller magnitude/higher frequency wavefront errors.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The foregoing and other problems are overcome and the objects and advantages are realized by methods and apparatus in accordance with embodiments of this invention.
A multistage deformable mirror structure is constructed and operated so as to simultaneously compensate an incident wavefront for both large and small magnitude and low and high temporal and spatial frequency wavefront errors with a dual stage device. In accordance with this invention a mirror facesheet is provided that is supported by and deformed with a set of high bandwidth actuators that are closely spaced together. The set of high bandwidth, closely spaced actuators are supported by an intermediate deformable structure which, in turn, is supported by and deformed with a set of larger dynamic range actuators. The set of larger dynamic range actuators operate with a lower bandwidth, and are spaced at wider intervals than the set of high bandwidth actuators. As the intermediate structure is deformed, the deformed shape is transmitted through the closely spaced, high bandwidth actuators and deforms the mirror facesheet so as to correct for the large magnitude/lower frequency wavefront errors. Simultaneously, the set of high bandwidth, closely spaced actuators are selectively operated to compensate an incident wavefront for the smaller magnitude/higher frequency wavefront errors. The single mirror facesheet is thus simultaneously deformed and given a shape suitable for compensating the incident wavefront for the large and small magnitude and low and high temporal and spatial frequency wavefront errors.
A multistage deformable mirror structure, in accordance with the teachings of this invention, includes a backup structure having a support surface; a mirror facesheet having an optical surface; and, interposed between the support surface and the optical surface, at least one intermediate deformable structure that is coupled at a first surface to the support surface through a first set of linear actuators for being deformed by the set first set of actuators. The at least one intermediate deformable structure is also coupled at an opposing second surface to the optical surface through a second set of linear actuators for deforming the optical surface. The optical surface assumes a shape that is a combination of the deformation imparted to the at least one intermediate deformable structure by the first set of linear actuators, and the deformation imparted to it by the second set of linear actuators. The first set of linear actuators have a wider dynamic range than the second set of linear actuators, and the optical surface is deformed so as to simultaneously compensate an incident wavefront for both large and small magnitude and low and high temporal and spatial frequency wavefront errors. The first set of linear actuators operate with a lower bandwidth, and are spaced at wider intervals, than the second set of linear actuators.
Also disclosed is a method for simultaneously compensating a wavefront for large magnitude/low frequency error and small magnitude/high frequency error. This method includes steps of: (a) directing the wavefront to an optical surface of a facesheet of a deformable mirror structure; and (b) simultaneously deforming the optical surface with a first set of actuators, applied through an intermediate deformable structure, and with a second set of actuators that are mounted on the intermediate deformable structure.
The step of simultaneously deforming includes a step of varying the linear extension of individual ones of the second set of actuators at a higher rate than the linear extension of the first set of actuators is varied. In this manner the second set of actuators are operated to deform the optical surface for correcting for the small magnitude/high frequency error, while the first set of actuators are operated to simultaneously deform the optical surface for correcting for the larger magnitude/lower frequency error.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The above set forth and other features of the invention are made more apparent in the ensuing Detailed Description of the Invention when read in conjunction with the attached Drawings, wherein:
Fig. 1 is a cross-sectional view (not to scale) of a prior art two mirror system used for compensating an incident wavefront for both large magnitude/low frequency wavefront errors and smaller magnitude/higher frequency wavefront errors;
Fig. 2 is a cross-sectional view (not to scale) of a dual stage deformable mirror system in accordance with the teachings of this invention; and
Figs. 3A and 3B are each a top view showing a portion of the facesheet of the dual stage mirror of Fig. 2, with the remaining portion being cut-away for revealing two exemplary patterns of the underlying high frequency actuators.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Reference is made to Fig. 2 for illustrating a dual stage deformable mirror structure 10 that is constructed and operated so as to simultaneously compensate an incident wavefront of a beam 11 for both large and small magnitude and low and high temporal and spatial frequency wavefront errors. The beam 11 may be a high energy laser beam, or any beam that has a wavefront susceptible to wavefront errors that are desired to be corrected.
The dual stage deformable mirror structure 10 includes a single backup structure 12 made of any suitable rigid material. Supported on a major surface of the backup structure 12 is a set of large dynamic range linear actuators 16 which could be, by example, lead screw, linear stepper motor, Lead/Magnesium/Niobate (PMN) actuators, or PZT actuators. An exemplary range of motion for the actuators 16 is +10 micrometers to +50 micrometers, and they may exhibit a bandwidth in the range of about 5 Hz to about 20 Hz. The set of large dynamic range actuators 16 in turn support an intermediate structure 14, Intermediate structure 14 can be comprised of, by example, metal, glass or some ultra low expansion (ULE) material. In general, the thickness of the intermediate structure may be in the range of about 2.5 millimeters to about 20 millimeters, while the selected thickness is generally a function of the number of actuators 16 (i.e., as fewer actuators are used the structure 14 is made thinner, and vice versa.)
Further in accordance with this invention, a mirror facesheet 18 is supported by and deformed with a set of high bandwidth actuators 20 that are more closely spaced together than the actuators 16. The set of high bandwidth, closely spaced actuators 20 are supported by the intermediate deformable structure 14 which, as was just explained, is supported by and deformed with the set of large dynamic range actuators 16. The set of large dynamic range actuators 16 operate with a lower bandwidth, and are spaced at wider intervals, than the set of high bandwidth actuators 20. As the intermediate structure 14 is deformed, the deformed shape is transmitted through the closely spaced, high bandwidth actuators 20 and deform the mirror facesheet 18 so as to correct the incident wavefront of beam 11 for the large magnitude/lower frequency wavefront errors. Simultaneously, the set of high bandwidth, closely spaced actuators are selectively operated to compensate the incident wavefront of beam 11 for the smaller magnitude/higher frequency wavefront errors. The single mirror facesheet 18 is thus simultaneously deformed and given a shape suitable for compensating the incident wavefront for the large and small magnitude and low and high temporal and spatial frequency wavefront errors.
In the preferred embodiment of this invention the mirror facesheet is comprised of ULE, or ZERODUR™, or silicon, or glass, or any suitable material. A suitable thickness is in the range of about 0.7 millimeters to about 2 millimeters. The actuators 20, in the preferred embodiment of the invention, are PMN actuators that exhibit an exemplary range of linear motion of +2 micrometers, and they may exhibit a bandwidth in the range of about 500 Hz to about 1000 Hz. Other types of actuators could be used as well.
The facesheet 18 has a reflective surface 18A. The reflective surface could contain a film of aluminum, or silver, or gold, or any suitable material. It is also within the scope of this invention to prove the surface 18A of the facesheet 18 as a multi-layer stack (similar to an interference filter), thereby providing some degree of wavelength selectivity. In general, the surface 18A may be referred to herein as an optical surface.
A controller 22 is responsive to an indication of wavefront errors (which may be generated in a conventional fashion, such as by monitoring the wavefront of the beam) to generate low bandwidth control (LBC) signals 22A for controlling individual ones of the actuators 16, as well as high bandwidth control (HBC) signals 22B for controlling individual ones of the actuators 20.
In operation, the controller 22 determines the required mirror shape, then drives the actuators 16 to deform the facesheet 18 to compensate for the large magnitude disturbances, and then drives the actuators 20 to further deform the facesheet 18 to compensate for the smaller magnitude disturbances. The controller 22 then monitors and tracks the disturbances, and adaptively changes the actuator drive signals accordingly, with the actuators 20 being driven and updated at a significantly higher rate than the low bandwidth actuators 16.
Fig. 3A illustrates an exemplary circular shape for the facesheet 18, and also shows a first, hexagonal layout pattern for the array of actuators 20. In practice, multiple concentric hexagonal patterns of actuators 20 may be employed. Fig. 3B shows an alternative, generally square grid layout pattern for the actuators 20. For an exemplary case where the diameter of the facesheet 18 is in the range of about 10 centimeters to about 30 centimeters, the distance (d) between actuators 20 can be in the range of about 0.7 centimeters to about 1.5 centimeters. The lower bandwidth actuators 16 may be laid out in the same pattern as the higher bandwidth actuators 20, but the distance between the actuators 16 is typically made about three to about five times the distance between the actuators 20. As an example, and assuming the square grid pattern of Fig. 3B with the actuators 20 being spaced 1 centimeter apart, then the actuators 16 could be spaced 3 centimeters apart to 5 centimeters apart. The number of and spacing between the actuators 16 is taken into account when determining the thickness of the intermediate structure 14.
In any of these embodiments a preferred technique to join the actuators 16 and 20 to their supporting and supported surfaces is with an adhesive (epoxy) bond, although other suitable fastening techniques could be used.
While described above in the context of a dual stage deformable mirror structure, those skilled in the art should appreciate that these teachings can be extended to encompass three stage and higher deformable mirror structures. These higher level mirror structures would employ multiple intermediate structures, with at least one that is supported and deformed by an underlying set of actuators, while supporting another set of actuators for deforming and supporting an overlying intermediate structure. The teachings of this invention are also not intended to be limited in scope by any of the exemplary dimensions, materials, actuator types, mirror shapes, actuator layout patterns or other specific embodiments that were disclosed above.
As such, while the invention has been particularly shown and described with respect to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A multistage deformable mirror structure, comprising:
a backup structure having a support surface;
a mirror facesheet having an optical surface; and
interposed between said support surface and said optical surface, at least one intermediate deformable structure that is coupled at a first surface to said support surface through a first set of linear actuators for being deformed by said set first set of actuators, said at least one intermediate deformable structure also being coupled at a second opposing surface to said optical surface through a second set of linear actuators for deforming said optical surface, wherein said optical surface assumes a shape that is a combination of the deformation imparted to said at least one intermediate deformable structure by said first set of linear actuators and the deformation imparted to it by said second set of linear actuators.
2. A multistage deformable mirror structure as in claim 1 , wherein said first set of linear actuators have a wider dynamic range than said second set of linear actuators, and wherein said optical surface is deformed so as to simultaneously compensate an incident wavefront for both large and small magnitude and low and high temporal and spatial frequency wavefront errors.
3. A multistage deformable mirror structure as in claim 1 , wherein said first set of linear actuators operate with a lower bandwidth, and are spaced at wider intervals, than said second set of linear actuators.
4. A method for compensating a wavefront for large magnitude/low frequency error and small magnitude/high frequency error, comprising steps of:
directing the wavefront to an optical surface of a facesheet of a deformable mirror structure; and
simultaneously deforming the optical surface with a first set of actuators, applied through an intermediate deformable structure, and with a second set of actuators that are mounted on said intermediate deformable structure.
5. A method as in claim 4, wherein step of simultaneously deforming includes a step of varying the linear extension of individual ones of the second set of actuators at a higher rate than the linear extension of the first set of actuators is varied, whereby the second set of actuators are operated to deform the optical surface for correcting for the small magnitude/high frequency error, while the first set of actuators are operated to simultaneously deform the optical surface for correcting for the larger magnitude/lower frequency error.
6. A multistage deformable mirror structure for correcting wavefront errors in an incident laser beam, comprising:
a single backup structure having a support surface;
a single mirror facesheet having an optical surface; and
interposed between said support surface and said optical surface, an intermediate deformable structure that is coupled at a first surface to said support surface through a first set of linear actuators for being deformed by said set first set of actuators, said intermediate deformable structure also being coupled at a second opposing surface to said optical surface through a second set of linear actuators for deforming said optical surface, wherein said optical surface assumes a shape that is a combination of the deformation imparted to said at least one intermediate deformable structure by said first set of linear actuators and the deformation imparted to it by said second set of linear actuators; wherein
said first set of linear actuators have a wider dynamic range than said second set of linear actuators, and wherein said optical surface is deformed so as to simultaneously compensate said wavefront of said incident laser beam for both large and small magnitude and low and high temporal and spatial frequency wavefront errors.
7. A multistage deformable mirror structure as in claim 6, wherein said first set of linear actuators operate with a lower bandwidth, and are spaced at wider intervals, than said second set of linear actuators.
8. A multistage deformable mirror structure as in claim 7, wherein said first set of linear actuators are spaced apart about three times to about five times a spacing between said second set of linear actuators.
9. A multistage deformable mirror structure as in claim 6, wherein said second set of linear actuators are comprised of PMN actuators.
EP01900884A 2000-01-05 2001-01-05 Dual stage deformable mirror Withdrawn EP1190272A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US478159 2000-01-05
US09/478,159 US6236490B1 (en) 2000-01-05 2000-01-05 Dual stage deformable mirror
PCT/US2001/000303 WO2001050173A2 (en) 2000-01-05 2001-01-05 Dual stage deformable mirror

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1190272A2 true EP1190272A2 (en) 2002-03-27

Family

ID=23898777

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP01900884A Withdrawn EP1190272A2 (en) 2000-01-05 2001-01-05 Dual stage deformable mirror

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US6236490B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1190272A2 (en)
JP (1) JP2003519404A (en)
AU (1) AU2629801A (en)
CA (1) CA2362460A1 (en)
IL (1) IL145207A0 (en)
WO (1) WO2001050173A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6756317B2 (en) * 2001-04-23 2004-06-29 Memx, Inc. Method for making a microstructure by surface micromachining
US6600587B2 (en) * 2001-04-23 2003-07-29 Memx, Inc. Surface micromachined optical system with reinforced mirror microstructure
DE10160893A1 (en) * 2001-12-12 2003-07-17 Diehl Munitionssysteme Gmbh Deformable mirror
US6951397B1 (en) * 2002-03-19 2005-10-04 Lockheed Martin Corporation Composite ultra-light weight active mirror for space applications
US6984049B2 (en) * 2002-11-04 2006-01-10 General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc. Hinged substrate for large-aperture, lightweight, deformable mirrors
WO2004057407A1 (en) * 2002-12-23 2004-07-08 Bae Systems Plc Deformable mirror
EP1590698A4 (en) 2003-01-24 2009-07-22 Univ Montana State Off-axis variable focus and aberration control mirrors and method
US7188964B2 (en) * 2003-02-25 2007-03-13 Xinetics, Inc. Integrated actuator meniscus mirror
CA2517906A1 (en) * 2003-03-03 2004-12-29 Montana State University-Bozeman Miniature confocal optical device, system, and method
US20060018045A1 (en) * 2003-10-23 2006-01-26 Carl Zeiss Smt Ag Mirror arrangement and method of manufacturing thereof, optical system and lithographic method of manufacturing a miniaturized device
US7125128B2 (en) * 2004-01-26 2006-10-24 Nikon Corporation Adaptive-optics actuator arrays and methods for using such arrays
US7352791B2 (en) * 2004-07-27 2008-04-01 Corning Incorporated Optical systems including wavefront correcting optical surfaces
US20060050421A1 (en) * 2004-09-08 2006-03-09 Ealey Mark A Adaptive mirror system
US20060050419A1 (en) * 2004-09-08 2006-03-09 Ealey Mark A Integrated wavefront correction module
US20060077579A1 (en) * 2004-10-12 2006-04-13 Margeson Christopher S Force actuator with clamp
JP4817702B2 (en) * 2005-04-14 2011-11-16 キヤノン株式会社 Optical apparatus and exposure apparatus provided with the same
US7355777B2 (en) * 2006-05-09 2008-04-08 Texas Instruments Incorporated Energy storage structures using electromechanically active materials for micro electromechanical systems
CN100476462C (en) * 2006-06-20 2009-04-08 刘彤 Basal body of reflector, and fabricating method
CN100454080C (en) * 2006-12-09 2009-01-21 中国科学技术大学 Piezoelectric thick diaphragm driving micro deformable mirror and producing method thereof
US8292441B2 (en) 2009-02-10 2012-10-23 Optical Physics Company Deformable mirror
US8102583B2 (en) * 2009-03-26 2012-01-24 Raytheon Company Real-time optical compensation of orbit-induced distortion effects in long integration time imagers
FR2958415B1 (en) * 2010-04-06 2012-08-17 Alpao DEFORMABLE MIRROR WITH LOW BONDING IMPRESSION AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SUCH MIRROR
DE102014211546B4 (en) 2014-06-17 2022-08-25 Robert Bosch Gmbh MICROSMIRROR ARRANGEMENT
CN104102002B (en) * 2014-07-14 2016-06-08 中国工程物理研究院激光聚变研究中心 A kind of method improving distorting lens calibration capability
CN105182529A (en) * 2015-09-24 2015-12-23 中国科学院西安光学精密机械研究所 Spherical metal deformable mirror and integrated processing technology thereof
FR3047321B1 (en) * 2016-02-03 2018-02-23 Thales DEFORMABLE MIRROR
KR101829684B1 (en) * 2016-11-07 2018-02-20 한국표준과학연구원 Deformable mirror compensation apparatus
JP6831910B2 (en) * 2017-05-19 2021-02-17 川崎重工業株式会社 Adaptive optics, optical system and light wave surface compensation method
GB2576993B (en) * 2017-05-19 2021-12-22 Kawasaki Heavy Ind Ltd Adaptive optical apparatus, optical system, and optical wavefront compensation method
FR3120451B1 (en) * 2021-03-03 2023-11-24 Alpao IMPROVED ADAPTIVE OPTICAL DEVICE AND RELATED MANUFACTURING METHOD

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4280756A (en) * 1979-01-02 1981-07-28 Itek Corporation Piezoelectric bi-morph mirror actuator
US4295710A (en) * 1979-09-04 1981-10-20 Rockwell International Corporation Deformable mirror with dither
US4655563A (en) * 1985-11-25 1987-04-07 Itek Corporation Variable thickness deformable mirror
US5864215A (en) * 1992-03-06 1999-01-26 Hughes Aircraft Company Steering apparatus for controllably displacing a structure relative to a frame member
US5274479A (en) * 1992-07-30 1993-12-28 Hughes Aircraft Company Mirror alignment and/or figure sensing with surface mounted holographic optical elements

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0150173A3 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2003519404A (en) 2003-06-17
US6236490B1 (en) 2001-05-22
CA2362460A1 (en) 2001-07-12
WO2001050173A2 (en) 2001-07-12
WO2001050173A3 (en) 2001-12-20
IL145207A0 (en) 2002-06-30
AU2629801A (en) 2001-07-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6236490B1 (en) Dual stage deformable mirror
US20100202071A1 (en) Deformable mirror
US4940318A (en) Gradient membrane deformable mirror having replaceable actuators
US4655563A (en) Variable thickness deformable mirror
US6844994B2 (en) Optical element deformation system
US6900926B2 (en) Light induced strains in porous crystalline materials and uses thereof
US6917478B2 (en) Scanning head lens assembly
CA2579651A1 (en) Integrated wavefront correction module with reduced translation
US5831780A (en) Continually supported thin mirror with force-type actuators
US5870227A (en) Scanning head lens assembly
US7967456B2 (en) Scalable size deformable pocket mirror with on-pocket bimorph actuator
Ealey Active and adaptive optical components: the technology and future trends
AU697053B2 (en) Thin film actuated mirror array for providing double tilt angle
US5710657A (en) Monomorph thin film actuated mirror array
US8054531B2 (en) Micro-electro-mechanical systems and photonic interconnects employing the same
US6953254B2 (en) Silicon wafer based macroscopic mirror for wide angle scanning applications
US6539159B1 (en) Adaptive support for positioning optical components
EP1086529A2 (en) Piezoelectric difraction grating light steering device
US6788794B2 (en) Thin, lightweight acoustic actuator tile
Ribak Deformable mirrors
CN101122680A (en) Variable shape mirror
Lillie et al. Adaptive x-ray optics development at AOA-Xinetics
JPH02102897A (en) Film surfaced structure for space
CN115480388A (en) Actuator element and actuator system
Aldrich Technology Consultant, Acton, Massachusetts

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20010904

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20030703

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20040114