EP1190175A1 - Method on regulating the air flow around the windmill wing and device for use in such method - Google Patents

Method on regulating the air flow around the windmill wing and device for use in such method

Info

Publication number
EP1190175A1
EP1190175A1 EP00934942A EP00934942A EP1190175A1 EP 1190175 A1 EP1190175 A1 EP 1190175A1 EP 00934942 A EP00934942 A EP 00934942A EP 00934942 A EP00934942 A EP 00934942A EP 1190175 A1 EP1190175 A1 EP 1190175A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
spoiler
wing
hollow
shape
air flow
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP00934942A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Henrik Bonus Energy A/S STIESDAL
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy AS
Original Assignee
Bonus Energy AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bonus Energy AS filed Critical Bonus Energy AS
Publication of EP1190175A1 publication Critical patent/EP1190175A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03—MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03D—WIND MOTORS
    • F03D7/00—Controlling wind motors 
    • F03D7/02—Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor
    • F03D7/0244—Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor for braking
    • F03D7/0252—Controlling wind motors  the wind motors having rotation axis substantially parallel to the air flow entering the rotor for braking with aerodynamic drag devices on the blades
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05B—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2240/00—Components
    • F05B2240/20—Rotors
    • F05B2240/30—Characteristics of rotor blades, i.e. of any element transforming dynamic fluid energy to or from rotational energy and being attached to a rotor
    • F05B2240/305—Flaps, slats or spoilers
    • F05B2240/3052—Flaps, slats or spoilers adjustable
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00—Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/70—Wind energy
    • Y02E10/72—Wind turbines with rotation axis in wind direction

Definitions

  • the invention concerns a method for controlling a wind mill and an apparatus for use in the method.
  • the wings are fixed on the mill hub and cannot be turned about their longitudinal axis.
  • the angular position of the wings on the hub is adjusted once for all at the erection and running in of the mill.
  • the wings are designed so that the air flow over them by itself gives larger air resistance in high wind and thereby limits the power. Due to this passive utilisation of the aerodynamic properties of the wings, the control becomes simple and sturdy under all circumstances with only small peak loads.
  • stall control has the drawback that the maximum power depends on the density of the air and the surface roughness of the wing. Hence there will be changes in maximum power from summer to winter and by dirty wings. To a large degree, the stall power also depends on the design of the leading edge of the wing. Small produc- tion tolerances in the shape of the leading edge may give significant differences in the power level at which a wind mill is stall controlled.
  • the wings are mounted on bearings on the mill hub so that they may be turned about their longitudinal axis. In high wind, the angular position is adjusted away from stall all the time so that the lift is limited to give just the power desired.
  • Pitch control has the drawback that a relatively complicated, active regulation is re- quired which in high wind may be somewhat sensitive to turbulence. Therefore in practice, pitch control depends on a special generator with fully or partly variable rotational speed so that the mill may increase speed slightly by wind gusts. Otherwise. the active regulation cannot follow the variations in the wind, and too great peak loads are obtained. Compared with stall control with fixed wings, pitch control also has the drawback that the wings are to be mounted turning on the mill hub and therefore have to be provided with bearings and actuation systems. These components have to transmit large loads and imply an increased demand for service.
  • a newer kind of control is active stall regulation.
  • the two normal methods of power limiting are combined.
  • pitch control there are bearings between wings and mill hub so that the angular position may be adjusted but the power limiting itself in high wind occurs by stalling.
  • active stalling has the advantage that the maximum power may be held at the desired valued with certainty irrespectively of air density, possible dirt on the wings and the influence from production tolerances.
  • active stall control has the advantage that the regulation itself still occurs by stalling, thus a passive utilisation of the aerodynamic properties of the wing so that sensitivity to turbulence is still small. Therefore, it is not necessary to use special generators, variable speed or the like for avoiding large peak loads.
  • Active stall control has. however, also its drawbacks compared with passive stall control with fixed wings. As with pitch control there is the disadvantage that the wings may be mounted turning on the mill hub and therefore has to be provided with bearings and actuating systems. These components have to transmit great loads and imply an increased demand for service. By active stall control, the regulating is slower than by pitch control, and the demands to the actuating systems are therefore lesser but the complexity is, however, substantially greater than by passive stall regulation.
  • spoilers on fixed wings are also known where the regulating occurs by a spoiler effect, usually sup- ported by complete or part stall of the wing.
  • the spoiler may typically be made as a rail disposed over the suction side of the wing, and which by extension gives increased air resistance and turbulence, and maybe also trips a real stall.
  • Such spoilers were used on the windmills erected in Denmark by F.L.Schmidt during Second World War.
  • Spoiler systems of this kind usually has the disadvantage that they imply mechanical parts far out on the wing.
  • spoilers disposed over the wing surface also when not actuated, normally have a certain continuous spoiler effect reducing the aerodynamic efficiency of the wing.
  • the external mounting may also give a considerable noise contribution.
  • Such spoilers are seen to be used, among others, on early wind mills of the Wind- Matic-type in Denmark. By being placed in a recess in the wing surface, this type of spoilers has the advantage that it does not to any significant degree reduce the aerodynamic efficiency of the wing when it is not extended.
  • Recessed spoilers usually have the disadvantage that they require special wing structures with recesses and hollows. Furthermore, normally they may be provided only with difficulty at the leading edge itself where the air forces are great but have to be disposed farther back at the suction side of the section. Here the operating conditions are better but in return the spoiler effect is more limited, and the spoiler therefore has to be of substantial size. Noise problems may exist at the partitioning faces between main wing and spoiler, and the effect may be uncertain under icing and by strong dirtying with dust etc. where extension and withdrawal may be impeded.
  • the purpose with the present invention is to provide a method and an apparatus for power regulation of wind mills with fixed wings reducing the disadvantages connected with the known methods. This purpose is achieved by using a method based on a flexible spoiler disposed at the leading edge of the wing, and which is actuated by filling with a liquid or gaseous medium.
  • This method has many advantages as compared with prior art systems.
  • the disadvantages usually connected with spoilers of prior art are avoided.
  • the spoiler By being mounted on the leading edge of the wing, the spoiler may achieve maximum effect when extended.
  • the spoiler By being mounted on the wing surface, the spoiler may dispense with the recesses and hollows normally connected with recessed spoilers. By not having parti- tioning faces between spoiler and main wing, the function of the spoiler is also ensured under icing and by strong dirtying by dust etc.
  • a special advantage by the method and the spoiler type comes from the mounting on the wing surface. This implies that the spoiler may be retrofitted so that the method of regulation may be applied to existing wind mills. Usually, this would not be possible by prior art type of spoilers, except maybe the original type which is mounted spaced above the wing surface.
  • a further advantage by the method is that the flexible spoiler, as a side gain, may be used for removing ice at the leading edge of the wing by inflating when the leading edge is covered by ice.
  • Figure 1 shows a wind mill wing with an external spoiler according to older prior art.
  • the wing section 1 is provided with a spoiler rail 2 carried by a row of fittings 3 with hinges 4.
  • the spoiler is shown in normal, deactivated position where no spoiler effect is desired.
  • Figure 2 shows the same spoiler in activated position where the spoiler is pivoted for maximum effect by mechanical means.
  • FIG. 3 shows a wind mill wing with a built-in spoiler according to newer prior art.
  • the wing section 5 is provided with a spoiler rail 6 disposed in a hollow 7 in the wing surface and which may be pivoted about a hinge 8.
  • the spoiler is shown in normal deactivated position where no spoiler effect is desired.
  • Figure 4 shows the same spoiler in activated position where the spoiler is pivoted for maximum effect by mechanical means.
  • FIG 5 shows a wind mill wing with a built-in flexible spoiler according to newer prior art.
  • the wing section 9 is provided with a hollow 10 covered by a flexible membrane 11.
  • the hollow 10 extends along a part of the length of the wing and is inwardly closed toward the wing root and outward toward the wing tip with valves not shown on the Figure.
  • the spoiler is shown in normal, deactivated position where no spoiler effect is desired.
  • Figure 6 shows the same spoiler in activated position where the spoiler membrane is inflated for maximum effect.
  • the activation normally occurs by opening the innermost valve and closing the outermost.
  • the inflation is then caused by the surpressure coming from the centrifugal force on the air column standing the hollow of the wing.
  • De- activation occurs by closing the innermost valve and opening the outermost.
  • Figure 7 shows the leading edge of a wind mill wing with a spoiler according to the invention.
  • the wing section 12 is provided with a flexible spoiler 13 extending along a part of the wing length.
  • the spoiler has a cross-section with a hollow 14.
  • the hollow 14 is partly closed outward toward the wing tip and is connected inward toward the wing root to a pressurised air system which may apply a greater or lesser pressure to the hollow of the spoiler.
  • the spoiler is shown in normal deactivated position where no spoiler effect is desired.
  • Figure 8 shows the same spoiler in activated position where the spoiler is inflated for maximum effect.
  • Activation usually takes place by applying pressure to the hollow of the spoiler.
  • the spoiler may be inflated steplessly, depending on the applied surpressure. Deactivation occurs by reducing the filling pressure.
  • the emptying is enhanced by the centrifugal effect on the air column standing in the hollow of the spoiler, pos- sibly supplemented by ejector effect from air flowing by at the outermost end of the spoiler.
  • Figure 9 shows the same kind of spoiler in activated position but where the hollow is moved farther back toward the suction side of the wing.
  • the stall effect is becom- ing more violent even by lesser angles of attack.
  • Figure 10 shows examples of cross-sections of spoiler according to the invention before the spoilers are mounted on the wing.
  • the spoilers may e.g. be extruded in EPDM Shore 45 whereby they may easily be mounted on leading edges with different curva- ture.
  • a normally preferred embodiment 15 may have uniform cross-section of the hollow.
  • Another preferred embodiment 16 may have a number of ribs 17 which maintains the shape of the hollow at possible underpressure from the suction effect under the centrifugal action but which gives good access for air for inflating anyway.
  • a third preferred embodiment 18 may have non-uniform cross-section of the hollow where one part 19 has great material thickness in the side expanding by inflation, while another part 20 has less material thickness.
  • the shape of the inflated spoiler may be adjusted for giving the most advantageous separation of the air flow.
  • the hollow may be divided into two or more parallel ducts which possibly may be inflated to different pressures.
  • the shape may be further differentiated as well as a larger part of the spoiler may be imparted a shape advantageous for separation.

Abstract

The invention concerns a method and a device for regulating the air flow around a wing on a wind mill. The device consists of a spoiler provided with a hollow. The spoiler is fastened to the leading part of the wing, and the spoiler may assume different shapes in order thereby to change the air flow around the wing. When the spoiler assumes a deactivated shape, no substantial change of the air flow occurs as the spoiler then extends continually and follows the contour of the wing. When the spoiler assumes an activated shape, the air flow is changed, however, by the spoiler no longer following the contour of the wing and creating a discontinuity or at least changing the wing section so that the flow conditions are changed. The change of shape occurs by supplying a fluid, such as pressurised air or hydraulic oil, to the hollow in the spoiler. The change in the air flow is an advantage in order thereby to regulate the rotational speed of the rotor onto which the wing is mounted.

Description

METHOD ON REGULATING THE AIR FLOW AROUND THE WINDMILL WING AND DEVICE FOR USE IN SUCH METHOD.
The invention concerns a method for controlling a wind mill and an apparatus for use in the method.
It is known that on every windmill it is necessary to limit the power in high wind oth- erwise the windmill may become overloaded. The normal methods for power limitation are stall control and pitch control.
By usual stall control, the wings are fixed on the mill hub and cannot be turned about their longitudinal axis. The angular position of the wings on the hub is adjusted once for all at the erection and running in of the mill. The wings are designed so that the air flow over them by itself gives larger air resistance in high wind and thereby limits the power. Due to this passive utilisation of the aerodynamic properties of the wings, the control becomes simple and sturdy under all circumstances with only small peak loads.
Common stall control has the drawback that the maximum power depends on the density of the air and the surface roughness of the wing. Hence there will be changes in maximum power from summer to winter and by dirty wings. To a large degree, the stall power also depends on the design of the leading edge of the wing. Small produc- tion tolerances in the shape of the leading edge may give significant differences in the power level at which a wind mill is stall controlled.
By pitch control, the wings are mounted on bearings on the mill hub so that they may be turned about their longitudinal axis. In high wind, the angular position is adjusted away from stall all the time so that the lift is limited to give just the power desired.
With the active regulation, there may be compensated for the density of the air. the surface roughness of the wing and the influence of production tolerances.
Pitch control has the drawback that a relatively complicated, active regulation is re- quired which in high wind may be somewhat sensitive to turbulence. Therefore in practice, pitch control depends on a special generator with fully or partly variable rotational speed so that the mill may increase speed slightly by wind gusts. Otherwise. the active regulation cannot follow the variations in the wind, and too great peak loads are obtained. Compared with stall control with fixed wings, pitch control also has the drawback that the wings are to be mounted turning on the mill hub and therefore have to be provided with bearings and actuation systems. These components have to transmit large loads and imply an increased demand for service.
A newer kind of control is active stall regulation. Here, the two normal methods of power limiting are combined. As by pitch control there are bearings between wings and mill hub so that the angular position may be adjusted but the power limiting itself in high wind occurs by stalling.
Compared with usual stall control, active stalling has the advantage that the maximum power may be held at the desired valued with certainty irrespectively of air density, possible dirt on the wings and the influence from production tolerances. Compared with pitch control, active stall control has the advantage that the regulation itself still occurs by stalling, thus a passive utilisation of the aerodynamic properties of the wing so that sensitivity to turbulence is still small. Therefore, it is not necessary to use special generators, variable speed or the like for avoiding large peak loads.
Active stall control has. however, also its drawbacks compared with passive stall control with fixed wings. As with pitch control there is the disadvantage that the wings may be mounted turning on the mill hub and therefore has to be provided with bearings and actuating systems. These components have to transmit great loads and imply an increased demand for service. By active stall control, the regulating is slower than by pitch control, and the demands to the actuating systems are therefore lesser but the complexity is, however, substantially greater than by passive stall regulation.
Besides the regulating systems based on turning of whole wings, spoilers on fixed wings are also known where the regulating occurs by a spoiler effect, usually sup- ported by complete or part stall of the wing. The spoiler may typically be made as a rail disposed over the suction side of the wing, and which by extension gives increased air resistance and turbulence, and maybe also trips a real stall. Such spoilers were used on the windmills erected in Denmark by F.L.Schmidt during Second World War.
Spoiler systems of this kind usually has the disadvantage that they imply mechanical parts far out on the wing. By experience, it is difficult to maintain a high availability on such systems as the operating conditions are very difficult and since the actuating mechanisms for spoilers usually are not very suited for resisting the hundreds of million actions to which the system is subjected during normal operation. To this is added that spoilers disposed over the wing surface, also when not actuated, normally have a certain continuous spoiler effect reducing the aerodynamic efficiency of the wing. The external mounting may also give a considerable noise contribution.
Other spoiler systems exist, consisting of rails or bellows placed in a recess in the wing surface. Again the effect is depending on increased air resistance and turbulence but compared with external spoilers, the mechanism is somehow better protected.
Such spoilers are seen to be used, among others, on early wind mills of the Wind- Matic-type in Denmark. By being placed in a recess in the wing surface, this type of spoilers has the advantage that it does not to any significant degree reduce the aerodynamic efficiency of the wing when it is not extended.
Recessed spoilers usually have the disadvantage that they require special wing structures with recesses and hollows. Furthermore, normally they may be provided only with difficulty at the leading edge itself where the air forces are great but have to be disposed farther back at the suction side of the section. Here the operating conditions are better but in return the spoiler effect is more limited, and the spoiler therefore has to be of substantial size. Noise problems may exist at the partitioning faces between main wing and spoiler, and the effect may be uncertain under icing and by strong dirtying with dust etc. where extension and withdrawal may be impeded.
The purpose with the present invention is to provide a method and an apparatus for power regulation of wind mills with fixed wings reducing the disadvantages connected with the known methods. This purpose is achieved by using a method based on a flexible spoiler disposed at the leading edge of the wing, and which is actuated by filling with a liquid or gaseous medium.
This method has many advantages as compared with prior art systems.
By being based on active regulation, the drawbacks usually connected with passive stall regulation with fixed wings are avoided. With the active regulation, compensation can be made for air density, wing roughness and influence from production toler- ances.
By being based on a spoiler effect, the drawbacks normally connected with wing turning systems are avoided. The expense to the spoiler system is quite marginal compared with the considerable expenses to wing bearings and actuating systems, as well as the service demands are much reduced.
By being based on a flexible type of spoiler mounted on the wing surface, the disadvantages usually connected with spoilers of prior art are avoided. There is no loss of aerodynamic efficiency when the spoiler is not extended, and by suitable design of the edges so that the height of the transition to the wing surface is small compared with the boundary layer, the risk of noise problems may be minimised. By being mounted on the leading edge of the wing, the spoiler may achieve maximum effect when extended. By being mounted on the wing surface, the spoiler may dispense with the recesses and hollows normally connected with recessed spoilers. By not having parti- tioning faces between spoiler and main wing, the function of the spoiler is also ensured under icing and by strong dirtying by dust etc.
A special advantage by the method and the spoiler type comes from the mounting on the wing surface. This implies that the spoiler may be retrofitted so that the method of regulation may be applied to existing wind mills. Usually, this would not be possible by prior art type of spoilers, except maybe the original type which is mounted spaced above the wing surface. A further advantage by the method is that the flexible spoiler, as a side gain, may be used for removing ice at the leading edge of the wing by inflating when the leading edge is covered by ice.
Reference is made to the patent claims for the means for achieving the effect.
In the following, the invention is described more closely as reference is made to the Figures.
Figure 1 shows a wind mill wing with an external spoiler according to older prior art.
The wing section 1 is provided with a spoiler rail 2 carried by a row of fittings 3 with hinges 4. The spoiler is shown in normal, deactivated position where no spoiler effect is desired.
Figure 2 shows the same spoiler in activated position where the spoiler is pivoted for maximum effect by mechanical means.
Figure 3 shows a wind mill wing with a built-in spoiler according to newer prior art. The wing section 5 is provided with a spoiler rail 6 disposed in a hollow 7 in the wing surface and which may be pivoted about a hinge 8. The spoiler is shown in normal deactivated position where no spoiler effect is desired.
Figure 4 shows the same spoiler in activated position where the spoiler is pivoted for maximum effect by mechanical means.
Figure 5 shows a wind mill wing with a built-in flexible spoiler according to newer prior art. The wing section 9 is provided with a hollow 10 covered by a flexible membrane 11. The hollow 10 extends along a part of the length of the wing and is inwardly closed toward the wing root and outward toward the wing tip with valves not shown on the Figure. The spoiler is shown in normal, deactivated position where no spoiler effect is desired. Figure 6 shows the same spoiler in activated position where the spoiler membrane is inflated for maximum effect. The activation normally occurs by opening the innermost valve and closing the outermost. The inflation is then caused by the surpressure coming from the centrifugal force on the air column standing the hollow of the wing. De- activation occurs by closing the innermost valve and opening the outermost.
Figure 7 shows the leading edge of a wind mill wing with a spoiler according to the invention. The wing section 12 is provided with a flexible spoiler 13 extending along a part of the wing length. The spoiler has a cross-section with a hollow 14. The hollow 14 is partly closed outward toward the wing tip and is connected inward toward the wing root to a pressurised air system which may apply a greater or lesser pressure to the hollow of the spoiler. The spoiler is shown in normal deactivated position where no spoiler effect is desired.
Figure 8 shows the same spoiler in activated position where the spoiler is inflated for maximum effect. Activation usually takes place by applying pressure to the hollow of the spoiler. The spoiler may be inflated steplessly, depending on the applied surpressure. Deactivation occurs by reducing the filling pressure. The emptying is enhanced by the centrifugal effect on the air column standing in the hollow of the spoiler, pos- sibly supplemented by ejector effect from air flowing by at the outermost end of the spoiler.
Figure 9 shows the same kind of spoiler in activated position but where the hollow is moved farther back toward the suction side of the wing. Here the stall effect is becom- ing more violent even by lesser angles of attack.
Figure 10 shows examples of cross-sections of spoiler according to the invention before the spoilers are mounted on the wing. The spoilers may e.g. be extruded in EPDM Shore 45 whereby they may easily be mounted on leading edges with different curva- ture. A normally preferred embodiment 15 may have uniform cross-section of the hollow. Another preferred embodiment 16 may have a number of ribs 17 which maintains the shape of the hollow at possible underpressure from the suction effect under the centrifugal action but which gives good access for air for inflating anyway. A third preferred embodiment 18 may have non-uniform cross-section of the hollow where one part 19 has great material thickness in the side expanding by inflation, while another part 20 has less material thickness. Hereby the shape of the inflated spoiler may be adjusted for giving the most advantageous separation of the air flow. In a fourth, preferred embodiment, the hollow may be divided into two or more parallel ducts which possibly may be inflated to different pressures. Hereby the shape may be further differentiated as well as a larger part of the spoiler may be imparted a shape advantageous for separation.

Claims

1. A method for regulating air flow around a wind mill wing, the method comprising changing a section of the wing in such a way that the air flow around the wing is also changed, characterised in that a first air flow around the wing is created around a stepless flexible device mounted at a front outer side of the wing by a deactivated shape of the wing, and that a second air flow around the wing is created by an activated shape of the device, and that the shape of the device is changed from the deactivated shape to the activated shape so that the rotational speed of the rotor onto which the wing is fixed is maintained within a given range for the rotational speed.
2. A device for use in the method according to claim 1, where the device is made of a flexible material which is provided with at least one hollow, and where the hollow has a first volume in a deactivated shape and has a second volume in an activated shape, and where the volume of the hollow may be changed from the deactivated shape to the activated shape by conducting a fluid to the hollow, characterised in that the at least one hollow is formed in a separate spoiler, and that the separate spoiler is mounted on a surface of the wing.
3. A device according to claim 1, characterised in that the spoiler constitutes a film with an outer side intended to face outward in relation to the wing surface, and an inner side intended to face inward in relation to the wing surface, that the inner side of the film is intended to be fastened to the wing surface and that the hollow is formed between the outer side and the inner side of the film.
4. A device according to claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the film has a central area where the hollow is formed and which has a thickness T, that the central part converges toward edge areas having a thickness t, and that the thickness t is less than the thickness T.
5. A device according to any of claims 2-4, characterised in that the central area of the spoiler has an outer side converging continuously toward the edge areas when the spoiler assumes the deactivated shape, and that the central area of the spoiler at least implies a changed section of the wing, preferably displays a discontinuity in relation to the wing surface, when the spoiler assumes the activated shape.
6. A device according to any of claims 2-5, characterised in that reinforcing ribs have been formed through the hollow between the outer side of the spoiler and the inner side of the spoiler, and which are capable of maintaining a given minimum distance between the outer side and the inner side of the spoiler when the device is in its deactivated shape.
7. A device according to any of claims 2-5, characterised in that passages are formed through the hollow, extending in narrower ducts in the hollow and between wider ducts in the hollow, that the passages are folded when the spoiler assumes its deactivated shape, and that the passages are distended when the spoiler assumes its activated shape.
8. A device according to any of claims 2-7, characterised in that the spoiler is brought from its deactivated shape to its activated shape by the hollow being filled with a give amount of fluid, preferably pressurised air or other pressurised gas, alter- natively hydraulic oil or other liquid.
9. A device according to claim 8, characterised in that the spoiler is brought from its activated shape back to its deactivated shape by the hollow becoming emptied from fluid by means of the air flow acting on the wing surface and at the outer side of the film, and/or by means of the centrifugal force acting on the fluid.
10. A device according to any of claims 2-9. characterised in that the spoiler is made of rubber, alternatively made of plastic, preferably made of an extruded section of EPDM with a hardness between Shore 45 and Shore 70 and with a width of 50 - 250 mm.
EP00934942A 1999-06-07 2000-06-06 Method on regulating the air flow around the windmill wing and device for use in such method Withdrawn EP1190175A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DK80299 1999-06-07
DKPA199900802 1999-06-07
PCT/DK2000/000304 WO2000075508A1 (en) 1999-06-07 2000-06-06 Method on regulating the air flow around the windmill wing and device for use in such method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1190175A1 true EP1190175A1 (en) 2002-03-27

Family

ID=8097738

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00934942A Withdrawn EP1190175A1 (en) 1999-06-07 2000-06-06 Method on regulating the air flow around the windmill wing and device for use in such method

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1190175A1 (en)
AU (1) AU5061200A (en)
WO (1) WO2000075508A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DK174261B1 (en) * 2000-09-29 2002-10-21 Bonus Energy As Device for use in regulating air flow around a wind turbine blade
DE10109553B4 (en) * 2001-02-28 2006-03-30 Wobben, Aloys, Dipl.-Ing. Air density dependent power control
NL1019315C2 (en) * 2001-11-06 2003-05-07 Ngup Holding B V Cover strip for fixture on blade of windmill influences aerodynamics of blade and has at least one specific part for this purpose
AT503537A1 (en) * 2006-04-24 2007-11-15 Kummer Ursula DEFROSTING SYSTEM FOR WIND POWER PLANTS
WO2008131800A1 (en) 2007-04-30 2008-11-06 Vestas Wind Systems A/S A wind turbine blade
US9039372B2 (en) 2007-04-30 2015-05-26 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Wind turbine blade
EP1995455B1 (en) * 2007-05-25 2016-11-16 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Actuation system for a wind turbine blade flap
GB2459453B (en) * 2008-04-21 2011-06-08 Barry Robert Marshall Energy output limiter for wind turbine rotor(s)
EP2141357A1 (en) 2008-07-03 2010-01-06 Dundalk Institute of Technology A wind turbine blade
US8092172B2 (en) * 2009-11-05 2012-01-10 General Electric Company Method for operating a wind turbine with reduced blade fouling
GB2481416A (en) * 2010-06-22 2011-12-28 Vestas Wind Sys As Wind turbine blade de-icing system based on shell distortion
DE102013006166A1 (en) 2013-04-03 2014-10-09 Tembra Gmbh & Co. Kg Shape variable, fluidically actuated trailing edge on rotor blades

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2918978A (en) * 1957-02-11 1959-12-29 United Aircraft Corp Variable contour propeller blades
EP0283730B1 (en) * 1987-03-14 1992-11-04 Mtb Manövriertechnisches Büro Aerodynamic body surrounded with air or water
DE3913505A1 (en) * 1989-04-25 1989-11-16 Astrid Holzem WING WITH AERODYNAMIC BRAKE FOR WIND ENGINES
US5673654A (en) * 1994-06-30 1997-10-07 Aalborg Marine Boilers A/S Marine boiler
DE19719221C1 (en) * 1997-05-07 1998-10-29 Roland Stelzer Rotor blade for wind generator
DE19815519A1 (en) * 1998-03-31 1999-10-07 Tacke Windenergie Gmbh Rotor blade for a wind turbine

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0075508A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU5061200A (en) 2000-12-28
WO2000075508A1 (en) 2000-12-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7419356B2 (en) Method for regulating a windmill, and an apparatus for the use of said method
CA2634427C (en) Actuation system for a wind turbine blade flap
CN102459876B (en) Wind turbine rotor blade
EP1190175A1 (en) Method on regulating the air flow around the windmill wing and device for use in such method
EP2122164B1 (en) Wind turbine blade with lift-regulating means in form of slots or holes
JP4020783B2 (en) Rotor blades for wind power generation
EP3517773A1 (en) Trailing edge assembly
US10677217B2 (en) Wind turbine and method of operating the same
US10018179B2 (en) Wind turbine blade
WO2011026495A2 (en) Wind turbine rotor blade
WO2010000852A1 (en) A wind turbine blade
CA3072004A1 (en) A wind turbine blade and a method of operating such a wind turbine blade
EP3870845B1 (en) Damping vibrations in a wind turbine
WO2000017046A1 (en) Profile and process for changing the maximum angle of attack of aprofile
EP3667080A1 (en) Wind turbine blade flow regulation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20011215

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN

18W Application withdrawn

Effective date: 20030218