EP1142196A2 - Verfahren und gerät für sitzungswiederherstellung - Google Patents

Verfahren und gerät für sitzungswiederherstellung

Info

Publication number
EP1142196A2
EP1142196A2 EP00944892A EP00944892A EP1142196A2 EP 1142196 A2 EP1142196 A2 EP 1142196A2 EP 00944892 A EP00944892 A EP 00944892A EP 00944892 A EP00944892 A EP 00944892A EP 1142196 A2 EP1142196 A2 EP 1142196A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
session
analyzer
packets
application
flow
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP00944892A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Limor Schweitzer
Tal Givoly
Ory Baruch Kushnir
Damian Sean Black
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
XACCT Technologies Inc
Original Assignee
XACCT Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US09/553,261 external-priority patent/US6963912B1/en
Priority claimed from US09/552,818 external-priority patent/US6957255B1/en
Application filed by XACCT Technologies Inc filed Critical XACCT Technologies Inc
Publication of EP1142196A2 publication Critical patent/EP1142196A2/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
    • H04L41/5003Managing SLA; Interaction between SLA and QoS
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
    • H04L41/5032Generating service level reports
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/24Traffic characterised by specific attributes, e.g. priority or QoS
    • H04L47/2441Traffic characterised by specific attributes, e.g. priority or QoS relying on flow classification, e.g. using integrated services [IntServ]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M15/00Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M15/00Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
    • H04M15/41Billing record details, i.e. parameters, identifiers, structure of call data record [CDR]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M15/00Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
    • H04M15/56Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP for VoIP communications
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M15/00Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
    • H04M15/58Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP based on statistics of usage or network monitoring
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M15/00Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
    • H04M15/80Rating or billing plans; Tariff determination aspects
    • H04M15/8016Rating or billing plans; Tariff determination aspects based on quality of service [QoS]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M15/00Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
    • H04M15/81Dynamic pricing, e.g. change of tariff during call
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M7/00Arrangements for interconnection between switching centres
    • H04M7/006Networks other than PSTN/ISDN providing telephone service, e.g. Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), including next generation networks with a packet-switched transport layer
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q3/00Selecting arrangements
    • H04Q3/0016Arrangements providing connection between exchanges
    • H04Q3/0062Provisions for network management
    • H04Q3/0075Fault management techniques
    • H04Q3/0079Fault management techniques involving restoration of networks, e.g. disaster recovery, self-healing networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/06Management of faults, events, alarms or notifications
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
    • H04L41/508Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements based on type of value added network service under agreement
    • H04L41/5087Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements based on type of value added network service under agreement wherein the managed service relates to voice services
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
    • H04L41/508Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements based on type of value added network service under agreement
    • H04L41/509Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements based on type of value added network service under agreement wherein the managed service relates to media content delivery, e.g. audio, video or TV
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements
    • H04L41/508Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements based on type of value added network service under agreement
    • H04L41/5096Network service management, e.g. ensuring proper service fulfilment according to agreements based on type of value added network service under agreement wherein the managed service relates to distributed or central networked applications
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M2215/00Metering arrangements; Time controlling arrangements; Time indicating arrangements
    • H04M2215/01Details of billing arrangements
    • H04M2215/0112Dynamic pricing, e.g. change of tariff during call
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M2215/00Metering arrangements; Time controlling arrangements; Time indicating arrangements
    • H04M2215/01Details of billing arrangements
    • H04M2215/0164Billing record, e.g. Call Data Record [CDR], Toll Ticket[TT], Automatic Message Accounting [AMA], Call Line Identifier [CLI], details, i.e. parameters, identifiers, structure
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M2215/00Metering arrangements; Time controlling arrangements; Time indicating arrangements
    • H04M2215/01Details of billing arrangements
    • H04M2215/0188Network monitoring; statistics on usage on called/calling number
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M2215/00Metering arrangements; Time controlling arrangements; Time indicating arrangements
    • H04M2215/20Technology dependant metering
    • H04M2215/202VoIP; Packet switched telephony
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M2215/00Metering arrangements; Time controlling arrangements; Time indicating arrangements
    • H04M2215/22Bandwidth or usage-sensitve billing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M2215/00Metering arrangements; Time controlling arrangements; Time indicating arrangements
    • H04M2215/74Rating aspects, e.g. rating parameters or tariff determination apects
    • H04M2215/7414QoS
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M3/00Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
    • H04M3/22Arrangements for supervision, monitoring or testing
    • H04M3/2218Call detail recording
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q2213/00Indexing scheme relating to selecting arrangements in general and for multiplex systems
    • H04Q2213/13034A/D conversion, code compression/expansion
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q2213/00Indexing scheme relating to selecting arrangements in general and for multiplex systems
    • H04Q2213/1305Software aspects
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q2213/00Indexing scheme relating to selecting arrangements in general and for multiplex systems
    • H04Q2213/13093Personal computer, PC
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q2213/00Indexing scheme relating to selecting arrangements in general and for multiplex systems
    • H04Q2213/1313Metering, billing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q2213/00Indexing scheme relating to selecting arrangements in general and for multiplex systems
    • H04Q2213/13166Fault prevention
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q2213/00Indexing scheme relating to selecting arrangements in general and for multiplex systems
    • H04Q2213/13175Graphical user interface [GUI], WWW interface, visual indication
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q2213/00Indexing scheme relating to selecting arrangements in general and for multiplex systems
    • H04Q2213/13196Connection circuit/link/trunk/junction, bridge, router, gateway
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q2213/00Indexing scheme relating to selecting arrangements in general and for multiplex systems
    • H04Q2213/13204Protocols
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q2213/00Indexing scheme relating to selecting arrangements in general and for multiplex systems
    • H04Q2213/13209ISDN
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q2213/00Indexing scheme relating to selecting arrangements in general and for multiplex systems
    • H04Q2213/1325Priority service
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q2213/00Indexing scheme relating to selecting arrangements in general and for multiplex systems
    • H04Q2213/13337Picturephone, videotelephony
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q2213/00Indexing scheme relating to selecting arrangements in general and for multiplex systems
    • H04Q2213/13349Network management
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04QSELECTING
    • H04Q2213/00Indexing scheme relating to selecting arrangements in general and for multiplex systems
    • H04Q2213/13389LAN, internet

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the field of network management.
  • the invention relates to session reconstruction in a network environment. Description of the Related Art
  • IP Internet protocol
  • Diffserv Differentiated Services
  • RFC 2474 and RFC 2475 that provides for using portions of the IP header information to store information about the types of service (TOS).
  • RSVP resource reservation protocol
  • the two can be used together to provide a committed quality of service over an IP network.
  • RMON2 The provision of a committed quality of service network is distinct from the monitoring the network and billing for usage of the network.
  • Existing network monitoring processes such as RMON2, and RMON, specified by RFC 2074 and RFC 2021 are designed to report statistics based on information available in the packet headers, e.g. source and destination address. With RMON2, this can be broken down on a per port basis. The granularity of the reports depends on the sampling of the RMON trace.
  • the returned statistics are basic measures of number of bytes and number of packets.
  • Netflow(TM) from Cisco Corporation, San Jose, California, adds to these abilities by providing measures based on the terms of service, e.g. diffserv style flag, and the IP port used.
  • Firewall- 1(TM) and Floodgate- 1(TM) from Check Point Software Technologies, Ramat Gan, Israel, offers a similar set of features to Netflow(TM).
  • Both Netflow(TM) and Firewall- l(TM)/Floodgate-l(TM) focus on reporting per flow statistics.
  • Previous techniques do not support quality of service related evaluation of network usage. Previous systems do not allow for reconstructing sessions, where each session may be comprised of multiple flows. Previous systems do not provide for application specific event monitoring. Previous systems to not handle large volumes of data received over different network devices well. Accordingly, what is needed is a session reconstruction system that supports measuring quality of service, reconstruction of sessions that include multiple flows, application specific event monitoring within flows, and distributed session reconstruction.
  • a method and apparatus for reconstructing sessions on a network allows for monitoring of quality of service at an application level as well as for understanding application specific events. This allows the method to be used to generate service detail records for usage based on application type for use in billing. It also allows the qualitative and quantitative analysis of quality of service based on application specific parameters. For example, for web applications, quality of service can be measured by the time from requesting a link till the close of the session by delivery of the whole page. Similarly, for voice over IP calls, application events like adding participants and removing participants can be detected and billed accordingly. Also, the quality of service can be measured. For example, the actual latency can be compared to a predetermined latency amount set by a provider for voice over IP calls.
  • service detail records can be generated based on application specific events instead of generic flows, so usage billing can be performed based on factors such as a price per minute per leg, etc, with application specific events generated each time a leg is added or dropped. Further, because the periodicity of the output can be controlled on a per application basis, output for voice over IP calls can be generated more often than for other applications. Additionally, embodiments of the invention can reconstruct sessions that are flowing across multiple network devices.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates a system including one embodiment of the invention.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates the handling of packets that are not part of a recognized flow.
  • Fig. 3 illustrates the handling of packets that are part of a recognized flow.
  • Fig. 4 illustrates the relationship between information about a flow and information about a session.
  • Fig. 5 illustrates information generated by some embodiments of the invention for from session information.
  • Fig. 6 illustrates a situation in which distributed session reconstruction may be desirable.
  • Fig. 7 illustrates a system including one embodiment of the invention configured to support distributed session reconstruction.
  • IP Internet protocol
  • TCP transmission control protocol
  • UDP user datagram protocol
  • telnet file transport protocol
  • http hypertext transfer protocol
  • DNS domain name service
  • SMTP simple mail transport protocol
  • TM NetMeeting
  • One common encapsulation of IP packets is within IEEE 802.3 Ethernet frames.
  • the payload, or data, portion of the packet includes an IP datagram comprising headers and a text part.
  • the text part in turn includes the transport layer protocol such as TCP or UDP.
  • the transport layer portion has an additional transport layer specific header and then a data portion. This data portion is in turn comprised of data specific to the application layer protocol.
  • a given packet sent over an IP network may have several sets of addresses, including: a set of medium access (MAC) layer address; a set of network layer address; and a set of transport layer address. Additionally, there may be application specific addresses.
  • MAC medium access
  • TCP UDP ports can be used for multiple purposes; therefore, unless the application data itself is examined, it may not be possible to provide accurate application based reporting.
  • port 80 is typically used for hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP) access.
  • HTTP hypertext transfer protocol
  • switching a protocol like RealAudio(TM) which sometimes exhibits poor behavior due to network congestion, to a port used by a well-known service such as DNS can provide huge speed improvements for an end user.
  • the OSI model or Open Systems Interconnection Reference Model, is a seven-layer model comprising the following layers: physical (1); data link (2); network (3); transport (4); session (5); presentation (6); and application (7).
  • the TCP/IP Model terminology used in this specification can be mapped onto the OSI Model as follows: host-to-network (1/2); Internet Protocol (IP) (3); Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and/or User Datagram Protocol (UDP) (4); and application layer (7).
  • IP Internet Protocol
  • TCP Transmission Control Protocol
  • UDP User Datagram Protocol
  • the TCP/IP model does not include an analogous set of abstractions for layers five and six of the OSI Model.
  • the application layer in the TCP/IP model is comprised of higher-level protocols such as file transfer protocol (FTP), hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP), etc.
  • FTP file transfer protocol
  • HTTP hypertext transfer protocol
  • Some embodiments of the invention may be adapted to work with OSI Model networks and may include appropriate detectors for operating at the presentation and/or session layers.
  • the term "session” refers to a group of related flows within a definite time bound relating to an end user experience, each of the flows may share one or more common packet header elements.
  • a session is comprised of the flows containing the commands as well as of the flows used for transferring files.
  • the control flows as well as all of the flows containing voice and/or video data would be part of a single session.
  • sessions can hierarchically be comprised of other sessions.
  • the process of accessing a single web page may be comprised of multiple HTTP sessions.
  • a "WWW session” might be considered to comprise all web activity by a user in a definite time bound, e.g. times out after X minutes without further activity.
  • a WWW session could be comprised of page sessions for each retrieved page.
  • the page sessions in turn could be comprised of one or more HTTP sessions, e.g. one or more flows for retrieving an object using the HTTP protocol.
  • a provider might provide guarantees about average latency to customers. For example, the provider might promise that the average latency would not exceed Z ms. If the entire voice over IP call is treated as a single session, the latency can be measured and the appropriate compensation can be given if the latency guarantee was not met. Further, because application specific events can be monitored, addition and removal of call legs can be tracked and appropriate service detail records generated. Also, different application protocols may have different usage billing requirements. For example, voice over IP calls for a prepaid calling card must be checked every minute to ensure that a user does not exceed the minutes available to them.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a system including one embodiment of the invention. This could be used in conjunction with a corporate Intranet to provide policy based session management and monitoring. A provider of voice could use this over IP telephony to meter and monitor usage and provide a committed quality of service.
  • Figure 1 includes the packet sources lOOa-e, a filter 102, an analyzer 104, a data collector 106, a policy 114.
  • the analyzer 104 includes a flow manager 108, an application recognizer 110, and a session streamer 112.
  • the packet sources lOOa-e are coupled in communication with the filter 102.
  • the filter 102 is coupled in communication with the analyzer 104.
  • the analyzer 104 is coupled in communication with the data collector 106.
  • the filter 102, the analyzer 104, and the data collector 106 are capable of accessing the policy 114.
  • the packet sources lOOa-e could be network connections, local computers, network computers, the Internet, and/or some other type of packet source.
  • the packet sources lOOa-e are sources of packets such as IP packets, IPX packets, and/or some other type of packets.
  • the filter 102 is provided to filter out packets. In other embodiments, no filter 102 is used.
  • the filter 102 can be set to remove local traffic from further analysis, e.g. packets not leaving the corporate Intranet, or packets not travelling over a particular backbone. Additionally, if multiple analyzers like the analyzer 104 are being used, then multiple filters like the filter 102 can be used to segment the analysis. For example, all voice over IP calls might be filtered out by one filter but be the only thing passed through by another. This allows for tremendous flexibility in providing distributed analysis and meaningful analysis.
  • a standard packet capture (pcap) language is used to define the filter, e.g. "tcp and port 80 or dst net 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0", etc.
  • the filter 102 and the analyzer 104 are hosted on separate computers.
  • the filter 102 might have two Ethernet interfaces, one for receiving packets from the packet sources lOOa-e and the other for sending matching packets to the analyzer 104.
  • Packets are analyzed by the analyzer 104 to be assigned to flows and then to sessions.
  • the analyzer 104 can gather statistics about flows and sessions for use by the data collector 106.
  • Each of the components of the analyzer 104 can be performed on a single computer and/or multiple computers to support distributed processing.
  • the policy 114 controls how the system operates. For example, the policy might specify the ability of certain users or groups to perform certain tasks. The policy might control how much bandwidth certain users or groups get. The policy might control how users or groups are billed for usage. The policy may also control how different application events are treated, e.g. for voice over IP request minute by minute service detail records, etc. Other options include controlling when sessions, flows and/or packets are dropped, the contents of output from the data collector 106, what application specific headers and statistics are being collected, and/or other options. For example, for HTTP, the time from click to first reply and time from click till last TCP thread finished might be recorded as well as the base uniform resource indicator (URI).
  • the policy can include a series of pcap language style expressions together with output selectors as shown by the example in Table 1.
  • Figure 2 illustrates the handling of packets that are not part of a recognized flow. As users begin new activities, each flow is initially not recognized. For example, starting to access a web page. Figure 2 shows how unrecognized flows are handled according to some embodiments of the invention.
  • a filtered packet 200 is passed to the flow manager 108 within the analyzer 104 by the filter 102. Because the flow manager 108 does not recognize the packet as belonging to an existing flow, it is added to a queue of unrecognized flows 202A-B as unrecognized flow 202C and the packets are placed in content 204C. If additional packets for the flow arrive before the flow is recognized, they can be associated with the flow by adding the packet to the respective content 204A-C.
  • the application recognizer 110 examines each of the flows in the queue and identifies whether the content of the flow matches a known application. This is based on the packet content itself. The application recognizer 110 can use the application tests 206 to perform matching.
  • the application tests 206 include tests for CuSeeMe, http, ftp, RealAudio(TM), post office protocol version 3 (POP3), SMTP, NetMeeting(TM), Quicktime(TM), H.323 calls, telnet, and/or other applications.
  • the application tests for a particular application protocol describe how to identify a particular application protocol from the data content of packets.
  • the unrecognized flow 202A will be assigned to a new session, session 210D.
  • the session streamer 112 is used to alert the flow manager 108 to new flows that are part of an existing session in some embodiments of the invention. Therefore, unrecognized flows will be assigned to new sessions while new flows for an existing session will be treated as recognized flows.
  • Some flows may not be recognized as belonging to any application. For example, if a new protocol is developed for streaming media, then none of the application tests 206 may be able to recognize the flow. In that case, some embodiments of the invention treat the unrecognized flow as a self-contained session after more than two kilobytes (KB) have been sent or if a predetermined amount of time passes without additional packets. Because the application tests 206 are modular, additional tests can be added, modified, and/or removed easily. The tests can, if appropriately designed, detect specific application protocols, e.g. RealAudio(TM) type Y encoding, etc.
  • TM RealAudio
  • Figure 3 illustrates the handling of packets that are part of a recognized flow once a session is underway (For example, ongoing packets in a voice over IP call). Additionally, the session streamer 112 can provide information to the flow manager 108 to allow new flows for an existing session to be recognized without the application recognizer 110 being used. Figure 3 shows how recognized flows are handled according to some embodiments of the invention. Filtered packets 300 flow into the flow manager 108. Because the packet belongs to a recognized flow, e.g. the recognized flow 3202A, it is associated with the respective content, e.g. the content 304A.
  • the session streamer 112 uses the application streamers 306 to detect application specific events, e.g. add leg, etc., and assign the content to respective sessions.
  • the application streamers 306 are similar to the application tests 206. However, the application streamers 306 contain tests for matching additional packets from the same application session.
  • the session streamer 112 in conjunction with the application streamers 306 may also be able to detect the request for additional channels or ports and provide that information to the flow manager 108.
  • new flows for an existing session will not be treated as unrecognized flows, but rather will be recognized and handled by the session streamer 112.
  • the application streamers 306 might include NetMeeting(TM) specific streamers for detecting add leg and drop leg events and providing the addressing information to the flow manager 108.
  • the policy 114 can assign significance and actions relative to certain application events identified by the application streamers 306.
  • the session streamer 112 assigns the packets from the flows to the respective sessions based on the results of the application streamers 306.
  • the recognized flow 302 A and the content 304 A is matched with the session 210B.
  • Figure 4 illustrates the relationship between information about a flow and information about a session.
  • Figure 4 includes three flows 400A-C with respective packet time-stamps 402A-C.
  • Each flow 400A-C is associated with a corresponding session 210A-D.
  • the flows 400 A-B are both associated with session 210D while flow 400C is associated with session 210 A.
  • the packet time-stamps 402A-C are used to generate the statistics 404A-D corresponding to each of the sessions.
  • an H.323 call is may be comprised of at three or more flows. For example, for a call from John to Jane, there might be two flows for audio and a third flow for control. Per flow monitoring alone could suggest that one flow for the call, e.g. John to Jane, is meeting the committed quality of service. But, nothing would connect that information with the fact that the other flow, Jane to John, is not.
  • a service detail record can include a billing identifier, e.g. user name, calling card number, phone number, and/or some other identifier.
  • the service detail record also can include the usage within the interval covered by the service detail record.
  • a service detail record for a voice over IP call might include the phone number and the usage, e.g. "650/555-1212, 5 legs, 3007 sec ttl", etc.
  • Some statistics computed by embodiments of the invention include: flow-level statistics, start time, end time, time since last output, number of packets, number of bytes, average time between packets, moving average, latency, throughput, jitter, and/or other statistics.
  • the jitter is the standard deviation of the latency and throughput.
  • the statistics can be further subdivided between input and output information.
  • Latency is an application specific computation in some embodiments of the invention. For example, with TCP packets, latency can be determined by looking at the time between sequential acknowledgements. In contrast, for a real-time protocol, the latency might be calculated as the difference between the end of communication in a control flow and the start of communication in a data flow.
  • Figure 5 illustrates information generated by some embodiments of the invention for from session information.
  • the generated statistics e.g. the statistics 404A-D
  • the policy 114 can be used to define the output of the data collector 116.
  • Outputs include usage reports 500 that describe application usage in application specific terms, e.g. 700 minutes of voice over IP calls, maximum of 10 simultaneous calls, etc.
  • Service detail records 502 are another output of the data collector 106. These could be output at application specific intervals, six seconds for voice over IP, every hour for web usage, etc.
  • the service detail records 502 can be used for billing purposes and also to limit access if the paid for usage is exceeded. For example if a user purchases twenty minutes of voice over IP calls, when she/he reaches that limit, systems monitoring the service detail records
  • 502 can terminate the call, etc.
  • Another output can include quality of service reports 504. These may specify, on an application level, the performance for the session, as appropriate, this can be presented in application specific terms. For example, if a voice over
  • IP call should have no more than a Z ms latency to avoid echo
  • the report might specify how many calls exceeded that latency and by how much.
  • Another output might include router commands 506 to control a router, e.g. to limit further usage or re-prioritize usage of bandwidth relative to performance and committed quality of service. For example, if RealAudio(TM) sessions consume too much bandwidth relative to the priority set in the policy 114, the router commands 506 could block the routing of RealAudio(TM), or reduce its priority further to allow higher priority sessions to proceed at the committed quality of service.
  • the service detail report 502 might include the quality of service of a voice over IP call and if the committed quality of service is not delivered, the usage charge might be waived.
  • Figure 6 illustrates a situation in which distributed session reconstruction may be desirable.
  • a client computer 600 and a host computer 602 are coupled in communication over a packet switched network including two routers, the router 604 and the router 606. Two examples will be considered, one involving the file transfer protocol and the other involving asymmetric routing.
  • a flow 608 is the control flow for the FTP session and is established across the router 606.
  • the flow 610 is a transfer flow in the FTP session and is established across the router 604.
  • the packets flowing through the router 606 are sent to a session reconstruction system of the type described above as the packet source 100a, but that packets flowing through the router 604 are provided to a different session reconstruction system.
  • the session reconstruction system monitoring the packets from the router 606 will be able to detect the FTP session and the control flow 608.
  • the other session reconstruction system, monitoring the packets from the router 604 may be able to detect the transfer flow 610, but may not be able to identify the protocol or the appropriate application session.
  • the flow 608 and the flow 610 represent two halves of a single communication. This occurs when the traffic from the client computer 600 to the host computer 602 traverse a different set of network devices than packets sent in the other direction, e.g. asymmetric routing. Again, as in the example above, if the two routers are supplying their traffic data to different session reconstruction systems, it may not be possible to monitor even a single flow from one session reconstruction system.
  • Solutions to this problem could include providing all of the raw data to a single session reconstruction system. This approach does not scale well. As the number of packet sources increases, the bandwidth and computation power required for session reconstruction goes up. For example, consider a session reconstruction system coupled to an ATM switch, that system might be working at capacity. Adding packets from three or four additional ATM switches for analysis may not be a viable option computationally or in terms of bandwidth. Accordingly, some embodiments of the invention operate in a semi- hierarchical fashion. This allows session reconstruction to be distributed over several systems of the type described above.
  • Figure 7 illustrates a system including one embodiment of the invention configured to support distributed session reconstruction.
  • Figure 7 does not show the policy 114, however such a policy can control the filters 102a-c, analyzers 104a-d and data collector 106a. Additionally, the policy 114 can have different rules for different modules, if appropriate. For example, filter 102a and filter 102b might have different rules in the policy 114 to filter out local traffic.
  • each session reconstruction system is according to the manner described above.
  • a packet source e.g. the packet source lOOf
  • flows into a filter e.g. the filter 102a
  • an analyzer e.g. the analyzer 104a
  • results from the analyzers 104a-d can be passed to other analyzers (e.g. the analyzer 104d).
  • This approach can be further nested with the analyzer 104d coupled to other analyzers higher in the hierarchy, not shown.
  • data can be transferred directly from an analyzer (e.g.
  • the session data can be sent to a higher level analyzer (e.g. the analyzer 104d) or directly to the data collector (e.g. the data collector 106a).
  • a higher level analyzer e.g. the analyzer 104d
  • the data collector e.g. the data collector 106a
  • the raw packet data from the different lower level analyzers can be integrated and considered. In many instances, e.g. the example of Figure 6, this will allow for session reconstruction. Thus, if the analyzer 104a was handling the data from the router 606 and the analyzer 104b was handling the data from the router 604, both analyzers would forward the raw packet data to the analyzer 104d which would now be able to recognize the entire FTP session.
  • This approach reduces some of the computational complexity of the first approach, e.g. the need for the higher level analyzers to reprocess all packet data.
  • hints are extracted by the lower level session analyzer and provided to higher level analyzers.
  • the raw packet data is forwarded - together with time stamps - to higher level analyzers.
  • the application streamer might detect the request to establish a file transfer over certain ports within the control flow 608. This information can be provided to the higher level organizer as a hint.
  • a second hint could be provided that identifies the packets being forwarded by the analyzer 104a as an FTP control flow.
  • the hints reduce the amount of processing required by the higher level analyzer.
  • the higher level analyzer could use the second hint to identify the forwarded packets as belonging to an FTP session and use the first hint to prime the application streamer to recognize the transfer flow packets when they are forwarded from another analyzer.
  • This approach is the most complex, but also the most bandwidth efficient.
  • hints are generated at lower level analyzers.
  • incomplete data is aggregated into a summary whenever possible.
  • the summary can include information from packet headers as well as attributes and metrics. Examples of data that would be included in summaries are: source address, destination address, source port, destination port, terms of service (TOS), protocol quality of service (QOS), number of packets, number of bytes, latency, etc.
  • TOS terms of service
  • QOS protocol quality of service
  • control flow 608 could be reduced to a summary together with a hint for recognizing the transfer flow 610.
  • the transfer flow 610 might be reduced to a summary by another analyzer and the hint would allow a higher level analyzer to group the summary information about the transfer flow 610 as part of a single FTP session with the control flow 608 summary information.
  • hint methods can accept data in packet forwarding format, e.g. without hints.
  • hint plus summary method can also accept hints together with forward packets, e.g. without summaries.
  • the filter e.g. the filter 102
  • the filter can be omitted.
  • different streams can traverse different components.
  • the analyzer 104c could be omitted in preference for allowing the packet source lOOh to be analyzed first by the analyzer 104d.
  • the filter 102, the analyzer 104, the flow manager 108, the application recognizer 110, the session streamer 112, the data collector 106, the policy 114, the application tests 206 and the application streamers 306 are included in hardware, software, and/or a combination of hardware and software.
  • the filter 102, the analyzer 104, the flow manager 108, the application recognizer 110, the session streamer 112, the data collector 106, the policy 114, the application tests 206 and the application streamers 306 are included as one or more computer usable media such as CD-ROMs, floppy disks, and/or other media.
  • the electromagnetic wave form comprises information such as the flow manager 108, the application recognizer 110, the session streamer 112, the application tests 206, and/or the application streamers 306.
  • the application streamers 306 might include a database of application streamer data accessed over a network by the session streamer 112.
EP00944892A 1999-06-28 2000-06-26 Verfahren und gerät für sitzungswiederherstellung Withdrawn EP1142196A2 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14135199P 1999-06-28 1999-06-28
US141351P 1999-06-28
US09/553,261 US6963912B1 (en) 1999-06-28 2000-04-20 Method and apparatus for session reconstruction
US553261 2000-04-20
US09/552,818 US6957255B1 (en) 1999-06-28 2000-04-20 Method and apparatus for session reconstruction and accounting involving VoIP calls
PCT/US2000/017583 WO2001001726A2 (en) 1999-06-28 2000-06-26 Method and apparatus for session reconstruction
US552818 2006-10-25

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1142196A2 true EP1142196A2 (de) 2001-10-10

Family

ID=27385639

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00944892A Withdrawn EP1142196A2 (de) 1999-06-28 2000-06-26 Verfahren und gerät für sitzungswiederherstellung

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1142196A2 (de)
AU (1) AU5891900A (de)
CA (1) CA2340184A1 (de)
GB (1) GB2357392A (de)
HK (1) HK1039425A1 (de)
IL (2) IL141378A0 (de)
WO (1) WO2001001726A2 (de)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7496670B1 (en) 1997-11-20 2009-02-24 Amdocs (Israel) Ltd. Digital asset monitoring system and method
FI20002694A (fi) * 2000-12-08 2002-06-09 Sonera Oyj Menetelmä laskutuksen järjestämiseksi ja tiedonsiirtojärjestelmä
US7315894B2 (en) 2001-07-17 2008-01-01 Mcafee, Inc. Network data retrieval and filter systems and methods
US7162698B2 (en) 2001-07-17 2007-01-09 Mcafee, Inc. Sliding window packet management systems
US7296080B2 (en) 2001-07-17 2007-11-13 Mcafee, Inc. Method of simulating network communications

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6279029B1 (en) * 1993-10-12 2001-08-21 Intel Corporation Server/client architecture and method for multicasting on a computer network
CA2186795A1 (en) * 1995-11-17 1997-05-18 Cormac John Sreenan Resource management system for a broadband multipoint bridge
GB2344265B (en) * 1997-11-20 2003-07-16 Xacct Technologies Inc Network accounting and billing system and method

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
IEEE, 1997, pages 337 - 346, XP010252439 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
IL141378A0 (en) 2002-03-10
GB0107092D0 (en) 2001-05-09
IL141378A (en) 2006-07-05
CA2340184A1 (en) 2001-01-04
HK1039425A1 (zh) 2002-04-19
GB2357392A (en) 2001-06-20
WO2001001726A3 (en) 2001-07-19
AU5891900A (en) 2001-01-31
WO2001001726A2 (en) 2001-01-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6957255B1 (en) Method and apparatus for session reconstruction and accounting involving VoIP calls
US7539749B2 (en) Method and apparatus for session reconstruction
US6625650B2 (en) System for multi-layer broadband provisioning in computer networks
US11870696B2 (en) Method and system for triggering augmented data collection on a network device based on traffic patterns
US6963912B1 (en) Method and apparatus for session reconstruction
EP1142196A2 (de) Verfahren und gerät für sitzungswiederherstellung
US7739159B1 (en) Aggregation of user usage data for accounting systems in dynamically configured networks
CN105282050A (zh) 聚合数据流的方法和装置
Al-Shaer et al. MRMON: remote multicast monitoring
Joshi et al. Integrated quality of service and network management.
Grossglauser et al. Passive tra c measurement for ip operations
Tang MRMON: Remote Multicast Monitoring
Párhonyi et al. Domain based metering

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20010322

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20040823

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20050304

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HK

Ref legal event code: WD

Ref document number: 1039425

Country of ref document: HK