EP1121626B1 - Prozesssteuerung - Google Patents

Prozesssteuerung Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1121626B1
EP1121626B1 EP99954933A EP99954933A EP1121626B1 EP 1121626 B1 EP1121626 B1 EP 1121626B1 EP 99954933 A EP99954933 A EP 99954933A EP 99954933 A EP99954933 A EP 99954933A EP 1121626 B1 EP1121626 B1 EP 1121626B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
process control
computers
computer
communication protocol
controlling machine
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP99954933A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1121626A1 (de
Inventor
Russell L. Agrusa
Jan Burian
Robert A. Braier
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Iconics Inc
Original Assignee
Iconics Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Iconics Inc filed Critical Iconics Inc
Publication of EP1121626A1 publication Critical patent/EP1121626A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1121626B1 publication Critical patent/EP1121626B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS], computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
    • G05B19/4185—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS], computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by the network communication
    • G05B19/4186—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS], computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by the network communication by protocol, e.g. MAP, TOP
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS], computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
    • G05B19/4185—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS], computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by the network communication
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/31—From computer integrated manufacturing till monitoring
    • G05B2219/31208—Server node to watch, store message, variable, data between lon, network
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/34—Director, elements to supervisory
    • G05B2219/34263—OLE object linking and embedding, OPC ole for process control
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/34—Director, elements to supervisory
    • G05B2219/34488—One computer, controller replaces other, backup computer
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Definitions

  • the invention relates to communication between computers in a network, and in particular to communication between computers that are communicating according to a communication standard for process control.
  • e-mail electronic mail
  • LANs local area networks
  • WANs wide area networks
  • Manufacturing machines and other types of industrial equipment can be interconnected and controlled to form an automated manufacturing system. It is known to hard-wire different types of equipment together to form such a system, using custom cabling. The use of such dedicated custom cabling makes it difficult, time consuming, and expensive to add additional machines or equipment to the system, or to replace machines/equipment with different or improved machines/equipment or with machines/equipment made by different manufacturers.
  • Another solution that has been applied to this problem is the writing of custom computer code to allow the conversion of information or instructions residing on one manufacturer's equipment, 75375.620 such as a Programmable Logic Controller (“PLC”), to be communicated to another PLC made by a different manufacturer.
  • PLC Programmable Logic Controller
  • EP-A-0 778 688 describes a modular system using a third party middle tier application and the use of the OLE protocol.
  • EP-A-0 810 499 describes a secure front end communication system for process control computers which includes a plurality of process control computers which simultaneously make independent logical decisions, and subsequently communicate with each other and arbitrate their decisions if necessary.
  • US 5,652,908 describes a system for recovering from a failure in a remote control resource environment by implementing redundancy in the lower level servers and the client workstations.
  • the invention relates generally to controlling processes, which can include controlling equipment (such as valves and gauges) in an automated factory or process line, and the control of other processes or activities, including the operation of power plants, water treatment facilities, and heating, air conditioning and ventilation (“HVAC”) systems.
  • the invention can be used in activities that involve the interactions of humans with control processes and systems, for example, in nursing homes, in amusement park rides, and even in prisons.
  • the invention can also be used to conduct operations in a discrete manufacturing environment, where data or events result in the generation and use of digital signals.
  • Some manufacturers of process control equipment also sell or provide a computer (and/or software) that controls the equipment and/or monitors the equipment.
  • Two such manufacturers are Allen-Bradley and Siemens.
  • the invention can be used to connect such controlling computers (e.g., OPC servers, where OPC stands for Object Linking and Embedding for Process Control).
  • OPC servers where OPC stands for Object Linking and Embedding for Process Control
  • an Allen-Bradley OPC server can be made to interoperate with a Siemans OPC server, such that they can share data easily and seamlessly and thereby control/monitor the various equipment connected to the two different servers.
  • the invention also can be used to allow multilevel OPC data redundancy. When there is a primary and one or more secondary or backup OPC servers, the invention allows automatic switching to one of the backup servers if the primary server becomes unavailable.
  • Still another use of the invention is in allowing aggregation of requests directed to a particular piece of process control equipment, and thereby increasing the efficiency of the process by obtaining information once based on those aggregated requests, and then supplying copies of that information to all of the requesters.
  • a process control parameter such as the rate of production of a certain part at a particular workstation, or the volume of some reagent held in a tank in a chemical process.
  • the information is requested once, and the information obtained is then supplied to each of the requesting computers, allowing the process control equipment to perform more efficiently.
  • the invention provides a computer program which, when running on data handling apparatus, creates: a module that permits: a primary controlling machine: (a) to communicate according to a standard communication protocol for process control with a first computer communicating with a first piece of process control equipment; and (b) to communicate according to the standard communication protocol for process control with a second computer communicating with a second piece of process control equipment; and a secondary controlling machine to communicate according to the standard communication protocol for process control with the first and second computers in place of the primary controlling machine.
  • the standard communication protocol for process control is OLE ("Object Linking and Embedding") for Process Control (“OPC").
  • OPC Object Linking and Embedding
  • the OPC protocol has been defined by the OPC Foundation.
  • OPC is designed for use by programmers in building programs and systems that allow communication in a Distributed Component Object Model (“DCOM") system, such as a network of computers, in which component objects can reside on different computers.
  • DCOM Distributed Component Object Model
  • Other standardized communication protocols for process control could be used as the communication protocol in other embodiments of the invention.
  • the information that is communicated according to the protocol can be a process control parameter.
  • the invention in another aspect, relates to a computer program recorded on a computer-readable medium.
  • the computer program comprises a module that permits a primary controlling machine to communicate according to a standard communication protocol for process control with a first computer and a second computer.
  • the module also permits a secondary controlling machine to communicate according to the standard communication protocol for process control with the first and second computers in place of the primary controlling machine.
  • the first and second computers are in communication with first and second pieces of process control equipment, respectively.
  • the secondary controlling machine automatically communicates with the first and second computers in place of the primary controlling machine when the primary controlling machine becomes unavailable.
  • the invention in another aspect, relates to a computer program recorded on a computer-readable medium.
  • the computer program comprises a module that aggregates all requests for information directed to one of a plurality of interconnected computers in a process control environment, such as a factory.
  • the module identifies each of the requesting computers, and delivers (according to the standard communication protocol for process control) the information to each of the requesting computers.
  • At least the computer to which the requests are directed is in communication with at least one piece of process control equipment, and the requests are transmitted according to the standard communication protocol for process control by one or more of the other interconnected computers.
  • the module communicates with the target computer (using the standard communication protocol for process control) and obtains the information.
  • the invention relates to a computer program that combines the functionality of the three modules described above.
  • the invention in another aspect, relates to a networked computerized communication and control system.
  • the system includes a primary controlling machine and a plurality of computers. Each of the computers is connected via the network to the primary controlling machine, and at least some of the computers communicate with at least one of piece of process control equipment.
  • the system also includes three modules that are able to perform the functionality of the three modules described above.
  • the invention in another aspect, relates to communication between/among and control of equipment connected via a computerized communication and control network.
  • Each of a plurality of computers is connected via the network to a controlling machine.
  • At least some of the computers communicate with at least one piece of process control equipment.
  • the first, second and third modules described above can be operated to communicate information (according to the standard communication protocol for process control) between the computers that are communicating with pieces of process control equipment so as to control a process.
  • FIG. 1 depicts an embodiment of a server-to-server bridging capability, according to the invention.
  • FIG. 2A depicts an embodiment of a system having the redundancy capability, according to the invention, with the primary controlling machine, or primary OPC server, shown online.
  • FIG. 2B depicts an embodiment of the system of FIG. 2A, with the primary controlling machine shown offline.
  • FIG. 3 depicts an example of a system having aggregation capability, according to the invention.
  • FIG. 4 depicts an embodiment of a first view of a user screen according to the invention.
  • FIG. 5 depicts an embodiment of another view of a user screen according to the invention.
  • FIG. 6 depicts an embodiment of another view of a user screen according to the invention.
  • FIG. 7 depicts an embodiment of another view of a user screen according to the invention.
  • FIG. 8 depicts an embodiment of a view of a statistics window according to the invention.
  • FIG. 9 depicts an example of the configuration of a data bridging application according to the invention, in which properties of a register are defined.
  • FIG. 10 depicts an example of the configuration of input parameters in a data bridging application, according to the invention.
  • FIG. 11 depicts an example of the configuration of a data bridging application according to the invention, in which an output is being selected and configured.
  • FIG. 12 depicts an embodiment of the present invention, in which a list of tags may be examined.
  • FIG. 13 depicts an embodiment of the present invention, in which a list of registers may be examined.
  • FIG. 14 depicts an example of the configuration of a redundancy application according to the invention, in which a primary controlling machine and a plurality of secondary controlling machines are being enumerated.
  • FIG. 15 depicts an embodiment of the present invention in which computers are selected as primary controlling machine and as one or more secondary controlling machines.
  • FIG. 16 depicts an embodiment of the present invention in which computers are identified as servers.
  • FIG. 17 depicts an embodiment of the present invention in which OPC settings may be selected.
  • FIG. 18 depicts an embodiment of the present invention in which optional features are selected.
  • FIG. 19 depicts an embodiment in which the value of an alias is changed, according to the invention.
  • FIG. 20 depicts an embodiment in which a new alias is created, according to the invention.
  • FIG. 21 depicts an embodiment in which an alias is edited, according to the invention.
  • FIG. 22 depicts an embodiment of the screen that provides information about the system during its operation, according to the invention.
  • This invention relates generally to communication between two or more OPC (i.e., "Object Linking and Embedding" for Process Control) servers.
  • the invention provides the capabilities of creating data bridges between two or more computers, of aggregating requests from one or more computers that are directed to obtaining information from one computer, and of providing redundancy in the control of the communications between the computers.
  • An embodiment of the invention is available from ICONICS, Inc., located at 100 Foxborough Road, Foxborough, Massachusetts 02035, as a software program and package called DataWorX32 that is designed to operate with a variety of operating systems, including Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows NT 4.0, Windows NT 5.0, Windows 2000 and Windows CE.
  • This software program can be, and is, supplied on a computer-readable medium such as a CD-ROM.
  • a program recorded on a computer-readable medium includes not only the program on a CD-ROM but also the program recorded on other computer-readable media such as floppy disks, hard drives, magnetic tape, other storage media such as RAM, ROMs, PROMs, EPROMs and the like, and any other physical storage medium that may be used to permanently record a program, as well as a copy of the program that may be downloaded or transferred from the active memory of one computer to a second computer.
  • DataWorX32 is software that is designed to execute in general purpose computers, its functionality could be achieved in specialized hardware or in another combination of hardware and software. The invention will be described with reference to the functionality provided by DataWorX32.
  • a computer program that accesses input and output signals may obtain information, but this information will in general be available only in a single application.
  • information that is obtained by one application residing on one computer can be made available both to other applications on that computer and to other computers in the network, as an OPC data point that is available to the entire network. This is true whether the other computers are made by the same manufacturer or not, whether the other computers have the same kind of CPU or not, and whether the other computers are running the same operating system or not.
  • a Register is a datum, or its location in memory somewhere in the system.
  • the Register is defined with no input and no output, it is simply a storage register for a global variable with the ability to be read on demand, and written on demand by any computer in the network.
  • An Alias is a placeholder, or a variable whose name can be substituted at a later time.
  • An Alias is used to allow redirection of the reading or writing of information to any location within the network.
  • a Tag is a pointer to a Register, or to a Register on a particular computer or server in the network.
  • a plurality of computers 102, 104, 106, 108 are interconnected.
  • the computers 102, 104, 106, 108 can be on a computer network 100, and they can communicate over the network 100.
  • the computers 102, 104, 106, 108 can be personal computers or workstations, or generally any other type of computing device such as minicomputers, mainframe computers, embedded computers, or other general purpose computers.
  • the computers have monitors and keyboards, but it should be understood that the computers could have additional or different input and output devices, such as keypads, touch screens, printers, plotters, scanners, modems, and the like, or they can have fewer input and output devices attached, as may be appropriate for a process control system.
  • Each of the computers 102, 104, 106, 108 can run any of a variety of operating systems, such as the Windows systems mentioned above, or systems such as Unix or Linux, and each generally includes all of the basic internal components of a general purpose computer such as a microprocessor, one or more buses, one or more controllers, memory (such as RAM and ROM of any of many conventional types), input and output devices, recording systems such as hard disks, floppy disks or magnetic tape, and the like.
  • One computer 102 is identified as "OPC Server A.” This computer 102 also has a connection to a first piece of process control equipment 110, to which it can send instructions and from which it can obtain information.
  • the computer 102 and the first piece of process control equipment 110 can communicate by the exchange of electrical signals that correspond to instructions defined by the manufacturer of the process control equipment 110. In some cases these instructions are proprietary, and in some cases manufacturers have agreed to some standard set of instructions.
  • An example of a first piece of process control equipment can be a sensing device that counts or examines a first type of part (such as a wheel) that passes through a workstation.
  • Another example of the process control equipment is a mass flow controller that both measures and controls the flow of a fluid in a chemical process.
  • Another computer 106 is identified as "OPC Server B.” This other computer 106 has a connection to a second piece of process control equipment 112, to which it can send instructions and from which it can obtain information.
  • the computer 106 and the second piece of process control equipment 112 can also exchange instructions and information as electrical signals.
  • An example of a second piece of process control equipment can be a sensing device that counts a second type of part (such as a chassis to which four wheels are attached).
  • Another example of the process control equipment is a power controller that controls the temperature of a chemical reactor. The second controller can request information from the first in order to maintain its process control parameters at the levels needed to keep the process running correctly.
  • computer 102 can obtain the information from the first piece of process control equipment 110 and can transmit that information via the OPC communication protocol to another computer 104 that is in the network, and that is running the appropriate software according to the invention.
  • a commercial embodiment of the software is known as DataWorx32, as indicated above.
  • the computer 104 can then transmit the received information, using the OPC communication protocol, from itself to the computer 106 that communicates with the second piece of process control equipment 112.
  • the computer 106 can communicate the information to the second piece of process control equipment 112, using either a proprietary communication protocol or a standard communication protocol.
  • Additional computers, such as the computer 108, that is a "client" that is connected to the network, but that is not involved in the specific communication under discussion, may be part of the network, and may at other times be involved in other communications according to the invention.
  • the computer 104 upon which the DataWorX32 program is operating views as input the data transmitted to it by the computer 102, and views as output the information it send to the computer 106.
  • the computers 102, 104, 106, 108 can be made by different manufacturers, can be of different types, and can operate under different operating systems, so long as they all communicate according to a standard communication protocol for process control, which in this embodiment is OPC.
  • OPC a standard communication protocol for process control
  • OPC-compliant interface available in its operating system.
  • an OPC-compliant Dynamic Link Library (“DLL”) file is sufficient to communicate in an OPC system.
  • DLL Dynamic Link Library
  • data that the second piece of process control equipment 112 requires about the first piece of process control equipment 110 can be provided to the process control equipment 112.
  • the user sets up DataWorX32 to take information out of 110 (on a polling basis, e.g., every 50ms) and then to send it to 112.
  • the information is supplied when it represents a significant change in the parameter of interest.
  • a request can be handled between the piece of process control equipment 112 and the computer 106 in the proprietary language of the equipment 112, and can signal, for example, that an error condition has occurred. Such a request will traverse the computer network via computers 106, 104 and 102, once again in the format defined by the standard communication protocol for process control.
  • the request can be handled between the piece of process control equipment 110 and the computer 102 in the proprietary language of the equipment 110.
  • the information will flow along the same path, but in the opposite direction.
  • a process control parameter is a datum (e.g., time, date, temperature, pressure, volume, mass, units of measure, rate of change, measured or computed quantity, alphanumeric string, symbol, etc.), a status of equipment, a status of a process, an identifier of equipment, an identifier of a process, an identifier of a processing batch, a mathematical or logical relationship, and the like.
  • FIG. 2A depicts an embodiment of the redundancy capability according to the invention.
  • a primary controlling machine or primary OPC server 202
  • primary controlling machine 202 has a communication link to a programmable logic controller ("PLC") 212 that controls the steps of a process in a piece of process equipment (not shown).
  • PLC programmable logic controller
  • the primary controlling machine 202 can be one of the computers in the network that perform process control functions, in addition to its operation as the primary controlling machine 202 of the system.
  • the primary controlling machine 202 can communicate with the PLC 212 in either or both of the proprietary language of the PLC 212 or in a standard communication protocol for process control if the PLC 212 is so equipped.
  • the primary controlling machine 202 is additionally in communication with a plurality of computers 206, 208 and 210.
  • Each of the computers 206, 208 and 210 is capable of controlling one or more pieces of process control equipment (not shown) in a manner like that of computers 102 and 106 of FIG. 1.
  • the computers 206, 208 and 210 are connected by a communications network, and can communicate using a standard communication protocol for process control.
  • the DataWorX32 program is operating on one of the computers in the network and monitors the activity of the primary controlling machine 202.
  • a redundant OPC server, the secondary controlling machine, or the secondary OPC server 204 is present.
  • This redundant secondary controlling machine 204 has connections that duplicate those of the primary controlling machine 202.
  • primary controlling machine 202 has connections to a PLC 212 that controls some portion of a process
  • a redundant PLC 214 that has redundant connections to the portion of the process that PLC 212 controls.
  • secondary controlling machine 204 will have access to all of the facilities that are needed to take the place of primary controlling machine 202, at both the overall system control level and at the level of an individual computer that controls one or more process variables or steps, for example, controlling a PLC needed to run the process control functions that primary controlling machine 202 is intended to perform.
  • the DataWorX32 program that embodies the present invention can be configured to cause secondary controlling machine 204 to take over the functions of primary controlling machine 202 upon the unavailability of primary controlling machine 202.
  • FIG. 2B further depicts an embodiment of the redundancy capability according to the invention.
  • the primary controlling machine 202 or primary OPC server
  • the primary controlling machine 202 can be offline for any one of a variety of reasons, such as being deliberately taken out of service for maintenance, or being unavailable because of a malfunction.
  • the invention as embodied in the DataWorX32 program can automatically pass control of the communication between the computers 206, 208 and 210 themselves as well as communication between any of the computers 206, 208 and 210 and a controller to secondary controlling machine 204.
  • the secondary controlling machine 204 takes over all of the functions and capabilities that the primary controlling machine 202 was carrying out before it became unavailable.
  • secondary controlling machine 204 is connected to a PLC 214 that takes the place of the PLC 212 that the primary controlling machine 202 uses to control a process.
  • the replacement of primary controlling machine 202 with secondary controlling machine 204 occurs automatically and transparently as viewed by any of the computers 206, 208 and 210.
  • FIG. 3 depicts an example of the aggregation capability according to the invention.
  • Fig. 3 shows a network 300 that comprises three computers 302, 304 and 306.
  • computers 320, 304 or 306 are a primary controlling machine. It is also unimportant where in the network there is a computer upon which the DataWorX32 program that embodies a part of the invention is operating.
  • the DataWorX32 program is depicted as operating within the network, as shown in box 310.
  • the computer 304 is connected to a process machine 314, labeled machine #1.
  • the computer 306 is connected to another process machine 316, labeled machine #2.
  • machine #2 can generate one or more process control parameters, such as the number of units of product that it processes, the amount of material that flows through it, a temperature, a pressure, a time, or the like. If the value of some process control parameter is needed by computer 304, for example to control or to operate the machine 314 that it controls, and if the same process control parameter is needed by the computer 302 for its operation, for example to control the inventory or work-in-process, it is possible that both computer 302 and computer 304 will request the same information from computer 306.
  • process control parameters such as the number of units of product that it processes, the amount of material that flows through it, a temperature, a pressure, a time, or the like.
  • a request by computer 302 is shown as the arrow 322 connecting computer 302 and the DataWorX32 program
  • a request by computer 304 is shown as the arrow 324 connecting computer 304 and the DataWorX32 program.
  • the DataWorX32 program aggregates the requests from the computers 302 and 304 and makes a single request of computer 306 for the desired information. This single request is shown by the arrow 326.
  • Computer 306 responds once with the requested information, which commonly will be transmitted in the opposite direction along the path that the request followed.
  • the program identifies which of the computers in the network have requested the information, for example by maintaining a list of the requests as they are received, and transmits to each of the requesting computers a copy of the information that it obtained from the computer 306. While this embodiment shows only two requests, one from each of two computers, it can be understood that there can be multiple requests from numerous computers that aggregate to a single request for a specific datum from one computer, which datum is then disseminated to all of the requesting computers.
  • DataWorX32 may act as a "middle-man" between the requesting computers and the one computer that communicates with the holding tank process controls. DataWorX32 may obtain from the one computer the desired value of fluid depth, and can then send copies of the information to each computer that requested it, thereby reducing the overhead on the computer that communicates with the tank and its process control equipment.
  • FIGs. 1-3 and the preceding text present a description of the features of the invention.
  • FIGs. 4-22 show, and the following text describes, the operation of an embodiment of the invention (namely, the software embodiment known as DataWorX32) in greater detail.
  • FIG. 4 depicts an embodiment of a first view of a user screen according to the invention.
  • a user screen shows a user a status of some aspect of a program, one or more options that might be chosen, or otherwise informs the user of events or actions that have occurred or that may be selected.
  • the DataWorX32 user screen 400 depicted the user has an overview of the status of a program, DataWorX32, and of the actions that the user may take.
  • a menubar 402 that provides a text-based control system for user actions.
  • toolbar 404 that provides a graphical user interface that includes equivalent controls to those found in the menubar 402.
  • the user can also activate many of the dialog boxes that are described below by clicking the right button of a mouse pointing device when an item of interest is highlighted. For example, highlighting a Tag and clicking on the right mouse button activates the OPC Tag Browser, which is discussed below and which is depicted in FIG. 12.
  • the remainder of the DataWorX32 user screen 400 is split into two windows, a top pane 406 and an output window 408.
  • the top pane 406 can display information about registers, aliases, current values, and statistics, as will be explained below.
  • a scroll bar 407 At the bottom of the top pane 406 is a scroll bar 407 that can be employed to observe information that extends laterally across the top pane 406.
  • the output window 408 displays the status of the program DataWorX32.
  • a status bar 409 that enunciates the status of the DataWorX32 program (here, it is stopped), and the date and the time for the convenience of the user.
  • the toolbar 404, the output window 408 and the status bar 409 each can be toggled to appear or to be hidden from view.
  • FIG. 5 depicts an embodiment of another view of a user screen according to the invention.
  • the DataWorX32 user screen 400 is shown with the output window 408 hidden.
  • the All Registers item of the heading Registers on the menubar 402 has been selected.
  • Registers are used to define variables that can then be made available to all OPC clients.
  • a register can correspond to an OPC data point, which may or may not be a global variable.
  • a register may be given values via OPC, by the use of mathematical or logical expressions and constants, or by an application program.
  • the DataWorX32 user screen 400 displays a list of registers with information about the register name, the type of register that the name represents, what inputs if any provide information to the register, what outputs the register supplies information to, and a scan rate in milliseconds for each register that is set for scanning.
  • the type of register is either a register or a status flag that declares a primary or secondary status to a controlling machine.
  • the inputs and outputs are the names of registers or OPC tags that are connected to the register in question as inputs or outputs.
  • a scan rate can only be defined for a register that has an OPC tag connected to its input, and the rate is the repeat period in milliseconds that the input of the register is polled.
  • FIG. 6 depicts an embodiment of another view of a user screen according to the invention.
  • the Aliases item of the heading View of the menubar 402 has been selected.
  • DataWorX32 user screen 400 is displaying a list of aliases.
  • Aliases can be considered as shorthand for a register or for a value, and can be used as variables in expressions.
  • An alias can be thought of as a "placeholder” or “indirect addresse” for a tag, a register, a value, or a variable.
  • An alias is expanded or "resolved” into a string known as an "alias value” when it is used.
  • An alias must first be defined before it can be requested by an item that contains it.
  • an alias list includes an alias name, a default value to which the alias will initially be set, whether the alias can be accessed by and is available to OPC compliant devices, and whether the alias is read-only or may also be written to, thereby changing its value.
  • FIG. 7 depicts an embodiment of yet another view of a user screen according to the invention.
  • the Monitor item under the heading View on the menubar 402 in DataWorX32 user screen 400 has been selected.
  • FIG. 7 there is shown a list of the current values of three types of variables, Registers, Aliases, and Controlling Machines.
  • a register named R1 has a current value of zero, and has an input and at least one output that is expressed as an equation wherein a variable x is given a value based on an OPC tag.
  • an alias named ALIAS 1 that takes the current value of an expression kokos, which is a register or an expression. ALIAS1 has no inputs or outputs.
  • a Controlling Machine named MB2 is depicted as having a type given as a Redundant server whose value is expressed by a location in the system, and which has no input and no output.
  • a register named Ramp1 has a current value of zero, an input given by an equation wherein a variable x is given a value based on an OPC tag.
  • Ramp 1 has at least one output, also given by an OPC tag.
  • another redundant Controlling Machine is enumerated, by the name of MODBUS, and which has no inputs or outputs.
  • FIG. 8 depicts an embodiment of a view of a statistics window according to the invention.
  • the item Statistics that appears under the heading View of menubar 402 of DataWorX32 user screen 400 has been selected.
  • OLExpress Statistics screen 500 is shown in Fig. 8, wherein a left pane lists a tree structure that contains the listings of all the OPC servers that the system recognizes, starting from a root directory of OPC servers, and progressing to a subdirectory named ICONICS.ModbusOPCServer that contains two listings, SCAN_50 and INACTIVE.
  • the contents of the root directory which is the entry that is highlighted in the left pane, is displayed.
  • the right pane shows the name of the entry, the date and time that it started, its status (i.e., running or stopped), the Vendor, and the version.
  • FIG. 9 depicts an example of the configuration of a data bridging application according to the invention, in which the properties of a register are defined.
  • FIG. 9 shows an interactive display 550 that appears upon selection of the Add item of the heading Register of menubar 402 of DataWorX32 user screen 400.
  • the Properties tab 560 has been selected.
  • the user can then enter an alphanumeric expression as the Register name in box 561.
  • the user can elect to check the box 562 labeled "Make available to OPC clients" which, if checked, will make the register named available to OPC clients.
  • Checking box 563 will make the register available to Visual Basic for Applications ("VBA”) Applications.
  • VBA Visual Basic for Applications
  • Checking box 564 will make the register writeable while not checking box 564 will make the register read-only. Entering an expression in the box 565 will allow the register to receive data of a specified type from an input.
  • the acceptable types of data include Float, Double, Boolean, Byte, Word, Dword, Character, Short, Long and String, all of which are well known in the computer programming art, and all of which are available as a dropdown list activated by using a pointing device to activate the down arrowhead button at the right of box 565.
  • Checking box 566 allows the use of manual range selection by entry of values in boxes 567 and 568 to denote low and high ranges, respectively.
  • the entry can be completed by activating the button 569a labeled OK.
  • the user can remove all the entries by activating the button 569b labeled Cancel, and can then re-enter information.
  • the user can edit any individual entry at any time. If the user is not sure what to do, or what an entry represents, the user can activate the button 569c labeled Help, and a dialog box of on-line information will appear.
  • FIG. 10 depicts an example of the configuration of input parameters in a data bridging application according to the invention.
  • FIG. 10 shows an embodiment comprising an interactive display 550, known to those of ordinary skill in the art as a dialog box, through which the user provides the DataWorX32 program information about an input connected to a register. The user first selects the Input tab 570 that activates the dialog box shown.
  • the elements of the dialog box that the user can control include radio button 571 labeled OPC Item, which if activated declares the input to be an OPC item.
  • the Input name is entered in box 572 as a tag name comprising alphanumeric symbols.
  • the user defines a scan rate in milliseconds by entering a numeric value in box 573. The scan rate is the repeat period that the register polls the input for new information.
  • the Browse button 574 causes the OPC Universal Tag Browser to appear.
  • the OPC Universal Tag Browser is discussed below and depicted in FIG. 12.
  • Radio button 576 labeled Register. If the Register radio button 576 is active, a drop-down list of all the register names defined in DataWorX32 can be displayed for the convenience of the user upon activation of the button marked with a down arrowhead.
  • Radio button 577 labeled Expression, allows the entry of an expression in the box 578. If Radio button 577 is activated, the button labeled Edit 57 activates an Edit Expression dialog box, which permits an expression to be edited. Activation of radio button 577 also activates scan rate entry box 580 that behaves as discussed earlier with regard to box 573.
  • Radio button 581 labeled None, that indicates to the DataWorX32 program that the selected register has no inputs.
  • the register may have a defined initial value, if the user activates check box 582 and enters a value in box 583.
  • An OPC client may also write to a register that has no defined input. The user finishes entering data by activating the button 569a labeled OK, or cancels an entry in its entirety by activating the button 569b labeled Cancel. If the user needs help, he or she can activate the button 569c labeled Help at any time.
  • FIG. 11 depicts an example of the configuration of an output in a data bridging application, according to the invention.
  • FIG. 11 shows an embodiment comprising an interactive display 550, also known as a dialog box, through which the user provides the DataWorX32 program information about one or more outputs that are connected to a register. The user selects the tab 583 labeled Outputs to activate this dialog box 550.
  • a name of an OPC Tag or a Register 584 is displayed in the dialog box 550. The name is designated as either an OPC Register or a Tag by the entry in the column headed Type. If the user activates the button 585 labeled Add OPC Tag, the OPC Tag Browser is displayed. The OPC Tag Browser is discussed below and depicted in FIG. 12.
  • the Select Register dialog box is discussed below and is depicted in FIG. 13.
  • the Select Register dialog box allows the user to add a Register to the list of Registers that take values as outputs from the Register that is being configured.
  • the button 587 labeled Remove allows the user to remove an output from the list of outputs. The user finishes entering data by activating the button 569a labeled OK, or cancels an entry in its entirety by activating the button 569b labeled Cancel. If the user needs help, he or she can activate the button 569c labeled Help at any time.
  • FIG. 12 depicts an embodiment of the present invention, in which a list of tags may be examined.
  • FIG. 12 shows an embodiment comprising an interactive display called the OPC Tag Browser 590, also known as a dialog box, through which the user communicates with the DataWorX32 program to review information about one or more OPC Tags.
  • OPC Tag Browser 590 also known as a dialog box
  • the left pane 591 of the OPC Tag Browser 590 there is presented a tree structure showing the various directories and sub-directories of the computer file system, of which a subdirectory names Simulate happens to be selected.
  • the right pane 592 of the OPC Tag Browser 590 shows a list of the available Tag names in the selected sub-directory, according to the entry of a filter in box 594.
  • the filter 594 is the asterisk, or wildcard, that allows the display of any entry that is present.
  • the identifier of the Tag is displayed in the box 595 labeled Item Id.
  • the OPC Tag Browser 590 allows the user to find and select any of the Tags available in the system. Upon completing the selection process, the user can activate the button 596a labeled OK, or can cancel the selection by activating the button 596b labeled Cancel. The user can obtain a current list of OPC Tags by activating the Refresh button 596c.
  • FIG. 13 depicts an embodiment of the present invention, in which a list of registers may be examined.
  • FIG. 13 shows an embodiment comprising an interactive display called Select Register 600, which is a dialog box, through which the user communicates with the DataWorX32 program to review and/or modify information about one or more Registers, Aliases, and redundant servers.
  • the Select Register dialog box 600 has a single pane that lists all of the Registers, Aliases, and redundant servers that are defined in the DataWorX32 program.
  • To edit a Register one selects a displayed Register name and activates the Edit option of the Registers menu of the DataWorX32 user screen 400. One then modifies the entries under the Properties, Input and Output Tabs discussed above, and accepts the modified entries.
  • FIG. 14 depicts an example of the configuration of a redundancy application according to the invention, in which a primary controlling machine and a plurality of secondary controlling machines are being enumerated.
  • FIG. 14 shows an embodiment comprising an interactive display 700 called the Redundant Server Configuration.
  • Primary and backup nodes are listed two servers or computers, named PC17 and PC14.
  • One computer must be the primary controlling machine, which in the present example is PC17, identified as "(primary node)."
  • One or more computers can be designated as secondary controlling machines, or redundant or "Backup" servers. If more than one secondary controlling machine is specified, the machines must be specified in an order that each will be called upon if the primary controlling machine is unavailable.
  • the DataWorX32 program can thus direct the flow of instructions and information to a secondary controlling machine if the primary controlling machine is unavailable, making the operation of the system transparent to the computers connected to the network.
  • the secondary controlling machines are given control of the network in the order of their designation in the configuration.
  • the selection of primary and secondary controlling machines, or primary and backup nodes, is accomplished in conjunction with the Select Network Node dialog box depicted in FIG. 15, which is activated by selecting the Add button 702.
  • FIG. 15 depicts an embodiment of the present invention in which computers are selected as primary controlling machine and as one or more secondary controlling machines.
  • a dialog box 720 called the Select Network Node dialog box.
  • a node can be identified in the Node name box 722.
  • a pane 724 labeled Available nodes lists the nodes that the network has as available nodes. The use can highlight a node by using a pointing device, such as a mouse, arrow keys on a computer keyboard or by typing in a designator, and accept the selection by activating the button 726 labeled OK. The user can also cancel the operation by activating the button 728 labeled Cancel.
  • a node can be removed by activating the Remove button 703.
  • the user can identify a node to the DataWorX32 program by highlighting the node identifier and activating the Set as Primary button 704.
  • the name of the server, or computer, or node is displayed as the primary node in the pane 701, and its name is displayed in the box 705a labeled Server name.
  • the user can select the Browse button 705b that activates the Select OPC Server dialog box discussed below and depicted in FIG. 16.
  • Some computers may be given common names in a network. Such common names can be displayed in the Common name box 706.
  • the common name enclosed within two sets of square brackets can be used as an alias, as in the name "[[bristol]]" as depicted in FIG. 14.
  • FIG. 16 depicts an embodiment of the present invention in which computers are identified as servers.
  • FIG. 16 shows a user dialog box 730 that is called Select OPC Server. This dialog box lists all the available servers in a pane 732, in which the user can highlight a name of a server using a pointing device, such as a mouse or arrow keys. Upon completing the selection, the user can confirm the selection by activating the OK button 734, or the user can reject the selection by activating the Cancel button 736.
  • a user dialog box 730 that is called Select OPC Server. This dialog box lists all the available servers in a pane 732, in which the user can highlight a name of a server using a pointing device, such as a mouse or arrow keys.
  • the user can confirm the selection by activating the OK button 734, or the user can reject the selection by activating the Cancel button 736.
  • the user can designate whether the primary controlling machine is intended to regain control of the network after it returns to availability by checking the Automatic Switch back to Primary Server box 707.
  • the user can designate whether a flag will be set when the primary controlling machine is off-line by checking the Node Status register box 708, and can designate a name for the flag in the dialog box 709.
  • the user can accept the selection by activating the OK button 710a or can reject the selection by activating the Cancel button 710b.
  • the Redundant Server Configuration dialog box 700 can be used to edit a Redundant node by accessing it via the Edit item under the Redundancy menu of the DataWorX32 user screen 400.
  • FIG. 17 depicts an embodiment of the present invention in which OPC settings may be selected.
  • FIG. 17 shows an embodiment comprising an OPC Settings dialog box 740.
  • the OPC Settings dialog box 740 can be accessed by selecting the OPC Setting item under the Tools menu of the DataWorX32 user screen 400. This is a sophisticated capability that allows the user to designate some of the parameters of operation of the system according to the OPC communication standard.
  • the OPC Settings dialog box 740 allows the user to set a period in seconds for checking whether the servers or computers are alive.
  • the user can enter a numeric value in the box 741 to set this value.
  • the user can additionally set a response time in seconds in the box 742, which defines an interval within which a server or computer must respond to be considered alive.
  • the user can additionally set a time period in seconds by making a numeric entry in the box 743 for reattempting to gain a response from a computer that has failed to respond, either because the connection is lost, or because the response appears to be corrupted in some manner.
  • a user can activate a checkbox 744 that indicates that a connection to an unused server should be shut down after a specific time of disuse, with the time in seconds entered by the user in the box 745, if the user has checked the box 744.
  • the user can also indicate that certain maintenance functions should be performed on a desired schedule.
  • the user can designate a time in seconds for cleaning up items by entering a numerical value in the box 746.
  • the user can designate a time in seconds for deleting up items by entering a numerical value in the box 747.
  • the user can designate a time in seconds for attempting a reconnection by entering a numerical value in the box 748.
  • the user can designate a time in milliseconds for adding or removing requests by entering a numerical value in the box 749.
  • the user can designate a time in milliseconds for writing requests by entering a numerical value in the box 750.
  • the user can designate the length of a write queue by entering a numerical value in the box 751.
  • servers are supposed to send initial values automatically. If the user checks the Perform initial refresh box 752, the system is forced to make the server send initial values. The user can make check the Enumerate all items in one call box 753 to require a server to send all values in a single transmission to improve performance. However, some servers may not be able to send more than one item at a time, and this option may create difficulties with such servers. The user can select an Access path separator by checking the box 754 and entering a symbol or string in the box 755.
  • the user can designate a parameter for identifying a computer in a local group by entering a value in the Locale ID box 756.
  • the user can specify a Deadband width in percent by entering a numerical value in percent in the box 757.
  • the user can return all the parameters described above to their original settings provided in the software by activating the Set Defaults button 758.
  • the user can cancel any changes in parameters that may have been entered by activating the Cancel button 759.
  • the user can accept his or her changes in the foregoing parameters by activating the OK button 760.
  • FIG. 18 depicts an embodiment of the present invention in which optional features are selected.
  • FIG. 18 shows an embodiment comprising an Options dialog box 770.
  • the user can activate the Options dialog box 770 by selecting the Options item of the Tool menu of the DataWorX32 user screen 400.
  • the user can designate whether the most recently run project file will be reloaded on starting the DataWorX32 program by checking the Reload project on start box 771.
  • the user can require the DataWorX32 program to save the then current setting on exit by checking the box Save settings on exit 772.
  • the user can define an update rate by entering a numerical value that will be interpreted in milliseconds in box 773.
  • the user can permit the editing of aliases as Registers in Configuration mode by checking the Allow editing aliases as registers box 774.
  • the user can accept the feature of allowing the program to go to Runtime when started by the OPC server by checking the box 775.
  • the user can control features of the browse interface.
  • the user can allow the display of redundant servers in the Redundancy menu by checking the box 776.
  • the user can allow examination of the file system of the local computer through DataWorX32 by checking the Browse 'My Computer' box 777.
  • the user can allow examination of the other nodes in the system of the local computer through DataWorX32 by checking the Browse 'Network Neighborhood' box 778.
  • the user can return the parameters of the Options menu to the original settings by activating the Set Defaults button 779.
  • the user can accept changes to the options parameters by activating the OK button 780a or can reject all of the changes by activating the Cancel button 780b.
  • FIG. 19 depicts an embodiment in which the value of an alias is changed, according to the invention.
  • the user selects an alias from the Alias Names column of the Alias editor, which is described below and depicted in FIG.21.
  • the user selects the Change Value item under the Aliases menu of the DataWorX32 user screen 400.
  • the Change alias value dialog box 800 shown in FIG. 19 appears.
  • the name of the selected alias appears in the box 802.
  • the user can enter a new value for the alias in the Value box 804.
  • the OPC Tag Browser described above is activated, and the user can select a Tag as a value for the alias. The user can then accept the new value by activating the OK box 808, or the user can reject the new value by activating the Cancel box 809.
  • FIG. 20 depicts an embodiment in which a new alias is created, according to the invention.
  • the user can create a new alias.
  • the user can activate this feature by selecting the Add item of the Alias menu of the DataWorX32 user screen 400.
  • FIG. 20 shows an embodiment of a New alias dialog box 810.
  • the user can enter a name, which can be a tag name, for a new alias in the box 812.
  • the user can enter a default value for the alias in the box 814.
  • the user can make the alias a read-only alias by checking the box 818.
  • the user can search for tags by activating the Browse button 820, which will cause the OPC Tag Browser to become active.
  • the user can then accept the parameters entered by activating the OK button 822, or can reject the selections made by activating the Cancel button 824.
  • FIG. 21 depicts an embodiment in which an alias is edited, according to the invention.
  • FIG. 21 shows an embodiment comprising an Edit alias dialog box 830.
  • the user can activate this dialog box 830 by selecting an alias name in the upper pane of DataWorX32 user screen 400, and then selecting the Edit alias item under the Aliases menu of the DataWorX32 user screen 400.
  • the user can enter an alias name in the box 832, or the user can locate an alias name by activating the browse button 834 to display the OPC Tag Browser.
  • the user can also enter a default value in the box 836. If the user checks the box 838, the new alias will be available via OPC.
  • the user can make the alias a read-only alias by checking the box 840.
  • the user can then accept the parameters entered by activating the OK button 842, or can reject the selections made by activating the Cancel button 844.
  • FIG. 22 depicts an embodiment of the screen that provides information about the system during its operation, according to the invention.
  • Runtime screen 900 Comparison of this Runtime screen 900 with the DataWorX32 user screen 400 shows that there are several fewer entries in the Runtime screen menubar 902 and several fewer icons in the Runtime screen 900 toolbar 904 as compared to the DataWorX32 user screen 400 menubar 402 and toolbar 404.
  • the menu entries Register, Redundancy, and Tools are not present in the Runtime screen 900 menubar 902.
  • the entry Security is present in the Runtime menubar 902, and such an entry is absent from the DataWorX32 user screen 400 menubar 402.
  • the upper pane 906 of the Runtime screen 900 is shown in FIG. 22, while the lower pane is not shown.
  • the upper pane 906 of the Runtime screen 900 displays live data for the various Registers, Aliases and Redundant servers or controlling machines.
  • the lower pane that is not shown displays various status messages that describe the status of the DataWorX32 program.
  • the Security menu provides options for the user to define a security configuration in Runtime, so that certain nodes can be designated as accessible only by certain individuals and/or under certain conditions. There are many well known reasons for providing security both with respect to who may access a system and which nodes of a system may be amenable to access. As examples, one may wish to deny access to all but specified persons if the system under control poses the possibility of reaching dangerous conditions, or contains proprietary information.
  • Many other good reasons to limit access to the entry points in an industrial control system will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art.
  • the present invention provides for such limitations on access to the control system that can be invoked by a user with sufficient authority.

Claims (16)

  1. Computerprogramm, das wenn es auf einer Datenbehandlungsvorrichtung läuft, ein Modul erzeugt, das ermöglicht, daß
    eine primäre Steuermaschine (202):
    (a) gemäß einem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung mit einem ersten Computer (102, 206, 208, 210), der mit einem ersten Teil einer Prozeßsteuereinrichtung (110) kommuniziert, kommuniziert, und
    (b) gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung mit einem zweiten Computer (106, 206, 208, 210), der mit einem zweiten Teil einer Prozeßsteuereinrichtung (112) kommuniziert, kommuniziert, und
    eine sekundäre Steuermaschine (204) gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung mit dem ersten und dem zweiten Computer anstelle der primären Steuermaschine kommuniziert.
  2. Computerprogramm nach Anspruch 1, das weiterhin aufweist:
    ein Modul, das
    (i) alle Anforderungen nach Informationen, die zu einem von einer Mehrzahl von miteinander verbundenen Computern (302, 304, 306) gerichtet sind, gruppiert bzw. zusammensetzt, wobei der eine Computer mit zumindest einem Teil der Prozeßsteuereinrichtung (110, 112,) kommuniziert und die Anfragen gemäß einem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung durch einen oder mehr der anderen Computer übertragen werden,
    (ii) mit dem einen Computer gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung kommuniziert und die Informationen erhält,
    (iii) jeden der anderen anfordernden Computer identifiziert bzw. kennzeichnet, und
    (iv) gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung die Informationen zu jedem der anderen anfordernden Computer liefert.
  3. Computerprogramm nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, das weiterhin aufweist:
    ein Modul, das die Kommunikation von Informationen gemäß einem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung zwischen einem ersten Computer (102), der mit einem ersten Teil einer Prozeßsteuereinrichtung (110) kommuniziert, und einem zweiten Computer (106), der mit einem zweiten Teil einer Prozeßsteuereinrichtung (102) kommuniziert, ermöglicht.
  4. Computerprogramm nach Anspruch 1, 2 oder 3, bei dem das Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung ein Einbetten und Verknüpfen (OLE: Object Linking and Embedding) für eine Prozeßsteuerung (OPC) ist.
  5. Computerprogramm nach Anspruch 1, 2 oder 3, bei dem die sekundäre Steuermaschine (204) automatisch mit dem ersten und dem zweiten Computer anstelle der primären Steuermaschine kommuniziert, wenn die primäre Steuermaschine (202) nicht verfügbar wird.
  6. Computerprogramm nach Anspruch 2 oder 3, bei dem die Informationen einen Prozeßsteuerparameter umfassen.
  7. Computerprogramm nach Anspruch 1 bis 6, bei dem die sekundäre Steuermaschine (204) automatisch mit dem ersten und dem zweiten Computer anstelle der primären Steuermaschine (202) kommuniziert, wenn die primäre Steuermaschine nicht verfügbar wird.
  8. Rechnergestütztes Kommunikations- und Steuersystem im Netzwerk, mit:
    (a) einer primären Steuermaschine (202),
    (b) einer Mehrzahl von Computern (206, 208, 210, 102, 106), wobei jeder Computer über ein Netzwerk mit der primären Steuermaschine verbunden ist, und zumindest einige der Computer jeweils mit zumindest einem Teil einer Prozeßsteuereinrichtung (110, 112) kommunizieren,
    (c) einem ersten Modul, das eine Kommunikation von Informationen gemäß einem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung zwischen einem ersten Computer der Mehrzahl von Computern und einem zweiten Computer der Mehrzahl von Computern ermöglicht,
    (d) einem zweiten Modul, das:
    der primären Steuermaschine ermöglicht:
    (i) gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung mit dem ersten Computer zu kommunizieren, und
    (ii) gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung mit dem zweiten Computer zu kommunizieren, und
    einer sekundären Steuermaschine (204) ermöglicht, gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung mit dem ersten und dem zweiten Computer anstelle der primären Steuermaschine zu kommunizieren, und
    (e) einem dritten Modul, das
    (i) alle Anforderungen für Informationen, die zu einem der Mehrzahl von miteinander verbundenen Computern gerichtet sind, zusammenfaßt, wobei der eine Computer mit zumindest einem Teil der Prozeßsteuereinrichtung kommuniziert und die Anforderungen gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung durch einen oder mehrere der anderen Computer übertragen wird,
    (ii) mit dem einen Computer gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung kommuniziert und die Informationen erhält,
    (iii) jeden der anderen anfordernden Computer identifiziert, und
    (iv) gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung die Informationen zu jedem der anderen anfordernden Computer liefert.
  9. Rechnergestütztes Kommunikations- und Steuersystem in einem Netzwerk nach Anspruch 8, bei dem das Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung ein Einbetten und Verknüpfen (OLE: Object Linking and Embedding) für eine Prozeßsteuerung (OPC) ist.
  10. Rechnergestütztes Kommunikations- und Steuerungssystem in einem Netzwerk nach Anspruch 8, bei dem die Informationen einen Prozeßsteuerparameter umfassen.
  11. Verfahren zum Kommunizieren zwischen einer Einrichtung, die über ein rechnergestütztes Kommunikations- und Steuernetzwerk verbunden ist, und steuern derselben, mit folgenden Schritten:
    (a) Bereitstellen einer primären Steuermaschine (202),
    (b) Bereitstellen einer Mehrzahl von Computern (206, 208, 210, 102, 106), wobei jeder Computer über das Netzwerk mit der Steuermaschine verbunden ist und zumindest einige der Computer jeweils mit zumindest einem Teil der Prozeßsteuereinrichtung (110, 112) kommunizieren,
    (c) Bereitstellen eines ersten Moduls, das eine Kommunikation von Informationen gemäß einem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung zwischen einem ersten Computer der Mehrzahl von Computern und einem zweiten Computer der Mehrzahl von Computern ermöglicht,
    (d) Bereitstellen eines zweiten Moduls, das:
    der primären Steuermaschine ermöglicht:
    (i) gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung mit dem ersten Computer zu kommunizieren, und
    (ii) gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung mit dem zweiten Computer zu kommunizieren, und
    einer sekundären Steuermaschine (204) ermöglicht, gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung mit dem ersten und dem zweiten Computer anstelle der primären Steuermaschine zu kommunizieren,
    (e) Bereitstellen eines dritten Moduls, das
    (i) alle Anforderungen nach Informationen, die zu einem der Mehrzahl von miteinander verbundenen Computern gerichtet sind, zusammenfaßt, wobei der eine Computer mit zumindest einem Teil der Prozeßsteuereinrichtung kommuniziert und die Anforderungen gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung durch einen oder mehrere der anderen Computer übertragen werden,
    (ii) mit dem einen Computer gemäß 'dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung kommuniziert und die Informationen erhält,
    (iii) jeden der anderen anfordernden Computer identifiziert, und
    (iv) gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung die Informationen zu jedem der anderen anfordernden Computer liefert, und
    (f) Betreiben des ersten Moduls, des zweiten Moduls und des dritten Moduls, um Informationen gemäß dem Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung zwischen gewissen der Mehrzahl von Computern zu kommunizieren, die mit Teilen der Prozeßsteuereinrichtung kommunizieren, um einen Prozess zu steuern.
  12. Verfahren nach Anspruch 11, bei dem das Standardkommunikationsprotokoll für eine Prozeßsteuerung ein Einbetten und Verknüpfen (OLE: Object Linking and Embedding) für eine Prozeßsteuerung (OPC) ist.
  13. Verfahren nach Anspruch 11, bei dem die Informationen einen Prozeßsteuerparameter umfassen.
  14. Verfahren nach Anspruch 11, bei dem die sekundäre Steuermaschine (204) automatisch mit dem ersten und dem zweiten Computer (206, 208, 210,102,106) anstelle der primären Steuermaschine (202) kommuniziert, wenn die primäre Steuermaschine nicht verfügbar wird.
  15. Computerprogramm nach einem der Ansprüche 2 bis 7, das computergestützte Kommunikations- und Steuersystem in einem Netzwerk nach einem der Ansprüche 8 bis 10 oder das Verfahren zur Kommunikation zwischen einer Einrichtung, die über ein rechnergestütztes Kommunikations- und Steuersystem nach einem der Ansprüche 11 bis 14 verbunden ist und dieses steuert, wobei alle Anforderungen nach Informationen von einem Computer stammen.
  16. Computerprogramm nach einem der Ansprüche 2 bis 7, rechnergestütztes Kommunikations- und Steuersystem in einem Netzwerk nach einem der Ansprüche 8 bis 10 oder das Verfahren zur Kommunikation zwischen einer Einrichtung, die über ein rechnergestütztes Kommunikations- und Steuersystem nach einem der Ansprüche 11 bis 14 verbunden ist und dieses steuert, wobei alle Anforderungen nach Informationen auf dieselbe Information gerichtet sind.
EP99954933A 1998-10-16 1999-10-15 Prozesssteuerung Expired - Lifetime EP1121626B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10448598P 1998-10-16 1998-10-16
US104485P 1998-10-16
PCT/US1999/024093 WO2000023857A1 (en) 1998-10-16 1999-10-15 Process control

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1121626A1 EP1121626A1 (de) 2001-08-08
EP1121626B1 true EP1121626B1 (de) 2004-03-17

Family

ID=22300758

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP99954933A Expired - Lifetime EP1121626B1 (de) 1998-10-16 1999-10-15 Prozesssteuerung

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (2) US7003558B2 (de)
EP (1) EP1121626B1 (de)
AT (1) ATE262189T1 (de)
AU (1) AU1115700A (de)
CZ (1) CZ20011336A3 (de)
DE (1) DE69915661T2 (de)
WO (1) WO2000023857A1 (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2945034A1 (de) * 2014-05-16 2015-11-18 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zum Schutz von redundanten Servern, die mit einem MES gekoppelt sind

Families Citing this family (69)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7245634B2 (en) * 2000-09-27 2007-07-17 Yen Robert C Wireless internet access with enhanced bandwidth capabilities
US8516146B1 (en) 1999-11-24 2013-08-20 Robert C. Yen Method and system for reduction of delay and bandwidth requirements in internet data transfer
US9538386B2 (en) 1999-11-24 2017-01-03 Robert C. Yen Wireless internet access with enhanced bandwidth capabilities
JP3613550B2 (ja) * 2000-03-29 2005-01-26 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション ウェブページ取得サービスシステム、サーバ、ウェブページ取得方法、記憶媒体及びプログラム伝送装置
DE10038552A1 (de) * 2000-08-03 2002-02-28 Siemens Ag System und Verfahren zur Übertragung von OPC-Daten über Datennetze, insbesondere Internet, mit asynchroner Datenverbindung
DE10038562B4 (de) * 2000-08-03 2005-12-15 Siemens Ag System und Verfahren zur Übertragung von Daten über Datennetze mit Datenumsetzung durch einen COM Automarschaller
US7216132B1 (en) * 2000-08-16 2007-05-08 Sparta Systems, Inc. System and method for automated process control
AT411973B (de) * 2001-01-26 2004-08-26 Fronius Schweissmasch Prod Verfahren zum betreiben eines schweissgerätes bzw. einer schweissanlage
ES2177454A1 (es) * 2001-02-05 2002-12-01 Univ Granada Procedimiento de comunicacion para sistemas de surpervision y control remoto.
DE10108599C2 (de) 2001-02-22 2003-04-30 Rittal Gmbh & Co Kg Schaltschrank oder Schaltschrankanordnung mit einer darin angeordneten Überwachungseinrichtung
EP1249747A1 (de) * 2001-04-09 2002-10-16 Patria Ailon Steuerungssystem und Verfahren zur Prozesssteuerung
US7747764B2 (en) * 2001-04-20 2010-06-29 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Web access for non-TCP/IP control devices of an industrial control system
US8065358B2 (en) * 2001-04-20 2011-11-22 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Proxied web access for control devices on industrial control systems
US7188200B2 (en) * 2001-07-25 2007-03-06 Endress + Hauser Process Solutions Ag Method for data exchange between an operating and monitoring program and a field device
US6819960B1 (en) 2001-08-13 2004-11-16 Rockwell Software Inc. Industrial controller automation interface
US7568000B2 (en) * 2001-08-21 2009-07-28 Rosemount Analytical Shared-use data processing for process control systems
DE10144386A1 (de) * 2001-09-10 2003-04-03 Siemens Ag Verfahren zur automatischen Projektierung eines technologischen Bausteins zur Abbildung und Steuerung einer technischen Prozessanlage
SE519905C2 (sv) * 2001-10-05 2003-04-22 Abb Ab Dataåtkomstmetod för ett styrsystem
DE10149481A1 (de) * 2001-10-08 2003-04-30 Siemens Ag System und Verfahren zur Datenausgabe eines Geräts, insbesondere eines Automatisierungsgerät über eine standardisierte Schnittstelle mit Variablenersetzung über einen Echoserver
DE10149480A1 (de) * 2001-10-08 2003-04-17 Siemens Ag System und Verfahren zum Zugriff auf ein Gerät, insbesondere ein Automatisierungsgerät mit einer standardisierten Schnittstelle
DE10200730A1 (de) * 2002-01-11 2003-10-16 Abb Research Ltd System und Verfahren zum Simulieren von Prozessen
US7725528B1 (en) * 2002-03-06 2010-05-25 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. System and methodology providing optimized data exchange with industrial controller
FI116004B (fi) * 2002-03-11 2005-08-31 Metso Automation Oy Varmennus prosessinohjausjärjestelmässä
US8856345B2 (en) 2002-03-11 2014-10-07 Metso Automation Oy Redundancy in process control system
BR0308899A (pt) * 2002-04-05 2005-08-02 Thomson Licensing Sa Navegador com caracterìstica de salvamento de parâmetros
US20030204560A1 (en) * 2002-04-26 2003-10-30 Chen Thomas C.H. Programmable Logic Controller with embedded Intelligent Web Server
US7096255B2 (en) * 2002-05-21 2006-08-22 Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corp. System and method for providing a roster list of temporary contacts having expiration periods designated by a user in an instant messaging environment
US7447756B2 (en) * 2002-05-21 2008-11-04 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Temporary aliasing for resource list
US7496668B2 (en) * 2002-06-28 2009-02-24 Honeywell International Inc. OPC server redirection manager
GB2410574B (en) * 2003-01-02 2007-07-11 Fisher Rosemount Systems Inc Redundant application stations for process control systems
WO2005016552A2 (en) * 2003-08-12 2005-02-24 Nordson Corporation User-friendly control system for coating equipment
US8041798B1 (en) * 2003-09-11 2011-10-18 Oracle America, Inc. Self-healing grid mechanism
US20050097119A1 (en) * 2003-10-31 2005-05-05 Bayoumi Deia S. Industrial information technology (IT) paperless operator workstation
US20050096774A1 (en) * 2003-10-31 2005-05-05 Bayoumi Deia S. System and method for integrating transactional and real-time manufacturing data
US20050096769A1 (en) * 2003-10-31 2005-05-05 Bayoumi Deia S. Industrial information technology (IT) workflow optimizer for discrete manufacturing
EP1683036A4 (de) * 2003-10-31 2007-03-07 Abb Research Ltd Intelligente online-steuerung von maschinen in einer diskreten herstellungsfabrik durch industrielle informationstechnologie (it)
US20050096957A1 (en) * 2003-10-31 2005-05-05 Bayoumi Deia S. System and method for manufacturing job rescheduling
DE502004010849D1 (de) * 2004-03-06 2010-04-15 Peter Renner System zur Steuerung und Bedienung technischer Prozesse
TW200534068A (en) * 2004-04-07 2005-10-16 Macronix Int Co Ltd Close loop control system and method thereof
US20060056285A1 (en) * 2004-09-16 2006-03-16 Krajewski John J Iii Configuring redundancy in a supervisory process control system
US7314169B1 (en) * 2004-09-29 2008-01-01 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Device that issues authority for automation systems by issuing an encrypted time pass
US7139239B2 (en) * 2004-10-05 2006-11-21 Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. Self-healing control network for building automation systems
CN100365571C (zh) * 2004-10-29 2008-01-30 英业达股份有限公司 一种软件升级装置及方法
CZ15451U1 (cs) * 2004-11-29 2005-05-30 Pavel Ing. Votruba Systém k provádění automatizované vícemodulární regulace přípravné fáze výroby včetně diagnostiky
US7702789B2 (en) * 2005-11-03 2010-04-20 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus, system, and method for reassigning a client
US20070130261A1 (en) * 2005-11-26 2007-06-07 Shaub Frances J Control/satellite electronic work station configurations in which stations interact among themselves on a real-time basis
US7953785B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2011-05-31 Microsoft Corporation Content synchronization in a file sharing environment
JP2008077535A (ja) * 2006-09-25 2008-04-03 Yokogawa Electric Corp フィールド通信システム、フィールドサーバ、フィールド機器およびフィールド通信方法
US7822802B2 (en) * 2006-09-29 2010-10-26 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Apparatus and method for merging wireless data into an established process control system
US8458350B2 (en) * 2006-11-03 2013-06-04 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Control and communications architecture
US8135383B2 (en) * 2007-07-30 2012-03-13 Lsi Corporation Information security and delivery method and apparatus
US8566439B2 (en) * 2007-10-01 2013-10-22 Ebay Inc Method and system for intelligent request refusal in response to a network deficiency detection
WO2009046095A1 (en) * 2007-10-01 2009-04-09 Iconics, Inc. Visualization of process control data
DE102007062985B4 (de) * 2007-12-21 2014-01-02 Abb Research Ltd. Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Kommunikation gemäß dem Standardprotokoll OPC UA in einem Client-Server-System
ES2464992T3 (es) 2008-01-28 2014-06-04 Lg Electronics Inc. Sistema de control de equipos y método de control del mismo
EP2093678A1 (de) 2008-02-21 2009-08-26 British Telecmmunications public limited campany Datennetzwerk
IT1391806B1 (it) * 2008-09-26 2012-01-27 Siti B & T Group Spa Impianto di controllo per controllare unita' elettroniche di gestione di macchine
US9261888B2 (en) * 2008-10-27 2016-02-16 Lennox Industries Inc. System and method of use for a user interface dashboard of a heating, ventilation and air conditioning network
US7779124B2 (en) * 2008-12-22 2010-08-17 Moxa Inc. Active monitoring system and method thereof
JP5005010B2 (ja) * 2009-09-03 2012-08-22 三菱電機株式会社 設備制御装置
US10083249B2 (en) * 2010-09-23 2018-09-25 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Systems, methods and articles of manufacture to provide a search service to a process control system
US8836497B2 (en) * 2012-07-23 2014-09-16 General Electric Company Systems and methods for configuring analog process alarms in control devices
US9088558B2 (en) 2013-08-21 2015-07-21 Owl Computing Technologies, Inc. Secure one-way interface for OPC data transfer
US10282071B2 (en) 2015-06-26 2019-05-07 Iconics, Inc. Asset-driven dynamically composed visualization system
US10495336B2 (en) * 2015-11-19 2019-12-03 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Energy operations across domains
US10048713B2 (en) * 2015-11-19 2018-08-14 Rockwell Automation Technologies Inc. Energy operations across domains
US10805399B2 (en) * 2017-04-18 2020-10-13 Mitsubishi Electric Corporation Data server unit and communication system including master-slave management circuitry
DE102017123222A1 (de) * 2017-10-06 2019-04-11 Endress + Hauser Process Solutions Ag Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Anlage der Automatisierungstechnik
CN111343144B (zh) * 2020-01-23 2022-09-02 奇安信科技集团股份有限公司 基于Linux的OPC网闸系统及数据处理方法

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5652908A (en) * 1991-10-02 1997-07-29 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for establishing communications sessions in a remote resource control environment

Family Cites Families (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US460308A (en) * 1891-09-29 Top for vehicles
US589516A (en) * 1897-09-07 weber
US4141066A (en) * 1977-09-13 1979-02-20 Honeywell Inc. Process control system with backup process controller
US4831582A (en) 1986-11-07 1989-05-16 Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. Database access machine for factory automation network
US4958270A (en) * 1989-01-23 1990-09-18 Honeywell Inc. Method for control data base updating of a redundant processor in a process control system
EP0566283A3 (de) * 1992-04-14 1994-12-07 Honeywell Inc Interface für den Zugriff von Multicomputersystemen auf ein Prozesssteuersystem.
AU4400993A (en) * 1992-06-12 1994-01-04 Dow Chemical Company, The Secure front end communication system and method for process control computers
US5600789A (en) * 1992-11-19 1997-02-04 Segue Software, Inc. Automated GUI interface testing
US5671415A (en) 1992-12-07 1997-09-23 The Dow Chemical Company System and method for facilitating software development
FR2718638B1 (fr) * 1994-04-19 1996-05-24 Oreal Compositions cosmétiques filtrantes contenant un agent hydrophile acide et utilisation.
US5627977A (en) 1994-04-19 1997-05-06 Orchid Systems, Inc. Trainable user interface translator
DE69601868T2 (de) 1995-06-14 1999-08-05 Novell Inc Verfahren zur verwaltung globaler verteilter softwarekomponenten
EP0762273B1 (de) 1995-09-06 2002-05-15 Seiko Epson Corporation Peripheriegerätsteuerungssystem mit einer Mehrheit von Objekten
US6401081B1 (en) * 1995-11-20 2002-06-04 Schlumberger Resource Management Services, Inc. Modular object-based architecture for extensible master station software
US6330005B1 (en) 1996-02-23 2001-12-11 Visionael Corporation Communication protocol binding in a computer system for designing networks
US5815657A (en) 1996-04-26 1998-09-29 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for network electronic authorization utilizing an authorization instrument
US5818447A (en) 1996-06-06 1998-10-06 Microsoft Corporation System and method for in-place editing of an electronic mail message using a separate program
US5850446A (en) 1996-06-17 1998-12-15 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for virtual point of sale processing utilizing an extensible, flexible architecture
US5812668A (en) 1996-06-17 1998-09-22 Verifone, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for verifying the operation of a remote transaction clearance system utilizing a multichannel, extensible, flexible architecture
US5828840A (en) 1996-08-06 1998-10-27 Verifone, Inc. Server for starting client application on client if client is network terminal and initiating client application on server if client is non network terminal
EP0825506B1 (de) 1996-08-20 2013-03-06 Invensys Systems, Inc. Verfahren und Gerät zur Fernprozesssteuerung
US5726912A (en) 1996-09-06 1998-03-10 Honeywell Iac Control system monitor
US6018343A (en) 1996-09-27 2000-01-25 Timecruiser Computing Corp. Web calendar architecture and uses thereof
US5867153A (en) 1996-10-30 1999-02-02 Transaction Technology, Inc. Method and system for automatically harmonizing access to a software application program via different access devices
US5835914A (en) 1997-02-18 1998-11-10 Wall Data Incorporated Method for preserving and reusing software objects associated with web pages
US6032203A (en) * 1997-04-07 2000-02-29 General Electric Company System for interfacing between a plurality of processors having different protocols in switchgear and motor control center applications by creating description statements specifying rules
US5910895A (en) 1997-06-13 1999-06-08 Teradyne, Inc. Low cost, easy to use automatic test system software
US6389464B1 (en) * 1997-06-27 2002-05-14 Cornet Technology, Inc. Device management system for managing standards-compliant and non-compliant network elements using standard management protocols and a universal site server which is configurable from remote locations via internet browser technology
US6313851B1 (en) 1997-08-27 2001-11-06 Microsoft Corporation User friendly remote system interface
US6151625A (en) * 1997-09-10 2000-11-21 Schneider Automation Inc. Internet web interface including programmable logic controller for controlling output devices based on status of input devices
US5828674A (en) 1997-09-16 1998-10-27 Teradyne, Inc. Production interface for integrated circuit test system
US6188401B1 (en) 1998-03-25 2001-02-13 Microsoft Corporation Script-based user interface implementation defining components using a text markup language
US6441834B1 (en) 1998-03-26 2002-08-27 Sap Portals, Inc. Hyper-relational correlation server
US6211856B1 (en) 1998-04-17 2001-04-03 Sung M. Choi Graphical user interface touch screen with an auto zoom feature
US6590588B2 (en) * 1998-05-29 2003-07-08 Palm, Inc. Wireless, radio-frequency communications using a handheld computer
US6131122A (en) * 1998-06-01 2000-10-10 Nortel Networks Corporation Programmable internet automation
US6259448B1 (en) 1998-06-03 2001-07-10 International Business Machines Corporation Resource model configuration and deployment in a distributed computer network
US6456307B1 (en) 1998-09-09 2002-09-24 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic icon generation
US6141005A (en) 1998-09-10 2000-10-31 International Business Machines Corporation Combined display of locale-sensitive calendars in a distributed computer enterprise environment
US6477565B1 (en) 1999-06-01 2002-11-05 Yodlee.Com, Inc. Method and apparatus for restructuring of personalized data for transmission from a data network to connected and portable network appliances
US6349410B1 (en) 1999-08-04 2002-02-19 Intel Corporation Integrating broadcast television pause and web browsing
US6341306B1 (en) 1999-08-13 2002-01-22 Atomica Corporation Web-based information retrieval responsive to displayed word identified by a text-grabbing algorithm
US6781720B1 (en) * 1999-11-30 2004-08-24 Xerox Corporation Gradient-based trapping using patterned trap zones
US6762912B2 (en) * 2001-04-10 2004-07-13 Iomega Corporation Head cleaner for a disk drive into which a disk media cartridge is inserted

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5652908A (en) * 1991-10-02 1997-07-29 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for establishing communications sessions in a remote resource control environment

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2945034A1 (de) * 2014-05-16 2015-11-18 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zum Schutz von redundanten Servern, die mit einem MES gekoppelt sind
US9696715B2 (en) 2014-05-16 2017-07-04 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method of protecting redundant servers coupled to a manufacturing executing system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7003558B2 (en) 2006-02-21
WO2000023857A9 (en) 2000-11-02
EP1121626A1 (de) 2001-08-08
ATE262189T1 (de) 2004-04-15
WO2000023857A1 (en) 2000-04-27
DE69915661T2 (de) 2005-03-24
US20050038885A1 (en) 2005-02-17
US20040024891A1 (en) 2004-02-05
CZ20011336A3 (cs) 2002-01-16
AU1115700A (en) 2000-05-08
DE69915661D1 (de) 2004-04-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1121626B1 (de) Prozesssteuerung
US7228187B2 (en) System and method for interfacing multi-agent system
US6788980B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for control using control devices that provide a virtual machine environment and that communicate via an IP network
JP3827092B2 (ja) 制御システム設定装置および制御システム設定方法ならびに設定プログラム
US8122434B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for control configuration control objects associated with a track attribute for selecting configuration information
US7502656B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for remote process control
US7953849B2 (en) Asset monitor for fieldbus devices
US20090019146A1 (en) Associating and evaluating status information for a primary input parameter value from a profibus device
US20100305720A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for control configuration with control objects that are fieldbus protocol-aware
WO1998036335A9 (en) Process control system using a layered-hierarchy control strategy distributed into multiple control devices
WO1998036335A2 (en) Process control system using a layered-hierarchy control strategy distributed into multiple control devices
US20100064297A1 (en) Configuring And Providing Enhanced Access To Profibus Device Diagnostic Data
WO2000077592A2 (en) Control device providing a virtual machine environment and an ip network
EP2630546B1 (de) Vorrichtung und verfahren für erweiterte alarmfunktionen in feldsgerätprotokollen
Holding et al. Communications in microprocessor industrial implementation
Jennyc Linking Enterprise Business Systems to the Factory Floor
Yamamoto et al. FDT/DTM framework for field device integration
Critoph Remote Communication and Remote Diagnostics
MOORE et al. 4.14 DCS: System Architecture

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20010516

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL PAYMENT 20010516;LT PAYMENT 20010516;LV PAYMENT 20010516;MK PAYMENT 20010516;RO PAYMENT 20010516;SI PAYMENT 20010516

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20020423

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040317

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040317

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20040317

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040317

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040317

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040317

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040317

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040317

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040317

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69915661

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20040422

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040617

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040617

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040617

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040628

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20040317

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041015

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041015

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041031

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

EN Fr: translation not filed
26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20041220

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040817

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20171027

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20181029

Year of fee payment: 20

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20181015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69915661

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181015