EP1013424B1 - Apparatus and method for controlling a charging voltage in ink jet printers - Google Patents

Apparatus and method for controlling a charging voltage in ink jet printers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1013424B1
EP1013424B1 EP19990309534 EP99309534A EP1013424B1 EP 1013424 B1 EP1013424 B1 EP 1013424B1 EP 19990309534 EP19990309534 EP 19990309534 EP 99309534 A EP99309534 A EP 99309534A EP 1013424 B1 EP1013424 B1 EP 1013424B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
voltage
segment
charge
segments
charging
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP19990309534
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1013424A3 (en
EP1013424A2 (en
Inventor
Robert J. Simon
Joseph P. Cleary
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Eastman Kodak Co
Original Assignee
Eastman Kodak Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Eastman Kodak Co filed Critical Eastman Kodak Co
Publication of EP1013424A2 publication Critical patent/EP1013424A2/en
Publication of EP1013424A3 publication Critical patent/EP1013424A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1013424B1 publication Critical patent/EP1013424B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41JTYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
    • B41J2/00Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed
    • B41J2/005Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed characterised by bringing liquid or particles selectively into contact with a printing material
    • B41J2/01Ink jet
    • B41J2/07Ink jet characterised by jet control
    • B41J2/075Ink jet characterised by jet control for many-valued deflection
    • B41J2/08Ink jet characterised by jet control for many-valued deflection charge-control type
    • B41J2/085Charge means, e.g. electrodes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of continuous ink jet printing and, more particularly, to a method for improving charge voltage print windows for ink jet printers which utilize arrays of charging electrodes and orifice arrays.
  • Ink jet drops are controlled via high voltage electrodes built into a planar array.
  • the planar array is aligned to an array of orifices and the drops are deflected onto a catcher surface which is parallel to the charging array.
  • the catch drops flow down the catcher surface and are returned to a fluid tank to be recycled.
  • Print drops are selected by switching the voltage off, on specific electrodes. The print drops must clear the fluid film generated by previous catch drops, while the characteristics of the fluid film changes depending on the selected drop patterns used to generate the images.
  • JP58212964A discloses a deflection control ink jet recorder provided with an array of orifices for emitting ink drops.
  • a series of print patterns are used to determine a charge voltage, or print, window, which is the range of voltages which can be applied to the charging electrodes and still provide perfect print. It is desired to maximize the print window to allow operation of the printer in a variety of operating conditions including, for example, ambient temperature, print speed, and related print features.
  • the precise location of the drop generation point in an electric field requires parts that are flat and parallel, (catchers, charge plates, and orifice arrays) at tolerances utilizing state of the art manufacturing techniques.
  • the voltage required for charging and deflecting the catch drops is applied to all electrodes.
  • the fluid impact on the catcher face is uniform when the ideal flat and parallel parts are assembled. Variations in part tolerances result in a range of impact heights on the catcher face, and this non-uniformity reduces the print window. If the range is excessive, there is no voltage that can be applied to provide acceptable operation. Higher density and longer arrays make it more difficult to fabricate the components to the desired tolerances.
  • means are provided to adjust the charging voltage to a discrete section of the array, increasing the operating range of the printhead.
  • the array of charging electrodes are broken into segments with means to provide relative voltage adjustment to each segment.
  • the voltage to the charge plate electrodes is then switchably controlled by discrete high voltage driver chips to enable drop selection for printing.
  • the integrated circuit within each chip converts serial input data at low voltages (5V typical) to parallel outputs at high voltage ( ⁇ 170 Vdc).
  • the supplied high voltage to each of these chips is varied to compensate for impact variations on the catcher face caused by nonuniform parts.
  • the compensation levels required for a set of aligned parts are stored within the printhead memory. The printhead will then function with the correct compensation levels on any system in which it is installed.
  • Present ink jet devices typically use a single voltage level applied to all electrodes to provide the drop charge required for deflecting the catch drops.
  • a single voltage is applied and the parts are uniform, the fluid impact on the catcher face is uniform.
  • the variation in part tolerances causes the impact on the catcher face to vary, and this variation or non-uniformity reduces the print window.
  • a method is provided to compensate for this variation in part tolerances, by providing different voltages to different regions of the electrode array. The average impact will be more uniform and the size of the print window will increase.
  • FIG. 1 there is illustrated a side view of an aligned printhead 14 showing the major components required for a continuous flow ink jet printer.
  • a drop generator 10 is aligned to a charge plate assembly 20 to cause drops 12 to form within the electric fields generated by high voltage electrodes 22.
  • the charged drops are then attracted to a nearby catcher surface 30.
  • the drops which strike the catcher form a fluid layer 32 which flows down catcher face 28 into the catcher opening.
  • the fluid slows down and the fluid layer 32 gets thicker. If the fluid layer gets too thick, the fluid layer can interfere with the non-deflected print drops. This can cause areas of missing print. On the other hand, too thin of a fluid layer can allow some catch drops to print, producing a dark defect. As the fluid layer thickness depends on the height at which the drops strike the catcher, there is a range of impact heights on the catcher that produces defect-free print.
  • the impact height of the drops on the catcher depends on the amount of charging and deflection produced by the charge plate.
  • the charging and deflection depend on the charging voltage and on the spacing between the charge plate and the jets.
  • the impact height further depends on the recess distance of the catcher behind the charge plate. Deviations in jet directionality, charge plate flatness, catcher flatness or the parallelism of the components all result in variations in impact height.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates a front view of the printhead 14. Ink is seen to flow down the catcher face below the impact line 35 of drops on the catcher. As discussed, the impact line 35 varies up and down the catcher face. Fig. 2 also shows the boundaries for the acceptable drop impacts, defined by pick out of the print drops in areas with the impact line high up in the catcher face such as at 34 and printing of catch drops where the impact line is low on the catcher face such as at 36.
  • Fig. 3 shows the same impact on the catcher face from Fig. 2, but the drop deflection has been modified by changing the voltage on the charging electrodes.
  • the voltage in segment D has been raised relative to segments C and E to minimize the depth of the low impacting center section of the array.
  • segments B and F have also been raised relative to segments C and E.
  • the impact line 35 shows discrete jumps or breakpoints at the voltage steps. With the total impact variation reduced, the print latitude improves accordingly.
  • each fixed voltage segment may vary as desired. While the best print window would be achieved by adjusting the charging voltage electrode by electrode, one electrode segments, such an implementation would add considerable cost to the electronics.
  • a more cost effective option which still provides most of the virtue provided by the single electrode segmenting option, is to chose a segment size which corresponds to the number of electrodes controlled by a charge voltage driver IC.
  • the segment size is 64 jets or charge leads, since the charge voltage switching electronics, Supertex HV34, which produces the necessary print voltage pulses, are designed to control 64 charging electrodes.
  • the typical impact profile was considered, so that the segment width, corresponding to the number of charge driver IC's per segment, is varied across the array.
  • the segment width was wider, the segment includes a larger number of charge driver IC's. In areas where the impact height tends to change more rapidly, the segment width is narrower, the number of charge driver IC's is less. For this particular embodiment, forty two charge driver IC's are separated non-uniformly into 18 segments.
  • the high voltage supplied to each segment can be provided by either individual high voltage supplies or by a main supply with individual segment regulators.
  • voltage may be added to or subtracted from the main supply voltage.
  • the individual segment regulators subtract voltage from the main supply voltage.
  • Fig. 4 shows a block diagram 50 of a preferred embodiment of the present invention for supplying high voltage to each segment.
  • the embodiment illustrated in Fig. 4 uses a main supply 56 and individual segment regulators 54.
  • High voltage is supplied to the individual segment regulators 54 by the main high voltage supply 56.
  • Current sensing electronics at block 58 measure the current drawn by the individual segments. This allows shorts to be detected. Furthermore the shorts can be located to the individual charging segment.
  • the segment regulators 54 then supply the voltage to the charge drivers, as indicated by block 60.
  • Fig. 5 there is illustrated in Fig. 5 one embodiment of an individual segment regulator.
  • This segment regulator 54 adjusts the voltage across capacitor 82.
  • the voltage across the capacitor has a polarity such that it will oppose or subtract from the voltage from the high voltage supply, 56.
  • the resulting voltage, supplied high voltage from source 56 minus the voltage drop across capacitor 56 is applied to the charge driver IC 60 through the reverse blocking diode 96.
  • this design ensures all segments drop to zero volts when the main supply voltage is dropped to zero volts. This is an important consideration during charge plate short recovery.
  • the load current drawn by the HV34 charge driver IC's 60 cause the voltage across capacitor 82 to increase, decreasing the voltage across capacitor 84.
  • the switch 72 is turned on. This discharges capacitor 82 through resistor 80, which controls the discharge time constant. The on time of switch 72 is adjusted by the analog control circuit 62 to maintain the voltage across capacitor 82 at the desired level.
  • the voltage across capacitor 82 is sensed by means of the difference amplifier 90 and two resistive voltage dividers.
  • One voltage divider consisting of resistors 86 and 88 supplies the difference amplifier with a voltage proportional to the output voltage from the regulator, while the other resistive voltage divider consisting of resistors 92 and 94 supplies the other input of the difference amplifier with a voltage proportional to the input voltage to the regulator.
  • the resulting voltage from the difference amplifier which is proportional to the voltage across the capacitor 82, is supplied to the analog control section 62. In this way the output voltage from each segment regulator can be controlled by its analog control circuit.
  • the set point for each segment is dictated by a common digital control circuit 66.
  • the digital control electronics 66 reads the configuration data stored in the printhead and sets the segment voltage appropriately. Should changes in ink properties require a change in the charge voltage, the baseline high voltage value would be changed. This maintains the relative voltages between segments.
  • the segment voltage levels and current levels are monitored by the analog measure circuit 64, which passes the data on to the digital control circuit 66. In this way, the digital control can perform diagnostics tests related to the printhead and the segment charging electronics.

Landscapes

  • Particle Formation And Scattering Control In Inkjet Printers (AREA)

Description

    Technical Field
  • The present invention relates to the field of continuous ink jet printing and, more particularly, to a method for improving charge voltage print windows for ink jet printers which utilize arrays of charging electrodes and orifice arrays.
  • Background Art
  • Ink jet drops are controlled via high voltage electrodes built into a planar array. The planar array is aligned to an array of orifices and the drops are deflected onto a catcher surface which is parallel to the charging array. The catch drops flow down the catcher surface and are returned to a fluid tank to be recycled. Print drops are selected by switching the voltage off, on specific electrodes. The print drops must clear the fluid film generated by previous catch drops, while the characteristics of the fluid film changes depending on the selected drop patterns used to generate the images.
  • JP58212964A discloses a deflection control ink jet recorder provided with an array of orifices for emitting ink drops.
  • A series of print patterns are used to determine a charge voltage, or print, window, which is the range of voltages which can be applied to the charging electrodes and still provide perfect print. It is desired to maximize the print window to allow operation of the printer in a variety of operating conditions including, for example, ambient temperature, print speed, and related print features.
  • The precise location of the drop generation point in an electric field requires parts that are flat and parallel, (catchers, charge plates, and orifice arrays) at tolerances utilizing state of the art manufacturing techniques. The voltage required for charging and deflecting the catch drops is applied to all electrodes. The fluid impact on the catcher face is uniform when the ideal flat and parallel parts are assembled. Variations in part tolerances result in a range of impact heights on the catcher face, and this non-uniformity reduces the print window. If the range is excessive, there is no voltage that can be applied to provide acceptable operation. Higher density and longer arrays make it more difficult to fabricate the components to the desired tolerances.
  • It is seen, therefore, that an alternative method to increase the print window is needed.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • This need is met by the segmented charging technique of the present invention.
  • In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, means are provided to adjust the charging voltage to a discrete section of the array, increasing the operating range of the printhead. The array of charging electrodes are broken into segments with means to provide relative voltage adjustment to each segment. The voltage to the charge plate electrodes is then switchably controlled by discrete high voltage driver chips to enable drop selection for printing. The integrated circuit within each chip converts serial input data at low voltages (5V typical) to parallel outputs at high voltage (~170 Vdc). The supplied high voltage to each of these chips is varied to compensate for impact variations on the catcher face caused by nonuniform parts. The compensation levels required for a set of aligned parts are stored within the printhead memory. The printhead will then function with the correct compensation levels on any system in which it is installed.
  • Other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description, the accompanying drawing and the appended claims.
  • Brief Description of the Drawing
    • Fig. 1 is a side view of an aligned printhead indicating the major components required for a continuous flow ink jet printer;
    • Fig. 2 is a front view of the printhead of Fig. 1;
    • Fig. 3 is a front view of a printhead, similar to Fig. 2, but with the drop deflection modified by changing the voltage on segments of the charging electrodes;
    • Fig. 4 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of the present invention using a main supply and individual segment regulators; and
    • Fig. 5 illustrates one embodiment of an individual segment controller, in accordance with the present invention.
    Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
  • Present ink jet devices typically use a single voltage level applied to all electrodes to provide the drop charge required for deflecting the catch drops. When a single voltage is applied and the parts are uniform, the fluid impact on the catcher face is uniform. However, the variation in part tolerances causes the impact on the catcher face to vary, and this variation or non-uniformity reduces the print window. In accordance with the present invention, a method is provided to compensate for this variation in part tolerances, by providing different voltages to different regions of the electrode array. The average impact will be more uniform and the size of the print window will increase.
  • Referring to Fig. 1, there is illustrated a side view of an aligned printhead 14 showing the major components required for a continuous flow ink jet printer. A drop generator 10 is aligned to a charge plate assembly 20 to cause drops 12 to form within the electric fields generated by high voltage electrodes 22. The charged drops are then attracted to a nearby catcher surface 30. The drops which strike the catcher form a fluid layer 32 which flows down catcher face 28 into the catcher opening.
  • As the fluid flows down the catcher face 28, the fluid slows down and the fluid layer 32 gets thicker. If the fluid layer gets too thick, the fluid layer can interfere with the non-deflected print drops. This can cause areas of missing print. On the other hand, too thin of a fluid layer can allow some catch drops to print, producing a dark defect. As the fluid layer thickness depends on the height at which the drops strike the catcher, there is a range of impact heights on the catcher that produces defect-free print.
  • The impact height of the drops on the catcher depends on the amount of charging and deflection produced by the charge plate. The charging and deflection depend on the charging voltage and on the spacing between the charge plate and the jets. The impact height further depends on the recess distance of the catcher behind the charge plate. Deviations in jet directionality, charge plate flatness, catcher flatness or the parallelism of the components all result in variations in impact height.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates a front view of the printhead 14. Ink is seen to flow down the catcher face below the impact line 35 of drops on the catcher. As discussed, the impact line 35 varies up and down the catcher face. Fig. 2 also shows the boundaries for the acceptable drop impacts, defined by pick out of the print drops in areas with the impact line high up in the catcher face such as at 34 and printing of catch drops where the impact line is low on the catcher face such as at 36.
  • To ensure maximum reliability, it is desirable to minimize the variation in impact heights within the acceptable range of impacts. This makes the printer less sensitive to variations in pressure, ink properties or other environmental variables.
  • In accordance with the present invention, it is possible to minimize the impact variation by using different charge voltage levels for different sections of the ink jet array. Fig. 3 shows the same impact on the catcher face from Fig. 2, but the drop deflection has been modified by changing the voltage on the charging electrodes. The voltage in segment D has been raised relative to segments C and E to minimize the depth of the low impacting center section of the array. Similarly segments B and F have also been raised relative to segments C and E. The impact line 35 shows discrete jumps or breakpoints at the voltage steps. With the total impact variation reduced, the print latitude improves accordingly.
  • The number and width of each fixed voltage segment may vary as desired. While the best print window would be achieved by adjusting the charging voltage electrode by electrode, one electrode segments, such an implementation would add considerable cost to the electronics. A more cost effective option, which still provides most of the virtue provided by the single electrode segmenting option, is to chose a segment size which corresponds to the number of electrodes controlled by a charge voltage driver IC. In one such implementation of the invention, the segment size is 64 jets or charge leads, since the charge voltage switching electronics, Supertex HV34, which produces the necessary print voltage pulses, are designed to control 64 charging electrodes. In a still more cost effective embodiment the typical impact profile was considered, so that the segment width, corresponding to the number of charge driver IC's per segment, is varied across the array. In areas that tend to have flat impact profiles, the segment width was wider, the segment includes a larger number of charge driver IC's. In areas where the impact height tends to change more rapidly, the segment width is narrower, the number of charge driver IC's is less. For this particular embodiment, forty two charge driver IC's are separated non-uniformly into 18 segments.
  • The high voltage supplied to each segment, or can be provided by either individual high voltage supplies or by a main supply with individual segment regulators. When using the individual segment regulators, voltage may be added to or subtracted from the main supply voltage. In the particular embodiment described here the individual segment regulators subtract voltage from the main supply voltage. To prevent damage to the charge driver IC's from excessive reverse current, it is important to block reverse current from one high voltage segment to the next. This can be accomplished using any suitable means such as, for example, by using a diode in the high voltage supply line to each charge driver IC.
  • Fig. 4 shows a block diagram 50 of a preferred embodiment of the present invention for supplying high voltage to each segment. The embodiment illustrated in Fig. 4 uses a main supply 56 and individual segment regulators 54. High voltage is supplied to the individual segment regulators 54 by the main high voltage supply 56. Current sensing electronics at block 58 measure the current drawn by the individual segments. This allows shorts to be detected. Furthermore the shorts can be located to the individual charging segment. The segment regulators 54 then supply the voltage to the charge drivers, as indicated by block 60.
  • Continuing with Fig. 4 and referring also to Fig. 5, there is illustrated in Fig. 5 one embodiment of an individual segment regulator. This segment regulator 54 adjusts the voltage across capacitor 82. The voltage across the capacitor has a polarity such that it will oppose or subtract from the voltage from the high voltage supply, 56. The resulting voltage, supplied high voltage from source 56 minus the voltage drop across capacitor 56 is applied to the charge driver IC 60 through the reverse blocking diode 96. By subtracting voltage from the main supply level, this design ensures all segments drop to zero volts when the main supply voltage is dropped to zero volts. This is an important consideration during charge plate short recovery.
  • During operation, the load current drawn by the HV34 charge driver IC's 60 cause the voltage across capacitor 82 to increase, decreasing the voltage across capacitor 84. To reduce the voltage increase across capacitor 82, the switch 72 is turned on. This discharges capacitor 82 through resistor 80, which controls the discharge time constant. The on time of switch 72 is adjusted by the analog control circuit 62 to maintain the voltage across capacitor 82 at the desired level.
  • The voltage across capacitor 82 is sensed by means of the difference amplifier 90 and two resistive voltage dividers. One voltage divider consisting of resistors 86 and 88 supplies the difference amplifier with a voltage proportional to the output voltage from the regulator, while the other resistive voltage divider consisting of resistors 92 and 94 supplies the other input of the difference amplifier with a voltage proportional to the input voltage to the regulator. The resulting voltage from the difference amplifier, which is proportional to the voltage across the capacitor 82, is supplied to the analog control section 62. In this way the output voltage from each segment regulator can be controlled by its analog control circuit. The set point for each segment is dictated by a common digital control circuit 66.
  • It is desirable to store the segment and main supply voltage information needed by the digital control circuit 66 in a nonvolatile memory 70 that is part of the printhead. In this way, the printhead appropriate set point information for each segment, established during manufacture of the printhead to provide the widest printhead latitude, can be supplied to the digital control circuit.
  • In operation, the digital control electronics 66 reads the configuration data stored in the printhead and sets the segment voltage appropriately. Should changes in ink properties require a change in the charge voltage, the baseline high voltage value would be changed. This maintains the relative voltages between segments.
  • For diagnostic purposes, the segment voltage levels and current levels are monitored by the analog measure circuit 64, which passes the data on to the digital control circuit 66. In this way, the digital control can perform diagnostics tests related to the printhead and the segment charging electronics.
  • The invention has been described in detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that modifications and variations can be effected within the scope of the invention.

Claims (9)

  1. A method for improving charge voltage print windows for ink jet printers that have a linear array of orifices for emitting ink drops (12); said method being characterized by the steps of:
    providing a linear array of charging electrodes (22) that are grouped into segments (37); and
    providing regulator means (54) adapted to control relative voltage provided to each segment (37), whereby the charging electrodes (22) charge the ink drops (12) according to the voltage provided to the segments (37).
  2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein each segment (37) has a charge voltage window for proper charging of the drops (12) and the relative voltage control is adapted to supply each segment (37) with a charging voltage near a center of its charge voltage window.
  3. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the provided regulator means is further adapted to store relative voltage levels in the printer.
  4. A method as claimed in claim 1 further comprising the step of providing a current sensor (58) adapted to detect charge plate shorts in each segment.
  5. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the provided regulator means is further adapted to adjust baseline voltage while maintaining desired relative voltage adjustment between segments.
  6. A system for improving charge voltage print windows for ink jet printers that have a linear array of orifices for emitting ink drops (12) and an array of charging electrodes (22); the system characterized by:
    the charging electrodes being grouped into segments (37); and
    a regulator means (54) that is adapted to control relative voltage provided to each segment (37), whereby the charging electrodes are adapted to charge the ink drops according to the voltage provided to the segments.
  7. A system as claimed in claim 7 wherein the regulator means comprises individual segment regulators.
  8. A system as claimed in claim 7 further characterized by means adapted to detect charge plate shorts in each segment.
  9. A system as claimed in claim 7 further comprising means adapted to adjust baseline voltage while maintaining desired relative voltage adjustment between segments.
EP19990309534 1998-12-14 1999-11-29 Apparatus and method for controlling a charging voltage in ink jet printers Expired - Lifetime EP1013424B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US21107998A 1998-12-14 1998-12-14
US211079 1998-12-14

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1013424A2 EP1013424A2 (en) 2000-06-28
EP1013424A3 EP1013424A3 (en) 2001-01-03
EP1013424B1 true EP1013424B1 (en) 2007-09-12

Family

ID=22785525

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19990309534 Expired - Lifetime EP1013424B1 (en) 1998-12-14 1999-11-29 Apparatus and method for controlling a charging voltage in ink jet printers

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1013424B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2000218794A (en)
CA (1) CA2292412A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69937095T2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10207505B1 (en) 2018-01-08 2019-02-19 Eastman Kodak Company Method for fabricating a charging device

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3769627A (en) * 1972-12-13 1973-10-30 Dick Co Ab Ink jet printing system using ion charging of droplets
US3769625A (en) * 1972-12-29 1973-10-30 Ibm Traveling wave actuated segmented charging electrode for an ink jet printer
US4223320A (en) * 1978-12-18 1980-09-16 The Mead Corporation Jet printer and electrode assembly therefor
US4220958A (en) * 1978-12-21 1980-09-02 Xerox Corporation Ink jet electrohydrodynamic exciter
JPS5617272A (en) * 1979-07-23 1981-02-19 Canon Inc Ink jet recorder
US4333063A (en) * 1979-12-03 1982-06-01 Nippon Electric Co., Ltd. Amplitude equalizer
JPS58212964A (en) * 1982-06-04 1983-12-10 Ricoh Co Ltd Deflection control type ink jet recorder
US4616234A (en) * 1985-08-15 1986-10-07 Eastman Kodak Company Simultaneous phase detection and adjustment of multi-jet printer
JPS62119046A (en) * 1985-11-19 1987-05-30 Toppan Printing Co Ltd Ink jet printer control circuit
US4928113A (en) * 1988-10-31 1990-05-22 Eastman Kodak Company Constructions and fabrication methods for drop charge/deflection in continuous ink jet printer

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10207505B1 (en) 2018-01-08 2019-02-19 Eastman Kodak Company Method for fabricating a charging device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69937095D1 (en) 2007-10-25
DE69937095T2 (en) 2008-06-12
CA2292412A1 (en) 2000-06-14
EP1013424A3 (en) 2001-01-03
EP1013424A2 (en) 2000-06-28
JP2000218794A (en) 2000-08-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0650837B1 (en) Energy management scheme for an ink-jet printer
US4417256A (en) Break-off uniformity maintenance
EP0440492B1 (en) Recording head and a recording device utilizing the recording head
US5418557A (en) Drop quality control system for jet printing
EP2701916B1 (en) Compensating for capacitance changes in piezoelectric printhead elements
US7866781B2 (en) Method and apparatus to check piezoelectric inkjet head
EP0039772B1 (en) Multinozzle ink jet printer and method of operating such a printer
US20110193908A1 (en) Inkjet printing device with compensation for jet velocity
EP1022149B1 (en) Method and apparatus for establishing ink-jet printhead operating energy from an optical determination of turn-on energy
US4994821A (en) Continuous ink jet printer apparatus having improved short detection construction
US4292640A (en) Closed loop compensation of ink jet aerodynamics
EP1013424B1 (en) Apparatus and method for controlling a charging voltage in ink jet printers
US5523778A (en) Segmented charge tunnel for drop charging in a printhead
US4638325A (en) Ink jet filament length and stimulation amplitude assessment system
EP0744292B1 (en) Method and apparatus for automatic setting of nozzle drive voltage in an ink jet printer
US5844581A (en) Electronic control for consistent ink jet images
US6817691B2 (en) Head driver for liquid jetting apparatus
US9840093B2 (en) Light emitting elements drive control device, droplets-deposited layer drying device and image processing apparatus
US4171527A (en) Ink jet contamination detecting system
US5517216A (en) Ink jet printer employing time of flight control system for ink jet printers
US6702418B2 (en) Ink jet recording device capable of detecting defective nozzle with high signal-to-noise ratio
US7946675B2 (en) Liquid ejecting apparatus and ejection inspecting method
EP1403048B1 (en) Low catch voltage startup
US20220266598A1 (en) Image recording apparatus
US20220032614A1 (en) Liquid discharge device and liquid discharging method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20010502

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: DE FR GB

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69937095

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20071025

Kind code of ref document: P

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20080613

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20131028

Year of fee payment: 15

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20131025

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20141201

Year of fee payment: 16

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20141129

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20150731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141129

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69937095

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160601