EP0993504A1 - Production of detergent granulates - Google Patents

Production of detergent granulates

Info

Publication number
EP0993504A1
EP0993504A1 EP98933629A EP98933629A EP0993504A1 EP 0993504 A1 EP0993504 A1 EP 0993504A1 EP 98933629 A EP98933629 A EP 98933629A EP 98933629 A EP98933629 A EP 98933629A EP 0993504 A1 EP0993504 A1 EP 0993504A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
stage
process according
temperature
gas
less
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP98933629A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0993504B1 (en
Inventor
Johannes Hendrikus Maria Akkermans
Michael F. Unilever Res.Port Sunlight EDWARDS
Andreas Theodorus Johannes Groot
Cornelis Paulus Maria Montanus
Roland Wilhelmus Johannes Van Pomeren
Korkut Ahmet R. Unilever Res.Port Sunlight YUREGIR
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=10814308&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0993504(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Unilever PLC, Unilever NV filed Critical Unilever PLC
Publication of EP0993504A1 publication Critical patent/EP0993504A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0993504B1 publication Critical patent/EP0993504B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D11/00—Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents
    • C11D11/0082—Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents one or more of the detergent ingredients being in a liquefied state, e.g. slurry, paste or melt, and the process resulting in solid detergent particles such as granules, powders or beads
    • C11D11/0088—Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents one or more of the detergent ingredients being in a liquefied state, e.g. slurry, paste or melt, and the process resulting in solid detergent particles such as granules, powders or beads the liquefied ingredients being sprayed or adsorbed onto solid particles

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for the production of granular detergent compositions.
  • a known kind of mixing process which does not involve spray drying, employs a moderate-speed granulator (a common example often colloquially being called a "ploughshare"), optionally preceded by a high-speed mixer (a common example often colloquially being called a "recycler” due to its recycling cooling system) .
  • a moderate-speed granulator (a common example often colloquially being called a "ploughshare")
  • a high-speed mixer a common example often colloquially being called a "recycler” due to its recycling cooling system) .
  • Typical examples of such processes are described in our European patent specifications EP-A-367 339, EP-A-390 251 and EP-A-420 317.
  • gas fluidisation granulators can give good control of bulk density, there is still a need for greater flexibility and in particular, for producing lower bulk density powders. Processes involving low-shear granulation are quite varied.
  • WO96/04359 discloses a process whereby low bulk density powders are prepared by contacting a neutralising agent such as an alkaline detergency builder and a liquid acid precursor of an anionic surfactant in a fluidisation zone to form detergent granules.
  • a neutralising agent such as an alkaline detergency builder and a liquid acid precursor of an anionic surfactant in a fluidisation zone to form detergent granules.
  • the present invention now provides a process of forming a granular detergent products, the process comprising, in a gas fluidisation granulator, contacting a fluidised particulate solid material with a spray of liquid binder, whilst fluidising the solids in the granulator with at least one gas stream, wherein the gas temperature is controlled so as to be increased and/or reduced during at least one stage of the process.
  • controlling the gas temperature according to the present invention leads to an increase and/or reduction in the temperature of the fluidising particulate solid material during at least one stage of the process.
  • the gas temperature is controlled not so as to merely maintain a constant "bed" temperature, for example by removing heat of reaction, but so as to increase and/or decrease the actual temperature of the fluidising solids.
  • the gas fluidisation granulation apparatus basically comprises a chamber in which a stream of gas, usually air, is used to cause turbulent flow of particulate solids to form a "cloud" of the solids and liquid binder is sprayed onto or into the cloud to contact the individual particles.
  • a stream of gas usually air
  • liquid binder is sprayed onto or into the cloud to contact the individual particles.
  • the process of the present invention resolves the stickiness of the granules as they form. In many cases, it is believed that this may occur as a result of transformation of the liquid constituents into a more solid state or a state having a higher viscosity, due to the temperature variation of the process.
  • the temperature increase and/or reduction must occur during at least one stage of the process, i.e. at least one stage when fluidisation and spraying are in progress.
  • the process may be operated with a gas temperature below ambient during at least one stage (or all of) the process. Preferably, it is operated with a gas temperature higher during a first stage of the process than during a second stage, before or after the first stage.
  • the gas fluidisation granulator is typically operated at a superficial air velocity of about 0.1-1.2 ms , either under positive or negative relative pressure.
  • the gas temperature, and thus preferably the bed temperature may be elevated for a first period, e.g. at up to 80°C or even up to 200°C and then at one or more other stages (before or after) , it may be reduced to just above, at, or below ambient, e.g. to 30°C or less, preferably 25°C or less or even as low as 5°C or less or -10°C or less.
  • the gas temperature and preferably also the bed temperature, is elevated for a first period and subsequently lowered in a second period.
  • the temperature variation When the process is a batch process, the temperature variation will be effected over time. If it is a continuous process, it will be varied along the "track" of the granulator bed. In the latter case, this is conveniently effected using a granulator of the "plug flow” type, i.e. one in which the materials flow through the reactor from beginning to end.
  • the gas temperature may be reduced over a relatively short period of time, for example 10 to 50% of the process time. Typically, the gas temperature may be reduced for 0.5 to 15 minutes. In a continuous process, the gas temperature may be reduced along a relatively short length of the "track" of the granulator bed, for example along 10 to 50% of the track. In both cases, the gas may be pre-cooled.
  • the gas temperature is not lowered until granulation of the fluidising particulate solid material is substantially complete.
  • bed temperature refers to the temperature of the fluidising solid particulate material.
  • the temperature of the fluidising solid particulate material can be measured, for example, using a thermocouple probe. Whether there is a discernible powder bed or no discernible powder bed (i.e. because the mixer is being operated with a gas flow rate so high that a classical "bubbling" fluid bed is not formed) , the "bed temperature” is taken to be the temperature as measured at a point inside the fluidisation chamber about 15 cm from the gas distributor plate.
  • granular detergent product encompasses granular finished products for sale, as well as granular components or adjuncts for forming finished products, e.g. by post-dosing to or with, or any other form of admixture with further components or adjuncts.
  • a granular detergent product as herein defined may, or may not contain detergent material such as synthetic surfactant and/or soap.
  • the minimum requirement is that it should contain at least one material of a general kind of conventional component of granular detergent products, such as a surfactant (including soap), a builder, a bleach or bleach-system component, an enzyme, an enzyme stabiliser or a component of an enzyme stabilising system, a soil anti- redeposition agent, a fluorescer or optical brightener, an anti-corrosion agent, an anti-foam material, a perfume or a colourant .
  • a surfactant including soap
  • the term "powder” refers to materials substantially consisting of grains of individual materials and mixtures of such grains.
  • the term “granule” refers to a small particle of agglomerated powder materials.
  • the final product of the process according to the present invention consists of, or comprises a high percentage of granules. However, additional granular and or powder materials may optionally be post-dosed to such a product.
  • solid starting materials of the present invention are particulate and may be powdered and/or granular.
  • particulate solid starting material may be introduced at any time during the time when liquid binder is being sprayed.
  • solid starting material is first introduced to the gas fluidisation granulator and then sprayed with the liquid binder.
  • some particulate solid starting material could be introduced at the beginning of processing in the gas fluidisation apparatus and the remainder introduced at one or more later times, either as one or more discrete batches or in continuous fashion.
  • the solid starting material (s) have a particle size distribution such that not more than 5% by weight of the particles have a particle size greater than 250 ⁇ m. It is also preferred that at least 30% by weight of the particles have a particle size below 100 ⁇ m, more preferably below 75 ⁇ m.
  • the present invention is also usable with larger fractions of solid starting materials (i.e. > 5% more than 250 ⁇ m, optionally also ⁇ 30% below 100 ⁇ m or 75 ⁇ m) but this increases the chance of some crystals of unagglommerated starting materials being found in the final product. This presents a cost benefit in allowing use of cheaper raw materials.
  • the particulate solid starting material (s) have an average particle size below 500 ⁇ m to provide detergent powders having a particularly desired low bulk density.
  • reference to an average particle size means the d 3 2 average particle diameter.
  • the gas fluidisation granulator may be adapted to recycle "fines" i.e. powdered or part-granular material of very small particle size, so that they are returned to the input of the gas fluidisation apparatus and/or input of any pre-mixer.
  • the fine particulates are elutriated material, i.e. they are present in the air leaving a the gas fluidisation chamber.
  • the gas fluidisation granulator may optionally be of the kind provided with a vibrating bed, particularly for use in continuous mode.
  • the liquid binder comprises an acid precursor of an anionic surfactant and the particulate solid starting material comprises an inorganic alkaline material.
  • the process of the present invention is especially suited to this kind of granulation, especially when the temperature is elevated in the first part of the process. In that way, the neutralisation reaction can proceed much nearer to completion, before the end of the granulation operation, than would otherwise be the case.
  • bed temperature is increased by increasing the gas temperature during any neutralisation reaction, preferably for a substantial part of the neutralisation reaction.
  • the acid precursor may for example be the acid precursor of a linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LAS) or primary alkyl sulphate (PAS) anionic surfactant or of any other kind of anionic surfactant.
  • LAS linear alkylbenzene sulphonate
  • PAS primary alkyl sulphate
  • Suitable materials for use as the inorganic alkaline material include alkali metal carbonates and bicarbonates, for example sodium salts thereof.
  • the neutralising agent is very preferably present at a level sufficient to neutralise fully the acidic component. If desired, a stoichiometric excess of neutralising agent may be employed to ensure complete neutralisation or to provide an alternative function, for example as a detergency builder, e.g. if the neutralising agent comprises sodium carbonate.
  • the liquid binder may alternatively or additionally contain one or more other liquid materials such as liquid nonionic surfactants and/or organic solvents.
  • the total amount of acid precursor will normally be as high as possible, subject to the presence of any other components in the liquid and subject to other considerations referred to below.
  • the acid precursor may constitute at least 98% (e.g. at least 95%) by weight of the liquid binder, but could be at least 75%, at least 50% or at least 25% by weight of the binder.
  • the binder can even, for example, constitute 5% or less by weight of the binder.
  • the acid precursor can be omitted altogether if required.
  • the weight ratio of all acid precursor (s) to nonionic surfactants will normally be from 20:1 to 1:20. However, this ratio may be, for example, 15:1 or less (of the anionic), 10:1 or less, or 5:1 or less.
  • the nonionic may be the major component so that the ratio is 1:5 or more (of the nonionic), 1:10 or more, or 1:15 or more. Ratios in the range from 5:1 to 1:5 are also possible.
  • the maximum amount of anionic incorporated in the salt form is preferably no more than 70%, more preferably no more than 50% and most preferably no more than 40%.
  • a soap in the granules, this can be achieved by incorporating a fatty acid, either in solution in the liquid binder or as part of the solids.
  • the solids in any event must then also comprise an inorganic alkaline neutralising agent to react with the fatty acid to produce the soap.
  • the liquid binder will often be totally or substantially non- aqueous, that is to say, any water present does not exceed 25% by weight of the liquid binder, but preferably no more than 10% by weight. However, if desired, a controlled amount of water may be added to facilitate neutralisation. Typically, the water may be added in amounts of 0.5 to 2% by weight of the final detergent product. Any such water is suitably added prior to or together or alternating with the addition of the acid precursor.
  • an aqueous liquid binder may be employed.
  • adjuncts for subsequent admixture with other components to form a fully formulated detergent product.
  • Such adjuncts will usually, apart from components resulting from the liquid binder, mainly consist of one, or a small number of components normally found in detergent compositions, e.g. a surfactant or a builder such as zeolite or sodium tripolyphosphate.
  • aqueous liquid binders for granulation if substantially fully formulated products.
  • typical aqueous liquid binders include aqueous solutions of alkali metal silicates, water soluble acrylic/maleic polymers (e.g. Sokalan CP5) and the like.
  • the particulate solid starting material may be contacted and mixed with a first portion of the liquid binder, e.g. in a low-, moderate- or high-shear mixer (i.e. a pre-mixer) to form a partially granulated material.
  • a low-, moderate- or high-shear mixer i.e. a pre-mixer
  • the latter can then be sprayed with a second portion of the liquid binder in the gas fluidisation granulator, to form the granulated detergent product .
  • liquid binder In such a two-stage granulation process, it is preferred, but not absolutely necessary, for the total of liquid binder to be dosed only in the partial granulation pre-mixer and fluidisation steps. Conceivably, some could be dosed during or before partial granulation premixing and/or fluidisation. Also, the content of the liquid binder could be varied between these first and second stages.
  • the extent of granulation in the pre-mixer (i.e. partial granulation) and the amount of granulation in the gas fluidisation granulator is preferably determined in accordance with the final product density desired.
  • Preferred amounts of liquid binder to dosed at each of the two stages may be varied thus : -
  • R appropriate mixer for this step is a high-shear Lodige CB
  • a low- or high-shear mixer granulator has a stirring action and/or a cutting action which are operated independently of one another. Preferred types of low- or high-shear mixer/
  • R R granulators are mixers of the Fukae FS-G series; Diosna V series ex Dierks & Sohne, Germany; Pharma Matrix ex T.K.
  • a "layering agent” or “flow aid” may be introduced at any appropriate stage. This is to improve the granularity of the product, e.g. by preventing aggregation and/or caking of the granules.
  • Any layering agent flow aid is suitably present in an amount of 0.1 to 15% by weight of the granular product and more preferably in an amount of 0.5 to 5%.
  • Suitable layering agents/flow aids include crystalline or amorphous alkali metal silicates, aluminosilicates including zeolites, Dicamol, calcite, diatomaceous earths, silica, for example precipitated silica, chlorides such as sodium chloride, sulphates such as magnesium sulphate, carbonates such as calcium carbonate and phosphates such as sodium tripolyphospate. Mixtures of these materials may be employed as desired.
  • additional components may be included in the liquid binder or admixed with the solid neutralising agent at an appropriate stage of the process.
  • solid components can be post-dosed to the granular detergent product .
  • anionic surfactant which optionally may be produced by a neutralisation step
  • further anionic surfactants, or nonionic surfactant as mentioned above also, cationic, zwitterionic, amphoteric or semipolar surfactants and mixtures thereof may be added at a suitable time.
  • suitable surfactants include those generally described in "Surface active agents and detergents" Vol I by Schwartz and Perry.
  • soap derived from saturated or unsaturated fatty acids having, for example having an average of C 10 to C 18 carbon atoms may also be present.
  • the detergent active is suitably incorporated at a level of 5 to 40%, preferably 10 to 30% by weight of the final granular detergent product.
  • a complete detergent composition often contains a detergency builder.
  • a detergency builder may be introduced with the solid material and/or added subsequently as desired.
  • the builder may also constitute a neutralising agent, for example sodium carbonate, in which case sufficient material will be employed for both functions.
  • the total amount of detergency builder in the granular product is suitably from 5 to 95%, for example from 10 to 80%, preferably from 15 to 65%, more preferably from 15 to 50% by weight.
  • Inorganic builders that may be present include sodium carbonate, if desired in combination with a crystallisation seed for calcium carbonate as disclosed in GB-A-1 437 950. Any sodium carbonate will need to be in excess of any used to neutralise the anionic acid precursor if the latter is added during the process.
  • Suitable builders include crystalline and amorphous aluminosilicates, for example zeolites as disclosed in GB-A-1 473 201; amorphous aluminosilicates as disclosed in GB-A-1 473 202; and mixed crystalline/amorphous aluminosilicates as disclosed in GB 1 470 250; and layered silicates as disclosed in EP-B-164 514.
  • Inorganic phosphate builders for example, sodium, orthophosphate, pyrophosphate and tripolyphosphate, may also be present, but on environmental grounds those are no longer preferred.
  • Aluminosilicates whether used as layering agents and/or incorporated in the bulk of the particles may suitably be present in a total amount of from 10 to 60% and preferably an amount of from 15 to 50% by weight.
  • the zeolite used in most commercial particulate detergent compositions is zeolite A.
  • maximum aluminium zeolite P zeolite MAP described and claimed in EP-A-384 070 may be used.
  • Zeolite MAP is an alkali metal aluminosilicated of the P type having a silicon to aluminium ratio not exceeding 1.33, preferably not exceeding 1.15, and more preferably not exceeding 1.07.
  • Organic builders that may be present include polycarboxylate polymers such as polyacrylates, acrylic/maleic copolymers, and acrylic phosphinates ; monomeric polycarboxylates such as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates, glycerol mono-, di- and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates, carboxymethyloxymalonates , dipicolinates , hydroxyethyliminodiacetates , alkyl- and alkenylmalonates and succinates; and sulphonated fatty acid salts.
  • a copolymer of maleic acid, acrylic acid and vinyl acetate is especially preferred as it is biodegradable and thus environmentally desirable. This list is not intended to be exhaustive.
  • Especially preferred organic builders are citrates, suitably used in amounts of from 5 to 30%, preferably from 10 to 25% by weight; and acrylic polymers, more especially acrylic/maleic copolymers, suitably used in amounts of from 0.5 to 15%, preferably from 1 to 10% by weight. Citrates can also be used at lower levels (eg 0.1 to 5%) by weight for other purposes.
  • the builder is preferably present in alkali metal salt, especially sodium salt, form.
  • the builder system may also comprise a crystalline layered silicate, for example, SKS-6 ex Hoechst, a zeolite, for example, zeolite A and optionally an alkali metal citrate.
  • the granular composition resulting from the process of the present invention may also comprise a particulate filler (or any other component which does not contribute to the wash process) which suitably comprises an inorganic salt, for example sodium sulphate and sodium chloride.
  • a particulate filler or any other component which does not contribute to the wash process
  • the filler may be present at a level of 5 to 70% by weight of the granular product .
  • the present invention also encompasses a granular detergent product resulting from the process of the invention (before any post-dosing or the like) .
  • This product will have a bulk density determined by the exact nature of the process. If the process does not involve a pre-mixer to effect partial granulation, a final bulk density of 350-750 g/1 can normally be expected. As mentioned above, use of a pre-mixer enables the final bulk density to be 350-650 g/1 or 550-1300 g/1, respectively, according to whether option (i) or (ii) is utilised.
  • granular detergent products resulting from the present invention are also characterised by their particle size ranges.
  • not more than 10% by weight has a diameter > 1.4 mm and more preferably, not more than 5% by weight of the granules are above this limit. It is also preferred that not more than 20% by weight of the granules have a diameter > 1 mm.
  • the granules can be distinguished from granules produced by other methods by mercury porosimetry. The latter technique cannot reliably determine the porosity of individual unagglomerated particles but is ideal for characterising the granules.
  • a fully formulated detergent composition produced according to the invention might for example comprise the detergent active and builder and optionally one or more of a flow aid, a filler and other minor ingredients such as colour, perfume, fluorescer, bleaches, enzymes.
  • the fluidising air temperature was varied from 20°C to 80°C in the first stage followed by a second stage at 20°C.
  • a Spraying System nozzle SUE25 was used operating with an atomising air pressure of 5 bar.
  • Example I and II are control examples where there was no temperature variation.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Glanulating (AREA)
  • Projection Apparatus (AREA)

Abstract

A process of forming granular detergent products, the process comprising, in a gas fluidisation granulator, contacting a fluidised particulate solid material with a spray of liquid binder, whilst fluidising the solids in the granulator with at least one gas stream, wherein the gas temperature is controlled so as to be increased and/or reduced during at least one stage of the process.

Description

PRODUCTION OF DETERGENT GRANULATES
The present invention relates to a process for the production of granular detergent compositions.
It is long known in the art to obtain detergent powders by spray drying. However, the spray-drying process is both capital and energy intensive and consequently the resultant product is expensive.
More recently, there has been much interest in production of granular detergent products by processes which employ mainly mixing, without the use of spray drying. These mixing techniques can offer great flexibility in producing powders of various different compositions from a single plant by post-dosing various components after an initial granulation stage.
A known kind of mixing process, which does not involve spray drying, employs a moderate-speed granulator (a common example often colloquially being called a "ploughshare"), optionally preceded by a high-speed mixer (a common example often colloquially being called a "recycler" due to its recycling cooling system) . Typical examples of such processes are described in our European patent specifications EP-A-367 339, EP-A-390 251 and EP-A-420 317. These moderate-speed and high-speed mixers exert relatively high levels of shear on the materials being processed.
Until recently, there has been less effort in developing use of low-shear mixers or granulators. One kind of process, which does mot involve spray-drying, involves use of a low- shear granulator of the gas fluidisation kind. In this kind of apparatus, a gas (usually air) is blown through a body of particulate solids onto which is sprayed a liquid component. A gas fluidisation granulator is sometimes called a "fluidised bed" granulator or mixer. However, this is not strictly accurate since such mixers can be operated with a gas flow rate so high that a classical "bubbling" fluid bed does not form.
Although gas fluidisation granulators can give good control of bulk density, there is still a need for greater flexibility and in particular, for producing lower bulk density powders. Processes involving low-shear granulation are quite varied.
For example, WO96/04359 (Unilever) discloses a process whereby low bulk density powders are prepared by contacting a neutralising agent such as an alkaline detergency builder and a liquid acid precursor of an anionic surfactant in a fluidisation zone to form detergent granules.
Nevertheless, as pointed-out in Indian Patent No. 166307 (Unilever) , use of a conventional gas fluidisation process can lead to formation of lumps and sticky granules. The latter document seeks to overcome this problem by using an internal recirculation gas fluidisation granulator. However, the present invention overcomes this problem more simply and effectively by controlling the gas temperature.
Thus, the present invention now provides a process of forming a granular detergent products, the process comprising, in a gas fluidisation granulator, contacting a fluidised particulate solid material with a spray of liquid binder, whilst fluidising the solids in the granulator with at least one gas stream, wherein the gas temperature is controlled so as to be increased and/or reduced during at least one stage of the process. Preferably, controlling the gas temperature according to the present invention leads to an increase and/or reduction in the temperature of the fluidising particulate solid material during at least one stage of the process. In other words, the gas temperature is controlled not so as to merely maintain a constant "bed" temperature, for example by removing heat of reaction, but so as to increase and/or decrease the actual temperature of the fluidising solids.
The gas fluidisation granulation apparatus basically comprises a chamber in which a stream of gas, usually air, is used to cause turbulent flow of particulate solids to form a "cloud" of the solids and liquid binder is sprayed onto or into the cloud to contact the individual particles. As the process progresses, individual particles of solid starting materials become agglomerated, due to the liquid binder, to form granules.
The process of the present invention resolves the stickiness of the granules as they form. In many cases, it is believed that this may occur as a result of transformation of the liquid constituents into a more solid state or a state having a higher viscosity, due to the temperature variation of the process.
The temperature increase and/or reduction must occur during at least one stage of the process, i.e. at least one stage when fluidisation and spraying are in progress.
The process may be operated with a gas temperature below ambient during at least one stage (or all of) the process. Preferably, it is operated with a gas temperature higher during a first stage of the process than during a second stage, before or after the first stage. The gas fluidisation granulator is typically operated at a superficial air velocity of about 0.1-1.2 ms , either under positive or negative relative pressure. The gas temperature, and thus preferably the bed temperature, may be elevated for a first period, e.g. at up to 80°C or even up to 200°C and then at one or more other stages (before or after) , it may be reduced to just above, at, or below ambient, e.g. to 30°C or less, preferably 25°C or less or even as low as 5°C or less or -10°C or less.
In a preferred embodiment, the gas temperature, and preferably also the bed temperature, is elevated for a first period and subsequently lowered in a second period.
When the process is a batch process, the temperature variation will be effected over time. If it is a continuous process, it will be varied along the "track" of the granulator bed. In the latter case, this is conveniently effected using a granulator of the "plug flow" type, i.e. one in which the materials flow through the reactor from beginning to end.
In a batch process, the gas temperature may be reduced over a relatively short period of time, for example 10 to 50% of the process time. Typically, the gas temperature may be reduced for 0.5 to 15 minutes. In a continuous process, the gas temperature may be reduced along a relatively short length of the "track" of the granulator bed, for example along 10 to 50% of the track. In both cases, the gas may be pre-cooled.
Preferably, the gas temperature, and preferably also the bed temperature, is not lowered until granulation of the fluidising particulate solid material is substantially complete. As used herein, the term "bed temperature" refers to the temperature of the fluidising solid particulate material. The temperature of the fluidising solid particulate material can be measured, for example, using a thermocouple probe. Whether there is a discernible powder bed or no discernible powder bed (i.e. because the mixer is being operated with a gas flow rate so high that a classical "bubbling" fluid bed is not formed) , the "bed temperature" is taken to be the temperature as measured at a point inside the fluidisation chamber about 15 cm from the gas distributor plate.
In the context of the present invention, the term "granular detergent product" encompasses granular finished products for sale, as well as granular components or adjuncts for forming finished products, e.g. by post-dosing to or with, or any other form of admixture with further components or adjuncts. Thus a granular detergent product as herein defined may, or may not contain detergent material such as synthetic surfactant and/or soap. The minimum requirement is that it should contain at least one material of a general kind of conventional component of granular detergent products, such as a surfactant (including soap), a builder, a bleach or bleach-system component, an enzyme, an enzyme stabiliser or a component of an enzyme stabilising system, a soil anti- redeposition agent, a fluorescer or optical brightener, an anti-corrosion agent, an anti-foam material, a perfume or a colourant .
As used herein, the term "powder" refers to materials substantially consisting of grains of individual materials and mixtures of such grains. The term "granule" refers to a small particle of agglomerated powder materials. The final product of the process according to the present invention consists of, or comprises a high percentage of granules. However, additional granular and or powder materials may optionally be post-dosed to such a product. Moreover, as will be explained in more detail hereinbelow, solid starting materials of the present invention are particulate and may be powdered and/or granular.
Whether the gas fluidisation granulation process of the present invention is a batch process or a continuous process, particulate solid starting material may be introduced at any time during the time when liquid binder is being sprayed. In the simplest form of process, solid starting material is first introduced to the gas fluidisation granulator and then sprayed with the liquid binder. However, some particulate solid starting material could be introduced at the beginning of processing in the gas fluidisation apparatus and the remainder introduced at one or more later times, either as one or more discrete batches or in continuous fashion.
Suitably, the solid starting material (s) have a particle size distribution such that not more than 5% by weight of the particles have a particle size greater than 250 μm. It is also preferred that at least 30% by weight of the particles have a particle size below 100 μm, more preferably below 75 μm. However the present invention is also usable with larger fractions of solid starting materials (i.e. > 5% more than 250 μm, optionally also < 30% below 100 μm or 75 μm) but this increases the chance of some crystals of unagglommerated starting materials being found in the final product. This presents a cost benefit in allowing use of cheaper raw materials. In any event, the particulate solid starting material (s) have an average particle size below 500 μm to provide detergent powders having a particularly desired low bulk density. Within the context of solid starting materials, reference to an average particle size means the d3 2 average particle diameter. The gas fluidisation granulator may be adapted to recycle "fines" i.e. powdered or part-granular material of very small particle size, so that they are returned to the input of the gas fluidisation apparatus and/or input of any pre-mixer. Preferably the fine particulates are elutriated material, i.e. they are present in the air leaving a the gas fluidisation chamber.
The gas fluidisation granulator may optionally be of the kind provided with a vibrating bed, particularly for use in continuous mode.
In a preferred class of processes according to the present invention, the liquid binder comprises an acid precursor of an anionic surfactant and the particulate solid starting material comprises an inorganic alkaline material. The process of the present invention is especially suited to this kind of granulation, especially when the temperature is elevated in the first part of the process. In that way, the neutralisation reaction can proceed much nearer to completion, before the end of the granulation operation, than would otherwise be the case.
It is thus preferred that bed temperature is increased by increasing the gas temperature during any neutralisation reaction, preferably for a substantial part of the neutralisation reaction.
The acid precursor may for example be the acid precursor of a linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LAS) or primary alkyl sulphate (PAS) anionic surfactant or of any other kind of anionic surfactant. Suitable materials for use as the inorganic alkaline material include alkali metal carbonates and bicarbonates, for example sodium salts thereof.
The neutralising agent is very preferably present at a level sufficient to neutralise fully the acidic component. If desired, a stoichiometric excess of neutralising agent may be employed to ensure complete neutralisation or to provide an alternative function, for example as a detergency builder, e.g. if the neutralising agent comprises sodium carbonate.
The liquid binder may alternatively or additionally contain one or more other liquid materials such as liquid nonionic surfactants and/or organic solvents. The total amount of acid precursor will normally be as high as possible, subject to the presence of any other components in the liquid and subject to other considerations referred to below. Thus, the acid precursor may constitute at least 98% (e.g. at least 95%) by weight of the liquid binder, but could be at least 75%, at least 50% or at least 25% by weight of the binder.
It can even, for example, constitute 5% or less by weight of the binder. Of course the acid precursor can be omitted altogether if required.
When liquid nonionic surfactant is present in the liquid binder together with an acid precursor of an anionic surfactant, then the weight ratio of all acid precursor (s) to nonionic surfactants, will normally be from 20:1 to 1:20. However, this ratio may be, for example, 15:1 or less (of the anionic), 10:1 or less, or 5:1 or less. On the other hand, the nonionic may be the major component so that the ratio is 1:5 or more (of the nonionic), 1:10 or more, or 1:15 or more. Ratios in the range from 5:1 to 1:5 are also possible. For manufacture of granules containing anionic surfactant, sometimes it will be desirable not to incorporate all of such anionic by neutralisation of an acid precursor. Some can optionally be incorporated in the alkali metal salt form, dissolved in the liquid binder or else as part of the solids. In that case, the maximum amount of anionic incorporated in the salt form (expressed as the weight percentage of total anionic surfactant salt in the product output from the gas fluidisation granulator) is preferably no more than 70%, more preferably no more than 50% and most preferably no more than 40%.
If it is desired to incorporate a soap in the granules, this can be achieved by incorporating a fatty acid, either in solution in the liquid binder or as part of the solids. The solids in any event must then also comprise an inorganic alkaline neutralising agent to react with the fatty acid to produce the soap.
The liquid binder will often be totally or substantially non- aqueous, that is to say, any water present does not exceed 25% by weight of the liquid binder, but preferably no more than 10% by weight. However, if desired, a controlled amount of water may be added to facilitate neutralisation. Typically, the water may be added in amounts of 0.5 to 2% by weight of the final detergent product. Any such water is suitably added prior to or together or alternating with the addition of the acid precursor.
Alternatively, an aqueous liquid binder may be employed.
This is especially suited to manufacture of products which are adjuncts for subsequent admixture with other components to form a fully formulated detergent product. Such adjuncts will usually, apart from components resulting from the liquid binder, mainly consist of one, or a small number of components normally found in detergent compositions, e.g. a surfactant or a builder such as zeolite or sodium tripolyphosphate. However, this does not preclude use of aqueous liquid binders for granulation if substantially fully formulated products. In any event, typical aqueous liquid binders include aqueous solutions of alkali metal silicates, water soluble acrylic/maleic polymers (e.g. Sokalan CP5) and the like.
In a refinement of the process of the present invention, the particulate solid starting material may be contacted and mixed with a first portion of the liquid binder, e.g. in a low-, moderate- or high-shear mixer (i.e. a pre-mixer) to form a partially granulated material. The latter can then be sprayed with a second portion of the liquid binder in the gas fluidisation granulator, to form the granulated detergent product .
In such a two-stage granulation process, it is preferred, but not absolutely necessary, for the total of liquid binder to be dosed only in the partial granulation pre-mixer and fluidisation steps. Conceivably, some could be dosed during or before partial granulation premixing and/or fluidisation. Also, the content of the liquid binder could be varied between these first and second stages.
The extent of granulation in the pre-mixer (i.e. partial granulation) and the amount of granulation in the gas fluidisation granulator is preferably determined in accordance with the final product density desired. Preferred amounts of liquid binder to dosed at each of the two stages may be varied thus : -
(i) If a lower powder density is desired, i.e. 350-650 g/1 (a) 5-75% by weight of total liquid binder is preferably added in the pre-mixer; and
(b) the remaining 95-25% by weight of total liquid binder is preferably added in the gas fluidisation granulator.
(ii) If a higher powder density is desired, i.e. 550-1300 g/1 (a) 75-95% by weight of total liquid binder is preferably added in the pre-mixer; and (b) the remaining 25-5% by weight of total liquid binder is preferably added in the gas fluidisation granulator .
If an initial pre-mixer is used for partial granulation, an
R appropriate mixer for this step is a high-shear Lodige CB
R machine or a moderate-speed mixer such as a Lodige KM
. R machine. Other suitable equipment include Drais T160 series manufactured by Drais Werke GmbH, Germany; the Lit leford mixer with internal chopping blades and turbine-type miller mixer having several blades on an axis of rotation. A low- or high-shear mixer granulator has a stirring action and/or a cutting action which are operated independently of one another. Preferred types of low- or high-shear mixer/
R R granulators are mixers of the Fukae FS-G series; Diosna V series ex Dierks & Sohne, Germany; Pharma Matrix ex T.K.
Fielder Ltd; England. Other mixers believed to be suitable
. . R for use in the process of the invention are Fuji VG-C series
. . R ex Fuji Sangyo Co., Japan; the Roto ex Zanchetta & Co. srl, Italy and Schugi Flexomix granulator. Yet another mixer suitable for use in a pre-granulation stage is the Lodige (Trade Mark) FM series (ploughshare mixers) batch mixer ex Morton Machine Co. Ltd., Scotland.
Optionally, a "layering agent" or "flow aid" may be introduced at any appropriate stage. This is to improve the granularity of the product, e.g. by preventing aggregation and/or caking of the granules. Any layering agent flow aid is suitably present in an amount of 0.1 to 15% by weight of the granular product and more preferably in an amount of 0.5 to 5%.
Suitable layering agents/flow aids include crystalline or amorphous alkali metal silicates, aluminosilicates including zeolites, Dicamol, calcite, diatomaceous earths, silica, for example precipitated silica, chlorides such as sodium chloride, sulphates such as magnesium sulphate, carbonates such as calcium carbonate and phosphates such as sodium tripolyphospate. Mixtures of these materials may be employed as desired.
In general, additional components may be included in the liquid binder or admixed with the solid neutralising agent at an appropriate stage of the process. However, solid components can be post-dosed to the granular detergent product .
In addition to any anionic surfactant which optionally may be produced by a neutralisation step, further anionic surfactants, or nonionic surfactant as mentioned above, also, cationic, zwitterionic, amphoteric or semipolar surfactants and mixtures thereof may be added at a suitable time. In general suitable surfactants include those generally described in "Surface active agents and detergents" Vol I by Schwartz and Perry. As mentioned above if desired, soap derived from saturated or unsaturated fatty acids having, for example having an average of C10 to C18 carbon atoms may also be present.
If present, the detergent active is suitably incorporated at a level of 5 to 40%, preferably 10 to 30% by weight of the final granular detergent product.
A complete detergent composition often contains a detergency builder. Such a builder may be introduced with the solid material and/or added subsequently as desired. The builder may also constitute a neutralising agent, for example sodium carbonate, in which case sufficient material will be employed for both functions.
Generally speaking, the total amount of detergency builder in the granular product is suitably from 5 to 95%, for example from 10 to 80%, preferably from 15 to 65%, more preferably from 15 to 50% by weight.
Inorganic builders that may be present include sodium carbonate, if desired in combination with a crystallisation seed for calcium carbonate as disclosed in GB-A-1 437 950. Any sodium carbonate will need to be in excess of any used to neutralise the anionic acid precursor if the latter is added during the process.
Other suitable builders include crystalline and amorphous aluminosilicates, for example zeolites as disclosed in GB-A-1 473 201; amorphous aluminosilicates as disclosed in GB-A-1 473 202; and mixed crystalline/amorphous aluminosilicates as disclosed in GB 1 470 250; and layered silicates as disclosed in EP-B-164 514. Inorganic phosphate builders, for example, sodium, orthophosphate, pyrophosphate and tripolyphosphate, may also be present, but on environmental grounds those are no longer preferred.
Aluminosilicates, whether used as layering agents and/or incorporated in the bulk of the particles may suitably be present in a total amount of from 10 to 60% and preferably an amount of from 15 to 50% by weight. The zeolite used in most commercial particulate detergent compositions is zeolite A. Advantageously, however, maximum aluminium zeolite P (zeolite MAP) described and claimed in EP-A-384 070 may be used.
Zeolite MAP is an alkali metal aluminosilicated of the P type having a silicon to aluminium ratio not exceeding 1.33, preferably not exceeding 1.15, and more preferably not exceeding 1.07.
Organic builders that may be present include polycarboxylate polymers such as polyacrylates, acrylic/maleic copolymers, and acrylic phosphinates ; monomeric polycarboxylates such as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates, glycerol mono-, di- and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates, carboxymethyloxymalonates , dipicolinates , hydroxyethyliminodiacetates , alkyl- and alkenylmalonates and succinates; and sulphonated fatty acid salts. A copolymer of maleic acid, acrylic acid and vinyl acetate is especially preferred as it is biodegradable and thus environmentally desirable. This list is not intended to be exhaustive.
Especially preferred organic builders are citrates, suitably used in amounts of from 5 to 30%, preferably from 10 to 25% by weight; and acrylic polymers, more especially acrylic/maleic copolymers, suitably used in amounts of from 0.5 to 15%, preferably from 1 to 10% by weight. Citrates can also be used at lower levels (eg 0.1 to 5%) by weight for other purposes. The builder is preferably present in alkali metal salt, especially sodium salt, form. Suitably, the builder system may also comprise a crystalline layered silicate, for example, SKS-6 ex Hoechst, a zeolite, for example, zeolite A and optionally an alkali metal citrate.
The granular composition resulting from the process of the present invention may also comprise a particulate filler (or any other component which does not contribute to the wash process) which suitably comprises an inorganic salt, for example sodium sulphate and sodium chloride. The filler may be present at a level of 5 to 70% by weight of the granular product .
The present invention also encompasses a granular detergent product resulting from the process of the invention (before any post-dosing or the like) . This product will have a bulk density determined by the exact nature of the process. If the process does not involve a pre-mixer to effect partial granulation, a final bulk density of 350-750 g/1 can normally be expected. As mentioned above, use of a pre-mixer enables the final bulk density to be 350-650 g/1 or 550-1300 g/1, respectively, according to whether option (i) or (ii) is utilised. However, granular detergent products resulting from the present invention are also characterised by their particle size ranges. Preferably not more than 10% by weight has a diameter > 1.4 mm and more preferably, not more than 5% by weight of the granules are above this limit. It is also preferred that not more than 20% by weight of the granules have a diameter > 1 mm. Finally, the granules can be distinguished from granules produced by other methods by mercury porosimetry. The latter technique cannot reliably determine the porosity of individual unagglomerated particles but is ideal for characterising the granules. A fully formulated detergent composition produced according to the invention might for example comprise the detergent active and builder and optionally one or more of a flow aid, a filler and other minor ingredients such as colour, perfume, fluorescer, bleaches, enzymes.
The invention will now be illustrated by the following non- limiting examples:
Examples
The following formulation was produced:
Sodium-LAS 24 wt% Sodium-Carbonate 32 wt% STPP 32 wt%
Zeolite 4A 10 wt% water 2 wt%
In examples I to IV, the fluidising air temperature was varied from 20°C to 80°C in the first stage followed by a second stage at 20°C. A Spraying System nozzle SUE25 was used operating with an atomising air pressure of 5 bar.
The following influence on the powder was observed in batch experiments :
*UCT is a measure of stickiness, the higher the value, the more sticky the product. Example I and II are control examples where there was no temperature variation.

Claims

1. A process of forming a granular detergent products, the process comprising, in a gas fluidisation granulator, contacting a fluidised particulate solid material with a spray of liquid binder, whilst fluidising the solids in the granulator with at least one gas stream, wherein the gas temperature is controlled so as to be increased and/or reduced during at least one stage of the process.
2. A process according to claim 1, wherein the gas temperature is controlled so as increase and/or reduce the temperature of the fluidising particulate solid material during at least one stage of the process.
3. A process according to claim 2, wherein the temperature of the fluidising particulate solid material is reduced to below or at ambient during the at least one stage.
4. A process according to claim 2, wherein the temperature of the fluidising particulate solid material is higher during a first stage of the process than during a second stage of the process, after the first stage.
5. A process according to claim 4, wherein the process is a batch process and the temperature change between the first and second stages is made over time.
6. A process according to claim 4, wherein the process is a continuous process and the temperature change between the first and second stages is made along the granulation track.
7. A process according to claim 5, when effected in a plug flow granulator.
8. A process according to any one of claims 4 to 7, wherein the temperature in the first stage is controlled so as to be up to 200┬░C, preferably up to 802C.
9. A process according to any one of claims 4 to 8, wherein the temperature in the second stage is controlled so as to be 30┬░C or less, preferably 252C or less, or 5┬░C or less or -10┬░C or less.
10. A process according to claim 1, wherein the gas temperature is reduced to below or at ambient during the at least one stage.
11. A process according to claim 1, wherein the gas temperature is higher during a first stage of the process than during a second stage of the process, before or after the first stage.
12. A process according to claim 11, wherein the process is a batch process and the temperature change between the first and second stages is made over time.
13. A process according to claim 11, wherein the process is a continuous process and the temperature change between the first and second stages is made along the granulation track.
14. A process according to claim 13, when effected in a plug flow granulator.
15. A process according to any one of claims 11 to 14, wherein the temperature in the first stage is controlled so as to be up to 200SC, preferably up to 80┬░C.
16. A process according to any one of claims 10 to 15, wherein the temperature in the second stage is controlled so as to be 30BC or less, preferably 25CC or less, or 5┬░C or less or -10CC or less.
17. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein the liquid binder comprises an acid precursor of an anionic surfactant and the particulate solids comprise an inorganic alkaline material.
18. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein a first portion of the liquid binder is admixed with a particulate solid starting material in a pre-mixer to form a partially granular solid material and then a second portion of the liquid binder is sprayed to contact the partially granular solid material in the gas fluidisation granulator to effect complete granulation.
19. A granular detergent product produced by a process according to any preceding claim.
EP98933629A 1997-06-16 1998-06-12 Production of detergent granulates Revoked EP0993504B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9712587 1997-06-16
GBGB9712587.6A GB9712587D0 (en) 1997-06-16 1997-06-16 Production of detergent granulates
PCT/EP1998/003669 WO1998058048A1 (en) 1997-06-16 1998-06-12 Production of detergent granulates

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0993504A1 true EP0993504A1 (en) 2000-04-19
EP0993504B1 EP0993504B1 (en) 2002-03-27

Family

ID=10814308

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98933629A Revoked EP0993504B1 (en) 1997-06-16 1998-06-12 Production of detergent granulates

Country Status (18)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0993504B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1170917C (en)
AR (1) AR013093A1 (en)
AU (1) AU725182B2 (en)
BR (1) BR9810165A (en)
CA (1) CA2294287A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69804457T2 (en)
EA (1) EA002160B1 (en)
ES (1) ES2174457T3 (en)
GB (1) GB9712587D0 (en)
HU (1) HUP0003031A3 (en)
ID (1) ID24618A (en)
IN (1) IN189876B (en)
PL (1) PL186896B1 (en)
TR (1) TR199903104T2 (en)
TW (1) TW432108B (en)
WO (1) WO1998058048A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA985194B (en)

Families Citing this family (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB9526097D0 (en) * 1995-12-20 1996-02-21 Unilever Plc Process
GB9712583D0 (en) 1997-06-16 1997-08-20 Unilever Plc Production of detergent granulates
GB9712580D0 (en) * 1997-06-16 1997-08-20 Unilever Plc Production of detergent granulates
GB9713748D0 (en) * 1997-06-27 1997-09-03 Unilever Plc Production of detergent granulates
DE69838293D1 (en) 1997-07-14 2007-10-04 Procter & Gamble METHOD FOR PRODUCING LASER BULK DUST DETERGENT BY CONTROLLING AGGLOMERATION IN A SWABILITY DRYER
US6258773B1 (en) 1997-07-14 2001-07-10 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling agglomeration via particle size
ATE266084T1 (en) 1997-07-15 2004-05-15 Procter & Gamble METHOD FOR PRODUCING HIGHLY CONCENTRATED DETERGENT AGGLOMERATES BY MULTI-STEP INJECTION OF SURFACTANT PASTES
US6440342B1 (en) 1998-07-08 2002-08-27 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making a low density detergent composition by controlling nozzle height in a fluid bed dryer
DE19904657B4 (en) * 1999-02-04 2012-09-20 Glatt Ingenieurtechnik Gmbh Process for the preparation of heavy-duty detergents and heavy-duty detergent components
GB9913544D0 (en) * 1999-06-10 1999-08-11 Unilever Plc Process for preparing granular detergent compositions
GB9913542D0 (en) * 1999-06-10 1999-08-11 Unilever Plc Process for preparing granular detergent compositions
GB9913546D0 (en) 1999-06-10 1999-08-11 Unilever Plc Granular detergent component containing zeolite map and laundry detergent compositions containing it
GB9927653D0 (en) 1999-11-22 2000-01-19 Unilever Plc Process for preparing granular detergent compositions
DE19957036A1 (en) * 1999-11-26 2001-05-31 Henkel Kgaa Production of particulate detergents containing components effective at different pH values involves applying a flowable acidic component onto alkali-containing particles in amount related mathematically to the particle radius
GB0125653D0 (en) 2001-10-25 2001-12-19 Unilever Plc Process for the production of detergent granules
RU2305701C2 (en) 2001-10-25 2007-09-10 Унилевер Нв Method of production of detergent granules

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1341557A (en) * 1970-06-02 1973-12-25
GB2209172A (en) * 1987-08-28 1989-05-04 Unilever Plc Preparation of solid particulate components for detergents
US4919847A (en) * 1988-06-03 1990-04-24 Colgate Palmolive Co. Process for manufacturing particulate detergent composition directly from in situ produced anionic detergent salt
GB9415904D0 (en) * 1994-08-05 1994-09-28 Unilever Plc Process for the production of detergent composition

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9858048A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1998058048A1 (en) 1998-12-23
CN1170917C (en) 2004-10-13
TW432108B (en) 2001-05-01
TR199903104T2 (en) 2000-03-21
EA002160B1 (en) 2001-12-24
DE69804457D1 (en) 2002-05-02
ID24618A (en) 2000-07-27
GB9712587D0 (en) 1997-08-20
ES2174457T3 (en) 2002-11-01
AU8338298A (en) 1999-01-04
AR013093A1 (en) 2000-12-13
AU725182B2 (en) 2000-10-05
EP0993504B1 (en) 2002-03-27
HUP0003031A3 (en) 2003-02-28
IN189876B (en) 2003-05-03
DE69804457T2 (en) 2002-10-17
PL186896B1 (en) 2004-03-31
BR9810165A (en) 2000-08-08
CN1267329A (en) 2000-09-20
PL337431A1 (en) 2000-08-14
EA200000024A1 (en) 2000-06-26
ZA985194B (en) 1999-12-17
CA2294287A1 (en) 1998-12-23
HUP0003031A2 (en) 2001-01-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0993505B1 (en) Production of detergent granulates
AU743892B2 (en) Production of detergent granulates
EP0993506B1 (en) Production of detergent granulates
EP0993504B1 (en) Production of detergent granulates
US7053038B2 (en) Process for the production of detergent granules
US20030060392A1 (en) Process for the production of detergent granules
EP1185607B1 (en) Process for preparing granular detergent compositions
EP1115837B1 (en) Granular detergent compositions having homogenous particles and process for producing same
MXPA99011599A (en) Production of detergent granulates
MXPA00000207A (en) Production of detergent granulates

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19991217

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20010627

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IT

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69804457

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20020502

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2174457

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY

Effective date: 20021223

Opponent name: COGNIS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH & CO. KG

Effective date: 20021223

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBM Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

PLAQ Examination of admissibility of opposition: information related to despatch of communication + time limit deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOPE2

PLAR Examination of admissibility of opposition: information related to receipt of reply deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDOPE4

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY

Effective date: 20021223

Opponent name: COGNIS DEUTSCHLAND GMBH & CO. KG

Effective date: 20021223

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20060620

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20060626

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20060626

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20060630

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20060714

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20060731

Year of fee payment: 9

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20061005