EP0972007B1 - Detergent compositions - Google Patents

Detergent compositions Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0972007B1
EP0972007B1 EP98917084A EP98917084A EP0972007B1 EP 0972007 B1 EP0972007 B1 EP 0972007B1 EP 98917084 A EP98917084 A EP 98917084A EP 98917084 A EP98917084 A EP 98917084A EP 0972007 B1 EP0972007 B1 EP 0972007B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
weight
particles
tablet
water
surfactant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP98917084A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0972007A1 (en
Inventor
Peter William Lever Development Centre APPEL
Jelles Vincent Lever Development Centre BOSKAMP
Henning Lever Development Centre WAGNER
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GBGB9706083.4A external-priority patent/GB9706083D0/en
Priority claimed from GBGB9722345.7A external-priority patent/GB9722345D0/en
Application filed by Unilever PLC, Unilever NV filed Critical Unilever PLC
Publication of EP0972007A1 publication Critical patent/EP0972007A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0972007B1 publication Critical patent/EP0972007B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/0047Detergents in the form of bars or tablets
    • C11D17/0065Solid detergents containing builders
    • C11D17/0073Tablets
    • C11D17/0086Laundry tablets

Definitions

  • This invention relates to detergent compositions in the form of tablets for use in fabric washing.
  • Detergent compositions in tablet form have been described in, for example, GB 911204 (Unilever), US 3953350 (Kao), JP 60-015500A (Lion), and EP-A-711827 (Unilever) and are sold commercially in Spain. Tablets have several advantages over powdered products: they do not require measuring and are thus easier to handle and dispense into the washload, and they are more compact, hence facilitating more economical storage.
  • Such tablets are generally made by compressing or compacting a quantity of detergent composition in particulate form. It is desirable that tablets should have adequate mechanical strength when dry, before use, yet disintegrate and disperse/dissolve quickly when added to wash water. It has not proved simple to achieve both properties simultaneously. As more pressure is used when a tablet is compacted, so the tablet density and strength rise, but the speed of disintegration/dissolution when the tablet comes into contact with wash water goes down.
  • the compression pressure used in the Examples of this document was from 180 to 300 psi (approximately 1.2 to 2.1 MPa). Elsewhere in the document it is proposed that the pressure should not exceed 350 psi (approximately 2.5 MPa) to avoid slow disintegration encountered with higher pressures.
  • Detergent compositions including tablet compositions, frequently contain a mixture of anionic and nonionic organic surfactants. It is often desirable to include both of these types of surfactant, for performance of the composition when washing fabrics.
  • the surfactant is a mixture of non-soap anionic and nonionic detergent surfactants (preferably accompanied by soap) where both are present in significant amounts, but anionic is in the majority.
  • the balance of the composition should then contain material, other than organic surfactant, which is water soluble. This approach to formulation is applied to the composition of a whole tablet.
  • a detergent tablet of compressed particulate composition wherein the tablet comprises organic surfactant and water-soluble detergency builder, characterised in that the tablet contains from 30 to 65% by weight (of the tablet) of particles which contain from 25 to 80% by weight (of these particles) of water-soluble detergency builder and from 20 to 50% by weight (of these particles) of non-soap organic surfactant which is anionic and nonionic surfactants in a ratio from 5:1 to 1.5:1 and in that in addition to said particles the tablet contains at least 15% by weight (of the tablet) of substance which is other than soap or organic surfactant and which has a solubility in water of at least 10gm/litre at 20°C.
  • surfactant as a binder material in the part of the composition outside the surfactant-rich particles. Excluding it from this part of the composition is advantageous, to avoid interference with the prompt dissolution of this part of the composition.
  • the weight of the non-soap anionic surfactant in the particles is at least 1.7 times the weight of the nonionic surfactant in them. More preferably, this weight ratio of anionic surfactant to nonionic surfactant lies in a range from 2:1 up to 5:1, and more preferably from 2:1 to 4:1. Preferably these particles contain at least 80% by weight better at least 90% or even 95% of all the organic surfactant (including any soap) in the tablet.
  • the water-soluble material which is present in the composition, externally to the surfactant-rich particles preferably comprises from 15 to 40% (better 16 or even 25% up to 35%) by weight (of the tablet) of one or more materials selected from
  • the water-soluble material which is present in the composition, externally to the surfactant-rich particles is present as particles which are substantially free of surfactant, i.e. contain no more than 5% of their own weight of organic surfactant.
  • a preferred form of this invention provides a detergent tablet of compressed particulate composition containing
  • this invention provides a detergent tablet of compressed particulate composition wherein the tablet comprises particles which contain non-soap anionic surfactant, nonionic surfactant, preferably soap and other water-soluble ingredients, characterised in that the particles contain at least 20 wt% in total of the anionic and nonionic surfactants and in that a test tablet consisting of the said non-soap anionic surfactant, nonionic surfactant, and any soap in the same proportions, together with 15% by weight moisture has a breaking strength as herein defined of at least 0.4 MPa and a modulus as herein defined of not more than 10 MPa preferably not more than 8 MPa.
  • this invention provides the use of particles containing a mixture of non-soap anionic and nonionic surfactants and detergency builder, where the concentration by weight of non-soap anionic surfactant is at least 1.5 times as great as the concentration by weight of nonionic surfactant and the total concentration of these surfactants is at least 20 wt% of the particles to provide improvements in tablet strength and elasticity versus speed of disintegration.
  • the tablet of the invention is homogeneous.
  • the term “homogeneous” is used to mean a tablet produced by compaction of a single particulate composition, but does not imply that all the particles of that composition will necessarily be of identical composition.
  • the term “heterogeneous” is used to mean a tablet consisting of a plurality of discrete regions, for example layers, inserts or coatings, each derived by compaction from a particulate composition.
  • a graph of force (F) against displacement (x) has the form illustrated by Fig 2.
  • the maximum force is the force at failure (F f ).
  • the force at failure divided by the area of a diametral plane through the tablet is the breaking strength, with units of Pascals.
  • the break energy is the area under the graph of force against displacement, up to the point of break. It is shown shaded in Fig 2 and is given by the equation: where E b is the break energy in joules, x is the displacement in metres, F is the applied force in Newtons at displacement x and x f is the displacement at failure.
  • the displacement at failure relative to the tablet diameter is the relative displacement x f /y.
  • Breaking strength divided by relative displacement is a modulus, whose value is inverse to tablet elasticity.
  • anionic surfactants are well known to those skilled in the art.
  • the anionic surfactant may comprise, wholly or predominantly, linear alkyl benzene sulphonate of the formula where R is linear alkyl of 8 to 15 carbon atoms and M + is a solubilising cation, especially sodium.
  • Primary alkyl sulphate having the formula ROSO 3 - M + in which R is an alkyl or alkenyl chain of 8 to 18 carbon atoms especially 10 to 14 carbon atoms and M + is a solubilising cation, is also commercially significant as an anionic surfactant and may be used in this invention.
  • such linear alkyl benzene sulphonate or primary alkyl sulphate of the formula above, or a mixture thereof will be the desired non-soap anionic surfactant and may provide 75 to 100wt% of any anionic non-soap surfactant in the composition.
  • non-soap anionic surfactants examples include olefin sulphonates; alkane sulphonates; dialkyl sulphosuccinates; and fatty acid ester sulphonates.
  • One or more soaps of fatty acids may also be included in addition to the required non-soap anionic surfactant.
  • Examples are sodium soaps derived from the fatty acids from coconut oil, beef tallow, sunflower or hardened rapeseed oil. These may be formed by adding fatty acid and a base such as sodium carbonate to a slurry which is spray-dried to form the surfactant-rich base particles.
  • Nonionic surfactant compounds include in particular the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide.
  • Nonionic surfactant compounds are alkyl (C 8-22 ) phenol-ethylene oxide condensates, the condensation products of linear or branched aliphatic C 8-20 primary or secondary alcohols with ethylene oxide, and products made by condensation of ethylene oxide with the reaction products of propylene oxide and ethylene-diamine.
  • the primary and secondary alcohol ethoxylates especially the C 9-11 and C 12-15 primary and secondary alcohols ethoxylated with an average of from 3 to 20 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
  • composition which is compacted to form tablets includes water-soluble detergency builder.
  • Water-soluble phosphorous-containing inorganic detergency builders include the alkali-metal orthophosphates, metaphosphates, pyrophosphates and polyphosphates. Specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders include sodium and potassium tripolyphosphates, orthophosphates and hexametaphosphates.
  • Non-phosphorous water-soluble builders may be organic or inorganic.
  • Inorganic builders that may be present include alkali metal (generally sodium) carbonate; while organic builders include polycarboxylate polymers, such as polyacrylates and acrylic/maleic copolymers, monomeric polycarboxylates such as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates, glycerol mono- di- and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates, carboxymethyloxymalonates, dipicolinates and hydroxyethyliminodiacetates.
  • alkali metal generally sodium
  • organic builders include polycarboxylate polymers, such as polyacrylates and acrylic/maleic copolymers, monomeric polycarboxylates such as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates, glycerol mono- di- and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates, carboxymethyloxymalonates, dipicolinates and hydroxyethyliminodiacetate
  • Tablet compositions preferably include polycarboxylate polymers, more especially polyacrylates and acrylic/maleic copolymers which can function as builders and also inhibit unwanted deposition onto fabric from the wash liquor.
  • a tablet in accordance with this invention will contain overall from 2 or 5wt% up to 40 or 50wt% non-soap surfactant, and from 5 or 10wt% up to 60 or 80wt% detergency builder.
  • the concentration of non-soap anionic surfactant in the tablet will generally be at least one and a half times the concentration of nonionic surfactant. It is preferably at least 3% by weight of the tablet, e.g. from 3wt% up to 30 or 40wt%.
  • the concentration of nonionic surfactant is preferably at least 2% by weight of the tablet, such as 2 to 15wt% of the tablet.
  • the quantity of soap in the tablet is preferably from 0.1 or 0.2 up to 1% or 2% by weight of the tablet. Higher proportions such as up to 4% are less preferred.
  • anionic non-soap surfactant, nonionic surfactant water-soluble detergency builder and other materials which preferably include soap are made into particles such that the non-soap surfactant provides from 20 to 50% of the weight of these particles.
  • the non-soap surfactant provides at least 22% or 24% of the weight of these particles, and more preferably at least 28%, desirably up to 45% of their weight.
  • soap is desirably from 0.2 to 2%, and possibly more, up to 3% or 4% by weight of these particles, and in these particles the weight ratio of nonionic detergent to soap is preferably from 5:1 better 10:1 to 30:1.
  • Such particles may be made by spray drying, or by a granulation process.
  • they Preferably they contain water-soluble detergency builder in an amount which is from 30 to 80% of the weight of these particles, better 30 or 40 up to 60% of the weight of these particles.
  • the surfactant mixture used in these particles can be tested mechanically in directly analogous manner to the testing of tablets, discussed above. To do this a mixture of the non-soap surfactants and any soap is made on a small scale, and cast into cylindrical form or some other shape from which a cylinder can be cut. If necessary this is dried to reduce the water content to 15% by weight (approximating to 5% moisture in the particles which contain this surfactant mixture). Next, it is tested on a materials testing machine in the manner described above for testing of tablets. This mechanical testing procedure can also be applied to tablets made from the surfactant-rich particles alone.
  • anionic surfactant in these particles is to enhance elasticity without much effect on magnitude of the force to cause fracture.
  • Nonionic surfactant tends to have some opposite effect. Soap when present, cooperates with the nonionic surfactant to reduce mobility of the nonionic surfactant and to increase tablet strength (as measured by force to cause failure).
  • anionic non-soap surfactant nonionic surfactant and preferably soap we have found that it is possible to achieve adequate strength and elasticity of a test tablet which in turn signifies that the same mixture will give tablets with good strength and elasticity.
  • Breaking strength is desirably at least 0.04MPa preferably at least 0.05MPa.
  • the modulus is desirably no more than 10 MPa preferably no more than 8 or even 5 MPa.
  • a tablet of this invention contains water-soluble material which serves to promote disintegration.
  • this is provided as particles which are substantially free of organic surfactant.
  • the said particles which promote disintegration are particles containing sodium tripolyphosphate with more than 50% of it (by weight of the particles) in the anhydrous phase I form.
  • phase II which is the low temperature form
  • phase I which is stable at high temperature.
  • the conversion of phase II to phase I proceeds fairly rapidly on heating above the transition temperature, which is about 420°C but the reverse reaction is slow. Consequently phase I sodium tripolyphosphate is metastable at ambient temperature.
  • phase I form of sodium tripolyphosphate will often contain the phase I form of sodium tripolyphosphate as at least 55% by weight of the tripolyphosphate in the particles.
  • Other forms of sodium tripolyphosphate will usually be present to a lesser extent.
  • Other salts may be included in the particles, although that is not preferred.
  • a further preference is that the sodium tripolyphosphate is partially hydrated. The extent of hydration should be at least 1% by weight of the sodium tripolyphosphate in the particles. It may lie in a range from 2.5 to 4%, or it may be higher.
  • Suitable material is commercially available. Suppliers include Rhone-Poulenc, France and Albright & Wilson, UK.
  • Rhodiaphos HPA 3.5 from Rhone-Poulenc has been found particularly suitable. It is a characteristic of this grade of sodium tripolyphosphate that it hydrates very rapidly in a standard Olten test. We have found that it hydrates as quickly as anhydrous sodium tripolyphosphate, yet the prehydration appears to be beneficial in avoiding unwanted crystallisation of the hexahydrate when the material comes into contact with water at the time of use.
  • these disintegration-promoting particles contain at least 50% of their own weight, better at least 80%, of a material which has a solubility in deionised water at 20°C of at least 50 grams per 100 grams of water.
  • the said particles may provide material of such solubility in an amount which is at least 7 wt% or 12 wt% of the whole composition of the tablet.
  • a solubility of at least 50 grams per 100 grams of water at 20°C is an exceptionally high solubility: many materials which are classified as water soluble are less soluble than this.
  • this highly water soluble material is incorporated as particles of the material in a substantially pure form (i.e. each such particle contains over 95% by weight of the material).
  • the said particles may contain material of such solubility in a mixture with other material, provided that material of the specified solubility provides at least 50% by weight of these particles.
  • Detergent tablets according to the invention may contain a bleach system.
  • This preferably comprises one or more peroxy bleach compounds, for example, inorganic persalts or organic peroxyacids, which may be employed in conjunction with activators to improve bleaching action at low wash temperatures. If any peroxygen compound is present, the amount is likely to lie in a range from 10 to 25% by weight of the tablet.
  • Preferred inorganic persalts are sodium perborate monohydrate and tetrahydrate, and sodium percarbonate.
  • Bleach activators have been widely disclosed in the art. Preferred examples include peracetic acid precursors, for example tetraacetylethylene diamine (TAED), and perbenzoic acid precursors.
  • TAED tetraacetylethylene diamine
  • the quaternary ammonium and phosphonium bleach activators disclosed in US 4751015 and US 4818426 (Lever Brothers Company) are also of interest.
  • Another type of bleach activator which may be used, but which is not a bleach precursor is a transition metal catalyst as disclosed in EP-A-458397, EP-A-458398 and EP-A-549272.
  • a bleach system may also include a bleach stabiliser (heavy metal sequestrant) such as ethylenediamine tetramethylene phosphonate and diethylenetriamine pentamethylene phosphonate.
  • Bleach activator is usually present in an amount from 1 to 10% by weight of the tablet, possibly less in the case of a transition metal catalyst which may be used as 0.1% or more by weight of the tablet.
  • the detergent tablets of the invention may also contain one of the detergency enzymes well known in the art for their ability to degrade various soils and stains and so aid in their removal. Suitable enzymes include the various proteases, cellulases, lipases, amylases, and mixtures thereof, which are designed to remove a variety of soils and stains from fabrics. Detergency enzymes are commonly employed in the form of granules or marumes, optionally with a protective coating, in amount of from about 0.1% to about 3.0% by weight of the tablet.
  • the detergent tablets of the invention may also contain a fluorescer (optical brightener), for example, Tinopal (Trade Mark) DMS or Tinopal CBS available from Ciba-Geigy AG, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Tinopal DMS is disodium 4,4'bis-(2-morpholino-4-anilino-s-triazin-6-ylamino) stilbene disulphonate
  • Tinopal CBS is disodium 2,2'-bis-(phenyl-styryl) disulphonate.
  • Antifoam material is advantageously included, especially if a detergent tablet is primarily intended for use in front-loading drum-type automatic washing machines.
  • Antifoam materials in granular form are described in EP 266863A (Unilever).
  • Such antifoam granules typically comprise a mixture of silicone oil, petroleum jelly, hydrophobic silica and alkyl phosphate as antifoam active material, sorbed onto a porous absorbed water-soluble carbonate-based inorganic carrier material.
  • a detergent tablet of the invention includes an amount of an alkali metal silicate, particularly sodium ortho-, meta- or disilicate.
  • an alkali metal silicate particularly sodium ortho-, meta- or disilicate.
  • the presence of such alkali metal silicates may be advantageous in providing protection against the corrosion of metal parts in washing machines, besides providing some detergency building.
  • the surfactant-rich particles contain from 5 to 15% silicate by weight of the particles. This improves the strength and free flow of these particles prior to tabletting.
  • compositions which can optionally be employed in fabric washing detergent tablet of the invention include anti-redeposition agents such as sodium carboxymethylcellulose, straight-chain polyvinyl pyrrolidone and the cellulose ethers such as methyl cellulose and ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, fabric-softening agents; heavy metal sequestrants such as EDTA; perfumes; and colorants or coloured speckles.
  • anti-redeposition agents such as sodium carboxymethylcellulose, straight-chain polyvinyl pyrrolidone and the cellulose ethers such as methyl cellulose and ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, fabric-softening agents
  • heavy metal sequestrants such as EDTA
  • perfumes and colorants or coloured speckles.
  • a detergent tablet of this invention is a matrix of compacted particles.
  • the particulate composition has an average particle size before compaction in the range from 200 to 2000 ⁇ m, more preferably from 250 to 1400 ⁇ m. Fine particles, smaller than 180 ⁇ m or 200 ⁇ m may be eliminated by sieving before tableting, if desired, although we have observed that this is not always essential.
  • the starting particulate composition may in principle have any bulk density
  • the present invention is especially relevant to tablets made by compacting powders of relatively high bulk density, because of their greater tendency to exhibit disintegration and dispersion problems.
  • Such tablets have the advantage that, as compared with a tablet derived from a low bulk density powder, a given dose of composition can be presented as a smaller tablet.
  • the starting particulate composition may suitably have a bulk density of at least 400 g/litre, preferably at least 550 g/litre, and perhaps at least 600 g/litre.
  • Granular detergent compositions of high bulk density prepared by granulation and densification in a high-speed mixer/granulator, as described and claimed in EP 340013A (Unilever), EP 352135A (Unilever), and EP 425277A (Unilever), or by the continuous granulation/densification processes described and claimed in EP 367339A (Unilever) and EP 390251A (Unilever), are inherently suitable for use in the present invention.
  • Tableting entails compaction of the particulate composition.
  • a variety of tableting machinery is known, and can be used. Generally it will function by stamping a quantity of the particulate composition which is confined in a die.
  • Tableting may be carried out without application of heat, so as to take place at ambient temperature or at a temperature above ambient.
  • the particulate composition is preferably supplied to the tableting machinery at an elevated temperature. This will of course supply heat to the tableting machinery, but the machinery may be heated in some other way also.
  • any heat is supplied, it is envisaged that this will be supplied conventionally, such as by passing the particulate composition through an oven, rather than by any application of microwave energy.
  • the size of a tablet will suitably range from 10 to 160 grams, preferably from 15 to 60 g, depending on the conditions of intended use, and whether it represents a dose for an average load in a fabric washing or dishwashing machine or a fractional part of such a dose.
  • the tablets may be of any shape. However, for ease of packaging they are preferably blocks of substantially uniform cross-section, such as cylinders or cuboids.
  • the overall density of a tablet preferably lies in a range from 1040 or 1050gm/litre up to 1300gm/litre. The tablet density may well lie in a range up to no more than 1250 or even 1200gm/litre.
  • Tablets for use in fabric washing were made, starting with spray-dried base powders of the following compositions: Ingredient Parts by Weight A B C Sodium linear alkylbenzene sulphonate 6.4 9.6 11.0 C 13-15 fatty alcohol 7EO 4.3 1.1 2.4 C 13-15 fatty alcohol 3EO 3.2 3.2 2.3 Sodium tripolyphosphate 24.3 24.3 18.0 Sodium silicate 6.4 5.9 4.0 Soap 0.3 0.3 0.21 Acrylate/maleate copolymer 1.2 1.2 1.5 Sodium sulphate, moisture and minor ingredients balance to 60 balance to 55 balance to 45;
  • Particulate compositions were made by mixing this powder with other ingredients as tabulated below. These included particles of sodium tripolyphosphate specified to contain 70% phase I form and contain 3.5% water of hydration (Rhodia-Phos HPA 3.5 available from Rhone-Poulenc).
  • compositions contained the following percentages by weight: Ingredient % by weight Ex 1 Ex2 Ex 3 Base powder A 60 Base powder B 55 Base powder C 45 Sodium percarbonate granules 14 15 15 TAED granules 3.4 3.4 3.4 Anti-foam granules 1.2 1.2 3.2 Perfume, enzymes and other minor ingredients 1.4 2.2 3.5 Rhodiaphos HPA3.5 tripolyphosphate 20 20 30 Sodium carbonate - 3.2 -
  • each composition 40g portions of each composition were made into cylindrical tablets of 44 mm diameter, using a Carver hand press, with sufficient applied pressure to produce tablets which dissolved to 90% of complete dissolution within approximately equal times not exceeding four minutes, in water at 20°C. Applied forces in a range from 2 to 4 kN have usually been found to be enough when using this hand press.
  • the force at fracture was measured and also the displacement at fracture.
  • the break energy which as explained above is the area under a force-over-displacement graph up to failure, was calculated.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)

Description

  • This invention relates to detergent compositions in the form of tablets for use in fabric washing.
  • Detergent compositions in tablet form have been described in, for example, GB 911204 (Unilever), US 3953350 (Kao), JP 60-015500A (Lion), and EP-A-711827 (Unilever) and are sold commercially in Spain. Tablets have several advantages over powdered products: they do not require measuring and are thus easier to handle and dispense into the washload, and they are more compact, hence facilitating more economical storage.
  • Such tablets are generally made by compressing or compacting a quantity of detergent composition in particulate form. It is desirable that tablets should have adequate mechanical strength when dry, before use, yet disintegrate and disperse/dissolve quickly when added to wash water. It has not proved simple to achieve both properties simultaneously. As more pressure is used when a tablet is compacted, so the tablet density and strength rise, but the speed of disintegration/dissolution when the tablet comes into contact with wash water goes down.
  • During the period from about 1960 to 1970 there was considerable research activity in connection with tablets for use in fabric washing. A number of patents were published by major detergent manufacturers. Detergent tablets were sold commercially in USA and some European countries.
  • However, tablets disappeared from the market place in nearly all countries (Spain is the apparent exception) even though tablets have apparent advantages and have become known as a product form for machine dishwashing compositions which are characterised by a low content of organic surfactant.
  • US-A-3018267 (Procter & Gamble) taught that the force, and hence pressure, applied when compacting a composition into tablets should be limited, or else the tablets would take too long to dissolve.
  • The compression pressure used in the Examples of this document was from 180 to 300 psi (approximately 1.2 to 2.1 MPa). Elsewhere in the document it is proposed that the pressure should not exceed 350 psi (approximately 2.5 MPa) to avoid slow disintegration encountered with higher pressures.
  • A number of proposals have been put forward as ways to improve the compromise between conflicting desiderata, but there still remains a desire to improve tablet strength without loss of speed of disintegration and vice versa.
  • Some documents have proposed surface treatments or coatings to enhance tablet strength. For instance US-A-3451928 (Colgate) stated that the problem of strength versus speed of dissolution remained unsolved, and proposed a treatment of spraying on water, followed by flash heating.
    US-A-3324038 (Procter) proposed the application of a coating containing urea.
  • It is known to include materials whose function is to enhance disintegration of tablets when placed in wash water. Some tablets which are sold commercially incorporate urea for this purpose. Urea has a very high solubility in water exceeding 100gms per 100ml water at 20°C. EP-A-711827 teaches the use of sodium citrate for the same purpose.
  • Detergent compositions, including tablet compositions, frequently contain a mixture of anionic and nonionic organic surfactants. It is often desirable to include both of these types of surfactant, for performance of the composition when washing fabrics.
  • We have now found that an improved compromise between tablet strength and speed of disintegration can be achieved by following certain principles concerning tablet formulation and manufacture.
  • At the same time it is possible to incorporate materials which are desired to give good washing performance, and it is possible to formulate component ingredients of the tablet so that they are satisfactory in handling during tablet manufacture.
  • Also, we have found that two different measures of tablet strength are relevant to properties observed by a consumer. Force to cause fracture is a direct assessment of strength and indicates the tablets' resistance to breakage when handled by a consumer at the time of use. The amount of energy (or mechanical work) put in prior to fracture is a measure of tablet deformability and is relevant to the tablets' resistance to breakage during transport.
  • Both properties are relevant to consumers' perception of tablets: consumers will want tablets to be strong enough to handle, to reach them intact, and to disintegrate quickly and fully at the time of use. By following this invention's principles as to formulation, it is possible to achieve a good combination of these properties.
  • In this invention, we have found it desirable to incorporate most (if not all) of the surfactants in particles which constitute a substantial part but by no means all the composition of a tablet. The organic surfactant in these particles provides a substantial part, but again by no means all, of their weight.
  • Secondly, it is desirable that the surfactant is a mixture of non-soap anionic and nonionic detergent surfactants (preferably accompanied by soap) where both are present in significant amounts, but anionic is in the majority. Thirdly, the balance of the composition should then contain material, other than organic surfactant, which is water soluble. This approach to formulation is applied to the composition of a whole tablet.
  • So, according to a first aspect of this invention, there is provided a detergent tablet of compressed particulate composition wherein the tablet comprises organic surfactant and water-soluble detergency builder, characterised in that the tablet contains from 30 to 65% by weight (of the tablet) of particles which contain from 25 to 80% by weight (of these particles) of water-soluble detergency builder and from 20 to 50% by weight (of these particles) of non-soap organic surfactant which is anionic and nonionic surfactants in a ratio from 5:1 to 1.5:1 and in that in addition to said particles the tablet contains at least 15% by weight (of the tablet) of substance which is other than soap or organic surfactant and which has a solubility in water of at least 10gm/litre at 20°C.
  • We believe that concentrating most or all of the surfactant into surfactant-rich particles, and using a substantial proportion of anionic surfactant is beneficial in providing tablets which have both strength and elasticity, while allowing the remainder of the tablet composition to contain a substantial proportion of water-soluble material which assists disintegration of the tablets at the time of use.
  • It is not necessary to include surfactant as a binder material in the part of the composition outside the surfactant-rich particles. Excluding it from this part of the composition is advantageous, to avoid interference with the prompt dissolution of this part of the composition.
  • So, it is preferred that the weight of the non-soap anionic surfactant in the particles is at least 1.7 times the weight of the nonionic surfactant in them. More preferably, this weight ratio of anionic surfactant to nonionic surfactant lies in a range from 2:1 up to 5:1, and more preferably from 2:1 to 4:1. Preferably these particles contain at least 80% by weight better at least 90% or even 95% of all the organic surfactant (including any soap) in the tablet.
  • The water-soluble material which is present in the composition, externally to the surfactant-rich particles, preferably comprises from 15 to 40% (better 16 or even 25% up to 35%) by weight (of the tablet) of one or more materials selected from
    • compounds with a water-solubility exceeding 50 grams per 100 grams water;
    • sodium tripolyphosphate containing at least 50% of its own weight of the phase I anhydrous form, and preferably partially hydrated so as to contain water of hydration in an amount which is at least 1% by weight of the sodium tripolyphosphate;
    • mixtures thereof.
  • It is strongly preferred that the water-soluble material which is present in the composition, externally to the surfactant-rich particles, is present as particles which are substantially free of surfactant, i.e. contain no more than 5% of their own weight of organic surfactant.
  • A preferred form of this invention provides a detergent tablet of compressed particulate composition containing
  • (i) from 35 to 60 wt% (and probably from 41 to 53, 56 or 60wt%) of particles which contain non-soap anionic surfactant, nonionic surfactant and water-soluble detergency builder,
  • (ii) from 15 to 40 wt%( and probably from 16 or 1.7 to 35 wt%) of particles which are substantially free of surfactant, i.e. contain at least 95% of their own weight of water soluble material but contain no more than 5% of their own weight of organic surfactant, and
  • (iii) from 0 to 50 wt% of further particulate ingredients,
  • wherein the first said particles (i) contain at least 20% preferably at least 24% of their own weight of non-soap surfactant and the weight of anionic surfactant therein is from 1.5 to 5 times the weight of nonionic surfactant therein.
  • In another aspect, this invention provides a detergent tablet of compressed particulate composition wherein the tablet comprises particles which contain non-soap anionic surfactant, nonionic surfactant, preferably soap and other water-soluble ingredients, characterised in that the particles contain at least 20 wt% in total of the anionic and nonionic surfactants and in that a test tablet consisting of the said non-soap anionic surfactant, nonionic surfactant, and any soap in the same proportions, together with 15% by weight moisture has a breaking strength as herein defined of at least 0.4 MPa and a modulus as herein defined of not more than 10 MPa preferably not more than 8 MPa.
  • In a yet further aspect, this invention provides the use of particles containing a mixture of non-soap anionic and nonionic surfactants and detergency builder, where the concentration by weight of non-soap anionic surfactant is at least 1.5 times as great as the concentration by weight of nonionic surfactant and the total concentration of these surfactants is at least 20 wt% of the particles to provide improvements in tablet strength and elasticity versus speed of disintegration.
  • The tablet of the invention is homogeneous. In the present specification, the term "homogeneous" is used to mean a tablet produced by compaction of a single particulate composition, but does not imply that all the particles of that composition will necessarily be of identical composition. The term "heterogeneous" is used to mean a tablet consisting of a plurality of discrete regions, for example layers, inserts or coatings, each derived by compaction from a particulate composition.
  • Drawings
  • The accompanying drawings diagrammatically illustrate the testing of a cylindrical tablet:
  • Fig 1a shows a tablet when first contacted by the platens of a materials testing machine,
  • Fig 1b shows the tablet at the point of failure,
  • Fig 2 diagrammatically illustrates the form of a graph obtained during testing.
  • Tablet testing
  • We have tested the speed of disintegration of tablets by means of a test procedure in which a tablet was placed on a plastic sieve with 2mm mesh size which is immersed in 9 litres of demineralised water at ambient temperature of 20°C. The water conductivity is monitored until it reached a constant value. The time for dissolution of the tablets is taken as the time (T90) for change in the water conductivity to reach 90% of its final magnitude.
  • We have tested tablet strength by a procedure illustrated by the accompanying drawings in which a cylindrical tablet 10 is compressed radially between the platens 12,14 of a materials testing machine until the tablet fractures. At the starting position shown in Fig 1a, the platens 12, 14 contact the tablet but do not apply force to it. Force is applied, as indicated by the arrows 16 to compress the tablet. The testing machine measures the applied force (F), and also the displacement (x) of the platens towards each other as the tablet is compressed. The distance (y) between the platens before force is applied, which is the diameter of the tablet, is also known. At failure, illustrated in Fig 1b the tablet cracks (eg as shown at 18) and the applied force needed to maintain the displacement drops. Measurement is discontinued when the applied force needed to maintain the displacement has dropped by 25% from its maximum value (indicated as point D in Fig 2 below).
  • A graph of force (F) against displacement (x) has the form illustrated by Fig 2. The maximum force is the force at failure (Ff). From this measurement of force a test parameter called diametral fracture stress, which we have used in the past, can be calculated using the equation σ = 2Ff πDt where σ is the diametral fracture stress in Pascals, Ff is the applied force in Newtons to cause fracture, D is the tablet diameter in metres and t is the tablet thickness in metres.
  • The force at failure divided by the area of a diametral plane through the tablet (approximately the area of the crack 18) is the breaking strength, with units of Pascals.
  • The break energy is the area under the graph of force against displacement, up to the point of break. It is shown shaded in Fig 2 and is given by the equation:
    Figure 00120001
    where Eb is the break energy in joules,
    x is the displacement in metres,
    F is the applied force in Newtons at displacement x and
    xf is the displacement at failure.
  • The displacement at failure relative to the tablet diameter is the relative displacement xf/y.
  • Breaking strength divided by relative displacement is a modulus, whose value is inverse to tablet elasticity.
  • Materials and other features
  • Materials which may be used in tablets of this invention will now be discussed in more detail.
  • Anionic Surfactant Compounds
  • Synthetic (i.e. non-soap) anionic surfactants are well known to those skilled in the art. The anionic surfactant may comprise, wholly or predominantly, linear alkyl benzene sulphonate of the formula
    Figure 00130001
    where R is linear alkyl of 8 to 15 carbon atoms and M+ is a solubilising cation, especially sodium.
  • Primary alkyl sulphate having the formula ROSO3 - M+ in which R is an alkyl or alkenyl chain of 8 to 18 carbon atoms especially 10 to 14 carbon atoms and M+ is a solubilising cation, is also commercially significant as an anionic surfactant and may be used in this invention.
  • Frequently, such linear alkyl benzene sulphonate or primary alkyl sulphate of the formula above, or a mixture thereof will be the desired non-soap anionic surfactant and may provide 75 to 100wt% of any anionic non-soap surfactant in the composition.
  • Examples of other non-soap anionic surfactants include olefin sulphonates; alkane sulphonates; dialkyl sulphosuccinates; and fatty acid ester sulphonates.
  • One or more soaps of fatty acids may also be included in addition to the required non-soap anionic surfactant. Examples are sodium soaps derived from the fatty acids from coconut oil, beef tallow, sunflower or hardened rapeseed oil. These may be formed by adding fatty acid and a base such as sodium carbonate to a slurry which is spray-dried to form the surfactant-rich base particles.
  • Nonionic surfactant compounds
  • Nonionic surfactant compounds include in particular the reaction products of compounds having a hydrophobic group and a reactive hydrogen atom, for example, aliphatic alcohols, acids, amides or alkyl phenols with alkylene oxides, especially ethylene oxide.
  • Specific nonionic surfactant compounds are alkyl (C8-22) phenol-ethylene oxide condensates, the condensation products of linear or branched aliphatic C8-20 primary or secondary alcohols with ethylene oxide, and products made by condensation of ethylene oxide with the reaction products of propylene oxide and ethylene-diamine.
  • Especially preferred are the primary and secondary alcohol ethoxylates, especially the C9-11 and C12-15 primary and secondary alcohols ethoxylated with an average of from 3 to 20 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
  • Detergency Builder
  • The composition which is compacted to form tablets includes water-soluble detergency builder.
  • Water-soluble phosphorous-containing inorganic detergency builders include the alkali-metal orthophosphates, metaphosphates, pyrophosphates and polyphosphates. Specific examples of inorganic phosphate builders include sodium and potassium tripolyphosphates, orthophosphates and hexametaphosphates.
  • Non-phosphorous water-soluble builders may be organic or inorganic. Inorganic builders that may be present include alkali metal (generally sodium) carbonate; while organic builders include polycarboxylate polymers, such as polyacrylates and acrylic/maleic copolymers, monomeric polycarboxylates such as citrates, gluconates, oxydisuccinates, glycerol mono- di- and trisuccinates, carboxymethyloxysuccinates, carboxymethyloxymalonates, dipicolinates and hydroxyethyliminodiacetates.
  • Tablet compositions preferably include polycarboxylate polymers, more especially polyacrylates and acrylic/maleic copolymers which can function as builders and also inhibit unwanted deposition onto fabric from the wash liquor.
  • Proportions
  • Generally, a tablet in accordance with this invention will contain overall from 2 or 5wt% up to 40 or 50wt% non-soap surfactant, and from 5 or 10wt% up to 60 or 80wt% detergency builder.
  • The concentration of non-soap anionic surfactant in the tablet will generally be at least one and a half times the concentration of nonionic surfactant. It is preferably at least 3% by weight of the tablet, e.g. from 3wt% up to 30 or 40wt%. The concentration of nonionic surfactant is preferably at least 2% by weight of the tablet, such as 2 to 15wt% of the tablet.
  • The quantity of soap in the tablet is preferably from 0.1 or 0.2 up to 1% or 2% by weight of the tablet. Higher proportions such as up to 4% are less preferred.
  • In accordance with this invention, anionic non-soap surfactant, nonionic surfactant water-soluble detergency builder and other materials which preferably include soap are made into particles such that the non-soap surfactant provides from 20 to 50% of the weight of these particles. Preferably the non-soap surfactant provides at least 22% or 24% of the weight of these particles, and more preferably at least 28%, desirably up to 45% of their weight. When soap is present, it is desirably from 0.2 to 2%, and possibly more, up to 3% or 4% by weight of these particles, and in these particles the weight ratio of nonionic detergent to soap is preferably from 5:1 better 10:1 to 30:1.
  • Such particles may be made by spray drying, or by a granulation process. Preferably they contain water-soluble detergency builder in an amount which is from 30 to 80% of the weight of these particles, better 30 or 40 up to 60% of the weight of these particles.
  • The surfactant mixture used in these particles can be tested mechanically in directly analogous manner to the testing of tablets, discussed above. To do this a mixture of the non-soap surfactants and any soap is made on a small scale, and cast into cylindrical form or some other shape from which a cylinder can be cut. If necessary this is dried to reduce the water content to 15% by weight (approximating to 5% moisture in the particles which contain this surfactant mixture). Next, it is tested on a materials testing machine in the manner described above for testing of tablets. This mechanical testing procedure can also be applied to tablets made from the surfactant-rich particles alone.
  • We have found that the effect of anionic surfactant in these particles is to enhance elasticity without much effect on magnitude of the force to cause fracture. Nonionic surfactant tends to have some opposite effect. Soap when present, cooperates with the nonionic surfactant to reduce mobility of the nonionic surfactant and to increase tablet strength (as measured by force to cause failure).
  • By using sufficient quantities of anionic non-soap surfactant, nonionic surfactant and preferably soap we have found that it is possible to achieve adequate strength and elasticity of a test tablet which in turn signifies that the same mixture will give tablets with good strength and elasticity.
  • Breaking strength is desirably at least 0.04MPa preferably at least 0.05MPa. The modulus is desirably no more than 10 MPa preferably no more than 8 or even 5 MPa.
  • We have observed that a mixture of alkylbenzene sulphonate and nonionic surfactant in ratio 1.16:1 gave a modulus of about 15 MPa but when the proportions were changed to 2.2:1 (in accordance with this invention) the modulus dropped dramatically to about 4.0 to 4.5 MPa, indicating greater elasticity, with very little change in force at failure.
  • Disintegration-promoting particles
  • In addition to the required particles containing surfactants and builder, a tablet of this invention contains water-soluble material which serves to promote disintegration. Preferably this is provided as particles which are substantially free of organic surfactant.
  • One preferred possibility is that the said particles which promote disintegration are particles containing sodium tripolyphosphate with more than 50% of it (by weight of the particles) in the anhydrous phase I form.
  • Sodium tripolyphosphate is very well known as a sequestering builder in detergent compositions. It exists in a hydrated form and two crystalline anhydrous forms. These are the normal crystalline anhydrous form, known as phase II which is the low temperature form, and phase I which is stable at high temperature. The conversion of phase II to phase I proceeds fairly rapidly on heating above the transition temperature, which is about 420°C but the reverse reaction is slow. Consequently phase I sodium tripolyphosphate is metastable at ambient temperature.
  • A process for the manufacture of particles containing a high proportion of the phase I form of sodium tripolyphosphate by spray drying below 420°C is given in US-A-4536377.
  • Particles which contain this phase I form will often contain the phase I form of sodium tripolyphosphate as at least 55% by weight of the tripolyphosphate in the particles. Other forms of sodium tripolyphosphate will usually be present to a lesser extent. Other salts may be included in the particles, although that is not preferred. A further preference is that the sodium tripolyphosphate is partially hydrated. The extent of hydration should be at least 1% by weight of the sodium tripolyphosphate in the particles. It may lie in a range from 2.5 to 4%, or it may be higher.
  • Suitable material is commercially available. Suppliers include Rhone-Poulenc, France and Albright & Wilson, UK.
  • "Rhodiaphos HPA 3.5" from Rhone-Poulenc has been found particularly suitable. It is a characteristic of this grade of sodium tripolyphosphate that it hydrates very rapidly in a standard Olten test. We have found that it hydrates as quickly as anhydrous sodium tripolyphosphate, yet the prehydration appears to be beneficial in avoiding unwanted crystallisation of the hexahydrate when the material comes into contact with water at the time of use.
  • Another possibility which can be used instead of tripolyphosphate, or in a mixture with it, is that these disintegration-promoting particles contain at least 50% of their own weight, better at least 80%, of a material which has a solubility in deionised water at 20°C of at least 50 grams per 100 grams of water.
  • The said particles may provide material of such solubility in an amount which is at least 7 wt% or 12 wt% of the whole composition of the tablet.
  • A solubility of at least 50 grams per 100 grams of water at 20°C is an exceptionally high solubility: many materials which are classified as water soluble are less soluble than this.
  • Some highly water-soluble materials which may be used are listed below, with their solubilities expressed as grams of solid to form a saturated solution in 100 grams of water at 20°C:-
    Material Water Solubility (g/100g)
    Sodium citrate dihydrate 72
    Potassium carbonate 112
    Urea >100
    Sodium acetate 119
    Sodium acetate trihydrate 76
    Magnesium sulphate 7H2O 71
    Potassium acetate >200
  • By contrast the solubilities of some other common materials at 20°C are:
    Material Water Solubility (g/100g)
    Sodium chloride 36
    Sodium sulphate decahydrate 21.5
    Sodium carbonate anhydrous 8.0
    Sodium percarbonate anhydrous 12
    Sodium perborate anhydrous 3.7
    Sodium tripolyphosphate anhydrous 15
  • Preferably this highly water soluble material is incorporated as particles of the material in a substantially pure form (i.e. each such particle contains over 95% by weight of the material). However, the said particles may contain material of such solubility in a mixture with other material, provided that material of the specified solubility provides at least 50% by weight of these particles.
  • Other ingredients
  • Detergent tablets according to the invention may contain a bleach system. This preferably comprises one or more peroxy bleach compounds, for example, inorganic persalts or organic peroxyacids, which may be employed in conjunction with activators to improve bleaching action at low wash temperatures. If any peroxygen compound is present, the amount is likely to lie in a range from 10 to 25% by weight of the tablet.
  • Preferred inorganic persalts are sodium perborate monohydrate and tetrahydrate, and sodium percarbonate. Bleach activators have been widely disclosed in the art. Preferred examples include peracetic acid precursors, for example tetraacetylethylene diamine (TAED), and perbenzoic acid precursors. The quaternary ammonium and phosphonium bleach activators disclosed in US 4751015 and US 4818426 (Lever Brothers Company) are also of interest. Another type of bleach activator which may be used, but which is not a bleach precursor, is a transition metal catalyst as disclosed in EP-A-458397, EP-A-458398 and EP-A-549272. A bleach system may also include a bleach stabiliser (heavy metal sequestrant) such as ethylenediamine tetramethylene phosphonate and diethylenetriamine pentamethylene phosphonate.
  • Bleach activator is usually present in an amount from 1 to 10% by weight of the tablet, possibly less in the case of a transition metal catalyst which may be used as 0.1% or more by weight of the tablet.
  • The detergent tablets of the invention may also contain one of the detergency enzymes well known in the art for their ability to degrade various soils and stains and so aid in their removal. Suitable enzymes include the various proteases, cellulases, lipases, amylases, and mixtures thereof, which are designed to remove a variety of soils and stains from fabrics. Detergency enzymes are commonly employed in the form of granules or marumes, optionally with a protective coating, in amount of from about 0.1% to about 3.0% by weight of the tablet.
  • The detergent tablets of the invention may also contain a fluorescer (optical brightener), for example, Tinopal (Trade Mark) DMS or Tinopal CBS available from Ciba-Geigy AG, Basel, Switzerland. Tinopal DMS is disodium 4,4'bis-(2-morpholino-4-anilino-s-triazin-6-ylamino) stilbene disulphonate; and Tinopal CBS is disodium 2,2'-bis-(phenyl-styryl) disulphonate.
  • An antifoam material is advantageously included, especially if a detergent tablet is primarily intended for use in front-loading drum-type automatic washing machines. Antifoam materials in granular form are described in EP 266863A (Unilever). Such antifoam granules typically comprise a mixture of silicone oil, petroleum jelly, hydrophobic silica and alkyl phosphate as antifoam active material, sorbed onto a porous absorbed water-soluble carbonate-based inorganic carrier material.
  • It may also be desirable that a detergent tablet of the invention includes an amount of an alkali metal silicate, particularly sodium ortho-, meta- or disilicate. The presence of such alkali metal silicates may be advantageous in providing protection against the corrosion of metal parts in washing machines, besides providing some detergency building. Preferably the surfactant-rich particles contain from 5 to 15% silicate by weight of the particles. This improves the strength and free flow of these particles prior to tabletting.
  • Further ingredients which can optionally be employed in fabric washing detergent tablet of the invention include anti-redeposition agents such as sodium carboxymethylcellulose, straight-chain polyvinyl pyrrolidone and the cellulose ethers such as methyl cellulose and ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, fabric-softening agents; heavy metal sequestrants such as EDTA; perfumes; and colorants or coloured speckles.
  • These various other ingredients may be present in the surfactant-rich particles or in the balance of the composition outside them. It is preferred that any bleach is contained in the balance of the composition outside the surfactant-rich particles.
  • Particle Size and Distribution
  • A detergent tablet of this invention is a matrix of compacted particles.
  • Preferably the particulate composition has an average particle size before compaction in the range from 200 to 2000 µm, more preferably from 250 to 1400 µm. Fine particles, smaller than 180 µm or 200 µm may be eliminated by sieving before tableting, if desired, although we have observed that this is not always essential.
  • While the starting particulate composition may in principle have any bulk density, the present invention is especially relevant to tablets made by compacting powders of relatively high bulk density, because of their greater tendency to exhibit disintegration and dispersion problems. Such tablets have the advantage that, as compared with a tablet derived from a low bulk density powder, a given dose of composition can be presented as a smaller tablet.
  • Thus the starting particulate composition may suitably have a bulk density of at least 400 g/litre, preferably at least 550 g/litre, and perhaps at least 600 g/litre.
  • Granular detergent compositions of high bulk density prepared by granulation and densification in a high-speed mixer/granulator, as described and claimed in EP 340013A (Unilever), EP 352135A (Unilever), and EP 425277A (Unilever), or by the continuous granulation/densification processes described and claimed in EP 367339A (Unilever) and EP 390251A (Unilever), are inherently suitable for use in the present invention.
  • Tableting
  • Tableting entails compaction of the particulate composition. A variety of tableting machinery is known, and can be used. Generally it will function by stamping a quantity of the particulate composition which is confined in a die.
  • Tableting may be carried out without application of heat, so as to take place at ambient temperature or at a temperature above ambient. In order to carry out the tableting at a temperature which is above ambient, the particulate composition is preferably supplied to the tableting machinery at an elevated temperature. This will of course supply heat to the tableting machinery, but the machinery may be heated in some other way also.
  • If any heat is supplied, it is envisaged that this will be supplied conventionally, such as by passing the particulate composition through an oven, rather than by any application of microwave energy.
  • The size of a tablet will suitably range from 10 to 160 grams, preferably from 15 to 60 g, depending on the conditions of intended use, and whether it represents a dose for an average load in a fabric washing or dishwashing machine or a fractional part of such a dose. The tablets may be of any shape. However, for ease of packaging they are preferably blocks of substantially uniform cross-section, such as cylinders or cuboids. The overall density of a tablet preferably lies in a range from 1040 or 1050gm/litre up to 1300gm/litre. The tablet density may well lie in a range up to no more than 1250 or even 1200gm/litre.
  • Examples
  • Tablets for use in fabric washing were made, starting with spray-dried base powders of the following compositions:
    Ingredient Parts by Weight
    A B C
    Sodium linear alkylbenzene sulphonate 6.4 9.6 11.0
    C13-15 fatty alcohol 7EO 4.3 1.1 2.4
    C13-15 fatty alcohol 3EO 3.2 3.2 2.3
    Sodium tripolyphosphate 24.3 24.3 18.0
    Sodium silicate 6.4 5.9 4.0
    Soap 0.3 0.3 0.21
    Acrylate/maleate copolymer 1.2 1.2 1.5
    Sodium sulphate, moisture and minor ingredients balance to 60 balance to 55 balance to 45
  • Particulate compositions were made by mixing this powder with other ingredients as tabulated below. These included particles of sodium tripolyphosphate specified to contain 70% phase I form and contain 3.5% water of hydration (Rhodia-Phos HPA 3.5 available from Rhone-Poulenc).
  • The compositions contained the following percentages by weight:
    Ingredient % by weight
    Ex 1 Ex2 Ex 3
    Base powder A 60
    Base powder B 55
    Base powder C 45
    Sodium percarbonate granules 14 15 15
    TAED granules 3.4 3.4 3.4
    Anti-foam granules 1.2 1.2 3.2
    Perfume, enzymes and other minor ingredients 1.4 2.2 3.5
    Rhodiaphos HPA3.5 tripolyphosphate 20 20 30
    Sodium carbonate - 3.2 -
  • 40g portions of each composition were made into cylindrical tablets of 44 mm diameter, using a Carver hand press, with sufficient applied pressure to produce tablets which dissolved to 90% of complete dissolution within approximately equal times not exceeding four minutes, in water at 20°C. Applied forces in a range from 2 to 4 kN have usually been found to be enough when using this hand press.
  • To test dissolution of tablets, a test procedure was used in which a tablet was placed on a plastic sieve with 2mm mesh size which was immersed in 9 litres of demineralised water at ambient temperature of 20°C. The water conductivity was monitored until it reached a constant value. The time for dissolution of the tablets was taken as the time (T90) for change in the water conductivity to reach 90% of its final magnitude.
  • The strength of these tablets was measured by compressing them radially, between the platens of a universal materials testing machine until fracture of the tablet occurred.
  • The force at fracture was measured and also the displacement at fracture. The break energy, which as explained above is the area under a force-over-displacement graph up to failure, was calculated.
  • The following table gives the results obtained for tablets of Examples 2 and 3 embodying the invention, and comparative tablets of Example 1. It is apparent that tablets embodying the invention were stronger although they dissolved in a similar time. Included in the table are mechanical properties of the surfactant mixture used.
    Ex 1 Ex2 Ex 3
    Powder features
    active system anionic/nonionic 6/7 9/4 9/4
    level of base powder [%] 60 55 45
    active level in base [%] 23 25 35
    active/tripolyphosphate in base powder 0.57 0.57 0.88
    level of disintegrant [%] 20 20 30
    Tablet properties
    force at failure [N] 30.5 35.0 69.5
    break energy [m joules] 5.8 10.5 20.4
    Properties of surfactant mix
    Breaking strength [MPa] 0.06 - 0.08 0.05 - 0.07
    Modulus [MPa] 15 4.0 - 4.5

Claims (15)

  1. A detergent tablet of compressed particulate composition wherein the tablet is homogeneous and comprises organic surfactant and water-soluble detergency builder, characterised in that the tablet contains from 30 to 65% by weight of particles which contain from 25 to 80% by weight (of these particles) of water-soluble detergency builder and from 20 to 50% by weight (of these particles) of non-soap organic surfactant which is anionic and nonionic surfactants in a weight ratio from 5:1 to 1.5:1 and in that in addition to said particles the tablet contains 15% or more by weight (of the tablet) of material which is other than soap or organic surfactant and which has a solubility in water of at least 10 gm/litre at 20°C.
  2. A tablet according to claim 1 wherein the tablet contains the said particles in an amount from 41 to 56% by weight.
  3. A tablet according to claim 1 to 2 wherein the weight ratio of anionic surfactants to non-ionic surfactant lies in range from 1.7:1 to 5:1.
  4. A tablet according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein the weight ratio of non-ionic surfactant to soap in said particles lies in range from 10:1 to 30:1.
  5. A tablet according to any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the amount of non-soap organic surfactant in the said particles is from 22 to 45% by weight of the particles.
  6. A tablet according to any one of claims 1 to 5 containing soup in the said particles in an amount for 0.2 to 2% by weight of the particles.
  7. A tablet according to any one of claims 1 to 6 herein the said particles contain from 30 to 80% by weight (of the particles) of water-soluble detergency builder which is an alkali metal salt of a condensed phosphate.
  8. A tablet according to claim 7 wherein the salt of a condensed phosphate is sodium tripolyphosphate.
  9. A tablet according to any one of claims 1 to 8 wherein the water-soluble material present in addition to the said particles comprises 15% or more (by weight of the tablet) in the form of further particles which contain no more than 5% of their own weight of organic surfactant.
  10. A tablet according to any one of claims 1 to 9 wherein the water-soluble substance present in addition to the said particles comprises 25 to 35% (by weight of the tablet) of material with a water solubility of at least 50 gm/litre at 20°C, or sodium tripolyphosphate containing more than 50% of its own weight of the phase I anhydrous form, or a mixture thereof.
  11. A tablet according to claim 10 wherein the water-soluble substance present in addition to the said particles comprises 15 to 35% (by weight of the tablet) of sodium tripolyphosphate containing more than 50% of its own weight of the phase I anhydrous form, which is partially hydrated so as to contain from 1 to 4% by weight of water of hydration.
  12. A tablet according to any one of claims 1 to 11 wherein said anionic surfactant is a majority of sodium alkyl benzene sulphonate, optionally accompanied by a smaller amount of other anionic surfactant.
  13. A tablet according to any one of claims 1 to 12 wherein said non-ionic surfactant is a majority of ethoxylated fatty alcohol, optionally accompanied by a smaller amount of other non-ionic surfactant.
  14. A tablet according to any one of claims 1 to 13 which is a formed by compression of a single particulate composition.
  15. A process for making a detergent tablet according to any one of claims 1 to 14 which comprises mixing
    a) 30 to 65% by weight of particles which contain from 25 to 80% by weight (of these particles) of water-soluble detergency builder and from 20 to 50% by weight (of these particles) of non-soap organic surfactant which is anionic and non-ionic surfactants in a weight ratio from 5:1 to 1.5:1 with
    b) 15% or more by weight of material which is other than soap or organic surfactant and which has a solubility in water of at least 10 gm/litre at 20°C, and compacting the mixture into a tablet.
EP98917084A 1997-03-24 1998-03-18 Detergent compositions Expired - Lifetime EP0972007B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9706083 1997-03-24
GBGB9706083.4A GB9706083D0 (en) 1997-03-24 1997-03-24 Detergent compositions
GB9722345 1997-10-22
GBGB9722345.7A GB9722345D0 (en) 1997-10-22 1997-10-22 Detergent compositions
PCT/EP1998/001770 WO1998042817A1 (en) 1997-03-24 1998-03-18 Detergent compositions

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0972007A1 EP0972007A1 (en) 2000-01-19
EP0972007B1 true EP0972007B1 (en) 2004-06-16

Family

ID=26311251

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98917084A Expired - Lifetime EP0972007B1 (en) 1997-03-24 1998-03-18 Detergent compositions

Country Status (10)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0972007B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1257536A (en)
AU (1) AU742565B2 (en)
BR (1) BR9808057A (en)
CA (1) CA2284828A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69824564T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2222583T3 (en)
PL (1) PL335883A1 (en)
TR (1) TR199902317T2 (en)
WO (1) WO1998042817A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ZA984570B (en) 1997-06-06 1999-11-29 Unilever Plc Cleaning compositions.
GB9711829D0 (en) 1997-06-06 1997-08-06 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions
CA2307377A1 (en) * 1997-10-22 1999-04-29 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions in tablet form
DE19818965A1 (en) * 1998-04-28 1999-11-04 Henkel Kgaa Detergent tablets with improved disintegration properties
AU6201099A (en) * 1998-10-09 2000-05-01 Unilever Plc Water-softening and detergent compositions
GB9822090D0 (en) * 1998-10-09 1998-12-02 Unilever Plc Detergent Compositions
FR2784392B1 (en) * 1998-10-09 2000-11-17 Rhodia Chimie Sa DETERGENT OR ANTI-CALCIUM COMPOSITION TABLETS AND THEIR IMPLEMENTATION IN DISHWASHER OR WASHING MACHINE
GB9826105D0 (en) * 1998-11-27 1999-01-20 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions
GB9901688D0 (en) 1999-01-26 1999-03-17 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions
AU2001260269A1 (en) * 2000-06-02 2001-12-17 Unilever Plc Dish washing compositions
GB2367830A (en) * 2000-10-12 2002-04-17 Procter & Gamble Process for preparing tablets

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB911204A (en) * 1960-07-28 1962-11-21 Unilever Ltd Bleaching compositions
US3451928A (en) * 1964-03-16 1969-06-24 Colgate Palmolive Co Process for production of detergent tablets
US3324038A (en) * 1964-04-17 1967-06-06 Procter & Gamble Detergent composition
JPS5070286A (en) * 1973-10-25 1975-06-11
DE3417820A1 (en) * 1984-05-14 1985-11-14 Henkel KGaA, 4000 Düsseldorf METHOD FOR PRODUCING A WASHING ADDITIVE IN TABLET FORM
GB9015504D0 (en) * 1990-07-13 1990-08-29 Unilever Plc Detergents composition
GB9015503D0 (en) * 1990-07-13 1990-08-29 Unilever Plc Detergent composition
GB9114184D0 (en) * 1991-07-01 1991-08-21 Unilever Plc Detergent composition
GB9224015D0 (en) * 1992-11-16 1993-01-06 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions
GB9422924D0 (en) * 1994-11-14 1995-01-04 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions
GB9422895D0 (en) * 1994-11-14 1995-01-04 Unilever Plc Detergent compositions

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0972007A1 (en) 2000-01-19
CA2284828A1 (en) 1998-10-01
ES2222583T3 (en) 2005-02-01
AU7041898A (en) 1998-10-20
BR9808057A (en) 2000-03-08
TR199902317T2 (en) 1999-12-21
PL335883A1 (en) 2000-05-22
WO1998042817A1 (en) 1998-10-01
DE69824564D1 (en) 2004-07-22
DE69824564T2 (en) 2005-06-09
CN1257536A (en) 2000-06-21
AU742565B2 (en) 2002-01-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1236794B2 (en) Detergent compositions in tablet form
EP1019484B1 (en) Cleaning compositions
EP1705241B1 (en) Detergent compositions in tablet form
US6242403B1 (en) Detergent compositions
EP0986634B1 (en) Cleaning compositions in tablet form
EP0972007B1 (en) Detergent compositions
EP1511834B1 (en) Detergent tablets
EP0839906B1 (en) Detergent composition
EP1071742A1 (en) Water-softening and detergent compositions
EP1375636B1 (en) Detergent tablets
EP1054947B1 (en) Tablet detergent compositions
EP1371719A1 (en) Detergent tablets
US20020068688A1 (en) Cleaning compositions
EP1496105B1 (en) Detergent compositions
EP1469061B1 (en) Method for the Preparation of multiphase cleaning tablet comprising a smooth phase
EP1466964A1 (en) Cleaning compositions
CZ9903402A3 (en) Detergent composition
EP1466965A1 (en) Cleaning compositions
EP1522575A1 (en) Detergent compositions
HUP0002074A2 (en) Detergent compositions

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19990913

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IE IT NL

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: RO PAYMENT 19990913

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20011213

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE ES FR GB IE IT NL

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: RO

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040616

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040616

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69824564

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20040722

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2222583

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050318

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20050317

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20060317

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20060331

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20060502

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20071130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20071002

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070318

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20100326

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20100326

Year of fee payment: 13

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20110318

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110318

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20120424

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110319