EP0943026A1 - A method for insect-resist treatment of carpets, textiles and insulation products - Google Patents

A method for insect-resist treatment of carpets, textiles and insulation products

Info

Publication number
EP0943026A1
EP0943026A1 EP97932044A EP97932044A EP0943026A1 EP 0943026 A1 EP0943026 A1 EP 0943026A1 EP 97932044 A EP97932044 A EP 97932044A EP 97932044 A EP97932044 A EP 97932044A EP 0943026 A1 EP0943026 A1 EP 0943026A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
insect
fibre
synthetic
wool
treated
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP97932044A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0943026B1 (en
EP0943026A4 (en
Inventor
Steven Andrew Leftly
Peter Edward Ingham
Cynthia Kathleen King
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Canesis Network Ltd
Original Assignee
Wool Research Organization of New Zealand Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Wool Research Organization of New Zealand Inc filed Critical Wool Research Organization of New Zealand Inc
Publication of EP0943026A1 publication Critical patent/EP0943026A1/en
Publication of EP0943026A4 publication Critical patent/EP0943026A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0943026B1 publication Critical patent/EP0943026B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D06TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D06MTREATMENT, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE IN CLASS D06, OF FIBRES, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR FIBROUS GOODS MADE FROM SUCH MATERIALS
    • D06M16/00Biochemical treatment of fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics, or fibrous goods made from such materials, e.g. enzymatic
    • D06M16/006Biochemical treatment of fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics, or fibrous goods made from such materials, e.g. enzymatic with wool-protecting agents; with anti-moth agents
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D06TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D06MTREATMENT, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE IN CLASS D06, OF FIBRES, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR FIBROUS GOODS MADE FROM SUCH MATERIALS
    • D06M16/00Biochemical treatment of fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics, or fibrous goods made from such materials, e.g. enzymatic

Definitions

  • This invention involves a method of imparting insect-resistance on carpets, textiles or insulation products which contain wool and/or other animal fibres.
  • the most common insecticides used to give wool fibres insect resistance are synthetic pyrethroids, usually permethrin. These are usually applied by adding an aqueous emulsion of the insecticide to wool during scouring, dyeing, tape-scouring or chemical-setting.
  • the insecticide active is exhausted into and onto the fibres in the above applications.
  • dyebath application typically 95% of the insecticide is exhausted onto the fibre.
  • loose wool or yarn scouring application processes a continuous exhaustion equilibrium is reached being partially dependent on fibre throughput and bowl insecticide concentration. In both the above application processes considerable amounts of effluent containing insecticide are produced.
  • the purpose and object of this invention is to overcome the problems of pesticides present in discharge effluents i.e. to produce an alternative to traditional aqueous application methods.
  • the nature of the invention is to blend a proportion of synthetic or regenerated natural fibre, which has been pre-treated with an effective insecticide, with wool fibres.
  • the effective insecticide can be permethrin, an insect growth regulator or any other compound having an insect-resist effect.
  • the insect growth regulator can be RH 5992 (Rohm & Hass) and the insect-resist compound can be Abamectin, Lufenuron (Ciba Geigy), Bifenthrin (FMC Corporation), MGK 264 or a perfluoroalkylsulphonate (3M).
  • the aim is to add as little as possible to the overall fibre blend so as to minimise the proportion of synthetic or regenerated natural fibres in the blend.
  • a secondary but very important feature of the invention is for the pre- treated fibre to contain a high concentration of insecticide (for example permethrin) to impart insect resistance on the whole fibre blend.
  • insecticide for example permethrin
  • the choice of fibre for treatment and the method of insecticide application to the fibre are key features of the invention.
  • Another key factor is that the insecticide treatment is largely fast to subsequent wet processes. This is essential to prevent downstream losses of the insecticide which end up in discharged effluent.
  • Low-melt bi-component polyester fibre (PES) (LM-51 , 1 5 den, 76 mm - SAM YANG Co Limited) was pre-treated in a bath containing 1 g/l Topsoft (Dylachem - Precision Processors) for 15 minutes at 40°C.
  • PES Low-melt bi-component polyester fibre
  • the fibre is then squeezed and added to the application bath which contains: 30% owf Mystox CMP (Catomance) (containing 12% permethrin W/V)
  • the bath temperature is raised to 55 °C and held for 60 minutes.
  • Fibre is then squeezed and rinsed twice in 40° C rinsewater.
  • the fibre generally takes up about 1 5% Mystox CMP on weight fibre (owf) (i.e. 1 .8% w/w permethrin owf).
  • the dry fibre was blended with wool in the ratio (95% wool/5% PES) to achieve an overall treatment level of about 0.75% Mystox CMP owf (i.e. 0.09% w/w permethrin owf).
  • the fibre was spun into yarn and then tufted into 10mm cut pile carpet.
  • the durability of the treatment to shampooing was determined using three shampoo cycles according to the protocol outlined in IWS Test Method 28.
  • a 45 °C, 1 Og/I solution of non-ionic detergent was applied to the carpet using a spray/vacuum cleaner (Kerrick Hydra-Vac).
  • the spray head was moved over the carpet at a speed of 3cm/sec.
  • a second pass was made with vacuum only.
  • the sample was dried at room temperature before the second and third respective cleaning cycles.
  • the amount of permethrin removed was determined using an established HPLC assay technique. The treatment was found to be 94% fast to the shampoo treatment.
  • the resistance of the carpet to insect attack was determined by using protocol of IWS Test Method 25.
  • the test species used was Tineola bisselliella. 1 5 larvae of equal size were placed on carpet discs (40mm diameter) in mesh-topped aluminium containers in a controlled environment for fourteen days. Four replicates were used. At the completion of the test the larvae mortalities were determined and carpet damage and weight loss assessed.
  • the overall treatment level was 83% fast to this dyeing.
  • Low-melt bi-component fibre was treated as in Example 1 . This loose fibre was tested for treatment fastness to a simulated tape-scour train as follows:
  • Fibre was passed through a series of scour bowls with a roller-squeeze between each one.
  • the treatment level was 92% fast to this wet process.
  • Low-melt bi-component PES fibre was treated as in Example 1. This fibre was subjected to a simulated loose-stock dyeing to test for fastness.
  • Dye bath contained - 0.5 % Albegal FFA (Ciba Geigy) omw
  • the low-melt sheath which constitutes about 50% of a bi-component fibre was doped in the melt with.3% permethrin prior to extrusion to produce an insect-resist fibre for blending with wool containing around 1 .5% permethrin.
  • the treated fibre was subsequently blended with wool in the ratio 5%/95% PES/wool as in Example 1 and a similar bioassay carried out to give a pass result in terms of WNZ Test Method 25.
  • Permethrin was added to low-melt polyester fibre at a rate of 1 .5% on mass of polymer.
  • the polymer chips were subsequently fed into a hopper, melted then extruded as an homogenous fibre containing about 1 .5% insecticide. This was subsequently blended with wool in the ratio 95% wool/5% synthetic as for Example 1 .
  • the same level of protection is achieved.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Treatments For Attaching Organic Compounds To Fibrous Goods (AREA)
  • Catching Or Destruction (AREA)

Abstract

A method of insect-resist treating carpets, textiles and insulation products and a product produced by the method in which a proportion of synthetic or regenerated natural fibre, which has been pre-treated with an effective insecticide, is blended with wool fibres. The effective insecticide can be any insect growth regulator which has an insect-resist effect such as permethrin. When using the pre-treated fibre to insect-resist wool the aim is to add as little as possible to the overall fibre blend so as to minimise the proportion of synthetic or regenerated natural fibres in the blend.

Description

A METHOD FOR INSECT-RESIST TREATMENT OF CARPETS, TEXTILES AND INSULATION PRODUCTS
BACKGROUND
This invention involves a method of imparting insect-resistance on carpets, textiles or insulation products which contain wool and/or other animal fibres.
All goods containing wool and other animal fibre components are susceptible to damage caused by insects. Presently these fibre components are treated with insecticides to render them resistant to insect attack.
The most common insecticides used to give wool fibres insect resistance are synthetic pyrethroids, usually permethrin. These are usually applied by adding an aqueous emulsion of the insecticide to wool during scouring, dyeing, tape-scouring or chemical-setting.
The insecticide active is exhausted into and onto the fibres in the above applications. In the case of dyebath application typically 95% of the insecticide is exhausted onto the fibre. With loose wool or yarn scouring application processes, a continuous exhaustion equilibrium is reached being partially dependent on fibre throughput and bowl insecticide concentration. In both the above application processes considerable amounts of effluent containing insecticide are produced.
These effluents are environmentally undesirable in that they may have adverse effects on aquatic organism populations in waters to which the effluent is eventually discharged (usually via sewerage or other waste treatment). This may have an adverse effect on other species down the food chain.
In some geographic areas strict limits are being imposed on the discharge of effluent containing these insecticides. These limits can be such that traditional insect-resist treatment methods as described above, cannot be used if effluent is discharged directly to sewer.
The purpose and object of this invention is to overcome the problems of pesticides present in discharge effluents i.e. to produce an alternative to traditional aqueous application methods.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The nature of the invention is to blend a proportion of synthetic or regenerated natural fibre, which has been pre-treated with an effective insecticide, with wool fibres.
The effective insecticide can be permethrin, an insect growth regulator or any other compound having an insect-resist effect.
The insect growth regulator can be RH 5992 (Rohm & Hass) and the insect-resist compound can be Abamectin, Lufenuron (Ciba Geigy), Bifenthrin (FMC Corporation), MGK 264 or a perfluoroalkylsulphonate (3M). When using the pre-treated fibre to insect-resist wool the aim is to add as little as possible to the overall fibre blend so as to minimise the proportion of synthetic or regenerated natural fibres in the blend.
This could be, for example, < 5% synthetic fibre of overall weight of wool. Because wool eating insects do not selectively graze wool fibres the pre-treated component effectively protects the whole fibre blend.
A secondary but very important feature of the invention is for the pre- treated fibre to contain a high concentration of insecticide (for example permethrin) to impart insect resistance on the whole fibre blend. The choice of fibre for treatment and the method of insecticide application to the fibre are key features of the invention. Another key factor is that the insecticide treatment is largely fast to subsequent wet processes. This is essential to prevent downstream losses of the insecticide which end up in discharged effluent. DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The process of application and its inherent properties will be apparent from the following examples.
Example 1
Low-melt bi-component polyester fibre (PES) (LM-51 , 1 5 den, 76 mm - SAM YANG Co Limited) was pre-treated in a bath containing 1 g/l Topsoft (Dylachem - Precision Processors) for 15 minutes at 40°C.
The fibre is then squeezed and added to the application bath which contains: 30% owf Mystox CMP (Catomance) (containing 12% permethrin W/V)
10% owf Dyapol BLF (Yorkshire Chemicals) pH 4.5 with acetic acid (BDH).
The bath temperature is raised to 55 °C and held for 60 minutes.
Fibre is then squeezed and rinsed twice in 40° C rinsewater. The fibre generally takes up about 1 5% Mystox CMP on weight fibre (owf) (i.e. 1 .8% w/w permethrin owf). The dry fibre was blended with wool in the ratio (95% wool/5% PES) to achieve an overall treatment level of about 0.75% Mystox CMP owf (i.e. 0.09% w/w permethrin owf).
The fibre was spun into yarn and then tufted into 10mm cut pile carpet.
The durability of the treatment to shampooing was determined using three shampoo cycles according to the protocol outlined in IWS Test Method 28. A 45 °C, 1 Og/I solution of non-ionic detergent was applied to the carpet using a spray/vacuum cleaner (Kerrick Hydra-Vac). The spray head was moved over the carpet at a speed of 3cm/sec. A second pass was made with vacuum only. The sample was dried at room temperature before the second and third respective cleaning cycles. The amount of permethrin removed was determined using an established HPLC assay technique. The treatment was found to be 94% fast to the shampoo treatment.
The resistance of the carpet to insect attack was determined by using protocol of IWS Test Method 25. The test species used was Tineola bisselliella. 1 5 larvae of equal size were placed on carpet discs (40mm diameter) in mesh-topped aluminium containers in a controlled environment for fourteen days. Four replicates were used. At the completion of the test the larvae mortalities were determined and carpet damage and weight loss assessed.
100% mortality and low mass losses/damage scores were achieved on all samples, giving a pass result to Wools of New Zealand (WNZ) Test Method 25 protocol.
The above carpet was winch dyed using the following programme: Auxiliaries: 0.2 g/l ALBEGAL FFD (Ciba Geigy)
1 .5 g/l Sodium acetate (BDH)
1 .25 ml/I Acetic acid (BDH)
1 % omw Albegal SET (Ciba Geigy)
5% omw Sodium Sulphate (BDH)
Dyes: 0.021 % omw Lanaset Yellow 2R (Ciba Geigy) 0.018% omw Lanaset Blue 2R (Ciba Geigy) 0.077% omw Lanaset Red 2B (Ciba Geigy)
Raise bath temperature to 40°C - add auxilliaries
- circulate 10 mins
- add dyes Heat to 85 °C @ 1 °/minute
Hold 30 minutes Dump bath, rinse
Hydro extract
The overall treatment level was 83% fast to this dyeing.
Example 2
Low-melt bi-component fibre was treated as in Example 1 . This loose fibre was tested for treatment fastness to a simulated tape-scour train as follows:
Tape-scouring
Fibre was passed through a series of scour bowls with a roller-squeeze between each one.
Bowl (1 ) contained 1 .5 g/l Teric GN9 (ICI) @ 65 °C Bowls (2), (3) and (4) were clean water rinses @ 65 °C
There was 25 second immersion in each bowl followed by a squeeze to hydro- extract the fibre.
The treatment level was 92% fast to this wet process.
Example 3
Low-melt bi-component PES fibre was treated as in Example 1. This fibre was subjected to a simulated loose-stock dyeing to test for fastness. Dye bath contained - 0.5 % Albegal FFA (Ciba Geigy) omw
- 1 .25 ml/l Acetic acid (BDH)
- 0.25% Avolan S (Bayer) (omw)
Auxilliaries added to bath @ 50°C
Fibre added to bath and temperature increased to
95°C @ 1 °C/hour
Hold at 95 °C for 1 5 minutes
Drop a cold rinse
Fastness to this process was 75%.
Example 4
The low-melt sheath which constitutes about 50% of a bi-component fibre was doped in the melt with.3% permethrin prior to extrusion to produce an insect-resist fibre for blending with wool containing around 1 .5% permethrin.
The treated fibre was subsequently blended with wool in the ratio 5%/95% PES/wool as in Example 1 and a similar bioassay carried out to give a pass result in terms of WNZ Test Method 25.
Example 5
Permethrin was added to low-melt polyester fibre at a rate of 1 .5% on mass of polymer. The polymer chips were subsequently fed into a hopper, melted then extruded as an homogenous fibre containing about 1 .5% insecticide. This was subsequently blended with wool in the ratio 95% wool/5% synthetic as for Example 1 . The same level of protection is achieved. Advantages of the invention are:
1 . It eliminates the need to directly insect-proof the wool fibre;
2. It protects wool by incorporating a small proportion of a blend with doped synthetic fibre;
3. It provides a method for treating bi-component fibres with an insect-resist treatment which is substantially fast to subsequent wet processing and cleaning;
4. It provides a method of insect-proofing wool yarns, carpet, textiles, insulation materials or other woollen materials;
5. It provides a method of doping synthetic bi-component or low- melt fibres by exhaust methods;
6. It provides a method of protecting wool products by blending with synthetic fibres doped with pesticide prior to extrusion;
7. It provides a batchwise treatment which does not require effluent discharge between treatments; and
8. It provides a method of insect-proofing wool fibres with little subsequent loss of insect-resist agent during downstream wet processing of dyeing, tape-scouring and chemical setting. Particular examples of the invention have been described and it is envisaged that modifications and variations can take place without departing from the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

1 . A method for insect-resist treatment of carpets, textiles and insulation products including the steps of pre-treating synthetic or regenerated natural fibres with an effective insecticide; and blending a proportion of the synthetic or regenerated natural fibre with wool fibres.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the synthetic or regenerated natural fibre is pre-treated with the effective insecticide permethrin.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the synthetic or regenerated natural fibre is pre-treated with an insect growth regulator or any compound having an insect-resist effect.
4. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the insect growth compound is RH5992 (Rohm & Hass), Abamectin, Lufenuron (Ciba Geigy), Bifenthrin (FMC Corporation), MGK 264 or a perfluoroalkylsulphonate (3M).
5. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the proportion of syntethic or regenerated fibres in the blend is < 5% synthetic fibre of overall weight of wool.
6. A method as claimed in claim 1 and substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to any one of the Examples.
7. An insect-resist treated carpet, textile or insulation product manufactured in accordance with the method as claimed in claim 1.
8. An insect-resist treated carpet, textile or insulation product substantially as hereinbefore described.
AMENDED CLAIMS
[rece ived by the International Bureau on 17 November 1997 ( 17. 1 1 .97) ; orig inal claim 1 amended ; remain ing cl a ims unchanged ( 1 page ) ]
1 . A method of protecting wool and other animal fibres from being eaten by insect larvae by pre-treating synthetic or regenerated cellulose fibres with an effective insecticide and blending a small proportion of this pre- treated fibre with a larger proportion of untreated wool or other animal fibre.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the synthetic or regenerated natural fibre is pre-treated with the effective insecticide permethrin.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the synthetic or regenerated natural fibre is pre-treated with an insect growth regulator or any compound having an insect-resist effect.
4. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the insect growth compound is RH5992 (Rohm & Hass), Abamectin, Lufenuron (Ciba Geigy), Bifenthrin (FMC Corporation), MGK 264 or a perfluoroalkylsulphonate (3M).
5. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the proportion of syntethic or regenerated fibres in the blend is < 5% synthetic fibre of overall weight of wool.
6. A method as claimed in claim 1 and substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to any one of the Examples.
EP97932044A 1996-07-24 1997-07-24 A method for insect-resist treatment of carpets, textiles and insulation products Expired - Lifetime EP0943026B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NZ29905196 1996-07-24
NZ29905196 1996-07-24
PCT/NZ1997/000094 WO1998003718A1 (en) 1996-07-24 1997-07-24 A method for insect-resist treatment of carpets, textiles and insulation products

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0943026A1 true EP0943026A1 (en) 1999-09-22
EP0943026A4 EP0943026A4 (en) 2000-05-24
EP0943026B1 EP0943026B1 (en) 2003-12-17

Family

ID=19925867

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP97932044A Expired - Lifetime EP0943026B1 (en) 1996-07-24 1997-07-24 A method for insect-resist treatment of carpets, textiles and insulation products

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0943026B1 (en)
AU (1) AU732690B2 (en)
WO (1) WO1998003718A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2170048B1 (en) * 2007-06-29 2016-04-13 Vestergaard Frandsen SA Insecticidal thread
CN105076131B (en) * 2007-06-29 2017-11-14 韦斯特高有限公司 Coextrusion monofilament of desinsection and application thereof and production method and the method for control insecticide movement thereon
DE102008023388A1 (en) 2008-05-13 2009-11-19 Teijin Monofilament Germany Gmbh Monofilaments, tapes or films, useful for deterring or killing snails or bugs, comprise a thermoplastic polymer e.g. thermoplastic polyester elastomer and a pyrethroid e.g. permethrin, incorporated into the polymer matrix
EP2243878A1 (en) * 2009-04-23 2010-10-27 Color-Textil Veredelung Ein Unternehmensbereich der Peppermint Holding GmbH Use of a textile structure for vector protection and development of a method for producing a textile structure for vector protection
LU91807B1 (en) * 2011-04-07 2012-10-08 Gottlieb Weinen Long-term parasite rejection procedures
CN104486946A (en) * 2012-05-16 2015-04-01 Vegro有限责任公司 A strong insecticidal net

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1995007021A1 (en) * 1993-09-06 1995-03-16 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Insecticidal composition
WO1997023682A1 (en) * 1995-12-21 1997-07-03 Wool Research Organisation Of New Zealand (Inc.) A method for insect-resist treatment of carpet and textiles

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3565562D1 (en) * 1984-04-06 1988-11-17 Ciba Geigy Ag Process for protecting keratinic material against deterioration by keratin devouring insects
NZ233919A (en) * 1990-06-01 1993-02-25 Wool Res Organisation Treatment of textiles made of animal fibres with insecticides without use of solvents

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1995007021A1 (en) * 1993-09-06 1995-03-16 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Insecticidal composition
WO1997023682A1 (en) * 1995-12-21 1997-07-03 Wool Research Organisation Of New Zealand (Inc.) A method for insect-resist treatment of carpet and textiles

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO9803718A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0943026B1 (en) 2003-12-17
WO1998003718A1 (en) 1998-01-29
EP0943026A4 (en) 2000-05-24
AU3560297A (en) 1998-02-10
AU732690B2 (en) 2001-04-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3495330B2 (en) Esterified triclosan derivatives as improved textile antimicrobial agents
US6576154B1 (en) Method of retaining antimicrobial properties on a halamine-treated textile substrate while simultaneously reducing deleterious odor and skin irritation effects
US5423905A (en) Moth- and beetle-proofing formulation
AP147A (en) Insecticidal treatment and compositions therefor
González et al. Wash resistance of insecticide-treated materials
EP0943026B1 (en) A method for insect-resist treatment of carpets, textiles and insulation products
EP0993368B1 (en) Method of impregnating garments with an insecticide
JPH0610272A (en) Finishing agent for woven fabric
JP3484520B2 (en) Antimicrobial fiber product and method for producing the same
JPS595703B2 (en) Washing resistance sanitary processing method for textile products
US3134714A (en) Immunization of fabrics against insect attacks
JP3165235B2 (en) Antibacterial processed fiber product and its processing method
CN1057080C (en) Wool protecting compositions and methods
Kayedi et al. Entomological evaluation of three brands of manufactured insecticidal nets and of nets conventionally treated with deltamethrin, after repeated washing
JP3899405B2 (en) Eating damage inhibitor, eating damage control material containing this eating damage inhibitor, and method for producing the same
JP3509828B2 (en) Manufacturing method of antibacterial deodorant water-repellent fabric
JPH09111663A (en) Modifying method of animal hair fiber
US10494760B2 (en) Methods and formulations for controlling human lice infestations
JPH09502189A (en) Insecticidal composition
Shaw et al. The Effectiveness of a Permethrin-containing Mothproofing Agent against the Brown House Moth (Hofmannophila pseudospretella (Stainton))
EP0883710A1 (en) A method for insect-resist treatment of carpet and textiles
JP3406971B2 (en) Pest repellent processing method for polyester fiber products
JPS61282475A (en) Antibacterial and antifungal processing of acrylic syntheticfiber
Singh et al. Development of mosquito-repellent and antibacterial nylon
US20190254283A1 (en) Insect repellent compositions and materials bearing the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19990129

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE GB

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20000412

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): BE GB

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Free format text: 7D 06M 16/00 A, 7D 06M 13/236 B, 7D 06M 13/00 B

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20010625

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE GB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

BECA Be: change of holder's address

Owner name: *CANESIS NETWORK LTDCORNER OF SPRINGS ROAD AND GER

Effective date: 20031217

BECH Be: change of holder

Owner name: *CANESIS NETWORK LTD

Effective date: 20031217

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: CANESIS NETWORK LIMITED

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20040920

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20060719

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20060912

Year of fee payment: 10

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *CANESIS NETWORK LTD

Effective date: 20070731

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20070724

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070724

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070731