EP0878748B1 - Oxidative age resistance of surface oxidized roller - Google Patents

Oxidative age resistance of surface oxidized roller Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0878748B1
EP0878748B1 EP98303801A EP98303801A EP0878748B1 EP 0878748 B1 EP0878748 B1 EP 0878748B1 EP 98303801 A EP98303801 A EP 98303801A EP 98303801 A EP98303801 A EP 98303801A EP 0878748 B1 EP0878748 B1 EP 0878748B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
roller
roll
polybutadiene
antioxidant
polydiene
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP98303801A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0878748A1 (en
Inventor
Bradley L. Beach
Jean M. Massie
Johnny D. Massie
Ronald L. Roe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Lexmark International Inc
Original Assignee
Lexmark International Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US08/979,600 external-priority patent/US5874172A/en
Application filed by Lexmark International Inc filed Critical Lexmark International Inc
Publication of EP0878748A1 publication Critical patent/EP0878748A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0878748B1 publication Critical patent/EP0878748B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03GELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; MAGNETOGRAPHY
    • G03G15/00Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern
    • G03G15/06Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing
    • G03G15/08Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing using a solid developer, e.g. powder developer
    • G03G15/0806Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing using a solid developer, e.g. powder developer on a donor element, e.g. belt, roller
    • G03G15/0818Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing using a solid developer, e.g. powder developer on a donor element, e.g. belt, roller characterised by the structure of the donor member, e.g. surface properties
    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03GELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; MAGNETOGRAPHY
    • G03G5/00Recording members for original recording by exposure, e.g. to light, to heat, to electrons; Manufacture thereof; Selection of materials therefor

Definitions

  • U. S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/629,855, Filed April 9, 1996, now allowed, and corresponding to U.S. patent US 5 707 743 A is to rollers modified by this invention for oxidative age resistance.
  • U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/870,782, Filed June 6, 1997 is a division of the foregoing Serial No. 08/629,855, directed to process coverage.
  • This invention relates to developer rollers used in electrophotography, and, more specifically, to a roller and its process of manufacture having a surface with a high electrical resistivity layer.
  • a functional developer roller for use in contact electrophotographic printing having a high resistance surface layer over a semi-conductive core gives excellent print performance independent of the speed of movement of the printing members (termed process speed). This is an improvement over a more common method which involves making a semi-conductive core and subsequently coating that core with a resistive material in a separate process such as spray or dip coating.
  • a high resistance surface layer over a more conductive core can be produced simply by oxidizing the roll surface. This eliminates the need for coating the conductive roll with a resistive layer in a separate process.
  • This process is an improvement over a more common method which involves making a semi-conductive core and then subsequently coating the core with a resistive material in a separate process such as spray or dip coating. Baking is much more cost effective than spray or dip coating and produces a roller with less defects.
  • the baked polydiene-based roll of this invention mimics the electrical performance of the coated roller and gives excellent print perfonnance over a wide range of process speeds.
  • an antioxidant material such as a hindered phenol is employed to minimize the additional oxidation of the roller during its functional life.
  • the antioxidant material extends the useful life of the roller by approximately ten times or more while continuing to provide excellent print performance.
  • the roller of this invention is a cast urethane, electrically conductive rubber roller with a surface layer of high electrical resistivity.
  • This roller mimics the electrical properties of a coated roller.
  • the roller is composed of a polydiene, such as polyisoprene and more specifically polybutadiene, either as a polyol or a urethane prepolymer, blended with a second polyurethane prepolymer and a conductive additive such as ferric chloride.
  • the bulk resistivity of the roller is approximately 1 x 10 8 (one times ten to the eighth power) ohm-cm at 22° C and 50% relative humidity.
  • the surface of the cured roller is oxidized to produce a surface layer of material with high electrical resistivity.
  • Oxidation of the roller is achieved by baking the roller in air at fairly high temperature (greater than 80 degrees C) for several hours.
  • the reaction of the oxygen with the polybutadiene, catalyzed by the ferric chloride, oxidizes the surface of the roller.
  • the oxidized layer is very resistive. The cost of production is low.
  • the developer roller function is to develop a layer of toner on a photoconductor drum charged in an image pattern.
  • a two layer, "coated” roll will develop a fixed quantity of toner per volt of development bias that is determined by the dielectric thicknesses of the photoconductor, the toner and the developer roller. This development characteristic is independent of process speed, within limits.
  • a solid roll of a single resistivity develops a quantity of toner based on the dielectric constants of the photoconductor and the toner, and the resistance of the roll in the photoconductor nip. This is dependent on process speed.
  • a two-layer roll has a longer time constant than a solid roll. Longer time constant materials leave a higher effective development surface potential on the developer roll at the entry to the photoconductor nip. This improves the single pel dot print performance of the roll.
  • the desired electrical properties during normal operation of a two-layer roller are a core resistivity less than 1 x 10 9 ohm-cm, preferably less than 3 x 10 8 ohm-cm, at 22° C and 50% relative humidity (RH), a coating resistivity of 5 x 10 9 - 2 x 10 12 ohm-cm, preferably 1 x 10 11 ohm-cm, at 22° C and 50% RH and a coating thickness of approximately 50-150 microns, preferably approximately 100 microns, at 22° C and 50% RH.
  • the time constant should be about 5-2,000 milliseconds, preferably about 100 milliseconds, at 22° C and 50% RH.
  • a common technique to produce a semi-conductive roll with a resistive layer is to prepare a core using any standard rubber molding technique, such as casting liquid urethanes or rubber transfer molding.
  • the core is then ground to the correct dimensions and either spray or dip coated with a resistive material to the desired thickness.
  • the coating is usually applied in several layers to build up to the desired thickness of 100 microns. Problems with this process include its higher cost due to the multiple coating steps and the defects introduced into the surface layer during the coating process.
  • a resistive surface layer can be produced on a cast urethane roll simply by baking in air at elevated temperature.
  • the thickness and resistivity of this layer can be controlled by varying the polybutadiene level, the ferric chloride level, the baking time, the baking temperature, and the oxygen level.
  • the residual materials in the roller after this controlled oxidation process to form the resistive surface layer render the roller susceptible to further oxidation which is accelerated by higher temperatures that may possibly be encountered in both storage prior to use or during functional life in a printer.
  • This invention includes the use of a blend of a urethane prepolymer with polybutadiene, either in diol or urethane prepolymer form, and ferric chloride as a conductivity modifier.
  • the blend of materials is cured in roll form and then baked at elevated temperatures ( ⁇ 80°C) for various times to oxidize the surface of the roll. This oxidation produces a layer of high resistivity material on the surface of the roll.
  • Polycaprolactone urethane prepolymer such as Vibrathane 6060 (trademark product of Uniroyal Chemical), is the preferred base urethane because of its stable electrical resistivity with temperature and humidity changes.
  • Vibrathane 6060 is a polycaprolactone ester toluene-diisocyanate prepolymer.
  • Ferrio chloride is added to the urethane to reduce the electrical resistivity of the roll core to ⁇ 1 x 10 9 ohm-cm.
  • the combination of polycaprolactone urethane and ferric chloride produces a roller with a single resistivity from the roll surface to the center or core. In order to produce a roller with a high resistivity surface layer, a polydiene must be included in the formulation.
  • Polybutadiene prepolymers are prepared by the reaction of a polybutadiene diol (PBD) with toluene diisocyanate (TDI).
  • PBD-TDI prepolymer can be blended with the caprolactone prepolymer in various proportions.
  • a suitable polybutadiene prepolymer is an experimental product of Uniroyal Chemical.
  • the blend of prepolymers is cured with polyol curatives, such as Voranol 234-630, (trademark product of Dow Chemical Co., Inc.), a trifunctional polyether polyol.
  • Typical polycaprolactone/polybutadiene blend ratios range from 95/5 parts by weight per hundred parts of total rubber which includes the polycaprolactone and the polybutadiene to 60/40 parts by weight.
  • the polycaprolactone urethane can be cured by using a combination of polybutadiene diol (such as poly bd (trademark) R-45HT, a product of Elf Atochem) with a trifunctional curative such as the Voranol 234-630.
  • the poly bd® R-45HT polybutadiene has a molecular weight Mn, of 2800 and a microstructure of 20% cis-1,4- polybutadiene, 60% trans-1,4-polybutadiene and 20% 1,2-polybutadiene.
  • Voranol 234-630 is a polyether polyol with a functionality of 3.
  • the polybutadiene diol acts as a polymer chain extender for the urethane.
  • Typical weight ratios of the Voranol to the poly bd® R-45 HT range from 1/0 up to 1/7 by weight.
  • the polybutadiene prepolymer is a very highly resistive material.
  • the addition of high levels of conductive additives in powder form such as copper (II) chloride or ferric chloride does not lower the electrical resistivity of this material.
  • addition of 0.1 parts per hundred rubber by weight ferric chloride powder to one hundred parts by weight polycaprolactone urethane reduces the electrical resistivity from the 5 x 10 10 ohm-cm range to approximately 1.5 x 10 8 ohm-cm.
  • Ferric chloride is not soluble in the polybutadiene prepolymer.
  • Ferric chloride is added to the polybutadiene/polycaprolactone urethane blend to reduce the blend bulk resistivity to ⁇ 1 x 10 9 ohm-cm.
  • Typical concentrations of ferric chloride range from 0.05-0.30 parts by weight per hundred by weight rubber.
  • Other conductive additives in powder form, such as ferrous chloride, calcium chloride and cobalt hexafluoroacetylacetonate are alternatives to the ferric chloride.
  • the urethane formulation is then cast into a maid around a central, metal shaft and then cured at approximately 100 degrees C for 16 hours using a combination of curing in a mold, demolding and postcuring in an oven to produce a rubber roller.
  • the roller is then ground to the correct dimensions.
  • This roller does not have a resistive layer on the surface.
  • the resistive layer is produced by baking the ground roll in air at an elevated temperature for some length of time. This baking procedure oxidizes the ferric chloride and the polybutadiene.
  • the polybutadiene is highly unsaturated, which makes it very susceptible to oxidation.
  • the presence of ferric chloride is necessary to catalyze this oxidation process.
  • Example 1 illustrates a formulation and the processing conditions for using such a combination of materials.
  • a highly resistive layer is not formed in the presence of copper (II) chloride since copper (II) chloride does not sufficiently catalyze the oxidation reaction to produce a high resistance surface layer.
  • the oxidation of polybutadiene in the presence of ferric chloride produces a highly resistive surface layer.
  • the thickness and electrical resistivity of this surface layer can be controlled by varying the concentration of ferric chloride, concentration of polybutadiene, the baking temperature, the level of oxygen and the baking time.
  • the antioxidant material may be chosen from the major classes of antioxidants standard to the rubber industry; for example aromatic amines, such as a diphenylamine or a dihydroquinoline; phenols, such as a substituted phenol; or a hydroperoxide decomposer, such as a phosphite or sulfide.
  • aromatic amines such as a diphenylamine or a dihydroquinoline
  • phenols such as a substituted phenol
  • a hydroperoxide decomposer such as a phosphite or sulfide.
  • the antioxidant may be added to the roll either during the casting of the blended raw materials or in a post-treatment process.
  • the addition of an antioxidant during the casting process will require a modification of the oxidative bake process to form the resistive surface layer by requiring either a higher-oxidative baking temperature and/or a longer baking time.
  • Antioxidants such as a hindered phenol, e.g., 2,6-di-tertiarybutyl-4-methyl-phenol also known as BHT or 2,2'-methylenebis (4-methyl-6-tertiarybutyl) phenol also known as CYANOX 2246 from Cytec Industries can be used.
  • the antioxidant can be added to the roll by pre-blending into the polybutadiene diol or prepolymer raw material and then casting the roll using the standard type of process described previously or applied using a post-treatment process such as dip or spray coating a dilute solution of the antioxidant onto the roll surface and allowing for diffusion of the antioxidant into the rubber roll.
  • the concentration of antioxidant may vary depending on the type of antioxidant used and the method of addition into the roll.
  • the concentration of BHT used when added to the roll during casting of the mixed urethane raw materials may range from .05% by weight (w/w) to 1.0%, with a preferred range of 0.08% (w/w) to 0.40% (w/w).
  • the concentration of CYANOX 2246 when added to the roll in a post-treatment process such as dip coating by dissolving in a solvent may range from 2.0% to 28.0% (w/w) with a preferred range of 10.0% to 20.0% (w/w).
  • Examples 2 and 3 illustrate formulations and the processing conditions for using such materials and processes.
  • the rollers are characterized by a variety of electrical techniques.
  • a roll is typically cleaned with isopropyl alcohol and may be painted with conductive carbon paint in a 10mm strip down the roll. Alternatively, a 10mm strip of conductive carbon tape is placed down the roll.
  • a circuit is made by making electrical contact with the painted surface and the roller shaft.
  • the DC resistivity of the roll at 100V, the AC resistivity of the roll at 1KHz, and the time constant are measured.
  • the time constant is measured by applying a 100 volt bias to the roll, removing the voltage and measuring the time for voltage on the roll to decay to 1/e (37%) of its original value. This time constant is related to the thickness and resistivity of the surface layer on the roll.
  • the roller is modeled as two parallel RC circuits in series.
  • the coating thickness and resistivity can be calculated from the time constant and DC resistance measurements.
  • the dielectric constant of the coating is assumed to be 10, a typical value for polyurethane rubber.
  • Increasing the polybutadiene level increases the resistivity of the coating.
  • Increasing the time and temperature of baking increases both the coating thickness and the coating electrical resistivity.
  • a roller with a resistive surface layer of between 5 x 10 9 and 2 x 10 12 ohm-cm and a surface layer thickness of approximately 50-150 microns measured at 22° C and 50% relative humidity can be produced.
  • the resistive surface layer produced by the oxidation process is permanent. Rolls with antioxidant have been analyzed for several months at 22° C and at higher temperatures such as 43° C and 80° C for an appropriate shorter duration without a significant change in electrical properties.
  • TIPA trademark of Dow Chemical Co.
  • Triisopropanolamine 99 acts to hydrolytically stabilize the described urethane-based developer roll.
  • Example 1 By Weight Vibrathane 6060 prepolymer 83.06% poly bd® R-45HT diol 12.00% Voranol 234-630 polyol 4.68% Ferric chloride 0.17% Triisopropanotamine 0.10%
  • Example 2 By Weight Vibrathane 6060 prepolymer 82.75% poly bd® R-45HT diol 12.00% Voranol 234-630 polyol 4.66% Ferric chloride 0.17% BHT 0.33% Triisopropanolamine 0.10%
  • Example 3 By Weight Vibrathane 6060 prepolymer 83.06% poly bd® R-45HT diol 12.00% Voranol 234-630 polyol 4.68% Ferric chloride 0.17% Triisopropanolamine 0.10%
  • Oxidative bake process 7 hours at 90° C

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Rolls And Other Rotary Bodies (AREA)
  • Dry Development In Electrophotography (AREA)
EP98303801A 1997-05-14 1998-05-14 Oxidative age resistance of surface oxidized roller Expired - Lifetime EP0878748B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US979600 1992-11-20
US4644497P 1997-05-14 1997-05-14
US46444P 1997-05-14
US08/979,600 US5874172A (en) 1997-11-26 1997-11-26 Oxidative age resistance of surface oxidized roller

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0878748A1 EP0878748A1 (en) 1998-11-18
EP0878748B1 true EP0878748B1 (en) 2003-02-19

Family

ID=26723928

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98303801A Expired - Lifetime EP0878748B1 (en) 1997-05-14 1998-05-14 Oxidative age resistance of surface oxidized roller

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0878748B1 (ko)
JP (1) JPH1195542A (ko)
KR (1) KR100514056B1 (ko)
CN (1) CN1204464C (ko)
DE (1) DE69811424T2 (ko)
TW (1) TW416025B (ko)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6042946A (en) * 1998-07-29 2000-03-28 Lexmark International, Inc. Polyurethane roller with high surface resistance
US6087011A (en) * 1998-10-13 2000-07-11 Lexmark International, Inc. Polyurethane roller with oxide surface layer
US6150025A (en) * 1999-07-12 2000-11-21 Lexmark International, Inc. Polyurethane roller with high surface resistance
US8182405B2 (en) * 2008-09-30 2012-05-22 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Developing roller, developing roller production method, process cartridge, and electrophotographic apparatus

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH02106777A (ja) * 1988-10-17 1990-04-18 Canon Inc 電子写真用定着オイル組成物
JP2584863B2 (ja) * 1989-06-07 1997-02-26 キヤノン株式会社 電子写真用帯電部材
US5248560A (en) * 1992-05-07 1993-09-28 Lexmark International, Inc. Filled urethane developer roller
US5434653A (en) * 1993-03-29 1995-07-18 Bridgestone Corporation Developing roller and apparatus
US5300339A (en) * 1993-03-29 1994-04-05 Xerox Corporation Development system coatings
US6117557A (en) * 1995-04-19 2000-09-12 Lexmark International, Inc. Caprolactone ester polyurethane developer roller
US5707743A (en) * 1996-04-09 1998-01-13 Lexmark International, Inc. Polyurethane roller with high surface resistance

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69811424T2 (de) 2003-12-18
CN1205456A (zh) 1999-01-20
CN1204464C (zh) 2005-06-01
KR100514056B1 (ko) 2006-01-12
EP0878748A1 (en) 1998-11-18
JPH1195542A (ja) 1999-04-09
DE69811424D1 (de) 2003-03-27
TW416025B (en) 2000-12-21
KR19980087055A (ko) 1998-12-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5707743A (en) Polyurethane roller with high surface resistance
US5874172A (en) Oxidative age resistance of surface oxidized roller
US20080219713A1 (en) Developer Rolls Having A Tuned Resistivity And Methods For Making The Same
EP0878748B1 (en) Oxidative age resistance of surface oxidized roller
US7034097B2 (en) Polyurethane elastomers with combination of curatives
US6042946A (en) Polyurethane roller with high surface resistance
US20050154149A1 (en) Polyurethane rolls and methods of manufacturing
JP5792532B2 (ja) 現像ローラ
US8448336B2 (en) Electrophotographic roller with resistance to nip banding
US6150025A (en) Polyurethane roller with high surface resistance
US6087011A (en) Polyurethane roller with oxide surface layer
AU721466B2 (en) Process of making a polyurethane roller with high surface resistance
US6936184B2 (en) Conductive member for OA equipment
EP2042939B1 (en) Conductive rubber member
MXPA97002573A (en) Polyurethane roller with high resistencesuperfic
US20100155677A1 (en) Polyurethane Roller with Reduced Surface Resistance
US7655311B2 (en) Homogeneous low hardness polyurethane
JP2000026719A (ja) 導電性部材及び画像形成装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19990507

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: DE FR GB

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20020412

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69811424

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20030327

Kind code of ref document: P

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20031120

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20070702

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20070525

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20070517

Year of fee payment: 10

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20080514

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20090119

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080602

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081202

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080514