EP0878593B1 - Curtain wall construction - Google Patents
Curtain wall construction Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0878593B1 EP0878593B1 EP98107360A EP98107360A EP0878593B1 EP 0878593 B1 EP0878593 B1 EP 0878593B1 EP 98107360 A EP98107360 A EP 98107360A EP 98107360 A EP98107360 A EP 98107360A EP 0878593 B1 EP0878593 B1 EP 0878593B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- facade
- panel
- vertical
- panels
- holder
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
- E04F13/00—Coverings or linings, e.g. for walls or ceilings
- E04F13/07—Coverings or linings, e.g. for walls or ceilings composed of covering or lining elements; Sub-structures therefor; Fastening means therefor
- E04F13/08—Coverings or linings, e.g. for walls or ceilings composed of covering or lining elements; Sub-structures therefor; Fastening means therefor composed of a plurality of similar covering or lining elements
- E04F13/0801—Separate fastening elements
- E04F13/0803—Separate fastening elements with load-supporting elongated furring elements between wall and covering elements
- E04F13/081—Separate fastening elements with load-supporting elongated furring elements between wall and covering elements with additional fastening elements between furring elements and covering elements
- E04F13/0821—Separate fastening elements with load-supporting elongated furring elements between wall and covering elements with additional fastening elements between furring elements and covering elements the additional fastening elements located in-between two adjacent covering elements
- E04F13/0826—Separate fastening elements with load-supporting elongated furring elements between wall and covering elements with additional fastening elements between furring elements and covering elements the additional fastening elements located in-between two adjacent covering elements engaging side grooves running along the whole length of the covering elements
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04F—FINISHING WORK ON BUILDINGS, e.g. STAIRS, FLOORS
- E04F2203/00—Specially structured or shaped covering, lining or flooring elements not otherwise provided for
- E04F2203/04—Specially structured or shaped covering, lining or flooring elements not otherwise provided for comprising a plurality of internal elongated cavities arranged in substantially parallel rows
Definitions
- the invention relates to a curtain, preferably one Aluminum substructure assembled facade construction according to the Preamble of claim 1.
- the high head fold is particularly significant Risk of breakage if a strong impact hits the front Facade slab is executed, as this can be done by slightly tilting the Facade panel of the top rebate with its upper rear edge on the panel holder supports, so that the support force with a long lever arm on the top fold takes effect.
- the joint profile consists of a central bead in the width of the vertical joint arranged between the facade panels and two resilient Double legs, which are arranged on both sides of the center bead.
- the Joint profile is mounted in long rods and thus ensures a clean one Alignment of the vertical joints.
- the disadvantage of this construction is that the joint profile described because of the required spring action must be made of very thin material and therefore easy to assemble folds away or a high level with the necessary care Assembly time expenditure caused.
- DE-A-39 34 686 is a fastening device for facade panels known in which the holding profiles are vertically extending box profiles.
- the Box profiles of a facade panel are spaced from each other on, which is smaller than the width of the facade panels and their distance to the holding profile of the neighboring facade panel with a joint profile is filled in that in its central section with projecting lateral Stops for the facade panels protrude into the vertical joint.
- the object of the invention is therefore to a facade construction describe in which the cost of materials in connection with the Reduced plate holders and shortened the required assembly time and the Driving rain safety is increased.
- the object is achieved by Characteristic of claim 1.
- Characteristic of claim 1 is that by a single plate holder two upper and two lower Facade panels in their corner areas on the support profiles of Substructure to be attached. So there is in each crosshairs of the facade a plate holder arranged; so the need is in the area of Facade only one Panel holder per facade panel, while the facade construction according to the state of the Technique two plate holders per facade plate are required. This will Material costs saved and assembly times shortened.
- Another advantage of this Embodiment is that the facade panels by tongues or tabs, which on the plate holders are flush aligned or notched on one exact joint spacing and that the vertical joints of the top arranged plate pairs with the vertical joints of the plate pairs arranged below exactly cursed.
- the width of the tongues or tabs corresponds to that required relatively little play of the clear width of the vertical joints between the facade panels.
- double tongues or tabs can also be released be, the total dimension of the outer edge to outer edge of the width of a single tongue equivalent.
- the tongues attached to the plate holder do not intervene directly in the vertical joints between the respective plate pairs but only in the beads that are open from behind and arranged in the vertical joints Joint profiles.
- the joint profile which is preferably made of very thin sheet metal or plastic
- the facade panels holds at a precise distance, but still so far in the elastic and plastic range is deformable that it is neither in the assembly nor in subsequent relative movements of the Facade due to wind loads or building settlements to force and thereby to Damage or breakage of facade panels can occur.
- This is also supported Joint profile with the ends of its two outward spread legs in its lower Resilient area on the plate holder and in its upper area resilient on the support profile and thereby presses the double-sided facade panels, the vertical rear edges of which grips as far as elastic to the front of the facade until the play between the head or the rebate of the facade panels on the one hand and the panel holder on the other hand is balanced.
- this embodiment is on the one hand that the joint profile with its protruding edges tightly embraces the rear vertical edges of the facade panels and thereby forming a particularly effective seal against the ingress of driving rain.
- this joint profile compared to the joint profile according to the prior art Much cheaper, since instead of one bead and 6 folds, there is only one bead and 2 Bends is provided.
- Another advantage lies in the fact that it works with the facade panels can be assembled in short pieces and the cumbersome Handling of the long joint profiles according to the prior art is eliminated, which means Assembly time is saved.
- FIG. 5 Another advantageous embodiment of the facade construction according to the invention Claim 5 is that the top fold of the lower two facade panels and / or the U-shaped part of the footprint of the upper two facade panels Plate holder are released in the middle part of the same.
- the resulting benefit is there in that the head or foot folds of the facade panels do not bend at the extreme end be loaded because the risk of breakage is highest there.
- By notching the The respective load application point of the plate holder moves from the fold end to the plate holder away towards the center of the fold, where the so-called load-bearing width of the fold much larger is. Tests have shown that when the facade panels are subjected to shock loads from the Front of the facade the resistance to rebate by the described displacement of the Load application point increases up to two and a half times.
- the facade construction according to claim 6 are the rear, around the top fold or foot fold of the plate holder on their Provide ends with reinforcements, which are oriented towards the back of the facade panel are.
- the advantage that results from this is that, when exposed to a Impact load on the front of the facade panel, the load application point from the head of the relocated the respective fold to its foot or even to the actual panel body itself becomes. The result is that the impact load can be absorbed by the facade panel without damage against the impact load, which is fixed by a conventional holder Facade slab can be recorded, increases to multiple.
- the plate holder according to the invention is by moving the load application point to the lower end of the leg of the Plate holder not only the length of the effective lever arm of the top fold considerably shortened or omitted entirely; rather, at the same time, the effective lever arm of the rear Leg of the plate holder is significantly extended, which makes it able to move on the Facade panel applied impact loads much more elastic on the panel holder and thus to remove on the substructure, as this with the plate holder according to the state of the Technology is possible
- facade construction is on the back Leg of the H-shaped part of the plate holder waived.
- the facade panels are then just pushed forward by the resilient joint profiles and support themselves in the event of a Impact load from the front on the front of the plate holder or on the lower front edge of the Support profiles from.
- the invention further relates to a plate holder for a curtain Facade construction.
- the Plate holder characterized by the features of claim 7.
- Advantageous further developments are described in claims 8 to 11.
- Fig. 1 shows the substructure 1, the horizontal profile 2 on which the Facade panels 3 are fastened by means of the panel holder 4.
- the joint profiles 17, 18 consist of a bead 15, 16 and resilient legs 19, 20 whose ends 28, 30 are on the front surface 31 of the plate holder 4 and / or support on the front edge 32 of the horizontal profile 2.
- the tongue 7 engages the bead 15 of the upper joint profile 17 and the tongue 9 in the bead 16 of the lower Joint profile 18 a.
- the tongue 8 engages in the vertical joint between the upper Facade panels 3 and can also the centering function of the tongue 7 in its place take.
- Fig. 2 shows the horizontal profile 2 on soft the facade panels 3 by means of the plate holder 4 is attached.
- the tongue 7 of the grips from behind Holder 4 whereby the joint profile 17 is centered relative to the holder 4.
- the bead 15 engages from behind in the joint 10 between the upper pair of plates 13 (for the sake of Clarity drawn in dashed lines) and ensures compliance with the required Joint spacing of the vertical joint 10.
- the bead 16 of the lower joint profile 18 engages in the back of the joint 11 between the lower pair of plates 14 (for reasons of clarity drawn in dashed lines) and ensures compliance with the required joint spacing of the vertical joint 11.
- the tongue 9 engages in the bead 16 from behind.
- the tongues 7 and 9 or 8 and 9 are arranged one above the other on the same vertical central axis and The two lower legs 33, 34 are in the middle of the Plate holder 4 unlatched so that it does not directly overlap the head folds 40 of the plate pair 14 next to the fugue 11 but grasped away from it.
- the tongue 7 can also the tongue 8 engage directly in the vertical joint 10 between the upper pair of plates 13.
- FIG. 3 shows the lower plate pair 14 whose top rebate 40 encompassed by the plate holder 4 and are attached to the horizontal profile 2.
- the tongue 7 engages from behind in the bead 15 of the upper joint profile 17, which with its protruding edges 21, 22 the rear grips vertical edges 23, 24 of the facade panels 25, 26.
- the two resilient legs 19, 20 are supported with their ends 42, 43 on the front surface 31 of the plate holder 4.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Finishing Walls (AREA)
- Load-Bearing And Curtain Walls (AREA)
- Panels For Use In Building Construction (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung bezieht sich auf eine vorgehängte, vorzugsweise auf einer
Aluminium-Unterkonstruktion montierte Fassadenkonstruktion nach dem
Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 1.The invention relates to a curtain, preferably one
Aluminum substructure assembled facade construction according to the
Preamble of
Aus der DE-A-34 01 271 und aus Herstellerprospekten ist eine Fassadenkonstruktion bekannt deren Platten mittels schmaler Plattenhalter an horizontalen oder vertikalen Tragprofilen befestigt werden. Dabei umgreift ein H-förmiges Teil des Plattenhalters den Kopffalz der jeweils unteren Platte und den Fußfalz der jeweils oberen Platte. Die Plattenhalter sind in der Regel bei den vorzugsweise im Querformat ausgeführten Fassadenplatten am Kopf- bzw. Fußfalz paarweise angeordnet und von den Ecken der Fassadenplatten her etwas eingerückt, so daß die Fassadenplatten an 4 Punkten befestigt sind. Da die H-förmigen Teile der Plattenhalter nach oben und unten wirksam sind, ergibt sich in der Fläche ein Bedarf von zwei Plattenhaltem pro Fassadenplatte. Der Nachteil dieser Konstruktion liegt in dem hohen Bedarf von zwei Plattenhaltern pro Fassadenplatte, wodurch sich sowohl die Materialals auch die Lohnkosten der fix und fertig montierten Fassadenkonstruktion erhöhen. Außerdem ist insbesondere der hohe Kopffalz einer erheblichen Bruchgefahr ausgesetzt, wenn ein starker Stoß von vorne auf die Fassadenplatte ausgeführt wird, da sich dabei durch leichtes Kippen der Fassadenplatte der Kopffalz mit seiner oberen hinteren Kante am Plattenhalter abstützt, so daß die Abstützkraft mit einem langen Hebelarm am Kopffalz wirksam wird.From DE-A-34 01 271 and from manufacturer's brochures is one Facade construction known whose slabs by means of narrow slab holders horizontal or vertical support profiles. It embraces H-shaped part of the plate holder the top fold of each lower plate and the rebate of the top plate. The plate holders are usually included the facade panels, preferably in landscape format, on the head or foot rebate arranged in pairs and from the corners of the facade panels here indented so that the facade panels are attached at 4 points. Since the H-shaped parts of the plate holders are effective upwards and downwards, there is a need for two plate holders per area Facade panel. The disadvantage of this construction is the high demand of two plate holders per facade plate, which means that both the material and also the labor costs of the fully assembled facade construction increase. In addition, the high head fold is particularly significant Risk of breakage if a strong impact hits the front Facade slab is executed, as this can be done by slightly tilting the Facade panel of the top rebate with its upper rear edge on the panel holder supports, so that the support force with a long lever arm on the top fold takes effect.
Weiter ist aus der DE-A-36 27 584 und aus Herstellerprospekten ein Fugenprofil für die vertikalen Fugen von Fassadenkonstruktionen bekannt, welches die Relativbewegung der Fassadenplatten in horizontaler Richtung in der Fassadenebene und das Klappern der Fassadenplatten bei Wind verhindern soll. Das Fugenprofil besteht aus einer Mittelsicke in der Breite der zwischen der Fassadenplatten angeordneten Vertikalfuge und zwei federnden Doppelschenkeln, die beiderseits der Mittelsicke angeordnet sind. Das Fugenprofil wird in langen Stangen montiert und sichert somit ein sauberes Fluchten der vertikalen Fugen. Der Nachteil dieser Konstruktion liegt darin, daß das beschriebene Fugenprofil wegen der erforderlichen Federwirkung aus sehr dünnem Material ausgeführt sein muß und deshalb bei der Montage leicht wegknickt bzw. bei der erforderlichen Sorgfalt einen hohen Montagezeitaufwand verursacht. Außerdem ist es aufgrund der erforderlichen 7-fachen Abkantung teuer in der Herstellung. Aus beiden Gründen erhöhen sich die Herstellkosten der fix und fertig montierten Fassadenkonstruktion. Ein weiterer Nachteil dieses Fugenprofils liegt darin, daß es die Vertikalfuge nur mangelhaft gegen Schlagregen abdichtet, da sich die Schenkel der Mittelsicke in gerader Linie bis zum Abstützpunkt am Tragprofil fortsetzen und deshalb durch herstellungsbedingte Toleranzen schmale Spalte verbleiben können, durch welche Wasser eingetrieben werden kann, welches bis zum Tragprofil und über dieses bis zur Wärmedämmung gelangt und diese durchfeuchtet.Next is from DE-A-36 27 584 and from manufacturer's brochures Joint profile known for the vertical joints of facade structures, which shows the relative movement of the facade panels in the horizontal direction the facade level and the clatter of the facade panels in the wind should prevent. The joint profile consists of a central bead in the width of the vertical joint arranged between the facade panels and two resilient Double legs, which are arranged on both sides of the center bead. The Joint profile is mounted in long rods and thus ensures a clean one Alignment of the vertical joints. The disadvantage of this construction is that the joint profile described because of the required spring action must be made of very thin material and therefore easy to assemble folds away or a high level with the necessary care Assembly time expenditure caused. It is also required due to 7-fold folding is expensive to manufacture. Increase for both reasons the manufacturing costs of the fully assembled facade construction. On Another disadvantage of this joint profile is that it is only the vertical joint insufficiently seals against driving rain, because the legs of the center bead Continue in a straight line to the support point on the support profile and therefore narrow gaps can remain due to manufacturing tolerances, through which water can be driven, which up to the support profile and through this to the insulation and moistened it.
Aus der DE-A-39 34 686 ist eine Befestigungsvorrichtung für Fassadenplatten bekannt, bei der die Halteprofile vertikal verlaufende Kastenprofile sind. Die Kastenprofile einer Fassadenplatte weisen jeweils einen Abstand voneinander auf, der geringer als die Breite der Fassadenplatten ist und deren Abstand zu dem Halteprofil der benachbarten Fassadenplatte durch ein Fugenprofil ausgefüllt ist, das in seinem mittleren Abschnitt mit vorspringenden seitlichen Anschlägen für die Fassadenplatten in die vertikale Fuge ragt.DE-A-39 34 686 is a fastening device for facade panels known in which the holding profiles are vertically extending box profiles. The Box profiles of a facade panel are spaced from each other on, which is smaller than the width of the facade panels and their distance to the holding profile of the neighboring facade panel with a joint profile is filled in that in its central section with projecting lateral Stops for the facade panels protrude into the vertical joint.
Aufgabe der Erfindung ist es deshalb, eine Fassadenkonstruktion zu beschreiben, bei welcher der Materialaufwand in Verbindung mit den Plattenhaltern verringert und die erforderliche Montagezeit verkürzt und die Schlagregensicherheit erhöht wird.The object of the invention is therefore to a facade construction describe in which the cost of materials in connection with the Reduced plate holders and shortened the required assembly time and the Driving rain safety is increased.
Die Lösung der gestellten Aufgabe erfolgt erfindungsgemäß durch das
Kennzeichen des Anspruchs 1. Der Vorteil dieser Ausführungsform liegt darin,
daß durch einen einzigen Plattenhalter jeweils zwei obere und zwei untere
Fassadenplatten in ihren Eckbereichen an den Tragprofilen der
Unterkonstruktion befestigt werden. In jedem Fugenkreuz der Fassade ist also
ein Plattenhalter angeordnet; der Bedarf beträgt also in der Fläche der
Fassade nur einen
Plattenhalter pro Fassadenplatte, während bei den Fassadenkonstruktionen nach dem Stand der
Technik zwei Plattenhalter pro Fassadenplatte erforderlich sind. Dadurch werden
Materialkosten eingespart und die Montagezeiten verkürzt. Ein weiterer Vorteil dieser
Ausführungsform liegt darin, daß die Fassadenplatten durch Zungen oder Laschen, welche an
den Plattenhaltern genau übereinander fluchtend angebracht oder ausgeklinkt sind auf einem
exakten Fugenabstand gehalten werden und daß dadurch die Vertikalfugen der jeweils oben
angeordneten Plattenpaare mit den Vertikalfugen der jeweils unten angeordneten Plattenpaare
genau fluchten. Dabei entspricht die Breite der Zungen oder Laschen mit dem erforderlichen
relativ geringen Spiel der lichten Breite der vertikalen Fugen zwischen den Fassadenplatten.
Anstelle der Zungen oder Laschen können auch doppelte Zungen oder Laschen ausgeklinkt
sein, deren Gesamtmaß von Außenkante zu Außenkante der Breite einer einzelnen Zunge
entspricht. Bei der Montage der Fassadenkonstruktion wird dabei jeweils die untere Zunge
oder das untere Zungenpaar des Plattenhalters von oben in die Vertikalfuge des unteren
Plattenpaares eingeführt, wodurch der Plattenhalter vor seiner endgültigen Befestigung am
Tragprofil genau auf die Fugenmitte zentriert wird. Da auch die obere Zunge des Plattenhalters
mittig über der unteren Zunge angeordnet ist, ergibt sich bei der Montage des oberen
Plattenpaares zwangsläufig ein Fluchten der Vertikalfuge des oberen Plattenpaares mit der des
unteren.According to the invention, the object is achieved by
Characteristic of
Bei einer anderen besonders vorteilhaften Ausführungsform nach Anspruch 3 und 4 ist zwischen den Vertikalfugen des oberen und des unteren Plattenpaares ein Fugenprofil mit einer Sicke angeordnet, welches die vertikalen hinteren Kanten der beidseitig angeordneten Fassadenplatten umgreift und welches sich mittels beidseitiger einfacher federnder Schenkel am Plattenhalter bzw. an dem Tragprofil abstützt. Die an dem Plattenhalter angebrachten Zungen greifen dabei nicht direkt in die Vertikalfugen zwischen den jeweiligen Plattenpaaren ein sondern nur in die von hinten offenen Sicken der in den Vertikalfugen angeordneten Fugenprofile. Die Vorteile dieser Ausführungsform liegen darin, daß das Fugenprofil, welches vorzugsweise aus sehr dünnem Blech oder aus Kunststoff gefertigt ist, die Fassadenplatten zwar auf genauem Abstand hält, trotzdem aber im elastischen und plastischen Bereich so weit verformbar ist, daß es weder bei der Montage noch bei nachträglichen Relativbewegungen der Fassade durch Windlasten oder Gebäudesetzungen zu Zwangskräften und dadurch zur Beschädigung oder zum Bruch von Fassadenplatten kommen kann. Außerdem stützt sich das Fugenprofil mit den Enden seiner beiden nach außen gespreizten Schenkel in seinem unteren Bereich federnd an dem Plattenhalter und in seinem oberen Bereich federnd am Tragprofil ab und drückt dadurch die beidseitigen Fassadenplatten, deren vertikale rückseitige Kanten es umgreift, soweit elastisch zur Vorderseite der Fassade, bis das Spiel zwischen dem Kopf- bzw. dem Fußfalz der Fassadenplatten einerseits und dem Plattenhalter andrerseits ausgeglichen ist. Der Vorteil dieser Ausführungsform liegt einerseits darin, daß das Fugenprofil mit seinen einspringenden Kanten die hinteren vertikalen Kanten der Fassadenplatten eng umgreift und dadurch eine besonders wirksame Abdichtung gegen das Eindringen von Schlagregen bildet. Außerdem ist dieses Fugenprofil gegenüber dem Fugenprofil nach dem Stand der Technik wesentlich billiger, da es statt mit einer Sicke und 6 Abkantungen nur mit einer Sicke und 2 Abkantungen versehen ist. Ein weiterer Vorteil liegt darin begründet, daß es gleichzeitig mit den Fassadenplatten in kurzen Stücken montiert werden kann und die umständliche Handhabung der langen Fugenprofile nach dem Stand der Technik entfällt, wodurch Montagezeit eingespart wird.In another particularly advantageous embodiment according to claims 3 and 4 a joint profile with a between the vertical joints of the upper and the lower pair of plates Bead arranged, which arranged the vertical rear edges of the two sides Grips facade panels and which is by means of simple resilient legs on both sides Plate holder or supported on the support profile. The tongues attached to the plate holder do not intervene directly in the vertical joints between the respective plate pairs but only in the beads that are open from behind and arranged in the vertical joints Joint profiles. The advantages of this embodiment are that the joint profile, which is preferably made of very thin sheet metal or plastic, the facade panels holds at a precise distance, but still so far in the elastic and plastic range is deformable that it is neither in the assembly nor in subsequent relative movements of the Facade due to wind loads or building settlements to force and thereby to Damage or breakage of facade panels can occur. This is also supported Joint profile with the ends of its two outward spread legs in its lower Resilient area on the plate holder and in its upper area resilient on the support profile and thereby presses the double-sided facade panels, the vertical rear edges of which grips as far as elastic to the front of the facade until the play between the head or the rebate of the facade panels on the one hand and the panel holder on the other hand is balanced. The advantage of this embodiment is on the one hand that the joint profile with its protruding edges tightly embraces the rear vertical edges of the facade panels and thereby forming a particularly effective seal against the ingress of driving rain. In addition, this joint profile compared to the joint profile according to the prior art Much cheaper, since instead of one bead and 6 folds, there is only one bead and 2 Bends is provided. Another advantage lies in the fact that it works with the facade panels can be assembled in short pieces and the cumbersome Handling of the long joint profiles according to the prior art is eliminated, which means Assembly time is saved.
Eine andere vorteilhafte Ausführungsform der erfindungsgemäßen Fassadenkonstruktion nach
Anspruch 5 besteht darin, daß die den Kopffalz der unteren beiden Fassadenplatten und/oder
die den Fußfalz der oberen beiden Fassadenplatten umgreifenden U-förmigen Teil des
Plattenhalters im Mittelteil derselben ausgeklinkt sind. Der daraus resultierende Vorteil besteht
darin, daß die Kopf- bzw. Fußfalze der Fassadenplatten nicht am äußersten Ende auf Biegung
belastet werden, da dort die Bruchgefahr am höchsten ist. Durch die Ausklinkung des
Plattenhalters verlagert sich der jeweilige Lastenangriffspunkt der Plattenhalter vom Falzende
weg in Richtung zur Falzmitte, wo die sogen. mittragende Breite des Falzes wesentlich größer
ist. Versuche haben ergeben, daß bei Stoßbelastung der Fassadenplatten von der
Fassadenvorderseite her die Falzbruchfestigkeit durch die beschriebene Verlagerung des
Lastangriffspunktes bis auf das zweieinhalbfache zunimmt.Another advantageous embodiment of the facade construction according to the
In weiterer Ausgestaltung der erfindungsgemäßen Fassadenkonstruktion nach Anspruch 6 sind die hinteren, den Kopffalz bzw. Fußfalz umgreifenden Schenkel des Plattenhalters an ihren Enden mit Verstärkungen versehen, welche zur Rückseite der Fassadenplatte hin ausgerichtet sind. Der Vorteil, der sich daraus ergibt, ist darin begründet, daß bei Einwirkung einer Stoßlast auf die Vorderseite der Fassadenplatte, der Lastangriffspunkt vom Kopf des jeweiligen Falzes zu seinem Fuß oder sogar bis zum eigentlichen Plattenkörper selbst verlagert wird. Das Ergebnis ist, daß die von der Fassadenplatte schadensfrei aufnehmbare Stoßlast gegenüber der Stoßlast, die von einer, mit einem konventionellen Halter befestigten Fassadenplatte aufgenommen werden kann, auf das Mehrfache ansteigt. Bei der Befestigung einer gleichartigen Fassadenplatte mit Plattenhaltern nach dem Stand der Technik macht die Fassadenplatte bei einer Stoßbelastung von vorne im Bereich des Spiels zwischen Plattenhalter und Kopffalz eine leichte Kippbewegung nach hinten und stützt sich dadurch mit der oberen Hinterkante des Kopffalzes am Plattenhalter ab. Das auf den Kopffalzfuß einwirkende Biegemoment hat deshalb wegen des langen Hebelarmes seine maximal mögliche Größe. Dagegen ist der Hebelarm des hinteren Schenkels des Plattenhalters an dieser Stelle sehr kurz, wodurch die elastische Verformbarkeit sehr gering ist. Beim erfindungsgemäßen Plattenhalter wird durch die Verlagerung des Lastangriffspunktes an das untere Ende des Schenkels des Plattenhalters nicht nur die Länge des wirksamen Hebelarmes des Kopffalzes erheblich verkürzt bzw. entfällt ganz; vielmehr wird gleichzeitig der wirksame Hebelarm des hinteren Schenkels des Plattenhalters erheblich verlängert, wodurch es in der Lage ist, die auf die Fassadenplatte aufgebrachten Stoßlasten wesentlich elastischer auf den Plattenhalter und damit auf die Unterkonstruktion abzutragen, als dies bei dem Plattenhaler nach dem Stand der Technik möglich istIn a further embodiment of the facade construction according to claim 6 are the rear, around the top fold or foot fold of the plate holder on their Provide ends with reinforcements, which are oriented towards the back of the facade panel are. The advantage that results from this is that, when exposed to a Impact load on the front of the facade panel, the load application point from the head of the relocated the respective fold to its foot or even to the actual panel body itself becomes. The result is that the impact load can be absorbed by the facade panel without damage against the impact load, which is fixed by a conventional holder Facade slab can be recorded, increases to multiple. When fixing a similar facade panel with panel holders according to the prior art makes the Facade panel with a shock load from the front in the area of play between the panel holder and top fold a slight tilting movement backwards and thereby supports itself with the upper one From the rear edge of the top fold on the plate holder. The one acting on the top rebate Bending moment therefore has its maximum possible size due to the long lever arm. In contrast, the lever arm of the rear leg of the plate holder is very short at this point, whereby the elastic deformability is very low. In the plate holder according to the invention is by moving the load application point to the lower end of the leg of the Plate holder not only the length of the effective lever arm of the top fold considerably shortened or omitted entirely; rather, at the same time, the effective lever arm of the rear Leg of the plate holder is significantly extended, which makes it able to move on the Facade panel applied impact loads much more elastic on the panel holder and thus to remove on the substructure, as this with the plate holder according to the state of the Technology is possible
Bei einer weiteren Ausführungsvariante der Fassadenkonstruktion wird auf die rückseitigen Schenkel des H-förmigen Teils des Plattenhalters verzichtet. Die Fassadenplatten werden dann lediglich durch die federnden Fugenprofile nach vorne gedrückt und stützen sich im Falle einer Stoßlast von vorne an der Vorderseite der Plattenhalter bzw. an der unteren Vorderkante der Tragprofile ab.In a further embodiment variant of the facade construction is on the back Leg of the H-shaped part of the plate holder waived. The facade panels are then just pushed forward by the resilient joint profiles and support themselves in the event of a Impact load from the front on the front of the plate holder or on the lower front edge of the Support profiles from.
Die Erfindung betrifft ferner einen Plattenhalter für eine vorgehängte
Fassadenkonstruktion.
Zur Lösung der oben angegebenen Aufgabe ist der
Plattenhalter durch die Merkmale des Anspruchs 7 gekennzeichnet.
Vorteilhafte Weiterbildungen sind in den Ansprüchen 8 bis 11 beschrieben.The invention further relates to a plate holder for a curtain
Facade construction.
To solve the above problem is the
Plate holder characterized by the features of
Die Erfindung ist in der nachstehenden Beschreibung anhand von Zeichnungen in verschiedenen Ausführungsformen beispielhaft wie folgt erläutert:
- Fig. 1
- zeigt einen Vertikalschnitt durch die erfindungsgemäße Fassadenkonstruktion.
- Fig. 2
- zeigt die Vorderansicht der Fassadenkonstruktion
- Fig. 3
- zeigt die Draufsicht auf die Fassadenkonstruktion
- Fig. 1
- shows a vertical section through the facade construction according to the invention.
- Fig. 2
- shows the front view of the facade construction
- Fig. 3
- shows the top view of the facade construction
Die Fig. 1 zeigt die Unterkonstruktion 1, das horizontale Profil 2 an welchem die
Fassadenplatten 3 mittels des Plattenhalters 4 befestigt sind. Die Fugenprofile 17, 18 (aus
Gründen der Übersichtlichkeit gestrichelt eingezeichnet) bestehen aus einer Sicke 15, 16 und
federnden Schenkein 19, 20 deren Enden 28, 30 sich an der Vorderfläche 31 des Plattenhalters
4 und/oder an der Vorderkante 32 des horizontalen Profils 2 abstützen. Die Zunge 7 greift in
die Sicke 15 des oberen Fugenprofils 17 und die Zunge 9 in die Sicke 16 des unteren
Fugenprofils 18 ein. Die Zunge 8 greift in die Vertikalfuge zwischen den oberen
Fassadenplatten 3 ein und kann auch die zentrierende Funktion der Zunge 7 an deren Stelle
übernehmen. Die hinteren Schenkel 34, 35 des Plattenhalters 4 sind an ihren Enden mit
Verstärkungen 36, 37 versehen, so daß sich die Fassadenplatten bei Belastung von der
Vorderseite her mit ihrer Rückseite 38, 39 an den Verstärkungen 36, 37 abstützen, so daß der
Kopffalz 40 und der Fußfalz 41 nicht auf Biegung belastet werden.
Fig. 2 zeigt das horizontale Profil 2 an weichem die Fassadenplatten 3 mittels des Plattenhalters
4 befestigt ist. In die Sicke 15 des oberen Fugenprofils 17 greift von hinten die Zunge 7 des
Halters 4 ein, wodurch das Fugenprofil 17 gegenüber dem Halter 4 zentriert wird. Die Sicke
15 greift von hinten in die Fuge 10 zwischen dem oberen Plattenpaar 13 (aus Gründen der
Übersichtlichkeit gestrichelt gezeichnet) ein und sichert die Einhaltung des erforderlichen
Fugenabstandes der vertikalen Fuge 10. Die Sicke 16 des unteren Fugenprofils 18 greift von
hinten in die Fuge 11 zwischen dem unteren Plattenpaar 14 (aus Gründen der Übersichtlichkeit
gestrichelt gezeichnet) ein und sichert die Einhaltung des erforderlichen Fugenabstandes der
vertikalen Fuge 11. Die Zunge 9 greift von hinten in die Sicke 16 ein. Die Zungen 7 und 9 bzw.
8 und 9 sind auf der gleichen vertikalen Mittelachse übereinander angeordnet und
achsensymetrisch ausgebildet.Die beiden unteren Schenkel 33, 34 sind in der Mitte des
Plattenhalters 4 ausgeklinkt, so daß sie die Kopffälze 40 des Plattenpaares 14 nicht unmittelbar
neben der Fuge 11 sondern von dieser abgerückt umgreifen. Anstelle der Zunge 7 kann auch
die Zunge 8 direkt in die Vertikalfuge 10 zwischen dem oberen Plattenpaar 13 eingreifen.
Fig. 3 zeigt das untere Plattenpaar 14 dessen Kopffälze 40 durch den Plattenhalter 4 umgriffen
und am horizontalen Profil 2 befestigt sind. Die Zunge 7 greift von hinten in die Sicke 15 des
oberen Fugenprofils 17 ein, welches mit seinen einspringenden Kanten 21,22 die hinteren
vertikalen Kanten 23,24 der Fassadenplatten 25, 26 umgreift. Die beiden federnden Schenkel
19,20 stützen sich mit ihren Enden 42, 43 an der Vorderfläche 31 des Plattenhalters 4 ab. Fig. 1 shows the
Claims (11)
- Curtain-wall facade structure comprising a substructure (1), horizontal and/or vertical profiles (2), facade panels (3), which can be secured on the horizontal or vertical profiles (2) by means of panel holders (4), and joint profiles (5), which are arranged in and/or behind the vertical joints (6) between the facade panels (3), characterized in that the panel holder (4) is arranged centrally in relation to the vertical joints (10, 11) and has retaining legs (33, 34, 35) which engage over adjacent panels (3) of a pair (13, 14) of panels on the front side and/or engage around the same in a U-shaped manner on the front and rear sides, and in that the panel holder has one or more tongues (7, 8, 9) which engage in one or more of the joint profiles (5, 17, 18) which are designed to engage in the vertical joints (10, 11) between the panels (3) of one or more pairs (13, 14) of panels.
- Curtain-wall facade structure according to Claim 1, characterized in that the centre axes of the tongues (7, 8, 9) are arranged in the same vertical plane, as seen from the front side of the facade.
- Curtain-wall facade structure according to Claims 1 and 2, characterized in that one or more tongues (7, 9) are designed to engage in one or more beads (15, 16) of vertical joint profiles (17, 18).
- Curtain-wall facade structure according to Claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the joint profiles (17, 18) comprise a bead (15, 16) and two resilient legs (19, 20), of which the inwardly projecting edges (21, 22) engage around the rear vertical edges (23, 24) of the facade panels (25, 26) and the ends (27, 28, 42, 43) are designed for support on the front surface (31) of the panel holder (4) and/or on the front edge (32) of the profile (2).
- Curtain-wall facade structure according to Claims 1 to 4, characterized in that one or both bottom legs (33, 34) are cut away in the centre of the panel holder (4).
- Curtain-wall facade structure according to Claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the rear legs (34, 35) of the panel holder (4) are provided at their end with a reinforcement (36, 37) which is directed towards the facade panel (3).
- Panel-holder arrangement for a curtain-wall facade structure comprising facade panels arranged with vertical joints, having a panel holder for retaining facade panels, and having one or more joint profiles for arranging in and/or behind the vertical joints, characterized in that the panel holder (4) has facade-panel-securing retaining legs (33, 34, 35) for retaining facade panels, and in that the panel holder (4) has one or more tongues (7, 9) which engages or engage in one or more joint profiles.
- Panel-holder arrangement according to Claim 7, characterized in that the centre axes of the tongues (7, 8, 9) are arranged in the same vertical plane.
- Panel-holder arrangement according to Claim 7 or 8, characterized in that one or more of the tongues (7, 9) are designed for engaging in one or more beads (15, 16) of vertical joint profiles (17, 18).
- Panel-holder arrangement according to one of Claims 7 to 9, characterized in that one or both bottom legs (33, 34) are cut away in the centre of the panel holder (4).
- Panel-holder arrangement according to one of Claims 7 to 10, characterized in that the rear legs (34, 35) of the panel holder (4) are provided with a reinforcement (36, 37) at their end.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE19720016A DE19720016C2 (en) | 1997-05-13 | 1997-05-13 | Curtain wall construction |
DE19720016 | 1997-05-13 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0878593A2 EP0878593A2 (en) | 1998-11-18 |
EP0878593A3 EP0878593A3 (en) | 1999-04-28 |
EP0878593B1 true EP0878593B1 (en) | 2004-06-16 |
Family
ID=7829331
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP98107360A Expired - Lifetime EP0878593B1 (en) | 1997-05-13 | 1998-04-22 | Curtain wall construction |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6289644B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP0878593B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE269467T1 (en) |
CZ (1) | CZ123798A3 (en) |
DE (2) | DE19720016C2 (en) |
PL (1) | PL326237A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE10027502B4 (en) * | 2000-06-02 | 2005-02-17 | Möding Keramikfassaden GmbH | Curtain ventilated facade construction |
JP3438723B2 (en) * | 2001-01-24 | 2003-08-18 | ニチハ株式会社 | Fastening seal fitting and outer wall construction structure |
DE10312833A1 (en) * | 2002-08-21 | 2004-03-04 | Möding Keramikfassaden GmbH | Wall construction and facade panel |
US20040144052A1 (en) * | 2003-01-17 | 2004-07-29 | Long Douglas A. | Suspended ceiling system |
US20050060950A1 (en) * | 2003-09-22 | 2005-03-24 | Hauschildt William R. | Wall panel system |
DE102004013016B4 (en) * | 2004-03-16 | 2007-12-27 | Nbk-Keramik Gmbh & Co. | building facade |
US8225556B2 (en) * | 2004-10-19 | 2012-07-24 | Russell Perry Brown | Self cleaning gutter system and gutter bracket |
DE102005002097A1 (en) * | 2005-01-14 | 2006-07-20 | Moeding Keramikfassaden Gmbh | facade panel |
DE102006033045A1 (en) * | 2006-07-14 | 2008-01-17 | Moeding Keramikfassaden Gmbh | Curtain wall construction |
US7673430B1 (en) * | 2006-08-10 | 2010-03-09 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V | Recessed wall-wash staggered mounting system |
US20090025327A1 (en) * | 2007-03-26 | 2009-01-29 | Albracht Gregory P | Furring Strip Alignment System |
ES2338192B1 (en) * | 2007-12-13 | 2011-03-28 | Eclad Limited | ANCHOR SYSTEM OF VENTILATED FACADES. |
US20110094177A1 (en) * | 2008-04-10 | 2011-04-28 | Sam Licciardi | Tiling system |
US8322103B1 (en) * | 2008-10-22 | 2012-12-04 | Charles D Kownacki | Faux brick with suspension system |
US20100212255A1 (en) * | 2009-02-20 | 2010-08-26 | David Allen Lesoine | Universal extrusion |
PL2447440T3 (en) * | 2010-11-02 | 2015-05-29 | Rockwool Int | A fixing bracket, a system comprising such a fixing bracket, and use of a fixing bracket |
US9556618B2 (en) * | 2012-09-20 | 2017-01-31 | Oldcastle Building Products Canada Inc. | Panel with compressible projections and masonry wall system including the panel |
JP6490410B2 (en) * | 2014-11-28 | 2019-03-27 | ケイミュー株式会社 | Exterior material construction structure |
US9648968B1 (en) * | 2014-07-24 | 2017-05-16 | 12 Inch Art, LLC | Materials for the mounting and display of record albums or standard size artwork |
ES2586736B1 (en) * | 2015-04-15 | 2017-09-07 | Cupa Innovacion S.L.U. | VENTILATED FACADE |
US10907362B2 (en) * | 2016-05-18 | 2021-02-02 | Stephen N. Loyd Irrevocable Family Trust | Clip for curtain wall system and associated method for installation |
US9896849B1 (en) * | 2016-10-18 | 2018-02-20 | Charbel Tannious Aboukhalil | Flush or lap siding system |
JP6861108B2 (en) * | 2017-06-30 | 2021-04-21 | ニチハ株式会社 | Fixtures and building wall structures |
JP7053206B2 (en) * | 2017-09-29 | 2022-04-12 | ニチハ株式会社 | Fixtures and building wall structures |
CN108571101B (en) * | 2018-04-28 | 2024-06-04 | 浙江中南建设集团有限公司 | Back bolt type stone curtain wall connecting piece |
US11536023B2 (en) | 2020-10-23 | 2022-12-27 | Stephen N. Loyd Irrevocable Family Trust | Panel installation system and method |
US20230028102A1 (en) * | 2020-12-15 | 2023-01-26 | Sekisui House, Ltd. | Exterior wall member attachment member, lower end exterior wall member attachment member, and exterior wall member attachment structure |
DE202021003947U1 (en) | 2021-12-29 | 2022-02-04 | IfL Ingenieurbüro für Leichtbau GmbH & Co. KG | Rear-ventilated cladding as a facade of at least one area of a building wall with a holding device |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3545154A (en) * | 1968-11-19 | 1970-12-08 | Celotex Corp | Surface panel assembly with rigid strips to conceal fasteners |
DE3401271C3 (en) * | 1984-01-16 | 1997-09-18 | Herzog Thomas Prof Dr | Curtain wall construction |
DE3627584C3 (en) * | 1986-08-14 | 2000-07-13 | Herzog Thomas | Component for the prevention of relative movements of facade panels |
DE8915947U1 (en) * | 1988-12-24 | 1992-05-07 | F. v. Müller Dachziegelwerke GmbH & Co. KG, 6719 Eisenberg | Fastening device for facade panels, especially facade bricks |
US5177929A (en) * | 1990-05-16 | 1993-01-12 | Reynolds Henry B | Ceiling devices and methods of installing same |
SE469137B (en) * | 1990-11-09 | 1993-05-17 | Oliver Sjoelander | DEVICE FOR INSTALLATION OF FRONT COVER PLATE |
DE4420890A1 (en) * | 1994-06-15 | 1996-01-04 | Gerhaher Max | Suspended facade structure with horizontal support profiles |
-
1997
- 1997-05-13 DE DE19720016A patent/DE19720016C2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1998
- 1998-04-22 DE DE59811560T patent/DE59811560D1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-04-22 CZ CZ981237A patent/CZ123798A3/en unknown
- 1998-04-22 AT AT98107360T patent/ATE269467T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-04-22 EP EP98107360A patent/EP0878593B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-05-11 PL PL98326237A patent/PL326237A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1998-05-13 US US09/078,586 patent/US6289644B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CZ123798A3 (en) | 1998-12-16 |
DE19720016A1 (en) | 1998-11-26 |
EP0878593A3 (en) | 1999-04-28 |
US6289644B1 (en) | 2001-09-18 |
DE59811560D1 (en) | 2004-07-22 |
ATE269467T1 (en) | 2004-07-15 |
DE19720016C2 (en) | 1999-04-01 |
EP0878593A2 (en) | 1998-11-18 |
PL326237A1 (en) | 1998-11-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0878593B1 (en) | Curtain wall construction | |
EP0440104B1 (en) | Partition wall for the subdivision of spaces | |
EP0641901B1 (en) | Mounting or construction system for a wooden house | |
DE3151516C2 (en) | Device for bridging movement joints | |
DE29509738U1 (en) | Curtain wall construction | |
DE2316876A1 (en) | COLLAPSIBLE PARTITION WALL FOR DIVIDING ROOMS | |
EP2322731A2 (en) | Floor to ceiling glazing | |
DE3939872C2 (en) | Fastening device | |
DE60014197T2 (en) | cover device | |
DE3837475C1 (en) | ||
DE3336914C2 (en) | ||
WO2005059271A1 (en) | Transversal bolt for curved concrete formwork, and curved concrete formwork | |
CH651095A5 (en) | REINFORCEMENT ELEMENT FOR TRANSMITTING LATERAL FORCES IN PANEL-LIKE SUPPORT LINKS, e.g. FLAT CEILINGS. | |
DE2543174A1 (en) | Wall facade sub frame - consists of base plates with variable screw connections to angle wall brackets | |
DE2404526C2 (en) | Connection element for fastening wall elements | |
DE19814452A1 (en) | Connection between loadbearing and cantilevered components used for e.g. balconies of buildings | |
DE2236097B2 (en) | Frame for a window element with roller box | |
DE29708496U1 (en) | Curtain wall construction | |
DE2250505C3 (en) | Room cell for buildings | |
DE9305802U1 (en) | Console for holding flat components, especially glass panes | |
EP0569865B1 (en) | Supporting plate for bridges and ramps | |
DE8708808U1 (en) | Sound absorbing and reflecting wall with wall cladding | |
DE3308118A1 (en) | Facade cladding and roof covering | |
DE2352801A1 (en) | Base-plate attachment for fixing prefabricated bearing wall-sections - with upright bolts associated with inserted clamp-plates for walls, and crosswise wedges | |
AT399008B (en) | Shuttering with carrying rails and shuttering panels |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19980422 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK FR GB IE IT LI LU NL SE |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Free format text: AT BE CH DE DK FR GB IE IT LI LU NL SE |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20021202 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: MOEDING KERAMIKFASSADEN GMBH |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: GERHAHER, FRANZ, DR. Inventor name: GERHAHER, MAX, DIPL. ING. |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK FR GB IE IT LI LU NL SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20040616 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20040616 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20040616 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20040616 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20040616 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 59811560 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20040722 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: GERMAN |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20040916 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20040916 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
GBV | Gb: ep patent (uk) treated as always having been void in accordance with gb section 77(7)/1977 [no translation filed] |
Effective date: 20040616 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050422 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050422 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050430 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050430 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050430 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20050317 |
|
EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: *MODING KERAMIKFASSADEN G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20050430 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20060202 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: *MODING KERAMIKFASSADEN G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20050430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20071101 |