EP0844906A4 - Apparatus for the disinfection of liquids - Google Patents

Apparatus for the disinfection of liquids

Info

Publication number
EP0844906A4
EP0844906A4 EP96926763A EP96926763A EP0844906A4 EP 0844906 A4 EP0844906 A4 EP 0844906A4 EP 96926763 A EP96926763 A EP 96926763A EP 96926763 A EP96926763 A EP 96926763A EP 0844906 A4 EP0844906 A4 EP 0844906A4
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
liquid
gradient
chamber
barrier
pulses
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP96926763A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0844906A1 (en
EP0844906B1 (en
Inventor
Helmut I Milde
Sanborn F Philp
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ion Physics Corp
Original Assignee
Ion Physics Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ion Physics Corp filed Critical Ion Physics Corp
Publication of EP0844906A1 publication Critical patent/EP0844906A1/en
Publication of EP0844906A4 publication Critical patent/EP0844906A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0844906B1 publication Critical patent/EP0844906B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2/00Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising materials or objects other than foodstuffs or contact lenses; Accessories therefor
    • A61L2/02Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising materials or objects other than foodstuffs or contact lenses; Accessories therefor using physical phenomena
    • A61L2/03Electric current
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2/00Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising materials or objects other than foodstuffs or contact lenses; Accessories therefor
    • A61L2/0005Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising materials or objects other than foodstuffs or contact lenses; Accessories therefor for pharmaceuticals, biologicals or living parts
    • A61L2/0011Methods or apparatus for disinfecting or sterilising materials or objects other than foodstuffs or contact lenses; Accessories therefor for pharmaceuticals, biologicals or living parts using physical methods
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/48Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage with magnetic or electric fields
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12MAPPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
    • C12M29/00Means for introduction, extraction or recirculation of materials, e.g. pumps
    • C12M29/26Conditioning fluids entering or exiting the reaction vessel
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2201/00Apparatus for treatment of water, waste water or sewage
    • C02F2201/002Construction details of the apparatus
    • C02F2201/003Coaxial constructions, e.g. a cartridge located coaxially within another
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2301/00General aspects of water treatment
    • C02F2301/02Fluid flow conditions
    • C02F2301/024Turbulent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2303/00Specific treatment goals
    • C02F2303/04Disinfection

Definitions

  • the invention relates to the destruction or inactivation of microbes by subjecting them to a high potential gradient.
  • microbes - such as spores, in particular, - can be found in gaseous media (in the air, for example) or in solid materials or on the surfaces of solid materials
  • the vital processes of most microbes require a liquid medium - usually an aqueous medium.
  • Such liquid media are usually weak electrolytes (water being an example) and consequently these media have comparatively high electrical conductivity.
  • Conductivity of 0.05 Siemens (S) per meter is a typical value; but values differing from this by a factor of IO 6 would still be classified as "semi-conducting", or "non-insulating" .
  • a potential gradient of IO 6 volts/meter is of the order of the lowest gradient which will have a permanent effect on a microbe.
  • Such a gradient, applied as a steady (DC) gradient to a medium having a conductivity of 0.05 S/m would result in a current density of 5 x IO 4 amp/m 2 , with consequent power dissipation of 50,000 Megawatts/m 3 ; and the temperature of the medium would rise at an initial rate of roughly 12,000 °C/sec.
  • DC steady
  • this potential would be divided equally between the membranes at either pole. If the membrane has a thickness T, then the potential gradient E p at the poles (where this gradient has its maximum value) would be
  • the advantages of the invention include the following: (1) The lethal effect of electric fields on microbes increases very rapidly as the strength of the field (i.e., the magnitude of the potential gradient) increases. An example of this is shown in Figure 1.
  • the subject invention makes it possible to apply very high potential gradients to the electrolytic liquids and partially-conducting liquids in which microbes are found.
  • a practical apparatus must be capable of running reliably for long periods of time without being removed from service for repairs and maintenance work. Typical causes of operating problems are weakening of electrical insulation, which results in electrical discharges, and occasional breakdowns; contamination of electrodes and other internal parts by accumulated debris, and the effect of electrolysis.
  • the subject invention overcomes these reliability problems.
  • liquid mean ⁇ and includes any conformable substance which can be made to flow through the processing chamber.
  • liquid includes, for example, thixatropic fluids and non- newtonian fluids.
  • Fig. 1 is a graph showing percentage of bacteria surviving as a function of peak electric field. The solid line applies to fecal coliform bacteria and the broken line to total coliform bacteria counts. (For each experimental point ten pulses were applied.)
  • Fig. 2 is an example of the application of an insulating barrier within the processing cell, in which a cylindrical barrier is placed concentrically between cylindrical electrodes.
  • Fig. 3 is another example of the application of an insulating barrier within the processing cell, in which two parallel, insulating barriers are placed perpendicular to the liquid flow.
  • pairs of grids, of conducting material could be placed on either side of the insulating barriers, to provide greater control over potential distribution within the processing chamber.
  • E is a grounded electrode
  • E 2 is a high voltage electrode
  • V l7 V 2 and V 3 are fluid volumes at successive places in the flow.
  • Fig. 4 is a graph showing breakdown potential gradient E M in water as a function of the length of the applied voltage pulse.
  • a sharp-edged electrode faces a plane counter-electrode.
  • the sharp-edged electrode is negative in the case of the upper curve, and it is positive in the case of the lower curve.
  • Fig. 5 is an example of a possible arrangement of processing chamber and high-voltage supply which provides low inductance in the voltage supply circuit.
  • the processing chamber is the inner element in a concentric- cylindrical a ⁇ embly.
  • Fig. 6 i ⁇ a view, ⁇ imilar to that of Fig. 3, and showing the structure in greater detail.
  • the path of the liquid being processed is therefore a ⁇ follows: Through an inlet pipe to a volume V j , through the small pas ⁇ ageway ⁇ in the dielectric barrier into volume V 2 , and ⁇ o on, until it reache ⁇ the outlet pipe.
  • the passageways have a length equal to or greater than the thicknes ⁇ of the dielectric barrier.
  • the ⁇ e pa ⁇ ageways are preferably slot ⁇ , but may have other geometrie ⁇ , ⁇ uch a ⁇ that of pin-hole ⁇ .
  • the transverse section of the slots may have any shape, as long a ⁇ each pa ⁇ ageway ha ⁇ a minor transverse dimension small compared to the thicknes ⁇ of the barrier.
  • the electrical conductivity of the liquid medium, containing the microbe ⁇ is very much higher (for example, one million-fold higher) than the conductivity of the dielectric barrier; and the dielectric constant of the liquid is much higher (typically at least 20 times higher) than the dielectric constant of the barrier. Therefore, the gradient which result ⁇ from a potential difference between E t and E 2 is much higher in the liquid in the passsageways than it is in the liquid in the volume ⁇ V t , V 2 and V 3 .
  • the velocity of the fluid ⁇ hould be maintained con ⁇ tant in the pa ⁇ ageway .
  • the advantages of this arrangement are: (a) There is a high degree of control over the liquid flow with re ⁇ pect to the region ⁇ of the processing chamber which experience the highest potential gradient. In other word ⁇ , no liquid can pass through the chamber without experiencing the highest potential gradient.
  • Pulse length The maximum gradient which can be supported in a liquid depends on the duration of the gradient, in time.
  • the pulse characteristic ⁇ can be modified, a ⁇ required, without the use of external high-voltage circuit elements connected in parallel with the processing cell, or by modifications to the pulse power supply.
  • Such modifications in pul ⁇ e shape and pulse length contribute to attaining optimum proces ⁇ ing conditions.
  • a pulse consisting of a succession of very narrow pulses One individual pulse can be formed of a succession (a "train") of very narrow pulses.
  • the train of very narrow pulse ⁇ may be of decrea ⁇ ing amplitude,- and successive ⁇ ive pul ⁇ e ⁇ may alternate in polarity, a ⁇ might be the ca ⁇ e - for example - in a damped, sinu ⁇ oidal o ⁇ cillation.
  • the advantage of thi ⁇ method of operation i ⁇ that it permits - because of the very narrow individual component pulses - the attainment of a higher potential gradient in the processing chamber.
  • Pulses alternating in polarity A succession of pulses which alternate in polarity should have the ⁇ ame anti-microbial effectiveness as a succe ⁇ sion of pulses, all of the same polarity. However, pulses alternating in polarity would have various advantages, including: (1) Electrolytic effects, in the liquid being processed, would be eliminated or greatly reduced.
  • Low inductance structure in the assembly of voltage source and processing chamber Very short, high-voltage pulse ⁇ imply a high dl/dt (rate-of-change of current with re ⁇ pect to time) . Thi ⁇ , in turn, puts an upper limit on the permissible inductance in the circuit which connect ⁇ the voltage source to the processing chamber. Certain arrangements - of which coaxial cylindrical arrangements are an example - permit low inductance connections. An example of a low-inductance as ⁇ embly of the voltage ⁇ ource and the processing chamber is shown in Figure 5. 7. A variety of electrode geometries in the processing chamber to meet the requirements of a variety of dif erent microbes in the liquid: Process requirements may differ widely for different microbes.
  • a liquid may be contaminated with cyst ⁇ which require very high potential gradient ⁇ for disinfection, but disinfection requirements for these cysts may be met by a surviving fraction of IO" 3 .
  • the same liquid may contain a virus, which i ⁇ inactivated by a significantly lower value of gradient, but disinfection requirements may be for a surviving fraction of only IO" 6 .
  • the very small surviving fraction is achievable only if every bit of the liquid experiences the high gradient.
  • This means a uniform-field geometry - such as concentric cylinders, or an arrangement such as that described in (1) hereinabove ("Use of an insulating barrier within the interelectrode gap”) .
  • Means for excluding gas voids from the processing chamber Included gas in the liquid can lead to corona di ⁇ charge ⁇ and breakdown in the liquid. Thi ⁇ will re ⁇ ult in unreliable operation and - po ⁇ ibly - in unde ⁇ irable change ⁇ in the liquid under treatment.
  • the dielectric barrier and the a ⁇ ociated electrode ⁇ may be ⁇ haped to minimize the retention of bubbles at any point in the flowing liquid stream. The pos ⁇ ibility of included air in the high-gradient regions is reduced if the proces ⁇ ing cell i ⁇ oriented ⁇ o that it "fills from the bottom". That is, the inlet occurs at the lowe ⁇ t point in the processing chamber and the outlet is at the highest point. 9.
  • Operation of the processing chamber at elevated pressure Operation of the proces ⁇ ing chamber at an elevated pre ⁇ ure may be u ⁇ eful under certain conditions: Except at very low Reynolds' Number, there may be some degree of turbulence in a flowing liquid. For example, around bend ⁇ , at di ⁇ continuitie ⁇ , and so forth. If dis ⁇ olved gases are present in the liquid, they may form bubbles, under these circumstances, and this could lead to electrical discharges. Operation of the system under a positive pressure will reduce the formation of bubbles under these and other conditions, and lead to a more reliable process. Furthermore, in some cases the microbicidal action of the process may be enhanced by an elevated pres ⁇ ure during processing.

Abstract

PCT No. PCT/US96/12176 Sec. 371 Date Jan. 7, 1998 Sec. 102(e) Date Jan. 7, 1998 PCT Filed Jul. 25, 1996 PCT Pub. No. WO97/04858 PCT Pub. Date Feb. 13, 1997Apparatus for the destruction of inactivation of microbes by subjecting them to a high potential gradient. The apparatus includes a processing chamber containing spaced apart electrodes, at least one solid insulating barrier dividing the space within the chamber, the barrier having at least one passageway such that no fluid can pass through the chamber without flowing through the passageway, and a voltage source for providing a pulse of voltage.

Description

APPARATUS FOR THE DISINFECTION OF LIQUIDS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to the destruction or inactivation of microbes by subjecting them to a high potential gradient.
2. Description of the Related Art
As shown by publications in the open technical literature (see Technical Bibliography, below) it has been known for at least fifty years that microbes can be destroyed or deactivated by high potential gradients. In the earliest publications
(1949-1965) practical application of this phenomenon for the purpose of disinfecting liquids - and liquid foods in particular - was emphasized. Somewhat later (1970-1985) , carefully controlled application of high potential gradients to the manipulation of biological cells was studied and reported. Publications described, inter alia, the use of high potential gradients to render the membranes of biological cells permeable, to organize a number of cells into a group and to accomplish the fusion of two or more cells. Practical devices to accomplish these things were developed and offered for sale as commercial products for use in biological laboratories. The microbiological studies associated with this work provided valuable fundamental information on the effect of high potential gradients on cells. Among other things, it became evident that high potential gradients produce porosity and, in some cases, permanent damage to cell membranes by exerting electromechanical force (electrophoretic force) on the membrane. In other words, the observed effects were due to these forces and not due to electric currents or ohmic heating.
While some microbes - such as spores, in particular, - can be found in gaseous media (in the air, for example) or in solid materials or on the surfaces of solid materials, the vital processes of most microbes require a liquid medium - usually an aqueous medium. Such liquid media are usually weak electrolytes (water being an example) and consequently these media have comparatively high electrical conductivity. Conductivity of 0.05 Siemens (S) per meter is a typical value; but values differing from this by a factor of IO6 would still be classified as "semi-conducting", or "non-insulating" . Consequently, it was recognized from the earliest work (1949- 1960) that high potential gradients could be applied successfully to media containing microbes only under certain special conditions. A potential gradient of IO6 volts/meter is of the order of the lowest gradient which will have a permanent effect on a microbe. Such a gradient, applied as a steady (DC) gradient to a medium having a conductivity of 0.05 S/m, would result in a current density of 5 x IO4 amp/m2, with consequent power dissipation of 50,000 Megawatts/m3; and the temperature of the medium would rise at an initial rate of roughly 12,000 °C/sec. Of course, these considerations were well-known to all who have worked on this subject. Some of the earliest work applied high-frequency AC voltages (Burton - 1949; Doevenspeck - 1961) but by 1965, pulsed voltages had become accepted as the preferred means of creating high potential gradients in the various media which were studied. (E.g., Hamilton & Sale - 1967; Sale & Hamilton - 1967,1968) . Pulse lengths in the range .1 microsec to several milliseconds were employed. It was established that the effect of potential gradients on cells - as measured by the induced porosity of the membrane or by the lethal effect on the cells - increased rapidly as the magnitude of the gradient increased. Sale and Hamilton (1968) presented a formula for the potential difference across a microbe in an electric field which has been widely used ever since. They assumed a spherical cell of radius a0 in an electrolytic medium (specific resistance p and dielectric constant K ) . The cell membrane is assumed to have a very high resistance - high enough that it can be approximated as a perfectly-insulating membrane - while the interior of the cell is assumed to be conducting; that is, its specific resistance is less than p . A uniform potential gradient E0 is impressed on the medium containing the cell. Although the cited paper does not give the derivation, it can be shown that the maximum potential difference occurs between the poles of the spherical cell, in the direction of E0. This potential difference, V,-^ is
Presumably, this potential would be divided equally between the membranes at either pole. If the membrane has a thickness T, then the potential gradient Ep at the poles (where this gradient has its maximum value) would be
Ep = (3/2) (a0/τ) E0 Thus, the gradient in the membrane increases with an increase in the overall size (represented by the radius a0) of the cell and decreases with an increase in the membrane thickness.
Below a certain critical gradient - which depends upon the type of cell and is of the order of 10 kV/cm - the porosity induced in the cell membrane is reversible. That is, when the gradient is removed, the membrane regenerates its properties. Whereas, for values of gradient above the critical value, there is an increasing probability that the cell will be destroyed. There is also evidence that - for a given value of potential gradient - the effect increaseε with increasing time of application. Various systems for applying high potential gradients to a medium containing microbes are disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,048,404 to Bushnell et al. and in U.S. Patent No. 5,235,905 to Bushnell et al. Apparatus for inactivation of viruses using pulsed high electric field is disclosed in an article by Mizuno et al. entitled "Inactivation of Viruses using Pulsed High Electric Field" at Conference Record, Annual Meeting, IEEE Industry Applications Society, page 674, 1990. Technical Bibliography 1949 H. Burton, National Institute for Research in Dairying, Paper #1041, Reading, England
1961 Doevenspeck, Fleischwirstschaft 13., 986 1967 A.J.H. Sale & W.A. Hamilton, Biochimica & Biophysica Acta 148, 781
1967 W.A. Hamilton & A.J.H. Sale, Biochimica & Biophysica
1968 A.J.H. Sale & W.A. Hamilton, Biochimica & Biophysica Acta 163. 37 1971 Roland Benz & K. Janko, Biochimica & Biophysics Acta 455. 721
1973 J.M. Crowley, Biophysics Journal 13., 711
1974 Ulrich Zimmermann, Gunther Pilwat -i F. Riemann, Biophysics Journal 2A, 881
1974 S.H. White, Biophysics Journal 14, 155
1974 Ulrich Zimmermann, Gunther Pilwat & F.Riemann, Dielectric Breakdown in Cell Membranes , in: Membrane Transport in Plants, p. 146, Springer, Berlin 1975 H.G.L. Coster & Ulrich Zimmermann, Biochimica &
Biophysica Acta 382. 410
1975 F. Riemann, Ulrich Zimmermann & Gunther Pilwat, Biochimica & Biophysica Acta 394. 449
1975 Gunther Pilwat, Ulrich Zimmermann & F. Riemann, Biochimica & Biophysica Acta 406. 424
1975 J. Requena & D.A. Haydon, Biophysics Journal 15., 77
1976 Ulrich Zimmermann, Gunther Pilwat, G. Beckers & F. Riemann, Bioelectrochemistry & Bioenergetics 3., 58
1976 Roland Benz & P. Lauger, Journal of Membrane Biology 22, 171
1977 Ulrich Zimmermann, F. Beckers & H.G.L. Coster, Biochimica & Biophysica Acta 464. 399
1978 G. Boheim & Roland Benz, Biochimica & Biophysica Acta 507. 262 1978 J. Vienken, E. Jeltsch & Ulrich Zimmermann,
Cytobiology 17., 182
1979 Roland Benz & Ulrich Zimmermann, Journal of Membrane Bilogy, 48., 181
1980 Roland Benz & Ulrich Zimmermann, Biochimica & Biophysica Acta 597, 637
1980 Ulrich Zimmermann, J. Vienken & Gunther Pilwat, Bioelectrochemistry & Bioenergetics 1_, 553
1980 H. Hulsheger & Eberhard Neumann, Radiation & Environmental Biophysics 2 ., 281 1980 Ulrich Zimmermann, Gunther Pilwat, A Pequeux & R.
Giles, Journal of Membrane Biology 5_4, 103 1981 Ulrich Zimmermann, Peter Scheurich, Gunther Pilwat
& Roland Benz, Angewandte Chemie £3., 332 1983 H.Hulsheger, J Potel S- Eberhard Neumann, Radiation
& Environmental Biophysics 20., 53 1986 Akihira Mizuno & Yuji Hori, IEEE Trans , on Indust .
Applicationε 24, 387 1989 Eberhard Niemann, A.E. Sowers & CA. Jordan,
Electroporation and Electrofusion in Cell Biology,
Plenum Press, N.Y. 1990 Akihira Mizuno, et al. , Conference Record, Ann. Mtg.
Industrial Applications Soc, IEEE, p. 713 1991 S. Jayaram, G.S.P. Castle & A. Margaritis, Proc.
Annual Mtg. Industry Applications Soc . , IEEE, p. 674 1991 Yoichi Matsumoto, Norio Shioji, Tokuki Satake & Akihiro Sakuma, Ibid., p. 652
1991 J. Wilschut & D. Hoekstra, Membrane Fusion, Marcel
Dekker N.Y.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The fact that microbes can be destroyed or inactivated by subjecting them to a high potential gradient does not lead to a practical process for disinfection unless the apparatus for its implementation incorporates certain features and, in addition thereto, the electrical, mechanical and chemical parameters of the process are appropriate to the particular desired disinfection. The practical apparatus of the invention accomplishes these objectives and constitutes an innovation.
The advantages of the invention include the following: (1) The lethal effect of electric fields on microbes increases very rapidly as the strength of the field (i.e., the magnitude of the potential gradient) increases. An example of this is shown in Figure 1. The subject invention makes it possible to apply very high potential gradients to the electrolytic liquids and partially-conducting liquids in which microbes are found. (2) A practical apparatus must be capable of running reliably for long periods of time without being removed from service for repairs and maintenance work. Typical causes of operating problems are weakening of electrical insulation, which results in electrical discharges, and occasional breakdowns; contamination of electrodes and other internal parts by accumulated debris, and the effect of electrolysis. The subject invention overcomes these reliability problems.
(3) The pulsed, high-gradient disinfection technique is not practical if the apparatus and methods employed in its application result in high power consumption. A high power requirement in itself - together with the necessary cooling equipment - would increase the cost of the process and could ultimately make it less advantageous than other alternative processes. The invention herein described iε a pulsed, high- gradient apparatus of high efficiency.
As used throughout this specification and claims, the term "liquid" meanε and includes any conformable substance which can be made to flow through the processing chamber. Thus, the term "liquid" includes, for example, thixatropic fluids and non- newtonian fluids.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention may best be understood from the following detailed description thereof, having reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a graph showing percentage of bacteria surviving as a function of peak electric field. The solid line applies to fecal coliform bacteria and the broken line to total coliform bacteria counts. (For each experimental point ten pulses were applied.)
Fig. 2 is an example of the application of an insulating barrier within the processing cell, in which a cylindrical barrier is placed concentrically between cylindrical electrodes.
Fig. 3 is another example of the application of an insulating barrier within the processing cell, in which two parallel, insulating barriers are placed perpendicular to the liquid flow. In this embodiment, pairs of grids, of conducting material, could be placed on either side of the insulating barriers, to provide greater control over potential distribution within the processing chamber.
In either Fig. 2 or Fig. 3, E, is a grounded electrode, E2 is a high voltage electrode and Vl7 V2 and V3 are fluid volumes at successive places in the flow. Thus, the portions of the boundary of the processing cell through which the liquid enters and leaves are at ground potential; this is an important feature of the invention.
Fig. 4 is a graph showing breakdown potential gradient EM in water as a function of the length of the applied voltage pulse. In these experiments a sharp-edged electrode faces a plane counter-electrode. The sharp-edged electrode is negative in the case of the upper curve, and it is positive in the case of the lower curve. (From J. Pace VanDevender and T.H. Martin, Untriαcrered Water Switching. Sandia Laboratories Report, 1968.)
Fig. 5 is an example of a possible arrangement of processing chamber and high-voltage supply which provides low inductance in the voltage supply circuit. In this example, the processing chamber is the inner element in a concentric- cylindrical aεεembly.
Fig. 6 iε a view, εimilar to that of Fig. 3, and showing the structure in greater detail.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Referring to the drawings, and first to Figs. 2, 3 and 6 thereof, therein are shown two embodiments of apparatus in accordance with thiε invention. The featureε of the invention may be εummarized aε follows: 1. Use of an insulating barrier within the interelectrode gap. 2. Pulse length.
3. Control of the pulse length and pulεe εhape by varying the physical and geometrical parameters of the proceεsing chamber.
4. A pulεe conεiεting of a εucceεεion of very narrow pulεeε.
5. Pulses alternating in polarity. 6. Low inductance structure in the assembly of voltage source and processing chamber. 7. A variety of electrode geometrieε in the proceεεing chamber to meet the requirementε of a variety of different microbeε in the liquid.
8. Meanε for excluding gaε voidε from the processing chamber. 9. Operation of the processing chamber at elevated pressure.
Referring now to each of these features in sequence, 1. Use of an insulating barrier within the interelectrode gap: A solid dielectric is placed within the chamber wherein the flowing liquid is exposed to the pulsed potential gradient. The dielectric, which is pierced with a number of narrow passageways, is so placed within the chamber that it constituteε a barrier to the flow of the liquid. That is, any liquid passing through the chamber must pasε through the paεεagewayε in the dielectric. Two examples of this use of the dielectric barrier are shown in Figureε 2 and 3. The path of the liquid being processed is therefore aε follows: Through an inlet pipe to a volume Vj, through the small pasεagewayε in the dielectric barrier into volume V2, and εo on, until it reacheε the outlet pipe. The passageways have a length equal to or greater than the thicknesε of the dielectric barrier. Theεe paεεageways are preferably slotε, but may have other geometrieε, εuch aε that of pin-holeε. The transverse section of the slots may have any shape, as long aε each paεεageway haε a minor transverse dimension small compared to the thicknesε of the barrier. The electrical conductivity of the liquid medium, containing the microbeε, is very much higher (for example, one million-fold higher) than the conductivity of the dielectric barrier; and the dielectric constant of the liquid is much higher (typically at least 20 times higher) than the dielectric constant of the barrier. Therefore, the gradient which resultε from a potential difference between Et and E2 is much higher in the liquid in the passsageways than it is in the liquid in the volumeε Vt, V2 and V3. The velocity of the fluid εhould be maintained conεtant in the paεεageway . The advantages of this arrangement are: (a) There is a high degree of control over the liquid flow with reεpect to the regionε of the processing chamber which experience the highest potential gradient. In other wordε, no liquid can pass through the chamber without experiencing the highest potential gradient.
(b) The gradient at the electrodes is quite low; and this has at least two advantages: First, this iε a situation which is highly favorable to the electrical performance of the apparatus, since electrical breakdown must involve the electrodes, and theεe are in thiε case exposed to reduced potential gradients. Second, this meanε that the current density at the electrodes will be comparatively low and possible accumulation of electrolytic products at the electrode surfaces will be greatly reduced. This idea can be incorporated into a large variety of electrode geometries, of which Figures 2 and 3 show two examples.
2. Pulse length: The maximum gradient which can be supported in a liquid depends on the duration of the gradient, in time.
With the maximum, continuous (DC) gradient aε a basis, it is found that reducing the time of application permits a higher gradient to be εustained. This increaεe in gradient with reduction in the time of application is gradual until the time of application becomes very short (of the order of a microsecond) . But then for times leεε than one microεecond the insulating strength begins to rise very rapidly (see Figure 4) . Since the disinfecting effect increaεeε with increaεing gradient, the proceεε becomes more effective when very short pulses and the highest possible gradients are employed. This is particularly important when more resistant microbes are to be treated.
3. Control of the pulse length and pulse shape by varying the physical and geometrical parameters of the processing chamber: The arrangement described in (1) ("Use of an insulating barrier within the interelectrode gap") provideε a meanε for controlling the electrical parameterε - reεistance and capacitance - of the processing cell. This could be accompliεhed by providing a meanε for closing and opening - or partly closing and partly opening - the pasεagewayε through the dielectric barrier. The pulse shape and pulse length depend - amongst other things - on the resistance and capacitance of the electrical load preεented to the source of pulsed voltage. So in this way the pulse characteristicε can be modified, aε required, without the use of external high-voltage circuit elements connected in parallel with the processing cell, or by modifications to the pulse power supply. Such modifications in pulεe shape and pulse length contribute to attaining optimum procesεing conditions.
4. A pulse consisting of a succession of very narrow pulses: One individual pulse can be formed of a succession (a "train") of very narrow pulses. The train of very narrow pulseε may be of decreaεing amplitude,- and succesεive pulεeε may alternate in polarity, aε might be the caεe - for example - in a damped, sinuεoidal oεcillation. The advantage of thiε method of operation iε that it permits - because of the very narrow individual component pulses - the attainment of a higher potential gradient in the processing chamber.
5. Pulses alternating in polarity: A succession of pulses which alternate in polarity should have the εame anti-microbial effectiveness as a succeεsion of pulses, all of the same polarity. However, pulses alternating in polarity would have various advantages, including: (1) Electrolytic effects, in the liquid being processed, would be eliminated or greatly reduced.
(2) the circuitry required to generate sharp pulses from an AC input -- of the desired frequency -- would be simpler than that required for conventional pulεe-generating circuitε. (The conventional circuitε produce mono-polar pulses from a DC input.)
6. Low inductance structure in the assembly of voltage source and processing chamber: Very short, high-voltage pulseε imply a high dl/dt (rate-of-change of current with reεpect to time) . Thiε, in turn, puts an upper limit on the permissible inductance in the circuit which connectε the voltage source to the processing chamber. Certain arrangements - of which coaxial cylindrical arrangements are an example - permit low inductance connections. An example of a low-inductance asεembly of the voltage εource and the processing chamber is shown in Figure 5. 7. A variety of electrode geometries in the processing chamber to meet the requirements of a variety of dif erent microbes in the liquid: Process requirements may differ widely for different microbes. For example, a liquid may be contaminated with cystε which require very high potential gradientε for disinfection, but disinfection requirements for these cysts may be met by a surviving fraction of IO"3. Meanwhile, the same liquid may contain a virus, which iε inactivated by a significantly lower value of gradient, but disinfection requirements may be for a surviving fraction of only IO"6. The very small surviving fraction is achievable only if every bit of the liquid experiences the high gradient. This, in turn, means a uniform-field geometry - such as concentric cylinders, or an arrangement such as that described in (1) hereinabove ("Use of an insulating barrier within the interelectrode gap") . On the other hand, the very high gradients necessary to deal with the cysts are more easily achieved in a non-uniform geometry, εuch aε would be provided by a small-diameter rod surrounded by a concentric-cylindrical opposing electrode or a rod or cylinder εurrounded by one or more circular diεkε, or by any one of - or a combination of - the many configuration which yield non-uniform fields. These electrode arrangements do not subject every bit of the flowing liquid to the same high potential gradient. However, this diεadvantage can be overcome to a considerable extent by providing several εuccessive non¬ uniform field gapε, and also by providing - up-stream from the high-voltage gaps - devices which introduce turbulence into the liquid flow. Examples of such devices to excite turbulence are: (a) A sharp lip or edge protruding into the flow, (b) A group of vanes protruding into the flow, (c) A sudden increaεe in croεs-sectional area of the flow. The combination, within the proceεεing chamber, of various electrode geometries providing both uniform and nonuniform fieldε makeε it possible to deal with a variety of disinfection requirements. 8. Means for excluding gas voids from the processing chamber: Included gas in the liquid can lead to corona diεchargeε and breakdown in the liquid. Thiε will reεult in unreliable operation and - poεεibly - in undeεirable changeε in the liquid under treatment. In addition, the dielectric barrier and the aεεociated electrodeε may be εhaped to minimize the retention of bubbles at any point in the flowing liquid stream. The posεibility of included air in the high-gradient regions is reduced if the procesεing cell iε oriented εo that it "fills from the bottom". That is, the inlet occurs at the loweεt point in the processing chamber and the outlet is at the highest point. 9. Operation of the processing chamber at elevated pressure: Operation of the procesεing chamber at an elevated preεεure may be uεeful under certain conditions: Except at very low Reynolds' Number, there may be some degree of turbulence in a flowing liquid. For example, around bendε, at diεcontinuitieε, and so forth. If disεolved gases are present in the liquid, they may form bubbles, under these circumstances, and this could lead to electrical discharges. Operation of the system under a positive pressure will reduce the formation of bubbles under these and other conditions, and lead to a more reliable process. Furthermore, in some cases the microbicidal action of the process may be enhanced by an elevated presεure during processing.
Having thus described the principles of the invention, together with several illustrative embodiments thereof, it is to be understood that, although specific terms are employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense, and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention being set forth in the following claimε.

Claims

AMENDED CLAIMS
[received by the International Bureau on 06 January 1997 (06.01.97); original claims 1,2 and 22 amended; new claim 23 added; remaining claims unchanged (2 pages)]
1. An apparatus for the destruction of microbeε, or the deactivation of microbes, present in a liquid, comprising in combination: a procesεing chamber containing electrodeε εpaced apart by a certain diεtance, at least one solid insulating barrier dividing the space within said chamber into at least two volumes, said barrier having one or more passageways such that no fluid can pass through the apparatus without flowing through said pasεageway or passagewayε, a voltage εource adapted to provide a pulεe of voltage such that a gradient of at least 30 kV/cm is produced in at least some portion of the space between said electrodes. 2. Apparatus according to claim 1 in which the geometry of the insulating barrier and/or of the pasεageway or paεεagewayε through the inεulting barrier can be changed εo as to alter the electrical characteristics of the processing cell.
3. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein each individual voltage pulse haε the form of a "train" or succession of very narrow pulses.
4. Apparatus according to claim 3, wherein said successive narrow pulses diminish in amplitude.
5. Apparatus according to claim 3, wherein said succesεive narrow pulεeε are all of the εame polarity.
6. Apparatuε according to claim 3, wherein εuccessive pulses of said successive narrow pulεeε alternate in polarity. 21. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the portions of the boundary of said chamber through which said liquid enters and leaves are at ground potential.
22. Apparatus according to claim 1, wherein conductive grids or other electrode structureε are transverεely arranged to render the electric field more uniform.
23. Apparatuε according to claim 1, including meanε for cooling said liquid.
EP96926763A 1995-07-27 1996-07-25 Apparatus for the disinfection of liquids Expired - Lifetime EP0844906B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US240195P 1995-07-27 1995-07-27
US2401P 1995-07-27
PCT/US1996/012176 WO1997004858A1 (en) 1995-07-27 1996-07-25 Apparatus for the disinfection of liquids

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0844906A1 EP0844906A1 (en) 1998-06-03
EP0844906A4 true EP0844906A4 (en) 2000-08-16
EP0844906B1 EP0844906B1 (en) 2004-09-15

Family

ID=21700586

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP96926763A Expired - Lifetime EP0844906B1 (en) 1995-07-27 1996-07-25 Apparatus for the disinfection of liquids

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US6077479A (en)
EP (1) EP0844906B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE276036T1 (en)
DE (1) DE69633394D1 (en)
WO (1) WO1997004858A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5690978A (en) * 1996-09-30 1997-11-25 Ohio State University High voltage pulsed electric field treatment chambers for the preservation of liquid food products
AUPP263898A0 (en) * 1998-03-30 1998-04-23 Tradon Enterprises Pty Ltd Waste water sterilisation by electro-oxidation treatment apparatus and method
AUPP569498A0 (en) * 1998-09-04 1998-10-01 Fortbay Pty Ltd A method and apparatus for emitting a signal
FR2792309B1 (en) * 1999-04-15 2001-06-08 Electricite De France METHOD FOR REMOVING LEGIONELLA FROM A COLONIZED AQUEOUS STREAM BY ELECTROPULSATION, METHOD FOR TREATING AN AQUEOUS STREAM BY ELECTROPULSATION, AND APPLICATION TO THE ELIMINATION OF LEGIONELLA
KR100425255B1 (en) * 2001-09-18 2004-03-30 이희규 Apparatus for disinfecting drinkables using Discharged Oscillatory Decay Wave
FR2831061A1 (en) * 2001-10-18 2003-04-25 Commissariat Energie Atomique Treatment procedure and apparatus for substances containing undesirable organisms uses pulsed electrical fields in treatment zones separated by insulators
FR2831026B1 (en) * 2001-10-18 2004-05-28 Commissariat Energie Atomique DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PULSE ELECTRIC FIELD PROCESSING OF COLONIZED FLOW SUBSTANCE BY UNDESIRABLE ORGANISMS
EP1565555A4 (en) * 2002-09-30 2008-07-09 Maxcyte Inc Apparatus and method for streaming electroporation
EP2941968A1 (en) * 2005-05-12 2015-11-11 Estrella Maarud Holding AS Device for electroporation of potatoes and potato products
KR101405618B1 (en) * 2008-03-07 2014-06-10 엘지전자 주식회사 Air conditioning system
WO2010049923A2 (en) * 2008-10-28 2010-05-06 Gideon Rosenberg Purification sheet assembly combining flow obstacles and electric field formation
DE102010001279A1 (en) * 2010-01-27 2011-07-28 Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik e.V., 49610 Apparatus and method for high voltage pulse treatment in the annular gap
US8975901B2 (en) * 2011-10-24 2015-03-10 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Measurement device and method thereof
EP2902370B1 (en) * 2012-09-28 2020-10-21 Daikin Industries, Ltd. Water treatment device
JP5522247B2 (en) * 2012-09-28 2014-06-18 ダイキン工業株式会社 Discharge unit
CN104085967B (en) * 2014-07-31 2015-12-02 哈尔滨工程大学 The cruising ballast water treatment process of high-gradient magnetic field and combined treatment of pulsating
US11679369B2 (en) * 2016-01-25 2023-06-20 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Liquid plasma discharge device and method for biodiesel synthesis using same

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2846452A1 (en) * 1978-10-25 1980-05-08 Inst Biomedizinische Technik Anodic oxidation water treatment cell supply - by pulsed DC voltage with pulse width or height modulation
EP0269306A1 (en) * 1986-11-11 1988-06-01 Hayashibara, Ken Low-frequency treatment device directed to use in a bath
EP0468478A2 (en) * 1990-07-26 1992-01-29 House Food Industrial Co., Ltd. Method for sterilizing an aqueous medium
US5338421A (en) * 1992-08-07 1994-08-16 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Method of and apparatus for separation by agglomeration
DE4325891A1 (en) * 1993-08-02 1995-02-09 Thamm Siegfried Dr Ing Habil Process and apparatus for automated sterilisation and/or treatment of drinking water and service water or of waste waters by means of anodic oxidation
DE4432228A1 (en) * 1994-09-10 1996-03-14 Stauder Norbert Pulse width modulated, high frequency discharge method

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4457221A (en) * 1980-12-23 1984-07-03 Geren David K Sterilization apparatus
US5130032A (en) * 1989-10-10 1992-07-14 Sartori Helfred E Method for treating a liquid medium
US5575974A (en) * 1993-05-12 1996-11-19 Wurzburger; Stephen R. Apparatus and method for an anodic oxidation biocidal treatment
US5690978A (en) * 1996-09-30 1997-11-25 Ohio State University High voltage pulsed electric field treatment chambers for the preservation of liquid food products

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2846452A1 (en) * 1978-10-25 1980-05-08 Inst Biomedizinische Technik Anodic oxidation water treatment cell supply - by pulsed DC voltage with pulse width or height modulation
EP0269306A1 (en) * 1986-11-11 1988-06-01 Hayashibara, Ken Low-frequency treatment device directed to use in a bath
EP0468478A2 (en) * 1990-07-26 1992-01-29 House Food Industrial Co., Ltd. Method for sterilizing an aqueous medium
US5338421A (en) * 1992-08-07 1994-08-16 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Method of and apparatus for separation by agglomeration
DE4325891A1 (en) * 1993-08-02 1995-02-09 Thamm Siegfried Dr Ing Habil Process and apparatus for automated sterilisation and/or treatment of drinking water and service water or of waste waters by means of anodic oxidation
DE4432228A1 (en) * 1994-09-10 1996-03-14 Stauder Norbert Pulse width modulated, high frequency discharge method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69633394D1 (en) 2004-10-21
WO1997004858A1 (en) 1997-02-13
US6077479A (en) 2000-06-20
EP0844906A1 (en) 1998-06-03
EP0844906B1 (en) 2004-09-15
ATE276036T1 (en) 2004-10-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0844906B1 (en) Apparatus for the disinfection of liquids
RU2408006C2 (en) System with high impedance to generate electric fields and method of its use
Lubicki et al. High voltage pulse application for the destruction of the Gram-negative bacterium Yersinia enterocolitica
US5326530A (en) Energy-efficient electromagnetic elimination of noxious biological organisms
WO1999063843A1 (en) Pulsed electric field treatment system
JP2009515168A5 (en)
AU6771087A (en) Method and apparatus for extending the shelf life of fluid food products
US5851375A (en) Apparatus for disinfecting fluids
JP4120098B2 (en) Method and apparatus for sterilizing microorganisms in liquid
JP2000093973A (en) Sterilizing apparatus using multiple cylindrical electrodes
JP2000107754A (en) Liquid treatment apparatus by plasma
DK2528460T3 (en) Devices and method for the treatment of high voltage pulse in ring spalte
US11548799B2 (en) System and method for water treatment with pulsed electric fields
Priya et al. Modeling of electroporation and electric field investigation for a single cell dispersed in liquid foods
EP1423022B1 (en) Method and apparatus for treating a fluid
Johnstone et al. Applications of a high-voltage SMPS in water disinfection
Lee et al. Energy efficiency improvement of electrical sterilization using oscillatory waveforms from a RLC discharging circuit
AU2002325578A1 (en) Method and apparatus for treating a fluid
CA2060259A1 (en) Energy-efficient electromagnetic elimination of noxious biological organisms

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19971218

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20000630

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Free format text: 7B 01D 61/00 A, 7A 61L 2/02 B, 7C 02F 1/46 B, 7C 02F 1/48 B

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20020524

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040915

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040915

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20040915

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040915

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040915

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040915

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040915

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040915

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69633394

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20041021

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041215

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041215

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041216

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20041226

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050725

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050725

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050725

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050731

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20050616

EN Fr: translation not filed
GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20050725

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050215