EP0816485A1 - Process for making detergent compositions - Google Patents

Process for making detergent compositions Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0816485A1
EP0816485A1 EP96201854A EP96201854A EP0816485A1 EP 0816485 A1 EP0816485 A1 EP 0816485A1 EP 96201854 A EP96201854 A EP 96201854A EP 96201854 A EP96201854 A EP 96201854A EP 0816485 A1 EP0816485 A1 EP 0816485A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
surfactant
premix
particle size
nonionic surfactant
micrometers
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP96201854A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0816485B1 (en
Inventor
Scott John Donoghue
Marcel Karel Nelis Liplijn
Carole Patricia Denise Wilkinson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Procter and Gamble Co
Original Assignee
Procter and Gamble Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to EP96201854A priority Critical patent/EP0816485B1/en
Application filed by Procter and Gamble Co filed Critical Procter and Gamble Co
Priority to ES96201854T priority patent/ES2253747T3/en
Priority to AT96201854T priority patent/ATE312901T1/en
Priority to DE69635575T priority patent/DE69635575T2/en
Priority to CNB971973946A priority patent/CN1195834C/en
Priority to JP10505241A priority patent/JPH11514033A/en
Priority to US09/214,327 priority patent/US6156718A/en
Priority to PCT/US1997/011281 priority patent/WO1998001520A2/en
Priority to CA002259535A priority patent/CA2259535C/en
Priority to BR9710199-0A priority patent/BR9710199A/en
Priority to ARP970102992A priority patent/AR008062A1/en
Publication of EP0816485A1 publication Critical patent/EP0816485A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0816485B1 publication Critical patent/EP0816485B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D11/00Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents
    • C11D11/0082Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents one or more of the detergent ingredients being in a liquefied state, e.g. slurry, paste or melt, and the process resulting in solid detergent particles such as granules, powders or beads
    • C11D11/0088Special methods for preparing compositions containing mixtures of detergents one or more of the detergent ingredients being in a liquefied state, e.g. slurry, paste or melt, and the process resulting in solid detergent particles such as granules, powders or beads the liquefied ingredients being sprayed or adsorbed onto solid particles

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for making detergent compositions
  • the object of the invention is to provide an improved process for making a detergent composition comprising anionic surfactant, nonionic surfactant and non-surfactant additives.
  • the object of the present invention is achieved by a process comprising the steps of:
  • the first intermediate particle is formed by :
  • the first intermediate particle is formed by :
  • the process of the invention results in a narrow particle size distribution with a sharply defined mean.
  • the mean particle size is 800 to 1200 micrometers, and the particle size distribution has a standard deviation of less than 100 micrometers. More preferably the mean particle size is from 900 to 1100 micrometers, and the particle size distribution has a standard deviation of less than 50 micrometers.
  • Non-surfactant additives may include any detergent additives such as bleach, especially perborate or percarbonate; inorganic salts, especially carbonate, bicarbonate, silicate, sulphate, or citrate; chelants, enzymes.
  • detergent additives such as bleach, especially perborate or percarbonate
  • inorganic salts especially carbonate, bicarbonate, silicate, sulphate, or citrate
  • chelants especially enzymes.
  • the first intermediate particle comprises less than 5% by weight of anionic surfactant, more preferably the first intermediate particle comprises less than 1% by weight of anionic surfactant.
  • Finely divided particulate materials useful herein include aluminosilicates having the empirical formula: M z (zAlO 2 ) y ] ⁇ x H 2 O wherein z and y are integers of at least 6, the molar ratio of z to y is in the range from 1.0 to about 0.5, and x is an integer from about 15 to about 264.
  • Useful aluminosilicate ion exchange materials are commercially available. These aluminosilicates can be crystalline or amorphous in structure and can be naturally-occurring aluminosilicates or synthetically derived.
  • aluminosilicate ion exchange materials A method for producing aluminosilicate ion exchange materials is disclosed in US-A-3 985 669, Krummel et al, issued October 12, 1976.
  • Preferred synthetic crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange materials useful herein are available under the designations zeolite A, zeolite P(B), zeolite MAP, zeolite X and zeolite Y.
  • the crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange material has the formula : Na 12 [(AlO 2 ) 12 (SiO2) 12 ] ⁇ x H 2 O wherein x is from about 20 to about 30, especially about 27. This material is known as zeolite A.
  • the "overdried" zeolites are particularly useful when a low moisture environment is required, for example to improve stability of detergent bleaches such as perborate and percarbonate.
  • the aluminosilicate has a particle size of about 0.1-10 micrometers in diameter.
  • Preferred ion exchange materials have a particle size diameter of from about 0.2 micrometers to about 4 micrometers.
  • the term "particle size diameter” herein represents the average particle size diameter by weight of a given ion exchange material as determined by conventional analytical techniques such as, for example, microscopic determination utilizing a scanning electron microscope.
  • the crystalline zeolite A materials herein are usually further characterized by their calcium ion exchange capacity, which is at least about 200 mg equivalent of CaCO 3 water hardness/g of aluminosilicate, calculated on an anhydrous basis, and which generally is in the range of from about 300 mg eq./g to about 352 mg eq./g.
  • the zeolite A materials herein are still further characterized by their calcium ion exchange rate which is at least about 2 grains Ca ++ /gallon/minute/gram/gallon (0.13g Ca ++ /litre/minute/gram/litre) of aluminosilicate (anhydrous basis), and generally lies within the range of from about 2 grains/gallon/minute/gram/gallon(0.13g Ca ++ /litre/minute/gram/litre) to about 6 grains/gallon/minute/gram/gallon (0.39g Ca ++ /litre/minute/gram/litre), based on calcium ion hardness.
  • Optimum aluminosilicate for builder purposes exhibit a calcium ion exchange rate of at least about 4 grains/gallon/minute/gram/gallon (0.26g Ca ++ /litre/minute/gram/litre).
  • nonionic surfactant While any nonionic surfactant may be usefully employed in the present invention, two families of nonionics have been found to be particularly useful. These are nonionic surfactants based on alkoxylated (especially ethoxylated) alcohols, and those nonionic surfactants based on amidation products of fatty acid esters and N-alkyl polyhydroxy amine. The amidation products of the esters and the amines are generally referred to herein as polyhydroxy fatty acid amides. Particularly useful in the present invention are mixtures comprising two or more nonionic surfactants wherein at least one nonionic surfactant is selected from each of the groups of alkoxylated alcohols and the polyhydroxy fatty acid amides.
  • Suitable nonionic surfactants include compounds produced by the condensation of alkylene oxide groups (hydrophilic in nature) with an organic hydrophobic compound, which may be aliphatic or alkyl aromatic in nature.
  • the length of the polyoxyalkylene group which is condensed with any particular hydrophobic group can be readily adjusted to yield a water-soluble compound having the desired degree of balance between hydrophilic and hydrophobic elements.
  • nonionic surfactants such as the polyethylene oxide condensates of alkyl phenols, e.g., the condensation products of alkyl phenols having an alkyl group containing from about 6 to 16 carbon atoms, in either a straight chain or branched chain configuration, with from about 4 to 25 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alkyl phenol.
  • Preferred nonionics are the water-soluble condensation products of aliphatic alcohols containing from 8 to 22 carbon atoms, in either straight chain or branched configuration, with an average of up to 25 moles of ethylene oxide per more of alcohol.
  • Particularly preferred are the condensation products of alcohols having an alkyl group containing from about 9 to 15 carbon atoms with from about 2 to 10 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol; and condensation products of propylene glycol with ethylene oxide.
  • the nonionic surfactant system also includes a polyhydroxy fatty acid amide component.
  • Polyhydroxy fatty acid amides may be produced by reacting a fatty acid ester and an N-alkyl polyhydroxy amine.
  • the preferred amine for use in the present invention is N-(R1)-CH2(CH2OH)4-CH2-OH, where R1 is typically a alkyl, e.g. methyl group; and the preferred ester is a C12-C20 fatty acid methyl ester.
  • nonionic surfactants which may be used as components of the surfactant systems herein include ethoxylated nonionic surfactants, glycerol ethers, glucosamides, glycerol amides, glycerol esters, fatty acids, fatty acid esters, fatty amides, alkyl polyglucosides, alkyl polyglycol ethers, polyethylene glycols, ethoxylated alkyl phenols and mixtures thereof.
  • ethoxylated nonionic surfactants include ethoxylated nonionic surfactants, glycerol ethers, glucosamides, glycerol amides, glycerol esters, fatty acids, fatty acid esters, fatty amides, alkyl polyglucosides, alkyl polyglycol ethers, polyethylene glycols, ethoxylated alkyl phenols and mixtures thereof.
  • the second intermediate particle of the present invention comprises anionic surfactant.
  • the second intermediate particle may be made by any process including spray drying, flaking, prilling, extruding, pastillating, and agglomeration.
  • Agglomeration processes for making anionic surfactant particles have been disclosed in the prior art in, for example, EP-A-0 508 543, EP-A-0 510 746, EP-A-0 618 289 and EP-A-0 663 439.
  • An essential feature of the invention is that no nonionic surfactant is sprayed on to the surfactant agglomerate stream.
  • Non-limiting examples of anionic surfactants useful herein include the conventional C11-C18 alkyl benzene sulfonates ("LAS") and primary, branched-chain and random C10-C20 alkyl sulfates (“AS”), the C10-C18 secondary (2,3) alkyl sulfates of the formula CH 3 (CH 2 ) x (CHOSO 3 - M + ) CH 3 and CH 3 (CH 2 ) y (CHOSO 3 - M + ) CH 2 CH 3 where x and (y+1) are integers of at least about 7, preferably at least about 9, and M is a water-solubilizing cation, especially sodium, unsaturated sulfates such as oleyl sulfate, the C10-C18 alkyl alkoxy sulfates ("AE x S", especially EO 1-7 ethoxy sulfates), C10-C18 alkyl alkoxy carboxylates (especially the EO 1-5 ethoxy
  • surfactant agglomerates and layered granular additives are mixed, optionally with additional additives to form a finished detergent composition.
  • the various mixing steps of the present invention may be carried out in any suitable mixer such as the Eirich®, series RV, manufactured by Gustau Eirich Hardheim, Germany; Lödige®, series FM for batch mixing, series Baud KM for continuous mixing/agglomeration, manufactured by Lödige Machinenbau GmbH, Paderborn Germany; Drais® T160 series, manufactured by Drais Werke GmbH, Mannheim Germany; and Winkworth® RT 25 series, manufactured by Winkworth Machinery Ltd., Berkshire, England; the Littleford Mixer, Model #FM-130-D-12, with internal chopping blades and the Cuisinart Food Processor, Model #DCX-Plus, with 7.75 inch (19.7 cm) blades.
  • Many other mixers are commercially available for both batch and continuous mixing.
  • Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 Sodium carbonate 3 2 2 7.8 - Sodium citrate - - - - 10 Sodium bicarbonate - - - - 10 Percarbonate 20 16 16 - - Perborate - - - 18 - Enzymes 1.7 2.2 2.2 1 2 Nonionic surfactant particles 4 13 19 20 20 Hydroxy ethylene diphosphonic acid 1 1 1 - - Tetraacetyl ethylene diamine 6 4.7 4.7 4 - Antifoam particle 2.8 1 1 - - Layered silicate 15 12 12 - - Sodium silicate (2.0R) - - - 2 3 Sodium sulphate - - - - 5 Cationic surfactant particles 5 - - - - Brightener - - - 0.2 - 58.5 51.9 57.9 53 50
  • Nonionic surfactant particles contained 15 parts alcohol ethoxylate with an average of 5 EO groups per mole, AE5, 15 parts of polyhydroxy fatty acid amide, 60 parts zeolite, 5 parts fatty acid and 5 parts water, and were made according to the process disclosed in EP-A-0 643 130.
  • Antifoam particles contained 12 parts silicone oil, 70 parts starch and 12 parts hydrogenated fatty acid / tallow alcohol ethoxylate (TAE80), and were made according to the process disclosed in EP-A-0 495 345.
  • Layered silicate is SKS-6® supplied by Hoechst Cationic surfactant particles contained 30 parts alkyl dimethyl ethoxy ammonium chloride, 60 parts sodium sulphate, 5 parts alkyl sulphate and 5 parts water and were made according to the process disclosed in EP-A-0 714 976.
  • Brightener is Tinopal CDX® supplied by Ciba-Geigy.
  • Example 1 The additives shown under Example 1 in the previous table were mixed together and found to have an average particle size of 440 micrometers.
  • the product in the concrete mixer had an average particle size of 1020 micrometers.
  • the anionic surfactant particle was then added to the concrete mixer at a level of 22%.
  • the anionic surfactant particle contained 28 parts linear alkyl benzene sulphonate, 12 parts tallow alkyl sulphate, 30 parts zeolite, 20 parts carbonate and 10 parts water, and had an average particle size of 850 micrometers.
  • the finished product had an average particle size of 960 micrometers.
  • nonionic surfactant (AE5) at 35°C was sprayed onto the additive mixture in a concrete mixer using a two-fluid spray nozzle.
  • 4% of zeolite A was added into the concrete mixer over a period of 1 minute.
  • the mixer then continued to operate without further addition of zeolite for a further one minute.
  • Finally a further 9% of zeolite was added over a period of 2 minutes.
  • the product in the concrete mixer had an average particle size of 1080 micrometers.
  • the anionic surfactant particle was then added to the concrete mixer at a level of 28.6%.
  • the anionic surfactant particle contained 28 parts linear alkyl benzene sulphonate, 12 parts tallow alkyl sulphate, 30 parts zeolite, 20 parts carbonate and 10 parts water, and had an average particle size of 850 micrometers.
  • the finished product had an average particle size of 1030 micrometers.
  • the product in the concrete mixer had an average particle size of 555 micrometers.
  • the anionic surfactant particle was then added to the concrete mixer at a level of 28.6%.
  • the anionic surfactant particle contained 28 parts linear alkyl benzene sulphonate, 12 parts tallow alkyl sulphate, 30 parts zeolite, 20 parts carbonate and 10 parts water, and had an average particle size of 410 micrometers.
  • the finished product had an average particle size of 520 micrometers.
  • nonionic surfactant AE5
  • zeolite A 6% were added into the concrete mixer in discrete portions, 1% at a time.
  • the product in the concrete mixer had an average particle size of 1000 micrometers.
  • a spray dried powder was then added to the concrete mixer at a level of 28%.
  • the spray dried particle contained 20 parts linear alkyl benzene sulphonate, 5 parts polyacrylate polymer, 5 parts of chelant, 30 parts zeolite, 30 parts sulphate and 10 parts water, and had an average particle size of 1000 micrometers.
  • the finished product had an average particle size of 1000 micrometers.
  • nonionic surfactant AE5
  • zeolite A 7% were added into the concrete mixer in discrete portions, 1% at a time.
  • the product in the concrete mixer had an average particle size of 1050 micrometers.
  • a spray-dried granule was then added to the concrete mixer at a level of 30%.
  • the spray dried particle contained 20 parts linear alkyl benzene sulphonate, 5 parts polyacrylate polymer, 5 parts of chelant, 30 parts zeolite, 30 parts sulphate and 10 parts water, and had an average particle size of 1000 micrometers.
  • the finished product had an average particle size of 1020 micrometers.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a process comprising the steps of:
  • (i) mixing together at least two non-surfactant additives to form a premix;
  • (ii) spraying substantially all of the nonionic surfactant on to the premix to form a first intermediate particle;
  • (iii) subsequently mixing the first intermediate particle with a second intermediate particle, wherein the second intermediate particle comprises substantially all of the anionic surfactant, and is substantially free of nonionic surfactant.
  • Description

    The present invention relates to a process for making detergent compositions
    There is a trend amongst commercially available granular detergents towards higher bulk densities. This gives benefits both for consumer convenience and for reduction of packaging materials.
    Many of the prior art attempts to move in this direction have met with problems of poor solubility properties arising from low rate of dissolution or the formation of gels. A consequence of this in a typical washing process can be poor dispensing of the product, either from the dispensing drawer of a washing machine, or from a dosing device placed with the laundry inside the machine. This poor dispensing is often caused by gelling of particles which have high levels of surfactant upon contact with water. The gel prevents a proportion of the detergent powder from being solubilised in the wash water which reduces the effectiveness of the powder. Another adverse consequence arises even if the powder is well dispensed and dispersed in the washing water if it does not dissolve rapidly. The wash cycle has a limited duration during which the detergent can act upon the laundry. If the cleaning action is delayed because the powder is slow to dissolve, this, too, will limit the effectiveness of the powder.
    The process engineer and formulator have frequently found that the need for good dispensing and the need for good dissolution rate have placed conflicting demands upon them. The solution has generally been to find a compromise which gives adequate dispensing and adequate dissolution rate. For example, poor dispensing of high bulk density granular detergents is often associated with surfactant rich particles having a high specific surface area, either due to high porosity or a small particle size (especially "fines"). However, decreasing the porosity and/or increasing the average particle size cause the dissolution rate to decrease. WO94/05761, published on 17th March 1994, describes a final product densification step wherein substantially all of the product is sprayed with nonionic surfactant and coated with zeolite. Good dispensing and dissolving properties are claimed.
    However it has now been found that even further improvements in dispensing and dissolving properties can be achieved if the nonionic surfactant and zeolite coating is applied only to selected parts of the detergent composition, rather than to the detergent composition as a whole.
    The object of the invention is to provide an improved process for making a detergent composition comprising anionic surfactant, nonionic surfactant and non-surfactant additives.
    Summary of the Invention
    The object of the present invention is achieved by a process comprising the steps of:
  • (i) mixing together at least two non-surfactant additives to form a premix;
  • (ii) spraying substantially all of the nonionic surfactant on to the premix to form a first intermediate particle;
  • (iii) subsequently mixing the first intermediate particle with a second intermediate particle, wherein the second intermediate particle comprises substantially all of the anionic surfactant, and is substantially free of nonionic surfactant.
  • Detailed Description of the Invention
    In a preferred embodiment of the process the first intermediate particle is formed by :
  • (a) mixing together at least two non-surfactant additives to form a premix; and
  • (b) increasing the mean particle size of the premix by spraying nonionic surfactant on to the premix and applying a finely divided particulate material, preferably aluminosilicate.
  • In a still further preferred embodiment of the process the first intermediate particle is formed by :
  • (a) mixing together at least two non-surfactant additives to form a premix;
  • (b) spraying nonionic surfactant on to the premix wherein the ratio of nonionic surfactant to premix is at least 1:25;
  • (c) applying a first amount of finely divided particulate material, wherein the ratio of the first amount of finely divided particulate material to nonionic surfactant applied in step (b) is less than 1:1;
  • (d) increasing the mean particle size of the premix by mixing; and
  • (e) applying a second amount of finely divided particulate material, wherein the second amount of finely divided particulate material to nonionic surfactant applied in step (b) is greater than 1:1.
  • The process of the invention results in a narrow particle size distribution with a sharply defined mean. Preferably the mean particle size is 800 to 1200 micrometers, and the particle size distribution has a standard deviation of less than 100 micrometers. More preferably the mean particle size is from 900 to 1100 micrometers, and the particle size distribution has a standard deviation of less than 50 micrometers.
    Non-surfactant additives may include any detergent additives such as bleach, especially perborate or percarbonate; inorganic salts, especially carbonate, bicarbonate, silicate, sulphate, or citrate; chelants, enzymes.
    Preferably the first intermediate particle comprises less than 5% by weight of anionic surfactant, more preferably the first intermediate particle comprises less than 1% by weight of anionic surfactant.
    Finely divided particulate materials useful herein include aluminosilicates having the empirical formula: Mz (zAlO2)y ] · x H2O wherein z and y are integers of at least 6, the molar ratio of z to y is in the range from 1.0 to about 0.5, and x is an integer from about 15 to about 264.
    Useful aluminosilicate ion exchange materials are commercially available. These aluminosilicates can be crystalline or amorphous in structure and can be naturally-occurring aluminosilicates or synthetically derived. A method for producing aluminosilicate ion exchange materials is disclosed in US-A-3 985 669, Krummel et al, issued October 12, 1976. Preferred synthetic crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange materials useful herein are available under the designations zeolite A, zeolite P(B), zeolite MAP, zeolite X and zeolite Y. In an especially preferred embodiment, the crystalline aluminosilicate ion exchange material has the formula : Na12 [(AlO2)12 (SiO2)12 ] · x H2O wherein x is from about 20 to about 30, especially about 27. This material is known as zeolite A. Dehydrated zeolites (x=0-10), and "overdried" zeolites (x=10-20) may also be used herein. The "overdried" zeolites are particularly useful when a low moisture environment is required, for example to improve stability of detergent bleaches such as perborate and percarbonate. Preferably, the aluminosilicate has a particle size of about 0.1-10 micrometers in diameter. Preferred ion exchange materials have a particle size diameter of from about 0.2 micrometers to about 4 micrometers. The term "particle size diameter" herein represents the average particle size diameter by weight of a given ion exchange material as determined by conventional analytical techniques such as, for example, microscopic determination utilizing a scanning electron microscope. The crystalline zeolite A materials herein are usually further characterized by their calcium ion exchange capacity, which is at least about 200 mg equivalent of CaCO3 water hardness/g of aluminosilicate, calculated on an anhydrous basis, and which generally is in the range of from about 300 mg eq./g to about 352 mg eq./g. The zeolite A materials herein are still further characterized by their calcium ion exchange rate which is at least about 2 grains Ca++/gallon/minute/gram/gallon (0.13g Ca++/litre/minute/gram/litre) of aluminosilicate (anhydrous basis), and generally lies within the range of from about 2 grains/gallon/minute/gram/gallon(0.13g Ca++/litre/minute/gram/litre) to about 6 grains/gallon/minute/gram/gallon (0.39g Ca++/litre/minute/gram/litre), based on calcium ion hardness. Optimum aluminosilicate for builder purposes exhibit a calcium ion exchange rate of at least about 4 grains/gallon/minute/gram/gallon (0.26g Ca++/litre/minute/gram/litre).
    While any nonionic surfactant may be usefully employed in the present invention, two families of nonionics have been found to be particularly useful. These are nonionic surfactants based on alkoxylated (especially ethoxylated) alcohols, and those nonionic surfactants based on amidation products of fatty acid esters and N-alkyl polyhydroxy amine. The amidation products of the esters and the amines are generally referred to herein as polyhydroxy fatty acid amides. Particularly useful in the present invention are mixtures comprising two or more nonionic surfactants wherein at least one nonionic surfactant is selected from each of the groups of alkoxylated alcohols and the polyhydroxy fatty acid amides.
    Suitable nonionic surfactants include compounds produced by the condensation of alkylene oxide groups (hydrophilic in nature) with an organic hydrophobic compound, which may be aliphatic or alkyl aromatic in nature. The length of the polyoxyalkylene group which is condensed with any particular hydrophobic group can be readily adjusted to yield a water-soluble compound having the desired degree of balance between hydrophilic and hydrophobic elements.
    Particularly preferred for use in the present invention are nonionic surfactants such as the polyethylene oxide condensates of alkyl phenols, e.g., the condensation products of alkyl phenols having an alkyl group containing from about 6 to 16 carbon atoms, in either a straight chain or branched chain configuration, with from about 4 to 25 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alkyl phenol.
    Preferred nonionics are the water-soluble condensation products of aliphatic alcohols containing from 8 to 22 carbon atoms, in either straight chain or branched configuration, with an average of up to 25 moles of ethylene oxide per more of alcohol. Particularly preferred are the condensation products of alcohols having an alkyl group containing from about 9 to 15 carbon atoms with from about 2 to 10 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol; and condensation products of propylene glycol with ethylene oxide. Most preferred are condensation products of alcohols having an alkyl group containing from about 12 to 15 carbon atoms with an average of about 3 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
    It is a particularly preferred embodiment of the present invention that the nonionic surfactant system also includes a polyhydroxy fatty acid amide component.
    Polyhydroxy fatty acid amides may be produced by reacting a fatty acid ester and an N-alkyl polyhydroxy amine. The preferred amine for use in the present invention is N-(R1)-CH2(CH2OH)4-CH2-OH, where R1 is typically a alkyl, e.g. methyl group; and the preferred ester is a C12-C20 fatty acid methyl ester.
    Methods of manufacturing polyhydroxy fatty acid amides have been described in WO 92 6073, published on 16th April, 1992. This application describes the preparation of polyhydroxy fatty acid amides in the presence of solvents. In a highly preferred embodiment of the invention N-methyl glucamine is reacted with a C12-C20 methyl ester.
    Other nonionic surfactants which may be used as components of the surfactant systems herein include ethoxylated nonionic surfactants, glycerol ethers, glucosamides, glycerol amides, glycerol esters, fatty acids, fatty acid esters, fatty amides, alkyl polyglucosides, alkyl polyglycol ethers, polyethylene glycols, ethoxylated alkyl phenols and mixtures thereof.
    The second intermediate particle of the present invention comprises anionic surfactant. The second intermediate particle may be made by any process including spray drying, flaking, prilling, extruding, pastillating, and agglomeration. Agglomeration processes for making anionic surfactant particles have been disclosed in the prior art in, for example, EP-A-0 508 543, EP-A-0 510 746, EP-A-0 618 289 and EP-A-0 663 439. An essential feature of the invention is that no nonionic surfactant is sprayed on to the surfactant agglomerate stream.
    Non-limiting examples of anionic surfactants useful herein include the conventional C11-C18 alkyl benzene sulfonates ("LAS") and primary, branched-chain and random C10-C20 alkyl sulfates ("AS"), the C10-C18 secondary (2,3) alkyl sulfates of the formula CH3 (CH2)x (CHOSO3 -M+) CH3 and CH3 (CH2)y(CHOSO3 -M+) CH2 CH3 where x and (y+1) are integers of at least about 7, preferably at least about 9, and M is a water-solubilizing cation, especially sodium, unsaturated sulfates such as oleyl sulfate, the C10-C18 alkyl alkoxy sulfates ("AExS", especially EO 1-7 ethoxy sulfates), C10-C18 alkyl alkoxy carboxylates (especially the EO 1-5 ethoxycarboxylates), the C10-C18 glycerol ethers, the C10-C18 alkyl polyglycosides and their corresponding sulfated polyglycosides, the C12-C18 alpha-sulfonated fatty acid esters, methyl ester sulphonate and oleoyl sarcosinate.
    Finally the surfactant agglomerates and layered granular additives are mixed, optionally with additional additives to form a finished detergent composition.
    The various mixing steps of the present invention may be carried out in any suitable mixer such as the Eirich®, series RV, manufactured by Gustau Eirich Hardheim, Germany; Lödige®, series FM for batch mixing, series Baud KM for continuous mixing/agglomeration, manufactured by Lödige Machinenbau GmbH, Paderborn Germany; Drais® T160 series, manufactured by Drais Werke GmbH, Mannheim Germany; and Winkworth® RT 25 series, manufactured by Winkworth Machinery Ltd., Berkshire, England; the Littleford Mixer, Model #FM-130-D-12, with internal chopping blades and the Cuisinart Food Processor, Model #DCX-Plus, with 7.75 inch (19.7 cm) blades. Many other mixers are commercially available for both batch and continuous mixing.
    Examples
    Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5
    Sodium carbonate 3 2 2 7.8 -
    Sodium citrate - - - - 10
    Sodium bicarbonate - - - - 10
    Percarbonate 20 16 16 - -
    Perborate - - - 18 -
    Enzymes 1.7 2.2 2.2 1 2
    Nonionic surfactant particles 4 13 19 20 20
    Hydroxy ethylene diphosphonic acid 1 1 1 - -
    Tetraacetyl ethylene diamine 6 4.7 4.7 4 -
    Antifoam particle 2.8 1 1 - -
    Layered silicate 15 12 12 - -
    Sodium silicate (2.0R) - - - 2 3
    Sodium sulphate - - - - 5
    Cationic surfactant particles 5 - - - -
    Brightener - - - 0.2 -
    58.5 51.9 57.9 53 50
    All percentages are expressed by weight of finished product unless otherwise stated.
    Nonionic surfactant particles contained 15 parts alcohol ethoxylate with an average of 5 EO groups per mole, AE5, 15 parts of polyhydroxy fatty acid amide, 60 parts zeolite, 5 parts fatty acid and 5 parts water, and were made according to the process disclosed in EP-A-0 643 130.
    Antifoam particles contained 12 parts silicone oil, 70 parts starch and 12 parts hydrogenated fatty acid / tallow alcohol ethoxylate (TAE80), and were made according to the process disclosed in EP-A-0 495 345.
    Layered silicate is SKS-6® supplied by Hoechst
    Cationic surfactant particles contained 30 parts alkyl dimethyl ethoxy ammonium chloride, 60 parts sodium sulphate, 5 parts alkyl sulphate and 5 parts water and were made according to the process disclosed in EP-A-0 714 976.
    Brightener is Tinopal CDX® supplied by Ciba-Geigy.
    Example 1
    The additives shown under Example 1 in the previous table were mixed together and found to have an average particle size of 440 micrometers.
    6.5% of nonionic surfactant (alcohol ethoxylate with an average of 5 EO groups per mole, AE5) at 35°C was sprayed onto the additive mixture in a concrete mixer using a two-fluid spray nozzle. 5% of zeolite A was added into the concrete mixer over a period of 1 minute. The mixer then continued to operate without further addition of zeolite for a further one and a half minutes. Finally a further 8% of zeolite was added over a period of 1 minute.
    The product in the concrete mixer had an average particle size of 1020 micrometers.
    An anionic surfactant particle was then added to the concrete mixer at a level of 22%. The anionic surfactant particle contained 28 parts linear alkyl benzene sulphonate, 12 parts tallow alkyl sulphate, 30 parts zeolite, 20 parts carbonate and 10 parts water, and had an average particle size of 850 micrometers.
    The finished product had an average particle size of 960 micrometers.
    Example 2
    The additives shown under Example 2 in the previous table were mixed together and found to have an average particle size of 390 micrometers.
    6.5% of nonionic surfactant (AE5) at 35°C was sprayed onto the additive mixture in a concrete mixer using a two-fluid spray nozzle. 4% of zeolite A was added into the concrete mixer over a period of 1 minute. The mixer then continued to operate without further addition of zeolite for a further one minute. Finally a further 9% of zeolite was added over a period of 2 minutes.
    The product in the concrete mixer had an average particle size of 1080 micrometers.
    An anionic surfactant particle was then added to the concrete mixer at a level of 28.6%. The anionic surfactant particle contained 28 parts linear alkyl benzene sulphonate, 12 parts tallow alkyl sulphate, 30 parts zeolite, 20 parts carbonate and 10 parts water, and had an average particle size of 850 micrometers.
    The finished product had an average particle size of 1030 micrometers.
    Example 3
    The additives shown under Example 3 in the previous table were mixed together and found to have an average particle size of 390 micrometers.
    6.5% of nonionic surfactant (AE5) at 35°C was sprayed onto the additive mixture in a concrete mixer using a two-fluid spray nozzle. 7% of zeolite A was added into the concrete mixer in a single step.
    The product in the concrete mixer had an average particle size of 555 micrometers.
    An anionic surfactant particle was then added to the concrete mixer at a level of 28.6%. The anionic surfactant particle contained 28 parts linear alkyl benzene sulphonate, 12 parts tallow alkyl sulphate, 30 parts zeolite, 20 parts carbonate and 10 parts water, and had an average particle size of 410 micrometers.
    The finished product had an average particle size of 520 micrometers.
    Example 4
    The additives shown under Example 4 in the previous table were mixed together.
    6% of nonionic surfactant (AE5) at 35°C was sprayed onto the additive mixture in a concrete mixer using a two-fluid spray nozzle. 13% of zeolite A were added into the concrete mixer in discrete portions, 1% at a time.
    The product in the concrete mixer had an average particle size of 1000 micrometers.
    A spray dried powder was then added to the concrete mixer at a level of 28%. The spray dried particle contained 20 parts linear alkyl benzene sulphonate, 5 parts polyacrylate polymer, 5 parts of chelant, 30 parts zeolite, 30 parts sulphate and 10 parts water, and had an average particle size of 1000 micrometers.
    The finished product had an average particle size of 1000 micrometers.
    Example 5
    The additives shown under Example 5 in the previous table were mixed together.
    7% of nonionic surfactant (AE5) at 35°C was sprayed onto the additive mixture in a concrete mixer using a two-fluid spray nozzle. 13% of zeolite A were added into the concrete mixer in discrete portions, 1% at a time.
    The product in the concrete mixer had an average particle size of 1050 micrometers.
    A spray-dried granule was then added to the concrete mixer at a level of 30%. The spray dried particle contained 20 parts linear alkyl benzene sulphonate, 5 parts polyacrylate polymer, 5 parts of chelant, 30 parts zeolite, 30 parts sulphate and 10 parts water, and had an average particle size of 1000 micrometers.
    The finished product had an average particle size of 1020 micrometers.

    Claims (8)

    1. A process for making a detergent composition comprising anionic surfactant, nonionic surfactant and non-surfactant additives, the process being characterised by the steps of:
      (i) mixing together at least two non-surfactant additives to form a premix;
      (ii) spraying substantially all of the nonionic surfactant on to the premix to form a first intermediate particle;
      (iii) subsequently mixing the first intermediate particle with a second intermediate particle, wherein the second intermediate particle comprises substantially all of the anionic surfactant, and is substantially free of nonionic surfactant.
    2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the first intermediate particle is formed by :
      (a) mixing together at least two non-surfactant additives to form a premix; and
      (b) increasing the mean particle size of the premix by spraying nonionic surfactant on to the premix applying a finely divided particulate material.
    3. A process according to claim 2 wherein the first intermediate particle is formed by :
      (a) mixing together at least two non-surfactant additives to form a premix;
      (b) spraying nonionic surfactant on to the premix wherein the ratio of nonionic surfactant to premix is at least 1:25;
      (c) applying a first amount of finely divided particulate material, wherein the ratio of the first amount of finely divided particulate material to nonionic surfactant applied in step (b) is less than 1:1;
      (d) increasing the mean particle size of the premix by mixing; and
      (e) applying a second amount of finely divided particulate material, wherein the second amount of finely divided particulate material to nonionic surfactant applied in step (b) is greater than 1:1.
    4. A process according to claim 3 wherein the first intermediate particle has a mean particle size of from 800 to 1200 micrometers, and the particle size distribution has a standard deviation of less than 100 micrometers.
    5. A process according to claim 4 wherein the first intermediate particle has a mean particle size of from 900 to 1100 micrometers, and the particle size distribution has a standard deviation of less than 50 micrometers.
    6. A process according to any of claims 2 to 5 wherein the first intermediate particle comprises less than 5% by weight of anionic surfactant.
    7. A process according to any of claim 2 to 5 wherein the finely divided particulate material is aluminosilicate.
    8. A process according to claim 1 wherein at least one of the non-surfactant additives is a bleach selected from the group consisting of perborate, percarbonate, and mixtures thereof.
    EP96201854A 1996-07-04 1996-07-04 Process for making detergent compositions Expired - Lifetime EP0816485B1 (en)

    Priority Applications (11)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    ES96201854T ES2253747T3 (en) 1996-07-04 1996-07-04 PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS.
    AT96201854T ATE312901T1 (en) 1996-07-04 1996-07-04 METHOD FOR PRODUCING CLEANING AGENT COMPOSITIONS
    DE69635575T DE69635575T2 (en) 1996-07-04 1996-07-04 Process for the preparation of detergent compositions
    EP96201854A EP0816485B1 (en) 1996-07-04 1996-07-04 Process for making detergent compositions
    JP10505241A JPH11514033A (en) 1996-07-04 1997-06-27 Method for producing a detergent composition
    US09/214,327 US6156718A (en) 1996-07-04 1997-06-27 Process for making detergent compositions
    CNB971973946A CN1195834C (en) 1996-07-04 1997-06-27 Process for making detergent compositions
    PCT/US1997/011281 WO1998001520A2 (en) 1996-07-04 1997-06-27 Process for making detergent compositions
    CA002259535A CA2259535C (en) 1996-07-04 1997-06-27 Process for making detergent compositions
    BR9710199-0A BR9710199A (en) 1996-07-04 1997-06-27 Process for manufacturing detergent compositions
    ARP970102992A AR008062A1 (en) 1996-07-04 1997-07-03 PROCESS TO MANUFACTURE DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS

    Applications Claiming Priority (1)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    EP96201854A EP0816485B1 (en) 1996-07-04 1996-07-04 Process for making detergent compositions

    Publications (2)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP0816485A1 true EP0816485A1 (en) 1998-01-07
    EP0816485B1 EP0816485B1 (en) 2005-12-14

    Family

    ID=8224140

    Family Applications (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP96201854A Expired - Lifetime EP0816485B1 (en) 1996-07-04 1996-07-04 Process for making detergent compositions

    Country Status (10)

    Country Link
    EP (1) EP0816485B1 (en)
    JP (1) JPH11514033A (en)
    CN (1) CN1195834C (en)
    AR (1) AR008062A1 (en)
    AT (1) ATE312901T1 (en)
    BR (1) BR9710199A (en)
    CA (1) CA2259535C (en)
    DE (1) DE69635575T2 (en)
    ES (1) ES2253747T3 (en)
    WO (1) WO1998001520A2 (en)

    Cited By (10)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    WO2000018878A1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2000-04-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Granular detergent compositions having improved solubility profiles
    WO2000018874A1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2000-04-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Granular detergent composition having improved appearance and solubility
    WO2000018875A1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2000-04-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Granular detergent composition having improved appearance and solubility
    WO2000078913A1 (en) * 1999-06-21 2000-12-28 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making a granular detergent composition
    EP1104804A1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2001-06-06 Kao Corporation Method for producing single nucleus detergent particles
    US6555514B1 (en) 1998-10-26 2003-04-29 The Procter & Gamble Company Processes for making granular detergent composition having improved appearance and solubility
    US6833346B1 (en) * 1999-06-21 2004-12-21 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making detergent particulates
    US6906022B1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2005-06-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Granular detergent compositions having homogenous particles and process for producing same
    US6951837B1 (en) 1999-06-21 2005-10-04 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making a granular detergent composition
    EP1870447A1 (en) * 2006-06-24 2007-12-26 Cognis IP Management GmbH Solid tensides in granular form

    Families Citing this family (4)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US6156718A (en) * 1996-07-04 2000-12-05 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making detergent compositions
    US6964945B1 (en) 1998-09-25 2005-11-15 The Procter & Gamble Company Solid detergent compositions
    US6673766B1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2004-01-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Solid detergent compositions containing mixtures of surfactant/builder particles
    GB0111863D0 (en) * 2001-05-15 2001-07-04 Unilever Plc Granular composition

    Citations (5)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US4136051A (en) * 1974-02-25 1979-01-23 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien (Henkel Kgaa) Pourable washing compositions containing a luminosilicates and non-ionics and method for their preparation
    JPS6189300A (en) * 1984-10-09 1986-05-07 ライオン株式会社 Production of granular detergent composition containing nonionic surfactant
    EP0560395A1 (en) * 1992-03-12 1993-09-15 Kao Corporation Nonionic powdery detergent composition
    WO1993019151A1 (en) * 1992-03-24 1993-09-30 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Granular, phosphate-free additive containing non-ionic surface-active agents for washing and cleaning agents
    WO1994005761A1 (en) * 1992-09-01 1994-03-17 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making high density granular detergent and compositions made by the process

    Patent Citations (5)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US4136051A (en) * 1974-02-25 1979-01-23 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien (Henkel Kgaa) Pourable washing compositions containing a luminosilicates and non-ionics and method for their preparation
    JPS6189300A (en) * 1984-10-09 1986-05-07 ライオン株式会社 Production of granular detergent composition containing nonionic surfactant
    EP0560395A1 (en) * 1992-03-12 1993-09-15 Kao Corporation Nonionic powdery detergent composition
    WO1993019151A1 (en) * 1992-03-24 1993-09-30 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Granular, phosphate-free additive containing non-ionic surface-active agents for washing and cleaning agents
    WO1994005761A1 (en) * 1992-09-01 1994-03-17 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making high density granular detergent and compositions made by the process

    Non-Patent Citations (1)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Title
    DATABASE WPI Section Ch Week 8625, Derwent World Patents Index; Class A97, AN 86-158046, XP002021079 *

    Cited By (13)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    US6906022B1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2005-06-14 The Procter & Gamble Company Granular detergent compositions having homogenous particles and process for producing same
    WO2000018874A1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2000-04-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Granular detergent composition having improved appearance and solubility
    WO2000018875A1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2000-04-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Granular detergent composition having improved appearance and solubility
    WO2000018878A1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2000-04-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Granular detergent compositions having improved solubility profiles
    US6608021B1 (en) 1998-09-25 2003-08-19 The Procter & Gamble Co. Granular detergent composition having improved appearance and solubility
    US6555514B1 (en) 1998-10-26 2003-04-29 The Procter & Gamble Company Processes for making granular detergent composition having improved appearance and solubility
    EP1104804A1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2001-06-06 Kao Corporation Method for producing single nucleus detergent particles
    EP1104804A4 (en) * 1999-06-14 2002-08-28 Kao Corp Method for producing single nucleus detergent particles
    US6602846B1 (en) 1999-06-14 2003-08-05 Kao Corporation Method for producing single nucleus detergent particles
    WO2000078913A1 (en) * 1999-06-21 2000-12-28 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making a granular detergent composition
    US6833346B1 (en) * 1999-06-21 2004-12-21 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making detergent particulates
    US6951837B1 (en) 1999-06-21 2005-10-04 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for making a granular detergent composition
    EP1870447A1 (en) * 2006-06-24 2007-12-26 Cognis IP Management GmbH Solid tensides in granular form

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    DE69635575D1 (en) 2006-01-19
    DE69635575T2 (en) 2006-09-14
    JPH11514033A (en) 1999-11-30
    CA2259535A1 (en) 1998-01-15
    CA2259535C (en) 2002-10-01
    BR9710199A (en) 1999-11-23
    CN1332790A (en) 2002-01-23
    CN1195834C (en) 2005-04-06
    AR008062A1 (en) 1999-12-09
    EP0816485B1 (en) 2005-12-14
    ES2253747T3 (en) 2006-06-01
    WO1998001520A2 (en) 1998-01-15
    ATE312901T1 (en) 2005-12-15

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    EP0390251B1 (en) Detergent compositions and process for preparing them
    EP0451894B2 (en) High bulk density granular detergent compositions and process for preparing them
    US4925585A (en) Detergent granules from cold dough using fine dispersion granulation
    EP0816485B1 (en) Process for making detergent compositions
    EP0656825B2 (en) Process for making compact detergent compositions
    EP0040091A1 (en) Suds suppressing granules for use in detergent compositions
    CA2028204A1 (en) Detergent compositions
    EP0882126B1 (en) Process for the production of a detergent composition
    EP0578871B1 (en) Process and compositions for compact detergents
    CA2083332C (en) Detergent compositions and process for preparing them
    US5610131A (en) Structuring liquid nonionic surfactants prior to granulation process
    US6156718A (en) Process for making detergent compositions
    JPH0762160B2 (en) Process for producing high bulk density detergent powder containing clay
    US5998356A (en) Process for making granular detergents
    CA2231577C (en) Process for making granular detergents
    US5990073A (en) Process for the production of a detergent composition
    JPH10176200A (en) Production of nonionic detergent granule
    AU739651B2 (en) Process for the production of a detergent composition
    EP0660873B2 (en) High density granular detergent composition
    JP2013147578A (en) Process for producing particle group added to detergent

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 19980706

    AKX Designation fees paid

    Free format text: AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

    RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

    17Q First examination report despatched

    Effective date: 20040517

    GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

    GRAS Grant fee paid

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

    GRAA (expected) grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: B1

    Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU NL PT SE

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: LI

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20051214

    Ref country code: FI

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20051214

    Ref country code: CH

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20051214

    Ref country code: BE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20051214

    Ref country code: AT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20051214

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: CH

    Ref legal event code: EP

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    REF Corresponds to:

    Ref document number: 69635575

    Country of ref document: DE

    Date of ref document: 20060119

    Kind code of ref document: P

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: SE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060314

    Ref country code: GR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060314

    Ref country code: DK

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060314

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: PT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20060515

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: ES

    Ref legal event code: FG2A

    Ref document number: 2253747

    Country of ref document: ES

    Kind code of ref document: T3

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Payment date: 20060614

    Year of fee payment: 11

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: NL

    Payment date: 20060616

    Year of fee payment: 11

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: CH

    Ref legal event code: PL

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20060704

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: FR

    Payment date: 20060705

    Year of fee payment: 11

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IT

    Payment date: 20060731

    Year of fee payment: 11

    Ref country code: DE

    Payment date: 20060731

    Year of fee payment: 11

    ET Fr: translation filed
    PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

    26N No opposition filed

    Effective date: 20060915

    GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

    Effective date: 20070704

    NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

    Effective date: 20080201

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: NL

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20080201

    Ref country code: DE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20080201

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20070704

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: ST

    Effective date: 20080331

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: LU

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20060704

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: FR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20070731

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: ES

    Ref legal event code: FD2A

    Effective date: 20070705

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: ES

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20070705

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20070704