EP0741026B1 - Image inspection and ink supply method in printed products of a printing machine - Google Patents

Description

The invention relates to a method for image inspection and control of the Color guidance on print products of a printing press, according to the preamble of claim 1.

Such a method is disclosed in document EP-A-522 301.

A method of the type mentioned is based on the U.S. Patent 5,187,376. By means of the method ongoing production operation by means of an optical Detection device the print images of the continuously created Printed products checked for errors. This is done by that of the print images of the print products actual image data obtained and compared with target image data. The Target image data come from an error-free image original, so that in the comparison mentioned when a Deviation between actual and target data on an error can be closed. An occurring deviation shows that there is an error, but is fundamental not recognizable what kind of error it is. Would Various available for troubleshooting Measures are taken without the exact type of error is known, this can lead to problems in printing.

It is also known that when an error occurs faulty sheets of a sheet printing machine separated be what, for example by means of a switch or through Streaking can take place. These well-known Measures lead to error identification however no error analysis.

Based on this basic problem, the invention is the The task is based on a method for image inspection and Color guidance on print products of a printing machine create in which a determined and in terms of Production process safe error detection respectively Error removal is done.

This object is achieved by the combination of the features of claim 1. If an error occurs before changing the color scheme it is checked whether another cause is due to the type of error than the color scheme is possible for the deviation. Becomes a deviation of the by the target-actual comparison Image data determined, which indicates an error, is done a corrective action in a targeted manner such that before changing the color scheme, especially performing color control with high Probability can be excluded that the determined deviation a different cause than the color guide Has. All other known causes of error come Printing errors, such as slugs, register, color, moisture, Stenciling, toning, pushing, duplicating, transfer register etc. in question. Operating errors such as Change of paper type, too little color in the ink fountain and also Device errors, such as dirty optics, fiber breakage Optical fiber, lamp defect or voltage drop electrical facilities to be responsible for the determined deviation between target and actual value. In all In these cases the color may not be regulated, but for example, an error message can go to the printer or the corresponding error is corrected by appropriate measures automatically eliminated. If the target-actual comparison is a Color deviation detected, this can of course due to wrong color management (wrong setting the zone opening of the inking unit) have its cause, whereby however, the other errors mentioned above are not caused by Adjusting the zone opening or Zone openings can be eliminated. Now try that Color control this pressure disturbance by changing the To compensate for zone opening, the effects are not foreseeable; they can go as far as the instability of the Carry out control process, but without eliminating errors entry. In the method according to the invention online image inspection before any necessary Color guide correction ensures that all possible other causes of malfunction can be excluded. First if it is ensured that other causes of malfunction are not in Finally, the question of color control, for example activated by color zone adjustment.

According to the invention it is provided that an error type analysis is carried out in which different, predetermined criteria one after the other Fault type detection, preferably systematically, applied become. Therefore there are certain criteria for each type of error which is used for systematic troubleshooting so that the nature of the present error can be forecast with high probability. If the type of error is determined, one can definitely Remedial action to be taken.

It is also advantageous that a remedial measure is carried out according to the determined type of error. Thus speaks a high probability for one certain errors, only the planned concrete action taken.

If the type of error is ambiguous, the type of error is as In the present case it is assumed that the greatest probability having. So be several of the above Criteria for determining the type of error met, and is thereby possibly a clear determination of the type of error difficult combinations of criteria must be used. Certain combinations of the criteria allow information about the type of error, with additional aids such as the Probability calculation, can be used to the greatest possible accuracy with the To determine the type of error.

Finally, it is advantageous if there are several in question upcoming error types for troubleshooting a Color guide change, especially activation of Color control that is performed last. An intervention in the Color control is therefore not only carried out with clear Error determination as the last measure, but forms also the last act, if due to the Error type analysis does not rule out ambiguity can be.

Fig. 1

ein Flußdiagramm der dem Verfahren zugrundeliegenden Verfahrensschritte und

Fig. 2

eine Fehlerermittlungsmatrix.

The drawings illustrate the invention with reference to the figures, which show:

Fig. 1

a flow chart of the process steps underlying the method and

Fig. 2

an error determination matrix.

As the automation of the Printing process in printing machines and the introduction of The automatic image inspection in wins quality standards the printing press in the production process is becoming increasingly important. By means of an optical detection device, the for example in the boom or in the area of Impression cylinder of the last printing unit of the printing press can be arranged, the continuously freshly printed Sheet with regard to the printed images of the printed products, whereby actual image data is determined and electronics, in particular be fed to a computer. Aim this The procedure is to identify defective sheets. For this the determined actual image data with target image data compared. The target image data are stored in the computer. They represent an ok bow, that is, an error-free one Printed copy.

If a deviation is found in the target-actual comparison, on the one hand, it is possible to determine which arch or which bows have this deviation and on the other hand also the location of the deviation in the printed image is understandable, the is called the faulty sheet and also the fault locations For example, the printer can be shown on a display become. Possible causes of errors can be: slugs, lint, Register, slide, duplicate, paper type, paper color, Illumination, fiber optic defects, distance between arc and Measuring bar of the optical detection device, moisture, none or too little color, paper transport, no paper, dirty optics, stripes, temporary color changes for Example due to speed changes etc.

The invention assumes that when troubleshooting certain measures uncritical and others very much can be critical to the printing process, so that the critical troubleshooting measures only then carried out if it is ensured that another Type of error does not exist. What is critical in the printing process Color guide, so that color guide changes in the Troubleshooting is the last measure to be carried out.

A systematic procedure is used when analyzing errors required.

Below are the causes of errors and their typical Appearance.

Register deviation

• on the whole sheet
• solid color on solid edges
• multicolored on solid edges
• in a multi-color grid
• not in full tone
• not in the single color grid
• in the differential image as a gradient image of the target image

Humidity error

• for example in a 50% to 80% grid due to an increase in tone value (Lubricate)
• under coloring on solid edges (water noses)
• reinforced at the start of printing
• globally even on non-printed surfaces
• preferred places, usually at the beginning of printing and here mostly sideways
• no rhythmic appearance

Slugs

• very limited error impact (no expansion)
• is a one-time event or a rare event (Lint on bow)
• occurs suddenly, the front sheets are not affected
• The fault location first shows under-coloring and then overdyeing of a color (lint on rubber blanket)

Optics dirty or optical path defective (the optical detection device)

• errors can be found in non-image areas and in the image
• Continuous errors in the printing direction (line systems) limited locally perpendicular to it

paper

• in non-image areas
• across the entire width
• in a grid (small area covers)

Slide / duplicate

• in the grid
• not in full tone
• over the entire arch
• global
• not on unprinted areas
• no preferred positions
• depending on the area coverage combination
• Color value
• rhythmic appearance in time

Color guide errors

• in the solid field
• in the grid
• as a zonal change in color value
• in the mixed field (for example gray field) as a difference vector in the direction of the corresponding spot color
• build up slowly
• usually not across the entire sheet width

Stripes

• certain distance
• certain period
• Expression depends on the printing speed.

In the case of the type of error analysis, a preferably occurs systematic processing of criteria and a part of it linked elimination to the number of to reduce possible sources of error until ideally only one mistake remains.

Another possibility is the type of error and location or other sizes or auxiliary sizes in one Link matrix Figure 2). Once the matrix has been created can reduce the likelihood of a particular type of error determined and in this way the error is determined be the most likely with regard to has its appearance.

Alternatively or in addition to the above, it is also possible, a time component in the type of error analysis with, for example, the image data or the difference values over several sheets be, so that their temporal career in the Error assessment flows into it.

Below are ways to get started mutual error analysis respectively Plausibility checks with the largest possible Probability of identifying the error.

The flow chart shown in FIG. 1 illustrates the procedure for the error type analysis. It can be seen that whenever one criterion is met, to the next Type of error is passed until finally - as the last Measure - a color control measure is taken. It will assumed that the print images of the printed products in Zones according to the zonal division of the inking unit are mentally divided, being transverse to these zones again mental separations take place so that individual Fields arise. Measurement locations of the optically working detection device. Signs in Color field due to a color deviation during production a deviation in the mentioned target-actual comparison, so must -before the color control is activated- with large Probability are excluded that the A change in the measured value has a different cause than the color guide. The other causes of error have already been mentioned above explained. Also on the other operating errors such as Change of paper type, too little color, etc. has already been done received and device errors were also mentioned. In all in these cases, which do not concern the color scheme, may In the event of an error, the color must not be regulated, but it must be get an error message to the printer and / or Troubleshoot manually or automatically. Because the Measured values cannot be seen a priori as to what cause one Changes in the measured value must be evaluated by Auxiliary measurement values and auxiliary color measurement fields are tried on infer the cause.

a. Einzelmeßwerte:

grad > 3 dE von Bogen zu Bogen

b. Einzelmeßwerte:

grad > 5 dE nach 8 Bogen

c. Mittelwerte :

grad > 2,0 dE nach 5 Bogen.

(aus 16 Bogen gleitendes Mittel) According to FIG. 1, it is determined in step 1 by means of the optical detection device that there is a color deviation in one or more specific color measuring fields. In step 2, a check is carried out for a paper white field. In order to detect deviations due to changes in the paper surface, fluctuations in the lighting, glass fiber breakage or changes in distance, a color measuring field must be defined on the print image that monitors an unprinted paper spot across the entire width of the zone. If there is a significant change in the mean value or the standard deviation of the image data in this measuring field, the further color measuring fields in the same zone will also show these changes, which, however, are generally not due to a change in the color guide. If it is found in step 3 that there is no error, then the process continues to step 4. If an error is found, it is displayed according to step 5. In step 4 there is a check for scatter in the color measurement field. If the scatter changes by more than 20 X, in particular 50 X, in the current color measurement field to be controlled, a color control measure, which of course also takes place in color-free operation, must be excluded. Changes in the color routing generally have little or no influence on the scatter of the pixel values within the color measuring field. If the scatter changes significantly, this can be attributed to error causes such as slugs, lint or the like. The permissible change in the scatter depends on the size of the measuring field. The smaller the measuring field, the greater the permissible spread. The test is carried out in step 6. If there is no error, go to step 7. In the event of an error, a message is issued in accordance with step 8. In step 7, the time gradient in the color measurement field is checked. The color scheme is sluggish and color changes are slow. The maximum measured color gradient in the event of a brief sharp increase (dead beat) when driving in the color is on average 0.4 dE per sheet (dE = delta-E). This means that if there are color changes greater than 0.5 dE per sheet, the color guide must be excluded as the cause. However, since statistical process and measurement fluctuations of the measured values are of the order of magnitude from sheet to sheet, no direct comparison sheet to sheet can be made here, but several sheets must be evaluated and different methods combined:

a. Single measurements:

degrees> 3 dE from bow to bow

b. Single measurements:

degree> 5 dE after 8 sheets

c. Mean values:

degree> 2.0 dE after 5 sheets.

(from 16 sheets sliding average)

The evaluation takes place in step 9, whereby in the case of a An error occurs according to step 10 or when Error-free - go to step 11. In the course of Step 9 also makes it possible to check whether periodically scatter the measured image data in the time domain, for example that every second or third sheet with a Errors, this can be caused by duplication his. As a result, the mean values are relative remain constant, but because of the color control Single value tolerance violations could be called. Since such effects result in a significant increase in Scattering, for example the last 16 or 64 measured values can be noticed by checking this spread such a cause of error is excluded or identified become. In step 11, the field one is compared Zone with similar fields in the same zone. Are in the localized in the same zone fields that have a similar or have identical color composition, they must also show the same tendency for control deviation. Reports for example, a cyan solid field in one zone too few Color, the corresponding gray field must be the same Zone - apart from a factor - also a cyan deviation Report. In the simplest case, when searching for the measuring field for each control field defines a quasi-identical auxiliary field, that in the printing direction a certain distance from the control field Has. With gray field control in standard printing, the Solid auxiliary fields serve this purpose. According to Step 12 finds an error, so in step 13 reported this. If there are no errors, go to step 14. Step 14 relates to the comparison of fields a zone with fields from neighboring zones. As for each zone and Measurement / control fields can be selected for each color Error message in a zone the equivalent fields of a or several neighboring zones are used for verification become. A color deviation in a zone must be in weakened form can be observed in the neighboring zone.

If there is an error in this way, this is done in step 15 determined and displayed in step 16. If there are no errors go to step 17. In step 17 there is a Checking the color change vector (logic of the adjustment). The rough composition of the Rule field known, that is Coverage shares of the colors involved in the printing must be determined. Before the color control is called up, should be checked whether the change in color values due to the colors in the field can be caused. If an error is determined in step 18, then in Step 19 the message. Otherwise, go to step 20 passed over. Step 20 relates to checking the Register. A register adjustment causes short-term Duplicate with large measurement value changes in the grid, whereby after a few sheets the original color value is reached again. Due to the large color gradient, this error is true intercepted by the temporal color gradient, but nevertheless a rough register monitoring should take place. This can in particular by an auxiliary color measuring field on a Solid edge (per color) can be carried out. This Register check is carried out in step 21. If there is an error, this is indicated in accordance with FIG. 22.

On the other hand, the process proceeds to step 23, which at previous freedom from errors, if so in the previous ones Steps no error was found, the color control activated (step 24).

In summary, it should be noted that for a quick Elimination of sources of error and to avoid waste the causes of errors are automatically analyzed and output or be fixed. That from the procedural know-how of the printing process for Knowledge is available in search strategies and Evaluation algorithms implemented, their sequential application or parallel link if an error occurs To draw conclusions about the cause of the error.

FIG. 2 shows a matrix, as already mentioned above was defined. On one axis there are possible errors and occurring on the other axis during the measurement Appearances. To now have an error with there is a sufficiently high probability to analyze preferably automatically an evaluation of the determined Apparitions. A cross in the matrix means that this Appearance has occurred. A dash means that the Appearance does not exist. The greater the number of phenomena attributable to an error, respectively the more securely an appearance is linked to an error the greater the likelihood that the correct error is determined. It can also be said that with increasing number of relevant measured variables in the matrix, the more clearly and reliably an error assignment is made can.

The line "Hardware error" is only a placeholder understand for different hardware components that are in one Evaluation electronics occur and their defect Cause measured value changes. Since not all of them occur Hardware components can be listed here The principle is shown by way of example using two examples:

Example 1: (defective CCD element)

The measurement takes place in three color channels (X, Y, Z) with each a CCD element; if one of them fails, this will add up all measured values noticeable, d. H. in the matrix would be in the Enter a cross in the "Hardware" line in each box equivalent to the line "no paper". So the matrix must the columns are expanded: X values, Y values, Z values, because a CCD defect is only noticeable in one of these columns makes.

Example 2: (Preprocessing unit (VVE) defective)

In a measuring system, depending on the maximum Print speed, between two and eight Preprocessing units in use, which the accruing Process measured values zonally, d. H. at eight is the first for Zones 1 to 4 are responsible and the eighth for zones 29 to 32. Another column in the matrix with the measured values can be checked according to this organization Conclusions about defective preprocessing units.

Reference list

1

step

2nd

step

3rd

step

4th

step

5

step

6

step

7

step

8th

step

9

step

10th

step

11

step

14

step

15

step

16

step

17th

step

18th

step

19th

step

20th

step

21

step

22

step

23

step

24th

step

X, Y, Z

Color channels

Claims (13)

1. Method for image inspection and controlling the ink feed at printed products in a printing press, in which in online operation actual image data of the printed images of the printed products are obtained and compared with nominal image data to detect defects, and in which - when a deviation between nominal image data and actual image data indicating a defect occurs - a check is made whether, based on the type of the defect, some other cause than the ink feed may be responsible for the deviation,
   characterized in
   that before changing the ink feed, a defect type analysis is performed, in which different predetermined criteria are systematically and successively used to determine the type of the defect, and that before a possibly necessary ink feed correction is done, it is ascertained that all possible other causes of defect are precluded.
2. Method according to claim 1,
   characterized in
   that a defect elimination measure is taken in accordance with the ascertained defect type.
3. Method according to one of the preceding claims,
   characterized in
   that in the event of an ambiguous defect type determination, the defect type with the highest probability is assumed to be present.
4. Method according to one of the preceding claims,
   characterized in
   that if several defect types are possible, activating the ink control is the last step to be taken in order to eliminate the defect.
5. Method according to one of the preceding claims,
   characterized in
   that the defect type analysis determines whether a colour deviation is present in one or more particular colour measurement fields.
6. Method according to one of the preceding claims,
   characterized in
   that the defect analysis includes a check with respect to a paper-white field.
7. Method according to claim 6,
   characterized in
   that, in order to evaluate the paper white field for deviations based on changes in the paper surface, lighting fluctuations, glass fibre breakage or changes in spacing, a colour measurement field is defined on the printed image which monitors an unprinted area on the paper over the entire width of an ink zone.
8. Method according to one of claims 5 to 7,
   characterized in
   that the defect analysis includes a check as to whether in the current colour measurement field to be controlled the scattering changes by more than 20%.
9. Method according to one of claims 5 to 8,
   characterized in
   that in the defect type analysis the time gradient in the colour measurement field is checked.
10. Method according to one of the preceding claims,
    characterized in
    that in the defect type analysis the colour measurement field of one ink zone is compared with similar colour measurement fields in the same ink zone which have a similar or identical colour composition and are located.
11. Method according to one of claims 5 to 10,
    characterized in
    that in the defect analysis colour measurement fields of one ink zone are compared with colour measurement fields of adjacent ink zones.
12. Method according to one of the preceding claims,
    characterized in
    that the defect type analysis includes an evaluation of the colour change vector.
13. Method according to one of the preceding claims,
    characterized in
    that the defect type analysis includes an evaluation of the register.

Images