EP0666923A1 - Targeted delivery of poly- or oligonucleotides to cells - Google Patents

Targeted delivery of poly- or oligonucleotides to cells

Info

Publication number
EP0666923A1
EP0666923A1 EP92920863A EP92920863A EP0666923A1 EP 0666923 A1 EP0666923 A1 EP 0666923A1 EP 92920863 A EP92920863 A EP 92920863A EP 92920863 A EP92920863 A EP 92920863A EP 0666923 A1 EP0666923 A1 EP 0666923A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
cell
molecular complex
oligonucleotide
antisense
binding agent
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP92920863A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0666923A4 (en
Inventor
George Y. Wu
Catherine H. Wu
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Connecticut
Original Assignee
University of Connecticut
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Connecticut filed Critical University of Connecticut
Publication of EP0666923A4 publication Critical patent/EP0666923A4/en
Publication of EP0666923A1 publication Critical patent/EP0666923A1/en
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/87Introduction of foreign genetic material using processes not otherwise provided for, e.g. co-transformation
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/50Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates
    • A61K47/51Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent
    • A61K47/62Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being a protein, peptide or polyamino acid
    • A61K47/64Drug-peptide, drug-protein or drug-polyamino acid conjugates, i.e. the modifying agent being a peptide, protein or polyamino acid which is covalently bonded or complexed to a therapeutically active agent
    • A61K47/645Polycationic or polyanionic oligopeptides, polypeptides or polyamino acids, e.g. polylysine, polyarginine, polyglutamic acid or peptide TAT
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K48/00Medicinal preparations containing genetic material which is inserted into cells of the living body to treat genetic diseases; Gene therapy
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/30Chemical structure
    • C12N2310/31Chemical structure of the backbone
    • C12N2310/315Phosphorothioates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/30Chemical structure
    • C12N2310/32Chemical structure of the sugar
    • C12N2310/3212'-O-R Modification
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/30Chemical structure
    • C12N2310/35Nature of the modification
    • C12N2310/351Conjugate
    • C12N2310/3513Protein; Peptide

Definitions

  • Antisense oligonucleotides hold great promise as means of specifically inhibiting unwanted gene expression in cells. Improvements in the delivery of oligonucleotides to cells will enhance effectiveness. Naked antisense oligonucleotides can be taken up by cells non-specifically and at low efficiency. Some methods have been explored to increase uptake. Lemaitre et al. covalently coupled an oligonucleotide to polylysine and demonstrated inhibition of viral gene expression at several fold lower than DNA concentrations compared to mixtures of polylysine and antisense DNA (Lemaitre, M. et. al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:648-652). Although specific antiviral effects were shown, specific delivery was not demonstrated.
  • This invention pertains to a soluble, targetable molecular complex for targeting poly- or oligonucleo ⁇ tides to a specific cell to inhibit the expression of a gene or genes.
  • the molecular complex comprises a single-stranded poly- or oligonucleotide which hybridizes to an RNA transcript of the gene, complexed to a carrier which is a conjugate of a cell-specific binding agent and a poly- or oligonucleotide-binding agent.
  • the complex is administered in a pharmaceutically acceptable solution in an amount sufficient to hybridize to and inhibit the function of the RNA transcript.
  • the poly- or oligonucleotide can be DNA or RNA.
  • an antisense oligodeoxy- nucleotide can be used which hybridizes to and inhibits the function of an RNA.
  • the targeted RNA is typically a messenger RNA.
  • the oligonucleotide can also be an RNA which has catalytic activity (a ribozyme) .
  • the target for antisense or ribozyme- mediated inhibition can be a gene or genes of cellular origin (e.g., a cellular oncogene) or of noncellular origin (e.g., a viral oncogene or the genes of an infecting pathogen such as a virus) .
  • the cell-specific binding agent is specific for a cellular surface structure, typically a receptor, which mediates internalization of bound ligands by endocytosis, such as the asialoglycoprotein receptor of hepatocytes.
  • the cell-specific binding agent can be a natural or synthetic ligand (for example, a protein, polypeptide, glycoprotein, carbohydrate, etc.) or it can be an antibody, or an analogue thereof, which specifically binds a cellular surface structure which then mediates internalization of the bound complex.
  • the poly- or oligonucleotide-binding component of the conjugate is a compound such as a polycation which stably complexes the single-stranded poly- or oligonucleotide under " extracellular conditions and releases it under intracellular conditions so that it can function within the cell.
  • the complex of the gene and the carrier can be used in vitro or in vivo to selectively deliver poly- or oligonucleotides to target cells.
  • the complex is stable and soluble in physiological fluids. It can be administered in vivo where it is selectively taken up by the target cell via the surface-structure- mediated endocytotic pathway.
  • the incorporated poly- or oligonucleotide hybridizes with its complementary RNA, thereby inhibiting function of the RNA and expression of the target gene or genes.
  • Figure 1 shows the uptake of complexed antisense DNA by HepG2 and SK Hepl cells.
  • Figure 2 shows the effect of complexed antisense DNA on hepatitis B virus surface antigen concentration in culture medium.
  • FIG. 3 shows Southern blots of DNA extracted from medium and cells after 24 hrs of exposure to antisense DNA.
  • a soluble, targetable molecular complex is used to selectively deliver a single-stranded poly- or oligonucleotide to a target cell or tissue in vivo to specifically inhibit gene expression.
  • the molecular complex comprises the oligonucleotide to be delivered complexed to a carrier made up of a binding agent specific for the target cell and a DNA-binding agent. The complex is selectively taken up by the target cell and the oligonucleotide hybridizes to the RNA transcript which inhibits expression of the targeted gene(s) .
  • the poly- or oligonucleotide is a single- stranded molecule which hybridizes to a specific RNA under intracellular conditions.
  • the degree of complementarity required for appropriately specific hybridization to the target RNA sequence under intra ⁇ cellular conditions can be determined empirically.
  • the oligonucleotide is an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide.
  • the antisense oligodeoxynucleotide can be a normal oligodeoxy ⁇ nucleotide or an analogue of an oligodeoxynucleotide (e.g., phosphorothioate oligonucleotides., in which one of the phosphate oxygens is replaced by a sulfur atom) sufficiently stable to reach the target in effective concentrations. See e.g., Stein, CA. and Cohen, J.S. (1988) Cancer Research 48:2659-2668.
  • Antisense oligodeoxynucleotides can be prepared by standard synthetic procedures. The antisense oligonucleotides can be designed to operate by different mechanisms of gene inhibition.
  • these mechanisms involve the hybridization of the oligonucleotide to a specific RNA sequence, typically a messenger RNA.
  • the targeted sequence can be located in the coding region of the RNA or it can be a signal sequence required for processing or translation of the RNA.
  • the targeted sequence can be a sequence normally found in an organism or a sequence found in a pathogenic organism but not in its host.
  • the oligonucleotide may form a triple helix DNA structure, inhibiting transcription of the mRNA sequence.
  • the oligonucleotide can be an RNA molecule which has catalytic activity, i.e., a ribozyme.
  • Ribozymes are advantageous because they specifically cleave and, thus, destroy the targeted RNA sequence. Ribozymes are described in U.S. Patent No. 4,987,071.
  • the carrier component of the complex is a conjugate of a cell-specific binding agent and an oligonucleotide-binding agent.
  • the cell- specific binding agent specifically binds a cellular surface structure which mediates its internalization by, for example, the process of endocytosis.
  • the surface structure can be a protein, polypeptide, carbohydrate, lipid or combination thereof. It is typically a surface receptor which mediates endo ⁇ cytosis of a ligand.
  • the binding agent can be a natural or synthetic ligand which binds the receptor.
  • the ligand can be a protein, polypeptide, carbohydrate, lipid or a combination thereof which has functional groups that are exposed sufficiently to be recognized by the cell surface structure.
  • the binding agent can also be an antibody, or an analogue of an antibody such as a single chain antibody, which binds the cell surface structure.
  • Ligands useful in forming the carrier will vary according to the particular cell to be targeted.
  • glycoproteins having exposed terminal carbohydrate groups such as asialoglyco- protein (galactose-terminal) can be used, although other ligands such as polypeptide hormones may also be employed.
  • asialoglycoproteins include asialoorosomucoid, asialofetuin and desialylated vesicular stomatitis virus.
  • Such ligands can be formed by chemical or enzymatic desialylation of glycoproteins that possess terminal sialic acid and penultimate galactose residues.
  • asialoglycoprotein ligands can be formed by coupling galactose terminal carbohydrates such as lactose or arabinogalactan to non-galactose bearing proteins by reductive lactosamination.
  • galactose terminal carbohydrates such as lactose or arabinogalactan
  • non-galactose bearing proteins by reductive lactosamination.
  • other types of ligands can be used, such as mannose for macrophages (lymphoma), mannose-6-phosphate glycoproteins for fibroblasts (fibrosarcoma) , intrinsic factor-vitamin B12 for enterocytes and insulin for fat cells.
  • the cell-specific binding agent can be a receptor or receptor-like molecule, such as an antibody which binds a ligand (e.g., antigen) on the cell surface.
  • Such antibodies can be produced by standard procedures.
  • the poly- or oligonucleotide-binding agent complexes the oligonucleotide to be delivered. Complexation with the oligonucleotide must be sufficiently stable in vivo to prevent significant uncoupling of the oligonucleotide extracellularly prior to internalization by the target cell. However, the complex is cleavable under appropriate conditions within the cell so that the oligonucleo ⁇ tide is released in functional, hybridizable form.
  • the complex can be labile in the acidic and enzyme rich environment of lysosomes.
  • a non ⁇ covalent bond based on electrostatic attraction between the binding agent and the oligonucleotide provides extracellular stability and is releasable under intracellular conditions.
  • Preferred poly- or oligonucleotide-binding agents are polycations that bind the negatively charged nucleic acid strands. These positively charged materials can bind noncovalently with the poly- or oligonucleotide to form a soluble, targetable molecular complex which is stable extracellularly but which releases the poly- or oligonucleotide as a functional (e.g., hybridizable) molecule intracellularly.
  • Suitable polycations are polylysine, polyarginine, polyornithine, basic proteins such as histones, avidin, protamines and the like.
  • a preferred polycation is polylysine (e.g., ranging from 3,800 to 60,000 daltons) .
  • noncovalent bonds that can be used to releasably link the poly- or oligonucleotide include hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic bonding, electrostatic bonding alone or in combination such as, anti-poly- or oligonucleotide antibodies bound to poly- or oligonucleotide, and streptavidin or avidin binding to poly- or oligonucleotide containing biotinylated nucleotides.
  • the carrier can be formed by chemically linking the cell-specific binding agent and the oligonucleo ⁇ tide-binding agent.
  • the linkage is typically covalent.
  • a preferred linkage is a peptide bond. This can be formed with a water soluble carbodiimide as described by Jung, G. et al. (1981) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Cornmun. 101:599-606.
  • An alternative linkage is a disulfide bond.
  • the linkage reaction can be optimized for the particular cell-specific binding agent and oligonucleotide-binding agent used to form the carrier. Reaction conditions can be designed to maximize linkage formation but to minimize the formation of aggregates of the carrier components.
  • the optimal ratio of cell-specific binding agent to poly- or oligonucleotide-binding agent can be determined empirically. When polycations are used, the molar ratio of the components will vary with the size of the polycation and the size of the poly- or oligonucleotide.
  • the ratio can range from 2:1 to 1:2 by weight (asialoorosomucoid:oligonucleotide) can be used.
  • Uncoupled components and aggregates can be separated from the carrier by molecular sieve or ion exchange chromatography.
  • the conjugate is purified on a high pressure liquid cation exchange column (AquaporeTM cation-exchange, Rainin) with stepwise elution with 0.1 M sodium acetate, pH 5.0, 2.5, 2.25 and 2.0.
  • the poly- or oligonucleo ⁇ tide and carrier are mixed and incubated under conditions conducive to complexation.
  • the poly- or oligonucleotide and carrier can be mixed at the appropriate ratio in 2 M NaCl and the solution can be diluted to 0.15 M and filtered to provide an administrable composition.
  • the molecular complex can contain more than one copy of the nucleic acid strand.
  • the amount of poly- or oligonucleotide should not exceed that required to maintain solubility of the resulting complex.
  • the preferred weight or molar ratio of carrier to poly- or oligonucleotide for the construct employed can be determined by routine experimentation,
  • the molecular complex of this invention can be administered parenterally. Preferably, it is injected intravenously.
  • the complex is administered in solution in a physiologically acceptable vehicle.
  • the molecular complex of this invention can be used to target delivery of a wide range of poly- and oligonucleotide for specific hybridization usually to an RNA target.
  • the target can also be DNA by triplex formation.
  • the oligonucleotide can be directed against translation of a gene or genes of cellular origin (e.g., a cellular oncogene) or of noncellular origin (e.g., a viral oncogene or the genes of an infecting pathogen such as a virus or a parasite such as malaria, trypanosome, lysteria or mycoplasma) .
  • the antisense can be directed against transcription of target genes.
  • the method of this invention can be used to treat hepatitis infection.
  • the complex can be used to deliver an antisense oligo ⁇ deoxynucleotide specifically to liver cells to block production of hepatitis virus.
  • One strategy is to take advantage of the fact that, because of its compact nature, the human hepatitis B virus has only one polyadenylation signal (nucleotides 1903-1923) . The signal is common to all hepatitis B viral-derived mRNA and is different from the mammalian signal. As a result, antisense oligodeoxynucleotides comple ⁇ mentary to this region can block viral protein synthesis.
  • the antisense strand is complexed to a carrier comprising a ligand for the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor and a polycationic protein such as polylysine to provide a soluble molecular complex targetable to the liver.
  • the method of this invention can be used to alter the expression of a gene of cellular origin.
  • This method may be useful in the treatment of diseases characterized by abnormal biosynthesis, especially overexpression, of normal or abnormal cellular proteins.
  • a targetable, soluble DNA carrier was prepared by coupling asialoorosomucoid to poly L-lysine
  • a 21-mer oligodeoxynucleotide, complementary to a portion of the human hepatitis B virus (ayw subtype) (Hirschman, S.Z. et al. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
  • nucleotides 1903-1923 See SEQUENCE ID NO. 1 - TTTATAAGGGTCGATGTCCAT) of the viral genome, was synthesized with phosphorothioate linkages on an automated nucleotide synthesizer (Applied Biosystems) (Matsukura, M. et al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:7705-7710). As a control, a random 21-mer sequence was prepared in an identical fashion. The purity of oligonucleotides was determined by electrophoresis through 15% polyacrylamide gels stained with ethidium bromide.
  • Antisense DNA was titrated with conjugate to form a soluble complex using an agarose gel retardation system as described previously (Wu, G.Y. and Wu, CH. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262:4429-4432) and a conjugate to DNA ratio of 1.6:1 by weight (asialoorosomucoid: DNA) was selected.
  • antisense DNA was end-labeled with 32 P (Sambrook, J. et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning - A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2nd ed., vol. 2, pg. 11.31). DNA alone, or in the form of a complex was added to medium of HepG2 and SK Hepl cells to make 50 ⁇ M solutions with respect to added antisense DNA. Uptake was determined as described previously for asialoglycoproteins (Schwartz, A.L. et al. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256:8878-8881).
  • HepG2 2.2.15 cells were seeded six days pre-confluence and incubated at 37°C in medium containing antisense DNA alone, complexed antisense DNA, complexed random DNA, or medium alone. All media containing added DNA were initially 50 ⁇ M with respect to DNA. At daily intervals, 50 ⁇ l of medium was sampled and assayed for hepatitis B surface antigen by an ELISA (Abbott) method as described by the manufacturer, modified for quantitation using serially diluted standard surface antigen (CalBiochem) which produced a linear response within the range of antigen levels found in the samples. Cell number was determined by microscopic counting cells stained with trypan blue. All points were determined in triplicate and the results of four experiments are shown as means ⁇ SEM expressed as ⁇ g/ml/10 6 cells. Effect of Antisense DNA on Protein Secretion
  • HepG2 2.2.15 cells were incubated with 50 ⁇ M complexed DNA as described in Figure 2 except that 10 ⁇ Ci [ 35 S]-methionine (Amersham), specific activity 1000 Ci/mmole, was added to label newly synthesized proteins. After 24 hrs, medium was moved, cells washed with phosphate buffered saline and lysed with 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate which was subsequently removed with triton X-100. Both media and cell lysates were treated with a specific rabbit anti- surface antigen antibody (DAKO) and precipitated with protein-A sepharose (Sigma) . Precipitates were scintillation counted and each point assayed in triplicate. Total cell protein was determined by colorimetric assay (Bio-Rad) . The results of three experiments are shown as means ⁇ SEM expressed as cpm/mg cell protein.
  • HBV DNA was identified by Southern blot using an EcoRI-Bglll fragment of the HBV genome (nucleotide 0 to 1982) as a probe labeled with 32 P and exposed to x-ray film as described previously (Sambrook, J. et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning - A
  • FIG. 1 shows uptake of complexed antisense DNA by HepG2 and SK Hepl cells.
  • a targetable, soluble DNA carrier was prepared by coupling asialooroso ⁇ mucoid to poly L-lysine using a water soluble carbodiimide as described previously (Wu, G.Y.
  • Figure 2 shows the effect of complexed antisense DNA on hepatitis B virus surface antigen concentration in culture medium.
  • HepG2 2.2.15 cells were incubated at 37°C in medium containing antisense DNA alone, complexed antisense DNA, complexed random DNA, or medium alone. All media containing added DNA were initially 50 ⁇ M with respect to DNA.
  • medium was sampled and assayed for the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen by an ELISA (Abbott) method as described by the manufacturer, modified as described in Materials and Methods.
  • Cell number was determined by microscopically counting cells stained with trypan blue. All points were determined in triplicate and the results of four experiments are shown as means £ SEM expressed as ⁇ g/ml/10 6 cells.
  • Figure 2 shows that in untreated control cells, hepatitis B viral surface antigen steadily increased in concentration in their media, rising from 1 ⁇ g/ml/10 6 cells on the first day to 5.5 ⁇ g/ml/10 6 cells by the seventh day. Exposure of cells to antisense DNA alone had no significant effect until the 3rd day at which time surface antigen concen ⁇ tration was 30% lower than untreated controls. Nevertheless, surface antigen concentrations in the presence of antisense DNA alone continued to rise steadily throughout the 7 days of exposure. However, treatment with complexed antisense DNA resulted in an 80% inhibition after the 1st day and 95% inhibition by the 7th day compared to untreated controls. There was no significant increase in surface antigen concentration after the first 24 hrs. Complexed random DNA of the same size had no effect on antigen concentrations at any time point under identical conditions.
  • FIG. 3 shows Southern blots of DNA extracted from medium and cells after 24 hrs exposure to antisense DNA. Cells were incubated as described for Figure 2 with 50 ⁇ M antisense DNA alone, or in the form of complexes as described for Figure 2. After 24 hrs, medium was removed and DNA, extracted from the medium (Sells, M.A. et al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA M 1005-1009) and from the cell layer (Hirt, B.J. (1967) Mol. Biol. 26:365-371).
  • Total cell protein was determined by colorimetric assay (Bio-Rad) .
  • DNA extracted from equal volumes of medium and from approximately equal numbers of cells were applied on an agarose gel, HBV DNA was identified by Southern blot using an EcoRI-Bglll fragment of the HBV genome as a probe labeled with 32 P and exposed to x-ray film (Sambrook, J. et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning - A
  • Figure 3 lanes 1 and 5 show that untreated cells produced bands at positions expected for relaxed circular and single-stranded linear viral replicative DNA forms. Other minor bands are present, at 2.3 kb for example, as described previously for this cell line (Sells, M.A. et al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA rl005-1009) .
  • Lanes 2 and 6 show that treatment of cells with complexed antisense DNA decreased the amount of all viral DNA forms in the medium by approximately 80% compared to untreated cells (lanes 1 and 5).
  • Complexed random DNA lanes 3 and 7, had no detectable effect on the levels of HBV DNA under identical conditions.
  • Agrawal et al. administered infectious virus (HIV) together with antisense oligonucleotides in a non-targeted manner to cell media (Agrawal, S. et al. (1989) Proc. Natl.
  • hepatitis B virus in vivo, persistent production of hepatitis B virus is usually due to the presence of unintegrated viral DNA (Shafritz, D. et al. (1981) N. Eng. J. Med. 305:1067-1073). Integration of the viral genome into that of the host is usually associated with a cessation of production of complete viral particles (Ganem, D. (1982) Rev. Infect. Pis. 4:1026). Whether targeted antisense delivery can be effective in the presence of an infection generated by unintegrated viral DNA remains to be seen.
  • asialoglycoprotein uptake in hepatitis virus-infected HepG2 cells was found to be not substantially different from non-infected HepG2 cells (data not shown) , indicating that infection by the virus did not alter the receptor activity in these cells.
  • targeted delivery of antisense oligonucleotides may be generally applicable to naturally infected hepatocytes, that are otherwise normal, via asialoglycoprotein receptors. It should be noted that the oligonucleotides used in this current work were linked together by phosphorothioate bonds. These linkages are less susceptible to nuclease degradation than normal phosphodiester bonds.
  • Confluent 35mm dishes of 3T3-AsGR were treated with ⁇ l(I) antisense DNA alone (1.3 ⁇ M or 2.7 ⁇ M) or varying concentrations of antisense DNA complex (1.3 ⁇ M, 1.7 ⁇ M, or 2.7 ⁇ M antisense) for 12-16 hours (overnight) at 37°C in DMEM and 10% FBS.
  • the medium was removed and replaced with labeling medium containing 5 ⁇ Ci/ml of [ 3 H]-proline, 50 ⁇ g/ml
  • L-ascorbate L-ascorbate and varying concentrations of antisense DNA or complexes. Cells were incubated for 4 hours at 37°C in the labeling medium. Newly synthesized procollagens and other proteins were determined by bacterial collagenase digestion (Peterkofsky, B. and Diegelmann, Biochemistry 05 10.:988-994 (1971)) .
  • the labeling medium was removed and set aside.
  • Buffer containing protease inhibitors (.5 M Tris, pH 7.4, .4 mM NEM, .2 mM PMSF, 2.5 ⁇ i EDTA) was added to 0 the cell layer and the cell layer was removed and pooled with the supernatant. The entire mixture was homogenized using a Dounce homogenizer and ice cold TCA was added to a final concentration of 15%.
  • TCA precipitable proteins were digested with bacterial 5 collagenase (Form III, Advanced Biofactures, Lynbrook, NY) at 37°C for 2 hours followed by precipitation with TCA-tannic acid.
  • the collagenase-sensitive radioactivity in the supernatant was separated by centrifugation to measure newly synthesized 0 procollagen production.
  • the collagenase-resistant precipitated radioactivity was used to calculate non-collagenous protein production. All assays were normalized to equal numbers of cells.
  • Antisense DNA was titrated with conjugate to form a soluble complex using an agarose gel retardation system as described previously (Wu, G.Y. and Wu, CH. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262:4429-4432) and a conjugate to DNA ratio of 2:1 by weight (asialoorosomucoid-pplylysine (AsOR-PL) : DNA) was selected.
  • cells were incubated with [ 125 I]-AsOR at 37°C and at regular time intervals (0.5, 1, 2, or 4 hours), dishes were chilled to 4°C, washed three times with cold 10 mM EDTA-phosphate buffered saline and the cell layers solubilized with 0.1 NaOH and gamma counted.
  • RNA samples 60 ⁇ g were heat denatured in 50% formamide, 2x formaldehyde running buffer, 7% formaldehyde at 55°C for 15 minutes (Sambrook, J., et al. Molecular Cloning 7.43, (1989)). Samples were run on formaldehyde gels (1% agarose, 2.2 M formaldehyde) for 4 hours at 100 mvolts on ice. Molecular weight and control RNAs were stained in 0.1 ammonium acetate and 0.5 ⁇ g/ml ethidium bromide and photographed with a fluorescent ruler.
  • RNA was transferred onto a nitrocellulose filter under vacuum for one hour and cross-linked to the filter by exposure to ultraviolet irradiation using a Stratalinker. Conditions for prehybridization and hybridization were the same as in the slot blot studies.
  • the 3T3-ASGR cells do not normally possess asialoglycoprotein receptors, they were transfected with the asialoglycoprotein receptor genes and were found to have a Kg of 1.5 x 10 -9 M, a binding saturation with [ 125 I]-AsOR at 1.8 ⁇ g/ml, and an uptake rate of [ 12 5 ⁇ ]-AsOR of 1.8 pmole/million cells/hr.
  • the number of asialoglycoprotein receptors per cell was 250,000.
  • the 3T3-AsGR cells displayed a linear uptake of ⁇ l(I) antisense DNA-AsOR-PL complex up to 4 hours at a rate of 18.2 pmole of DNA/million cells/hr. In contrast, the rate of uptake of labeled ⁇ l(I) antisense DNA alone was 0.15 pmole DNA/million cells/hr. Uptake of AsOR in a 300x excess by weight competed with the uptake of ⁇ l(I) antisense DNA complex. Effect of ⁇ l(I) antisense DNA complex on collagen synthesis ⁇ l(I) antisense DNA complexes inhibited collagen production by 3T3-AsGR cells. This inhibition was specific for collagen production and was dependent on the concentration of ⁇ l(I) antisense DNA in the complex. This result is set forth in the following table.

Abstract

Molecular complexes for targeting oligonucleotides, such as antisense oligonucleotides or ribozymes, to a specific cell to block expression of a gene or genes in the cell are described. The single-stranded poly- or oligonucleotide is complexed to a conjugate of a cell-specific binding agent and a poly- or oligonucleotide-binding agent. The cell-specific binding agent is specific for a cellular surface structure which mediates internalization of the complex. An example is the asialoglycoprotein receptor of hepatocytes. The poly- or oligodeoxy-nucleotide-binding agent is a compound such as a polycationic protein which stably complexes the oligonucleotide under extracellular conditions and releases it under intracellular conditions so that it can hybridize with the target RNA. The molecular complex is stable and soluble in physiological fluids and can be used to selectively introduce antisense oligonucleotides, ribozymes or other signal-stranded oligonucleotides into a cell to inhibit expression of a gene within the cell. The oligonucleotide can be directed against cellular genes (e.g., cellular oncogenes) or genes of noncellular origin (e.g., viral oncogenes, genes of an infecting pathogen).

Description

TARGETED DELIVERY OF POLY- OR OLIGONUCLEOTIDES TO CELLS
Background of the Invention
Antisense oligonucleotides hold great promise as means of specifically inhibiting unwanted gene expression in cells. Improvements in the delivery of oligonucleotides to cells will enhance effectiveness. Naked antisense oligonucleotides can be taken up by cells non-specifically and at low efficiency. Some methods have been explored to increase uptake. Lemaitre et al. covalently coupled an oligonucleotide to polylysine and demonstrated inhibition of viral gene expression at several fold lower than DNA concentrations compared to mixtures of polylysine and antisense DNA (Lemaitre, M. et. al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:648-652). Although specific antiviral effects were shown, specific delivery was not demonstrated.
Su mary of the Invention
This invention pertains to a soluble, targetable molecular complex for targeting poly- or oligonucleo¬ tides to a specific cell to inhibit the expression of a gene or genes. The molecular complex comprises a single-stranded poly- or oligonucleotide which hybridizes to an RNA transcript of the gene, complexed to a carrier which is a conjugate of a cell-specific binding agent and a poly- or oligonucleotide-binding agent. The complex is administered in a pharmaceutically acceptable solution in an amount sufficient to hybridize to and inhibit the function of the RNA transcript.
The poly- or oligonucleotide can be DNA or RNA. For antisense applications, an antisense oligodeoxy- nucleotide can be used which hybridizes to and inhibits the function of an RNA. The targeted RNA is typically a messenger RNA. The oligonucleotide can also be an RNA which has catalytic activity (a ribozyme) . The target for antisense or ribozyme- mediated inhibition can be a gene or genes of cellular origin (e.g., a cellular oncogene) or of noncellular origin (e.g., a viral oncogene or the genes of an infecting pathogen such as a virus) .
The cell-specific binding agent is specific for a cellular surface structure, typically a receptor, which mediates internalization of bound ligands by endocytosis, such as the asialoglycoprotein receptor of hepatocytes. The cell-specific binding agent can be a natural or synthetic ligand (for example, a protein, polypeptide, glycoprotein, carbohydrate, etc.) or it can be an antibody, or an analogue thereof, which specifically binds a cellular surface structure which then mediates internalization of the bound complex. The poly- or oligonucleotide-binding component of the conjugate is a compound such as a polycation which stably complexes the single-stranded poly- or oligonucleotide under" extracellular conditions and releases it under intracellular conditions so that it can function within the cell. The complex of the gene and the carrier can be used in vitro or in vivo to selectively deliver poly- or oligonucleotides to target cells. The complex is stable and soluble in physiological fluids. It can be administered in vivo where it is selectively taken up by the target cell via the surface-structure- mediated endocytotic pathway. The incorporated poly- or oligonucleotide hybridizes with its complementary RNA, thereby inhibiting function of the RNA and expression of the target gene or genes.
Brief Description of the Figures
Figure 1 shows the uptake of complexed antisense DNA by HepG2 and SK Hepl cells. Figure 2 shows the effect of complexed antisense DNA on hepatitis B virus surface antigen concentration in culture medium.
Figure 3 shows Southern blots of DNA extracted from medium and cells after 24 hrs of exposure to antisense DNA. Detailed Description of the Invention
A soluble, targetable molecular complex is used to selectively deliver a single-stranded poly- or oligonucleotide to a target cell or tissue in vivo to specifically inhibit gene expression. The molecular complex comprises the oligonucleotide to be delivered complexed to a carrier made up of a binding agent specific for the target cell and a DNA-binding agent. The complex is selectively taken up by the target cell and the oligonucleotide hybridizes to the RNA transcript which inhibits expression of the targeted gene(s) .
The poly- or oligonucleotide is a single- stranded molecule which hybridizes to a specific RNA under intracellular conditions. The degree of complementarity required for appropriately specific hybridization to the target RNA sequence under intra¬ cellular conditions can be determined empirically. In a preferred embodiment, the oligonucleotide is an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide. The antisense oligodeoxynucleotide can be a normal oligodeoxy¬ nucleotide or an analogue of an oligodeoxynucleotide (e.g., phosphorothioate oligonucleotides., in which one of the phosphate oxygens is replaced by a sulfur atom) sufficiently stable to reach the target in effective concentrations. See e.g., Stein, CA. and Cohen, J.S. (1988) Cancer Research 48:2659-2668. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotides can be prepared by standard synthetic procedures. The antisense oligonucleotides can be designed to operate by different mechanisms of gene inhibition. Generally, these mechanisms involve the hybridization of the oligonucleotide to a specific RNA sequence, typically a messenger RNA. The targeted sequence can be located in the coding region of the RNA or it can be a signal sequence required for processing or translation of the RNA. The targeted sequence can be a sequence normally found in an organism or a sequence found in a pathogenic organism but not in its host. Alternatively, the oligonucleotide may form a triple helix DNA structure, inhibiting transcription of the mRNA sequence.
In other embodiments, the oligonucleotide can be an RNA molecule which has catalytic activity, i.e., a ribozyme. Ribozymes are advantageous because they specifically cleave and, thus, destroy the targeted RNA sequence. Ribozymes are described in U.S. Patent No. 4,987,071.
The carrier component of the complex is a conjugate of a cell-specific binding agent and an oligonucleotide-binding agent. The cell- specific binding agent specifically binds a cellular surface structure which mediates its internalization by, for example, the process of endocytosis. The surface structure can be a protein, polypeptide, carbohydrate, lipid or combination thereof. It is typically a surface receptor which mediates endo¬ cytosis of a ligand. Thus, the binding agent can be a natural or synthetic ligand which binds the receptor. The ligand can be a protein, polypeptide, carbohydrate, lipid or a combination thereof which has functional groups that are exposed sufficiently to be recognized by the cell surface structure. It can also be a component of a biological organism such as a virus, cells (e.g., mammalian, bacterial, protozoan) or artificial carriers such as liposomes. The binding agent can also be an antibody, or an analogue of an antibody such as a single chain antibody, which binds the cell surface structure.
Ligands useful in forming the carrier will vary according to the particular cell to be targeted. For targeting hepatocytes, glycoproteins having exposed terminal carbohydrate groups such as asialoglyco- protein (galactose-terminal) can be used, although other ligands such as polypeptide hormones may also be employed. Examples of asialoglycoproteins include asialoorosomucoid, asialofetuin and desialylated vesicular stomatitis virus. Such ligands can be formed by chemical or enzymatic desialylation of glycoproteins that possess terminal sialic acid and penultimate galactose residues. Alternatively, asialoglycoprotein ligands can be formed by coupling galactose terminal carbohydrates such as lactose or arabinogalactan to non-galactose bearing proteins by reductive lactosamination. For targeting the molecular complex to other cell surface receptors, other types of ligands can be used, such as mannose for macrophages (lymphoma), mannose-6-phosphate glycoproteins for fibroblasts (fibrosarcoma) , intrinsic factor-vitamin B12 for enterocytes and insulin for fat cells. Alternative¬ ly, the cell-specific binding agent can be a receptor or receptor-like molecule, such as an antibody which binds a ligand (e.g., antigen) on the cell surface. Such antibodies can be produced by standard procedures. The poly- or oligonucleotide-binding agent complexes the oligonucleotide to be delivered. Complexation with the oligonucleotide must be sufficiently stable in vivo to prevent significant uncoupling of the oligonucleotide extracellularly prior to internalization by the target cell. However, the complex is cleavable under appropriate conditions within the cell so that the oligonucleo¬ tide is released in functional, hybridizable form. For example, the complex can be labile in the acidic and enzyme rich environment of lysosomes. A non¬ covalent bond based on electrostatic attraction between the binding agent and the oligonucleotide provides extracellular stability and is releasable under intracellular conditions.
Preferred poly- or oligonucleotide-binding agents are polycations that bind the negatively charged nucleic acid strands. These positively charged materials can bind noncovalently with the poly- or oligonucleotide to form a soluble, targetable molecular complex which is stable extracellularly but which releases the poly- or oligonucleotide as a functional (e.g., hybridizable) molecule intracellularly. Suitable polycations are polylysine, polyarginine, polyornithine, basic proteins such as histones, avidin, protamines and the like. A preferred polycation is polylysine (e.g., ranging from 3,800 to 60,000 daltons) . Other noncovalent bonds that can be used to releasably link the poly- or oligonucleotide include hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic bonding, electrostatic bonding alone or in combination such as, anti-poly- or oligonucleotide antibodies bound to poly- or oligonucleotide, and streptavidin or avidin binding to poly- or oligonucleotide containing biotinylated nucleotides.
The carrier can be formed by chemically linking the cell-specific binding agent and the oligonucleo¬ tide-binding agent. The linkage is typically covalent. A preferred linkage is a peptide bond. This can be formed with a water soluble carbodiimide as described by Jung, G. et al. (1981) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Cornmun. 101:599-606. An alternative linkage is a disulfide bond.
The linkage reaction can be optimized for the particular cell-specific binding agent and oligonucleotide-binding agent used to form the carrier. Reaction conditions can be designed to maximize linkage formation but to minimize the formation of aggregates of the carrier components. The optimal ratio of cell-specific binding agent to poly- or oligonucleotide-binding agent can be determined empirically. When polycations are used, the molar ratio of the components will vary with the size of the polycation and the size of the poly- or oligonucleotide. For example, for a conjugate of asialoorosomucoid linked to polylysine complexed with a 21-mer oligonucleotide the ratio can range from 2:1 to 1:2 by weight (asialoorosomucoid:oligonucleotide) can be used. Uncoupled components and aggregates can be separated from the carrier by molecular sieve or ion exchange chromatography. In a preferred embodiment, the conjugate is purified on a high pressure liquid cation exchange column (Aquapore™ cation-exchange, Rainin) with stepwise elution with 0.1 M sodium acetate, pH 5.0, 2.5, 2.25 and 2.0. To form the complex, the poly- or oligonucleo¬ tide and carrier are mixed and incubated under conditions conducive to complexation. For example, the poly- or oligonucleotide and carrier can be mixed at the appropriate ratio in 2 M NaCl and the solution can be diluted to 0.15 M and filtered to provide an administrable composition.
The molecular complex can contain more than one copy of the nucleic acid strand. The amount of poly- or oligonucleotide, of course, should not exceed that required to maintain solubility of the resulting complex. The preferred weight or molar ratio of carrier to poly- or oligonucleotide for the construct employed can be determined by routine experimentation, The molecular complex of this invention can be administered parenterally. Preferably, it is injected intravenously. The complex is administered in solution in a physiologically acceptable vehicle. The molecular complex of this invention can be used to target delivery of a wide range of poly- and oligonucleotide for specific hybridization usually to an RNA target. The target can also be DNA by triplex formation. Duvall-Valentine e al. (1992) PNAS .89.:504-508. In the former case, depending on the therapeutic goal, the oligonucleotide can be directed against translation of a gene or genes of cellular origin (e.g., a cellular oncogene) or of noncellular origin (e.g., a viral oncogene or the genes of an infecting pathogen such as a virus or a parasite such as malaria, trypanosome, lysteria or mycoplasma) . In the latter cases, the antisense can be directed against transcription of target genes. In one embodiment, the method of this invention can be used to treat hepatitis infection. The complex can be used to deliver an antisense oligo¬ deoxynucleotide specifically to liver cells to block production of hepatitis virus. One strategy is to take advantage of the fact that, because of its compact nature, the human hepatitis B virus has only one polyadenylation signal (nucleotides 1903-1923) . The signal is common to all hepatitis B viral-derived mRNA and is different from the mammalian signal. As a result, antisense oligodeoxynucleotides comple¬ mentary to this region can block viral protein synthesis. In a preferred embodiment, the antisense strand is complexed to a carrier comprising a ligand for the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor and a polycationic protein such as polylysine to provide a soluble molecular complex targetable to the liver.
In another embodiment, the method of this invention can be used to alter the expression of a gene of cellular origin. This method may be useful in the treatment of diseases characterized by abnormal biosynthesis, especially overexpression, of normal or abnormal cellular proteins.
This invention is illustrated further by the following examples.
Example 1
MATERIALS AND METHODS
05 Cells and Cell Culture
Human hepatoma, HepG2 2.2.15 cells kindly provided by Dr. George Acs (Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, NY) and SK Hepl cells were grown in DMEM and 10% fetal calf serum as described previously (Wu,
10 G.Y. and Wu, CH. (1987) J. Biol. Chβm. 262:4429- 4432) .
Preparation of Targetable Antisense DNA
A targetable, soluble DNA carrier was prepared by coupling asialoorosomucoid to poly L-lysine
15 (Sigma) (Mr = 59,000) using l-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyl- aminopropyl) carbodiimide) (Pierce) as described previously (Wu, G.Y. and Wu, CH. (1987) J. Biol. Che . 262:4429-4432) except that the conjugate was purified by cation exchange chromatography using a
20 high pressure liquid chromatographic system (Rainin) employing an Aquapore C-300 column (Rainin) and stepwise elution with 0.1 M sodium acetate, pH 5.0, 2.5, 2.25 and 2.0. The second peak eluted from the column, as detected by U.V. absorption at 230 nm, was
25 determined to be the optimal conjugate form and was used for all subsequent experiments. A 21-mer oligodeoxynucleotide, complementary to a portion of the human hepatitis B virus (ayw subtype) (Hirschman, S.Z. et al. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
30 22:5507-5511) including the polyadenylation signal. corresponding to nucleotides 1903-1923 (See SEQUENCE ID NO. 1 - TTTATAAGGGTCGATGTCCAT) of the viral genome, was synthesized with phosphorothioate linkages on an automated nucleotide synthesizer (Applied Biosystems) (Matsukura, M. et al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:7705-7710). As a control, a random 21-mer sequence was prepared in an identical fashion. The purity of oligonucleotides was determined by electrophoresis through 15% polyacrylamide gels stained with ethidium bromide. Antisense DNA was titrated with conjugate to form a soluble complex using an agarose gel retardation system as described previously (Wu, G.Y. and Wu, CH. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262:4429-4432) and a conjugate to DNA ratio of 1.6:1 by weight (asialoorosomucoid: DNA) was selected.
Assay for Receptor-Mediated Uptake of Complexed Antisense DNA
To evaluate uptake of oligonucleotides, antisense DNA was end-labeled with 32P (Sambrook, J. et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning - A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2nd ed., vol. 2, pg. 11.31). DNA alone, or in the form of a complex was added to medium of HepG2 and SK Hepl cells to make 50 μM solutions with respect to added antisense DNA. Uptake was determined as described previously for asialoglycoproteins (Schwartz, A.L. et al. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256:8878-8881). In brief, cells were incubated with ligands at 37°C and at regular time intervals, dishes were chilled to 4°C, washed with cold 10 mM EDTA-phosphate buffered saline and the cell layers removed and scintillation counted. To determine counts bound to the cell surface, identical sets of cells were incubated at 4°C with ligands and, after washing as described above, the cell layers were removed and adherent radioactivity was determined by scintillation counting. Uptake was calculated as the difference between total cell-associated counts at 37°C and counts bound to the cells at 4°C for each time point. All points were determined in triplicate and results shown as means ± SEM expressed as pmole DNA/106 cells.
Antisense DNA and Viral Gene Expression
To determine the effect of antisense DNA on viral gene expression, HepG2 2.2.15 cells were seeded six days pre-confluence and incubated at 37°C in medium containing antisense DNA alone, complexed antisense DNA, complexed random DNA, or medium alone. All media containing added DNA were initially 50 μM with respect to DNA. At daily intervals, 50 μl of medium was sampled and assayed for hepatitis B surface antigen by an ELISA (Abbott) method as described by the manufacturer, modified for quantitation using serially diluted standard surface antigen (CalBiochem) which produced a linear response within the range of antigen levels found in the samples. Cell number was determined by microscopic counting cells stained with trypan blue. All points were determined in triplicate and the results of four experiments are shown as means ± SEM expressed as μg/ml/106 cells. Effect of Antisense DNA on Protein Secretion
HepG2 2.2.15 cells were incubated with 50 μM complexed DNA as described in Figure 2 except that 10 μCi [35S]-methionine (Amersham), specific activity 1000 Ci/mmole, was added to label newly synthesized proteins. After 24 hrs, medium was moved, cells washed with phosphate buffered saline and lysed with 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate which was subsequently removed with triton X-100. Both media and cell lysates were treated with a specific rabbit anti- surface antigen antibody (DAKO) and precipitated with protein-A sepharose (Sigma) . Precipitates were scintillation counted and each point assayed in triplicate. Total cell protein was determined by colorimetric assay (Bio-Rad) . The results of three experiments are shown as means ± SEM expressed as cpm/mg cell protein.
In order to assess the effect of complexed antisense DNA on total protein synthesis, cells treated with complexed DNA and labeled with
[35S]-methionine as described above were separated from media. Total protein was precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid and counted. The results of triplicate assays of three experiments are shown as means ± SEM expressed as cpm/mg cell protein.
Effect of Antisense DNA on Production of Viral DNA Cells were incubated with 50 μM antisense DNA alone, or in the form of complexes. After 24 hrs, medium was removed and HBV DNA, extracted from the medium according to the method of Sells e al.
(Sells, M.A. et al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA :1005-1009) and from the cell layer according to the method of Hirt (Hirt, B.J. (1967) Mol. Biol. .26.:365-371) . Total cell protein was determined by colorimetric assay (Bio-Rad) . DNA extracted from equal volumes (40 ml) of medium and from approxi- mately equal numbers of cells (107) were applied on an agarose gel. HBV DNA was identified by Southern blot using an EcoRI-Bglll fragment of the HBV genome (nucleotide 0 to 1982) as a probe labeled with 32P and exposed to x-ray film as described previously (Sambrook, J. et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning - A
Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2nd ed., vol. 2, pp. 10.14-10.15). Relative quantitation was achieved by densitometry and confirmed by scintillation counting of corresponding bands. The first objective was to determine whether a single-stranded DNA oligonucleotide could be bound by an asialoglycoprotein-based carrier and whether it could be specifically targeted to asialoglycoprotein receptor-bearing cells. Figure 1 shows uptake of complexed antisense DNA by HepG2 and SK Hepl cells. A targetable, soluble DNA carrier was prepared by coupling asialooroso¬ mucoid to poly L-lysine using a water soluble carbodiimide as described previously (Wu, G.Y. and Wu, CH. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262.:4429-4432) and purified as described in Materials and Methods. The conjugate was complexed to a 21-mer oligodeoxy¬ nucleotide, complementary to a portion of the human hepatitis B virus including the polyadenylation signal and labeled with 32P. DNA alone, or in the form of a complex was added to medium to make it 50 uM with respect to added antisense DNA. Uptake was determined as described previously for asialo- glycoproteins (Schwartz, A.L. e al. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256:8878-8881). Cells were incubated at 37°C and at regular time intervals, dishes were chilled, washed with 10 mM EDTA-phosphate buffered saline. To determine counts bound to the cell surface, identical sets of cells were also incubated at 4°C with ligands and, after washing as described above, the cell layers were removed and radioactivity determined by scintillation counting. Uptake was calculated as the difference between cell-associated counts at 37°C and counts bound to the cell surface at 4°C for each time point. All points were determined in triplicate and results shown as means ± SEM expressed as pmole DNA/106 cells, (o) , antisense DNA alone; ( ), complexed antisense DNA; (Δ) , complexed antisense DNA plus a 100-fold molar excess of asialoorosomucoid. Figure 1 shows that in SK Hepl [asialoglycoprotein receptor (-) cells], the average uptake of antisense DNA alone was less than 0.05 pmole/hr/ million cells over 4 hrs of exposure. Incubation with DNA in the form of a complex did not improve the uptake in these cells. Similarly, uptake of antisense DNA alone by HepG2 [asialoglycoprotein receptor (+)] cells was as low as observed in receptor (-) cells over the course of the 4 hrs. However, in the receptor (+) cells, complexed antisense DNA was taken up nearly linearly at an average rate 12 times faster than antisense DNA alone through the 4 hrs of incubation. Accumulation of complexed antisense was also 12 times greater than antisense DNA alone after 4 hrs of exposure. The uptake of complexed DNA was virtually completely blocked by administration of a large molar excess of free carrier protein, asialoorosomucoid, to compete for receptor binding. This confirmed the involvement of asialoglycoprotein receptors in the differential delivery of the antisense DNA.
To determine whether the targeted antisense DNA was functional, effects on hepatitis B viral gene expression were evaluated. Figure 2 shows the effect of complexed antisense DNA on hepatitis B virus surface antigen concentration in culture medium. HepG2 2.2.15 cells were incubated at 37°C in medium containing antisense DNA alone, complexed antisense DNA, complexed random DNA, or medium alone. All media containing added DNA were initially 50 μM with respect to DNA. At daily intervals, medium was sampled and assayed for the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen by an ELISA (Abbott) method as described by the manufacturer, modified as described in Materials and Methods. Cell number was determined by microscopically counting cells stained with trypan blue. All points were determined in triplicate and the results of four experiments are shown as means £ SEM expressed as μg/ml/106 cells.
Figure 2 shows that in untreated control cells, hepatitis B viral surface antigen steadily increased in concentration in their media, rising from 1 μg/ml/106 cells on the first day to 5.5 μg/ml/106 cells by the seventh day. Exposure of cells to antisense DNA alone had no significant effect until the 3rd day at which time surface antigen concen¬ tration was 30% lower than untreated controls. Nevertheless, surface antigen concentrations in the presence of antisense DNA alone continued to rise steadily throughout the 7 days of exposure. However, treatment with complexed antisense DNA resulted in an 80% inhibition after the 1st day and 95% inhibition by the 7th day compared to untreated controls. There was no significant increase in surface antigen concentration after the first 24 hrs. Complexed random DNA of the same size had no effect on antigen concentrations at any time point under identical conditions.
The lack of accumulation of hepatitis B surface antigen in the medium of cells treated with complexed antisense DNA could have been due to a block in protein secretion. To examine this possibility, the synthesis of new surface antigen was measured in the media and cell layers. Table 1A shows that radiolabeled immunopreci itable surface antigen in both the medium and cells after treatment with complexed antisense DNA for 24 hrs were decreased to an equal extent (80%) compared to untreated cells. There was no significant intracellular accumulation of newly synthesized antigen that would have been expected if a block in protein secretion had occurred. Table IB shows that neither complexed antisense DNA nor random DNA had a significant effect on total newly synthesized protein in the cell layer. A small, 2%, decrease was detected in newly synthesized secreted protein in cells exposed to complexed antisense DNA. This likely reflects the contribution of the inhibition of viral surface antigen synthesis noted in Table 1A. The data, overall, indicate that the observed inhibition of hepatitis B surface antigen synthesis by complexed antisense DNA was specific and could not have been due to a generalized inhibition of total protein synthesis. Table 1A Immunoprecipitable Hepatitis B Surface Antigen*
Treatment Cell Laver+ Cell Medium+
Untreated Control 56,100 ± 2,321 114,500 ± 2,442 Complexed Antisense DNA 10,200 ± 1,009 15,300 ± 890
Complexed Random DNA 52,500 ± 4,534 122,220 ± 5,742
Table IB Total TCA Precipitable Radioactivity*
Treatment Cell Laver+ Cell Medium+ Untreated Control 184,498 ± 2,258 712,498 ± 5,435
Complexed Antisense DNA 188,844 ± 6,240 684,302 ± 9,678
Complexed Random DNA 183,591 ± 5,444 706,240 ± 7,544
*after 24 hrs incubation +cpm/mg cell protein TCA - trichloroacetic acid
Finally, in order to determine whether viral replication was affected, DNA was extracted from the medium and cells layers exposed to oligonucleotides for 24 hrs and analyzed by Southern blots. Figure 3 shows Southern blots of DNA extracted from medium and cells after 24 hrs exposure to antisense DNA. Cells were incubated as described for Figure 2 with 50 μM antisense DNA alone, or in the form of complexes as described for Figure 2. After 24 hrs, medium was removed and DNA, extracted from the medium (Sells, M.A. et al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA M 1005-1009) and from the cell layer (Hirt, B.J. (1967) Mol. Biol. 26:365-371). Total cell protein was determined by colorimetric assay (Bio-Rad) . DNA extracted from equal volumes of medium and from approximately equal numbers of cells were applied on an agarose gel, HBV DNA was identified by Southern blot using an EcoRI-Bglll fragment of the HBV genome as a probe labeled with 32P and exposed to x-ray film (Sambrook, J. et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning - A
Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2nd ed., vol. 2, pp. 10.14-10.15). Relative quantitation was achieved by densitometry and confirmed by scintillation counting of corresponding bands, normalized to equal volume or cell number, for media and cell layers, respectively. Duplicate blots were performed, a representative of which is shown above. Lanes 1-4, cell lysates; lanes 5-8, media; lanes 1 and 5, untreated controls; lanes 2 and 6, treated with complexed antisense DNA; lanes 3 and 7, treated with complexed random DNA and lanes 4 and 8, treated with antisense DNA alone. Expected positions for relaxed circular (RC) and single stranded (SS) forms are indicated on the right. Figure 3 lanes 1 and 5 show that untreated cells produced bands at positions expected for relaxed circular and single-stranded linear viral replicative DNA forms. Other minor bands are present, at 2.3 kb for example, as described previously for this cell line (Sells, M.A. et al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA rl005-1009) . Lanes 2 and 6 show that treatment of cells with complexed antisense DNA decreased the amount of all viral DNA forms in the medium by approximately 80% compared to untreated cells (lanes 1 and 5). Complexed random DNA, lanes 3 and 7, had no detectable effect on the levels of HBV DNA under identical conditions. Antisense DNA alone, lanes 4 and 8, decreased HBV DNA by approximately 30% relative to untreated controls. The number of viable cells as determined by trypan blue exclusion was not affected by treatment with any form of DNA (data not shown) .
It has been shown previously that many cell-types are capable of taking up free oligonucleotides (Loke, S.L. et al. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 8.6:3474-3478). Loke et al. showed that the rates of uptake were inversely proportional to the size of the oligonucleotide (Loke, S.L. et al. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA £6.:3474-3478) . However, in general, the longer the DNA sequence, the greater the specificity for target mRNA molecules. These conflicting properties illustrate two common problems with the current use of antisense oligonucleotides: inefficient uptake and lack of cell specificity. In order to improve uptake of antisense oligonucleotides, Lemaitre et. al. covalently coupled an oligonucleotide to polylysine (Lemaitre, M. et al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA .84.:648-652) and obtained anti-viral effects at several-fold lower concentrations than could be obtained with free DNA. However, the delivery was not cell-specific. Our uptake data indicate that not only can transport of oligonucleo¬ tides into cells be greatly enhanced, but the uptake can also be directed to specific cells mediated by an asialoglycoprotein-based DNA-carrier system. Because of the specificity of DNA hybridization with mRNA to form hybrids implicated in antisense-mediated inhibition of translation, antisense oligonucleotides have been used successfully to study normal gene expression in vitro (Bevilaqua, A. et al. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA £5:831-835). For similar reasons, antisense oligonucleotides have also been examined previously for anti-viral effects (Goodchild, J. et al. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85.:5507-5511 and Agrawal, S. et al. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA .86.: 790-7794) . For example, Agrawal et al. administered infectious virus (HIV) together with antisense oligonucleotides in a non-targeted manner to cell media (Agrawal, S. et al. (1989) Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA £6.:7790-7794) . Specific inhibition of viral replication was demonstrated. Similarly, Lemaitre et al. studied a model of acute viral infection in which antisense was pre-administered to cells (Lemaitre, M. et al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84.'.648-652) with substantial specific antiviral effects. Our experiments differ from these previous studies in that our cells had a pre-existing, stable viral infection with viral production maintained by an integrated viral genome. Our data indicate that although a stable infection existed, delivery of antisense oligonucleotides can dramatically inhibit viral gene expression in a specific manner. However, in vivo, persistent production of hepatitis B virus is usually due to the presence of unintegrated viral DNA (Shafritz, D. et al. (1981) N. Eng. J. Med. 305:1067-1073). Integration of the viral genome into that of the host is usually associated with a cessation of production of complete viral particles (Ganem, D. (1982) Rev. Infect. Pis. 4:1026). Whether targeted antisense delivery can be effective in the presence of an infection generated by unintegrated viral DNA remains to be seen. However, asialoglycoprotein uptake in hepatitis virus-infected HepG2 cells was found to be not substantially different from non-infected HepG2 cells (data not shown) , indicating that infection by the virus did not alter the receptor activity in these cells. This suggests that targeted delivery of antisense oligonucleotides may be generally applicable to naturally infected hepatocytes, that are otherwise normal, via asialoglycoprotein receptors. It should be noted that the oligonucleotides used in this current work were linked together by phosphorothioate bonds. These linkages are less susceptible to nuclease degradation than normal phosphodiester bonds. However, an antisense oligonucleotide synthesized with phosphodiester linkages was also effective. In addition, a variety of other synthetic strategies have been developed to confer nuclease resistance to antisense oligonucleo¬ tides (Miller, P.S. et al. (1985) Nucleosides Nucleotides .6:769-776). Forms that retain polyanionic character may also be deliverable by a receptor- mediated carrier system to provide enhanced and prolonged efficacy in a targeted manner. Uptake of AsOR-Poly L-lysine-oligoDNA Complexes in Vivo
To determine whether the AsOR-poly-L-lysine- oligoDNA complexes retained their ability to be recognized by hepatocyte asialoglycoprotein receptors in vivo, rats 200-250 g, were injected intravenously via a tail vein with AsOR-poly-L-lysine-[32P]-oligoDNA alone or together with a 1000-fold molar excess of asialoorosomucoid in 0.15 M sterile saline. After 10 min, animals were killed and samples of blood, liver, spleen, lung and kidney were obtained. Tissue samples were weighed, homogenized, mixed with aqueous counting scintillant and counted for 32P radioactivity on a beta-counter. The uptake of radioactivity by each organ was expressed as the mean of the percent of the total injected counts. These data indicate that complexed single-stranded (antisense) oligoDNA sequences can be targeted specifically to the liver by simple intravenous injection.
Organ Distribution of 32P-(oligonucleotide) DNA as an AsOR-PL Complex
Competition with 1000-fold Molar Excess Cold AsOR
Example 2
MATERIALS AND METHODS
ASSAYS FOR DETERMINING THE EFFECT OF AsOR-PL-αl(I) PROCOLLAGEN ANTISENSE DNA ON PROCOLLAGEN BIOSYNTHESIS
Cell Culture and Treatment
A mouse fibroblast cell line (3T3-AsGR) producing collagen and stably transfected with the asialoglycoprotein (AsG) receptor genes kindly provided by Dr. Michael Shia (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA) was grown in DMEM and 10% FBS. Confluent 35mm dishes of 3T3-AsGR were treated with αl(I) antisense DNA alone (1.3 μM or 2.7 μM) or varying concentrations of antisense DNA complex (1.3 μM, 1.7 μM, or 2.7 μM antisense) for 12-16 hours (overnight) at 37°C in DMEM and 10% FBS. The medium was removed and replaced with labeling medium containing 5 μCi/ml of [3H]-proline, 50 μg/ml
L-ascorbate and varying concentrations of antisense DNA or complexes. Cells were incubated for 4 hours at 37°C in the labeling medium. Newly synthesized procollagens and other proteins were determined by bacterial collagenase digestion (Peterkofsky, B. and Diegelmann, Biochemistry 05 10.:988-994 (1971)) .
Collagenase Digestion
The labeling medium was removed and set aside. Buffer containing protease inhibitors (.5 M Tris, pH 7.4, .4 mM NEM, .2 mM PMSF, 2.5 πi EDTA) was added to 0 the cell layer and the cell layer was removed and pooled with the supernatant. The entire mixture was homogenized using a Dounce homogenizer and ice cold TCA was added to a final concentration of 15%. TCA precipitable proteins were digested with bacterial 5 collagenase (Form III, Advanced Biofactures, Lynbrook, NY) at 37°C for 2 hours followed by precipitation with TCA-tannic acid. The collagenase-sensitive radioactivity in the supernatant was separated by centrifugation to measure newly synthesized 0 procollagen production. The collagenase-resistant precipitated radioactivity was used to calculate non-collagenous protein production. All assays were normalized to equal numbers of cells.
Preparation of Targetable Antisense DNA 5 A targetable, soluble DNA carrier was prepared by coupling asialoorosomucoid to poly L-lysine (Sigma) (Mr = 41,000) using l-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyl- aminopropyl) carbodiimide) (Pierce) as described previously (Wu, G.Y. and Wu, CH. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262:4429-4432) except that the conjugate was purified by cation exchange chromatography using a high pressure liquid chromatographic system (Rainin) employing an Aquapore C-300 column (Rainin) and stepwise elution with 0.1 M sodium acetate, pH 5.0, 2.5, 2.25 and 2.0. The second peak eluted from the column, as detected by U.V. absorption at 230 nm, was determined to be the optimal conjugate form and was used for all subsequent experiments. A 24-mer oligodeoxynucleotide, complementary to the 5'-region of the pro αl procollagen mRNA (See SEQUENCE ID NO. 2 - CCGGAGGTCCACAAAGCTGAACAT) was synthesized with phosphodiester linkages on an automated nucleotide synthesizer (Applied Biosystems) (Matsukura, M. e al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 4:7705-7710). Specifically, this sequence is antisense to the first 24 nucleotides of pro αl procollagen beginning at the αl(I) translation start site and including a portion of the first intron. The purity of oligonucleotides was determined by electrophoresis through 15% polyacrylamide gels stained with ethidium bromide. Antisense DNA was titrated with conjugate to form a soluble complex using an agarose gel retardation system as described previously (Wu, G.Y. and Wu, CH. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262:4429-4432) and a conjugate to DNA ratio of 2:1 by weight (asialoorosomucoid-pplylysine (AsOR-PL) : DNA) was selected.
Assay for Receptor-Mediated Uptake of Complexed Antisense DNA
In order to characterize the uptake capacity of the asialoglycoprotein receptors on the 3T3-AsGR cells, confluent 35mm dishes of 3T3-AsGR cells in DMEM and 10% FBS were stripped with phosphate buffered saline (PBS)-IO mM EDTA, pH 5.0 and incubated with 2 μg/ml [125I]-AsOR with specific activity of 1 x 106 cpm/μg. Uptake was determined as described previously for asialoglycoproteins (Schwartz, A.L. et al. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256:8878-8881). In brief, cells were incubated with [125I]-AsOR at 37°C and at regular time intervals (0.5, 1, 2, or 4 hours), dishes were chilled to 4°C, washed three times with cold 10 mM EDTA-phosphate buffered saline and the cell layers solubilized with 0.1 NaOH and gamma counted. This process was repeated by incubating the 3T3-AsGR cells with [32P]-DNA-AsOR-PL (1.3 μM antisense) or 1.3 μM DNA-[125I]-AsOR-PL (specific activity = 0.5 x 106 cpm/ μg) to determine the rate of uptake of antisense complex except that cell layers incubated with 32P-labeled complex were scintillation counted. Parallel dishes were incubated with the radiolabeled ligand together with a 300-fold weight excess of cold AsOR to determine non-specific uptake. To ascertain counts bound to the cell surface, identical sets of cells were incubated at 4°C with ligands and, after washing as described above, the cell layers were removed and adherent radioactivity was determined by scintillation counting. Uptake was calculated as the difference between total cell-associated counts at 37°C and counts bound to the cells at 4°C for each time point.
RNA Extraction and RNA Dot Blots
Confluent 10 cm dishes of 3T3-AsGR cells in DMEM and 10% FBS were incubated overnight at 37°C with one or a combination of the following: (1) αl(I) antisense oligonucleotide (1.3 μM or 2.7 μM) ; (2) similar concentrations of antisense complexed with AsOR-PL. Total cellular mRNA was extracted by the guanidinium thiocyanate method. (Chomczynski, P. and Sacchi, N., Anal. Biochem. 162: 156-159 (1987)). Quantity and quality of the extracted RNA were determined by 7^260/^280 absorbance and ethidium bromide stained formaldehyde gels.
Dot blot studies starting with 20 μg of total RNA were serially diluted 2-fold in 20x SSC pH 7.0. Samples were heat-denatured in 50% formamide, 7% formaldehyde, and lx SSC pH 7.0 (Sambrook, J., et al. Molecular Cloning 7.54, 1989). Samples were applied to nitrocellulose filters using slot blot apparatus, cross-linked to the filter by ultraviolet exposure, and prehybridized for 3 hours at 42°C The cDNA probes, labeled with 3 P using a random priming method (Sambrook, J., et al. Molecular Cloning 13.44, (1989)) were rat proαl(I) and β-actin, both linearized with EcoRI, and a 900bp piece of rat proα2(I) The nitrocellulose filters were hybridized with the probes (0.5-1.0 x 107 cpm/filter) overnight at 42°C, washed, and exposed to film. Quantitation was done by scintillation counting of the filters.
Northern Blots Total RNA samples (60 μg) were heat denatured in 50% formamide, 2x formaldehyde running buffer, 7% formaldehyde at 55°C for 15 minutes (Sambrook, J., et al. Molecular Cloning 7.43, (1989)). Samples were run on formaldehyde gels (1% agarose, 2.2 M formaldehyde) for 4 hours at 100 mvolts on ice. Molecular weight and control RNAs were stained in 0.1 ammonium acetate and 0.5 μg/ml ethidium bromide and photographed with a fluorescent ruler. The remaining gel was washed several times with water, the RNA hydrolyzed with 0.5 N NaOH for 20 minutes, and soaked in 20x SSC for 45 minutes. The RNA was transferred onto a nitrocellulose filter under vacuum for one hour and cross-linked to the filter by exposure to ultraviolet irradiation using a Stratalinker. Conditions for prehybridization and hybridization were the same as in the slot blot studies.
RESULTS
Characterization of 3T3-AsGR cells
Since the 3T3-ASGR cells do not normally possess asialoglycoprotein receptors, they were transfected with the asialoglycoprotein receptor genes and were found to have a Kg of 1.5 x 10-9 M, a binding saturation with [125I]-AsOR at 1.8 μg/ml, and an uptake rate of [125ι]-AsOR of 1.8 pmole/million cells/hr. The number of asialoglycoprotein receptors per cell was 250,000.
The 3T3-AsGR cells displayed a linear uptake of αl(I) antisense DNA-AsOR-PL complex up to 4 hours at a rate of 18.2 pmole of DNA/million cells/hr. In contrast, the rate of uptake of labeled αl(I) antisense DNA alone was 0.15 pmole DNA/million cells/hr. Uptake of AsOR in a 300x excess by weight competed with the uptake of αl(I) antisense DNA complex. Effect of αl(I) antisense DNA complex on collagen synthesis αl(I) antisense DNA complexes inhibited collagen production by 3T3-AsGR cells. This inhibition was specific for collagen production and was dependent on the concentration of αl(I) antisense DNA in the complex. This result is set forth in the following table.
Effect of αl(I) antisense DNA complex on procollagen I mRNA levels αl(I) antisense DNA complex specifically inhibited mRNA of the αl(I) chain. But at a higher concentration (2.7 μM) of antisense DNA complex, mRNA of both the αl(I) and α2(I) chain was inhibited. The following table is a result of the quantitation of several dot blot analyses.
Eguivalents
Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, numerous equivalents to the specific procedures described herein. Such equivalents are considered to be within the scope of this invention and are covered by the following claims.
SEOUENCE LISTING
(1) GENERAL INFORMATION:
(i) APPLICANT: Wu, George Y.
Wu, Catherine H. (ϋ) TITLE OF INVENTION: Targeted Delivery of
Poly- or
Oligonucleotides to Cells (iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 2 (iv) CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
(A) ADDRESSEE: Lahive & Cockfield
(B) STREET: 60 State Street
(C) CITY: Boston
(D) STATE: Massachusetts (E) COUNTRY: U.S.A.
(F) ZIP: 02109 (v) COMPUTER READABLE FORM:
(A) MEDIUM TYPE: Floppy disk
(B) COMPUTER: IBM PC compatible (C) OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-DOS/MS-DOS
(D) SOFTWARE: ASCII
(vi) CURRENT APPLICATION DATA:
(A) APPLICATION NUMBER:
(B) FILING DATE: (C) CLASSIFICATION:
(vii) PRIOR APPLICATION DATA:
(A) APPLICATION NUMBER: US 07/864,003
(B) FILING DATE: 03-APR-1992
(C) APPLICATION NUMBER: US 07/788,119 .(D) FILING DATE: 04-NOV-1991
(E) APPLICATION NUMBER: US 07/755,083
(F) FILING DATE: 05-SEP-1991 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:l:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 21 nucleotides
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (iv) ANTISENSE: yes
(ix) FEATURE: Complement to hepatitis B virus polyadenylation site
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:l:
TTTATAAGGG TCGATGTCCA T 21
2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:2:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 24 nucleotides
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear (ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA (iv) ANTISENSE: yes
(ix) FEATURE: Complement to first 24 nucleotides of pro αl procollagen beginning at the αl(I) translation start site and including a portion of the first intron. (xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:2:
CCGGAGGTCC ACAAAGCTGA ACAT 24

Claims

Claims
1. A soluble molecular complex for targeting a poly- or oligonucleotide to a specific cell for hybridization to an RNA therein, the complex comprising a single-stranded poly- or oligonucleotide which hybridizes to the RNA complexed with a carrier comprised of a cell-specific binding agent and a poly- or oligonucleotide-binding agent.
2. A soluble .molecular complex of claim 1, wherein the oligonucleotide is an antisense oligodeoxy¬ nucleotide.
3. A soluble molecular complex of claim 2, wherein the antisense oligodeoxynucleotide hybridizes to cellular or viral RNA or DNA.
4. A soluble molecular complex of claim 3, wherein the antisense oligodeoxynucleotide hybridizes to a hepatitis viral RNA.
5. A soluble molecular complex of claim 4, wherein the antisense oligodeoxynucleotide hybridizes to the hepatitis RNA polyadenylation site.
6. A soluble molecular complex of claim 2, wherein the antisense oligodeoxynucleotide hybridizes to oncogene RNA.
7. A soluble molecular complex of claim 1, wherein the oligonucleotide is a ribozyme.
8. A soluble molecular complex of claim 1, wherein the oligonucleotide-binding agent is a polycation.
9. A soluble molecular complex of claim 8, wherein the polycation is polylysine.
10. A soluble molecular complex of claim 1, wherein the cell-specific binding agent binds a surface receptor of the cell which mediates endocytosis of the complex by the cell.
11. A soluble molecular complex of claim 10, wherein the cell-specific binding agent is a ligand for an asialoglycoprotein receptor and the targeted cell is an hepatocyte.
12. A soluble molecular complex of claim 11, wherein the ligand is an asialoglycoprotein.
13. A pharmaceutical composition, comprising a solution of the molecular complex of claim 1 and physiologically acceptable vehicle.
14. A soluble molecular complex for targeting an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to an hepatocyte, the complex comprising the antisense oligodeoxy¬ nucleotide complexed with a carrier comprised of a ligand for the asialoglycoprotein receptor and an oligodeoxynucleotide-binding polycation.
15. A soluble molecular complex of claim 14, wherein the antisense oligodeoxynucleotide hybridizes to a viral RNA transcript.
16. A soluble molecular complex of claim 15, wherein the antisense oligodeoxynucleotide hybridizes to a hepatitis RNA transcript.
17. A soluble molecular complex of claim 16, wherein the antisense oligodeoxynucleotide hybridizes to a hepatitis virus RNA polyadenylation site.
18. A soluble molecular complex of claim 14, wherein the polycation is polylysine.
19. A soluble molecular complex, the complex comprising an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide complementary to hepatitis RNA polyadenylation site complexed with a carrier comprised of a ligand for the asialoglycoprotein receptor and an oligonucleotide-binding polycation.
20. A soluble molecular complex of claim 19, wherein the polycation is polylysine.
21. A method of delivering an oligonucleotide to a specific cell of an organism to block expression of a gene or genes in the cell, comprising administering to the organism a soluble molecular complex comprising a single-stranded oligonucleotide which hybridizes to an RNA transcript of the gene or genes, complexed with a carrier comprised of a cell-specific binding agent and an oligonucleotide-binding agent.
22. A method of claim 21, wherein the oligo¬ nucleotide is an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide.
23. A method of claim 22, wherein the oligodeoxy¬ nucleotide hybridizes to a viral RNA transcript.
05 24. A method of claim 23, wherein the oligodeoxy¬ nucleotide hybridizes to a hepatitis viral RNA transcript.
25. A method of claim 24, wherein the oligodeoxy¬ nucleotide hybridizes to a hepatitis viral RNA 0 polyadenylation site.
26. A method of claim 21, wherein the oligo¬ nucleotide is a ribozyme which catalyzes the cleavage of the transcript.
27. A method of claim 21, wherein the oligonucleo- 5 tide-binding agent is a polycation.
28. A method of claim 27, wherein the polycation is polylysine.
29. A method of claim 22, wherein the cell-specific binding agent binds a surface receptor of the 0 cell which mediates endocytosis of the complex.
30. A method of claim 29, wherein the cell-specific binding agent is a ligand for an asialoglyco¬ protein receptor and the targeted cell is an hepatocyte.
31. A method of claim 30, wherein the ligand is an asialoglycoprotein.
32. A method of claim 21, wherein the molecular complex is administered intravenously.
05 33. A method of inhibiting replication of hepatitis virus in infected hepatocytes, comprising injecting a pharmaceutically acceptable solution of an effective amount of a molecular complex comprising an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide
10 which hybridizes to an RNA transcript of a hepatitis DNA sequence necessary for viral replication, complexed with a carrier comprised of a ligand for the asialoglycoprotein receptor and an oligodeoxynucleotide-binding polycation.
15 34. A method of claim 33, wherein the oligodeoxy¬ nucleotide is complementary to a hepatitis viral RNA polyadenylation site.
35. A method of claim 33, wherein the polycation is polylysine.
20 36. A method of claim 33, wherein the molecular complex is administered intravenously.
37. An antisense oligonucleotide which hybridizes to the polyadenylation site of hepatitis virus.
38. An antisense oligodeoxynucleotide having the
25 nucleotide sequence given as SEQUENCE ID NO. 1.
EP92920863A 1991-09-05 1992-09-04 Targeted delivery of poly- or oligonucleotides to cells Ceased EP0666923A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US75508391A 1991-09-05 1991-09-05
US78811991A 1991-11-04 1991-11-04
US788119 1991-11-04
US86400392A 1992-04-03 1992-04-03
US864003 1992-04-03
PCT/US1992/007339 WO1993004701A1 (en) 1991-09-05 1992-09-04 Targeted delivery of poly- or oligonucleotides to cells
US755083 2004-01-09

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0666923A4 EP0666923A4 (en) 1995-01-20
EP0666923A1 true EP0666923A1 (en) 1995-08-16

Family

ID=27419474

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP92920863A Ceased EP0666923A1 (en) 1991-09-05 1992-09-04 Targeted delivery of poly- or oligonucleotides to cells

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0666923A1 (en)
JP (1) JPH07500820A (en)
KR (1) KR100252547B1 (en)
AU (1) AU681997B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2116107A1 (en)
WO (1) WO1993004701A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (94)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5889169A (en) * 1991-05-16 1999-03-30 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cell cycle regulatory protein p16 gene
US7550561B1 (en) 1991-05-16 2009-06-23 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory p16INK4 polypeptides
NZ244306A (en) * 1991-09-30 1995-07-26 Boehringer Ingelheim Int Composition for introducing nucleic acid complexes into eucaryotic cells, complex containing nucleic acid and endosomolytic agent, peptide with endosomolytic domain and nucleic acid binding domain and preparation
US5521291A (en) * 1991-09-30 1996-05-28 Boehringer Ingelheim International, Gmbh Conjugates for introducing nucleic acid into higher eucaryotic cells
US5981273A (en) * 1991-09-30 1999-11-09 Boehringer Ingelheim Int'l. Gmbh Composition comprising an endosomolytic agent for introducing nucleic acid complexes into higher eucaryotic cells
US5858784A (en) * 1991-12-17 1999-01-12 The Regents Of The University Of California Expression of cloned genes in the lung by aerosol- and liposome-based delivery
US6627615B1 (en) 1991-12-17 2003-09-30 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods and compositions for in vivo gene therapy
US5756353A (en) * 1991-12-17 1998-05-26 The Regents Of The University Of California Expression of cloned genes in the lung by aerosol-and liposome-based delivery
US5922859A (en) * 1992-02-01 1999-07-13 Boehringer Ingelheim International Gmbh Complexes containing nucleic acid which can be taken-up by endocytosis into higher eukaryotic cells
US6806084B1 (en) 1992-06-04 2004-10-19 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods for compositions for in vivo gene delivery
IL105914A0 (en) * 1992-06-04 1993-10-20 Univ California Methods and compositions for in vivo gene therapy
US6211334B1 (en) 1992-10-16 2001-04-03 Cold Spring Harbor Cell-cycle regulatory proteins, and uses related thereto
US5962316A (en) 1992-10-16 1999-10-05 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cell-cycle regulatory proteins, and uses related thereto
CA2148687A1 (en) * 1992-11-09 1994-05-26 Darwin Prockop Antisense oligonucleotides to inhibit expression of mutated and wild type genes for collagen
US5574142A (en) * 1992-12-15 1996-11-12 Microprobe Corporation Peptide linkers for improved oligonucleotide delivery
US6043030A (en) * 1992-12-17 2000-03-28 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cell-cycle regulatory proteins, and uses related thereto
US6331390B1 (en) 1992-12-17 2001-12-18 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cell-cycle regulatory proteins, and uses related thereto
CA2154363A1 (en) * 1993-01-22 1994-08-04 Bruce A. Sullenger Localization of therapeutic agents
EP0693130A1 (en) * 1993-04-05 1996-01-24 The University Of Connecticut Targeted delivery of genes encoding antisense polyribonucleotides
EP0693939A1 (en) * 1993-04-14 1996-01-31 Roche Diagnostics GmbH Nucleic acid tranfer peptides and their use for injecting nucleic acids into eucaryotic cells
GB9317380D0 (en) * 1993-08-20 1993-10-06 Therexsys Ltd Transfection process
DE4331011A1 (en) * 1993-09-13 1995-03-16 Bayer Ag C-branched oligomers that bind nucleic acids for therapy and diagnostics
DE4331012A1 (en) * 1993-09-13 1995-03-16 Bayer Ag Nucleic acid-binding oligomers with N-branching for therapy and diagnostics
US7691632B2 (en) 1993-11-18 2010-04-06 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Kit for detecting the level of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor P16 gene expression
US5728518A (en) * 1994-01-12 1998-03-17 The Immune Response Corporation Antiviral poly-and oligonucleotides
AU1925195A (en) 1994-02-22 1995-09-04 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Nucleic acid delivery system, method of synthesis and uses thereof
DE69520496T2 (en) * 1994-05-13 2001-07-12 Chiron Corp METHOD AND COMPOSITIONS AS VEHICLES FOR TARGETED INTRODUCTION OF GENES
FR2721612B1 (en) 1994-06-23 1996-08-09 Idm New oligoside derivatives, their preparation process and their applications.
US5728399A (en) * 1994-06-29 1998-03-17 University Of Conn. Use of a bacterial component to enhance targeted delivery of polynucleotides to cells
DE4427980A1 (en) * 1994-08-08 1996-02-15 Bayer Ag Nucleic acid binding oligomers for therapy and diagnostics
AU4690596A (en) * 1994-12-30 1996-07-24 Chiron Viagene, Inc. Nucleic acid condensing agents with reduced immunogenicity
CA2212682A1 (en) 1995-02-10 1996-08-15 Worcester Foundation For Experimental Biology, Inc. Delivery of exogenous compounds
EP0821001A4 (en) * 1995-03-31 2002-07-17 Drug Delivery System Inst Ltd Amidite derivatives and oligonucleotide derivatives
US5856459A (en) * 1995-06-06 1999-01-05 Hybridon, Inc. Oligonucleotides specific for hepatitis B virus
AU745049B2 (en) 1997-03-11 2002-03-07 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota DNA-based transposon system for the introduction of nucleic acid into DNA of a cell
US6524613B1 (en) 1997-04-30 2003-02-25 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Hepatocellular chimeraplasty
GB2341390B (en) 1997-05-21 2000-11-08 Univ Leland Stanford Junior Composition and method for enhancing transport across biological membranes
US6162641A (en) * 1997-06-06 2000-12-19 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Neuregulin response element and uses therefor
US6635623B1 (en) 1997-06-13 2003-10-21 Baylor College Of Medicine Lipoproteins as nucleic acid vectors
EP1019511A2 (en) 1997-10-01 2000-07-19 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute STABILIZATION OF ENVELOPE GLYCOPROTEIN TRIMERS BY DISULFIDE BONDS INTRODUCED INTO A gp41 GLYCOPROTEIN ECTODOMAIN
US6197513B1 (en) 1998-02-11 2001-03-06 Pe Corporation PNA and DNA conjugates and methods for preparation thereof
US6210892B1 (en) * 1998-10-07 2001-04-03 Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Alteration of cellular behavior by antisense modulation of mRNA processing
US7160682B2 (en) 1998-11-13 2007-01-09 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Nucleic acid transfer vector for the introduction of nucleic acid into the DNA of a cell
DE19858005B4 (en) * 1998-12-16 2007-02-08 november Aktiengesellschaft, Gesellschaft für Molekulare Medizin Synthetic nucleic acid particle
JP2003507438A (en) 1999-08-24 2003-02-25 セルゲイト, インコーポレイテッド Enhanced delivery of drugs across and into epithelial tissue using oligoarginine moieties
US7229961B2 (en) 1999-08-24 2007-06-12 Cellgate, Inc. Compositions and methods for enhancing drug delivery across and into ocular tissues
US6669951B2 (en) 1999-08-24 2003-12-30 Cellgate, Inc. Compositions and methods for enhancing drug delivery across and into epithelial tissues
US6271360B1 (en) 1999-08-27 2001-08-07 Valigen (Us), Inc. Single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide mutational vectors
EP1541690A3 (en) * 1999-09-09 2005-07-27 CureVac GmbH Transfer of mRNA using polycationic compounds
AU2000240366B2 (en) * 2000-03-28 2005-08-04 Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Alteration of cellular behavior by antisense modulation of mRNA processing
EP1286699A2 (en) * 2000-05-19 2003-03-05 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Composition for delivery of compounds to cells
EP1478751A4 (en) 2001-03-30 2005-10-19 Avigenics Inc Avian lysozyme promoter
US7176300B2 (en) 2001-03-30 2007-02-13 Avigenics, Inc. Avian lysozyme promoter
US7541512B2 (en) 2001-03-30 2009-06-02 Synageva Biopharma Corp. Avians containing a lysozyme promoter transgene
US7550650B2 (en) 2001-09-18 2009-06-23 Synageva Biopharma Corp. Production of a transgenic avian by cytoplasmic injection
US7335761B2 (en) 2001-11-30 2008-02-26 Avigenics, Inc. Avian gene expression controlling regions
US6875588B2 (en) 2001-11-30 2005-04-05 Avigenics, Inc. Ovomucoid promoter and methods of use
US7294507B2 (en) 2001-11-30 2007-11-13 Avigenics, Inc. Ovomucoid promoters and methods of use
US7135562B2 (en) 2002-03-14 2006-11-14 University Of Cincinnati Avian iFABP gene expression controlling region
AU2003231048A1 (en) 2002-04-22 2003-11-03 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Transposon system and methods of use
KR20050089151A (en) 2002-11-26 2005-09-07 프로테인 디자인 랩스 인코포레이티드 CHIMERIC AND HUMANIZED ANTIBODIES TO α5β1 INTEGRIN THAT MODULATE ANGIOGENESIS
US7312320B2 (en) 2003-12-10 2007-12-25 Novimmune Sa Neutralizing antibodies and methods of use thereof
JP5060134B2 (en) 2003-12-12 2012-10-31 ガバメント オブ ザ ユナイテッド ステイツ オブ アメリカ・アズ リプレゼンテッド バイ ザ セクレタリー・デパートメント オブ ヘルス アンド ヒューマン サービシーズ Epitope of human cytotoxic T lymphocytes and its non-variable number of non-VNTR (non-variable number of nucleotide repeat sequences) of MUC-1
NL1027479C2 (en) * 2004-10-21 2006-05-01 Synvolux Ip B V Protection of biologically active molecules with the help of amphiphiles.
CA2595848C (en) 2005-01-25 2014-06-17 Prolexys Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Erastin and erastin binding proteins, and uses thereof
US8921050B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2014-12-30 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary, Department Of Health And Human Services Methods of diagnosing renal cell carcinoma
EP2629094A1 (en) 2007-01-24 2013-08-21 Carnegie Mellon University Optical biosensors
EP3524619A1 (en) 2007-12-06 2019-08-14 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. Antibodies against influenza virus and methods of use thereof
WO2010096388A2 (en) 2009-02-18 2010-08-26 Carnegie Mellon University Quenched dendrimeric dyes for bright detection
SG175276A1 (en) 2009-05-05 2011-11-28 Novimmune Sa Anti-il-17f antibodies and methods of use thereof
EP3252068A3 (en) 2009-10-12 2018-03-14 Larry J. Smith Methods and compositions for modulating gene expression using oligonucleotide based drugs administered in vivo or in vitro
WO2011088435A1 (en) 2010-01-15 2011-07-21 Cornell University Methods for reducing protein levels in a cell
JP2013517772A (en) 2010-01-21 2013-05-20 デイナ ファーバー キャンサー インスティチュート,インコーポレイテッド A situation-specific gene screening platform to aid gene discovery and target confirmation
EP2577309B1 (en) 2010-05-25 2016-11-23 Carnegie Mellon University Targeted probes of cellular physiology
US9527924B2 (en) 2010-06-02 2016-12-27 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. Humanized monoclonal antibodies and methods of use
EP3026432A3 (en) 2010-12-27 2016-07-27 Brown University Method for predicting patient's response to biglycan treatment
HUE037613T2 (en) 2012-03-29 2018-09-28 Novimmune Sa Anti-tlr4 antibodies and uses thereof
US9441045B2 (en) 2012-05-04 2016-09-13 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. Affinity matured anti-CCR4 humanized monoclonal antibodies and methods of use
WO2014055897A2 (en) 2012-10-04 2014-04-10 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. Human monoclonal anti-pd-l1 antibodies and methods of use
CA3155275A1 (en) 2012-12-03 2014-06-12 Novimmune S.A. Anti-cd47 antibodies and methods of use thereof
AU2015231164B2 (en) 2014-03-19 2020-04-09 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. Immunogenetic restriction on elicitation of antibodies
KR20160145813A (en) 2014-04-25 2016-12-20 다나-파버 캔서 인스티튜트 인크. Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus neutralizing antibodies and methods of use thereof
TWI695011B (en) 2014-06-18 2020-06-01 美商梅爾莎納醫療公司 Monoclonal antibodies against her2 epitope and methods of use thereof
AU2015327781A1 (en) 2014-10-03 2017-04-20 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. Glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (GITR) antibodies and methods of use thereof
AU2015328273B2 (en) 2014-10-06 2020-09-17 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. Humanized CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) antibodies and methods of use thereof
WO2016081440A1 (en) 2014-11-17 2016-05-26 Carnegie Mellon University Activatable two-component photosensitizers
EP3221358B1 (en) 2014-11-18 2021-07-21 Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V. Cd47 antibodies, methods, and uses
JP7033082B2 (en) 2016-02-05 2022-03-09 ナノビュー バイオサイエンシズ インコーポレイテッド Detection of exosomes with surface markers
CA3016474A1 (en) 2016-03-15 2017-09-21 Mersana Therapeutics, Inc. Napi2b-targeted antibody-drug conjugates and methods of use thereof
SG11201900500TA (en) 2016-07-22 2019-02-27 Dana Farber Cancer Inst Inc Glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor (gitr) antibodies and methods of use thereof
CA3035081A1 (en) 2016-09-02 2018-03-08 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. Composition and methods of treating b cell disorders
WO2018048939A1 (en) 2016-09-06 2018-03-15 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. Methods of treating or preventing zika virus infection
TW201825511A (en) 2016-09-09 2018-07-16 美商艾斯合顧問有限公司 Oncolytic virus expressing immune checkpoint modulators
JP7377590B2 (en) 2018-03-14 2023-11-10 ノビミューン エスアー Anti-CD3 epsilon antibodies and methods of using them

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BIOTHERAPY (DORDR) 3 (1). 1991. 87-96 WU, G. & WU, C. 'DELIVERY SYSTEMS FOR GENE THERAPY.' *
J BIOL CHEM 262 (10). 1987. 4429-4432 WU, G. ET AL. 'RECEPTOR-MEDIATED IN-VITRO GENE TRANSFORMATION BY A SOLUBLE DNA CARRIER SYSTEM.' *
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, vol.81, no.20, 18 October 1989, BETHESDA, MD, USA pages 39 - 44 ROTHENBERG, M. ET AL. 'Oligodeoxynucleotides as anti-sense inhibitors of gene expression: therapeutic implications' *
See also references of WO9304701A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2678092A (en) 1993-04-05
EP0666923A4 (en) 1995-01-20
KR100252547B1 (en) 2000-09-01
WO1993004701A1 (en) 1993-03-18
AU681997B2 (en) 1997-09-18
CA2116107A1 (en) 1993-03-18
JPH07500820A (en) 1995-01-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6030954A (en) Targeted delivery of poly- or oligonucleotides to cells
AU681997B2 (en) Targeted delivery of poly- or oligonucleotides to cells
EP0894129B1 (en) Short external guide sequences
Wu et al. Specific inhibition of hepatitis B viral gene expression in vitro by targeted antisense oligonucleotides.
CA2210353C (en) Stabilized external guide sequences
Kumasaka et al. Role of the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in endotoxin-induced pneumonia evaluated using ICAM-1 antisense oligonucleotides, anti-ICAM-1 monoclonal antibodies, and ICAM-1 mutant mice.
AU704562C (en) Anti-hepatitis B poly- and oligonucleotides
AU2006261732B2 (en) RNAi modulation of HIF-1 and theraputic uses thereof
CN107849567A (en) A kind of siRNA, the pharmaceutical composition containing the siRNA and conjugate and their application
US5843770A (en) Antisense constructs directed against viral post-transcriptional regulatory sequences
JP2018511307A (en) Compounds and methods for modulating TMPRSS6 expression
CA2205075C (en) Reagent and method for inhibition of n-ras expression
JPH10510700A (en) Methods for treating Kaposi's sarcoma with antisense oligonucleotides
CN103333890A (en) RNA interference preparation used for treating viral hepatitis B
WO2003008628A2 (en) Enzymatic nucleic acid peptide conjugates
US20020102694A1 (en) Nucleozymes with endonuclease activity
AU686614B2 (en) Targeted delivery of genes encoding antisense polyribonucleotides
EP4273245A1 (en) Nucleic acid, pharmaceutical composition and sirna conjugate containing the nucleic acid, preparation method therefor, and use thereof
WO2023116607A1 (en) Nucleic acid, composition and conjugate containing nucleic acid, preparation method therefor and use thereof
JPH10501224A (en) Use of oligonucleotide phosphorothioates for complement depletion and lowering blood pressure
JP3150609B2 (en) Antisense oligonucleotides for cancer treatment
WO2005007854A2 (en) Polycationic compositions for cellular delivery of polynucleotides

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched
AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A4

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL SE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19940329

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19970513

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED

18R Application refused

Effective date: 20030306