EP0635567A2 - Method and composition for facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from solid surfaces - Google Patents

Method and composition for facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from solid surfaces Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0635567A2
EP0635567A2 EP94202131A EP94202131A EP0635567A2 EP 0635567 A2 EP0635567 A2 EP 0635567A2 EP 94202131 A EP94202131 A EP 94202131A EP 94202131 A EP94202131 A EP 94202131A EP 0635567 A2 EP0635567 A2 EP 0635567A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
composition
layer
removal
soil
washing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP94202131A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0635567A3 (en
Inventor
Gregory C/O Kodak Limited Batts
Garland C/O Eastman Kodak Company Corey
Leon C/O Eastman Kodak Company Paszek
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Reckitt Benckiser LLC
Original Assignee
Kodak Ltd
Eastman Kodak Co
Reckitt and Colman Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kodak Ltd, Eastman Kodak Co, Reckitt and Colman Inc filed Critical Kodak Ltd
Publication of EP0635567A2 publication Critical patent/EP0635567A2/en
Publication of EP0635567A3 publication Critical patent/EP0635567A3/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/38Products with no well-defined composition, e.g. natural products
    • C11D3/384Animal products
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/37Polymers
    • C11D3/3746Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • C11D3/3769(Co)polymerised monomers containing nitrogen, e.g. carbonamides, nitriles or amines
    • C11D3/3776Heterocyclic compounds, e.g. lactam
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/38Products with no well-defined composition, e.g. natural products
    • C11D3/382Vegetable products, e.g. soya meal, wood flour, sawdust

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and composition for facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from solid surfaces e.g. the removal of soap scum from bathroom hard surfaces such as ceramic tiles.
  • FR-A-2 639 353 describes coating a solid surface with a composition comprising a mixture of polymers to render the surface waterproof, oil-resistant, stain-resistant and self-cleaning.
  • a shortcoming of this approach is that the nature of the adhesive bond between a soil contaminant and the surface varies depending on the composition of the contaminant. For example, adhesion could result from electrostatic, dispersion, dipole/dipole, hydrophobic or hydrogen bond interactions as well as from rugosity effects. For contaminants which are a mixture of different components, adhesion usually occurs through a number of different adhesive bonds. Furthermore, solid surfaces are rarely, if ever, smooth and soil contamination can occur by physical entrapment.
  • composition of soap scum which is a common bathroom soil is a mixture of ionic, hydrophilic and hydrophobic components.
  • a scum could form a variety of adhesive bonds to typical household hard surfaces such as metals, plastics, ceramics, glass and glazed surfaces.
  • An object of the invention is to provide a method of facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from a solid surface which does not require chemically modifying the surface to render it less prone to soil adhesion.
  • a method of facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from a solid surface comprises washing the surface with a liquid composition characterised in that the liquid composition comprises a material which is deposited on the surface during washing and upon drying forms a layer adhered to the surface, said material having a cohesive strength such that at least the outermost surface portion of the layer is removable by further washing.
  • a liquid composition for cleaning solid surfaces comprising one or more cleaning agents characterised in that the composition comprises a material capable of being deposited on the surface during cleaning and of forming a dried layer adhered to the surface, said layer having a cohesive strength such that at least the outermost surface portion of the layer is removable by washing.
  • Figure 1 is a graph showing results achieved using the method of the invention.
  • the method of the invention can be used for any solid surface. It is particularly applicable to hard surfaces found in the household for which a variety of cleaning compositions are known, especially bathroom cleaning compositions. Typical household surfaces include metal, plastics, ceramic, fibreglass, enamel, glass and glazed surfaces.
  • the liquid composition used in the invention is preferably an aqueous composition in which the other components are dissolved or dispersed.
  • the material which is deposited on the surface to form a layer of low cohesive strength is preferably a film-forming polymeric material.
  • the cohesive failure of the polymeric material can be controlled by choosing suitable molecular weight polymers.
  • the layer is at least partially water-soluble.
  • the layer is uncharged over a reasonable pH range.
  • the layer is preferably clear.
  • Examples of materials which have been successfully used to form the layer include polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), gelatin and saponin.
  • the deposited layer provides a weak link between the adhered soil contaminants and the solid surface. Hence, the soil contaminants can be removed easily by washing. It is possible to provide treated surfaces with resistance to multiple soiling since the layer can be made to become thinner after each washing with sufficient of the layer remaining for further protection. Upon washing, the layer strips partially from the surface to leave a thinner, but clean surface. In the preferred mode of operation, this surface is invisible to the naked eye.
  • the material from which the low cohesive strength layer is formed can be incorporated in a cleaning composition so that the layer can be formed on the solid surface during cleaning.
  • Existing cleaning compositions can be modified in this way provided that the incorporation of the material has no adverse interactions with the other components.
  • the cleaning composition comprises one or more components known in the art such as detergents, chelating agents, water-miscible organic solvents and pH control agents.
  • composition of the invention may be incorporated into other materials such as quaternary nitrogen or phenolic antimicrobial agents.
  • the invention is further illustrated by way of example as follows.
  • Standard glazed black ceramic tiles were wipe-coated with a 5%w/w PVP ( ⁇ 40k MW) aqueous solution and allowed to dry.
  • a standard bathroom soil was sprayed from an acetone/water mixture onto the treated tiles and allowed to dry.
  • the composition of the bathroom soil (soap-scum) used is a mixture of ionic, hydrophilic and hydrophobic components as follows: component %w/w hard water 95.54 bar soap 3.90 shampoo 0.35 sebum 0.15 clay soil 0.06
  • the tiles were then "aged” by heating at 1100C for ⁇ 2 hours. After cooling to room temperature, the tiles were cleaned in water with a brush under standard conditions. Measurements (10x) were taken with a simple reflectometer (visible light) from different points of the area cleaned by the brush. The average (mean) was compared with that from a control untreated tile, which had been through the soiling process, and an untouched reference.
  • Table 1 below provides data showing the average percentage soil removal from PVP-treated and untreated tiles after one or more cycles of soiling and cleaning operations.
  • Table 1 Conditions % Soil removal* Untreated PVP-treated Reference 80.9 N/A Soiled & cleaned 1x 39.8 57.7 Soiled & cleaned 2x 0.0 78.5 Soiled & cleaned 3x 1.9 51.0 Soiled & cleaned 4x 2.0 60.5 * % soil removals are calculated from reflectance readings
  • Table 2 Coating Material wt. % in water Control 0 Digel (gelatin) 2.0 PVP ( ⁇ 10k MW) 5.0 Saponin 1.0 Cetyl pyridinium bromide (CPB) 0.1
  • Standard glazed black ceramic tiles were prepared and subjected to soiling/cleaning cycles in accordance with the procedure of Example 1.
  • the cleaning results after three cycles of soiling/cleaning are shown in Figure 1.
  • PVP was incorporated into a bathroom hard surface cleaner to provide the composition given in Table 3 below.
  • Table 3 Formulation % by weight 1.
  • Hard surface cleaner 99.0 EDTA 2%
  • NeodolTM 23.6 0.5%
  • Sodium meta silicate 0.25% Water to 100% 2.
  • PVP ( ⁇ 10k MW) 1.0 (NeodolTM 23.6 is a linear C12-C13 alcohol ethoxylate nonionic surfactant)
  • Standard glazed black ceramic tiles were wiped with 0.5g of the above composition until dry. About 0.01g of the composition is deposited on each tile.
  • Tiles were coated with soap scum in accordance with Example 1. The coated tiles were allowed to dry in air for 30 minutes and cured for 45 minutes at 85°C. The tiles were cooled and rinsed. A comparison was made with untreated tiles used as controls. The results are shown in Table 4 below. Table 4 Tile No. Treatment Removability of Soap Scum 1 Treated 100% removed with water rinse Control Untreated No removal even after 15 rubbing strokes and cold water rinse 2 Treated 90% removal Control Untreated 0% removal 3 Treated 90-100% removal 4 Treated 90-100% removal
  • the object of the example is to determine if the coating provided by the composition of Example 3 is effective even after rinsing with water.
  • a test tile was prepared as in Example 3. The tile was treated with soap scum soil, air dried and then cured for 15-20 minutes at 90°C. A portion of the tile was rinsed under cold water and then resoiled and rinsed. The results are shown in Table 5 below. Table 5 Test No. Treatment % Soil Removal 1 Soiled/rinsed (1x) 100% 2 Soiled/rinsed (2x) 40% 3 None (Control) 0%

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Finishing Walls (AREA)

Abstract

A method of facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from a solid surface is provided which method comprises washing the surface with a liquid composition characterised in that the liquid composition comprises a material which is deposited on the surface during washing and upon drying forms a layer adhered to the surface, said material having a cohesive strength such that at least the outermost surface portion of the layer is removable by further washing. The low cohesive strength material may be incorporated in a composition for cleaning solid surfaces e.g. a bathroom cleaner for removing contaminants such as soap scum.

Description

    Field of the Invention
  • The invention relates to a method and composition for facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from solid surfaces e.g. the removal of soap scum from bathroom hard surfaces such as ceramic tiles.
  • Background of the Invention
  • Known methods for facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from a solid surface have involved treating the surface to render it less prone to soil adhesion. For example, FR-A-2 639 353 describes coating a solid surface with a composition comprising a mixture of polymers to render the surface waterproof, oil-resistant, stain-resistant and self-cleaning.
  • A shortcoming of this approach is that the nature of the adhesive bond between a soil contaminant and the surface varies depending on the composition of the contaminant. For example, adhesion could result from electrostatic, dispersion, dipole/dipole, hydrophobic or hydrogen bond interactions as well as from rugosity effects. For contaminants which are a mixture of different components, adhesion usually occurs through a number of different adhesive bonds. Furthermore, solid surfaces are rarely, if ever, smooth and soil contamination can occur by physical entrapment.
  • By way of example, the composition of soap scum which is a common bathroom soil is a mixture of ionic, hydrophilic and hydrophobic components. Hence, a scum could form a variety of adhesive bonds to typical household hard surfaces such as metals, plastics, ceramics, glass and glazed surfaces.
  • It can be seen that chemically modifying a surface to reduce soiling will only be effective in respect of certain soil contaminants and is unlikely to be very effective against complex mixtures such as soap scums.
  • Problem to be Solved by the Invention
  • An object of the invention is to provide a method of facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from a solid surface which does not require chemically modifying the surface to render it less prone to soil adhesion.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • In accordance with the invention there is provided a method of facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from a solid surface which method comprises washing the surface with a liquid composition characterised in that the liquid composition comprises a material which is deposited on the surface during washing and upon drying forms a layer adhered to the surface, said material having a cohesive strength such that at least the outermost surface portion of the layer is removable by further washing.
  • In accordance with another aspect of the invention there is provided a liquid composition for cleaning solid surfaces comprising one or more cleaning agents characterised in that the composition comprises a material capable of being deposited on the surface during cleaning and of forming a dried layer adhered to the surface, said layer having a cohesive strength such that at least the outermost surface portion of the layer is removable by washing.
  • Advantageous Effect of the Invention
  • The removal of soil contaminants from a solid surface is facilitated since any contaminant can be readily removed without having to modify the surface to render it less prone to soil adhesion.
  • Brief Description of the Drawings
  • Figure 1 is a graph showing results achieved using the method of the invention.
  • Detailed Description of the Invention
  • The method of the invention can be used for any solid surface. It is particularly applicable to hard surfaces found in the household for which a variety of cleaning compositions are known, especially bathroom cleaning compositions. Typical household surfaces include metal, plastics, ceramic, fibreglass, enamel, glass and glazed surfaces.
  • The liquid composition used in the invention is preferably an aqueous composition in which the other components are dissolved or dispersed.
  • The material which is deposited on the surface to form a layer of low cohesive strength is preferably a film-forming polymeric material. The cohesive failure of the polymeric material can be controlled by choosing suitable molecular weight polymers.
  • It is desirable for the layer to be at least partially water-soluble. Preferably, the layer is uncharged over a reasonable pH range.
  • The layer is preferably clear.
  • Examples of materials which have been successfully used to form the layer include polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), gelatin and saponin.
  • The deposited layer provides a weak link between the adhered soil contaminants and the solid surface. Hence, the soil contaminants can be removed easily by washing. It is possible to provide treated surfaces with resistance to multiple soiling since the layer can be made to become thinner after each washing with sufficient of the layer remaining for further protection. Upon washing, the layer strips partially from the surface to leave a thinner, but clean surface. In the preferred mode of operation, this surface is invisible to the naked eye.
  • The material from which the low cohesive strength layer is formed can be incorporated in a cleaning composition so that the layer can be formed on the solid surface during cleaning. Existing cleaning compositions can be modified in this way provided that the incorporation of the material has no adverse interactions with the other components. Typically, the cleaning composition comprises one or more components known in the art such as detergents, chelating agents, water-miscible organic solvents and pH control agents.
  • Other materials such as quaternary nitrogen or phenolic antimicrobial agents may be incorporated into the composition of the invention.
  • The invention is further illustrated by way of example as follows.
  • Example 1
  • Reduced soil adhesion has been demonstrated with pretreatments of saponin, deionised gelatin and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). Experimental evidence is presented for PVP, which has been shown to provide protection against several soil applications.
  • Standard glazed black ceramic tiles were wipe-coated with a 5%w/w PVP (∼40k MW) aqueous solution and allowed to dry. A standard bathroom soil was sprayed from an acetone/water mixture onto the treated tiles and allowed to dry. The composition of the bathroom soil (soap-scum) used is a mixture of ionic, hydrophilic and hydrophobic components as follows:
    component %w/w
    hard water 95.54
    bar soap 3.90
    shampoo 0.35
    sebum 0.15
    clay soil 0.06
  • The tiles were then "aged" by heating at 110⁰C for ∼2 hours. After cooling to room temperature, the tiles were cleaned in water with a brush under standard conditions. Measurements (10x) were taken with a simple reflectometer (visible light) from different points of the area cleaned by the brush. The average (mean) was compared with that from a control untreated tile, which had been through the soiling process, and an untouched reference.
  • Following these experiments, a tile was treated with the same PVP solution, soiled, cleaned, re-soiled, cleaned etc several times to study it's anti-resoiling properties. The results from this and the initial test are given in Table 1. It is worth noting that an untouched tile has a reflectivity of ∼81%. Hence, the higher reflectivity % relates to cleaner tiles and therefore better visual appearance to a consumer.
  • Table 1 below provides data showing the average percentage soil removal from PVP-treated and untreated tiles after one or more cycles of soiling and cleaning operations. Table 1
    Conditions % Soil removal*
    Untreated PVP-treated
    Reference 80.9 N/A
    Soiled & cleaned 1x 39.8 57.7
    Soiled & cleaned 2x 0.0 78.5
    Soiled & cleaned 3x 1.9 51.0
    Soiled & cleaned 4x 2.0 60.5
    * % soil removals are calculated from reflectance readings
  • The data in Table 1 show clearly that the pretreatment of the glazed ceramic tiles makes the standard soap-scum easier to remove with water, under controlled cleaning conditions, compared with the control tile. Although the readings are not absolute, the consumer would notice the difference.
  • Similar results were obtained with deionised gelatin. Saponin worked for one cycle of soiling and cleaning but appears too water soluble for multiple protection against soil build-up.
  • Example 2
  • Four sample compositions were made as shown in Table 2 below. Table 2
    Coating Material wt. % in water
    Control
    0
    Digel (gelatin) 2.0
    PVP (∼10k MW) 5.0
    Saponin 1.0
    Cetyl pyridinium bromide (CPB) 0.1
  • Standard glazed black ceramic tiles were prepared and subjected to soiling/cleaning cycles in accordance with the procedure of Example 1. The cleaning results after three cycles of soiling/cleaning are shown in Figure 1. The results clearly show that the tiles treated with polyvinylpyrollidone were the most consistent in facilitating the rinsing off of soap scum.
  • Example 3
  • PVP was incorporated into a bathroom hard surface cleaner to provide the composition given in Table 3 below. Table 3
    Formulation % by weight
    1. Hard surface cleaner 99.0
    EDTA 2%
    Propylene glycol monopropyl ether 5%
    Neodol™ 23.6 0.5%
    Sodium meta silicate 0.25%
    Water to 100%
    2. PVP (∼10k MW) 1.0
    (Neodol™ 23.6 is a linear C₁₂-C₁₃ alcohol ethoxylate nonionic surfactant)
  • Standard glazed black ceramic tiles were wiped with 0.5g of the above composition until dry. About 0.01g of the composition is deposited on each tile.
  • Tiles were coated with soap scum in accordance with Example 1. The coated tiles were allowed to dry in air for 30 minutes and cured for 45 minutes at 85°C. The tiles were cooled and rinsed. A comparison was made with untreated tiles used as controls. The results are shown in Table 4 below. Table 4
    Tile No. Treatment Removability of Soap Scum
    1 Treated 100% removed with water rinse
    Control Untreated No removal even after 15 rubbing strokes and cold water rinse
    2 Treated 90% removal
    Control Untreated 0% removal
    3 Treated 90-100% removal
    4 Treated 90-100% removal
  • The results confirm that treatment in accordance with the invention prevents soap scum adherence.
  • Example 4
  • The object of the example is to determine if the coating provided by the composition of Example 3 is effective even after rinsing with water.
  • A test tile was prepared as in Example 3. The tile was treated with soap scum soil, air dried and then cured for 15-20 minutes at 90°C. A portion of the tile was rinsed under cold water and then resoiled and rinsed. The results are shown in Table 5 below. Table 5
    Test No. Treatment % Soil Removal
    1 Soiled/rinsed (1x) 100%
    2 Soiled/rinsed (2x) 40%
    3 None (Control) 0%
  • The results show that the coating was effective even after being subjected to a water rinse.

Claims (8)

  1. A method of facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from a solid surface which method comprises washing the surface with a liquid composition characterised in that the liquid composition comprises a material which is deposited on the surface during washing and upon drying forms a layer adhered to the surface, said material having a cohesive strength such that at least the outermost surface portion of the layer is removable by further washing.
  2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the liquid composition is an aqueous composition.
  3. A method according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the material is a film-forming polymeric material.
  4. A method according to claim 3 wherein the polymeric material is polyvinylpyrrolidone.
  5. A liquid composition for cleaning solid surfaces comprising one or more cleaning agents characterised in that the composition comprises a material capable of being deposited on the surface during cleaning and of forming a dried layer adhered to the surface, said layer having a cohesive strength such that at least the outermost surface portion of the layer is removable by washing.
  6. A composition according to claim 5 wherein the liquid composition is an aqueous composition.
  7. A composition according to claim 5 or claim 6 wherein the material is a film-forming polymeric material.
  8. A composition according to claim 7 wherein the polymeric material is polyvinylpyrrolidone.
EP94202131A 1993-07-23 1994-07-21 Method and composition for facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from solid surfaces. Withdrawn EP0635567A3 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9315281 1993-07-23
GB939315281A GB9315281D0 (en) 1993-07-23 1993-07-23 Method and composition for facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from solid surfaces

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0635567A2 true EP0635567A2 (en) 1995-01-25
EP0635567A3 EP0635567A3 (en) 1996-11-27

Family

ID=10739309

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP94202131A Withdrawn EP0635567A3 (en) 1993-07-23 1994-07-21 Method and composition for facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from solid surfaces.

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0635567A3 (en)
GB (1) GB9315281D0 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0892039A1 (en) * 1997-07-18 1999-01-20 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid cleaning compositions
WO1999020724A1 (en) * 1997-10-22 1999-04-29 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid hard-surface cleaning compositions
EP0913458A1 (en) * 1997-10-22 1999-05-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid hard-surface cleaning compositions
EP0982394A1 (en) * 1998-08-27 2000-03-01 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid neutral or alkaline hard-surface cleaning composition
WO2001042415A1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2001-06-14 Unilever N.V. Use of polymeric material in the treatment of hard surfaces
US6369019B1 (en) * 1997-10-22 2002-04-09 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid hard-surface cleaning compositions
US6718992B1 (en) 1998-08-27 2004-04-13 Sergio Cardola Liquid neutral to alkaline hard-surface cleaning composition

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1349741A (en) * 1970-05-06 1974-04-10 Unilever Ltd Liquid cleaning compositions
GB1604562A (en) * 1977-05-25 1981-12-09 Unilease Process for keeping clean internal and external surfaces in danger of contamination
US4325744A (en) * 1980-07-25 1982-04-20 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method and composition for cleaning metal surfaces with a film-forming composition
JPS59189200A (en) * 1983-04-11 1984-10-26 株式会社日本触媒 Method of cleaning substance surface
EP0178899A2 (en) * 1984-10-15 1986-04-23 QO CHEMICALs, INC. Metal cleaning
JPS61231097A (en) * 1985-04-05 1986-10-15 永石 太平 Cleanser
JPS63189476A (en) * 1987-02-02 1988-08-05 Hisao Miyahara Glass cleaner
FR2639353A1 (en) * 1988-11-23 1990-05-25 Atochem Aqueous compositions for the antisoiling treatment of construction materials
EP0467472A2 (en) * 1990-07-16 1992-01-22 Colgate-Palmolive Company Hard surface liquid cleaning composition with anti-soiling polymer
WO1992016309A1 (en) * 1991-03-25 1992-10-01 Isoline A/S A process for the cleaning and protection, including corrosion protection, preservation and disinfection, of surfaces, and an agent for use in the process
US5259984A (en) * 1992-05-11 1993-11-09 Jim Hull Associates, Inc. Rinse-free cleansing composition

Patent Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1349741A (en) * 1970-05-06 1974-04-10 Unilever Ltd Liquid cleaning compositions
GB1604562A (en) * 1977-05-25 1981-12-09 Unilease Process for keeping clean internal and external surfaces in danger of contamination
US4325744A (en) * 1980-07-25 1982-04-20 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method and composition for cleaning metal surfaces with a film-forming composition
JPS59189200A (en) * 1983-04-11 1984-10-26 株式会社日本触媒 Method of cleaning substance surface
EP0178899A2 (en) * 1984-10-15 1986-04-23 QO CHEMICALs, INC. Metal cleaning
JPS61231097A (en) * 1985-04-05 1986-10-15 永石 太平 Cleanser
JPS63189476A (en) * 1987-02-02 1988-08-05 Hisao Miyahara Glass cleaner
FR2639353A1 (en) * 1988-11-23 1990-05-25 Atochem Aqueous compositions for the antisoiling treatment of construction materials
EP0467472A2 (en) * 1990-07-16 1992-01-22 Colgate-Palmolive Company Hard surface liquid cleaning composition with anti-soiling polymer
WO1992016309A1 (en) * 1991-03-25 1992-10-01 Isoline A/S A process for the cleaning and protection, including corrosion protection, preservation and disinfection, of surfaces, and an agent for use in the process
US5259984A (en) * 1992-05-11 1993-11-09 Jim Hull Associates, Inc. Rinse-free cleansing composition

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS + INDEXES, vol. 110, no. 6, 6 February 1989, page 108 XP000015720 MIYAHARA HISAO: "PEELABLE COATINGS FOR CLEANING OF GLASS, CERAMIC AND PLASTIC MOLDINGS" & JP-A-63 189 476 (MIYAHARA HISAO ) 5 August 1988 *
CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS, vol. 102, no. 14, 8 April 1985 Columbus, Ohio, US; abstract no. 115563c, page 117; XP002014806 & JP-A-59 189 200 (NIPPON SHOKUBAI K.K.) *
DATABASE WPI Section Ch, Week 8648 Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class A97, AN 86-314277 XP002014807 & JP-A-61 231 097 (NAGAISHI T. ) , 15 October 1986 *

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0892039A1 (en) * 1997-07-18 1999-01-20 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid cleaning compositions
WO1999003957A1 (en) * 1997-07-18 1999-01-28 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid cleaning compositions
WO1999020724A1 (en) * 1997-10-22 1999-04-29 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid hard-surface cleaning compositions
EP0913458A1 (en) * 1997-10-22 1999-05-06 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid hard-surface cleaning compositions
US6369019B1 (en) * 1997-10-22 2002-04-09 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid hard-surface cleaning compositions
EP0982394A1 (en) * 1998-08-27 2000-03-01 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid neutral or alkaline hard-surface cleaning composition
WO2000012661A1 (en) * 1998-08-27 2000-03-09 The Procter & Gamble Company Liquid neutral to alkaline hard-surface cleaning composition
US6718992B1 (en) 1998-08-27 2004-04-13 Sergio Cardola Liquid neutral to alkaline hard-surface cleaning composition
WO2001042415A1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2001-06-14 Unilever N.V. Use of polymeric material in the treatment of hard surfaces

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB9315281D0 (en) 1993-09-08
EP0635567A3 (en) 1996-11-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1239326A (en) Method for cleaning textiles with cyclic siloxanes
EP2260094B1 (en) Use of citrate as cleaning aid for hard surfaces
US6759377B2 (en) Detergent for vitroceramic surfaces
JP4163814B2 (en) Hard surface cleaning and finishing composition and method thereof
US5705472A (en) Neutral aqueous cleaning composition
CA2384307A1 (en) Hard surface cleaning compositions, premoistened wipes, methods of use, and articles comprising said compositions or wipes and instructions for use resulting in easier cleaning and maintenance, improved surface appearance and/or hygiene under stress conditions such as no-rinse
CA2210760A1 (en) An aqueous shower rinsing composition and a method for keeping showers clean
EP0635567A2 (en) Method and composition for facilitating the removal of soil contaminants from solid surfaces
KR102326799B1 (en) Aqueous composition suitable for cleaning and protection comprising silica nanoparticles, copolymer of acrylamide and acrylic acd, nonionic and anionic surfactant
US5863884A (en) Silicone and adhesive removal composition
JP2000308860A (en) Cleaning method of composite material and self-cleaning composite material structure
US6391837B1 (en) Cleaning composition and method comprising a ternary solvent blend
JPH0192391A (en) Ultrasonic washing of solid molded product
US20180362887A1 (en) Mold, Mildew, Rust, Tarnish & Lime Remover
US3511707A (en) Method of cleaning a stone surface and composition therefor
US5763377A (en) Compositions and methods for removing titanium dioxide from surfaces
US20080223414A1 (en) Compositions and methods for removing titanium dioxide from surfaces
JPH04216831A (en) Method for protecting hard surface
EP0524155B1 (en) Industrial procedure for the application of a P.T.F.E. film on aluminium surfaces
US6296902B1 (en) Sealing process for surface pores of construction parts
WO1991018046A1 (en) Method for cleaning articles made of molded resin
JPS62185796A (en) Detergent composition for vehicle
JPH01243433A (en) Finishing agent for ceramic substrate
JP3454533B2 (en) Cleaning method
JPH11116995A (en) Detergent composition for industrial precision part and cleaning

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: RECKITT & COLMAN INC.

Owner name: KODAK LIMITED

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: RECKITT & COLMAN INC.

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): DE ES FR GB IT

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 19970528

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: RECKITT & COLMAN INC.