EP0579756B1 - Coated cutting tool - Google Patents
Coated cutting tool Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0579756B1 EP0579756B1 EP92910857A EP92910857A EP0579756B1 EP 0579756 B1 EP0579756 B1 EP 0579756B1 EP 92910857 A EP92910857 A EP 92910857A EP 92910857 A EP92910857 A EP 92910857A EP 0579756 B1 EP0579756 B1 EP 0579756B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- coating
- blades
- chromium
- substrate
- blade
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B26—HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
- B26B—HAND-HELD CUTTING TOOLS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B26B21/00—Razors of the open or knife type; Safety razors or other shaving implements of the planing type; Hair-trimming devices involving a razor-blade; Equipment therefor
- B26B21/54—Razor-blades
- B26B21/58—Razor-blades characterised by the material
- B26B21/60—Razor-blades characterised by the material by the coating material
Definitions
- This invention relates to coatings for shaving razor blades and for cutting blades generally.
- a “razor” is defined as a self-contained shaving unit having at least one blade, a blade support, a guard surface attached to the blade support and extending outwardly from the support below the blade or blades, and a cap covering and protecting the blade or blades.
- the support and cap combine to maintain the blade or blades in a predetermined shaving position.
- the razor can include an attached disposable handle to provide a disposable razor per se or it may be in the form of a disposable cartridge for use with an interchangeable handle. In both instances the disposable cartridge and the razor head of the disposable razor are substantially identical.
- the term "razor” may also refer to injector mechanisms of other single or double edge shaving mechanisms as well.
- the blades utilized in modern shaving razors incorporate a plurality of features that interact to provide efficient and comfortable shaving action.
- a shaving razor blade is far sharper than an ordinary industrial razor blade or knife. This sharpness can be expressed and measured in terms of the "ultimate tip radius". Shaving razor blades ordinarily have ultimate tip radii of about 500-600 Angstroms or less, whereas industrial razor blades, cutting knives and the like ordinarily have ultimate tip radio of several thousand Angstroms.
- modern shaving razor blades have lubricant coatings, such as coatings of fluorocarbon polymers on their cutting edges. The lubricant decreases the frictional forces created by engagement of the blade with the individual whiskers, and hence materially reduces the drag or "pull" experienced by the user upon shaving. Because the requirements for a shaving razor are specialized when compared to other types of cutting tools, it is not always easy to predict properties of a shaving razor based on a cutting tool having similar features.
- a shaving razor blade should remain usable for many shaves.
- the blade should retain a keen edge and should retain its lubricant during these repeated shaves, despite exposure to the physical effects of contact with the beard and skin, and despite exposure to the chemical effects of water, soaps and the like encountered in the shaving environment.
- the shaving razor blade must be adapted for efficient and economical mass production. It must withstand shipment, storage and handling under ordinary conditions without special care. All of these factors together create a daunting technical challenge.
- razor blade cutting edges are coated with a thin metal coating that provides enhanced durability and corrosion resistance to the underlying stainless steel substrate.
- This coating usually chromium or a chromium/platinum alloy, is deposited at a thickness of only a few hundred angstroms, keeping the ultimate tip radius of curvature to about 500 angstroms in order to maintain blade sharpness.
- a fluoropolymer film may be applied to the blade edge to provide comfort while shaving. The bonding forces between the thin film and the substrate and between the thin coating and the polymer film should be greater than the mechanical forces experienced at the blade edge while shaving.
- the polymer film can delaminate from the thin film, or the thin coating can delaminate from the substrate, taking the polymer film along with it. Both conditions lead to nicks, cuts and severe degradation of shaving comfort. Any potential coating material must therefore adhere well to the
- Chromium and chromium/platinum alloys demonstrate these favorable adhesive properties, but the search for other less expensive and more facile coatings continues.
- Coatings of certain metallic, intermetallic, and ceramic compounds that are much harder than the chromium or chromium/platinum alloys, and which offer sufficient adherence to the substrate and polymer film, are capable of demonstrating improved shaving characteristics over the chromium or chromium/platinum coatings.
- Typical modern shaving razor blades incorporate a substrate of stainless steel, such as an iron and chromium- containing martensitic stainless steel, together with a hard coating of chromium or chromium nitride overlying the stainless steel substrate at least along the cutting edge of the blade.
- the fluoropolymer lubricant such as polytetrafluoroethylene, overlies the hard coating and adheres thereto.
- the hard coating may be on the order of a few hundred Angstroms thick.
- the hard coating is applied by a process known as sputtering.
- sputtering ordinarily is conducted under a controlled atmosphere, typically a noble gas at extremely low pressures.
- the semifinished blades, with the hard coating thereon are removed from the controlled atmosphere.
- the blades are coated with the lubricant by applying a dispersion of the fluorocarbon polymer in a fugitive liquid solvent, evaporating off the solvent and then fusing the remaining lubricant by heating.
- the fusing step typically is conducted in an inert atmosphere, the blades are exposed to ordinary room air during application of the lubricant dispersion, and during any storage period between application of the hard coating and application of the lubricant dispersion.
- US Patent No. 3,774,703 discloses a razor blade having two distinct, superimposed coatings.
- the first coating is used to strengthen the cutting edge, to reduce damage thereto and to reduce corrosion.
- the second coating functions to provide a surface that resists wear during shaving.
- US Patent No. 3,774,703 also discloses an optional, third layer on the second coating.
- GB Patent N o 1,416,887 describes a cutting blade, especially a razor blade comprising a
- Razors incorporating blades according to this general construction have been regarded heretofore as superior in that they provide a good combination of shaving performance, durability and low cost. Nonetheless, still further improvements have been needed.
- shaving razor blade cutting edges normally do not become dull in the same manner as cutting tools.
- the very sharp, thin edges of shaving razor blades normally become dull due to microscopic fractures of the edge brought on by the extra thinness of blade. Therefore, hardness alone does not always correlate well with blade edge durability in a shaving razor blade.
- a shaving razor blade coating must also be compatible with the lubricant film and with the processes used to apply the lubricant.
- the lubricant must adhere to the hard coating to provide a durable lubricating effect in use. Adhesion between hard coating materials and lubricants is not predictable. Many otherwise suitable hard coating materials are incompatible with lubricants in that the lubricant will not adhere satisfactorily. Of course, the coating must also be compatible with the underlying substrate. For these and other reasons, the search for better hard coatings for use in shaving razor blades has not been fully successful heretofore.
- suitable coating materials included metal oxides, nitrides, carbides and borides, and mixtures of a metal and an oxide, nitride or carbide thereof.
- Specific examples of coating materials are alumina (sapphire), tungsten carbide, titanium nitride, boron nitride, mixtures of boron and boron nitride, and diamond-like carbon.
- multi layer coatings are also acceptable coatings, such as a first coating of titanium nitride under a second coating of boron/boron nitride and a first coating of chromium or titanium under a seconding coating of diamond-like carbon.
- Boron carbide alone or in combination with silicon has been suggested as a coating material for a razor blade in commonly assigned U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 218,637 filed July 13, 1988. Boron carbide, however, can have various, unpredictable failure modes, so it is not fully appropriate for large-scale commercial development.
- the invention comprises a cutting tools, e.g., a razor blade, having a substrate; a hard, adherent coating on the substrate which is the sole such coating on the substrate; and a compatible film.
- the coating is selected from the group consisting of a mixture of chromium and boron carbide and silicon carbide, or titanium diboride; a ceramic material and a binder of up to 20 % by weight of metallic compounds; mixtures of the above; titanium carbonitride.
- the invention also comprises ceramic compounds having a binder of up to 20%, by weight, of metallic compounds.
- the coating is then covered with a film, preferably a fluorocarbon polymer such as Vydax.
- the invention comprises three components: (a) a substrate; (b) a coating; and (c) a film.
- the film is preferably a lubricant desirably comprising a fluorinated polyolefin.
- Lubricants consisting essentially of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) are particularly preferred.
- the substrate preferably includes a ferrous alloy, such as a stainless steel, including iron and chromium. Desirably, the hard coating directly overlies the ferrous alloy and adheres thereto.
- a blade according to one embodiment of the present invention includes a flat, striplike substrate.
- the substrate may incorporate substantially any of the materials commonly utilized for conventional razor blades. Of those materials, ferrous metals, such as stainless steels, are preferred. Especially preferred are martensitic stainless steels of the type commonly referred to in the trade as "400-Series.” These steels incorporate at least about 80% Fe and at least about 10% chromium. 440A stainless steel, consisting essentially of about 13 to 15% Cr, about 0.7% C and the remainder Fe is particularly preferred.
- a first rough-honed or rear facet, a second ground facet, and a third fine-honed or forward facet are provided on at least one face of a substrate or at least on one cutting edge.
- a fine-honed or forward facet, rough-honed or rear facet, and ground facet also provided on the opposite face of the cutting edge of the substrate.
- the forward facets and intersect one another at an extremity of the edge.
- the facets are formed by conventional processes such as grinding, honing and the like.
- the geometry of the facets may also be conventional, and may be the same as that employed for the facets of a conventional chromium-coated stainless steel razor blade.
- the intersecting forward facets of the substrate define an edge radius of no more than about 300 Angstroms.
- the same arrangement of facets is provided on a second cutting edge opposite from the first-mentioned cutting edge.
- the blades are cleaned by a conventional wet cleaning process, which may include washing in appropriate solvent solutions to remove debris and grease left as residues from the grinding or honing processes.
- the blade is subject to a sputter cleaning step.
- the blade is arrranged as part of a stack of blades with the faceted or cutting edges and of all of the substrates in the stack aligned.
- the stack is placed within a chamber of the sputtering apparatus.
- a conventional vacuum pumping device is actuated to bring the chamber to a low, subatmospheric pressure, typically about 10 -7 to 10 -6 mmHg, whereupon a conventional gas supply apparatus is actuated to fill the chamber with a noble gas such as argon and to maintain the pressure in the chamber at about 10 -3 to 10 -2 mmHg.
- a sputtering power supply is then actuated to apply an alternating radio frequency ("RF") or direct current (“DC”) potential between the stack of substrates and the chamber ground.
- RF radio frequency
- DC direct current
- the power density applied may be about 0.1 watts cm 2 to about 1.0 watts/cm 2 , based on the projected area of the long sides of the stack, i.e., the area of the stack projected in the planes defined by the cutting edges.
- the alternating potential creates an electrical discharge within the low pressure gas inside the chamber, thus converting the gas to a plasma or mixture of positively charged ions and the electrons. Due to the well-known "diode effect" of the plasma, the stack of substrates assumes a negative potential with respect to the plasma.
- the power supply may be arranged to provide a negative DC potential to the substrates, with or without an alternating or RF potential.
- a DC potential will likewise cause an electrical discharge and will likewise cause bombardment of the substrates by ions from the plasma. With either DC or RF sputter cleaning, the bombarding ions dislodge unwanted material from the surfaces of facets.
- the dislodged material in the form of highly energetic neutral atoms, passes into the vapor state and passes from the chamber or is deposited on the walls of the chamber.
- This sputtering action removes trace contaminants from the surfaces of the substrates, particularly at the facets. It is important to continue this sputter cleaning of contaminants for some time. In particular, it is desirable to remove in the sputter cleaning step any traces of oxygen remaining at these surfaces.
- This sputter cleaning step removes these first few atomic layers and hence removes adsorbed oxygen, oxides and other contaminants.
- the time required to achieve an acceptable degree of surface cleanliness will vary depending upon the gas pressure, the applied power and the physical configuration of the sputtering apparatus. Typically, at least about five minutes to about fifty minutes or more, and more typically about ten minutes to about thirty minutes will provide substrate facet surfaces essentially free of either uncombined or oxide-form oxygen and essentially free of other contaminants as well.
- the substrates are subjected to a sputter coating step.
- the substrates are maintained in a non-oxidizing atmosphere such as a noble or reducing gas or a high vacuum between these steps.
- the sputter coating step is conducted in the same apparatus as employed for the sputter cleaning step, and the sputter coating step is conducted immediately after the sputter cleaning step.
- the sputter coating step is also conducted utilizing a noble gas atmosphere such as argon or may use nitrogen or some other gas.
- a noble gas atmosphere such as argon or may use nitrogen or some other gas.
- the sputter coating step is performed at between aobut 10 -3 and 10 -2 mmHg pressure, and more preferably at about 4 x 10 -3 mmHg pressure.
- the targets confront the edges of the stacked substrates. Each target incorporates the material to be deposited as a hard coating on the substrates.
- targets may contain a binder.
- Binders are materials added to targets to increase the thermal conductivity of the target. In commercial applications, DC magnetron sputtering is preferred due to the high deposition rates obtained. This technique, however, causes thermal shock to the target, and binders, usually metals, fill in crystal voids between the molecules of ceramic to bind the system.
- binders are selected from cobalt and nickel and mixtures thereof.
- binders are present in an amount of less than about 20% by weight of the target, more preferably about 5-15% by weight and most preferably about 10% by weight.
- Each target is retained on a conventional target holder of the type commonly employed in a sputtering apparatus.
- the power supply is actuated to maintain the stack of blades at the ground potential and to apply an RF potential between the targets and the chamber wall.
- the applied RF potential creates an electrical discharge in the gas within the chamber so as to convert the gas to a plasma.
- the targets assume a negative potential with respect to the plasma, so that positively charged ions from the plasma bombard each target and dislodge material therefrom.
- DC potential may be applied instead of RF potential if the target is an electrical conductor or in conjunction therewith.
- the sputtering apparatus and techniques may employ well-known sputtering expedients.
- a magnetic field may be applied in the vicinity of the target to enhance the sputtering by the well-known magnetron effect.
- the stack of substrates and/or targets may move relative to one another so as to enhance uniformity of sputtering conditions along the length of each cutting edge.
- the material dislodged from the targets deposits on the substrates, and particularly upon the exposed cutting edges therof as a coating directly overlying the ferrous material of the substrates and adhering thereto.
- the material from the target deposits as a substantially homogeneous, amorphous coating. Because the substrates are arranged in a stack as shown during the sputter coating step, the sputtered atoms pass generally forwardly-to-rearwardly with respect to each cutting edge of substrate before impinging on the substrate. Each layer projects in a forward direction beyond the extremity of the blade, so that the two layers merge with one another. The merged layers define the ultimate tip or extremity of the cutting edge.
- the hard coating on the second cutting edge of each blade is substantially the same.
- the term "thickness" refers to the dimension perpendicular to the plane of the underlying surface.
- the thickness of each hard coating layer decreases progressively in the rearward direction, away from the ultimate tip of the cutting edge.
- the average thickness of each hard coating layer on the forward facets closest to the forward extremity of the substrate is betwen about 100 and about 400 Angstroms, more preferably between about 150 and about 300 Angstroms, and most preferably between about 200 and 250 Angstroms.
- the tip to tip dimension or forward to rearward dimension d between the forwardmost extremity of the substrate and the forwardmost extremity of the hard coating desirably is between about 200 and about 900 Angstroms, more preferably between about 300 and 700 Angstroms, and most preferably between aobut 500 and about 600 Angstroms. Both the average coating thickness and the tip to tip distance increase as the sputter coating process progresses.
- the time required to deposit the hard coating material to the desired coating thickness and tip to tip distance will depend upon the geometry of the sputtering apparatus, the gas pressure and the power applied.
- the factors governing the deposition rate of various materials in sputtering processes in general are well known to those skilled in the sputtering art, and the same factors apply in the present sputter coating step.
- higher sputtering power input tends to produce a higher deposition rate.
- the deposition process can be completed in between about 5 minutes and aobut 50 minutes, typically between about 20 minutes and about 40 minutes and most preferably in about 30 minutes.
- Sputtering processes which deposit coatings of the preferred thicknesses mentioned above within the preferred times generally do not cause overheating or other adverse effects on the substrates or the coatings.
- the hard coating may adhere tenaciously to the facet surfaces.
- adhesion between a coating and the substrates may be enhanced by techniques such as ion implantation, wherein some of the sputtered target material is ionized and accelerated towards the substrate across an applied electrical potential. Such known additional techniques, however, are generally unnecessary.
- the semi-finished blades resulting from the sputter coating step, incorporating the substrates with the hard coatings thereon, are removed from the sputtering chamber.
- a polymeric lubricant is then deposited on the blades, for example by contacting the blades with a dispersion of the polymer in a fugitive liquid carrier.
- the dispersion may be sprayed from a conventional spray nozzle onto the exposed cutting edges of the blades. Dipping or other conventional liquid application techniques may be employed as alternates to spraying. Where the polymer is in powder form, conventional powder application techniques can be used.
- the polymer deposition step and any storage and handling between hard coating and polymer deposition may be conducted in an ordinary air atmosphere. Following the polymer deposition step, the blades are subjected to heat treatment in a conventional industrial oven arranged with a gas supply apparatus. The gas supply apparatus is operated to maintain a non-oxidizing atomosphere such as a reducing or inert atmosphere within the oven during the heat treatment.
- the heat treatment is conducted at or above the melting temperature of the polymer, and preferably at about the melting temperature of the polymer, for a period sufficient to fuse the lubricant into a coherent lubricant coating overlying the hard coating.
- the thickness of the lubricant coating will depend upon the amount of lubricant applied. Preferably, the amount of lubricant applied is the minimum amount required to form a coherent coating on those portions of the hard coating overlying the forwardmost facets. Although some lubricant may be applied on other areas of the blade, the same is not essential.
- the lubricant preferably is a fluorinated polyolefin or a copolymer or blend including the fluorinated polyolefin. Most preferably, it is Vydax.
- the lubricant preferably includes polymers having a main chain or backbone composed principally of - CF 2 -repeating units.
- the lubricant more preferably includes polytetrafluoroethylene ("PTFE”), and most desirably consists essentially of PTFE.
- PTFE polytetrafluoroethylene
- the molecular weight of the PTFE desirably is from about 10,000 to about 50,000, and about 30,000, is especially preferred.
- Suitable dispersion of a 30,000 molecular weight PTFE in a volatile fluorocarbon solvent is commercially available under the registered trademark VIDAX 1000 from the DuPont Company of Wilmington, Delaware, USA.
- Other PTFE dispersions are available under the registerd trademark Fluron from ICI Chemical Industries of Great Britain.
- Higher molecular weight PTFE suitable for use in the present process is sold under the registered trademark Teflon by the Dupont Company.
- the deposited hard coating material defines the ultimate tip of 42 of the cutting edge of the blade.
- the sharpness of the edge at this ultimate tip can be expressed in terms of the ultimate tip radius R, which is the radius of curvature of the hard coating surface at the tip.
- the ultimate tip radius R normally is measured by use of a scanning electron microsope.
- the lubricant is not considered in measurement of the ultimate tip radius.
- the term "ultimate tip radius" should be understood as referring to the radius exclusive of the lubricant.
- Chromium or chromium/platinum alloy coatings have been the standard in the industry for many years. The coating has been successful due to the fact that not only does it adhere well to the stainless steel blade edge, but the fluoropolymer coating that is deposited on top of the chromium or chromium/platinum alloy razors adheres well to the chromium or chromium/platinum alloy. This fluoropolymer coating provides the extra comfort. Loss of this fluoropolymer coating during use results in a blade that "pulls" uncomfortably at the whiskers, rendering the blade less comfortable to use. Loss of the fluoropolymer coating can occur in two ways.
- the coating supporting the fluoropolymer can delaminate from the substrate.
- the fluoropolymer film is also then lost, since the fluoropolymer coating is on top of the hard coating.
- the fluoropolymer can delaminate from the coating. Hence, for any hard coating to enhance shave characteristics, it must demonstrate high affinity for both the stainless steel substrate and the fluoropolymer film.
- Titanium Carbide an extremely hard refractory material. Titanium Carbide, when sputter deposited on blade edges demonstrates sufficient adherence with the substrate. However, due to insufficient adhesion with the fluoropolymer film, after two or three shaves a blade with a Titanium carbide coating has its shaving comfort degraded to an unacceptable level.
- Deposition techniques suitable for use with the invention are, but are not limited to, the following:
- the above deposition techniques can be supplemented by additional ion bombardment from an ion beam gun either in inert mode (to modify thin film mechanical structure via bombardment with inert gas ions, esp. Argon), or in reactive mode (to modify the stoichiometry of the thin film via bombardment with reactive gas species, esp. O 2 , N 2 , and hydrocarbons).
- inert mode to modify thin film mechanical structure via bombardment with inert gas ions, esp. Argon
- reactive mode to modify the stoichiometry of the thin film via bombardment with reactive gas species, esp. O 2 , N 2 , and hydrocarbons.
- a stack of razor blades was placed in a vacuum sputtering apparatus, which was subsequently evacuated to a pressure of 1.0 x 10 -6 Torr. After achieving this base pressure, Argon gas was admitted into the chamber until a dynamic pressure of 1.0 x 10 -3 Torr was attained. At this point, with the razor blades connected to the electrical circuit in such a manner as to serve as the cathode, a 1000 watt, 13.56 mHz RF plasma was initiated, and the blades were bombarded with Argon ions. This surface decontamination step was continued for 10 minutes.
- the chamber was again evacuated to the original base pressure.
- Argon was introduced to the system at a pressure of 15.0 x 10 -3 Torr.
- Nitrogen gas flow was then introduced to bring the combined Ar and N2 pressure to a level of 15.2 x 10 -3 Torr.
- a 2000 watt, 13.56 mHz plasma was initiated.
- the sputter deposition process was continued for 30 minutes.
- the vacuum chamber was then vented to atmosphere and the blades removed.
- the razor blades went through standard subsequent processing which included deposition of a fluoropolymer. These blades, when shave tested against standard chromium coated blades, demonstrated superior performance. Tables 3, 4, 5 and 6 (corresponding to Figures 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 5A, 5B, 6A and 6B) show the improved performance of the blades of the invention.
- a stack of blades was placed in the apparatus of Example I, and subjected to the same pre-deposition ion decontamination treatment. After this treatment a flow of Argon gas was admitted into the chamber and adjusted to provide a chamber pressure of 15 x 10 -3 Torr. Next, with the RF power leads connected to a pair of Tungsten Carbide targets, a 2000 watt, 13.56 mHz plasma was initiated. The deposition was continued for 30 minutes.
- the stack of blades coated with Titanium Carbide were also subjected to a blind two-day shave test on male volunteers. On a scale of 0-6, with 6 being the best rating, the blades were compared for comfort, closeness, safety, and overall evaluation to chromium coated blades. The average results were as follows: Comfort Closeness Safety Overall Day 1 TiC 4.08 4.31 4.31 4.23 Day 1 Cr 4.31 4.00 4.38 4.15 Day 2 TiC 3.92 4.15 4.31 4.15 Day 2 Cr 4.31 4.15 4.00 4.23
- the stack of blades of Example 2 were also subjected to a blind two-day shave test on thirteen male volunteers.
- the coverage scores for the tungsten carbide coated blades and chromium coated blades are as follows: Comfort Closeness Safety Overall Day 1 WC 4.08 4.00 4.77 4.15 Day 1 Cr 4.15 3.77 4.00 4.08 Day 2 WC 4.15 4.00 4.62 4.15 Day 2 Cr 4.23 4.15 4.31 4.23
- a stack of razor blades was admitted into the etch chamber of an in-line DC Magnetron sputtering apparatus. This chamber was evacuated to a pressure of 1.0 x 10-6 torr. Argon gas was then introduced to the chamber to a dynamic pressure level of 6 x 10 -3 torr. A 400 watt RF plasma was then initiated. This blade cleaning process was continued for 5 minutes. Upon completion of the etch process, the sputtering chamber of the in-line system was activated. Nitrogen gas was admitted into the evacuated chamber until a dynamic pressure of 1.6 x 10 -3 torr was acheived. Argon gas was admitted next until the total pressure of the nitrogen plus the Argon was equal to 12. x 10 -3 torr.
- An edge indentation analysis was performed on blades coated with chromium, Tungsten carbide, titanium carbonitride, and zirconium nitride, respectively.
- An edge indentation analysis is performed by lowering a diamond tipped wedge onto the very edge of a blade and adding a small, known force to the wedge. In this example, the force was 5 grams.
- the applied force results in an indentation in the edge of the blade. Multiple indentations were made across a blade to determine an average value. A microscope is then used to measure the length of the indentation in arbitrary units. Stronger edges will result in shorter indentations.
- Felt cutting is a test used to quantify how strong the edge of a blade is. A blade is used to cut through felt twenty times. Measurements of the force required to cut the felt are made. For food, strong blades, the force required to cut the felt should not increase greatly.
- a stack of blades is introduced into a vacuum chamber, which is subsequently evacuated to a pressure of ⁇ 1.0 x 10 -6 Torr.
- Argon gas is then admitted and is adjusted to provide a chamber pressure of 1.0 x 10 -3 Torr.
- a 900 watt, 13.56 mHz plasma is initiated. This pre-deposition ion surface cleaning process is continued for 2 minutes.
- the blades are then automatically loaded into the next evacuated processing chamber of the sputtering apparatus.
- Argon gas is then admitted into the process chamber and is adjusted to provide a pressure of 2.0 x 10 -3 Torr.
- a 3000 watt plasma is initiated.
- a chromium deposit of ⁇ 200 angstroms thickness is carried out.
- the DC high voltage is removed from the chromium targets, and is applied instead to composite Boron Carbide - Silicon Carbide magnetron targets.
- a 3000 watt plasma is initiated.
- a Boron Carbide - Silicon Carbide film of ⁇ 200 angstroms thickness is deposited on top of the chromium.
- the blades may be processed as usual through the subsequent production steps.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Forests & Forestry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Physical Vapour Deposition (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Comfort | Closeness | | Overall | |
Day | ||||
1 TiC | 4.08 | 4.31 | 4.31 | 4.23 |
| 4.31 | 4.00 | 4.38 | 4.15 |
| 3.92 | 4.15 | 4.31 | 4.15 |
| 4.31 | 4.15 | 4.00 | 4.23 |
Comfort | Closeness | | Overall | |
Day | ||||
1 WC | 4.08 | 4.00 | 4.77 | 4.15 |
| 4.15 | 3.77 | 4.00 | 4.08 |
| 4.15 | 4.00 | 4.62 | 4.15 |
| 4.23 | 4.15 | 4.31 | 4.23 |
TiCN, WC and Cr blades | ||||||||
Blade No. | Type | Indentation Number | | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |||
1 | TiCN | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.75 |
2 | TiCN | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.48 |
3 | TiCN | 2.4 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 2.35 |
4 | TiCN | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.22 |
5 | Cr | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.55 |
6 | Cr | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.62 |
7 | Cr | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.62 |
8 | Cr | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.65 |
9 | WC | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.35 |
10 | WC | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 2.33 |
11 | WC | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.35 |
12 | WC | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.20 |
Cr and ZrN Blades | ||||||||||
Blade No. | Type | Indentation No. | Avg. | |||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |||
13 | Cr | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.75 |
14 | Cr | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.80 |
15 | Cr | 3.1 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.86 |
16 | Cr | 3.0 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.83 |
17 | Cr | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 2.83 |
18 | ZrN | 2.5 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.66 |
19 | ZrN | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 2.73 |
20 | ZrN | 2.4 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 2.61 |
21 | ZrN | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.65 |
22 | ZrN | 2.6 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.66 |
Felt Cutting Test Results (Force in Arbitrary Units) | ||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 |
Cr | 28.3 | 29.4 | 31.5 | 34.1 | 35.7 | 43.7 | 52.9 | 58.9 |
TiCN | 24.0 | 22.8 | 23.7 | 24.3 | 24.1 | 26.0 | 27.1 | 29.3 |
Cr | 22.0 | 22.1 | 21.5 | 22.0 | 22.7 | 23.4 | 23.7 | 25.6 |
TiCN | 22.1 | 21.1 | 20.7 | 20.8 | 20.9 | 20.8 | 21.8 | 22.0 |
Cr | 24.3 | 23.8 | 23.0 | 23.2 | 24.3 | 25.2 | 26.3 | 27.0 |
TiCN | 19.5 | 18.8 | 18.8 | 19.0 | 19.4 | 20.1 | 21.0 | 22.6 |
Cr | 26.8 | 23.9 | 23.9 | 24.1 | 23.6 | 24.1 | 25.9 | 25.3 |
TiCN | 20.7 | 21.2 | 21.2 | 21.1 | 20.4 | 21.4 | 21.5 | 22.2 |
Claims (6)
- A cutting blade, especially a razor blade comprising:a) a substrate;b) a hard, adherent coating on said substrate which is the sole such coating on the substrate; andc) a compatible film, characterised in that the hard, adherent coating is selected from the group consisting of:a mixture of chromium and boron carbide and silicon carbide, or titanium diboride, a ceramic material and a binder of up to 20 % by weight of metallic compounds; mixtures of the above; titanium carbonitride.
- A cutting blade according to Claim 1, characterised in that the substrate is metallic.
- A cutting blade according to Claim 2 characterised in that the hard adherent coating comprises titanium carbonitride, titanium aluminium nitride, tungsten carbide, zirconium nitride or mixtures thereof.
- A cutting blade according to any of Claims 1 to 3 characterised in that the compatible film comprises an organic polymeric lubricant.
- A cutting blade according to Claim 4 wherein the organic polymeric lubricant comprises a fluoropolymer, preferably a fluorinated polyolefin, and more preferably polytetrafluoroethylene.
- A cutting blade according to any of Claims 1 to 5 characterised in that the hard adherent coating has a thickness less than 500 angstroms.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US68095791A | 1991-04-05 | 1991-04-05 | |
US680957 | 1991-04-05 | ||
PCT/US1992/001946 WO1992017323A1 (en) | 1991-04-05 | 1992-03-09 | Coated cutting tool |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0579756A1 EP0579756A1 (en) | 1994-01-26 |
EP0579756B1 true EP0579756B1 (en) | 1998-07-15 |
Family
ID=24733201
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP92910857A Expired - Lifetime EP0579756B1 (en) | 1991-04-05 | 1992-03-09 | Coated cutting tool |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0579756B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPH06508533A (en) |
AU (1) | AU1772292A (en) |
DE (1) | DE69226266T2 (en) |
MX (1) | MX9201490A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1992017323A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5669144A (en) * | 1991-11-15 | 1997-09-23 | The Gillette Company | Razor blade technology |
US6077572A (en) * | 1997-06-18 | 2000-06-20 | Northeastern University | Method of coating edges with diamond-like carbon |
JP4741056B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2011-08-03 | 株式会社貝印刃物開発センター | Blade member and method of manufacturing the blade edge |
GB2376911A (en) * | 2001-10-18 | 2002-12-31 | Diamanx Products Ltd | Razor blade |
US20060010696A1 (en) * | 2004-07-19 | 2006-01-19 | Critelli James M | Hand tool with cutting blade having cutting surfaces with wear-enhancing coating thereon |
JP5184886B2 (en) | 2004-09-08 | 2013-04-17 | ビック・バイオレクス・エス・エー | Method of depositing a predetermined layer on a razor blade tip and razor blade |
US7250224B2 (en) * | 2004-10-12 | 2007-07-31 | General Electric Company | Coating system and method for vibrational damping of gas turbine engine airfoils |
CA2736807C (en) | 2008-09-19 | 2017-06-27 | Acme United Corporation | Coating for cutting implements |
BRPI1010577A2 (en) | 2009-05-15 | 2016-03-15 | Gillette Co | razor blade coating. |
EP3225736A1 (en) * | 2016-03-31 | 2017-10-04 | BTG Eclépens S.A. | Masked coating blade |
US11466357B2 (en) * | 2017-10-06 | 2022-10-11 | Oerlikon Surface Solutions Ag, Pfaffikon | Ternary TM-diboride coating films |
KR102211395B1 (en) * | 2019-05-22 | 2021-02-03 | 주식회사 도루코 | Razor Blade and Manufacturing Method Thereof |
KR102211399B1 (en) | 2019-05-22 | 2021-02-03 | 주식회사 도루코 | Razor Blade and Manufacturing Method Thereof |
EP3828311A1 (en) * | 2019-11-28 | 2021-06-02 | BIC-Violex S.A. | Razor blade coating |
EP4240567A2 (en) * | 2020-11-03 | 2023-09-13 | The Gillette Company LLC | Razor blades with chromium boride-based coatings |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR1600109A (en) * | 1968-01-02 | 1970-07-20 | ||
BR7102060D0 (en) * | 1970-04-17 | 1973-04-05 | Wilkinson Sword Ltd | SHAVING BLADE AND PROCESS FOR THE SAME MANUFACTURE |
US3802078A (en) * | 1971-06-07 | 1974-04-09 | P Denes | Cutting device and method for making same |
GB1416887A (en) * | 1972-06-07 | 1975-12-10 | Gillette Industries Ltd | Coating of razor blade cutting edges gas flow regulation |
EP0089818A3 (en) * | 1982-03-23 | 1985-04-03 | United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority | Coatings for cutting blades |
US4933058A (en) * | 1986-01-23 | 1990-06-12 | The Gillette Company | Formation of hard coatings on cutting edges |
AU625072B2 (en) * | 1988-07-13 | 1992-07-02 | Warner-Lambert Company | Shaving razors |
-
1992
- 1992-03-09 WO PCT/US1992/001946 patent/WO1992017323A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1992-03-09 JP JP4509945A patent/JPH06508533A/en active Pending
- 1992-03-09 AU AU17722/92A patent/AU1772292A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1992-03-09 DE DE69226266T patent/DE69226266T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1992-03-09 EP EP92910857A patent/EP0579756B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1992-04-01 MX MX9201490A patent/MX9201490A/en unknown
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JPH06508533A (en) | 1994-09-29 |
DE69226266T2 (en) | 1998-12-17 |
EP0579756A1 (en) | 1994-01-26 |
AU1772292A (en) | 1992-11-02 |
WO1992017323A1 (en) | 1992-10-15 |
MX9201490A (en) | 1992-10-01 |
DE69226266D1 (en) | 1998-08-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5129289A (en) | Shaving razors | |
US5295305A (en) | Razor blade technology | |
US5142785A (en) | Razor technology | |
EP0579756B1 (en) | Coated cutting tool | |
US5088202A (en) | Shaving razors | |
US5669144A (en) | Razor blade technology | |
US5232568A (en) | Razor technology | |
US5992268A (en) | Amorphous diamond coating of blades | |
US7966909B2 (en) | Process of forming a razor blade | |
EP0582676B1 (en) | Improvements in or relating to razor blades | |
EP0591339B1 (en) | Razor blade and process for forming a razor blade | |
CN101198447A (en) | Razor blades | |
WO2007095120A2 (en) | Multi-layer coating for razor blades | |
JP2744809B2 (en) | Razor for shaving | |
JPH0548713B2 (en) |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19931008 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE GB |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19960422 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE GB |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69226266 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19980820 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20110325 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20110329 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R071 Ref document number: 69226266 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R071 Ref document number: 69226266 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Expiry date: 20120308 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20120310 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20120308 |