EP0561889B1 - Process for the removal of sulphur compounds from gases - Google Patents

Process for the removal of sulphur compounds from gases Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0561889B1
EP0561889B1 EP92900559A EP92900559A EP0561889B1 EP 0561889 B1 EP0561889 B1 EP 0561889B1 EP 92900559 A EP92900559 A EP 92900559A EP 92900559 A EP92900559 A EP 92900559A EP 0561889 B1 EP0561889 B1 EP 0561889B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sulphur
aqueous solution
sulphide
compounds
concentration
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP92900559A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0561889A1 (en
Inventor
Cees Jan Nico Buisman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Paques BV
Original Assignee
Paques BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=19858088&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0561889(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Paques BV filed Critical Paques BV
Publication of EP0561889A1 publication Critical patent/EP0561889A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0561889B1 publication Critical patent/EP0561889B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12MAPPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
    • C12M47/00Means for after-treatment of the produced biomass or of the fermentation or metabolic products, e.g. storage of biomass
    • C12M47/18Gas cleaning, e.g. scrubbers; Separation of different gases
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/48Sulfur compounds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/48Sulfur compounds
    • B01D53/50Sulfur oxides
    • B01D53/507Sulfur oxides by treating the gases with other liquids
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/48Sulfur compounds
    • B01D53/52Hydrogen sulfide
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/84Biological processes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01BNON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
    • C01B17/00Sulfur; Compounds thereof
    • C01B17/02Preparation of sulfur; Purification
    • C01B17/04Preparation of sulfur; Purification from gaseous sulfur compounds including gaseous sulfides
    • C01B17/05Preparation of sulfur; Purification from gaseous sulfur compounds including gaseous sulfides by wet processes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/34Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage characterised by the microorganisms used
    • C02F3/345Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage characterised by the microorganisms used for biological oxidation or reduction of sulfur compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12MAPPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
    • C12M21/00Bioreactors or fermenters specially adapted for specific uses
    • C12M21/04Bioreactors or fermenters specially adapted for specific uses for producing gas, e.g. biogas
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A50/00TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE in human health protection, e.g. against extreme weather
    • Y02A50/20Air quality improvement or preservation, e.g. vehicle emission control or emission reduction by using catalytic converters
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02CCAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
    • Y02C20/00Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
    • Y02C20/40Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of CO2
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E50/00Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
    • Y02E50/30Fuel from waste, e.g. synthetic alcohol or diesel
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S423/00Chemistry of inorganic compounds
    • Y10S423/09Reaction techniques
    • Y10S423/17Microbiological reactions

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a process for the removal of sulphur compounds from a gas flow, in particular from biogas, wherein the gas is washed with an aqueous washing liquid and the spent washing liquid is treated with oxygen and is subsequently reused as a washing liquid.
  • H2S Hydrogen sulphide
  • Sulphur dioxide is another noxious sulphur compound that is present in gas flows resulting from the combustion of fossil fuels.
  • Other harmful sulphur compounds that may be present in gas flows include sulphur trioxide, carbon disulfide, lower alkyl mercaptans etc. Gaseous effluents containing these sulphur compounds must therefore be purified, before they can be discharged into the atmosphere.
  • a process for removal of H2S from a gas flow by scrubbing with a washing liquid and subsequently oxidising the absorbed sulphide is known from European patent application EP-A-0 229,587. According to that process, sulphide absorbed in the washing liquid is oxidised non-biologically, in the presence of a catalyst, to products including elemental sulphur which is separated from the system.
  • loss of catalyst occurs in such a process, which is an environmental drawback and which increases costs.
  • the known process is also relatively expensive because oxidation takes place using pressure.
  • a process frequently used is washing biogas with an aqueous liquid having an increased pH, typically a pH of about 11. This increased pH may be adjusted by the addition of sodium hydroxide or other alkalis.
  • Such processes are known for example from European patent application EP-A-0 229,587.
  • a drawback of scrubbers of this type is their high consumption of chemicals, resulting in relatively high operational costs.
  • the price of sodium hydroxide has been increasing strongly recently as a result of a reduced production of chlorine. For many industries, savings in sodium hydroxide will therefore become important.
  • Another disadvantage of this process is that it results in an aqueous effluent contaminated with sulphide. According to NL-A-8801009 spent washing liquid from H2S removal from gases can be regenerated by subjecting it to sulphur-oxidising bacteria in the presence of oxygen.
  • Another method consists in mixing the biogas with air or oxygen and then conveying it into an oxidation reactor, wherein the sulphide is converted to sulphur, as is known from European patent application EP-A-0 224,889.
  • a drawback of this method is that the reactor becomes rather expensive, because the mixture of biogas and oxygen is explosive, requiring safety precautions.
  • the reactor should also be rather large because the conversion rate is strongly reduced by the low concentration of oxygen which is allowed ion connection with the gas effluent requirements (explosion standards).
  • the invention provides an integrated process for the removal of sulphur compounds, such as H2S and SO2, from gaseous effluents, wherein chemical scrubbing and biological oxidation are combined.
  • the process results in an effective purification without the need to continuously add alkali or other chemicals to the washing liquid or to add oxygen to the gas flow and without danger of explosion.
  • the first step of the process according to the invention consists in contacting the gaseous effluent with an aqueous washing liquid. This step can be perfomed in a gas scrubber which ensures an effective contact between the gas flow and the washing liquid.
  • the washing liquid is buffered at a pH between 6.0 and 9.0, depending on the nature of the gas flow to be treated and especially on the nature of the sulphur compounds to be removed.
  • the buffering compounds must be tolerated by the bacteria present in the oxidation reactor.
  • Preferred buffering compounds are carbonates, bicarbonates, phosphates and mixtures thereof, especially sodium carbonate and/or sodium bicarbonate.
  • the concentration of the buffering compounds depends on the nature of the gas flow, and is generally adjusted to a value within the range of 20 to 2000 meq/l. When sodium carbonate is the buffering compound, its concentration is preferably adjusted to about 1 to 70 g/l. Where in this specification reference is made to bicarbonate and carbonate concentrations, these are expressed as the concentration by weight of HCO3 ⁇ and CO3 ⁇ ions respectively.
  • buffering compounds can be done after the washing liquid has left the gas scrubber, but also before it is fed into the scrubber.
  • the buffering compound can advantageously be added in the form of carbon dioxide, for example in the gas scrubbing step, when the gaseous effluent contains high levels of carbon dioxide.
  • Known autotrophic aerobic cultures such as cultures of the genera Thiobacillus and Thiomicrospira , can be used as bacteria oxidising sulphide to elemental sulphur (herein referred to as sulphide-oxidising bacteria) in the treatment of spent washing liquid in the presence of oxygen in step c).
  • the amount of oxygen fed into the washing liquid in the oxidation reactor is adjusted in such a way that the oxidation of the absorbed sulphide predominantly leads to the production of elemental sulphur.
  • Such a process for the controlled oxidation of sulphur-containing waste water is described in the mentioned patent application NL-A-8801009.
  • the production of sulphur in the oxidation reactor will result in a sulphur slurry which is drawn off.
  • the sulphur from this slurry is separated and processed by drying and optionally pruifying, and utilised.
  • the sulphur concentration in the washing liquid is generally kept between 0.1 and 50 g/l, preferably between 1 and 50, and more preferably between 10 and 50 g/l (1-5 % by weight).
  • the sulphur separation rate is adjusted such that the washing liquid is recycled to the largest extent possible.
  • the liquid recovered after processing of the separated sulphur can be returned to the washing liquid.
  • H2S or other reduced volatile sulphur compounds such as lower alkyl meraptans or carbon disulphide
  • the spent washing liquid containing the sulphur compounds can be directly fed into the reactor containing the sulphide-oxidising bacteria.
  • reduced sulphur compounds when dissolved, are referred to herein as "sulphide”, but this term will be understood to include other reduced sulphur species such as dissolved hydrogen sulphide (H2S or HS ⁇ ), disulphide, polysulphides, thiocarbonates, alkanethiolates, etc.
  • the pH in the system is preferably kept at about 8-9, particularly at about 8.5.
  • the pH is lower, the H2S scrubbing efficiency is insufficient, whereas a higher pH inhibits the activity of most of the bacteria.
  • an alkaline washing liquid will be used, or alkali will be added in the initial stage of the process. It was found surprisingly that, after an initial period, no alkali needs to be added any more, in particular when the gas flow also contains carbon dioxide such as in biogas.
  • composition of the washing liquid is determined by:
  • the level of CO2 absorption is much higher than in a scrubber as operated according to the present invention.
  • the total amount of CO2 absorbed depends on the CO2 content of the gas flow, the pH of the scrubbing liquid and the gas flow conducted through the scrubber.
  • the CO2 saturation value i.e. the HCO3 ⁇ and CO3 ⁇ concentration
  • the CO2 saturation value is not reached, because of the high pH and the short contact time between gas and washing liquid.
  • the carbonate and bicarbonate concentrations of the washing liquid will be equal to or close to the saturation level, because of the relatively low pH (and thus the relatively low saturation value, which is about 3-5 g/l for HCO3 ⁇ and about 0.1-0.3 g/l for CO3 ⁇ at pH 8.5) and low gas/liquid flow ratio, and because the system is cyclic.
  • the washing liquid will no longer absorb CO2 and no more or very little alkali will be needed for neutralising the CO2.
  • the CO2 which is stripped in the oxidation step can be replenished in the absorption step.
  • CO2 or (bi)carbonate may be added, preferably to a level of 100-1500, more preferably 200-1200, and most preferably between 400 and 1200 meq/l.
  • sulphide oxidation As a result of the oxidation of sulphide with oxygen the concentration of sulphide in the washing liquid will not increase. The sulphur content in the liquid will increase instead, according to the following reactions, which illustrate why the pH of the washing liquid does not decrease.
  • the sulphide concentration in the spent washing liquid having a pH of about 8.5 will normally be about 80-100 mg/l, expressed as sulphur. This is a lower concentration than the concentration that is obtained in a conventional H2S scrubber operating at a pH of 10 to 11. Therefore, the scrubber will have to be larger than a conventional scrubber and a higher water/gas flow ratio will be used, for example a water flow to gas flow ratio of 0.1 to 0.2.
  • a sulphur concentration of 0.1-50 g/l, in particular 1-50 g/l in the washing liquid improves the removal of H2S from the biogas, while at the same time an effective sulphur separation is ensured.
  • the improved H2S removal results from polysulphide production according to the reaction: HS ⁇ + S n ⁇ HS (n+1) ⁇ which causes the absorption equilibrium to shift towards increased absorption.
  • a sulphide concentration of 90 mg/l in the spent washing liquid at least half of the sulphide will be bound as polysulphide.
  • the present process has the advantage that neutralising agents are not necessary to lower the pH after the scrubber, and therefore no salts are built up in the recirculating washing liquid.
  • gaseous effluent contains appreciable levels of sulphur compounds having higher oxidation states, particularly sulphur dioxide, but also sulphur trioxide or other oxidised sulphur compounds, an additional process step is required to reduce the sulphur compounds to sulphide.
  • sulphite sulphur compounds having higher oxidation states, when dissolved, are referred to herein as "sulphite", but this term will be understood to include other oxidised species such as dissolved sulphur dioxide, hydrogen sulphite (bisulphite), sulphate, thiosulphate, etc.
  • Suitable bacteria for use in the anaerobic reactor to reduce sulphite to sulphide include bacteria reducing sulphur comnpounds (herein reffered to as sulphur-reducing bacteria) such as species of the genera Desulfovibrio , Desulfotomaculum , Desulfomonas , Desulfobulbus , Desulfobacter , Desulfococcus , Desulfonema , Desulfosarcina , Desulfobacterium and Desulfuromas .
  • these bacteria are available from various anaerobic cultures and/or grow spontaneously in the anaerobic reactors.
  • the pH of the washing liquid is preferably maintained at a level of about 6 to 7. This is higher than in conventional SO2 scrubbers in processes wherein the sulphur dioxide is fixed as gypsum, which typically use a pH below 5.8. This increased pH results in a more efficient SO2 scrubbing.
  • the pH may be adjusted by the addition of buffering agents. Preferably, carbonate or bicarbonate is added to a level of 20-100 meq/l, for example about 30 meq/l.
  • the washing liquid may be conducted through the scrubber several times before being regenerated.
  • the (bi)carbonate concentration of the washing liquid is preferably higher, e.g. 50-200 meq/l.
  • the presence of sulphur in the washing liquid was also found to be advantageous. Reaction of sulphur with SO2 (or with HSO3 ⁇ ) results in thiosulphate formation. In the absence of sulphur, SO2 may be further oxidised to sulphate by the oxygen which is often present in combustion gases as well. As sulphate requires more reduction equivalents (electron donor) than thiosulphate does, less electron donor (such as alcohol) is required in the reduction reactor as a result of the presence of sulphur in the washing liquid. In addition, the absorption capacity of the washing liquid is increased by the conversion to thiosulphate.
  • the sulphur level is between 0.1 and 50 g/l, preferably between 1 and 50, and most preferably between 10 and 50 g/l.
  • H2S and other reduced sulphur compounds such as lower alkyl mercaptans
  • Biogas contaminated with H2S (1) enters the scrubber (2) at the bottom and is treated with washing liquid (9).
  • Purified gas (3) leaves the reactor at the top.
  • the washing liquid (10) which is now contaminated with sulphide leaves the reactor at the bottom and is fed into the oxidation reactor (5), where sulphide is converted to sulphur by the bacteria present therein and oxygen.
  • the reactor is supplied with oxygen by an aeration device (4).
  • Spent air (6) will have to be treated in a compost filter (7) because of its stench.
  • the treated air (8) can be discharged without problems.
  • sulphur will result in a sulphur slurry (11) which is partially drawn off.
  • the sulphur (12) from this slurry can be dried and utilised.
  • the separated aqueous solution (13) is recycled as much as possible in order to save nutrients and alkalinity. If necessary, alkali may be added to flow (9).
  • the combustion gas containing SO2 (14) enters the scrubber (2) in a similar way.
  • the washing liquid (15) containing sulphite is fed into the reduction reactor (16) wherein sulphite is converted to sulphide by anaerobic bacteria.
  • a part of the spent washing liquid may be directly returned to the washing liquid (9) by a short-cut (17).
  • the reduced washing liquid (18) is then treated in the oxidation reactor (5) as in the process of figure 1.
  • An electron donor, e.g. alcohol, is added through (19).
  • Fresh carbonate solution may be added through (19) or elsewhere in the cycle.
  • Any gaseous effluent that can be treated with an alkali scrubber can also be purified with the process described herein, provided that the temperature is not too high for the biological activity.
  • the process according to the invention is therefore not restricted to biogas. It can also be used for treating combustion gases and ventilation air; in the latter case a phosphate buffer having a concentration of about 50 g/l is preferred.
  • the oxidation reactor (5) is a "fixed-film” reactor or a "trickling filter” and contains about 6 m3 of carrier material having a surface area of 200 m2/m3.
  • the dimensions of the scrubber (2) are (diameter x height) 0.5 x 2.5 m.
  • the reactor is filled with Bionet 200 rings (NSW company).

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Treating Waste Gases (AREA)
  • Gas Separation By Absorption (AREA)
  • Transition And Organic Metals Composition Catalysts For Addition Polymerization (AREA)

Abstract

PCT No. PCT/NL91/00250 Sec. 371 Date May 26, 1993 Sec. 102(e) Date May 26, 1993 PCT Filed Dec. 4, 1991 PCT Pub. No. WO92/10270 PCT Pub. Date Jun. 25, 1992.A process for the removal of sulphur compounds from a gaseous effluent, comprising the steps of: a) contacting the gaseous effluent with an aqueous solution wherein sulphur compounds are dissolved; b) adjusting the concentration of buffering compounds such as carbonate and/or bicarbonate and/or phosphate in the aqueous solution to a value between 20 and 2000 meq/l; c) subjecting the aqueous solution containing sulphide to sulphide-oxidizing bacteria in the presence of oxygen in a reactor wherein sulphide is oxidized to elemental sulphur; d) separating elemental sulphur from the aqueous solution; and e) recycling the aqueous solution to step a). This process is suitable for removing H2S from biogas, ventilation air etc. It can be used for removing SO2 from combustion gases by introducing the additional step, after step a) and before step c), of subjecting the aqueous solution containing the sulphur compounds to a reduction of the sulphur compounds to sulphide. H2S and SO2 removal is further enhanced by a residual sulphur content in the washing liquid of 1-50 g/l.

Description

  • The invention relates to a process for the removal of sulphur compounds from a gas flow, in particular from biogas, wherein the gas is washed with an aqueous washing liquid and the spent washing liquid is treated with oxygen and is subsequently reused as a washing liquid.
  • Background of the invention
  • The presence of sulphur compounds in gas flows is undesirable, because of their toxicity and their smell. Hydrogen sulphide (H₂S) is a harmful compound that is frequently present in gas flows, especially in biogas originating from anaerobic waste treatment. Sulphur dioxide is another noxious sulphur compound that is present in gas flows resulting from the combustion of fossil fuels. Other harmful sulphur compounds that may be present in gas flows include sulphur trioxide, carbon disulfide, lower alkyl mercaptans etc. Gaseous effluents containing these sulphur compounds must therefore be purified, before they can be discharged into the atmosphere.
  • A process for removal of H₂S from a gas flow by scrubbing with a washing liquid and subsequently oxidising the absorbed sulphide is known from European patent application EP-A-0 229,587. According to that process, sulphide absorbed in the washing liquid is oxidised non-biologically, in the presence of a catalyst, to products including elemental sulphur which is separated from the system. However, loss of catalyst occurs in such a process, which is an environmental drawback and which increases costs. The known process is also relatively expensive because oxidation takes place using pressure.
  • A process frequently used is washing biogas with an aqueous liquid having an increased pH, typically a pH of about 11. This increased pH may be adjusted by the addition of sodium hydroxide or other alkalis. Such processes are known for example from European patent application EP-A-0 229,587. A drawback of scrubbers of this type is their high consumption of chemicals, resulting in relatively high operational costs. The price of sodium hydroxide has been increasing strongly recently as a result of a reduced production of chlorine. For many industries, savings in sodium hydroxide will therefore become important. Another disadvantage of this process is that it results in an aqueous effluent contaminated with sulphide. According to NL-A-8801009 spent washing liquid from H₂S removal from gases can be regenerated by subjecting it to sulphur-oxidising bacteria in the presence of oxygen.
  • Another method consists in mixing the biogas with air or oxygen and then conveying it into an oxidation reactor, wherein the sulphide is converted to sulphur, as is known from European patent application EP-A-0 224,889. A drawback of this method is that the reactor becomes rather expensive, because the mixture of biogas and oxygen is explosive, requiring safety precautions. The reactor should also be rather large because the conversion rate is strongly reduced by the low concentration of oxygen which is allowed ion connection with the gas effluent requirements (explosion standards).
  • Known processes for the removal of sulphur dioxide from gaseous effluents involve washing the gas flow with an acidic aqueous washing liquid having a pH which is typically below 5.8. The dissolved SO₂ is usually oxidised and separated as calcium sulphate (gypsum).
  • Summary of the invention
  • The invention provides an integrated process for the removal of sulphur compounds, such as H₂S and SO₂, from gaseous effluents, wherein chemical scrubbing and biological oxidation are combined. The process results in an effective purification without the need to continuously add alkali or other chemicals to the washing liquid or to add oxygen to the gas flow and without danger of explosion.
  • In the process of the invention the following steps are carried out:
    • a) contacting the gaseous effluent with an aqueous solution wherein sulphur compounds are dissolved;
    • b) adjusting the concentration of buffering compounds such as carbonate and/or bicarbonate and/or phosphate in the aqueous solution to a value between 20 and 2000 meq/l and adjusting the pH of the aqueous solution to between 6 and 9 throughout the process;
    • c) subjecting the aqueous solution containing sulphide to sulphide-oxidising bacteria in the presence of oxygen in a reactor wherein sulphide is oxidised to elemental sulphur and hydroxide;
    • d) separating elemental sulphur form the aqueous solution; and causing the aqueous solution to contain 0.1 - 50 g of elemental sulphur per liter; and
    • e) recycling the aqueous solution to step a).
    When the gaseous effluent contains appreciable levels of oxidised sulphur compounds, in particular sulphur dioxide, the process comprises, after or before step b), the additional step of subjecting the aqueous solution containing the sulphur compounds to a reduction of the sulphur compounds to sulphide. Description of the invention
  • The first step of the process according to the invention consists in contacting the gaseous effluent with an aqueous washing liquid. This step can be perfomed in a gas scrubber which ensures an effective contact between the gas flow and the washing liquid.
  • An important feature of the present process is that the washing liquid is buffered at a pH between 6.0 and 9.0, depending on the nature of the gas flow to be treated and especially on the nature of the sulphur compounds to be removed. The buffering compounds must be tolerated by the bacteria present in the oxidation reactor. Preferred buffering compounds are carbonates, bicarbonates, phosphates and mixtures thereof, especially sodium carbonate and/or sodium bicarbonate. The concentration of the buffering compounds depends on the nature of the gas flow, and is generally adjusted to a value within the range of 20 to 2000 meq/l. When sodium carbonate is the buffering compound, its concentration is preferably adjusted to about 1 to 70 g/l. Where in this specification reference is made to bicarbonate and carbonate concentrations, these are expressed as the concentration by weight of HCO₃⁻ and CO3⁻⁻ ions respectively.
  • Addition of buffering compounds can be done after the washing liquid has left the gas scrubber, but also before it is fed into the scrubber. In case of carbonate/bicarbonate, the buffering compound can advantageously be added in the form of carbon dioxide, for example in the gas scrubbing step, when the gaseous effluent contains high levels of carbon dioxide.
  • Known autotrophic aerobic cultures, such as cultures of the genera Thiobacillus and Thiomicrospira, can be used as bacteria oxidising sulphide to elemental sulphur (herein referred to as sulphide-oxidising bacteria) in the treatment of spent washing liquid in the presence of oxygen in step c).
  • The amount of oxygen fed into the washing liquid in the oxidation reactor is adjusted in such a way that the oxidation of the absorbed sulphide predominantly leads to the production of elemental sulphur. Such a process for the controlled oxidation of sulphur-containing waste water is described in the mentioned patent application NL-A-8801009.
  • The production of sulphur in the oxidation reactor will result in a sulphur slurry which is drawn off. The sulphur from this slurry is separated and processed by drying and optionally pruifying, and utilised.
  • It has been found to be advantageous when not all sulphur is drawn off, and thus the separation is carried out discontinuously or partially, resulting in a washing liquid still containing sulphur. The sulphur concentration in the washing liquid is generally kept between 0.1 and 50 g/l, preferably between 1 and 50, and more preferably between 10 and 50 g/l (1-5 % by weight). In particular, the sulphur separation rate is adjusted such that the washing liquid is recycled to the largest extent possible. The liquid recovered after processing of the separated sulphur can be returned to the washing liquid.
  • The advantages of the present process are:
    • 1. there is hardly any need for chemicals (sodium hydroxide);
    • 2. no catalyst is needed;
    • 3. the required equipment is simple;
    • 4. energy consumption is low;
    • 5. no CO₂ is absorbed (after equilibrium has been established);
    • 6. no waste effluent results, the sulphur may be sold.
  • Experiments have shown that the high (bi)carbonate concentrations do not negatively affect the bacterial activity.
  • Removal of hydrogen sulphide
  • When H₂S or other reduced volatile sulphur compounds such as lower alkyl meraptans or carbon disulphide, have to be removed, e.g. from biogas, the spent washing liquid containing the sulphur compounds can be directly fed into the reactor containing the sulphide-oxidising bacteria. These reduced sulphur compounds, when dissolved, are referred to herein as "sulphide", but this term will be understood to include other reduced sulphur species such as dissolved hydrogen sulphide (H₂S or HS⁻), disulphide, polysulphides, thiocarbonates, alkanethiolates, etc.
  • The pH in the system is preferably kept at about 8-9, particularly at about 8.5. When the pH is lower, the H₂S scrubbing efficiency is insufficient, whereas a higher pH inhibits the activity of most of the bacteria. At the start of the process according to the invention, an alkaline washing liquid will be used, or alkali will be added in the initial stage of the process. It was found surprisingly that, after an initial period, no alkali needs to be added any more, in particular when the gas flow also contains carbon dioxide such as in biogas.
  • The composition of the washing liquid is determined by:
    • 1. the pH
    • 2. the oxidation of sulphide
       As to the pH:
       CO₂ which is present in the (bio)gas will also partially be absorbed in the washing liquid. As a result of the recycling of the washing liquid a carbon dioxide equilibrium will be established according to the following reactions:



            H₂O + CO₂ ⇄ H₂CO₃ ⇄ HCO₃⁻ + H⁺ ⇄ CO₃⁻⁻ + 2H⁺



       The concentration of the dissolved carbonates produced depends of course on the CO₂ concentration in the gas to be purified. The carbonate concentration is about 4-70 g/l, when the CO₂ concentration in the gas is between 10 and 20%. The process is found to operate particularly effectively at such concentrations. A carbonate concentration of more than 70 g/l is not suitable, since it will adversely affect the activity of the bacteria in the oxidation reactor.
  • In a conventional scrubber absorbing H₂S and CO₂ at high pH, the level of CO₂ absorption is much higher than in a scrubber as operated according to the present invention. The total amount of CO₂ absorbed depends on the CO₂ content of the gas flow, the pH of the scrubbing liquid and the gas flow conducted through the scrubber. In a conventionally operated scrubber the CO₂ saturation value (i.e. the HCO₃⁻ and CO₃⁻⁻ concentration) is not reached, because of the high pH and the short contact time between gas and washing liquid. In the present process however, the carbonate and bicarbonate concentrations of the washing liquid will be equal to or close to the saturation level, because of the relatively low pH (and thus the relatively low saturation value, which is about 3-5 g/l for HCO₃⁻ and about 0.1-0.3 g/l for CO₃⁻⁻ at pH 8.5) and low gas/liquid flow ratio, and because the system is cyclic.
  • After an equilibrium has thus been established, the washing liquid will no longer absorb CO₂ and no more or very little alkali will be needed for neutralising the CO₂. The CO₂ which is stripped in the oxidation step can be replenished in the absorption step.
  • When the CO₂ content in the gas is lower, CO₂ or (bi)carbonate may be added, preferably to a level of 100-1500, more preferably 200-1200, and most preferably between 400 and 1200 meq/l.
  • As to sulphide oxidation:
       As a result of the oxidation of sulphide with oxygen the concentration of sulphide in the washing liquid will not increase. The sulphur content in the liquid will increase instead, according to the following reactions, which illustrate why the pH of the washing liquid does not decrease.
    Figure imgb0001

       The sulphide concentration in the spent washing liquid having a pH of about 8.5 will normally be about 80-100 mg/l, expressed as sulphur. This is a lower concentration than the concentration that is obtained in a conventional H₂S scrubber operating at a pH of 10 to 11. Therefore, the scrubber will have to be larger than a conventional scrubber and a higher water/gas flow ratio will be used, for example a water flow to gas flow ratio of 0.1 to 0.2.
  • It was found that a sulphur concentration of 0.1-50 g/l, in particular 1-50 g/l in the washing liquid improves the removal of H₂S from the biogas, while at the same time an effective sulphur separation is ensured. The improved H₂S removal results from polysulphide production according to the reaction: HS⁻ + Sn → HS(n+1)
    which causes the absorption equilibrium to shift towards increased absorption. At a sulphide concentration of 90 mg/l in the spent washing liquid, at least half of the sulphide will be bound as polysulphide.
  • The present process has the advantage that neutralising agents are not necessary to lower the pH after the scrubber, and therefore no salts are built up in the recirculating washing liquid.
  • Removal of sulphur dioxide
  • When the gaseous effluent contains appreciable levels of sulphur compounds having higher oxidation states, particularly sulphur dioxide, but also sulphur trioxide or other oxidised sulphur compounds, an additional process step is required to reduce the sulphur compounds to sulphide.
  • These sulphur compounds having higher oxidation states, when dissolved, are referred to herein as "sulphite", but this term will be understood to include other oxidised species such as dissolved sulphur dioxide, hydrogen sulphite (bisulphite), sulphate, thiosulphate, etc.
  • Reduction of sulphite to sulphide can be performed by chemical means, but preferably a biological reduction is carried out using an anaerobic reactor. Suitable bacteria for use in the anaerobic reactor to reduce sulphite to sulphide include bacteria reducing sulphur comnpounds (herein reffered to as sulphur-reducing bacteria) such as species of the genera Desulfovibrio, Desulfotomaculum, Desulfomonas, Desulfobulbus, Desulfobacter, Desulfococcus, Desulfonema, Desulfosarcina, Desulfobacterium and Desulfuromas. In general, these bacteria are available from various anaerobic cultures and/or grow spontaneously in the anaerobic reactors.
  • The pH of the washing liquid is preferably maintained at a level of about 6 to 7. This is higher than in conventional SO₂ scrubbers in processes wherein the sulphur dioxide is fixed as gypsum, which typically use a pH below 5.8. This increased pH results in a more efficient SO₂ scrubbing. The pH may be adjusted by the addition of buffering agents. Preferably, carbonate or bicarbonate is added to a level of 20-100 meq/l, for example about 30 meq/l.
  • The washing liquid may be conducted through the scrubber several times before being regenerated. In such a process, the (bi)carbonate concentration of the washing liquid is preferably higher, e.g. 50-200 meq/l.
  • When SO₂ is removed from gaseous effluents, the presence of sulphur in the washing liquid was also found to be advantageous. Reaction of sulphur with SO₂ (or with HSO₃⁻) results in thiosulphate formation. In the absence of sulphur, SO₂ may be further oxidised to sulphate by the oxygen which is often present in combustion gases as well. As sulphate requires more reduction equivalents (electron donor) than thiosulphate does, less electron donor (such as alcohol) is required in the reduction reactor as a result of the presence of sulphur in the washing liquid. In addition, the absorption capacity of the washing liquid is increased by the conversion to thiosulphate. The sulphur level is between 0.1 and 50 g/l, preferably between 1 and 50, and most preferably between 10 and 50 g/l.
  • Description of the figures
  • The process for removing H₂S and other reduced sulphur compounds such as lower alkyl mercaptans is illustrated with reference to figure 1. Biogas contaminated with H₂S (1) enters the scrubber (2) at the bottom and is treated with washing liquid (9). Purified gas (3) leaves the reactor at the top. The washing liquid (10) which is now contaminated with sulphide leaves the reactor at the bottom and is fed into the oxidation reactor (5), where sulphide is converted to sulphur by the bacteria present therein and oxygen. The reactor is supplied with oxygen by an aeration device (4). Spent air (6) will have to be treated in a compost filter (7) because of its stench. The treated air (8) can be discharged without problems. The production of sulphur will result in a sulphur slurry (11) which is partially drawn off. The sulphur (12) from this slurry can be dried and utilised. The separated aqueous solution (13) is recycled as much as possible in order to save nutrients and alkalinity. If necessary, alkali may be added to flow (9).
  • The process for removing SO₂ and other oxidised sulphur compounds is ilustrated with reference to figure 2.
  • The combustion gas containing SO₂ (14) enters the scrubber (2) in a similar way. The washing liquid (15) containing sulphite is fed into the reduction reactor (16) wherein sulphite is converted to sulphide by anaerobic bacteria. A part of the spent washing liquid may be directly returned to the washing liquid (9) by a short-cut (17). The reduced washing liquid (18) is then treated in the oxidation reactor (5) as in the process of figure 1. An electron donor, e.g. alcohol, is added through (19). Fresh carbonate solution may be added through (19) or elsewhere in the cycle.
  • Any gaseous effluent that can be treated with an alkali scrubber can also be purified with the process described herein, provided that the temperature is not too high for the biological activity. The process according to the invention is therefore not restricted to biogas. It can also be used for treating combustion gases and ventilation air; in the latter case a phosphate buffer having a concentration of about 50 g/l is preferred.
  • Example
  • An operating example for H₂S removal is presented in Table A; numbers in the table correspond with the numbers in the accompanying figure 1.
  • The oxidation reactor (5) is a "fixed-film" reactor or a "trickling filter" and contains about 6 m³ of carrier material having a surface area of 200 m²/m³. The dimensions of the scrubber (2) are (diameter x height) 0.5 x 2.5 m. The reactor is filled with Bionet 200 rings (NSW company). TABLE A
    flow
    1 concentration H₂S 0,8 - 1,0 %
    1 concentration CH₄ 79 %
    1 concentration CO₂ 20 %
    1 flow rate 200 m³/h
    3 concentration H₂S 150 ppm
    3 concentration CH₄ 79 %
    3 concentration CO₂ 20 %
    3 flow rate 200 m³/h
    10 sulphide concentration 89 mg/l
    10 bicarbonate concentration 7 g/l
    10 sulphur concentration 3 %
    10 pH 8.2
    10 flow rate 30 m³/h
    9 sulphide concentration < 5 mg/l
    9 sulphur concentration ca 3 %
    9 pH 8.4
    9 flow rate 30 m³/h

Claims (10)

  1. Process for the removal of sulphur compounds from a gaseous effluent, comprising the steps of:
    a) contacting the gaseous effluent with an aqueous solution wherein sulphur compounds are dissolved;
    c) subjecting the aqueous solution containing sulphide to sulphide-oxidising bacteria in the presence of oxygen in a reactor wherein sulphide is oxidised to elemental sulphur;
    d) separating elemental sulphur form the aqueous solution; and
    e) recycling the aqueous solution to step a);
    characterised in that it further comprises the step of:
    b) adjusting the concentration of buffering compounds such as carbonate and/or bicarbonate and/or phosphate in the aqueous solution to a value between 20 and 2000 meq/l and adjusting the pH of the aqueous solution to between 6 and 9 throughout the process; and
    after step d) causing the aqueous solution to contain 0.1-50 g of elemental sulphur per l.
  2. Process of Claim 1, wherein the gaseous effluent in step a) contains hydrogen sulphide and the concentration of buffering compounds in step b) is adjusted to a value between 100 and 1500 meq/l.
  3. Process of Claim 2, wherein in step b) the buffering compounds comprise carbonate and/or bicarbonate the concentration of which is adjusted to a value between 200 and 1200 meq/l.
  4. Process according to any of claims 1-3, wherein the pH of the aqueous solution is adjusted to between 8 and 9.
  5. Process according to claim 1, wherein the gaseous effluent in step a) contains sulphur dioxide, comprising, after step a) and before step c), the additional step of subjecting the aqueous solution containing the sulphur compounds to a reduction of the sulphur compounds to sulphide.
  6. Process according to claim 5, wherein the reduction is performed using bacteria reducing sulphur compounds.
  7. Process according to claim 5 or 6, wherein the concentration of buffering compounds is adjusted to a value between 20 and 200 meq/l.
  8. Process according to any of claims 1-7, wherein in step a) the gaseous effluent contains carbon dioxide.
  9. Process according to any of claims 1-8, wherein after step d) the aqueous solution is caused to contain 1-50 g of elemental sulphur per l.
  10. Process according to claim 9, wherein in step e) the aqueous solution contains 10-50 g of elemental sulphur per l.
EP92900559A 1990-12-04 1991-12-04 Process for the removal of sulphur compounds from gases Expired - Lifetime EP0561889B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL9002661A NL9002661A (en) 1990-12-04 1990-12-04 PROCESS FOR THE REMOVAL OF H2S FROM GAS.
NL9002661 1990-12-04
PCT/NL1991/000250 WO1992010270A1 (en) 1990-12-04 1991-12-04 Process for the removal of sulphur compounds from gases

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0561889A1 EP0561889A1 (en) 1993-09-29
EP0561889B1 true EP0561889B1 (en) 1994-11-02

Family

ID=19858088

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP92900559A Expired - Lifetime EP0561889B1 (en) 1990-12-04 1991-12-04 Process for the removal of sulphur compounds from gases

Country Status (22)

Country Link
US (1) US5354545A (en)
EP (1) EP0561889B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH0775655B2 (en)
KR (1) KR960010378B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE113497T1 (en)
AU (1) AU648129B2 (en)
BG (1) BG61069B1 (en)
BR (1) BR9107117A (en)
CA (1) CA2096660C (en)
CZ (1) CZ285699B6 (en)
DE (1) DE69104997T2 (en)
DK (1) DK0561889T3 (en)
EE (1) EE02976B1 (en)
ES (1) ES2062883T3 (en)
FI (1) FI109525B (en)
HU (1) HU212908B (en)
NL (1) NL9002661A (en)
NO (1) NO180325C (en)
PL (1) PL168365B1 (en)
RU (1) RU2089267C1 (en)
UA (1) UA27039C2 (en)
WO (1) WO1992010270A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9764966B2 (en) 2012-12-24 2017-09-19 Paques I.P. B.V. Hydrogen sulfide removal from anaerobic treatment

Families Citing this family (72)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU2108982C1 (en) * 1992-05-26 1998-04-20 Паквес Б.В. Method for recovering sulphur compounds from water (alternatives) and method for cleaning sulphur-laden flue gases
NL9301000A (en) * 1993-06-10 1995-01-02 Pacques Bv Method for the purification of waste water containing sulphide.
DE69407905T2 (en) * 1993-09-20 1998-04-30 Babcock & Wilcox Co Flue gas desulfurization with biological regeneration
AUPM301993A0 (en) * 1993-12-17 1994-01-20 Microsystem Controls Pty Ltd Coin validator
US5480550A (en) * 1994-05-05 1996-01-02 Abb Environmental Services, Inc. Biotreatment process for caustics containing inorganic sulfides
US5501185A (en) * 1995-01-06 1996-03-26 Kohler Co. Biogas-driven generator set
NL9500577A (en) * 1995-03-24 1996-11-01 Pacques Bv Method for cleaning gases.
US5785888A (en) * 1995-03-24 1998-07-28 Milmac Operating Company Method for removal of sulfur dioxide
CA2253936C (en) * 1996-05-10 2006-01-31 Paques Bio Systems B.V. Process for the purification of gases containing hydrogen sulphide
US6287873B2 (en) 1996-05-20 2001-09-11 Arctech Inc. Microbiological desulfurization of sulfur containing gases
US5981266A (en) * 1996-05-20 1999-11-09 Gas Research Institute Microbial process for the mitigation of sulfur compounds from natural gas
EP0845288A1 (en) * 1996-11-27 1998-06-03 Thiopaq Sulfur Systems B.V. Process for biological removal of sulphide
NL1006339C2 (en) * 1997-06-17 1998-12-21 Stork Eng & Contractors Bv Process for desulfurizing waste gases.
NL1008407C2 (en) * 1998-02-25 1999-08-26 Hoogovens Tech Services Gas scrubbing process using an anaerobic reactor to remove sulfur dioxide from the scrubber liquid
US6306288B1 (en) 1998-04-17 2001-10-23 Uop Llc Process for removing sulfur compounds from hydrocarbon streams
US6287365B1 (en) 1999-01-13 2001-09-11 Uop Llc Sulfur production process
US6120581A (en) * 1999-01-13 2000-09-19 Uop Llc Sulfur production process
US6245553B1 (en) 1999-08-05 2001-06-12 Gene E. Keyser Method and apparatus for limiting emissions from a contained vessel
EP1127850A1 (en) * 2000-02-25 2001-08-29 Nederlandse Organisatie Voor Toegepast-Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek Tno Removal of sulfur compounds from wastewater
US6521201B1 (en) 2001-02-14 2003-02-18 Uop Llc Process for recovery of high purity hydrophilic sulfur
DE10119991A1 (en) * 2001-04-23 2002-10-24 Stephan Pieper Purification of biogas containing hydrogen sulfide and ammonia, removes hydrogen sulfide at least partially by absorption into alkaline wash solution
AT411332B (en) * 2002-04-04 2003-12-29 Profactor Produktionsforschung Plant separating hydrogen sulfide from biogas using microorganisms, for use in fuel cells, mixes process fluid with oxidant in reactor
EP1560801B1 (en) 2002-11-14 2007-05-16 Shell Internationale Researchmaatschappij B.V. A process for the manufacture of sulphur-containing ammonium phosphate fertilizers
US7588627B2 (en) * 2003-04-17 2009-09-15 Shell Oil Company Process for the removal of H2S and mercaptans from a gas stream
DE10340049A1 (en) * 2003-08-28 2005-03-24 Micropro Gmbh Microbial process and plant for the purification of gases
WO2005044742A1 (en) * 2003-11-11 2005-05-19 Paques B.V. Process for the biological treatment of sulphur salts
AR046755A1 (en) 2003-12-10 2005-12-21 Shell Int Research SULFUR PELLET INCLUDING A H2S SUPPRESSOR
EP1720798A2 (en) * 2004-03-03 2006-11-15 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. A process for the high recovery efficiency of sulfur from an acid gas stream
BRPI0508284A (en) * 2004-03-03 2007-08-07 Shell Intenationale Res Mij B sulfur recovery process
MY140997A (en) 2004-07-22 2010-02-12 Shell Int Research Process for the removal of cos from a synthesis gas stream comprising h2s and cos
AU2005278126B2 (en) 2004-08-06 2010-08-19 General Electric Technology Gmbh Ultra cleaning of combustion gas including the removal of CO2
CN100360212C (en) * 2005-07-21 2008-01-09 四川大学 Waste gas control method by removing sulfur dioxide for resource utilization
EA200801713A1 (en) 2006-01-18 2008-12-30 Шелл Интернэшнл Рисерч Маатсхаппий Б.В. METHOD FOR REMOVING CARBONESULFIDE AND HYDROGEN FROM A SYNTHESIS GAS FLOW
DE102006005066B3 (en) * 2006-02-03 2007-10-18 Perske, Günter Apparatus and method for producing biogas from organic matter
US7531159B2 (en) 2006-07-26 2009-05-12 National Tank Company Method for extracting H2S from sour gas
EP2118657B1 (en) * 2006-12-29 2014-05-21 Abbott Laboratories Non-denaturing lysis reagent for use with capture-in-solution immunoassay
US20080190844A1 (en) * 2007-02-13 2008-08-14 Richard Alan Haase Methods, processes and apparatus for biological purification of a gas, liquid or solid; and hydrocarbon fuel from said processes
CN101801500A (en) 2007-09-10 2010-08-11 国际壳牌研究有限公司 Process for producing purified synthesis gas from synthesis gas comprising trace amounts of sulphur contaminants with a metal-organic framework
US8182577B2 (en) 2007-10-22 2012-05-22 Alstom Technology Ltd Multi-stage CO2 removal system and method for processing a flue gas stream
US7862788B2 (en) 2007-12-05 2011-01-04 Alstom Technology Ltd Promoter enhanced chilled ammonia based system and method for removal of CO2 from flue gas stream
ES2325758B1 (en) * 2008-03-14 2010-06-24 Endesa Generacion, S.A GAS CAPTURE IN LIQUID PHASE.
US7846240B2 (en) 2008-10-02 2010-12-07 Alstom Technology Ltd Chilled ammonia based CO2 capture system with water wash system
US8404027B2 (en) 2008-11-04 2013-03-26 Alstom Technology Ltd Reabsorber for ammonia stripper offgas
EP2208521A3 (en) * 2009-01-15 2010-10-13 Universität Duisburg-Essen Method and assembly for processing process water
US8292989B2 (en) 2009-10-30 2012-10-23 Alstom Technology Ltd Gas stream processing
AU2010230280B2 (en) * 2009-03-30 2013-08-29 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Process for producing a purified synthesis gas stream
CN101637697B (en) * 2009-08-03 2012-01-11 庞金钊 Biological desulfurization method of smoke
US8293200B2 (en) 2009-12-17 2012-10-23 Alstom Technology Ltd Desulfurization of, and removal of carbon dioxide from, gas mixtures
EP2386648A1 (en) * 2010-05-10 2011-11-16 Solvay SA Process for producing biogas
CN102371109A (en) * 2010-08-23 2012-03-14 北京思践通科技发展有限公司 Method for removing sulfur from gas containing reductive sulfur
US8329128B2 (en) 2011-02-01 2012-12-11 Alstom Technology Ltd Gas treatment process and system
DE102011007653A1 (en) 2011-04-19 2012-02-02 Voith Patent Gmbh Purification of biogas of hydrogen sulfide, comprises removing washing phase impurities e.g. hydrogen sulfide from gas phase of biogas in scrubber using washing medium, and supplying washing medium containing sulfides to aerobic reactor
US8568512B2 (en) * 2011-04-29 2013-10-29 A.R.C. Technologies Corporation Method and system for methane separation and purification from a biogas
ES2372509B1 (en) * 2011-10-18 2012-10-30 Biogás Fuel Cell, S.A. SYSTEM OF SIMULTANEOUS DEPURATION OF BIOGAS AND INDUSTRIAL RESIDUAL EFFLUENTS THROUGH MICROALGAS AND BACTERIA.
US9162177B2 (en) 2012-01-25 2015-10-20 Alstom Technology Ltd Ammonia capturing by CO2 product liquid in water wash liquid
US9447996B2 (en) 2013-01-15 2016-09-20 General Electric Technology Gmbh Carbon dioxide removal system using absorption refrigeration
PE20160725A1 (en) * 2013-09-26 2016-08-05 Paques Ip Bv A PROCESS TO REMOVE SULFIDE FROM AN AQUEOUS SOLUTION
US8986640B1 (en) 2014-01-07 2015-03-24 Alstom Technology Ltd System and method for recovering ammonia from a chilled ammonia process
AU2015212801B2 (en) * 2014-02-03 2018-12-06 Paqell B.V. A process for the biological conversion of bisulphide into elemental sulphur
EP2944367A1 (en) 2014-05-16 2015-11-18 Shell International Research Maatschappij B.V. Process for reducing the total sulphur content of a gas stream
US20170173531A1 (en) * 2014-07-17 2017-06-22 Dcl International Inc. Methods and systems for total organic carbon removal
EP3034157A1 (en) * 2015-02-19 2016-06-22 Paqell B.V. Process for treating a hydrogen sulphide and mercaptans comprising gas
FR3045663B1 (en) * 2015-12-22 2019-07-19 Biogaz Pevele METHANIZATION UNIT EQUIPPED WITH A "U" -shaped LINEAR DIGESTER WITH INTERNAL THERMAL EXCHANGER
CN111542662A (en) 2017-12-29 2020-08-14 维美德技术有限公司 Method and system for adjusting S/Na balance of pulp mill
WO2019229167A1 (en) 2018-06-01 2019-12-05 Paqell B.V. Process to convert a sulphur compound
BR112021000947A2 (en) * 2018-07-19 2021-04-20 Stora Enso Oyj process for the treatment of industrial alkaline currents
KR20210137497A (en) * 2019-03-21 2021-11-17 바스프 에스이 Method for purification of alkanes
DE102019004689B4 (en) * 2019-07-03 2022-04-21 Verbio Vereinigte Bioenergie Ag Process for the recovery of molten sulfur from a gas stream containing hydrogen sulfide
DE102019004693B4 (en) * 2019-07-03 2022-04-21 Verbio Vereinigte Bioenergie Ag Process for the recovery of molten sulfur from a gas stream containing hydrogen sulfide
CN112428379B (en) * 2020-11-13 2022-04-08 山东唐唐家居有限公司 Multi-layer molded door panel molding device and process thereof
EP4359112A1 (en) 2021-06-21 2024-05-01 Paques I.P. B.V. A process to continuously treat a hydrogen sulphide comprising gas and sulphur reclaiming facilities
CN116904240B (en) * 2023-09-13 2023-11-28 山西德远净能环境科技股份有限公司 Separation equipment for efficiently removing hydrogen sulfide

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE81347C (en) *
NL25204C (en) *
US2138214A (en) * 1935-07-08 1938-11-29 Standard Oil Co California Process for the production of precipitated sulphur
BE786389A (en) * 1971-07-20 1973-01-18 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR THE ELIMINATION OF SULFUR DIOXIDE CONTAINED IN INDUSTRIAL GAS
CA1004028A (en) * 1972-02-29 1977-01-25 The Mead Corporation Sulfur recovery system
DE2547675B2 (en) * 1975-10-24 1978-06-01 Daimler-Benz Ag, 7000 Stuttgart Process for the wet cleaning of polluted exhaust air
JPS5348094A (en) * 1976-10-15 1978-05-01 Ebara Corp Removing method for hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide
GB1557295A (en) * 1977-07-19 1979-12-05 Davy Powergas Ltd Removal of sulphur dioxide from gas
SU711142A1 (en) * 1978-04-27 1980-01-25 Государственный научно-исследовательский институт цветных металлов "Гинцветмет" Method of processing sulfur-sulfide material
US4242448A (en) * 1979-04-12 1980-12-30 Brown Robert S Iii Regeneration of scrubber effluent containing sulfate radicals
US4579727A (en) * 1984-12-04 1986-04-01 The M. W. Kellogg Company Oxidative removal of hydrogen sulfide from gas streams
NL8801009A (en) * 1988-04-19 1989-11-16 Rijkslandbouwuniversiteit Oxidative biological removal of sulphide from waste water - using short-fall in oxygen, giving conversion largely to sulphur

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9764966B2 (en) 2012-12-24 2017-09-19 Paques I.P. B.V. Hydrogen sulfide removal from anaerobic treatment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
HU212908B (en) 1996-12-30
NL9002661A (en) 1992-07-01
KR960010378B1 (en) 1996-07-31
ES2062883T3 (en) 1994-12-16
HU9301632D0 (en) 1993-11-29
CA2096660A1 (en) 1992-06-05
BG61069B1 (en) 1996-10-31
AU648129B2 (en) 1994-04-14
UA27039C2 (en) 2000-02-28
US5354545A (en) 1994-10-11
HUT64875A (en) 1994-03-28
DE69104997D1 (en) 1994-12-08
ATE113497T1 (en) 1994-11-15
BG97844A (en) 1994-05-27
FI932534A (en) 1993-07-09
EP0561889A1 (en) 1993-09-29
DK0561889T3 (en) 1994-12-05
NO180325C (en) 1997-04-02
RU2089267C1 (en) 1997-09-10
CZ105893A3 (en) 1994-01-19
PL168365B1 (en) 1996-02-29
JPH05507235A (en) 1993-10-21
JPH0775655B2 (en) 1995-08-16
AU9067291A (en) 1992-07-08
DE69104997T2 (en) 1995-03-23
FI109525B (en) 2002-08-30
NO931943L (en) 1993-05-28
WO1992010270A1 (en) 1992-06-25
BR9107117A (en) 1994-02-22
EE02976B1 (en) 1997-04-15
CZ285699B6 (en) 1999-10-13
FI932534A0 (en) 1993-06-03
NO180325B (en) 1996-12-23
NO931943D0 (en) 1993-05-28
CA2096660C (en) 1999-06-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0561889B1 (en) Process for the removal of sulphur compounds from gases
US5976868A (en) Process for the treatment of gases
US6156205A (en) Process for the purification of gases containing hydrogen sulphide
EP0451922B1 (en) Process for the removal of sulfur dioxide from waste gas
SK1999A3 (en) Sulphur reducing bacterium and its use in biological desulphurisation processes
CN104860474A (en) Method for carbon sequestration and biological treatment of waste alkali liquid containing sulfur
RO111357B1 (en) Method for the removing of the sulphur compounds from water
EP0487705A1 (en) Process for the removal of hydrogensulphide (h 2?s) from biogas.
Janssen et al. Development of a family of large-scale biothechnological processes to desukphurise industrial gases
CA2216461C (en) Process for the treatment of gases
VAN HEERINGEN et al. Development of a family of large-scale biotechnological processes to desulphurise industrial gasses
JPS58122093A (en) Treatment for waste water containing sodium sulfide and/or sodium hydrosulfide

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19930514

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19940211

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: DE DOMINICIS & MAYER S.R.L.

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 113497

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19941115

Kind code of ref document: T

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69104997

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19941208

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2062883

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: FG4A

Free format text: 3014755

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: BIOTHANE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL

Effective date: 19950727

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: BIOTHANE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBF Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO

PLBO Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REJO

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 19961209

NLR2 Nl: decision of opposition
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20101026

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20110107

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20101227

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20101221

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20101224

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20101229

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20101221

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20101217

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20101222

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20101224

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20110125

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20101223

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20101221

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69104997

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69104997

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V4

Effective date: 20111204

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EUP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20111203

BE20 Be: patent expired

Owner name: *PAQUES B.V.

Effective date: 20111204

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20111204

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20120220

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20111203

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: MA

Ref document number: 950400067

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20111205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK07

Ref document number: 113497

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20111204

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20111205

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20111205