EP0539097A1 - Low-contamination impact tool for breaking silicon - Google Patents
Low-contamination impact tool for breaking silicon Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0539097A1 EP0539097A1 EP92309423A EP92309423A EP0539097A1 EP 0539097 A1 EP0539097 A1 EP 0539097A1 EP 92309423 A EP92309423 A EP 92309423A EP 92309423 A EP92309423 A EP 92309423A EP 0539097 A1 EP0539097 A1 EP 0539097A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- core
- impact tool
- low
- silicon
- head portion
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25D—PERCUSSIVE TOOLS
- B25D9/00—Portable percussive tools with fluid-pressure drive, i.e. driven directly by fluids, e.g. having several percussive tool bits operated simultaneously
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25D—PERCUSSIVE TOOLS
- B25D1/00—Hand hammers; Hammer heads of special shape or materials
- B25D1/02—Inserts or attachments forming the striking part of hammer heads
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25D—PERCUSSIVE TOOLS
- B25D2222/00—Materials of the tool or the workpiece
- B25D2222/21—Metals
- B25D2222/51—Hard metals, e.g. tungsten carbide
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25D—PERCUSSIVE TOOLS
- B25D2222/00—Materials of the tool or the workpiece
- B25D2222/54—Plastics
- B25D2222/69—Foamed polymers, e.g. polyurethane foam
Definitions
- the present invention is a low-contamination impact tool especially useful for the breaking of semiconductor-grade silicon into pieces.
- the low-contamination impact tool comprises a core forming a handle portion and a head portion, the head portion contacting a tungsten carbide alloy striking element.
- the core is encapsulated in a synthetic resin.
- transistional metal impurities including among others copper, gold, iron, cobalt, nickel, chromium, tantalum, zinc and tungsten and impurities such as carbon, boron, phosphorous, aluminum and arsenic. These impurities, even in small quantities, introduce defect sites in semiconductor grade silicon which can ultimately result in degraded device performance and limit circuit density.
- a polycrystalline silicon of high purity is formed by chemical vapor deposition of a high purity chlorosilane gas onto a heated silicon substrate.
- the resulting product is rods of polycrystalline silicon.
- the polycrystalline silicon rods must be further processed to produce a monocrystalline silicon from which silicon wafers can be cut.
- a significant portion of the monocrystalline silicon required by the semiconductor industry is produced by the well known Czochralski process.
- silicon pieces are melted in an appropriate vessel and a monocrystalline silicon seed crystal is used to draw a monocrystalline rod of semiconductor-grade silicon from the melt. Control of this crystal growth process requires that the silicon pieces added to the melt containing vessel be within a defined size range. Therefore, it is necessary that the polycrystalline silicon rods formed during the chemical vaporization deposition process be broken into pieces of suitable size.
- the low-contamination impact tool described as the present invention is especially useful for breaking silicon into pieces.
- the inventors have discovered that during the breaking process, the silicon can be significantly contaminated by contact with the surfaces of the breaking instrument, including the handle and striking surfaces.
- the present invention reduces the contamination associated with the breaking instrument by covering all surfaces, but the striking surface, with a low-contamination synthetic resin.
- the exposed striking surface is formed of a tungsten carbide alloy, which is also of a low-contamination nature.
- Maeda U.S. Patent No. 4,697,481, issued October 6, 1987, describes a hammer including a head core and a handle core, where the head core and handle core are imbedded in a resin, with the exception of one end of the head core which serves as a striking surface.
- Maeda describes the striking surface as being made of a ferrous metal.
- the present invention is a low-contamination impact tool especially useful for the breaking of semiconductor-grade silicon into pieces.
- the low-contamination impact tool comprises a core forming a handle portion and a head portion, the head portion contacting a tungsten carbide alloy striking element.
- the core is encapsulated in a synthetic resin material.
- the preferred synthetic resin is urethane.
- Figure 1 illustrates a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of the present invention.
- the present invention is a low-contamination impact tool.
- the tool is designed especially to break semiconductor grade silicon into pieces without imparting significant contamination to the pieces.
- the low-contamination impact tool comprises: (A) a core forming a handle portion and a head portion, (B) a tungsten carbide alloy striking element having an end contacted with the head portion of the core and (C) a shell of synthetic resin encapsulating the core.
- the low-contamination impact tool comprises a core consisting of handle portion 1 and head portion 2 .
- the core can be formed from any metal, metal alloy, plastic or composite of sufficient rigidity and strength to deliver an impact to a surface. Preferred is when the core is formed from a metal or metal alloy, for example, carbon steel, stainless steel, inconel, monel or hasteloy. More preferred is when the core is formed from AISI 1018 cold rolled steel.
- the size of the core is not critical to the present invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the core must have sufficient cross-sectional area to prevent bending and breaking of the core during use of the low-contamination impact tool as a breaking instrument.
- the required cross-sectional area will depend upon the material from which the core is constructed as well as the length of handle portion 1 .
- AISI 1018 cold rolled steel is used as the material of construction of the core material, and the low-comtamination impact tool is to be used for the breaking of silicon
- a length of about 8 inches to 12 inches for handle portion 1 and a cross-sectional diameter of about 0.4 to 0.5 inches for handle portion 1 is suitable.
- Head portion 2 can be constructed of the same or different material than handle portion 1 . Preferred is when head portion 2 is formed from the same material as handle portion 1 .
- Head portion 2 and handle portion 1 are connected.
- the connection can be achieved by forming the core as a single element by, for example, molding, casting, stamping, cutting or machining, depending upon the particular material of fabrication.
- head portion 2 and handle portion 1 can be formed separately and connected by, for example, wedging, welding, brazing, fusing, threading or other standard means for connecting two solid objects.
- the core is formed from AISI 1018 cold rolled steel, it is preferred that head portion 2 and handle portion 1 be formed separately and connected by welding.
- head portion 2 is determined by the material of fabrication, the size of handle portion 1 , the method of securing striking element 4 and the size of striking element 4 .
- handle portion 1 and head portion 2 are formed from AISI 1018 cold rolled steel, it is preferred that head portion 2 has a length of about one inch to two inches and a diameter of about 0.5 to one inch.
- Head portion 2 is secured in contact with striking element 4 .
- the method of securing contact of head portion 2 with striking element 4 is not critical to the present invention.
- striking element 4 is secured in contact with head portion 2 during the process of encapsulating the core with a synthetic resin.
- the synthetic resin maintains the position of striking element 4 , as illustrated in Figure 1.
- the advantage of this method of securing striking element 4 is that the striking element can be easily recovered and reused if the remainder of the low-contamination impact tool is damaged.
- striking element 4 can be directly secured to head portion 2 by standard means, as described above, for attaching two solid objects.
- Striking element 4 is formed from a tungsten carbide alloy, where cobalt is the alloying metal. It is preferred that the tungsten carbide alloy contain about 8 to 15 weight percent cobalt. More preferred is when the tungsten carbide alloy contains about 10 to 13 weight percent cobalt.
- the shape of striking element 4 is not critical to the present invention. However, in a preferred embodiment of the present invention striking element 4 is formed in a generally cylindrical shape with a constricted central portion. The constricted central portion helps secure striking element 4 in contact with head portion 2 , when a synthetic resin is used as the securing means. The constriction can be about one to 30 percent of the diameter of striking element 4 . Preferred is when the constriction is about five to 20 percent of the diameter of striking element 4 .
- the diameter of striking element 4 is within a range of about 0.5 to one inch.
- Striking element 4 has striking face 5 .
- the radius of curvature of the edge of striking face 5 is important to minimize breaking of particles from striking element 4 during use.
- a radius of about 0.03 to 0.25 inch is considered useful.
- Preferred is a radius of about 0.07 to 0.12 inch.
- the core is encapsulated in a synthetic resin to form cover 3 .
- the purpose of encapsulating the core in the synthetic resin is to prevent the core from contacting the material to be broken with the low-contamination impact tool.
- the synthetic resin is selected so as to impart minimal undesirable contamination to the material to be broken.
- synthetic resin is meant highly cross-linked polymeric materials that are not naturally occurring.
- the synthetic resin can be for example, polyurethane, polypropylene, polyethylene or polycarbonate. Preferred is when the synthetic resin is polyurethane. Even more preferred is when the synthetic resin is a polyurethane having a Shore A Hardness of about 90 to 97.
- Cover 3 can be formed around the core and striking element 4 by injecting or casting the synthetic resin into a cavity of a mold which has the same shape as the external shape of cover 3 .
- the core is placed in the mold, striking element 4 positioned as illustrated in Figure 1 and the synthetic resin injected and cured, securing striking element 4 in contact with head portion 2 .
- Silicon samples were prepared by breaking a rod of polycrystalline silicon with an impact tool having a non-encapsulated handle and head formed from AISI 1018 cold rolled steel. A tungsten carbide alloy striking element was attached to the head of the impact tool. The tungsten carbide alloy contained about 12 weight percent cobalt. During the breaking process, care was taken to contact each piece of silicon with the handle of the impact tool. Samples of silicon pieces were analyzed for iron and phosphorus surface contamination by graphite furnace atomic absorption and photoluminesience techniques, respectively. The results are presented in Table 1. Table 1 Contamination of Silicon Pieces by Contact With Impact Tool Uncoated Handle Sample No. Fe ppb P ppb 1 0.90 0.27 2 0.74 0.29 3 0.79 0.43 4 0.80 0.37 5 0.63 0.07 6 0.67 0.20 Mean 0.76 0.27
- Silicon samples were prepared by breaking a rod of polycrystalline silicon with an impact tool having a polyurethane encapsulated handle and head.
- the handle and head were formed from AISI 1018 cold rolled steel.
- the polyurethane coating was formed-from a polyether based liquid, isocyanate-terminated prepolymer using (4,4′-methylene-bis(orthochloroaniline)) as catalyst to effect cure.
- the cured polyurethane had a Shore A durometer of about 95.
- a tungsten carbide alloy striking element was attached to the head of the impact tool by molding into the polyurethane.
- the tungsten carbide alloy was as described for Example 1.
- care was taken to contact each sample of silicon with the urethane coated handle of the impact tool.
- the silicon samples were analyzed as described in Example 1 and the results are presented in Table 2.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Percussive Tools And Related Accessories (AREA)
- Silicon Compounds (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention is a low-contamination impact tool especially useful for the breaking of semiconductor-grade silicon into pieces. The low-contamination impact tool comprises a core forming a handle portion and a head portion, the head portion contacting a tungsten carbide alloy striking element. The core is encapsulated in a synthetic resin.
- High density, integrated, electronic circuits require wafers of monocrystalline silicon of high purity. Of particular problem is transistional metal impurities including among others copper, gold, iron, cobalt, nickel, chromium, tantalum, zinc and tungsten and impurities such as carbon, boron, phosphorous, aluminum and arsenic. These impurities, even in small quantities, introduce defect sites in semiconductor grade silicon which can ultimately result in degraded device performance and limit circuit density.
- Typically, a polycrystalline silicon of high purity is formed by chemical vapor deposition of a high purity chlorosilane gas onto a heated silicon substrate. The resulting product is rods of polycrystalline silicon. The polycrystalline silicon rods must be further processed to produce a monocrystalline silicon from which silicon wafers can be cut.
- A significant portion of the monocrystalline silicon required by the semiconductor industry is produced by the well known Czochralski process. In a typical Czochralski type process, silicon pieces are melted in an appropriate vessel and a monocrystalline silicon seed crystal is used to draw a monocrystalline rod of semiconductor-grade silicon from the melt. Control of this crystal growth process requires that the silicon pieces added to the melt containing vessel be within a defined size range. Therefore, it is necessary that the polycrystalline silicon rods formed during the chemical vaporization deposition process be broken into pieces of suitable size.
- The low-contamination impact tool described as the present invention is especially useful for breaking silicon into pieces. The inventors have discovered that during the breaking process, the silicon can be significantly contaminated by contact with the surfaces of the breaking instrument, including the handle and striking surfaces. The present invention reduces the contamination associated with the breaking instrument by covering all surfaces, but the striking surface, with a low-contamination synthetic resin. The exposed striking surface is formed of a tungsten carbide alloy, which is also of a low-contamination nature.
- Maeda, U.S. Patent No. 4,697,481, issued October 6, 1987, describes a hammer including a head core and a handle core, where the head core and handle core are imbedded in a resin, with the exception of one end of the head core which serves as a striking surface. Maeda describes the striking surface as being made of a ferrous metal.
- Porter, U.S. Patent No. 3,640,324, issued February 8, 1972, describes a forged steel hammer head having a striking face provided with a layer of electrodeposited tungsten carbide. The tungsten carbide layer is reported to provide an antislip and wear-resistant surface on the striking face.
- The present invention is a low-contamination impact tool especially useful for the breaking of semiconductor-grade silicon into pieces. The low-contamination impact tool comprises a core forming a handle portion and a head portion, the head portion contacting a tungsten carbide alloy striking element. The core is encapsulated in a synthetic resin material. The preferred synthetic resin is urethane.
- Figure 1 illustrates a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of the present invention.
- The present invention is a low-contamination impact tool. The tool is designed especially to break semiconductor grade silicon into pieces without imparting significant contamination to the pieces. The low-contamination impact tool comprises: (A) a core forming a handle portion and a head portion, (B) a tungsten carbide alloy striking element having an end contacted with the head portion of the core and (C) a shell of synthetic resin encapsulating the core.
- In order to further clarify the concept of the present invention, one exemplary embodiment of the invention will be specifically described referring to the drawing provided as Figure 1.
- The low-contamination impact tool comprises a core consisting of
handle portion 1 andhead portion 2. The core can be formed from any metal, metal alloy, plastic or composite of sufficient rigidity and strength to deliver an impact to a surface. Preferred is when the core is formed from a metal or metal alloy, for example, carbon steel, stainless steel, inconel, monel or hasteloy. More preferred is when the core is formed from AISI 1018 cold rolled steel. - The size of the core is not critical to the present invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the core must have sufficient cross-sectional area to prevent bending and breaking of the core during use of the low-contamination impact tool as a breaking instrument. The required cross-sectional area will depend upon the material from which the core is constructed as well as the length of
handle portion 1. When AISI 1018 cold rolled steel is used as the material of construction of the core material, and the low-comtamination impact tool is to be used for the breaking of silicon, a length of about 8 inches to 12 inches forhandle portion 1 and a cross-sectional diameter of about 0.4 to 0.5 inches forhandle portion 1 is suitable. -
Head portion 2 can be constructed of the same or different material thanhandle portion 1. Preferred is whenhead portion 2 is formed from the same material ashandle portion 1. -
Head portion 2 andhandle portion 1 are connected. The connection can be achieved by forming the core as a single element by, for example, molding, casting, stamping, cutting or machining, depending upon the particular material of fabrication. Alternatively,head portion 2 andhandle portion 1 can be formed separately and connected by, for example, wedging, welding, brazing, fusing, threading or other standard means for connecting two solid objects. When the core is formed from AISI 1018 cold rolled steel, it is preferred thathead portion 2 andhandle portion 1 be formed separately and connected by welding. - The size of
head portion 2 is determined by the material of fabrication, the size ofhandle portion 1, the method of securingstriking element 4 and the size ofstriking element 4. Generally, when handleportion 1 andhead portion 2 are formed from AISI 1018 cold rolled steel, it is preferred thathead portion 2 has a length of about one inch to two inches and a diameter of about 0.5 to one inch. -
Head portion 2 is secured in contact withstriking element 4. The method of securing contact ofhead portion 2 withstriking element 4 is not critical to the present invention. However, in a preferred embodiment of the present inventionstriking element 4 is secured in contact withhead portion 2 during the process of encapsulating the core with a synthetic resin. The synthetic resin maintains the position ofstriking element 4, as illustrated in Figure 1. The advantage of this method of securingstriking element 4 is that the striking element can be easily recovered and reused if the remainder of the low-contamination impact tool is damaged. Alternatively,striking element 4 can be directly secured tohead portion 2 by standard means, as described above, for attaching two solid objects. - Striking
element 4 is formed from a tungsten carbide alloy, where cobalt is the alloying metal. It is preferred that the tungsten carbide alloy contain about 8 to 15 weight percent cobalt. More preferred is when the tungsten carbide alloy contains about 10 to 13 weight percent cobalt. In general, the shape ofstriking element 4 is not critical to the present invention. However, in a preferred embodiment of the present inventionstriking element 4 is formed in a generally cylindrical shape with a constricted central portion. The constricted central portion helps secure strikingelement 4 in contact withhead portion 2, when a synthetic resin is used as the securing means. The constriction can be about one to 30 percent of the diameter ofstriking element 4. Preferred is when the constriction is about five to 20 percent of the diameter ofstriking element 4. - In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the diameter of
striking element 4 is within a range of about 0.5 to one inch. - Striking
element 4 has strikingface 5. The radius of curvature of the edge ofstriking face 5 is important to minimize breaking of particles from strikingelement 4 during use. A radius of about 0.03 to 0.25 inch is considered useful. Preferred is a radius of about 0.07 to 0.12 inch. - The core is encapsulated in a synthetic resin to form cover 3. The purpose of encapsulating the core in the synthetic resin is to prevent the core from contacting the material to be broken with the low-contamination impact tool. The synthetic resin is selected so as to impart minimal undesirable contamination to the material to be broken. by "synthetic resin" is meant highly cross-linked polymeric materials that are not naturally occurring. The synthetic resin can be for example, polyurethane, polypropylene, polyethylene or polycarbonate. Preferred is when the synthetic resin is polyurethane. Even more preferred is when the synthetic resin is a polyurethane having a Shore A Hardness of about 90 to 97.
- Cover 3 can be formed around the core and
striking element 4 by injecting or casting the synthetic resin into a cavity of a mold which has the same shape as the external shape of cover 3. In the preferred embodiment, the core is placed in the mold,striking element 4 positioned as illustrated in Figure 1 and the synthetic resin injected and cured, securingstriking element 4 in contact withhead portion 2. - Silicon samples were prepared by breaking a rod of polycrystalline silicon with an impact tool having a non-encapsulated handle and head formed from AISI 1018 cold rolled steel. A tungsten carbide alloy striking element was attached to the head of the impact tool. The tungsten carbide alloy contained about 12 weight percent cobalt. During the breaking process, care was taken to contact each piece of silicon with the handle of the impact tool. Samples of silicon pieces were analyzed for iron and phosphorus surface contamination by graphite furnace atomic absorption and photoluminesience techniques, respectively. The results are presented in Table 1.
Table 1 Contamination of Silicon Pieces by Contact With Impact Tool Uncoated Handle Sample No. Fe ppb P ppb 1 0.90 0.27 2 0.74 0.29 3 0.79 0.43 4 0.80 0.37 5 0.63 0.07 6 0.67 0.20 Mean 0.76 0.27 - Silicon samples were prepared by breaking a rod of polycrystalline silicon with an impact tool having a polyurethane encapsulated handle and head. The handle and head were formed from AISI 1018 cold rolled steel. The polyurethane coating was formed-from a polyether based liquid, isocyanate-terminated prepolymer using (4,4′-methylene-bis(orthochloroaniline)) as catalyst to effect cure. The cured polyurethane had a Shore A durometer of about 95.
- A tungsten carbide alloy striking element was attached to the head of the impact tool by molding into the polyurethane. The tungsten carbide alloy was as described for Example 1. During the breaking process, care was taken to contact each sample of silicon with the urethane coated handle of the impact tool. The silicon samples were analyzed as described in Example 1 and the results are presented in Table 2.
Table 2 Contamination of Silicon Pieces by Contact With Impact Tool Polyurethane Coated Handle Sample No. Fe ppb P ppb 1 0.35 0.09 2 0.56 0.13 3 0.36 0.14 4 0.40 0.02 5 0.45 0.01 6 0.40 0.06 Mean 0.42 0.08 - The data presented in Table 2, when contrasted with the data of Table 1, demonstrate the contamination that can occur to silicon pieces when they are contacted with the unencapsulated handle of the impact tool.
Claims (2)
- A low-contamination impact tool comprising:(A) a core forming a handle portion and a head portion,(B) a tungsten carbide alloy striking element having an end in contact with the head portion of the core and(C) a shell of synthetic resin encapsulating the core.
- The low-contamination impact tool of Claim 1, where the head portion is secured in contact with the tungsten carbide alloy striking element by the synthetic resin.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US78147691A | 1991-10-23 | 1991-10-23 | |
US781476 | 1991-10-23 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0539097A1 true EP0539097A1 (en) | 1993-04-28 |
EP0539097B1 EP0539097B1 (en) | 1994-11-30 |
Family
ID=25122876
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP92309423A Expired - Lifetime EP0539097B1 (en) | 1991-10-23 | 1992-10-15 | Low-contamination impact tool for breaking silicon |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0539097B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPH06218677A (en) |
KR (1) | KR100207163B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2081127A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69200756T2 (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2384741A (en) * | 2002-02-02 | 2003-08-06 | Keith England | Hammers and the like |
EP1338682A2 (en) * | 2002-02-20 | 2003-08-27 | Hemlock Semiconductor Corporation | Flowable chips and methods and apparatus for their preparation and use of same |
US6874713B2 (en) | 2002-08-22 | 2005-04-05 | Dow Corning Corporation | Method and apparatus for improving silicon processing efficiency |
EP1553214A2 (en) * | 2002-02-20 | 2005-07-13 | Hemlock Semiconductor Corporation | Flowable chips and methods for the preparation and use of same, and apparatus for use in the methods |
WO2007101666A3 (en) * | 2006-03-08 | 2008-03-27 | Schott Solar Gmbh | Method for recovering and/or recycling material |
EP2030737A3 (en) * | 2007-08-27 | 2009-04-29 | Mitsubishi Materials Corporation | Hammer for breaking polycrystalline silicon |
DE102012204050A1 (en) * | 2012-03-15 | 2013-09-19 | Sunicon GmbH | Device for machining silicon pieces for photovoltaic applications, has shredding device crushing silicon pieces and comprising liner, and separator for separating silicon pieces and impurities |
US20140037959A1 (en) * | 2012-08-06 | 2014-02-06 | Wacker Chemie Ag | Polycrystalline silicon chunks and method for producing them |
CN111727107A (en) * | 2018-02-27 | 2020-09-29 | 株式会社德山 | Hammer |
WO2021037366A1 (en) | 2019-08-29 | 2021-03-04 | Wacker Chemie Ag | Method for producing silicon fragments |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7270706B2 (en) | 2004-10-04 | 2007-09-18 | Dow Corning Corporation | Roll crusher to produce high purity polycrystalline silicon chips |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3148716A (en) * | 1962-04-02 | 1964-09-15 | Vanghan & Bushnell Mfg Co | Impact tool with chip-resistant striking face |
US3640324A (en) * | 1969-11-13 | 1972-02-08 | Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg Co | Hammer head having an antislip and wear-resistant striking face surface |
DE2152761A1 (en) * | 1971-06-22 | 1972-12-28 | Custom Electronic Systems, Inc., Indianapolis, Ind. (V.StA.) | Impact tool |
FR2337612A1 (en) * | 1976-01-12 | 1977-08-05 | Ces Inc | HAMMER |
DE3204848A1 (en) * | 1982-02-11 | 1983-08-18 | Lothar Laflör GmbH & Co, 5620 Velbert | Emergency hammer |
FR2577458A1 (en) * | 1985-02-21 | 1986-08-22 | Maeda Shell Service Co | MONOBLOCK MOLDING HAMMER WITH SEPARATE CORES OF HEAD AND HANDLE |
-
1992
- 1992-10-15 DE DE69200756T patent/DE69200756T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1992-10-15 EP EP92309423A patent/EP0539097B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1992-10-22 CA CA002081127A patent/CA2081127A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1992-10-23 JP JP4285935A patent/JPH06218677A/en active Pending
- 1992-10-23 KR KR1019920019583A patent/KR100207163B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3148716A (en) * | 1962-04-02 | 1964-09-15 | Vanghan & Bushnell Mfg Co | Impact tool with chip-resistant striking face |
US3640324A (en) * | 1969-11-13 | 1972-02-08 | Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg Co | Hammer head having an antislip and wear-resistant striking face surface |
DE2152761A1 (en) * | 1971-06-22 | 1972-12-28 | Custom Electronic Systems, Inc., Indianapolis, Ind. (V.StA.) | Impact tool |
FR2337612A1 (en) * | 1976-01-12 | 1977-08-05 | Ces Inc | HAMMER |
DE3204848A1 (en) * | 1982-02-11 | 1983-08-18 | Lothar Laflör GmbH & Co, 5620 Velbert | Emergency hammer |
FR2577458A1 (en) * | 1985-02-21 | 1986-08-22 | Maeda Shell Service Co | MONOBLOCK MOLDING HAMMER WITH SEPARATE CORES OF HEAD AND HANDLE |
Cited By (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2384741A (en) * | 2002-02-02 | 2003-08-06 | Keith England | Hammers and the like |
EP1338682A2 (en) * | 2002-02-20 | 2003-08-27 | Hemlock Semiconductor Corporation | Flowable chips and methods and apparatus for their preparation and use of same |
EP1338682A3 (en) * | 2002-02-20 | 2004-01-28 | Hemlock Semiconductor Corporation | Flowable chips and methods and apparatus for their preparation and use of same |
EP1553214A2 (en) * | 2002-02-20 | 2005-07-13 | Hemlock Semiconductor Corporation | Flowable chips and methods for the preparation and use of same, and apparatus for use in the methods |
EP1553214A3 (en) * | 2002-02-20 | 2007-03-28 | Hemlock Semiconductor Corporation | Flowable chips and methods for the preparation and use of same, and apparatus for use in the methods |
US6874713B2 (en) | 2002-08-22 | 2005-04-05 | Dow Corning Corporation | Method and apparatus for improving silicon processing efficiency |
WO2007101666A3 (en) * | 2006-03-08 | 2008-03-27 | Schott Solar Gmbh | Method for recovering and/or recycling material |
US8118248B2 (en) | 2006-03-08 | 2012-02-21 | Schott Solar Ag | Method for recovering and/or recycling material |
EP2141121A1 (en) | 2006-03-08 | 2010-01-06 | SCHOTT Solar AG | Cutting mill |
US7694903B2 (en) | 2006-03-08 | 2010-04-13 | Schott Solar Ag | Method for recovering and/or recycling material |
US7950308B2 (en) | 2007-08-27 | 2011-05-31 | Mitsubishi Materials Corporation | Hammer for breaking polycrystalline silicon |
EP2030737A3 (en) * | 2007-08-27 | 2009-04-29 | Mitsubishi Materials Corporation | Hammer for breaking polycrystalline silicon |
CN101376242B (en) * | 2007-08-27 | 2012-11-14 | 三菱麻铁里亚尔株式会社 | Hammer for breaking polycrystalline silicon |
DE102012204050A1 (en) * | 2012-03-15 | 2013-09-19 | Sunicon GmbH | Device for machining silicon pieces for photovoltaic applications, has shredding device crushing silicon pieces and comprising liner, and separator for separating silicon pieces and impurities |
DE102012204050B4 (en) * | 2012-03-15 | 2017-03-23 | Solarworld Industries Sachsen Gmbh | Apparatus and method for processing silicon pieces |
US20140037959A1 (en) * | 2012-08-06 | 2014-02-06 | Wacker Chemie Ag | Polycrystalline silicon chunks and method for producing them |
US9266741B2 (en) * | 2012-08-06 | 2016-02-23 | Wacker Chemie Ag | Polycrystalline silicon chunks and method for producing them |
CN111727107A (en) * | 2018-02-27 | 2020-09-29 | 株式会社德山 | Hammer |
EP3760384A4 (en) * | 2018-02-27 | 2021-04-28 | Tokuyama Corporation | Hammer |
US11794330B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2023-10-24 | Tokuyama Corporation | Hammer |
WO2021037366A1 (en) | 2019-08-29 | 2021-03-04 | Wacker Chemie Ag | Method for producing silicon fragments |
CN114127011A (en) * | 2019-08-29 | 2022-03-01 | 瓦克化学股份公司 | Method for producing silicon blocks |
CN114127011B (en) * | 2019-08-29 | 2024-03-08 | 瓦克化学股份公司 | Method for producing silicon blocks |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE69200756D1 (en) | 1995-01-12 |
DE69200756T2 (en) | 1995-04-06 |
CA2081127A1 (en) | 1993-04-24 |
JPH06218677A (en) | 1994-08-09 |
EP0539097B1 (en) | 1994-11-30 |
KR100207163B1 (en) | 1999-07-15 |
KR930007591A (en) | 1993-05-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0539097B1 (en) | Low-contamination impact tool for breaking silicon | |
US10022843B2 (en) | Methods of fabricating a polycrystalline diamond compact | |
EP0354043B1 (en) | Thermally stable diamond abrasive compact body | |
US3757878A (en) | Drill bits and method of producing drill bits | |
CA2002385C (en) | Multiple metal coated superabrasive grit and methods for their manufacture | |
EP0029187B1 (en) | Improved method of making diamond compacts for rock drilling | |
US5035771A (en) | Process for treating diamond grains | |
US4008976A (en) | Cutting tool and method for making same | |
IE46644B1 (en) | Temperature resistant abrasive compact and method for making same | |
Taylor et al. | Anomalous slip in high-purity vanadium crystals | |
EP0233162B1 (en) | Method of treating cemented carbide bodies regarding their compositions and structures | |
EP0715833A2 (en) | A practical cutting bur and a method of having practical training for the cutting of human tooth by using it | |
EP0389476A4 (en) | A method of preparing a bulk amorphous metal article | |
CN109071362B (en) | Polycrystalline diamond compact with interstitial diamond grains and method of making same | |
EP0014589B1 (en) | A method of making diamond particles and metal bond abrasive body produced therewith | |
CA2070328A1 (en) | Composite diamond abrasive compact | |
EP0652057B1 (en) | Multiple grained diamond wire die | |
US5494760A (en) | Object with an at least partly amorphous glass-metal film | |
EP0211571A1 (en) | Fine amorphous metallic wires | |
WO1992000939A3 (en) | Reduced metal content ceramic composite bodies | |
JP4135405B2 (en) | Seed crystal holding jig and method for producing single crystal | |
Danford | Role of Grain Boundaries in Hydrogen Diffusion in Metals at 25 deg C | |
Kabanova et al. | Habit Planes of the Face-Centred Cubic Phase Formed During Heating in Crystals of Martensite and Polyhedral Ferrite With a Body-Centred Cubic Lattice | |
EP0865864B1 (en) | Drill blank | |
Kuszyk | Ceramic Composite Article for Use in Thermal Shock Environments |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19930528 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19930702 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69200756 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19950112 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 19970904 Year of fee payment: 6 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 19970904 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19970909 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19981015 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 19981015 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19990630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19990803 |