EP0502622A1 - Image processing method - Google Patents

Image processing method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0502622A1
EP0502622A1 EP92301215A EP92301215A EP0502622A1 EP 0502622 A1 EP0502622 A1 EP 0502622A1 EP 92301215 A EP92301215 A EP 92301215A EP 92301215 A EP92301215 A EP 92301215A EP 0502622 A1 EP0502622 A1 EP 0502622A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
image
array
operator matrix
blocks
boundaries
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP92301215A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0502622B1 (en
Inventor
Anthony Harold Downing
John Whitaker
Robert George Hadingham
Jeremy Bentley D'assis Fonseca
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nortel Networks Ltd
Original Assignee
Northern Telecom Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Northern Telecom Ltd filed Critical Northern Telecom Ltd
Publication of EP0502622A1 publication Critical patent/EP0502622A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0502622B1 publication Critical patent/EP0502622B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/50Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using predictive coding
    • H04N19/503Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using predictive coding involving temporal prediction
    • H04N19/51Motion estimation or motion compensation
    • H04N19/527Global motion vector estimation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N19/00Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals
    • H04N19/85Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using pre-processing or post-processing specially adapted for video compression
    • H04N19/86Methods or arrangements for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals using pre-processing or post-processing specially adapted for video compression involving reduction of coding artifacts, e.g. of blockiness

Definitions

  • This invention relates to image processing and in particular to digital image processing.
  • a series of digitised numbers i.e. a data array
  • Each number represents the brightness value at a particular location and is called a picture element or pixel.
  • various operations can be performed on the image by the computing means, such as enhancement, restoration or compression. Compression of an image is a way of representing the image by fewer numbers.
  • Image compression has been recognised as an important enabler in the next generation of Information Technology products which will incorporate video-phones, desk top presentations and interactive video etc. This has led to standards being promulgated which are based on the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT), currently the most efficient general purpose compression technique, although there are others.
  • DCT Discrete Cosine Transform
  • a particular standard (draft CCITT document number 396 "Description Reference Model 7 (RM7)” describes a compression scheme suitable for the transmission of medium resolution (360 x 288 pixels) black and white and colour images at up to 30 frames per second over ISDN 64 Kbit/sec links. Similar techniques can be used to transmit lower resolution low bit rate images over standard telephone lines (PSTN).
  • Images to be compressed are divided into blocks of say 8 x 8 or 16 x 16 pixels and the transformation is performed on the block.
  • the use of blocks ensures local pixel correlation and additionally limits the size of the transform coefficients.
  • the block boundaries becomes distinct in the image presented to the viewer and in the extreme case they are visually disturbing. This situation is further aggravated by the motion compression techniques which selectively refresh blocks where movement of an image part has occurred, that is the whole image information is not transmitted all of the time but only that relating to changes. Filtering of the image can be used to remove the block discontinuities. Filtering in this context means "averaging" a pixel value with its neighbours, with the possible application of weights to the values first.
  • Image filtering to remove noise etc, is normally achieved by scanning a small 3 x 3 operator matrix, set of values, or mask, over the image i.e. convolving the operator matrix with the data array, the elements of the data array being sequentially scanned by the operator matrix.
  • the operator matrix is substantially smaller than the data array.
  • For each pixel point the values of its 8 neighbours are weighted together with itself to create a new averaged (smoothed) value.
  • the block discontinuity problem can be overcome by a technique involving overlapping the block edges but this is very complicated and involves considerable computing effort. Hence it is particularly unsuitable for PSTN type applications where costs and computing power should be minimised as far as possible.
  • Fig. 1 there are vertical boundaries 1, 13 between 8 x 8 pixel blocks 2 and horizontal boundaries 3, 14. It is at these boundaries that the block discontinuities referred to above occur. If conventional image filtering using a 3 x 3 operator matrix is employed for every pixel there are clearly special cases to be considered when the pixel in question is at the image edge, such as 4, or at an image corner, such as 5, since there are not then the 8 pixel neighbours required.
  • the present invention proposes the use of a one dimensional filter, namely a row operator matrix 6, for example comprised of three values at windows corresponding to pixels i.e. a 3 x 1 matrix.
  • This filter is scanned over the elements at the block boundaries as follows, for example.
  • the filter is first "applied” so that its central value corresponds to pixel 7 of the image (position A) and a weighted version of the value of that pixel 7 is taken together with weighted versions of the values of the adjoining pixels 8 and 9 to produce the smoothed value for pixel 7.
  • the filter positions are indicated at the side of the image, rather than over it, for clarity. In use they are "superimposed”, however, on the array and scanned thereover.
  • the smoothed value of pixel 7 is (mi7 + ni8 + pi9)/(m + n + p).
  • the filter is then "moved" one pixel sideways (to position B) in order to operate on boundary pixel 9 and its neighbours 7 and 10, again using the original value of pixel 7. Using the same weights as before i.e.
  • the filtering technique described above may be used, for example, in a video-telephony application.
  • the apparatus basically consists of two distinct elements, the transmitter (Fig. 2) and the receiver (Fig. 3).
  • the transmitter Fig. 2
  • the receiver Fig. 3
  • both elements would be present at each site in order to allow two way video communication.
  • a camera 20 produces an analogue waveform corresponding to the scene before it.
  • This waveform is digitised by an analogue to digital converter 21 and placed into a digital image memory 22 as a two dimensional data array.
  • a compression processor 23 converts this data from the spatial to the frequency domain. Generally all frequencies are not present within an image and therefore only a limited number of frequencies need be transmitted. Further compression can be achieved by transmitting only those frequencies found to be significant to the human visual system.
  • This reduced frequency data (compressed digital image 24) is coded by variable length codes and transmitted by a transmit MODEM 25 (modulator/demodulator).
  • receive MODEM 26 receives the compressed digital image.
  • the frequency information is extracted at 27 from the variable length codes and converted into spatial information representing the image. Filtering, as described above, is then applied at 28 to this reconstructed image.
  • the digital image data at 29 is then converted at 30 to an analogue waveform for display at 31 on a video monitor.
  • the invention proposes applying a one dimensional filter along the block boundaries, both horizontal and vertical, of an image produced by a block compression technique. This allows intra-block image detail to be retained and the greatly reduced memory fetches increase image throughput in comparison with conventional techniques.

Abstract

A method of digitally processing images, in the form of a two dimensional data element array, in which the image is compressed by dividing the array into blocks (2) and performing transformation thereon. In order to smooth discontinuities at the boundaries (1, 13, 3, 14) between the blocks (2) resulting from the compression, filtering is performed by sequentially scanning elements at the boundaries with a one dimensional operator matrix (6, Fig, 1). The matrix applies suitable weights to those elements and adjacent ones to effect smoothing.

Description

  • This invention relates to image processing and in particular to digital image processing.
  • To digitally process an image it is first necessary to reduce the image to a series of digitised numbers, i.e. a data array, that can be manipulated by computing means. Each number represents the brightness value at a particular location and is called a picture element or pixel. Once digitised various operations can be performed on the image by the computing means, such as enhancement, restoration or compression. Compression of an image is a way of representing the image by fewer numbers.
  • Image compression has been recognised as an important enabler in the next generation of Information Technology products which will incorporate video-phones, desk top presentations and interactive video etc. This has led to standards being promulgated which are based on the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT), currently the most efficient general purpose compression technique, although there are others. A particular standard (draft CCITT document number 396 "Description Reference Model 7 (RM7)" describes a compression scheme suitable for the transmission of medium resolution (360 x 288 pixels) black and white and colour images at up to 30 frames per second over ISDN 64 Kbit/sec links. Similar techniques can be used to transmit lower resolution low bit rate images over standard telephone lines (PSTN).
  • Images to be compressed are divided into blocks of say 8 x 8 or 16 x 16 pixels and the transformation is performed on the block. The use of blocks ensures local pixel correlation and additionally limits the size of the transform coefficients. However, when high compression ratios are implemented the block boundaries becomes distinct in the image presented to the viewer and in the extreme case they are visually disturbing. This situation is further aggravated by the motion compression techniques which selectively refresh blocks where movement of an image part has occurred, that is the whole image information is not transmitted all of the time but only that relating to changes. Filtering of the image can be used to remove the block discontinuities. Filtering in this context means "averaging" a pixel value with its neighbours, with the possible application of weights to the values first.
  • Image filtering, to remove noise etc, is normally achieved by scanning a small 3 x 3 operator matrix, set of values, or mask, over the image i.e. convolving the operator matrix with the data array, the elements of the data array being sequentially scanned by the operator matrix. The operator matrix is substantially smaller than the data array. For each pixel point the values of its 8 neighbours are weighted together with itself to create a new averaged (smoothed) value. When applying this to images to remove block discontinuities (boundaries) detail is lost from the whole image rather than just at the boundaries. The block discontinuity problem can be overcome by a technique involving overlapping the block edges but this is very complicated and involves considerable computing effort. Hence it is particularly unsuitable for PSTN type applications where costs and computing power should be minimised as far as possible.
  • According to the present invention there is provided a method of digitally processing an image in the form of a two-dimensional data array having elements arranged in rows and columns, wherein the image is compressed by dividing the array into blocks and performing transformation on the blocks, and wherein the image is filtered by convolution with an operator matrix substantially smaller than the array, characterised in that the filtering is used to smooth discontinuities, at boundaries between said blocks, resulting from said compression, and comprises sequentially scanning elements of the data array at the data array block boundaries with a one dimensional operator matrix.
  • Embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which,
    • Fig. 1 shows part of an array of 8 x 8 pixel blocks.
    • Fig. 2 shows a transmitter in schematic form and
    • Fig. 3 shows a receiver in schematic form.
  • In Fig., 1 there are vertical boundaries 1, 13 between 8 x 8 pixel blocks 2 and horizontal boundaries 3, 14. It is at these boundaries that the block discontinuities referred to above occur. If conventional image filtering using a 3 x 3 operator matrix is employed for every pixel there are clearly special cases to be considered when the pixel in question is at the image edge, such as 4, or at an image corner, such as 5, since there are not then the 8 pixel neighbours required.
  • The present invention proposes the use of a one dimensional filter, namely a row operator matrix 6, for example comprised of three values at windows corresponding to pixels i.e. a 3 x 1 matrix. This filter is scanned over the elements at the block boundaries as follows, for example.
  • Consider the vertical block boundary 1, the filter is first "applied" so that its central value corresponds to pixel 7 of the image (position A) and a weighted version of the value of that pixel 7 is taken together with weighted versions of the values of the adjoining pixels 8 and 9 to produce the smoothed value for pixel 7. The filter positions are indicated at the side of the image, rather than over it, for clarity. In use they are "superimposed", however, on the array and scanned thereover. It the weights are m for the boundary pixel 7 in question and n and p for its neighbours 8 and 9, respectively, and i₇, i₈ and i₉ are the values of these pixels, then the smoothed value of pixel 7 is (mi₇ + ni₈ + pi₉)/(m + n + p). The filter is then "moved" one pixel sideways (to position B) in order to operate on boundary pixel 9 and its neighbours 7 and 10, again using the original value of pixel 7. Using the same weights as before i.e. m for pixel 9, n for pixel 7 and p for pixel 10, the smoothed value of pixel 9 is given by
    (mi₉ + ni₇ + pi₁₀)/(m + n + p)
    Typical smoothing weights are the values m = 2,
    n = 1 and p = 1.
  • This procedure is repeated for pixels 11 and 12 and so on down the vertical block boundary 1 and subsequently down other vertical block boundaries such as 13. The horizontal block boundary 3 and others such as 14 are treated similarly by using the vertical neighbours to the boundary pixels, "disposing" the filter first in position C and then position D. An alternative procedure would be to scan (sweep) the filter first down one boundary edge (pixels 7, 11 etc) and subsequently down the adjoining edge (pixels 9, 12 etc) but this would involve extra processing. Since the values of pixel 7 and pixel 9 are available after one application of the filter it is more "economic" to re-use them to calculate the smoothed value of pixel 9.
  • It will be apparent that use of such a one-dimensional filter achieves computational savings over the 3 x 3 matrix since there are no special cases to be considered at the image edge and corners, there are fewer pixel values (only those which are illustrated hatched) to be accessed, and the weighting calculation is greatly simplified. Experiments have shown that a one dimensional filter applied horizontally to the vertical boundaries and vertically to horizontal boundaries produces very acceptable results, removing discontinuities at block boundaries but not removing too much detail at subjectively important areas such as eyes and mouths whilst retaining details in the centre of blocks since their values are unaffected. In addition, the one dimensional filter proved to be three times faster than the equivalent two dimensional filter. Whilst a three element operator matrix (one dimensional filter) has been specifically described above, a filter with more than three elements, for example five, could alternatively be used.
  • The filtering technique described above may be used, for example, in a video-telephony application. The apparatus basically consists of two distinct elements, the transmitter (Fig. 2) and the receiver (Fig. 3). For video-telephony both elements would be present at each site in order to allow two way video communication.
  • Considering the transmitter (Fig. 2), a camera 20 produces an analogue waveform corresponding to the scene before it. This waveform is digitised by an analogue to digital converter 21 and placed into a digital image memory 22 as a two dimensional data array. A compression processor 23 converts this data from the spatial to the frequency domain. Generally all frequencies are not present within an image and therefore only a limited number of frequencies need be transmitted. Further compression can be achieved by transmitting only those frequencies found to be significant to the human visual system. This reduced frequency data (compressed digital image 24) is coded by variable length codes and transmitted by a transmit MODEM 25 (modulator/demodulator).
  • Considering the receiver, receive MODEM 26 receives the compressed digital image. The frequency information is extracted at 27 from the variable length codes and converted into spatial information representing the image. Filtering, as described above, is then applied at 28 to this reconstructed image. The digital image data at 29 is then converted at 30 to an analogue waveform for display at 31 on a video monitor.
  • Thus the invention proposes applying a one dimensional filter along the block boundaries, both horizontal and vertical, of an image produced by a block compression technique. This allows intra-block image detail to be retained and the greatly reduced memory fetches increase image throughput in comparison with conventional techniques.

Claims (6)

  1. A method of digitally processing an image in the form of a two-dimensional data array having elements arranged in rows and columns, wherein the image is compressed by dividing the array into blocks (2) and performing transformation on the blocks, and wherein the image is filtered by convolution with an operator matrix (6) substantially smaller than the array, characterised in that the filtering is used to smooth discontinuities, at boundaries (1, 13, 3, 14) between said blocks, resulting from said compression, and comprises sequentially scanning elements of the data array at the data array block boundaries (1, 13, 3, 14) with a one dimensional operator matrix (6).
  2. A method as claimed in claim 1 characterised in that the one dimensional operator matrix (6) is first scanned over the block boundaries extending in one direction and then over the block boundaries extending in the orthogonal direction.
  3. A method as claimed in claim 1 characterised in that the operator matrix is applied first to smooth an array element value on one side (7) of said boundary (1) and then applied to smooth the adjacent array element value on the opposite side (9) of the said boundary (1).
  4. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 3 characterised in that the operator matrix (6) is comprised of three elements.
  5. A method as claimed in claim 4 wherein the operator matrix (6) serves to apply respective weights to an array element (7) on one side of a said boundary (1), the array element (8) adjacent thereto in the same block (2) and the array element (9) adjacent thereto in the neighbouring block (2), which array elements are disposed in a line orthogonal to the said boundary.
  6. A video-telephone employing an image processing method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims.
EP92301215A 1991-02-27 1992-02-14 Image processing method Expired - Lifetime EP0502622B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9104166A GB2253318B (en) 1991-02-27 1991-02-27 Image processing
GB9104166 1991-02-27

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0502622A1 true EP0502622A1 (en) 1992-09-09
EP0502622B1 EP0502622B1 (en) 1995-12-20

Family

ID=10690704

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP92301215A Expired - Lifetime EP0502622B1 (en) 1991-02-27 1992-02-14 Image processing method

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US5220616A (en)
EP (1) EP0502622B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH05110871A (en)
DE (1) DE69206847T2 (en)
GB (1) GB2253318B (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2695498A1 (en) * 1992-09-10 1994-03-11 Bertin & Cie Treatment procedure for images e.g. video or film for measurement, transformation or viewing - using initial digitisation followed by compression, transmission and or recording, decompression and final use
EP0613302A2 (en) * 1993-02-26 1994-08-31 Philips Patentverwaltung GmbH Videodecoder with a control unit
GB2283876A (en) * 1993-11-09 1995-05-17 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Encoding and decoding moving pictures
FR2737931A1 (en) * 1995-08-17 1997-02-21 Siemens Ag METHOD FOR THE PROCESSING OF BLOCKS OF IMAGES DECODED FROM A BLOCK-BASED IMAGE CODING PROCESS
WO1997015145A1 (en) * 1995-10-18 1997-04-24 Philips Electronics N.V. Region-based texture coding and decoding method, and corresponding systems
WO1997025818A1 (en) * 1996-01-12 1997-07-17 Iterated Systems, Inc. Predictive video encoding
EP0808068A2 (en) * 1996-05-14 1997-11-19 Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd Methods and apparatus for removing blocking effect in a motion picture decoder
EP0817496A2 (en) * 1996-07-04 1998-01-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for reducing blocking artifacts in encoded images
FR2763460A1 (en) * 1997-03-10 1998-11-20 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd ADAPTIVE ONE-DIMENSIONAL SIGNAL FILTER FOR REDUCING BLOCKING EFFECT AND FILTERING METHOD

Families Citing this family (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4818318A (en) * 1984-03-15 1989-04-04 Hoechst Celanese Corp. Method of forming composite fiber blends
US4871491A (en) * 1984-03-15 1989-10-03 Basf Structural Materials Inc. Process for preparing composite articles from composite fiber blends
US5339171A (en) * 1990-04-24 1994-08-16 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Image processing apparatus especially suitable for producing smooth-edged output multi-level tone data having fewer levels than input multi-level tone data
JP2528383B2 (en) * 1990-11-22 1996-08-28 大日本スクリーン製造株式会社 Pinhole erasing method
US5787207A (en) * 1991-12-30 1998-07-28 Golin; Stuart J. Method and apparatus for minimizing blockiness in reconstructed images
FR2690299B1 (en) * 1992-04-17 1994-06-17 Telecommunications Sa METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SPATIAL FILTERING OF DIGITAL IMAGES DECODED BY BLOCK TRANSFORMATION.
US5696851A (en) * 1993-04-30 1997-12-09 Comsat Corporation Codeword-dependent post-filtering for vector quantization-based image compression
US5363448A (en) * 1993-06-30 1994-11-08 United Technologies Automotive, Inc. Pseudorandom number generation and cryptographic authentication
US5377270A (en) * 1993-06-30 1994-12-27 United Technologies Automotive, Inc. Cryptographic authentication of transmitted messages using pseudorandom numbers
US5691775A (en) * 1995-03-30 1997-11-25 Intel Corporation Reduction of motion estimation artifacts
US5629778A (en) * 1995-05-15 1997-05-13 Polaroid Corporation Method and apparatus for reduction of image data compression noise
US5751861A (en) * 1995-06-30 1998-05-12 Intel Corporation Reducing residual artifacts in video coding schemes with integer motion compensation
DE19604050B4 (en) * 1995-08-17 2005-09-29 Siemens Ag Edge pixel smoothing of block-coded images - has edge pixels processed by edge filter having low=pass stages appropriate to motion vector ranges
US5881180A (en) * 1996-02-08 1999-03-09 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for the reduction of blocking effects in images
US5974196A (en) * 1996-03-15 1999-10-26 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for blocking effect reduction in images
US5933542A (en) * 1996-04-24 1999-08-03 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for blocking effect reduction in images by post-processing in the spatial domain
DE19640999A1 (en) * 1996-10-04 1998-04-09 Deutsche Telekom Ag Image error elimination method in block style coding of images
US6882688B1 (en) 1998-12-11 2005-04-19 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Deblocking filter arithmetic apparatus and deblocking filter arithmetic method
US7426315B2 (en) * 2001-09-05 2008-09-16 Zoran Microelectronics Ltd. Method for reducing blocking artifacts
EP1468266A4 (en) * 2002-01-22 2009-03-11 Beckman Coulter Inc Environmental containment system for a flow cytometer
US20050013494A1 (en) * 2003-07-18 2005-01-20 Microsoft Corporation In-loop deblocking filter
US7724827B2 (en) * 2003-09-07 2010-05-25 Microsoft Corporation Multi-layer run level encoding and decoding
US7545988B2 (en) * 2004-08-09 2009-06-09 George William Meeker Image blocking artifact reduction via transform pair
KR100716998B1 (en) 2005-05-24 2007-05-10 삼성전자주식회사 Encoder and Decoder for reducing blocking phenomenon, method therefor, and recording medium storing A program to implement thereof
US20080084932A1 (en) * 2006-10-06 2008-04-10 Microsoft Corporation Controlling loop filtering for interlaced video frames
US8787443B2 (en) 2010-10-05 2014-07-22 Microsoft Corporation Content adaptive deblocking during video encoding and decoding
US9042458B2 (en) 2011-04-01 2015-05-26 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Multi-threaded implementations of deblock filtering
JP2013025466A (en) * 2011-07-19 2013-02-04 Sony Corp Image processing device, image processing system and image processing program

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4754492A (en) * 1985-06-03 1988-06-28 Picturetel Corporation Method and system for adapting a digitized signal processing system for block processing with minimal blocking artifacts
US4941043A (en) * 1988-06-14 1990-07-10 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for reducing blocking artifacts in video scene coding with discrete cosine transformation (DCT) at a low data rate

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0107426B1 (en) * 1982-10-14 1987-01-21 British Telecommunications Image transmission
US4860373A (en) * 1986-03-31 1989-08-22 General Electric Company Location dependent signal processor
JP2940956B2 (en) * 1988-11-30 1999-08-25 株式会社リコー Line figure feature extraction method
US5101445A (en) * 1989-03-16 1992-03-31 Unisys Corporation Method and apparatus for filtering digital data by concatenating preprocessed overlapping groups of the data

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4754492A (en) * 1985-06-03 1988-06-28 Picturetel Corporation Method and system for adapting a digitized signal processing system for block processing with minimal blocking artifacts
US4941043A (en) * 1988-06-14 1990-07-10 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for reducing blocking artifacts in video scene coding with discrete cosine transformation (DCT) at a low data rate

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
NACHRICHTEN TECHNIK ELEKTRONIK, vol. 38, no. 5, May 1988, pages 166-169, Berlin, DE; L. ARNOLD et al.: "Adaptive Transformationscodierung von Grauwertbildern mit vermindertem Blocking-Effect" *

Cited By (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2695498A1 (en) * 1992-09-10 1994-03-11 Bertin & Cie Treatment procedure for images e.g. video or film for measurement, transformation or viewing - using initial digitisation followed by compression, transmission and or recording, decompression and final use
EP0613302A2 (en) * 1993-02-26 1994-08-31 Philips Patentverwaltung GmbH Videodecoder with a control unit
EP0613302A3 (en) * 1993-02-26 1995-02-01 Philips Patentverwaltung Videodecoder with a control unit.
GB2283876B (en) * 1993-11-09 1998-06-24 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Encoding and decoding code sequences and frames
GB2283876A (en) * 1993-11-09 1995-05-17 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Encoding and decoding moving pictures
US5815209A (en) * 1993-11-09 1998-09-29 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Encoding method, an encoding apparatus, a decoding method and a decoding apparatus for a moving picture
FR2737931A1 (en) * 1995-08-17 1997-02-21 Siemens Ag METHOD FOR THE PROCESSING OF BLOCKS OF IMAGES DECODED FROM A BLOCK-BASED IMAGE CODING PROCESS
US5933541A (en) * 1995-08-17 1999-08-03 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for processing decoded picture blocks in a block-based method of picture coding
WO1997015145A1 (en) * 1995-10-18 1997-04-24 Philips Electronics N.V. Region-based texture coding and decoding method, and corresponding systems
WO1997025818A1 (en) * 1996-01-12 1997-07-17 Iterated Systems, Inc. Predictive video encoding
US5982441A (en) * 1996-01-12 1999-11-09 Iterated Systems, Inc. System and method for representing a video sequence
EP0808068A3 (en) * 1996-05-14 1998-05-06 Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd Methods and apparatus for removing blocking effect in a motion picture decoder
EP0808068A2 (en) * 1996-05-14 1997-11-19 Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd Methods and apparatus for removing blocking effect in a motion picture decoder
EP1469680A3 (en) * 1996-05-14 2005-10-05 Daewoo Electronics Corporation Method and apparatus for removing blocking effects in a motion picture decoder
EP1469680A2 (en) * 1996-05-14 2004-10-20 Daewoo Electronics Corporation Method and apparatus for removing blocking effects in a motion picture decoder
EP0817496A2 (en) * 1996-07-04 1998-01-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for reducing blocking artifacts in encoded images
EP0817496A3 (en) * 1996-07-04 2000-03-08 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for reducing blocking artifacts in encoded images
EP1648174A1 (en) * 1996-07-04 2006-04-19 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for reducing blocking artifacts in encoded images
FR2763460A1 (en) * 1997-03-10 1998-11-20 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd ADAPTIVE ONE-DIMENSIONAL SIGNAL FILTER FOR REDUCING BLOCKING EFFECT AND FILTERING METHOD

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH05110871A (en) 1993-04-30
GB2253318A (en) 1992-09-02
US5220616A (en) 1993-06-15
EP0502622B1 (en) 1995-12-20
GB9104166D0 (en) 1991-04-17
GB2253318B (en) 1994-07-20
DE69206847D1 (en) 1996-02-01
DE69206847T2 (en) 1996-05-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5220616A (en) Image processing
JP2920209B2 (en) Blocking Phenomenon Elimination Method by Video Coding
US7864867B2 (en) Video coder employing pixel transposition
US6668097B1 (en) Method and apparatus for the reduction of artifact in decompressed images using morphological post-filtering
US6456745B1 (en) Method and apparatus for re-sizing and zooming images by operating directly on their digital transforms
EP0705027A2 (en) Region-based image processing method, image processing apparatus and image communication apparatus
KR20040065967A (en) Methods and apparatus for removing blocking artifacts of MPEG signals in real-time video reception
JPS60190090A (en) Method of processing gray scale image picture element
CN110324617A (en) Image processing method and device
JP3822298B2 (en) Video signal padding method and apparatus
Kondo et al. Digital image compression using directional sub-block DCT
US7039107B1 (en) Method and array for processing a digitized image with image points
RU94016495A (en) WAY OF CAPTURE COMPRESSION OF IMAGES
JP3176270B2 (en) Image decoding processing method
JP2919236B2 (en) Image coding device
JPH06292184A (en) Coding system
US7010173B2 (en) Video coder employing pixel transposition
KR20030078633A (en) Method of processing digital images for low-bit rate applications
KR20050085368A (en) Method of measuring blocking artefacts
JP2998388B2 (en) Image processing method
Yin Methods in digital image processing for subsea applications
Cheung et al. Window-Extent Tradeoffs in Inverse Dithering
Naemura et al. Detection of image orientation with mathematical morphology and orientation‐adaptive image processing for antialiasing
KR20040105274A (en) Method for blocking artifact reduction included ended image based on bdct
JPH03105484A (en) Method and device for color image processing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19920723

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19940624

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR NL SE

ET Fr: translation filed
REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69206847

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19960201

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19990118

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19990126

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000215

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000901

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 92301215.7

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20000901

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20040202

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20040227

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050901

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20051031