EP0492679A1 - Detergent powders - Google Patents
Detergent powders Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0492679A1 EP0492679A1 EP19910202862 EP91202862A EP0492679A1 EP 0492679 A1 EP0492679 A1 EP 0492679A1 EP 19910202862 EP19910202862 EP 19910202862 EP 91202862 A EP91202862 A EP 91202862A EP 0492679 A1 EP0492679 A1 EP 0492679A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- additive
- weight
- composition
- composition according
- fatty acid
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D1/00—Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
- C11D1/66—Non-ionic compounds
- C11D1/667—Neutral esters, e.g. sorbitan esters
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
- C11D3/16—Organic compounds
- C11D3/20—Organic compounds containing oxygen
- C11D3/2093—Esters; Carbonates
Definitions
- the present invention relates to detergent powders intended for use in drum-type fabric washing machines.
- the invention is of especial applicability to powders containing no, or reduced levels of, phosphate builders and to powders of high bulk density, which have a tendency to dispense poorly.
- the invention comprises a granular detergent composition comprising one or more surfactants and an additive, said additive being a polyol which is completely esterified with fatty acids, the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue being at least 14.
- the polyol is a glycerol.
- the invention provides a process for the preparation of a detergent composition comprising one or more anionic and/or nonionic surfactants and further comprising an additive, said additive being a polyol which is completely esterified with fatty acids, the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue being at least 14.
- the invention relates to the use of a polyol which is completely esterified with fatty acids, the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue being at least 14, as an additive for improving the dispensing behaviour of a granular detergent composition.
- EP-A-337,523 discloses that the dispensing properties of certain spray-dried detergent powder may be improved by the incorporation of 0.1 to 6.0% by weight of certain hydrophobic additives such as paraffin wax.
- EP-A-344,629 (Henkel) relates to a spray-dried granular detergent composition comprising 45 to 75% zeolite, 1 to 6% water-soluble soap, 1 to 12% of a polymer and 10 to 22% water, the granules having a mean particle size of 0.2 to 1.2 mm and a bulk density of 350 to 680 g/l.
- the granules have a high absorption capacity for liquid or pasty detergent components such as nonionic surfactants, and are used to manufacture a detergent powder having improved dispensing properties.
- the dispensing properties may be further improved if the nonionic surfactant contains a polar compound which is sparingly or not soluble in water, but may be dispersed therein, which compound further comprises hydrophobic moieties.
- a polar compound which is sparingly or not soluble in water, but may be dispersed therein, which compound further comprises hydrophobic moieties.
- Partially esterified polyols such as partially esterified glycerols are mentioned as examples.
- the first aspect of the invention is a granular detergent composition.
- the composition of the invention may be a fully formulated detergent composition prepared wholly by spray-drying or dry-mixing. It may also be a spray-dried base to which other ingredients may be admixed to form a finished product or a finished product of that type, comprising a spray-dried base in admixture with other ingredients.
- the detergent powder of the invention contains one or more surfactants, preferably anionic and/or nonionic surfactants, and a fully esterified polyol (hereafter also referred to as the additive), which influences its dispensing behaviour in a particular manner.
- surfactants preferably anionic and/or nonionic surfactants
- additive a fully esterified polyol
- composition of the invention may also contain any of the materials conventionally included in detergent compositions. These are described in more detail below.
- the surfactant component is the surfactant component
- the total amount of surfactant present in the composition of the invention will generally range from 5 to 40% by weight, more preferably from 10 to 30% by weight and especially from 12 to 20% by weight. These figures are typical for fully formulated detergent compositions, and where a spray-dried base forms only part of such a composition the surfactant content of that base, as a percentage, may of course be higher.
- the invention is of especial applicability to compositions containing anionic surfactant.
- the high-foaming anionic surfactant tends to cause "puffing" (entrainment of air) in the slurry, so that highly porous particles are formed in the spray-drying tower. These particles may be very crisp and free-flowing, but may be of lower bulk density than desired.
- the incorporation into the slurry of the additive in accordance with the present invention results in a bulk density increase.
- the amount of anionic surfactant present is desirably at least 5% by weight, and may suitably be in the range of from 5 to 30% by weight, preferably from 5 to 10% by weight, these figures again being based on a fully formulated detergent composition.
- Anionic surfactants are well known to those skilled in the art. Examples include alkylbenzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear alkylbenzene sulphonates having an alkyl chain length of C8-C15; primary and secondary alkyl sulphates, particularly sodium C12-C15 primary alcohol sulphates; olefin sulphonates; alkane sulphonates; dialkyl sulphosuccinates; and fatty acid ester sulphonates.
- alkylbenzene sulphonates particularly sodium linear alkylbenzene sulphonates having an alkyl chain length of C8-C15
- primary and secondary alkyl sulphates particularly sodium C12-C15 primary alcohol sulphates
- olefin sulphonates alkane sulphonates
- dialkyl sulphosuccinates and fatty acid ester sulphonates.
- the composition of the invention also contains one or more nonionic surfactants.
- Nonionic surfactants that may be used include the primary and secondary alcohol ethoxylates, especially the C12-C15 primary and secondary alcohols ethoxylated with an average of from 3 to 20 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
- the weight ratio of anionic surfactant to nonionic surfactant is preferably at least 0.67:1, more preferably at least 1:1, and most preferably within the range of from 1:1 to 0:1, in order to obtain the optimum detergency and foaming properties appropriate for front-loading automatic washing machines. These ratios of course apply to fully formulated products.
- a spray-dried base that is to form only part of a product may contain a lower proportion of, or no, nonionic surfactant, the balance of the nonionic surfactant being added after the spray-drying tower.
- the characterizing feature of the composition of the present invention is the presence of a low level (0.1-6.0% by weight) of an additive, a polyol which is completely esterified with fatty acids, whereby the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue is at least 14.
- a triglyceride is used.
- the additive may be a single type of triglyceride whereby the fatty acid residues are derived from one single type of fatty acid such as stearic acid or palmitic acid, but also mixtures of fatty acids can be employed.
- the fatty acids may be saturated or unsaturated and can be of natural or synthetic origin. The only prerequisite appears to be that the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue in the triglyceride is at least 14, preferably at least 16 and more preferably at least 18.
- triglyceride In stead of one single type of triglyceride one can also use mixtures of triglycerides such as they occur naturally in fats from animal or plant origin. An example of a much preferred material is tallow fat because it is easily available and attractive from an economic point of view. Mixtures of fats can obviously also be used.
- the additive is preferably present in an amount of from 0.2 to 4% by weight. In a fully formulated product the optimum level for triglycerides appears to be from 0.3 to 2% by weight.
- the composition of the invention can be prepared by a process which includes the step of spray-drying an aqueous crutcher slurry.
- This slurry will normally contain all those desired ingredients sufficiently heat-stable to survive the spray-drying process, notably anionic surfactants, builders, inorganic salts, sodium silicate, polymers and fluorescers. More heat-sensitive ingredients can be postdosed to, or sprayed onto, the spray-dried base.
- the composition may be prepared by a process which involves the in-situ neutralization of an acid anionic surfactant precursor by a solid alkaline component.
- the additive characteristic of the invention may be incorporated. It may be included in the slurry, in which case it is preferably used in an amount of from 0.2 to 4.0% by weight, more preferably from 0.3 to 2.0% by weight, based on the final powder including any postdosed ingredients. It may be advantageous to premix the additive with surfactant, especially nonionic surfactant, before admixture with other slurry ingredients.
- a second method by which the additive may be incorporated in a detergent composition of the invention is by spraying it in liquefied form onto the spray-dried powder, for example when the powder is transported on a conveyor belt.
- the additive may be melted and sprayed directly onto the powder. It is then preferably used in an amount of from 2.0 to 6.0% by weight, more preferably from 3.0 to 4.0% by weight.
- the additive is premixed with nonionic surfactant to form a coating composition which may then be sprayed onto the detergent powder.
- Lower levels of the additive for example, 0.2 to 4.0%, preferably 0.3 to 2.0%, are then found to be effective.
- the coating composition consists essentially of 2-50% by weight of the additive and 50-98% by weight of nonionic surfactant.
- the coating composition desirably contains 5-25% by weight of tallow fat and 75-95% by weight of nonionic surfactant.
- the tallow, and if necessary the nonionic surfactant are mixed to form the coating composition, which is applied as a liquid, suitably at a temperature of 20-60°C.
- the coating composition should be substantially free of other ingredients that might interfere with the beneficial effect of the additive on dispensing.
- the incorporation as specified above of an additive should bring about an improvement in dispensing behaviour. Dispensing is assessed by means of a standard test using a Philips (Trade Mark) AWB 126/7 washing machine using a 100 g powder dose and a water fill of 5 liters at 20°C flowing in over a period of 1 minute. The dry weight of powder remaining in the dispenser, in grams, then represents the weight percentage of powder not dispensed into the machine (the residue). It will be appreciated that this test is stringent, using a low water inlet temperature and flow rate, and a machine with a drawer-type dispenser which is particularly vulnerable to high residues and clogging. According to the invention, the incorporation of the completely esterified polyol or triglyceride material should effect a reduction in the residue of at least 10 percentage points, preferably at least 20 percentage points.
- the present invention is therefore especially applicable to powders which, without the additive, give dispenser residues of at least 10%, more especially at least 20%, by weight. That is especially likely to be the case if the powder is a zero-phosphate composition built with crystalline (zeolite) or amorphous sodium aluminosilicate; if it contains less than 10% sodium silicate; or if it has a bulk density of 600, preferably of 700 g/litre or more.
- zeolite crystalline
- amorphous sodium aluminosilicate if it contains less than 10% sodium silicate; or if it has a bulk density of 600, preferably of 700 g/litre or more.
- the detergent powder of the invention can contain any of the ingredients conventionally present in compositions intended for the washing of fabrics in automatic washing machines.
- examples of such components include inorganic and organic detergency builders, other inorganic salts, sodium silicate, bleaches, fluorescers, polymers, lather control agents, enzymes and perfumes.
- the powder of the invention may contain one or more soaps of fatty acids, in addition to the non-soap anionic surfactant mentioned above.
- the powder will also contain one or more detergency builders.
- the invention is of especial applicability, as previously mentioned, to low- or zero-phosphate powders containing crystalline (zeolite) or amorphous alumino silicate.
- Zeolite may suitably be present in an amount of from 20 to 80% by weight.
- Other, supplementary, builders may also be present, for example, polycarboxylate polymers such as polyacrylates, acrylic-maleic copolymers, or acrylic phosphinates; monomeric polycarboxylates such as nitrilotriacetates and ethylene diamine tetraacetates; inorganic salts such as sodium carbonate; and many other builder materials familiar to the skilled detergent formulator.
- the powder of the invention may contain sodium silicate.
- High levels of silicate can in themselves have a beneficial effect on dispensing, as well as on powder structure and prevention of machine corrosion, but are undesirable in powders containing aluminosilicate because the two components react together to form insoluble siliceous species.
- the present invention enables the dispensing behaviour of zeolite-built powders to be improved without a corresponding increase in the level of insoluble material. Accordingly, the invention is of especial applicability to powders containing less that 10% by weight, more especially less than 5% by weight, of sodium silicate.
- fluorescers include fluorescers, antiredeposition agents, inorganic salts such as sodium sulphate, enzymes, lather control agents, bleaches, bleach activators, and bleach stabilizers. These may be included in the spray-dried base powder or postdosed according to their known suitability for undergoing spray-drying processes and their compatibility with other slurry ingredients.
- a phosphate-free detergent base powder was prepared, by slurry-making and spray-drying, to form the following nominal composition: Parts ABS 9.23 Nonionic 7EO 2.75 Zeolite (anhydrous) 26.00 Carbonate 3.00 Copolymer 3.00 Minor ingredients 0.99 Moisture 11.24 Total: 56.21
- the Examples 1-4 were repeated using tallow fat/nonionic mixtures in various amounts.
- the coating compositions were as follows (amounts given in parts): 5 6 7 Tallow fat 0.25 0.50 1.00 Nonionic 3EO 4.70 4.70 4.70
- Table 2 shows the dispenser residue of the obtained compositions, when measured as described above.
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to detergent powders intended for use in drum-type fabric washing machines. The invention is of especial applicability to powders containing no, or reduced levels of, phosphate builders and to powders of high bulk density, which have a tendency to dispense poorly.
- In recent years the trend in detergent compositions has been towards reducing or eliminating phosphate builders. The replacement of sodium tripolyphosphate as a builder in detergent powders by its most popular zero-phosphate substitute, crystalline sodium aluminosilicate (zeolite), has led to a number of difficulties with the structure and physical properties of the powder. One such problem that has been encountered is the tendency of zeolite-built powders to dispense less well in automatic washing machines than do their phosphate-built counterparts; a higher proportion of the powder dosed into the machine is left behind in the dispenser, leading to product wastage and clogging. This problem is especially marked at low water inlet temperatures.
- The tendency towards poor dispensing has been exacerbated by the recent trend in the detergents industry towards higher bulk density powders.
- We have now found that the dispensing behaviour of those powders that are especially prone to this problem may be substantially improved by including in the powders a small amount of an additive, said additive being a polyol which is completely esterified with fatty acids, the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue being at least 14. Surprisingly, the incorporation of these compounds via the slurry also improves powder structure and, when anionic surfactant is present, raises the bulk density.
- In a first aspect, the invention comprises a granular detergent composition comprising one or more surfactants and an additive, said additive being a polyol which is completely esterified with fatty acids, the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue being at least 14. Preferably, the polyol is a glycerol.
- In a second aspect, the invention provides a process for the preparation of a detergent composition comprising one or more anionic and/or nonionic surfactants and further comprising an additive, said additive being a polyol which is completely esterified with fatty acids, the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue being at least 14.
- In a third aspect, the invention relates to the use of a polyol which is completely esterified with fatty acids, the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue being at least 14, as an additive for improving the dispensing behaviour of a granular detergent composition.
- EP-A-337,523 (Unilever) discloses that the dispensing properties of certain spray-dried detergent powder may be improved by the incorporation of 0.1 to 6.0% by weight of certain hydrophobic additives such as paraffin wax.
- EP-A-344,629 (Henkel) relates to a spray-dried granular detergent composition comprising 45 to 75% zeolite, 1 to 6% water-soluble soap, 1 to 12% of a polymer and 10 to 22% water, the granules having a mean particle size of 0.2 to 1.2 mm and a bulk density of 350 to 680 g/l. The granules have a high absorption capacity for liquid or pasty detergent components such as nonionic surfactants, and are used to manufacture a detergent powder having improved dispensing properties. It is mentioned that the dispensing properties may be further improved if the nonionic surfactant contains a polar compound which is sparingly or not soluble in water, but may be dispersed therein, which compound further comprises hydrophobic moieties. Partially esterified polyols such as partially esterified glycerols are mentioned as examples.
- The first aspect of the invention is a granular detergent composition. The composition of the invention may be a fully formulated detergent composition prepared wholly by spray-drying or dry-mixing. It may also be a spray-dried base to which other ingredients may be admixed to form a finished product or a finished product of that type, comprising a spray-dried base in admixture with other ingredients.
- As essential ingredients, the detergent powder of the invention contains one or more surfactants, preferably anionic and/or nonionic surfactants, and a fully esterified polyol (hereafter also referred to as the additive), which influences its dispensing behaviour in a particular manner.
- The composition of the invention may also contain any of the materials conventionally included in detergent compositions. These are described in more detail below.
- The total amount of surfactant present in the composition of the invention will generally range from 5 to 40% by weight, more preferably from 10 to 30% by weight and especially from 12 to 20% by weight. These figures are typical for fully formulated detergent compositions, and where a spray-dried base forms only part of such a composition the surfactant content of that base, as a percentage, may of course be higher.
- The invention is of especial applicability to compositions containing anionic surfactant. When such powders are prepared by spray-drying, the high-foaming anionic surfactant tends to cause "puffing" (entrainment of air) in the slurry, so that highly porous particles are formed in the spray-drying tower. These particles may be very crisp and free-flowing, but may be of lower bulk density than desired. Surprisingly, the incorporation into the slurry of the additive in accordance with the present invention results in a bulk density increase.
- The amount of anionic surfactant present is desirably at least 5% by weight, and may suitably be in the range of from 5 to 30% by weight, preferably from 5 to 10% by weight, these figures again being based on a fully formulated detergent composition.
- Anionic surfactants are well known to those skilled in the art. Examples include alkylbenzene sulphonates, particularly sodium linear alkylbenzene sulphonates having an alkyl chain length of C₈-C₁₅; primary and secondary alkyl sulphates, particularly sodium C₁₂-C₁₅ primary alcohol sulphates; olefin sulphonates; alkane sulphonates; dialkyl sulphosuccinates; and fatty acid ester sulphonates.
- Preferably, the composition of the invention also contains one or more nonionic surfactants. Nonionic surfactants that may be used include the primary and secondary alcohol ethoxylates, especially the C₁₂-C₁₅ primary and secondary alcohols ethoxylated with an average of from 3 to 20 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol.
- The weight ratio of anionic surfactant to nonionic surfactant is preferably at least 0.67:1, more preferably at least 1:1, and most preferably within the range of from 1:1 to 0:1, in order to obtain the optimum detergency and foaming properties appropriate for front-loading automatic washing machines. These ratios of course apply to fully formulated products. A spray-dried base that is to form only part of a product may contain a lower proportion of, or no, nonionic surfactant, the balance of the nonionic surfactant being added after the spray-drying tower.
- The characterizing feature of the composition of the present invention is the presence of a low level (0.1-6.0% by weight) of an additive, a polyol which is completely esterified with fatty acids, whereby the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue is at least 14. Preferably, a triglyceride is used.
- The additive may be a single type of triglyceride whereby the fatty acid residues are derived from one single type of fatty acid such as stearic acid or palmitic acid, but also mixtures of fatty acids can be employed. The fatty acids may be saturated or unsaturated and can be of natural or synthetic origin. The only prerequisite appears to be that the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue in the triglyceride is at least 14, preferably at least 16 and more preferably at least 18.
- In stead of one single type of triglyceride one can also use mixtures of triglycerides such as they occur naturally in fats from animal or plant origin. An example of a much preferred material is tallow fat because it is easily available and attractive from an economic point of view. Mixtures of fats can obviously also be used.
- The additive is preferably present in an amount of from 0.2 to 4% by weight. In a fully formulated product the optimum level for triglycerides appears to be from 0.3 to 2% by weight.
- The composition of the invention can be prepared by a process which includes the step of spray-drying an aqueous crutcher slurry. This slurry will normally contain all those desired ingredients sufficiently heat-stable to survive the spray-drying process, notably anionic surfactants, builders, inorganic salts, sodium silicate, polymers and fluorescers. More heat-sensitive ingredients can be postdosed to, or sprayed onto, the spray-dried base. Alternatively, the composition may be prepared by a process which involves the in-situ neutralization of an acid anionic surfactant precursor by a solid alkaline component.
- There are various methods by means of which the additive characteristic of the invention may be incorporated. It may be included in the slurry, in which case it is preferably used in an amount of from 0.2 to 4.0% by weight, more preferably from 0.3 to 2.0% by weight, based on the final powder including any postdosed ingredients. It may be advantageous to premix the additive with surfactant, especially nonionic surfactant, before admixture with other slurry ingredients.
- It has surprisingly been found that incorporation of the additive via the slurry not only improves dispensing behaviour, but also improves powder structure and, when anionic surfactant is present, also raises the bulk density. Flow properties are not detrimentally affected.
- A second method by which the additive may be incorporated in a detergent composition of the invention is by spraying it in liquefied form onto the spray-dried powder, for example when the powder is transported on a conveyor belt.
- If necessary, the additive may be melted and sprayed directly onto the powder. It is then preferably used in an amount of from 2.0 to 6.0% by weight, more preferably from 3.0 to 4.0% by weight.
- According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, however, the additive is premixed with nonionic surfactant to form a coating composition which may then be sprayed onto the detergent powder. Lower levels of the additive, for example, 0.2 to 4.0%, preferably 0.3 to 2.0%, are then found to be effective. The coating composition consists essentially of 2-50% by weight of the additive and 50-98% by weight of nonionic surfactant. In the preferred embodiment of the invention in which the additive is tallow, the coating composition desirably contains 5-25% by weight of tallow fat and 75-95% by weight of nonionic surfactant. The tallow, and if necessary the nonionic surfactant, are mixed to form the coating composition, which is applied as a liquid, suitably at a temperature of 20-60°C.
- The coating composition should be substantially free of other ingredients that might interfere with the beneficial effect of the additive on dispensing.
- It is an essential feature of the detergent powder of the invention that the incorporation as specified above of an additive should bring about an improvement in dispensing behaviour. Dispensing is assessed by means of a standard test using a Philips (Trade Mark) AWB 126/7 washing machine using a 100 g powder dose and a water fill of 5 liters at 20°C flowing in over a period of 1 minute. The dry weight of powder remaining in the dispenser, in grams, then represents the weight percentage of powder not dispensed into the machine (the residue). It will be appreciated that this test is stringent, using a low water inlet temperature and flow rate, and a machine with a drawer-type dispenser which is particularly vulnerable to high residues and clogging. According to the invention, the incorporation of the completely esterified polyol or triglyceride material should effect a reduction in the residue of at least 10 percentage points, preferably at least 20 percentage points.
- Clearly an improvement of this magnitude can only be observed if the control powder exhibits poor dispensing properties. The present invention is therefore especially applicable to powders which, without the additive, give dispenser residues of at least 10%, more especially at least 20%, by weight. That is especially likely to be the case if the powder is a zero-phosphate composition built with crystalline (zeolite) or amorphous sodium aluminosilicate; if it contains less than 10% sodium silicate; or if it has a bulk density of 600, preferably of 700 g/litre or more.
- As indicated previously, the detergent powder of the invention can contain any of the ingredients conventionally present in compositions intended for the washing of fabrics in automatic washing machines. Examples of such components include inorganic and organic detergency builders, other inorganic salts, sodium silicate, bleaches, fluorescers, polymers, lather control agents, enzymes and perfumes.
- If desired, the powder of the invention may contain one or more soaps of fatty acids, in addition to the non-soap anionic surfactant mentioned above.
- The powder will also contain one or more detergency builders. The invention is of especial applicability, as previously mentioned, to low- or zero-phosphate powders containing crystalline (zeolite) or amorphous alumino silicate. Zeolite may suitably be present in an amount of from 20 to 80% by weight. Other, supplementary, builders may also be present, for example, polycarboxylate polymers such as polyacrylates, acrylic-maleic copolymers, or acrylic phosphinates; monomeric polycarboxylates such as nitrilotriacetates and ethylene diamine tetraacetates; inorganic salts such as sodium carbonate; and many other builder materials familiar to the skilled detergent formulator.
- If desired, the powder of the invention may contain sodium silicate. High levels of silicate can in themselves have a beneficial effect on dispensing, as well as on powder structure and prevention of machine corrosion, but are undesirable in powders containing aluminosilicate because the two components react together to form insoluble siliceous species. The present invention enables the dispensing behaviour of zeolite-built powders to be improved without a corresponding increase in the level of insoluble material. Accordingly, the invention is of especial applicability to powders containing less that 10% by weight, more especially less than 5% by weight, of sodium silicate.
- Other materials that may be present in the powder of the invention include fluorescers, antiredeposition agents, inorganic salts such as sodium sulphate, enzymes, lather control agents, bleaches, bleach activators, and bleach stabilizers. These may be included in the spray-dried base powder or postdosed according to their known suitability for undergoing spray-drying processes and their compatibility with other slurry ingredients.
- The invention is further illustrated by the following non-limiting Examples, in which parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise stated. In the Examples the following abbreviations are used:
- ABS
- : C₁₂-C₁₅ alkyl benzene sulphonate
- Nonionic
- : Nonionic surfactant (ethoxylated alcohol), Synperonic A3 or A7 (3 or 7 EO groups, respectively) ex ICI
- Carbonate
- : Sodium carbonate
- Zeolite
- : Zeolite 4A (Wessalith [Trade Mark] ex Degussa)
- Copolymer
- : Copolymer of maleic and acrylic acid having a molecular weight of 70,000, CP5 ex BASF
- A phosphate-free detergent base powder was prepared, by slurry-making and spray-drying, to form the following nominal composition:
Parts ABS 9.23 Nonionic 7EO 2.75 Zeolite (anhydrous) 26.00 Carbonate 3.00 Copolymer 3.00 Minor ingredients 0.99 Moisture 11.24 Total: 56.21 - To this base powder, 6.0 parts of sodium carbonate were postdosed.
- Subsequently, 0.47 Parts of the triglycerides trilaurate, trimyristate tripalmitate and tristearate were each melted and dispersed in 4.7 parts liquid nonionic 3EO surfactant. These coating compositions thus consisted of 90.9% by weight of liquid nonionic surfactant and 9.1% by weight of triglyceride. The liquid triglyceride mixtures were sprayed onto the above described base powder/carbonate mixture. A comparative example A was prepared by spaying only 4.7 parts of nonionic surfactant onto the base powder. The following Table 1 shows the dispenser residue of the obtained five compositions, when measured in a Philips (Trade Mark) AWB 126/7 washing machine using 100 g powder, and 5 liters of water at 20°C flowing in over a period of 1 minute
- The incorporation of triglycerides having 16 C-atoms or more in the fatty acid residue results in a significant improvement of the dispensing behaviour.
- The Examples 1-4 were repeated using tallow fat/nonionic mixtures in various amounts. The coating compositions were as follows (amounts given in parts):
5 6 7 Tallow fat 0.25 0.50 1.00 Nonionic 3EO 4.70 4.70 4.70 -
- It can be seen that even at the low level of 0.25 parts or 0.4% by weight of tallow fat, negligible values were found for the dispenser residue.
- Complete fabric washing powders were prepared by post-dozing the ingredients mentioned below to the base powders of Comparative Example A and Example 6, to give the compositions of Comparative Example B and Example 8, respectively.
Base powder 72.3 Sodium perborate monohydrate 19.6 TAED granules 4.5 Enzyme granules 0.6 Anti-foam granules 3.0 Total 100.0 - The dispensing properties of the obtained washing powders are given in the following Table 3.
TABLE 2 Example 8 B Dispenser Residue (%) 0 51
Claims (16)
- A granular detergent composition comprising one or more surfactants and an additive, said additive being a polyol which is completely esterified with fatty acids, the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue being at least 14.
- A composition according to Claim 1, comprising from 0.1 to 6.0 % by weight of the additive.
- A composition according to any one of the preceding Claims, comprising from 0.2 to 4.0 % by weight of the additive.
- A composition according to any one of the preceding Claims, wherein the additive is a triglyceride.
- A composition according to any one of the preceding Claims, wherein the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue in the triglyceride is at least 16, preferably at least 18.
- A composition according to any one of the preceding Claims, wherein the additive is tallow fat.
- A composition according to any one of the preceding Claims, characterized in that a comparative composition without the additive gives a dispenser residue of at least 10%, preferably at least 20% by weight in the defined test.
- A composition according to any one of the preceding Claims, characterized in that a comparative composition without the additive gives a dispenser residue of at least 30% by weight in the defined test.
- A composition according to any one of the preceding Claims, which is substantially free from inorganic phosphate.
- A composition according to any one of the preceding Claims, containing at least 5% by weight of one or more anionic surfactants.
- A composition according to any one of the preceding Claims, comprising from 20 to 80% by weight of crystalline or amorphous aluminosilicate detergency builder.
- A composition according to any one of the preceding Claims, containing no more than 10% by weight of alkali metal silicate.
- A composition according to any one of the preceding Claims, having a bulk density of at least 600 g/l, preferably at least 700 g/l.
- A process for the preparation of a detergent composition comprising one or more surfactants and further comprising as an additive a polyol which is completely esterified with fatty acids, the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue being at least 14, whereby the additive is incorporated in the slurry or sprayed onto the composition in an amount of from 0.1 to 6% by weight based on the composition.
- A process according to Claim 14, whereby the additive is incorporated in an amount of from 0.2 to 4.0% by weight based on the composition.
- Use of a polyol which is completely esterified with fatty acids, the mean number of carbon atoms per fatty acid residue being at least 14, for improving the dispensing properties of a detergent composition.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB909025673A GB9025673D0 (en) | 1990-11-26 | 1990-11-26 | Detergent powders and process for preparing them |
GB9025673 | 1990-11-26 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0492679A1 true EP0492679A1 (en) | 1992-07-01 |
EP0492679B1 EP0492679B1 (en) | 1996-10-16 |
EP0492679B2 EP0492679B2 (en) | 2000-01-26 |
Family
ID=10685993
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP91202862A Expired - Lifetime EP0492679B2 (en) | 1990-11-26 | 1991-11-05 | Detergent powders |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0492679B2 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE144279T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU8810991A (en) |
DE (1) | DE69122730T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2094189T5 (en) |
GB (1) | GB9025673D0 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA919329B (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1995001418A1 (en) * | 1993-07-02 | 1995-01-12 | Unilever Plc | Process for the production of a detergent composition |
EP0694608A1 (en) * | 1994-07-28 | 1996-01-31 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Process for making granular detergents and detergent compositions comprising nonionic surfactant |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1395010A (en) * | 1971-05-28 | 1975-05-21 | Unilever Ltd | Coated alkaline earth metal hypochorites |
EP0206418A2 (en) * | 1985-06-28 | 1986-12-30 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Dry bleach and stable enzyme granular composition |
EP0337523A1 (en) * | 1988-03-21 | 1989-10-18 | Unilever N.V. | Detergent powders and process for preparing them |
-
1990
- 1990-11-26 GB GB909025673A patent/GB9025673D0/en active Pending
-
1991
- 1991-11-05 DE DE69122730T patent/DE69122730T3/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1991-11-05 AT AT91202862T patent/ATE144279T1/en active
- 1991-11-05 EP EP91202862A patent/EP0492679B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-11-05 ES ES91202862T patent/ES2094189T5/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-11-22 AU AU88109/91A patent/AU8810991A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1991-11-26 ZA ZA919329A patent/ZA919329B/en unknown
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1395010A (en) * | 1971-05-28 | 1975-05-21 | Unilever Ltd | Coated alkaline earth metal hypochorites |
EP0206418A2 (en) * | 1985-06-28 | 1986-12-30 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Dry bleach and stable enzyme granular composition |
EP0337523A1 (en) * | 1988-03-21 | 1989-10-18 | Unilever N.V. | Detergent powders and process for preparing them |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1995001418A1 (en) * | 1993-07-02 | 1995-01-12 | Unilever Plc | Process for the production of a detergent composition |
AU699818B2 (en) * | 1993-07-02 | 1998-12-17 | Unilever Plc | Process for the production of high bulk density detergent composition |
EP0694608A1 (en) * | 1994-07-28 | 1996-01-31 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Process for making granular detergents and detergent compositions comprising nonionic surfactant |
WO1996003482A1 (en) * | 1994-07-28 | 1996-02-08 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Process for making granular detergents and detergent compositions comprising nonionic surfactant |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ZA919329B (en) | 1993-05-26 |
DE69122730T2 (en) | 1997-03-13 |
EP0492679B1 (en) | 1996-10-16 |
ATE144279T1 (en) | 1996-11-15 |
ES2094189T3 (en) | 1997-01-16 |
AU8810991A (en) | 1992-05-28 |
ES2094189T5 (en) | 2000-05-01 |
DE69122730D1 (en) | 1996-11-21 |
EP0492679B2 (en) | 2000-01-26 |
DE69122730T3 (en) | 2000-09-14 |
GB9025673D0 (en) | 1991-01-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0534525B1 (en) | Detergent powders and process for preparing them | |
US4925585A (en) | Detergent granules from cold dough using fine dispersion granulation | |
EP0451894B2 (en) | High bulk density granular detergent compositions and process for preparing them | |
KR930005063B1 (en) | Detergent compositions | |
EP0040091A1 (en) | Suds suppressing granules for use in detergent compositions | |
EP0570237B1 (en) | Particulate fabric softening and detergent compositions | |
JPH09509204A (en) | Detergent containing an amorphous silicate builder substance | |
AU620381B2 (en) | Detergent powders and process for preparing them | |
EP0451893B1 (en) | Particulate bleaching detergent composition | |
US5736502A (en) | Process for preparing detergent compositions | |
EP0678119B1 (en) | Detergent composition and process for producing it | |
US5514295A (en) | Dispensable powder detergent | |
EP0119746B1 (en) | Process for manufacturing detergent powder | |
EP0492679B1 (en) | Detergent powders | |
CA1180970A (en) | Process for making controlled sudsing detergent powder | |
EP0436240B1 (en) | Process for preparing a high bulk density detergent composition having improved dispensing properties | |
CA1333245C (en) | Laundry detergent bar containing linear alkyl benzene sulfonate | |
JPH01268799A (en) | Granular washing detergent composition | |
EP0836640A1 (en) | Process for the production of a detergent composition | |
US20030114347A1 (en) | Detergent compositions | |
EP0710717A1 (en) | Dispensable powder detergent |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI NL SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19920703 |
|
RAP3 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: UNILEVER N.V. Owner name: UNILEVER PLC |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19950517 |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI NL SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 19961016 Ref country code: AT Effective date: 19961016 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 19961016 Ref country code: DK Effective date: 19961016 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 19961016 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 19961016 Ref country code: BE Effective date: 19961016 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 144279 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19961115 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69122730 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19961121 |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: JACOBACCI & PERANI S.P.A. |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Effective date: 19970116 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2094189 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLBQ | Unpublished change to opponent data |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO |
|
PLBF | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: HENKEL KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT AUF AKTIEN Effective date: 19970707 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: HENKEL KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT AUF AKTIEN Effective date: 19970707 Opponent name: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY Effective date: 19970716 |
|
PLBF | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO |
|
PLBF | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO |
|
PLBQ | Unpublished change to opponent data |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: HENKEL KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT AUF AKTIEN * 970716 T Effective date: 19970707 |
|
PLAW | Interlocutory decision in opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IDOP |
|
PLAW | Interlocutory decision in opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IDOP |
|
PUAH | Patent maintained in amended form |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED |
|
27A | Patent maintained in amended form |
Effective date: 20000126 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI NL SE |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: JACOBACCI & PERANI S.P.A. |
|
ET3 | Fr: translation filed ** decision concerning opposition | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: DC2A Kind code of ref document: T5 Effective date: 20000316 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20081126 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20081127 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20081117 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20081223 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20081128 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20091105 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20100730 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100601 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091105 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20110325 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091105 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110314 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091106 |