EP0456300A1 - Method of refining glyceride oil - Google Patents

Method of refining glyceride oil Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0456300A1
EP0456300A1 EP19910200995 EP91200995A EP0456300A1 EP 0456300 A1 EP0456300 A1 EP 0456300A1 EP 19910200995 EP19910200995 EP 19910200995 EP 91200995 A EP91200995 A EP 91200995A EP 0456300 A1 EP0456300 A1 EP 0456300A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
oil
acid
hydration
treatment
glyceride oil
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP19910200995
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0456300B1 (en
Inventor
Will J. Van Den Broek
Robert Leo K.M. C/O Unilever Res. Van De Sande
Jacobus Cornelis C/O Unilever Research Segers
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Unilever NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Unilever PLC, Unilever NV filed Critical Unilever PLC
Publication of EP0456300A1 publication Critical patent/EP0456300A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0456300B1 publication Critical patent/EP0456300B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11BPRODUCING, e.g. BY PRESSING RAW MATERIALS OR BY EXTRACTION FROM WASTE MATERIALS, REFINING OR PRESERVING FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES, e.g. LANOLIN, FATTY OILS OR WAXES; ESSENTIAL OILS; PERFUMES
    • C11B3/00Refining fats or fatty oils
    • C11B3/02Refining fats or fatty oils by chemical reaction

Abstract

The invention pertains to a method of refining glyceride oil comprising (1) an acid treatment in which an acid or acid anhydride is dispersed in the oil, (2) a hydration treatment in which alkali is mixed into the acidified glyceride oil during which treatment the temperature is maintained at 70°C or less, and (3) a separation treatment in which hydrated phosphatides so formed are separated from the glyceride oil. The invention provides a method to reliably achieve very good degumming results.

Description

  • The present invention relates to a method of refining glyceride oil, and in particular to such a method comprising an acid treatment in which an acid or acid anhydride is dispersed in the oil, a hydration treatment in which alkali is mixed into the acidified glyceride oil and a separation treatment in which hydrated phosphatides so formed are separated from the glyceride oil.
  • Glyceride oils of in particular vegetable origin, such as soybean oil, rapeseed oil, sunflower oil, safflower oil, cotton seed oil and the like, are a valuable raw material for the food industries. These oils in crude form are usually obtained from seeds and beans by pressing and/or extraction.
  • Such crude glyceride oils mainly consist of triglyceride components. However, they generally also contain a significant amount of non-triglyceride components including phosphatides (gums), waxy substances, partial glycerides, free fatty acids, colouring materials and small amounts of metals. Depending on the intended use of the oil, many of these impurities have an undesirable effect on the (storage) stability, taste, and colour of later products. It is therefore necessary to refine, i.e. to remove the gums and other impurities from the crude glyceride oils as much as possible.
  • In general the first step in the refining of glyceride oils is the so-called degumming step, i.e. the removal of the gums. In this context the term "degumming" relates to any treatment which eventually results in the removal of gums and associated components from the oil. In conventional degumming processes water is added to the crude glyceride oil to hydrate the phosphatides, which are subsequently removed, e.g. by centrifugal separation. Since the resulting degummed oil often still contains unacceptably high levels of "non-hydratable" phosphatides, this water-degumming step is normally followed by chemical treatments with acid and/or alkali to remove the residual phosphatides and to neutralize the free fatty acids ("alkali-refining").
  • Subsequently, the soapstock so formed is separated from the neutralized oil by for instance centrifugal separation. The resulting oil is then further refined using bleaching and deodorizing treatments.
  • By the above-described water-degumming step in general residual phosphorus levels are achieved in the order of 100-250 ppm. US-A-4,049,686 discloses an improved refining method in which the crude or water-degummed oil is treated with a concentrated acid such as in particular citric acid, reducing residual phosphorus levels to within the range of from 20 to 50 ppm.
  • EP-A-195,991 discloses a process for producing degummed vegetable oils, in which water degummed oil is first subjected to an acid treatment in which acid is finely dispersed in the water-degummed oil under dispersion conditions yielding at least 10 million acid droplets per gram of oil corresponding to an interface surface area between the acid and oil droplets of at least 0.2 m² per 100 gram of oil, and subsequently, to an alkali treatment in which sufficient alkali is added to the acid-in-oil dispersion to increase the pH to above 2.5. The refining process is carried out at an oil temperature of more than 75°C.
  • The above prior-art refining process is characterized by a difficult separation step requiring a large number of centrifuges (EP-A-344,718). Moreover, for certain oil qualities residual phosphorus levels are obtained that are still unacceptably high.
  • A review of prior-art refining processes is given in the article by J.C. Segers and R.L.K.M. van der Sande, entitled "Degumming - Theory and Practice", and presented at the AOS World Conference on Edible Oils and Fats, 2-6 October 1989, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a refining process which does not require the severe dispersion conditions of the aforementioned prior-art refining process.
  • It is a further object of the present invention to provide a refining process which reliably achieves very low levels of residual phosphatide and other impurities.
  • It is still a further object to provide a refining process in which the removal of gums is less cumbersome than in the aforementioned prior-art refining process.
  • The present invention now provides a method of refining glyceride oil comprising an acid treatment in which an acid or acid anhydride is dispersed in the oil, a hydration treatment in which alkali is mixed into the acidified glyceride oil and a separation treatment in which hydrated phosphatides so formed are separated from the glyceride oil, characterized in that during the hydration treatment the hydration temperature is equal to or below 70°C.
  • An essential aspect of the invention is that during the hydration treatment the hydration temperature is equal to or below 70°C. At higher temperatures the hydrated phosphatides formed are of such nature that they are to a lesser extent, and in some cases even not at all, removable from the oil.
  • The hydration of the phosphatides and their removal from the oil is positively affected by applying even lower hydration temperatures. Good degumming results are obtained at a hydration temperature of less than 60°C, preferably less than 40°C. Excellent refining results are obtained if the hydration temperature is maintained in the range of 10 to 50°C, preferably 20 to 30°C. In general, lower hydration temperatures allow less severe separation conditions, i.e. e.g. shorter centrifugation times and/or lower centrifugal forces may be applied in the separation treatment for obtaining excellent refining results.
  • In the hydration treatment the hydration time necessary for forming hydrated phosphatides that are removable from the oil, is dependent of the hydration temperature applied. At higher hydration temperatures shorter hydration times may be used. In general, the hydration time should be more than 3 minutes. Good results are obtained at hydration times of more than 30 minutes, preferably more than 50 minutes. Under practical conditions the hydration time is normally in the range of 30 to 240 minutes, preferably 60 to 240 minutes, most preferably in the range of 60 to 180 minutes.
  • The refining method of the invention is generally applicable to both crude (non-degummed) oil, and degummed oils. Whether it is best to use crude or degummed oil, is dependent on the composition of the phosphatides present in the oil. Sunflower oil and maize germ oil are examples of oils that may be refined by the method of the invention without prior degumming. Rapeseed oil and soybean oil are examples of oils which may need pre-degumming prior to application of the method in accordance with the invention. Although the oil may be predegummed by any suitable degumming process, normally it is sufficient that the oil is water degummed.
  • The acid or acid anhydride used in the acid treatment may be any acid or corresponding acid anhydride which converts the phosphatides into hydratable phosphatides. The acid or acid anhydride should be non-toxic, miscible with water, and may be of both inorganic and organic origin. Examples of suitable acids are phosphoric acid and citric acid. The use of citric acid is preferred.
  • The amount of acid or acid anhydride used should be such, that substantially all phosphatides present are converted in the hydratable form. In general, suitable amounts of acid lie in the range of 0.01 to 1 % by weight, preferably 0.01 to 0.5 % by weight of the glyceride oil. Citric acid is suitably added in an amount of 0.01 to 0.4 % by weight of the glyceride oil as a 50 % by weight aqueous citric acid solution. Phosphoric acid is suitably used in an amount of 0.02 to 0.4 % by weight, e.g. as a 35 % by weight aqueous phosphoric acid solution.
  • The conditions under which the acid is dispersed into the glyceride oil, may be less severe than the dispersion conditions disclosed in EP-A-195,991. Any static or dynamic mixer may be used suitable to achieve an acid-droplets distribution throughout the oil, said acid droplets generally having an average size in the range of from 10 to 20 micrometers.
  • The time during which the oil is in contact with the dispersed acid is not critical. During the acid treatment generally the oil temperature is as high as possible, and in practical circumstances is in the range of 60 to 95°C, preferably 70 to 90°C. However, it is essential that prior to the hydration treatment the oil is cooled to a temperature equal to or below 70°C.
  • In the hydration treatment the amount of alkali added is such that the hydrated phosphatides formed can be easily removed from the oil. Dependent on the amount of acid used in the preceding acid treatment, the alkali is generally added in an amount sufficient to neutralize 10 to 200 % of the acid or acid anhydride added in the acid treatment. Preferably, the alkali is added in an amount sufficient to neutralize 25 to 100 % of the acid.
  • During the refining process in accordance with the invention the water content of the oil is such that the hydration of the phosphatides is not inhibited because of a shortage of water. Water may be added during any stage of the refining process up to the hydration treatment. Preferably, alkali and water are added simultaneously as an aqueous alkali solution. In the hydration treatment the water content of the oil is generally 0.5 to 5 % by weight, dependent on the phosphatide level in the oil to be refined.
  • Examples of alkali that may suitably be used in the hydration treatment are sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide and ammonia, which are generally added as the aqueous solutions thereof.
  • After the separation of the hydrated phosphatides and other impurities from the oil, which is preferably carried out by way of centrifuging, it is generally not necessary to subject the refined oil to a further water-washing treatment. Although a water-washing treatment further decreases the phosphorus level of the glyceride oil, this decrease is under the hydration conditions according to the present invention generally marginal and under circumstances may not counterbalance the required use of an additional separation treatment (centrifuge) or the extra amount of effluent involved.
  • The present invention is now further illustrated by way of the following examples.
  • Example 1
  • Batches of water-degummed (wdg) rapeseed and soybean oils were subjected to a refining process in accordance with the invention (method A; hydration temperature of 20°C / hydration time of 120 minutes) and, for reasons of comparison, to a refining process according to EP-A-195,991 (method B: hydration temperature of 90°C / hydration time of 3 minutes).
  • The batches were heated to 90°C and their water contents were adjusted to 0.6 % by weight. Amounts of 0.215 % by weight of concentrated phosphoric acid (85 wt.% aqueous solution) were added to the batches and dispersed in the oils using an Ultra-TurraxR (mixing time 30 seconds). Subsequently, the mixtures were agitated for 2.5 minutes. Thereafter, amounts of 2.5 % by weight of a 5 wt.% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide were added.
  • The batches were subjected to each of the hydration methods A and B, whereafter the hydrated phosphatides were removed by three different separation procedures.
  • According to separation I the hydrated phosphatides were removed by centrifuging for 10 minutes using a centrifugal force of about 100 g, and according to separation II by centrifuging for 45 minutes at about 850 g. The oils obtained after separation II were further subjected to a water washing with 2 % by weight of water whereafter the water layer was removed by centrifuging for 45 minutes at about 850 g (separation III).
  • The phosphorus and calcium levels of the wdg starting oils and the phosphorus levels of the oils after refining according to method A of the present invention and according to method B of EP-A-195,991 were measured and are indicated in Table 1.
  • From these analytical data it is concluded that when the refining process according to the invention (method A) is used in combination with the mild separation I, no significant correlation between the residual phosphorus level in the refined oil and the calcium level in the starting oil is found, whereas when the refining process according to EP-A-195,991 (method B) is used in combination with the severe separation III, the residual phosphorus level is positively correlated with the calcium level in the starting oil.
  • Accordingly, the refining process according to the invention is more reliable than that of EP-A-195,991.
    Figure imgb0001
  • Example 2
  • Two wdg rapeseed oils were used: oil (1) comprised 230 mg/kg P and 151 mg/kg Ca; and oil (2) comprised 220 mg/kg P and 148 mg/kg Ca. These wdg rapeseed oils were heated to 90°C and their water content was adjusted to 0.6 % by weight. Amounts of 0.215 % by weight concentrated phosphoric acid (85 wt.%) were added to the oils and dispersed in the oils using a Ultra-TurraxR (mixing time 30 seconds). Subsequently, the mixtures were agitated during 2.5 minutes. Thereafter, 2.5 % by weight of a 5 wt.% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide was added. The hydration temperature T (°C) was varied between 8 and 90°C and the hydration time t (min.) was varied between 3 and 157 minutes. The hydrated phosphatides were removed from the oils by respectively separation I and separation III (see example 1). The residual phosphorus levels in the resulting oils were measured and are shown in Table 2.
  • The analytical data were subjected to a statistical analysis described in Experimental Designs, W.G. Cochran and G.M. Cox, Wiley (1957), Chapter 8A, "Some methods for the study of response surfaces", which analysis resulted for separation I in the response equation:

    P(I) = exp(2.45+0.387x₁-0.279x₂+0.7511x₁²+0.6628x₁.x₂)
    Figure imgb0002


    and for separation III in the response equation:

    P(III) = exp(1.881+1.049x₁-0.133x₂+0.0046x₁²+0.1098x₁.x₂)
    Figure imgb0003


    wherein

    x₁ = (T-49)/29
    Figure imgb0004


    x₂ = (t ½ -7.134)/3.82
    Figure imgb0005


  • From the above response equations it is concluded that lowering of the hydration temperature (to 70°C or less) gives improved refining results. In order to obtain hydrated phosphatides that are well removable, it may be required to select longer hydration times (30 minutes or more).
    Figure imgb0006
  • Example 3
  • Wdg maize oil (oil 1), non-degummed sunflower oil (oil 2), two wdg soybean oils (oils 3 and 4) and wdg rapeseed oil (oil 5) were mixed with 0.2 % by weight of a 45 wt.% solution of citric monohydrate using an Ultra TurraxR (30 seconds) followed by 10 minutes turbine stirring at 600 rpm, or with 0.1 % by weight of a 34 wt.% phosphoric acid solution using an Ultra TurraxR (60 seconds). Subsequently, amounts of 2 % by weight 1 N sodium hydroxide solution were added to the oils under turbine stirring (10 minutes, 600 rpm). An alkali hydration temperature of 30°C was maintained two hours under turbine stirring at 300 rpm.
  • After completion of the hydration treatment the hydrated phosphatides were removed by centrifuge (10 minutes at 1000 rpm corresponding to about 100 g).
  • The phosphorous and Ca levels in the starting oils and the residual phosphorus levels in the refined oils are summarized in Table 3.
    Figure imgb0007
  • Example 4
  • Non-degummed maize germ oil heated to 70°C was mixed with 0.1 % by weight citric monohydrate. Thereafter, the oil was cooled to 20°C and at this temperature 2 % by weight of an aqueous sodium hydroxide solution was added in an amount sufficient to neutralise 2/3 of the citric acid present in the oil. After two hours at 20°C the hydrated phosphatides were removed by centrifuge (10 minutes at 1000 rpm corresponding to about 100 g).
  • Analytical data of the starting and refined oil are shown in Table 4.
    Figure imgb0008

Claims (10)

  1. Method of refining glyceride oil comprising an acid treatment in which an acid or acid anhydride is dispersed in the oil, a hydration treatment in which alkali is mixed into the acidified glyceride oil and a separation treatment in which hydrated phosphatides so formed are separated from the glyceride oil, characterized in that during the hydration treatment the hydration temperature is equal to or below 70°C.
  2. Method according to claim 1 wherein the hydration temperature is equal to or below 40°C.
  3. Method according to claim 2 wherein the hydration temperature is in the range of 20 to 40°C.
  4. Method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein in the hydration treatment the hydration time is more than 3 minutes.
  5. Method according to claim 4 wherein the hydration time is in the range of 30 to 240 minutes, preferably 60 to 180 minutes.
  6. Method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the glyceride oil is a degummed glyceride oil.
  7. Method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein in the acid treatment the acid or acid anhydride is added in an amount of 0.01 to 1 % by weight, preferably 0.01 to 0.5 % by weight of the glyceride oil.
  8. Method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein in the hydration treatment alkali is added in an amount sufficient to neutralize 10 to 200 % of the acid or acid anhydride added in the acid treatment.
  9. Method according to any one of the preceding claims wherein in the hydration treatment the water content of the glyceride oil is 0.5 to 5 % by weight.
  10. Glyceride oil refined according to the refining method of claim 1 to 9.
EP19910200995 1990-05-04 1991-04-25 Method of refining glyceride oil Expired - Lifetime EP0456300B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP90201135 1990-05-04
EP90201135 1990-05-04

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0456300A1 true EP0456300A1 (en) 1991-11-13
EP0456300B1 EP0456300B1 (en) 1997-08-06

Family

ID=8205008

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19910200995 Expired - Lifetime EP0456300B1 (en) 1990-05-04 1991-04-25 Method of refining glyceride oil

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0456300B1 (en)
DE (1) DE69127127T2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0473985A2 (en) * 1990-08-23 1992-03-11 Krupp Maschinentechnik Gesellschaft Mit Beschränkter Haftung Process for degumming
EP3164010A4 (en) * 2014-07-03 2017-12-20 Arisdyne Systems, Inc. Methods for degumming oils

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102009049950A1 (en) 2009-10-19 2011-04-21 Lurgi Gmbh Process for the treatment of easily saponifiable crude oil of vegetable or animal origin, for further processing into biodiesel
DE102010007138B4 (en) * 2010-02-05 2016-10-20 Jungbunzlauer Ladenburg Gmbh Process for the refining of oils and fats and use of a fully or partially alkali-neutralized carboxylic acid as an additive in damping

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB539262A (en) * 1939-02-28 1941-09-03 Sharples Corp Improvements in or relating to the refining of fatty oils
US2678325A (en) * 1949-07-19 1954-05-11 Lever Brothers Ltd Alkali-refining of fatty glycerides in the presence of a tartaric compound
FR2303849A1 (en) * 1975-03-10 1976-10-08 Unilever Nv OILY TRIGLYCERIDES DEMUCILAGINATION PROCESS
FR2442882A1 (en) * 1978-11-30 1980-06-27 Showa Sangyo Co PROCESS FOR REFINING ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS AND FATS
EP0269277A2 (en) * 1986-11-13 1988-06-01 The Cambrian Engineering Group Limited Process for degumming triglyceride oils

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB539262A (en) * 1939-02-28 1941-09-03 Sharples Corp Improvements in or relating to the refining of fatty oils
US2678325A (en) * 1949-07-19 1954-05-11 Lever Brothers Ltd Alkali-refining of fatty glycerides in the presence of a tartaric compound
FR2303849A1 (en) * 1975-03-10 1976-10-08 Unilever Nv OILY TRIGLYCERIDES DEMUCILAGINATION PROCESS
FR2442882A1 (en) * 1978-11-30 1980-06-27 Showa Sangyo Co PROCESS FOR REFINING ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS AND FATS
EP0269277A2 (en) * 1986-11-13 1988-06-01 The Cambrian Engineering Group Limited Process for degumming triglyceride oils

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0473985A2 (en) * 1990-08-23 1992-03-11 Krupp Maschinentechnik Gesellschaft Mit Beschränkter Haftung Process for degumming
EP0473985A3 (en) * 1990-08-23 1992-06-03 Krupp Maschinentechnik Gesellschaft Mit Beschraenkter Haftung Process for degumming
US5239096A (en) * 1990-08-23 1993-08-24 Krupp Maschinentechnik Gmbh Degumming process for plant oils
EP3164010A4 (en) * 2014-07-03 2017-12-20 Arisdyne Systems, Inc. Methods for degumming oils

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69127127D1 (en) 1997-09-11
EP0456300B1 (en) 1997-08-06
DE69127127T2 (en) 1998-01-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0195991B1 (en) Process for producing degummed vegetable oils and gums of high phosphatidic acid content
US6033706A (en) Refining of edible oil retaining maximum antioxidative potency
US5696278A (en) Degumming of crude glyceride oils not exposed to prior enzymatic activity
EP0348004B1 (en) Method of refining glyceride oils
US20050158445A1 (en) Soybean oil process
EP0269277B1 (en) Process for degumming triglyceride oils
EP0936266A1 (en) Refining of edible oil retaining maximum antioxidative potency
US3943155A (en) Simultaneous refining and dewaxing of crude vegetable oil
EP0478090B1 (en) Process for refining glyceride oil
US3895042A (en) Clay-heat refining process
EP0122727A1 (en) Process relating to triglyceride oils
JPH0153999B2 (en)
WO2013163112A1 (en) Improved fractionation processes
EP0077528B1 (en) Refined edible oil and process for its preparation
EP0456300B1 (en) Method of refining glyceride oil
EP0170242B1 (en) In-line dewaxing of edible vegetable oils
Jawad et al. Quality characteristics of physically refined soyabean oil: effects of pre‐treatment and processing time and temperature
US5210242A (en) Process for soap splitting using a high temperature treatment
US4609500A (en) Refining of oil and product thereof
CA2372762A1 (en) Refining of glyceride oils by treatment with silicate solutions and filtration
US2182767A (en) Process of obtaining phosphatides from soap stock
US5449797A (en) Process for the removal of soap from glyceride oils and/or wax esters using an amorphous adsorbent
US2078428A (en) Process of obtaining phosphatides from soapstock
JPH07197076A (en) Refinement of crude edible oil
US5066501A (en) Fluidization of soapstock

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB NL

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19911028

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: UNILEVER PLC

Owner name: UNILEVER N.V.

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19940118

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB NL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19970806

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19970806

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19970806

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69127127

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19970911

EN Fr: translation not filed
NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980425

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19980425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990202