EP0447092A1 - Method of producing food grade quality white mineral oil - Google Patents

Method of producing food grade quality white mineral oil Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0447092A1
EP0447092A1 EP91301780A EP91301780A EP0447092A1 EP 0447092 A1 EP0447092 A1 EP 0447092A1 EP 91301780 A EP91301780 A EP 91301780A EP 91301780 A EP91301780 A EP 91301780A EP 0447092 A1 EP0447092 A1 EP 0447092A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
hydrogenation
food grade
mineral oil
white mineral
product
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP91301780A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0447092B1 (en
Inventor
Gary L. Everett
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Atlantic Richfield Co
Original Assignee
Atlantic Richfield Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=23952542&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0447092(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Atlantic Richfield Co filed Critical Atlantic Richfield Co
Publication of EP0447092A1 publication Critical patent/EP0447092A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0447092B1 publication Critical patent/EP0447092B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G65/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only
    • C10G65/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only
    • C10G65/04Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including only refining steps
    • C10G65/08Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including only refining steps at least one step being a hydrogenation of the aromatic hydrocarbons
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2400/00Products obtained by processes covered by groups C10G9/00 - C10G69/14
    • C10G2400/14White oil, eating oil

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the method of producing food grade quality white mineral oil. More particularly, this invention relates to a method of producing from a naphthenic distillate as a feedstock, a food grade white mineral oil with only a trace of aromatics therewithin.
  • the prior art has failed to provide an economical method of achieving a food grade quality white mineral oil without expensive and labor intensive steps such as acid treating, neutralization and adsorbing of undesired constituents from the product.
  • a method of producing a food grade quality of white mineral oil by subjecting a naphthenic or cycloparaffinic feedstock to three stages of hydroprocessing without any solvent extraction or acid treatment prior to the treatment to give the final desired quality with only a trace of the aromatic hydrocarbons, or aromatic carbons, therewithin.
  • a method of producing a food grade quality in which a naphthenic feedstock is first hydrogenated followed by a step of separating gaseous constituents produced during the hydrogenation reactions, followed by a second stage of hydroprocessing, or hydrogenation, followed by separation of the gaseous constituents produced by this second stage of hydrogenation, followed by a third and less severe hydrotreating step to produce the desired food grade white mineral oil.
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of a prior art process for producing food grade white mineral oil.
  • Fig. 2 is a schematic flow diagram of the process of this invention for producing food grade white mineral oil.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates a prior art method of preparing a food grade white mineral oil.
  • a naphthenic distillate is extracted with a solvent such as a phenol or N-methyl pyrrolidine to produce a hydrocarbon oil containing only about 4 to 7 percent aromatic carbons which is subjected to an acid treatment.
  • the bottoms fraction recovered from the acid treatment then emerges as acid sludge whereas from the first step of solvent extraction, a solvent extract containing a high level of aromatic compounds is recovered as a bottom product.
  • a finishing step consisting of an adsorption tower 17 employing clay or a hydrotreater tower 17 using hydrogen is employed to lower the remaining trace quantity of aromatics and produce a satisfactory food grade white mineral oil in the effluent line 19.
  • the approach of this invention involves subjecting a naphthenic distillate containing a concentration of aromatic carbons in the range of 15 - 25 percent by weight to hydrogenation to produce a hydrogenated product in which there is a reduction of about 50 to 70 percent of the aromatic hydrocarbons to yield an aromatic carbon content of 7 - 10 percent by weight.
  • a naphthenic distillate containing a concentration of aromatic carbons in the range of 15 - 25 percent by weight to hydrogenation to produce a hydrogenated product in which there is a reduction of about 50 to 70 percent of the aromatic hydrocarbons to yield an aromatic carbon content of 7 - 10 percent by weight.
  • Fig. 2 at stage 1, also labeled tower 21.
  • the term "naphthenic distillates” is synonymous with cycloparaffinic distillates. Normally these distillates contain about 15 - 25 percent by weight of aromatic carbons.
  • These naphthenic distillates come in via line 23, Fig. 2. Hydrogen is fed through line 25 in Fig. 2.
  • Both feed constituents are admixed prior to entering stage 1 where hydrogenation is carried out in the presence of a hydrogenation catalyst containing metal components from the Group VIIIA class, preferably Nickel and from the Group VIA class, preferably Molybdenum at a temperature of 550 degrees Fahrenheit to 750 degrees Fahrenheit, preferably about 650 degrees Fahrenheit - 700 degrees Fahrenheit with a partial pressure of hydrogen in the range of 1200 - 2000 pounds per square inch gauge (PSIG), preferably about 1500 - 1800 pounds per square inch gauge.
  • PSIG pounds per square inch gauge
  • the gaseous constituents of the hydrogenated product in line 27 are separated from liquid constituents and flow out through the overhead line 29.
  • the overhead line 29 carries from the stripper 31 hydrogen sulfide and ammonia, inter alia, as the gaseous products of the hydrogenation reactions carried out in the hydrogenation tower of stage 1, labelled 21.
  • the aromatic carbon content of the liquid constituents will have been reduced to about 7 - 10 percent aromatic carbons as in the liquid bottom draw from the stripper, line 33.
  • These liquid bottoms containing only about half as much aromatic carbons as the initial feedstock in line 23, or less, are then sent through line 35 to a second hydrogenation tower 37.
  • the liquid bottoms, or hydrogenated product from the first stage, in line 35 is admixed with hydrogen by way of line 39.
  • a second hydrogenation is carried out at rather severe conditions in the presence of a hydrogenation catalyst containing metal components from the Group VIIIA class, preferably Nickel and from the Group VIA class, preferably Molybdenum, with the hydrogen partial pressure in the range of 2500 - 3000 PSIG, preferably 2750 - 3000 PSIG and a temperature in the range of 575 - 750 degrees Fahrenheit, preferably 625 - 700 degrees Fahrenheit.
  • the entire reactor effluent then exits by a line 41 to stripper 43 and again the gaseous constituents of the second hydrogenation stage reaction product are separated from liquid constituents and exit line 45 from the second stripper 47.
  • the resulting liquid bottoms from the stripper 43, in line 49, contain only about 1 percent of aromatic carbons and they are sent, as by line 51 to be admixed with hydrogen in line 53 and the hydrogenation as a final step is carried out in stage 3, or the final, less severe hydrogenation of stage 3 in the hydrogenation tower 55.
  • a hydrogenation catalyst containing a metal component of Group VIIIA class such as platinum, palladium or Nickel, preferably platinum in the form usually utilized in reforming reactions with hydrogen partial pressure in the range of 2000 - 3000 PSIG, preferably 2500 - 3000 PSIG and temperature of only about 375 degrees Fahrenheit to 600 degrees Fahrenheit, preferably 450 degrees Fahrenheit - 550 degrees Fahrenheit.
  • the liquid bottoms draw in the line 57 will have only about 0.3 percent or less by weight of aromatic constituents and this trace of aromatics is satisfactory as a food grade white mineral oil.
  • the polynucular aromatics will comprise less than 30 parts per million (PPM) of the final food grade white mineral oil.
  • the naphthenic distillate comprising the initial feedstock is fed into and admixed with the hydrogen at the desired partial pressure in the incoming stream and hydrogenation is carried out in stage 1.
  • the gaseous constituents are allowed to separate from the liquid constituents such that the gases pass out the overhead stream in line 29 and the bottoms pass out the liquid stream 33 and are then fed through the line 35, Fig. 2, to the second stage, or hydrotreating tower, 37.
  • the admixture of hydrogen at its high partial pressure with the liquid constituents effects a direct reaction at elevated temperatures over suitable catalyst to produce the reduction in the aromatic carbons in line 41 such that after the gaseous constituents are separated and go to the overhead line 45, the liquid bottom draw 49 can be fed, low as it is in aromatic carbons, to the third hydrogenation stage 55.
  • the third hydrogenation stage 55 At the entrance to the third stage, it is admixed with high pressure hydrogen at the desired high partial pressure and the hydrogenation reactions carried out in the third hydrotreating tower 55. The result is that the final product comes out the bottom effluent line 57.
  • the desired food grade quality white mineral oil is produced in the line 57 by a process that differs substantially from the prior art technology for preparing food grade white mineral oil.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Edible Oils And Fats (AREA)
  • Fats And Perfumes (AREA)
  • Low-Molecular Organic Synthesis Reactions Using Catalysts (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Lubricants (AREA)
  • Non-Alcoholic Beverages (AREA)

Abstract

The production of food grade quality white mineral oils from predominantly naphthenic or cycloparaffinic crude distillates heretofore have required acid treating using sulfuric acid followed by neutralization, water wash and possibly finishing step. Herein, however, three stages of hydroprocessing without any solvent extraction or acid treatment prior step are employed to produce the desired food grade quality white mineral oil having a trace of aromatic constituents therewithin. Specific steps are defined in the application in terms of the severity of the hydrogenation in the hydrotreating operation at each respective step; as well as the steps of separating gaseous constituents of the hydroprocessing product.

Description

    Field of the Invention
  • This invention relates to the method of producing food grade quality white mineral oil. More particularly, this invention relates to a method of producing from a naphthenic distillate as a feedstock, a food grade white mineral oil with only a trace of aromatics therewithin.
  • Background of the Invention
  • The prior art is replete with various referrals to methods of treating hydrocarbons. These range from the technology during the depression to modern methods of treating hydrocarbons.
  • There are almost as many references to employing hydrogen in hydrogenation and hydrotreating aspects. Included are a couple of textbooks published right after World War II including "The Textbook of Organic Chemistry" by E. Wertheim, Second Edition, Blakiston Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1947, and "Unit Processes in Organic Synthesis", Groggins, Editor, a3rd Edition, McGraw Hill, New York, New York, 1947. As pointed out in these texts, careful control of hydrogenation can give careful results. This application envisions employing such careful control.
  • The prior art has seen many ways of trying to achieve a food grade quality of white mineral oil but they have always been expensive and employed acid treatment, neutralization and an adsorption tower or the like for removing of undesired constituents to give the final product.
  • Specifically, the prior art has failed to provide an economical method of achieving a food grade quality white mineral oil without expensive and labor intensive steps such as acid treating, neutralization and adsorbing of undesired constituents from the product.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • Accordingly it is an object of this invention to provide an economical method of achieving a food grade white mineral oil without the labor intensity of processes of the prior art.
  • It is a specific object of this invention to provide an economical continuous flow process of providing a food grade white mineral oil without the labor intensive processes of the prior art. These and other objects will become apparent when taken with the descriptive matter hereinafter, particularly when taken in conjunction with the appended drawings.
  • In accordance with one aspect of this invention, there is provided a method of producing a food grade quality of white mineral oil by subjecting a naphthenic or cycloparaffinic feedstock to three stages of hydroprocessing without any solvent extraction or acid treatment prior to the treatment to give the final desired quality with only a trace of the aromatic hydrocarbons, or aromatic carbons, therewithin.
  • In another aspect of this invention, there is provided a method of producing a food grade quality in which a naphthenic feedstock is first hydrogenated followed by a step of separating gaseous constituents produced during the hydrogenation reactions, followed by a second stage of hydroprocessing, or hydrogenation, followed by separation of the gaseous constituents produced by this second stage of hydrogenation, followed by a third and less severe hydrotreating step to produce the desired food grade white mineral oil.
  • Specific reaction conditions for the respective steps are discussed hereinafter.
  • Brief Description of the Drawings
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic flow diagram of a prior art process for producing food grade white mineral oil.
  • Fig. 2 is a schematic flow diagram of the process of this invention for producing food grade white mineral oil.
  • Description of Preferred Embodiments
  • Fig. 1 illustrates a prior art method of preparing a food grade white mineral oil. Therein, a naphthenic distillate is extracted with a solvent such as a phenol or N-methyl pyrrolidine to produce a hydrocarbon oil containing only about 4 to 7 percent aromatic carbons which is subjected to an acid treatment. The bottoms fraction recovered from the acid treatment then emerges as acid sludge whereas from the first step of solvent extraction, a solvent extract containing a high level of aromatic compounds is recovered as a bottom product. After the acid treatment, only a trace of aromatic carbons, or aromatic hydrocarbons are in line 15 leading from the acid treater. A finishing step consisting of an adsorption tower 17 employing clay or a hydrotreater tower 17 using hydrogen is employed to lower the remaining trace quantity of aromatics and produce a satisfactory food grade white mineral oil in the effluent line 19.
  • In contrast, the approach of this invention involves subjecting a naphthenic distillate containing a concentration of aromatic carbons in the range of 15 - 25 percent by weight to hydrogenation to produce a hydrogenated product in which there is a reduction of about 50 to 70 percent of the aromatic hydrocarbons to yield an aromatic carbon content of 7 - 10 percent by weight. This is shown in Fig. 2, at stage 1, also labeled tower 21. The term "naphthenic distillates" is synonymous with cycloparaffinic distillates. Normally these distillates contain about 15 - 25 percent by weight of aromatic carbons. These naphthenic distillates come in via line 23, Fig. 2. Hydrogen is fed through line 25 in Fig. 2. Both feed constituents are admixed prior to entering stage 1 where hydrogenation is carried out in the presence of a hydrogenation catalyst containing metal components from the Group VIIIA class, preferably Nickel and from the Group VIA class, preferably Molybdenum at a temperature of 550 degrees Fahrenheit to 750 degrees Fahrenheit, preferably about 650 degrees Fahrenheit - 700 degrees Fahrenheit with a partial pressure of hydrogen in the range of 1200 - 2000 pounds per square inch gauge (PSIG), preferably about 1500 - 1800 pounds per square inch gauge. The hydrogenated product then exits the tower 21 through the line 27.
  • As the next step, the gaseous constituents of the hydrogenated product in line 27 are separated from liquid constituents and flow out through the overhead line 29. The overhead line 29 carries from the stripper 31 hydrogen sulfide and ammonia, inter alia, as the gaseous products of the hydrogenation reactions carried out in the hydrogenation tower of stage 1, labelled 21. After this process, the aromatic carbon content of the liquid constituents will have been reduced to about 7 - 10 percent aromatic carbons as in the liquid bottom draw from the stripper, line 33. These liquid bottoms containing only about half as much aromatic carbons as the initial feedstock in line 23, or less, are then sent through line 35 to a second hydrogenation tower 37. The liquid bottoms, or hydrogenated product from the first stage, in line 35 is admixed with hydrogen by way of line 39. A second hydrogenation is carried out at rather severe conditions in the presence of a hydrogenation catalyst containing metal components from the Group VIIIA class, preferably Nickel and from the Group VIA class, preferably Molybdenum, with the hydrogen partial pressure in the range of 2500 - 3000 PSIG, preferably 2750 - 3000 PSIG and a temperature in the range of 575 - 750 degrees Fahrenheit, preferably 625 - 700 degrees Fahrenheit. The entire reactor effluent then exits by a line 41 to stripper 43 and again the gaseous constituents of the second hydrogenation stage reaction product are separated from liquid constituents and exit line 45 from the second stripper 47. These gaseous constituents include hydrogen sulfide and ammonia, inter alia. The resulting liquid bottoms from the stripper 43, in line 49, contain only about 1 percent of aromatic carbons and they are sent, as by line 51 to be admixed with hydrogen in line 53 and the hydrogenation as a final step is carried out in stage 3, or the final, less severe hydrogenation of stage 3 in the hydrogenation tower 55.
  • In the final step, less severe hydrogenation of stage three in the third hydrogenation tower, or hydrotreating tower 55, is carried out in the presence of a hydrogenation catalyst containing a metal component of Group VIIIA class such as platinum, palladium or Nickel, preferably platinum in the form usually utilized in reforming reactions with hydrogen partial pressure in the range of 2000 - 3000 PSIG, preferably 2500 - 3000 PSIG and temperature of only about 375 degrees Fahrenheit to 600 degrees Fahrenheit, preferably 450 degrees Fahrenheit - 550 degrees Fahrenheit.
  • It is noteworthy that in all these reactions, the use of a relatively high partial pressure of hydrogen and relatively lower temperature facilitates carrying out the hydrogenation to give the desired reaction product in reducing the aromatic constituents of the liquid stream without excessive cracking of the stream to undesired lower boiling range material.
  • In the illustrated embodiment, the liquid bottoms draw in the line 57 will have only about 0.3 percent or less by weight of aromatic constituents and this trace of aromatics is satisfactory as a food grade white mineral oil. Specifically, the polynucular aromatics will comprise less than 30 parts per million (PPM) of the final food grade white mineral oil.
  • In operation, the naphthenic distillate comprising the initial feedstock is fed into and admixed with the hydrogen at the desired partial pressure in the incoming stream and hydrogenation is carried out in stage 1. Similarly, in a stripper, the gaseous constituents are allowed to separate from the liquid constituents such that the gases pass out the overhead stream in line 29 and the bottoms pass out the liquid stream 33 and are then fed through the line 35, Fig. 2, to the second stage, or hydrotreating tower, 37. Again, the admixture of hydrogen at its high partial pressure with the liquid constituents effects a direct reaction at elevated temperatures over suitable catalyst to produce the reduction in the aromatic carbons in line 41 such that after the gaseous constituents are separated and go to the overhead line 45, the liquid bottom draw 49 can be fed, low as it is in aromatic carbons, to the third hydrogenation stage 55. At the entrance to the third stage, it is admixed with high pressure hydrogen at the desired high partial pressure and the hydrogenation reactions carried out in the third hydrotreating tower 55. The result is that the final product comes out the bottom effluent line 57.
  • From the foregoing it can be seen that the desired food grade quality white mineral oil is produced in the line 57 by a process that differs substantially from the prior art technology for preparing food grade white mineral oil.
  • Although this invention has been described with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure is made only by way of example and that combination and arrangement of parts may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention, reference being had for the latter purpose to the appended claims.

Claims (9)

  1. A method of producing food grade quality white mineral oil comprising the steps of subjecting a naphthenic feedstock continuously and progressively to three stages of hydroprocessing without any solvent extraction or acid treatment.
  2. A method of producing food grade quality white mineral oil comprising the steps of:
    a. subjecting a naphthenic feed stock to a first stage of hydroprocessing without any solvent extraction or acid treatment to reduce the aromatic carbon content by about fifty percent;
    b. separating the gaseous constituents from the hydrogenated liquid product from step a;
    c. subjecting the product from step a from which the gaseous constituents have been separated to a second hydrogenation step to reduce the aromatic carbon content to about one percent;
    d. separating the gaseous product constituents of the hydrogenation product of step c; and
    e. finally, subjecting the liquid from which the gaseous constituents have been separated to a final, less severe hydrotreating step to produce a food grade quality white mineral oil with only a trace of aromatics therewithin.
  3. A method of producing food grade quality white mineral oil comprising the steps of:
    a. subjecting a naphthenic, or cycloparaffinic, distillate containing a concentration of aromatic carbons in the range of 15 - 25 percent by weight to hydrogenation to produce a hydrogenated product in which the aromatic carbons concentration is reduced by about 50 percent;
    b. separating the gaseous constituents of the hydrogenated product as overhead to prepare a liquid bottoms draw containing only about one-half the concentration of aromatic carbons based on a weight percent concentration;
    c. subjecting said liquid bottoms draw after said gaseous constituents have been separated therefrom to a second step of hydrogenation to produce a second hydrogenated product in which said concentration of aromatic carbons is reduced to about one percent of the liquid component;
    d. separating the gaseous constituents of said second hydrogenated product as overhead to produce a second liquid bottoms stream containing only about one percent aromatic carbons; and
    e. finally subjecting said second liquid bottoms stream to a final, less severe hydrotreating step to produce a food grade quality white mineral oil with only a trace of aromatics therewithin.
  4. The method of claim 3 wherein said first hydrogenation is carried out in a first hydrotreating tower with a nicked molybdenum catalyst and said gaseous constituents of said hydrotreated product comprise hydrogen sulfide and ammonia which are separated by sending said hydrogenated product effluent from said first tower to a stripper tower means.
  5. The method of claim 3 or claim 4 wherein said first hydrogenation is carried out with a partial pressure of hydrogen in the range of 1500 - 1800 PSIG, pounds per square inch gauge; and a temperature in a range of 650 - 700 degrees Fahrenheit.
  6. The method of claim 3, claim 4 or claim 5 wherein said second hydrogenation is carried out in a second hydrotreating tower with a nickel molybdenum catalyst and said gas constituents of said second hydrotreated product comprise hydrogen sulfide and ammonia which are separated by sending said second hydrogenation effluent from said second hydrotreating tower to a second stripper tower means.
  7. The method of claim 6 wherein said partial pressures of said hydrogen is in the range of 2750 - 3000 PSIG and wherein said temperature is in the range of 625 degrees Fahrenheit - 700 degrees Fahrenheit.
  8. The method of any one of claims 3 to 7 wherein said final, less severe hydrogenation is carried out in a third hydrotreating tower in the presence of a platinum reforming catalyst.
  9. The method of claim 8 wherein said final, less severe hydrogenation is carried out with a partial pressure of hydrogen being in the range of 2500 - 3000 PSIG and said temperature being in the range of 450 degrees Fahrenheit - 550 degrees Fahrenheit.
EP91301780A 1990-03-12 1991-03-04 Method of producing food grade quality white mineral oil Revoked EP0447092B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US49151190A 1990-03-12 1990-03-12
US491511 1990-03-12

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0447092A1 true EP0447092A1 (en) 1991-09-18
EP0447092B1 EP0447092B1 (en) 1994-07-27

Family

ID=23952542

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP91301780A Revoked EP0447092B1 (en) 1990-03-12 1991-03-04 Method of producing food grade quality white mineral oil

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0447092B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3062701B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE109199T1 (en)
BR (1) BR9100974A (en)
CZ (1) CZ279524B6 (en)
DE (2) DE69103049T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2025542T1 (en)
GR (1) GR910300140T1 (en)
HU (1) HU208615B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1352039A1 (en) * 2000-12-14 2003-10-15 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company Hydroprocessing process with integrated interstage stripping

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2001339A (en) * 1977-07-20 1979-01-31 Shell Int Research Process for the preparation of a light-stable lubricating oil
US4325804A (en) * 1980-11-17 1982-04-20 Atlantic Richfield Company Process for producing lubricating oils and white oils

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2001339A (en) * 1977-07-20 1979-01-31 Shell Int Research Process for the preparation of a light-stable lubricating oil
US4325804A (en) * 1980-11-17 1982-04-20 Atlantic Richfield Company Process for producing lubricating oils and white oils

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1352039A1 (en) * 2000-12-14 2003-10-15 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company Hydroprocessing process with integrated interstage stripping
EP1352039A4 (en) * 2000-12-14 2005-03-16 Exxonmobil Res & Eng Co Hydroprocessing process with integrated interstage stripping

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69103049D1 (en) 1994-09-01
HU910783D0 (en) 1991-09-30
EP0447092B1 (en) 1994-07-27
HUT59573A (en) 1992-06-29
JP3062701B2 (en) 2000-07-12
DE69103049T2 (en) 1994-11-17
DE447092T1 (en) 1992-02-27
HU208615B (en) 1993-12-28
BR9100974A (en) 1991-11-05
ATE109199T1 (en) 1994-08-15
ES2025542T1 (en) 1992-04-01
CS64491A3 (en) 1992-03-18
GR910300140T1 (en) 1992-06-30
JPH04220492A (en) 1992-08-11
CZ279524B6 (en) 1995-05-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA2198623C (en) A process for removing essentially naphthenic acids from a hydrocarbon oil
KR840001851B1 (en) Process for preparing low pour lubricating oils
US6454934B2 (en) Petroleum processing method
KR970059263A (en) Two Stage Hydroprocessing Reaction with Continuous Recirculating Gas Flow
JP2010533224A (en) Method for producing naphthenic base oil from effluent of fluid catalytic cracker
US3306845A (en) Multistage hydrofining process
US6103104A (en) Multi-stage hydroprocessing of middle distillates to avoid color bodies
JPH0782573A (en) Method and apparatus for treating petroleum
EP0926219A1 (en) Method of producing a process oil
US5294327A (en) Method of producing food grade quality white mineral oil
CA2079421C (en) Process for upgrading a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock and apparatus for use therein
US4448665A (en) Use of ammonia to reduce the viscosity of bottoms streams produced in hydroconversion processes
US4973396A (en) Method of producing sweet feed in low pressure hydrotreaters
EP0447092A1 (en) Method of producing food grade quality white mineral oil
US4435274A (en) Process for manufacturing gasoline with upgrading of hydrocarbon oils
JP3488281B2 (en) Petroleum processing method
US4368113A (en) Hydrocarbon hydrocracking process
US4338186A (en) Shale oil process
KR930004155B1 (en) Process for treating crude oil
US3425931A (en) Hydrocarbon recovery method
US3436340A (en) Denitrification process with recycle of extracted nitrogen compounds
CA2030416C (en) Method of producing sweet feed in low pressure hydrotreaters
US3567624A (en) Hydroforming with preliminary hydrodesulfurization
DE1174007B (en) Process for the production of lubricating oil

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

EL Fr: translation of claims filed
TCNL Nl: translation of patent claims filed
DET De: translation of patent claims
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: BA2A

Ref document number: 2025542

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T1

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19920305

TCAT At: translation of patent claims filed
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19920724

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19940727

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19940727

Ref country code: DK

Effective date: 19940727

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19940727

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19940727

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19940727

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19940727

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19940727

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 109199

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19940815

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69103049

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19940901

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19941028

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

ET Fr: translation filed
NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 91301780.2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19950331

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, LUDWIGSHAFEN

Effective date: 19950413

PLAW Interlocutory decision in opposition

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IDOP

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

APAE Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFNO

APAE Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFNO

APAE Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFNO

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20010219

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20010220

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20010221

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20010222

Year of fee payment: 11

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

RDAH Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REVO

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20010808

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Free format text: 20010808

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO