EP0388252B1 - Method of separating condensible vapors from particles in highly compressed gases - Google Patents
Method of separating condensible vapors from particles in highly compressed gases Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0388252B1 EP0388252B1 EP90400595A EP90400595A EP0388252B1 EP 0388252 B1 EP0388252 B1 EP 0388252B1 EP 90400595 A EP90400595 A EP 90400595A EP 90400595 A EP90400595 A EP 90400595A EP 0388252 B1 EP0388252 B1 EP 0388252B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- particles
- flow apparatus
- compressed gas
- condensible
- vapors
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D5/00—Condensation of vapours; Recovering volatile solvents by condensation
- B01D5/0027—Condensation of vapours; Recovering volatile solvents by condensation by direct contact between vapours or gases and the cooling medium
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D8/00—Cold traps; Cold baffles
Definitions
- Trace quantities of condensible vapors such as hydrocarbons or fluorinated hydrocarbons in gases are commonly detected and quantified by a variety of means such as chromatography in the gas phase, infrared (IR) absorption spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, total hydrocarbon detectors, etc.
- IR infrared
- Pressure reduction by critical orifice is commonly used in pressure regulators.
- a pressure reducer consisting of a clean orifice, a chamber into which the gas can expand, and a means to sample part of the expanding jet, can achieve "zero" particle shedding.
- Such a unit can be purchased from Liquid Air Corporation.
- Utilization of the differences in diffusion coefficients to remove unwanted nitric acid vapor from a gas stream to obtain true particulate nitrate is a common practice among air pollution researchers, where it is called "acid denuder".
- a basic coating is usually applied to the collection surfaces to retain the acid vapors, which may shed significant particles to upset the purpose of sampling particles from high-purity gases.
- the system is at ambient pressure. No temperature control is provided.
- EP-A-0312457 and EP-A-0312458 It is also known from EP-A-0312457 and EP-A-0312458 to generate droplets of condensible vapors in a carrier gas through a critical orifice and to discharge a carrier gas containing condensible vapors through a plurality of orifices without causing the condensation of the condensible vapors.
- the invention furthermore provides processes as defined in respectively claim 4 and claim 5.
- a starting compressed gas containing condensible vapors and particles is passed through a flow system.
- the flow system used comprises simple geometries and polished, clean surfaces.
- the flow rate of the compressed gas through the flow system and the flow system geometry are selected such that particles having a diameter greater than 0.01 micrometers have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with the flow system surfaces and condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with the flow system surfaces.
- the temperature of the flow system surfaces is then controlled to retain collided vapor molecules on the surfaces. This process produces a product compressed gas which is free of condensable vapors and contains the spectra and concentration of particles of the starting compressed gas.
- the invention provides a process for removing trace amount of condensible vapor impurities from highly compressed gases without disturbing the original particle size spectra and concentrations in the compressed gas. These condensible vapors can convert into particles under conditions of large temperature drop or pressure drop and totally distort the original particle information.
- compressed gases are defined as comprising, among others, a carrier gas and condensible vapors.
- the compound gases may have pressures ranging from 6,9x105 Pa (100 psia) to 20,7x106 Pa (3000 psia).
- the carrier gas may be, e.g. nitrogen (N2), argon, helium, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, methane, ethane, propane, etc.
- Condensible vapors are defined for the present purposes as species which will condense to form droplets upon sufficient cooling of the carrier gas or upon contacting a sufficiently cool surface ( vide infra ), e.g. C5 ⁇ 16 hydrocarbons or C5 ⁇ 16 fluorinated hydrocarbons, etc., and higher hydrocarbons or fluorinated hydrocarbons which can include up to C30 hydrocarbons/fluorinated hydrocarbons under some circumstances, such as when these vapors are present in a very low concentration. These condensible vapors are however present in their gaseous state before cooling and not as droplets.
- the method of the invention thus distinguishes itself from other detection methods for preexisting particles and specifically from methods for the detection of preexisting oil droplets in gases which require the preexistence of such droplets.
- An example of such methods is given in U.S.-A-4794086
- the present invention provides for the removal of either global amounts of condensible vapors or individual components within a "family" of such species (for example hydrocarbons).
- Another important application of the present invention is that this method can be used for the purpose of purification of gases, especially during the cylinder filling process, to obtain ultra-clean gases.
- the present method is superior to conventional method in "zero" particle generation and low pressure drop.
- the invention removes condensible vapors in a flow system of simple geometries and of polished, clean surfaces, such as art electro-polished round tube, an annular tube, or a rectangular slit.
- simple geometries such as art electro-polished round tube, an annular tube, or a rectangular slit.
- smooth geometries is used to indicate that these flow systems do not have sharp turns and/or dead spaces to trap particles.
- the conventional vapor removing process (usually referred to as purification) utilizes complex flow systems with rough surfaces and porous pellets which can generate or trap substantial amount of particles. This conventional process is therefore not compatible with particle sampling and analysis.
- the particles contained in the compound gases treated in this invention have diameters of at least 0.01 ⁇ m.
- the invention selectively removes condensible vapor molecules without affecting the particles in the gas stream.
- the diffusion coefficients for gas molecules are orders of magnitude larger than those of particles.
- the diffusion coefficient for air molecules is 0.19 cm2.s ⁇ 1 versus 0.00052 cm2.s ⁇ 1 for particles of 0.01 ⁇ m diameter. (Note: 0.01 ⁇ m is currently the practical lower limit of detection by commonly used particle counters. The diffusion coefficient decreases further with increasing particle diameter.)
- the collision frequency with the tube walls is much higher for vapor molecules than for particles.
- CE collision efficiency
- CE 1 - 0.819 exp (-11.5K) for K > 0.007
- K DL/Q for round tube
- K DLW/QH for rectangular slit
- D is the diffusion coefficient
- L the tube length
- Q the flow rate
- W the width of the slit
- H the height of the slit.
- Tables 1 to 3 list the collision efficiency in a round tube for various tube lengths, flow rates, and diffusion coefficients. The range of diffusion coefficients covers most commonly encountered vapor species. The last row of each table indicates the diffusion loss of 0.01 ⁇ m particles. The loss decreases with increasing particle size.
- the present process retains the collided vapor molecules on the tube walls by controlling the wall temperature.
- the molecules may stick or rebound depending upon the physical and chemical interactions occurring between the vapor and the collection surface.
- Conventional purification process rely on the adsorption properties of the collection surface to retain vapor molecules.
- the sticking probability of the colliding molecules is increased by decreasing the surface temperature.
- the temperature control can be obtained by a mechanical refrigerator or a reservoir of dry ice or liquid nitrogen.
- the suitable temperature ranges lie between the boiling point of the gas to be sampled and the lowest boiling point of the condensible vapors to be removed.
- at least a portion of the surface sufficient to trap the condensible vapors must be cooled.
- the invention further provides a process for identifying the species of vapor impurities in cylinder gases. After trapping an adequate amount of vapor impurities, heated, clean gases can be directed through the tube to desorb the trapped vapors. Fourrier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), gas-chromatography (GC), or other instruments can be used on-line to identify the species of the trapped vapors.
- FTIR Fourrier transform infrared spectroscopy
- GC gas-chromatography
- Figure 2 shows the schematic design for the application of sampling particles from cylinder gases.
- the tube length and the temperature control method employed here only serve as an example.
- a 0,635 cm (1/4 inch) SSEP tubing of 1,22m (4 feet) long submerged in a dry ice-freon reservoir served as the vapor removing device (cold trap).
- the temperature of the cold trap was -78°C.
- the required tube length can be found in Table 1 to 3 for different applications. With this design, the background particle levels, generated from reentrainment and condensation, were controlled well.
- the temperature control can be facilitated by a mechanical freezer, a jet-expansion device, or a reservoir filled with different liquefied gases.
- the detected background particle concentration with an absolute filter in-line but by-passing the cold trap is given in Figure 1, which illustrates background particle levels, generated by condensation, as a function of cylinder (gas) pressure.
- Figure 1 illustrates that particle concentration increases with cylinder Pressure.
- the CNC counts are two orders of magnitude higher than the LAS-X counts.
- the detected background particle concentration with the cold trap is given in Table 4.
- the background level can be further reduced by employing a lower flow rate, a longer tube in the cold trap or a lower reservoir temperature.
- Figure 3 shows that the use of a cold trap does not cause extra particle loss.
- Figure 3 provides particle concentration data for a turbulently filled cylinder. The concentration of the particles remains the same with and without the cold trap at pressures less than 41,4x105 Pa (600 psi), where no condensation occurs.
- Figure 4 shows examples of measuring true particle concentration in turbulent-filled and aged cylinders by employing the present method.
- Figure 4 provides particle concentrations for high pressure gases in cylinders with different histories.
- the concentration of particles can be different by two orders of magnitude depending on the history of the high pressure gas in the cylinder.
- concentration of particles is relatively low.
Abstract
Description
- In many applications of gases, such as the manufacture of VLSI chips, high purity gases are needed during the manufacturing process to avoid, among others, the creation of defects during the various masking steps of the process. Avoiding such defects enhances the manufacture output of the process as well as the reliability of the chips. There is also a need for high purity gases in the optical, aerospace and pharmaceutical industries.
- Various impurities such as particles or vapors may be present in compressed gases stored in a container such as a cylinder. It is known from the article entitled "A gas filtration system for concentrations of 10⁻⁵ particles/cm³" from G. Kasper and H.Y. Wen; published in Aerosol Science and Technology 5: 167-185 (1986), that "totally" particle-free process gases may be obtained. Particle analysis has been also carefully studied by the same authors and the results of this study has been published in the Proceedings - Institute of Environmental Sciences - May 6, 1987 - in an article entitled "Particle Analysis in cylinder gases".
- Trace quantities of condensible vapors such as hydrocarbons or fluorinated hydrocarbons in gases are commonly detected and quantified by a variety of means such as chromatography in the gas phase, infrared (IR) absorption spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, total hydrocarbon detectors, etc.
- Pressure reduction by critical orifice is commonly used in pressure regulators. For the purpose of sampling particles from compressed gases of pressure up to 34,5.10⁵ Pa (500 psi), a pressure reducer, consisting of a clean orifice, a chamber into which the gas can expand, and a means to sample part of the expanding jet, can achieve "zero" particle shedding. Such a unit can be purchased from Liquid Air Corporation.
- It is known that very high concentration of fine particles can be generated during the pressure reduction process if the upstream pressure exceeds a few hundred psi depending on the gas purity (J. Aerosol Sci., 19, 153, 1988). The particle concentration decreases with decreasing upstream pressure and drops to zero typically at pressures within the range of 20,7x10⁵ Pa (300 psi) to 41,4x10⁵ Pa (600 psi). It is documented that these particles are formed from condensation of trace amount of vapor impurities in the compressed gases.
- The removal of vapor impurities (purification) is conventionally accomplished with the help of molecular sieve or activated carbon. This approach however may totally distort the original particle spectra and concentrations in the compressed gases.
- Utilization of the differences in diffusion coefficients to remove unwanted nitric acid vapor from a gas stream to obtain true particulate nitrate is a common practice among air pollution researchers, where it is called "acid denuder". A basic coating is usually applied to the collection surfaces to retain the acid vapors, which may shed significant particles to upset the purpose of sampling particles from high-purity gases. The system is at ambient pressure. No temperature control is provided.
- In view of the considerable demand for high purity gases and high purity gases containing particles there is therefore a strongly felt need for a method for separating condensible vapors from particles in a highly compressed gas. Such a method would ideally not affect the spectra or concentration of the particles in the compressed gas.
- It is also known from EP-A-0312457 and EP-A-0312458 to generate droplets of condensible vapors in a carrier gas through a critical orifice and to discharge a carrier gas containing condensible vapors through a plurality of orifices without causing the condensation of the condensible vapors.
- It is an object of this invention to provide a process for removing condensible vapors from a compressed gas containing particles, without affecting the spectra or concentration of these particles in the compressed gas.
- The inventors have now discovered a process as defined in claim 1 which satisfies this object of this invention, and other objects which will become apparent from the description of the invention given hereinbelow.
- The invention furthermore provides processes as defined in respectively claim 4 and claim 5.
- In the process of the present invention, a starting compressed gas containing condensible vapors and particles is passed through a flow system. The flow system used comprises simple geometries and polished, clean surfaces. The flow rate of the compressed gas through the flow system and the flow system geometry are selected such that particles having a diameter greater than 0.01 micrometers have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with the flow system surfaces and condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with the flow system surfaces. The temperature of the flow system surfaces is then controlled to retain collided vapor molecules on the surfaces. This process produces a product compressed gas which is free of condensable vapors and contains the spectra and concentration of particles of the starting compressed gas.
- A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of its attendant advantages will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures, wherein:
- FIGURE 1 illustrates background particle levels generated by condensation as a function of the cylinder (gas) pressure;
- FIGURE 2 provides a schematic illustration of a design useful for particle sampling from high pressure gas cylinders;
- FIGURE 3 provides a comparison of particle concentration below 41,4x10⁵ Pa (600 psia) and above 41,4x10⁵ Pa (600 psia), showing no particle loss due to the use of a cold trap in the system; and
- FIGURE 4 provides particle concentration data in high pressure gas cylinders with different histories.
- The invention provides a process for removing trace amount of condensible vapor impurities from highly compressed gases without disturbing the original particle size spectra and concentrations in the compressed gas. These condensible vapors can convert into particles under conditions of large temperature drop or pressure drop and totally distort the original particle information.
- In accordance with the present invention, compressed gases are defined as comprising, among others, a carrier gas and condensible vapors. The compound gases may have pressures ranging from 6,9x10⁵ Pa (100 psia) to 20,7x10⁶ Pa (3000 psia). The carrier gas may be, e.g. nitrogen (N₂), argon, helium, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, methane, ethane, propane, etc.
- Condensible vapors are defined for the present purposes as species which will condense to form droplets upon sufficient cooling of the carrier gas or upon contacting a sufficiently cool surface (vide infra), e.g. C₅₋₁₆ hydrocarbons or C₅₋₁₆ fluorinated hydrocarbons, etc., and higher hydrocarbons or fluorinated hydrocarbons which can include up to C₃₀ hydrocarbons/fluorinated hydrocarbons under some circumstances, such as when these vapors are present in a very low concentration. These condensible vapors are however present in their gaseous state before cooling and not as droplets.
- The method of the invention thus distinguishes itself from other detection methods for preexisting particles and specifically from methods for the detection of preexisting oil droplets in gases which require the preexistence of such droplets. An example of such methods is given in U.S.-A-4794086
- The present invention provides for the removal of either global amounts of condensible vapors or individual components within a "family" of such species (for example hydrocarbons).
- One important application of the method of this invention, in conjunction with a critical orifice pressure reducer, is the analysis of particles present in highly compressed gases, e.g. cylinder gases. Such particle analysis is of critical importance to a variety of industrial processes that utilize ultra-pure, compressed gases and is a major topic of research on microcontamination. However, there is no current practical means for this particle analysis from compressed gases of pressure greater than 48,26x10⁵ Pa (700 psi) because particles generated from condensible vapors during pressure reduction are usually orders of magnitude more numerous than the original particles (Figure 1).
- Another important application of the present invention is that this method can be used for the purpose of purification of gases, especially during the cylinder filling process, to obtain ultra-clean gases. The present method is superior to conventional method in "zero" particle generation and low pressure drop.
- The invention removes condensible vapors in a flow system of simple geometries and of polished, clean surfaces, such as art electro-polished round tube, an annular tube, or a rectangular slit. The term "simple" geometries" is used to indicate that these flow systems do not have sharp turns and/or dead spaces to trap particles.
- It is well documented that particle loss can be significant in a flow system with complex geometry. The polished, clean surface of the flow systems used in this invention can prevent particle shedding or reentrainment, which is well recognized as a significant problem for rough surfaces.
- The conventional vapor removing process (usually referred to as purification) utilizes complex flow systems with rough surfaces and porous pellets which can generate or trap substantial amount of particles. This conventional process is therefore not compatible with particle sampling and analysis.
- The particles contained in the compound gases treated in this invention have diameters of at least 0.01 µm. The invention selectively removes condensible vapor molecules without affecting the particles in the gas stream.
- It is well known that the diffusion coefficients for gas molecules are orders of magnitude larger than those of particles. For example, the diffusion coefficient for air molecules is 0.19 cm².s⁻¹ versus 0.00052 cm².s⁻¹ for particles of 0.01 µm diameter. (Note: 0.01 µm is currently the practical lower limit of detection by commonly used particle counters. The diffusion coefficient decreases further with increasing particle diameter.)
- Accordingly, the collision frequency with the tube walls is much higher for vapor molecules than for particles. For convenience, we define the collision efficiency (CE) as the fraction of the species of interest that collide with the walls.
- By proper selection of flow rate, tube geometry, and tube length, it is possible to devise a system with negligible collision efficiency (e.g., 5%) for particles greater than 0.01 µm while having nearly 100% (e.g., >98%) collision efficiency for vapor molecules.
-
- Tables 1 to 3 list the collision efficiency in a round tube for various tube lengths, flow rates, and diffusion coefficients. The range of diffusion coefficients covers most commonly encountered vapor species. The last row of each table indicates the diffusion loss of 0.01 µm particles. The loss decreases with increasing particle size.
- The present process retains the collided vapor molecules on the tube walls by controlling the wall temperature. When vapor molecules collide with the wall, the molecules may stick or rebound depending upon the physical and chemical interactions occurring between the vapor and the collection surface. Conventional purification process rely on the adsorption properties of the collection surface to retain vapor molecules.
- In the present invention the sticking probability of the colliding molecules is increased by decreasing the surface temperature. As the surface temperature decreases systematically, different species of trace vapors can be selectively removed. The temperature control can be obtained by a mechanical refrigerator or a reservoir of dry ice or liquid nitrogen. The suitable temperature ranges lie between the boiling point of the gas to be sampled and the lowest boiling point of the condensible vapors to be removed. In the present invention, at least a portion of the surface sufficient to trap the condensible vapors must be cooled.
- The invention further provides a process for identifying the species of vapor impurities in cylinder gases. After trapping an adequate amount of vapor impurities, heated, clean gases can be directed through the tube to desorb the trapped vapors. Fourrier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), gas-chromatography (GC), or other instruments can be used on-line to identify the species of the trapped vapors.
- Figure 2 shows the schematic design for the application of sampling particles from cylinder gases. The tube length and the temperature control method employed here only serve as an example. A 0,635 cm (1/4 inch) SSEP tubing of 1,22m (4 feet) long submerged in a dry ice-freon reservoir served as the vapor removing device (cold trap). The temperature of the cold trap was -78°C. The required tube length can be found in Table 1 to 3 for different applications. With this design, the background particle levels, generated from reentrainment and condensation, were controlled well.
- The temperature control can be facilitated by a mechanical freezer, a jet-expansion device, or a reservoir filled with different liquefied gases.
- The detected background particle concentration with an absolute filter in-line but by-passing the cold trap is given in Figure 1, which illustrates background particle levels, generated by condensation, as a function of cylinder (gas) pressure. Figure 1 illustrates that particle concentration increases with cylinder Pressure. The CNC counts are two orders of magnitude higher than the LAS-X counts. The detected background particle concentration with the cold trap is given in Table 4. The background level can be further reduced by employing a lower flow rate, a longer tube in the cold trap or a lower reservoir temperature.
- Figure 3 shows that the use of a cold trap does not cause extra particle loss. Figure 3 provides particle concentration data for a turbulently filled cylinder. The concentration of the particles remains the same with and without the cold trap at pressures less than 41,4x10⁵ Pa (600 psi), where no condensation occurs.
- Figure 4 shows examples of measuring true particle concentration in turbulent-filled and aged cylinders by employing the present method. Figure 4 provides particle concentrations for high pressure gases in cylinders with different histories.
- As this graph illustrates, the concentration of particles can be different by two orders of magnitude depending on the history of the high pressure gas in the cylinder. Notably, with well-aged high pressure gases in cylinders (i.e. with gases which have been stored under high pressure in cylinders and undisturbed for at least one month), the concentration of particles is relatively low. As seen from a comparison of the two curves provided in Figure 4 for particle concentrations in well-aged high pressure gas cylinders, without the present invention, it is not possible to measure the Particle content of a gas obtained from a well-aged cylinder at pressures greater than 68,95x10⁵ (1,000 psia) (see Figure 1).
Table 4 Achievable Particle Background With a Filter and a Cold Trap Test Pressure (PSIA) 10⁵ Pa CNC >0.01 µm Particles/scf LAS-X >0.2 µm Particles/scf >0.3 µm Particles/scf >0.5 µm Particles/ scf 500 34,475 3.2 0 0 0 1000 68,95 4.8 2.4 2.4 0 1500 103,93 16 4.0 1.3 0 1800 124,11 90 25 14 3.1 2000 137,9 209 46 25 9.2
Claims (5)
- A process for removing condensible vapors from a compressed gas containing condensible vapors and particles without affecting the spectra or concentration of said particles in said compressed gas, said process comprising:(i) passing a starting compressed gas containing condensible vapors and particles through a flow apparatus without sharp turns and/or dead spaces to trap particles, preferably an electro-polished round tube, an annular tube or a rectangular slit, the flow apparatus comprising polished clean surfaces;(ii) selecting (iia) a compressed gas flow rate through said flow apparatus and (iib) a flow apparatus length and geometry, such that particles having a diameter greater than 0.01 µm have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with said flow apparatus surfaces and condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with said flow apparatus surfaces;(iii) controlling the temperature of at least a portion of the surfaces of said flow apparatus to retain collided vapor molecules on said portion of the surfaces; and(iv) obtaining a product compressed gas free of condensible vapors and containing the spectra and concentration of particles of said starting compound gas.
- The process of Claim 1, wherein said condensible vapors comprise a hydrocarbon or a fluorinated hydrocarbon.
- The process of Claim 1 or 2, comprising charging a cylinder with said product compressed gas.
- A process for identifying the species of condensible vapor impurities in a compressed gas, comprising:(i) passing a starting compressed gas containing condensible vapors through a flow apparatus length and geometry, such that particles having a diameter greater than 0.01 µm have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with said flow apparatus surfaces and condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with said flow apparatus surfaces, said flow apparatus being comprised of simple geometrics without sharp turns and/or dead spaces, preferably an electro-polished round tube or a rectangular slit, and being comprised of polished, clean surfaces;(ii) selecting (iia) a compressed gas flow rate through said flow apparatus and (iib) a flow apparatus length and geometry, such that particles in said gas having a diameter greater than 0.01 µm have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with said flow apparatus surfaces and said condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with said flow apparatus surfaces;(iii) controlling the temperature of at least a portion of the surfaces of said flow apparatus to retain collided vapor molecules on said portion of the surfaces;(iv) replacing said starting compressed gas passing through said flow apparatus with a clean gas and desorbing said retained vapor molecules;(v) identifying the vapor molecules.
- A process for the analysis of particles present in a compressed gas, comprising:(i) passing a starting compressed gas containing condensible vapors and particles through a flow apparatus length and geometry, such that particles having a diameter greater than 0.01 µm have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with said flow apparatus surfaces and condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with said flow apparatus surfaces, said flow apparatus being comprised of simple geometrics without sharp turns and/or dead spaces, preferably an electro-polished round tube, an annular tube or a rectangular slit, and being comprised of polished, clean surfaces;(ii) selecting (iia) a compressed gas flow rate through said flow apparatus and (iib) a flow apparatus length and geometry such that particles having a diameter greater than 0.01 µm have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with said flow apparatus surfaces and condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with said flow apparatus surfaces;(iii) controlling the temperature of at least a portion of the surfaces of said flow system to retain collided vapor molecules on said portion of the surfaces;(iv) obtaining a product compressed gas free of condensible vapors and containing the spectra and concentration of particles of said starting compressed gas;(v) analyzing the particles present in said product compressed gas.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US318828 | 1981-11-06 | ||
US07/318,828 US4964278A (en) | 1989-03-06 | 1989-03-06 | Method of separating condensible vapors from particles in highly compressed gases |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0388252A2 EP0388252A2 (en) | 1990-09-19 |
EP0388252A3 EP0388252A3 (en) | 1991-01-16 |
EP0388252B1 true EP0388252B1 (en) | 1994-12-14 |
Family
ID=23239740
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP90400595A Expired - Lifetime EP0388252B1 (en) | 1989-03-06 | 1990-03-05 | Method of separating condensible vapors from particles in highly compressed gases |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US4964278A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0388252B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP3056501B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR900014022A (en) |
AT (1) | ATE115429T1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2011474A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69014946T2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5205987A (en) * | 1991-02-28 | 1993-04-27 | Suprex Corporation | Off-line supercritical fluid extraction collection system |
US5209102A (en) * | 1992-01-31 | 1993-05-11 | American Air Liquide | Method of introducing and controlling compressed gases for impurity analysis |
US5349833A (en) * | 1993-02-22 | 1994-09-27 | Xontech, Inc. | Cryotrap for air pollution analyzer |
US5426944A (en) * | 1993-08-31 | 1995-06-27 | American Air Liquide, Inc. | Chemical purification for semiconductor processing by partial condensation |
US5665902A (en) * | 1994-05-10 | 1997-09-09 | American Air Liquide, Inc. | Method to analyze particle contaminants in compressed gases |
US5814741A (en) * | 1996-03-01 | 1998-09-29 | American Air Liquide Inc. | Metal sampling method and system for non-hydrolyzable gases |
US5941081A (en) * | 1997-10-27 | 1999-08-24 | Air Liquide America Corp. | Solid phase latent heat vapor extraction and recovery system for liquified gases |
US7867779B2 (en) * | 2005-02-03 | 2011-01-11 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | System and method comprising same for measurement and/or analysis of particles in gas stream |
EP1830173A1 (en) * | 2005-02-03 | 2007-09-05 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | System and method for measurement and/or analysis of particles in gas stream |
EP1688731A1 (en) * | 2005-02-03 | 2006-08-09 | Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | System and method for measurement and/or analysis of particles in gas stream |
US7592178B2 (en) * | 2005-02-23 | 2009-09-22 | Hunter Menufacturing Co. | Filter integrity tester |
US7851750B2 (en) * | 2008-04-09 | 2010-12-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Mass independent kinetic energy reducing inlet system for vacuum environment |
FI128773B (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2020-11-30 | Sisaeilmatutkimuspalvelut Elisa Aattela | Method for examining indoor air, and sampling arrangement |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR1203026A (en) * | 1958-05-09 | 1960-01-14 | Air Liquide | Process improvements for the analysis of gas mixtures |
US3338034A (en) * | 1963-11-12 | 1967-08-29 | Union Carbide Corp | Adsorbent-coated thermal panels |
FR1389059A (en) * | 1964-01-29 | 1965-02-12 | Hochvakuum Dresden Veb | Method and device for the analysis of very small quantities of gas at very low pressures |
US4023398A (en) * | 1975-03-03 | 1977-05-17 | John Barry French | Apparatus for analyzing trace components |
US4506513A (en) * | 1983-06-17 | 1985-03-26 | Max John K | Cold trap |
US4530250A (en) * | 1984-04-12 | 1985-07-23 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Method for sampling sub-micron particles |
DE3422417A1 (en) * | 1984-06-16 | 1985-12-19 | Kernforschungsanlage Jülich GmbH, 5170 Jülich | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SEPARATING A GAS COMPONENT FROM A GAS MIXTURE BY FREEZING OUT |
DE3729374C1 (en) * | 1987-09-03 | 1988-12-01 | Kernforschungsanlage Juelich | Device for cryogenic enrichment of trace substances contained in gases and use of the device in a device |
US5027642A (en) * | 1987-10-13 | 1991-07-02 | American Air Liquide | Method of detecting and or removing trace amounts of condensible vapors from compressed gas |
-
1989
- 1989-03-06 US US07/318,828 patent/US4964278A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1990
- 1990-03-05 CA CA002011474A patent/CA2011474A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1990-03-05 AT AT90400595T patent/ATE115429T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1990-03-05 JP JP2053479A patent/JP3056501B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-03-05 EP EP90400595A patent/EP0388252B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-03-05 DE DE69014946T patent/DE69014946T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1990-03-06 KR KR1019900002910A patent/KR900014022A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US4964278A (en) | 1990-10-23 |
EP0388252A2 (en) | 1990-09-19 |
JP3056501B2 (en) | 2000-06-26 |
ATE115429T1 (en) | 1994-12-15 |
DE69014946T2 (en) | 1995-05-04 |
JPH02298302A (en) | 1990-12-10 |
CA2011474A1 (en) | 1990-09-06 |
KR900014022A (en) | 1990-10-22 |
DE69014946D1 (en) | 1995-01-26 |
EP0388252A3 (en) | 1991-01-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0388252B1 (en) | Method of separating condensible vapors from particles in highly compressed gases | |
EP0312457B1 (en) | Method of detecting trace amounts of condensible vapors from compressed gas | |
US7867779B2 (en) | System and method comprising same for measurement and/or analysis of particles in gas stream | |
Bloom et al. | Determination of volatile mercury species at the picogram level by low-temperature gas chromatography with cold-vapour atomic fluorescence detection | |
EP1688731A1 (en) | System and method for measurement and/or analysis of particles in gas stream | |
Thiemens et al. | Oxygen isotope fractionation in stratospheric CO2 | |
Subramanyam et al. | Gas-to-particle partitioning of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an urban atmosphere | |
US4902318A (en) | Inlet apparatus for gas-aerosol sampling | |
Hoering et al. | The isotopic composition of the nitrogen in natural gases and associated crude oils | |
CN1094163A (en) | The authentication method of the heavy hydrocarbon in the gangue and device thereof | |
Krieger et al. | Measurement of polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in air with a diffusion denuder | |
EP1854906A2 (en) | Analysis of a reactive gas such as silane for particle generating impurities | |
CN101839878A (en) | Method and device for analyzing trace gaseous impurities in high-purity gas (or electron gas) | |
KR19990023535A (en) | Ultra High Purity Gas Analysis Method and Apparatus Using Atmospheric Pressure Ionization Mass Spectroscopy | |
US5814741A (en) | Metal sampling method and system for non-hydrolyzable gases | |
Golovoy et al. | Adsorption of automotive paint solvents on activated carbon: I. Equilibrium adsorption of single vapors | |
Dravnieks et al. | Collection and processing of airborne chemical information, II | |
EP1830173A1 (en) | System and method for measurement and/or analysis of particles in gas stream | |
Hanrahan et al. | Adsorption-desorption gas chromatographic-infrared determination of trace disulfur decafluoride in sulfur hexafluoride | |
Lindqvist | Determination of nitric acid in ambient air by gas chromatography/photoionization detection after collection in a denuder | |
US3724169A (en) | Delta t bar spectrometer | |
Stehr et al. | Collection and analysis of atmospheric ozone samples | |
Knöppel | Sampling and analysis of organic indoor air pollutants | |
Simon et al. | Study of isoprene and�-pinene breakthrough volume on Tenax TA | |
Soby et al. | Assessment of stack gas emitted trace metals from incineration: determination of filter collection efficiency by condensational enlargement of penetrating submicron particles |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19900309 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19930212 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Effective date: 19941214 Ref country code: ES Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY Effective date: 19941214 Ref country code: BE Effective date: 19941214 Ref country code: DK Effective date: 19941214 Ref country code: AT Effective date: 19941214 Ref country code: LI Effective date: 19941214 Ref country code: NL Effective date: 19941214 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 19941214 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 115429 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19941215 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69014946 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19950126 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Effective date: 19950314 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19950331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 19970210 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19970220 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 19970224 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19980305 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY Effective date: 19980331 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 19980305 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19981201 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |