EP0388252B1 - Method of separating condensible vapors from particles in highly compressed gases - Google Patents

Method of separating condensible vapors from particles in highly compressed gases Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0388252B1
EP0388252B1 EP90400595A EP90400595A EP0388252B1 EP 0388252 B1 EP0388252 B1 EP 0388252B1 EP 90400595 A EP90400595 A EP 90400595A EP 90400595 A EP90400595 A EP 90400595A EP 0388252 B1 EP0388252 B1 EP 0388252B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
particles
flow apparatus
compressed gas
condensible
vapors
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP90400595A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0388252A2 (en
EP0388252A3 (en
Inventor
Horng-Yuan Wen
Hwa-Chi Wang
Stephen Chesters
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Air Liquide SA
LAir Liquide SA pour lEtude et lExploitation des Procedes Georges Claude
Original Assignee
Air Liquide SA
LAir Liquide SA pour lEtude et lExploitation des Procedes Georges Claude
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Air Liquide SA, LAir Liquide SA pour lEtude et lExploitation des Procedes Georges Claude filed Critical Air Liquide SA
Publication of EP0388252A2 publication Critical patent/EP0388252A2/en
Publication of EP0388252A3 publication Critical patent/EP0388252A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0388252B1 publication Critical patent/EP0388252B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D5/00Condensation of vapours; Recovering volatile solvents by condensation
    • B01D5/0027Condensation of vapours; Recovering volatile solvents by condensation by direct contact between vapours or gases and the cooling medium
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D8/00Cold traps; Cold baffles

Definitions

  • Trace quantities of condensible vapors such as hydrocarbons or fluorinated hydrocarbons in gases are commonly detected and quantified by a variety of means such as chromatography in the gas phase, infrared (IR) absorption spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, total hydrocarbon detectors, etc.
  • IR infrared
  • Pressure reduction by critical orifice is commonly used in pressure regulators.
  • a pressure reducer consisting of a clean orifice, a chamber into which the gas can expand, and a means to sample part of the expanding jet, can achieve "zero" particle shedding.
  • Such a unit can be purchased from Liquid Air Corporation.
  • Utilization of the differences in diffusion coefficients to remove unwanted nitric acid vapor from a gas stream to obtain true particulate nitrate is a common practice among air pollution researchers, where it is called "acid denuder".
  • a basic coating is usually applied to the collection surfaces to retain the acid vapors, which may shed significant particles to upset the purpose of sampling particles from high-purity gases.
  • the system is at ambient pressure. No temperature control is provided.
  • EP-A-0312457 and EP-A-0312458 It is also known from EP-A-0312457 and EP-A-0312458 to generate droplets of condensible vapors in a carrier gas through a critical orifice and to discharge a carrier gas containing condensible vapors through a plurality of orifices without causing the condensation of the condensible vapors.
  • the invention furthermore provides processes as defined in respectively claim 4 and claim 5.
  • a starting compressed gas containing condensible vapors and particles is passed through a flow system.
  • the flow system used comprises simple geometries and polished, clean surfaces.
  • the flow rate of the compressed gas through the flow system and the flow system geometry are selected such that particles having a diameter greater than 0.01 micrometers have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with the flow system surfaces and condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with the flow system surfaces.
  • the temperature of the flow system surfaces is then controlled to retain collided vapor molecules on the surfaces. This process produces a product compressed gas which is free of condensable vapors and contains the spectra and concentration of particles of the starting compressed gas.
  • the invention provides a process for removing trace amount of condensible vapor impurities from highly compressed gases without disturbing the original particle size spectra and concentrations in the compressed gas. These condensible vapors can convert into particles under conditions of large temperature drop or pressure drop and totally distort the original particle information.
  • compressed gases are defined as comprising, among others, a carrier gas and condensible vapors.
  • the compound gases may have pressures ranging from 6,9x105 Pa (100 psia) to 20,7x106 Pa (3000 psia).
  • the carrier gas may be, e.g. nitrogen (N2), argon, helium, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, methane, ethane, propane, etc.
  • Condensible vapors are defined for the present purposes as species which will condense to form droplets upon sufficient cooling of the carrier gas or upon contacting a sufficiently cool surface ( vide infra ), e.g. C5 ⁇ 16 hydrocarbons or C5 ⁇ 16 fluorinated hydrocarbons, etc., and higher hydrocarbons or fluorinated hydrocarbons which can include up to C30 hydrocarbons/fluorinated hydrocarbons under some circumstances, such as when these vapors are present in a very low concentration. These condensible vapors are however present in their gaseous state before cooling and not as droplets.
  • the method of the invention thus distinguishes itself from other detection methods for preexisting particles and specifically from methods for the detection of preexisting oil droplets in gases which require the preexistence of such droplets.
  • An example of such methods is given in U.S.-A-4794086
  • the present invention provides for the removal of either global amounts of condensible vapors or individual components within a "family" of such species (for example hydrocarbons).
  • Another important application of the present invention is that this method can be used for the purpose of purification of gases, especially during the cylinder filling process, to obtain ultra-clean gases.
  • the present method is superior to conventional method in "zero" particle generation and low pressure drop.
  • the invention removes condensible vapors in a flow system of simple geometries and of polished, clean surfaces, such as art electro-polished round tube, an annular tube, or a rectangular slit.
  • simple geometries such as art electro-polished round tube, an annular tube, or a rectangular slit.
  • smooth geometries is used to indicate that these flow systems do not have sharp turns and/or dead spaces to trap particles.
  • the conventional vapor removing process (usually referred to as purification) utilizes complex flow systems with rough surfaces and porous pellets which can generate or trap substantial amount of particles. This conventional process is therefore not compatible with particle sampling and analysis.
  • the particles contained in the compound gases treated in this invention have diameters of at least 0.01 ⁇ m.
  • the invention selectively removes condensible vapor molecules without affecting the particles in the gas stream.
  • the diffusion coefficients for gas molecules are orders of magnitude larger than those of particles.
  • the diffusion coefficient for air molecules is 0.19 cm2.s ⁇ 1 versus 0.00052 cm2.s ⁇ 1 for particles of 0.01 ⁇ m diameter. (Note: 0.01 ⁇ m is currently the practical lower limit of detection by commonly used particle counters. The diffusion coefficient decreases further with increasing particle diameter.)
  • the collision frequency with the tube walls is much higher for vapor molecules than for particles.
  • CE collision efficiency
  • CE 1 - 0.819 exp (-11.5K) for K > 0.007
  • K DL/Q for round tube
  • K DLW/QH for rectangular slit
  • D is the diffusion coefficient
  • L the tube length
  • Q the flow rate
  • W the width of the slit
  • H the height of the slit.
  • Tables 1 to 3 list the collision efficiency in a round tube for various tube lengths, flow rates, and diffusion coefficients. The range of diffusion coefficients covers most commonly encountered vapor species. The last row of each table indicates the diffusion loss of 0.01 ⁇ m particles. The loss decreases with increasing particle size.
  • the present process retains the collided vapor molecules on the tube walls by controlling the wall temperature.
  • the molecules may stick or rebound depending upon the physical and chemical interactions occurring between the vapor and the collection surface.
  • Conventional purification process rely on the adsorption properties of the collection surface to retain vapor molecules.
  • the sticking probability of the colliding molecules is increased by decreasing the surface temperature.
  • the temperature control can be obtained by a mechanical refrigerator or a reservoir of dry ice or liquid nitrogen.
  • the suitable temperature ranges lie between the boiling point of the gas to be sampled and the lowest boiling point of the condensible vapors to be removed.
  • at least a portion of the surface sufficient to trap the condensible vapors must be cooled.
  • the invention further provides a process for identifying the species of vapor impurities in cylinder gases. After trapping an adequate amount of vapor impurities, heated, clean gases can be directed through the tube to desorb the trapped vapors. Fourrier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), gas-chromatography (GC), or other instruments can be used on-line to identify the species of the trapped vapors.
  • FTIR Fourrier transform infrared spectroscopy
  • GC gas-chromatography
  • Figure 2 shows the schematic design for the application of sampling particles from cylinder gases.
  • the tube length and the temperature control method employed here only serve as an example.
  • a 0,635 cm (1/4 inch) SSEP tubing of 1,22m (4 feet) long submerged in a dry ice-freon reservoir served as the vapor removing device (cold trap).
  • the temperature of the cold trap was -78°C.
  • the required tube length can be found in Table 1 to 3 for different applications. With this design, the background particle levels, generated from reentrainment and condensation, were controlled well.
  • the temperature control can be facilitated by a mechanical freezer, a jet-expansion device, or a reservoir filled with different liquefied gases.
  • the detected background particle concentration with an absolute filter in-line but by-passing the cold trap is given in Figure 1, which illustrates background particle levels, generated by condensation, as a function of cylinder (gas) pressure.
  • Figure 1 illustrates that particle concentration increases with cylinder Pressure.
  • the CNC counts are two orders of magnitude higher than the LAS-X counts.
  • the detected background particle concentration with the cold trap is given in Table 4.
  • the background level can be further reduced by employing a lower flow rate, a longer tube in the cold trap or a lower reservoir temperature.
  • Figure 3 shows that the use of a cold trap does not cause extra particle loss.
  • Figure 3 provides particle concentration data for a turbulently filled cylinder. The concentration of the particles remains the same with and without the cold trap at pressures less than 41,4x105 Pa (600 psi), where no condensation occurs.
  • Figure 4 shows examples of measuring true particle concentration in turbulent-filled and aged cylinders by employing the present method.
  • Figure 4 provides particle concentrations for high pressure gases in cylinders with different histories.
  • the concentration of particles can be different by two orders of magnitude depending on the history of the high pressure gas in the cylinder.
  • concentration of particles is relatively low.

Abstract

A method is described to remove condensible vapors in highly compressed gases without affecting the original particle spectra and concentrations. The vapors are separated from particles primarily through diffusion mechanism and collected on cold surfaces. Four important parameters are the length, the flow rate, the temperature, and the diffusion coefficients of the vapors to be removed. Important applications include sampling particles from high pressure gases and condensible vapor-free filling for ultra-pure cylinder gases.

Description

    Discussion of the Background:
  • In many applications of gases, such as the manufacture of VLSI chips, high purity gases are needed during the manufacturing process to avoid, among others, the creation of defects during the various masking steps of the process. Avoiding such defects enhances the manufacture output of the process as well as the reliability of the chips. There is also a need for high purity gases in the optical, aerospace and pharmaceutical industries.
  • Various impurities such as particles or vapors may be present in compressed gases stored in a container such as a cylinder. It is known from the article entitled "A gas filtration system for concentrations of 10⁻⁵ particles/cm³" from G. Kasper and H.Y. Wen; published in Aerosol Science and Technology 5: 167-185 (1986), that "totally" particle-free process gases may be obtained. Particle analysis has been also carefully studied by the same authors and the results of this study has been published in the Proceedings - Institute of Environmental Sciences - May 6, 1987 - in an article entitled "Particle Analysis in cylinder gases".
  • Trace quantities of condensible vapors such as hydrocarbons or fluorinated hydrocarbons in gases are commonly detected and quantified by a variety of means such as chromatography in the gas phase, infrared (IR) absorption spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, total hydrocarbon detectors, etc.
  • Pressure reduction by critical orifice is commonly used in pressure regulators. For the purpose of sampling particles from compressed gases of pressure up to 34,5.10⁵ Pa (500 psi), a pressure reducer, consisting of a clean orifice, a chamber into which the gas can expand, and a means to sample part of the expanding jet, can achieve "zero" particle shedding. Such a unit can be purchased from Liquid Air Corporation.
  • It is known that very high concentration of fine particles can be generated during the pressure reduction process if the upstream pressure exceeds a few hundred psi depending on the gas purity (J. Aerosol Sci., 19, 153, 1988). The particle concentration decreases with decreasing upstream pressure and drops to zero typically at pressures within the range of 20,7x10⁵ Pa (300 psi) to 41,4x10⁵ Pa (600 psi). It is documented that these particles are formed from condensation of trace amount of vapor impurities in the compressed gases.
  • The removal of vapor impurities (purification) is conventionally accomplished with the help of molecular sieve or activated carbon. This approach however may totally distort the original particle spectra and concentrations in the compressed gases.
  • Utilization of the differences in diffusion coefficients to remove unwanted nitric acid vapor from a gas stream to obtain true particulate nitrate is a common practice among air pollution researchers, where it is called "acid denuder". A basic coating is usually applied to the collection surfaces to retain the acid vapors, which may shed significant particles to upset the purpose of sampling particles from high-purity gases. The system is at ambient pressure. No temperature control is provided.
  • In view of the considerable demand for high purity gases and high purity gases containing particles there is therefore a strongly felt need for a method for separating condensible vapors from particles in a highly compressed gas. Such a method would ideally not affect the spectra or concentration of the particles in the compressed gas.
  • It is also known from EP-A-0312457 and EP-A-0312458 to generate droplets of condensible vapors in a carrier gas through a critical orifice and to discharge a carrier gas containing condensible vapors through a plurality of orifices without causing the condensation of the condensible vapors.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is an object of this invention to provide a process for removing condensible vapors from a compressed gas containing particles, without affecting the spectra or concentration of these particles in the compressed gas.
  • The inventors have now discovered a process as defined in claim 1 which satisfies this object of this invention, and other objects which will become apparent from the description of the invention given hereinbelow.
  • The invention furthermore provides processes as defined in respectively claim 4 and claim 5.
  • In the process of the present invention, a starting compressed gas containing condensible vapors and particles is passed through a flow system. The flow system used comprises simple geometries and polished, clean surfaces. The flow rate of the compressed gas through the flow system and the flow system geometry are selected such that particles having a diameter greater than 0.01 micrometers have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with the flow system surfaces and condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with the flow system surfaces. The temperature of the flow system surfaces is then controlled to retain collided vapor molecules on the surfaces. This process produces a product compressed gas which is free of condensable vapors and contains the spectra and concentration of particles of the starting compressed gas.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of its attendant advantages will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures, wherein:
    • FIGURE 1 illustrates background particle levels generated by condensation as a function of the cylinder (gas) pressure;
    • FIGURE 2 provides a schematic illustration of a design useful for particle sampling from high pressure gas cylinders;
    • FIGURE 3 provides a comparison of particle concentration below 41,4x10⁵ Pa (600 psia) and above 41,4x10⁵ Pa (600 psia), showing no particle loss due to the use of a cold trap in the system; and
    • FIGURE 4 provides particle concentration data in high pressure gas cylinders with different histories.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The invention provides a process for removing trace amount of condensible vapor impurities from highly compressed gases without disturbing the original particle size spectra and concentrations in the compressed gas. These condensible vapors can convert into particles under conditions of large temperature drop or pressure drop and totally distort the original particle information.
  • In accordance with the present invention, compressed gases are defined as comprising, among others, a carrier gas and condensible vapors. The compound gases may have pressures ranging from 6,9x10⁵ Pa (100 psia) to 20,7x10⁶ Pa (3000 psia). The carrier gas may be, e.g. nitrogen (N₂), argon, helium, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen, methane, ethane, propane, etc.
  • Condensible vapors are defined for the present purposes as species which will condense to form droplets upon sufficient cooling of the carrier gas or upon contacting a sufficiently cool surface (vide infra), e.g. C₅₋₁₆ hydrocarbons or C₅₋₁₆ fluorinated hydrocarbons, etc., and higher hydrocarbons or fluorinated hydrocarbons which can include up to C₃₀ hydrocarbons/fluorinated hydrocarbons under some circumstances, such as when these vapors are present in a very low concentration. These condensible vapors are however present in their gaseous state before cooling and not as droplets.
  • The method of the invention thus distinguishes itself from other detection methods for preexisting particles and specifically from methods for the detection of preexisting oil droplets in gases which require the preexistence of such droplets. An example of such methods is given in U.S.-A-4794086
  • The present invention provides for the removal of either global amounts of condensible vapors or individual components within a "family" of such species (for example hydrocarbons).
  • One important application of the method of this invention, in conjunction with a critical orifice pressure reducer, is the analysis of particles present in highly compressed gases, e.g. cylinder gases. Such particle analysis is of critical importance to a variety of industrial processes that utilize ultra-pure, compressed gases and is a major topic of research on microcontamination. However, there is no current practical means for this particle analysis from compressed gases of pressure greater than 48,26x10⁵ Pa (700 psi) because particles generated from condensible vapors during pressure reduction are usually orders of magnitude more numerous than the original particles (Figure 1).
  • Another important application of the present invention is that this method can be used for the purpose of purification of gases, especially during the cylinder filling process, to obtain ultra-clean gases. The present method is superior to conventional method in "zero" particle generation and low pressure drop.
  • The invention removes condensible vapors in a flow system of simple geometries and of polished, clean surfaces, such as art electro-polished round tube, an annular tube, or a rectangular slit. The term "simple" geometries" is used to indicate that these flow systems do not have sharp turns and/or dead spaces to trap particles.
  • It is well documented that particle loss can be significant in a flow system with complex geometry. The polished, clean surface of the flow systems used in this invention can prevent particle shedding or reentrainment, which is well recognized as a significant problem for rough surfaces.
  • The conventional vapor removing process (usually referred to as purification) utilizes complex flow systems with rough surfaces and porous pellets which can generate or trap substantial amount of particles. This conventional process is therefore not compatible with particle sampling and analysis.
  • The particles contained in the compound gases treated in this invention have diameters of at least 0.01 µm. The invention selectively removes condensible vapor molecules without affecting the particles in the gas stream.
  • It is well known that the diffusion coefficients for gas molecules are orders of magnitude larger than those of particles. For example, the diffusion coefficient for air molecules is 0.19 cm².s⁻¹ versus 0.00052 cm².s⁻¹ for particles of 0.01 µm diameter. (Note: 0.01 µm is currently the practical lower limit of detection by commonly used particle counters. The diffusion coefficient decreases further with increasing particle diameter.)
  • Accordingly, the collision frequency with the tube walls is much higher for vapor molecules than for particles. For convenience, we define the collision efficiency (CE) as the fraction of the species of interest that collide with the walls.
  • By proper selection of flow rate, tube geometry, and tube length, it is possible to devise a system with negligible collision efficiency (e.g., 5%) for particles greater than 0.01 µm while having nearly 100% (e.g., >98%) collision efficiency for vapor molecules.
  • The collision efficiency in laminar flow can be calculated from

    CE = 5.50 K 2/3 - 3.77 K for K < 0.007
    Figure imgb0001

    CE = 1 - 0.819 exp (-11.5K) for K > 0.007
    Figure imgb0002


    where
       K = DL/Q
    Figure imgb0003
    for round tube
       K = DLW/QH
    Figure imgb0004
    for rectangular slit
    where D is the diffusion coefficient, L the tube length, Q the flow rate, W the width of the slit, and H the height of the slit.
  • Tables 1 to 3 list the collision efficiency in a round tube for various tube lengths, flow rates, and diffusion coefficients. The range of diffusion coefficients covers most commonly encountered vapor species. The last row of each table indicates the diffusion loss of 0.01 µm particles. The loss decreases with increasing particle size.
    Figure imgb0005
  • The present process retains the collided vapor molecules on the tube walls by controlling the wall temperature. When vapor molecules collide with the wall, the molecules may stick or rebound depending upon the physical and chemical interactions occurring between the vapor and the collection surface. Conventional purification process rely on the adsorption properties of the collection surface to retain vapor molecules.
  • In the present invention the sticking probability of the colliding molecules is increased by decreasing the surface temperature. As the surface temperature decreases systematically, different species of trace vapors can be selectively removed. The temperature control can be obtained by a mechanical refrigerator or a reservoir of dry ice or liquid nitrogen. The suitable temperature ranges lie between the boiling point of the gas to be sampled and the lowest boiling point of the condensible vapors to be removed. In the present invention, at least a portion of the surface sufficient to trap the condensible vapors must be cooled.
  • The invention further provides a process for identifying the species of vapor impurities in cylinder gases. After trapping an adequate amount of vapor impurities, heated, clean gases can be directed through the tube to desorb the trapped vapors. Fourrier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), gas-chromatography (GC), or other instruments can be used on-line to identify the species of the trapped vapors.
  • Figure 2 shows the schematic design for the application of sampling particles from cylinder gases. The tube length and the temperature control method employed here only serve as an example. A 0,635 cm (1/4 inch) SSEP tubing of 1,22m (4 feet) long submerged in a dry ice-freon reservoir served as the vapor removing device (cold trap). The temperature of the cold trap was -78°C. The required tube length can be found in Table 1 to 3 for different applications. With this design, the background particle levels, generated from reentrainment and condensation, were controlled well.
  • The temperature control can be facilitated by a mechanical freezer, a jet-expansion device, or a reservoir filled with different liquefied gases.
  • The detected background particle concentration with an absolute filter in-line but by-passing the cold trap is given in Figure 1, which illustrates background particle levels, generated by condensation, as a function of cylinder (gas) pressure. Figure 1 illustrates that particle concentration increases with cylinder Pressure. The CNC counts are two orders of magnitude higher than the LAS-X counts. The detected background particle concentration with the cold trap is given in Table 4. The background level can be further reduced by employing a lower flow rate, a longer tube in the cold trap or a lower reservoir temperature.
  • Figure 3 shows that the use of a cold trap does not cause extra particle loss. Figure 3 provides particle concentration data for a turbulently filled cylinder. The concentration of the particles remains the same with and without the cold trap at pressures less than 41,4x10⁵ Pa (600 psi), where no condensation occurs.
  • Figure 4 shows examples of measuring true particle concentration in turbulent-filled and aged cylinders by employing the present method. Figure 4 provides particle concentrations for high pressure gases in cylinders with different histories.
  • As this graph illustrates, the concentration of particles can be different by two orders of magnitude depending on the history of the high pressure gas in the cylinder. Notably, with well-aged high pressure gases in cylinders (i.e. with gases which have been stored under high pressure in cylinders and undisturbed for at least one month), the concentration of particles is relatively low. As seen from a comparison of the two curves provided in Figure 4 for particle concentrations in well-aged high pressure gas cylinders, without the present invention, it is not possible to measure the Particle content of a gas obtained from a well-aged cylinder at pressures greater than 68,95x10⁵ (1,000 psia) (see Figure 1). Table 4
    Achievable Particle Background With a Filter and a Cold Trap
    Test Pressure (PSIA) 10⁵ Pa CNC >0.01 µm Particles/scf LAS-X
    >0.2 µm Particles/scf >0.3 µm Particles/scf >0.5 µm Particles/scf
    500 34,475 3.2 0 0 0
    1000 68,95 4.8 2.4 2.4 0
    1500 103,93 16 4.0 1.3 0
    1800 124,11 90 25 14 3.1
    2000 137,9 209 46 25 9.2

Claims (5)

  1. A process for removing condensible vapors from a compressed gas containing condensible vapors and particles without affecting the spectra or concentration of said particles in said compressed gas, said process comprising:
    (i) passing a starting compressed gas containing condensible vapors and particles through a flow apparatus without sharp turns and/or dead spaces to trap particles, preferably an electro-polished round tube, an annular tube or a rectangular slit, the flow apparatus comprising polished clean surfaces;
    (ii) selecting (iia) a compressed gas flow rate through said flow apparatus and (iib) a flow apparatus length and geometry, such that particles having a diameter greater than 0.01 µm have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with said flow apparatus surfaces and condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with said flow apparatus surfaces;
    (iii) controlling the temperature of at least a portion of the surfaces of said flow apparatus to retain collided vapor molecules on said portion of the surfaces; and
    (iv) obtaining a product compressed gas free of condensible vapors and containing the spectra and concentration of particles of said starting compound gas.
  2. The process of Claim 1, wherein said condensible vapors comprise a hydrocarbon or a fluorinated hydrocarbon.
  3. The process of Claim 1 or 2, comprising charging a cylinder with said product compressed gas.
  4. A process for identifying the species of condensible vapor impurities in a compressed gas, comprising:
    (i) passing a starting compressed gas containing condensible vapors through a flow apparatus length and geometry, such that particles having a diameter greater than 0.01 µm have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with said flow apparatus surfaces and condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with said flow apparatus surfaces, said flow apparatus being comprised of simple geometrics without sharp turns and/or dead spaces, preferably an electro-polished round tube or a rectangular slit, and being comprised of polished, clean surfaces;
    (ii) selecting (iia) a compressed gas flow rate through said flow apparatus and (iib) a flow apparatus length and geometry, such that particles in said gas having a diameter greater than 0.01 µm have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with said flow apparatus surfaces and said condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with said flow apparatus surfaces;
    (iii) controlling the temperature of at least a portion of the surfaces of said flow apparatus to retain collided vapor molecules on said portion of the surfaces;
    (iv) replacing said starting compressed gas passing through said flow apparatus with a clean gas and desorbing said retained vapor molecules;
    (v) identifying the vapor molecules.
  5. A process for the analysis of particles present in a compressed gas, comprising:
    (i) passing a starting compressed gas containing condensible vapors and particles through a flow apparatus length and geometry, such that particles having a diameter greater than 0.01 µm have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with said flow apparatus surfaces and condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with said flow apparatus surfaces, said flow apparatus being comprised of simple geometrics without sharp turns and/or dead spaces, preferably an electro-polished round tube, an annular tube or a rectangular slit, and being comprised of polished, clean surfaces;
    (ii) selecting (iia) a compressed gas flow rate through said flow apparatus and (iib) a flow apparatus length and geometry such that particles having a diameter greater than 0.01 µm have a collision efficiency of less than 5% with said flow apparatus surfaces and condensible vapor molecules have a collision efficiency of at least 98% with said flow apparatus surfaces;
    (iii) controlling the temperature of at least a portion of the surfaces of said flow system to retain collided vapor molecules on said portion of the surfaces;
    (iv) obtaining a product compressed gas free of condensible vapors and containing the spectra and concentration of particles of said starting compressed gas;
    (v) analyzing the particles present in said product compressed gas.
EP90400595A 1989-03-06 1990-03-05 Method of separating condensible vapors from particles in highly compressed gases Expired - Lifetime EP0388252B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US318828 1981-11-06
US07/318,828 US4964278A (en) 1989-03-06 1989-03-06 Method of separating condensible vapors from particles in highly compressed gases

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0388252A2 EP0388252A2 (en) 1990-09-19
EP0388252A3 EP0388252A3 (en) 1991-01-16
EP0388252B1 true EP0388252B1 (en) 1994-12-14

Family

ID=23239740

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP90400595A Expired - Lifetime EP0388252B1 (en) 1989-03-06 1990-03-05 Method of separating condensible vapors from particles in highly compressed gases

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US4964278A (en)
EP (1) EP0388252B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3056501B2 (en)
KR (1) KR900014022A (en)
AT (1) ATE115429T1 (en)
CA (1) CA2011474A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69014946T2 (en)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5205987A (en) * 1991-02-28 1993-04-27 Suprex Corporation Off-line supercritical fluid extraction collection system
US5209102A (en) * 1992-01-31 1993-05-11 American Air Liquide Method of introducing and controlling compressed gases for impurity analysis
US5349833A (en) * 1993-02-22 1994-09-27 Xontech, Inc. Cryotrap for air pollution analyzer
US5426944A (en) * 1993-08-31 1995-06-27 American Air Liquide, Inc. Chemical purification for semiconductor processing by partial condensation
US5665902A (en) * 1994-05-10 1997-09-09 American Air Liquide, Inc. Method to analyze particle contaminants in compressed gases
US5814741A (en) * 1996-03-01 1998-09-29 American Air Liquide Inc. Metal sampling method and system for non-hydrolyzable gases
US5941081A (en) * 1997-10-27 1999-08-24 Air Liquide America Corp. Solid phase latent heat vapor extraction and recovery system for liquified gases
US7867779B2 (en) * 2005-02-03 2011-01-11 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. System and method comprising same for measurement and/or analysis of particles in gas stream
EP1830173A1 (en) * 2005-02-03 2007-09-05 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. System and method for measurement and/or analysis of particles in gas stream
EP1688731A1 (en) * 2005-02-03 2006-08-09 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. System and method for measurement and/or analysis of particles in gas stream
US7592178B2 (en) * 2005-02-23 2009-09-22 Hunter Menufacturing Co. Filter integrity tester
US7851750B2 (en) * 2008-04-09 2010-12-14 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Mass independent kinetic energy reducing inlet system for vacuum environment
FI128773B (en) * 2014-12-30 2020-11-30 Sisaeilmatutkimuspalvelut Elisa Aattela Method for examining indoor air, and sampling arrangement

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR1203026A (en) * 1958-05-09 1960-01-14 Air Liquide Process improvements for the analysis of gas mixtures
US3338034A (en) * 1963-11-12 1967-08-29 Union Carbide Corp Adsorbent-coated thermal panels
FR1389059A (en) * 1964-01-29 1965-02-12 Hochvakuum Dresden Veb Method and device for the analysis of very small quantities of gas at very low pressures
US4023398A (en) * 1975-03-03 1977-05-17 John Barry French Apparatus for analyzing trace components
US4506513A (en) * 1983-06-17 1985-03-26 Max John K Cold trap
US4530250A (en) * 1984-04-12 1985-07-23 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Method for sampling sub-micron particles
DE3422417A1 (en) * 1984-06-16 1985-12-19 Kernforschungsanlage Jülich GmbH, 5170 Jülich METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SEPARATING A GAS COMPONENT FROM A GAS MIXTURE BY FREEZING OUT
DE3729374C1 (en) * 1987-09-03 1988-12-01 Kernforschungsanlage Juelich Device for cryogenic enrichment of trace substances contained in gases and use of the device in a device
US5027642A (en) * 1987-10-13 1991-07-02 American Air Liquide Method of detecting and or removing trace amounts of condensible vapors from compressed gas

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US4964278A (en) 1990-10-23
EP0388252A2 (en) 1990-09-19
JP3056501B2 (en) 2000-06-26
ATE115429T1 (en) 1994-12-15
DE69014946T2 (en) 1995-05-04
JPH02298302A (en) 1990-12-10
CA2011474A1 (en) 1990-09-06
KR900014022A (en) 1990-10-22
DE69014946D1 (en) 1995-01-26
EP0388252A3 (en) 1991-01-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0388252B1 (en) Method of separating condensible vapors from particles in highly compressed gases
EP0312457B1 (en) Method of detecting trace amounts of condensible vapors from compressed gas
US7867779B2 (en) System and method comprising same for measurement and/or analysis of particles in gas stream
Bloom et al. Determination of volatile mercury species at the picogram level by low-temperature gas chromatography with cold-vapour atomic fluorescence detection
EP1688731A1 (en) System and method for measurement and/or analysis of particles in gas stream
Thiemens et al. Oxygen isotope fractionation in stratospheric CO2
Subramanyam et al. Gas-to-particle partitioning of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an urban atmosphere
US4902318A (en) Inlet apparatus for gas-aerosol sampling
Hoering et al. The isotopic composition of the nitrogen in natural gases and associated crude oils
CN1094163A (en) The authentication method of the heavy hydrocarbon in the gangue and device thereof
Krieger et al. Measurement of polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in air with a diffusion denuder
EP1854906A2 (en) Analysis of a reactive gas such as silane for particle generating impurities
CN101839878A (en) Method and device for analyzing trace gaseous impurities in high-purity gas (or electron gas)
KR19990023535A (en) Ultra High Purity Gas Analysis Method and Apparatus Using Atmospheric Pressure Ionization Mass Spectroscopy
US5814741A (en) Metal sampling method and system for non-hydrolyzable gases
Golovoy et al. Adsorption of automotive paint solvents on activated carbon: I. Equilibrium adsorption of single vapors
Dravnieks et al. Collection and processing of airborne chemical information, II
EP1830173A1 (en) System and method for measurement and/or analysis of particles in gas stream
Hanrahan et al. Adsorption-desorption gas chromatographic-infrared determination of trace disulfur decafluoride in sulfur hexafluoride
Lindqvist Determination of nitric acid in ambient air by gas chromatography/photoionization detection after collection in a denuder
US3724169A (en) Delta t bar spectrometer
Stehr et al. Collection and analysis of atmospheric ozone samples
Knöppel Sampling and analysis of organic indoor air pollutants
Simon et al. Study of isoprene and�-pinene breakthrough volume on Tenax TA
Soby et al. Assessment of stack gas emitted trace metals from incineration: determination of filter collection efficiency by condensational enlargement of penetrating submicron particles

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900309

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19930212

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19941214

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19941214

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19941214

Ref country code: DK

Effective date: 19941214

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19941214

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19941214

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19941214

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19941214

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 115429

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19941215

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69014946

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19950126

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19950314

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19950331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19970210

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19970220

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19970224

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19980331

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19980305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19981201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST