EP0387092A2 - Traffic monitoring equipment - Google Patents
Traffic monitoring equipment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0387092A2 EP0387092A2 EP90302553A EP90302553A EP0387092A2 EP 0387092 A2 EP0387092 A2 EP 0387092A2 EP 90302553 A EP90302553 A EP 90302553A EP 90302553 A EP90302553 A EP 90302553A EP 0387092 A2 EP0387092 A2 EP 0387092A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- signal
- equipment
- cable
- validation
- speed detection
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
- G08G1/01—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled
- G08G1/052—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled with provision for determining speed or overspeed
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
- G08G1/01—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled
- G08G1/02—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled using treadles built into the road
Definitions
- This invention relates to validation checks applied to traffic monitoring equipment including traffic speed detection equipment.
- the invention is, however, in principle applicable to any traffic data collection equipment subject to what will be said herein below.
- An area of primary application which is envisaged, for example, is traffic monitoring equipment based on a cable or cables extending across a road or other surface and providing electrical signals.
- electrical signals can have one or more of several physical origins including piezo-electric effects whether resistive and/or generative piezo-electric effects, capacitive effects and tribo-electric effects, for example.
- the validation checks or security checks are to be provided to enhance the reliability, accuracy and convenience of operating such equipment. In the use of such equipment for law enforcement this can have favourable legal implications. Generally less reliance may be placed on the operator of the equipment to ensure the integrity of the equipment and the security of the measurements it takes.
- the apparatus may be adapted to check the correct sequence of impulses derived from several cables a single cable and/or a sensor pad or other sensor according to the set up of the equipment. This can be a security against swopping errors, for example, connection of cables incorrectly to the equipment after the cables have been set out in a suitable array with or without sensors or the like on a road surface, for example in the case of a duplicated pair of cables extended across the full width of a road in a spaced parallel array for speed law enforcement.
- the correct sequence of pulses will be from start cable 1, then start cable 2 followed by stop cable 1 and then stop cable 2 or, the reverse sequence for traffic in the opposite direction on the other side of the road being stop cable 2 then stop cable 1, then start cable 2 and then start cable 2.
- instrument 1 function measures the time from start 1 to stop 1 independently of the instrument 2 function which measures from start 2 to stop 1, each on either the front or the back axles or any other axles in physical contact with the road.
- instrument 2 function measures from start 2 to stop 1, each on either the front or the back axles or any other axles in physical contact with the road.
- cables can also be used and the verification can have application in measurement of deceleration and acceleration.
- This sequence checking verification can be generalised as stated to any desired or required arrays of cable, cables and/or detector pads, magnetic loop detectors or others.
- a RFI radio frequency interference check can be implemented in the instrument to monitor any radio interference during and in between measurements in order to ensure interference free measurements.
- the cables act as antennas for electro-magnetic energy and provide radio signals any risk of this causing measurement errors can be excluded by such radio interference checks and validations provided in the instrument.
- a EMI (Electromagnetic Interference) check from sources such as two-way radios, high frequency communication, high tension cables or lighting, can be implemented in the instrument to monitor any RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) or other EMI interference during and in between measurements in order to ensure interference free measurements.
- RFI Radio Frequency Interference
- the cables act as antennas for electro-magnetic energy fields and any risk of this causing measurement errors can be excluded.
- Further validation can be provided by ongoing checking of the level of insulation resistance between conductors in a particular cable and monitoring for low impedance, that is below the prescribed threshold value.
- the instrument will memorise the initial impedance of the cable and/or be set to a prescribed minimum limit impedance for monitoring the degrading of cable insulation resistance by means of impedance measurements.
- the gradual or abrupt deterioration of a cable in service conditions leading to degrading of the insulation resistance and which can lead to erroneous measurements and degraded accuracy or reliability can be monitored for and the equipment rendered inoperative and/or warning signals displayed when the cable deteriorates below a certain prescribed state.
- the degrading of the impedance of insulation material between conductors of the cable can seriously degrade the signal strength to be generated between the conductors, for example, such as is generated by piezo-electric effects in such material.
- low impedance may arise due to physical contact of the conductors due to mechanical damage of the insulating material between them.
- Low impedance can also result due to moisture and water becoming present in the cable which, for example, can arise during rainy weather where the outside sheath of the cable has become pervious to water, for example, due to mechanical damage again or water has access to the interior of the cable via its ends or in other ways.
- Degradation of the cable insulation can also occur under conditions of service due to heat, solar radiation, mechanical impulses of the vehicles and other conditions of use.
- the instrument can be provided with further validation by means of a facility for signal strength monitoring.
- each individual pulse be it piezo-electric or tribo-electric or both in origin (for example, refer to South African patent number 66/0493) must pass through a minimal signal level before being detected as a valid trigger for time pulses. There is thus a minimum threshold level below which signals will be ignored, in order to avoid rise time error due to weak signals.
- the instrument is given this validation facility designed to prescribe that the minimum signal strength must arise within a certain minimum time measured from a starting threshold in order to be validated for time measurement.
- the first pulse (be it positive or negative) must have a minimum steepness, i.e.
- the minimum rise time to the prescribed minimum signal level may be of the order of 1 ms to 20 ms depending on the application and the features required in various circumstances.
- this validation test will be applied typically to both positive and negative going signals, whichever occurs first.
- preference is made to South African patent No. 76/4959 whose content is incorporated herein by reference. The discovery and observation of this phenomenon and the design of suitable circuitry to provide accurate measurement in its context is described in this patent. The addition of the signal strength monitoring or validation features described will thus further enhance the security, reliability and convenience of use of the apparatus.
- the instrumentation will be so designed that if the time measurement start signal has triggered positive the validation signal must be of the same polarity, i.e. positive and vice versa if the start signal has triggered negative. Failing this check again the start signal will not be accepted.
- Degradation of the inner coaxial conductor or the screen in the case of a coaxial conductor by means of capacitance checking can be a further validation of checking features supplied to an instrument.
- the instrument will be designed to monitor frequency changes, phase changes, changes in natural frequency, for example, in particular ringing of the cable and any other means of detecting changes in capacitances can be employed.
- any particular cable will be detected to have a certain capacitance per metre length and should a break occur of course the capacitance will change and an error signal can be produced indicating a faulty cable.
- the integrity of the inner core conductor and/or of the coaxial screen conductor can be monitored in this way again to provide more reliable operation of the instrument without dependance upon the operator.
- the instrument can also be designed to monitor for any spurious signal which is not in accordance with the typical signal produced by the cable under normal circumstances and required for detection of traffic and/or speed measurements.
- parameters describing a category of signal within which the signal must fall can be prescribed and every signal produced by the cable can be checked against these parameters. If such a spurious signal should occur, for example, more than a prescribed number of times the cable can be flagged by means of a suitable error message displayed by the instrument for checking.
- the instrument can be made "fail safe" in this or any of the other aspects by being adapted to stop functioning and to await correction if any prescribed threshold is exceeded.
- the monitoring of cables as described can be adapted to coaxial cables, triaxial cables, screened pair cables or any other cable construction or array.
- the coaxial cables referred to herein have been referred to merely by way of example.
- a vehicle wheel 1 is rotating as shown by the arrow 2 and moving forward as shown by the arrow 3 over a road surface 4 which has laid on it a cable 5 of piezo-electric shielded cable type.
- the wheel 1 thus moves to the position fully over the cable as shown at 1′ and then to the position where it is just leaving the cable as shown at 1 ⁇ .
- the graph 6 below shows the voltage pulse produced in the piezo-electric cable 5 by the passage of the wheel and the three positions shown above the broken line 7, 8 and 9 indicating correspondence between the successive positions on the graph 6 and the successive positions of the wheel 1.
- the pulse begins to rise from the zero line 10 at "V b ".
- the pulse reaches the peak at the position of the wheel 1′ as indicated by the broken line 8 at "V p ".
- the pulse then declines to a voltage of zero at the position of the wheel 1 ⁇ indicated by the broken line where the pulse crosses the zero line 10 and then moves into a negative pulse portion or "under shoot "U” followed by an atenuating oscillation 11.
- a concentric shielded cable 12 is shown, the central core 13 carrying the signal and the outer shield 14 being earthed.
- the electrical equivalent of the cable is shown as a capacitance 15 which can be located in an equivalent circuit comprising a series connection of the capacitor 15 with a piezo-electrical or tribo-electrical generator 16 to provide the output voltage at V out as shown.
- This is the equivalent circuit for the generative type of piezo-electrical or tribo-electrical ponomo which is used in the insulating material 17 between the core 13 and shield 14.
- the minimum threshold level detection with polarity verification is an important validation check in accordance with this invention.
- the graph 18 shows the normal pulse of the kind shown in figure 1 as compared with a weak signal 18′.
- the broken lines 19 show the trigger level and the broken lines 20 the verification level to which the instrument is set in accordance with this invention.
- the broken lines 21 show the commencement of the pulse 18 and the broken lines 22 the commencement of the trigger signal 23 which follows after a time delay t d from the commencement of the signal.
- the verification signal 24 commences at the instant indicated by the broken lines 25. By contrast in the case of a weak signal no verification signal as indicated at 26 occurs and the measurement is aborted.
- Minimum threshold verification can be applied using another criteria, namely that the verification signal must occur within a minimum specified time, e.g. 1 ms or an adjustable delay being calculated once the speed of the vehicle has been established, e.g. 3 ms if 30 km/h or 0,3 ms at 160 km/h - this allows a maximum constant signal error over the whole speed range (e.g. 1%).
- a minimum specified time e.g. 1 ms or an adjustable delay being calculated once the speed of the vehicle has been established, e.g. 3 ms if 30 km/h or 0,3 ms at 160 km/h - this allows a maximum constant signal error over the whole speed range (e.g. 1%).
- FIG. 4 illustrates techniques used in radio frequency interference and electro-magnetic interference checking.
- the graph 27 shows a normal pulse and the graph 28 a pulse which has been degraded by RFI or EMI intereference.
- this interference can produce a trigger signal 29 which is premature as compared with the correct trigger signal as indicated at 30.
- This type of interference can arise with deteriorating sensors making them prone to external signals.
- RFI and EMI signals receiving components in the instrument can then provide a necessary instruction to disallow measurement where interference on these sources is detected.
- Figure 5 shows an example graph of a pulse arising where insulation resistance results in a weaker signal which leads to greater triggering uncertainty.
- the triggering pulse 33 only occurs at the instant indicated by the broken lines 44 when it should have occured at the instant indicated by the broken lines 35 implying the delay period shown.
- the insulation resistance check will be carried out as described above.
- the capacitance check implies monitoring breakage of the inner or outer conductors of the coaxial cable which could lead to false triggering by vehicles moving across or in close proximity of the cable. This occurs as a result of compression or tension waves which move the cables and cause the broken cable ends to make and break contact thus causing an impulse which cannot be reliably related to the occurance of physical contact with the tyre of a vehicle. In general spurious signal monitoring will be resorted to as described above.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
- Measurement Of Resistance Or Impedance (AREA)
- Devices For Checking Fares Or Tickets At Control Points (AREA)
- Road Signs Or Road Markings (AREA)
- Crystals, And After-Treatments Of Crystals (AREA)
- Alarm Systems (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to validation checks applied to traffic monitoring equipment including traffic speed detection equipment. The invention is, however, in principle applicable to any traffic data collection equipment subject to what will be said herein below. An area of primary application which is envisaged, for example, is traffic monitoring equipment based on a cable or cables extending across a road or other surface and providing electrical signals. As is known such electrical signals can have one or more of several physical origins including piezo-electric effects whether resistive and/or generative piezo-electric effects, capacitive effects and tribo-electric effects, for example.
- The validation checks or security checks are to be provided to enhance the reliability, accuracy and convenience of operating such equipment. In the use of such equipment for law enforcement this can have favourable legal implications. Generally less reliance may be placed on the operator of the equipment to ensure the integrity of the equipment and the security of the measurements it takes.
- Thus there is a problem of improvement of measuring the speed of vehicles on the base that speed equals distance divided by time more accurately and reliably by means of error checking and automatic signal rejection, equipment shutdown and error signals for defective or below standard features. The improvement of accuracy lies within checking one or a combination of the factors which will be discussed below.
- The apparatus may be adapted to check the correct sequence of impulses derived from several cables a single cable and/or a sensor pad or other sensor according to the set up of the equipment. This can be a security against swopping errors, for example, connection of cables incorrectly to the equipment after the cables have been set out in a suitable array with or without sensors or the like on a road surface, for example in the case of a duplicated pair of cables extended across the full width of a road in a spaced parallel array for speed law enforcement. Here the correct sequence of pulses will be from start cable 1, then start
cable 2 followed by stop cable 1 and then stopcable 2 or, the reverse sequence for traffic in the opposite direction on the other side of the road being stopcable 2 then stop cable 1, then startcable 2 and then startcable 2. Any sequence other than these will be rejected by the instrument as a result of this validity checking facility. In this way the speed checking is done by independant time measuring devices, i.e. instrument 1 function measures the time from start 1 to stop 1 independently of theinstrument 2 function which measures fromstart 2 to stop 1, each on either the front or the back axles or any other axles in physical contact with the road. Such cables can also be used and the verification can have application in measurement of deceleration and acceleration. - This sequence checking verification can be generalised as stated to any desired or required arrays of cable, cables and/or detector pads, magnetic loop detectors or others.
- A RFI radio frequency interference check can be implemented in the instrument to monitor any radio interference during and in between measurements in order to ensure interference free measurements. To the extent thus that the cables act as antennas for electro-magnetic energy and provide radio signals any risk of this causing measurement errors can be excluded by such radio interference checks and validations provided in the instrument.
- A EMI (Electromagnetic Interference) check from sources such as two-way radios, high frequency communication, high tension cables or lighting, can be implemented in the instrument to monitor any RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) or other EMI interference during and in between measurements in order to ensure interference free measurements. To the extent thus that the cables act as antennas for electro-magnetic energy fields and any risk of this causing measurement errors can be excluded.
- Further validation can be provided by ongoing checking of the level of insulation resistance between conductors in a particular cable and monitoring for low impedance, that is below the prescribed threshold value. Thus the instrument will memorise the initial impedance of the cable and/or be set to a prescribed minimum limit impedance for monitoring the degrading of cable insulation resistance by means of impedance measurements. Thus the gradual or abrupt deterioration of a cable in service conditions leading to degrading of the insulation resistance and which can lead to erroneous measurements and degraded accuracy or reliability can be monitored for and the equipment rendered inoperative and/or warning signals displayed when the cable deteriorates below a certain prescribed state. It will be appreciated that the degrading of the impedance of insulation material between conductors of the cable (be it a coaxial cable, for example or a two core cable) can seriously degrade the signal strength to be generated between the conductors, for example, such as is generated by piezo-electric effects in such material. Thus low impedance may arise due to physical contact of the conductors due to mechanical damage of the insulating material between them. Low impedance can also result due to moisture and water becoming present in the cable which, for example, can arise during rainy weather where the outside sheath of the cable has become pervious to water, for example, due to mechanical damage again or water has access to the interior of the cable via its ends or in other ways. Degradation of the cable insulation can also occur under conditions of service due to heat, solar radiation, mechanical impulses of the vehicles and other conditions of use.
- The instrument can be provided with further validation by means of a facility for signal strength monitoring. Thus each individual pulse, be it piezo-electric or tribo-electric or both in origin (for example, refer to South African patent number 66/0493) must pass through a minimal signal level before being detected as a valid trigger for time pulses. There is thus a minimum threshold level below which signals will be ignored, in order to avoid rise time error due to weak signals. The instrument is given this validation facility designed to prescribe that the minimum signal strength must arise within a certain minimum time measured from a starting threshold in order to be validated for time measurement. Thus in reference to a curve of the signal drawn on a time base the first pulse (be it positive or negative) must have a minimum steepness, i.e. a minimum value of the first differential of magnitude of the pulse with respect to time. For example, the minimum rise time to the prescribed minimum signal level may be of the order of 1 ms to 20 ms depending on the application and the features required in various circumstances. As stated this validation test will be applied typically to both positive and negative going signals, whichever occurs first. In the context of positive and negative starting signals preference is made to South African patent No. 76/4959 whose content is incorporated herein by reference. The discovery and observation of this phenomenon and the design of suitable circuitry to provide accurate measurement in its context is described in this patent. The addition of the signal strength monitoring or validation features described will thus further enhance the security, reliability and convenience of use of the apparatus. The instrumentation will be so designed that if the time measurement start signal has triggered positive the validation signal must be of the same polarity, i.e. positive and vice versa if the start signal has triggered negative. Failing this check again the start signal will not be accepted.
- Degradation of the inner coaxial conductor or the screen in the case of a coaxial conductor by means of capacitance checking can be a further validation of checking features supplied to an instrument. Here the instrument will be designed to monitor frequency changes, phase changes, changes in natural frequency, for example, in particular ringing of the cable and any other means of detecting changes in capacitances can be employed. For example, any particular cable will be detected to have a certain capacitance per metre length and should a break occur of course the capacitance will change and an error signal can be produced indicating a faulty cable. Thus the integrity of the inner core conductor and/or of the coaxial screen conductor can be monitored in this way again to provide more reliable operation of the instrument without dependance upon the operator.
- The instrument can also be designed to monitor for any spurious signal which is not in accordance with the typical signal produced by the cable under normal circumstances and required for detection of traffic and/or speed measurements. Thus parameters describing a category of signal within which the signal must fall can be prescribed and every signal produced by the cable can be checked against these parameters. If such a spurious signal should occur, for example, more than a prescribed number of times the cable can be flagged by means of a suitable error message displayed by the instrument for checking.
- The instrument can be made "fail safe" in this or any of the other aspects by being adapted to stop functioning and to await correction if any prescribed threshold is exceeded.
- The monitoring of cables as described can be adapted to coaxial cables, triaxial cables, screened pair cables or any other cable construction or array. The coaxial cables referred to herein have been referred to merely by way of example.
- These validity checks and security features can furthermore be provided in the context of apparatus described in South African patent 81/6666 and in the context of patent No. 88/2312. Reference to the contents of these patents and the others referred to above is hereby made and their contents incorporated in this disclosure by reference.
- The invention will be more fully described by way of examples with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which :
- Figure 1 is a series of schematic side views of a vehicle wheel passing over a cable with below that an indication of the pulse generated in the cable at the various positions of the wheel shown,
- Figure 2 is a schematic representation of an equivalent circuit for the cable,
- Figure 3 is a graphical representation of respectively normal and weak signals with the resulting trigger signal down and verification signals shown below in corresponding positions,
- Figure 4 is a graphical representation of respectively normal and interference signals with the trigger signal shown below in relation to RFI and EMI checking,
- Figure 5 is a graphical representation of a signal with a trigger signal shown below in corresponding positions relating to insulation resistance checks.
- As shown in figure 1 a vehicle wheel 1 is rotating as shown by the
arrow 2 and moving forward as shown by the arrow 3 over aroad surface 4 which has laid on it acable 5 of piezo-electric shielded cable type. The wheel 1 thus moves to the position fully over the cable as shown at 1′ and then to the position where it is just leaving the cable as shown at 1˝. - The
graph 6 below shows the voltage pulse produced in the piezo-electric cable 5 by the passage of the wheel and the three positions shown above thebroken line graph 6 and the successive positions of the wheel 1. Thus at the position 1 of the wheel where it first touches thecable 5 is indicated by thebroken line 7 the pulse begins to rise from the zero line 10 at "Vb". The pulse reaches the peak at the position of the wheel 1′ as indicated by the broken line 8 at "Vp". The pulse then declines to a voltage of zero at the position of the wheel 1˝ indicated by the broken line where the pulse crosses the zero line 10 and then moves into a negative pulse portion or "under shoot "U" followed by an atenuating oscillation 11. Time T for the tyre footprint to first touch the cable to the moment when it leaves the cable can be regarded as composed of the two parts t₁ and t₂ and under normal conditions :
t₁ = t₂ and T = t₁ ÷ t₂ -
- In normal speed timing equipment using such cables two parallel spaced cables are set on the road in an array and the time is measured between a pulse being generated in the first cable and a pulse generated in the second cable by the same wheel set of a vehicle. On this basis speed is calculated by the formula distance divided by time or :
- In figure 2 a concentric shielded
cable 12 is shown, thecentral core 13 carrying the signal and theouter shield 14 being earthed. The electrical equivalent of the cable is shown as acapacitance 15 which can be located in an equivalent circuit comprising a series connection of thecapacitor 15 with a piezo-electrical or tribo-electrical generator 16 to provide the output voltage at Vout as shown. This is the equivalent circuit for the generative type of piezo-electrical or tribo-electrical ponomo which is used in the insulatingmaterial 17 between the core 13 andshield 14. - As shown in figure 3 the minimum threshold level detection with polarity verification is an important validation check in accordance with this invention. In figure 3 the
graph 18 shows the normal pulse of the kind shown in figure 1 as compared with aweak signal 18′. Thebroken lines 19 show the trigger level and thebroken lines 20 the verification level to which the instrument is set in accordance with this invention. Thebroken lines 21 show the commencement of thepulse 18 and thebroken lines 22 the commencement of thetrigger signal 23 which follows after a time delay td from the commencement of the signal. Theverification signal 24 commences at the instant indicated by thebroken lines 25. By contrast in the case of a weak signal no verification signal as indicated at 26 occurs and the measurement is aborted. - A vehicle travelling 100 km/h t₁ = 3,6 milliseconds
and td < t₁, with NORMAL OR GOOD SIGNAL
but with weak signal td₁ = t₁ = 3,6 ms.
therefore consider the speed being measured over a distance of 1,5 m (see note) the error occurance if minimum threshold detection is not applied can be :
true time atdelay 3,6 ms)
and stop being a good signal triggered with wheel touching the cable (delay 0 ms) approximately zero, - Minimum threshold verification can be applied using another criteria, namely that the verification signal must occur within a minimum specified time, e.g. 1 ms or an adjustable delay being calculated once the speed of the vehicle has been established, e.g. 3 ms if 30 km/h or 0,3 ms at 160 km/h - this allows a maximum constant signal error over the whole speed range (e.g. 1%).
- Figure 4 illustrates techniques used in radio frequency interference and electro-magnetic interference checking. The
graph 27 shows a normal pulse and the graph 28 a pulse which has been degraded by RFI or EMI intereference. As will be seen this interference can produce atrigger signal 29 which is premature as compared with the correct trigger signal as indicated at 30. This type of interference can arise with deteriorating sensors making them prone to external signals. RFI and EMI signals receiving components in the instrument can then provide a necessary instruction to disallow measurement where interference on these sources is detected. - Figure 5 shows an example graph of a pulse arising where insulation resistance results in a weaker signal which leads to greater triggering uncertainty. Here, with the triggering voltage at the level indicated by the
broken line 32 the triggeringpulse 33 only occurs at the instant indicated by the broken lines 44 when it should have occured at the instant indicated by the broken lines 35 implying the delay period shown. Hence the insulation resistance check will be carried out as described above. - The capacitance check implies monitoring breakage of the inner or outer conductors of the coaxial cable which could lead to false triggering by vehicles moving across or in close proximity of the cable. This occurs as a result of compression or tension waves which move the cables and cause the broken cable ends to make and break contact thus causing an impulse which cannot be reliably related to the occurance of physical contact with the tyre of a vehicle. In general spurious signal monitoring will be resorted to as described above.
Claims (15)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
ZA8901830 | 1989-03-10 | ||
ZA891830 | 1989-03-10 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0387092A2 true EP0387092A2 (en) | 1990-09-12 |
EP0387092A3 EP0387092A3 (en) | 1991-05-15 |
EP0387092B1 EP0387092B1 (en) | 1996-06-12 |
Family
ID=25579626
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP90302553A Expired - Lifetime EP0387092B1 (en) | 1989-03-10 | 1990-03-09 | Traffic monitoring equipment |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0387092B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE139359T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69027351T2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK0387092T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2087889T3 (en) |
HU (2) | HU901598D0 (en) |
PT (1) | PT93397B (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA901905B (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1993022756A1 (en) * | 1992-04-30 | 1993-11-11 | Robot Foto Und Electronic Gmbh & Co Kg | Device for testing the operatability of speed-measurement devices used in traffic control |
WO1998052008A1 (en) * | 1997-05-14 | 1998-11-19 | Snap-On Equipment Limited | Tyre pressure determination |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN201838183U (en) * | 2010-02-24 | 2011-05-18 | 交通运输部公路科学研究所 | Road driving speed acquisition system |
CN103617736B (en) * | 2013-12-17 | 2016-04-13 | 南宁光波科技有限公司 | A kind of road monitoring device |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4276539A (en) * | 1978-06-22 | 1981-06-30 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Vehicle detection systems |
US4368428A (en) * | 1979-08-09 | 1983-01-11 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Method and arrangement for determining the velocity of a vehicle |
-
1990
- 1990-03-09 PT PT93397A patent/PT93397B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1990-03-09 EP EP90302553A patent/EP0387092B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-03-09 DE DE69027351T patent/DE69027351T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-03-09 DK DK90302553.4T patent/DK0387092T3/en active
- 1990-03-09 AT AT90302553T patent/ATE139359T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1990-03-09 HU HU901598A patent/HU901598D0/en unknown
- 1990-03-09 HU HU901598A patent/HU213827B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1990-03-09 ES ES90302553T patent/ES2087889T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-03-13 ZA ZA901905A patent/ZA901905B/en unknown
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4276539A (en) * | 1978-06-22 | 1981-06-30 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Vehicle detection systems |
US4368428A (en) * | 1979-08-09 | 1983-01-11 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Method and arrangement for determining the velocity of a vehicle |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
SIEMENS ZEITSCHRIFT, vol. 44, no. 2, February 1970, pages 61-66, Munich, DE; P. LINGENFELSER et al.: "Schleifendetektoren zum Messen des Strassenverkehrs" * |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1993022756A1 (en) * | 1992-04-30 | 1993-11-11 | Robot Foto Und Electronic Gmbh & Co Kg | Device for testing the operatability of speed-measurement devices used in traffic control |
WO1998052008A1 (en) * | 1997-05-14 | 1998-11-19 | Snap-On Equipment Limited | Tyre pressure determination |
AU733735B2 (en) * | 1997-05-14 | 2001-05-24 | Snap-On Equipment Limited | Tyre pressure determination |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ATE139359T1 (en) | 1996-06-15 |
PT93397A (en) | 1991-10-31 |
PT93397B (en) | 1996-01-31 |
ES2087889T3 (en) | 1996-08-01 |
DE69027351T2 (en) | 1996-10-10 |
EP0387092B1 (en) | 1996-06-12 |
EP0387092A3 (en) | 1991-05-15 |
DK0387092T3 (en) | 1996-07-01 |
ZA901905B (en) | 1991-01-30 |
HU213827B (en) | 1997-10-28 |
HU901598D0 (en) | 1990-06-28 |
DE69027351D1 (en) | 1996-07-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5132629A (en) | Apparatus for testing the insulation of an electrical conductor passing through an electrode | |
Bartnikas | A commentary on partial discharge measurement and detection | |
US3729635A (en) | Yarn inspector | |
US4349782A (en) | Shielded differentiator for automotive ignition applications | |
US5254954A (en) | Defect detecting apparatus and method for detecting a defect in an insulator using an electric discharge sense by an optical pickup | |
US5128618A (en) | Withstand-voltage testing method and apparatus | |
CN111537935A (en) | High-frequency partial discharge anti-interference function verification method and system | |
EP0387092A2 (en) | Traffic monitoring equipment | |
JP3352278B2 (en) | Partial discharge detection method | |
CN109799432B (en) | Electrical equipment discharge fault positioning device | |
CN111707910B (en) | Porcelain insulator inner insulation detection method and porcelain insulator detection circuit | |
US5396234A (en) | Validation checking in traffic monitoring equipment | |
US4164703A (en) | Methods of and apparatus for detecting openings in cable jackets | |
PL161319B1 (en) | Apparatus for detecting errors of a meter | |
WO1988005171A1 (en) | Method and device for detecting a fault, e.g. a short circuit, break or leakage, in an electric cable or conductor | |
EP0751396A1 (en) | Monitoring the insulation in electric vehicles | |
US5646410A (en) | System and method for validating the detection signal of a measuring chain with a wide band of nuclear radiations | |
JP3172626B2 (en) | Partial discharge detection method for high voltage equipment | |
CN106443191B (en) | A method of detection fence wave impedance variation degree | |
Werle et al. | Diagnosing the insulation condition of dry type transformers using a multiple sensor partial-discharge-localization technique | |
JPS6156979A (en) | Insulation measurement of power cable | |
US5892369A (en) | Method for the detection of the presence of passivation in an integrated circuit | |
CN116973702B (en) | Signal identification method and system applied to GIS partial discharge test | |
JP3707188B2 (en) | Insulation deterioration diagnosis device | |
CN218512613U (en) | Calibration platform of cable oscillatory wave partial discharge detection device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19911105 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19931221 |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 139359 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19960615 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: STUDIO TORTA SOCIETA' SEMPLICE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: BA2A Ref document number: 2087889 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69027351 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19960718 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2087889 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Payment date: 19970408 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19980309 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20090313 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20090317 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20090327 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20090317 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20090316 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20090325 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20090325 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20090320 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20090430 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20090312 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: V4 Effective date: 20100309 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EUP |
|
BE20 | Be: patent expired |
Owner name: *GEBERT RALF DIETER HEINRICH Effective date: 20100309 Owner name: *GEBERT RUDIGER HEINZ Effective date: 20100309 Owner name: *GEBERT FRANZ JOSEF Effective date: 20100309 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Expiry date: 20100308 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20100310 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20100308 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20100309 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20100310 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20100309 |