EP0377616B1 - Coal ash modification and reduction - Google Patents
Coal ash modification and reduction Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0377616B1 EP0377616B1 EP88907553A EP88907553A EP0377616B1 EP 0377616 B1 EP0377616 B1 EP 0377616B1 EP 88907553 A EP88907553 A EP 88907553A EP 88907553 A EP88907553 A EP 88907553A EP 0377616 B1 EP0377616 B1 EP 0377616B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- acid
- mineral
- process according
- coal
- carbonaceous material
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
- C10L9/00—Treating solid fuels to improve their combustion
- C10L9/02—Treating solid fuels to improve their combustion by chemical means
Definitions
- This invention relates to the beneficiation of carbonaceous materials, particularly black coals, using a chemical treatment process adapted for the removal or alteration of selected minerals.
- Australian black coals are generally low in sulfur and trace elements but have a high ash yield which is usually a refractory ash, that is, it has a high ash fusion temperature, compared with overseas coals.
- This refractory ash reflects the high silica and kaolin clay content in the coal.
- the main objective is to lower the ash yield of the coal without appreciable size reduction.
- the coal size generally ranges from about 150mm to below 0.5mm and depending on the size range, different washing techniques are used to separate the minerals and high ash coal from the coal rich fraction.
- Another selective chemical leaching process is the ion exchange method used on lignites or brown coal to exchange calcium, magnesium, aluminium, iron and other cations from the carboxylate and phenate salts in the coal structure.
- ion exchange processes are described by Bowling K. McG. and Rottendorf, H.R. in Australian patent specification 472,900, New Zealand patent specification 171,005 and Canadian Patent specification 100,023 and in "Demineralised brown coal as an alternative to current hydrocarbon resources" Proc. 4th National Conf. Chem. Eng. Sydney, 86-91 (1976).
- this ion exchange method various solutions of salts and acids are used but there is no removal of minerals which are not chemically combined minerals, apart from quartz by fluoride salts.
- US-A-4,560,390 describes a process for treating coal to remove sulphur and ash by a process that comprises cleaning and pulverising the coal and subsequently treating the coal with an aqueous solution of a compound containing an active nitrogen; an aqueous solution of an organic compound containing at least one hydroxyl group; a surfactant containing active ammonium groups; or combinations thereof.
- GB-A-2094830 discloses a process for chemically removing ash from coal which comprises finely divided coal in an aqueous solution of
- US-A-3988120 relates to a method of desulfurizing high sulfur low grade coal by immersing the coal in an aqueous solution of a polar compound containing non-polar groups bonded with polar groups.
- the non-polar groups and polar groups are to be selected from the lists provided in columns 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the specification.
- lines 53 to 56 of US-A-3988120 each usually contain 10 to 20 carbon atoms (preferably 10 to 15 carbon atoms).
- the present inventors have realised that there is benefit to be gained by selectively removing minerals such as mineral sulfates, carbonates, phosphates, hydroxides and other mineral salts from black coals and other carbonaceous materials.
- the benefits to be gained by the selective removal of such mineral salts broadly include increasing coal recovery and improving coal quality.
- the present inventors have found that by the treatment of black coals and other carbonaceous materials with selective chemical reagents, it is possible to remove the aforementioned reactive minerals present in the coal.
- the reactive minerals present are bonding or cementing some of the silicates and oxides to the coal, then removal of the cementing minerals allows the silicates and oxides to be liberated and thereby more readily removed by standard washery techniques.
- the present invention consists in a process for the beneficiation of a carbonaceous material which contains at least one mineral comprising:
- the process of the present invention may be used for the beneficiation of any carbonaceous materials containing minerals, such as coal, anthracite, graphite, peat, lignites and oil shale.
- the present method is particularly adapted for treatment of black coals containing an appreciable content of reactive minerals.
- the present process may also be used on coal washery products or low ash run-of-mine coals to produce significant yields of super clean coal. These yields may be further increased and/or ash levels reduced with subsequent physical cleaning.
- the inventive process When, however, the inventive process is used alone without physical beneficiation, it is capable of significantly altering the ash fusion properties of such black coals. This may be achieved without resort to the use of prior art chemical treatment and without significant size reduction.
- the inventive process is capable of altering some minerals present in coals by ion exchange to give a coal with different, desirable, ash characteristics and hence improve the properties of the coal.
- those coals containing alkali feldspars and some swelling clays may be associated with the fouling/slagging properties of coals and/or difficulties experienced with coking coals sticking to the refractory lining of coke ovens thereby resulting in serious damage to the expensive oven linings.
- coals are being treated they will be of a particle size generally no greater than a few millimetres.
- the treatment may be carried out at ambient temperature conditions or at elevated-temperatures (below boiling point of the solution) in which case the treatment time will generally be reduced. Generally, however the treatment time will be about 30 to 45 minutes.
- the reagent is removed and the coal washed with water to remove excess salts and dissolved minerals. Only mild washing is required.
- the treated coal, after drying, can if required be subjected to physical cleaning methods to obtain cleaner coal fractions or may be left in the dry state without further physical treatment.
- Organic compounds are one of the preferred classes for use as any organic residues remaining in the coal are non-contaminating and non-polluting.
- the reagents suitable for use in the process of the present invention are all ammonium salts, polyhydroxy alcohols, organic acids excluding sulphur containing organic acids, organic complexing agents capable of complexing with metal cations, and polysaccharides. Preference is given to those reagents that are cheapest and most easily available.
- ammonium salts examples include acetate, sulphate, chloride, citrate, hydroxide, carbonate, bicarbonate and oxalate salts.
- polyhydroxy alcohols examples include glycerol, glycol, ethylene glycol, sorbitol, propylene glycol, mannitol and threitol.
- Suitable organic acids are citric, acetic, ascorbic, oxallic, formic, stearic, succinic and adipic acids.
- Suitable complexing agents capable of complexing with metal cations are ethylene diamine tetracetic acid (EDTA), disodium salt of EDTA, 8-hydroxyquinoline and mercaptoethanol.
- EDTA ethylene diamine tetracetic acid
- disodium salt of EDTA 8-hydroxyquinoline
- mercaptoethanol ethylene diamine tetracetic acid
- the preferred complexing agents are suitable for complexing with transition metal cations.
- Suitable polysaccharides are sucrose, maltose, dextrose, lactose, starch, glycogen, cellulose and cellulose derivatives, and galactose.
- ammonium salts are capable of removing sulphate minerals such as gypsum and bassinite and are able to alter exchangeable minerals and feldspar minerals.
- Organic acids are able to remove carbonate minerals such as calcite, dolomite and siderite, phosphate minerals such apatite and alter feldspar minerals.
- Citric acid contains no inorganic elements and therefore does not contaminate the product or lead to pollution problems when using the treated coal.
- Organic complexing agents are also capable of removing phosphate minerals such as apatite and altering feldspar minerals.
- Polyhydroxy alcohols are capable of removing sulphate minerals and of altering swelling clays, exchangeable minerals and feldspar minerals.
- Polysaccharides are capable of altering feldspar minerals.
- carbonaceous materials may be treated successfully with various reagents of the invention to achieve selective removal of different mineral species.
- Figure 1 is a graph of cumulative yield vs. cumulative ash of both starting and treated coal under the conditions of Example 7.
- a coking coal product having a top size of 2mm was found to have an ash yield of 7.7% after conventional washing.
- the coal contained several percent of reactive minerals and after treating the coal in 3 M citric acid at 80 o C for 30 minutes followed by a second treatment using glycerol at room temperature for 30 minutes, a coal was obtained with an ash yield of 6.6%.
- Example 2 The same coal was treated as in Example 1, with 3 M citric acid at 80 o C for 30 minutes and was found to have an ash yield of 6.5% and gave an increased floats yield of 87.2% at the same density (SG 1.355) of a floats fraction with an ash of 3.6%.
- the sinks fraction which was lower in quantity than in the case of the untreated coal had an ash yield of 26.8%.
- a premium Queensland coking coal containing a high phosphorus content (0.15% P) was treated with a molar excess of citric acid at 80 o C for 30 minutes then washed.
- the coal was separated into two size fractions of -4 mm + 2mm and -2 mm to zero.
- the reduction in phosphorus from the coal samples was 45% and 89% respectively.
- a Bowen basin coking coal containing a high proportion of alkali elements namely sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium and iron was treated with a number of organic acids and complexing agents, ascorbic acid, oxalic acid, citric acid, acetic acid, ethylene diamine tetracetic acid (EDTA), both in a protonated form and as the disodium salt. All reagents showed significant reduction in the basic elements (alkali s) in the coal. Hot citric acid solution and hot EDTA (protonated form) showed the greatest reduction at more than 50%. This reduction is slightly greater than that obtained when the coal was treated with sulfurous acid as shown in the Table II.
- the reduction of alkali elements from coals improves both the thermal properties and ash characteristics, and the coking properties.
- the BI is lowered by 35-40% using sulfurous acid and by 50% using the complexing agent.
- Brown coals contain minerals, salts and inorganic matter. The latter can be in the form of inorganic humates.
- Samples of Georgia and South Australian brown coals were treated with a molar excess of hot citric acid for 30 minutes then filtered and washed. The liquors were brightly coloured presumably from the iron salts being removed.
- the reduction in ash was as follows:
- Georgia brown coal originally 3.5% ash was reduced to 0.6% ash.
- the South Australian coals were originally 10.0 and 8.0% ash and after treatment were reduced to 3.0% and 2.5% respectively.
- the ash from these coals was pale in comparison to the original ash and reflected the removal of iron minerals and iron salts.
- the resultant ash was rich in silicates.
- the washability potential of a washery coal was re-evaluated after treatment with a molar excess of hot citric acid for 30 minutes.
- the coal sample (8 mm top size) washability curves are shown in Fig. 1. The results indicate that a cleaner coal can be obtained and that a significant yield increase of a coal at a set ash content can be achieved. i.e. 15% increase in coal yield at 7.4% ash. The increases are more marked as the particle size is reduced.
- the inventive process has a capability of increasing coal recovery, improving coal quality, enhancing coal ash fusion characteristics, improving coal industry operations and advancing sales of predictable quality coals.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Solid Fuels And Fuel-Associated Substances (AREA)
- Detergent Compositions (AREA)
- Curing Cements, Concrete, And Artificial Stone (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to the beneficiation of carbonaceous materials, particularly black coals, using a chemical treatment process adapted for the removal or alteration of selected minerals.
- Australian black coals are generally low in sulfur and trace elements but have a high ash yield which is usually a refractory ash, that is, it has a high ash fusion temperature, compared with overseas coals. This refractory ash reflects the high silica and kaolin clay content in the coal.
- There are however some coals in Australia and many coals originating from overseas that have appreciable contents of other minerals which are more reactive and detract from the quality of the coal and/or hinder its industrial application.
- In conventional coal washeries, as described in "An Introduction To Coal Preparation" edited by members of the executive committee of the Coal Preparation Society of NSW (1985), the main objective is to lower the ash yield of the coal without appreciable size reduction. The coal size generally ranges from about 150mm to below 0.5mm and depending on the size range, different washing techniques are used to separate the minerals and high ash coal from the coal rich fraction.
- It is to be noted that the majority of techniques are based on the separation by density differences between coal at 1.3SG and minerals at 2.5SG. However, none of these methods are intended to alter the relative proportion of the individual minerals present in the coal. Thus any selective separation on size reduction or beneficiation at the washery is usually incidental.
- It is known in the art that there are a variety of specialised, sophisticated chemical leaching techniques to demineralise coal wherein all of the minerals are removed to produce ultra-clean coal, that is coals having an ash of less than 1%. These methods are generally used to remove all minerals unselectively. Typical such methods employ hydrofluoric acid or fluoride salts as described by Lloyd, R. and Turner, M.J. (Kinneret Enterprises Ltd.) - Patents pending and by Das, S.K. "Electrode grade carbon from coal by acid leaching process", Light Metals, 575 (1979); aqueous caustic soda solutions as described by Meyers, R.A, Hart, W.D. and McClanathan, L.C. "Gravimelt process for near complete chemical removal", Coal Processing Technology, 7, 89. (C.E.P. Technical Manual published by American Institute of Chemical Engineers) (1981) and aqueous caustic soda solutions under autoclave conditions as described by the present inventors in "Removal of Mineral Matter from Bituminous Coals by Aqueous Chemical Leaching" Fuel Processing Technology 9 217-233 (1984), "Demineralisation - A New Approach to Old Problems in the Utilisation of Solid Fuels", Proc. Aust. Inst. Energy Nat. Conf., Melbourne 347-357 (1985) and "An integrated, physical and chemical approach to coal beneficiation" Proc. CHEMECA 86, Adelaide, 297-302 (1986).
- Additionally, selective chemical leaching has been used to remove pyrites from coal. The methods used are reviewed by Morrison, G.F. "Chemical desulphurisation of coal". Report No. ICTIS/TR15 I.E.A. Coal Research, London, June 1981. In this review the author categorises the reactions possible as displacement reactions, acid/base neutralisation, oxidation or reduction. It is noted that these methods are selective for pyrites only.
- Another selective chemical leaching process is the ion exchange method used on lignites or brown coal to exchange calcium, magnesium, aluminium, iron and other cations from the carboxylate and phenate salts in the coal structure. These ion exchange processes are described by Bowling K. McG. and Rottendorf, H.R. in Australian patent specification 472,900, New Zealand patent specification 171,005 and Canadian Patent specification 100,023 and in "Demineralised brown coal as an alternative to current hydrocarbon resources" Proc. 4th National Conf. Chem. Eng. Adelaide, 86-91 (1976). In this ion exchange method various solutions of salts and acids are used but there is no removal of minerals which are not chemically combined minerals, apart from quartz by fluoride salts.
- US-A-4,560,390 describes a process for treating coal to remove sulphur and ash by a process that comprises cleaning and pulverising the coal and subsequently treating the coal with an aqueous solution of a compound containing an active nitrogen; an aqueous solution of an organic compound containing at least one hydroxyl group; a surfactant containing active ammonium groups; or combinations thereof.
- GB-A-2094830 discloses a process for chemically removing ash from coal which comprises finely divided coal in an aqueous solution of
- i) hydrochloric acid or citric acid up to a concentration of 10% by weight, and
- ii) acidic ammonium fluoride
- The same document compares the above mentioned processes with washing the finely divided coal with citric acid at concentrations of up to 3% and washing with water, and concludes that both the latter two treatments fail to produce a substantial de-ashing effect.
- US-A-3988120 relates to a method of desulfurizing high sulfur low grade coal by immersing the coal in an aqueous solution of a polar compound containing non-polar groups bonded with polar groups. The non-polar groups and polar groups are to be selected from the lists provided in
columns 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the specification. As stated on column 3, lines 53 to 56 of US-A-3988120 the alkyl groups R and R' each usually contain 10 to 20 carbon atoms (preferably 10 to 15 carbon atoms). - The present inventors have realised that there is benefit to be gained by selectively removing minerals such as mineral sulfates, carbonates, phosphates, hydroxides and other mineral salts from black coals and other carbonaceous materials. The benefits to be gained by the selective removal of such mineral salts broadly include increasing coal recovery and improving coal quality.
- The present inventors have found that by the treatment of black coals and other carbonaceous materials with selective chemical reagents, it is possible to remove the aforementioned reactive minerals present in the coal. In addition, if the reactive minerals present are bonding or cementing some of the silicates and oxides to the coal, then removal of the cementing minerals allows the silicates and oxides to be liberated and thereby more readily removed by standard washery techniques.
- Accordingly, the present invention consists in a process for the beneficiation of a carbonaceous material which contains at least one mineral comprising:
- a) forming an aqueous solution of a compound selected from the group consisting of citric acid having a concentration of greater than 10% by weight, acetic acid, ascorbic acid, oxalic acid, formic acid, succinic acid, adipic acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, disodium salts of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 8-hydroxyquinoline mercaptoethanol, sorbitol, mannitol, threitol and polysaccharides;
- b) contacting said carbonaceous material with said solution at a temperature less than the boiling point of said solution for a sufficient time to allow the compound to react with the at least one mineral to selectively remove or chemically modify said at least one mineral contained in said carbonaceous material; and
- c) subsequently washing the carbonaceous material with water.
- The process of the present invention may be used for the beneficiation of any carbonaceous materials containing minerals, such as coal, anthracite, graphite, peat, lignites and oil shale.
- The present method is particularly adapted for treatment of black coals containing an appreciable content of reactive minerals.
- The present process may also be used on coal washery products or low ash run-of-mine coals to produce significant yields of super clean coal. These yields may be further increased and/or ash levels reduced with subsequent physical cleaning.
- When, however, the inventive process is used alone without physical beneficiation, it is capable of significantly altering the ash fusion properties of such black coals. This may be achieved without resort to the use of prior art chemical treatment and without significant size reduction.
- In addition, the inventive process is capable of altering some minerals present in coals by ion exchange to give a coal with different, desirable, ash characteristics and hence improve the properties of the coal. In particular, those coals containing alkali feldspars and some swelling clays may be associated with the fouling/slagging properties of coals and/or difficulties experienced with coking coals sticking to the refractory lining of coke ovens thereby resulting in serious damage to the expensive oven linings.
- Preferably, where coals are being treated they will be of a particle size generally no greater than a few millimetres.
- The treatment may be carried out at ambient temperature conditions or at elevated-temperatures (below boiling point of the solution) in which case the treatment time will generally be reduced. Generally, however the treatment time will be about 30 to 45 minutes.
- Following treatment with the reagent, the reagent is removed and the coal washed with water to remove excess salts and dissolved minerals. Only mild washing is required. The treated coal, after drying, can if required be subjected to physical cleaning methods to obtain cleaner coal fractions or may be left in the dry state without further physical treatment.
- Organic compounds are one of the preferred classes for use as any organic residues remaining in the coal are non-contaminating and non-polluting.
- The reagents suitable for use in the process of the present invention are all ammonium salts, polyhydroxy alcohols, organic acids excluding sulphur containing organic acids, organic complexing agents capable of complexing with metal cations, and polysaccharides. Preference is given to those reagents that are cheapest and most easily available.
- Examples of suitable ammonium salts are acetate, sulphate, chloride, citrate, hydroxide, carbonate, bicarbonate and oxalate salts.
- Examples of suitable polyhydroxy alcohols are glycerol, glycol, ethylene glycol, sorbitol, propylene glycol, mannitol and threitol.
- Examples of suitable organic acids are citric, acetic, ascorbic, oxallic, formic, stearic, succinic and adipic acids.
- Examples of suitable complexing agents capable of complexing with metal cations are ethylene diamine tetracetic acid (EDTA), disodium salt of EDTA, 8-hydroxyquinoline and mercaptoethanol. The preferred complexing agents are suitable for complexing with transition metal cations.
- Examples of suitable polysaccharides are sucrose, maltose, dextrose, lactose, starch, glycogen, cellulose and cellulose derivatives, and galactose.
- The present inventors have found that the various reagents of the invention are appropriate for removing or altering different minerals by ion exchange. Thus, ammonium salts are capable of removing sulphate minerals such as gypsum and bassinite and are able to alter exchangeable minerals and feldspar minerals. Organic acids are able to remove carbonate minerals such as calcite, dolomite and siderite, phosphate minerals such apatite and alter feldspar minerals. Citric acid contains no inorganic elements and therefore does not contaminate the product or lead to pollution problems when using the treated coal. It is also of special interest in the context of coalfields such as those in Queensland because it can be easily and cheaply produced by the fermentation of sugar solutions, available locally, with a suitable mould (e.g. Aspergillus niger). Organic complexing agents are also capable of removing phosphate minerals such as apatite and altering feldspar minerals. Polyhydroxy alcohols are capable of removing sulphate minerals and of altering swelling clays, exchangeable minerals and feldspar minerals. Polysaccharides are capable of altering feldspar minerals.
- From the above, it will be realised that carbonaceous materials may be treated successfully with various reagents of the invention to achieve selective removal of different mineral species.
- It will be understood that a number of different mineral species may be selectively removed by repeating the process of the invention using a different reagent for each repetition.
- Figure 1 is a graph of cumulative yield vs. cumulative ash of both starting and treated coal under the conditions of Example 7.
- So that the invention may be more clearly understood, there follow seven examples of the application of the invention to prepare a low ash coal, an increased yield of clean coal, and an ash fusion modification.
- A coking coal product having a top size of 2mm was found to have an ash yield of 7.7% after conventional washing. The coal contained several percent of reactive minerals and after treating the coal in 3 M citric acid at 80oC for 30 minutes followed by a second treatment using glycerol at room temperature for 30 minutes, a coal was obtained with an ash yield of 6.6%.
- Subsequent float/sink separation at SG 1.6 achieved total recovery of the coal present at a reduced ash level of 4.4%. The sinks fraction was found to contain only quartz and clay indicating greater liberation due to the chemical treatment.
- A run-of-mine coal having a 2mm top particle size and an ash yield of 8.8% on float/sink separation at SG 1.355 gave a 78.8% mass yield at 3.6% ash. The sinks fraction contained 27.9% ash.
- The same coal was treated as in Example 1, with 3 M citric acid at 80oC for 30 minutes and was found to have an ash yield of 6.5% and gave an increased floats yield of 87.2% at the same density (SG 1.355) of a floats fraction with an ash of 3.6%. The sinks fraction, which was lower in quantity than in the case of the untreated coal had an ash yield of 26.8%.
- From the foregoing, it will be seen that through the use of the inventive process, a 10% increase in recovery of a super clean coal fraction (having an ash content of 1-5%) was obtained with less waste material.
- Samples of the coal listed in Table 1 were treated with 3 M citric acid solution at 80oC for 30 minutes, filtered and washed with water. The coals were reslurried with a small quantity of water and ammonium acetate solution. The slurry was stirred for 30 minutes then filtered, water-washed, dried and the ash fusion properties determined.
- As shown in Table 1, a comparison of the treated and untreated coals indicates that in all cases the ash fusion temperatures have been substantially increased. The filtrates were analysed and indicated that the major elements removed from the coals were calcium, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, sodium and potassium with smaller quantities of most other elements, all of which came from the dissolved minerals.
TABLE 1 ALTERATION OF ASH FUSION PROPERTIES AND REDUCTION IN COAL ASH YIELD BY CHEMICAL LEACHING OF SELECTED MINERALS FROM SAMPLES OF SIX DIFFERENT COALS Properties Before Leaching Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ash % (dry basis) 9.8 12.1 17.2 9.7 8.0 7.2 Deformation temp oC 1280 1250 1320 1440 1140 1110 Sphere temp oC 1530 1550 1560 1600 1200 1280 Hemisphere temp oC 1570 1550 1580 1600 1200 1300 Flow temp oC 1600 1580 1600 1600 1340 1390 Properties After Leaching Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ash % (dry basis) 8.9 10.0 15.1 9.1 6.1 5.4 Deformation temp oC 1280 1600 1600 1380 1290 1270 Sphere temp oC 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1540 Hemisphere temp oC 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1560 Flow temp oC 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 - A premium Queensland coking coal containing a high phosphorus content (0.15% P) was treated with a molar excess of citric acid at 80oC for 30 minutes then washed. The coal was separated into two size fractions of -4 mm + 2mm and -2 mm to zero. The reduction in phosphorus from the coal samples was 45% and 89% respectively. The finer size fraction having a phosphorus level of <0.02%. This is a considerable improvement in the quality of coking coal as phosphorus is considered a serious contaminant for metallurgical applications.
- A Bowen basin coking coal containing a high proportion of alkali elements namely sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium and iron was treated with a number of organic acids and complexing agents, ascorbic acid, oxalic acid, citric acid, acetic acid, ethylene diamine tetracetic acid (EDTA), both in a protonated form and as the disodium salt. All reagents showed significant reduction in the basic elements (alkali s) in the coal. Hot citric acid solution and hot EDTA (protonated form) showed the greatest reduction at more than 50%. This reduction is slightly greater than that obtained when the coal was treated with sulfurous acid as shown in the Table II.
-
- Brown coals contain minerals, salts and inorganic matter. The latter can be in the form of inorganic humates. Samples of Victorian and South Australian brown coals were treated with a molar excess of hot citric acid for 30 minutes then filtered and washed. The liquors were brightly coloured presumably from the iron salts being removed. The reduction in ash was as follows: Victorian brown coal originally 3.5% ash was reduced to 0.6% ash. The South Australian coals were originally 10.0 and 8.0% ash and after treatment were reduced to 3.0% and 2.5% respectively.
- The ash from these coals was pale in comparison to the original ash and reflected the removal of iron minerals and iron salts. The resultant ash was rich in silicates.
- The washability potential of a washery coal was re-evaluated after treatment with a molar excess of hot citric acid for 30 minutes. The coal sample (8 mm top size) washability curves are shown in Fig. 1. The results indicate that a cleaner coal can be obtained and that a significant yield increase of a coal at a set ash content can be achieved. i.e. 15% increase in coal yield at 7.4% ash. The increases are more marked as the particle size is reduced.
- From the foregoing description, it is evident that the inventive process has a capability of increasing coal recovery, improving coal quality, enhancing coal ash fusion characteristics, improving coal industry operations and advancing sales of predictable quality coals.
Claims (13)
- A process for the beneficiation of a carbonaceous material which contains at least one mineral comprising:a) forming an aqueous solution of a compound selected from the group consisting of citric acid having a concentration of greater than 10% by weight, acetic acid, ascorbic acid, oxalic acid, formic acid, succinic acid, adipic acid, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, disodium salts of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 8-hydroxquinoline, mercaptoethanol, sorbital, mannitol, threitol and polysaccharides;b) contacting said carbonaceous material with said solution at a temperature less than the boiling point of said solution for a sufficient time to allow the compound to react with the at least one mineral to selectively remove or chemically modify said at least one mineral contained in said carbonaceous material; andc) subsequently washing the carbonaceous material with water.
- A process according to claim 1 wherein steps a), b) and c) are repeated sequentially using a different compound selected from said group for each repetition of step a).
- A process according to claims 1 or 2 wherein said carbonaceous material is coal.
- A process according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein said carbonaceous material is crushed before contacting with said solution.
- A process according to any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein said carbonaceous material has a particle size of less than 3mm.
- A process according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein said step b) is for the duration of 30 to 45 minutes.
- A process according to any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein said compound is a polysaccharide selected from sucrose, maltose, dextrose, lactose, starch, glycogen, cellulose derivatives and galactose.
- A process according to claim 1 wherein said at least one mineral is an exchangeable mineral and/or a feldspar material.
- A process according to any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein said at least one mineral is an alkaline mineral and/or a phosphate mineral and said compound is selected from the group consisting of citric acid, acetic acid, ascorbic acid, oxalic acid, formic acid, succinic acid and adipic acid.
- A process according to claim 9 wherein said alkaline mineral is selected from calcite, dolomite and siderite.
- A process according to any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein said at least one mineral is a sulphate and/or phosphate mineral and/or an alkali clay, and said compound is selected from ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, disodium salts of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 8-hydroxyquinoline and mercaptoethanol.
- A process according to any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein said at least one mineral is a sulphate and/or phosphate mineral and/or an alkali clay, and said compound is selected from sorbitol, mannitol and threitol.
- A carbonaceous material whenever prepared by a process according to any one of the preceding claims.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AT8888907553T ATE105580T1 (en) | 1987-09-03 | 1988-09-02 | COAL ASH MODIFICATION AND REDUCTION. |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU4128/87 | 1987-09-03 | ||
AUPI412887 | 1987-09-03 | ||
PCT/AU1988/000339 WO1989001963A1 (en) | 1987-09-03 | 1988-09-02 | Coal ash modification and reduction |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0377616A1 EP0377616A1 (en) | 1990-07-18 |
EP0377616A4 EP0377616A4 (en) | 1991-06-05 |
EP0377616B1 true EP0377616B1 (en) | 1994-05-11 |
Family
ID=3772428
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP88907553A Expired - Lifetime EP0377616B1 (en) | 1987-09-03 | 1988-09-02 | Coal ash modification and reduction |
Country Status (11)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0377616B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2659132B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR960014929B1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU616437B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA1330770C (en) |
DE (1) | DE3889542D1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK54590A (en) |
FI (1) | FI901047A0 (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ226023A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1989001963A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA886518B (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1988007080A2 (en) * | 1987-03-09 | 1988-09-22 | The Upjohn Company | Transgenic animal cells resistant to viral infection |
DE10393609B4 (en) | 2002-10-29 | 2020-08-06 | Ucc Energy Pty Ltd. | Process for demineralizing coal |
US10041015B2 (en) * | 2009-09-10 | 2018-08-07 | Emmanouil Koukios | Methodology for the removal of inorganic components from biomass of agro/forest/urban origin and from low-quality coal such as peat, lignite, sub-bituminous and bituminous coals |
EP2794823B1 (en) * | 2011-12-21 | 2017-11-22 | Kentucky-Tennessee Clay Co. | Method for operating a combustor |
CN104774670B (en) * | 2015-03-24 | 2017-04-05 | 石家庄新华能源环保科技股份有限公司 | A kind of production method and device of ashless coal |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB190902071A (en) * | 1909-01-28 | 1909-11-11 | William Clacher | A Process for Purifying Most Forms of Carbon. |
JPS53961B2 (en) * | 1974-05-09 | 1978-01-13 | ||
US4105416A (en) * | 1977-04-12 | 1978-08-08 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Process for removing sulfur from coal |
NZ199964A (en) * | 1981-03-13 | 1985-09-13 | Hitachi Shipbuilding Eng Co | A process for chemically removing ash from coal |
US4560390A (en) * | 1983-09-22 | 1985-12-24 | Robert Bender | Method of beneficiating coal |
US4490238A (en) * | 1984-04-16 | 1984-12-25 | Exxon Research And Engineering Co. | Process for beneficiating oil-shale |
US4542704A (en) * | 1984-12-14 | 1985-09-24 | Aluminum Company Of America | Three-stage process for burning fuel containing sulfur to reduce emission of particulates and sulfur-containing gases |
US4753033A (en) * | 1985-03-24 | 1988-06-28 | Williams Technologies, Inc. | Process for producing a clean hydrocarbon fuel from high calcium coal |
US4705530A (en) * | 1985-09-24 | 1987-11-10 | Shell Oil Company | Reduction of sodium in coal by water wash and ion exchange with a weak electrolyte |
US4719092A (en) * | 1985-10-04 | 1988-01-12 | Fuel Tech, Inc. | Reduction of nitrogen-based pollutants through the use of urea solutions containing oxygenated hydrocarbon solvents |
US4741741A (en) * | 1986-10-17 | 1988-05-03 | The Standard Oil Company | Chemical beneficiation of coal |
-
1988
- 1988-09-01 ZA ZA886518A patent/ZA886518B/en unknown
- 1988-09-02 JP JP63507172A patent/JP2659132B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-09-02 EP EP88907553A patent/EP0377616B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-09-02 DE DE3889542T patent/DE3889542D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-09-02 NZ NZ226023A patent/NZ226023A/en unknown
- 1988-09-02 WO PCT/AU1988/000339 patent/WO1989001963A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1988-09-02 CA CA000576440A patent/CA1330770C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1988-09-02 AU AU23803/88A patent/AU616437B2/en not_active Expired
- 1988-09-02 KR KR1019890700788A patent/KR960014929B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
1990
- 1990-03-01 DK DK054590A patent/DK54590A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1990-03-01 FI FI901047A patent/FI901047A0/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR890701714A (en) | 1989-12-21 |
DK54590A (en) | 1990-05-02 |
ZA886518B (en) | 1989-05-30 |
AU2380388A (en) | 1989-03-31 |
JPH03501265A (en) | 1991-03-22 |
JP2659132B2 (en) | 1997-09-30 |
DK54590D0 (en) | 1990-03-01 |
FI901047A0 (en) | 1990-03-01 |
WO1989001963A1 (en) | 1989-03-09 |
NZ226023A (en) | 1991-04-26 |
AU616437B2 (en) | 1991-10-31 |
CA1330770C (en) | 1994-07-19 |
DE3889542D1 (en) | 1994-06-16 |
EP0377616A4 (en) | 1991-06-05 |
KR960014929B1 (en) | 1996-10-21 |
EP0377616A1 (en) | 1990-07-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4816236A (en) | Recovery of vanadium and nickel from petroleum residues | |
US4045537A (en) | Process for recovering soda and alumina values from red mud | |
US3387941A (en) | Process for desulfurizing carbonaceous materials | |
US4640692A (en) | Process for the elimination of pyrite | |
US5192338A (en) | Coal ash modification and reduction | |
US4134737A (en) | Process for producing high-purity coal | |
Waugh et al. | Removal of mineral matter from bituminous coals by aqueous chemical leaching | |
US4753033A (en) | Process for producing a clean hydrocarbon fuel from high calcium coal | |
US4743271A (en) | Process for producing a clean hydrocarbon fuel | |
EP0377616B1 (en) | Coal ash modification and reduction | |
CN114174227A (en) | Method for obtaining powdery sodium silicate from sandy tailings generated in iron ore dressing process | |
US4249910A (en) | Process for removing sulfur from coal | |
US7931800B2 (en) | Method for extraction of bitumen from oil sands using lime | |
AU2019357221B2 (en) | Method for removing ash from solid carbonaceous material | |
US3516787A (en) | Recovery of oil and aluminum from oil shale | |
JPS63117095A (en) | Chemical refining of coal | |
US4582512A (en) | Chemical leaching of coal to remove ash, alkali and vanadium | |
US4261699A (en) | Process for removal of sulfur and ash from coal | |
US4121910A (en) | Treating carbonaceous material | |
US4255156A (en) | Process for removal of sulfur and ash from coal | |
US4528029A (en) | Self-reducing iron oxide agglomerates | |
US4668380A (en) | Method for treating shale | |
US4584088A (en) | Method for treating shale | |
GB2031020A (en) | Process for Removing Sulfur from Coal | |
US4386057A (en) | Recovery of iron oxide from coal fly ash |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19900302 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 19910415 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A4 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19911022 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 19940511 Ref country code: NL Effective date: 19940511 Ref country code: LI Effective date: 19940511 Ref country code: DE Effective date: 19940511 Ref country code: FR Effective date: 19940511 Ref country code: BE Effective date: 19940511 Ref country code: CH Effective date: 19940511 Ref country code: SE Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY Effective date: 19940511 Ref country code: AT Effective date: 19940511 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 105580 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19940515 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3889542 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19940616 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19940930 |
|
EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20070829 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Expiry date: 20080901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20080901 |