METHOD OF REVERSING THE SIDE EFFECTS OF EPIDURAL ANALGESICS
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to methods of reversing the untoward side effects of of opiate analgesics administered epidurally.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The administration of epicural narcotic analgesics, such as morphine, for the relief of postoperative pair, has been well established. Adverse side effects include: nausea, pruritis, urinary retention, and more rarely, severe respiratory depression. Although these side effects are reversible through the administration of narcotic antagonists such as naloxone, the relatively short duration of action of nalaxone together with the long duration of action of the opiate analgesic permits the recurrence of the Side effects, often for as long as 24 hours after the epicural administration. Thus, the risk of potentially serious adverse side effects requires close patient surveillance for at least 12-24 hours following epidural administration of an opiate analgesic, and may necessitate the repeated administration of an antagonist such as naloxone.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to provide a methcά of alleviating or reversing the adverse side effects of epidural opiate analgesia,while avoiding the necessity of prolonged patient monitoring and the frequent administration of a narcotic antagonist.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a method as described above which does not interfere with the analgesic effectiveness of the epidural medication.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a method as described above which is safe, reliable and relatively inexpensive.
In keeping with these objects and others that will become apparent hereinafter, the present invention resides in the administration of the narcotic antagonist nalmefene (6-methylene- 6-desoxy-N-cyclopropylmethyl-14-hydroxydihydronormorphine) parenterally following (or immediately preceding) epidural administration of opiate analgesics.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The opiate analgesic most commonly administered by the epidural route is morphine and/or salts thereof such as morphine sulfate, although pethidine, fentanyl and phenoperidine have been administered epidurally as well. Excellent analgesia is attained through this method without sedation and certain other central nervous system effects of intravenous opiates.
For reasons not yet well understood, however, the administration of opiate analgesics epidurally, while relieving pain, stimulates and aggravates pruritis and can lead to urinary retention, nausea and ultimately severe respiratory depression; see, for example, P.V. Scott and H.B.J. Fischer, Brit. Med. J., Vol. 284, pp. 1015-16 (1982); Anaesthesia, Vol. 36(1), pp. 67-β8 (1981); Lancet, Vol. 2 (8187), p. 204 (1980). As indicated previously, naloxone has been utilized to antagonize the adverse side effects of epidural opiates, but has been found somewhat unsatisfactory because of its short duration of action.
It has now been discovered, however, that the use of the narcotic antagonist nalmefene provides relief of long duration from the side effects of epidural opiates. Nalmefene can even be used prophylactically to avoid the onset of such side effects. The dosage range of epidurally administered opiates, particularly morphine, varies from about 0.03 to about 0.15 mg/kg, with the most common dosage being 0.1 mg/kg. The administration of from about 0.1 to about 2.0 mg of nalmefene parenterally, preferably by the intravenous route, has been found effective in reversing the known adverse effects of epidural opiates.
A more preferred dosage range for the administration of of nalmefene in the method of the present invention is from about 0.2 to about 1.5 mg administered as a bolus injection immediately prior to or after epidural analgesics or in 2 to 4 equally divided doses, with the first dose immediately prior to or after adminis
tration of the analgesic and the succeeding doses every 6-10 hours thereafter.
No adverse side effects have been found to result from the administration of nalmefene in accordance with the method of the invention, and the degree of analgesia provided by the epidurally administered opiate does not appear to diminish to any degree upon parenteral nalmefene administration.
The following Example provides a detailed illustration of the method of the present invention for alleviating or reversing the side effects of epidurally administered opiates. The Example is not intended, however, to limit or restrict the scope of the invention in any way, and should not be construed as providing dosage regimens or methods of administration which must be utilized exclusively to practice the present invention.
EXAMPLE
Methods Informed consent was obtained from seven healthy male volunteers who agreed to participate in this study. Each subject was required to complete two separate 24 hour sessions spaced approximately 1 week apart. A prestudy EKG and urinary drug screen was performed on each subject. At the beginning of each session the subjects were tested on each of the study variables to obtain baseline control values. Following baseline measurements a
dose of 0.1 mg/kg epidural morphine ("DURAMORPH"-Eikins-Sinn, Inc.) was administered as a bolus. The study incorporated a double blind! crossover scientific design where one arm consisted of 0.2 mg nalmefene administered intravenously immediately after the morphine and repeated at 8 and 16 hours post morphine. The second arm of the design was identical to the first except that a placebo saline was substituted for nalmefene.
Presence of cutaneous sensation was assessed by both the pinprick and ice application methods at time 0 and at the end of each of the first six hours following epidural morphine and again at 12, 18 and 24 hours post morphine. The cold presscr test was administered pre-morphine and retested 1/2 hour after injection and again every three hours post epidural morphine throughout the 24 hour period. One hand and one foot were successively immersed in ice water for a period of 90 seconds. Blood pressure changes were obtained in an effort to assess the integrity of the sympathetic nervous system.
Tourniquet-induced ischemic pain was utilized to assess analgesia levels at baseline and at end of each hour post morphine for the first twelve hours and then every three hours throughout the session. The bladder of a B.P. cuff was inflated to 20 mmHg above systolic pressure and subjects were required to continuously squeeze a rubber bulb until it became too painful to carry on. Endurance of ischemic pain was measured in seconds. Blood gas analyses were conducted every four hours and values were obtained
for PaO2, PaCO2, HCO3 , SO2 and pH. Base excess (E.E.) nurses monitored the subjects throughout the twenty four hour period for evidence of urinary retention, pruritis cr respiratory depression. Blood pressure, respiratory rate and pulse were monitored every 15 minutes throughout the session.
Statistical analysis employed included two way repeated measures analysis of variance and post-test comparisons of means where appropriate. Comparison of the proportions cf subjects experiencing pruritis cr urinary retention in the nalmefene versus placebo was conducted using the bi-nomial test described by Armirage.
Only one subject reported any alteration cf cutaneous sensation as assessed by pinprick and ice application. That subject experienced the change only during the first five hours of the placebo session. Analyses of variance conducted on the arithmetic mean blood pressure data obtained during cold pressor tests of both the hand and foot revealed a statistically significant difference (p<0.01) between trials (time blocks) within sessions (i.e. drug or placebo). However, there was not a statistically significant difference between the drug and placebo sessions and no interaction (i.e. trial x drug) was found.
Mean ischemic pain tolerance measurement in seconds of
endurance cf exercise following occlusion of blood to the limb by the application of tourniquet failed to reveal a statistically significant difference for session (i.e. drug or placebo), trial (i.e. baseline, 1 hour, 2 hours, etc.) or the interaction of session by trial.
Blocd gas statistical analyses showed statistically significant differences across time for PaCO2 and B.E. Neither the difference between sessions (i.e. drug-placebo) nor the interaction cf sessions by time was found to be significant for these two bleed measures. No significant difference was found for the PaO2, HCO3, %SO2 or pH measures.
All incidences of pruritis through nalmefene and placebo treatments are set forth in Table 1 hereto. Of the six subjects treated with placebo, only five had records available for pruritis. Four (80%) of those subjects reported multiple incidences of pruritis.
On the contrary, out of seven subjects treated with nalmefene only three (43%) reported slight itching on one or two occasions. In these three subjects the feeling of itching appeared at 4, 5 1/2 and 6 hours after the first dose cf nalmefene. This may be due to the decreased effectiveness of the small dose (0.2 mg) of nalmefene after that period. Nalmefene-treated subjects did not report any itching two hours after the second dose, but placebo-treated subjects complained of itching until long after that time.
Table 2 lists incidences of urinary retention. Records were available far five of the six subjects treated with placebo. Of these five, three (60%) had urinary retention and needed to be catheterized at various times. In nalmefene-treated subjects only two out of seven (29%) needed to be catheterized.
Discussion
Pruritis, caused by epidural morphine, was prevented or diminished by nalmefene. Nalmefene also appeared to diminish urinary retention.
Nalmefene was well tolerated by healthy male volunteers. No clinically significant changes in blood chemistries, hematology or urinalysis were seen. At the dose level used, nalmefene had minimal effects on analσesia.
Table 1
Pruritis
Sub j ect # Nalmefene Placebo 1 6 hrs after first nalmeNot given fene dose itchy face, dry mouth
3 None None 4 None 2 hrs after first dose itching in lower leg
3 1/2 hrs after first dose decreased itching
7 hrs after second dose general body itchinσ 5 5 1/2 hrs after first No record dose itchinσ
2 hrs after second dose itching 6 None 1 1/4 hr after firs; dose itching
5 3/4 hrs after first dose generalized itching
6 3/4 hrs after first dose continued itching
3 hrs after second dose itching
6 hrs after second dose still itching
Table 1 (cont'd.)
Pruritis
Subject # Nalmefene Placebo 7 None 2 hrs after first dose slight itching on lower leg 8 4 hrs after first dose 1 1/2 hrs after slight itching first doseitching in upper thighs and lower abdomen
4 hrs after first dose generalized itching
6 hrs after first dose increased itching, head to toe
1 hr after second dose itching creatly reduced
Table 2
Urinary Retention
Nalmerene Placebo
Subi ect #
Yes Not given 1
No No 2 No Yes 4 No No record 5 No No 6 No Yes 7 Yes Yes 8
It has thus been shown that there are provided methods which achieve the various objects of the invention and which are well adapted to meet the conditions of practical use.
As various possible embodiments might be made of the above intention, and as various changes might be made in the embodiments set forth above, it is to be undestood that all matters herein described are to be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
What is claimed as new and desired to be protected by Letters Patent is set forth in the following claims.