EP0366764A1 - Verfahren zur herstellung von papier und pappe. - Google Patents

Verfahren zur herstellung von papier und pappe.

Info

Publication number
EP0366764A1
EP0366764A1 EP19890905452 EP89905452A EP0366764A1 EP 0366764 A1 EP0366764 A1 EP 0366764A1 EP 19890905452 EP19890905452 EP 19890905452 EP 89905452 A EP89905452 A EP 89905452A EP 0366764 A1 EP0366764 A1 EP 0366764A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
polymer
paper
suspension
retention
shear
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP19890905452
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0366764B1 (de
Inventor
Peter Lowry
David Farrar
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Water Treatments Ltd
Original Assignee
Allied Colloids Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=10635686&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0366764(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Allied Colloids Ltd filed Critical Allied Colloids Ltd
Publication of EP0366764A1 publication Critical patent/EP0366764A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0366764B1 publication Critical patent/EP0366764B1/de
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H23/00Processes or apparatus for adding material to the pulp or to the paper
    • D21H23/02Processes or apparatus for adding material to the pulp or to the paper characterised by the manner in which substances are added
    • D21H23/04Addition to the pulp; After-treatment of added substances in the pulp
    • D21H23/06Controlling the addition
    • D21H23/14Controlling the addition by selecting point of addition or time of contact between components
    • D21H23/16Addition before or during pulp beating or refining
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/20Macromolecular organic compounds
    • D21H17/33Synthetic macromolecular compounds
    • D21H17/34Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • D21H17/41Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds containing ionic groups
    • D21H17/44Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds containing ionic groups cationic
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H17/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
    • D21H17/20Macromolecular organic compounds
    • D21H17/33Synthetic macromolecular compounds
    • D21H17/34Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • D21H17/41Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds containing ionic groups
    • D21H17/44Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds containing ionic groups cationic
    • D21H17/45Nitrogen-containing groups
    • D21H17/455Nitrogen-containing groups comprising tertiary amine or being at least partially quaternised
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21HPULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D21H21/00Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its function, form or properties; Paper-impregnating or coating material, characterised by its function, form or properties
    • D21H21/06Paper forming aids
    • D21H21/10Retention agents or drainage improvers

Definitions

  • Paper and paper board is made by draining an aqueous cellulosic suspension through a screen to form a sheet, and drying the sheet.
  • the suspension may be substantially free of filler or may contain substantial amounts of filler.
  • Optimum retention occurs when the amount of fibre fines and filler that drains through the screen is minimum.
  • Optimum formation occurs when the paper and paper board is of uniform density and thickness both on a macro scale (e.g., across the width of the sheet) and on a micro scale (e.g., at any particular point).
  • Optimum drainage occurs when the water of the suspension drains through the screen very quickly.
  • Optimum drainage generally occurs when the paper or paper board has a very open structure and so frequently is associated with poor retention and formation.
  • the cationic retention aids should have an intrinsic viscosity of 12 to 25dl/g. This has not proved to be normal experience and we are unaware of such materials ever having been commercialised. The reason for this may be that the polymers in that were made by polymerisation in dilute aqueous solution and were kept in solution form, which would render the process rather uneconomic as most paper mills require reverse phase dispersions or powdered polymers.
  • EP 277728-A cationic retention aids are defined in terms of specific viscosity but it is unclear what order of molecular weight they have.
  • a difficulty with cationic polymeric retention aids is that the solubility of the polymer tends to deteriorate as the molecular weight increases and certainly the polymer technology in 1975 could not have produced a solid grade (reverse phase dispersion or powder) retention aid having intrinsic viscosity of 25 and which had adequate solubility.
  • the screen of a paper-making machine is travelling as the cellulosic suspension flows, or is forced, on to it. Until recently, the maximum screen speed was up to abcu.t SC metres per minute. The contact of the suspension vrith this screen causes substantial acceleration to the suspension and this in turn applies shear to the suspension.
  • the cationic retention aids having intrinsic viscosity of up to 7 to lOdl/g give satisfactory floes under these conditions.
  • paper or paper board is made by drainage through a screen of an aqueous cellulosic suspension containing a water soluble cationic polymeric retention aid formed from water soluble ethylenically unsaturated monomer or monomer blend, and in this process the polymeric retention aid has intrinsic viscosity of at least about 12dl/g, the formation of the paper or paper board is improved without substantial deterioration in retention by subjecting the suspension to shear before or during drainage and the polymer is introduced into the suspension as a solution that has been made by dissolving in water a powdered or reverse phase suspension of the polymer that has a solubility, as defined below, of less than 25 lumps per lg.
  • the solubility defined herein is an indication that the polymer is a true solution and will not leave any unwanted polymeric deposits on the paper or paper board.
  • the test is carried out as follows: lg polymer is weighed out into a"screw top jar. 5ml acetone is added to wet out the polymer. 95ml de-ionised water is added to the jar and the closed jar is shaken on a laboratory shaker for 2 hours to ensure maximum dissolution. A 150 ⁇ m stainless steel sieve is wetted out and the polymer solution is poured onto the sieve. The jar is rinsed once with water which is poured through the sieve. The sieve is gently washed with cold running water to remove excess polymer solution until the back of the sieve is no longer slimy.
  • the back of the sieve is dabbed dry with a paper towel and the number of lumps of polymer retained in the sieve is counted.
  • the total number of lumps gives the solubility as defined above, ie it is the number of lumps per lg dry polymer or of 10Og of a 1% solution of polymer.
  • the intrinsic viscosity measurements herein are measured by the following technique.
  • the specific viscosity of the test polymer is measured at four different low concentrations (in the range 0.02-0.08% by weight) in IM buffered sodium chloride solution using a suspended level viscometer at a temperature of 25°C.
  • the value of the reduced viscosity which is the specific viscosjlty divided by the polymer concentration, is plotted against the concentration, which at the low concentrations gives a straight line which intercepts the y-axis to give the reduced viscosity at infinite dilution, which is the intrinsic viscosity, reported in units dl/g.
  • the invention is based in part on the surprising discovery that good formation and good retention are easily obtained upon shearing the very large floes that are inevitably formed when the retention aid is a very high molecular weight water soluble polymer.
  • the molecular weight (expressed as intrinsic viscosity) and the degree of shearing that are required for optimum properties are inter-related in that moderately high molecular weight needs to be associated with moderate degrees of shear and very high molecular weight needs to be associated with higher amounts of shear. If the molecular weight is too low having regard to the amount of shear (or if the amount of shear is toe high having regard to the molecular weight) retention (and also drainage) will be poor even though formation may be satisfactory.
  • the invention is of particular value when some or all of the shear is caused by the very fast speed of travel of the drainage screen on to which the suspension is applied.
  • an alternative way of defining the invention is to say that the polymeric retention aid has intrinsic viscosity above about 12dl/g and the suspension containing the retention aid is applied on to a drainage screen that is moving very fast.
  • the invention provides a solution to the problem of how to achieve good retention and good formation on the very high speed modern paper making machines where the screen travels at above 800 and usually above 850 metres per minute.
  • the speed is generally above 900, most usually above 925, metres per minute.
  • satisfactory results can be obtained at screen speeds above 950, above 975 and even at 1,000 metres per minute or more, for instance up to 1,05C and 1,100 metres per minute or more.
  • the polymer preferably has an intrinsic viscosity in the range 12 to 17, often 13 to 16, dl/g, with best results often being obtained at about IV 14 or 15 dl/g.
  • higher screen speeds are required then higher molecular weights may be used, e.g., up to IV of 20dl/g or more.
  • the polymer can be added in the headbox with gentle agitation, but, because of the high molecular weight of the polymer, it is now possible to incorporate the polymer under the same mixing conditions as are used for the formation of the thin stock and, in particular, it is no longer necessary to take the usual precautions to avoid shearing the suspension in the headbox or prior to the headbox.
  • the polymer can be incorporated into the suspension under shear, eg at a centriscreen or fan pump, and the suspension then drained on a relatively slow screen.
  • An essential feature of the invention is that the retention aid should be water soluble. If the retention aid is not water soluble then the retention effect deteriorates and problems may arise due to the appearance of insoluble polymer on or in the paper or paper board. The tendency for insolubility increases as the molecular weight of the retention aid increases (which is another reason why conventional thinking dictates the use of medium to low molecular weight retention aids) due to accidental cross linking, for instance due to impurity amounts of cross linking agent.
  • ionic regain As defined in EP 0202780.
  • the ionic regain should be below 10%, preferably beicw 5% and most preferably in the region O to 2%.
  • the polymeric retention aid may be made by reverse phase emulsion or dispersion polymerisation to provide a dispersion of aqueous (or dehydrated) polymer particles having a size generally below lO ⁇ m dispersed in non-aqueous liquid, in known manner.
  • a dispersion may be converted into polymer solution by mixing it into water, generally in the presence of an oil-in-water emulsifier, in known manner.
  • oil-in-water emulsifier in known manner.
  • the solid may have been made by reverse phase bead polymerisation (followed by azeotroping and separating the beads from the non-aqueous liquid) or by gel polymerisation followed by drying and comminution in conventional manner.
  • the polymer is made from cationic monomers alone or from blends thereof with non-ionic monomers or, if an ampholytic polymer is required, with anionie monomers as well.
  • a blend of cationic and non-ionic monomers is used, the proportion of non-ionic units may be low, e.g., 5 to 50% by weight but often the polymer is formed from 10 to 50% by weight cationic units and 90 to 50% by weight non-ionic units.
  • Suitable cationic monomers are dialkylaminoalkyl
  • (meth) acrylates and dialkylaaminoalkyl (meth) acrylamides.
  • the cationic monomers are generally used in the form of their acid addition or, preferably, quaternary ammonium salts.
  • non-ionic monomers conventionally incorporated into high molecular weight water soluble polymers can be used, but acrylamide is preferred.
  • anionie monomers may be ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acids such as methacrylic acid or, preferably, acrylic acid, or ethylenically unsaturated sulphonic acids such as 2-acrylamido methyl propane sulphonic acid.
  • Anionie monomers are generally used in the form of ammonium or alkali metal (generally sodium) salts.
  • the retention aids are copolymers of acrylamide with cationic monomer, most preferably a copolymer of 10 to 95% (preferably 50 to 90%) by weight acrylamide with 90 to 5% (preferably 50 to 10%) cationic monomer, most preferably dialkylaminoethyl acrylate quaternary ammonium salt (or the corresponding ir.cthacrylate compound) wherein the alkyl groups are generally methyl or ethyl.
  • Particularly preferred copolymers are formed of about 50 to 80%, often 70 to about 80%, by weight acrylamide and the balance diethylaminoethyl acrylate or methacrylate quaternary ammonium salt.
  • Other preferred copolymers include those wherein the quaternary monomer is 50 to 100% of the monomers and acrylamide is 0 to 50% by weight.
  • any of the normal quaternising groups may be used, generally methyl sulphate or methyl chloride.
  • the intrinsic viscosity of the polymer is preferably around 14 or 15dl/g or more and the polymer is preferably produced as a powder and is dissolved in water to give a solubility as explained above.
  • the high molecular weight soluble polymer is the last paper making additive that is added to the suspension and thus normally bentonite or other significant materials are generally not added after it, although bentonite may be added beforehand if desired, for instance as described in EP 17353, or subsequently as in EP 235893.
  • the suspension may either be substantially unfilled, for instance containing not more than about 15%, and generally not more than about 10%, inorganic filler or it may be filled, for instance containing more than 15% inorganic filler (based on the dry weight of the suspension) . If the suspension has a high cationic demand it is particularly preferred to treat it first with bentonite and then to use a substantially non-ionic high molecular weight retention aid, for instance as described in EP 17353.
  • the amount of retention aid that is incorporated in the suspension is conventional, for instance in the range 100 to 1,000 grams dry polymer per tonne dry weight of suspension, often 200 to 500 grams, although higher amounts may be used if desired.
  • a low or medium molecular weight polymer before the high molecular weight polymer. Suitable amounts are in the range 50 to lOOOg/tonne. Generally the low or medium molecular weight polymer is cationic, and the other polymer may be slightly anionie, nonion-ic or, preferably, cationic.
  • Suitable cationic low to medium molecular weight polymers are formed from the cationic monomers quoted above (often as copolymers with acrylamide) , diallyldimethyla monium chloride (often copolymerised with acrylamide) , or the polymers may be polyethyleneimine ⁇ or amine-halohydrin or amine-haloalkane polymers.
  • the molecular weight is typically in the range 10000 to 1 million, for instance IV 0.1 to ldl/g or 2dl/g.
  • a medium molecular weight cationic retention aid may be made by conventional gel polymerisation of 75% acrylamide with 25% by weight quaternary salt of diethylaminoethyl acrylate to intrinsic viscosity 7. After drying in conventional manner the product typically has a solubility of less than 10 lumps per 100 grams. When the same monomer feed is used under polymerisation conditions that are ' known to favour higher molecular weights it is possible to obtain intrinsic viscosity of, say, 14 but the solubility is liable to be above 30 lumps per 100 grams . However when the cationic and acrylamide monomers are purified by conventional purification techniques so as to remove substantially all traces of cross linker, a polymer having intrinsic viscosity of about 14 and giving less than 1C lumps per ICO grams can easily be obtained.
  • Two cationic retentionaids, A and B were made by conventional gel polymerisation, of 75% acrylamide with 25% by weight quaternary salt of diethylaminoethyl acrylate, A to an intrinsic viscosity of 8 dig " and B to an intrinsic viscosity of 13 dig . Both polymers had a solubility of less than 10 lumps per lg (polymer) . They were then compared for performance on a commercial paper machine using a bleached kraft-pulp finish to produce the paper grades. Each retention aid was run for 30 days on the machine and yielded the following comparative data averaged for each 30 day period.
  • Example 3 To demonstrate the effect of shear on the composition at different molecular weights (IV) tests were carried out in the laboratory as follows. Polymers of different IV" 1 s in the range 4 to 17 dl/g were prepared by gel polymerisation of 75% acrylamide and 25% of the quaternary salt of diethylaminoethyl acrylate. All polymers had a solubility of less than 10 lumps per lg
  • polymer (polymer) .
  • Stock solutions of these polymers were made up for. addition to the dilute paper stock. Shearing was carried out by placing the stock solution into a Brit jar mixer and running it at 1500rpm for predetermined periods in the range 15-45s.

Landscapes

  • Paper (AREA)
  • Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)
  • Separation Of Suspended Particles By Flocculating Agents (AREA)
EP19890905452 1988-04-22 1989-04-24 Verfahren zur herstellung von papier und pappe Revoked EP0366764B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB888809588A GB8809588D0 (en) 1988-04-22 1988-04-22 Processes for the production of paper & paper board
GB8809588 1988-04-22

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0366764A1 true EP0366764A1 (de) 1990-05-09
EP0366764B1 EP0366764B1 (de) 1993-11-10

Family

ID=10635686

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19890905452 Revoked EP0366764B1 (de) 1988-04-22 1989-04-24 Verfahren zur herstellung von papier und pappe

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0366764B1 (de)
JP (1) JPH02504049A (de)
CA (1) CA1329683C (de)
DE (1) DE68910639T2 (de)
FI (1) FI95827C (de)
GB (1) GB8809588D0 (de)
NO (1) NO175648C (de)
WO (1) WO1989010447A1 (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2012175528A1 (en) 2011-06-20 2012-12-27 Basf Se Manufacture of paper and paperboard

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5110878A (en) * 1991-05-14 1992-05-05 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Dry polyamide-epichlorohydrin resin power for strengthening wet paper
US5571380A (en) * 1992-01-08 1996-11-05 Nalco Chemical Company Papermaking process with improved retention and maintained formation
CN103608516B (zh) * 2011-06-20 2016-11-16 巴斯夫欧洲公司 生产纸和纸板

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2345922A1 (de) * 1973-09-12 1975-04-17 Bayer Ag Papierhilfsmittel
FI272374A (de) * 1973-10-01 1975-04-02 Calgon Corp
DE3677046D1 (de) * 1985-04-25 1991-02-28 Allied Colloids Ltd Flockungsverfahren.
GB8602121D0 (en) * 1986-01-29 1986-03-05 Allied Colloids Ltd Paper & paper board

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO8910447A1 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2012175528A1 (en) 2011-06-20 2012-12-27 Basf Se Manufacture of paper and paperboard
US9103071B2 (en) 2011-06-20 2015-08-11 Basf Se Manufacture of paper and paperboard

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO175648C (no) 1994-11-09
JPH02504049A (ja) 1990-11-22
NO895166D0 (no) 1989-12-21
FI95827C (fi) 1996-03-25
DE68910639T2 (de) 1994-02-24
GB8809588D0 (en) 1988-05-25
NO895166L (no) 1989-12-21
FI895957A0 (fi) 1989-12-13
FI95827B (fi) 1995-12-15
EP0366764B1 (de) 1993-11-10
DE68910639D1 (de) 1993-12-16
WO1989010447A1 (en) 1989-11-02
NO175648B (de) 1994-08-01
CA1329683C (en) 1994-05-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5254221A (en) Processes for the production of paper and paper board
EP1683817B1 (de) Anionische Copolymere erhältlich in inverser Emulsion sowie deren Verwendung zur Herstellung von Cellulosefaser-Mischungen
US5676796A (en) Manufacture of paper
US4720346A (en) Flocculation processes
EP2205643B1 (de) Ein polymerisches koagulans enthaltende inverse emulsionspolymere
AU696483B2 (en) Production of paper
MXPA02005108A (es) Metodo para usar polimeros asociativos hidrofobicamente en la preparacion de composiciones de fibras celulosicas y composiciones de fbiras celulosicas que incorporan los polimeros asociativos hidrofobicamente.
CA2935453C (en) Papermaking agent composition and method for treating fibre stock
JPS6118408A (ja) 懸濁液の凝集方法
US5185061A (en) Processes for the production of paper and paper board
JP2008525665A (ja) 紙製造における改善された歩留まりおよび濾水
EP1090185B1 (de) Verfahren zur ausflockung bei der herstellung einer papierbahn
CA1329683C (en) Processes for the production of paper and paper board
KR101917482B1 (ko) 비목재 펄프를 함유하는 종이 및 판지의 제조
JP2575692B2 (ja) 紙の製造法
JP3614609B2 (ja) 製紙用薬剤、抄紙方法および製紙用薬剤の製造方法
Gibbs et al. The influence of dextran derivatives on polyethylene oxide and polyacrylamide-induced calcium carbonate flocculation and floc strength
JP2854072B2 (ja) 製紙の際に妨害物質を定着させる方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900112

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19920129

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 68910639

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19931216

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: JACOBACCI CASETTA & PERANI S.P.A.

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: S.N.F.

Effective date: 19940810

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: S.N.F.

EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 89905452.2

APAE Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFNO

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19980504

Year of fee payment: 10

APAE Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFNO

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19990302

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19990310

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19990311

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19990324

Year of fee payment: 11

RAP4 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: CIBA SPECIALTY CHEMICALS WATER TREATMENTS LIMITED

APAC Appeal dossier modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19990614

Year of fee payment: 11

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 19990413

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Free format text: 990413

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO