EP0347968B1 - Device and method for control of a weapon system - Google Patents

Device and method for control of a weapon system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0347968B1
EP0347968B1 EP89201478A EP89201478A EP0347968B1 EP 0347968 B1 EP0347968 B1 EP 0347968B1 EP 89201478 A EP89201478 A EP 89201478A EP 89201478 A EP89201478 A EP 89201478A EP 0347968 B1 EP0347968 B1 EP 0347968B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
signals
platform
target
control device
projectile
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP89201478A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0347968A1 (en
Inventor
Bertil Jan Hijink
Johannes Martinus Keller
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Thales Nederland BV
Original Assignee
Thales Nederland BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Thales Nederland BV filed Critical Thales Nederland BV
Publication of EP0347968A1 publication Critical patent/EP0347968A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0347968B1 publication Critical patent/EP0347968B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G7/00Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
    • F41G7/20Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on continuous observation of target position
    • F41G7/30Command link guidance systems
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G5/00Elevating or traversing control systems for guns
    • F41G5/08Ground-based tracking-systems for aerial targets
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G5/00Elevating or traversing control systems for guns
    • F41G5/14Elevating or traversing control systems for guns for vehicle-borne guns

Definitions

  • the invention relates to an assessment device for assessment of the hitting probability of a gun system
  • a control device suitable for application with the gun system, for generating control signals with which at least one projectile can be manoeuvred towards a target by aiming the gun in a certain direction and where, for the purpose of generating the said control signals, the control device is provided with present target position signals obtained with a first sensor.
  • the invention also relates to a method for assessment of the hitting probability of a gun system wherein control signals are generated with which at least one projectile can be manoeuvred towards a target by aiming the gun in a certain direction and where the said control signals are generated on the basis of present target position signals obtained with a first sensor.
  • the control device computes an optimal gun aiming point for the gun to achieve that the projectile, in this case a missile, fired by the gun is directed towards the vicinity of the moving target.
  • a measure for the operational quality of the system may be the hitting probability with respect to the projectile hitting the target.
  • the hitting probability is not only determined by the operation of a target tracking sensor, the control device and the weapon system, but also by the target.
  • the effectiveness of the control device is strongly determined by the quality of target measurements by the target tracking sensor and by the behaviour of the target.
  • a well-known test procedure to specify the hitting probability of a weapon control system is to fire projectiles at a towed target. Although in this procedure all factors determining the hitting probability are included in the assessment, the procedure remains limited to a non-realistic target and target trajectory. Another disadvantage of this test procedure is that real ammunition is used, leading to high costs.
  • Another well-known test procedure for a weapon system provided with a gun, in which no firing takes place, is to aim the gun, which is provided with well-known video registration equipment including a barrel camera, at a hitting point of projectile with target calculated by the control device, while a zero projectile time of flight is assumed.
  • a disadvantage of this test procedure is that it does not include the influence of unexpected target manoeuvres occurring during the projectile time of flight.
  • the present invention has for its object to provide a device and method for assessment of the hitting probability of a control system, suitable for application with a weapon system, for generating control signals such as described in the opening paragraph, offering a possibility for a test procedure under operational conditions against realistic targets, while the above-mentioned objections are obviated.
  • the assessment device is characterised in that an electro-optic sensor is mounted on the gun, that signals representing a predicted hitting point between the at least one projectile and the target, presently valid and calculated in the past from present target position signals, are used for calculating the said control signals such that the electro-optic sensor is substantially pointed onto the said predicted hitting point, and that actual target position signals provided by the electro-optic sensor are made available for indicating the actual target position relative to the predicted hitting point at each time the target should arrive at the said predicted hitting point.
  • the method according to the invention is characterised in that an electro-optic sensor is mounted on the gun, that signals representing a predicted hitting point between the at least one projectile and the target, presently valid and calculated in the past present target position signals, are used for calculating the said control signals such that the electro-optic sensor is substantially pointed onto the said predicted hitting point, and that actual target position signals provided by the electro-optic sensor are made available for indicating the actual target position relative to the said predicted hitting point at each time the target should arrive at the said predicted hitting point.
  • the advantage of the present invention is that the influence of target manoeuvres occurring during the said time span on the control device is taken into account in the test procedure.
  • control device is suitable for mounting on a moving platform and where the control device is provided with platform signals containing information on the orientation, velocity and position of the platform with respect to a reference coordinate system
  • platform signals containing information on the orientation, velocity and position of the platform with respect to a reference coordinate system
  • the device and method for control according to the invention may be applied in various weapon systems.
  • an embodiment is obtained by the control device calculating a future maximum interception area of the projectile with the target and the control device is provided with signals representing the present interception area calculated a certain time span ago and relating to the present.
  • Fig. 1 represents a first embodiment of a control device according to the invention applied in a weapon control system which is provided with a target sensor 1, the control device 2 and a weapon system 3.
  • This figure shows a platform sensor unit 4 which is provided with suitable sensors for measuring the orientation S p and position P p of the platform on which the weapon control system is fitted.
  • Target sensor 1 is fitted with a pulse radar apparatus 5 supplying bearing and range information of a target with respect to a line of sight of an antenna of the pulse radar apparatus.
  • Target sensor 1 can also be an electro-optic sensor such as an IR or a TV camera, possibly provided with a laser range finder.
  • the antenna is provided with aiming means 6, placing the antenna in the desired orientation by means of orientation readers recording the orientation S s of the antenna with respect to the platform.
  • aiming means 6 are provided with servos and so-called synchros.
  • the bearing and range information of the target, the information relating to the orientation S s of the antenna, the information with respect to the orientation S p of the platform and the data relating to the position P p of the platform are supplied to control device 2.
  • the measured target data are, by means of data relating to the orientation S s of the antenna, the orientation S p and position P p of the platform, preferably converted (block 7) to a first reference coordinate system, which is preferably earth-orientated. Moreover, the measured target data are filtered ("target track filtering", block 7) for the purpose of control signals for aiming means 6.
  • the converted target data P d (t 1 ) indicated at regular intervals at a first point in time with t 1 (block 8), are used to calculate a gun aiming point SP R (t 1 ) for weapon system 3 (block 9).
  • a future target position after this time of flight is calculated (block 10).
  • This future hitting point TP(t 1 ) calculated at a first point in time t 1 is converted by means of data concerning the position P p of the platform to a relative future hitting point TP R (t 1 ) with respect for the platform (block 11).
  • a model of the projectile trajectory is used to make a new calculation (block 12) of the projectile time of flight TS(t 1 ), which calculation is used as an improved estimation of the projectile time of flight in the new calculation of the future hitting point TP(t 1 ).
  • a relative gun aiming point SP R (t 1 ) for weapon system 3 is calculated (block 12) by means of the projectile trajectory model.
  • the projectile trajectory model uses stored ballistic and meteorological data B and M (blocks 12a and 12b).
  • control signal S ⁇ 1 When using the control device in a normal weapon control mode, indicated by control signal S ⁇ 1 , the calculated relative gun aiming point SP R (t 1 ) is converted to platform coordinates by means of data concerning the orientation S p of the platform (block 13). On the basis of the converted gun aiming point, control signals are generated (block 13) for aiming means 14a which aim a launching system 14b.
  • control signal S 1 Use of the control device in a mode suitable for assessment of the aiming of the weapon system at the target according to the invention is indicated with control signal S 1 .
  • weapon system 3 is not controlled on the basis of gun aiming point SP R (t 1 ), but on the basis of a previously calculated and stored (block 19) hitting point TP R (t 2 ), which is valid at the present time t 1 .
  • Time t 2 relates to the point in time at which this hitting point was calculated.
  • the calculated future hitting points TP(t 1 ), a time validity TTP(t 1 ) corresponding with this hitting point and the point in time t 1 at which these data were calculated, are stored in a memory (block 15) during a certain period of time.
  • the time validity TTP(t 1 ) is obtained by adding to t 1 the corresponding projectile time of flight TS(t 1 ).
  • This memory consists of a cyclic buffer whose cycle time is longer than the longest expected projectile time of flight.
  • two hitting points TP(t′) and TP(t ⁇ ) are taken from the memory in which the future hitting points are stored, together with the corresponding time validity TTP(t′) and TTP(t ⁇ ) for which t′ ⁇ t 1 ⁇ t ⁇ (blocks 15 and 16).
  • the present hitting point TP(t 2 ), together with the time validity of t 1 is calculated by means of a linear interpolation between hitting points TP(t′) and TP(t ⁇ ) (block 16).
  • an embodiment may also store, during a particular time, the target trajectory data P d (t 1 ) or data derived thereof. The present hitting point calculation will then have to be carried out at a time t 1 , on the basis of the stored target trajectory data which were valid at an earlier time t 2 .
  • the present hitting points TP(t 2 ) are converted by means of data P p , relating to the position of the platform (block 16a), to present hitting points TF R (t 2 ) relative to the position of the platform. These relative present hitting points TP R (t 2 ) are subsequently converted (block 13) by means of data S p , relating to the orientation of the platform, to a coordinate system connected to the platform for the purpose of generating control signals for continuous aiming of weapon system 3 at these present hitting points.
  • a launching system 14b in the form of a gun has, for the purpose of the use of the control device in mode S 1 , been provided with a well-known barrel camera 17 for aligning the gun.
  • a difference between the present hitting point and the present target position as visible on video 18 from barrel camera 17 may subsequently be further processed in various ways.
  • the video information is continuously supplied to a user for assessment, which user is able to obtain an impression of the operation of the weapon control system.
  • Another embodiment is obtained when assessment is automated by the calculation of quality values, such as hitting probability, by means of data concerning dispersion relating to the trajectory, effectiveness of the projectile and target dimensions.
  • An embodiment including a barrel camera 17 is, strictly speaking, not required if the orientation of the gun has been calculated accurately enough. This orientation can be measured by the said readers, such as synchros, and compared by the control device with the stale hitting points.
  • Fig. 2 shows an embodiment of a control device in an application in a similar weapon control system which, for the purpose of aiming at the present hitting points, has been fitted with a second target sensor 22 provided with its own aiming means 20.
  • the control device 2 is executed in such a way that, besides conversion of gun aiming points (block 13), simultaneous conversion of present hitting points is executed (block 21).
  • the second target sensor is coupled in mode S 1 to the control device and continuously aimed at the present hitting points. In mode S ⁇ 1 , the second target sensor is available for another weapon control channel 23.
  • platform sensors 4 consist of means for once-only determination of the platform data relating to orientation S p and position P p .
  • a distinction between earth-oriented coordinates and coordinates determined by the platform is not required. Conversion from and to relative coordinates is therefore no longer necessary.
  • Fig. 3 shows an embodiment of a control device applied in a weapon control system suitable for mounting on a moving platform.
  • Platform sensors 4 continuously supply data relating to orientation S p , data relating to position P p , but also data relating to the own velocity V p of the platform.
  • the platform sensors 4 may consist of well-known gyro's, acceleration and velocity meters.
  • the control device by means of data relating to position P p and velocity V p of the platform, calculates the displacement of the platform at certain intervals at points in time indicated with t 1 (block 24). Position P p (t 1 ) at this time, velocity V p (t 1 ) at this time and the time t 1 are stored in a memory (block 25) during a certain period of time.
  • This memory is executed as cyclic memory of which the cycle time exceeds the maximum expected projectile time of flight. Subsequently, the present hitting point TP(t 2 ) (block 19) corresponding with a time t 1 is corrected (block 16a) for own displacement ⁇ P p (t 2 ) of the platform from time t 2 till time t 1 . To determine this own displacement, two stored platform positions P p (t′) and P p (t ⁇ ) are retrieved from memory 25, with t′ ⁇ t 2 ⁇ t ⁇ (block 26). Subsequently, the platform displacement ⁇ P p (t 2 ) as from time t 2 is found by linear interpolation between these platform positions (block 26).

Description

  • The invention relates to an assessment device for assessment of the hitting probability of a gun system comprising a control device suitable for application with the gun system, for generating control signals with which at least one projectile can be manoeuvred towards a target by aiming the gun in a certain direction and where, for the purpose of generating the said control signals, the control device is provided with present target position signals obtained with a first sensor.
  • The invention also relates to a method for assessment of the hitting probability of a gun system wherein control signals are generated with which at least one projectile can be manoeuvred towards a target by aiming the gun in a certain direction and where the said control signals are generated on the basis of present target position signals obtained with a first sensor.
  • An example of an embodiment of such a weapon control system is known from patent specification WO 81/00149. In this specification the gun system, is controlled by the control device, in this case a weapon control computer, which for that purpose is provided with target data from a radar tracking device suitable for tracking a moving target.
  • The control device computes an optimal gun aiming point for the gun to achieve that the projectile, in this case a missile, fired by the gun is directed towards the vicinity of the moving target.
  • To determine the availability of the gun system against certain targets and the operation of the entire chain in the weapon control system as part of a test procedure or exercise it is necessary to be able to assess the system's operation under operational conditions.
    In the case of the above-mentioned embodiment, a measure for the operational quality of the system may be the hitting probability with respect to the projectile hitting the target. Actually, under operational conditions the hitting probability is not only determined by the operation of a target tracking sensor, the control device and the weapon system, but also by the target. The effectiveness of the control device is strongly determined by the quality of target measurements by the target tracking sensor and by the behaviour of the target. An unexpected change in the target trajectory after a non-or partly correctable projectile has been fired by the weapon system may result in the projectile missing the target. This will occur especially in case of projectile times of flight which are long when compared to the intervals between the unexpected target manoeuvres.
  • A well-known test procedure to specify the hitting probability of a weapon control system is to fire projectiles at a towed target. Although in this procedure all factors determining the hitting probability are included in the assessment, the procedure remains limited to a non-realistic target and target trajectory. Another disadvantage of this test procedure is that real ammunition is used, leading to high costs.
  • Another well-known test procedure for a weapon system provided with a gun, in which no firing takes place, is to aim the gun, which is provided with well-known video registration equipment including a barrel camera, at a hitting point of projectile with target calculated by the control device, while a zero projectile time of flight is assumed. A disadvantage of this test procedure is that it does not include the influence of unexpected target manoeuvres occurring during the projectile time of flight.
  • The present invention has for its object to provide a device and method for assessment of the hitting probability of a control system, suitable for application with a weapon system, for generating control signals such as described in the opening paragraph, offering a possibility for a test procedure under operational conditions against realistic targets, while the above-mentioned objections are obviated.
  • According to the invention, the assessment device is characterised in that an electro-optic sensor is mounted on the gun, that signals representing a predicted hitting point between the at least one projectile and the target, presently valid and calculated in the past from present target position signals, are used for calculating the said control signals such that the electro-optic sensor is substantially pointed onto the said predicted hitting point, and that actual target position signals provided by the electro-optic sensor are made available for indicating the actual target position relative to the predicted hitting point at each time the target should arrive at the said predicted hitting point.
  • The method according to the invention is characterised in that an electro-optic sensor is mounted on the gun, that signals representing a predicted hitting point between the at least one projectile and the target, presently valid and calculated in the past present target position signals, are used for calculating the said control signals such that the electro-optic sensor is substantially pointed onto the said predicted hitting point, and that actual target position signals provided by the electro-optic sensor are made available for indicating the actual target position relative to the said predicted hitting point at each time the target should arrive at the said predicted hitting point.
  • The advantage of the present invention is that the influence of target manoeuvres occurring during the said time span on the control device is taken into account in the test procedure.
  • In an embodiment where the control device is suitable for mounting on a moving platform and where the control device is provided with platform signals containing information on the orientation, velocity and position of the platform with respect to a reference coordinate system, a further advantage is obtained because the control device by means of the platform signals continuously calculates the displacement of the platform and stores these displacement values during at least a certain time span in a memory. Thus a parallax occurring as a result of displacement of the platform may be corrected. Moreover, a way is provided to assess whether the platform signals are processed correctly and in the proper manner.
  • The device and method for control according to the invention may be applied in various weapon systems.
  • In an application where the projectile is a projectile correctable by the control device, an embodiment is obtained by the control device calculating a future maximum interception area of the projectile with the target and the control device is provided with signals representing the present interception area calculated a certain time span ago and relating to the present.
  • The system and method according to the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying figures of which:
  • Fig. 1
    is a first embodiment of a control device according to the invention applied in a weapon control system provided with a gun, a target tracking sensor and an electro-optic sensor using the same aiming means as the gun;
    Fig. 2
    is a second embodiment of a control device in a similar weapon control system in an application where the electro-optic sensor is provided with its own aiming means;
    Fig. 3
    is a third embodiment of a control device in a similar weapon control system suitable for mounting on a moving platform.
  • Fig. 1 represents a first embodiment of a control device according to the invention applied in a weapon control system which is provided with a target sensor 1, the control device 2 and a weapon system 3. This figure shows a platform sensor unit 4 which is provided with suitable sensors for measuring the orientation Sp and position Pp of the platform on which the weapon control system is fitted.
  • Target sensor 1 is fitted with a pulse radar apparatus 5 supplying bearing and range information of a target with respect to a line of sight of an antenna of the pulse radar apparatus. Target sensor 1 can also be an electro-optic sensor such as an IR or a TV camera, possibly provided with a laser range finder. The antenna is provided with aiming means 6, placing the antenna in the desired orientation by means of orientation readers recording the orientation Ss of the antenna with respect to the platform. For this purpose, aiming means 6 are provided with servos and so-called synchros. The bearing and range information of the target, the information relating to the orientation Ss of the antenna, the information with respect to the orientation Sp of the platform and the data relating to the position Pp of the platform are supplied to control device 2. The measured target data are, by means of data relating to the orientation Ss of the antenna, the orientation Sp and position Pp of the platform, preferably converted (block 7) to a first reference coordinate system, which is preferably earth-orientated. Moreover, the measured target data are filtered ("target track filtering", block 7) for the purpose of control signals for aiming means 6. The converted target data Pd(t1), indicated at regular intervals at a first point in time with t1 (block 8), are used to calculate a gun aiming point SPR(t1) for weapon system 3 (block 9). For this purpose, by means of a target trajectory model and an initial estimation of a time of flight TS(t1) of a projectile to be fired from weapon system 3, a future target position after this time of flight is calculated (block 10). This future hitting point TP(t1) calculated at a first point in time t1 is converted by means of data concerning the position Pp of the platform to a relative future hitting point TPR(t1) with respect for the platform (block 11). Subsequently, a model of the projectile trajectory is used to make a new calculation (block 12) of the projectile time of flight TS(t1), which calculation is used as an improved estimation of the projectile time of flight in the new calculation of the future hitting point TP(t1). If, after this reiteration, the relative future hitting point TPR(t1) is calculated sufficiently accurately, a relative gun aiming point SPR(t1) for weapon system 3 is calculated (block 12) by means of the projectile trajectory model. The projectile trajectory model uses stored ballistic and meteorological data B and M (blocks 12a and 12b).
  • When using the control device in a normal weapon control mode, indicated by control signal S ¯
    Figure imgb0001
    1, the calculated relative gun aiming point SPR(t1) is converted to platform coordinates by means of data concerning the orientation Sp of the platform (block 13). On the basis of the converted gun aiming point, control signals are generated (block 13) for aiming means 14a which aim a launching system 14b.
  • Use of the control device in a mode suitable for assessment of the aiming of the weapon system at the target according to the invention is indicated with control signal S1. In this mode, at time t1, weapon system 3 is not controlled on the basis of gun aiming point SPR(t1), but on the basis of a previously calculated and stored (block 19) hitting point TPR(t2), which is valid at the present time t1. Time t2 relates to the point in time at which this hitting point was calculated.
  • For this purpose, at certain intervals, the calculated future hitting points TP(t1), a time validity TTP(t1) corresponding with this hitting point and the point in time t1 at which these data were calculated, are stored in a memory (block 15) during a certain period of time. The time validity TTP(t1) is obtained by adding to t1 the corresponding projectile time of flight TS(t1). This memory consists of a cyclic buffer whose cycle time is longer than the longest expected projectile time of flight. In order to find the present hitting point TP(t2) valid at time t1, two hitting points TP(t′) and TP(t˝) are taken from the memory in which the future hitting points are stored, together with the corresponding time validity TTP(t′) and TTP(t˝) for which t′ < t1 ≤ t˝ (blocks 15 and 16). The present hitting point TP(t2), together with the time validity of t1, is calculated by means of a linear interpolation between hitting points TP(t′) and TP(t˝) (block 16).
  • The above-described method of interpolation is simple and hence requires less computing time than extensive methods of interpolation. If a higher accuracy is required, it is also possible to use non-linear interpolation between more than two hitting points.
  • Instead of storing the calculated hitting points TP(t1), an embodiment may also store, during a particular time, the target trajectory data Pd(t1) or data derived thereof. The present hitting point calculation will then have to be carried out at a time t1, on the basis of the stored target trajectory data which were valid at an earlier time t2.
  • The present hitting points TP(t2) are converted by means of data Pp, relating to the position of the platform (block 16a), to present hitting points TFR(t2) relative to the position of the platform. These relative present hitting points TPR(t2) are subsequently converted (block 13) by means of data Sp, relating to the orientation of the platform, to a coordinate system connected to the platform for the purpose of generating control signals for continuous aiming of weapon system 3 at these present hitting points.
  • A launching system 14b in the form of a gun has, for the purpose of the use of the control device in mode S1, been provided with a well-known barrel camera 17 for aligning the gun. Equipment 18, processing the barrel camera video to check the alignment with a target sensor in the form of radar apparatus, is used in mode S1 to assess the aiming of the gun.
  • A difference between the present hitting point and the present target position as visible on video 18 from barrel camera 17 may subsequently be further processed in various ways. In the embodiment described, the video information is continuously supplied to a user for assessment, which user is able to obtain an impression of the operation of the weapon control system.
  • Another embodiment is obtained when assessment is automated by the calculation of quality values, such as hitting probability, by means of data concerning dispersion relating to the trajectory, effectiveness of the projectile and target dimensions. An embodiment including a barrel camera 17 is, strictly speaking, not required if the orientation of the gun has been calculated accurately enough. This orientation can be measured by the said readers, such as synchros, and compared by the control device with the stale hitting points.
  • Fig. 2 shows an embodiment of a control device in an application in a similar weapon control system which, for the purpose of aiming at the present hitting points, has been fitted with a second target sensor 22 provided with its own aiming means 20. The control device 2 is executed in such a way that, besides conversion of gun aiming points (block 13), simultaneous conversion of present hitting points is executed (block 21). In this embodiment, the second target sensor is coupled in mode S1 to the control device and continuously aimed at the present hitting points. In mode S ¯
    Figure imgb0002
    1, the second target sensor is available for another weapon control channel 23.
  • The weapon control systems according to Figs. 1 and 2 are intended for mounting on a fixed platform. In the most simple embodiment, platform sensors 4 consist of means for once-only determination of the platform data relating to orientation Sp and position Pp. In a simpler embodiment, a distinction between earth-oriented coordinates and coordinates determined by the platform is not required. Conversion from and to relative coordinates is therefore no longer necessary.
  • Fig. 3 shows an embodiment of a control device applied in a weapon control system suitable for mounting on a moving platform. Platform sensors 4 continuously supply data relating to orientation Sp, data relating to position Pp, but also data relating to the own velocity Vp of the platform. The platform sensors 4 may consist of well-known gyro's, acceleration and velocity meters. The control device 2, by means of data relating to position Pp and velocity Vp of the platform, calculates the displacement of the platform at certain intervals at points in time indicated with t1 (block 24). Position Pp(t1) at this time, velocity Vp(t1) at this time and the time t1 are stored in a memory (block 25) during a certain period of time. This memory is executed as cyclic memory of which the cycle time exceeds the maximum expected projectile time of flight. Subsequently, the present hitting point TP(t2) (block 19) corresponding with a time t1 is corrected (block 16a) for own displacement ΔPp(t2) of the platform from time t2 till time t1. To determine this own displacement, two stored platform positions Pp(t′) and Pp(t˝) are retrieved from memory 25, with t′ < t2 < t˝ (block 26). Subsequently, the platform displacement ΔPp(t2) as from time t2 is found by linear interpolation between these platform positions (block 26).
  • It should finally be stated that this description does not include the processing times required for data processing and measurement in order to avoid unnecessarily complicating the description.

Claims (6)

  1. Assessment device for assessment of the hitting probability of a gun system (14b) comprising a control device (2) suitable for application with the gun system (14b), for generating control signals with which at least one projectile can be manoeuvred towards a target by aiming the gun (14b) in a certain direction and where, for the purpose of generating the said control signals, the control device (2) is provided with present target position signals obtained with a first sensor (1), characterised in that the assessment device comprises an electro-optic sensor (17) mounted on the gun (14b), that signals representing a predicted hitting point between the at least one projectile and the target, presently valid and calculated in the past from the said present target position signals, are used by the control device (2) for continuously pointing the gun by means of the said control signals such that the electro-optic sensor (17) is substantially pointed onto the said predicted hitting point, and that actual target position signals provided by the electro-optic sensor (17) are made available for indicating the actual target position relative to the said predicted hitting point at each time the target should arrive at the said predicted hitting point.
  2. Assessment device as claimed in claim 1, where the control device (2) is suitable for mounting on a moving platform (4) and where the control device is provided with platform signals containing information on the orientation, velocity and position of the platform with respect to a reference coordinate system, characterised in that the control device (2) by means of the platform signals continuously calculates the displacement of the platform and stores these displacement values during at least a certain time span in a memory (25).
  3. Assessment device as claimed in claim 2, characterised in that the control device continuously corrects the predicted position signals for the present orientation and the displacement of the platform during a certain time span with respect to the reference coordinate system.
  4. Assessment device as claimed in one of the above claims, where the projectile is executed as a projectile correctable by the control device, characterised in that the control device calculates a future maximum interception area of the projectile with the target and the control device is provided with signals representing the present interception area calculated a certain time span ago and relating to the present.
  5. Method for assessment of the hitting probability of a gun system (14b) wherein control signals are generated with which at least one projectile can be manoeuvred towards a target by aiming the gun (14b) in a certain direction and where the said control signals are generated on the basis of present target position signals obtained with a first sensor (1), characterised in that an electro-optic sensor (17) is mounted on the gun (14b), that signals representing a predicted hitting point between the at least one projectile and the target, presently valid and calculated in the past from the said present target position signals, are used for calculating the said control signals such that the electro-optic sensor (17) is substantially pointed onto the said predicted hitting point, and that actual target position signals provided by the electro-optic sensor (17) are made available for indicating the actual target position relative to the said predicted hitting point at each time the target should arrive at the said predicted hitting point.
  6. Method as claimed in claim 5 for application on a moving platform, where use is made of platform signals containing information on orientation, velocity and position of the platform with respect to a reference coordinate system, characterised in that the displacement of the platform is continuously calculated on the basis of the platform signals, and the displacement values are stored at least during a time span needed for a projectile to reach the predicted hitting point.
EP89201478A 1988-06-21 1989-06-08 Device and method for control of a weapon system Expired - Lifetime EP0347968B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL8801576 1988-06-21
NL8801576A NL8801576A (en) 1988-06-21 1988-06-21 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A WEAPON SYSTEM.

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0347968A1 EP0347968A1 (en) 1989-12-27
EP0347968B1 true EP0347968B1 (en) 1996-10-30

Family

ID=19852494

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP89201478A Expired - Lifetime EP0347968B1 (en) 1988-06-21 1989-06-08 Device and method for control of a weapon system

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0347968B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH0244197A (en)
DE (1) DE68927395T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2094727T3 (en)
NL (1) NL8801576A (en)
NO (1) NO892538L (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL9500285A (en) * 1995-02-16 1996-10-01 Hollandse Signaalapparaten Bv Fire control system.

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3848509A (en) * 1972-10-31 1974-11-19 Us Navy Closed-loop gun control system
FR2378318A1 (en) * 1977-01-21 1978-08-18 Thomson Csf MOBILE TARGET TRACKING SYSTEM
NL7905061A (en) * 1979-06-29 1980-12-31 Hollandse Signaalapparaten Bv METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATIC MEASUREMENT OF AIMING ERRORS AND IMPROVING GUIDE VALUES IN SHOOTING AND AIMING BALLISTIC WEAPONS AGAINST MOVING TARGETS.
US4320287A (en) * 1980-01-25 1982-03-16 Lockheed Electronics Co., Inc. Target vehicle tracking apparatus
GB2095799A (en) * 1981-03-27 1982-10-06 Baasch Hans An aiming device for use in firing at moving targets
DE3128761C2 (en) * 1981-07-21 1986-01-02 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München Fire control device for an air defense system
US4647759A (en) * 1983-07-07 1987-03-03 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Fire control apparatus for a laser weapon
EP0207521B1 (en) * 1985-07-04 1989-09-27 Contraves Ag Target measurement system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0347968A1 (en) 1989-12-27
DE68927395D1 (en) 1996-12-05
NO892538D0 (en) 1989-06-19
NO892538L (en) 1989-12-22
DE68927395T2 (en) 1997-05-15
JPH0244197A (en) 1990-02-14
ES2094727T3 (en) 1997-02-01
NL8801576A (en) 1990-01-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3955292A (en) Apparatus for antiaircraft gunnery practice with laser emissions
US6247259B1 (en) Method and apparatus for fire control
US6386879B1 (en) Precision gunnery simulator system and method
EP0116183A1 (en) Pulse radar apparatus
EP1696198A1 (en) Method and system for fire simulation
GB2037957A (en) Shot simulators using laser light for simulating shooting of light guided missiles
JPH0124275B2 (en)
KR100928754B1 (en) Method and apparatus for determining aiming error of weapon system and use of this apparatus
KR100925404B1 (en) 3D-position tracking system and apparatus, and method thereof
GB2107835A (en) Correcting, from one shot to the next, the firing of a weapon
GB2032072A (en) Weapon training systems
US20080160486A1 (en) Simulation system and method for determining the compass bearing of directing means of a virtual projectile/missile firing device
CA2023659A1 (en) Method and apparatus for improving the accuracy of fire
GB2506733A (en) Method for determining the probability of hitting a target with a shot, and for displaying the determined probability in an aiming device
US20060073439A1 (en) Simulation system, method and computer program
EP0009984B1 (en) System for controlling the dispersion pattern of a gun
KR100917932B1 (en) Method and device for judging the aiming error of a weapon system and use of the device
US3965582A (en) Gunnery practice method and apparatus
EP0347968B1 (en) Device and method for control of a weapon system
US20220049931A1 (en) Device and method for shot analysis
AU754674B2 (en) Shooting simulation method
EP1580516A1 (en) Device and method for evaluating the aiming behaviour of a weapon
AU2018221607B2 (en) Device and method for registering a hit on a target
RU2190822C2 (en) Method for provision of aimed fire on the tank flank move
Dwyer et al. Improved laser ranging using video tracking

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900609

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: HOLLANDSE SIGNAALAPPARATEN B.V.

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19920828

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: BARZANO' E ZANARDO ROMA S.P.A.

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 68927395

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19961205

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: ISLER & PEDRAZZINI AG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2094727

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19990517

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19990518

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19990528

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 19990601

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19990602

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19990615

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19990616

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19990623

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000608

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000609

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 20000609

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000630

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000630

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000630

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: HOLLANDSE SIGNAALAPPARATEN B.V.

Effective date: 20000630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20010101

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20000608

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 89201478.8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20010228

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20010101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20010403

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20020204

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050608