EP0301812A2 - Improved vehicle detector method and system - Google Patents

Improved vehicle detector method and system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0301812A2
EP0301812A2 EP88306887A EP88306887A EP0301812A2 EP 0301812 A2 EP0301812 A2 EP 0301812A2 EP 88306887 A EP88306887 A EP 88306887A EP 88306887 A EP88306887 A EP 88306887A EP 0301812 A2 EP0301812 A2 EP 0301812A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
count
sample
value
loop
call
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP88306887A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0301812A3 (en
Inventor
Thomas Ray Potter
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Detector Systems Inc
Original Assignee
Detector Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Detector Systems Inc filed Critical Detector Systems Inc
Publication of EP0301812A2 publication Critical patent/EP0301812A2/en
Publication of EP0301812A3 publication Critical patent/EP0301812A3/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/01Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled
    • G08G1/042Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled using inductive or magnetic detectors

Definitions

  • This invention relates to vehicle detector systems of the type employing period shift measurement.
  • Vehicle detector systems which em­ploy the principles of period shift measurement in or­der to determine the presence of a vehicle in or adja­cent to an inductive loop mounted on or in a roadway.
  • a first oscillator which typically operates in the range from about 20 to about 50 Khz, is used to produce a periodic signal in a vehicle detector loop.
  • a second oscillator operating at a much higher frequency is commonly used to generate a sample count signal over a fixed number of loop cycles.
  • the rela­tively high frequency count signal is typically used to increment a counter which stores a number corresponding to the sample count at the end of the fixed number of loop cycles. This sample count is compared with a ref­erence count representative of a previous count in order to determine whether a vehicle has entered or departed the region of the loop.
  • the initial reference value is obtained from a sample count and stored in a reference counter. There­after, successive sample counts are obtained on a peri­odic basis, and compared with the reference count. If the two values are essentially equal, the condition of the loop remains unchanged, i.e., a vehicle has not entered the loop. However, if the two numbers differ by at least a threshold amount in a first direction (termed the Call direction), the condition of the loop has changed and may signify that a vehicle has entered the loop.
  • this change signifies that the period of the loop signal has decreased (since few­er counts were accumulated during the fixed number of loop cycles), which in turn indicates that the frequen­cy of the loop signal has increased, usually due to the presence of the vehicle in or near the loop.
  • the vehicle detector generates a signal termed a call signal indicating the presence of a vehicle in the loop.
  • this condition indicates that a vehicle which was formerly located in or near the loop has left the vicinity.
  • a previously generated call signal is dropped.
  • the call signals are used in a wide variety of applications, including vehicle counting along a roadway or through a parking entrance or exit, vehicle speed between preselected points along a roadway, vehi­cle presence at an intersection controlled by a traffic control light system or in a parking stall, and numer­ous other applications.
  • vehicle counting along a roadway or through a parking entrance or exit vehicle speed between preselected points along a roadway, vehi­cle presence at an intersection controlled by a traffic control light system or in a parking stall, and numer­ous other applications.
  • the loop wire, connecting cables and associated electronic ana­log circuitry are typically subject to widely varying temperature conditions, which cause the frequency of the loop signal to vary in a somewhat unpredictable manner.
  • the reference is slow strictlyly adjusted (typically once every 2 seconds) after tak­ing the sample count by examining the difference be­tween the sample count and the reference and (a) dec­rementing the reference by one count when the sample count is less than the reference and (b) incrementing the reference by one count whenever the sample count exceeds the reference.
  • This technique suffers from several disadvantages. Firstly, while the slow track­ing of the loop drift afforded by this approach from the No Call to Call direction is desirable, it is high strictlyly undesirable in the opposite direction (i.e., the Call to No Call direction).
  • the count sample in order to register a call from the No Call condition, the count sample must be smaller than the reference value by a threshold amount.
  • This threshold amount is necessary in order to avoid jitter around zero and sample count changes due to vi­bration of vehicles in or adjacent the loop, which can cause slight changes in the sample count value.
  • vehicle detector sys­tems have been designed with fixed hysteresis for the Call/No Call conditions.
  • two thresholds have been employed: A first threshold of 8 counts between the reference value and the sample count in the No Call to Call direction, and a second value of 5 counts in the Call to No Call direction.
  • the invention comprises a method for updating a reference count in a vehicle de­tector system having a loop subject to ambient induc­tance changes which substantially reduces adverse noise effects, prevents false operation of the detector system in the presence of a shorted or open loop condition, and enables automatic recovery of the vehicle detector system when an open or shorted loop self- corrects.
  • the method is performed by generat­ing a sample count representative of loop inductance, comparing the sample count with a reference count, and replacing the reference count with the sample count whenever the sample count exceeds the reference count for a predetermined time period. In this embodiment, when the sample count first exceeds the reference count, a timer is started.
  • the timer period is selectable between two different values to provide flexibility of operation for the system in dif­ferent applications.
  • the successive comparisons between the sample counts and the reference count are conducted for a predeter­mined number of samples. If each sample count exceeds the reference count for the predetermined number of samples, the reference count is updated to the value of the most recent sample. If any one of the sample counts does not exceed the reference count before the predeter­mined number of sample counts is taken, the counter measuring the number of sample counts is reset to zero and the method begins anew.
  • the number of samples taken before permitting updating of the reference count is selectable between two different values to provide flexibility for the vehicle detector system in a wide variety of appli­cations.
  • the detection of an open or shorted loop condition overrides the con­ditional updating of the reference and freezes the ref­erence value until such time as the open or shorted condition is corrected.
  • This is effected by preventing replacement of the reference count with a sample count whenever the sample count differs from the reference count by a predetermined threshold value which is sub­stantially larger than any expected short term change in the value of the sample count due to the presence or absence of a vehicle in the loop.
  • this freeze threshold is set at ⁇ 12.5% of the current reference count.
  • the two embodiments noted above for updating the reference are combined with additional method steps for controlling the updating of the reference count.
  • a guard band is provided at the zero difference threshold between the sample count and reference count to elimi­nate jitter and vibratory effects, the guard band pref­erably comprising three counts.
  • gradual tracking of the reference count in the call direction is provided by decrementing the reference count in a preselected manner whenever the value of the sample count minus the reference count is less than zero.
  • the combined effect of the conditional reference updating in the no call direction, the guard band and the gradual tracking in the call direction provides fast tracking in the No Call direction while substantially eliminat­ing adverse noise effects, suspension of the reference updating process in the presence of an open or shorted loop while allowing return of the detector system to normal operation if the open or shorted condition self-­corrects (or is otherwise corrected), a substantial reduction of jitter and vibratory noise effects, and gradual tracking of the reference count in the call direction.
  • variable hysteresis is provided for the Call/No Call signal gen­eration by including in the vehicle detector system means for enabling the selection of at least two dif­ferent threshold values required to establish a call condition.
  • This aspect of the invention enables a sin­gle vehicle detector to be used in a wide variety of applications requiring different call condition estab­lishing parameters.
  • Fig. 1 is a plot of the value of sample count minus reference count which illustrates the manner in which the reference count in a vehicle detector is maintained or updated.
  • the reference count is a numerical value stored in a counter in the vehicle detector system and is representative of either an initial or a recent value of the inductive state of the vehicle detector loop.
  • the sample count is a numerical value stored in a coun­ter which is obtained by gating the output of a high speed oscillator to the input of the sample counter for a preselected number of loop oscillator cycles. After the sample counter has been incremented by the high frequency oscillator for the predetermined number of loop oscillator cycles, the sample counter is disabled and the contents thereof are compared with the contents of the reference counter. After the comparison is com­pleted, the sample counter is reset and subsequently enabled to accumulate another sample.
  • the zero reference level corresponds to equal values of the sam­ple count and the reference count. Regions above the zero level represent positive values of the difference obtained by subtracting the reference count from the sample count, while regions below the zero level repre­sent negative values of this difference.
  • the reference In the numer­ical range from 0 to +3, representing a guard band to filter out the jitter and vibration induced changes in the value of the sample count, the reference is main­tained, i.e., is not updated.
  • positive regions ex­tending from +3 to the value designated +12.5% condi­tional updating of the reference count is permitted.
  • the manner in which the conditional reference updating is conducted in this positive region varies in accor­dance with the two specific embodiments.
  • the updating proceeds as follows. The first time that the sample count minus reference count dif­ference exceeds the value of +3, a timer is started.
  • the timer has a predetermined time out period which is preselected. Each time that a subsequent sample count minus reference count difference lies in the range be­tween the +3 value and the value designated +12.5%, the operation of the timer is not affected. Thus, the tim­er continues to run while several successive difference measurements are obtained.
  • the timer times out, the value of the last sample count is placed in the reference counter so that the reference count assumes the value of that sample count. If during the opera­tion of the timer any difference value does not exceed the value of +3, the timer is stopped and reset to zero. The timer remains at zero until the next difference value exceeds the value of +3, at which time the timer is restarted.
  • the conditional reference updating is performed using a number of samples counter.
  • This counter accumulates the number of times a sample count is taken or the num­ber of difference measurements taken and is started whenever the value of the sample count minus the refer­ence count exceeds the value of +3.
  • the number of samples counter is incremented by one. After a predetermined number of samples has been consecutively taken and the difference value for each sample count has exceeded the value of +3, the value of the most recent sample count is set into the reference counter to update the refer­ence count. If any difference value does not exceed the value of +3 during this process, the number of sam­ples counter is reset to zero and the process is re­started.
  • the conditional reference process is aborted and the reference count is frozen in the reference counter until such time as a new difference value drops below this upper limit.
  • the region beyond +12.5% is considered to represent an open loop condition under which the vehicle detector system is inoperable.
  • the above described operation of the refer­ence count conditional updating in the No Call direc­tion provides for relatively fast updating of the ref­erence count, when permitted, but filters out jitter, vibration induced changes in the sample count, and noise pulses present in the vehicle detector loop.
  • the freeze reference operation preserves the last valid reference count before the open loop condition occurred, which permits resumption of normal operation if the open self-corrects (or is otherwise corrected).
  • the operation of the reference updating meth­od in the call direction proceeds as follows. Whenever the sample count minus reference count value is below zero, the reference counter is decremented in a prese­lected manner by a predetermined value (preferably one count) until the sample count minus the reference count is zero or greater.
  • a predetermined value preferably one count
  • the manner in which the decrement­ing is performed depends on two different operator se­lected parameters: Mode and sensitivity, and on the value of the sample count minus the reference count.
  • sample count minus reference count exceeds the -12.5% boundary value, which represents a shorted loop condi­tion
  • the value of the reference count is frozen. This preserves the last valid reference count established before the shorted loop condition occurred. If the shorted loop condition self-corrects (or is otherwise corrected), the decrementing of the reference count in the call direction is automatically resumed.
  • the 12, 5% count boundaries are representative numerical values only, and that other percentage boundaries may be selected, if desired. In one specific embodiment of the inven­tion, for example, boundaries of 10% have been selected. Other values may be employed, as desired.
  • the freeze reference boundary value should be substan­tially beyond the expected difference values experi­enced when a vehicle leaves a vehicle detector loop (in the No Call direction) or when a vehicle enters a vehi­cle detector loop (in the Call direction).
  • the vehicle detector is provided with a selectable tim­ing period of either 100 or 500 m sec., so that a single vehicle detector may be used in a wide variety of appli­cations.
  • a value of 5 for the required number of successive samples which provide measured difference values lying in the permitted range of +3 to +12.5% has been found to provide best results in traffic control applications; while a value of 128 has been found most useful for parking lot applications.
  • Other values may be selected, as desired.
  • the vehicle de­tector may be provided with means for selecting the value of more than one number of threshold sample counts (e.g., 5 or 128) so that the vehicle detector may be used in a wide variety of applications.
  • Fig. 1 also illustrates another aspect of the invention in which variable hysteresis is provided for the Call/No Call operation.
  • the sample count minus reference count value in order to register a call the sample count minus reference count value must equal or be more negative than a predetermined negative thres­hold value, which is selectable. In one state, this value is -8 (designated with the legend TURN ON CALL). In another state this value is -12 (designated with the legend ALTERNATE TURN ON CALL). In order to extinguish a call the sample count minus reference count difference is tested against a different threshold -5 (designated with the legend TURN OFF CALL).
  • the ALTERNATE TURN ON CALL threshold of -12 When the ALTERNATE TURN ON CALL threshold of -12 is selected, a call signal is not generated until the sample count minus reference count difference value is -12 or below, and the call signal is not extinguished until the sample count minus reference count difference value is -5 or above. This provides a hysteresis band of seven sample counts which is broader than that afforded by the first turn on call threshold of -8.
  • the TURN ON CALL threshold can be selected by the operator to tailor the operation of the vehicle detector to a specific application. In general, the -8 TURN ON CALL threshold has been found to provide best results with traffic control applications, while the alternate TURN ON CALL threshold of -12 has been found to provide superior results with sliding gate and park­ing lot control applications.
  • Mode setting There are seven different Mode settings and eight different sensitivity settings. Seven Mode set­tings and each Sensitivity setting specify a decrement­ing period which determines the rate at which the ref­erence count is decremented in the call direction. The time at which decrementing begins depends upon the neg­ative range in which the sample count minus reference count difference lies and the mode setting. For values between zero and the TURN ON Call threshold, decrement­ing is controlled as follows: where N is determined by sensitivity setting as fol­lows: For values below the TURN ON Call threshold, decrement­ing is controlled as follows: Mode 0 - wait 2 seconds after Call starts, if call persists, set reference count equal to sample count.
  • Mode 2 wait 4 minutes after Call starts, if call persists, decrement reference count every 2 seconds.
  • Mode 3 wait 4 minutes after Call starts, if call persists, decrement reference count every 4 seconds.
  • Mode 4 wait 4 minutes after Call starts, if call persists, decrement reference count every 8 seconds.
  • Mode 5 wait 4 minutes after Call starts, if call persists, decrement reference count every 16 seconds.
  • Mode 6 wait 4 minutes after Call starts, if call persists, then decrement reference count every N seconds, where N is determined by the sensitivity setting in accordance with the above sensitivity table.
  • Mode 1 decrement reference count every N seconds, where N is determined by the sensi­tivity setting in accordance with the above sensitivity table.
  • the reference count is immediately decremented when the call signal is ex­tinguished, provided that the sample count minus the reference count is still negative.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates in schematic form a micro­processor based vehicle detector incorporating the tim­er based conditional reference updating, the freeze reference technique, the guard band, alternate turn on call threshold and Call direction reference decrement­ing aspects of the invention described above.
  • a microprocessor 12 preferably a type 8751 microprocessor, is provided with a real time clock input derived from an AC source via a transformer 14, a capacitor 15 and a gate circuit 16 coupled to port 3.2 of the microprocessor 12.
  • a loop oscillator 18 provid­ing a nominal loop frequency in the range from about 20 to about 50 Khz drives a vehicle detector loop (not shown) via transformer circuit 19.
  • the loop frequency is coupled via a gate 20, which functions as a Schmitt trigger to square up the sinusoidal loop signal, into the clock input of a loop count flipflop 21, the output of which is coupled to port 3.5 of the microprocessor 12 as a loop count reference signal.
  • a high frequency 12 Mhz crystal oscillator circuit 22 provides a high frequency counting signal via a gate 23 to the input of an external sample counter 24, which is preferably a type 74HC4024 integrated circuit.
  • the Q1-Q5 outputs of circuit 24 are coupled to the D0-D4 and T0 (3.4) input ports of the microprocessor 12.
  • Internal to micropro­cessor 12 are additional counter stages for configuring the sample count register in conjunction with external circuit 24.
  • the high frequency counting signal produced by crystal oscillator circuit 22 is gated by a control flipflop 26, which is enabled by the presence of a run signal at the D input thereto latched by a clock signal provided from flipflop 21.
  • the run signal is generated by the microprocessor.
  • a plurality of strobe lines emanating from ports 1.3-1.7 of microprocessor 12 are connected to individual rows of a cross point matrix 30, the columns of which are coupled to input ports 2.0-2.7 of micro­processor 12 and provide operator selectable data in­puts for extension times, delay times, mode, presence and sensitivity values.
  • the magnitude of the time out period for conditional reference updating i.e., 100 or 500 m sec.
  • the default value is 100 m sec., while 500 m sec. can be selected by inserting the diode in the matrix.
  • the value of the selectable hysteresis for the Call/No Call signal gen­eration is selected by bit 7 of the mode row of matrix 30 (i.e., the input to port 2.7).
  • the default value is -8, while the -12 value can be selected by inserting the diode.
  • a delay/extension inhibit circuit 33 has a pair of input terminals 34, 35 coupled to the green light circuit, of the associated traffic control system, a delay inhibit terminal connected to port 3.6 of micro­processor 12 and an extension inhibit terminal coupled to port 3.7 of microprocessor 12.
  • a fail interrogate switch 36 is coupled to port 0.5 of microprocessor 12 which permits an operator to interrogate an internal flag bit which is set when­ever a loop fail condition is sensed by the micropro­cessor 12.
  • a power on reset gate 38 has an input coupled to a zener diode via circuitry within a loop oscillator circuit 18 and an output coupled to the reset input of microprocessor 12 and functions to reset the micropro­cessor upon power up and whenever the operating voltage for the system drops below a threshold value set by the zener diode 40.
  • a call indicator diode 41 is driven from port 1.0 of microprocessor 12 via a driving transistor 42, which is preferably a type 2N3904 transistor.
  • a true presence output circuit 43 is driven from port 1.1 of microprocessor 12, while a conditioned presence circuit 44 is driven by port 1.2 of micropro­cessor 12.
  • FIG. 2 A complete software listing for the system shown in Fig. 2 is incorporated in Appendix A.
  • the system described in the software and the hardware of Fig. 2 implements the timer based conditional reference count update embodiment.
  • the software In order to implement the number of sample counts conditional reference count update embodiment, the software must be reconfigured to provide a number of samples counter, and the 2.6/mode bit is used to specify the alternate number of thresh­old sample counts (i.e., either 5 or 128). Such changes are well within the capability of one of ordinary skill in the art.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)

Abstract

In an inductive loop vehicle detector, a sample count which depends on the loop inductance is compared with a reference count in producing a detection signal. In order to take account of loop drift, the reference count is replaced with the sample count when the difference therebetween indicates drift for a predetermined period of time.

Description

  • A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copy­right protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to vehicle detector systems of the type employing period shift measurement.
  • Vehicle detector systems are known which em­ploy the principles of period shift measurement in or­der to determine the presence of a vehicle in or adja­cent to an inductive loop mounted on or in a roadway. In such systems, a first oscillator, which typically operates in the range from about 20 to about 50 Khz, is used to produce a periodic signal in a vehicle detector loop. A second oscillator operating at a much higher frequency is commonly used to generate a sample count signal over a fixed number of loop cycles. The rela­tively high frequency count signal is typically used to increment a counter which stores a number corresponding to the sample count at the end of the fixed number of loop cycles. This sample count is compared with a ref­erence count representative of a previous count in order to determine whether a vehicle has entered or departed the region of the loop.
  • The initial reference value is obtained from a sample count and stored in a reference counter. There­after, successive sample counts are obtained on a peri­odic basis, and compared with the reference count. If the two values are essentially equal, the condition of the loop remains unchanged, i.e., a vehicle has not entered the loop. However, if the two numbers differ by at least a threshold amount in a first direction (termed the Call direction), the condition of the loop has changed and may signify that a vehicle has entered the loop. More specifically, in a system in which the sample count has decreased and the sample count has a numerical value less than the reference count by at least a threshold magnitude this change signifies that the period of the loop signal has decreased (since few­er counts were accumulated during the fixed number of loop cycles), which in turn indicates that the frequen­cy of the loop signal has increased, usually due to the presence of the vehicle in or near the loop. When these conditions exist, the vehicle detector generates a signal termed a call signal indicating the presence of a vehicle in the loop.
  • Correspondingly, if the difference between a sample count and the reference count is greater than a second threshold amount, (i.e., the sample count plus a second threshold amount is larger than the reference count), this condition indicates that a vehicle which was formerly located in or near the loop has left the vicinity. When this condition obtains, a previously generated call signal is dropped.
  • The call signals are used in a wide variety of applications, including vehicle counting along a roadway or through a parking entrance or exit, vehicle speed between preselected points along a roadway, vehi­cle presence at an intersection controlled by a traffic control light system or in a parking stall, and numer­ous other applications. In all applications, it is necessary to periodically update the reference value so that the vehicle detector system can be dynamically adjusted to varying conditions. For example, the loop wire, connecting cables and associated electronic ana­log circuitry are typically subject to widely varying temperature conditions, which cause the frequency of the loop signal to vary in a somewhat unpredictable manner. If the loop frequency drifts between sample periods by an amount equivalent to the period threshold count in the Call direction, a false call will be de­tected (since the sample count will be less than the reference count by the threshold value), even though no vehicle has actually entered the loop. This false call will be manifested by a green light in the lane con­trolled by the detector issuing the false call, even though no vehicle is present in that lane. This is clearly highly undesirable as it adversely affects ve­hicle flow through a controlled system.
  • In the past, the problem of loop frequency drift has been addressed by a number of techniques. According to one known technique, the reference is slow­ly adjusted (typically once every 2 seconds) after tak­ing the sample count by examining the difference be­tween the sample count and the reference and (a) dec­rementing the reference by one count when the sample count is less than the reference and (b) incrementing the reference by one count whenever the sample count exceeds the reference. This technique suffers from several disadvantages. Firstly, while the slow track­ing of the loop drift afforded by this approach from the No Call to Call direction is desirable, it is high­ly undesirable in the opposite direction (i.e., the Call to No Call direction). This is principally due to the fact that, starting with the Call condition the reference is decremented to an artificially low value (typically 100 counts or more below the previous No Call reference value). If the vehicle which generated the call leaves the loop and another vehicle enters the loop, this new Call condition will not be detected, since the new sample count will not be less than the current reference value until the reference is incre­mented by the testing threshold amount (which would take many cycles). As a result, the newly entered vehicle will not be serviced by the traffic control system (i.e., issuance of a green).
  • In an attempt to avoid this disadvantage, a modification of this first technique has been developed which decrements the reference (typically once every 2 seconds) when the sample count is less than the refer­ence value (the same as the decrementing in the first technique), but which changes the reference to the sam­ple count whenever the sample count exceeds the current reference value. This technique introduces another disadvantage. Specifically, when a noise pulse is gen­erated in the loop which causes the sample count to erroneously rise in value by a significant amount, which is a common occurrence, the new reference value is in­correctly set to an artificially high value. When the noise disappears (typically before the next sample count is taken), the new sample count drops back to the nomi­nal No Call value, which causes a false call to be regis­tered, with the observable disadvantages noted above. Further, since the reference is only decremented (typi­cally once every 2 seconds) , it may take a long period of time (possible hours) for the reference to be read­justed to the nominal No Call value. During this peri­od of adjustment, false calls are registered for each successive sample, and false greens are issued for the same period of time, which totally disrupts the traffic control system.
  • Still further compounding this problem is the fact that an intermittent open loop can also disrupt the reference adjustment process by suddenly raising the loop inductance, which causes a corresponding in­crease in the sample count. For the case of a shorted loop, the reference value is gradually decremented to the extremely small value of the sample count regis­tered by the shorted loop during which time a false call will be registered. If the short self-corrects with a vehicle in the loop, the next sample count will exceed that of the invalid reference value and no call will be detected. The new reference will then be ad­justed to the sample count obtained with the vehicle. However, since no call will be generated so long as the vehicle remains in the loop, the vehicle will never obtain a green signal, which is highly undesirable.
  • As noted above, in order to register a call from the No Call condition, the count sample must be smaller than the reference value by a threshold amount. This threshold amount is necessary in order to avoid jitter around zero and sample count changes due to vi­bration of vehicles in or adjacent the loop, which can cause slight changes in the sample count value. In order to avoid these two effects, vehicle detector sys­tems have been designed with fixed hysteresis for the Call/No Call conditions. In one popular system, two thresholds have been employed: A first threshold of 8 counts between the reference value and the sample count in the No Call to Call direction, and a second value of 5 counts in the Call to No Call direction. Specifical­ly, in order to register a call the difference between the reference and the sample count must be at least 8; while to register a No Call from a Call condition the difference between the reference value and the sample count must be at least 5. While fixed hysteresis has been found useful, it suffers from the disadvantage that different applications optimally require different hysteresis values. For example, in traffic intersection control applications, the 8, 5 fixed hysteresis values function well. However, for parking applications in which the vehicle traffic moves quite slowly a vibrat­ing metal part on a vehicle (e.g, the bumper) causes vibration changes to the sample count which are greater than the three count difference in the 8, 5 fixed hyster­esis system. Consequently, for such applications greater hysteresis must be used, such as a difference of at least 12 for a call to be registered and a difference of five or less for the call to be extinguished. As a result of these differing hysteresis requirements, sys­tems in the past have been specially designed for spe­cific applications with fixed hysteresis, which requires a large number of different models of the same basic vehicle detector in order to meet consumer demands.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In a first aspect, the invention comprises a method for updating a reference count in a vehicle de­tector system having a loop subject to ambient induc­tance changes which substantially reduces adverse noise effects, prevents false operation of the detector system in the presence of a shorted or open loop condition, and enables automatic recovery of the vehicle detector system when an open or shorted loop self- corrects. In a first embodiment, the method is performed by generat­ing a sample count representative of loop inductance, comparing the sample count with a reference count, and replacing the reference count with the sample count whenever the sample count exceeds the reference count for a predetermined time period. In this embodiment, when the sample count first exceeds the reference count, a timer is started. Successive sample counts are taken and compared against the reference count. If each suc­cessive sample count exceeds the reference count up until the end of the timer period, the reference count is updated to the most recent sample count when the timer times out. If any sample count does not exceed the reference count while the timer is operating, the timer is stopped and reset. The timer is restarted thereafter whenever a sample count next exceeds the reference count. In one specific embodiment, the timer period is selectable between two different values to provide flexibility of operation for the system in dif­ferent applications.
  • In an alternate embodiment of the invention, the successive comparisons between the sample counts and the reference count are conducted for a predeter­mined number of samples. If each sample count exceeds the reference count for the predetermined number of samples, the reference count is updated to the value of the most recent sample. If any one of the sample counts does not exceed the reference count before the predeter­mined number of sample counts is taken, the counter measuring the number of sample counts is reset to zero and the method begins anew. In a specific embodiment of the invention, the number of samples taken before permitting updating of the reference count is selectable between two different values to provide flexibility for the vehicle detector system in a wide variety of appli­cations.
  • In both of the above embodiments, the detection of an open or shorted loop condition overrides the con­ditional updating of the reference and freezes the ref­erence value until such time as the open or shorted condition is corrected. This is effected by preventing replacement of the reference count with a sample count whenever the sample count differs from the reference count by a predetermined threshold value which is sub­stantially larger than any expected short term change in the value of the sample count due to the presence or absence of a vehicle in the loop. In one specific embod­iment, this freeze threshold is set at ± 12.5% of the current reference count.
  • In another aspect of the invention, the two embodiments noted above for updating the reference are combined with additional method steps for controlling the updating of the reference count. In particular, a guard band is provided at the zero difference threshold between the sample count and reference count to elimi­nate jitter and vibratory effects, the guard band pref­erably comprising three counts. In addition, gradual tracking of the reference count in the call direction is provided by decrementing the reference count in a preselected manner whenever the value of the sample count minus the reference count is less than zero. The combined effect of the conditional reference updating in the no call direction, the guard band and the gradual tracking in the call direction provides fast tracking in the No Call direction while substantially eliminat­ing adverse noise effects, suspension of the reference updating process in the presence of an open or shorted loop while allowing return of the detector system to normal operation if the open or shorted condition self-­corrects (or is otherwise corrected), a substantial reduction of jitter and vibratory noise effects, and gradual tracking of the reference count in the call direction.
  • In another aspect of the invention, variable hysteresis is provided for the Call/No Call signal gen­eration by including in the vehicle detector system means for enabling the selection of at least two dif­ferent threshold values required to establish a call condition. This aspect of the invention enables a sin­gle vehicle detector to be used in a wide variety of applications requiring different call condition estab­lishing parameters.
  • For a fuller understanding of the nature and advantages of the invention, reference should be had to the ensuing detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
    • Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating the several embodiments of the invention; and
    • Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a micropro­cessor implemented system incorporating the several embodiments of the invention.
    DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Turning now to the drawings, Fig. 1 is a plot of the value of sample count minus reference count which illustrates the manner in which the reference count in a vehicle detector is maintained or updated. It is understood that the reference count is a numerical value stored in a counter in the vehicle detector system and is representative of either an initial or a recent value of the inductive state of the vehicle detector loop. The sample count is a numerical value stored in a coun­ter which is obtained by gating the output of a high speed oscillator to the input of the sample counter for a preselected number of loop oscillator cycles. After the sample counter has been incremented by the high frequency oscillator for the predetermined number of loop oscillator cycles, the sample counter is disabled and the contents thereof are compared with the contents of the reference counter. After the comparison is com­pleted, the sample counter is reset and subsequently enabled to accumulate another sample.
  • As seen in Fig. 1, there are several numer­ical regions plotted on a vertical scale. The zero reference level corresponds to equal values of the sam­ple count and the reference count. Regions above the zero level represent positive values of the difference obtained by subtracting the reference count from the sample count, while regions below the zero level repre­sent negative values of this difference. In the numer­ical range from 0 to +3, representing a guard band to filter out the jitter and vibration induced changes in the value of the sample count, the reference is main­tained, i.e., is not updated. In positive regions ex­tending from +3 to the value designated +12.5%, condi­tional updating of the reference count is permitted. The manner in which the conditional reference updating is conducted in this positive region varies in accor­dance with the two specific embodiments.
  • In the first embodiment, which uses a timing function, the updating proceeds as follows. The first time that the sample count minus reference count dif­ference exceeds the value of +3, a timer is started. The timer has a predetermined time out period which is preselected. Each time that a subsequent sample count minus reference count difference lies in the range be­tween the +3 value and the value designated +12.5%, the operation of the timer is not affected. Thus, the tim­er continues to run while several successive difference measurements are obtained. When the timer times out, the value of the last sample count is placed in the reference counter so that the reference count assumes the value of that sample count. If during the opera­tion of the timer any difference value does not exceed the value of +3, the timer is stopped and reset to zero. The timer remains at zero until the next difference value exceeds the value of +3, at which time the timer is restarted.
  • In a second embodiment of the invention, the conditional reference updating is performed using a number of samples counter. This counter accumulates the number of times a sample count is taken or the num­ber of difference measurements taken and is started whenever the value of the sample count minus the refer­ence count exceeds the value of +3. For each succes­sive complete sample count taken, the number of samples counter is incremented by one. After a predetermined number of samples has been consecutively taken and the difference value for each sample count has exceeded the value of +3, the value of the most recent sample count is set into the reference counter to update the refer­ence count. If any difference value does not exceed the value of +3 during this process, the number of sam­ples counter is reset to zero and the process is re­started.
  • In both of the embodiments described above, if the value of the difference exceeds the upper limit of +12.5%, the conditional reference process is aborted and the reference count is frozen in the reference counter until such time as a new difference value drops below this upper limit. The region beyond +12.5% is considered to represent an open loop condition under which the vehicle detector system is inoperable.
  • The above described operation of the refer­ence count conditional updating in the No Call direc­tion provides for relatively fast updating of the ref­erence count, when permitted, but filters out jitter, vibration induced changes in the sample count, and noise pulses present in the vehicle detector loop. In addi­tion, the freeze reference operation preserves the last valid reference count before the open loop condition occurred, which permits resumption of normal operation if the open self-corrects (or is otherwise corrected).
  • The operation of the reference updating meth­od in the call direction proceeds as follows. Whenever the sample count minus reference count value is below zero, the reference counter is decremented in a prese­lected manner by a predetermined value (preferably one count) until the sample count minus the reference count is zero or greater. The manner in which the decrement­ing is performed depends on two different operator se­lected parameters: Mode and sensitivity, and on the value of the sample count minus the reference count. These operations are described in detail below and per­mit gradual tracking of the reference count in the call direction to follow long term drift of the loop induc­tance in the call direction. However, if the value of sample count minus reference count exceeds the -12.5% boundary value, which represents a shorted loop condi­tion, the value of the reference count is frozen. This preserves the last valid reference count established before the shorted loop condition occurred. If the shorted loop condition self-corrects (or is otherwise corrected), the decrementing of the reference count in the call direction is automatically resumed.
  • It should be understood that the 12, 5% count boundaries are representative numerical values only, and that other percentage boundaries may be selected, if desired. In one specific embodiment of the inven­tion, for example, boundaries of 10% have been selected. Other values may be employed, as desired. In general, the freeze reference boundary value should be substan­tially beyond the expected difference values experi­enced when a vehicle leaves a vehicle detector loop (in the No Call direction) or when a vehicle enters a vehi­cle detector loop (in the Call direction).
  • With respect to the timing embodiment described above, a value of 100 m sec. has been found suitable as a time out period for traffic control applications. For parking lot applications, a relatively longer time period is preferred, for example 500 m sec. In the specific embodiment of the invention described below, the vehicle detector is provided with a selectable tim­ing period of either 100 or 500 m sec., so that a single vehicle detector may be used in a wide variety of appli­cations.
  • In the number of samples counter embodiment described above, a value of 5 for the required number of successive samples which provide measured difference values lying in the permitted range of +3 to +12.5% has been found to provide best results in traffic control applications; while a value of 128 has been found most useful for parking lot applications. Other values may be selected, as desired. In addition, the vehicle de­tector may be provided with means for selecting the value of more than one number of threshold sample counts (e.g., 5 or 128) so that the vehicle detector may be used in a wide variety of applications.
  • Fig. 1 also illustrates another aspect of the invention in which variable hysteresis is provided for the Call/No Call operation. With reference to the neg­ative portion of the scale, in order to register a call the sample count minus reference count value must equal or be more negative than a predetermined negative thres­hold value, which is selectable. In one state, this value is -8 (designated with the legend TURN ON CALL). In another state this value is -12 (designated with the legend ALTERNATE TURN ON CALL). In order to extinguish a call the sample count minus reference count difference is tested against a different threshold -5 (designated with the legend TURN OFF CALL). When the first turn on call threshold of -8 is selected, and beginning with the No Call condition (sample count minus reference count value lying above the -8 value), whenever the sample count minus reference count value is -8 or below -8, a call signal is generated by the vehicle detector. Once the call signal has been generated, this signal will not be extinguished until the sample count minus reference count difference is -5 or above -5. This difference in the two threshold values provides a three count hysteresis band which filters out vibration induced changes in the sample count. When the ALTERNATE TURN ON CALL threshold of -12 is selected, a call signal is not generated until the sample count minus reference count difference value is -12 or below, and the call signal is not extinguished until the sample count minus reference count difference value is -5 or above. This provides a hysteresis band of seven sample counts which is broader than that afforded by the first turn on call threshold of -8. In the specific embodiment described below, the TURN ON CALL threshold can be selected by the operator to tailor the operation of the vehicle detector to a specific application. In general, the -8 TURN ON CALL threshold has been found to provide best results with traffic control applications, while the alternate TURN ON CALL threshold of -12 has been found to provide superior results with sliding gate and park­ing lot control applications.
  • As noted above, the manner in which the ref­erence count is decremented in the Call direction de­pends upon the difference value of the sample count minus the reference count, and two operator selected parameters: Mode and Sensitivity.
  • There are seven different Mode settings and eight different sensitivity settings. Seven Mode set­tings and each Sensitivity setting specify a decrement­ing period which determines the rate at which the ref­erence count is decremented in the call direction. The time at which decrementing begins depends upon the neg­ative range in which the sample count minus reference count difference lies and the mode setting. For values between zero and the TURN ON Call threshold, decrement­ing is controlled as follows:
    Figure imgb0001
    where N is determined by sensitivity setting as fol­lows:
    Figure imgb0002
    For values below the TURN ON Call threshold, decrement­ing is controlled as follows:
    Mode 0 - wait 2 seconds after Call starts, if call persists, set reference count equal to sample count.
    Mode 2 - wait 4 minutes after Call starts, if call persists, decrement reference count every 2 seconds.
    Mode 3 - wait 4 minutes after Call starts, if call persists, decrement reference count every 4 seconds.
    Mode 4 - wait 4 minutes after Call starts, if call persists, decrement reference count every 8 seconds.
    Mode 5 - wait 4 minutes after Call starts, if call persists, decrement reference count every 16 seconds.
    Mode 6 - wait 4 minutes after Call starts, if call persists, then decrement reference count every N seconds, where N is determined by the sensitivity setting in accordance with the above sensitivity table.
    Mode 1 - decrement reference count every N seconds, where N is determined by the sensi­tivity setting in accordance with the above sensitivity table.
  • If the call does not persist for 2 seconds in Mode 0 or 4 minutes in Modes 2-6, the reference count is immediately decremented when the call signal is ex­tinguished, provided that the sample count minus the reference count is still negative.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates in schematic form a micro­processor based vehicle detector incorporating the tim­er based conditional reference updating, the freeze reference technique, the guard band, alternate turn on call threshold and Call direction reference decrement­ing aspects of the invention described above. As seen in Fig. 2, a microprocessor 12, preferably a type 8751 microprocessor, is provided with a real time clock input derived from an AC source via a transformer 14, a capacitor 15 and a gate circuit 16 coupled to port 3.2 of the microprocessor 12. A loop oscillator 18 provid­ing a nominal loop frequency in the range from about 20 to about 50 Khz drives a vehicle detector loop (not shown) via transformer circuit 19. The loop frequency is coupled via a gate 20, which functions as a Schmitt trigger to square up the sinusoidal loop signal, into the clock input of a loop count flipflop 21, the output of which is coupled to port 3.5 of the microprocessor 12 as a loop count reference signal. A high frequency 12 Mhz crystal oscillator circuit 22 provides a high frequency counting signal via a gate 23 to the input of an external sample counter 24, which is preferably a type 74HC4024 integrated circuit. The Q1-Q5 outputs of circuit 24 are coupled to the D0-D4 and T0 (3.4) input ports of the microprocessor 12. Internal to micropro­cessor 12 are additional counter stages for configuring the sample count register in conjunction with external circuit 24. The high frequency counting signal produced by crystal oscillator circuit 22 is gated by a control flipflop 26, which is enabled by the presence of a run signal at the D input thereto latched by a clock signal provided from flipflop 21. The run signal is generated by the microprocessor.
  • A plurality of strobe lines emanating from ports 1.3-1.7 of microprocessor 12 are connected to individual rows of a cross point matrix 30, the columns of which are coupled to input ports 2.0-2.7 of micro­processor 12 and provide operator selectable data in­puts for extension times, delay times, mode, presence and sensitivity values. The magnitude of the time out period for conditional reference updating (i.e., 100 or 500 m sec.) is established by bit 6 of the mode row of matrix 30 (i.e., the input to port 2.6). The default value is 100 m sec., while 500 m sec. can be selected by inserting the diode in the matrix. The value of the selectable hysteresis for the Call/No Call signal gen­eration is selected by bit 7 of the mode row of matrix 30 (i.e., the input to port 2.7). The default value is -8, while the -12 value can be selected by inserting the diode.
  • A delay/extension inhibit circuit 33 has a pair of input terminals 34, 35 coupled to the green light circuit, of the associated traffic control system, a delay inhibit terminal connected to port 3.6 of micro­processor 12 and an extension inhibit terminal coupled to port 3.7 of microprocessor 12.
  • A fail interrogate switch 36 is coupled to port 0.5 of microprocessor 12 which permits an operator to interrogate an internal flag bit which is set when­ever a loop fail condition is sensed by the micropro­cessor 12.
  • A power on reset gate 38 has an input coupled to a zener diode via circuitry within a loop oscillator circuit 18 and an output coupled to the reset input of microprocessor 12 and functions to reset the micropro­cessor upon power up and whenever the operating voltage for the system drops below a threshold value set by the zener diode 40.
  • A call indicator diode 41 is driven from port 1.0 of microprocessor 12 via a driving transistor 42, which is preferably a type 2N3904 transistor.
  • A true presence output circuit 43 is driven from port 1.1 of microprocessor 12, while a conditioned presence circuit 44 is driven by port 1.2 of micropro­cessor 12.
  • A complete software listing for the system shown in Fig. 2 is incorporated in Appendix A. The system described in the software and the hardware of Fig. 2 implements the timer based conditional reference count update embodiment. In order to implement the number of sample counts conditional reference count update embodiment, the software must be reconfigured to provide a number of samples counter, and the 2.6/mode bit is used to specify the alternate number of thresh­old sample counts (i.e., either 5 or 128). Such changes are well within the capability of one of ordinary skill in the art.
  • While the above provides a complete and ade­quate description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, various modifications, alternate construc­tions and equivalents will occur to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the above should not be construed as limiting the invention, which is defined by the ap­pended claims.

Claims (9)

1. A method for updating a reference count in a vehicle detector system having a loop subject to drift in both the vehicle call direction and the vehicle no call direction, said method comprising the steps of:
generating a sample count representative of loop inductance;
comparing the sample count with a reference count; and
replacing the reference count with the sample count whenever the difference between the sample count and the reference count continuously indicates loop drift in the no call direction for a predetermined time period.
2. A method for updating a reference count in a vehicle detector system having a loop subject to drift in both the vehicle call direction and the vehicle no call direction, said method comprising the steps of:
generating a sample count representative of loop inductance;
comparing the sample count with a reference count; and
replacing the reference count with the sample count whenever the difference between the sample count and the reference count successively indicates loop drift in the no call direction for a predetermined number of samples.
3. In a vehicle detector system having a loop subject to drift in both the vehicle call direction and the vehicle no call direction, a method of tracking variations in loop inductance comprising the steps of:
(a) establishing a loop inductance reference val­ue REF;
(b) generating a sample count SAMPLE representa­tive of measured loop inductance;
(c) testing the value of the sample count against the reference value; and
(d) modifying the reference value as a result of the testing step by:
(i) changing the reference value by a prede­termined amount in a preselected manner when the difference between SAMPLE and REF assumes a call direction value;
(ii) changing the reference value to the SAM­PLE count when the difference between SAMPLE and REF assumes a no call direction value greater than a guard band threshold value for a minimum time period or a predetermined number of samples.
4. In a vehicle detector having means for establishing a reference value, means for accumulating a sample count representative of loop inductance, and means for testing the sample count against the reference value to determine the presence or absence of a vehicle in a loop wherein a call condition is established when the difference between a sample count and a reference value exceeds a first threshold in the vehicle call direction and an established call condition is extinguished when the difference between a sample count and a reference value does not exceed a second threshold smaller in magnitude than the first threshold, the improvement comprising means for enabling the selection of at least two different values for said first threshold re­quired to establish a call condition.
5. A method of tracking variations in loop inductance of a detector loop in a vehicle detector system having a TURN ON CALL threshold C in the vehicle call direc­tion and a guard band threshold G in the vehicle no call direction, said method comprising the steps of:
(a) establishing a loop inductance reference val­ue REF;
(b) generating a sample count SAMPLE representa­tive of measured loop inductance;
(c) testing the value of each sample count against the reference value; and
(d) modifying the reference value as a result of the testing step by:
(i) changing the reference value to the sample count when the difference between SAMPLE and REF assumes a no call direction value G for a minimum time period or a predetermined number of samples;
(ii) changing the reference value by a prede­termined amount every N seconds, where N is a real number, when the difference between SAMPLE and REF assumes a call direction value greater than zero and less than C;
(iii) waiting for an initial period and then changing the reference value by a predetermined amount every N seconds, where N is a real number, when the difference between SAMPLE and REF assumes a call direction value at least equal to C for at least the initial period.
6. In a vehicle detector system having a loop subject to drift in both the vehicle call direction and the vehicle no call direction, the improvement comprising means for generating a sample count representative of loop inductance, means for comparing the sample count with a ref­erence count, and means for replacing the reference count with the sample count whenever the difference between the sample count and the reference count continuously indicates loop drift in the no call direction for a predetermined time period.
7. In a vehicle detector system having a loop subject to drift in the both the vehicle call direction and the vehicle no call direction, the improvement comprising means for generating a sample count representative of loop inductance, means for comparing the sample count with a reference count, and means for replacing the reference count with the sample count whenever the difference between the sample count and the reference count successively indicates loop drift in the no call direction for a predetermined number of samples.
8. For use in a vehicle detector installa­tion having a loop subject to drift in both the vehicle call direction and the vehicle no call direction, a system for tracking variations in loop inductance comprising:
means for establishing a loop inductance ref­erence value REF;
means for generating a sample count SAMPLE representative of measured loop inductance;
means for testing the value of the sample count against the reference value; and
means for modifying the reference value as a result of the testing step by:
(i) changing the reference value by a predetermined amount in a preselected manner when the dif­ference between SAMPLE and REF assumes a call direction value;
(ii) changing the reference value to the sample count when the difference between SAMPLE and REF as­sumes a no call direction value greater than a guard band threshold value for a minimum time period or a predetermined number of samples.
9. A system for tracking variations in loop inductance of a detector loop in a vehicle detector instal­lation having a TURN ON CALL threshold C in the vehicle call direction and a guard band threshold G in the vehicle no call direction, said system comprising:
means for establishing a loop inductance ref­erence value REF;
means for generating a sample count SAMPLE representative of measured loop inductance;
means for testing the value of each sample count against the reference value; and
means for modifying the reference value as a result of the testing step by:
(i) changing the reference value to the sample count when the difference between SAMPLE and REF as­sumes a no call direction value greater than or equal to G for a minimum time period or a predetermined number of sam­ples;
(ii) changing the reference value by a predetermined amount every N seconds, where N is a real num­ber, when the difference between SAMPLE and REF assumes a call direction value greater zero and less than C;
(iii) waiting for an initial period and then changing the reference value by a predetermined amount every N seconds, where N is a real number, when the differ­ence between SAMPLE and REF assumes a call direction value at least equal to C for at least the initial period.
EP88306887A 1987-07-27 1988-07-26 Improved vehicle detector method and system Withdrawn EP0301812A3 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US7793387A 1987-07-27 1987-07-27
US77933 1987-07-27

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0301812A2 true EP0301812A2 (en) 1989-02-01
EP0301812A3 EP0301812A3 (en) 1989-07-12

Family

ID=22140876

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP88306887A Withdrawn EP0301812A3 (en) 1987-07-27 1988-07-26 Improved vehicle detector method and system

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0301812A3 (en)
JP (1) JP2668402B2 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3868626A (en) * 1973-07-09 1975-02-25 Gulf & Western Industries Digital loop detector system
US3943339A (en) * 1974-04-29 1976-03-09 Canoga Controls Corporation Inductive loop detector system
GB2131994A (en) * 1982-12-02 1984-06-27 Sarasota Automation Inductive loop sensors

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3868626A (en) * 1973-07-09 1975-02-25 Gulf & Western Industries Digital loop detector system
US3943339A (en) * 1974-04-29 1976-03-09 Canoga Controls Corporation Inductive loop detector system
GB2131994A (en) * 1982-12-02 1984-06-27 Sarasota Automation Inductive loop sensors

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0301812A3 (en) 1989-07-12
JPH01120699A (en) 1989-05-12
JP2668402B2 (en) 1997-10-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3877541A (en) Electronic safety assurance system for an automotive vehicle
DE4036407C2 (en) Sensor system
US7454287B2 (en) Method and apparatus for providing automatic lane calibration in a traffic sensor
US5028921A (en) Vehicle detector method and system
EP0052933B1 (en) Object detector
US4730152A (en) Vehicle power antenna control with drive stress limiting
US4668951A (en) Inductive loop vehicle detector
EP0119483A1 (en) System and method for detecting driver drowsiness of a vehicle
AU694561B2 (en) Vehicle detector system with periodic source filtering
DE10338289B4 (en) Device with receiver with selectable threshold time constant
US5247297A (en) Vehicle detector method for multiple vehicle counting
US5936551A (en) Vehicle detector with improved reference tracking
EP0301812A2 (en) Improved vehicle detector method and system
AU656426B2 (en) Negative feedback control loop acquisition aid
AU688982B2 (en) Vehicle detector system
EP0521401A1 (en) Signal level display unit
JP2000114962A (en) Motor rotation pulse generation circuit for dc motor and sandwiching detection device using the circuit
US5097203A (en) Method and circuit for producing an input variable for a cross-coil indicating device
EP0578715B1 (en) Control system for windscreen wiping
JP3481373B2 (en) Loop coil type vehicle detector
US4736185A (en) Digital display apparatus
US6668617B2 (en) 02 Sensor filter
CA2280755C (en) Regulating dead time given varying pulse repetition rates
AU651880B2 (en) Control system for windscreen wiping
KR100412706B1 (en) Limphome control method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900108

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19920507

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 19931027