EP0292910B1 - Hard surface cleaning composition - Google Patents

Hard surface cleaning composition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0292910B1
EP0292910B1 EP88108207A EP88108207A EP0292910B1 EP 0292910 B1 EP0292910 B1 EP 0292910B1 EP 88108207 A EP88108207 A EP 88108207A EP 88108207 A EP88108207 A EP 88108207A EP 0292910 B1 EP0292910 B1 EP 0292910B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
weight
composition
fatty acid
ranges
abrasive
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP88108207A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0292910A3 (en
EP0292910A2 (en
Inventor
Pierre Fonsny
Nicole Andries
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Colgate Palmolive Co
Original Assignee
Colgate Palmolive Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Colgate Palmolive Co filed Critical Colgate Palmolive Co
Publication of EP0292910A2 publication Critical patent/EP0292910A2/en
Publication of EP0292910A3 publication Critical patent/EP0292910A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0292910B1 publication Critical patent/EP0292910B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/20Organic compounds containing oxygen
    • C11D3/2075Carboxylic acids-salts thereof
    • C11D3/2079Monocarboxylic acids-salts thereof
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D10/00Compositions of detergents, not provided for by one single preceding group
    • C11D10/04Compositions of detergents, not provided for by one single preceding group based on mixtures of surface-active non-soap compounds and soap
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/0008Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties aqueous liquid non soap compositions
    • C11D17/0013Liquid compositions with insoluble particles in suspension
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/37Polymers
    • C11D3/3746Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/02Anionic compounds
    • C11D1/12Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof
    • C11D1/14Sulfonic acids or sulfuric acid esters; Salts thereof derived from aliphatic hydrocarbons or mono-alcohols
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D1/00Detergent compositions based essentially on surface-active compounds; Use of these compounds as a detergent
    • C11D1/66Non-ionic compounds
    • C11D1/72Ethers of polyoxyalkylene glycols

Definitions

  • This invention relates to liquid, aqueous, stable, effective, safe, non-scratching hard surface cleaning compositions commonly referred to as scouring cleansers.
  • the compositions are physically stable, do not separate, whereby the user is assured of the optimum performance to be expected from the various components and their amounts and ratios with respect to one another, are safe and do not scratch the usual surfaces to be cleaned, such as glass, porcelain, ceramic, plastic, metal, wood, painted wood (enamelled and lacquered).
  • U.S. Patent 4,005,027 describes compositions which include clay and insoluble abrasive. Only inorganic abrasives are shown. The compositions include surfactants which are bleach stable. Nonionics are not used. It is alleged that the products are physically stable and also do not "appreciably run along vertical surfaces" (column 10, lines 45-47). Such stability is a manifestation of a false body fluid formed when using the smectite and attapulgite clays necessary in such compositions. In U.S. Patent 4,116,849 the compositions are very similar to those in U.S. Patent 4,005,027. In addition, U.S.
  • Patent 4,116,849 discloses thickening agents instead of the preferred smectite and attapulgite clays, such as colloidal silica, polystyrenes, sulfonated polystyrenes, polyethylene, oxidized polyethylenes, polypropylene, copolymers of styrene with methacrylic acid, methyl or ethyl acrylate, vinyl acetate, among others; patentee states that "...ethoxylated nonionic surfactants are to be avoided.” Neither of these two patents disclose soaps or fatty acids as suitable materials as well.
  • U.S. Patent 4,240,919 describes compositions of multivalent stearate soap, water and water-insoluble abrasive.
  • abrasives are disclosed and among the “organic” types are “melamine, urea formaldehyde resins, ground rigid polymeric materials, such as polyurethane foam." (column 3, lines 10-12).
  • substantially any surfactant materials which are compatible with the other components in the composition of the present invention.
  • surfactant materials include water-soluble anionic, nonionic, amphoteric, cationic and zwitterionic surfactants.” (column 3, lines 57-62). Further reference is made to U.S.
  • Patents 4,051,056 (expanded perlite as abrasive), 4,457,856 (polyacrylate abrasive), German 1,956,616 (polyvinyl chloride as abrasive), 3,645,904 (skin cleanser containing polymer abrasive material).
  • GB-A-1 534 680 discloses liquid aqueous compositions suitable for cleaning hard surfaces which compositions comprise sulfonate or sulfate surfactants, nonionic detergents (hydrophobe condensed with ethylene oxide), an electrolyte, a fatty acid and an abrasive.
  • This reference only shows natural abrasives such as feldspar, calcite or silica. Polymeric abrasives are not suggested.
  • the compositions of this reference may be produced by any of the techniques commonly employed in the manufacturing of liquid detergent compositions.
  • GB-A-2 181 738 relating to a stable liquid detergent composition discloses a list of water insoluble abrasives including many inorganic abrasives and also mentions powders of plastics as polystyrene, polyacrylate and nylon. However, all examples given use silica powder as the abrasive. This document is silent with regard to the method of preparation of the detergent composition. The authors of this document clearly were not aware that it is difficult to prepare a stable aqueous dispersion of polymers as e.g. polystyrene particles.
  • US 4 655 957 relating to a composition having utility as a contact lens cleaner without scratching the lens surface suggests particulate organic polymer of a hydrophilic nature from the group consisting of poly(hydroxyalkyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyalkyl acrylate), and poly N-vinyl lactam or mixtures thereof.
  • a composition manifesting the optimum desiderata for a non-scratching, stable, effective and safe aqueous scouring cleanser has eluded the art.
  • the ability to remove most stains from all normally encountered hard surfaces and particularly plastic surfaces without damaging such delicate plastic materials as one might find as, for example, kitchen counter tops, anti-stick coatings on metal pots, polystyrene, polymethyl methacrylate, polyvinyl chloride, nylon, polyester (e.g. fiberglass) and the like articles is the major thrust of this invention.
  • the composition should have good degreasing characteristics as well. Physical stability as demonstrated by the prior art cited above is a major problem and for good consumer acceptability is a must.
  • the objects of this invention are obtained in accordance with the following description by a method for preparing a stable liquid non-scratching aqueous, scouring cleansing composition comprising a fatty acid and/or fatty acid soap, non-soap anionic surfactant, nonionic surfactant, electrolyte and particulate abrasive and by the compositions obtained.
  • the fatty acid component may by any fatty acid having a carbon chain of from about C6-C30 with C8-C20 preferred. Most preferred are C10-C18 and typically, naturally occuring materials, such as coconut oil, palm kernel oil, and animal tallow, serve admirably as sources for the fatty acids. A particularly preferred range of fatty acids is C12-C18 as one would find in coconut oil. A typical coconut oil fatty acid composition contains about 50% C12: 20% C14; 8.5% C16; and 10% C18 the balance other acid and even perhaps some neutral material, and is a liquid at 40°C.
  • the soaps used are the alkali metal and ammonium salts with sodium and potassium preferred.
  • the fatty acid comprises from about 0.5 to 15% by weight and preferably 1 to 10% and, more preferably 1 to 7% of the composition.
  • the non-soap anionic surfactants contain a C10-C20 linear aliphatic hydrocarbon chain and are selected from the group consisting of sulfonate and sulfate surfactants. They may be chosen from any of the conventional anionics, such as the alkyl benzene sulfonates, the alkyl sulfates, alcohol sulfates, the alcohol ether sulfates, olefin sulfonates, paraffin sulfonates, fatty acid monoglyceride sulfates, taurides and the like as alkali and ammonium salts.
  • the preferred non-soap anionic surfactants are the paraffin sulfonates (C10-C20); the linear alkyl benzene sulfonates, the alcohol and the alcohol ether sulfates.
  • the most preferred anionics are the C12-C18 paraffin sulfonates in the form of their alkali metal or ammonium salts; C12-C16 alkyl benzene sulfonates; the alkyl (i.e. alcohol) sulfates of C12-C18 and the corresponding ether sulfates with 3 to 50 (e.g. 3, 5, 10, 20, 30 or 50) moles of condensed ethylene oxide.
  • the most preferred salt forming cation is sodium.
  • the amount of the non-soap anionic is in the range of from 1 to 15% by weight, preferably 1 to 10% and more preferably 1 to 5% by weight.
  • anionics are sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium paraffin (C14-C17) sulfonate, sodium decyl sulfate, sodium tridecyl sulfonate, sodium tallow alkyl sulfate, sodium coconut alkyl sulfate, sodium oxotridecyl-(triethoxyl) [sulfate (sulfated - 3 E.O.
  • the nonionic surfactants which are usable herein contain a C10-C20 aliphatic hydrocarbon chain and have the molecular configuration of an hydrophobe condensed with ethylene oxide, the number of oxyethyl groups in the nonionic surfactant ranging from 1 to 8.
  • the hydrophobe may and preferably is from an alcohol (preferably C10-C16, typically a C13 alcohol, such as linear tridecyl alcohol), or a polypropylene backbone.
  • Other hydrophobes such as thioalcohols, acids, amines and the like may also be used.
  • the preferred alcohol is a C10-C16 alcohol with 1 to less than 5 moles of ethylene oxide and most preferably 2 to 4 moles of ethylene oxide, typically 3 moles of ethylene oxide.
  • the level of nonionic in the formulation is varying from about 0.5% to about 15% by weight with preferred levels ranging from 1 to 10% and most preferred from about 3.5 to 6.5% typically and most highly preferred is 5%.
  • the electrolyte used herein is typically an alkaline, builder-type inorganic or organic salt.
  • the usual salts comprise the alkali metal bicarbonates, borates, carbonates, phosphates, polyphosphates and silicates among the inorganics and the polycarboxylates, such as polyacetates, tartrates, citrates, maleates, oxydiacetates, alkenyl succinates, carboxymethyloxy succinates, oxydisuccinates and the like, among the organics.
  • Polymeric builder salts such as the water-soluble salts of polymers of maleic acid, itaconic acid and the like, may be used as well as copolymers and interpolymers thereof with polymerizable ⁇ , ⁇ -ethylenically unsaturated compounds, such as vinyl ethers, esters, alkyl alcohol, acrylic and methacrylic acid and esters thereof, etc.
  • the electrolyte may vary over a considerable range from as little as 0.5% to 25%.
  • a preferred range is from about 2% to 15%; typically a mixture of carbonate and phosphate may total 5 to 10%; other convenient and preferred mixtures may comprise carbonate, polyphosphate and optionally some silicate in amounts of from 5 to 10% as well.
  • Specific electrolytes include sodium and potassium carbonate, sodium and potassium bicarbonate, sodium and potassium sesquicarbonate, sodium and potassium orthophosphates, pyrophosphates, tripolyphosphate and hexametaphosphates, sodium and potassium tetraborate anhydrous, pentahydrate, decahydrate, sodium silicate (e.g. sodium metasilicate or other silicates with the Na2O to SiO2 ratio ranging from 3.5 to 1 to 1:1) as illustrative of the inorganics and ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid tetrasodium or potassium salt, trisodium nitrilotriacetate, disodium polymaleate, and the like, as merely illustrative of the organics.
  • sodium silicate e.g. sodium metasilicate or other silicates with the Na2O to SiO2 ratio ranging from 3.5 to 1 to 1:1
  • ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid tetrasodium or potassium salt
  • the abrasive may be any particulate abrasive being a solid polymerisate derived from polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, polyester, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinyl acetate, polymethyl methacrylate and various copolymers and interpolymers of the foregoing.
  • the criteria for suitability are that the material does not have a hardness greater than homopolymeric polymethyl methacrylate and therefore does not scratch the same and that the average particle size ranges from 10 to 150 ⁇ m and preferably from 25 to 100 ⁇ m and most preferably from 30 to 75 ⁇ m, e.g. 60 ⁇ m.
  • a polyvinyl chloride abrasive powder whose average particle size is about 60 ⁇ m, with a major amount being within the range of 30 to 75 ⁇ m.
  • the molecular weight ranges of the polymeric abrasives may vary widely just so long as the physical properties set out above are met. Generally, molecular weights will range from several thousand (e.g. 2,000; 5,000; 20,000) to several hundred thousand (e.g. 125,000; 250,000; 400,000) and upwards of several million (e.g. 1,000,000; 2,000,000; 4,000,000; 6,000,000).
  • the amount of abrasive ranges from about 2% to 30% or more - (e.g. 40%; 50%).
  • a preferred range in the preferred formulations is from 5 to 25% and more preferred is a range of 5 to 15%, such as 7%; 10%; or 12%.
  • a large variety of optional ingredients may be included in the formulations of this invention. Some are even preferred, such as inorganic viscosity modifiers (e.g. montmorillonite clays, such as bentonite; attapulgites, etc.); organic ones, such as methylcellulose, carboxyl methylcellulose, hydroxy propylmethylcellulose. Such materials are particularly advantageous for a "cream” scouring cleanser where a "thickened” type of material is desired by the consumer. For such products it may be desirable to have viscosities ranging from several hundred (250 mPas; 400 mPas; 500 mPas) to several thousand (e.g. 1,100 mPas; 1,500 mPas; 2,000 mPas, etc.).
  • inorganic viscosity modifiers e.g. montmorillonite clays, such as bentonite; attapulgites, etc.
  • organic ones such as methylcellulose, carboxyl methylcellulose, hydroxy propy
  • the formulations of this invention exhibit unusual stability (i.e. lack of or minimum phase separation) in the absence of the viscosity "elevators," their major function as mentioned above to merely thicken.
  • the amount of the viscosity modifier ranges from 0.1 to 5 to 10%; usually 0.5 to 3%.
  • Other optional but, again, preferred additives include a hydrocarbon material, particularly a terpene, such as d-limonene. Such terpenes are readily available in many perfume materials which are generally added to most consumer cleaning products.
  • the amounts of the hydrocarbon vary from 0.05 to 5% and preferably from 0.1 to 2 to 3%.
  • Other additives which may be used include bleaches (liquid and solid hypochlorites, available, e.g.
  • auxiliary materials as NaOCl solution or calcium hypochlorite powder; chloramines, chlorinated di- and trisodium phosphates, sodium and potassium dichlorisocyanurate, trichlorocyanuric acid, and so forth); buffers, caustic soda; caustic potash; suds boosters; enzymes; preservatives; disinfectants; colorants; fragrances and the like, may be used where desired and compatible. Generally, minor amounts of such auxiliary materials are employed, e.g. 0.01 to 10% and often 0.1% to 5%.
  • compositions of this invention are alkaline and generally have a pH from about 10 to 12. It is necessary to add in the formulations the fatty acid in free acid form and neutralize in situ preferably with caustic soda (NaOH) or caustic potash (KOH), at the same time adjusting the pH to the desired level.
  • CaOH caustic soda
  • KOH caustic potash
  • the compositions are prepared by adding the following compounds to water with stirring in a suitable mixer and homogenizer at a temperature of 50 to 80°C, e.g. 60°C in the order given: 0.5 to 15% by weight of the composition of a C6 to C30 fatty acid; 0.5 to 15% by weight of the composition of a nonionic surfactant containing a C10-C20 linear aliphatic hydrocarbon chain and having the molecular configuration of an hydrophobe condensed with ethylene oxide, the number of oxyethyl groups in the nonionic surfactant ranging from 1 to 8; optionally 0.1 to 10% by weight of the composition of a viscosity modifier; 2 to 50% by weight of the composition of a particulate abrasive being a solid polymerizate derived from polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, polyester, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinyl acetate or polymethyl methacrylate having a hardness not greater than homopolymeric
  • a formulation of the following ingredients is prepared: % % A.I. Distilled coconut fatty acids 2.0 2.0 C13 alcohol and 3 moles ethylene oxide 5.0 5.0 White montmorillonite clay 0.8 0.8 Polyvinyl chloride powder (PVC) (beads of average particle size of 60 ⁇ made by an emulsion polymerization process) 10.0 10.0 50% aqueous KOH 0.5 0.25 60% tetrapotassium pyrophosphate solution (TKPP) 10.0 6.0 Potassium carbonate-granular, anhydrous (K2CO3) 0.5 0.5 60% C14 ⁇ 17 paraffin (Na) sulfonate 3.33 2.0 Perfume 0.5 0.5 tap water balance
  • composition is prepared in the manner described previously. To the formula weight of water at 60°C are added the fatty acid, nonionic, clay, abrasive and caustic potash with vigorous stirring. After a uniform mixture is obtained, it is cooled to room temperature (20°C) and the remaining components (in the order listed) are added with stirring. A creamy, stable product results; the pH is about 11 and the viscosity is about 1,100 mPas.
  • Example I is repeated except that the following fatty acids are used in place of 2% distilled coconut fatty acid: (a) lauric acid 2.0% (b) palmitic acid 2.0% (c) coconut oil fatty acids 3.0% (d) coconut oil fatty acids 4.0% (e) lauric-stearic (3:1) 3.5%
  • Example I is repeated using 5% sodium lauryl sulfate in place of the sodium paraffin sulfonate.
  • Examples I and III are repeated separately replacing the TKPP and K2CO3 with 4% soda ash (anhydrous Na2CO3).
  • Example I The product of Example I is used in a standarized test procedure to determine the degree of scratching against a plastic surface. This is compared with two commercial products.
  • the procedure involves the use of a reciprocating moving sponge (spontex) containing 1 g of test product which is applied to a plastic tile and after 200 strokes the plastic tile is washed and the gloss is compared with that of the original.
  • the tile used has an initial gloss reading of 79 and this is unchanged after the test with the product of Example I.
  • the two commercial products gave readings of 72 and 73 demonstrating thereby some damage to the tile by the commercial materials and none by the composition of this invention.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Emergency Medicine (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Fluid-Pressure Circuits (AREA)

Description

    Background of the Invention (1) Field of Invention
  • This invention relates to liquid, aqueous, stable, effective, safe, non-scratching hard surface cleaning compositions commonly referred to as scouring cleansers. The compositions are physically stable, do not separate, whereby the user is assured of the optimum performance to be expected from the various components and their amounts and ratios with respect to one another, are safe and do not scratch the usual surfaces to be cleaned, such as glass, porcelain, ceramic, plastic, metal, wood, painted wood (enamelled and lacquered).
  • (2) Prior Art Discussion
  • The art is, of course, replete with liquid scouring compositions alleged to perform in a safe and effective manner, others stated to be physically and chemically stable and so on.
  • Some examples of prior art scouring compositions include U.S. Patent 4,005,027 which describes compositions which include clay and insoluble abrasive. Only inorganic abrasives are shown. The compositions include surfactants which are bleach stable. Nonionics are not used. It is alleged that the products are physically stable and also do not "appreciably run along vertical surfaces" (column 10, lines 45-47). Such stability is a manifestation of a false body fluid formed when using the smectite and attapulgite clays necessary in such compositions. In U.S. Patent 4,116,849 the compositions are very similar to those in U.S. Patent 4,005,027. In addition, U.S. Patent 4,116,849 discloses thickening agents instead of the preferred smectite and attapulgite clays, such as colloidal silica, polystyrenes, sulfonated polystyrenes, polyethylene, oxidized polyethylenes, polypropylene, copolymers of styrene with methacrylic acid, methyl or ethyl acrylate, vinyl acetate, among others; patentee states that "...ethoxylated nonionic surfactants are to be avoided." Neither of these two patents disclose soaps or fatty acids as suitable materials as well. U.S. Patent 4,240,919 describes compositions of multivalent stearate soap, water and water-insoluble abrasive. Various abrasives are disclosed and among the "organic" types are "melamine, urea formaldehyde resins, ground rigid polymeric materials, such as polyurethane foam..." (column 3, lines 10-12). Optionally, there may be present "substantially any surfactant materials which are compatible with the other components in the composition of the present invention...." These include water-soluble anionic, nonionic, amphoteric, cationic and zwitterionic surfactants." (column 3, lines 57-62). Further reference is made to U.S. Patents 4,051,056 (expanded perlite as abrasive), 4,457,856 (polyacrylate abrasive), German 1,956,616 (polyvinyl chloride as abrasive), 3,645,904 (skin cleanser containing polymer abrasive material).
  • GB-A-1 534 680 (corresponding to US 4 302 347) discloses liquid aqueous compositions suitable for cleaning hard surfaces which compositions comprise sulfonate or sulfate surfactants, nonionic detergents (hydrophobe condensed with ethylene oxide), an electrolyte, a fatty acid and an abrasive. This reference, however, only shows natural abrasives such as feldspar, calcite or silica. Polymeric abrasives are not suggested. The compositions of this reference may be produced by any of the techniques commonly employed in the manufacturing of liquid detergent compositions.
  • GB-A-2 181 738 relating to a stable liquid detergent composition discloses a list of water insoluble abrasives including many inorganic abrasives and also mentions powders of plastics as polystyrene, polyacrylate and nylon. However, all examples given use silica powder as the abrasive. This document is silent with regard to the method of preparation of the detergent composition. The authors of this document clearly were not aware that it is difficult to prepare a stable aqueous dispersion of polymers as e.g. polystyrene particles.
  • US 4 655 957 relating to a composition having utility as a contact lens cleaner without scratching the lens surface suggests particulate organic polymer of a hydrophilic nature from the group consisting of poly(hydroxyalkyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyalkyl acrylate), and poly N-vinyl lactam or mixtures thereof.
  • A composition manifesting the optimum desiderata for a non-scratching, stable, effective and safe aqueous scouring cleanser has eluded the art. The ability to remove most stains from all normally encountered hard surfaces and particularly plastic surfaces without damaging such delicate plastic materials as one might find as, for example, kitchen counter tops, anti-stick coatings on metal pots, polystyrene, polymethyl methacrylate, polyvinyl chloride, nylon, polyester (e.g. fiberglass) and the like articles is the major thrust of this invention. In addition to removing stains, the composition should have good degreasing characteristics as well. Physical stability as demonstrated by the prior art cited above is a major problem and for good consumer acceptability is a must.
  • Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a method for preparing a stable, liquid, aqueous, abrasive-containing cleaning composition which composition is safe and also substantially non-scratching on most encountered surfaces, including plastic surfaces.
  • It is a further object of the invention to provide the compositions made by the method of the invention.
  • Other objects will appear hereinafter as the description proceeds.
  • Description of the Invention
  • The objects of this invention are obtained in accordance with the following description by a method for preparing a stable liquid non-scratching aqueous, scouring cleansing composition comprising a fatty acid and/or fatty acid soap, non-soap anionic surfactant, nonionic surfactant, electrolyte and particulate abrasive and by the compositions obtained.
  • The fatty acid component may by any fatty acid having a carbon chain of from about C₆-C₃₀ with C₈-C₂₀ preferred. Most preferred are C₁₀-C₁₈ and typically, naturally occuring materials, such as coconut oil, palm kernel oil, and animal tallow, serve admirably as sources for the fatty acids. A particularly preferred range of fatty acids is C₁₂-C₁₈ as one would find in coconut oil. A typical coconut oil fatty acid composition contains about 50% C₁₂: 20% C₁₄; 8.5% C₁₆; and 10% C₁₈ the balance other acid and even perhaps some neutral material, and is a liquid at 40°C. While the most convenient sources are natural oils or fats yielded, mixed acids, of course, the individual specific acids, and indeed any mixture of any number and chain length of acids within the parameter of C₆-C₃₀ may be used. The soaps used are the alkali metal and ammonium salts with sodium and potassium preferred. The fatty acid comprises from about 0.5 to 15% by weight and preferably 1 to 10% and, more preferably 1 to 7% of the composition.
  • The non-soap anionic surfactants contain a C₁₀-C₂₀ linear aliphatic hydrocarbon chain and are selected from the group consisting of sulfonate and sulfate surfactants. They may be chosen from any of the conventional anionics, such as the alkyl benzene sulfonates, the alkyl sulfates, alcohol sulfates, the alcohol ether sulfates, olefin sulfonates, paraffin sulfonates, fatty acid monoglyceride sulfates, taurides and the like as alkali and ammonium salts.
  • The preferred non-soap anionic surfactants are the paraffin sulfonates (C₁₀-C₂₀); the linear alkyl benzene sulfonates, the alcohol and the alcohol ether sulfates.
  • The most preferred anionics (non-soap) are the C₁₂-C₁₈ paraffin sulfonates in the form of their alkali metal or ammonium salts; C₁₂-C₁₆ alkyl benzene sulfonates; the alkyl (i.e. alcohol) sulfates of C₁₂-C₁₈ and the corresponding ether sulfates with 3 to 50 (e.g. 3, 5, 10, 20, 30 or 50) moles of condensed ethylene oxide. The most preferred salt forming cation is sodium. The amount of the non-soap anionic is in the range of from 1 to 15% by weight, preferably 1 to 10% and more preferably 1 to 5% by weight.
  • Some specific examples of suitable anionics are sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium paraffin (C₁₄-C₁₇) sulfonate, sodium decyl sulfate, sodium tridecyl sulfonate, sodium tallow alkyl sulfate, sodium coconut alkyl sulfate, sodium oxotridecyl-(triethoxyl) [sulfate (sulfated - 3 E.O. condensate with oxotridecyl alcohol], sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate, sodium tridecyl benzene sulfonate, sodium tetradecyl benzene sulfonate and sodium (C₁₅) olefin sulfonate.
  • The nonionic surfactants which are usable herein contain a C₁₀-C₂₀ aliphatic hydrocarbon chain and have the molecular configuration of an hydrophobe condensed with ethylene oxide, the number of oxyethyl groups in the nonionic surfactant ranging from 1 to 8. The hydrophobe may and preferably is from an alcohol (preferably C₁₀-C₁₆, typically a C₁₃ alcohol, such as linear tridecyl alcohol), or a polypropylene backbone. Other hydrophobes, such as thioalcohols, acids, amines and the like may also be used. The preferred alcohol is a C₁₀-C₁₆ alcohol with 1 to less than 5 moles of ethylene oxide and most preferably 2 to 4 moles of ethylene oxide, typically 3 moles of ethylene oxide. The level of nonionic in the formulation is varying from about 0.5% to about 15% by weight with preferred levels ranging from 1 to 10% and most preferred from about 3.5 to 6.5% typically and most highly preferred is 5%.
  • The electrolyte used herein is typically an alkaline, builder-type inorganic or organic salt. The usual salts comprise the alkali metal bicarbonates, borates, carbonates, phosphates, polyphosphates and silicates among the inorganics and the polycarboxylates, such as polyacetates, tartrates, citrates, maleates, oxydiacetates, alkenyl succinates, carboxymethyloxy succinates, oxydisuccinates and the like, among the organics. Polymeric builder salts, such as the water-soluble salts of polymers of maleic acid, itaconic acid and the like, may be used as well as copolymers and interpolymers thereof with polymerizable α,β-ethylenically unsaturated compounds, such as vinyl ethers, esters, alkyl alcohol, acrylic and methacrylic acid and esters thereof, etc.
  • The electrolyte may vary over a considerable range from as little as 0.5% to 25%. A preferred range is from about 2% to 15%; typically a mixture of carbonate and phosphate may total 5 to 10%; other convenient and preferred mixtures may comprise carbonate, polyphosphate and optionally some silicate in amounts of from 5 to 10% as well.
  • Specific electrolytes include sodium and potassium carbonate, sodium and potassium bicarbonate, sodium and potassium sesquicarbonate, sodium and potassium orthophosphates, pyrophosphates, tripolyphosphate and hexametaphosphates, sodium and potassium tetraborate anhydrous, pentahydrate, decahydrate, sodium silicate (e.g. sodium metasilicate or other silicates with the Na₂O to SiO₂ ratio ranging from 3.5 to 1 to 1:1) as illustrative of the inorganics and ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid tetrasodium or potassium salt, trisodium nitrilotriacetate, disodium polymaleate, and the like, as merely illustrative of the organics.
  • The abrasive may be any particulate abrasive being a solid polymerisate derived from polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, polyester, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinyl acetate, polymethyl methacrylate and various copolymers and interpolymers of the foregoing. The criteria for suitability are that the material does not have a hardness greater than homopolymeric polymethyl methacrylate and therefore does not scratch the same and that the average particle size ranges from 10 to 150 µm and preferably from 25 to 100 µm and most preferably from 30 to 75 µm, e.g. 60 µm. For optimum performance it is most desirable to utilize a polyvinyl chloride abrasive powder whose average particle size is about 60 µm, with a major amount being within the range of 30 to 75 µm. The molecular weight ranges of the polymeric abrasives may vary widely just so long as the physical properties set out above are met. Generally, molecular weights will range from several thousand (e.g. 2,000; 5,000; 20,000) to several hundred thousand (e.g. 125,000; 250,000; 400,000) and upwards of several million (e.g. 1,000,000; 2,000,000; 4,000,000; 6,000,000). The amount of abrasive ranges from about 2% to 30% or more - (e.g. 40%; 50%). A preferred range in the preferred formulations is from 5 to 25% and more preferred is a range of 5 to 15%, such as 7%; 10%; or 12%.
  • A large variety of optional ingredients may be included in the formulations of this invention. Some are even preferred, such as inorganic viscosity modifiers (e.g. montmorillonite clays, such as bentonite; attapulgites, etc.); organic ones, such as methylcellulose, carboxyl methylcellulose, hydroxy propylmethylcellulose. Such materials are particularly advantageous for a "cream" scouring cleanser where a "thickened" type of material is desired by the consumer. For such products it may be desirable to have viscosities ranging from several hundred (250 mPas; 400 mPas; 500 mPas) to several thousand (e.g. 1,100 mPas; 1,500 mPas; 2,000 mPas, etc.).
  • It is extremely significant that the formulations of this invention exhibit unusual stability (i.e. lack of or minimum phase separation) in the absence of the viscosity "elevators," their major function as mentioned above to merely thicken. The amount of the viscosity modifier ranges from 0.1 to 5 to 10%; usually 0.5 to 3%. Other optional but, again, preferred additives include a hydrocarbon material, particularly a terpene, such as d-limonene. Such terpenes are readily available in many perfume materials which are generally added to most consumer cleaning products. The amounts of the hydrocarbon vary from 0.05 to 5% and preferably from 0.1 to 2 to 3%. Other additives which may be used include bleaches (liquid and solid hypochlorites, available, e.g. as NaOCl solution or calcium hypochlorite powder; chloramines, chlorinated di- and trisodium phosphates, sodium and potassium dichlorisocyanurate, trichlorocyanuric acid, and so forth); buffers, caustic soda; caustic potash; suds boosters; enzymes; preservatives; disinfectants; colorants; fragrances and the like, may be used where desired and compatible. Generally, minor amounts of such auxiliary materials are employed, e.g. 0.01 to 10% and often 0.1% to 5%.
  • The compositions of this invention are alkaline and generally have a pH from about 10 to 12. It is necessary to add in the formulations the fatty acid in free acid form and neutralize in situ preferably with caustic soda (NaOH) or caustic potash (KOH), at the same time adjusting the pH to the desired level. A typical, preferred pH 11±0.5.
  • According to the method of this invention the compositions are prepared by adding the following compounds to water with stirring in a suitable mixer and homogenizer at a temperature of 50 to 80°C, e.g. 60°C in the order given:
    0.5 to 15% by weight of the composition of a C₆ to C₃₀ fatty acid;
    0.5 to 15% by weight of the composition of a nonionic surfactant containing a C₁₀-C₂₀ linear aliphatic hydrocarbon chain and having the molecular configuration of an hydrophobe condensed with ethylene oxide, the number of oxyethyl groups in the nonionic surfactant ranging from 1 to 8;
    optionally 0.1 to 10% by weight of the composition of a viscosity modifier;
    2 to 50% by weight of the composition of a particulate abrasive being a solid polymerizate derived from polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, polyester, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinyl acetate or polymethyl methacrylate having a hardness not greater than homopolymeric methyl methacrylate and having an average particle size ranging from 10 to 150 µm; and
    an alkali metal and/or ammonium base for neutralization of said fatty acid;
    at this point the temperature of the mixture is lowered to about room temperature; and then
    adding
    0.5 to 25% by weight of the composition of an electrolyte comprising a water-soluble inorganic or organic alkaline builder salt followed by
    1 to 15% by weight of the composition of a non-soap anionic surfactant containing a C₁₀-C₂₀ linear aliphatic hydrocarbon chain and being selected from the group consisting of sulfonate and sulfate surfactants and finally
    where desired 0.05 to 5% of a hydrocarbon. Where no hydrocarbon is to be used one may, obviously, use a non-hydrocarbon containing fragrance. The use, however, of a hydrocarbon material has proven desirable for increased grease removal characteristics.
  • The following examples will serve to illustrate the present invention without being deemed limitative thereof. Parts and percents are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
  • Example I
  • A formulation of the following ingredients is prepared:
    % % A.I.
    Distilled coconut fatty acids 2.0 2.0
    C₁₃ alcohol and 3 moles ethylene oxide 5.0 5.0
    White montmorillonite clay 0.8 0.8
    Polyvinyl chloride powder (PVC) (beads of average particle size of 60µ made by an emulsion polymerization process) 10.0 10.0
    50% aqueous KOH 0.5 0.25
    60% tetrapotassium pyrophosphate solution (TKPP) 10.0 6.0
    Potassium carbonate-granular, anhydrous (K₂CO₃) 0.5 0.5
    60% C₁₄₋₁₇ paraffin (Na) sulfonate 3.33 2.0
    Perfume 0.5 0.5
    tap water balance
  • The composition is prepared in the manner described previously. To the formula weight of water at 60°C are added the fatty acid, nonionic, clay, abrasive and caustic potash with vigorous stirring. After a uniform mixture is obtained, it is cooled to room temperature (20°C) and the remaining components (in the order listed) are added with stirring. A creamy, stable product results; the pH is about 11 and the viscosity is about 1,100 mPas.
  • Example II
  • Example I is repeated except that the following fatty acids are used in place of 2% distilled coconut fatty acid:
    (a) lauric acid 2.0%
    (b) palmitic acid 2.0%
    (c) coconut oil fatty acids 3.0%
    (d) coconut oil fatty acids 4.0%
    (e) lauric-stearic (3:1) 3.5%
  • Example III
  • Example I is repeated using 5% sodium lauryl sulfate in place of the sodium paraffin sulfonate.
  • Example IV
  • Examples I and III are repeated separately replacing the TKPP and K₂CO₃ with 4% soda ash (anhydrous Na₂CO₃).
  • Example V
  • Each of the previous examples is separately repeated but in place of 5% nonionic there is used
    • (a) 3% nonionic
    • (b) 6% nonionic.
  • The product of Example I is used in a standarized test procedure to determine the degree of scratching against a plastic surface. This is compared with two commercial products. The procedure involves the use of a reciprocating moving sponge (spontex) containing 1 g of test product which is applied to a plastic tile and after 200 strokes the plastic tile is washed and the gloss is compared with that of the original. The tile used has an initial gloss reading of 79 and this is unchanged after the test with the product of Example I. The two commercial products gave readings of 72 and 73 demonstrating thereby some damage to the tile by the commercial materials and none by the composition of this invention.

Claims (8)

  1. A method for preparing a stable, liquid, aqueous, non-scratching scouring cleaning composition comprising the steps of
    A) adding the following compounds to water at a temperature of 50 to 80°C with stirring in a suitable mixer and homogenizer in the order given:
    0.5 to 15% by weight of the composition of a C₆-C₃₀ fatty acid;
    0.5 to 15% by weight of the composition of a nonionic surfactant containing a C₁₀-C₂₀ linear aliphatic hydrocarbon chain and having the molecular configuration of an hydrophobe condensed with ethylene oxide, the number of oxyethyl groups in the nonionic surfactant ranging from 1 to 8;
    optionally 0.1 to 10% by weight of the composition of a viscosity modifier;
    2 to 50% by weight of the composition of a particulate abrasive being a solid polymerizate derived from polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, polyester, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinyl acetate or polymethyl methacrylate having a hardness not greater than homopolymeric methyl methacrylate and having an average particle size ranging from 10 to 150 µm; and
    an alkali metal and/or ammonium base for neutralization of said fatty acid;
    B) lowering the temperature of the mixture at this point to about room temperature; and
    C) adding
    0.5 to 25% by weight of the composition of an electrolyte comprising a water-soluble inorganic or organic alkaline builder salt followed by
    1 to 15% by weight of the composition of a non-soap anionic surfactant containing a C₁₀-C₂₀ linear aliphatic hydrocarbon chain and being selected from the group consisting of sulfonate and sulfate surfactants and finally
    where desired 0.05 to 5% of a hydrocarbon.
  2. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein the fatty acid is a C₈-C₂₀ acid, the non-soap anionic contains a C₁₂-C₁₈ linear aliphatic hydrocarbon and the nonionic surfactant contains C₁₀-C₁₆ linear aliphatic hydrocarbon.
  3. The method as defined in any of the preceding claims wherein the fatty acid is derived from coconut oil, the non-soap anionic is a paraffin sulphonate, the nonionic is a C₁₀-C₁₆ alcohol containing from 1 to less than 5 oxyethyl groups and the electrolyte comprises a polyphosphate.
  4. The method as defined in any of the preceding claims wherein the abrasive is polyvinyl chloride.
  5. The method as defined in any of claims 1 to 4 wherein the hydrocarbon is terpene.
  6. The method as defined in any of claims 1 to 4 wherein the hydrocarbon is d-limonene.
  7. The composition obtainable by the method according to any of the preceding claims.
  8. The composition of claim 7 wherein the amount of fatty acid soap ranges from 1 to 5% by weight, the amount of non-soap anionic ranges from 1 to 5% by weight, the weight of nonionic ranges from 1 to 10% by weight, the amount of electrolyte ranges from 5 to 10% by weight, and the amount of abrasive ranges from 5 to 15% by weight.
EP88108207A 1987-05-28 1988-05-21 Hard surface cleaning composition Expired - Lifetime EP0292910B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US5497487A 1987-05-28 1987-05-28
US54974 1987-05-28

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0292910A2 EP0292910A2 (en) 1988-11-30
EP0292910A3 EP0292910A3 (en) 1990-03-28
EP0292910B1 true EP0292910B1 (en) 1994-12-28

Family

ID=21994733

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP88108207A Expired - Lifetime EP0292910B1 (en) 1987-05-28 1988-05-21 Hard surface cleaning composition

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0292910B1 (en)
AU (1) AU609482B2 (en)
CA (1) CA1315636C (en)
DE (1) DE3852571T2 (en)
DK (1) DK293188A (en)
NO (1) NO172592C (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7393820B2 (en) 2002-10-16 2008-07-01 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Transparent abrasive cleaning product, especially manual dishwashing liquid
CN116134120A (en) * 2020-03-13 2023-05-16 联合利华知识产权控股有限公司 A bar of soap with a high water content

Families Citing this family (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4678596A (en) * 1986-05-01 1987-07-07 Rohm And Haas Company Rinse aid formulation
CA1335646C (en) * 1988-06-13 1995-05-23 Guido Clemens Van Den Brom Liquid detergent compositions
JPH0633415B2 (en) * 1988-12-02 1994-05-02 花王株式会社 Skin cleanser composition
US5017238A (en) * 1989-08-30 1991-05-21 Dow Corning Corporation Aqueous cleaning dispersions using adsorptive polymeric powder and method of using
DE4001595A1 (en) * 1990-01-20 1991-07-25 Henkel Kgaa DEMULGATING, POWDERFUL, OR LIQUID CLEANSING AGENTS AND THEIR USE
WO1992020776A1 (en) * 1991-05-15 1992-11-26 Eftichios Van Vlahakis Liquid hand soap composition
GB2311996A (en) * 1996-04-12 1997-10-15 Reckitt & Colman Inc Hard surface scouring cleansers `
NO315947B1 (en) * 2001-08-31 2003-11-17 Polymers Holding As Use of spherical and monodisperse polymer particles in detergents, and such detergents
US7256167B2 (en) * 2001-08-31 2007-08-14 Reckitt Benckiser Inc. Hard surface cleaner comprising suspended particles and oxidizing agent
GB2398571A (en) 2003-02-22 2004-08-25 Reckitt Benckiser Inc Acidic hard surface cleaning and/or disinfecting composition
US7119055B2 (en) 2001-08-31 2006-10-10 Reckitt Benckiser Inc. Hard surface cleaners comprising a thickening gum mixture
GB2379223A (en) 2001-08-31 2003-03-05 Reckitt Benckiser Inc Cleaning composition comprising citric acid
EP1321514A1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2003-06-25 Maclean S.A. Liquid scouring composition containing polyethylene particles
DE10248313A1 (en) 2002-10-16 2004-05-06 Henkel Kgaa Transparent abrasive cleaning agent, especially hand dishwashing liquid
AR043906A1 (en) 2003-02-22 2005-08-17 Reckitt Benckiser Inc CLEANING COMPOSITIONS FOR HARD SURFACES
GB2398792A (en) 2003-02-22 2004-09-01 Reckitt Benckiser Inc Acidic hard surface cleaning and/or disinfecting composition
US7799141B2 (en) * 2003-06-27 2010-09-21 Lam Research Corporation Method and system for using a two-phases substrate cleaning compound
SE0601157L (en) * 2006-05-26 2007-10-16 Gs Dev Ab Detergent composition for granular dishwashers
EP3040408A1 (en) * 2014-12-31 2016-07-06 Hayata Kimya Sanayi Anonim Sirketi Aqueous liquid cleaning compositions comprising bleaching agent and abrasive particles
FR3046061B1 (en) * 2015-12-23 2019-11-01 L'oreal COMPOSITION COMPRISING TWO NEUTRALIZED FATTY ACIDS, DIFFERENT FROM ONE ANOTHER, AND A PARTICULAR CLAY
CN115975735B (en) * 2022-12-28 2024-06-04 宁波坚锋新材料有限公司 Plastic cleaning agent for waste HIPS

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1534680A (en) * 1977-10-14 1978-12-06 Colgate Palmolive Co Cleaning compositions
US4240919A (en) * 1978-11-29 1980-12-23 S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. Thixotropic abrasive liquid scouring composition
ZA822496B (en) * 1981-04-20 1983-02-23 Alcon Lab Inc Polymeric scrub
US4655957A (en) * 1984-06-25 1987-04-07 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Contact lens cleaning composition with polymeric beads
GB2181738B (en) * 1985-10-16 1990-06-20 Kao Corp Abrasive, detergent composition

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7393820B2 (en) 2002-10-16 2008-07-01 Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien Transparent abrasive cleaning product, especially manual dishwashing liquid
CN116134120A (en) * 2020-03-13 2023-05-16 联合利华知识产权控股有限公司 A bar of soap with a high water content

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO172592C (en) 1993-08-11
EP0292910A3 (en) 1990-03-28
NO882339D0 (en) 1988-05-27
EP0292910A2 (en) 1988-11-30
DE3852571D1 (en) 1995-02-09
NO172592B (en) 1993-05-03
AU609482B2 (en) 1991-05-02
DE3852571T2 (en) 1995-08-17
CA1315636C (en) 1993-04-06
AU1666788A (en) 1988-12-01
NO882339L (en) 1988-11-29
DK293188D0 (en) 1988-05-27
DK293188A (en) 1988-11-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU609482B2 (en) Hard surface cleaning composition
EP0723576B1 (en) Liquid detergent compositions comprising salts of alpha sulfonated fatty acid methyl or ethyl esters, and anionic surfactants
US8785366B2 (en) Liquid cleaning compositions and methods
AU601067B2 (en) Liquid detergent compositions
US8440604B2 (en) Liquid hard surface cleaning composition
EP2350247B1 (en) Liquid hard surface cleaning composition
US8569223B2 (en) Liquid hard surface cleaning composition
AU2002220627B2 (en) Composition for cleaning hard surfaces
CA2015150C (en) Linear viscoelastic aqueous liquid automatic dishwasher detergent composition
US5536437A (en) Hard surface cleaning composition formed from a structured silicate
CA1334919C (en) Liquid detergent compositions
WO2007119195A2 (en) Process of cleaning a hard surface with zwitterionic copolymer
EP0502030B1 (en) Cleaning composition
EP0346994B1 (en) Liquid detergent compositions
WO2000020545A1 (en) Hard surface cleaning bar
WO2000041468A2 (en) Detergent composition
WO2000020544A1 (en) Non-liquid abrasive composition
WO2016118096A1 (en) Aqueous liquid cleaning compositions comprising bleaching agent and abrasive particles
WO1994004647A1 (en) Structured silicates and their use in automatic dishwashers
AU2009248799C1 (en) Liquid cleaning compositions and methods
EP0656053A1 (en) Automatic dishwashing detergent
ZA200500965B (en) Fabric treatment article and corresponding method of using it

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB GR IT SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB GR IT SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900719

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19920702

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB GR IT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19941228

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19941228

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3852571

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19950209

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19950328

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19950412

Year of fee payment: 8

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19960517

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19960521

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19960524

Year of fee payment: 9

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19960521

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980203

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050521