EP0259344B1 - Aerofoil - Google Patents

Aerofoil Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0259344B1
EP0259344B1 EP86904896A EP86904896A EP0259344B1 EP 0259344 B1 EP0259344 B1 EP 0259344B1 EP 86904896 A EP86904896 A EP 86904896A EP 86904896 A EP86904896 A EP 86904896A EP 0259344 B1 EP0259344 B1 EP 0259344B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
aerofoil
leading
chord
trailing
compound
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP86904896A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0259344A1 (en
Inventor
John Graham Walker
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
WALKER, JEAN MARGARET
WALKER, JOHN GRAHAM
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP0259344A1 publication Critical patent/EP0259344A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0259344B1 publication Critical patent/EP0259344B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63HMARINE PROPULSION OR STEERING
    • B63H9/00Marine propulsion provided directly by wind power
    • B63H9/04Marine propulsion provided directly by wind power using sails or like wind-catching surfaces
    • B63H9/06Types of sail; Constructional features of sails; Arrangements thereof on vessels
    • B63H9/061Rigid sails; Aerofoil sails

Definitions

  • This invention relates to aerofoils for wingsails.
  • Wingsails used to propel marine or terrestrial vessels, generally require to be capable of operation on port or starboard tack. This may be achieved by having complex folding arrangements of asymmetrical aerofoils the camber of which can be reversed by extension and folding of separate sections.
  • European patent specification 61291 describes a compound wingsail assembly that comprises a plurality of symmetrical aerofoil sections which can be angled with respect to one another to give cambered and slotted configurations. In that specification a trailing aerofoil is mounted for pivoting movement about a point on the chord of a leading aerofoil so that it can pivot from a coplanar position to angularly displaced positions.
  • the present invention relates to the particular profiles of aerofoil sections in a compound wingsail assembly of the type described in EP 61291.
  • a compound wingsail assembly comprising a leading symmetrical aerofoil and a trailing symmetrical aerofoil mounted for pivoting movement about a point on the chord of the leading aerofoil from an aligned position coplanar with the leading aerofoil to positions angularly displaced from the aligned position, characterised in that the aerofoils have a thickness in the range of one to two fifths of their respective chord lengths, the leading aerofoil has a zone in which its thickness is at least 90% of its maximum thickness extending over substantially 30% of its chord length located in the range of 20% to 55% along its chord from its leading edge and the trailing aerofoil has a zone in which its thickness is at least 90% of its maximum thickness extending over substantially 20% of its chord length located in the range of 10% to 35% along the chord from its leading edge.
  • the aerofoil shown has a chord length C and a maximum thickness of 0.291 C, with a leading edge radius of 6.489% of C.
  • the overall shape follows that of the table of ordinates Table 1.
  • the leading element 2 has a leading edge radius of 8.777% of its chord and a maximum thickness of 39.32% of its chord occurring at approximately 35% along the chord.
  • the table of ordinates for this aerofoil shape is given in Table 2.
  • the trailing element 3 shown in Figure 2 has a leading edge radius of 10.625% of its chord with a maximum thickness of 30.42% of its chord occurring at approximately 25% along the chord from the leading edge.
  • the table of ordinates for the profile is given in Table 3.
  • the aerofoil of Figure 1 may be regarded as a basic member of the preferred family of wingsail profiles. It comprises a relatively high leading edge radius when compared with aerofoils for aircraft, and thickens relatively rapidly to reach a 90% thickness zone that commences at about 20% of the chord and continues to about 40% of the chord, the aerofoil then narrowing into the trailing portion and curvature undergoing an inflexion.
  • the second member of the family, aerofoil 2 of Figure 2 has a leading edge curvature that matches with the leading edge of the aerofoil of Figure 1, but is modified into a more abrupt trailing edge with almost no curvature from about two thirds of the way along the chord.
  • the trailing edges are flat, in a more general case they may only be substantially flat and may have a slight curve or a slight inflexion.
  • the trailing edge of the aerofoil 2 is provided with a slat 4 which acts to extend the trailing edge.
  • the trailing edge of the leading section may be truncated for the pivot mounting of the slat.
  • the curvatures of the leading parts of aerofoils 1 and 2 match, the positions of maximum thickness and leading edge radius in percentages deviate because of the differing lengths of the trailing sections.
  • the trailing edge modification is shown in dotted outline.
  • the trailing areofoil 3 of Figures 2 and 3 has a fatter leading edge portion, but from the point of maximum thickness matches with the trailing section of the aerofoil of Figure 1.
  • the relatively rapid rise to maximum thickness makes the point of maximum thickness occur relatively sooner along the chord.
  • Figure 4 the leading edge modification for a trailing aerofoil is shown in chain dot outline.
  • the 90% thickness zone extends over a range of approximately 17% to 33% of the chord, most preferably in the range of 23% to 27% of the chord.
  • the 90% thickness zone may commence in the range of 10% to 25% of the chord and be contained within the range of 10% to 55% of the chord from the leading edge, most preferably being within the range 17% to 45%.
  • the maximum thickness may lie in the range of 20% to 40% but preferably is in the range of 25% to 30% of the chord.
  • the leading edge radius is preferably in the range of 5.5% to 7.5% of the chord, but may be in the range 5.5% to 12%.
  • the leading section (disregarding any flaps or slats) preferably has a shortened tail section with no inflexion so that the 90% thickness zone starts at about 19% to 23% of the chord.
  • the trailing section of compound wings preferably has a leading edge radius that lies in the upper end of the range as defined for single aerofoils.
  • Table 4 gives the approximate preferred ranges in terms of chord % for the three wingsail aerofoils described above. In compound wingsails it is possible to modifiy the curvature at the end that is adjacent another aerofoil, or to modify the overall curvature and compensate in the other aerofoil.
  • Figures 2 and 3 represent an especially preferred compound wingsail according to the invention.
  • the trailing element 3 is mounted on a boom or booms pivotable about an axis 5 on the chord of the leading element 2.
  • Each of the main aerofoils 2 and 3 preferably have the same maximum thickness (although differing thickness is possible, the trailing section preferably having the largerthickness) of .170 C TOT where C TOT is the total chord defined from the leading edge of the leading section to the trailing edge of the trailing section with the aerofoils aligned as in Figure 2.
  • the leading element is shorter having a chord of .432C r or and the trailing section having a chord of .560C TOT with a space of .008C TOT between the aerofoils.
  • the slat 4 has a length .076C TOT and in the fully cambered position shown in Figure 3 is deflected through 25° with an adjustment facility of 5.5°.
  • the preferred fully cambered configuration deflects the trailing section through 42° with the pivot of the trailing section positioned about 2/3 of the way along the leading section: in Figure 3 is is .278c TOT from the leading edge.
  • a main upright pivot axis for the compound wing passes through the zone of the centre of pressure of the leading element 2 and the wing is trimmed to the wind by an auxiliary aerofoil, normally a tail vane, which also has an aerofoil section in accordance with the invention.
  • a tail vane is usually a single aerofoil and does not have slats or an adjacent aerofoil it preferably has the leading and trailing profiles shown in Figure 1.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Wind Motors (AREA)
  • Structures Of Non-Positive Displacement Pumps (AREA)

Abstract

An aerofoil shape having a section with a maximum total thickness in the range of 20% to 40% of the total chord and a 90% thickness zone that extends for at least 17% and at most 33% of the total chord and lies in the range of 105 to 55% along the chord. In a compound wingsail both the leading and trailing elements belong to this basic section but the leading section has a more abrupt trailing edge and the trailing section has a blunted nose.

Description

  • This invention relates to aerofoils for wingsails.
  • Wingsails, used to propel marine or terrestrial vessels, generally require to be capable of operation on port or starboard tack. This may be achieved by having complex folding arrangements of asymmetrical aerofoils the camber of which can be reversed by extension and folding of separate sections. European patent specification 61291 describes a compound wingsail assembly that comprises a plurality of symmetrical aerofoil sections which can be angled with respect to one another to give cambered and slotted configurations. In that specification a trailing aerofoil is mounted for pivoting movement about a point on the chord of a leading aerofoil so that it can pivot from a coplanar position to angularly displaced positions.
  • The present invention relates to the particular profiles of aerofoil sections in a compound wingsail assembly of the type described in EP 61291.
  • According to the invention there is provided a compound wingsail assembly comprising a leading symmetrical aerofoil and a trailing symmetrical aerofoil mounted for pivoting movement about a point on the chord of the leading aerofoil from an aligned position coplanar with the leading aerofoil to positions angularly displaced from the aligned position, characterised in that the aerofoils have a thickness in the range of one to two fifths of their respective chord lengths, the leading aerofoil has a zone in which its thickness is at least 90% of its maximum thickness extending over substantially 30% of its chord length located in the range of 20% to 55% along its chord from its leading edge and the trailing aerofoil has a zone in which its thickness is at least 90% of its maximum thickness extending over substantially 20% of its chord length located in the range of 10% to 35% along the chord from its leading edge.
  • The invention is now described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
    • Figure 1 is a schematic outline of an aerofoil according to the invention;
    • Figure 2 is a schematic outline of a slotted wing assembly according to the invention;
    • Figure 3 is a schematic outline of the wing of Figure 2 in a cambered configuration; and
    • Figure 4 is a schematic outline superimposing the aerofoil sections of Figures 1, 2 and 3.
  • Referring now to Figure 1, the aerofoil shown has a chord length C and a maximum thickness of 0.291 C, with a leading edge radius of 6.489% of C. The overall shape follows that of the table of ordinates Table 1.
    Figure imgb0001
  • It will be seen from Table 1 that the maximum thickness occurs at approximately 30% along the total chord.
  • Referring now to Figure 2 the leading element 2 has a leading edge radius of 8.777% of its chord and a maximum thickness of 39.32% of its chord occurring at approximately 35% along the chord. The table of ordinates for this aerofoil shape is given in Table 2.
    Figure imgb0002
  • The trailing element 3 shown in Figure 2 has a leading edge radius of 10.625% of its chord with a maximum thickness of 30.42% of its chord occurring at approximately 25% along the chord from the leading edge. The table of ordinates for the profile is given in Table 3.
    Figure imgb0003
  • The aerofoil of Figure 1 may be regarded as a basic member of the preferred family of wingsail profiles. It comprises a relatively high leading edge radius when compared with aerofoils for aircraft, and thickens relatively rapidly to reach a 90% thickness zone that commences at about 20% of the chord and continues to about 40% of the chord, the aerofoil then narrowing into the trailing portion and curvature undergoing an inflexion.
  • The second member of the family, aerofoil 2 of Figure 2, has a leading edge curvature that matches with the leading edge of the aerofoil of Figure 1, but is modified into a more abrupt trailing edge with almost no curvature from about two thirds of the way along the chord. In the drawing the trailing edges are flat, in a more general case they may only be substantially flat and may have a slight curve or a slight inflexion. If reference is made to Figure 3 it will be observed that the trailing edge of the aerofoil 2 is provided with a slat 4 which acts to extend the trailing edge. In practice the trailing edge of the leading section may be truncated for the pivot mounting of the slat. Although the curvatures of the leading parts of aerofoils 1 and 2 match, the positions of maximum thickness and leading edge radius in percentages deviate because of the differing lengths of the trailing sections. In Figure 4 the trailing edge modification is shown in dotted outline.
  • The trailing areofoil 3 of Figures 2 and 3 has a fatter leading edge portion, but from the point of maximum thickness matches with the trailing section of the aerofoil of Figure 1. The relatively rapid rise to maximum thickness makes the point of maximum thickness occur relatively sooner along the chord. In Figure 4 the leading edge modification for a trailing aerofoil is shown in chain dot outline.
  • For a single aerofoil, the 90% thickness zone extends over a range of approximately 17% to 33% of the chord, most preferably in the range of 23% to 27% of the chord. The 90% thickness zone may commence in the range of 10% to 25% of the chord and be contained within the range of 10% to 55% of the chord from the leading edge, most preferably being within the range 17% to 45%. The maximum thickness may lie in the range of 20% to 40% but preferably is in the range of 25% to 30% of the chord. The leading edge radius is preferably in the range of 5.5% to 7.5% of the chord, but may be in the range 5.5% to 12%.
  • In compound wings the leading section (disregarding any flaps or slats) preferably has a shortened tail section with no inflexion so that the 90% thickness zone starts at about 19% to 23% of the chord. The trailing section of compound wings preferably has a leading edge radius that lies in the upper end of the range as defined for single aerofoils.
  • Table 4 gives the approximate preferred ranges in terms of chord % for the three wingsail aerofoils described above. In compound wingsails it is possible to modifiy the curvature at the end that is adjacent another aerofoil, or to modify the overall curvature and compensate in the other aerofoil.
    Figure imgb0004
  • Figures 2 and 3 represent an especially preferred compound wingsail according to the invention. The trailing element 3 is mounted on a boom or booms pivotable about an axis 5 on the chord of the leading element 2. Each of the main aerofoils 2 and 3 preferably have the same maximum thickness (although differing thickness is possible, the trailing section preferably having the largerthickness) of .170 CTOT where CTOT is the total chord defined from the leading edge of the leading section to the trailing edge of the trailing section with the aerofoils aligned as in Figure 2. The leading element is shorter having a chord of .432Cror and the trailing section having a chord of .560CTOT with a space of .008CTOT between the aerofoils. The slat 4 has a length .076CTOT and in the fully cambered position shown in Figure 3 is deflected through 25° with an adjustment facility of 5.5°. The preferred fully cambered configuration deflects the trailing section through 42° with the pivot of the trailing section positioned about 2/3 of the way along the leading section: in Figure 3 is is .278cTOT from the leading edge.
  • A main upright pivot axis for the compound wing passes through the zone of the centre of pressure of the leading element 2 and the wing is trimmed to the wind by an auxiliary aerofoil, normally a tail vane, which also has an aerofoil section in accordance with the invention. As the tail vane is usually a single aerofoil and does not have slats or an adjacent aerofoil it preferably has the leading and trailing profiles shown in Figure 1.

Claims (10)

1. A compound wingsail assembly comprising a leading symmetrical aerofoil and a trailing symmetrical aerofoil mounted for pivoting movement about a point on the chord of the leading aerofoil from an aligned position coplanar with the leading aerofoil to positions angularly displaced from the aligned position, characterised in that the aerofoils have a thickness in the range of one to two fifths of their respective chord lengths, the leading aerofoil has a zone in which its thickness is at least 90% of its maximum thickness extending over substantially 30% of its chord length located in the range of 20% to 55% along its chord from its leading edge and the trailing aerofoil has a zone in which its thickness is at least 90% of its maximum thickness extending over substantially 20% of its chord length located in the range of 10% to 35% along the chord from its leading edge.
2. A compound wingsail assembly according to claim 1 further characterised in that the leading and trailing aerofoils have the same maximum thickness.
3. A compound wingsail assembly according to claim 2 further characterised in that when coplanar the leading and trailing aerofoils have a combined chord length of CTOT from the leading edge of the leading aerofoil to the trailing edge of the trailing aerofoil and the maximum thickness of the aerofoils is substantially 0.17 CTOT.
4. A compound wingsail assembly according to any preceding claim further characterised in that the chord lengths of the leading and trailing aerofoils are substantially in the ratio 43:56.
5. A compound wingsail assembly according to any preceding claim further characterised in that the leading aerofoil has a leading edge radius os substantially 8.7% of its chord length.
6. A compound wingsail assembly according to any preceding claim further characterised in that the trailing aerofoil has a leading edge radius of substantially 10.6% of its chord length.
7. A compound wingsail assembly according to any preceding claim in which the leading and trailing aerofoils are rotatable about a common axis and are arranged to be trimmed about that axis-by an auxiliary symmetrical aerofoil, further characterised in that the auxiliary aerofoil has a zone in which its thickness is at least 90% of its maximum thickness extending over substantially 25% of its chord length located in the range of 17% to 45% along its chord from its leading edge.
8. A compound wingsail assembly according to claim 7 further characterised in that the profile of the auxiliary aerofoil follows the table of ordinates given herein as Table 1.
9. A compound wingsail assembly according to any preceding claim further characterised in that the profile of the leading aerofoil follows the table or ordinates given herein as Table 2.
10. A compound wingsail assembly according to any preceding claim further characterised in that the profile of the trailing aerofoil folows the table or ordinates given herein as Table 3.
EP86904896A 1985-08-22 1986-08-22 Aerofoil Expired - Lifetime EP0259344B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8521085 1985-08-22
GB858521085A GB8521085D0 (en) 1985-08-22 1985-08-22 Aerofoil

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0259344A1 EP0259344A1 (en) 1988-03-16
EP0259344B1 true EP0259344B1 (en) 1990-12-27

Family

ID=10584188

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP86904896A Expired - Lifetime EP0259344B1 (en) 1985-08-22 1986-08-22 Aerofoil

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0259344B1 (en)
JP (1) JPS63501355A (en)
AU (1) AU597904B2 (en)
DE (1) DE3676702D1 (en)
DK (1) DK202087A (en)
FI (1) FI880826A0 (en)
GB (1) GB8521085D0 (en)
WO (1) WO1987001088A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR940000045B1 (en) * 1985-05-02 1994-01-05 쟝 마가렛 워커 Wingsail system
GB9401744D0 (en) * 1994-01-31 1994-03-23 Walker John G Monoplane wingsail

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU554405B2 (en) * 1981-03-19 1986-08-21 Walker Wingsail Systems Ltd. Sail of hinged aerofoil sections
US4519746A (en) * 1981-07-24 1985-05-28 United Technologies Corporation Airfoil blade
US4432298A (en) * 1981-10-01 1984-02-21 Cudmore Patrick J Hydrofoil sailing craft
JPS59184096A (en) * 1983-03-31 1984-10-19 Mitsui Eng & Shipbuild Co Ltd Composite sail

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Abbott, Von Doenhoff: "Theory of wing sections ", Dover Publications, New York (US), pages 326, 327 see page 326, Naca 0021, columns 1,2 page 327, NACA 0024, columns 1,2, last but one line *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS63501355A (en) 1988-05-26
GB8521085D0 (en) 1985-09-25
AU597904B2 (en) 1990-06-14
DE3676702D1 (en) 1991-02-07
AU6280886A (en) 1987-03-10
DK202087D0 (en) 1987-04-21
WO1987001088A1 (en) 1987-02-26
FI880826A (en) 1988-02-22
DK202087A (en) 1987-05-20
EP0259344A1 (en) 1988-03-16
FI880826A0 (en) 1988-02-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6000911A (en) Blade with swept-back tip for the rotary wings of an aircraft
US4880355A (en) Blade with curved end for a rotary airfoil of an aircraft
US4569633A (en) Airfoil section for a rotor blade of a rotorcraft
EP0385913B1 (en) Airfoiled blade
US8172540B2 (en) Airfoil for a helicopter rotor blade
EP0331603A2 (en) Airfoiled blade
US20090148303A1 (en) Main rotor blade with integral tip section
CA2134747A1 (en) Variable Diameter Rotor Having an Offset Twist
WO1996016272B1 (en) Fan blade with curved planform and high-lift airfoil having bulbous leading edge
US7513750B2 (en) Rotor blade tip planform
EP0482788A1 (en) Helicopter rotor blades
JPH0616190A (en) Aircraft rotor blade with apex of sweepback angle
US4130377A (en) Helicopter blade and rotor
US5199851A (en) Helicopter rotor blades
CN101501302A (en) Rotor blade for a high speed rotary-wing aircraft
US3173490A (en) Propeller blade for vtol aircraft
JPH04293695A (en) Low noise type tail section rotor
US4834617A (en) Airfoiled blade
EP0262071A1 (en) Helicopter blade airfoil
EP0259344B1 (en) Aerofoil
US4028003A (en) Torsionally compliant helicopter rotor blade with improved stability and performance characteristics
EP0306434B1 (en) Airfoiled blade
EP1695903B1 (en) Aircraft with rotatable leading edge of fuselage and wings
US6382561B1 (en) Trailing edge wedge for an aircraft wing
US4790724A (en) Aerial propellors more especially for aircraft propulsive units

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19880229

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL SE

DIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (deleted)
RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: WALKER, JEAN MARGARET

Owner name: WALKER, JOHN GRAHAM

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: WALKER, JOHN GRAHAM

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19891221

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: WALKER, JEAN MARGARET

Owner name: WALKER, JOHN GRAHAM

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3676702

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19910207

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19910823

ITTA It: last paid annual fee
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 86904896.7

Effective date: 19920306

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19971209

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19971212

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19971223

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19990215

Year of fee payment: 13

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990430

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 19990301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990601

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990822

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19990822

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050822