EP0248397B1 - Prebaked zirconium for electron beam melted barrier tube shell material - Google Patents
Prebaked zirconium for electron beam melted barrier tube shell material Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0248397B1 EP0248397B1 EP87107946A EP87107946A EP0248397B1 EP 0248397 B1 EP0248397 B1 EP 0248397B1 EP 87107946 A EP87107946 A EP 87107946A EP 87107946 A EP87107946 A EP 87107946A EP 0248397 B1 EP0248397 B1 EP 0248397B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sponge
- melting
- vacuum
- zirconium
- process according
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B9/00—General processes of refining or remelting of metals; Apparatus for electroslag or arc remelting of metals
- C22B9/16—Remelting metals
- C22B9/22—Remelting metals with heating by wave energy or particle radiation
- C22B9/228—Remelting metals with heating by wave energy or particle radiation by particle radiation, e.g. electron beams
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B34/00—Obtaining refractory metals
- C22B34/10—Obtaining titanium, zirconium or hafnium
- C22B34/14—Obtaining zirconium or hafnium
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B9/00—General processes of refining or remelting of metals; Apparatus for electroslag or arc remelting of metals
- C22B9/04—Refining by applying a vacuum
Definitions
- This invention relates to the production of purified zirconium.
- the conventional process for making zirconium metal utilizes a fluidized bed process in which the ore is subjected to a chlorination step which produces a relatively impure, hafnium-containing zirconium tetrachloride and by-product silicon tetrachloride (which by-product is relatively easily separated).
- the hafnium and zirconium containing material is then subjected to a number of purifying operations and also a complex hafnium separation operation. These operations result in purified oxides of zirconium and hafnium, which, of course, are maintained separate.
- the purified oxides are separately chlorinated.
- Zirconium and hafnium are commonly reduced from the chloride by means of a reducing metal, typically magnesium.
- U.S. Patent Specification No. 3,966,460 describes a process of introducing zirconium tetrachloride vapor onto molten magnesium, with the zirconium being reduced and traveling down through the magnesium layer to the bottom of the reactor and forming a metallic sponge.
- the metallic sponge (containing remaining chloride and some remaining excess reducing metal) is then placed in a distillation vessel for removal of the remaining salt and reducing metal by high temperature vacuum distillation.
- the sponge material is generally crushed, screened and pressed into electrodes for vacuum arc melting. Particularly, the material is multiple (typical double or triple) vacuum arc melted to provide ingots which are then further fabricated into various shapes.
- Most of the zirconium currently is used to produce Zircaloy.
- Zircaloy tubes as cladding material to contain the uranium dioxide fuel.
- a Zircaloy ingot is processed into a so-called "trex" and pilgering operations are used to reduce the trex inside diameter and wall thickness to size.
- Ultra-pure zirconium has been proposed for a liner for the inside surface of Zircaloy tubing which is used as a cladding for nuclear fuel and is described in, for example, U.S. Patent Specification No. 4,372,817 (Armijo et al.).
- a similar use of moderate purity material is proposed in U.S. Patent Specification No. 4,200,492 (Armijo et al.).
- the ultra-pure zirconium material described has been purified by iodide cells to produce so called "crystal bar” material.
- This rather expensive crystal bar processing is performed after reduction and is described, for example, in U.S. Patent Specification No. 4,368,072 (Siddal).
- EB (electron beam) melting of materials has been discussed in a number of U.S. patent specifications. EB melting has been used to consolidate crushed particles or chips in so called hearth furnaces and to separate impurities by either overflowing floating inclusions (U.S. Patent Specification No. 4,190,404 (Drs et al.) or to produce an electrode for arc melting (U.S. Patent Specification No. 4,108,644 (Walberg et al.).
- a number of U.S. patent specifications have used EB melting of powders or granules, often producing an ingot in a chilled mold. These powder melting EB patent specifications include U.S. Patent Specification Nos.
- 3,091,525 to (D. A. Hunt) describes adding a small amount of zirconium, for example, to hafnium, for example and melting in an EB furnace to deoxidize the hafnium.
- Japanese application 1979-144789 Kawakita published as patent publication 1981-67788 describes the use of a very small ingot with a high power density and ultra slow melting to produce a deep molten pool to produce a high purity ingot directly usable for lining of Zircaloy tubing for nuclear reactor applications.
- Such laboratory sized apparatus with its high powered consumption and very low throughput is, of course, not practical for commercial production.
- a process for producing zirconium in purified form comprises reducing zirconium tetrachloride to produce a sponge of metallic zirconium which is distilled to generally remove residual magnesium and residual magnesium chloride, and melting the distilled sponge to produce an ingot, characterized by vacuum baking the distilled sponge for at least one-half hour at 120-400°C; and electron beam melting said vacuum baked sponge.
- this process provides material much purer than the so-called sponge material and almost as good as the crystal bar material, at a fraction of the cost of crystal bar material.
- Generally purified zirconium produced according to the present invention has oxygen in the 250-350 ppm range and iron in the 50-300 ppm range.
- Total impurities are generally in the 500-1000 ppm range (total impurities for these purposes generally comprise the elements listed in the afore-mentioned U.S. Patent Specification No. 4,200,492).
- Vacuum baking in the temperature range of 120-400°C generally removes moisture absorbed on the surface of the sponge (it is felt that the moisture generally is in the form of absorbed moisture on small amounts of residual magnesium chloride salt which still may remain after distillation).
- the EB melting generally removes iron from the zirconium. The combined baked and EB melted material provides high purity material approaching the quality of crystal bar.
- the vacuum baked material is generally maintained in an inert atmosphere between the vacuum baking and EB melting to avoid moisture pick up.
- the vacuum baking can be performed within the EB furnace prior to the start of melting and the vacuum maintained until melting is begun, thus generally avoiding the regaining of moisture.
- the distilled sponge is tested and only sponge having less than about 600 ppm of oxygen is selected for use in the instant process.
- the iron impurity level is reduced by about a factor of 2 on each pass through the EB furnace (that is, when the intermediate ingot form during the first EB melting pass is used as the consumable electrode for a second EB melting, the iron level is reduced by another factor of approximately 2).
- this process makes the speed of the first EB melting less critical, and provides for a more controlled and more complete moisture removal, and thus a lower oxygen content product for a given oxygen level in the distilled sponge.
- this process gives oxygen levels in the 250-350 ppm range (which, of course, are preferred in any event, but are much more controllably obtained in the instant invention).
- These two inventions are desirably combinable such that the material can be prebaked, EB melted, and then vacuum arc melted for optimum properties.
- the baking at 120-400°C for at least one-half hour is most desirably done within the EB furnace such that the material can be maintained under vacuum until melting
- the material can be baked in any vacuum chamber, including the EB welding chambers which are sometimes used to weld end stubs on electrodes which have been fabricated by pressing sponge material.
- the crushed sponge can be baked prior to pressing (again preferably generally keeping the material in a dry, inert atmosphere) and then pressed and possibly subjected to a second baking cycle.
- the product of this process has low total impurities, and especially a low oxygen and low iron (the iron level generally being controlled by the number of passes through the EB furnace).
- the process is relatively inexpensive and, being compatible with existing production processes, requires little additional capital investment.
Description
- This invention relates to the production of purified zirconium.
- The conventional process for making zirconium metal utilizes a fluidized bed process in which the ore is subjected to a chlorination step which produces a relatively impure, hafnium-containing zirconium tetrachloride and by-product silicon tetrachloride (which by-product is relatively easily separated). The hafnium and zirconium containing material is then subjected to a number of purifying operations and also a complex hafnium separation operation. These operations result in purified oxides of zirconium and hafnium, which, of course, are maintained separate. The purified oxides are separately chlorinated. Zirconium and hafnium are commonly reduced from the chloride by means of a reducing metal, typically magnesium. At the present time, the commercial processes are batched-type processes. U.S. Patent Specification No. 3,966,460, for example, describes a process of introducing zirconium tetrachloride vapor onto molten magnesium, with the zirconium being reduced and traveling down through the magnesium layer to the bottom of the reactor and forming a metallic sponge. The metallic sponge (containing remaining chloride and some remaining excess reducing metal) is then placed in a distillation vessel for removal of the remaining salt and reducing metal by high temperature vacuum distillation. The sponge material is generally crushed, screened and pressed into electrodes for vacuum arc melting. Particularly, the material is multiple (typical double or triple) vacuum arc melted to provide ingots which are then further fabricated into various shapes. Most of the zirconium currently is used to produce Zircaloy.
- Commercial nuclear reactors generally have used Zircaloy tubes as cladding material to contain the uranium dioxide fuel. Generally a Zircaloy ingot is processed into a so-called "trex" and pilgering operations are used to reduce the trex inside diameter and wall thickness to size. Ultra-pure zirconium has been proposed for a liner for the inside surface of Zircaloy tubing which is used as a cladding for nuclear fuel and is described in, for example, U.S. Patent Specification No. 4,372,817 (Armijo et al.). A similar use of moderate purity material is proposed in U.S. Patent Specification No. 4,200,492 (Armijo et al.). The ultra-pure zirconium material described has been purified by iodide cells to produce so called "crystal bar" material. This rather expensive crystal bar processing is performed after reduction and is described, for example, in U.S. Patent Specification No. 4,368,072 (Siddal).
- EB (electron beam) melting of materials, including zirconium has been discussed in a number of U.S. patent specifications. EB melting has been used to consolidate crushed particles or chips in so called hearth furnaces and to separate impurities by either overflowing floating inclusions (U.S. Patent Specification No. 4,190,404 (Drs et al.) or to produce an electrode for arc melting (U.S. Patent Specification No. 4,108,644 (Walberg et al.). A number of U.S. patent specifications have used EB melting of powders or granules, often producing an ingot in a chilled mold. These powder melting EB patent specifications include U.S. Patent Specification Nos. 2,942,098 (Smith); 2,960,331 (Hanks); 2,963,530 (Hanks et al.); 2,997,760 (Hanks et al); 2,935,395 (Smith); and 4,482,376 (Tarasescu et al.). Electron beam zone refining using multiple passes is described in U.S. Patent Specification No. 3,615,345 (King).
- EB melting using a consumable feed "electrode" to produce an ingot collected in a chilled mold has also been discussed in a number of U.S. patent specifications, including 3,087,211 (Howe); 3,226,223 (Bussard et al.); 2,880,483 (Hanks et al.); and 4,130,416 (Zaboronok et al.). U.S. Patent Specification No. 3,219,435 (Gruber et al.) shows a commercial type EB furnace utilizing multiple beams. Typically the beams are directed to the surface of the molten pool and are continually swept across the pool surface to avoid overheating of any single portion of the pool surface. U.S. Patent Specification No. 3,091,525 to (D. A. Hunt) describes adding a small amount of zirconium, for example, to hafnium, for example and melting in an EB furnace to deoxidize the hafnium. Japanese application 1979-144789 Kawakita, published as patent publication 1981-67788 describes the use of a very small ingot with a high power density and ultra slow melting to produce a deep molten pool to produce a high purity ingot directly usable for lining of Zircaloy tubing for nuclear reactor applications. Such laboratory sized apparatus with its high powered consumption and very low throughput is, of course, not practical for commercial production.
- Accordingly, a process for producing zirconium in purified form comprises reducing zirconium tetrachloride to produce a sponge of metallic zirconium which is distilled to generally remove residual magnesium and residual magnesium chloride, and melting the distilled sponge to produce an ingot, characterized by vacuum baking the distilled sponge for at least one-half hour at 120-400°C; and electron beam melting said vacuum baked sponge.
- This is a process for making a very pure material for use in the lining of the interior of zirconium alloy fuel element cladding, and having, in particular, exceptionally low oxygen. Generally this process provides material much purer than the so-called sponge material and almost as good as the crystal bar material, at a fraction of the cost of crystal bar material. Generally purified zirconium produced according to the present invention has oxygen in the 250-350 ppm range and iron in the 50-300 ppm range. Total impurities are generally in the 500-1000 ppm range (total impurities for these purposes generally comprise the elements listed in the afore-mentioned U.S. Patent Specification No. 4,200,492).
Vacuum baking in the temperature range of 120-400°C generally removes moisture absorbed on the surface of the sponge (it is felt that the moisture generally is in the form of absorbed moisture on small amounts of residual magnesium chloride salt which still may remain after distillation). The EB melting generally removes iron from the zirconium. The combined baked and EB melted material provides high purity material approaching the quality of crystal bar. - Preferably, the vacuum baked material is generally maintained in an inert atmosphere between the vacuum baking and EB melting to avoid moisture pick up. The vacuum baking can be performed within the EB furnace prior to the start of melting and the vacuum maintained until melting is begun, thus generally avoiding the regaining of moisture. Preferably, also the distilled sponge is tested and only sponge having less than about 600 ppm of oxygen is selected for use in the instant process.
- It has been found that moisture has heretofore been a significant contributor of oxygen to zirconium during the normal processing. Further, our experiments have shown that only by vacuum baking within a relatively narrow temperature range can this oxygen contamination be generally avoided. This moisture, if not generally eliminated prior to melting, results in oxidizing of zirconium and magnesium, which zirconium oxide can then only be eliminated by very expensive processing (i.e., by the crystal bar process or by extremely slow and extremely high temperature EB melting as described in the afore-mentioned Japanese Patent Report 1981-67788). In addition, vacuum melting at below 250°C generally requires longer times for moisture reduction and baking at above 400°C causes the oxidation of zirconium and hydrolized MgCl₂ (to MgO), thus affixing the oxygen, rather than removing it.
- It has generally been found that the iron impurity level is reduced by about a factor of 2 on each pass through the EB furnace (that is, when the intermediate ingot form during the first EB melting pass is used as the consumable electrode for a second EB melting, the iron level is reduced by another factor of approximately 2). As compared with copending United States patent application S.N. 871,183, filed June 5, 1986, this process makes the speed of the first EB melting less critical, and provides for a more controlled and more complete moisture removal, and thus a lower oxygen content product for a given oxygen level in the distilled sponge. Thus, generally this process gives oxygen levels in the 250-350 ppm range (which, of course, are preferred in any event, but are much more controllably obtained in the instant invention). These two inventions are desirably combinable such that the material can be prebaked, EB melted, and then vacuum arc melted for optimum properties.
- Generally virgin material (as opposed to recycled scrap or turnings) is selected, generally for low oxygen content, at the sponge stage to obtain the best product. While generally low oxygen sponge material is desirable, reliably measuring such oxygen levels at the sponge stage is difficult.
- While the baking at 120-400°C for at least one-half hour (and preferably for several hours including, for example, 12 to 16 hours), is most desirably done within the EB furnace such that the material can be maintained under vacuum until melting, the material can be baked in any vacuum chamber, including the EB welding chambers which are sometimes used to weld end stubs on electrodes which have been fabricated by pressing sponge material.
- Conversely, the crushed sponge can be baked prior to pressing (again preferably generally keeping the material in a dry, inert atmosphere) and then pressed and possibly subjected to a second baking cycle.
- Another alternative is for vacuum baking directly in a EB melter without pressing into an electrode in a furnace of the type where granules can be fed as in the aforementioned "powder melting EB patent specifications" (e.g., U.S. Patent Specification Nos. 2,942,098; 4,482,376, etc.). Some such EB furnaces are referred to as "rotary feeder" EB furnaces.
- Although it is desirable to avoid exposure to the atmosphere between the vacuum baking and EB melting, the moisture pick up is apparently not extremely rapid and exposures of less than one hour to the atmosphere will generally give good results. Multiple passes through the EB furnace can, of course, be used, and may be necessary, especially if the starting material is high in iron. Multiple passes through a vacuum arc melting can, of course, follow the EB melting and, as mentioned in the aforementioned copending application, provides homogenous distribution of impurities and avoids localized impurity concentrations.
- Thus, the product of this process has low total impurities, and especially a low oxygen and low iron (the iron level generally being controlled by the number of passes through the EB furnace). The process is relatively inexpensive and, being compatible with existing production processes, requires little additional capital investment.
Claims (8)
- A process for producing zirconium in purified form which comprises reducing zirconium tetrachloride to produce a sponge of metallic zirconium which is distilled to generally remove residual magnesium and residual magnesium chloride, and melting the distilled sponge to produce an ingot, characterized by vacuum baking the distilled sponge for at least one-half hour at 120-400°C; and electron beam melting said vacuum baked sponge.
- A process according to claim 1, characterized in that the vacuum baked sponge is generally maintained in an inert atmosphere between vacuum baking and EB melting.
- A process according to claim 2, characterized in that vacuum baking is performed in an EB furnace prior to melting and the EB melting is then performed without breaking vacuum.
- A process according to claim 3, characterized in that a rotary feeder EB furnace is utilized and the sponge is melted without being consolidated into an electrode.
- A process according to claim 3 or 4, characterized in that the EB furnace has multiple swept beams.
- A process according to claim 3, 4 or 5, characterized in that the EB melted sponge is melted by multiple passes through a vacuum arc.
- A process according to claim 1, characterized in that the vacuum baked sponge is exposed to the atmosphere for less than one hour between the vacuum baking and the EB melting.
- A process according to any of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that the distilled sponge is tested and sponge having 600 ppm or more of oxygen is rejected.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US87118286A | 1986-06-05 | 1986-06-05 | |
US871182 | 1986-06-05 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0248397A2 EP0248397A2 (en) | 1987-12-09 |
EP0248397A3 EP0248397A3 (en) | 1990-05-02 |
EP0248397B1 true EP0248397B1 (en) | 1992-08-19 |
Family
ID=25356888
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP87107946A Expired - Lifetime EP0248397B1 (en) | 1986-06-05 | 1987-06-02 | Prebaked zirconium for electron beam melted barrier tube shell material |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0248397B1 (en) |
KR (1) | KR880000612A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3781206T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2033736T3 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4849016A (en) * | 1987-12-18 | 1989-07-18 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Combined ultra slow electron beam and vacuum arc melting for barrier tube shell material |
US5062887A (en) * | 1991-02-08 | 1991-11-05 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Process for chloride removal from sponge metal |
US6861030B2 (en) * | 2000-10-02 | 2005-03-01 | Nikko Materials Company, Limited | Method of manufacturing high purity zirconium and hafnium |
US9938605B1 (en) | 2014-10-01 | 2018-04-10 | Materion Corporation | Methods for making zirconium based alloys and bulk metallic glasses |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2814560A (en) * | 1954-04-23 | 1957-11-26 | James S Ballantine | Apparatus and process for melting material of high melting point |
BE568331A (en) * | 1956-07-27 | 1900-01-01 | ||
NL239776A (en) * | 1958-08-04 | |||
DE1110877B (en) * | 1959-04-24 | 1961-07-13 | Heraeus Gmbh W C | Process for melting metal blocks using electron beams |
US3966460A (en) * | 1974-09-06 | 1976-06-29 | Amax Specialty Metal Corporation | Reduction of metal halides |
US4190404A (en) * | 1977-12-14 | 1980-02-26 | United Technologies Corporation | Method and apparatus for removing inclusion contaminants from metals and alloys |
-
1987
- 1987-06-02 ES ES198787107946T patent/ES2033736T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1987-06-02 EP EP87107946A patent/EP0248397B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1987-06-02 DE DE8787107946T patent/DE3781206T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1987-06-05 KR KR870005721A patent/KR880000612A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE3781206T2 (en) | 1993-02-18 |
EP0248397A3 (en) | 1990-05-02 |
EP0248397A2 (en) | 1987-12-09 |
ES2033736T3 (en) | 1993-04-01 |
DE3781206D1 (en) | 1992-09-24 |
KR880000612A (en) | 1988-03-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR910001489B1 (en) | Process for producing high purity zirconium and hafnium | |
EP1445350B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for smelting titanium metal | |
RU2346891C2 (en) | Obtaining high-purity niobium monoxide and manufacturing of capacitor out of it | |
NO171778B (en) | PROCEDURE FOR REFINING SILICONE | |
US3721549A (en) | Preparation of metal ingots from the corresponding metal oxides | |
EP0248397B1 (en) | Prebaked zirconium for electron beam melted barrier tube shell material | |
US3746535A (en) | Direct reduction process for making titanium | |
CA1245864A (en) | Process for reduction of zirconium, hafnium or titanium using a zinc or tin seal | |
US4913884A (en) | Uranium-preextraction in zirconium/hafnium separations process | |
US4722827A (en) | Zirconium and hafnium with low oxygen and iron | |
US4610720A (en) | Method for preparing high purity vanadium | |
US2922710A (en) | Production of refractory metals | |
US4814136A (en) | Process for the control of liner impurities and light water reactor cladding | |
EP0248396B1 (en) | Combined electron beam and vacuum arc melting for barrier tube shell material | |
CA2267601A1 (en) | Process for obtaining titanium or other metals using shuttle alloys | |
CA1245863A (en) | Continuous reactive metal reduction using a salt seal | |
US4849016A (en) | Combined ultra slow electron beam and vacuum arc melting for barrier tube shell material | |
US4849013A (en) | Combined electron beam and vacuum arc melting for barrier tube shell material | |
US4816214A (en) | Ultra slow EB melting to reduce reactor cladding | |
JP2784324B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of titanium | |
JPH0681051A (en) | Production of metal by reduction reaction of metal halide | |
Fischer et al. | Investigation of the distribution of fission products among molten fuel and reactor phases:(I). The distribution of fission products between molten iron and molten uranium dioxide | |
EP0316579B1 (en) | Ultra-pure zirconium-tin liner material for nuclear reactor fuel elements | |
Carlson et al. | Preparation of high purity vanadium | |
RU2800271C1 (en) | Method for manufacturing ingots of zirconium alloys |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): DE ES FR IT SE |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): DE ES FR IT SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19901029 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19910718 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE ES FR IT SE |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3781206 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19920924 |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: MODIANO & ASSOCIATI S.R |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2033736 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 19930616 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 19930629 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 19931029 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Effective date: 19940603 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 19940603 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed |
Ref document number: 87107946.3 Effective date: 19950110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Effective date: 19950301 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed |
Ref document number: 87107946.3 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 19960607 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19980227 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 19990601 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20050602 |