EP0237153A1 - Process for removing protective coatings and bonding layers from metal parts - Google Patents

Process for removing protective coatings and bonding layers from metal parts Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0237153A1
EP0237153A1 EP87300550A EP87300550A EP0237153A1 EP 0237153 A1 EP0237153 A1 EP 0237153A1 EP 87300550 A EP87300550 A EP 87300550A EP 87300550 A EP87300550 A EP 87300550A EP 0237153 A1 EP0237153 A1 EP 0237153A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
base metal
atmosphere
coating
process according
subjecting
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP87300550A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0237153B1 (en
Inventor
Jack W. Chasteen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Dayton
Original Assignee
University of Dayton
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Dayton filed Critical University of Dayton
Publication of EP0237153A1 publication Critical patent/EP0237153A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0237153B1 publication Critical patent/EP0237153B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23FNON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F1/00Etching metallic material by chemical means
    • C23F1/10Etching compositions
    • C23F1/12Gaseous compositions
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23FNON-MECHANICAL REMOVAL OF METALLIC MATERIAL FROM SURFACE; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL; MULTI-STEP PROCESSES FOR SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL INVOLVING AT LEAST ONE PROCESS PROVIDED FOR IN CLASS C23 AND AT LEAST ONE PROCESS COVERED BY SUBCLASS C21D OR C22F OR CLASS C25
    • C23F1/00Etching metallic material by chemical means
    • C23F1/44Compositions for etching metallic material from a metallic material substrate of different composition
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23GCLEANING OR DE-GREASING OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY CHEMICAL METHODS OTHER THAN ELECTROLYSIS
    • C23G5/00Cleaning or de-greasing metallic material by other methods; Apparatus for cleaning or de-greasing metallic material with organic solvents

Definitions

  • the present invention re-lates to a process for removing protective coatings and/or bonding layers from a base metal, and more particularly, to a process:for removing gamma prime bonding layers, intermetallic protective coatings, metallic coatings, and ceramic or oxide-type coatings from a part such as a gas turbine engine component part.
  • Protective coatings and bonding layers are widely used in modern gas turbine engines. The use of such protective coatings and bonding layers permits a designer to specify structural materials of high strength without having to be particularly concerned with the surface stability of the materials. Intermetallic coatings, metalic coatings, and oxide-type coatings in particular are used on metal parts which encounter severe operating conditions at elevated temperatures. Such parts include gas turbine parts such as, the burner assembly, turbine vanes, and blades. Bonding layers are used to achieve a good bond between a base metal and a protective coating between which an adequate bond might not otherwise be obtained.
  • U.S. Patent No. 3;948,687 discloses an aqueous HF-HN0 3 stripping bath in which Cr0 3 is also present for removing aluminized-cases.
  • the stripping bath operates at 85°F.
  • the aluminized case dissolves in the bath and the base metal is not significantly attacked.
  • U.S. Patent No. 4,176,433 discloses a more detailed process for chemically stripping an aluminide protective coating from the internal and external surfaces of a salvageable vane.
  • the part is grit-blasted and then immersed in an agitated nitric acid solution at 75 to 90°F for four hours.
  • the part is then wet abrasive- blasted and immersed in'an agitated nitric acid solution at 75 to 90°F for four hours.
  • the wet abrasive-blasting and immersion in acid are repeated until the coating is removed.
  • U.S. Patent Nos. 4,188,237; 4,324,594; 4,328,044; and 4,405,379 disclose processes for cleaning crack damaged stainless steel, superalloy, solid solution superalloy, and gamma prime hardened nickel alloy parts which render the parts braze repairable.
  • the preferred cleaning process involves a three-stage procedure to eliminate the passivating oxides from the metallic surface.
  • stage I a cleaning atmosphere of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, and fluorine between 450-800°C, converts noble oxides on the metallic surface and in the cracks to their fluorides.
  • stage II the atmosphere is maintained to draw Al and Ti from the surface by diffusion.
  • stage III a predominantly hydrogen atmosphere between 750 and 1000°C, converts the crystalline non-volatile fluorides to their conjugate metals.
  • This fluorocarbon cleaning process avoids operation-within the sooting range, i.e., the point at which carbon precipitates from the gas phase at the temperature, pressure, and H/0 ratio of the treating atmosphere. If operated in the sooting range, the cracks, which are rich in nucleation sites, gather soot and cannot be cleaned.
  • the present invention provides a process for removing gamma prime bonding layers, intermetallic coat- _ings, metallic coatings, and ceramic or oxide-type coatings from a base metal such as a solid solution superalloy, a gamma prime hardened nickel base alloy, or a cobalt base or iron base superalloy. Removal is accomplished by subjecting the part to an atmosphere containing carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, and fluorine (C-0-H- F ). When using such a gaseous atmosphere under controlled conditions, as described below, it is possible to adequately remove protective coatings and/or bonding layers from a base metal.
  • a key to this coating removal process is control of the C/H and F/H atomic ratios in the C-O-H-F gaseous atmosphere.
  • the protective coatings and/or bonding layers on a base metal can be adequately removed at temperatures of 500 to 900°C.
  • the H/O ratio also must be greater than 10 4 to generate a very low oxygen potential atmosphere.
  • the H/O ratio of 10 4 c or- responds to approximately 200 ppm H 2 0 present as moisture in the hydrogen gas used as a component of the C-O-H-F atmosphere.
  • the stripping atmosphere is generated by pyrolysis of a fluorocarbon resin.
  • a fluorocarbon resin As disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,188,237, polytetrafluoroethylene resin liber- ates its monomer when heated to 350°C or higher, and the i rate of evolution sharply increases between 450° and 500°C.
  • the primary objective of the process is to remove the protective coatings and/or bonding layers from the metallic surface; however, if continued, the process can be used to deplete all surfaces, including the surfaces of any cracks or crevices, of Al and Ti to produce a surface that can be wet by brazing alloys.
  • the protective coatings and/or bonding layers are undermined in the process by converting metallic elements such as Al and Cr in the coatings or-bonding layers to their fluorides, AlF 3 and CrF 3 .
  • the volatile fluorides, AlF 3 sublime from the protective coatings and/or bonding layers thereby rendering the coating or layer readily removable by grit-blasting. If the process is allowed to continue, i.e., if diffusion is allowed to continue after the coating has been undermined, Al and Ti are drawn from all surfaces of the base metal and converted to their fluorides. Volatile fluorides, such as AlF 3 , are allowed to sublime from the metallic surface; the non-volatile fluorides, CrF 3 are, at a later stage, reduced to their conjugte metals.
  • the fluoridizing potential of the stripping process of the present invention results in effective removal of protective coatings and/or bonding layers from metallic surfaces.
  • the process operates within the sooting range, i.e., conditions under which carbon precipitates from the stripping atmosphere.
  • the process of the present invention introduces C0 2 into the system. The C0 2 removes any soot deposited on the parts and in the system.
  • the invention provides a process for removing protective coatings and/or bonding layers from a base metal which comprises:
  • Another, more specific object of the present invention is to provide a process for removing protective coatings and/or bonding layers from a base metal such as a solid solution superalloy, a gamma prime hardened nickel base alloy, and a cobalt base or a iron base superalloy part through the use of a C-O-H-F gaseous atmosphere.
  • a base metal such as a solid solution superalloy, a gamma prime hardened nickel base alloy, and a cobalt base or a iron base superalloy part through the use of a C-O-H-F gaseous atmosphere.
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide a process for removing gamma prime bonding layers, intermetallic protective coatings, metallic protective coatings, and ceramic protective coatings from a base metal and depleting the surfaces of the base metals of Al - and Ti so that the base metals are rendered braze repairable.
  • the present invention is useful in removing protective coatings and/or bonding layers from a base metal.
  • Protective coatings removable by the process of the present invention include intermetallic coatings, metallic coatings, and ceramic or oxide-type coatings.
  • intermetallic coatings include aluminide coatings, chromium coatings, chromium-aluminide coatings, and nickel-aluminide coatings.
  • An example of a metallic coating is a chromium-aluminum coating.
  • An example of a ceramic or oxide-type coating is a zirconium-oxide coating.
  • the present invention is also useful in removing any bonding layer which may be interposed between the protective coating and the base metal.
  • bonding layers removable by this process include gamma prime bonding layers, and metal-chromium-aluminum-yttrium layers.
  • the coatings and bonding layers removed by this process typically contain chromium or aluminum and, in addition, may contain elements such as cobalt, yttrium, and iron. These coatings are highly oxidation-and corrosion-resistant. In general, where present, the chromium content is at least 10% while the aluminum. content is at least 5.0%.
  • the present invention will be discussed with reference to the reaction of chromium or aluminum in the coatings since typically these metals are the most difficult to remove.
  • chromium and aluminum fluorides one concomitantly generates the fluorides of more reactive and more easily removable metals in the coating.
  • the discussion refers to removing chromium and aluminum, it is also applicable to the removal of coatings containing large proportions of zirconium, nickel, cobalt, and iron.
  • the stripping process of the present invention can be used to remove coatings and/or bonding layers from a wide variety of base metals, including but not limited to solid solution superalloys, gamma prime hardened nickel base alloys, and cobalt or iron base superalloys.
  • a partial list of nickel-based, gamma prime hardened alloys includes INCO 713C, Mar M-200, Rene 80, Rene 95, Rene 100, Rene 41, Udimet 500, and Udimet 520. These range from low, i.e., Rene 41, to medium, i.e., INCO 713C, to high, i.e., Rene 100, levels of gamma prime hardening. All levels may be stripped by the process of the present invention. While the present invention is not limited to cleaning any particular metal part, representative parts include variations of a turbine disc, blade, or segments from a nozzle guide vane.
  • a C-O-H-F cleaning atmosphere is established which diffuses into the coating and/or bonding layer, and converts the metals (typically Al and Cr) in the coatings or bonding layers to _ their fluorides.
  • the cleaning atmosphere is most readily produced by pyrolyzing a fluorocarbon resin.
  • a preferred fluorocarbon resin is polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).
  • the stripping process is carried out in a sealed reaction chamber. Since the chamber is sealed, it is necessary to place a sufficient quantity of the fluorine source in the chamber to react with the fluo- ridizable materials in the coating or bonding layer, and if the process is used to deplete surfaces of Al and Ti, to react with these elements as well.
  • a tandem chamber arrangement is also useful wherein the fluorine source is placed in one chamber where it is pyrolyzed and from which it is fed to a second chamber in which the stripping takes place
  • the process of the present invention is carried out over a temperature range of about 500 to 1000°C and for a reactive time of about 4 hours.
  • the process can be considered in stages.
  • the reactor is heated to pyrolyze the fluorocarbon source.
  • the rate of pyrolysis of the fluorocarbon is controlled to contain the fluoridizing chemicals until they can react.
  • a slow diffusion rate is accommodated via this control and the load is thereby held in a high fluoridizing potential atmosphere up to 12 hours. If the fluorocarbon is pyrolyzed too rapidly, the fluoridizing constituents will be exhausted from the cleaning atmosphere without reacting with the coating or base metal, and the reactor atmosphere may not contain sufficient fluorine constituents to undermine the coating or bonding layer.
  • the fluorine concentration of the atmosphere can be-calculated based on the preloaded mass of the fluorocarbon resin, the pyrolysis rate of the fluorocarbon, and the pyrolysis time. Upon reaching 510°C, the PTFE pyro- lyzes at a rate of 0.021 g/g remaining/min. Based on the fluorine concentration, H 2 is then added to the atmosphere to achieve a C/H ratio of greater than or equal to 0.17, and a F/H ratio of greater than or equal to 0.33. Using PTFE, the C/F ratio is 0.5. The C/H and F/H ratios may be decreased dramatically as temperatures rise while maintaining sooting conditions in-the atmosphere.
  • the pyrolysis of PTFE ends at 550 to 620°C•
  • the reactor is carried to the second stage of the process where the temperature of the system is increased to about 800°C. At this higher temperature, the diffusion rate of the fluorine into the coating increases.
  • the atmosphere is maintained in the temperature range of 700 to 1000°C for a period of time sufficient to undermine the protective coatings or bonding layers.
  • These protective coatings are about 1 to 5 mils in thickness and require about 4 hours to undermine.
  • the atmosphere may be maintained to react with the aluminum and titanium on the metallic surfaces of the base metal for conversion to their fluorides, AlF 3 and TiF x , in accordance with stage II of the cleaning process described in U.S. Patent No. 4,405,379. These reactions deplete the metallic surfaces of Al and Ti, and prevent the oxides of these elements from re-forming upon exposure to air.
  • CrF 3 chromium fluoride
  • the amount of C0 2 that is required to purge the soot is determined by first assuming that all fluorocarbon has formed soot and then assuming thermodynamic equilibrium in the C-CO-C0 2 system. When all of the soot has been oxidized and driven off in the form of CO, the final stage is entered.
  • the CrF 3 that has unavoidably formed is rendered metallic by reduction to its corresponding elemental form as the invention atmosphere is caused to become rich in hydrogen analogous to stage III of U.S. Patent No. 4,405,379.
  • This reaction is performed at temperatures in excess of 750°C and most typically at temperatures ranging from about 900° to 1,000° C.
  • the undermined coating is removed.
  • a preferred removal process is grit-blasting.
  • phase stability diagram of the Figure reveals atmospheres at which aluminum and chromium are _ converted to their fluorides at 550°C.
  • the pressure is fixed at 1.0 atmosphere and the H/O ratio is set at 10 5 .
  • the phase fields are shown imposed on an abscissa which is the F/H ratio and the ordinate which is the C/H ratio.
  • Al and Cr are representative of the elements found in the protective coatings on gas turbine engine parts. Therefore, a Cr-Al-C-O-H-F system is used to illustrate the invention.
  • curve A represents the sooting line, i.e., the point at which carbon can precipitate from the gas phase at the temperature, pressure, and H/O ratio of the treating atmosphere. Sooting is promoted in the present invention in order to obtain a high fluoridizing potential.
  • Curve B in the Figure is the equilibrium line for a Al 2 O 3 (solid) -AlF 3 (gas) system under the system conditions described above.
  • a metal part may have A1 2 0 3 and similar metal oxides on its surface. In this condition, the part cannot be brazed. Above and to the right of curve B, these oxides are converted to fluorides and removed from the metal surface.
  • Curve C on the phase stability diagram separates the oxide (Cr 2 0 3 ) and its fluoride (CrF 3 ). Cr 2 0 3 is present below and to the left of curve C.
  • the process of the present invention operates within the hashed region indicated in the Figure.
  • the C/H ratio is equal to 0.125 while the F/H ratio is equal to 0.025.
  • comparable phase stability diagrams with the corresponding hashed operational region exist for the full temperature range, i.e., 500 to 1000°C, of the process of the present invention.
  • the Al and the Cr in the protective coatings are converted to their fluorides, AlF 3 and CrF 3 .
  • the Al and Cr on the metallic surface convert to their fluorides.
  • the CrF 3 is reduced to Cr.
  • the C/F ratio in the retort is approximately 0.5; a 1:2 ratio of carbon to fluorine atoms is present in the resin.
  • atmospheres having C/F ratios equal to 0.5 can be derived from difluoroethylene and mixtures of tetrafluoromethane and hydrogen among others.
  • Point Q on the Figure signifies a gas composition that is potentially achievable by the preferred embodiment of PTFE and H 2 , and represents an atmosphere which is consonant with the stripping process and reasonable speed.
  • Point Q represents the C and F levels about as low as a practitioner may go to efficiently remove protective coatings and/or bonding layers from gas turbine engine parts.
  • the invention process is performed at a F/H ratio greater than or equal to 0.33, and a C/H ratio greater than or equal to 0.17.
  • Point P represents the typical - process levels.
  • the metallic parts are braze repairable.
  • a successful braze is manifest when braze material is placed at the source of a crack (say 0.001 inch wide and 1/2 inch long) and, at brazing temperature, not only melts and sticks to the parent material, but also runs into and fills the length of the crack.
  • the parts may also be otherwise bonded by carefully performed welding techniques.
  • the most expedient source of the stripping atmosphere is a fluorocarbon resin such-as polytetrafluoroethylene which releases fluorine-containing species upon thermal decomposition.
  • fluorocarbon resins which release gaseous fluorine species upon thermal decomposition may also be used.
  • Decomposed fluorocarbon resin gases are a convenient source of the stripping atmosphere because they are not only moisture-free, but, as indicated above, they also react with moisture otherwise introduced to create an extremely reducing atmosphere.
  • the invention atmosphere can, for example, be generated by reacting hydrogen with any saturated or unsaturated fluorocarbon such as and including difluoromethane (CH 2 F 2 ), tetrafluoromethane (CF 4 ), tetrafluoroethylene (C 2 F 4 ), and many of the freons.
  • the stripping atmosphere may be generated from a mixture of HF, CH 4 , and H 2 .
  • any fluorocarbon resin which can be pyrolyzed may be used in the process of the present invention.
  • the process of the present invention is typically performed at atmospheric pressure.
  • Increased pressure would undoubtedly cause pyrolysis of the resins to occur at higher temperatures where their chemical effects would be more pronounced.
  • aqueous stripping may be used in conjunction with the process of the present invention. After subjecting a part to the instant process and grit-blasting, the part would be aqueous stripped.
  • Aqueous stripping usually involves immersing a part in agitated nitric acid at 75 to 90°F. Aqueous stripping is undesirable because the procedure is somewhat dangerous and produces large volumes of hazardous waste. Also, the use of aqueous solutions tends to result in inner granular attack of the base metal.
  • HPI turbine blades from the Allison TF-41 engine are cast from Mar M 246 alloy and coated with Alpak. These, when removed from an engine in-a service damaged- condition, were placed in a vertical reaction chamber which contained teflon that had been placed on the bottom. The chamber was closed and, while being heated, hydrogen was introduced to impinge on the teflon, rise across the load, and exit at the top. The chamber was heated to 580°C, and the hydrogen turned off while the chamber continued to heat to 800°C. The system was held at 800°C for 1 hour to allow the stripping gases to undermine the coat-- ings. Carbon dioxide was then introduced to purge the soot while the chamber was heated to 950°C where hydrogen was again introduced to reduce the non-volatile fluorides to their conjugate metals.
  • the parts were grit-blasted to remove the undermined coating.
  • the parts were then immersed in a nitric acid solution for 5 to 15 minutes in order to remove the chromium particles entrapped in the cleaned but porous base metal surface. After rinsing and drying, the parts were vacuum brightened at 1100°C for 1/2 hour. The stripped and cleaned-blades were readily brazed or welded.
  • Pieces of Nimonic Alloy 75 from a flame tube of a Rolls Royce Nene engine of the Canadian Air Force T-33 Trainer have one side partially coated with a mixture of Nichrome and Chromium carbide.
  • the opposite side has a bond coating of Metco 443 (a NiCrAlY) and an overlay coating of yttria stabilized zirconia.
  • the zirconia was removed by grit-blasting to reveal the NiCrAlY bond coating, and the bare base metal of the opposite side was masked by a plasma sprayed coating of silicon carbide.
  • the resulting part was placed in a reaction chamber with teflon and the chamber was sealed.
  • the chamber was heated to 450°C, hydrogen was introduced and caused to flow until the chamber reached 580°C where the hydrogen was turned off while the chamber was heated to 800°C.
  • the system was held at 800°C for 1 hour to allow the stripping gases to undermine the coating.
  • Carbon dioxide was introduced to purge the soot, and the chamber was heated to 950°C where hydrogen was again introduced to reduce the non-volatile fluorides to their conjugate metals.
  • the part was grit-blasted and immersed in stripper solution for 15 minutes.
  • the part was removed, grit-blasted, and vacuum brightened at 1100°C for 1/2 hour.
  • the base metal was readily brazed or welded.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Turbine Rotor Nozzle Sealing (AREA)
  • Other Surface Treatments For Metallic Materials (AREA)

Abstract

A process for removing protective coatings and/or bonding layers from metal parts, particularly gamma prime hardened nickel base alloy, solid solution superalloy, iron base superalloy, and cobalt base superalloy parts to render them brazable or otherwise bondable. The process uses a C-O-H-F atmosphere as the primary stripping material wherein the atmosphere has a H/O ratio of 104 or greater. The preferred source of the C-O-H-F atmosphere is thermal decomposition of a fluorocarbon resin.

Description

  • The present invention re-lates to a process for removing protective coatings and/or bonding layers from a base metal, and more particularly, to a process:for removing gamma prime bonding layers, intermetallic protective coatings, metallic coatings, and ceramic or oxide-type coatings from a part such as a gas turbine engine component part.
  • Protective coatings and bonding layers are widely used in modern gas turbine engines. The use of such protective coatings and bonding layers permits a designer to specify structural materials of high strength without having to be particularly concerned with the surface stability of the materials. Intermetallic coatings, metalic coatings, and oxide-type coatings in particular are used on metal parts which encounter severe operating conditions at elevated temperatures. Such parts include gas turbine parts such as, the burner assembly, turbine vanes, and blades. Bonding layers are used to achieve a good bond between a base metal and a protective coating between which an adequate bond might not otherwise be obtained.
  • Various situations exist in which these protective coatings and/or bonding layers need to be removed. One such situation is when a part is crack damaged; the coating needs to be removed so that the part may be cleaned, repaired, recoated, and returned to service. Another situation arises upon improper application of the original coating; the coating needs to be removed so that 1 a new coating may be applied. A third situation arises as the coating becomes worn while in service. The coating must be removed and a new coat applied.
  • Currently, these coatings are removed by the use of acid baths. U.S. Patent No. 3;948,687 discloses an aqueous HF-HN03 stripping bath in which Cr03 is also present for removing aluminized-cases. The stripping bath operates at 85°F. The aluminized case dissolves in the bath and the base metal is not significantly attacked.
  • Additionally, U.S. Patent No. 4,176,433 discloses a more detailed process for chemically stripping an aluminide protective coating from the internal and external surfaces of a salvageable vane. The part is grit-blasted and then immersed in an agitated nitric acid solution at 75 to 90°F for four hours. The part is then wet abrasive- blasted and immersed in'an agitated nitric acid solution at 75 to 90°F for four hours. The wet abrasive-blasting and immersion in acid are repeated until the coating is removed.
  • Fluorocarbon cleaning of crack damaged metal parts is known in the art. U.S. Patent Nos. 4,188,237; 4,324,594; 4,328,044; and 4,405,379 disclose processes for cleaning crack damaged stainless steel, superalloy, solid solution superalloy, and gamma prime hardened nickel alloy parts which render the parts braze repairable. The preferred cleaning process involves a three-stage procedure to eliminate the passivating oxides from the metallic surface. In stage I, a cleaning atmosphere of carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, and fluorine between 450-800°C, converts noble oxides on the metallic surface and in the cracks to their fluorides. During stage II, the atmosphere is maintained to draw Al and Ti from the surface by diffusion. In stage III, a predominantly hydrogen atmosphere between 750 and 1000°C, converts the crystalline non-volatile fluorides to their conjugate metals. This fluorocarbon cleaning process avoids operation-within the sooting range, i.e., the point at which carbon precipitates from the gas phase at the temperature, pressure, and H/0 ratio of the treating atmosphere. If operated in the sooting range, the cracks, which are rich in nucleation sites, gather soot and cannot be cleaned.
  • While the aforementioned fluorocarbon cleaning process eliminates passivating oxides from a metallic surface, the fluorination potential of the process is lower than is required to significantly remove protective coatings, bonding layers, and the like which are common on gas turbine engine component parts. The current and prevailing acid bath procedu for removing aluminiae-type coatings is undesirable because the procedure is expensive, lengthy, somewhat dangerous, and produces large volumes of hazardous waste. Thus, a clear need exists for an efficient, safe, and clean method for removing aluminide-type coatings from gas turbine engine component parts.
  • The present invention provides a process for removing gamma prime bonding layers, intermetallic coat- _ings, metallic coatings, and ceramic or oxide-type coatings from a base metal such as a solid solution superalloy, a gamma prime hardened nickel base alloy, or a cobalt base or iron base superalloy. Removal is accomplished by subjecting the part to an atmosphere containing carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, and fluorine (C-0-H-F). When using such a gaseous atmosphere under controlled conditions, as described below, it is possible to adequately remove protective coatings and/or bonding layers from a base metal. Compared to the commonly employed method of removing protective coatings and/or bonding layers from metal parts by repeatedly grit-blasting and immersing the parts in nitric acid baths for several hours, the ecological advantages and safety of the process of the present invention are readily apparent. Furthermore, many of these coatings cannot be adequately removed in an acid bath.
  • A key to this coating removal process is control of the C/H and F/H atomic ratios in the C-O-H-F gaseous atmosphere. Thus, at a C/H ratio of greater than or equal to 0.125 and a F/H ratio of greater than or equal to 0.025, the protective coatings and/or bonding layers on a base metal can be adequately removed at temperatures of 500 to 900°C. As in the cleaning processes, the H/O ratio also must be greater than 104 to generate a very low oxygen potential atmosphere. The H/O ratio of 104 cor- responds to approximately 200 ppm H20 present as moisture in the hydrogen gas used as a component of the C-O-H-F atmosphere.
  • In accordance with the preferred embodiments of the invention, the stripping atmosphere is generated by pyrolysis of a fluorocarbon resin. As disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,188,237, polytetrafluoroethylene resin liber- ates its monomer when heated to 350°C or higher, and the i rate of evolution sharply increases between 450° and 500°C.
  • Liberation of the monomer is only a part of the decomposition process. When reduced to its simplest yet ; reasible rorm, tne system contains only rluorocarbons, ana then, only tetrafluoroethylene (C2F4) needs to be considered. Upon introduction of H2 into the system, two sets of reactions occur. C2F4 gas reacts with the H2 gas to produce HF gas and carbon.- The HF then reacts with the Al in the protective coating to produce AlF3 and H2. Likewise, the HF reacts with the Cr in the protective coating to produce CrF3 and H2. Additionally, C2F4 reacts directly with the Al and Cr in the protective coating to produce AlF3, CrF3 and carbon. The volatile fluorides, AlF3, sublime-from the protective coating. The reactions are as follows:
    Figure imgb0001
    Figure imgb0002
    Figure imgb0003
    Figure imgb0004
    Figure imgb0005
  • It is also believed that C2F4, when mixed with moist hydrogen, reduces the water content by the reaction:
    Figure imgb0006
    Thus, the decomposed fluorocarbon resin gases are not only moisture-free, but also react with the moisture otherwise introduced to, overall, create an extremely high fluoridizing atmosphere. It has been found that this atmosphere is capable of undermining most of the protective coatings and/or bonding layers used on a base metal.
  • The primary objective of the process is to remove the protective coatings and/or bonding layers from the metallic surface; however, if continued, the process can be used to deplete all surfaces, including the surfaces of any cracks or crevices, of Al and Ti to produce a surface that can be wet by brazing alloys.
  • The protective coatings and/or bonding layers are undermined in the process by converting metallic elements such as Al and Cr in the coatings or-bonding layers to their fluorides, AlF3 and CrF3. The volatile fluorides, AlF3, sublime from the protective coatings and/or bonding layers thereby rendering the coating or layer readily removable by grit-blasting. If the process is allowed to continue, i.e., if diffusion is allowed to continue after the coating has been undermined, Al and Ti are drawn from all surfaces of the base metal and converted to their fluorides. Volatile fluorides, such as AlF3, are allowed to sublime from the metallic surface; the non-volatile fluorides, CrF3 are, at a later stage, reduced to their conjugte metals.
  • The fluoridizing potential of the stripping process of the present invention results in effective removal of protective coatings and/or bonding layers from metallic surfaces. To achieve the high fluoridizing potential which is required, the process operates within the sooting range, i.e., conditions under which carbon precipitates from the stripping atmosphere. After stripping within the sooting range, the process of the present invention introduces C02 into the system. The C02 removes any soot deposited on the parts and in the system.
  • The invention provides a process for removing protective coatings and/or bonding layers from a base metal which comprises:
    • providing an atmosphere containing the elements C, 0, H, and F in which the C/H ratio is greater than or equal to 0.125, the F/H ratio is greater than or equal to 0.025, and the H/O ratio is 104 or greater;
    • subjecting said base metal to said atmosphere at a temperature of about 500 to 900°C for a period of time sufficient to undermine said coating or bonding layer;
    • replacing said atmosphere with C02;
    • subjecting said base metal to said C02 for a period of time sufficient to remove any carbon deposited on said base metal and in the system while subjecting said base metal to said atmosphere containing C, O, H, and F without oxidizing said base metal; and
    • removing said undermined coating or bonding layer from said base metal.
  • Another, more specific object of the present invention is to provide a process for removing protective coatings and/or bonding layers from a base metal such as a solid solution superalloy, a gamma prime hardened nickel base alloy, and a cobalt base or a iron base superalloy part through the use of a C-O-H-F gaseous atmosphere.
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide a process for removing gamma prime bonding layers, intermetallic protective coatings, metallic protective coatings, and ceramic protective coatings from a base metal and depleting the surfaces of the base metals of Al - and Ti so that the base metals are rendered braze repairable.
  • Other objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
  • The accompanying drawing is a phase stability diagram for a Cr-Al-C-O-H-F system at 1.0 atm. pressure. H/0=10 5 and T=550°C.
  • The present invention is useful in removing protective coatings and/or bonding layers from a base metal. Protective coatings removable by the process of the present invention include intermetallic coatings, metallic coatings, and ceramic or oxide-type coatings. Examples of intermetallic coatings include aluminide coatings, chromium coatings, chromium-aluminide coatings, and nickel-aluminide coatings. An example of a metallic coating is a chromium-aluminum coating. An example of a ceramic or oxide-type coating is a zirconium-oxide coating.
  • The present invention is also useful in removing any bonding layer which may be interposed between the protective coating and the base metal. Examples of bonding layers removable by this process include gamma prime bonding layers, and metal-chromium-aluminum-yttrium layers.
  • The coatings and bonding layers removed by this process typically contain chromium or aluminum and, in addition, may contain elements such as cobalt, yttrium, and iron. These coatings are highly oxidation-and corrosion-resistant. In general, where present, the chromium content is at least 10% while the aluminum. content is at least 5.0%.
  • Frequently, the present invention will be discussed with reference to the reaction of chromium or aluminum in the coatings since typically these metals are the most difficult to remove. Thus, in generating chromium and aluminum fluorides, one concomitantly generates the fluorides of more reactive and more easily removable metals in the coating. Thus, while the discussion refers to removing chromium and aluminum, it is also applicable to the removal of coatings containing large proportions of zirconium, nickel, cobalt, and iron. i
  • The stripping process of the present invention can be used to remove coatings and/or bonding layers from a wide variety of base metals, including but not limited to solid solution superalloys, gamma prime hardened nickel base alloys, and cobalt or iron base superalloys. At present, a partial list of nickel-based, gamma prime hardened alloys includes INCO 713C, Mar M-200, Rene 80, Rene 95, Rene 100, Rene 41, Udimet 500, and Udimet 520. These range from low, i.e., Rene 41, to medium, i.e., INCO 713C, to high, i.e., Rene 100, levels of gamma prime hardening. All levels may be stripped by the process of the present invention. While the present invention is not limited to cleaning any particular metal part, representative parts include variations of a turbine disc, blade, or segments from a nozzle guide vane.
  • In the process of the present invention, a C-O-H-F cleaning atmosphere is established which diffuses into the coating and/or bonding layer, and converts the metals (typically Al and Cr) in the coatings or bonding layers to _ their fluorides. The cleaning atmosphere is most readily produced by pyrolyzing a fluorocarbon resin. A preferred fluorocarbon resin is polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).
  • In most cases, the stripping process is carried out in a sealed reaction chamber. Since the chamber is sealed, it is necessary to place a sufficient quantity of the fluorine source in the chamber to react with the fluo- ridizable materials in the coating or bonding layer, and if the process is used to deplete surfaces of Al and Ti, to react with these elements as well. A tandem chamber arrangement is also useful wherein the fluorine source is placed in one chamber where it is pyrolyzed and from which it is fed to a second chamber in which the stripping takes place
  • The process of the present invention is carried out over a temperature range of about 500 to 1000°C and for a reactive time of about 4 hours. The process can be considered in stages.
  • The reactor is heated to pyrolyze the fluorocarbon source. During the initial stage of the process, the rate of pyrolysis of the fluorocarbon is controlled to contain the fluoridizing chemicals until they can react. A slow diffusion rate is accommodated via this control and the load is thereby held in a high fluoridizing potential atmosphere up to 12 hours. If the fluorocarbon is pyrolyzed too rapidly, the fluoridizing constituents will be exhausted from the cleaning atmosphere without reacting with the coating or base metal, and the reactor atmosphere may not contain sufficient fluorine constituents to undermine the coating or bonding layer.
  • The fluorine concentration of the atmosphere can be-calculated based on the preloaded mass of the fluorocarbon resin, the pyrolysis rate of the fluorocarbon, and the pyrolysis time. Upon reaching 510°C, the PTFE pyro- lyzes at a rate of 0.021 g/g remaining/min. Based on the fluorine concentration, H2 is then added to the atmosphere to achieve a C/H ratio of greater than or equal to 0.17, and a F/H ratio of greater than or equal to 0.33. Using PTFE, the C/F ratio is 0.5. The C/H and F/H ratios may be decreased dramatically as temperatures rise while maintaining sooting conditions in-the atmosphere.
  • The pyrolysis of PTFE ends at 550 to 620°C• When it is clear that the required high fluoridizing potential is achieved within the reactor, the reactor is carried to the second stage of the process where the temperature of the system is increased to about 800°C. At this higher temperature, the diffusion rate of the fluorine into the coating increases. The atmosphere is maintained in the temperature range of 700 to 1000°C for a period of time sufficient to undermine the protective coatings or bonding layers. These protective coatings are about 1 to 5 mils in thickness and require about 4 hours to undermine.
  • After the atmosphere-has-reacted with the metals in the coatings or bonding layers, if desirable, the atmosphere may be maintained to react with the aluminum and titanium on the metallic surfaces of the base metal for conversion to their fluorides, AlF3 and TiFx, in accordance with stage II of the cleaning process described in U.S. Patent No. 4,405,379. These reactions deplete the metallic surfaces of Al and Ti, and prevent the oxides of these elements from re-forming upon exposure to air.
  • During this, as well as previous stages, chromium fluoride (CrF3) also and unavoidably forms. Because of its refractory nature, the CrF3 remains in the reaction chamber and must be reduced to its metallic form. This reduction step, however, must await the soot removal step.
  • Because the atmosphere has been held in the high fluoridizing range during the stripping and depletion stages, carbon in the form of soot is in the reaction chamber, and in cracks and passages of the part. This soot is removed by introducing carbon dioxide (C02) into the chamber while holding at a high temperature. This step clears the soot by the following reaction:
    Figure imgb0007
  • The amount of C02 that is required to purge the soot is determined by first assuming that all fluorocarbon has formed soot and then assuming thermodynamic equilibrium in the C-CO-C02 system. When all of the soot has been oxidized and driven off in the form of CO, the final stage is entered.
  • In the final stage, the CrF3 that has unavoidably formed is rendered metallic by reduction to its corresponding elemental form as the invention atmosphere is caused to become rich in hydrogen analogous to stage III of U.S. Patent No. 4,405,379. This reaction is performed at temperatures in excess of 750°C and most typically at temperatures ranging from about 900° to 1,000° C.
  • The undermined coating is removed. A preferred removal process is grit-blasting.
  • The invention process may be demonstrated graphically. Thus, the phase stability diagram of the Figure reveals atmospheres at which aluminum and chromium are _ converted to their fluorides at 550°C. The pressure is fixed at 1.0 atmosphere and the H/O ratio is set at 105. The phase fields are shown imposed on an abscissa which is the F/H ratio and the ordinate which is the C/H ratio. Al and Cr are representative of the elements found in the protective coatings on gas turbine engine parts. Therefore, a Cr-Al-C-O-H-F system is used to illustrate the invention.
  • In the Figure, curve A represents the sooting line, i.e., the point at which carbon can precipitate from the gas phase at the temperature, pressure, and H/O ratio of the treating atmosphere. Sooting is promoted in the present invention in order to obtain a high fluoridizing potential.
  • Curve B in the Figure is the equilibrium line for a Al2O3 (solid) -AlF3 (gas) system under the system conditions described above. Below and to the left of curve B, a metal part may have A1203 and similar metal oxides on its surface. In this condition, the part cannot be brazed. Above and to the right of curve B, these oxides are converted to fluorides and removed from the metal surface.
  • Curve C on the phase stability diagram separates the oxide (Cr203) and its fluoride (CrF3). Cr203 is present below and to the left of curve C.
  • The process of the present invention operates within the hashed region indicated in the Figure. At point Q, the C/H ratio is equal to 0.125 while the F/H ratio is equal to 0.025. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that comparable phase stability diagrams with the corresponding hashed operational region exist for the full temperature range, i.e., 500 to 1000°C, of the process of the present invention. Thus, in one embodiment of the present invention, through temperature control and management of the C/H and F/H ratios, the Al and the Cr in the protective coatings are converted to their fluorides, AlF3 and CrF3. Those skilled in the art will also understand that in another embodiment of the invention process, the Al and Cr on the metallic surface convert to their fluorides. Additionally, those skilled in the art will understand that in a further embodiment of the present invention, through temperature control and management of the C/H and F/H ratios, the CrF3 is reduced to Cr.
  • Where the C-O-H-F atmosphere is derived from PTFE, the C/F ratio in the retort is approximately 0.5; a 1:2 ratio of carbon to fluorine atoms is present in the resin. At the same time, atmospheres having C/F ratios equal to 0.5 can be derived from difluoroethylene and mixtures of tetrafluoromethane and hydrogen among others.
  • Where certain minimum amounts of carbon, fluorine, and hydrogen are not present, the process of the present invention may take an inconvenient amount of time. Point Q on the Figure signifies a gas composition that is potentially achievable by the preferred embodiment of PTFE and H 2, and represents an atmosphere which is consonant with the stripping process and reasonable speed. Point Q represents the C and F levels about as low as a practitioner may go to efficiently remove protective coatings and/or bonding layers from gas turbine engine parts. Thus, typically the invention process is performed at a F/H ratio greater than or equal to 0.33, and a C/H ratio greater than or equal to 0.17. Point P represents the typical - process levels.
  • Upon removal of the protective coatings and/or bonding layers, depletion of the Al and Ti, and destabilization of the CrF3, the metallic parts are braze repairable. A successful braze is manifest when braze material is placed at the source of a crack (say 0.001 inch wide and 1/2 inch long) and, at brazing temperature, not only melts and sticks to the parent material, but also runs into and fills the length of the crack. The parts may also be otherwise bonded by carefully performed welding techniques.
  • The most expedient source of the stripping atmosphere is a fluorocarbon resin such-as polytetrafluoroethylene which releases fluorine-containing species upon thermal decomposition. Other fluorocarbon resins which release gaseous fluorine species upon thermal decomposition may also be used. Decomposed fluorocarbon resin gases are a convenient source of the stripping atmosphere because they are not only moisture-free, but, as indicated above, they also react with moisture otherwise introduced to create an extremely reducing atmosphere.
  • In addition to PTFE, other sources of the C-O-H-F stripping atmosphere exist. "The invention atmosphere can, for example, be generated by reacting hydrogen with any saturated or unsaturated fluorocarbon such as and including difluoromethane (CH 2F2), tetrafluoromethane (CF4), tetrafluoroethylene (C2F4), and many of the freons. In addition, the stripping atmosphere may be generated from a mixture of HF, CH4, and H2. Substantially, any fluorocarbon resin which can be pyrolyzed may be used in the process of the present invention.
  • The process of the present invention is typically performed at atmospheric pressure. The inherent advantages of using an increased pressure system are readily apparent. Increased pressure would undoubtedly cause pyrolysis of the resins to occur at higher temperatures where their chemical effects would be more pronounced.
  • In a less preferred embodiment, aqueous stripping may be used in conjunction with the process of the present invention. After subjecting a part to the instant process and grit-blasting, the part would be aqueous stripped. Aqueous stripping usually involves immersing a part in agitated nitric acid at 75 to 90°F. Aqueous stripping is undesirable because the procedure is somewhat dangerous and produces large volumes of hazardous waste. Also, the use of aqueous solutions tends to result in inner granular attack of the base metal.
  • The present invention is more fully illustrated by the following non-limiting Examples.
  • Example I
  • HPI turbine blades from the Allison TF-41 engine are cast from Mar M 246 alloy and coated with Alpak. These, when removed from an engine in-a service damaged- condition, were placed in a vertical reaction chamber which contained teflon that had been placed on the bottom. The chamber was closed and, while being heated, hydrogen was introduced to impinge on the teflon, rise across the load, and exit at the top. The chamber was heated to 580°C, and the hydrogen turned off while the chamber continued to heat to 800°C. The system was held at 800°C for 1 hour to allow the stripping gases to undermine the coat-- ings. Carbon dioxide was then introduced to purge the soot while the chamber was heated to 950°C where hydrogen was again introduced to reduce the non-volatile fluorides to their conjugate metals.
  • After cooling, the parts were grit-blasted to remove the undermined coating. The parts were then immersed in a nitric acid solution for 5 to 15 minutes in order to remove the chromium particles entrapped in the cleaned but porous base metal surface. After rinsing and drying, the parts were vacuum brightened at 1100°C for 1/2 hour. The stripped and cleaned-blades were readily brazed or welded.
  • Example II
  • Pieces of Nimonic Alloy 75 from a flame tube of a Rolls Royce Nene engine of the Canadian Air Force T-33 Trainer have one side partially coated with a mixture of Nichrome and Chromium carbide. The opposite side has a bond coating of Metco 443 (a NiCrAlY) and an overlay coating of yttria stabilized zirconia. The zirconia was removed by grit-blasting to reveal the NiCrAlY bond coating, and the bare base metal of the opposite side was masked by a plasma sprayed coating of silicon carbide. The resulting part was placed in a reaction chamber with teflon and the chamber was sealed. The chamber was heated to 450°C, hydrogen was introduced and caused to flow until the chamber reached 580°C where the hydrogen was turned off while the chamber was heated to 800°C. The system was held at 800°C for 1 hour to allow the stripping gases to undermine the coating. Carbon dioxide was introduced to purge the soot, and the chamber was heated to 950°C where hydrogen was again introduced to reduce the non-volatile fluorides to their conjugate metals.
  • After cooling, the part was grit-blasted and immersed in stripper solution for 15 minutes. The part was removed, grit-blasted, and vacuum brightened at 1100°C for 1/2 hour. The base metal was readily brazed or welded.

Claims (20)

1. A process for removing protective coatings and/or bonding layers from a base metal which comprises:
providing an atmosphere containing the elements C, O, H and F in which the C/H ratio is greater than or equal to 0.125, the F/H ratio is greater than or equal to 0.025 and having a H/O ratio of 104 or greater; -
subjecting said base metal to said atmosphere at a temperature of 500 to 900°C for a period of time sufficient to undermine said coating or bonding layer;
replacing said atmosphere with CO 2;
subjecting said base metal to said C02 for a period of time sufficient to remove any carbon deposited on said base metal while subjecting said base metal to said atmosphere without oxidizing said base metal; and
removing said undermined coating or bonding layer from said base metal.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein said undermined coating or bonding layer is removed by grit-blasting.
3. A process according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein said step of providing said atmosphere containing C, O, H and F comprises pyrolyzing a fluorocarbon.
4. A process according to claim 3, wherein said fluorocarbon is polytetrafluoroethylene.
5. A process according to claim 4, wherein said base metal is subjected to said atmosphere at a temperatue of 500 to 600°C until such time as said polytetrafluoroethylene is fully pyrolized, whereafter, said base meal is subjected to said atmosphere at 700 to 800°C until said coating or bonding layer is removable by grit-blasting.
6. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein said base metal is subjected to said atmosphere for a period of time sufficient to undermine said coating or bonding layer and to remove passivating oxides from the surface of said base metal.
7. A process according to claim 6 wherein after subjecting said base metal to CO2, said process comprises the additional step of subjecting said base metal to an atmosphere consisting essentially of hydrogen to reduce any CrF3 on the surface of said base metal to Cr.
8. A process according to claim 7, wherein said base metal is subjected to said atmosphere consisting essentially of hydrogen at a temperature of 900 to 1000°C.
9. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 7, which is carried out at atmospheric pressure.
10. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein said base metal is selected from solid solution superalloys, gamma prime hardened nickel base alloys, cobalt base superalloys, and iron base superalloys.
11. A process according to any preceding claim, wherein said protective coating is a metallic or oxide coating.
12. A process according to claim 11, wherein said protective coating is an aluminide, a chromium-aluminide or a nickel-aluminide coating.
13. A process according to claim 11, wherein said coating is a chromium-aluminium coating.
14. A process according to claim 11, wherein said protective coating is a zirconium-oxide coating.
15. A process of any preceding claim, wherein said bonding layer is a gamma prime bonding layer, or a chromium-aluminium- yttrium layer.
16. A process for removing protective coatings and/or bonding layers from a base metal which comprises:
providing an atomosphere containing the elements C, O, H and F by pyrolyzing a polytetrafluoroethylene resin, said atmosphere having a H/O ratio of 10 4 or greater;
subjecting said base metal to said atmosphere at a temperature of 500 to 900°C for a period of time sufficient to undermine said coating or bonding layer;
replacing said atmosphere with C02;
subjecting said base metal to-said-C02 for a period of time sufficient to remove any carbon deposited on said base metal while subjecting said base metal to said atmosphere; and
removing said undermined coating or bonding layer from said base metal.
17. A process according to claim 16 wherein said base metal is subjected to said atmosphere at a temperature of about 500 to 600°C until such time as said polytetrafluoroethylene is fully pyrolyzed, whereafter said base metal is subjected to said atmosphere at 700 to 800°C until said coating is removable by grit-blasting.
18. A process according to claim 17, wherein said base metal is subjected to said atmosphere for a period of time sufficient to undermine said coating or bonding layer and to remove passivating oxides from the surface of said base metal.
19. A process according to claim 18, wherein after subjecting said base metal to C02, said process comprises the additional step of subjecting said base metal to an atmosphere consisting essentially of hydrogen to reduce any CrF3 on the surface of said base metal to Cr.
20. A process according to claim 19, wherein said base metal is subjected to said atmosphere consisting essentially of hydrogen at a temperature of 900 to 1000°C.
EP19870300550 1986-02-06 1987-01-22 Process for removing protective coatings and bonding layers from metal parts Expired EP0237153B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US82671886A 1986-02-06 1986-02-06
US826718 1992-01-28

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0237153A1 true EP0237153A1 (en) 1987-09-16
EP0237153B1 EP0237153B1 (en) 1991-05-02

Family

ID=25247347

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19870300550 Expired EP0237153B1 (en) 1986-02-06 1987-01-22 Process for removing protective coatings and bonding layers from metal parts

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0237153B1 (en)
AU (1) AU586530B2 (en)
DE (1) DE3769677D1 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0416400A1 (en) * 1989-08-25 1991-03-13 Applied Materials, Inc. Cleaning method for semiconductor wafer processing apparatus
US5129958A (en) * 1989-09-22 1992-07-14 Applied Materials, Inc. Cleaning method for semiconductor wafer processing apparatus
US5207836A (en) * 1989-08-25 1993-05-04 Applied Materials, Inc. Cleaning process for removal of deposits from the susceptor of a chemical vapor deposition apparatus
DE4228551A1 (en) * 1992-08-27 1994-03-03 Linde Ag Process for the cleaning treatment of surfaces with a low pressure plasma
EP0814179A1 (en) * 1996-06-17 1997-12-29 General Electric Company Method for removing a diffusion coating from a nickel base alloy
WO2000048751A1 (en) * 1999-02-18 2000-08-24 General Electric Company Carbon-enhanced fluoride ion cleaning
EP1076114A1 (en) * 1999-08-11 2001-02-14 General Electric Company Method for removing a dense ceramic thermal barrier coating from a surface
DE19960353A1 (en) * 1999-12-14 2001-06-21 Dechema Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Chemisches Apparatewesen, Chemische Technik Und Biotechnologie Ev Production of a diffusion barrier comprises producing a ceramic particle dispersion below the surface of a metallic material
EP1275753A1 (en) * 2001-07-12 2003-01-15 Snecma Moteurs Process for the global repairing of a piece coated with a thermal barrier
WO2019057555A1 (en) * 2017-09-19 2019-03-28 Bortec Gmbh & Co. Kg Improved pre-treatment process of a surface of a metallic substrate

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7146990B1 (en) * 2005-07-26 2006-12-12 Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corporation Process for repairing sulfidation damaged turbine components

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2571328A (en) * 1947-12-22 1951-10-16 Ohio Rubber Co Method of cleaning metal articles of adherent rubber and the like
FR2198004A1 (en) * 1972-09-05 1974-03-29 Gen Electric
EP0003660A1 (en) * 1978-02-02 1979-08-22 The University Of Dayton Method for cleaning a surface of an unbrazable metal part
EP0020935A1 (en) * 1979-06-29 1981-01-07 International Business Machines Corporation A dry method of etching and an apparatus using solid masking materials for etch rate modification
EP0034041A1 (en) * 1980-02-06 1981-08-19 The University Of Dayton Method for cleaning metal parts
US4405379A (en) * 1980-02-06 1983-09-20 University Of Dayton Method for cleaning metal parts

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4324594A (en) * 1978-02-02 1982-04-13 University Of Dayton Method for cleaning metal parts

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2571328A (en) * 1947-12-22 1951-10-16 Ohio Rubber Co Method of cleaning metal articles of adherent rubber and the like
FR2198004A1 (en) * 1972-09-05 1974-03-29 Gen Electric
EP0003660A1 (en) * 1978-02-02 1979-08-22 The University Of Dayton Method for cleaning a surface of an unbrazable metal part
EP0020935A1 (en) * 1979-06-29 1981-01-07 International Business Machines Corporation A dry method of etching and an apparatus using solid masking materials for etch rate modification
EP0034041A1 (en) * 1980-02-06 1981-08-19 The University Of Dayton Method for cleaning metal parts
US4405379A (en) * 1980-02-06 1983-09-20 University Of Dayton Method for cleaning metal parts

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0416400A1 (en) * 1989-08-25 1991-03-13 Applied Materials, Inc. Cleaning method for semiconductor wafer processing apparatus
US5207836A (en) * 1989-08-25 1993-05-04 Applied Materials, Inc. Cleaning process for removal of deposits from the susceptor of a chemical vapor deposition apparatus
US5129958A (en) * 1989-09-22 1992-07-14 Applied Materials, Inc. Cleaning method for semiconductor wafer processing apparatus
DE4228551A1 (en) * 1992-08-27 1994-03-03 Linde Ag Process for the cleaning treatment of surfaces with a low pressure plasma
DE4228551C2 (en) * 1992-08-27 1996-02-22 Linde Ag Method and application of the method for the cleaning treatment of surfaces with a low pressure plasma
EP0814179A1 (en) * 1996-06-17 1997-12-29 General Electric Company Method for removing a diffusion coating from a nickel base alloy
WO2000048751A1 (en) * 1999-02-18 2000-08-24 General Electric Company Carbon-enhanced fluoride ion cleaning
US6416589B1 (en) * 1999-02-18 2002-07-09 General Electric Company Carbon-enhanced fluoride ion cleaning
EP1076114A1 (en) * 1999-08-11 2001-02-14 General Electric Company Method for removing a dense ceramic thermal barrier coating from a surface
DE19960353A1 (en) * 1999-12-14 2001-06-21 Dechema Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Chemisches Apparatewesen, Chemische Technik Und Biotechnologie Ev Production of a diffusion barrier comprises producing a ceramic particle dispersion below the surface of a metallic material
EP1275753A1 (en) * 2001-07-12 2003-01-15 Snecma Moteurs Process for the global repairing of a piece coated with a thermal barrier
FR2827308A1 (en) * 2001-07-12 2003-01-17 Snecma Moteurs PROCESS FOR GLOBAL REPAIR OF A PART COATED WITH A THERMAL BARRIER
WO2003006712A1 (en) * 2001-07-12 2003-01-23 Snecma Moteurs Method of globally repairing a part covered with a thermal barrier
WO2019057555A1 (en) * 2017-09-19 2019-03-28 Bortec Gmbh & Co. Kg Improved pre-treatment process of a surface of a metallic substrate
US11492693B2 (en) 2017-09-19 2022-11-08 Bortec Gmbh Pre-treatment process of a surface of a metallic substrate

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU6783987A (en) 1987-08-13
AU586530B2 (en) 1989-07-13
EP0237153B1 (en) 1991-05-02
DE3769677D1 (en) 1991-06-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5071486A (en) Process for removing protective coatings and bonding layers from metal parts
JP3027005B2 (en) Method for re-polishing corroded superalloy or heat-resistant steel member and re-polished member
EP0034041B1 (en) Method for cleaning metal parts
JP4885701B2 (en) Method for selectively stripping a metal coating
KR101523099B1 (en) Slurry diffusion aluminide coating composition and process
US3096205A (en) Diffusion coating of metals
US6416589B1 (en) Carbon-enhanced fluoride ion cleaning
EP0237153A1 (en) Process for removing protective coatings and bonding layers from metal parts
CA1295215C (en) Cleaning of metal articles
US4188237A (en) Method for cleaning metal parts with elemental fluorine
US4405379A (en) Method for cleaning metal parts
US4889589A (en) Gaseous removal of ceramic coatings
US4324594A (en) Method for cleaning metal parts
GB2167773A (en) Improvements in or relating to coating processes
US6199276B1 (en) Method for removing a dense ceramic thermal barrier coating from a surface
US4919157A (en) Method of cleaning metal components for cathode ray tubes
US20060057416A1 (en) Article having a surface protected by a silicon-containing diffusion coating
RU2200211C2 (en) Method of removal of coats from parts made from heat-resistant alloys
EP2020452A2 (en) Method for forming aluminide diffusion coatings
GB1586501A (en) Metal coating
US3059325A (en) Heat resisting alloys
US11549371B2 (en) Method for pickling a turbomachine component
US20060112976A1 (en) Method for removing at least one partial area of a component made of metal or a metallic compound
RU1784661C (en) Composition for chemical treatment of nickel alloys
RU2101650C1 (en) Method of cleaning inner surface of steel circulating loop containing lead-based liquid metallic heat-transfer agent

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19880304

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19890616

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3769677

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19910606

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 87300550.8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20020103

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20020103

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20020103

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20020104

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20020107

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20020107

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20020124

Year of fee payment: 16

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030122

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030123

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030131

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030131

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030801

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030801

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed
GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20030930

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20030801

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050122