EP0175511B1 - Visbreaking process - Google Patents

Visbreaking process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0175511B1
EP0175511B1 EP85306152A EP85306152A EP0175511B1 EP 0175511 B1 EP0175511 B1 EP 0175511B1 EP 85306152 A EP85306152 A EP 85306152A EP 85306152 A EP85306152 A EP 85306152A EP 0175511 B1 EP0175511 B1 EP 0175511B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
hydrogen
oil
content
visbreaking
process according
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP85306152A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0175511A1 (en
Inventor
Leslie Robert Rudnick
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ExxonMobil Oil Corp
Original Assignee
Mobil Oil Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mobil Oil Corp filed Critical Mobil Oil Corp
Priority to AT85306152T priority Critical patent/ATE34765T1/en
Publication of EP0175511A1 publication Critical patent/EP0175511A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0175511B1 publication Critical patent/EP0175511B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G9/00Thermal non-catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils
    • C10G9/007Visbreaking
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G47/00Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions
    • C10G47/32Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions in the presence of hydrogen-generating compounds
    • C10G47/34Organic compounds, e.g. hydrogenated hydrocarbons

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the processing of residual petroleum charge stocks by visbreaking in the presence of certain highly aromatic hydrogen-donor materials.
  • Visbreaking or viscosity breaking, is a well-known petroleum refining process in which reduced crudes are pyrolyzed, or cracked, under comparatively mild conditions to provide products having lower viscosities and pour points, thus reducing the amounts of less-viscous and more valuable blending oils required to make the residual stocks useful as fuel oils.
  • the visbreaker feedstock usually consists of a mixture of two or more refinery streams derived from sources such as atmospheric residuum, vacuum residuum, furfural-extract, propane-deasphalted tar and catalytic cracker bottoms. Most of these feedstock components, except the heavy aromatic oils, behave independently in the visbreaking operation.
  • the severity of operation for a mixed feed is limited greatly by the least desirable (highest coke forming) components.
  • the crude or resid feed is passed through a heater and heated to about 425 to about 525°C and at about 450 to about 7000 kPa.
  • Light gas-oil may be recycled to lower the temperature of the effluent to about 260 to about 370°C.
  • Cracked products from the reaction are flash distilled with the vapor overhead being fractionated into a light distillate overhead product, for example gasoline and light gas-oil bottoms, and the liquid bottoms being vacuum fractionated into heavy gas-oil distillate and residual tar.
  • U.S. Patent 3,691,058 describes the production of single ring aromatic hydrocarbons (70-220°C) by hydrocracking a heavy hydrocarbon feed (565°C-) and recycling 32­70 ⁇ C and 220°C+ product fractions to extinction. This is integrated with visbreaking of residua in the presence of 1-28 weight % free radical acceptor at 370 to 480°C in the presence or absence of hydrogen (to enhance residua depolymerization).
  • U.S. Patent 3,691,058 describes the production of single ring aromatic hydrocarbons (70-220°C) by hydrocracking a heavy hydrocarbon feed (565°C-) and recycling 32­70 ⁇ C and 220°C+ product fractions to extinction. This is integrated with visbreaking of residua in the presence of 1-28 weight % free radical acceptor at 370 to 480°C in the presence or absence of hydrogen (to enhance residua depolymerization).
  • Patent 4,067,757 describes a process comprising passing a resid up through a bed of inertia solids (packed bed reactor) in the presence or absence of 9-1800 Nm 3 hydrogen per m 3 resid at 400 to 540°C to enhance the production of middle distillate (175-345°C).
  • U.S. Patent 2,953,513 proposes the production of hydrogen-donors by partial hydrogenation of certain distillate thermal and catalytic tars, boiling above 370°C, containing a minimum of 40 weight % aromatics, to contain H/C ratios of 0.7-1.6.
  • the resid feed is then mixed with 9-83 volume % of hydrogen-donor and thermally cracked at 427-482°C to produce low boiling products.
  • U.S. Patent 4,090,947 describes a thermal cracking process (425-540°C) for converting resids into lighter products in the presence of 10-500 volume % hydrogen-donor.
  • the hydrogen-donor is produced by hydrotreating premium coker gas oil (345 ⁇ 480°C) alone or blended with gas oil produced in the thermal cracker.
  • U.S. Patent 4,292,168 proposes upgrading heavy hydrocarbon oils without substantial formation of chat by heating the oil with hydrogen and a hydrogen transfer solvent without a catalyst at temperatures of about 320-500°C and a pressure of 2200-18000 kPa for a time of about 3-30 minutes.
  • Examples of hydrogen-donor transfer solvents include pyrene, fluoranthene, anthracene and benzanthracene.
  • U.S. Patent 4,292,686 describes a process for contacting a resid with a hydrogen-donor at 350-500°C and a pressure of 2-7 MPa with liquid hourly space velocities ranging from 0.5-10.
  • European Patent Application 133,774 describes a process for the production of fuel oil products in which the formation of coke of filtration sediment is suppressed by visbreaking heavy petroleum residua under liquid phase, non-catalytic conditions in the presence of certain hydrogen-donor materials and in the absence of added free hydrogen.
  • heavy petroleum oil feed stocks containing deleterious contaminants such as sulfur and nitrogen compounds, asphaltenes and metals, can be visbroken at high severities to provide lower molecular weight fuel oil products of improved viscosity and pour point characteristics.
  • the process of that invention offers the potential of substantially eliminating and/or reducing the need for cutter stock to meet fuel oil product viscosity specifications.
  • the present invention represents an improvement in the visbreaking process described in that application and involves introducing an organic sulfur compound into the heavy petroleum residual oil before it is subjected to visbreaking in the presence of a hydrogen donor material.
  • the hydrogen-donor material used in the process of the invention is a thermally stable, polycyclic aromatic of hydroaromatic distillate mixture which results from one or more petroleum refining operations.
  • the hydrogen-donor preferably has an average boiling point in the range of 230 to 510°C and an A.P.I. gravity below 20°C.
  • suitable hydrogen-donors are highly aromatic petroleum refinery streams, such as fluidized catalytic cracker (FCC) "main column” bottoms, FCC “light cycle oil,” and theremofor catalytic cracker (TCC) "syntower” bottoms, all of which contain a substantial proportion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon constituents such as naphthalene, dimethyl naphthalene, anthracene, phenanthrene, fluorene, chrysene, pyrene, perylene, diphenyl, benzothiophene, tetralin and dihydronapthalene, for example.
  • FCC fluidized catalytic cracker
  • TCC light cycle oil
  • TCC theremofor catalytic cracker
  • Such refractory petroleum materials are resistant to conversion into higher (lower molecular weight) products by conventional non-hydrogenative procedures.
  • these petroleum refinery residual and recycle fractions are hydrocarbonaceous mixtures having an average carbon to hydrogen ratio above about 1:1, and an average boiling point above 230°C.
  • FCC main column bottoms refinery fraction is a highly preferred donor for use in the process of the invention.
  • a typical FCC main column bottoms (or FCC clarified slurry oil (CSO)) contains a mixture of constituents as represented in the following mass spectrometric analysis:
  • a typical FCC main column bottoms or clarified slurry oil has the following analysis and properties:
  • Another preferred hydrogen-donor material is a light cycle oil (LCO) taken from the main tower fractionator in a FCC operation of the riser type in which the LCO results from a distillation cut point not substantially above about 370°C.
  • LCO light cycle oil
  • a typical FCC light cycle oil has the following analysis and properties:
  • FCC main tower bottoms and light cycle oils are obtained by the catalytic cracking of gas oil in the presence of a solid porous catalyst. More complete descriptions of the production of these petroleum fractions can be found in U.S. Patents 3,725,240 and 4,302,323, for example.
  • Catalytically cracked stocks such as clarified slurry oils and light cycle oils are preferred hydrogen-donor materials because of their unique physical properties and chemical constituents.
  • a critical aspect of the hydrogen-donor material is the particular proportions of aromatic naphthenic and paraffinic moities and the type and content of aromatic and naphthenic structures together with a high content of alpha hydrogen provides a superior hydrogen-donor material.
  • the hydrogen transfer ability of a donor material can be expressed in terms of specific types of hydrogen content as determined by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectral analysis. Nuclear magnetic resonance characterization of heavy hydrocarbon oils is well developed. The spectra 60 (c/sec) are divided into four hands (H alpha , H beta , Hg amma and H Ar ) according to the following frequencies in Hertz (Hz) and chemical shift (delta):
  • H Ar protons are attached to aromatic rings and are a measure of aromaticity of a material.
  • H alpha protons are attached to non-aromatic carbon atoms themselves attached directly to an aromatic ring structure, e.g., alkyl groups and naphthenic ring structures.
  • H beta protons are attached to carbon atoms which are in a second position away from an aromatic ring, and Hg amma protons are attached to carbon atoms which are in a third position or more away from an aromatic ring structure. This can be illustrated by the compounds shown in the accompanying drawing (Fig. 1).
  • H AI protons are important because of their strong solvency power.
  • a high content of H al p ha protons is particularly significant because H alpha protons are labile and are potential hydrogen-donors.
  • the hydrogen-donor material used in the process of the invention has a hydrogen content distribution in which the H Ar proton content is from 20 to 50 percent and the H alpha proton content is at least 20 percent, preferably from 20 to 50 percent.
  • the alpha-hydrogen content should be at least 1.9 wt. % (20% of total hydrogen content).
  • the balance of the hydrogen is non-alpha hydrogen.
  • Hydrogen-donors possessing the desired hydrogen content distribution can be obtained as a bottoms fraction from the catalytic or hydrocracking of gas oil stocks in the moving bed or fluidized bed reactor processes.
  • a high severity cracking process results in a petroleum residuum solvent having an increased content of HA r and H alpha protons and a decreased content of the less desirable non-alpha hydrogen.
  • hydrocarbons having the same general process deviation may or may not have the desired proton distribution.
  • FCC/MCB #1 and #2 and FCC/ CSO #1 and #2 have the desired proton distribution while FCC/MCB #3 and #4 and FCC/CSO #3 do not.
  • the highly aromatic hydrogen donor component is derived from petroleum, it will be noted that the SRC recycle solvent closely resembles FCC/MCB 01 and #2.
  • the organic sulfur compound which is introduced into the residuum to be subjected to visbreaking is preferably one in which there is present an active thiol (-SH) group.
  • Suitable compounds in this respect include thiophenol, dodecanethiol and benzothiophene.
  • Dibenzothiophene on the basis of present knowledge, is not a suitable sulfur compound.
  • refinery streams obtained from the extraction of paraffinic oils to remove aromatics can contain sufficient sulfur compounds having sufficient thiol functionality and can be added to the residuum, directly or indirectly.
  • Another method of introducing the organic sulfur compound into the heavy residuum is to sulfonate the aromatic extract derived from extracting a paraffinic oil with phenol or furfural, for example to remove aromatic compounds; the sulfonated aromatics are then mildly hydrogenated to form the organic sulfur compound suitable for addition to heavy residua for visbreaking.
  • Techniques for aromatic extraction, sulfonation, and hydrogenation are well known in the art.
  • Still another source of thiol compounds is the extract obtained by contacting a hydrocarbon stream containing thiophenols with an alkaline solution, such as sodium hydroxide in water or alcohol, decanting the alkaline phase, and then acidifying the solution to release the thiol compounds.
  • the thiol compounds can be separated and mixed with the heavy residua.
  • This technique provides a means for removing sulfur from one portion of a refinery stream and utilizing the sulfur in another part of the refinery process.
  • Hydrocarbon streams that can be used in the manner include aromatic (furfural) extracts from lube oil stock and cycle oil stock.
  • a viscous hydrocarbon oil feed is supplied by line 4 to visbreaking heater 8.
  • the feed is blended with hydrogen donor materials supplied through line 6 in an amount from 0.1 to 50 weight percent, preferably from 0.1 to 20 weight percent based on the resid charge (a weight ratio of hydrogen-donor to resid of 0.001 to 0.5, preferably 0.001 to 0.2).
  • Organic sulfur compounds are added through line 2 to provide an amount equivalent to 0.05 to 10 percent by weight of sulfur in the stream flowing to line 2.
  • the amount added is equivalent to from 0.5 to 5 percent sulfur.
  • Mild thermal cracking of the resid under visbreaking conditions occurs in visbreaker 8 and produces a visbreaker effluent stream carried by line 10. This stream is cooled by admixture with a quench stream from line 14, and the visbreaker effluent continues through line 12 to distillation column 22 where it is fractionated to obtain C s -gases (C 3 , C 4 and lower) and a C s -135°C naphtha fraction from the top through line 24.
  • a 220°C+ fraction if taken off as a bottoms stream through line 16 where portions may be recycled as a quench stream through line 14, recovered as heavy fuel oil through line 18 or, via line 20, blended with cutter stock to meet fuel oil product specifications.
  • the overhead fraction removed from the distillation column in line 24 is passed through a cooler separator 26 which is operated under conditions effective to separate the incoming liquid into a C s -off-gas stream 28, mainly C 3 or C 4 and lower, and a C 5 -135°C naphtha fraction which is taken off via line 30. Because of the quality of the hydrogen-donor, it can be removed in admixture with the heavy oil fraction and used directly as heavy fuel oil, thus avoiding the need for separatioon.
  • the process of the invention is suitable for upgrading a wide variety of heavy liquid hydrocarbon oils in which mixtures of at least 75 weight percent of the components boil over 370°C. Included in this class of materials are residual fractions obtained by catalytic cracking of gas oils, solvent extracts obtained during the processing of lube oil stocks, asphalt precipitates obtained from deasphalting operations, high boiling bottoms or resids obtained during vacuum distillation of petroleum oils and tar sand bitumen feedstocks.
  • Visbreaking process conditions can vary widely based on the nature of the heavy oil material, the hydrogen-donor material and other factors. In general, the process is carried out at temperatures ranging from 350 to 485°C, preferably 425 to 455°C, at residence times ranging from 1 to 60 mintutes, preferably 7 to 20 minutes. The pressures employed will be sufficient to maintain liquid phase conditions usually 1480 to 7000 kPa.
  • An importent aspect of the invention is the improvement of visbreaker performance by optimizing operation severity for heavy oil feedstocks.
  • severity increased yields of distillate and gaseous hydrocarbons are obtained with a reduction in the amount of cutter oil required for blending to obtain specification-viscosity residual fuel oil.
  • cutter oil required for blending to obtain specification-viscosity residual fuel oil.
  • the use of certain hydrogen-donors in combination with certain organic sulfur compounds has been found to suppress the formation of sedimentation species and thus permit visbreaking at a higher severity consistent with the production of stable fuel oil.
  • the visbreaking of a heavy petroleum feed stock conventionally carried out at, say, 427°C with a residence time of 500 seconds may be carried out at 427°C with a residence time of 800 seconds under the conditions of the invention to obtain a fuel oil product free of sedimenting species.
  • the current stock requirement is substantially reduced and this represents a considerable financial savings.

Abstract

Visbreaking of heavy residual oil is carried out at high severity in the presence of an organic sulfur compound containing a thiol group and a highly aromatic hydrogen donor material having HAr and H hydrogen contents each of at least 20% of the total hydrogen content.

Description

  • This invention relates to the processing of residual petroleum charge stocks by visbreaking in the presence of certain highly aromatic hydrogen-donor materials.
  • Visbreaking, or viscosity breaking, is a well-known petroleum refining process in which reduced crudes are pyrolyzed, or cracked, under comparatively mild conditions to provide products having lower viscosities and pour points, thus reducing the amounts of less-viscous and more valuable blending oils required to make the residual stocks useful as fuel oils. The visbreaker feedstock usually consists of a mixture of two or more refinery streams derived from sources such as atmospheric residuum, vacuum residuum, furfural-extract, propane-deasphalted tar and catalytic cracker bottoms. Most of these feedstock components, except the heavy aromatic oils, behave independently in the visbreaking operation. Consequently, the severity of operation for a mixed feed is limited greatly by the least desirable (highest coke forming) components. In a typical visbreaking process, the crude or resid feed is passed through a heater and heated to about 425 to about 525°C and at about 450 to about 7000 kPa. Light gas-oil may be recycled to lower the temperature of the effluent to about 260 to about 370°C. Cracked products from the reaction are flash distilled with the vapor overhead being fractionated into a light distillate overhead product, for example gasoline and light gas-oil bottoms, and the liquid bottoms being vacuum fractionated into heavy gas-oil distillate and residual tar. Examples of such visbreaking methods are described in Beuther et al, "Thermal Visbreaking of Heavy Residues," The Oil and Gas Journal, 57:46, November 9, 1959, pp. 151-157; Rhoe et al, "Visbreaking: A Flexible Process," Hydrocarbon Processing, January 1979, pp. 131-136; and United States Patent 4,233,138.
  • Various visbreaking processes have been proposed in which residual oils are added to the visbreaking stage with or without added hydrogen or hydrogen-donors. For example, U.S. Patent 3,691,058 describes the production of single ring aromatic hydrocarbons (70-220°C) by hydrocracking a heavy hydrocarbon feed (565°C-) and recycling 32­70·C and 220°C+ product fractions to extinction. This is integrated with visbreaking of residua in the presence of 1-28 weight % free radical acceptor at 370 to 480°C in the presence or absence of hydrogen (to enhance residua depolymerization). U.S. Patent 4,067,757 describes a process comprising passing a resid up through a bed of inertia solids (packed bed reactor) in the presence or absence of 9-1800 Nm3 hydrogen per m3 resid at 400 to 540°C to enhance the production of middle distillate (175-345°C).
  • U.S. Patent 2,953,513 proposes the production of hydrogen-donors by partial hydrogenation of certain distillate thermal and catalytic tars, boiling above 370°C, containing a minimum of 40 weight % aromatics, to contain H/C ratios of 0.7-1.6. The resid feed is then mixed with 9-83 volume % of hydrogen-donor and thermally cracked at 427-482°C to produce low boiling products. U.S. Patent 4,090,947 describes a thermal cracking process (425-540°C) for converting resids into lighter products in the presence of 10-500 volume % hydrogen-donor. The hydrogen-donor is produced by hydrotreating premium coker gas oil (345―480°C) alone or blended with gas oil produced in the thermal cracker. U.S. Patent 4,292,168 proposes upgrading heavy hydrocarbon oils without substantial formation of chat by heating the oil with hydrogen and a hydrogen transfer solvent without a catalyst at temperatures of about 320-500°C and a pressure of 2200-18000 kPa for a time of about 3-30 minutes. Examples of hydrogen-donor transfer solvents include pyrene, fluoranthene, anthracene and benzanthracene. U.S. Patent 4,292,686 describes a process for contacting a resid with a hydrogen-donor at 350-500°C and a pressure of 2-7 MPa with liquid hourly space velocities ranging from 0.5-10.
  • European Patent Application 133,774 describes a process for the production of fuel oil products in which the formation of coke of filtration sediment is suppressed by visbreaking heavy petroleum residua under liquid phase, non-catalytic conditions in the presence of certain hydrogen-donor materials and in the absence of added free hydrogen. By means of the invention described in that application, heavy petroleum oil feed stocks containing deleterious contaminants such as sulfur and nitrogen compounds, asphaltenes and metals, can be visbroken at high severities to provide lower molecular weight fuel oil products of improved viscosity and pour point characteristics. The process of that invention offers the potential of substantially eliminating and/or reducing the need for cutter stock to meet fuel oil product viscosity specifications.
  • The present invention represents an improvement in the visbreaking process described in that application and involves introducing an organic sulfur compound into the heavy petroleum residual oil before it is subjected to visbreaking in the presence of a hydrogen donor material.
  • According to the invention, therefore, there is provided a process for visbreaking a heavy petroleum residual oil comprising:
    • (a) add to the residual oil an organic sulfur compound having an active thiol component; and
    • (b) visbreaking the residual oil in the presence of a highly aromatic hydrogen donor material having a content of Hlr and HalPha hydrogen each of at least 20 percent of the total hydogen-donor hydrogen content, and recovering a fuel oil product having a viscosity lower than that of the starting residual oil.
  • The hydrogen-donor material used in the process of the invention is a thermally stable, polycyclic aromatic of hydroaromatic distillate mixture which results from one or more petroleum refining operations. The hydrogen-donor preferably has an average boiling point in the range of 230 to 510°C and an A.P.I. gravity below 20°C.
  • Examples of suitable hydrogen-donors are highly aromatic petroleum refinery streams, such as fluidized catalytic cracker (FCC) "main column" bottoms, FCC "light cycle oil," and theremofor catalytic cracker (TCC) "syntower" bottoms, all of which contain a substantial proportion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon constituents such as naphthalene, dimethyl naphthalene, anthracene, phenanthrene, fluorene, chrysene, pyrene, perylene, diphenyl, benzothiophene, tetralin and dihydronapthalene, for example. Such refractory petroleum materials are resistant to conversion into higher (lower molecular weight) products by conventional non-hydrogenative procedures. Typically, these petroleum refinery residual and recycle fractions are hydrocarbonaceous mixtures having an average carbon to hydrogen ratio above about 1:1, and an average boiling point above 230°C.
  • An FCC main column bottoms refinery fraction is a highly preferred donor for use in the process of the invention. A typical FCC main column bottoms (or FCC clarified slurry oil (CSO)) contains a mixture of constituents as represented in the following mass spectrometric analysis:
    Figure imgb0001
  • A typical FCC main column bottoms or clarified slurry oil has the following analysis and properties:
    Figure imgb0002
  • Another preferred hydrogen-donor material is a light cycle oil (LCO) taken from the main tower fractionator in a FCC operation of the riser type in which the LCO results from a distillation cut point not substantially above about 370°C.
  • A typical FCC light cycle oil (LCO) has the following analysis and properties:
    Figure imgb0003
  • FCC main tower bottoms and light cycle oils are obtained by the catalytic cracking of gas oil in the presence of a solid porous catalyst. More complete descriptions of the production of these petroleum fractions can be found in U.S. Patents 3,725,240 and 4,302,323, for example.
  • Catalytically cracked stocks such as clarified slurry oils and light cycle oils are preferred hydrogen-donor materials because of their unique physical properties and chemical constituents. A critical aspect of the hydrogen-donor material is the particular proportions of aromatic naphthenic and paraffinic moities and the type and content of aromatic and naphthenic structures together with a high content of alpha hydrogen provides a superior hydrogen-donor material.
  • The hydrogen transfer ability of a donor material can be expressed in terms of specific types of hydrogen content as determined by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectral analysis. Nuclear magnetic resonance characterization of heavy hydrocarbon oils is well developed. The spectra 60 (c/sec) are divided into four hands (Halpha, Hbeta, Hgamma and HAr) according to the following frequencies in Hertz (Hz) and chemical shift (delta):
    Figure imgb0004
  • The HAr protons are attached to aromatic rings and are a measure of aromaticity of a material. Halpha protons are attached to non-aromatic carbon atoms themselves attached directly to an aromatic ring structure, e.g., alkyl groups and naphthenic ring structures. Hbeta protons are attached to carbon atoms which are in a second position away from an aromatic ring, and Hgamma protons are attached to carbon atoms which are in a third position or more away from an aromatic ring structure. This can be illustrated by the compounds shown in the accompanying drawing (Fig. 1).
  • The HAI protons are important because of their strong solvency power. A high content of Halpha protons is particularly significant because Halpha protons are labile and are potential hydrogen-donors.
  • It is particularly preferred that the hydrogen-donor material used in the process of the invention has a hydrogen content distribution in which the HAr proton content is from 20 to 50 percent and the Halpha proton content is at least 20 percent, preferably from 20 to 50 percent. For example, in H-donor streams containing 9.5 weight % total hydrogen, the alpha-hydrogen content should be at least 1.9 wt. % (20% of total hydrogen content). The balance of the hydrogen is non-alpha hydrogen.
  • Hydrogen-donors possessing the desired hydrogen content distribution can be obtained as a bottoms fraction from the catalytic or hydrocracking of gas oil stocks in the moving bed or fluidized bed reactor processes. In general, depending upon such conditions as temperature, pressure, catalyst-to-oil ratio, space velocity and catalyst nature, a high severity cracking process results in a petroleum residuum solvent having an increased content of HAr and Halpha protons and a decreased content of the less desirable non-alpha hydrogen.
  • The proton distribution in examples of various highly aromatic hydrocarbon by-product streams is shown below.
    Figure imgb0005
    Figure imgb0006
  • All of the values reported above are for non-hydrotreated materials.
  • From the data given above, it will be seen that hydrocarbons having the same general process deviation may or may not have the desired proton distribution. For example, FCC/MCB #1 and #2 and FCC/ CSO #1 and #2 have the desired proton distribution while FCC/MCB #3 and #4 and FCC/CSO #3 do not. Furthermore, although it is preferred that the highly aromatic hydrogen donor component is derived from petroleum, it will be noted that the SRC recycle solvent closely resembles FCC/MCB 01 and #2.
  • The organic sulfur compound which is introduced into the residuum to be subjected to visbreaking is preferably one in which there is present an active thiol (-SH) group. Suitable compounds in this respect include thiophenol, dodecanethiol and benzothiophene. Dibenzothiophene, on the basis of present knowledge, is not a suitable sulfur compound.
  • In addition, refinery streams obtained from the extraction of paraffinic oils to remove aromatics, for example with furfural, and other refinery streams can contain sufficient sulfur compounds having sufficient thiol functionality and can be added to the residuum, directly or indirectly.
  • Another method of introducing the organic sulfur compound into the heavy residuum is to sulfonate the aromatic extract derived from extracting a paraffinic oil with phenol or furfural, for example to remove aromatic compounds; the sulfonated aromatics are then mildly hydrogenated to form the organic sulfur compound suitable for addition to heavy residua for visbreaking. Techniques for aromatic extraction, sulfonation, and hydrogenation are well known in the art.
  • Still another source of thiol compounds is the extract obtained by contacting a hydrocarbon stream containing thiophenols with an alkaline solution, such as sodium hydroxide in water or alcohol, decanting the alkaline phase, and then acidifying the solution to release the thiol compounds. The thiol compounds can be separated and mixed with the heavy residua. This technique provides a means for removing sulfur from one portion of a refinery stream and utilizing the sulfur in another part of the refinery process. Hydrocarbon streams that can be used in the manner include aromatic (furfural) extracts from lube oil stock and cycle oil stock.
  • The process of the invention is advantageously carried out in refinery facilities of the type shown diagrammatically in the accompanying drawing. Referring to the drawing (Fig. 2), a viscous hydrocarbon oil feed,.typified by a 496°C+ Arab Heavy resid, is supplied by line 4 to visbreaking heater 8. The feed is blended with hydrogen donor materials supplied through line 6 in an amount from 0.1 to 50 weight percent, preferably from 0.1 to 20 weight percent based on the resid charge (a weight ratio of hydrogen-donor to resid of 0.001 to 0.5, preferably 0.001 to 0.2). Organic sulfur compounds are added through line 2 to provide an amount equivalent to 0.05 to 10 percent by weight of sulfur in the stream flowing to line 2. Preferably the amount added is equivalent to from 0.5 to 5 percent sulfur. Mild thermal cracking of the resid under visbreaking conditions occurs in visbreaker 8 and produces a visbreaker effluent stream carried by line 10. This stream is cooled by admixture with a quench stream from line 14, and the visbreaker effluent continues through line 12 to distillation column 22 where it is fractionated to obtain Cs-gases (C3, C4 and lower) and a Cs-135°C naphtha fraction from the top through line 24. A 220°C+ fraction if taken off as a bottoms stream through line 16 where portions may be recycled as a quench stream through line 14, recovered as heavy fuel oil through line 18 or, via line 20, blended with cutter stock to meet fuel oil product specifications.
  • The overhead fraction removed from the distillation column in line 24 is passed through a cooler separator 26 which is operated under conditions effective to separate the incoming liquid into a Cs-off-gas stream 28, mainly C3 or C4 and lower, and a C5-135°C naphtha fraction which is taken off via line 30. Because of the quality of the hydrogen-donor, it can be removed in admixture with the heavy oil fraction and used directly as heavy fuel oil, thus avoiding the need for separatioon.
  • The process of the invention is suitable for upgrading a wide variety of heavy liquid hydrocarbon oils in which mixtures of at least 75 weight percent of the components boil over 370°C. Included in this class of materials are residual fractions obtained by catalytic cracking of gas oils, solvent extracts obtained during the processing of lube oil stocks, asphalt precipitates obtained from deasphalting operations, high boiling bottoms or resids obtained during vacuum distillation of petroleum oils and tar sand bitumen feedstocks.
  • Visbreaking process conditions can vary widely based on the nature of the heavy oil material, the hydrogen-donor material and other factors. In general, the process is carried out at temperatures ranging from 350 to 485°C, preferably 425 to 455°C, at residence times ranging from 1 to 60 mintutes, preferably 7 to 20 minutes. The pressures employed will be sufficient to maintain liquid phase conditions usually 1480 to 7000 kPa.
  • An importent aspect of the invention is the improvement of visbreaker performance by optimizing operation severity for heavy oil feedstocks. In general; as severity increased, increased yields of distillate and gaseous hydrocarbons are obtained with a reduction in the amount of cutter oil required for blending to obtain specification-viscosity residual fuel oil. At high severities, however, there is an increased tendency to form coke deposits which result in plugged heater tubes and/or the production of unstable fuel oils as measured by sediment formation. By means of the process of the invention, the use of certain hydrogen-donors in combination with certain organic sulfur compounds has been found to suppress the formation of sedimentation species and thus permit visbreaking at a higher severity consistent with the production of stable fuel oil. As an example, the visbreaking of a heavy petroleum feed stock conventionally carried out at, say, 427°C with a residence time of 500 seconds may be carried out at 427°C with a residence time of 800 seconds under the conditions of the invention to obtain a fuel oil product free of sedimenting species. At such higher severities, the current stock requirement is substantially reduced and this represents a considerable financial savings.
  • Example
  • The effectiveness of thiophenolic compounds in increasing the hydrogen donor capacity of a hydrogen donor solvent was demonstrated by the following tests.
  • Four tests were made utilizing heavy-wall glass tubes into which the materials shown in Column 2 of the following Table were added in the amounts shown in Column 3. The tubes were blanketed in nitrogen, sealed and heated at 440°C for 1 hour. The mixtures were then analyzed using vapor pressure chromatography and the hydrogen-donor capacity of each mixture was calculated.
    Figure imgb0007

Claims (7)

1. A process for visbreaking a heavy petroleum residual oil comprising:
(a) adding to the residual oil an organic sulfur compound having an active thiol component before
(b) visbreaking the residual oil in the presence of a highly aromatic hydrogen donor material having a content of HAr and Halpha hydrogen of at least 20 percent of the total hydrogen-donor hydrogen content, and recovering a fuel oil product having a viscosity lower than that of the starting residual oil.
2. A process according to Claim 1, wherein the HAr hydrogen content is from 20 to 50 percent and the Halpha hydrogen content is from 20 to 50 percent, based on total hydrogen content.
3. A process according to Claim 2, wherein the hydrogen donor solvent has a HalPha content of at least 1.9 weight % and HAr content of at least 2.0 weight %.
4. A process according to any one of Claims 1 to 3, wherein the hydrogen-donor material is an FCC main column bottoms, a clarified slurry oil, a TCC syntower bottoms, an SRC recycle oil or a light cycle oil.
5. A process according to any one of Claims 1 to 4, wherein visbreaking is carried out at a temperature from 350 to 485°C and for a residence time from 1 to 60 minutes, in the presence of from 0.1 to 50 weight percent of hydrogen donor material, based on the heavy residual oil.
6. A process according to any one of Claims 1 to 5, wherein the organic sulfur compound is selected from thiophenol, dodecanethiol and benzothiophene.
7. A process according to any one of Claims 1 to 6, which is carried out in the absence of free hydrogen.
EP85306152A 1984-09-10 1985-08-30 Visbreaking process Expired EP0175511B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT85306152T ATE34765T1 (en) 1984-09-10 1985-08-30 VISCOSITY REDUCTION PROCEDURE.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US64841384A 1984-09-10 1984-09-10
US648413 1984-09-10

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0175511A1 EP0175511A1 (en) 1986-03-26
EP0175511B1 true EP0175511B1 (en) 1988-06-01

Family

ID=24600680

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP85306152A Expired EP0175511B1 (en) 1984-09-10 1985-08-30 Visbreaking process

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0175511B1 (en)
JP (1) JPS6166792A (en)
AT (1) ATE34765T1 (en)
AU (1) AU580617B2 (en)
CA (1) CA1251155A (en)
DE (1) DE3563063D1 (en)
ES (1) ES8605020A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA856933B (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7871510B2 (en) 2007-08-28 2011-01-18 Exxonmobil Research & Engineering Co. Production of an enhanced resid coker feed using ultrafiltration
US8100178B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2012-01-24 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method of oil recovery using a foamy oil-external emulsion

Families Citing this family (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU579005B2 (en) * 1985-03-22 1988-11-10 Mobil Oil Corporation Hydrogenation process
FR2607145B1 (en) * 1986-11-25 1990-06-08 Inst Francais Du Petrole IMPROVED PROCESS FOR THE THERMAL CONVERSION OF HEAVY OIL FRACTIONS AND REFINING RESIDUES IN THE PRESENCE OF OXYGEN COMPOUNDS OF SULFUR, NITROGEN OR PHOSPHORUS
US4814065A (en) * 1987-09-25 1989-03-21 Mobil Oil Company Accelerated cracking of residual oils and hydrogen donation utilizing ammonium sulfide catalysts
FR2628437B1 (en) * 1988-03-14 1992-12-31 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR THE HEAT TREATMENT OF HYDROCARBON CHARGES IN THE PRESENCE OF POLYSULFIDES AND HYDROGEN DONORS
US6800193B2 (en) 2000-04-25 2004-10-05 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Mineral acid enhanced thermal treatment for viscosity reduction of oils (ECB-0002)
US7338924B2 (en) 2002-05-02 2008-03-04 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Oil-in-water-in-oil emulsion
CN102925182B (en) 2003-05-16 2014-04-23 埃克森美孚研究工程公司 Delayed coking process for producing free-flowing shot coke
US7645375B2 (en) 2003-05-16 2010-01-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Delayed coking process for producing free-flowing coke using low molecular weight aromatic additives
US7658838B2 (en) 2003-05-16 2010-02-09 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Delayed coking process for producing free-flowing coke using polymeric additives
WO2005113727A2 (en) 2004-05-14 2005-12-01 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Inhibitor enhanced thermal upgrading of heavy oils
MXPA06011752A (en) 2004-05-14 2007-01-16 Exxonmobil Res & Eng Co Production and removal of free-flowing coke from delayed coker drum.
US7794586B2 (en) 2004-05-14 2010-09-14 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Viscoelastic upgrading of heavy oil by altering its elastic modulus
BRPI0511024A (en) 2004-05-14 2007-11-27 Exxonmobil Res & Eng Co delayed coking process and coke
JP4982069B2 (en) * 2005-10-21 2012-07-25 日立造船株式会社 Method for reducing the viscosity of heavy oil
US7794587B2 (en) 2008-01-22 2010-09-14 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Method to alter coke morphology using metal salts of aromatic sulfonic acids and/or polysulfonic acids
FR2969643B1 (en) * 2010-12-27 2014-11-21 Total Raffinage Marketing CATALYTIC CRACKING PROCESS FOR TREATING A LOW CARBON CONRADSON CUT
JP6199973B2 (en) 2012-08-24 2017-09-20 サウジ アラビアン オイル カンパニー Hydrovisbreaking method for raw materials containing dissolved hydrogen
MX359374B (en) 2013-10-22 2018-09-13 Mexicano Inst Petrol Application of a chemical composition for viscosity modification of heavy and extra-heavy crude oils.
KR102578301B1 (en) * 2017-09-27 2023-09-13 세키스이가가쿠 고교가부시키가이샤 Resin composition for molding

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1476426A (en) * 1973-07-03 1977-06-16 Shell Int Research Process for preparing white oils
US4414102A (en) * 1981-05-15 1983-11-08 Mobil Oil Corporation Process for reducing nitrogen and/or oxygen heteroatom content of a mineral oil
US4401561A (en) * 1981-12-21 1983-08-30 Uop Inc. Hydrotreating process with ammonia injection to reaction zone effluent

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8100178B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2012-01-24 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method of oil recovery using a foamy oil-external emulsion
US7871510B2 (en) 2007-08-28 2011-01-18 Exxonmobil Research & Engineering Co. Production of an enhanced resid coker feed using ultrafiltration

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ZA856933B (en) 1987-04-29
AU4648685A (en) 1986-03-20
JPS6166792A (en) 1986-04-05
ES8605020A1 (en) 1986-03-01
ES546809A0 (en) 1986-03-01
CA1251155A (en) 1989-03-14
AU580617B2 (en) 1989-01-19
DE3563063D1 (en) 1988-07-07
ATE34765T1 (en) 1988-06-15
EP0175511A1 (en) 1986-03-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1254529A (en) Process for visbreaking resids in the presence of hydrogen-donor materials
EP0175511B1 (en) Visbreaking process
US4302323A (en) Catalytic hydroconversion of residual stocks
EP0121376B1 (en) Process for upgrading a heavy viscous hydrocarbon
US5059303A (en) Oil stabilization
US2727853A (en) Process for refining of petroleum, shale oil, and the like
US5286371A (en) Process for producing needle coke
Carlson et al. Thermal hydrogenation. Transfer of hydrogen from tetralin to cracked residua
CN112955528B (en) C 5+ Hydrocarbon conversion process
SE446988B (en) PROCEDURE FOR PRODUCING PREMIUM COOK
US4587007A (en) Process for visbreaking resids in the presence of hydrogen-donor materials and organic sulfur compounds
US3238118A (en) Conversion of hydrocarbons in the presence of a hydrogenated donor diluent
US4171260A (en) Process for reducing thiophenic sulfur in heavy oil
US4389302A (en) Process for vis-breaking asphaltenes
US3321395A (en) Hydroprocessing of metal-containing asphaltic hydrocarbons
KR0148566B1 (en) Process for the conversion of a heavy hydrocarbonaceous feedstock
EP0160410A1 (en) Process for increasing deasphalted oil production from upgraded oil residua
US4892644A (en) Upgrading solvent extracts by double decantation and use of pseudo extract as hydrogen donor
RU2683642C1 (en) Method of converting hydrocarbon residues using deasphalting and slowed coking
SG186124A1 (en) Integrated process for steam cracking
US11359148B2 (en) Methods and systems to produce needle coke from aromatic recovery complex bottoms
CA1246481A (en) Coking residuum in the presence of hydrogen donor
US5057204A (en) Catalytic visbreaking process
US3472760A (en) Process for converting asphaltenic oils and olefinic gasolines to high-value petroleum products
US5024752A (en) Upgrading of resids by liquid phase mild coking

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19860830

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19870819

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 34765

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19880615

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3563063

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19880707

ET Fr: translation filed
ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: MODIANO & ASSOCIATI S.R.L.

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19910612

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19910619

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19910625

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19910702

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19910725

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 19910809

Year of fee payment: 7

ITTA It: last paid annual fee
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19910831

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19911031

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19920830

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19920830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19920831

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19920831

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19920831

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19920831

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: MOBIL OIL CORP.

Effective date: 19920831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19930301

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee
GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19920830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19930430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19930501

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 85306152.1

Effective date: 19930307