EP0151011B1 - Sicherheitswiderstandsbauelement - Google Patents
Sicherheitswiderstandsbauelement Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0151011B1 EP0151011B1 EP19850300542 EP85300542A EP0151011B1 EP 0151011 B1 EP0151011 B1 EP 0151011B1 EP 19850300542 EP19850300542 EP 19850300542 EP 85300542 A EP85300542 A EP 85300542A EP 0151011 B1 EP0151011 B1 EP 0151011B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- elements
- hard elements
- hard
- bores
- pins
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/02—Plate construction
- F41H5/04—Plate construction composed of more than one layer
- F41H5/0414—Layered armour containing ceramic material
- F41H5/0421—Ceramic layers in combination with metal layers
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05G—SAFES OR STRONG-ROOMS FOR VALUABLES; BANK PROTECTION DEVICES; SAFETY TRANSACTION PARTITIONS
- E05G1/00—Safes or strong-rooms for valuables
- E05G1/02—Details
- E05G1/024—Wall or panel structure
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/02—Plate construction
- F41H5/023—Armour plate, or auxiliary armour plate mounted at a distance of the main armour plate, having cavities at its outer impact surface, or holes, for deflecting the projectile
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method of constructing a penetration-resistant barrier structure for use in the doors or walls of safes, strongrooms and the like security enclosures and seeks in particular to provide a form of construction which can be made highly resistant to attacks with drills and punches and which will be suited especially to the localised protection of the locking points or other strategically important regions within a safe or strongroom door for example.
- barrier structures including elements of a hard mineral or ceramic disposed in a cast matrix.
- the hard elements are provided in the form of irregularly-shaped nuggets which must therefore be juxtaposed in a somewhat random fashion within the barrier, making it difficult to be sure that there is a sufficient depth of hard material evenly distributed throughout the barrier to provide elongate resistance over the whole of the protected area.
- One known variation of this comprises a closely-spaced parallel array of discrete high alumina ceramic pins held in a cast aluminium alloy matrix with the longitudinal axes of the pins being arranged perpendicularly to the plane of the barrier (i.e.
- a lightweight armour intended for protecting e.g. military aircraft or service personnel from projectiles (in the latter case used in bullet-resistant vests) comprising ceramic elements held under hoop stress in a metal plate.
- the hoop stress is taught to reduce the fragility of the ceramic elements under shock and is achieved by utilizing the high coefficient of thermal expansion of the surrounding metal, the ceramic elements being inserted into cells in a plate which has been heated to, say, 600-900°C, and which on subsequent cooling contracts around the ceramic.
- the present invention on the other hand resides in a method of constructing a barrier structure comprising a closely-spaced array of regularly-shaped hard elements embedded in parallel bores in a supporting plate or other body, the longitudinal axes of said bores being aligned generally perpendicularly to the plane of the barrier, characterised by the step of forcing elements of a cemented carbide material into respective said parallel bores which are prepared in the supporting body as an interference fit with the respective hard elements such that those elements are securely held under compression in the body by elastic stresses set up in the body as a result of the process of forcing in the hard elements.
- the hard elements in a structure according to the invention are preferably in the form of pins or balls of the chosen cemented carbide material.
- These materials also known as “sintered carbides” and “hard metals”, typically comprise compounds of tungsten carbide, titanium carbide or of both together and/or together with tantalum carbide, together with a small amount of a “cementing” metal such as cobalt or nickel.
- They can be made with both a sufficient hardness, say at least 1400 VPN (Vickers Pyramid Number) at room temperature, to resist the cutting action of the drills or other mechanical cutting tools which are likely to be appropriated for an attack upon the structure, and with a toughness and tensile strength (or transverse rupture strength-say at least 100,000 Ib/in 2 (7,000 kg/cm 2 )) which significantly exceeds that of alumina and the like ceramic materials and which confers upon elements of cemented carbide a greater inherent resistance to destruction by percussion than the ceramics.
- VPN Vinyl Pyramid Number
- these materials can also exhibit compressive strengths of, say, at least 400,000 Ib/in 2 (28,000 kg/ cm 2 ) and typically 650,000 Ib/in 2 , (45,000 kg/cm 2 ) which greatly exceeds that of alumina and the like and which enables the elements to be employed in the above-defined "forced-in" construction technique to which much of the improved percussion resistance of the present structure is thought to be attributable.
- the invention proposes to construct the structure by forcing the hard elements into interference-fit bores prepared in a supporting plate or other body.
- the residual elastic stresses which are set up in the body as a result of this force fitting of the hard elements exhibit a tightness of hold on the elements such as to maximise resistance to extraction of the elements and to minimise the tendency of the elements to crack or chip under impact loads.
- Using a steel supporting body gives the further advantage of enabling the barrier to be strongly attached to the associated structure without difficulty eg by welding or other conventional fixation techniques.
- the form of the hard elements themselves can also be chosen so as to maximise the desired residual and induced stresses in the body and elements after force-fitting.
- the pins In the case of hard pins, therefore, which will be pressed or driven endwise into the body, it is preferred for the pins to be tapered along much or all of their length.
- balls may be employed, which have certain advantages from the point of view of production-they will be self-locating in the bores if poured over the surface of the supporting body and may be forced in by a rolling press.
- each pin 1 is tapered along its length, with a shallow dome at its wider end.
- the pins are mounted in the plate 2 with their longitudinal axes parallel to each other and the plate will be mounted in the safe door or other structure which it is intended to protect face-on to the anticipated direction of attack and with the domed ends of the pins outwards.
- the plate 2 is drilled with an array of plain bores 3 ( Figure 3) to define the positions for the pins 1, and with a diameter to be an interference fit with the pins.
- the narrower end of a pin 1 is then inserted into each bore 3 and the pins are pressed fully home as shown in Figure 2 whence they are securely retained, under a considerable compressive load, by the very high elastic stresses which are induced in the steel surrounding each bore as the tapered pins progressively penetrate the plate.
- an 8 mm thick plate 2 of 50 mm diameter is provided with an array of 7/64" (2.8 mm) bores in the pattern shown in Figure 1 and at a pitch p of 6 mm.
- the pins 1 are 8 mm long and have a nominal diameter of 2.8 mm widening to 3.4 mm.
- This form of structure is particularly suitable for resisting carbide-tipped drills in the diameter range of 10-15 mm; tests have shown that, when attacked, not only is progress through the barrier extremely slow due to the very low cutting rate which can be achieved in any event against the pins 1, but also the carbide drill tips are repeatedly destroyed so that the drill in use must be continually replaced if any progress at all is to be made.
- the structure illustrated in Figures 4 and 5 comprises a closely-spaced array of discrete tungsten carbide balls 4 held in a mild steel plate 5.
- the balls are mounted in the plate so as to lie generally in one plane and the plate will be mounted in the safe door or other structure which it is intended to protect face-on to the anticipated direction of attack and with the exposed faces of the balls outwards.
- this barrier To construct this barrier the plate 5 is drilled with an array of plain blind bores 6 ( Figure 5) to define the positions for the balls 4, and with a diameter to be an interference fit with the balls. A ball 4 is then located in the mouth of each bore 6 and the balls are pressed fully home as shown in Figure 5 whence they are securely retained under compressive load by the very high elastic stresses which are induced in the steel surrouinding each bore as the balls progressively penetrate the plate. As with all the embodiments of the invention this process tends to maximise resistance to extraction of the forced-in carbide elements and to minimise the tendency of these elements to crack or chip under impact loads, the resultant induced compressive stress in the hard inclusions also having the net result of increasing the effective minimum (tensile) stress at which failure of the carbide material occurs.
- a 6 mm thick plate 2, 64 mm square is provided with an array of 4.5 mm deep 4.2 mm diameter bores in the pattern shown in Figure 4 and at a pitch p' of 8 mm.
- the balls 4 have a nominal diameter of 4.37 mm.
- This form of structure is particularly suitable for resisting carbide-tipped drills in the diameter range of 10-20 mm; tests have shown that, when attacked, not only is progress through the barrier extremely slow due to the very low cutting rate which can be achieved in any event against the hard balls 4, and that the spherical surfaces of the balls tends to deflect the drill, but also the carbide drill tips are repeatedly destroyed so that the drill in use must be continually replaced if any progress at all is to be made. As before, this is due to the fact that the geometry of the barrier allows partial penetration of the drill tip into the steel plate whereupon the flanks of the carbide inserts on the drill bit impact the hard balls and are consequently broken or ripped away from the bit.
- FIGs 6 and 7 there is shown a construction which offers still greater protection against drilling and percussion attacks.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
- Earth Drilling (AREA)
- Drilling Tools (AREA)
Claims (9)
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB848402012A GB8402012D0 (en) | 1984-01-26 | 1984-01-26 | Security barrier structure |
GB8402012 | 1984-01-26 | ||
GB848406315A GB8406315D0 (en) | 1984-03-10 | 1984-03-10 | Security barrier structure |
GB8406315 | 1984-03-10 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0151011A2 EP0151011A2 (de) | 1985-08-07 |
EP0151011A3 EP0151011A3 (en) | 1986-04-09 |
EP0151011B1 true EP0151011B1 (de) | 1989-08-16 |
Family
ID=26287229
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19850300542 Expired EP0151011B1 (de) | 1984-01-26 | 1985-01-25 | Sicherheitswiderstandsbauelement |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0151011B1 (de) |
AU (1) | AU571639B2 (de) |
ES (1) | ES292802Y (de) |
GB (1) | GB2153406B (de) |
NZ (1) | NZ210987A (de) |
PT (1) | PT79886B (de) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IL134642A0 (en) | 2000-02-21 | 2001-05-20 | Israel State | Ballistic armor panel |
WO2018161072A1 (en) * | 2017-03-03 | 2018-09-07 | The American University In Cairo | Projectile-stopping plates for personal, vehicular and equipment protection |
CN111705993B (zh) * | 2020-06-24 | 2024-01-05 | 王子国 | 预应力约束块和复合装甲结构 |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
BE711388A (de) * | 1967-03-01 | 1968-08-28 | ||
DE2525738A1 (de) * | 1975-06-10 | 1976-12-23 | Danzer Josef Helmut | Bohrsicheres plattenelement |
GB1600247A (en) * | 1978-05-11 | 1981-10-14 | Security Lock & Safe Co | Security barriers |
DE2933026A1 (de) * | 1979-08-16 | 1981-02-26 | Battelle Institut E V | Bauelement |
FR2526535A1 (fr) * | 1982-05-04 | 1983-11-10 | Pequignot Michel | Plaque de blindage, notamment pour blindage allege |
-
1985
- 1985-01-25 EP EP19850300542 patent/EP0151011B1/de not_active Expired
- 1985-01-25 ES ES1985292802U patent/ES292802Y/es not_active Expired
- 1985-01-25 GB GB08501862A patent/GB2153406B/en not_active Expired
- 1985-01-25 AU AU38096/85A patent/AU571639B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1985-01-25 PT PT7988685A patent/PT79886B/pt unknown
- 1985-01-29 NZ NZ21098785A patent/NZ210987A/en unknown
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
PT79886B (en) | 1986-09-11 |
AU3809685A (en) | 1985-08-01 |
PT79886A (en) | 1985-02-01 |
EP0151011A3 (en) | 1986-04-09 |
GB2153406A (en) | 1985-08-21 |
EP0151011A2 (de) | 1985-08-07 |
ES292802U (es) | 1986-12-16 |
AU571639B2 (en) | 1988-04-21 |
ES292802Y (es) | 1987-08-01 |
GB2153406B (en) | 1987-04-15 |
NZ210987A (en) | 1987-11-27 |
GB8501862D0 (en) | 1985-02-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4760611A (en) | Armor elements and method | |
US6216579B1 (en) | Composite armor material | |
US20090229453A1 (en) | Ceramic multi-hit armor | |
EP1705453B1 (de) | Verbundpanzerplatte zum Schutz von Fahrzeugen oder Gebäuden vor panzerbrechenden Geschossen mit hoher kinetischer Energie | |
US8468926B2 (en) | Ballistic armor system | |
US4364300A (en) | Composite cored combat vehicle armor | |
US7000550B1 (en) | Ablative blast resistant security door panel | |
Hu et al. | Ballistic performance and microstructure of modified rolled homogeneous armor steel | |
US20160201357A1 (en) | Tamper resistant bicycle lock | |
EP0151011B1 (de) | Sicherheitswiderstandsbauelement | |
EP1695019B1 (de) | Schutzstruktur und schutzsystem | |
EP2715272B1 (de) | Ballistikschutz | |
WO2008091369A2 (en) | Armor structures | |
WO2015031387A1 (en) | Tamper resistant padlocks | |
EP1229298A1 (de) | Schutzelement gegen ballistische Einwirkungen | |
DE4031550C2 (de) | ||
Lane et al. | Materials for blast and penetration resistance. | |
EP1342046B1 (de) | Passive panzerung zum schutz gegen hohlladungen | |
EP3055639B1 (de) | Schutzelement mit entkopplungsschicht | |
RU2491494C1 (ru) | Бронепанель пулезащитная | |
Maystrenko et al. | Ceramic armour for armoured vehicles against large-calibre bullets | |
DE3540820C2 (de) | ||
DE10313231B4 (de) | Hochfeste Flächengebilde für endballistischen Schutz und Verschleißschutz | |
EP3069097B1 (de) | Bekleidungsstück mit ballistischem schutz | |
Chartpuk et al. | Parameter analysis of SKD11 and SUS304 bulletproof plate that resistance penetration of bullet 7.62 mm according to standard NIJ 4 by finite element method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): BE FR IT LU NL |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): BE FR IT LU NL |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19860929 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19871007 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: CHUBB & SON'S LOCK AND SAFE COMPANY LIMITED |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: CHUBB & SON'S LOCK AND SAFE COMPANY LIMITED |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): BE FR IT LU NL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Effective date: 19890816 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 19890816 Ref country code: FR Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY Effective date: 19890816 |
|
EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
EPTA | Lu: last paid annual fee | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Payment date: 19950101 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 19950113 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19960125 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Effective date: 19960131 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: CHUBB & SON'S LOCK AND SAFE CY LTD Effective date: 19960131 |