EP0150296A2

EP0150296A2 - Electronic handwriting method and facilty

Info

Publication number: EP0150296A2
Application number: EP84113861A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Gregory Alan Flurry
Original assignee: International Business Machines Corp
Current assignee: International Business Machines Corp
Priority date: 1983-12-16
Filing date: 1984-11-16
Publication date: 1985-08-07
Also published as: JPH029385B2; EP0150296B1; JPS60129829A; DE3465387D1; US4633436A; EP0150296A3

Abstract

I@ An electronic handwriting facility comprises a central processing unit (10), an all points addressable display (12), and an electronic tablet (14) and stylus (16). The handwriting facility simulates writing with a pen or pencil and paper. An electronic document is generated by periodically sending to the central processing unit (10) the absolute location of the stylus (16) in relation to the tablet (14). Each point is mapped to the display coordinate system, and the points are stored in a point list. The handwriting facility is provided with a real-time rub-out erase feature wherein the handwriting facility is first set to the erase mode and then the points in the point list to be erased are identified. Real-time erasure is assured by using a grid overlaying the write area to limit the number of points searched to a small percentage of the total. The grid breaks the write area into a number of grid boxes. Only the grid boxes touched by the erase cursor are searched for erasure. When a point is inside the erase cursor, it is deleted from the point list. The user is provided with a menu from which to select an erase stylus size further adding to the flexibility of the erase feature.

Description

Technical Field

The subject invention generally relates to the provision of handwritten communication in an electronic office environment by simulating a pen or pencil and paper, and more particularly to an improvement in such an electronic handwriting facility that gives the user the same correction capability as a pencil with an eraser.

Background

In non-electronic office environments, handwritten notes (e.g. memos, reminders, telephone messages, and the like) are common because of the relative speed and convenience of handwriting. Even in an electronic environment, handwritten notes are still common. In fact, many users of electronic office systems think nothing of writing a memo with pen or pencil and paper rather than using a text editor to write the same memo. Unfortunately, in an electronic environment, these handwritten notes must be handled differently than electronic documents thereby leading to inefficiencies. An electronic handwriting facility has been developed that allows handwritten notes to be created and reviewed in an electronic environment and be considered as another type of electronic document. Thus, handwritten notes can be handled, i.e. mailed, archived, etc., the same as other electronic documents, improving efficiency and productivity.
The handwriting facility requires a certain minimum office system work station to support it. This work station is shown in Figure 1 and includes a central processing unit (CPU) 10̸ with an appropriate operating system (OS) to support real-time response of the facility and a connection to the office system network, an all points addressable (APA) display 12 for displaying the arbitrary appearance of handwriting, and an "electronic tablet" 14 or digitizer.or similar device which translates movements of a sylus or pen 16 into a stream of positional information that the CPU 10 can intrepret.
The office system user will in general be familiar with text editors and could consider the handwriting facility (HF) to be a handwriting or graphics editor. To capitalize on this familiarity, the HF can be invoked like a text editor; in other words, the user enters a command and selects a "document" to work on. The document created by the HF can have one or more "pages". One page documents might be used for short notes to others, telephone messages or the like, while a multi-page document might be used for a series of related notes, just like a paper notebook. The user can move to different document pages or scroll through one page just the same as with a text document. The OS is responsible for getting user commands and giving them to the HF. In general, the HF may be operated as one of several processes, each with its own "window" for user interaction on the display. The HF window may use only part of the total display area, so the OS would pass control to the HF whenever the user's sytlus moves into the window, and the HF recognizes when the user's stylus moves out of the HF window and then relinquishes control to the OS_-
When writing a note with pencil and paper, a user often wants to erase mistakes for a neater, more legible, or more understandable result. In the non-electronic office, an eraser on the end of the pencil facilitates the erasure. It is desirable to provide the HF with a similar capability.
It is known to provide interactive graphic displays with an erase feature, but real-time operation is generally limited to those systems having either a limited or low resolution display. The HF most advantageously uses a high resolution display, and there is therefore a need for real-time erasure of such a display.
Electronic erase functions are known in the prior art. For example, L. Kool in an article entitled "The Scribphone: a graphic telecommunication system" published in the Philips Telecommunication Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, January 1980, pages 7 to 10, states that the Scribphone system is provided with "wipe-out" facilities. J. L. Bordewijk in an article entitled "Teleboard, Scribphone and their Relation to 'Coded Text Transmission'" published in the Conference Proceedings of Electronic Text Communication held in Munich, Germany, June 12 to 15, 1978, mentions distant-erasing and distant- correction facilities of the Teleboard system. However, neither of these articles describes an erase facility capable of real-time erasure for a high resolution display.
Somewhat similar to the Scriphone and Teleboard systems is the remote chalkboard system which is the subject of U.S. Patent No. 4,317,956 to Torok et al. In this system, when information is being removed from the input surface, a graphical eraser appears at the remote screen at the site of the removed information. A different approach is taken by Sukonick et al in U.S. Patent No. 4,197,590. The system described in this patent is a computer graphics system as contrasted with a handwriting facility. Sukonick et al employ an XOR feature that allows a selective erase that restores lines crossing or concurrent with erased lines. This XOR feature also permits part of the drawing to be moved or "dragged" into place without erasing other parts of the drawing.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide the user of an electronic handwriting facility with the same correction capability as an eraser provides for hand writing with a pencil and paper.
It is another object of the invention to provide a real-time rub-out eraser for an electronic handwriting facility.
The foregoing and other objects of the invention are accomplished by first setting the HF to erase mode and then identifying points from a point list to be erased. Real-time erasure is assured by using a "grid" over the write area to limit the number of points searched to a small percentage of the total. The grid breaks the write area into a number of grid boxes, the number and size of which depend on processing requirements. Only the grid boxes touched by the erase cursor are searched for erasure. When a point is inside the erase cursor, it is deleted from the point list. This point list is updated after the erasure as is the visual display of the tablet. An additional feature of the invention is that the user may select an erase stylus size to match the user needs. Selection of the stylus size is preferably accomplished from a menu display.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The objects and other aspects and advantages of the invention will be better understood from the following detailed description of the invention with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

Figure 1 is a block diagram showing the basic hardware components of the handwriting facility;
Figure 2 is a diagram of the menu display showing the handwriting facility window and selection menus for both stylus style and eraser size;
Figure 3 is a fragmentary view of the digitizer tablet illustrating stroke segments within grid boxes;
Figure 4 is a diagram illustrating a line with an erase cursor over it;
Figure 5 is a diagram illustrating an erase cursor. covering parts of two grid boxes;
Figures 6a to 6f show several possible spatial relationships between the erase cursor and a vector of a segment; and
Figure 7 illustrates the process of making a point inactive and deleting it from the point list.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED

EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION

The terms "real-time" and "rub-out" imply that the electronic handwriting facility (_HF) eraser works just like the eraser on the end of a pencil; that is, the user "rubs" the area he or she wants to erase and the writing in that area disappears. A user may want to precisely erase a small area or erase a large area quickly. With a pencil, the eraser size is constant. In contrast, the electronic HF eraser size can be chosen to suit the user's current needs. To provide multiple eraser sizes, the HF menu shown in Figure 2 contains choices for the various sizes. A user can write by choosing one of the stylus styles, for example line width and/or color, in which case the HF presents a "write" cursor indicating the HF is in the "write mode". Similarly, a user can erase by choosing one of the eraser sizes, in which case the HF then presents an appropriately sized "erase" cursor.
More particularly, the HF is based on two assumptions: First, it is assumed that the electronic tablet can sample a user's hand movements fast enough and with enough resolution to provide points to the CPU 10 that can be connected with straight lines and result in an adequate representation of handwriting on paper, and second it is assumed that the CPU display controller is capable of drawing straight lines between two points fast enough and with enough resolution to result in an adequate representation of handwriting on the display 12. Both assumptions can be met by commercially available hardware. The electronic tablet 14 periodically sends the CPU 10 the absolute location of the stylus 16 in relation to the tablet surface. The CPU 10 maps each point to the display coordinate system and makes it available to the HF. The HF moves a "cursor" on the display to the point so the user knows the relationship of the stylus 16 to the display 12 and to the electronic page on which he or she is writing. These may be different because of the use of a window system for multitasking, scrolling of the page, or both. The HF maps the point to the page coordinate system for further use in the HF.
When the user writes, the handwriting facility stores the points from the tablet as well as displays them. Since the HF works on only one page at a time, a simple structure serves well. The "point list" contains two fields, a point count and a sequential list of the points recorded for the page. Handwriting is really a collection of "strokes". A stroke is the series of points from the first point where the stylus goes down to the first point where the stylus comes up. Since the user may move the stylus between strokes, e.g. between words, stroke starting points are identified in the point list. Since strokes may be of any style allowed, style information is also stored. For the start of a stroke and X and Y coordinates, the stroke start indication, and the stroke style are stored in the point list. For all points internal to the stroke, only the X and Y coordinates are necessary.
To erase the written information, two actions must occur. The HF must update the display to reflect the erasures and give feedback to the user, and modify the point list to match the modified display. In general, the point list can be so large that a linear search for the particular points that form the writing being erased could require more time than the maximum for real-time performance. Real-time erasure can be assured under most circumstances by using a "grid" over the write area to limit the number of points searched to a small percentage of the total. The grid breaks the write area into some number of "grid boxes" as illustrated in Figure 3. The number and size of the grid boxes varies depending on processing requirements. For example, it might be necessary to require that the grid boxes be large enough so that the largest eraser can cover no more than some fixed number of grid boxes at one time, which might impose some upper limit on the number of points that must be examined for each erase action.
Each stroke in the point list passes through one or more grid boxes. The grid box borders break each stroke into "segments". Generally, each segment is totally contained in a grid box; the exception as illustrated by segment (60,61) occurs when a grid box contains the line between two points but neither of the points defines the line. Each grid box may contain one or more segments from one or more strokes. The _HF maintains the segment information in a "grid table". For each grid box, the grid table records the number of segments in the grid box and the starting and ending indices in the point list for each segment contained in that grid box. A partial grid table for Figure 3 is shown below:
As the user writes, the HF puts each point in the point list and determines to which segment the point belongs and updates the grid table accordingly. When the user starts an erase operation, the erase cursor shows what writing is erased when the stylus is down. Only the segments and points in the grid boxes touched by the erase cursor need be searched for erasure. When a point is inside the erase cursor, it must be deleted from the point list. By setting an "inactive" flag in each point, it is not necessary to remove the point from the point list during the erase; it is only necessary to set the flag. Points with the inactive flag set are ignored during any subsequent erasing or drawing. It is possible to erase only the starting point of a stroke, leaving the rest intact. When this happens, the next point of the stroke becomes the start of the stroke; therefore, it is convenient to put the stroke start flag and style in each point of the point list, so the format of the points in the point list is as follows:
In the description which follows, high level programs for the operating system interface, menu support, write support, and erase support are presented. These high level programs are written following a procedure similar to what is known as Program Design Language (PDL). For a detailed description of that procedure, see Van Leer, "Top Down . Development Using a Program Design Language (PDL)", IBM Systems Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 155 to 170 (1976). The handwriting facility interface to the operating system is as follows:
The erase icons as well as the stylus style icons must be displayed on initialize and redisplay. The display of already existing handwriting must ignore any inactive points. For the stylus command, the HF must maintain the "current mode" and use it to decide whether to do writing or erasing when the user's stylus is in the write area.
Menu support must change the current mode according to the icon hit. If the current mode changes from erase to write, then any inactive points must be purged from the point list and the grid table updated to reduce processing requirements and storage requirements for further writing or erasing. The menu support is as follows:
Write support involves putting a point in the point list and updating the grid table. Occassionally a line between two points will pass through one or more grid boxes not containing either of the two points defining that line. An erasure may require knowledge of these situations, so the HF finds these grid boxes and creates a segment in each such grid box to identify them as, for example, segment (60,61) in Figure 3. The write support is as follows:
Erase support is very similar to write support. Instead of adding points to the point list and the grid table, however, it uses the grid table to determine the points (and/or lines) contained in the erase cursor that must be examined to determine how to modify the point list and display. During the examination of the erasure candidates, the HF can modify the point list and display in various ways to satisfy speed and appearance requirements. A very simple and fast method of erasure simply detects points inside the erase cursor and inactivates them and erases from the display any lines which those points help form. This method works well assuming points are close together so that the appearance of the erased result is acceptable. A more complicated method which results in a better appearance and handles situations where points are farther apart erases from the display only those parts of lines, and any points, inside the erase cursor. For this method, the HF must not only inactivate points, but add. points to the point list to make the image defined by the list match the display. In Figure 4, using the first method, no lines would be erased and no points inactivated. Using the second method, line AB must be erased and lines XA and BY kept; points A and B must be added to the point list so that lines XA and BY are included in the image defined by the point list. The erase support is as follows:
Implementation of a more sophisticated algorithm for real-time rub-out erase that ensures "what you see is what you get" requires some additional terminology and additional processing. In Figure 5, the erase cursor covers parts of two grid boxes. The stroke formed by points 43, 49 is partially covered by the erase cursor, and so must be partially erased. The segments generated for the stroke are shown in the figure. To ensure proper processing of the segments of the stroke, the various segments in the grid boxes must first be made contiguous. Again, the results are shown in the figure. If the contiguous segment (45, 49) were processed, note that because point 44 is not included, the results of erasure would not be correct; therefore, the contiguous segment must be made "proper" before processing by adding point 44. There are similar conditions for the ending of a proper segment. Generally, a segment is proper if it starts with a point that is the start of a stroke or is guaranteed to be outside of the erase area and stops with a point that is the end of a stroke or is guaranteed to be outside of the erase area. Processing of proper segments can be complete and correct.
Once the proper segments for a particular erase cursor location are found, several possible cases arise for the spatial relationship between the erase cursor and each vector in the segment as illustrated in Figures 6a to 6f. In some cases, it is required that segments be added to the point list as exemplified by Figure 6f. These "extra segments" are added to the end of the point list and processed separately.
In order to speed up the processing of each erase cursor position, one may recognize that in many cases, the erase cursor will not move enough to cover a different set of grid boxes. If this is true, then the proper segment list for the current erase cursor position is the same as that for the previous erase cursor position, and no recalculation of the contiguous segments and then proper segments is required.
Given the foregoing, the enhanced erase support is as follows:
As may be seen in Figure 7, when processing the vector 1-2 of the segment (1, 3), point 2 is made inactive and essentially deleted from the point list. To take advantage of this deletion and to prevent the vector 1-A from being added to the extra segment list, the point A is substituted for point 2. This creates a problem when vector 2-3 is processed. To avoid this problem, point 2 is saved for processing with vector 2-3 and the flag SAVED is set. Before the vector 2-3 is processed, SAVED must be checked to ensure that the correct point (2 in this case instead of A) is processed. A similar problem arises from case illustrated in Figure 6e. When the second of the two points is made inactive, the flag SET2IN is set to note the situation.
The method for processing the extra segments placed at the end of the point list is as follows. This processing can be special cased because no extra segment ever contains more than two points (one vector). The following terminology is used:
For a proper segment, the processing is as follows. The following terminology is used:
The following method must be used to process each . individual vector. The terminology used is as follows (refer to Figures 6a to 6f):

^* 1 - the first point of the vector in process
^* 2 - the second point of the vector in process
^* A - the first intersection of the erase cursor with the line corresponding to the vector
^* B - the second intersection of the erase cursor with the line corresponding to the vector
^* SOS - start of stroke

The details of vector processing are as follows:
When the user leaves the erase mode, the extra segments at the end of the point list are processed to include them in the grid table. The method for doing this is so similar for the initial entry of points that it is not repeated.
From the foregoing description of the invention, it will be appreciated that the inclusion of a real-time erase capability in the electronic handwriting facility makes the facility more flexible and more usable. The use of an overlying grid allows erasure to take place in real time and supports many methods of erasure.

Claims

1. Electronic handwriting method using a central processor unit, an all points addressable display, and an electronic tablet and stylus, said handwriting method simulating writing with a pen or pencil and paper and generating an electronic document by periodically sending the central processing unit the absolute location of the stylus in relation to the tablet, mapping each location point to the display coordinate system, and storing the points in a point list, the improvement comprising a real-time rub-out erase technique for the handwriting method comprising the steps of

establishing a grid over the write area on the table to delineate the write area into a plurality of grid boxes,

storing in a grid table the starting and ending points of line segments within each of said grid boxes, said grid table being updated whenever a point is added to said point list,

setting the system to erase mode and displaying an erase cursor on said display showing the relative location of said stylus to the electronic tablet,

searching only the segments and points in the grid boxes touched by the erase cursor during erasure,

updating said point list and said grid table after erasure, and

updating said display to provide a real-time display of the erasure.

2. A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising the step of selecting the size of the erase cursor.

3. A method as recited in claim 2 wherein the step of selecting the erase cursor size comprises the steps of

displaying a menu of erase stylus size icons on said display, and

detecting the touching of an erase stylus size icon by the erase cursor.

4. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein the step updating said point list comprises deleting any point in the display within the erase cursor.

5. A method as recited in claim 4 wherein the step of deleting is performed by setting in inactive flag in the point list.

6. A method as recited in claim 4 wherein, when only a portion of a line segment is within said erase cursor, the step of updating said point list further includes the step of adding to the point list points on the line segment at the intersection with the erase cursor.

7. A method as recited in claim 4 further comprising the step of selecting the size of the erase stylus and wherein the step of displaying an erase cursor produces a cursor display having a size corresponding to the selected erase stylus size.

8. An electronic handwriting facility comprising a central processor unit, an all points addressable display, and an electronic table and stylus, said handwriting facility being arranged to simulate writing with a pen or pencil and paper and to generate an electronic document by periodically sending to the central processing unit the absolute location of the stylus in relation to the tablet, mapping each location point to the display coordinate system, and storing the pints in a point list, the improvement comprising a real-time rub-out erase feature for the handwriting facility comprising means for

establishing a grid over the write area on the tablet to delineate the write area into a plurality of grid boxes,

means for storing in a grid table the starting and ending points of line segments within each of said grid boxes, said grid table being updated whenever a point is added to said point list,

means for setting the system to erase mode and displaying an erase cursor on said display showing the relative location of said stylus to the electronic tablet,

means for searching only the segments and points in the grid boxes touched by the erase cursor during erasure,

means for updating said point list and said grid table after erasure, and

means for updating said display to provide a real-time display of the erasure.