EP0150266A2 - Method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0150266A2 EP0150266A2 EP84111200A EP84111200A EP0150266A2 EP 0150266 A2 EP0150266 A2 EP 0150266A2 EP 84111200 A EP84111200 A EP 84111200A EP 84111200 A EP84111200 A EP 84111200A EP 0150266 A2 EP0150266 A2 EP 0150266A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- airstream
- filter
- filters
- particles
- upstream
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M3/00—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures
- G01M3/02—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum
- G01M3/04—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by detecting the presence of fluid at the leakage point
- G01M3/20—Investigating fluid-tightness of structures by using fluid or vacuum by detecting the presence of fluid at the leakage point using special tracer materials, e.g. dye, fluorescent material, radioactive material
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2273/00—Operation of filters specially adapted for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours
- B01D2273/18—Testing of filters, filter elements, sealings
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the leak testing of filters mounted in spaced apart serial arrangement within a housing.
- the filters, housing and related components are usually initially tested as the final manufacturing step at the factory to locate any leaks and insure compliance with the desired efficiency rating.
- in-place testing of the completed installation is essential to insure leak tightness of the housing and filters in their assembled form.
- in-place tests are usually conducted after each change of a filter in the system to insure proper installation of the new filter, as well as at regular intervals after installation to detect any deterioration of the gaskets or clamping devices, or the development of weld cracks or the like in the housing which result in leaks.
- Such periodic in-place testing is particularly important where harmful materials, such as potentially radioactive substances, dangerous viable organisms, or carcinogenic or toxic materials, are removed from the airstream by the filtration system.
- DOP dioctyl phthalate
- the DOP be introduced at least ten duct diameters upstream of the filters, or introduced upstream of baffles or turning vanes in the duct.
- the use of a Stairmand disk positioned three to five duct diameters upstream of the filters has been recommended for this purpose, see for example Chapter 7 of "Design; Construction, and Testing of High Efficiency Air Filtration Systems for Nuclear Applications" By Burchsted and Fuller, published January 1970 by Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
- extra equipment and a great deal of space is required.
- downstream sampling port be located a considerable distance downstream of the filter, and preferably downstream of the exhaust fan, to insure that any DOP which leaks through the filter becomes sufficiently mixed with the filtered air so that the leak will be detected no matter where in the airstream the sample is withdrawn.
- This procedure not only serves to further increase the space requirements of the test apparatus, but also, it reduces the assurance that a leak will be detected by reason of the dilution effect of the leaking DOP in the great volume of filtered air. As will be apparent, this dilution effect is particularly pronounced where a large bank of filters is employed.
- Still another problem associated with the above described conventional testing procedure for a bank of filters is the fact that a great deal of DOP must be fed into the airstream to assure an adequate dispersion in front of each filter. Since the area of the bank may be quite extensive, it is often difficult to achieve an even distribution of the DOP over the face of the entire bank, even when the DOP is introduced ten duct diameters upstream as recommended, and in addition, it is difficult to generate a sufficient quantity of the DOP for such large banks. Also, the DOP tends to become deposited on all of the filters while each individual filter in the system is being probed, thereby unduly loading the filters and increasing their resistance to the passage of the air.
- Applicants' prior U. S. Patent No. 4,055,075 discloses a method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters wherein the above noted disadvantages of the earlier techniques and equipment are effectively overcome. More particularly, the applicants' prior patent discloses a test housing wherein the DOP is introduced and dispersed into the duct at a location closely adjacent the upstream face of the filter, thereby to minimize floor space, by means of an electrostatic dispersion device and wherein each filter is charged with DOP and tested individually to permit the ready identification of a leaking filter without manually entering the duct and probing the filters.
- restriction means which is disposed downstream of the filter and upstream of the sampling or detecting means and which is pivotally mounted within the housing containing the filter for movement between a non-operative position disposed in general alignment with the direction of the airstream flowing through the filter and an operative position disposed transversely to the airstream. In its operative position, the restriction means partially restricts and imparts turbulence to the airstream flowing through the filter and thoroughly mixes the air and any leaking DOP so that the sampling means will be assured of detecting a representative portion of the DOP.
- the invention consists in a method for testing for leakage of particles of predetermined size through or around first and second filters spaced apart in series, comprising the steps of passing an airstream successively through the filters, introducing particles of predetermined size into the airstream selectively at locations upstream of the first filter and between the filters, dispersing the particles introduced at the selected location over substantially the full frontal area of the adjacent filter, and monitoring the airstream selectively at locations between the filters and downstream of the second filter to detect particles in the airstream and determine whether either of the filters is leaking, characterised by the step of imparting turbulence to the airstream at a location between the filters so as to mix the airstream and any leaking particles during testing of the first filter and mix the airstream and the particles introduced between the filters during testing of the second filter.
- the invention consists in apparatus for filtering an airstream and having provision for testing for leakage of particles of predetermined. size through or around first and second filters spaced apart in series, comprising a housing defining an air passageway and having the filters sealably mounted therein, first and second particle introducing means located upstream of the first filter and between the filters, respectively, for selectively introducing particles of predetermined size into the airstream within the housing, means for dispersing the particles introduced by the particle introducing means over substantially the full frontal areas of the adjacent filters, and first and second detecting means located between the filters and downstream of the second filter for detecting particles in the airstream, thereby to permit a determination as to whether either of the filters is leaking, characterised by means for imparting turbulence to the airstream at a location between the filters and, respectively, downstream and upstream of the second particle introducing means and the first detectionmeans, whereby said turbulence imparting means achieves both the functions of mixing the airstream and any leaking particles during testing of the first filter, and mixing of the air
- Figure 1 is a perspective view of a filter test housing which.embodies the features of the present invention.
- the housing 12 which is adapted to form a part of an air duct system, such as an exhaust air cleaning system in a nuclear fuel manufacturing facility. More particularly, the housing 12 comprises a generally box-like enclosed structure having two side walls 14 and 15, a top wall 16, and a bottom wall 17. Also, the housing defines a forward open end which is joined to an air inlet opening of the inlet duct 21 via the transition member 22, and a rear open end which is similarly joined to the outlet duct 24 via the transition member 25.
- the housing is typically fabricated from a sheet metal material, such as 14 gauge stainless steel.
- each filter 30 is about 60x60x30 cms (24 x 24 x 12 inches)in size, and comprises a wooden or chipboard frame 31 surrounding and supporting a pleated filtering media 32, such as a non-woven fiberglass or cellulose-asbestos sheet material.
- Filters of this type may have extremely high dust retention characteristics, usually greater than about 95% efficiency, and typically 99.97% efficiency, as measured by the conventional DOP test, and are known as "absolute" or HEPA filters in the art.
- the filters 30 of each bank are adapted to be inserted and removed from the housing 12 through the two associated side access doors 34, 35 with the two upper filters in each bank being inserted and removed through the upper door 34, and the two lower filters being inserted and removed through the lower door 35.
- clamping means as shown somewhat schematically in Figure 7 at 29, and sealing means are provided in the housing 12 for sealably mounting each of the filters therein.
- This sealing means may include a resilient gasket on the front peripheral face of the filter frame 31, or a fluid type seal such as shown schematically at 33 and as described in the U. S. Patent No. Re. 27,701 to Allan.
- the housing may further include a conventional "bag-out" ring (not shown) about each of the access doors 34, 35 to permit the filters 30 to be enclosed in a plastic bag while being removed from the housing and thereby avoid possible contamination.
- a conventional "bag-out" ring (not shown) about each of the access doors 34, 35 to permit the filters 30 to be enclosed in a plastic bag while being removed from the housing and thereby avoid possible contamination.
- the portion of the housing 12 immediately upstream of each bank of filters is divided into four separate and rectangular air channels by means of the four perpendicularly disposed panels 36, 37, 38 and 39.
- Each channel is aligned with one of the filters, and generally conforms in cross-sectional outline and size to that of the associated filters.
- the panels 36 and 37 cooperate with the side wall 14 and top wall 16 to define a separate air channel upstream of the filter located in the upper left hand corner of the bank as seen in Figure 1.
- the airstream entering the housing from the transition member 22 is divided by the panels into four equal portions with each portion being isolated from the other portions and directed to pass through a single filter.
- the panels 36-39 may extend the entire distance between the banks as best seen in Figure 2 so as to similarly define air channels for the downstream filters.
- the panels 36 and 38 are discontinuous at points immediately adjacent the filters to accommodate the sliding receipt of the inner filter, as well as the clamping mechanism 29, note Figure 7.
- this particle introducing means comprises two pairs of supply pipes 40 and 41 which extend horizontally through the housing upstream of the first bank of filters.
- One pair of supply pipes is operatively associated with the two upper filters in each bank, and another pair is operatively associated with the two lower filters.
- the pipe 40 terminates at a point centrally disposed in the adjacent air channel, and the pipe 41 extends to a central location in the far air channel.
- Both pipes include an exteriorly positioned cap 42, to permit the pipes to be selectively coupled to a DOP supply source.
- the apparatus of the present invention also includes means mounted within each of the separate channels for selectively mixing the airstream and DOP particles, and then substantially uniformly dispersing the same over the full frontal area of the adjacent filter.
- this mixing and dispersing means comprises restriction means in the form of a funnel-shaped member 54 mounted upstream of the filter and downstream of the associated DOP supply pipe.
- the funnel-shaped member 54 comprises a truncated, four sided pyramid which includes a base 56 which has a rectangular peripheral outline corresponding in size and configuration to the cross-sectional outline of the interior of the channel, and which defines a plane disposed transversely across the channel.
- a flange 57 is affixed to the base 56 to facilitate the mounting of the member in a rectangular duct.
- the member 54 also has an apex having a rectangular opening 58 therethrough, and a tube 59 having a rectangular cross-sectional outline corresponding to that of the opening 58.
- the tube is affixed to the periphery of the opening 58 and extends a substantial distance into the interior of the member and in a direction..parallel to the direction of air flow, i.e., toward and perpendicular to the plane defined by the base 56.
- the tube extends at least about one-half the distance to the plane of the base 56.
- a transverse deflector 80 overlies in spaced relation the free end of the tube 59, and as best seen in Figure 7, the deflector acts to laterally deflect the airstream moving through the tube, and thereby achieve a substantially uniform dispersion to the downstream filter.
- the deflector 80 comprises a four sided pyramid which is disposed with its base overlying the downstream end of the tube 59.
- the deflector is attached to the tube by any suitable means, and as illustrated, the attachment means comprises a longitudinally directed threaded member 81 fixed to the inside of the deflector, and a cooperating transverse strap 82 mounted across the opening of the apex of the member 54.
- the funnel-shaped member 54 also is composed of two separate components, namely, the lower base portion 61 which is adjacent the base 56, and a separate apex portion 62 adjacent the apex and including the tube 59 and deflector 80.
- the base portion 61 of the member 54 is fixedly mounted in the channel of the housing by welding or the like, and it may be described as being truncated to define a relatively large rectangular opening (not numbered) disposed centrally in the housing.
- the apex portion 62 is hingedly mounted to the base portion by a hinge 63 which extends transversely across the housing and adjacent the opening of the base portion.
- the two portions 61, 62 include mating flanges 64 to facilitate the interface thereof.
- the base 56 and opening 58 are each square in cross- section, with the base being about 60 cms (24 inches)along each side and the opening 58 being about 15 cms (6 inches) along each side.
- the flange 57 is about 2.5 cms (1 inch) wide, the longitudinal distance from the base 56 to the apex is about 131 ⁇ 2 and (5-1/4 inches), and the tube 59 has a longitudinal length of about 7.5 cms (3 inches).
- the apex portion 62 may be pivoted between an operative position wherein the member is in the form of a truncated pyramid which is disposed transversely across the air passageway, and a non-operative position (note the position of the member 54c in Figure 3) wherein the apex portion 62 is disposed along the side of the air passageway so as to be substantially withdrawn from interference with the airstream.
- the means for operatively controlling the positioning of the apex portion 62 of the member 54 comprises a control rod 65 which extends through the wall 14 of the housing and in a direction parallel to the hinged interconnection 63.
- a linkage 66, 67 interconnects the rod 65 and apex portion 62 (note Figure 4), and a crank 68 is positioned on the outside of the housing for rotating the rod to pivot the apex portion 62 between its operative and non-operative positions.
- the rod 65 extends through the two laterally adjacent channels, such that the two members 54 are concurrently operated by rotation of the rod.
- the housing includes a first funnel-shaped member 54a positioned upstream of the first filter, a second like funnel-shaped member 54b mounted immediately downstream of the first filter and upstream of the second filter, and a third like funnel-shaped member 54c which is mounted immediately downstream of the second filter.
- the housing 12 also includes means for withdrawing a sample of the airstream at each of three separate locations along its length.
- a first sampling or detecting means 70a is provided immediately downstream of the first funnel-shaped member 54a, a second sampling means 70b immediately downstream of the second member 54b, and a third sampling means 70c immediately downstream of the third member 54c.
- Each of these three sampling means comprises a first pipe 71 extending laterally into the first adjacent channel and having an apertured sampler 72 positioned immediately downstream of and in alignment with the tube 59 of the adjacent funnel-shaped member, and a second pipe 73 extending into the laterally remote channel and including a similarly positioned sampler 74, note Figure 6.
- Each pipe extends through the wall 14 of the housing, and includes a removable end cap 75 for permitting the sampler to be selectively connected to a conventional DOP detecting apparatus.
- the apex portions 62 of all of the funnel-shaped members 54 are lowered into their non-operative position, so as to minimize air resistance.
- the apex portions 62 of the four members 54a which are upstream of the initial bank of filters, as well as the four members 54b immediately downstream of this bank, are all raised into their operative positions.
- the third members 54c preferably remain open, such that the various members are oriented in the manner shown in Figure 3. -
- the DOP particles are then selectively and independently introduced into each of the four channels by means of their associated pipes 40 and 41.
- the airstream and entrained particles approach the first member 54a, and substantial turbulence is imparted thereto to mix the particles and air as illustrated schematically in the right hand portion of Figure 3, and the airstream is condensed into the tube 59 of the member.
- the airstream exits the tube 59 and deflector 80, it is dispersed over the full cross-sectional area of the channel.
- the first sampling means 70a may at this point in the test be connected to the DOP detecting apparatus to determine the upstream concentration of the DOP.
- the airstream continues through the first filter and strikes the downstream second member 54b, which again imparts turbulence to the airstream and condenses it to pass through the tube 59 of the member.
- the air and any leaking DOP is thoroughly mixed by the time it passes through the tube 59, and such that the sampler 72 (or 74), which is positioned immediately downstream of the tube 59 will be assured of picking up a representative portion of any leaking DOP when it is connected to the detecting apparatus.
- each filter in the first bank may be individually tested, so that the identification of a leaking filter is readily apparent.
- the four members 54a are preferably moved to'their non-operative lowered position, and the two downstream sets of members 54b and 54c are each moved to their operative positions.
- DOP is then selectively introduced from the associated pipes 40, 41 into each of the four channels, and samples are withdrawn through the samplers-of the third sampling means 70c to detect any leaking DOP in the manner described above.
- the members 54b now serve the dual functions of balancing the flow to the second bank of filters, and mixing the air and DOP particles and dispersing the mixture to the second filters.
- a single component in the housing namely, the members 54b, perform distinctly different functions during the testing of the two filter banks.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
- Examining Or Testing Airtightness (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to the leak testing of filters mounted in spaced apart serial arrangement within a housing.
- In the manufacture of high efficiency air filtration systems, the filters, housing and related components are usually initially tested as the final manufacturing step at the factory to locate any leaks and insure compliance with the desired efficiency rating. In addition, it is recognized that in-place testing of the completed installation is essential to insure leak tightness of the housing and filters in their assembled form. Also, in-place tests are usually conducted after each change of a filter in the system to insure proper installation of the new filter, as well as at regular intervals after installation to detect any deterioration of the gaskets or clamping devices, or the development of weld cracks or the like in the housing which result in leaks. Such periodic in-place testing is particularly important where harmful materials, such as potentially radioactive substances, dangerous viable organisms, or carcinogenic or toxic materials, are removed from the airstream by the filtration system.
- Both factory and in-place efficiency testing of filters and filter installations conventionally utilizes either a monodispersed or a polydispersed aerosol of dioctyl phthalate (DOP) droplets or particles which have a light-scattering mean diameter of 0.3 or 0.7 microns, respectively. The DOP is introduced into the airstream at a point in the duct far enough upstream of the filter or filter bank to assure complete dispersion by the time it reaches the filter or bank of filters. An upstream sampling device is usually provided immediately upstream of the filter to determine the concentration of the DOP in the duct, and a downstream sampling device is provided to detect leakage. A portion of the airstream is withdrawn from the duct through the sampling devices and conveyed to an external photometric light-scattering instrument or the like which is designed to determine the DOP concentration in both the upstream and downstream samples.
- In order to insure that the air-DOP mixture charged to the filters is thoroughly mixed to obtain a substantially uniform dispersion, and that the upstream sample is representative of the DOP concentration at that point, it has been recommended that the DOP be introduced at least ten duct diameters upstream of the filters, or introduced upstream of baffles or turning vanes in the duct. Also, the use of a Stairmand disk positioned three to five duct diameters upstream of the filters has been recommended for this purpose, see for example Chapter 7 of "Design; Construction, and Testing of High Efficiency Air Filtration Systems for Nuclear Applications" By Burchsted and Fuller, published January 1970 by Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Thus in order to properly introduce the DOP into the airstream utilizing these recommended procedures, extra equipment and a great deal of space is required.
- It is also presently recommended that the downstream sampling port be located a considerable distance downstream of the filter, and preferably downstream of the exhaust fan, to insure that any DOP which leaks through the filter becomes sufficiently mixed with the filtered air so that the leak will be detected no matter where in the airstream the sample is withdrawn. This procedure not only serves to further increase the space requirements of the test apparatus, but also, it reduces the assurance that a leak will be detected by reason of the dilution effect of the leaking DOP in the great volume of filtered air. As will be apparent, this dilution effect is particularly pronounced where a large bank of filters is employed.
- In installations requiring multiple banks of filters employed in series, the space requirements for introducing the DOP, and withdrawing the samples, are multiplied since the banks must be separated a distance sufficient to accomplish the above objectives. In an attempt to alleviate this problem, it has been proposed to employ temporary ducts between the various banks with suitable valves therein, and with the temporary ducts serving to selectively isolate each bank in the apparatus during the test procedure and introduce the DOP and withdraw the samples at an appropriate distance from each bank. However, this proposed system is not entirely satisfactory since it requires a great deal of extra equipment which is only used during the test procedure, and the use of temporary ducts adds additional problems of possible leakage through the various required connections and valves.
- Where the above tests indicate the presence of an unacceptable leak, it is standard practice for a workman to physically enter the duct at the downstream side of the filter bank to conduct leak probing of individual filters, and thereby permit identification and replacement of the faulty filter. In some cases, it is also necessary for the workman to enter the upstream side to locate the source of the leakage problem. Such direct personnel access is often impractical and/or dangerous however, either because of the system configuration, or because of high radioactivity levels or the presence of other dangerous materials in the airstream. In such cases, it has been previously proposed that the housing incorporate remotely operated long- handled probes which are able to cover the entire downstream area of the filter bank, or alternatively, that the workman don protective clothing prior to entering the duct. As will be apparent, neither of these alternatives is satisfactory, since the design and fabrication of suitable remotely operated probes significantly adds to the cost of the housing, and the physical entry of a workman into the duct greatly increases the risk of contamination to himself as well as other workers.
- Still another problem associated with the above described conventional testing procedure for a bank of filters is the fact that a great deal of DOP must be fed into the airstream to assure an adequate dispersion in front of each filter. Since the area of the bank may be quite extensive, it is often difficult to achieve an even distribution of the DOP over the face of the entire bank, even when the DOP is introduced ten duct diameters upstream as recommended, and in addition, it is difficult to generate a sufficient quantity of the DOP for such large banks. Also, the DOP tends to become deposited on all of the filters while each individual filter in the system is being probed, thereby unduly loading the filters and increasing their resistance to the passage of the air.
- Applicants' prior U. S. Patent No. 4,055,075 discloses a method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters wherein the above noted disadvantages of the earlier techniques and equipment are effectively overcome. More particularly, the applicants' prior patent discloses a test housing wherein the DOP is introduced and dispersed into the duct at a location closely adjacent the upstream face of the filter, thereby to minimize floor space, by means of an electrostatic dispersion device and wherein each filter is charged with DOP and tested individually to permit the ready identification of a leaking filter without manually entering the duct and probing the filters. Further, in one embodiment of the patented housing, there is provision for selectively condensing and imparting turbulence to the airstream immediately downstream of the filter so that the sample may be withdrawn at a location immediately downstream of the filter, thereby further to reduce the space requirements. This is achieved by the provision of restriction means which is disposed downstream of the filter and upstream of the sampling or detecting means and which is pivotally mounted within the housing containing the filter for movement between a non-operative position disposed in general alignment with the direction of the airstream flowing through the filter and an operative position disposed transversely to the airstream. In its operative position, the restriction means partially restricts and imparts turbulence to the airstream flowing through the filter and thoroughly mixes the air and any leaking DOP so that the sampling means will be assured of detecting a representative portion of the DOP.
- It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters in series, and wherein there is provided a single structure which is able to selectively function to mix and condense the air passing through an upstream filter to thereby permit a representative sample to be readily withdrawn and analyzed during testing of the upstream filter, or to mix and disperse the particles in the airstream during the testing of a downstream filter.
- Hence, from one aspect, the invention consists in a method for testing for leakage of particles of predetermined size through or around first and second filters spaced apart in series, comprising the steps of passing an airstream successively through the filters, introducing particles of predetermined size into the airstream selectively at locations upstream of the first filter and between the filters, dispersing the particles introduced at the selected location over substantially the full frontal area of the adjacent filter, and monitoring the airstream selectively at locations between the filters and downstream of the second filter to detect particles in the airstream and determine whether either of the filters is leaking, characterised by the step of imparting turbulence to the airstream at a location between the filters so as to mix the airstream and any leaking particles during testing of the first filter and mix the airstream and the particles introduced between the filters during testing of the second filter.
- From another aspect, the invention consists in apparatus for filtering an airstream and having provision for testing for leakage of particles of predetermined. size through or around first and second filters spaced apart in series, comprising a housing defining an air passageway and having the filters sealably mounted therein, first and second particle introducing means located upstream of the first filter and between the filters, respectively, for selectively introducing particles of predetermined size into the airstream within the housing, means for dispersing the particles introduced by the particle introducing means over substantially the full frontal areas of the adjacent filters, and first and second detecting means located between the filters and downstream of the second filter for detecting particles in the airstream, thereby to permit a determination as to whether either of the filters is leaking, characterised by means for imparting turbulence to the airstream at a location between the filters and, respectively, downstream and upstream of the second particle introducing means and the first detectionmeans, whereby said turbulence imparting means achieves both the functions of mixing the airstream and any leaking particles during testing of the first filter, and mixing of the airstream and the particles introduced by the particle introducing means located between the filters during testing of the second filter.
- In order that the invention may be more clearly understood,reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, in which:-
- Figure 1 is a perspective view of a filter test housing which.embodies the features of the present invention;
- Figure 2 is a perspective view, partly broken away, of the upper half of the filter housing shown in Figure I;
- Figure 3 is a sectional elevation view taken substantially along the line 3-3 of Figure 2, but with the final funnel-shaped member being shown in its non-operative position;
- Figure 4 is a fragmentary perpective view illustrating the apparatus for restricting and distributing an airstream in accordance with the present invention;
- Figure 5 is a front elevation view, on a reduced scale, of the upstream side of the apparatus shown in Figure 2;
- Figure 6 is a fragmentary elevation view, illustrating the DOP sampling device and taken substantially along the line 6-6 of Figure 3;
- Figure 7 is a sectional plan view of the upstream portion of the apparatus shown in Figure 3, but illustrating only one of the air channels; and
- Figure 8 is a perspective view of the funnel-shaped member of the present invention, and illustrated in its non-operative position in the housing.
- Referring more specifically to the drawings, one embodiment of the present invention is illustrated which includes a
housing 12 which is adapted to form a part of an air duct system, such as an exhaust air cleaning system in a nuclear fuel manufacturing facility. More particularly, thehousing 12 comprises a generally box-like enclosed structure having twoside walls top wall 16, and abottom wall 17. Also, the housing defines a forward open end which is joined to an air inlet opening of theinlet duct 21 via thetransition member 22, and a rear open end which is similarly joined to theoutlet duct 24 via thetransition member 25. The housing is typically fabricated from a sheet metal material, such as 14 gauge stainless steel. - In the illustrated embodiment, the
housing 12 mounts two banks of filters in series, with each bank comprising fourfilters 30 in parallel. Typically, eachfilter 30 is about 60x60x30 cms (24 x 24 x 12 inches)in size, and comprises a wooden or chipboard frame 31 surrounding and supporting apleated filtering media 32, such as a non-woven fiberglass or cellulose-asbestos sheet material. Filters of this type may have extremely high dust retention characteristics, usually greater than about 95% efficiency, and typically 99.97% efficiency, as measured by the conventional DOP test, and are known as "absolute" or HEPA filters in the art. - The
filters 30 of each bank are adapted to be inserted and removed from thehousing 12 through the two associatedside access doors upper door 34, and the two lower filters being inserted and removed through thelower door 35. As is well known in the art, clamping means as shown somewhat schematically in Figure 7 at 29, and sealing means are provided in thehousing 12 for sealably mounting each of the filters therein. This sealing means may include a resilient gasket on the front peripheral face of the filter frame 31, or a fluid type seal such as shown schematically at 33 and as described in the U. S. Patent No. Re. 27,701 to Allan. Where a dangerous substance, such as radioactive material or viable organisms may be present on the filters or in the airstream, the housing may further include a conventional "bag-out" ring (not shown) about each of theaccess doors filters 30 to be enclosed in a plastic bag while being removed from the housing and thereby avoid possible contamination. - The portion of the
housing 12 immediately upstream of each bank of filters is divided into four separate and rectangular air channels by means of the four perpendicularly disposedpanels panels side wall 14 andtop wall 16 to define a separate air channel upstream of the filter located in the upper left hand corner of the bank as seen in Figure 1. By this arrangement, the airstream entering the housing from thetransition member 22 is divided by the panels into four equal portions with each portion being isolated from the other portions and directed to pass through a single filter. Where the housing mounts a number of banks of filters in series, the panels 36-39 may extend the entire distance between the banks as best seen in Figure 2 so as to similarly define air channels for the downstream filters. In this regard, it will be understood that thepanels 36 and 38 are discontinuous at points immediately adjacent the filters to accommodate the sliding receipt of the inner filter, as well as theclamping mechanism 29, note Figure 7. - In accordance with the present invention, means are provided for selectively introducing particles of predetermined size (typically DOP particles having a mean diameter of between about 0.3 to 0.7 microns) in the portion of the airstream passing through each one of the channels. As illustrated, this particle introducing means comprises two pairs of
supply pipes pipe 40 terminates at a point centrally disposed in the adjacent air channel, and thepipe 41 extends to a central location in the far air channel. Both pipes include an exteriorly positioned cap 42, to permit the pipes to be selectively coupled to a DOP supply source. - The apparatus of the present invention also includes means mounted within each of the separate channels for selectively mixing the airstream and DOP particles, and then substantially uniformly dispersing the same over the full frontal area of the adjacent filter. In the illustrated embodiment, this mixing and dispersing means comprises restriction means in the form of a funnel-shaped member 54 mounted upstream of the filter and downstream of the associated DOP supply pipe. The funnel-shaped member 54 comprises a truncated, four sided pyramid which includes a base 56 which has a rectangular peripheral outline corresponding in size and configuration to the cross-sectional outline of the interior of the channel, and which defines a plane disposed transversely across the channel. A
flange 57 is affixed to the base 56 to facilitate the mounting of the member in a rectangular duct. The member 54 also has an apex having arectangular opening 58 therethrough, and atube 59 having a rectangular cross-sectional outline corresponding to that of theopening 58. The tube is affixed to the periphery of theopening 58 and extends a substantial distance into the interior of the member and in a direction..parallel to the direction of air flow, i.e., toward and perpendicular to the plane defined by the base 56. Preferably, the tube extends at least about one-half the distance to the plane of the base 56. - A
transverse deflector 80 overlies in spaced relation the free end of thetube 59, and as best seen in Figure 7, the deflector acts to laterally deflect the airstream moving through the tube, and thereby achieve a substantially uniform dispersion to the downstream filter. In the illustrated embodiment, thedeflector 80 comprises a four sided pyramid which is disposed with its base overlying the downstream end of thetube 59. The deflector is attached to the tube by any suitable means, and as illustrated, the attachment means comprises a longitudinally directed threadedmember 81 fixed to the inside of the deflector, and a cooperatingtransverse strap 82 mounted across the opening of the apex of the member 54. By this arrangement, longitudinal adjustment of the deflector with respect to the tube is permitted so that the spacing therebetween can be readily adjusted to best achieve the desired uniform dispersion. - The funnel-shaped member 54 also is composed of two separate components, namely, the
lower base portion 61 which is adjacent the base 56, and aseparate apex portion 62 adjacent the apex and including thetube 59 anddeflector 80. Thebase portion 61 of the member 54 is fixedly mounted in the channel of the housing by welding or the like, and it may be described as being truncated to define a relatively large rectangular opening (not numbered) disposed centrally in the housing. Theapex portion 62 is hingedly mounted to the base portion by ahinge 63 which extends transversely across the housing and adjacent the opening of the base portion. In addition, the twoportions mating flanges 64 to facilitate the interface thereof. - To more particularly describe the size and configuration of an exemplary embodiment of the member 54, the base 56 and
opening 58 are each square in cross- section, with the base being about 60 cms (24 inches)along each side and theopening 58 being about 15 cms (6 inches) along each side. Theflange 57 is about 2.5 cms (1 inch) wide, the longitudinal distance from the base 56 to the apex is about 13½ and (5-1/4 inches), and thetube 59 has a longitudinal length of about 7.5 cms (3 inches). - The
apex portion 62 may be pivoted between an operative position wherein the member is in the form of a truncated pyramid which is disposed transversely across the air passageway, and a non-operative position (note the position of themember 54c in Figure 3) wherein theapex portion 62 is disposed along the side of the air passageway so as to be substantially withdrawn from interference with the airstream. The means for operatively controlling the positioning of theapex portion 62 of the member 54 comprises acontrol rod 65 which extends through thewall 14 of the housing and in a direction parallel to the hingedinterconnection 63. Alinkage rod 65 and apex portion 62 (note Figure 4), and acrank 68 is positioned on the outside of the housing for rotating the rod to pivot theapex portion 62 between its operative and non-operative positions. In this regard, it will be noted that therod 65 extends through the two laterally adjacent channels, such that the two members 54 are concurrently operated by rotation of the rod. - Viewing Figure 3, it will be seen that the housing includes a first funnel-shaped
member 54a positioned upstream of the first filter, a second like funnel-shapedmember 54b mounted immediately downstream of the first filter and upstream of the second filter, and a third like funnel-shapedmember 54c which is mounted immediately downstream of the second filter. - The
housing 12 also includes means for withdrawing a sample of the airstream at each of three separate locations along its length. A first sampling or detectingmeans 70a is provided immediately downstream of the first funnel-shapedmember 54a, a second sampling means 70b immediately downstream of thesecond member 54b, and a third sampling means 70c immediately downstream of thethird member 54c. Each of these three sampling means comprises a first pipe 71 extending laterally into the first adjacent channel and having anapertured sampler 72 positioned immediately downstream of and in alignment with thetube 59 of the adjacent funnel-shaped member, and a second pipe 73 extending into the laterally remote channel and including a similarly positioned sampler 74, note Figure 6. Each pipe extends through thewall 14 of the housing, and includes aremovable end cap 75 for permitting the sampler to be selectively connected to a conventional DOP detecting apparatus. - During normal operation of the
filter housing 12, theapex portions 62 of all of the funnel-shaped members 54 are lowered into their non-operative position, so as to minimize air resistance. When leakage tests are to be conducted on the upstream bank, theapex portions 62 of the fourmembers 54a which are upstream of the initial bank of filters, as well as the fourmembers 54b immediately downstream of this bank, are all raised into their operative positions. Thethird members 54c preferably remain open, such that the various members are oriented in the manner shown in Figure 3. - - The above disposition of the members results in the air flow being partially restricted as it moves through each of the four channels, and this restriction produces a back pressure upstream of the housing, which in turn serves to substantially balance the flow among the four channels. Thus an uneven flow pattern resulting from the design of the
transition 22, plenum connections, or other upstream duct components, is avoided. - The DOP particles are then selectively and independently introduced into each of the four channels by means of their associated
pipes first member 54a, and substantial turbulence is imparted thereto to mix the particles and air as illustrated schematically in the right hand portion of Figure 3, and the airstream is condensed into thetube 59 of the member. As the airstream exits thetube 59 anddeflector 80, it is dispersed over the full cross-sectional area of the channel. At relatively low flow rates, such as where testing is conducted for example at 20% of the designed flow rate of the housing, substantially uniform dispersion over the full frontal area of the filter is achieved. The first sampling means 70a may at this point in the test be connected to the DOP detecting apparatus to determine the upstream concentration of the DOP. - The airstream continues through the first filter and strikes the downstream
second member 54b, which again imparts turbulence to the airstream and condenses it to pass through thetube 59 of the member. Thus the air and any leaking DOP is thoroughly mixed by the time it passes through thetube 59, and such that the sampler 72 (or 74), which is positioned immediately downstream of thetube 59 will be assured of picking up a representative portion of any leaking DOP when it is connected to the detecting apparatus. By this testing procedure, each filter in the first bank may be individually tested, so that the identification of a leaking filter is readily apparent. - To test the filters of the second bank, the four
members 54a are preferably moved to'their non-operative lowered position, and the two downstream sets ofmembers pipes members 54b now serve the dual functions of balancing the flow to the second bank of filters, and mixing the air and DOP particles and dispersing the mixture to the second filters. Thus a single component in the housing, namely, themembers 54b, perform distinctly different functions during the testing of the two filter banks.
Claims (10)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US1728979A | 1979-03-05 | 1979-03-05 | |
US17289 | 1979-03-05 |
Related Parent Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP80900534A Division EP0024421B1 (en) | 1979-03-05 | 1980-02-27 | Method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters |
EP80900534.1 Division | 1980-02-27 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0150266A2 true EP0150266A2 (en) | 1985-08-07 |
EP0150266A3 EP0150266A3 (en) | 1985-08-21 |
Family
ID=21781779
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP80900534A Expired EP0024421B1 (en) | 1979-03-05 | 1980-02-27 | Method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters |
EP84111200A Ceased EP0150266A3 (en) | 1979-03-05 | 1980-02-27 | Method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP80900534A Expired EP0024421B1 (en) | 1979-03-05 | 1980-02-27 | Method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (2) | EP0024421B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPS56500507A (en) |
AT (1) | ATE19554T1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA1144087A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3071580D1 (en) |
MX (1) | MX7475E (en) |
WO (1) | WO1980001952A1 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2187849A (en) * | 1986-03-13 | 1987-09-16 | Gen Electric | Flow measurement system for measuring leakage through a labyrinth seal |
GB2330914A (en) * | 1997-04-17 | 1999-05-05 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Testing the filtration efficiency of cloth materials |
GB2362841A (en) * | 2000-06-03 | 2001-12-05 | Secr Defence | Method and apparatus for testing filters |
US6327893B1 (en) * | 1999-12-07 | 2001-12-11 | Aaf Mcquay | Filter layer comparative testing method and apparatus |
US20110219855A1 (en) * | 2008-09-09 | 2011-09-15 | R + I Alliance | Method and device for detecting leaks in an underground liquid pipe, particularly a water pipe |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN116858436B (en) * | 2023-09-04 | 2023-11-28 | 常州宝捷电机制造有限公司 | Tightness detection device for motor detection |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2025957A1 (en) * | 1968-12-12 | 1970-09-11 | Gen Electric | |
US4055075A (en) * | 1976-04-08 | 1977-10-25 | Flanders Filters, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2297082A (en) * | 1940-12-13 | 1942-09-29 | Grover J Hornsby | Valve |
US2699287A (en) * | 1952-11-06 | 1955-01-11 | W B Connor Engineering Corp | Air purifying and circulating device |
US3185181A (en) * | 1962-12-13 | 1965-05-25 | Cottrell Res Inc | Diffuser swirl eliminator |
US3323437A (en) * | 1965-08-20 | 1967-06-06 | Weber Showcase & Fixture Co | Filter system |
US3395514A (en) * | 1965-10-27 | 1968-08-06 | Mine Safety Appliances Co | Filter testing system and method |
US3519024A (en) * | 1966-01-06 | 1970-07-07 | Gen Electric | Device for the prepatterned control of flow distribution in fluid flow experiencing a change in area and/or direction |
US3385036A (en) * | 1966-09-06 | 1968-05-28 | Nasa Usa | Portable superclean air column device |
US3522724A (en) * | 1968-03-29 | 1970-08-04 | Kidde & Co Walter | Method and apparatus for testing clean room filtration efficiency |
US3865561A (en) * | 1971-05-03 | 1975-02-11 | Jack S Osborn | Selective plugging of filter elements |
US3712114A (en) * | 1971-05-03 | 1973-01-23 | J Osborn | Dust bag quality testing system |
US3749130A (en) * | 1971-05-25 | 1973-07-31 | Corning Glass Works | Flow deflector for exhaust gases |
US3782884A (en) * | 1972-05-09 | 1974-01-01 | Standard Oil Co | Acid gas burner |
US3949594A (en) * | 1974-09-25 | 1976-04-13 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Interior | Two-stage disposable particle sampling head |
-
1980
- 1980-02-27 WO PCT/US1980/000189 patent/WO1980001952A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1980-02-27 EP EP80900534A patent/EP0024421B1/en not_active Expired
- 1980-02-27 EP EP84111200A patent/EP0150266A3/en not_active Ceased
- 1980-02-27 AT AT80900534T patent/ATE19554T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1980-02-27 JP JP50068780A patent/JPS56500507A/ja active Pending
- 1980-02-27 DE DE8080900534T patent/DE3071580D1/en not_active Expired
- 1980-03-05 MX MX808682U patent/MX7475E/en unknown
- 1980-03-05 CA CA000347061A patent/CA1144087A/en not_active Expired
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2025957A1 (en) * | 1968-12-12 | 1970-09-11 | Gen Electric | |
US4055075A (en) * | 1976-04-08 | 1977-10-25 | Flanders Filters, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2187849A (en) * | 1986-03-13 | 1987-09-16 | Gen Electric | Flow measurement system for measuring leakage through a labyrinth seal |
US4715213A (en) * | 1986-03-13 | 1987-12-29 | General Electric Company | Flow measurement system |
GB2187849B (en) * | 1986-03-13 | 1990-03-21 | Gen Electric | Flow measurement system |
GB2330914A (en) * | 1997-04-17 | 1999-05-05 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Testing the filtration efficiency of cloth materials |
GB2330914B (en) * | 1997-04-17 | 2001-07-18 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Method and apparatus for testing the filtration efficiency of cloth materials intended for use in a clean room environment |
US6327893B1 (en) * | 1999-12-07 | 2001-12-11 | Aaf Mcquay | Filter layer comparative testing method and apparatus |
GB2362841A (en) * | 2000-06-03 | 2001-12-05 | Secr Defence | Method and apparatus for testing filters |
US20110219855A1 (en) * | 2008-09-09 | 2011-09-15 | R + I Alliance | Method and device for detecting leaks in an underground liquid pipe, particularly a water pipe |
US8931330B2 (en) * | 2008-09-09 | 2015-01-13 | R+I Alliance | Method and device for detecting leaks in an underground liquid pipe, particularly a water pipe |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0150266A3 (en) | 1985-08-21 |
JPS56500507A (en) | 1981-04-16 |
CA1144087A (en) | 1983-04-05 |
EP0024421A1 (en) | 1981-03-11 |
MX7475E (en) | 1989-02-27 |
WO1980001952A1 (en) | 1980-09-18 |
DE3071580D1 (en) | 1986-06-05 |
EP0024421A4 (en) | 1981-10-13 |
EP0024421B1 (en) | 1986-04-30 |
ATE19554T1 (en) | 1986-05-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4324568A (en) | Method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters | |
USRE31952E (en) | Method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters | |
US4055075A (en) | Method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters | |
US9360411B2 (en) | Alternate inlet field testing apparatus | |
US4515007A (en) | Method of and apparatus for testing the integrity of filters | |
US8999035B2 (en) | Integrated containment system | |
US20160097705A1 (en) | Non-instrusive filter scanning | |
EP0024421B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for the leak testing of filters | |
JP5946109B2 (en) | Air purifier and its test system | |
CA1176997A (en) | Apparatus for the leak testing of filters | |
KR100621610B1 (en) | A simulation apparatus for filter test | |
DE2718218A1 (en) | Detection of gases in ventilation systems - using a parallel test line with colour responsive reagent | |
Fitz et al. | An ultrahigh volume sampler for the multiple filter collection of respirable particulate matter | |
Parrish | Tests of high-efficiency filters and filter installations at ORNL | |
Feigley et al. | Asbestos Fiber Deposition Patterns on Various 25-mm Cassette Filters at a High Flow Rate | |
Bradley et al. | Asbestos penetration test system for clothing materials | |
Lecamwasam et al. | Comparison between the potassium iodide (KI) discus test and the di-octyl phthalate (DOP) containment test for the testing of class II biological safety cabinets (BSC-II) | |
Martinez et al. | In-place testing summary (1992). Progress report | |
WO2004080538A2 (en) | Clean room fire simulation | |
Goldfield | HIGH EFFICIENCY PRRTICULRTE ARRESTORS (HEPR FILTERS) In the NUCLEAR INDUSTBY | |
Prevo et al. | WOTAMS: A Transuranic-Aerosol Measurement System for Workplace, Stack, or Fence-Line Air Monitoring |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AC | Divisional application: reference to earlier application |
Ref document number: 24421 Country of ref document: EP |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): AT CH DE FR GB LU NL SE |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): AT CH DE FR GB LU NL SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19860217 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19870624 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED |
|
18R | Application refused |
Effective date: 19880308 |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: ALLAN, THOMAS T. Inventor name: WILCOX, DAVID E. |