EP0141163B1

EP0141163B1 - Propellant material

Info

Publication number: EP0141163B1
Application number: EP19840110646
Authority: EP
Inventors: Frank A. Marion
Original assignee: Universal Propulsion Co Inc
Current assignee: Universal Propulsion Co Inc
Priority date: 1983-09-12
Filing date: 1984-09-06
Publication date: 1988-11-30
Also published as: BR8404538A; ES535857A0; ES8603163A1; IL72838A; DE141163T1; DE3475398D1; EP0141163A1

Description

This invention relates to propellants for providing an efficient propulsion of vehicles such as rockets. The invention further relates to propellants having a high density and stable properties at ambient temperatures and providing considerable energy at elevated temperatures for producing an efficient propulsion of vehicles such as rockets. The invention is particularly concerned with propellants which combust to provide end products which are not deleterious to the propulsion chamber.
For many rocket applications, the amount of propulsion energy capable of being stored in a limited volume of propulsion material is of prime importance. By increasing the amount of energy in each cubic inch of volume of such propulsion material, the volume of propulsion material required to store a particular amount of energy can be accordingly reduced. This in turn allows the rocket to be reduced in size and in weight, thereby causing the drag imposed on the rocket during the flight of the rocket through a fluid such as air or water to be correspondingly reduced. Since the drag imposed on the rocket is reduced, the amount of energy required to propel the rocket through a particular distance is reduced so that the amount of propulsion material required becomes correspondingly reduced. This in turn allows a further reduction in the size of the vehicle, with a corresponding reduction in drag. For the above reasons, a rocket required to push a heavy payload or move through a dense or viscous medium may have an increased efficiency if its propulsion material can be stored in a relatively small volume and can be provided with a high energy level.
The propulsion energy of a material is commonly measured in kilogram-seconds of force per kilogram of propellant (kg - sec/kg). For example, if a propellant has a "specific impulse" of two hundred (200) kg - sec/kg, it can produce in a rocket motor two hundred (200) kg of thrust (or force), per kg of weight of the propellant, for a duration of one (1) second. It can also produce any combination of thrust and time which, when multiplied, equals two hundred (200) kg - sec per kg of propellant.
Various attempts have been made to increase the efficiency of propellants. For example, attempts have been made to increase the temperature of combustion of the different materials in the propellant. One broad line of effort has been to use, in the propellant, materials which have a low heat of formation or a low bond energy so that an increased amount of energy is available to be converted into heat. However, in order to have a low heat of formation, the materials generally must have a low margin of stability so that they are more dangerous to process, to store and to use than conventional materials.
Another approach toward increasing the specific impulse of the propulsion material has been to decrease the average molecular weight of the exhaust products. For example, attempts have been made to combust highly energetic materials such as beryllium. However, these metals are quite toxic when vaporized and greatly increase the health hazards of anyone using such metals. Furthermore any use of such metals in a combustible material would tend to add to contaminants in the atmosphere if the metals should become adopted on a widespread basis.
When materials such as magnesium, beryllium and titanium are used in the propulsion material, the density of the propulsion material tends to be reduced since magnesium, titanium and beryllium are relatively light. This has tended to be disadvantageous since the amount of energy obtained in combustion per cubic centimeter of volume becomes reduced. In other words, even though such metals as beryllium, titanium and magnesium have a high energy, the available energy per cubic centimeter of the propulsion material has not tended to be increased in view of the decreased density of the material.
When metals such as beryllium have been used in the propulsion material, gases such as hydrogen have been added to the material, generally as a hydride of the metals. These hydrides tend to be somewhat unstable, requiring considerable care and special equipment for safe handling of them.
An extensive list of metallized solid propellants was published in 1966 by Reinhold Publishing Corp. in a book entitled, "Propellant Chemistry". This book was written by Stanley F. Sarner, Senior Research Chemist and Theoretical Analyst of Thiokol Chemical Corporation of Elkton, Maryland. This book lists values of specific impulse and density for approximately twenty (20) formulations of solid propellants which allegedly provide a high energy. The values of specific impulse for these formulations range upwardly to approximately 313.8 kg - sec per kg of propellant formulation. The values of density are as high as approximately 2.0 g/cm³ (0.0737 Ib./inch³). However, the maximum value of density impulse capable of being provided by any of these formulations is less than approximately 5.5 g · sec/cm³ (17.9 Ib.sec./in³). Furthermore, these formulations involve the use of toxic materials. Actually, practical and operable formulations heretofore available provide maximum values of density impulse of approximately 415.2 g . sec/cm³ (15 Ib.sec./in³). As will be appreciated, values of density-impulse are important since they indicate the amount of energy available for propulsion per cubic centimeter of propulsion material.
US-A-3,945,202 discloses a propellant which overcomes the disadvantages described above. The propulsion materials disclosed and claimed in US-A-3,945,202 have a high density and provide a high value of specific impulse. They can be safely and easily formulated and are stable at ambient and elevated temperatures. They are not toxic in their formulation, storage or use. Furthermore, density-impulses as high as approximately twenty-four (24) kg · sec per kg of formulation have been obtained from the propulsion materials disclosed and claimed in this patent.
The propulsion materials disclosed in US-A-3,945,202 include a binder, an oxidizer and a fuel additive. The binder preferably constitutes a hydrocarbon; the oxidizer preferably constitutes an inorganic lead oxidizer; and the fuel additive preferably constitutes particles of a metal such as aluminum. The propellants combust in the combustion chamber to produce end products, one of which may be vaporized lead.
The production of vaporized lead in the combustion chamber is not advantageous. This results from the fact that lead vapor is an effective solvent for steel and for other metals. Lead vapor condenses at a temperature of approximately 1751°C, whereas iron melts at a temperature of approximately 1530°C. Since the combustion chamber will tend to be made from a material such as iron, the walls of the combustion chamber tend to become melted as the lead is vaporized during combustion. Furthermore, the heat of fusion of iron is approximately 3.67 kilocalories per mole and the heat of vaporization of lead is approximately 46.34 kilocalories per mole. As a result, for each mole of lead vapor condensate produced, 12.6 moles of iron can be melted.
It has been the task underlying the present invention to provide a propellant which produces combustion products which do not have any adverse effects on the walls of the combustion chamber for combusting the propellant.
According to the present invention, this task is solved by a propellant having a lead compound oxidizer formed from an inorganic lead oxidizer salt and a binder also acting as a reducing agent, characterised in that the proportions of the lead compound oxidizer and the binder are chosen to have the binder reduce the lead compound oxidizer to lead oxide during the combustion of the propellant.
Although lead vapor acts as a solvent on steel and other metals, lead oxide does not have such an effect. This results from the fact that lead oxide condensates at a temperature of approximately 1472°C, which is below the melting temperature of iron.
The propellant of this invention combusts to produce as an end product lead oxide rather than lead. The propellant of this invention has a density-impulse which approximates, if not exceeds, the density-impulses of the propellants of US-A-3,945,202 while providing significantly reduced temperatures during the combustion of the propellant.
The lead compound oxidizer is preferably included in the propellant in the range of approximately 83% to 91% by weight.
The propellant of this invention preferably includes a binder having hydrocarbon linkages and a lead compound oxidizer formed from an inorganic lead oxidizer salt. This oxidizer has dense characteristics and stable properties at ambient temperatures and through a particular range of temperatures above ambient. The propellant also includes in one embodiment, a fuel additive, preferably a metal such as aluminum, having properties of being oxidized by the oxidizer and of reducing the lead. The fuel additive has a percentage by weight relative to the lead compound oxidizer to reduce the lead to the lead oxide. The fuel additive is preferably included in such embodiment of the propellant in the range to approximately twenty percent (20%) by weight and is preferably in a fragmentary form. The binder preferably is included in the range of approximately eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%) by weight. A second oxidizer such as potassium perchlorate may also be included in the propellant.
The lead compound oxidizer and the second oxidizer are preferably included in the propellant in the range of approximately seventy-four percent (74%) to ninety-one percent (91%) by weight. An additional binder such as carbon can also be included in the propellant. The carbon is preferably included in the propellant in the range of approximately eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%).
The propellant of this invention has certain distinct advantages over the propellants of the prior art. It provides high density-impulses and, when combusted, produces end products which do not have any deleterious effects. This results at least partly from the fact that the propellant produces lead oxide rather than lead when it combusts. The propellant is also advantageous in that it generates relatively low temperatures during combustion. For example, temperatures less than 538°C (1000°F) can be generated by at least some of the propellants of this invention by eliminating the fuel additive such as aluminum from the propellant. This is further advantageous in that it tends to simplify the formulation of the propellant.
By forming lead oxide and the other exhaust gases at relatively low temperatures during the combustion of the propellant, the formation of the propulsion chamber can be simplified. For example, the walls of the chamber can be made from a relatively standard material such as steel or copper and the heat insulation in the walls of the chamber can be minimized.
In the drawings:

Figure 1 illustrates the configuration of a combustion chamber suitable for combusting the propellants of this invention;
Figure 2 constitutes curves showing the relationship between the pressure of the exhaust gases from the propellant burning in the chamber of Figure 1 and the rate at which the propellant burns;
Figure 3 is a curve illustrating the relationship between time and pressure of the exhaust gases from the burning propellant;
Figure 4 is a curve in triangular coordination of the relative percentages of different chemical components in one embodiment of the propellant of this invention for different formulations of such propellant.
Figure 5 is a curve in triangular coordination of the relative percentages of different chemical components in another embodiment of the propellant of this invention for different formulations of such propellant.
Figure 1 schematically illustrates a chamber, generally shown at 10, for combusting the propellants of this invention. The walls of the chamber 10 may be made from a suitable material such as iron or steel. The components of the propellant combust in a burning area 12 and escape through a throat area 14. As will be seen, the propellant is isolated from the atmosphere so that the combustion occurs entirely from the components in the propellant.
Figure 2 illustrates the relationship between the pressure of the gases escaping from the burning area 12 into the throat area 14 and the rate at which the propellant is combusted in the burning area 12. As will be seen, the relationship between rate and pressure is essentially linear with changes in pressure. Figure 2 also indicates the relationship between pressure of the gases escaping from the burning area 12 into the throat area 14 and the area ratio. As will be seen, this relationship is also essentially linear with changes in pressure.
Figure 3 illustrates the pressure of the gases at progressive instants of time in the chamber illustrated in Figure 1. As will be appreciated, the term t_a represents the time between an initial pressure of ten percent (10%) of maximum pressure during the period of pressure build up and ten percent (10%) of maximum pressure during the period of pressure reduction.

The propellants of this invention include a binder preferably having hydrogen and carbon linkages. Preferably the binder includes a material having a formula such as CH₂. The binder preferably has properties of being cured at a particular temperature.
The lead compound oxidizer preferably constitutes lead nitrate. However, other lead oxidizers such as lead dioxide or lead iodate or any combination of the lead compounds specified above may also be used.
Lead nitrate has approximately 0.041 moles of oxygen per cubic centimeter. It has a specific gravity of approximately 4.53 grams per cubic centimeter. It has a decomposition temperature of approximately 470°C and has a heat of formation of only approximately 107.35 Kilocalories per mole of oxygen. It can be reacted chemically to produce reasonably good enthalpy.
Lead vaporizes at a temperature of approximately 1751°C. Since this temperature is considerably higher than the melting temperature of iron or steel, the lead melts the iron or steel when it vaporizes and contacts the iron or steel. Since the chamber 10 is generally made from iron or steel, the vapors from the propellant attack the iron or steel when the lead compound oxidizer becomes reduced to lead vapor. It is accordingly desirable to have the lead compound oxidizer become reduced to an end product other than lead. For example, lead oxide condenses at a temperature of approximately 1472°C, which is below the melting temperature of iron. As a result, lead oxide vapor does not act as a solvent or iron or steel.
A fuel additive is also included in one embodiment of the propellant of this invention. The fuel additive is preferably a metal such as aluminum, which becomes oxidized to aluminum oxide by the oxidizer. Preferably the aluminum is in a fragmented form such as in a particulate form. Although such metal is commonly added as a powder, it can be added as filaments of fine wire or as sheets or strips of thin foil. When used in a fragmentary form such as in filaments or sheets or strips, the aluminum provides substantial physical reinforcement to the propellant. In these forms, the aluminum can provide composites or laminates of high strength. This is desirable since considerable forces must be withstood by a propellant in various applications such as anti-missile rocket applications.
Other metals than aluminum are also theoretically useful as the fuel additive in some propulsion formulations. These include beryllium, magnesium, lithium and titanium. All of these metals are advantageous since they have high melting temperatures. For example, aluminum has a melting temperature of approximately 660°C (1220°F) and strontium has a melting temperature of approximately 650°C (1202°F). In this way, the propulsion materials can be formulated with reasonable safety when these additives are included. Furthermore, although the melting temperatures of these metals are relatively high, they are still below the melting temperature of steel or iron.
Other materials may be used as secondary oxidizers in association with the inorganic lead compounds. These include strontium nitrate, barium nitrate, cesium nitrate, rubidium nitrate, ammonium perchlorate, potassium permanganate, potassium chlorate, potassium periodate, potassium nitrate, urea nitrate and guanidine nitrate. In addition to serving as oxidizers, these materials have the properties of altering the ballistic and physical properties of the rocket as desired. This secondary oxidizer preferably constitutes potassium perchlorate.
The different materials have been included as follows in the propellant of the prior art:
The inclusion of the different materials in the relative amounts of equation (1) offers a number of important advantages. For example, the formation of carbon monoxide is desirable because it constitutes approximately -105.6 Kilocalories (-25.4 Kilocalories per mole) of combustion enthalpy. This tends to provide a cooling effect on the combustion gases. Since the carbon is oxidized to carbon monoxide, the carbon cannot absorb heat. This is particularly important since carbon has a high heat capacity.
The propulsion formulation specified above also has other important advantages. For example, although the values of specific impulse for the propellants using the oxidizers specified above range from approximately 190 kg - sec/kg to approximately 260 kg - sec/kg and are accordingly within the range of previous propellants, the high density of the propellants using these oxidizers produces theoretical values of density-impulse from approximately 609 g· sec/cm³ (22 Ib.sec./in³) to approximately 764 g - sec/cm³ (27.6Ib.sec./in3). Comparing such values with previously available values of approximately 415 g - sec/cm³ (15 lb.sec./in³) this represents an increase of approximately sixty percent (60%) over the density-impulses of previously available propellants.
In spite of the advantages described above, there is one serious disadvantage from the reaction specified in equation (1). This results from the formation of vaporized lead. As previously described, the vaporized lead tends to melt the steel or iron walls of the combustion chamber, thereby limiting the effectiveness of the combustion chamber. The lead vapor is produced by the thermal decomposition of the lead nitrate in the material specified in equation (1).
The materials specified above can be varied in relative amounts to overcome the disadvantage specified in the previous paragraph without losing any of the advantages specified above. For example, the different materials can be included in the relative percentages specified below for one embodiment of the invention to provide a combustion which produces lead oxide, rather than lead, in the combustion gases:
The inclusion of the different materials in the percentages specified above in equation (2) offers certain distinct advantages. For example, the formation of lead oxide in the combustion gases inhibits any tendency for the walls of the combustion chamber to melt. This results from the fact that lead oxide vaporizes at a temperature below the melting temperature of steel or iron.
The improved formulation of equation (2) also offers other important advantages. For example, the formulation of equation (2) provides an increased enthalpy over the formulation of equation (1) even though the amount of fuel in the formulation of equation (2) is significantly reduced relative to the amount in the formulation of equation (1). Specifically, the formulation of equation (2) produces an estimated combustion enthalpy of approximately -988 gram-calories/gram versus approximately -931 gram-calories/gram estimated for the formulation of equation (1).
The increased enthalpy for the formulation of equation (2) results in part from the formation of lead oxide. The heat of formation of lead oxide is approximately -52.1 Kilocalories per mole. This is in contrast to an endothermic heat of absorption of approximately 46.34 Kilocalories per mole for the formation of lead. This produces a resultant increase in combustion enthalpy of 52.1+46.34=98.44 Kilocalories per mole for the formulation of equation (2) relative to the formulation of equation (1).
As will be seen, there is a reduction of one third (1/3) of a mol of aluminum oxide in the propellant of equation (2) relative to the propellant of equation (1). This represents a reduction in enthalpy, particularly since the reduction of one third (1/3) of a mole in the amount of aluminum oxide formed represents a loss in enthalpy such as approximately -133 Kilocalories. However, the net enthalpy per gram is increased by the relative increase in the amount of oxidizer and binder in the propellant of equation (2) relative to the propellant of equation (1). This relative increase results from the reduction of the weight and volume of aluminum in the propellant of equation (2) relative to the propellant of equation (1).
The propellant of equation (2) produces an increase of approximately three percent (3%) in density-impulse relative to the propellant of equation (1). The propellant of equation (2) maintains burning rates and other performance characteristics comparable to the propellant of equation (1). As a result, the propellant of equation (2) can provide a simple replacement for the propellant of equation (1). However, the elimination of lead vapor from the exhaust products of the propellant of equation (2) offers significant improvements in the design of the combustion chamber. This can be accomplished by reductions in the required insulating weight and volume of the combustion chamber, by reduction in the size of special seals and heat sinks and reduction in the heat transfer of vapor condensates at temperatures above the melting point of the material of the chamber walls. As a result, the propellant of equation (2) provides an aggregate improvement in product performance and reliability relative to the propellant of equation (1).
An additional improvement has resulted from a further reduction in the level of aluminum from that of equation (2). This further reduction in aluminum produces a reduction in combustion enthalpy und gas temperatures. This in turn enables the design of members such as rockets with increased burning time without encountering any serious material problems in the construction of rocket chambers and nozzles. The further reduction in the level of aluminum has caused a chemical reaction to be produced as follows:
As will be seen, the propellant of equation (3) has the advantage of the propellant of equation (2) because lead oxide, rather than lead, is obtained as one of the combustion products. The decreased amount of the fuel such as aluminum causes the estimated enthalpy to be reduced to an estimated value such as approximately -826 gram-calories/gram from an estimated value of approximately -931 gram-caloriès/gram for the propellant of equation (1). This constitutes a reduction of approximately eleven and three tenths percent (11.3%) in enthalpy. However, the propellant of equation (3) has an increase of approximately ten percent (10%) in density relative to the propellant of equation (1). This increase is from a value of approximately 2.76 g/cm³ (0.10 Ib/cubic inch) to a value of approximately 3.04 g/cm³ (0.11 Ib/cubic inch). This results in an estimated decrease of approximately only one percent (1 %) in the density-impulse of the propellant of equation (3) relative to the propellant of equation (1).
The slight reduction in density-impulse in the formulation of equation (3) relative to the formulation of equation (1) is in contrast to the significant reduction in the temperatures of the combustion gases from the propellant of equation (3) relative to the propellant of equation (1). Corresponding reductions occur in the average molecular weight of the exhaust gases. This can in fact increase the specific impulse to produce an over-all improvement in the density-impulse performance of the propellant formulation of equation (3) relative to the propellant formulation of equation (1).
As the level of aluminum is reduced from the formulation of equation (1) toward the formulation of equation (3), the volume displaced by the reduction in the amount of aluminum can be replaced by an equal volume of high density oxidizer or hydrocarbon binder or by a combination of the two (2). Aluminum has a lower density than the high density oxidizer such as lead nitrate (2.70 vs. 4.53). This causes an increased volume of lead nitrate equal to that in the reduction in the amount of aluminum to produce a sixty-eight percent (68%) increase in specific gravity of lead nitrate relative to aluminum. In other words, replacing aluminum with lead nitrate causes the propellant density to be increased.
Aluminum reduces the burning rate of the propellant of equations (1), (2) and (3). Therefore, as the amount of aluminum in the propellant is reduced, the burning of the propellant is accelerated. This allows some of the potassium perchlorate to be removed from the propellant to maintain a particular burning rate. The potassium perchlorate removed from the propellant can be replaced in volume with a corresponding amount of lead nitrate. Potassium perchlorate has a specific gravity of approximately 2.5298 grams/cubic centimeter whereas lead nitrate has a specific gravity of approximately 4.53 grams/cubic centimeter. The replacement of the potassium perchlorate by lead nitrate accordingly produces an increase in specific gravity of approximately seventy-nine percent (79%) in a given volume.
As the aluminum content of the propellant is reduced below a critical ratio, the combustion enthalpy decreases more rapidly than the increase in density. This causes some reduction in density-impulse to occur. However, the reduction in the temperature of the exhaust gases from the combustion may facilitate design economy and simplicity within an acceptable level of density-impulse performance to warrant the use of such propellants with reduced amounts of aluminum.
Formulations having reduced levels of aluminum are plotted in Figure 4 in triangular coordinates. In the plots of Figure 4, the amount of the oxidizer is plotted in the vertical direction, with the apex of the triangle indicating an amount of one hundred percent (100%) and the base of the triangle indicating an amount of zero percent (0%). Similarly, the amount of the hydrocarbon binder is plotted from the left leg of the triangle representing zero percent (0%) as a base and the lower right corner representing one hundred percent (100%): The amount of aluminum is also plotted from the right leg of the triangle representing zero percent (0%) as a base and the lower left corner representing one hundred percent (100%).
As will be seen from Figure 4, the levels of aluminum can be varied between approximately zero percent (0%) and twenty percent (20%) by weight. The minimal amount of aluminum is preferably at least two percent (2%) by weight for beneficial effects and less than approximately eighteen percent (18%) by weight. This preferred range provides for ease of mixing, processing and casting. The percentage of the hydrocarbon by weight is preferably between approximately eight percent (8%) and ten percent (10%) to provide optimal density-impulse performance for the propellants. This range of weights for the hydrocarbon carbon also facilitates mixing and processing since the binder is a liquid polymer during the mixing and casting processes.
Specific percentages are specified in the table below for the different components in the propellant:
These different formulations are plotted in the curve illustrated at 20 in Figure 4.
Specific formulas can be developed at any point selected along the curve illustrated in Figure 4. Specific performance criteria such as burning rate, specific impulse and density-impulse can be formulated by extrapolating from established data points or by interpolating between established data points. It will be appreciated, however, that the invention is not to be limited to the formulations along the curve of Figure 4 or the extrapolations or interpolations along the points of such curve.
Carbon can be added to the formulations having reduced levels of aluminum. The carbon acts as a heat transfer mechanism to increase the burning rate of the propellant. Carbon also acts as a physical reinforcing agent in the synthetic rubber matrix. Adding carbon also alters the interior ballistics of the propellant by increasing the mols of gas. This results from an increase in the production of carbon monoxide in the combustion gases. The relatively low heat of formation (approximately -26.4 kilocalories per mol) of carbon monoxide provides an additional cooling effect on the combustion gases.
Combinations of aluminum and carbon as fuel additives expand the spectrum of useful propellant formulations. Specific performance parameters can be modified or tailored to fit an exacting application by ranging the levels of the two (2) additives and by changing their weight ratio.
The formulations constituting this invention provide certain important advantages. One distinct advantage is the production of lead oxide, rather than lead, in the combustion gases. This has resulted from the reduction in the amount of aluminum oxide produced in the combustion gases. This is an unexpected result since aluminum oxide is the highest enthalpy species produced in the combustion gases.
The reduction in the amount of aluminum in the propellant and the production of lead oxide, rather than lead, in the combustion gases has causes some serious thermodynamic, thermochemical and metallurgical problems to be eliminated. It has also enhanced the density-impulse performance of the propellant over a wide range of formulas. The range of formulas is even extended through an additional range of some significance where the density-impulse formulation is not degraded from that obtained from the formulation of equation (1).
Propellant formulations having high density-impulses and containing less than the stoichiometric ratio of aluminum fuel have demonstrated improvements in ballistic performance in rocket motors. The chemically improved exhaust gases of these propellants have caused substantial improvements in their containment to be obtained and have significantly reduced problems of heat transfer and insulation. These problems have been associated with previous propellants and have been based upon stoichiometric levels of aluminum in the formulations.
As will be seen, all of the above propellants include a fuel such as aluminum. The propellants according to another embodiment of this invention do not include the fuel such as aluminum. For example, one formulation of this invention may be as follows:
This formulation represents a reduction in specific impulse of approximately twenty-two percent (22%) from the propellants which include aluminum. However, since aluminum has been eliminated, the relative amount of the lead nitrate in the formulation is proportionately increased. This causes the formulation of equation (4) to be increased in density by approximately eleven percent (11%). This at least partially compensates for the decrease in the specific impulse of the formulation.
The formulation of equation (4) has a number of the advantages discussed above. For example, it produces lead oxide, rather than lead, as an end product during combustion. The formulation of equation (4) also has other advantages in addition to those discussed above. For example, it produces, during combustion, temperatures considerably lower than the conventional propellants of the prior art and the propellants of equations (1), (2) and (3). This enables the throat of the propulsion chamber to be made of a conventional material such as steel or copper. It also enables significant reductions to be provided in the volume and weight of the propulsion chamber. It also provides for significant reductions in the volume and weight of the insulation materials in the propulsion chamber, and particularly at the nozzle exit from the chamber.
The temperatures of the propellant exhaust gases can be further reduced by including carbon as a fuel to obtain a propellant such as set forth below:
This propellant has a high density and burns at a relatively low temperature. It can be considered as a high density "cool" gas generator. It provides an estimated heat of combustion of approximately -360 gram-calories/gram with an average density or specific gravity of approximately 2.74 g/cm³ (0.099 Ib/in³).
All of the above equations have included an inorganic salt oxidizer such as potassium perchlorate. The combustion enthalpy can be further reduced by eliminating the potassium perchlorate from the propellant. This is also advantageous in increasing the specific gravity of the propellant since the relative amount of the lead nitrate in the propellant is increased. This causes the propellant to have a formulation such as specified below:
As will be seen, carbon monoxide is produced during the combustion of the propellant of equation (6). Partly because of the generation of carbon monoxide, the heat of combustion for the formulation of equation (6) is reduced to approximately -106 gram-calories/gram from the heat of combustion for the formulation of equation (5). As will be seen, this constitutes a significant reduction in the heat of combustion. Even with this considerable reduction in the heat of combustion, the density of the propellant of equation (6) is increased to a value of approximately 3.21 g/cm³ (0.116 Ib/in³). Furthermore, the temperatures of the exhaust gases produced by the propellant of equation (6) tend to be below 538°C (1000°F). This is particularly pertinent since the formulation of equation (6) has a density almost twice as great as that of conventional gas generator propellants. The propellant also has a low burning rate. This is desirable for many designs of gas generators.
As the amount of carbon is reduced below that shown in equation (6), increased amounts of carbon dioxide, and reduced amount of carbon monoxide, are produced in the exhaust gases. The amount of combustion enthalpy tends to become increased at a relatively rapid rate as the amount of carbon is reduced. When the amount of carbon has been reduced to zero, the propellant may be as specified below:
The combination enthalpy for the propellant of equation (7) may be expressed as H_f=-94.05 kilocalories/mol. As will be seen from equation (7), all of the oxygen in the propellant is used to generate carbon dioxide in the combustion, except for the one half (1/2) mole of oxygen used to generate lead oxide (PbO). This produces the maximum heat of combustion from the available oxygen.
A comparison of equations (6) and (7) indicates that two (2) moles of carbon monoxide are produced in the propellant of equation (6) in comparison to each mole of carbon dioxide produced by the propellant of equation (7). Thus, the addition of carbon to the propellant tends to be advantageous since it facilitates the use of oxygen in the formation of carbon monoxide. This produces an increase in the moles of exhaust gases produced in the combustion, a decrease in the average molecular weight of such exhaust gases and a reduction in the combustion enthalpy. It also tends to cool the exhaust gases.
The production of carbon monoxide in the exhaust gases also has other important advantages in the production of gas generators in addition to those discussed above. For example, carbon monoxide is chemically stable and is not chemically reactive. It also has a low oxidizing potential and a low heat of formation of approximately -26.4 kilocalories/mol. Because of this low heat formation, it would appear that oxygen can be easily removed from the carbon monoxide. However, the heat of formation of carbon vapor is approximately 17.17 kilocalories/mol. Because of the considerable difference between the heat of formation of carbon monoxide and the heat of formation of carbon vapor, carbon monoxide is quite resistant to thermal disassociation.
The range of practical formulations of propellants including a hydrocarbon binder, oxidizers and carbon is shown in Figure 5. As will be seen, the hydrocarbon binder has a range of approximately eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%) by weight; the oxidizers have a range of approximately eighty-four percent (84%) to ninety-one percent (91%) by weight; and the carbon has a range of approximately zero percent (0%) to eight percent (8%) by weight.
Typical formulations of the propellant in the embodiment of the invention are specified below:
The different formulations specified above in Examples 1 through 5 are plotted in the curve illustrated at 20 in Figure 5. Specific formulas can be developed at any point selected along the curve illustrated in Figure 5. Specific performance criteria such as burning rate, specific impulse and density-impulse can be formulated by extrapolating from established data points or by interpolating between established data points. It will be appreciated, however, that the invention is not to be limited to the formulations along the curve of Figure 5 or the extrapolations or interpolations along the points of such curve.
The propellants disclosed above as being included in this invention have certain important advantages. They produce lead oxide, rather than lead, in the exhaust gases. This allows the walls of the combustion chamber to be made from conventional materials such as iron or steel without damaging such walls during the combustion. The propellants produce the exhaust gases at relatively low temperatures during the combustion. For example, some of the propellants of this invention even produce exhaust gases with temperatures below 538°C (1000°F) during the combustion. This allows the walls of the chamber to be made from such materials as copper and it further allows the amount of insulation in the chamber to be minimized. The propellants of this invention also produce, during the combustion, a relatively high energy per cubic centimeter of the propellant.

Claims

1. A propellant having a lead compound oxidizer formed from an inorganic lead oxidizer salt and a binder also acting as a reducing agent, characterized in that the proportions of the lead compound oxidizer and the binder are chosen to have the binder reduce the lead compound oxidizer to lead oxide during the combustion of the propellant.

2. A propellant as set forth in claim 1, wherein the lead compound oxidizer being included in the propellant in the range of approximately eight-three percent (83%) to ninety-one percent (91 %) by weight.

3. A propellant as set forth in claims 1 or 2, wherein carbon serving as an additional binder and reducing agent is included in the propellant.

4. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 1 to 3 wherein the lead compound oxidizer is selected from the group consisting of lead nitrate, lead peroxide and lead iodate.

5. A propellant as set forth in claims 3 or 4, wherein the carbon has a range in the propellant to approximately ten percent (10%) by weight.

6. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 1 to 4 wherein the binder is included in the propellant in the range of approximately eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%) by weight.

7. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 1 to 6 wherein the binder has hydrogen and carbon linkages.

8. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 1 to 7 wherein the proportions of the different materials in the propellant are chosen to generate carbon monoxide during the combustion of the propellant.

9. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 1 to 8 wherein a second oxidizer is included in the propellant.

10. A propellant as set forth in claim 9, wherein the second oxidizer contains oxygen and a metal.

11. A propellant as set forth in claim 9 or 10, wherein the second oxidizer is an inorganic salt.

12. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 9 to 11, wherein the second oxidizer is selected from the group consisting of strontium nitrate, ammonium perchlorate, potassium periodate, potassium nitrate, urea nitrate and guanidine nitrate.

13. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 9 to 12 wherein the lead compound oxidizer and the second oxidizer have a percentage of approximately seventy-four percent (74%) to ninety-one percent (91%) by weight.

14. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 9 to 13 wherein the lead compound oxidizer is included in the propellant in the range of approximately fifty-two percent (52%) to seventy-two percent (72%) by weight.

15. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 1 to 14 wherein a fuel additive is included in the propellant.

16. A propellant as set forth in claim 15, wherein the fuel additive is selected from the group consisting of aluminum, beryllium, magnesium, titanium and lithium.

17. A propellant as set forth in claim 15 or 16 wherein the fuel additive has a percentage by weight in the propellant to approximately twenty percent (20%).

18. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 15 to 17 wherein the fuel additive is in a fragmented form.

19. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 15 to 18 wherein the fuel additive is in a particular form.

20. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 1 to 19 wherein the binder is a hydrocarbon.

21. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 1 to 20 wherein the lead compound oxidizer is lead nitrate.

22. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 9 to 21 wherein the second oxidizer is potassium perchlorate.

23. A propellant as set forth in any of claims 15 to 22 wherein the fuel additive is aluminum.