EP0132974B1 - Safety systems for coal pulverizers - Google Patents

Safety systems for coal pulverizers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0132974B1
EP0132974B1 EP84304640A EP84304640A EP0132974B1 EP 0132974 B1 EP0132974 B1 EP 0132974B1 EP 84304640 A EP84304640 A EP 84304640A EP 84304640 A EP84304640 A EP 84304640A EP 0132974 B1 EP0132974 B1 EP 0132974B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
signal
coal pulverizer
comparing
inerting
setpoint
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP84304640A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0132974A3 (en
EP0132974B2 (en
EP0132974A2 (en
Inventor
Marshall Cooper
Robert Pocock
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Babcock and Wilcox Co
Original Assignee
Babcock and Wilcox Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=24067930&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0132974(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Babcock and Wilcox Co filed Critical Babcock and Wilcox Co
Publication of EP0132974A2 publication Critical patent/EP0132974A2/en
Publication of EP0132974A3 publication Critical patent/EP0132974A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0132974B1 publication Critical patent/EP0132974B1/en
Publication of EP0132974B2 publication Critical patent/EP0132974B2/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23KFEEDING FUEL TO COMBUSTION APPARATUS
    • F23K1/00Preparation of lump or pulverulent fuel in readiness for delivery to combustion apparatus
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B02CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
    • B02CCRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
    • B02C25/00Control arrangements specially adapted for crushing or disintegrating
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B02CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
    • B02CCRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
    • B02C23/00Auxiliary methods or auxiliary devices or accessories specially adapted for crushing or disintegrating not provided for in preceding groups or not specially adapted to apparatus covered by a single preceding group
    • B02C23/04Safety devices
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23KFEEDING FUEL TO COMBUSTION APPARATUS
    • F23K2201/00Pretreatment of solid fuel
    • F23K2201/10Pulverizing

Definitions

  • This invention relates to safety systems for coal pulverizers.
  • pulverized-coal systems pulverize coal, deliver it to fuel-burning equipment, and accomplish complete combustion in the furnace with a minimum of excess air.
  • the system operates as a continuous process and, within specified design limitations, the coal supply or feed can be varied as rapidly and as widely as required by the combustion process.
  • a small portion of the air required for combustion (15 to 20% in current installations) is used to transport the coal to the burner. This is known as primary air.
  • primary air In the direct-firing system, primary air is also used to dry the coal in the pulverizer.
  • the remainder of the combustion air (80 to 85%) is introduced at the burner and is known as secondary air.
  • Spontaneous combustion of coal is dependent on a sufficient supply of oxygen to maintain the reaction and on the surface area exposed.
  • Coals with a high surface area, due to small particle size, as in pulverized coal fuel, are particularly liable to self heating. This problem is of special significance to the safe operation and performance of industrial coal pulverizers.
  • Spontaneous combustion may result in deterioration in the quality of the coal, in damage to the power plant, and in certain cases, for example, where critical concentrations of coal dust are involved, may provide the ignition source for an explosion.
  • thermocouples to measure the rise in outlet temperature of the pulverizing mill or infrared gas analyzers to detect the buildup of CO produced in the mill.
  • thermocouples or resistance temperature devices are normally part of the control system for mill operation. However, they are a relatively insensitive means for detecting pulverizer fires. At best, they warn of impending trouble only a few minutes before it actually occurs, and in some cases, do not even detect a significant temperature rise before a fire or explosion is evident.
  • the ineffectiveness of thermocouples and RTD's in this application is due, in part, to the shielding used to protect them from the corrosive coal particles. Shields reduce heat conduction, slowing response time.
  • a safety system for a coal pulverizer comprising:
  • inerting means responsive to the first control signal for inerting coal combustion in the coal pulverizer
  • a preferred embodiment of the invention described in detail hereinbelow overcomes or at least alleviates the above-stated problems of prior art safety systems and provides an improvement over the existing art. It is not dependent on the measurement of pulverizer or pulverizing mill outlet temperature, the removal of moisture and all particulate matter from the sample extracted from the mill or multi-point sampling.
  • the preferred system incorporates the use of a standard single point oxygen and CO analyzer directly mounted to the coal pulverizing mill or pulverizer and providing a continuous percent by volume measurement of oxygen content and a continuous measurement of CO gas concentration of the mill atmosphere.
  • the O2 portion of the analyzer uses a sensor operating at a temperature where any combustible volatile material will combine with 0 2 in the sample.
  • the sensor will then respond to the free or uncombined O2 remaining.
  • the resulting measurement denoted net or residual 0 2
  • An additional significant indicator of a potentially hazardous condition is, thus, provided, augmenting the CO measurement.
  • the combined measurement of CO and net O2 concentration in the mill atmosphere is used to indicate and alarm both the onset and progress of spontaneous combustion within the mill.
  • the preferred system provides the following advantageous features. It provides an automated system capable of being integrated into a plant's pulverizer management and combustion control system designed to monitor the performance of and detect impending fires and explosions in industrial coal pulverizers and alarm such conditions. It provides an automated alarm system based on a net oxygen measurement in the coal pulverizer. It provides an automated alarm system based on a predetermined carbon monoxide rise per time. It provides an .automated inerting control of the coal pulverizer upon detection of either a predetermined net oxygen level or an absolute carbon monoxide level.
  • the drawings depict a reliable, relatively low- cost automated safety system 8 capable of being integrated into a plant's computer control system designed to monitor the performance of and detect impending fires and explosions in electric- utility and industrial coal pulverizers by monitoring the level of carbon monoxide (CO) and net oxygen (0 2 ) concentration in a pulverized coal mill atmosphere.
  • CO carbon monoxide
  • net oxygen (0 2 ) concentration in a pulverized coal mill atmosphere.
  • the combined measurement of CO and 0 2 concentration in the mill atmosphere is used to indicate the oxidation rate of the coal to preclude spontaneous combustion.
  • the measurement of net O2 concentration when combined with other measurements, may provide the basis for overall mill performance calculations and the quality of the pulverized coal.
  • a CO/0 2 sample probe 10 is typically placed in a coal pulverizer 12 classifier outlet zone.
  • a sample of gas is drawn through the probe 10 which has a porous high temperature filter 14.
  • the filter 14 is required to maintain trouble-free operation by minimizing the amount of particulate matter drawn into the analyzer.
  • a suitable filter 14 for this application is of a type described in U.S. Patent No. 4,286,472.
  • the air sample drawn from the coal pulverizer 12 is then analyzed for percent by volume of oxygen (0 2 ) content and CO gas concentration in ppm (parts per million) via a known oxygen and CO gas analyzer 16 designed to operate in a harsh power plant environment and having autocalibration capabilities.
  • a suitable analyzer for this application is one manufactured by the Bailey Controls Company of Babcock and Wilcox and is known as the Type OL Oxygen and CO Analyzer.
  • This analyzer 16 has a CO range of 0-1000 ppm and an 0 2 range of 0.1-25%. Electrical signals corresponding to carbon monoxide and oxygen concentrations are respectively transmitted to a monitoring system control 18 located in the central control room along lines 20 and 22.
  • CO and 0 2 concentrations are displayed and/or recorded on a strip-chart recorder 24.
  • net 0 2 levels represent typically 16% 0 2 and normal CO levels range between 40 and 80 ppm. If the net 0 2 concentration falls below a certain predetermined level, typically 15%, and/or the amount of CO produced exceeds a predetermined rise level considered cause for concern, typically a 50 ppm/minute sudden rise, the system 8 activates audible and visible alarms 26, 28 to alert the operator who in turn may manually take corrective action to inert the pulverizer 12 or permit the automatic monitoring system 8 to continue until it initiates an automatic inert to bring the pulverizer 12 operating parameters under control.
  • the monitoring and control logic assembly 18 utilizes both a net oxygen measurement provided by the analyzer 16 along line 20 as well as a carbon monoxide measurement provided along line 22 from analyzer 16, to, on the one hand, actuate alarms 26 and 28 at predetermined levels of net oxygen and predetermined rise times of carbon monoxide concentration. Also, when the net oxygen levels and the absolute carbon monoxide levels exceed certain critical limits, automatic inerting of the pulverizer 12 is accomplished by controllably opening a valve 30 which allows some inerting media such as carbon dioxide or steam to flow along a line 32 into the pulverizer 12.
  • the net oxygen measurement from line 20 is transmitted along a line 34 to a difference station 36 having a setpoint set at a predetermined net oxygen control point transmitted along line 38.
  • the difference station 36 compares the actual net oxygen measurement provided by the analyzer 16 representing the net oxygen level in the pulverizer 12 and compares it with the setpoint oxygen level which, in the present situation, is set at 15%.
  • the present setpoint of 15% is based on the assumption that the typical atmosphere in the pulverizer representative of normal conditions is approximately 16% and the initial alarm condition is derived to be a warning indicative of potential problem areas.
  • the difference station 36 thus compares the two signals and provides an error signal along line 40 which is one input of an AND gate 42.
  • the other input of the AND gate 42 is provided by a constant negative signal from a predetermined source along line 44.
  • a positive level error signal will be transmitted along line 40 to the AND gate 42 which then will fail to provide any control signal along line 46, failing to actuate the alarm 26.
  • the output along line 40 becomes negative and, in combination with the constant negative signal along line 44, will result in a conduction of the AND gate 42, causing a control signal to be transmitted along line 46 to the alarm 26 to thus actuate it and provide an indication of potential problems in the pulverizer 12 atmosphere.
  • the measured carbon monoxide signal transmitted along line 22 may also provide an actuation of the alternate alarm 28.
  • the measured carbon monoxide signal is transmitted to a derivative action controller 48 which will be sensitive to any variations in the carbon monoxide level and will effectively provide an output signal along line 50 indicative of the slope or rate of change of the carbon monoxide level in the pulverizing mill 12.
  • the output of the derivative action controller 48 is transmitted to a difference station 52 having a predetermined setpoint along line 54 indicative of a rate of carbon monoxide change which would indicate coal ignition in the pulverizer 12. Such a rate of change is typically taken to be a 50 ppm/minute rate of carbon monoxide change.
  • the output of the difference station 52 is transmitted along the line 56 to an AND gate 58 having a second input of a constant positive value provided along line 60.
  • the rate of carbon monoxide change normally stays below the 50 ppm/minute setpoint resulting in a negative output signal from the difference station 52.
  • the signal transmitted along line 56 turns positive, causing the AND gate 58 to start conducting a control signal along line 62 to the alarm 28 actuating the alarm 28 to indicate a potentially hazardous atmosphere in the pulverizer 12.
  • Automatic inerting of the pulverizer 12 is actuated by a difference station 64 which has a setpoint provided to it along line 66 having a net oxygen level significantly lower than the setpoint level provided to difference station 36.
  • the difference station 64 has a net oxygen setpoint of 9%.
  • the net oxygen level measured and transmitted to the difference station 64 will exceed the 9% setpoint and the error signal produced by the difference station 64 will be a positive level signal transmitted along line 68 to an AND gate 70.
  • the other input of the AND gate 70 is provided by a constant negative level signal transmitted to the AND gate 70 along line 72.
  • the inputs to the AND gate 70 will be positive and negative, providing no control signal from the output of the AND gate along line 74.
  • the output of the difference station 64 turns negative, providing two negative inputs to the AND gate 70 and resulting in a control signal along line 74 being transmitted to a switching circuit 76.
  • the switching circuit 76 is a normally open circuit, preventing the signal transmitted from a controller 78 from reaching the control valve 30.
  • the switching circuit 76 changes to a closed-circuit condition, turning over control of the valve 30 to the controller 78.
  • the controller 78 has an input signal indicative of the actual net oxygen level in the pulverizer 12 which is provided by a parallel line 80, paralleling the net oxygen signal in line 20.
  • the setpoint of the controller is provided along line 82 from some predetermined setpoint station and is typically set at a 12% level.
  • the controller 78 will open valve 30, causing an inerting atmosphere, such as carbon dioxide, to be delivered to the pulverizer 12 until a somewhat normal ambient is reached close to the setpoint level of 12%.
  • the reason for keeping the setpoint of the controller 78 at a somewhat lower than typically normal atmosphere is to minimize the shock to the pulverizer 2 due to the inerting process.
  • the switching circuit is then switched back to its normally open condition by a reset signal provided along line 84 from either a manual source or an automatic source which can be tied to some parameter indicative of the reestablishment of normal ambient conditions in the pulverizer 12.
  • the actuation of the automatic inserting means is also alternatively done upon the sensing of a predetermined absolute level of carbon monoxide in the pulverizer 12.
  • the carbon monoxide signal normally provided along line 22 is tapped by a line 86 to provide one input of a difference station 88.
  • the setpoint of the difference station 88 is provided along line 90 from a predetermined setpoint station typically set at an absolute carbon monoxide level of 200 ppm.
  • a positive error signal will be transmitted by the difference station 88 along line 92 to an AND gate 94.
  • the other input to AND gate 94 is provided by a line 96 connected to a constant negative level source.
  • opposite polarity signals are provided to the AND gate 94, preventing the establishment of any control signal along line 98 from the AND gate 94.
  • the error signal transmitted to the AND gate 94 turns negative, causing the conduction of the AND gate 94 and the establishment of a control signal along line 98 to the switching circuit 76.
  • this causes the switching circuit 76 to become conductive, turning control of the valve 30 over to the controller 78.
  • automatic inerting of the pulverizer 12 occurs until a reset signal is established along line 84, causing the switching circuit 76 to again become non-conductive and causing the valve 30 to switch its normally closed position.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Disintegrating Or Milling (AREA)
  • Crushing And Grinding (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)

Description

  • This invention, relates to safety systems for coal pulverizers.
  • Known pulverized-coal systems pulverize coal, deliver it to fuel-burning equipment, and accomplish complete combustion in the furnace with a minimum of excess air. The system operates as a continuous process and, within specified design limitations, the coal supply or feed can be varied as rapidly and as widely as required by the combustion process.
  • A small portion of the air required for combustion (15 to 20% in current installations) is used to transport the coal to the burner. This is known as primary air. In the direct-firing system, primary air is also used to dry the coal in the pulverizer. The remainder of the combustion air (80 to 85%) is introduced at the burner and is known as secondary air.
  • All coals, when exposed to air, undergo oxidation even at room temperature. This tendency varies with coal type: anthracite and semi- anthracite, for example, are little affected whereas many bituminous coals are particularly liable to absorb and combine with oxygen. The process of oxidation continues with increasing rapidity as the temperature rises. Heat is generated which, if allowed to accumulate, could result in thermal decomposition and ignition of the coal. Volatile components of the coal, such as methane and related compounds, are released during the decomposition. Accumulation of these gaseous materials may be ignited at fairly low temperatures and rapidly propagate fire or explosion.
  • Spontaneous combustion of coal is dependent on a sufficient supply of oxygen to maintain the reaction and on the surface area exposed. Coals with a high surface area, due to small particle size, as in pulverized coal fuel, are particularly liable to self heating. This problem is of special significance to the safe operation and performance of industrial coal pulverizers. Spontaneous combustion may result in deterioration in the quality of the coal, in damage to the power plant, and in certain cases, for example, where critical concentrations of coal dust are involved, may provide the ignition source for an explosion.
  • Present systems for fire detection in industrial coal pulverizers use either thermocouples to measure the rise in outlet temperature of the pulverizing mill or infrared gas analyzers to detect the buildup of CO produced in the mill.
  • Thermocouples or resistance temperature devices (RTD's) are normally part of the control system for mill operation. However, they are a relatively insensitive means for detecting pulverizer fires. At best, they warn of impending trouble only a few minutes before it actually occurs, and in some cases, do not even detect a significant temperature rise before a fire or explosion is evident. The ineffectiveness of thermocouples and RTD's in this application is due, in part, to the shielding used to protect them from the corrosive coal particles. Shields reduce heat conduction, slowing response time.
  • Actual CO measurements are also used for fire detection in coal pulverizers since the CO buildup is related directly to the oxidation rate of coal. Infrared gas analyzers are used to compare the CO content of the incoming and outgoing mill air and in effect, the amount of CO produced in the mill. Currently available infra-red gas analyzers require extensive filtering and dehydration of the gas sample extracted frommthe mill, to prevent interference by water vapor and particulate matter. Due to the high cost and maintenance requirements of infrared absorption analyzers, it is the usual practice to use one analyzer for several measurement points. Continuous measurement of each mill is not provided, thus, slowing response time. Nevertheless, this provides an improvement over the thermocouple and RTD method described. Additional problems occur, at some power plants, where appreciable concentrations of CO can be found in the air supply to the mill. Since in such plants CO in the boiler flue gases is transferred to the combustion air via the regenerative air heater, it thus becomes necessary to provide an analysis of the air entering the mill.
  • Thus, it is seen that an accurate and reliable safety system was required for coal pulverizers which would provide an early warning of impending safety problems in coal pulverizers.
  • According to the invention there is provided a safety system for a coal pulverizer, the safety system comprising:
    • means for measuring the actual net oxygen level in the coal pulverizer and establishing a first signal indicative thereof;
    • means for measuring the rate of change of carbon monoxide level in the coal pulverizer and establishing a second signal indicative thereof;
    • first comparing means for comparing the first signal established by the net oxygen measuring means with a first predetermined setpoint for establishing a first control signal whenever the first predetermined setpoint is exceeded;
    • second comparing means for comparing the second signal established by the rate of carbon monoxide change measuring means with a second predetermined setpoint for establishing a second control signal whenever the second predetermined setpoint is exceeded; and
    • alarm means responsive to either of the first and second control signals for indicating a potentially hazardous condition in the coal pulverizer.
    • The invention also provides a safety system for a coal pulverizer, the safety system comprising:
    • means for measuring the actual carbon monoxide level in the coal pulverizer and establishing a signal indicative thereof;
    • means for comparing the signal from the carbon monoxide level measuring means with a predetermined setpoint signal indicative of a hazardous carbon monoxide level in the coal pulverizer and establishing a first control signal therefrom;
  • inerting means responsive to the first control signal for inerting coal combustion in the coal pulverizer;
  • means for measuring the actual net oxygen level in the coal pulverizer and establishing a signal indicative thereof; and
  • means for comparing the signal from the net oxygen measuring means with a predetermined setpoint signal indicative of a potentially hazardous net oxygen level and establishing a second control signal for actuating an alarm indicative of the presence of the potentially hazardous net oxygen level.
  • A preferred embodiment of the invention described in detail hereinbelow overcomes or at least alleviates the above-stated problems of prior art safety systems and provides an improvement over the existing art. It is not dependent on the measurement of pulverizer or pulverizing mill outlet temperature, the removal of moisture and all particulate matter from the sample extracted from the mill or multi-point sampling. The preferred system incorporates the use of a standard single point oxygen and CO analyzer directly mounted to the coal pulverizing mill or pulverizer and providing a continuous percent by volume measurement of oxygen content and a continuous measurement of CO gas concentration of the mill atmosphere. The O2 portion of the analyzer uses a sensor operating at a temperature where any combustible volatile material will combine with 02 in the sample. The sensor will then respond to the free or uncombined O2 remaining. The resulting measurement, denoted net or residual 02, can be correlated with the amount of combustible volatiles within the mill. An additional significant indicator of a potentially hazardous condition is, thus, provided, augmenting the CO measurement. The combined measurement of CO and net O2 concentration in the mill atmosphere is used to indicate and alarm both the onset and progress of spontaneous combustion within the mill.
  • Thus, according to respective aspects of the present invention, the preferred system provides the following advantageous features. It provides an automated system capable of being integrated into a plant's pulverizer management and combustion control system designed to monitor the performance of and detect impending fires and explosions in industrial coal pulverizers and alarm such conditions. It provides an automated alarm system based on a net oxygen measurement in the coal pulverizer. It provides an automated alarm system based on a predetermined carbon monoxide rise per time. It provides an .automated inerting control of the coal pulverizer upon detection of either a predetermined net oxygen level or an absolute carbon monoxide level.
  • The invention will now be further described, by way of illustrative and non-limiting example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
    • Figure 1 is a schematic drawing of a safety control system embodying the present invention for a coal pulverizer; and
    • Figure 2 is a schematic drawing of monitoring and control logic of the Figure 1 safety control system.
  • The drawings depict a reliable, relatively low- cost automated safety system 8 capable of being integrated into a plant's computer control system designed to monitor the performance of and detect impending fires and explosions in electric- utility and industrial coal pulverizers by monitoring the level of carbon monoxide (CO) and net oxygen (02) concentration in a pulverized coal mill atmosphere. The combined measurement of CO and 02 concentration in the mill atmosphere is used to indicate the oxidation rate of the coal to preclude spontaneous combustion. Additionally, the measurement of net O2 concentration, when combined with other measurements, may provide the basis for overall mill performance calculations and the quality of the pulverized coal.
  • As shown in Figure 1, a CO/02 sample probe 10 is typically placed in a coal pulverizer 12 classifier outlet zone. A sample of gas is drawn through the probe 10 which has a porous high temperature filter 14. The filter 14 is required to maintain trouble-free operation by minimizing the amount of particulate matter drawn into the analyzer. A suitable filter 14 for this application is of a type described in U.S. Patent No. 4,286,472.
  • The air sample drawn from the coal pulverizer 12 is then analyzed for percent by volume of oxygen (02) content and CO gas concentration in ppm (parts per million) via a known oxygen and CO gas analyzer 16 designed to operate in a harsh power plant environment and having autocalibration capabilities. A suitable analyzer for this application is one manufactured by the Bailey Controls Company of Babcock and Wilcox and is known as the Type OL Oxygen and CO Analyzer. This analyzer 16 has a CO range of 0-1000 ppm and an 02 range of 0.1-25%. Electrical signals corresponding to carbon monoxide and oxygen concentrations are respectively transmitted to a monitoring system control 18 located in the central control room along lines 20 and 22. CO and 02 concentrations are displayed and/or recorded on a strip-chart recorder 24. During normal pulverizer 12 operation, net 02 levels represent typically 16% 02 and normal CO levels range between 40 and 80 ppm. If the net 02 concentration falls below a certain predetermined level, typically 15%, and/or the amount of CO produced exceeds a predetermined rise level considered cause for concern, typically a 50 ppm/minute sudden rise, the system 8 activates audible and visible alarms 26, 28 to alert the operator who in turn may manually take corrective action to inert the pulverizer 12 or permit the automatic monitoring system 8 to continue until it initiates an automatic inert to bring the pulverizer 12 operating parameters under control.
  • Referring now to Fig. 2, it will be seen that the monitoring and control logic assembly 18 utilizes both a net oxygen measurement provided by the analyzer 16 along line 20 as well as a carbon monoxide measurement provided along line 22 from analyzer 16, to, on the one hand, actuate alarms 26 and 28 at predetermined levels of net oxygen and predetermined rise times of carbon monoxide concentration. Also, when the net oxygen levels and the absolute carbon monoxide levels exceed certain critical limits, automatic inerting of the pulverizer 12 is accomplished by controllably opening a valve 30 which allows some inerting media such as carbon dioxide or steam to flow along a line 32 into the pulverizer 12.
  • Turning first to the alarm functions, it will be seen that the net oxygen measurement from line 20 is transmitted along a line 34 to a difference station 36 having a setpoint set at a predetermined net oxygen control point transmitted along line 38. The difference station 36 compares the actual net oxygen measurement provided by the analyzer 16 representing the net oxygen level in the pulverizer 12 and compares it with the setpoint oxygen level which, in the present situation, is set at 15%. The present setpoint of 15% is based on the assumption that the typical atmosphere in the pulverizer representative of normal conditions is approximately 16% and the initial alarm condition is derived to be a warning indicative of potential problem areas.
  • The difference station 36 thus compares the two signals and provides an error signal along line 40 which is one input of an AND gate 42. The other input of the AND gate 42 is provided by a constant negative signal from a predetermined source along line 44. Thus, as long as the net oxygen level provided to the difference station 36 along line 34 is greater than the 15% setpoint, a positive level error signal will be transmitted along line 40 to the AND gate 42 which then will fail to provide any control signal along line 46, failing to actuate the alarm 26. As soon as the net oxygen level falls below the 15% setpoint, the output along line 40 becomes negative and, in combination with the constant negative signal along line 44, will result in a conduction of the AND gate 42, causing a control signal to be transmitted along line 46 to the alarm 26 to thus actuate it and provide an indication of potential problems in the pulverizer 12 atmosphere.
  • Alternatively, the measured carbon monoxide signal transmitted along line 22 may also provide an actuation of the alternate alarm 28. The measured carbon monoxide signal is transmitted to a derivative action controller 48 which will be sensitive to any variations in the carbon monoxide level and will effectively provide an output signal along line 50 indicative of the slope or rate of change of the carbon monoxide level in the pulverizing mill 12. The output of the derivative action controller 48 is transmitted to a difference station 52 having a predetermined setpoint along line 54 indicative of a rate of carbon monoxide change which would indicate coal ignition in the pulverizer 12. Such a rate of change is typically taken to be a 50 ppm/minute rate of carbon monoxide change. The output of the difference station 52 is transmitted along the line 56 to an AND gate 58 having a second input of a constant positive value provided along line 60. In operation, the rate of carbon monoxide change normally stays below the 50 ppm/minute setpoint resulting in a negative output signal from the difference station 52. Whenever the actual rate of carbon monoxide change exceeds the setpoint of line 54, the signal transmitted along line 56 turns positive, causing the AND gate 58 to start conducting a control signal along line 62 to the alarm 28 actuating the alarm 28 to indicate a potentially hazardous atmosphere in the pulverizer 12.
  • These individual alarms, when actuated, warn the operator of potentially hazardous conditions in the pulverizer. This should indicate to the operator that close monitoring of the pulverizer is required and typically one alarm will be actuated, possibly followed by the second alarm. Since the inerting of a pulverizer may shock the pulverizer, such inerting is left to the discretion of the operator and his supervisor. However, there are certain conditions beyond which inerting of the pulverizer 12 is mandatory and should be automatically initiated. To provide for such automatic inerting, the control system 8, again, utilizes both the net oxygen measurements and the carbon monoxide measurements provided by lines 20 and 22, respectively.
  • Automatic inerting of the pulverizer 12 is actuated by a difference station 64 which has a setpoint provided to it along line 66 having a net oxygen level significantly lower than the setpoint level provided to difference station 36. Typically, the difference station 64 has a net oxygen setpoint of 9%. Thus, during normal pulverizer 12 operation, the net oxygen level measured and transmitted to the difference station 64 will exceed the 9% setpoint and the error signal produced by the difference station 64 will be a positive level signal transmitted along line 68 to an AND gate 70. The other input of the AND gate 70 is provided by a constant negative level signal transmitted to the AND gate 70 along line 72. Thus, during normal operation, the inputs to the AND gate 70 will be positive and negative, providing no control signal from the output of the AND gate along line 74. Whenever the oxygen level of the pulverizer 12 falls below the 9% setpoint level, the output of the difference station 64 turns negative, providing two negative inputs to the AND gate 70 and resulting in a control signal along line 74 being transmitted to a switching circuit 76. The switching circuit 76 is a normally open circuit, preventing the signal transmitted from a controller 78 from reaching the control valve 30. When the control signal from line 74 is present, the switching circuit 76 changes to a closed-circuit condition, turning over control of the valve 30 to the controller 78.
  • The controller 78 has an input signal indicative of the actual net oxygen level in the pulverizer 12 which is provided by a parallel line 80, paralleling the net oxygen signal in line 20. The setpoint of the controller is provided along line 82 from some predetermined setpoint station and is typically set at a 12% level. Thus, when the switching circuit 76 is actuated by a control signal from the AND gate 70, the controller 78 will open valve 30, causing an inerting atmosphere, such as carbon dioxide, to be delivered to the pulverizer 12 until a somewhat normal ambient is reached close to the setpoint level of 12%. The reason for keeping the setpoint of the controller 78 at a somewhat lower than typically normal atmosphere is to minimize the shock to the pulverizer 2 due to the inerting process. The switching circuit is then switched back to its normally open condition by a reset signal provided along line 84 from either a manual source or an automatic source which can be tied to some parameter indicative of the reestablishment of normal ambient conditions in the pulverizer 12.
  • The actuation of the automatic inserting means is also alternatively done upon the sensing of a predetermined absolute level of carbon monoxide in the pulverizer 12. The carbon monoxide signal normally provided along line 22 is tapped by a line 86 to provide one input of a difference station 88. The setpoint of the difference station 88 is provided along line 90 from a predetermined setpoint station typically set at an absolute carbon monoxide level of 200 ppm. Thus, as long as the carbon monoxide level stays below a 200 ppm value indicative of normal operation, a positive error signal will be transmitted by the difference station 88 along line 92 to an AND gate 94. The other input to AND gate 94 is provided by a line 96 connected to a constant negative level source. Thus, during normal pulverizer 12 operation, opposite polarity signals are provided to the AND gate 94, preventing the establishment of any control signal along line 98 from the AND gate 94. Whenever the absolute carbon monoxide level exceeds the predetermined setpoint of 200 ppm, the error signal transmitted to the AND gate 94 turns negative, causing the conduction of the AND gate 94 and the establishment of a control signal along line 98 to the switching circuit 76. As was described earlier, with reference to the net oxygen level control, this causes the switching circuit 76 to become conductive, turning control of the valve 30 over to the controller 78. Again, automatic inerting of the pulverizer 12 occurs until a reset signal is established along line 84, causing the switching circuit 76 to again become non-conductive and causing the valve 30 to switch its normally closed position.

Claims (6)

1. A safety system for a coal pulverizer (12), the safety system (8) comprising:
means (10, 16) for measuring the actual net oxygen level in the coal pulverizer (12) and establishing a first signal (20) indicative thereof;
means (10, 16, 48) for measuring the rate of change of carbon monoxide level in the coal pulverizer (12) and establishing a second signal (50) indicative thereof;
first comparing means (36) for comparing the first signal (20) established by the net oxygen measuring means (10, 16) with a first predetermined setpoint (38) for establishing a first control signal (46) whenever the first predetermined setpoint is exceeded;
second comparing means (52) for comparing the second signal (50) established by the rate of carbon monoxide change measuring means (10, 16, 48) with a second predetermined setpoint (54) for establishing a second control signal (62) whenever the second predetermined setpoint is exceeded; and
alarm means (26, 28) responsive to either of the first and second control signals (46, 62) for indicating a potentially hazardous condition in the coal pulverizer (12).
2. A safety system according to claim 1, including:
third comparing means (64) for comparing the signal (20) indicative of the actually measured net oxygen level in the coal pulverizer (12) with a setpoint (66) indicative of a hazardous condition in the coal pulverizer and establishing an inerting signal (74) whenever the actual net oxygen level in the coal pulverizer exceeds this setpoint (66); and
automatic inerting means (76, 78, 30) responsive to the inerting signal (74) for providing an inerting atmosphere to the coal pulverizer (12).
3. A safety system for a coal pulverizer (12), the safety system (8) comprising:
means (10, 16) for measuring the actual carbon monoxide level in the coal pulverizer (12) and establishing a signal (22) indicative thereof;
means (88) for comparing the signal (22) from the carbon monoxide level measuring means (10, 16) with a predetermined setpoint signal (90) indicative of a hazardous carbon monoxide level in tha coal pulverizer (12) and establishing a first control signal (98) therefrom;
inerting means (30, 76) responsive to the first control signal (98) for inerting coal combustion in the coal pulverizer (12);
means (10, 16) for measuring the actual net oxygen level in the coal pulverizer (12) and establishing a signal (20) indicative thereof; and
means (36) for comparing the signal (20) from the net oxygen measuring means (10, 16) with a predetermined setpoint signal (38) indicative of a potentially hazardous net oxygen level and establishing a second control signal (46) for actuating an alarm (26) indicative of the presence of the potentially hazardous net oxygen level.
4. A safety system according to claim 3, including:
means (64) for comparing the signal (20) from the net oxygen measuring means (10, 16) with a second predetermined oxygen level setpoint signal (66) lower than the first-mentioned predetermined oxygen level setpoint signal (38) and establishing a third control signal (74) therefrom for actuating the inerting means.
5. A safety system according to claim 2, claim 3, or claim 4, wherein the inerting means includes:
a source of inerting atmosphere for inerting the coal pulverizer (12);
valve means (30) for controlling the source of inerting atmosphere; and
controller means (78) responsive to the signal (20) from the means (10, 16) for measuring the net oxygen level in the coal pulverizer (12) for controlling the valve means (30).
6. A safety system according to claim 5 as dependent on claim 3 or claim 4, including switching means (76) mounted between the controller means (78) and the valve means (30) and responsive either to the first control signal (98) from the comparing means (88) comparing the absolute carbon monoxide level in the coal pulverizer (12) with the predetermined setpoint signal (90) or the third control signal (74) from the comparing means (64) comparing the net oxygen level in the coal pulverizer (12) with the second predetermined oxygen level setpoint signal (66) for allowing control of the valve means (30) by the controller means (78).
EP84304640A 1983-08-01 1984-07-06 Safety systems for coal pulverizers Expired EP0132974B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US51935283A 1983-08-01 1983-08-01
US519352 1983-08-01

Publications (4)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0132974A2 EP0132974A2 (en) 1985-02-13
EP0132974A3 EP0132974A3 (en) 1985-11-21
EP0132974B1 true EP0132974B1 (en) 1989-03-01
EP0132974B2 EP0132974B2 (en) 1992-09-02

Family

ID=24067930

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP84304640A Expired EP0132974B2 (en) 1983-08-01 1984-07-06 Safety systems for coal pulverizers

Country Status (12)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0132974B2 (en)
JP (1) JPS60143844A (en)
KR (1) KR900002655B1 (en)
AU (1) AU3131384A (en)
BR (1) BR8403542A (en)
CA (1) CA1229327A (en)
DE (1) DE3476851D1 (en)
ES (1) ES8504487A1 (en)
HK (1) HK96689A (en)
IN (1) IN162793B (en)
MX (1) MX160409A (en)
SG (1) SG63889G (en)

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4846410A (en) * 1986-04-26 1989-07-11 The Babcock & Wilcox Company Apparatus for monitoring low-level combustibles
IN166429B (en) * 1986-04-29 1990-05-05 Babcock & Wilcox Co
US4778113A (en) * 1986-04-29 1988-10-18 The Babcock & Wilcox Company Apparatus for monitoring low level combustibles
US4754932A (en) * 1987-03-18 1988-07-05 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Coal pulverizer inerting and fire extinguishing system
JP4551101B2 (en) * 2004-02-27 2010-09-22 三菱重工業株式会社 MILUINATO OXYGEN CONCENTRATION MEASURING DEVICE, MILLINATE OXYGEN SUPPLY DEVICE, AND MILLINATE OXYGEN CONCENTRATION METHOD
LU91451B1 (en) * 2008-06-02 2009-12-03 Wurth Paul Sa Method for producing pulverized coal
KR101118323B1 (en) * 2011-11-10 2012-03-09 도원기술 주식회사 Coal combustion early warning system
JP5949414B2 (en) * 2012-10-05 2016-07-06 新日鐵住金株式会社 Grinding plant exhaust gas control device, grinding plant exhaust gas control method, and computer program
JP6011933B2 (en) * 2012-11-26 2016-10-25 株式会社日向製錬所 Coal dust ignition prevention system and coal dust ignition prevention method for pulverized coal mill system
CN109696524B (en) * 2019-01-15 2023-11-24 华电电力科学研究院有限公司 Coal mill outlet O for explosion prevention 2 Online monitoring device and use method
CN111495565A (en) * 2020-04-27 2020-08-07 安徽工业大学 Coal mill explosion-proof detection system and method for coal-fired boiler of generator set
CN112371317A (en) * 2020-10-22 2021-02-19 徐州赛森电子自动化技术有限公司 Spontaneous combustion protection device of coal mill
CN113310778B (en) * 2021-05-06 2022-05-17 安徽汽车职业技术学院 Dynamic CO detection device for coal powder preparation
CN116060200B (en) * 2023-03-06 2023-06-23 北京博数智源人工智能科技有限公司 Deflagration early warning method and system for coal mill of thermal power station
CN116060201B (en) * 2023-03-08 2023-06-23 北京博数智源人工智能科技有限公司 Deflagration monitoring abnormality positioning and identifying method and system for coal mill of thermal power station

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3237634A (en) * 1966-03-01 Process control system
US2799848A (en) * 1953-12-17 1957-07-16 Glantz Lester Murray Two-level control system
GB977385A (en) * 1960-05-23 1964-12-09 Elliott Brothers London Ltd Improvements in or relating to electrical warning systems
US3419772A (en) * 1964-09-25 1968-12-31 Leeds & Northrup Co Probabilistic and deterministic filter for control systems
US3740739A (en) * 1971-11-30 1973-06-19 Dresser Ind Well monitoring and warning system
JPS5280215A (en) * 1975-12-27 1977-07-05 Nippon Steel Corp Preparation of annealed carbon steel wire
JPS575851U (en) * 1980-06-09 1982-01-12
JPS5820247A (en) * 1981-07-30 1983-02-05 バブコツク日立株式会社 Detection of ignition in mill
JPS5929052A (en) * 1982-08-09 1984-02-16 バブコツク日立株式会社 Crusher apparatus for preventing ignition of pyrite box
GB2127605B (en) * 1982-09-07 1986-09-24 Vickers Shipbuilding & Eng Portable hazard warning apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES534210A0 (en) 1985-05-16
KR850001561A (en) 1985-03-30
AU3131384A (en) 1985-02-07
IN162793B (en) 1988-07-09
HK96689A (en) 1989-12-15
JPS60143844A (en) 1985-07-30
EP0132974A3 (en) 1985-11-21
EP0132974B2 (en) 1992-09-02
SG63889G (en) 1990-01-26
JPH0128613B2 (en) 1989-06-05
MX160409A (en) 1990-02-19
DE3476851D1 (en) 1989-04-06
KR900002655B1 (en) 1990-04-21
BR8403542A (en) 1985-06-25
ES8504487A1 (en) 1985-05-16
CA1229327A (en) 1987-11-17
EP0132974A2 (en) 1985-02-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0132974B1 (en) Safety systems for coal pulverizers
US4653698A (en) Safety system for coal pulverizers
AU2016322778B2 (en) System and method for detecting smoldering in processes with continuous air flow
EP0244074B1 (en) Safety systems for coal pulverizing mills
EP0305446B1 (en) Coal pulverizer inerting and fire extinguishing system
US4846410A (en) Apparatus for monitoring low-level combustibles
JP5543591B2 (en) Method of operating a process combustion analyzer, safety system, and process gas transmitter
US20060170542A1 (en) Safety shut-off system
US4778113A (en) Apparatus for monitoring low level combustibles
US3867640A (en) Dust sampling system
JPS6149569B2 (en)
US6218951B1 (en) Safety circuit
CN111495565A (en) Coal mill explosion-proof detection system and method for coal-fired boiler of generator set
US3557725A (en) Furnace emission control system
US4099165A (en) Fire detection apparatus in a preheater
EP0314133B1 (en) Oil cooled fluid compression apparatus
NL9000789A (en) PROTECTION CIRCUIT FOR A HEATING DEVICE.
JP3376530B2 (en) Dust condition monitoring device in electric dust collector hopper
EP0405014B1 (en) Safety device for boilers
JPS5823300B2 (en) Safety devices in flammable powder transportation equipment
Toro et al. Controls for burning solid wastes
JPH0333003Y2 (en)
JPH0226188B2 (en)
JPH0238857B2 (en)
JP2022173153A (en) Method of monitoring operation of gas burner system, and gas burner system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19860509

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19871014

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: ST. ASSOC. MARIETTI & PIPPARELLI

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3476851

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19890406

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: KLOECKNER-HUMBOLDT-DEUTZ AG, KOELN C/O KHD HUMBOLD

Effective date: 19891125

ITTA It: last paid annual fee
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: ST. ASSOC. MARIETTI & PIPPARELLI

PUAH Patent maintained in amended form

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED

27A Patent maintained in amended form

Effective date: 19920902

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

ET3 Fr: translation filed ** decision concerning opposition
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19960617

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19960618

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19960626

Year of fee payment: 13

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19970706

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19970706

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST