EP0102951B1 - Glarefoil assembly - Google Patents

Glarefoil assembly Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0102951B1
EP0102951B1 EP82901333A EP82901333A EP0102951B1 EP 0102951 B1 EP0102951 B1 EP 0102951B1 EP 82901333 A EP82901333 A EP 82901333A EP 82901333 A EP82901333 A EP 82901333A EP 0102951 B1 EP0102951 B1 EP 0102951B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
glare
base runner
runner section
blades
glarefoil
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP82901333A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0102951A4 (en
EP0102951A1 (en
Inventor
Donald W. Schmanski
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to AT82901333T priority Critical patent/ATE32928T1/en
Publication of EP0102951A1 publication Critical patent/EP0102951A1/en
Publication of EP0102951A4 publication Critical patent/EP0102951A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0102951B1 publication Critical patent/EP0102951B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E01CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
    • E01FADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
    • E01F7/00Devices affording protection against snow, sand drifts, side-wind effects, snowslides, avalanches or falling rocks; Anti-dazzle arrangements ; Sight-screens for roads, e.g. to mask accident site
    • E01F7/06Anti-dazzle arrangements ; Securing anti-dazzle means to crash-barriers

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a glarefoil assembly according to the preamble of claim 1.
  • a glarefoil assembly is known from DE-A-2 320 795.
  • Another attempt to solve the glare problem consists of an aluminum screen mounted to steel posts along the top of the media barrier.
  • the screen is effective in eliminating headlight glare, but maintenance difficulties make this method impractical.
  • the screens would often come loose and sag when buffeted by the wind and air currents created by passing automobiles. Projecting objects from cars and trucks would often catch the screen and tear large holes or otherwise damage the screen.
  • Such screens were also subject to mischief in the form of thrown objects such as pop bottles or rocks which develop large holes in the screen, necessitating further maintenance. Often in repairing even small holes in the screen, large whole sections of screen had to be replaced, thus adding to labor and material costs.
  • the screens also created a barrier for police, ambulance and other emergency vehicles and personnel that need quick access across the highway in times of accident or emergency. Often, large holes must be cut in the screen to enable quick response. This not only causes critical delays in treating accident victims and in responding to emergencies, but also necessitates additional cost in later reparations of the screen.
  • the aforementioned DE-A-2 320 795 describes a glarefoil assembly eliminating the problems caused by the screens and comprising glarefoils which are individually mounted on the top of the median barrier.
  • These glarefoils sometimes referred to as paddles, are typically elliptical in shape extending up to 122 cm (4 feet) above the median barrier and are commonly made of polyethylene or other thermoplastic material.
  • These glarefoils preserved cross access over the divider and solved some of the maintenance problems associated with the screens. Also, the flexibility of these glarefoils allows them to yield upon impact by protruding or thrown objects and then recover their original shape and position.
  • each glarefoil is individually mounted to the median barrier by several bolts.
  • the installation or removal of each glarefoil is timely and therefore costly.
  • the thermoplastic glarefoils become brittle when exposed to extreme temperatures and ultraviolet radiation from the sun.
  • these glarefoils often break off at the bolt mountings when constantly buffeted by the wind or the everyday air currents from passing cars. Therefore, although the individual glarefoil system helped solve part of the problem of absorbing energy from an occasional random impact they failed to deal with the problem of absorbing the everyday vibrational energy caused by wind and passing cars.
  • effective glarefoil assembly must be capable of absorbing and dissipating substantial amounts of vibrational energy which result from the constant everyday buffetings of the wind, as well as impact from vehicles and other objects.
  • the problem to be solved by the invention is to provide a glarefoil assembly according to the preamble of claim 1 which is capable of absorbing and dissipating substantial amounts of vibrational energy resulting from the constant everyday buffetings of the wind, as well as impact from vehicles and other objects.
  • the glarefoil assembly of the present invention includes a plurality of glare blades and means for mounting them to the top face of a base runner section to form an integral, modular structure.
  • the bottom face of the base runner section is attached to the top of a median barrier.
  • Succeeding base runner sections may be mounted end to end in series to form a continuous glarefoil array along any distance desired. Since the base runner may be installed in sections with several glare blades mounted to each section, installation and removal is much more expeditious and inexpensive than an individual glarefoil system which requires individual mounting.
  • the base runner also functions to receive vibrational energy which is absorbed by the glare blades. This is facilitated by constructing the base runner and glare blades of flexible materials having mutually compatible elastic moduli, and by firmly securing the glare blades to the base runner. When the glare blades are buffeted by the wind, some of the resultant vibrational energy is transferred to the base runner which then also vibrates. This vibrational energy is transferred into the base runner in the form of wave motions or vibrations which are superimposed on other vibrations within the base runner from other glare blades, as well as rebound energy from the mounted ends of the base runner.
  • the effect of superimposition of nonharmonic vibrations within the base runner results in a cancellation of part of the vibration energy as opposing waves traverse the base runner.
  • This dissipation of vibrational energy relieves the glarefoil assembly of a portion of the vibrations within the glarefoil which would otherwise tend to concentrate at local points of stress where the glare blades are attached to the base runner, thus greatly reducing the risk of failure.
  • the glare blades are rigid enough to stand upright with respect to the base runner, but are also flexible enough to yield to the impact of an object and then restore themselves to their original positions.
  • the present invention is capable of absorbing and dissipating both impact energy and everyday vibrational energy, and as a result has a longer life expectancy.
  • An integral part of the present invention includes the discovery that in a typical highway environment of passing high speed traffic, pulsating air currents develop which set the glarefoils into a state of mild vibration which may often be barely noticeable. Over extended periods of time, however, this seemingly trivial energy is concentrated at an immovable bolt location where the glarefoil is attached to the concrete median. Because of the extreme high modulus of the concrete and steel mounting bolt, the vibrational energy remains in the glarefoil until dissipated.
  • the plastic of the glarefoil In contrast to the steel bolt and concrete of the median, the plastic of the glarefoil is flexible. At the point of attachment, therefore, there is an extreme mismatch in modulus of elasticity which eventually leads to material failure around the bolt attachment location.
  • the present invention provides for partial translation of this vibrational energy out of the glarefoil and into an elongated base member to thereby reduce the degree of vibrational movement at mounting bolt locations. Furthermore, the effects of the transferred vibrational energy are reduced by the fact that this energy is propagated into the base member in the form of waves which superimpose over waves from other light blocking members and thereby cause a partial cancellation or "interference" of superimposed waves.
  • the attachment of a plurality of light obstructing members to a single base member permits the obstructing members to cooperatively reduce the actual vibrational energy developed in the base member, as compared to vibrational energy which would require dissipation if each obstructing member were attached to an independent and separate base member alone.
  • a synergistic effect arises wherein the benefit exceeds the sum of the individual contributions made by the inventive structure. Mathematically, this could be illustrated in a glarefoil assembly with four blades attached to a single base member in the following manner.
  • This interference pattern is specifically facilitated by matching the compliance of the base member with that of the glare blades. This tends to reduce reflectional vibrations such as experienced by the conventional plastic glare blade as it vibrates against a rigid concrete median barrer.
  • FIG. 12 An embodiment of this glarefoil assembly is generally designated 12 in Figures 1 and 2.
  • Elongated light obstructing members 16 (also referred to herein as glare blades) are mounted to an elongated base runner section generally designated 13 at the top face 14a thereof, with angular support plates 26 providing the means for rigid attachment thereto.
  • the bottom face 14b of base runner 13 is attached to a median barrier 10 along a divided highway represented by traffic lanes 30 and 32.
  • Angular support plates 26 operate as rigid attachment means between the glare blades 16 and base runner 13. Although the figures illustrate the use of pop rivets 27 and 28, it will be noted that angular support plates 26 could be directly epoxied to glare blades 16 and base runner 13. Also, it will also be apparent that where minimal impact or vibrational energy is expected, glare blades 16 could be directly epoxied to top face 14a of base runner 13 without the need for angular support plates 26. Typically, angular support plates 26 are made of aluminum and add strength to the assembly as well as facilitate the transfer of vibrational energy as will be explained later. Other rigid metals or plastics could be used, provided they meet the strength requirement and facilitate the referenced energy transfer to the base runner section.
  • Strengthening ribs 18 located at the edges of glare blades 16 provide rigidity and form an I-Beam configuration with the web section 42 of the glare blades 16 (see Figure 3). As best shown in Figures 1, 2 and 4, the ends of strengthening ribs 18 interlock with slots 34 in securing ribs 20a located at the edges of base runner 13. Securing ribs 20a extend upward from top face 14a and provide extra contact of glare blades 16 with base runner 13 in better securing glare blades 16 thereto. Securing ribs 20a also provide a more efficient energy path for the transfer of vibrational energy from glare blades 16 to base runner 13, as will be explained later.
  • reinforcement ribs 20b which are also located at the edges of base runner 13 and extend downward from bottom face 14b.
  • a spacing means such as rib 24 located in the center of bottom face 14b cooperates with reinforcement ribs 20b to displace the bottom face 14b from the median barrier 10 and thereby accommodate the heads 29 of pop rivets 28 in the space therebetween, while at the same time providing a rigid mounting site.
  • an object such as a washer may also be used as the spacing means 24 to enable rigid attachment of the base runner 13 against median barrier 10 and provides a space to accommodate pop rivet heads 29.
  • Base runner section 13 is of sufficient length to permit a substantial receipt of vibrational energy from attached glare blades 16. As the wind and air currents from passing automobiles cause the glare blades 16 to vibrate, part of the vibrational energy is transferred through the rigid attachment means into the base runner, where it is dissipated. This is opposed to the prior art structure in which energy transfer was minimal due to the comparatively high modulus (E) of the median barrier to which the glare blades were directly mounted.
  • E modulus
  • the present invention provides for dissipation of vibrational energy . throughout the glarefoil structure, and particularly into the base runner.
  • the transfer of vibrational energy from glare blades 16 to base runner 13 is facilitated by making the glare blades, the base runner section and the angular support plate 26 or other attachment means of materials whose physical characteristics enhance their capability to transfer vibrational energy.
  • Elastic modulus and moment of inertia are two such physical characteristics which can be exploited to more easily effect such a transfer.
  • reflection of vibrational energy back into the glare blade is reduced. Instead, the vibrational energy is carried directly into the base runner in accordance with well known wave propagation theory.
  • the second element of moment of inertia its use in the present structure is primarily for the purpose of developing rigidity to improve the support and resilience of the glare blade and base member portions of the glarefoil assembly.
  • This more rigid structure tends to enhance the propagation of vibrational waves in the same manner that a taut string or rubber band has better wave transmittal characteristics than a loose string.
  • the use of ribs and other reinforcing structure which increase moment of inertia operate to improve resilience and transmittance of vibrational energy.
  • the glare blades 16 and base runner 13 are made of fiberglass or fiber reinforced plastic.
  • the elastic modulus of fiberglass composite (about 6.89 ⁇ 41.34 ⁇ 10 9 N/m 2 or approx. 1-6x10 6 psi) is well adapted for such a glarefoil assembly because it has inherent rigidity and weatherability to remain functional, yet it can be structured to withstand random impacts from passing vehicles or objects without incurring immediate need for maintenance.
  • Such fiberglass composite material can also be pultruded or otherwise formed into various geometric. cross-sections to maximize opposing characteristics of flexibility and rigidity at minimal cost. See for example, US-A-4,092,081.
  • moment of inertia can also be used to effect a better transfer of vibrational energy within glarefoil assembly 12.
  • the moment of inertia of an object is determined largely by its geometric configuration.
  • the rectangular cross-section of the base runner illustrated in Figure 5a typically will have only one primary mode of vibration in a glarefoil assembly of the present invention. This is indicated by arrows 3 and 3', respectively as an up and down direction.
  • FIG. 5b shows such a configuration, that of an I-Beam or modified Tri-Beam.
  • the I-Beam configurated base runner 13 of Figure 5b have a vertical mode of vibration as indicated by arrows 4 and 4', but it also develops a rotational mode of vibration indicated by arrows 5 and 5'.
  • This configuration is achieved by having a thin web section 40, in conjunction with securing ribs 20a and reinforcement ribs 20b.
  • the web section 40 has a low moment of inertia which improves flexibility.
  • the strengthening ribs 18 of glare blades 16 also employ this concep. Strenghtening ribs 18 form an I-Beam configuration with thin web section 42, as best seen in Figure 3.
  • the additional vibrational modes created by joining strengthening ribs 18 to web section 42 enhances translation of multiple modes of energy transfer to the base runner section. This method of energy transfer also avoids excessive concentration of stress at local sites and therefore reduces the rate of wear toward failure.
  • securing ribs 20a which provide- improved rigid contact between the glare blades 16 and the base runner 13. Not only does the extra contact provide enhanced stability to the upright member, but it also provides more effective contact area between the ribbed portions of the respective glare blades 16 and base runner 13. This integral contact between the more rigid rib portions tend to make the subject glarefoil assembly respond to energy vibration as a single, integral unit.
  • angular support plates 26 In providing additional contact and support with glare blades 16 and base runner 13, angular support plates 26 also provide an additional energy path for dissipating vibrational energy from the glare blade 16 to the base runner 13.
  • glarefoil assembly 12 to median barrier 10 can be accomplished in many different ways.
  • One simple method is to drill holes in the concrete median barrier and insert an iron stud 36. Holes 22 in corresponding position to the studs 36 are drilled in the base runner 13. The studs 36 are then inserted into holes 22 and the assembly 12 is then firmly secured to median barrier 10 by means of washers and steel nuts 38.
  • a possible alternative method of installation would be to epoxy the ends of the base runner 13 or ribs 20b and 24 directly to the median barrier 10.
  • each glare blade may vary, depending on the width of the blade and the relative angle of implacement with respect to the longitudinal axis of the base runner. It should be apparent that wider glare blades will enable greater spacial separation. Furthermore, the maximum spacial displacement between adjacent glare blades will be a function of blade orientation, since the blades must effectively block out all opposing headlight glare during close visual proximity between passing cars.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Bridges Or Land Bridges (AREA)
  • Non-Portable Lighting Devices Or Systems Thereof (AREA)
  • Liquid Crystal (AREA)
  • Polarising Elements (AREA)

Abstract

A glarefoil assembly (12) for mounting to a median barrier (10) which divides opposing lanes of a highway system and operates to reduce the glare of headlights from oncoming vehicles. The glarefoil assembly includes a plurality of glare blades (16) which are rigidly attached (26) to a base section (13) in an appropriate light-blocking orientation. The base section is rigidly mounted (36) to the top of the median barrier at opposing ends, thereby preserving some latitude for vibrational movement within this base section. By virtue of the rigid attachment (26) between the glare blades and base section, along with the compatible elastic moduli of these materials, the glarefoil assembly operates as an integral unit providing energy transfer from the glare blades into the base section. Such energy transfer and resultant dissipation prevents material failure developed by pulsating winds which typically arise from passing traffic.

Description

  • The present invention relates to a glarefoil assembly according to the preamble of claim 1. Such a glarefoil assembly is known from DE-A-2 320 795.
  • The problem of blinding headlight glare along divided highways has resulted in many attempts to reduce this driving hazard. Plants and shrubs have been planted along the top of the median barrier separating the divided lanes to block out the glare from oncoming traffic. This method proved unsatisfactory due to the time-consuming care and attention needed to keep the plants alive and trimmed, as well as the often long waiting periods accompanying the initial growth of the plants. Furthermore, exposure of crew personnel to the high speed traffic of freeway systems creates a severe safety risk while trimming and maintaining foliage.
  • Another attempt to solve the glare problem consists of an aluminum screen mounted to steel posts along the top of the media barrier. The screen is effective in eliminating headlight glare, but maintenance difficulties make this method impractical. The screens would often come loose and sag when buffeted by the wind and air currents created by passing automobiles. Projecting objects from cars and trucks would often catch the screen and tear large holes or otherwise damage the screen. Such screens were also subject to mischief in the form of thrown objects such as pop bottles or rocks which develop large holes in the screen, necessitating further maintenance. Often in repairing even small holes in the screen, large whole sections of screen had to be replaced, thus adding to labor and material costs.
  • The screens also created a barrier for police, ambulance and other emergency vehicles and personnel that need quick access across the highway in times of accident or emergency. Often, large holes must be cut in the screen to enable quick response. This not only causes critical delays in treating accident victims and in responding to emergencies, but also necessitates additional cost in later reparations of the screen.
  • The aforementioned DE-A-2 320 795 describes a glarefoil assembly eliminating the problems caused by the screens and comprising glarefoils which are individually mounted on the top of the median barrier. These glarefoils, sometimes referred to as paddles, are typically elliptical in shape extending up to 122 cm (4 feet) above the median barrier and are commonly made of polyethylene or other thermoplastic material. These glarefoils preserved cross access over the divider and solved some of the maintenance problems associated with the screens. Also, the flexibility of these glarefoils allows them to yield upon impact by protruding or thrown objects and then recover their original shape and position.
  • Many disadvantages, however, soon became apparent with the individual glarefoil system. Typically, each glarefoil is individually mounted to the median barrier by several bolts. Thus, the installation or removal of each glarefoil is timely and therefore costly. Also, the thermoplastic glarefoils become brittle when exposed to extreme temperatures and ultraviolet radiation from the sun. Furthermore, it has been noted that these glarefoils often break off at the bolt mountings when constantly buffeted by the wind or the everyday air currents from passing cars. Therefore, although the individual glarefoil system helped solve part of the problem of absorbing energy from an occasional random impact they failed to deal with the problem of absorbing the everyday vibrational energy caused by wind and passing cars.
  • A more detailed description of the prior art has been cataloged and summarized in a publication of the Transportation Research Board of the National Research Counsel in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, entitled "Glare Screen Guidelines." This report is dated December 1979 and is available from the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. In addition to outlining the various types of glare screen devices, the report lists a number of desirable functional which an effective glare screen should provide. These include:
    • 1. Effectively reduce glare
    • 2. Involve simple installation procedures
    • 3. Be resistant to vandalism and vehicle damage
    • 4. Be adpated for quick and safe repair
    • 5. Require minimal cleaning and painting
    • 6. Incur minimal accumulation of litter and snow
    • 7. Be resistant to winds
    • 8. Provide reasonable cost for purchase and maintenance
    • 9. Include good appearance and provide emergency access to opposing lanes.
  • In addition to the foregoing needs, it should be noted that effective glarefoil assembly must be capable of absorbing and dissipating substantial amounts of vibrational energy which result from the constant everyday buffetings of the wind, as well as impact from vehicles and other objects.
  • The problem to be solved by the invention is to provide a glarefoil assembly according to the preamble of claim 1 which is capable of absorbing and dissipating substantial amounts of vibrational energy resulting from the constant everyday buffetings of the wind, as well as impact from vehicles and other objects.
  • This problem is solved in accordance with the invention by the features comprised by the characterising portion of claim 1.
  • The glarefoil assembly of the present invention includes a plurality of glare blades and means for mounting them to the top face of a base runner section to form an integral, modular structure. The bottom face of the base runner section is attached to the top of a median barrier. Succeeding base runner sections may be mounted end to end in series to form a continuous glarefoil array along any distance desired. Since the base runner may be installed in sections with several glare blades mounted to each section, installation and removal is much more expeditious and inexpensive than an individual glarefoil system which requires individual mounting.
  • The base runner also functions to receive vibrational energy which is absorbed by the glare blades. This is facilitated by constructing the base runner and glare blades of flexible materials having mutually compatible elastic moduli, and by firmly securing the glare blades to the base runner. When the glare blades are buffeted by the wind, some of the resultant vibrational energy is transferred to the base runner which then also vibrates. This vibrational energy is transferred into the base runner in the form of wave motions or vibrations which are superimposed on other vibrations within the base runner from other glare blades, as well as rebound energy from the mounted ends of the base runner. The effect of superimposition of nonharmonic vibrations within the base runner results in a cancellation of part of the vibration energy as opposing waves traverse the base runner. This dissipation of vibrational energy relieves the glarefoil assembly of a portion of the vibrations within the glarefoil which would otherwise tend to concentrate at local points of stress where the glare blades are attached to the base runner, thus greatly reducing the risk of failure. The glare blades are rigid enough to stand upright with respect to the base runner, but are also flexible enough to yield to the impact of an object and then restore themselves to their original positions. Thus, the present invention is capable of absorbing and dissipating both impact energy and everyday vibrational energy, and as a result has a longer life expectancy.
  • Advantageous embodiments of the invention are claimed by the subclaims.
  • One way of carrying out the invention is described in detail below with reference to drawings which illustrate one specific embodiment, in which:
    • Figure 1 is a perspective view of the glarefoil assembly of the present invention, shown mounted to a median barrier.
    • Figure 2 is an end perspective view of the glarefoil assembly shown in position along a divided highway.
    • Figure 3 is a top plan view of the glarefoil assembly.
    • Figure 4 is a bottom perspective view of the glarefoil assembly.
    • Figure 5a is a cross-sectional view of a rectangular base runner of the glarefoil assembly with a segment of an upright light obstructing member and fastener shown in phantom lines.
    • Figure 5b is a cross-sectional view of the base runner of the glarefoil assembly of Figure 4 taken along line 2-2, showing the Tri-Beam configuration of the base runner.
    • Figure 6 depicts a slotted fastener used to assemble the glarefoil components.
  • As noted in the prior art description, a recurring problem with individually mounted glarefoil members has been failure of the thermoplastic material at the point of attachment to the median barrier. The remedial action against such failure has usually consisted of attempting to reinforce or strengthen this point of attachment to thereby prevent future cracking. Although such steps help to prolong the life of the glarefoil, they do not deal with the problem or overcome the result of material failure.
  • An integral part of the present invention includes the discovery that in a typical highway environment of passing high speed traffic, pulsating air currents develop which set the glarefoils into a state of mild vibration which may often be barely noticeable. Over extended periods of time, however, this seemingly trivial energy is concentrated at an immovable bolt location where the glarefoil is attached to the concrete median. Because of the extreme high modulus of the concrete and steel mounting bolt, the vibrational energy remains in the glarefoil until dissipated.
  • In contrast to the steel bolt and concrete of the median, the plastic of the glarefoil is flexible. At the point of attachment, therefore, there is an extreme mismatch in modulus of elasticity which eventually leads to material failure around the bolt attachment location. The present invention provides for partial translation of this vibrational energy out of the glarefoil and into an elongated base member to thereby reduce the degree of vibrational movement at mounting bolt locations. Furthermore, the effects of the transferred vibrational energy are reduced by the fact that this energy is propagated into the base member in the form of waves which superimpose over waves from other light blocking members and thereby cause a partial cancellation or "interference" of superimposed waves.
  • Although this principle of interference between nonharmonic waves is a well known part of wave theory, the present inventor is unaware of any application of this theory as a solution to reduce failure rate of individually mounted glarefoil paddles. In fact, since these paddles have often been mounted individually to a concrete median barrier, and since the modulus of the concrete is totally incompatible with the lower modulus of the attached glarefoil paddle, there has been a clear absence of consideration of nonharmonic interference as a means of reducing vibrational energy between two separate glarefoil paddles.
  • More specifically, as pulsating winds continuously subject the glarefoil to mild vibrational movement, these vibrations are transmitted into the base member through a rigid coupling (explained hereinafter) which sets up vibrational movement within the base member which can be evaluated by classical wave theory analysis. Because at least two of these glarefoils are attached to a single base runner, vibrational or wave-like motion is propagated into the same base member in a nonharmonic manner. As these non-harmonic waves traverse the base member, the respective wave patterns from each glarefoil are superimposed and operate to reduce vibration and thereby cancel out actual vibrational energy. Despite this cancellation, however, energy dissipation continues within the base member. Simply stated, the attachment of a plurality of light obstructing members to a single base member permits the obstructing members to cooperatively reduce the actual vibrational energy developed in the base member, as compared to vibrational energy which would require dissipation if each obstructing member were attached to an independent and separate base member alone. In a very real sense, therefore, a synergistic effect arises wherein the benefit exceeds the sum of the individual contributions made by the inventive structure. Mathematically, this could be illustrated in a glarefoil assembly with four blades attached to a single base member in the following manner. Assuming that each blade of comparable material composition and geometric configuration transmits an equal amount of vibrational energy (x) into the base member, the total vibrational energy being transferred therefore equals 4x. Since, however, a portion of this vibrational energy is cancelled out in effect by interference between the wave motions which traverse the base member in an effort to dissipate energy, the actual vibration experienced by the base member equals 4x minus y, where y equals the actual amount of vibrational energy which was cancelled by way of interference between respective waves within the base member.
  • This interference pattern is specifically facilitated by matching the compliance of the base member with that of the glare blades. This tends to reduce reflectional vibrations such as experienced by the conventional plastic glare blade as it vibrates against a rigid concrete median barrer.
  • An embodiment of this glarefoil assembly is generally designated 12 in Figures 1 and 2. Elongated light obstructing members 16 (also referred to herein as glare blades) are mounted to an elongated base runner section generally designated 13 at the top face 14a thereof, with angular support plates 26 providing the means for rigid attachment thereto. The bottom face 14b of base runner 13 is attached to a median barrier 10 along a divided highway represented by traffic lanes 30 and 32.
  • Angular support plates 26 operate as rigid attachment means between the glare blades 16 and base runner 13. Although the figures illustrate the use of pop rivets 27 and 28, it will be noted that angular support plates 26 could be directly epoxied to glare blades 16 and base runner 13. Also, it will also be apparent that where minimal impact or vibrational energy is expected, glare blades 16 could be directly epoxied to top face 14a of base runner 13 without the need for angular support plates 26. Typically, angular support plates 26 are made of aluminum and add strength to the assembly as well as facilitate the transfer of vibrational energy as will be explained later. Other rigid metals or plastics could be used, provided they meet the strength requirement and facilitate the referenced energy transfer to the base runner section.
  • Strengthening ribs 18 located at the edges of glare blades 16 provide rigidity and form an I-Beam configuration with the web section 42 of the glare blades 16 (see Figure 3). As best shown in Figures 1, 2 and 4, the ends of strengthening ribs 18 interlock with slots 34 in securing ribs 20a located at the edges of base runner 13. Securing ribs 20a extend upward from top face 14a and provide extra contact of glare blades 16 with base runner 13 in better securing glare blades 16 thereto. Securing ribs 20a also provide a more efficient energy path for the transfer of vibrational energy from glare blades 16 to base runner 13, as will be explained later.
  • Directly adjacent securing ribs 20a are reinforcement ribs 20b which are also located at the edges of base runner 13 and extend downward from bottom face 14b. A spacing means such as rib 24 located in the center of bottom face 14b cooperates with reinforcement ribs 20b to displace the bottom face 14b from the median barrier 10 and thereby accommodate the heads 29 of pop rivets 28 in the space therebetween, while at the same time providing a rigid mounting site. It will be noted that an object such as a washer may also be used as the spacing means 24 to enable rigid attachment of the base runner 13 against median barrier 10 and provides a space to accommodate pop rivet heads 29.
  • Base runner section 13 is of sufficient length to permit a substantial receipt of vibrational energy from attached glare blades 16. As the wind and air currents from passing automobiles cause the glare blades 16 to vibrate, part of the vibrational energy is transferred through the rigid attachment means into the base runner, where it is dissipated. This is opposed to the prior art structure in which energy transfer was minimal due to the comparatively high modulus (E) of the median barrier to which the glare blades were directly mounted.
  • As indicated previously, the present invention provides for dissipation of vibrational energy . throughout the glarefoil structure, and particularly into the base runner. The transfer of vibrational energy from glare blades 16 to base runner 13 is facilitated by making the glare blades, the base runner section and the angular support plate 26 or other attachment means of materials whose physical characteristics enhance their capability to transfer vibrational energy. Elastic modulus and moment of inertia are two such physical characteristics which can be exploited to more easily effect such a transfer. By matching elastic modulus of the glare blade to that of the base runner, reflection of vibrational energy back into the glare blade is reduced. Instead, the vibrational energy is carried directly into the base runner in accordance with well known wave propagation theory. With respect to the second element of moment of inertia, its use in the present structure is primarily for the purpose of developing rigidity to improve the support and resilience of the glare blade and base member portions of the glarefoil assembly. This more rigid structure tends to enhance the propagation of vibrational waves in the same manner that a taut string or rubber band has better wave transmittal characteristics than a loose string. Just as the taut string has resilience to maintain propagation of the wave, the use of ribs and other reinforcing structure which increase moment of inertia operate to improve resilience and transmittance of vibrational energy.
  • In the illustrated embodiment, the glare blades 16 and base runner 13 are made of fiberglass or fiber reinforced plastic. The elastic modulus of fiberglass composite (about 6.89―41.34×109 N/m2 or approx. 1-6x106 psi) is well adapted for such a glarefoil assembly because it has inherent rigidity and weatherability to remain functional, yet it can be structured to withstand random impacts from passing vehicles or objects without incurring immediate need for maintenance. Such fiberglass composite material can also be pultruded or otherwise formed into various geometric. cross-sections to maximize opposing characteristics of flexibility and rigidity at minimal cost. See for example, US-A-4,092,081. As is explained hereafter, these geometries can be applied to both the upright member 18 and the base member 13 to facilitate a rigid attachment therebetween. This closer matching of elastic moduli results in a much more efficient dissipation of energy from the glare blades 16 to the base section. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that, in addition to the fiber reinforced plastics, many different rigid materials having similar high elastic moduli can be used within the subject glarefoil system to effect the same transfer of vibrational energy.
  • As previously mentioned, moment of inertia can also be used to effect a better transfer of vibrational energy within glarefoil assembly 12. As previously indicated, the moment of inertia of an object is determined largely by its geometric configuration. The rectangular cross-section of the base runner illustrated in Figure 5a typically will have only one primary mode of vibration in a glarefoil assembly of the present invention. This is indicated by arrows 3 and 3', respectively as an up and down direction.
  • By configurating base runner 13 to have a moment of inertia which facilitates multiple modes of vibration; its ability to receive vibrational energy from the glare blade 16 will be greatly enhanced. Figure 5b shows such a configuration, that of an I-Beam or modified Tri-Beam. Not only does the I-Beam configurated base runner 13 of Figure 5b have a vertical mode of vibration as indicated by arrows 4 and 4', but it also develops a rotational mode of vibration indicated by arrows 5 and 5'. This configuration is achieved by having a thin web section 40, in conjunction with securing ribs 20a and reinforcement ribs 20b. The web section 40 has a low moment of inertia which improves flexibility. By combining this structure with the more rigid ribs at the edges of the structure, rotational flexing is developed to assist in energy dissipation.
  • The strengthening ribs 18 of glare blades 16 also employ this concep. Strenghtening ribs 18 form an I-Beam configuration with thin web section 42, as best seen in Figure 3. The additional vibrational modes created by joining strengthening ribs 18 to web section 42 enhances translation of multiple modes of energy transfer to the base runner section. This method of energy transfer also avoids excessive concentration of stress at local sites and therefore reduces the rate of wear toward failure.
  • Another important feature of the glarefoil assembly 12 is the use of securing ribs 20a which provide- improved rigid contact between the glare blades 16 and the base runner 13. Not only does the extra contact provide enhanced stability to the upright member, but it also provides more effective contact area between the ribbed portions of the respective glare blades 16 and base runner 13. This integral contact between the more rigid rib portions tend to make the subject glarefoil assembly respond to energy vibration as a single, integral unit.
  • Although such contact is shown in the drawings as being achieved by means of slots 34 in securing ribs 20a, a slot extending across face 14a to accommodate the entire end of a glare blade 16 is also possible. Such a slot would provide even more integral contact by glare blade 16 with base runner 13 and effect an even better transfer of vibrational energy therebetween.
  • The same contact principle is true with respect to angular support plates 26. In providing additional contact and support with glare blades 16 and base runner 13, angular support plates 26 also provide an additional energy path for dissipating vibrational energy from the glare blade 16 to the base runner 13.
  • It should be noted that even the less desirable flat slat structure of Figure 5a can be adapted as a modular glarefoil system by use of a slotted fastener 50 as shown in Figure 6 to stabilize an upright member 51. In this instance, the base runner is fastened in the slots of the lateral segments 52 as shown in Figure 5a. The upright member is coupled to the base section by attachment into the slot of the vertical fastener segment 53. This combined structure can then be cemented or epoxied at all contact points between the upright and base members to further enhance the rigidity of the attachment.
  • The installation of glarefoil assembly 12 to median barrier 10 can be accomplished in many different ways. One simple method is to drill holes in the concrete median barrier and insert an iron stud 36. Holes 22 in corresponding position to the studs 36 are drilled in the base runner 13. The studs 36 are then inserted into holes 22 and the assembly 12 is then firmly secured to median barrier 10 by means of washers and steel nuts 38. A possible alternative method of installation would be to epoxy the ends of the base runner 13 or ribs 20b and 24 directly to the median barrier 10.
  • The orientation and spacial separation between each glare blade may vary, depending on the width of the blade and the relative angle of implacement with respect to the longitudinal axis of the base runner. It should be apparent that wider glare blades will enable greater spacial separation. Furthermore, the maximum spacial displacement between adjacent glare blades will be a function of blade orientation, since the blades must effectively block out all opposing headlight glare during close visual proximity between passing cars.
  • As stated in the previously referenced article entitled "Glare Screen Guidelines" a twenty degree cutoff angle has been established generally as the minimum offset-for the glare blade from an axis ninety degrees to the longitudinal axis of the line of traffic. This minimum cutoff angle is primarily the product of safety research of state and federal highway authorities.
  • Using this twenty degree minimum, maximum spacial displacement can be calculated by trigonometric relationships. Since the twenty degree glare blade forms one side of a right triangle, whose hypotenuse is the distance to the next glare blade, the value of the hypotenuse will depend upon the width of the glare blade. For a six inch (1 inch=2.54 cm) glare blade, the optimum distance between blades is 44.55 cm. A 22.86 cm glare blade has an optimum distance of 66.83 cm. Typical dimensions for the glarefoil assembly illustrated in Figure 1 are as follows:
    Figure imgb0001

Claims (19)

1. A glarefoil assembly (12) for mounting to a median barrier (10) along a divided highway, comprising:
at least one elongated base runner section (13) having a bottom face for attachment to said median barrier (10) and a top face (14a) opposing said bottom face (14b);
at least two elongated glare blades (16) adapated for reducing headlight glare from oncoming traffic along said divided highway; and
rigid attachment means (26; 50) coupled to one end of each of said glare blades (16) and to said top face (14a) of said base runner section (13) such that said glare blades (16) are in upright light blocking orientation with respect to a projected median barrier location, characterised in that
said base runner section (13) has sufficient length to accept a substantial transfer of vibrational energy from an attached glare blade, said glare blades (16), said base runner section (13) and said attachment means (26; 50) having material compositions whose physical characteristics permit transfer of substantial vibrational energy from said glare blades (16) into said base runner section (13) to assist in dissipation of said vibrational energy.
2. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 1, characterised in that at least four of said glare blades (16) are rigidly attached at one end to the base runner section (13), the base runner section (13) forming an integral unitary structure with said glare blades (16) mounted thereto, said glare blades (16) being spaced apart and oriented along each base runner section (13) so as to maximize the amount of headlight glare obstructed by said glare blades (16) while minimizing the amount of surface area of said glare blades (16) needed for the obstruction.
3. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 1, characterised in that at least one securing rib (20a) located at an edge of said base runner section (13) and extending upward from said top face (14a), said securing rib (20a) having a slot (34) which interlocks with the end of said glare blades (16) and provides additional contact of said glare blade (16) with said base runner section (13) to better secure said glare blade (16) thereto and provide a more efficient path for transfer of said vibrational energy from said glare blades (16) to said base runner section (13).
4. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 1, characterised in that it comprises at least two reinforcement ribs (20b) located at edges of said base runner section (13) and extending downward from said bottom face (14b).
5. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 4, characterised in that it comprises means (24) for spacing said bottom face (14a) away from said median barrier (10) while at the same time providing a rigid mounting site for attachment at a mounting stud projecting from said median barrier (10).
6. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 1, characterised in that said rigid attachment means is an angular support plate (26).
7. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 6, characterised in that said angular support plate (26) is mounted to said base runner section by pop rivets (28).
8. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 7, characterised in that it comprises at least two reinforcement ribs (20b) located at the edges of said base runner section (13) and extending downward from said bottom face (14b) and a spacing rib (24) situated on said bottom face (14b), said spacing rib (24) co-operating with said reinforcement ribs (20b) to accommodate said pop rivets (28) in the space between said bottom face (14b) and said median barrier (10).
9. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 1, characterised in that said glare blade (16) is mounted to said base runner section (13) at an angle of at least about seventy degrees with respect to the axis formed by said elongated base runner section (13).
10. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 1, characterised in that said base runner section (13) and said glare blade (16) are non-reflective.
11. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 1, characterised in that said base runner section (13) and said glare blade (16) are made of plastic materials having elastic moduli which are mutually compatible for the transfer of vibrational energy from said glare blades (16) to said base runner section (13).
12. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 1, characterised in that said base runner section (13) and said glare blades (16) are made of fiber reinforced thermosetting resin, said reinforcement including longitudinal fibers and fibers in a transverse direction with respect to the longitudinal axis.
13. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 1, characterised in that said base runner section (13) is configurated to have a geometric configuration that increases the number of modes of vibration of said base runner section and thereby enhances its ability to receive said vibrational energy from said glare blade, and to result in partial non-vibrational dissipation thereof by reason of non-harmonic overlap of vibrational propagations from each glare blade (16).
14. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 13, characterised in that said base runner section (13) has an I-Beam configuration.
15. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 1, characterised in that it comprises strengthening ribs (18) located at the edges of said glare blades (16) to provide rigidity, said glare blade (16) having a thin web section (42) between said strengthening ribs (18) and forming an I-Beam configuration therewith.
16. A glarefoil assembly as defined in claim 1, characterised in that said rigid attachment means comprises a slotted fastener (50) which clips the glare blade (16) in rigid upright attachment to the base section along the respective sides thereof.
EP82901333A 1982-03-17 1982-03-17 Glarefoil assembly Expired EP0102951B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT82901333T ATE32928T1 (en) 1982-03-17 1982-03-17 ANTI-GLARE DEVICE.

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US1982/000360 WO1983003271A1 (en) 1982-03-17 1982-03-17 Glarefoil assembly

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0102951A1 EP0102951A1 (en) 1984-03-21
EP0102951A4 EP0102951A4 (en) 1985-09-09
EP0102951B1 true EP0102951B1 (en) 1988-03-09

Family

ID=22167880

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP82901333A Expired EP0102951B1 (en) 1982-03-17 1982-03-17 Glarefoil assembly

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0102951B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE32928T1 (en)
AU (1) AU8390782A (en)
DE (1) DE3278213D1 (en)
WO (1) WO1983003271A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105780677A (en) * 2015-12-18 2016-07-20 祝永亮 Rotary landscape anti-glare board

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2610650B1 (en) * 1987-02-11 1989-10-27 Allibert Sa ANTI-GLARE SCREEN
FR2621622B1 (en) * 1987-10-07 1991-07-26 Masair ANTI-GLARE SCREEN
FR2632991B1 (en) * 1988-06-17 1990-11-16 Sodirel Diffusion Rgle Locale METHODS AND DEVICES FOR FIXING PANELS OR SCREENS ON CONCRETE SECURITY SLIDES AND CORRESPONDING PANELS OR SCREENS
FR2635345B1 (en) * 1988-08-09 1992-01-24 Paris Normandie Autoroute SAFETY BARRIER FOR THE SEPARATION OF TWO OPPOSITE SIDEWAYS WITH ANTI-GLARE ELEMENTS
DE69420114T2 (en) * 1993-11-05 2000-04-27 Sodirel Sa Fasteners for anti-glare fence on guardrails
FR2712001B1 (en) * 1993-11-05 1996-06-07 France Autoroutes Sud Anti-glare road device, of the type comprising a blade, or screen positioned in a substantially vertical plane.

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1773488A (en) * 1926-11-20 1930-08-19 Standard Traffic Marker Compan Street stop signal
US2774323A (en) * 1955-05-18 1956-12-18 Everett S Kirk Audio road signal
US3096079A (en) * 1960-01-14 1963-07-02 Winn Henry James Fence panels for roadways
DE1154499B (en) * 1960-02-04 1963-09-19 Dr Josef Oberbach Guidance device for highways
NL6703658A (en) * 1966-04-15 1967-10-16
US3572223A (en) * 1969-08-26 1971-03-23 Ralph L Vierregger Laterally-disengageable highway marker assembly
DE2233994A1 (en) * 1972-07-11 1974-02-07 Schoeller & Co Kg VISOR ARRANGEMENT FOR BLIND SHIELD DEVICES
US3934540A (en) * 1973-01-17 1976-01-27 Bruner A J Barrier
DE2320795A1 (en) * 1973-04-25 1974-11-14 Beilharz Kg Johannes DEVICE FOR FASTENING SCREEN PROTECTION SLATS
DE2546427C2 (en) * 1975-10-16 1977-11-24 Döring, Erich, 8052 Moosburg Elastic delineator post for roads
US4088415A (en) * 1977-08-31 1978-05-09 Syro Steel Company Glare screen blade
US4249832A (en) * 1978-12-13 1981-02-10 High Performance Composites, Inc. Highway median delineator
US4228867A (en) * 1979-02-02 1980-10-21 Lockheed Corporation Noise barrier

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105780677A (en) * 2015-12-18 2016-07-20 祝永亮 Rotary landscape anti-glare board

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0102951A4 (en) 1985-09-09
EP0102951A1 (en) 1984-03-21
WO1983003271A1 (en) 1983-09-29
ATE32928T1 (en) 1988-03-15
DE3278213D1 (en) 1988-04-14
AU8390782A (en) 1983-10-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4338041A (en) Glarefoil assembly
US5015119A (en) Vision blocking barrier
US4222552A (en) Highway guardrail cover
US5190394A (en) Adjustable glarefoil assembly
AU760518B2 (en) Energy absorbing system for fixed roadside hazards
US2776116A (en) Beam guard for highways and the like
EP0102951B1 (en) Glarefoil assembly
CA2169700C (en) Box culvert
US6267529B1 (en) Flexible traffic post
US4445803A (en) Resilient marker
EP0094847A2 (en) Anchor assembly for an impact attenuation device
CA1105331A (en) Method to prevent vehicles from passing a temporarily speed reduced part of a road with high speed, and a device for utilizing the method
US5366247A (en) Vehicle splashguard
US6328284B2 (en) Roadway guardrail cover
US4674432A (en) Traffic barricade
JP2001200513A (en) Impact absorbing apparatus for vehicles
US4601140A (en) Lawn edging system
US5950992A (en) Guardrail reflector assembly
US4569495A (en) Support for traffic control device
WO2019215661A1 (en) Road safety barrier
WO2001011146A1 (en) A barrier
EP0140950B1 (en) Information board, particularly for road users
AU675795B2 (en) Improved glare screen
JPH0949216A (en) Media strip protection fence
JP3357465B2 (en) Beam structure of the viaduct beam median strip space shielding

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB LI LU NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19840224

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19861106

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB LI LU NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 32928

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19880315

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3278213

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19880414

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 19910304

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19910307

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19910311

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19910311

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19910318

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 19910318

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19910331

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19910415

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19910430

Year of fee payment: 10

EPTA Lu: last paid annual fee
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19920317

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19920317

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19920317

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19920318

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19920331

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19920331

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19920331

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: SCHMANSKI DONALD W.

Effective date: 19920331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19921001

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee
NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19921130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19921201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 82901333.3

Effective date: 19921005