EP0102112B1 - Process for the hydrotreating of a heavy oil - Google Patents
Process for the hydrotreating of a heavy oil Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0102112B1 EP0102112B1 EP19830201140 EP83201140A EP0102112B1 EP 0102112 B1 EP0102112 B1 EP 0102112B1 EP 19830201140 EP19830201140 EP 19830201140 EP 83201140 A EP83201140 A EP 83201140A EP 0102112 B1 EP0102112 B1 EP 0102112B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- reactor
- hydrocarbon mixture
- process according
- heavy oil
- catalyst
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10G—CRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
- C10G49/00—Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds, not provided for in a single one of groups C10G45/02, C10G45/32, C10G45/44, C10G45/58 or C10G47/00
Definitions
- the invention relates to a process for the hydrotreating of a heavy oil by leading the heavy oil and hydrogen at elevated temperature and pressure cocurrently in downward direction through a reactor which contains at least one bed of a solid catalyst.
- hydrotreatment is used for conversion processes in which heavy oils are converted in the presence of hydrogen. These conversion processes comprise in particular demetallization, desulphurization, denitrogenation, asphaltene conversion and hydrocracking.
- heavy oils is used in this specification and claims for mixtures of hydrocarbons which are at least for the greater part in the liquid phase at the conditions of temperature and pressure prevailing in the reactor during normal operation of the hydrotreating process.
- heavy oils may be mentioned crude mineral oils, topped mineral oils, residues of atmospheric or vacuum distillation of mineral oils, deasphalted residual oils, asphalts, shale oils, oils obtained from tar sands.
- Hydrotreatment of heavy oils is conventionally carried out by passing the oil together with hydrogen (in this specification the word hydrogen stands for pure hydrogen as well as for hydrogen-containing gases) in downward direction through a reactor which contains at least one bed of a solid catalyst.
- the heavy oil also called the feed
- This cooling capacity also called heat-sink
- the hydrogen containing gas which may include recycle gas
- the present invention relates to a process for the hydrotreating of a heavy oil by leading the heavy oil and hydrogen at elevated temperature and pressure cocurrently in downward direction through a reactor which contains at least one bed of a solid catalyst, in which process also a hydrocarbon mixture, which is at least for the greater part in the gaseous phase at the conditions prevailing in the reactor, is introduced into the reactor at a point upstream of the uppermost bed of solid catalyst.
- the hydrocarbon mixture which is at least for the greater part in the gaseous phase at the conditions prevailing in the reactor is very suitably brought at reactor pressure in the liquid state with the aid of a pump. In this way the need for using gas compressors with a high capacity is overcome. Part of this hydrocarbon mixture may evaporate between the said pump and its entrance into the reactor owing to heating or heat exchange with other streams.
- the said hydrocarbon mixture will act as a heat sink in the first reactor bed due to its heat capacity and heat of evaporation, and it may replace part of the hydrogen-containing gas in this respect during normal operation. It is preferred that such an amount of said hydrocarbon mixture is introduced into the reactor that temperature runaway in the uppermost catalyst bed does not occur when the supply of heavy oil or hydrogen is interrupted.
- the hydrocarbon mixture which is at least for the greater part in the gaseous phase at the conditions prevailing in the reactor and which is introduced into the reactor at a point upstream of the uppermost bed of solid catalyst very conveniently consists of a fraction of the reactor effluent.
- the effluent of the reactor which consists of hydrotreated heavy oil and a hydrogen-containing gas is separated in high temperature (“hot”) separators and low temperature (“cold”) separators consecutively, yielding gaseous and liquid products.
- Hot high temperature
- cold low temperature
- Liquid product from the cold separators (which consists of condensable compounds of the gaseous product from the hot separators) is very suitable to be used as the said hydrocarbon mixture.
- the amount of said hydrocarbon mixture, preferably liquid product from the cold separators, which is to be introduced in order to have available sufficient cooling capacity to avoid temperature runaway in the uppermost catalyst bed under all circumstances, even in case the feed supply or the hydrogen supply is interrupted, will depend on the type of feed, the type and degree of feed conversion to be achieved during normal operation, the reaction conditions and the catalyst. For each specific case the minimum amount of the said hydrocarbon mixture which is to be introduced into the reactor must be determined by experiments on a small scale and/or calculations.
- the composition of the catalyst will be adapted to the reaction desired.
- the supports very conveniently being amorphous refractory oxides (or mixtures thereof) of elements of Group II, III and IV of the Periodic Table of Elements e.g. magnesia, silica, alumina, zirconia, silica-alumina, silica-zirconia.
- Supports consisting of crystalline materials, such as zeolites may also be used.
- One or more metals (and/or compounds thereof) with hydrogenating activity are very suitably present onto the supports, in particular metals of Group VB, VIB, VIIB and/or VIII of the Periodic Table of Elements.
- metals of Group VB, VIB, VIIB and/or VIII of the Periodic Table of Elements For example, in case hydrodesulphurization is the most desired reaction to take place, catalysts which contain compounds of cobalt and/or nickel together with compounds of molybdenum and/or tungsten on alumina as a support are very suitable.
- hydrodemetallization is the most desired reaction, catalyts based on silica as a support and containing only compounds of molybdenum, or a combination of compounds of nickel and vanadium, respectively, are very convenient.
- the catalyst particles present in the beds may have any suitable form, e.g. powders, spheres, pellets, cylindrical extrudates, multilobed extrudates, rings and the like. Cylindrical extrudates with a diameter from 0.5 to 2.5 mm are very suitable in general.
- reaction conditions prevailing in the reactor will be adapted to the hydrotreating reaction desired. In general, temperatures from 300-450°C, total pressures from 25-300 bar, hydrogen partial pressures from 25-250 bar, and space velocities of 0.1-10 kg feed per kg catalyst per hour will be very suitable.
- the catalyst in the form of extrudates with 0.8 mm diameter
- the catalyst consists of an alumina support onto which nickel oxide and molybdenum oxide have been applied; the catalyst is sulphided before use.
- the feed of fresh hydrogen containing gas (95% vol. pure hydrogen, 5% vol. methane) is 225 nm 3 /ton feed.
- the off-gas of the reactors is (after removal of H 2 S) recycled and introduced into the reactor upstream of the first catalyst bed. The gases are led over the catalyst concurrently with the feed.
- the reactor pressures are adapted so as to have an average hydrogen partial pessure of 150 bar in all cases.
- the average reactor temperature is 380°C.
- the amount of recycle gas in experiment 1 as well as the amount of recycle gas together with the amount of hydrocarbon mixture in experiment 2 are sufficient to avoid temperature runaway in case the feed flow is interrupted. From the table it can be seen that the pressure drop (Ap) in experiment 1 (73 bar) is much higher than that in experiment 2 (14 bar). In order to overcome the pressure drop the pressure at the inlet of the first reactor must be higher in experiment 1 than in experiment 2. Accordingly the equipment of experiment 1 must be designed to withstand higher pressures than that of experiment 2, which of course is unattractive from an economical point of view. Moreover, the gas compressor for the recycle gas can be much smaller in experiment 2 than in experiment 1.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
Description
- The invention relates to a process for the hydrotreating of a heavy oil by leading the heavy oil and hydrogen at elevated temperature and pressure cocurrently in downward direction through a reactor which contains at least one bed of a solid catalyst.
- In the context of this specification and claims the term hydrotreatment is used for conversion processes in which heavy oils are converted in the presence of hydrogen. These conversion processes comprise in particular demetallization, desulphurization, denitrogenation, asphaltene conversion and hydrocracking.
- The term heavy oils is used in this specification and claims for mixtures of hydrocarbons which are at least for the greater part in the liquid phase at the conditions of temperature and pressure prevailing in the reactor during normal operation of the hydrotreating process. As examples of heavy oils may be mentioned crude mineral oils, topped mineral oils, residues of atmospheric or vacuum distillation of mineral oils, deasphalted residual oils, asphalts, shale oils, oils obtained from tar sands.
- Hydrotreatment of heavy oils is conventionally carried out by passing the oil together with hydrogen (in this specification the word hydrogen stands for pure hydrogen as well as for hydrogen-containing gases) in downward direction through a reactor which contains at least one bed of a solid catalyst. The heavy oil (also called the feed) trickles around the catalyst particles at the surface of which the reaction with hydrogen takes place. Because these reactions are exothermic, sufficient cooling capacity must be present during operation to control the temperature so as to avoid the development of undesired high temperatures which may lead to deactivation of the catalyst, coke formation, plugging of the catalyst bed and exposing the reactor walls to higher temperatures than those for which they are designed. This cooling capacity (also called heat-sink) is provided by the hydrogen containing gas (which may include recycle gas) and the heavy oil flowing through the reactor.
- Apart from controlling the temperature rise over all individual beds in the reactor the temperature at the outlet of each bed has to be reduced to the desired temperature at the inlet of the next bed. This cooling is in many cases accomplished by injection between the catalyst beds of fresh hydrogen and/or, hydrogen-containing recycle gas at a temperature lower than the temperature prevailing in the reactor.
- However it may happen that the forwarding of heavy oil or the recycle of gas to the reactors is interrupted by malfunctioning of equipment. In particular the heavy oil flow may be hampered or completely disrupted. Since the heavy oil present in the reactors will continue to react, the heat sink as provided by the gas flow of its own might become insufficient then and temperatures could increase to undesirable heights (so-called "temperature runaway"). In order to avoid such a temperature runaway in case e.g. the supply of heavy oil to the reactor is decreased or interrupted, the hydrotreatment process has to be brought to a standstill by depressurizing the reactor and discontinuing the heating of the gas and oil supply.
- It would be attractive to have provisions which enable avoidance of temperature runaway in the first catalyst bed under all circumstances, even during an interruption of heavy oil or hydrogen supply to that first catalyst bed. It is possible to provide sufficient heat sink in the first catalyst bed-even in case of interruption of feed suply-by continuous injection of a larger amount of hydrogen and/or hydrogen containing recycle gas into the reactor upstream of the first catalyst bed than what is normally applied for undisturbed feed flow. However, for such a purpose gas compressors with extra high capacity would be needed, which is very unattractive for technological and economical reasons.
- It has now been found that sufficient heat sink for the first catalyst bed can also be achieved by injection of a hydrocarbon mixture instead of part of a hydrogen containing gas into the reactor upstream of the uppermost (also called first) catalyst bed.
- Accordingly the present invention relates to a process for the hydrotreating of a heavy oil by leading the heavy oil and hydrogen at elevated temperature and pressure cocurrently in downward direction through a reactor which contains at least one bed of a solid catalyst, in which process also a hydrocarbon mixture, which is at least for the greater part in the gaseous phase at the conditions prevailing in the reactor, is introduced into the reactor at a point upstream of the uppermost bed of solid catalyst.
- The hydrocarbon mixture which is at least for the greater part in the gaseous phase at the conditions prevailing in the reactor is very suitably brought at reactor pressure in the liquid state with the aid of a pump. In this way the need for using gas compressors with a high capacity is overcome. Part of this hydrocarbon mixture may evaporate between the said pump and its entrance into the reactor owing to heating or heat exchange with other streams.
- The said hydrocarbon mixture will act as a heat sink in the first reactor bed due to its heat capacity and heat of evaporation, and it may replace part of the hydrogen-containing gas in this respect during normal operation. It is preferred that such an amount of said hydrocarbon mixture is introduced into the reactor that temperature runaway in the uppermost catalyst bed does not occur when the supply of heavy oil or hydrogen is interrupted.
- Although the presence of (part of the) said hydrocarbon mixture is needed when malfunctioning occurs, it is of advantage and preferred to introduce continuously said hydrocarbon mixture into the reactor, in order to avoid any risk of malfunctioning of instrument or equipment which might occur in the absence of this mixture.
- It is of advantage to use independent means (e.g. separate liquid pumps with different energy sources) for the introduction into the reactor of the said hydrocarbon mixture and the feed respectively. In that way the supply of the said hydrocarbon mixture is ascertained, even if the feed pump malfunctions or falls out completely. It is of course possible to mix the feed and the said hydrocarbon mixture downstream of the feed pump and injecting the mixture thus obtained upstream of the first catalyst bed, provided the said hydrocarbon mixture is transported with the aid of a separate pump with a different energy source.
- The hydrocarbon mixture which is at least for the greater part in the gaseous phase at the conditions prevailing in the reactor and which is introduced into the reactor at a point upstream of the uppermost bed of solid catalyst very conveniently consists of a fraction of the reactor effluent.
- In general the effluent of the reactor which consists of hydrotreated heavy oil and a hydrogen-containing gas is separated in high temperature ("hot") separators and low temperature ("cold") separators consecutively, yielding gaseous and liquid products. Liquid product from the cold separators (which consists of condensable compounds of the gaseous product from the hot separators) is very suitable to be used as the said hydrocarbon mixture.
- The amount of said hydrocarbon mixture, preferably liquid product from the cold separators, which is to be introduced in order to have available sufficient cooling capacity to avoid temperature runaway in the uppermost catalyst bed under all circumstances, even in case the feed supply or the hydrogen supply is interrupted, will depend on the type of feed, the type and degree of feed conversion to be achieved during normal operation, the reaction conditions and the catalyst. For each specific case the minimum amount of the said hydrocarbon mixture which is to be introduced into the reactor must be determined by experiments on a small scale and/or calculations.
- In most cases it is also desirable to introduce fresh hydrogen or fresh hydrogen-containing gas and recycle gas (which consists for the greater part of molecular hydrogen) into the reactor between the catalyst beds in order to reduce the inlet temperature of the next bed and thereby avoiding temperature runaways in subsequent catalyst beds. Part or all of these gases may be replaced by the said hydrocarbon mixture, which can be introduced in the liquid phase between the catalyst beds. In general about 10%-85% vol. of recycle gas can be replaced by a hydrocarbon mixture. Preference is given to the use of hydrocarbon mixtures of which about 70%wt. is in the vapour phase at the conditions prevailing in the reactor.
- Because of the much larger molecular weight of the vaporized part of the hydrocarbon mixture relative to the recycle gas, the total volume flow of the gas flow through the catalyst bed(s) is reduced markedly. The part of the hydrocarbon mixture which is still in the liquid phase in the reactor has an advantageous viscosity reducing effect on the heavy oil. The reduction in pressure drop achieved by these effects is very pronounced. Consequently in the process according to the invention use can be made of recycle gas compressors with a lower capacity (in terms of gas rate) and a lower differential pressure, as compared with a process in which as a heat sink use is made of feed and hydrogen exclusively.
- The composition of the catalyst will be adapted to the reaction desired. In general supported catalysts will be used, the supports very conveniently being amorphous refractory oxides (or mixtures thereof) of elements of Group II, III and IV of the Periodic Table of Elements e.g. magnesia, silica, alumina, zirconia, silica-alumina, silica-zirconia. Supports consisting of crystalline materials, such as zeolites may also be used.
- One or more metals (and/or compounds thereof) with hydrogenating activity are very suitably present onto the supports, in particular metals of Group VB, VIB, VIIB and/or VIII of the Periodic Table of Elements. For example, in case hydrodesulphurization is the most desired reaction to take place, catalysts which contain compounds of cobalt and/or nickel together with compounds of molybdenum and/or tungsten on alumina as a support are very suitable. In case hydrodemetallization is the most desired reaction, catalyts based on silica as a support and containing only compounds of molybdenum, or a combination of compounds of nickel and vanadium, respectively, are very convenient.
- The catalyst particles present in the beds may have any suitable form, e.g. powders, spheres, pellets, cylindrical extrudates, multilobed extrudates, rings and the like. Cylindrical extrudates with a diameter from 0.5 to 2.5 mm are very suitable in general.
- The reaction conditions prevailing in the reactor will be adapted to the hydrotreating reaction desired. In general, temperatures from 300-450°C, total pressures from 25-300 bar, hydrogen partial pressures from 25-250 bar, and space velocities of 0.1-10 kg feed per kg catalyst per hour will be very suitable.
- Four hydrotreatment experiments are carried out with a short residue of a Middle East crude as feed. This feed is passed in all cases in downward direction through two reactors in series, each of which contains three beds of catalyst.
- The catalyst (in the form of extrudates with 0.8 mm diameter) consists of an alumina support onto which nickel oxide and molybdenum oxide have been applied; the catalyst is sulphided before use.
- The feed of fresh hydrogen containing gas (95% vol. pure hydrogen, 5% vol. methane) is 225 nm3/ton feed. The off-gas of the reactors is (after removal of H2S) recycled and introduced into the reactor upstream of the first catalyst bed. The gases are led over the catalyst concurrently with the feed. The reactor pressures are adapted so as to have an average hydrogen partial pessure of 150 bar in all cases.
- In experiments 2 and 4 half of the recycle gas is replaced by a hydrocarbon mixture of which about 70%wt. is in the vapour phase at the conditions prevailing in the reactors. This hydrocarbon mixture is brought to reactor pressure in the liquid phase and introduced into the first reactor upstream of the first catalyst bed after heating.
- In experiments 1 (a comparative experiment) and 2 (experiment according to the invention) the average reactor temperature is 380°C. The amount of recycle gas in experiment 1 as well as the amount of recycle gas together with the amount of hydrocarbon mixture in experiment 2 are sufficient to avoid temperature runaway in case the feed flow is interrupted. From the table it can be seen that the pressure drop (Ap) in experiment 1 (73 bar) is much higher than that in experiment 2 (14 bar). In order to overcome the pressure drop the pressure at the inlet of the first reactor must be higher in experiment 1 than in experiment 2. Accordingly the equipment of experiment 1 must be designed to withstand higher pressures than that of experiment 2, which of course is unattractive from an economical point of view. Moreover, the gas compressor for the recycle gas can be much smaller in experiment 2 than in experiment 1.
- In experiments 3 (comparative) and 4 (according to the invention), in which the average reactor temperature is 390°C, the amount of recycle gas and the amounts of recycle gas plus hydrocarbon mixture, respectively, are not sufficient to avoid temperature runaway in case of feed flow interruption. The advantages of experiment 4 in comparison with experiment 3 as far as pressure drop (Ap) and recycle gas compressor capacity are concerned are similar to those of experiment 2 in comparison with experiment 1. Temperature runaway can be avoided when operating the reactors at 390°C by increasing the hydrocarbon mixture/feed ratio to 1.83. The temperature rise in the first bed with feed flow amounts to 26°C; in the absence of feed flow to 46°C.
Claims (9)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB8224533 | 1982-08-26 | ||
GB8224533 | 1982-08-26 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0102112A2 EP0102112A2 (en) | 1984-03-07 |
EP0102112A3 EP0102112A3 (en) | 1986-09-03 |
EP0102112B1 true EP0102112B1 (en) | 1988-12-14 |
Family
ID=10532535
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19830201140 Expired EP0102112B1 (en) | 1982-08-26 | 1983-08-01 | Process for the hydrotreating of a heavy oil |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0102112B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPS5958090A (en) |
CA (1) | CA1230571A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3378691D1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NL258576A (en) * | 1959-12-04 | |||
DE1248845B (en) * | 1960-05-17 | 1967-08-31 | Shell Int Research | Process for heating hydrocarbon oils for the purpose of catalytic hydrogenating refining |
NL7406226A (en) * | 1974-05-09 | 1975-11-11 | Shell Int Research | METHOD AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE HYDROGENING TREATMENT OF A LIQUID PETROLEUM FRACTION. |
GB1523992A (en) * | 1976-07-06 | 1978-09-06 | Shell Int Research | Process for hydrotreating of oils |
JPS54103775A (en) * | 1978-02-03 | 1979-08-15 | Nippon Steel Corp | Contact reactor |
JPS5757790A (en) * | 1980-09-25 | 1982-04-07 | Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd | Hydrogenation treatment of heavy oil |
JPS5896685A (en) * | 1981-12-03 | 1983-06-08 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Hydrogenation process |
JPS58149988A (en) * | 1982-03-03 | 1983-09-06 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Hydrogenation method |
-
1983
- 1983-08-01 DE DE8383201140T patent/DE3378691D1/en not_active Expired
- 1983-08-01 EP EP19830201140 patent/EP0102112B1/en not_active Expired
- 1983-08-17 CA CA000434795A patent/CA1230571A/en not_active Expired
- 1983-08-24 JP JP15337083A patent/JPS5958090A/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JPS5958090A (en) | 1984-04-03 |
EP0102112A3 (en) | 1986-09-03 |
DE3378691D1 (en) | 1989-01-19 |
EP0102112A2 (en) | 1984-03-07 |
CA1230571A (en) | 1987-12-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2580295C (en) | Process and installation for conversion of heavy petroleum fractions in a boiling bed with integrated production of middle distillates with a very low sulfur content | |
US8926824B2 (en) | Process for the conversion of residue integrating moving-bed technology and ebullating-bed technology | |
CN101376834B (en) | Bubbling bed combined process | |
US4457831A (en) | Two-stage catalytic hydroconversion of hydrocarbon feedstocks using resid recycle | |
RU2722644C1 (en) | Multistage hydrocracking of still residue | |
US9725661B2 (en) | Upgrading raw shale-derived crude oils to hydrocarbon distillate fuels | |
US4478705A (en) | Hydroconversion process for hydrocarbon liquids using supercritical vapor extraction of liquid fractions | |
US4576710A (en) | Catalyst desulfurization of petroleum residua feedstocks | |
US4427535A (en) | Selective operating conditions for high conversion of special petroleum feedstocks | |
US11384295B2 (en) | Hydroprocessing method with high liquid mass flux | |
JPH0772274B2 (en) | Long-term high hydroconversion method for petroleum residual oil feedstock | |
US3215617A (en) | Hydrogenation cracking process in two stages | |
CN101747935A (en) | Method for producing light olefins and monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from heavy hydrocarbons | |
JPS6327393B2 (en) | ||
PL81018B1 (en) | ||
US3291721A (en) | Combined hydrocracking and hydrofining process | |
US3933620A (en) | Process for hydroprocessing heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks in a pipe reactor | |
EP0026508B1 (en) | Process and apparatus for the demetallization of a hydrocarbon oil | |
US3050459A (en) | Two-stage conversion of heavy oils | |
EP0102112B1 (en) | Process for the hydrotreating of a heavy oil | |
WO2001098436A1 (en) | Catalytic hydrogenation process utilizing multi-stage ebullated bed reactors | |
EP0354626A1 (en) | Process for the hydrocracking of a hydrocarbonaceous feedstock | |
US11084991B2 (en) | Two-phase moving bed reactor utilizing hydrogen-enriched feed | |
JPS5932511B2 (en) | Hydrogenation method for high-boiling hydrocarbons |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19830801 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19880418 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3378691 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19890119 |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: ING. C. GREGORJ S.P.A. |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 19910703 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 19910709 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 19910722 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 19910812 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 19910826 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
ITTA | It: last paid annual fee | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 19910831 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 19911030 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Effective date: 19920801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Effective date: 19920802 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Effective date: 19920831 Ref country code: CH Effective date: 19920831 Ref country code: BE Effective date: 19920831 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ B.V. Effective date: 19920831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Effective date: 19930301 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 19920801 |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Effective date: 19930430 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Effective date: 19930501 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed |
Ref document number: 83201140.7 Effective date: 19930307 |